DOCSLIB.ORG

Article Inventing the “Traditional Concept” of Sex Discrimination

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Article Inventing the “Traditional Concept” of Sex Discrimination VOLUME 125 APRIL 2012 NUMBER 6 © 2012 by The Harvard Law Review Association ARTICLE INVENTING THE “TRADITIONAL CONCEPT” OF SEX DISCRIMINATION Cary Franklin CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1309 I. RECOVERING THE LEGISLATIVE HISTORY OF TITLE VII’S SEX PROVISION .... 1317 A. The Case Against Adding “Sex” to Title VII ............................................................... 1320 B. Support for the Sex Amendment ................................................................................... 1326 C. Uncertainty Regarding the Applications of Title VII’s Sex Provision ..................... 1329 II. DETERMINING WHAT COUNTS AS DISCRIMINATION “BECAUSE OF SEX” ......... 1333 A. “The Sex Provision of Title VII Is Mysterious and Difficult to Understand and Control” .................................................................................................................... 1334 B. A Women’s Movement Enters the Debate .................................................................... 1340 C. The Emergence of a More Effective Strategy for Limiting the Law’s Reach .......... 1348 D. Antistereotyping Conceptions of Title VII ................................................................... 1354 III. THE INVENTION OF A TRADITION ............................................................................... 1358 A. Pregnancy and the “Traditional” Understanding of Sex Discrimination ............... 1360 B. The Persistent Demand for Opposite-Sex Comparators ............................................. 1366 C. The Malleability of the “Traditional Concept” of Sex Discrimination ................... 1373 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................... 1378 1307 INVENTING THE “TRADITIONAL CONCEPT” OF SEX DISCRIMINATION Cary Franklin∗ It is a commonplace in employment discrimination law that Title VII’s prohibition of sex discrimination has no legislative history. Courts have therefore argued that this prohibition must be restricted to the “traditional concept” of sex discrimination. Traditionally, courts suggest, discrimination “because of sex” referred only to practices that divided men and women into two perfectly sex-differentiated groups. Although Title VII doctrine has evolved over time, this “traditional concept” of sex discrimination continues to exert a powerful regulative influence over the law. It excludes certain claims — such as those by sexual minorities — from coverage and elevates the evidentiary burdens plaintiffs must satisfy in order to prove discrimination “because of sex.” This Article argues that the “traditional concept” of sex discrimination is an invented tradition. It purports to reflect the historical record, but in fact reflects normative judgments about how deeply the law should intervene in the sex-based regulation of the workplace. Recovering the largely forgotten legislative history of Title VII’s sex provision, this Article shows that there was little consensus and much debate in the 1960s about what qualified as sex discrimination. Employers advanced the argument that Title VII applied only to practices that sorted men and women into two perfectly sex-differentiated groups in order to preserve the traditional gendered organization of the workplace and insulate particular employment practices from scrutiny. In the 1970s, courts adopted this interpretation but no longer cited the need to preserve conventional sex and family roles as a justification; instead, courts cited deference to the legislature and fidelity to tradition as justifications for interpreting the law narrowly. This Article shows that history does not compel courts to interpret Title VII’s prohibition of sex discrimination in anticlassificationist terms — and that, in fact, in cases where anticlassificationism produces expansive rather than narrow results, courts have routinely departed from it. This tendency should prompt us to think critically about the assertion that deference to the legislature and fidelity to tradition require courts to adhere to a narrow conception of what it means to discriminate “because of sex.” The parameters of Title VII’s prohibition of sex discrimination have always been determined by normative judgments about how forcefully the law should intervene in practices that reflect and reinforce conventional understandings of sex and family roles. ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ∗ Assistant Professor, University of Texas School of Law. Many thanks to Oren Bracha, Ariela Dubler, Karen Engle, Joseph Fishkin, Willy Forbath, Katherine Franke, Risa Goluboff, Serena Mayeri, Melissa Murray, Reva Siegel, Deborah Weiss, and Deborah Widiss, and to the participants in the Legal Theory Workshop at Columbia Law School, the Legal History and Law & Humanities Workshops at the University of Virginia School of Law, and the Faculty Workshop at the University of Texas School of Law for their helpful comments on this project. Thanks are also due to the excellent research librarians at the EEOC Library, the Schlesinger Library at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, and the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Tarlton Law Library at the University of Texas. 