DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2009.01374V2 [Hep-Th] 29 May 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2009.01374V2 [Hep-Th] 29 May 2021 Prepared for submission to JHEP Unified non-metric (1, 0) tensor-Einstein supergravity theories and (4, 0) supergravity in six dimensions Murat G¨unaydina,b aStanford Institute for Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stan- ford, CA 94305, USA bInstitute for Gravitation and the Cosmos Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The ultrashort unitary (4, 0) supermultiplet of 6d superconformal algebra OSp(8∗ 8) reduces to the CPT-self conjugate supermultiplet of 4d superconformal algebra | SU(2, 2 8) that represents the fields of maximal N = 8 supergravity. The graviton in | the (4, 0) multiplet is described by a mixed tensor gauge field which can not be identified with the standard metric in 6d. Furthermore the (4, 0) supermultiplet can be obtained as a double copy of (2, 0) conformal supermultiplet whose interacting theories are non- Lagrangian. It had been suggested that an interacting non-metric (4, 0) supergravity theory might describe the strongly coupled phase of 5d maximal supergravity. In this paper we study the implications of the existence of an interacting non-metric (4, 0) supergravity in 6d. The (4, 0) theory can be truncated to non-metric (1, 0) supergravity coupled to 5,8 and 14 self-dual tensor multiplets that reduce to three of the unified magical supergravity theories in d = 5. This implies that the three infinite families of unified N =2,5d Maxwell-Einstein supergravity theories (MESGTs) plus two sporadic ones must have uplifts to unified non- metric (1, 0) tensor Einstein supergravity theories (TESGT) in d = 6. These theories have non-compact global symmetry groups under which all the self-dual tensor fields including the gravitensor transform irreducibly. Four of these theories are uplifts of the magical arXiv:2009.01374v2 [hep-th] 29 May 2021 supergravity theories whose scalar manifolds are symmetric spaces. The scalar manifolds of the other unified theories are not homogeneous spaces. We also discuss the exceptional field theoretic formulations of non-metric unified (1, 0) tensor-Einstein supergravity theories and conclude with speculations concerning the existence of higher dimensional non-metric supergravity theories that reduce to the (4, 0) theory in d = 6 . Keywords: Supergravity, higher dimensions, conformal symmetry ArXiv ePrint: 2009.01374 Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Review of 5D, = 2 Maxwell-Einstein supergravity theories and their N gaugings 4 2.1 Unified Maxwell-Einstein Supergravity Theories 5 2.2 Unified = 2 Yang-Mills-Einstein supergravity theories in five dimensions 7 N 2.3 = 2 Yang-Mills-Einstein Supergravity Theories coupled to tensor fields 8 N 3 Magical supergravity theories and maximal supergravity 9 4 Magical Poincare supergravity theories in six dimensions 10 5 Superconformal symmetry and non-metric (4,0) supergravity in six di- mensions 12 5.1 On-shell superfields of 6d , (4, 0) supermultiplet of OSp(8∗ 8) in twistorial | formulation and first versus second order formalism 12 5.2 A Review of Exceptional Field Theoretic Formulation of the linearized (4, 0) Supergravity 15 5.3 On the question of existence of interacting N = 8 conformal supergravity theory in d = 4 and (4, 0) conformal supergravity in d = 6 18 6 Truncations of (4, 0) supergravity 19 6.1 (2, 0) supersymmetric truncations 19 6.2 (1, 0) supersymmetric truncations of (4, 0) conformal supergravity 20 6.3 (3, 0) supersymmetric truncation of (4, 0) supergravity 21 7 ExFT formulation of metric and non-metric (1, 0) magical supergravity theories in six dimensions 21 8 Unified non-metric Tensor-Einstein Supergravity theories in d = 6 23 8.1 Dimensional reduction of non-metric (4, 0) and (1, 0) tensor Einstein super- gravity theories 25 8.2 On the general ExFT formulation of unified non-metric tensor-Einstein supergravity theories in six dimensions. 