REVIEWS Companied by Its Native Fauna and There Were Attempts at Biological Con­ Trol Using Insects Imported from Europe As Early As the I 920S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REVIEWS Companied by Its Native Fauna and There Were Attempts at Biological Con­ Trol Using Insects Imported from Europe As Early As the I 920S 96 Austra lian Weeds Vol. 2{3) Autumn 1983 In its adventive range (America, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand) ragwort was not initially ac­ REVIEWS companied by its native fauna and there were attempts at biological con­ trol using insects imported from Europe as early as the I 920s. Harris (1979) calculated that a complete bio­ logical control programme against a pasture weed was worth implementing if the annual losses attributed to the weed were greater than $150000 (in 1976 dollars). When advantage can be taken of previous work (supposing Biological control of ragwort in New Zealand: suitable control agents have already a review been identified) then the project becomes more attractive economically. Inflation brings Harris's 1976 figure P. Syrett close to $300 000 in 1982 dollars, but Entomology Division .. DSIR. Lincoln, New Zealand annual ragwort control costs to New Zealand in excess of this would justify implementing a complete biological control programme. Moreover, since Summary deaths often occur many weeks after we are following on from early New animals are removed from infested Ragwort (Senecio jacobaea L.) is a Zealand work and using overseas ex­ pasture, disease may not always be serious pasture weed which is toxic to perience, the cost - benefit equation associated with ragwort but attributed stock. Insects recorded from the plant in becomes considerably more favour­ to facial eczema, symptoms of which New Zealand are described briefly and able. are similar. However, many farmers the potential for introduced insects as consider old ewes in particular to be a control agents is discussed. Work with cheaper form of control than herbicide. New Zealand insect fauna the cinnabar moth, Tyriajacobaeae (L.) Schmidl (1972) emphasized that con­ (Lepidoptera:Arctiidae), and ragwort Of a number of insect species fre­ trol by grazing is temporary. Ragwort seedily, Pegohylemyia spp. (Diptera: quenting ragwort in New Zealand, the will recover following the removal of Anthomyiidae), in New Zealand and magpie moth Nyclemera annulala Bois­ sheep even after 5 to 7 years of in­ overseas is reviewed, and followed by a duval (Lepidoptera:Arctiidae) is the tensive grazing. Plants begin to appear discussion of overseas work with a most conspicuous and, according to in the first year and recovery is com­ proposed new introduction, the flea Miller (1970), the only one to do any plete by the second (Schmidl, 1972). beetle, Longitarsus jacobaeae (Water­ significant damage. Its biology has house) (Coleoptera:Chrysomelidae). Ragwort is found in most areas of been studied by Quail (190 I) and New Zealand which receive more than McLaughlin ( 1967). Under certain 800 mm rain annually. It is not usually Introduction conditions larvae can cause extensive a problem on well managed productive defoliation of ragwort, but their effec­ Ragwort (Senecio jacobaea L.) was first land but can be difficult to control on tiveness is reduced by high levels of recorded in New Zealand in 1874 dairy farms. Much steep hill country in parasitism by a braconid, Microplilis (Thomson, 1922). A native to Europe the North Island is heavily infested sp. Miller (1970) noted that larvae and Asia, it was probably introduced with ragwort which is expensive, and were parasitized by two tachinids, Pales through contaminated seed (Radcliffe, often uneconomic, to control by nyclemeriana (Hudson) and P. casta 1969). This immigrant species is un­ chemical or mechanical methods. (Hutton), but these were not found in desirable as, besides displacing more These areas provide a source of seeds McLaughlin's study. Valentine (1967) valuable pasture plants, it contains which readily spread into neighbouring als o recorded Apanleles spp. toxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids which can areas. (Hymenoptera:Braconidae) from Nyc­ cause stock losses (Mortimer and In Victoria, Australia, from 1968 to temera annulala. The pupae are com­ White, 1975). Also, since there is no 1970 the annual cost of ragwort control monly parasitized by the ichneumonid consensus on the carcinogenicity of (over an infested area of 0.4 million Echlhromorpha intricaloria (F.). these alkaloids, and their effects are hal was estimated at $0.6 million, and Two stem borers are found on cumulative, products such as milk and this expenditure did little more than ragwort, Homoeosoma /arinaria Turner honey contaminated with only low contain the situation (Schmidl, 1972). (Lepidoptera:Pyralidae), and Melana­ concentrations may not necessarily be For Oregon, U.S.A., Isaacson (1975) gromyza senecionella Spencer (Dip­ considered safe to humans (Deinzer el calculated that an area of 4 million ha tera:Agromyzidae). Miller (1929) 01., 1977). was infested with ragwort resulting in noted that Homoeosoma jarinaria was Alkaloids cause stock to suffer losses of $1.5 to $10 million annually. well established throughout New chronic li ver disease