1308 2012] THE “TRADITIONAL CONCEPT” OF SEX DISCRIMINATION 1309 INTRODUCTION n 1976, in General Electric Co. v. Gilbert,1 the Supreme Court con- Ifronted the question of whether pregnancy discrimination qualified as discrimination “because of . sex”2 under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.3 The Court concluded in Gilbert that “[t]he legisla- tive history of Title VII’s prohibition of sex discrimination [was] nota- ble primarily for its brevity,”4 and shed little light on this question. In place of legislative history, the Court turned to “tradition” for guidance in interpreting the statute. “Traditionally,”5 the Court asserted, dis- crimination was defined as the division of individuals into two groups on the basis of a protected trait — as when Jim Crow laws reserved some water fountains for whites and others for blacks.6 Thus, the Court reasoned that, circa 1964, an employment practice would not have qualified as discrimination “because of sex” unless it divided men and women into two groups, perfectly differentiated along biological sex lines. The Court suggested that to interpret Title VII’s sex provi- sion in any other way would be “to depart from the longstanding meaning of ‘discrimination,’”7 which must have guided Congress when it passed the Civil Rights Act.8 Pledging deference to the legislature and fidelity to tradition, the Court held in Gilbert that pregnancy dis- crimination did not constitute discrimination “because of sex” because it did not fall within the long-standing parameters of that term.9 This narrow, anticlassificationist understanding of Title VII’s pro- hibition of sex discrimination was not cabined in the 1970s to cases involving pregnancy. Courts rejected some of the earliest sexual har- assment claims on the ground that the harassment at issue targeted some but not all members of the relevant class and thus did not quali- ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 1 429 U.S. 125 (1976). 2 Civil Rights Act of 1964 § 703(a), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) (2006). 3 Pub. L. No. 88-352, tit. VII, 78 Stat. 241, 253–66 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17). 4 Gilbert, 429 U.S. at 143. 5 Id. at 145. 6 See id. (“The concept of ‘discrimination,’ of course, was well known at the time of the en- actment of Title VII, having been associated with the Fourteenth Amendment for nearly a centu- ry, and carrying with it a long history of judicial construction.”). 7 Id. at 140 n.18. 8 Id. at 145 (“When Congress makes it unlawful for an employer to ‘discriminate . because of . sex . ,’ without further explanation of its meaning, we should not readily infer that it meant something different from what the concept of discrimination has traditionally meant. There is surely no reason for any such inference here.” (alterations in original) (citations omitted)). 9 Id. at 134–35 (explaining that pregnancy discrimination does not constitute discrimination “because of sex” because it divides workers “into two groups — pregnant women and nonpregnant persons. While the first group is exclusively female, the second includes members of both sexes,” id. at 135 (quoting Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484, 496–97 (1974)) (internal quotation mark omitted)). 1310 HARVARD LAW REVIEW [Vol. 125:1307 fy as discrimination “because of sex.”10 Here too, courts commonly cited the lack of legislative history attending Title VII’s sex provision as a reason for interpreting the statute narrowly.11 Sex-based Title VII claims by sexual minorities triggered a similar response. Courts uni- formly rejected such claims on the ground that “Congress has not shown any intent other than to restrict the term ‘sex’ to its traditional meaning.”12 “Congress had a narrow view of sex in mind when it passed the Civil Rights Act,”13 courts asserted, and that narrow view did not encompass discrimination against gay and transgender work- ers.14 Rejecting one of the first sex-based claims by a transgender plaintiff, the Seventh Circuit stated: “The total lack of legislative histo- ry surrounding the sex amendment coupled with the circumstances of the amendment’s adoption clearly indicates that Congress never con- sidered nor intended that this
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2017 South Carolina Bar Convention Employment & Labor Law Section