26 9 Conformal path to higher dimensions and non-metric supergravity the- ories 28 A CPT-self-conjugate Supermultiplet of SU(2, 2 8) 30 | – 1 – 1 Introduction Conformal supergravity theories with local Lagrangians based on the conformal superal- gebras SU(2, 2 N) have long been known to exist for N 4. It was generally believed | ≤ that one could not go beyond N = 4 without having higher spins (> 2). In [1] it was shown that the fields of maximal N = 8 supergravity of Cremmer and Julia [2] can be fitted into an ultra short CPT-self-conjugate unitary supermultiplet of N = 8 supercon- formal algebra SU(2, 2 8) referred to as the doubleton supermultiplet. The corresponding | ultra short supermultiplet of SU(2, 2 4) is the Yang-Mills supermultiplet in d = 4 [3]. | The N = 4 Yang-Mills theory of doubleton supermultiplets of SU(2, 2 4) is conformally | invariant both classically and quantum mechanically. This led the authors of [1] to pose the question whether a conformal supergravity theory based on the doubleton supermul- tiplet of SU(2, 2 8) exists which is closely related to the maximal N = 8 supergravity | theory of Cremmer, Julia and Scherk. Since the latter theory is not conformally invariant any superconformal theory based on the doubleton supermultiplet of SU(2, 2 8) must be | unconventional or exotic. The superalgebra SU(2, 2 8) was used to classify the counterterms in maximal su- | pergravity in [4]. Furthermore, it is known that amplitudes of maximal supergravity are SU(8) covariant even though the Lagrangian does not have SU(8) symmetry. This and above mentioned results provided part of the motivation for the work of Chiodaroli, Roiban and the current author [5] who studied the connection between maximal supergravity and superconformal symmetry in all dimensions that admit simple superconformal algebras as classified by Nahm [6]. They showed that the six dimensional counterpart of the double- ton supermultiplet of SU(2, 2 8) is the (4, 0) supermultiplet of the superconformal algebra | OSp(8∗ 8) with the even subalgebra SO∗(8) USp(8), where USp(8) is the R-symmetry | ⊕ group, which reduces to the CPT-self-conjugate doubleton supermultiplet of SU(2, 2 8) | under dimensional reduction. They also showed that the (4, 0) theory can be obtained as a double copy of the (2, 0) theory based on the CPT-self-conjugate doubleton supermultiplet of OSp(8∗ 4)1. The (2, 0) supermultiplet first appeared in the work of [8] who constructed | the entire Kaluza-Klein spectrum of 11-dimensional supergravity over AdS S4 by sim- 7 × ple tensoring of the (2, 0) doubleton supermultiplet. In the mid 1990s interacting (2, 0) supersymmetric theories in 6d were investigated within the framework of M/Superstring theory [9–12]. In particular, Seiberg pointed out the existence of four infinite series of new quantum theories with super-Poincare symmetry in six dimensions, which are not local quantum field theories[12]. Later an interacting (2, 0) superconformal theory was proposed by Maldacena as being dual to M-theory on AdS S4 [13]. 7 × The (4, 0) supermultiplet was studied earlier by Hull using the formalism of double gravitons whose equivalence to the (4, 0) supermultiplet obtained using the twistorial os- cillators was shown in [5]. Hull argued that an interacting (4, 0) theory in d = 6 might arise as the effective theory of the strongly coupled phase of five dimensional maximal 1Double copy construction of the (4, 0) theory in terms of the (2, 0) theory was later reformulated by showing that it can be obtained as the square of (2, 0) Abelian theory by using an involutive field-theoretic product at the linearized level[7]. – 2 – supergravity when one of the dimensions decompactifies[14–16]. On the other hand the interacting (2, 0) theory in six dimensions is believed to describe the strong coupling limit of 5d maximal super Yang-Mills theory. Since the maximal supergravity can be obtained as double copy of maximal super Yang-Mills theory in 5d these two proposals are consistent with the result that (4, 0) theory can also be obtained as double copy of (2, 0) theory in 6d [5, 7]. More recently, the action for the free (4, 0) theory was written down by Henneaux, Lekeu and Leonard using the formalism of prepotentials in [17] based on their earlier work on (2,2) mixed chiral tensor describing the graviton [18]. The most unorthodox property of the (4, 0) doubleton supermultiplet of OSp(8∗ 8) is the fact that the field strength of | the graviton does not arise from a metric and hence the corresponding theory in 6d is sometimes referred to as non-metric , exotic or generalized supergravity. However under dimensional reduction it reduces to the standard maximal supergravity in five and four dimensions. Independently of the work on maximal supergravity, five dimensional N = 2 super- gravity theories coupled to vector multiplets (MESGT) were constructed in [19–21] and their gaugings were studied in [22–27]. Among these MESGTs four are very special in the sense that they are unified theories with symmetric scalar manifolds G/H such