which can lead to The total expenditure on ragwort con­ Zealand but was controlled by liver failure and severe damage to other trol in New Zealand is not known. It is parasites. A description of H. jarinaria organs. Sheep are more resistant to a scheduled noxious plant and in (as H. vagella) and details of its life poisoning than cattle but the practice 1979-80, from a budget of $9 million history have been given by Cottier of using them to control ragwort by from public funds, $0.6 million was (1931). Miller(1970) recorded that the grazing is questioned by Mortimer and spent on ragwort control under the insect was attacked by two unidentified White (1975). They suggest that since Noxious Plant Control Scheme. species of Hymenoptera. Melanagro- Australian Weeds Vol. 2(3) Autumn 1983 97 myza senecionel/a is common, but An adult moth was collected from Miller (1970) noted that larval mor­ Miller (1970) regarded it as having no Masterton in 1951 (Wise, 1952) and tality occurred as a result of parasi tism marked influence on ragwort, and little occasional moths have also been recor­ by Pales Ci1sta (Hutton) and predation is known of its life cycle. ded from Carterton and Lake Brunner by the shining cuckoo and starling. The leaf miner Phylomyza syngene­ (Miller, 1970). From 1969 to 1974 Adults are also eaten by shining siae Hardy (as P. alricornis) causes high populations of cinnabar moth ap­ cuckoos and by house sparrows. Some marked damage to leaves and can peared in the Wairarapa, but from 1975 newly formed pupae are attacked by the become a problem on glasshouse to 1977 numbers declined again. This ichneumonid Echlhromorpha inlri­ grown plants (Kelsey, 1937). Its life was attributed to unsuitable climatic Ci1toria (F.). Dempster (1975) noted history and that of its parasite Dacnusa conditions during these years, but in that in Europe parasi tism of fifth instar areolaris Nees. has been described by 1979 the moth was abundant again larvae by the braconid Apanteles Kelsey (1937). A second hymenop­ (Anon, 1979). In the summer of papularis Hal. reduced numbers by up teran parasite, the eulophid Chryso­ 197 1 - 72 cinnabar moth was reported to 35 % but van der Meijden (1980) charis pubicornis has also been recorded from a number of locations in the concluded that it did not regulate the (E. W. Valentine, Entomology southern North Island (Meads, 1973). numbers of its host. When cinnabar Division, DSIR, Auckland, personal Larvae collected from the Wairarapa moth was imported into Canada, eggs communication, 1981). An aphid have been released at several South were heavily attacked by the hymen­ BrachyCi1udus helichrysi (Kaltenbach) Island sites during the I 970s but there opteran parasite Telenomus sp. and by occurs on ragwort flowers and may is no evidence of survival from these predatory cantharid bee tl es (Wilkin­ bunch them together into honey-dewed releases. The moth's distribution does, son, 1965). In Australia, the mecop­ masses (Miller, 1970). The cutworm however, appear to be increasing in the teran Harpabiltacus nigriceps (Selys) larva (Noctuidae) is often damaging to south of the North Island and high was the most important larval predator ragwort, particularly to young plants, populations of larvae build up in the (Bornemissza, 1966). It was often re­ but it cannot be regarded as a suitable Wairarapa during the summer. sponsible for an average mortality control agent since it is a pest of crop Cinnabar moth is univoltine in New above 80 % and frequently caused 90 plants. Zealand as in Europe, overwintering in to 100 % mortality. the pupal stage. Adults have been Lepidoptera are particularly suscep­ known to emerge as early as August, tible to microsporidian and virus Insects Introduced to control ragwort but are common from November on­ diseases. Attempts to establish the in ­ wards (Miller, 1970). The yellowish sect in Australia failed because of the Following the work of Cameron (1935) eggs (which take about two weeks to presence of a virus (identified as in England, a list of the most hatch) are laid on the undersiQes of nuclear polyhedrosis) which was promising insect species was drawn up, ragwort leaves in clusters. Larvae ap­ almost certainly introduced with it and the cinnabar moth Tyria jacobaeae pear in the field in New Zealand from (Bornemissza, 1966). During feeding (L.) and the seedfly Pegohylemyia (as September o nwards, becoming tests with cinnabar moth imported for Hylemyia) seneciel/a (Meade) were numerous in November and December. release in Canada, Bucher and Harris selected for prospective introduction Emerging larvae are yellowish with a (1961) found that an unknown species (Miller, 1970). Both were subsequently black head, but later ins tars have the of the microsporidian Nosema caused released, and the cinnabar moth was characteristic black and yellow banded high larval mortality. Harris et al. distributed widely throughout ragwort body. Early instars are gregarious and ( 1975) noted that a microsporidian infested areas. Unfortunately success relatively inconspicuous, but fourth disease was present in colonies estab­ was limited, as it was with attempts to and fifth ins tars migrate to the upper lished in one British Columbian pop­ establish these insects in Australia bet­ parts of the plant.