    2017 South Carolina Bar Convention Employment & Labor Law Section Seminar Friday, January 20, 2017 presented by The South Carolina Bar Continuing Legal Education Division SC Supreme Court Commission on CLE Course No. 170440 Onboarding and Offboarding in the Digital Age—Protecting Your Trade Secrets and Confidential Information Against Unfair Competition John C. Glancy Greenville, SC PDA in the Workplace Ashley C. Story Columbia, SC Christina L. Rogers Columbia Ashley C. Story, Duff, White & Turner, LLC Christy Rogers, Fisher & Phillips, LLP Roadmap The Law Regarding Pregnancy Discrimination Young v. UPS Other Case Updates EEOC Guidelines Future Trends – Election and the Law Tips Q&A Pregnancy Discrimination Act and Title VII PDA amended Title VII in 1978. Two pertinent clauses: 1. “because of or on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions “ 2. “[employers must treat women affected by pregnancy] the same for all employment- related purposes . as other persons not so affected but similar in their ability or inability to work.” Young v. United Parcel Service 575 U.S. ____ (2015) Employee brought action against her employer, alleging that she was the victim of pregnancy discrimination in violation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA). • Federal District Court granted summary judgment in favor of UPS; • 4th Circuit held that the employee failed to present direct evidence of discrimination or establish a prima facie case of discriminatory discharge on account of pregnancy under Title VII; • Vacated by U.S. Supreme Court and remanded to 4th Cir. – opinion by Breyer with 6-3 vote. Scalia authored dissent. Young v. United Parcel Service – Young’s Facts 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Women - Equal Rights Amendment - General” of the Sheila Weidenfeld Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 47, folder “Women - Equal Rights Amendment - General” of the Sheila Weidenfeld Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 47 of the Sheila Weidenfeld Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library ANSWERS to QUESTIONS about EQUAL RIGHTS AMENDMENT "Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." ., NATIONAL WOMAN'S PARTY ' 144 Constitution Avenue, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20002 Founded 1913 HISTORY 1. Why is the Equal Rights Amendment for Women necessary? The National Woman's Party was founded in 1913 and spearheaded the Woman's Suffrage give a woman a legal Movement. After passage of the Suffrage Act A. It is necessary to was not defined by the United in 1920 the National Woman's Party had intro­ status which as it was framed and duced in Congress in 1923 the first Equal States Constitution of English Common Rights Amendment bill ever proposed for wo­ adopted under the concept women as legal men.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminism Legal Theory Project
    Upcoming Workshops A Workshop on the Environment and Vulnerability Feminism Legal Theory Project Smith College, Northampton, MA April 8-9, 2016 Martha Albertson Fineman, Director A Workshop on Vulnerability and Social Justice Northeastern University School of Law, Boston, MA April 29-30, 2016 eason’s greetings from the The VHC Family Welcomes Vulnerability and the Human A Workshop on Vulnerability and Social Justice S Newest Addition, Mateo William Leeds University, Centre for Social Justice Condition Initiative! We hope your Marvel Jimenez June 17-18, 2016 new year is off to a great start. It has Proud parents Stu Fall Presentations been an exciting semester for the Marvel and Marta Vulnerability and the Human Jimenez welcome Deborah Dinner Condition Initiative and we look Mateo William “Equal by What Measure? The Struggle for Universal Protective Laws” (presentation, Employing Vulnerability Theory: Marvel Jimenez, born Challenges and Opportunities, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom, August 28, 2015). forward to sharing with you the many on September 8, 2015. projects and possibilities to come. “Working Fathers: The Origins and Consequences of Sex Neutral Parental Entitlements,” as part of panel titled “Constructing Fatherhood: Mediating Institutions and the Legal Regulation of Paternity from the Romantic Period to the Clinton Era” (presentation, American Society for Legal History, Annual Meeting, Washington DC, October 17, 2015). “Neoliberal Antidiscrimination Law: The Case of Title VII” (presenation, A Workshop on Vulnerability at the Intersection of the Changing Firm and the Changing Family, Atlanta, Georgia, October 17, 2015). Congratulations to Deborah Dinner! Martha Albertson Fineman Deborah Dinner received the William Nelson Cromwell “Vulnerability and Social Justice” (presenation, the inaugural address for the Centre for Social Justice at Leeds University, Foundation Research Fellowship, which will support her work on United Kingdom, September 16, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • The Otaku Phenomenon : Pop Culture, Fandom, and Religiosity in Contemporary Japan