that G is a symmetry of the Lagrangian. They were called magical supergravity theories since their symmetry groups in five , four and three dimensions coincide with the symmetry groups of the famous Magic Square of Freudenthal, Rosenfeld and Tits [19]. Later it was shown that there exist three infinite families of unified MESGTs and two isolated ones [28]. Three of the magical supergravities belong to the three infinite families. The scalar manifolds of unified MESGTs outside the magical ones are not homogeneous. One infinite family of unified MESGTs can be gauged to obtain an infinite family of unified Yang-Mills Einstein supergravity theories in d = 5 with the gauge group SU(N, 1) [28].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • David Olive: His Life and Work
    David Olive his life and work Edward Corrigan Department of Mathematics, University of York, YO10 5DD, UK Peter Goddard Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA St John's College, Cambridge, CB2 1TP, UK Abstract David Olive, who died in Barton, Cambridgeshire, on 7 November 2012, aged 75, was a theoretical physicist who made seminal contributions to the development of string theory and to our understanding of the structure of quantum field theory. In early work on S-matrix theory, he helped to provide the conceptual framework within which string theory was initially formulated. His work, with Gliozzi and Scherk, on supersymmetry in string theory made possible the whole idea of superstrings, now understood as the natural framework for string theory. Olive's pioneering insights about the duality between electric and magnetic objects in gauge theories were way ahead of their time; it took two decades before his bold and courageous duality conjectures began to be understood. Although somewhat quiet and reserved, he took delight in the company of others, generously sharing his emerging understanding of new ideas with students and colleagues. He was widely influential, not only through the depth and vision of his original work, but also because the clarity, simplicity and elegance of his expositions of new and difficult ideas and theories provided routes into emerging areas of research, both for students and for the theoretical physics community more generally. arXiv:2009.05849v1 [physics.hist-ph] 12 Sep 2020 [A version of section I Biography is to be published in the Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society.] I Biography Childhood David Olive was born on 16 April, 1937, somewhat prematurely, in a nursing home in Staines, near the family home in Scotts Avenue, Sunbury-on-Thames, Surrey.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENTIFIC REPORT for the YEAR 1999 ESI, Boltzmanngasse 9, A-1090 Wien, Austria
    The Erwin Schr¨odinger International Boltzmanngasse 9 ESI Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Wien, Austria Scientific Report for the Year 1999 Vienna, ESI-Report 1999 March 1, 2000 Supported by Federal Ministry of Science and Transport, Austria ESI–Report 1999 ERWIN SCHRODINGER¨ INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, SCIENTIFIC REPORT FOR THE YEAR 1999 ESI, Boltzmanngasse 9, A-1090 Wien, Austria March 1, 2000 Honorary President: Walter Thirring, Tel. +43-1-3172047-15. President: Jakob Yngvason: +43-1-31367-3406. [email protected] Director: Peter W. Michor: +43-1-3172047-16. [email protected] Director: Klaus Schmidt: +43-1-3172047-14. [email protected] Administration: Ulrike Fischer, Doris Garscha, Ursula Sagmeister. Computer group: Andreas Cap, Gerald Teschl, Hermann Schichl. International Scientific Advisory board: Jean-Pierre Bourguignon (IHES), Giovanni Gallavotti (Roma), Krzysztof Gawedzki (IHES), Vaughan F.R. Jones (Berkeley), Viktor Kac (MIT), Elliott Lieb (Princeton), Harald Grosse (Vienna), Harald Niederreiter (Vienna), ESI preprints are available via ‘anonymous ftp’ or ‘gopher’: FTP.ESI.AC.AT and via the URL: http://www.esi.ac.at. Table of contents Statement on Austria’s current political situation . 2 General remarks . 2 Winter School in Geometry and Physics . 2 ESI - Workshop Geometrical Aspects of Spectral Theory . 3 PROGRAMS IN 1999 . 4 Functional Analysis . 4 Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics . 7 Holonomy Groups in Differential Geometry . 9 Complex Analysis . 10 Applications of Integrability . 11 Continuation of programs from 1998 and earlier . 12 Guests via Director’s shares . 13 List of Preprints . 14 List of seminars and colloquia outside of conferences . 25 List of all visitors in the year 1999 .