Recommended publications
  • Protection of Pandora Moth (Coloradia Pandora Blake) Eggs from Consumption by Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrels (Spermophilus Lateralis Say)
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Elizabeth Ann Gerson for the degree of Master of Science in Forest Science presented on 10 January, 1995. Title: Protection of Pandora Moth (Coloradia pandora Blake) Eggs From Consumption by Golden-mantled Ground Squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis Say) Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy William C. McComb Endemic populations of pandora moths (Coloradia pandora Blake), a defoliator of western pine forests, proliferated to epidemic levels in central Oregon in 1986 and increased dramatically through 1994. Golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis Say) consume adult pandora moths, but reject nutritionally valuable eggs from gravid females. Feeding trials with captive S. lateralis were conducted to identify the mode of egg protection. Chemical constituents of fertilized eggs were separated through a polarity gradient of solvent extractions. Consumption of the resulting hexane, dichloromethane, and water egg fractions, and the extracted egg tissue residue, was evaluated by randomized 2-choice feeding tests. Consumption of four physically distinct egg fractions (whole eggs, "whole" egg shells, ground egg shells, and egg contents) also was evaluated. These bioassays indicated that C. pandora eggs are not protected chemically, however, the egg shell does inhibit S. lateralis consumption. Egg protection is one mechanism that enables C. pandora to persist within the forest food web. Spermophilus lateralis, a common and often abundant rodent of central Oregon pine forests, is a natural enemy of C. pandora
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER• of the MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    NEWSLETTER• of the MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY Volume 38, Numbers 4 December, 1993 Impacts ofBt on Non-Target Lepidoptera John W. Peacock, David L. Wagner, and Dale F. Schweitzer USDA Forest Service, Hamden, CT; University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; and The Nature Conservancy, Port Norris, NT, respectively Introduction gypsy moth in Oregon. Sample et a1. ing attempts bycertain birds. In another (1 993) have likewise reported a signifi­ study, Bellocq et al. (1992) showed that Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner var. cant reduction inspecies abundance and the use of Btk increased immigration kurstaki (Btk) is one of the pesticides richness in non-target Lepidoptera in rates andcaused d ietary shifts inshrews. most commonly employed against lepi­ field studies in eastern West Virginia. We report here a summary of our dopteran forest pests. In the eastern U.S., James et al. (1993) haveshown thatBtk is studies aimed at determining the effect where millionsofhectares of deciduous toxic to late, but not early, instar larvae of Btko n non-target Lepidoptera inboth forest have been defoliated by the ''Eu­ of the beneficial cinnabar moth, Tyria laboratoryand field studies. Laboratory ropean" gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar jacobaeae (L.). bioassays were conducted on larvae in (L.), Btk has been used extenSively to In addition to its direct effects on seven families of native eastern U.S. slow the spread of this pest and to re­ native Lepidoptera, Btk can indirectly Macrolepidoptera. Field studies were duce defoliation. In 1992 alone, over affect other animals that rely on lepi­ carried out in Rockbridge County, Vir­ 300,000 ha were treated with Btk, in­ dopterous larvae as a primary source of ginia, and were the first to evaluate non­ cluding gypsy moth suppression activi­ food.