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2017 The otaku phenomenon : pop culture, fandom, and religiosity in contemporary Japan. Kendra Nicole Sheehan University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Comparative Methodologies and Theories Commons, Japanese Studies Commons, and the Other Religion Commons Recommended Citation Sheehan, Kendra Nicole, "The otaku phenomenon : pop culture, fandom, and religiosity in contemporary Japan." (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2850. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2850 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE OTAKU PHENOMENON: POP CULTURE, FANDOM, AND RELIGIOSITY IN CONTEMPORARY JAPAN By Kendra Nicole Sheehan B.A., University of Louisville, 2010 M.A., University of Louisville, 2012 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Humanities Department of Humanities University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky December 2017 Copyright 2017 by Kendra Nicole Sheehan All rights reserved THE OTAKU PHENOMENON: POP CULTURE, FANDOM, AND RELIGIOSITY IN CONTEMPORARY JAPAN By Kendra Nicole Sheehan B.A., University of Louisville, 2010 M.A., University of Louisville, 2012 A Dissertation Approved on November 17, 2017 by the following Dissertation Committee: __________________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Historicizing the “End of Men”: the Politics of Reaction(S)
    HISTORICIZING THE “END OF MEN”: THE POLITICS OF REACTION(S) ∗ SERENA MAYERI In fact, the most distinctive change is probably the emergence of an American matriarchy, where the younger men especially are unmoored, and closer than at any other time in history to being obsolete . – Hanna Rosin1 In 1965 a Labor Department official named Daniel Patrick Moynihan wrote a report entitled The Negro Family: The Case for National Action (the Moynihan Report), intended only for internal Johnson Administration use but quickly leaked to the press.2 Designed to motivate the President and his deputies to launch massive federal employment and anti-poverty initiatives directed at impoverished African Americans, Moynihan’s report inadvertently sparked a sometimes vitriolic debate that reverberated through the next half century of social policy.3 Characterized as everything from a “subtle racist”4 to a “prescient”5 prophet, Moynihan and his assessment of black urban family life have been endlessly analyzed, vilified, and rehabilitated by commentators in the years since his report identified a “tangle of pathology” that threatened the welfare and stability of poor African American communities.6 At the center of the “pathology” Moynihan lamented was a “matriarchal” family structure characterized by “illegitimate” births, welfare dependency, and juvenile ∗ Professor of Law and History, University of Pennsylvania Law School. I am grateful to Kristin Collins for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this Essay; to Linda McClain, Hanna Rosin, and participants in the Conference, “Evaluating Claims About the ‘End of Men’: Legal and Other Perspectives,” out of which this Symposium grew; and to the staff of the Boston University Law Review for editorial assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Fact Sheets
    Texas Workforce Commission Facts About National Origin Discrimination Chapter 21, Texas Labor Code and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of l964 protects individuals against employment discrimination on the basis of national origin as well as race, color, religion and sex. It is unlawful to discriminate against any employee or applicant because of the individual’s national origin. No one can be denied equal employment opportunity because of birthplace, ancestry, culture, or linguistic characteristics common to a specific ethnic group. Equal employment opportunity cannot be denied because of marriage or association with persons of a national origin group; membership or association with specific ethnic promotion groups; attendance or participation in schools, churches, temples or mosques generally associated with a national origin group; or a surname associated with a national origin group. Speak English-Only Rule: A rule requiring performance or negatively affect an individual’s employees to speak only English, at all times, on the employment opportunities. Employers have a job may violate Title VII, unless an employer shows it responsibility to maintain a workplace free of national is necessary for conducting business. If an employer origin harassment. Employers may be responsible believes the English-only rule is critical for business for any on-the-job harassment by their agents and purposes, employees have to be told when they must supervisory employees, regardless of whether the speak English and the consequences for violating acts were authorized or specifically forbidden by the the rule. Any negative employment decision based employer. Under certain circumstances, an employer on breaking the English-only rule will be considered may be responsible for the acts of non-employees evidence of discrimination if the employer did not tell who harass their employees at work.