    [Show full text]
  • Science for Peace and Development Today and Tomorrow NEWS Round Table Conversation with Edward Witten
    World Premier International Research Center Initiative 世界トップレベル研究拠点プログラム Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe カブリ数物連携宇宙研究機構 Todai Institutes for Advanced Study The University of Tokyo 東京大学国際高等研究所 Feature Science for Peace and Development Today and Tomorrow NEWS Round Table Conversation with Edward Witten No. 28 December 2014 Kavli IPMU NEWS CONTENTS English Japanese 3 Director’s Corner Hitoshi Murayama 37 Director’s Corner 村山 斉 Hitoshi Murayama at Work 近況 4 Feature 38 Feature Science for Peace and Development Today and Tomorrow 平和と発展のための科学: 今日と明日 Hitoshi Murayama 村山 斉 7 Our Team Richard Calland 41 Our Team リチャード・カランド Edmond Cheung エドモンド・チャン William Donovan ウィリアム・ドノバン Dongmin Gang 姜 東泯 Dulip Piyaratne ドュリップ・ピヤラトナ Naonori Sugiyama 杉山 尚徳 Michihisa Takeuchi 竹内 道久 10 Round Table Talk 44 Round Table Talk Conversation with Edward Witten エドワード・ウィッテン博士に聞く 27 Workshop Report 60 Workshop Report Mini-Workshop: Towards Quantum Primitive Form Theory Mini-Workshop: 量子原始形式理論に向けて Kyoji Saito 斎藤 恭司 Workshop on CLASS and MontePython CLASS とMontePythonに関するワークショップ Eiichiro Komatsu 小松 英一郎 Kavli IPMU‒RIKEN iTHES‒Osaka TSRP Symposium Kavli IPMU-RIKEN iTHES-Osaka TSRP Symposium “Frontiers of Theoretical Science‒MATTER, LIFE and COSMOS‒” Frontiers of Theoretical Science‒MATTER, LIFE and COSMOS‒ Tsukasa Tada 多田 司 The 24th Workshop on General Relativity and The 24th Workshop on General Relativity and Gravitation in Japan (JGRG24) Gravitation in Japan (JGRG24) Tomohiro Fujita, Shinji Mukohyama, 齋藤 亮、難波 亮、 Ryo Namba, Rio Saitou 藤田 智弘、向山
    [Show full text]
  • A Journey Between Two Curves*
    Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications SIGMA 3 (2007), 043, 9 pages A Journey Between Two Curves? 1 2 Sergey A. CHERKIS † † 1 † School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland E-mail: [email protected] 2 † Hamilton Mathematics Institute, TCD, Dublin, Ireland Received October 31, 2006, in final form February 25, 2007; Published online March 11, 2007 Original article is available at http://www.emis.de/journals/SIGMA/2007/043/ Abstract. A typical solution of an integrable system is described in terms of a holomorphic curve and a line bundle over it. The curve provides the action variables while the time evolution is a linear flow on the curve’s Jacobian. Even though the system of Nahm equa- tions is closely related to the Hitchin system, the curves appearing in these two cases have very different nature. The former can be described in terms of some classical scattering problem while the latter provides a solution to some Seiberg–Witten gauge theory. This note identifies the setup in which one can formulate the question of relating the two curves. Key words: Hitchin system; Nahm equations; monopoles; Seiberg–Witten theory 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 53C28; 53C80; 70H06; 81T30 1 Introduction The Nahm Equations [1] and the Hitchin Equations [2, 3] are two integrable systems of equations that play increasingly important role in string theory and gauge theory literature. Solutions of Seiberg–Witten gauge theories in four [4, 5] and in three dimensions [6], dynamics of a five brane on a holomorphic curve [7, 8], D-brane dynamics [9, 10], aspects of the Generalized Geometry [12], physics version of Langlands duality [13], domain walls [14], topological Yang– Mills and nonlinear Schr¨odinger [15], to name a few, can be described in their terms.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010: Science Matters!!!