    [Show full text]
  • Descripción De Nuevas Especies Animales De La Península Ibérica E Islas Baleares (1978-1994): Tendencias Taxonómicas Y Listado Sistemático
    Graellsia, 53: 111-175 (1997) DESCRIPCIÓN DE NUEVAS ESPECIES ANIMALES DE LA PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA E ISLAS BALEARES (1978-1994): TENDENCIAS TAXONÓMICAS Y LISTADO SISTEMÁTICO M. Esteban (*) y B. Sanchiz (*) RESUMEN Durante el periodo 1978-1994 se han descrito cerca de 2.000 especies animales nue- vas para la ciencia en territorio ibérico-balear. Se presenta como apéndice un listado completo de las especies (1978-1993), ordenadas taxonómicamente, así como de sus referencias bibliográficas. Como tendencias generales en este proceso de inventario de la biodiversidad se aprecia un incremento moderado y sostenido en el número de taxones descritos, junto a una cada vez mayor contribución de los autores españoles. Es cada vez mayor el número de especies publicadas en revistas que aparecen en el Science Citation Index, así como el uso del idioma inglés. La mayoría de los phyla, clases u órdenes mues- tran gran variación en la cantidad de especies descritas cada año, dado el pequeño núme- ro absoluto de publicaciones. Los insectos son claramente el colectivo más estudiado, pero se aprecia una disminución en su importancia relativa, asociada al incremento de estudios en grupos poco conocidos como los nematodos. Palabras clave: Biodiversidad; Taxonomía; Península Ibérica; España; Portugal; Baleares. ABSTRACT Description of new animal species from the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands (1978-1994): Taxonomic trends and systematic list During the period 1978-1994 about 2.000 new animal species have been described in the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands. A complete list of these new species for 1978-1993, taxonomically arranged, and their bibliographic references is given in an appendix.
    [Show full text]
  • Pseudotsuga Menziesii
    SPECIAL PUBLICATION 4 SEPTEMBER 1982 INVERTEBRATES OF THE H.J. ANDREWS EXPERIMENTAL FOREST, WESTERN CASCADE MOUNTAINS, OREGON: A SURVEY OF ARTHROPODS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CANOPY OF OLD-GROWTH Pseudotsuga Menziesii D.J. Voegtlin FORUT REJEARCH LABORATORY SCHOOL OF FORESTRY OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY Since 1941, the Forest Research Laboratory--part of the School of Forestry at Oregon State University in Corvallis-- has been studying forests and why they are like they are. A staff or more than 50 scientists conducts research to provide information for wise public and private decisions on managing and using Oregons forest resources and operating its wood-using industries. Because of this research, Oregons forests now yield more in the way of wood products, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Wood products are harvested, processed, and used more efficiently. Employment, productivity, and profitability in industries dependent on forests also have been strengthened. And this research has helped Oregon to maintain a quality environment for its people. Much research is done in the Laboratorys facilities on the campus. But field experiments in forest genetics, young- growth management, forest hydrology, harvesting methods, and reforestation are conducted on 12,000 acres of School forests adjacent to the campus and on lands of public and private cooperating agencies throughout the Pacific Northwest. With these publications, the Forest Research Laboratory supplies the results of its research to forest land owners and managers, to manufacturers and users of forest products, to leaders of government and industry, and to the general public. The Author David J. Voegtlin is Assistant Taxonomist at the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Research Notes
    . , WEYERHAEUSER TIMBER Forestry R esearch N otes Tacoma, Washington BETTER TIMBER CROPS THROUGH INDUSTRIAl FOREST MANAGEMENT Fbrestry Research Note Noo 22 January 1960 DOUGLAS - FIR CONE AND SEED INSECT BI OLOGICAL AND CONTROL STUDIES: PROGRESS IN 1958 , 1959 by 'r. 1/ Norman E .. John son and Jack K. Win jum- Foresters in the Pacific Northwest a ~ e g1v1ng increased attention to use of high quality Douglas-fir seed. I nsect damage is one phase of seed investigations being conducted by our forestry resear ch staff at Centralia. The objective is to devel op a sound basis for control of ·the important cone and seed insects of D6uglas-fir. The reporting of pr ogress from these studies should prove of timely inter•est. The present paper on cone and seed insects of Douglas-fir in wester n Washington and Oregon contains sections on: ( 1) a key to seed--damaging larvae