    [Show full text]
  • YOUNG V. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2014 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus YOUNG v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12–1226. Argued December 3, 2014—Decided March 25, 2015 The Pregnancy Discrimination Act added new language to the defini- tions subsection of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The first clause of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act specifies that Title VII’s prohibition against sex discrimination applies to discrimination “be- cause of or on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions.” 42 U. S. C §2000e(k). The Act’s second clause says that employers must treat “women affected by pregnancy . the same for all employment-related purposes . as other persons not so affected but similar in their ability or inability to work.” Ibid. This case asks the Court to determine how the latter provision applies in the context of an employer’s policy that accommodates many, but not all, workers with nonpregnancy-related disabilities. Petitioner Young was a part-time driver for respondent United Parcel Service (UPS). When she became pregnant, her doctor advised her that she should not lift more than 20 pounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Changemakers: Biographies of African Americans in San Francisco Who Made a Difference
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Leo T. McCarthy Center for Public Service and McCarthy Center Student Scholarship the Common Good 2020 Changemakers: Biographies of African Americans in San Francisco Who Made a Difference David Donahue Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/mccarthy_stu Part of the History Commons CHANGEMAKERS AFRICAN AMERICANS IN SAN FRANCISCO WHO MADE A DIFFERENCE Biographies inspired by San Francisco’s Ella Hill Hutch Community Center murals researched, written, and edited by the University of San Francisco’s Martín-Baró Scholars and Esther Madríz Diversity Scholars CHANGEMAKERS: AFRICAN AMERICANS IN SAN FRANCISCO WHO MADE A DIFFERENCE © 2020 First edition, second printing University of San Francisco 2130 Fulton Street San Francisco, CA 94117 Published with the generous support of the Walter and Elise Haas Fund, Engage San Francisco, The Leo T. McCarthy Center for Public Service and the Common Good, The University of San Francisco College of Arts and Sciences, University of San Francisco Student Housing and Residential Education The front cover features a 1992 portrait of Ella Hill Hutch, painted by Eugene E. White The Inspiration Murals were painted in 1999 by Josef Norris, curated by Leonard ‘Lefty’ Gordon and Wendy Nelder, and supported by the San Francisco Arts Commission and the Mayor’s Offi ce Neighborhood Beautifi cation Project Grateful acknowledgment is made to the many contributors who made this book possible. Please see the back pages for more acknowledgments. The opinions expressed herein represent the voices of students at the University of San Francisco and do not necessarily refl ect the opinions of the University or our sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2002 (PDF)
    CIVILRIGHTS WINTER 2002 JOURNAL ALSO INSIDE: EQUATIONS: AN INTERVIEW WITH BOB MOSES FLYING HISTORY AS SENTIMENTAL EDUCATION WHILE WHERE ARE YOU REALLY FROM? ASIAN AMERICANS AND THE PERPETUAL FOREIGNER SYNDROME ARAB MANAGING THE DIVERSITY Lessons from the Racial REVOLUTION: BEST PRACTICES FOR 21ST CENTURY BUSINESS Profiling Controversy U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS CIVILRIGHTS WINTER 2002 JOURNAL The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, bipartisan agency first established by Congress in 1957. It is directed to: • Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are being deprived of their right to Acting Chief vote by reason of their race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, Terri A. Dickerson or by reason of fraudulent practices; • Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal Managing Editor protection of the laws under the Constitution because of race, color, religion, sex, David Aronson age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice; Copy Editor • Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to discrimination or denial of equal Dawn Sweet protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice; Editorial Staff • Serve as a national clearinghouse for information in respect to discrimination or Monique Dennis-Elmore denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, Latrice Foshee disability, or national origin; Mireille Zieseniss • Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress; • Issue public service announcements to discourage discrimination or denial of equal Interns protection of the laws. Megan Gustafson Anastasia Ludden In furtherance of its fact-finding duties, the Commission may hold hearings and issue Travis McClain subpoenas for the production of documents and the attendance of witnesses.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is “Great Sex”? Development of a Conceptual Model
    What is “Great Sex”? Development of a Conceptual Model A. Dana Menard A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree Department of Psychology Carleton University Ottawa, ON June 2007 © 2007 A. Dana Menard Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Library and Bibliotheque et Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-33750-9 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-33750-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce,Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve,sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet,distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform,et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWARD a FEMINIST THEORY of the STATE Catharine A. Mackinnon
    TOWARD A FEMINIST THEORY OF THE STATE Catharine A. MacKinnon Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England K 644 M33 1989 ---- -- scoTT--- -- Copyright© 1989 Catharine A. MacKinnon All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America IO 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 First Harvard University Press paperback edition, 1991 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data MacKinnon, Catharine A. Toward a fe minist theory of the state I Catharine. A. MacKinnon. p. em. Bibliography: p. Includes index. ISBN o-674-89645-9 (alk. paper) (cloth) ISBN o-674-89646-7 (paper) I. Women-Legal status, laws, etc. 2. Women and socialism. I. Title. K644.M33 1989 346.0I I 34--dC20 [342.6134} 89-7540 CIP For Kent Harvey l I Contents Preface 1x I. Feminism and Marxism I I . The Problem of Marxism and Feminism 3 2. A Feminist Critique of Marx and Engels I 3 3· A Marxist Critique of Feminism 37 4· Attempts at Synthesis 6o II. Method 8 I - --t:i\Consciousness Raising �83 .r � Method and Politics - 106 -7. Sexuality 126 • III. The State I 55 -8. The Liberal State r 57 Rape: On Coercion and Consent I7 I Abortion: On Public and Private I 84 Pornography: On Morality and Politics I95 _I2. Sex Equality: Q .J:.diff�_re11c::e and Dominance 2I 5 !l ·- ····-' -� &3· · Toward Feminist Jurisprudence 237 ' Notes 25I Credits 32I Index 323 I I 'li Preface. Writing a book over an eighteen-year period becomes, eventually, much like coauthoring it with one's previous selves. The results in this case are at once a collaborative intellectual odyssey and a sustained theoretical argument.
    [Show full text]
  • Attitudes of Thai People Toward Sex Education
    Sex Education and Women's Health: Attitudes of Thai People Toward Sex Education Tossaporn Sariyant B.Ed. Silapakorn University, 1979 M.Ed. University of Massachusetts, 1985 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Women's Studies O Tossaporn Sariyant 1997 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY December 1997 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL Name: Tossaporn Sariyant Degree: Master of Arts (Women's Studies) Title of thesis: Sex Education and Women's Health: Attitudes of Thai People Toward Sex Education Examining Committee: Chair: Dr. Jacqueline Levitin Dr. Habiba Zaman, Senior Supervisor Assistant Professor of Women's Studies Dr. Marilyn MacDonald, Supervisor Assistant Professor of Women's Studies Dr. Michael Howard, External Examiner Professor of Anthropology Simon Fraser University Date Approved: 3 1977 Partial Copyright Licence I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to user of the Simon Fraser University Library, and make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I fbrther agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]