commbn i n green Dougl as-fir ·cones in western Washington, ( 2) the p·e,r iod of emergence and attack of the adults of ·these same larvae., ( 3 ) /chemical control tests and ( 4 ) · pre ... cautions on the use of insecticides. Changes in both the scientific and common names of the insects dealt with in this paper has resulted in some confusion. The following l ist of "Names usedr·r with the "Explanatory notes" is included to give the various synonyms with references where the name was originally used. The authors ., Forest Entomol ogist and Technol ogi·st, r 'espectively, express appreciation for fine cboperation that facilitated these studies: Chemical companies for ~upplying insecticides to test; members of our forestry research staff, D~.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
    1 A molecular phylogeny of Cochylina, with confirmation of its relationship to Euliina 2 (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) 3 4 John W. Brown*1, Leif Aarvik2, Maria Heikkilä3, Richard Brown4, and Marko Mutanen5 5 6 1 National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA, e-mail: 7 [email protected] 8 2 Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Norway, e-mail: [email protected] 9 3 Finnish Museum of Natural History, LUOMUS, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00014, 10 Finland, e-mail: [email protected] 11 4 Mississippi Entomological Museum, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA, e-mail: 12 [email protected] 13 5 Ecology and Genetics Research Unit, PO Box 3000, 90014, University of Oulu, Finland, e- 14 mail: [email protected] 15 *corresponding author 16 17 This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Brown, J.W., Aarvik, L., Heikkilä, M., 18 Brown, R. and Mutanen, M. (2020), A molecular phylogeny of Cochylina, with confirmation of its 19 relationship to Euliina (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Syst Entomol, 45: 160-174., which has been 20 published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/syen.12385. 21 1 22 Abstract. We conducted a multiple-gene phylogenetic analysis of 70 species representing 24 23 genera of Cochylina and eight species representing eight genera of Euliina, and a maximum 24 likelihood analysis based on 293 barcodes representing over 220 species of Cochylina. The 25 results confirm the hypothesis that Cochylina is a monophyletic group embedded within a 26 paraphyletic Euliina. We recognize and define six major monophyletic lineages within 27 Cochylina: a Phtheochroa Group, a Henricus Group, an Aethes Group, a Saphenista Group, a 28 Phalonidia Group, and a Cochylis Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly Conservation Event Can Be Seen by Clicking Here
    Upper Thames Branch Moth Sightings Archive - January to June 2007 On Friday 29th June Dave Wilton carried out his transect in Finemere Wood and in the evening ran his overnight moth trap in his Westcott garden: "Moths seen in Finemere Wood were Narrow-bordered Five-spot Burnet (3), Clouded Border (2), Marbled White Spot (1) and Silver Y (1). My garden Robinson trap produced my first reasonable catch for a week or two, with more than 400 moths from about 80 species ending up in the trap. Best of the bunch were Lappet and Scarce Silver-lines, with Scarce Footman, Clay, Smoky Wainscot, Olive, Pleuroptya ruralis/Mother of Pearl and Phycitodes binaevella also new for my garden year list. The following evening a Blackneck came to our kitchen window light." Phycitodes binaevella Scarce Silver-lines Blackneck Photo © Dave Wilton Photo © Dave Wilton Photo © Dave Wilton ~ Thursday 28th June 2007 ~ Dave Wilton sent this moth report on 27th June: "On 26th June I was foolish enough to run my actinic trap at Westcott even though the temperature fell to 8 degrees Celsius overnight. The result was a pitiful catch of 64 moths from 17 species. Compare that to the same day last year when I got 800 moths in the Robinson! The poor weather of the past few days seems to have had a drastic effect on catches all across the country although last night did produce one new species for me, the Short-cloaked Moth. Looking on the bright side, thanks to Peter Hall and his microscope I do now have a few additions to the UTB list from back in April: Dichrorampha acuminatana, Elachista canapennella, Dipleurina lacustrata, Eudonia truncicolella and Parornix anglicella were all trapped in my garden, Rhopobota stagnana (B&F 1161, formerly Griselda stagnana) was found in the disused railway cutting west of Westcott Airfield and Pammene argyrana was caught in Rushbeds Wood." Also, while doing a butterfly transect in Finemere Wood on 20th June, Dave kicked up a Crambus perlella from the grass.
    [Show full text]
  • And Ragwort Flea Beetle, Cinnabar Moths and Other Organisms That Feed on Ragwort
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Interaction of population processes in ragwort (Senecio jacobaea L.) and ragwort flea.bee tle (Longitarsus jacobaeae Waterbouse) A Thesis presented in partial fulflllment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology at Massey University. April 2000 11 Declaration of Originality This thesis represents the original work of the author, except where otherwise acknowledged. It has not been submitted previously for a degree at any University. Aung Kyi III Acknowledgements I am sincerely grateful to my supervisors, Professor Brian Springett, Dr lan Stringer (Ecology, the Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University), and Dr Peter McGregor (Landcare Research) for their encouragement, supervision and patience over this study and their help in drafting this thesis. I am also indebted to Mr Keith Betteridge (AgResearch) for his valuable advice on the laboratory study on the movement of first instar larvae of ragwort flea beetle in different soils; Dr. Ed Minot (Ecology, Massey University) for explaining how to use the STELLA model; Dr. Jill Rapson (Ecology, Massey University) for comments on my PhD thesis proposal; Dr. Siva Ganesh, Dr. Jenny Brown and Mr. Duncan Hedderley (Statistics, Massey University) for help with univariate and multivariate analyses; and Dr. Kerry Harrington (Plant Science, Institute of Natural Resources, Massey University) for his comments and suggestion on the toxicity of ragwort and its chemical control.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Host Range Testing for Cotesia Urabae
    1 Appendix 2 Appendix 2: Risks to non-target species from potential biological control agent Cotesia urabae against Uraba lugens in New Zealand L.A. Berndt, A. Sharpe, T.M. Withers, M. Kimberley, and B. Gresham Scion, Private Bag 3020, Rotorua 3046, New Zealand, [email protected] Introduction Biological control of insect pests is a sustainable approach to pest management that seeks to correct ecological imbalances that many new invaders create on arrival in a new country. This is done by introducing carefully selected natural enemies of the pest, usually from its native range. This method is the only means of establishing and maintaining self-sustaining control of pest insects and it is highly cost effective in the long term (Greathead, 1995). However there is considerable concern for the risk new biological control agents might pose to other species in the country of introduction, and most countries now have regulations to manage decisions on whether to allow biological control introductions (Sheppard et al., 2003). A key component of the research required to gain approval to release a new agent is host range testing, to determine what level of risk the agent might pose to native and valued species in the country of introduction. Although methods for this are well developed for weed biological control, protocols are less established for arthropod biological control, and the challenges in conducting tests are greater (Van Driesche and Murray, 2004; van Lenteren et al., 2006; Withers and Browne, 2004). This is because insect ecology and taxonomy are relatively poorly understood, and there are many more species that need to be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera Für 1907. Karl Grünberg
    © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Lepidoptera für li)07. Von Dr. K. Grünberg, Berlin. (Inhaltsverzeichnis am Schlüsse des Berichtes. A. Verzeichnis der Publikationen. Aclieu, C. Überwinterung der Puppen von Pteroz. proserpina. Ent. Zeitschr., Vol. 21, No. 33, p. 204. Adliin, Robert. Tortrix pronubana Hb., double-brooded in Britain. Entomologist, Vol. 40, p. 102. Aigner- Abaf i, L. v. (I). Über die Lepidopterenfauna Japans. Zeit- schr. f. wissensch. Insektenbiol., Vol. 3, p. 123—128. — {'Z). Massenhaftes Auftreten des Baumweißlings. 1. c., p. 189 u. 190. — (3). Magyarorszäg pillangoi. XVIII. Rovart Lapok., Vol. 14, p. 31—40, p. 66—71 (XIX), 109—176 (XX), 140—145 (XXI), 172 —176 (XXII), 192—199 (XXIH). — (4). Lepke-elteresek a Magyar Nemzeti Muzeum gyüjtemenyeböl. I. 1. c., p. 79—88, f. 1—11; IL p. 122—131, f. 12—22; III. p. 148 —153, f. 23; IV. p. 178—181; V. p. 210—212. — (5). Japänorszag lepke-fauna jarol. 1. c, p. 95—102. — (6). A magyar lepke-fauna gyarapodäsa 1906. ban. 1. c, p. 212—215. Aitken, E. H. The climatal changes of Melanitis leda. Journ. Soc. Nat. Hist. Bombay, Vol. 18, p. 195—197. Alplieraky, S. (I). Contribution ä la faune des Lepidopteres du caucase septentrional. (Supplements et corrections.) Rev. Russe d'Ent., Vol. 7, p. 203—205. — (3). Petits notices lepidopterologiques. 1. c, p. 266 u. 267. Andre, B. (1). Copiopteryx semiramis. Bull. Soc. Sei. Nat. Mäcon, Vol. 2, p. 277 u. 278. — {2). Actias sinensis. 1. c, p. 278 u. 279. .4urivilliiis, Clir. (I). Diagnosen neuer Lepidopteren aus Afrika.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Expertise on Animal Defense Mechanisms
    Grade 4: Module 2B: Unit 1: Lesson 5 Reading Scientific Text: Building Expertise on Animal Defense Mechanisms This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Exempt third-party content is indicated by the footer: © (name of copyright holder). Used by permission and not subject to Creative Commons license. GRADE 4: MODULE 2B: UNIT 1: LESSON 5 Reading Scientific Text: Building Expertise on Animal Defense Mechanisms Long-Term Targets Addressed (Based on NYSP12 ELA CCLS) I can paraphrase portions of a text that is read aloud to me. (SL.4.2) I can interpret information presented through charts or graphs. I can explain how that information helps me understand the text around it. (RI.4.7) I can determine the main idea using specific details from the text. (RI.4.2) Supporting Learning Targets Ongoing Assessment • I can paraphrase information presented in a read-aloud on animal defense mechanisms. • Listening Closely note-catcher (page 7 of Animal • I can make inferences about animal defense mechanisms by examining articles that include text and Defenses research journal) visuals. • Examining Visuals note-catcher (page 8 of Animal • I can determine the main idea of a section of Animal Behaviors: Animal Defenses. Defenses research journal) • Determining Main Ideas note-catcher (pages 9 and 10 of Animal Defenses research journal) • Observation of participation during Jigsaw Copyright © 2013 by Expeditionary Learning, New York, NY. All Rights Reserved. NYS Common Core ELA Curriculum • G4:M2B:U1:L5 • June 2014 • 1 GRADE 4: MODULE 2B: UNIT 1: LESSON 5 Reading Scientific Text: Building Expertise on Animal Defense Mechanisms Agenda Teaching Notes 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying and Managing Common Groundsel (Senecio Vulgaris L.) In
    MSU Extension Bulletin E3440 Identifying and managing common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris L.) in nurseries and greenhouses Debalina Saha and Carolyn Fitzgibbon Michigan State University Department of Horticulture Debalina Saha, MSU Horticulture Photo 1. Common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) growing along the edges of walkway inside a greenhouse. Common groundsel (Senecio vulgaris) is one of the most common and problematic broadleaf Debalina Saha, MSU Horticulture weeds in nurseries and greenhouses. It belongs Photo 2. Erect and branched growth habit of common to the Asteraceae family, which also includes groundsel (Senecio vulgaris). dandelion, thistles and sunflower. It is classified identify and manage common groundsel in their as a winter annual because the seeds germinate nurseries and greenhouse operations. in late fall through early spring. Sometimes common groundsel is considered a summer annual since it has the capacity to germinate Biology of common groundsel under shady conditions in summer or fall. In addition to its general weediness, common HABITAT groundsel can be toxic to cattle, swine and Common groundsel can be found growing in horses if ingested. The toxicity is due to pyr- gardens, lawns, nursery plots, inside greenhous- rolizidine alkaloids, which can cause chronic es (under benches and on edges of walkways) liver damage to these animals (Smith-Fiola and (Photo 1), edges of yards, mulched beds around Gill, 2014; Uva et al., 1997). shrubs, fields, areas along railroads, roadsides The success of this weed lies with its ability to and waste areas. It is common in highly dis- produce enormous amount of seeds. Seed turbed areas where ground vegetation is low development starts early in its life cycle and and scant (Illinois wildflowers, 2020).
    [Show full text]