    2010: Science matters!!! http://www.nauka2010.com/elpart/nauka2010/science/signed.php Signatories 1. Pavel Wiegmann, University of Chicago; 2. Professor Paolo Furlan, Department of Physics of the University of Trieste; 3. Giuseppe Mussardo, Professor of Theoretical Physics, SISSA, Trieste (Italy); 4. Clisthenis P. Constantinidis, Física, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brasil; 5. Zlatan Tsvetanov, Research Prof., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; 6. Jean-Bernard ZUBER, Pr, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France; 7. Luiz Agostinho Ferreira (Full Professor), Instituto de Fisica de Sao Carlos, IFSC/USP, Brazil; 8. Sylvain Ribault, Universite Montpellier 2, France; 9. Baseilhac Pascal, PhD, LMPT Tours - CNRS; 10. Francesco Sardelli, University of Tours (FRANCE); 11. Professor Nathan Berkovits, IFT-UNESP, Sao Paulo; 12. Richard Kerner, Professor of Physics, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France; 13. Cosmas Zachos, Argonne National Laboratory; 14. almut beige, dr, university of leeds, uk; 15. S.L. Woronowicz, Professor, University of Warsaw; 16. Angel Ballesteros, Dr., Universidad de Burgos, Spain; 17. Loic Villain, PhD, LMPT (Univ. Tours, France); 18. Roberto Longo, Center for Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Rome; 19. Stefan Theisen, Professor, Max-Planck-Institut Albert-Einstein-Institut; 20. Alex Kehagias, National Technical University of Athens; 21. Patrick Moylan, Associate Professor of Physics, The Pennsylvania State University; 22. Van Proeyen, Antoine, professor, K.U. Leuven, Belgium; 23. Prof. Dr. Alejandro Frank, Director, Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, UNAM; 24. Victor Kac, Professor of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1 of 297 6/8/2018, 6:20 PM 2010: Science matters!!! http://www.nauka2010.com/elpart/nauka2010/science/signed.php 25.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITДT BONN Physikalisches Institut
    DE06FC864 UNIVERSITÄT BONN Physikalisches Institut Conformal Field Theory Between Supersymmetry and Indecomposable Structures von Holger Eberle Post address: BONN-IR-200&-08 Nussallee 12 Bonn University 53115 Bonn July 2006 Germany ISSN-0172-8741 UNIVERSITÄT BONN Physikalisches Institut Conformal Field Theory Between Supersymmetry and Indecomposable Structures von Holger Eberle Dieser Forschungsbericht wurde als Dissertation von der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaft- lichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn angenommen. Diese Dissertation ist auf dem Hochschulschriftenserver der Universitäts- und Lan- desbibliothek Bonn http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/dissjonline elektronisch publiziert. 1. Referent: Prof. Dr. Werner Nahm 2. Referent: Prof. Dr. Hans-Peter Nilles Tag der Promotion: 12. Juli 2006 Erscheinungsjahr: 2006 Abstract This thesis considers conformal field theory in its supersymmetric extension as well as in its relaxation to logarithmic conformal field theory. Compactification of superstring theory on four-dimensional complex manifolds obey- ing the Calabi-Yau conditions yields the moduli space of N — (4,4) sup er conformal field theories with central charge c = 6 which consists of two continuously connected subspaces. This thesis is concerned with the subspace of K3 compactifications which is not well known yet. In particular, we inspect the intersection point of the Z2 and Z4 orbifold subvarieties within the K3 moduli space, explicitly identify the two corre- sponding points on the subvarieties geometrically, and give an explicit isomorphism of the three conformal field theory models located at that point, a specific Z2 and a Z4 orbifold model as well as the Gepner model (2)4. We also prove the orthogonality of the two subvarieties at the intersection point.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies Research Report 2007
    AnnualAnnual Report Report 2008 2008 Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies DUBLIN INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES RESEARCH REPORT 2007 DUBLIN INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDIES RESEARCH REPORT 2007 DUBLIN INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED ResearchResearch Report Report 2007 2007 DublinDublin Institute Institute for Advanced for Advanced Studies Studies 10 Burlington10 Burlington Road, Road, Dublin Dublin 4. 4. www.dias.iewww.dias.ie 01 01 Contents School of Celtic Studies 1 Research Work 1.1 Taighde/Research 7 1.2 Tionscnamh Leabhar Breac/Leabhar Breac Project 8 1.3 Meamram Paipéar Ríomhaire/Irish Script on Screen (ISOS) 8 1.4 Tionscnamh Bibleagrafaiochta/Bibliography Project 8 1.5 Eagarthóireacht/Editing 8 1.6 Foilsitheoireacht/Publishing 8 1.7 Díolachán leabhar/Sale of books 9 1.8 Foilseacháin/Publications 9 1.9 Leabharlann/Library 9 1.10 Imeachtaí/Events 10 1.11 Léachtaí (foireann agus scoláirí)/Lectures (staff and scholars) 11 1.12 Cúrsaí in ollscoileanna Éireannacha/Courses in Irish universities 12 1.13 Scrúdaitheoireacht sheachtarach,srl./External examining etc. 12 1.14 Na meáin chumarsáide agus aithne phoiblí/Media and public awareness 12 1.15 Coistí seachtracha/Outside committees 12 1.16 Bord Rialúcháin Scoil an Léinn Cheiltigh/Governing Board of the School of Celtic Studies 12 1.17 Cuairteoirí agus Comhaltaí/Visitors and Associates 13 School of Cosmic Physics - Astronomy and Astrophysics 1 Highlights 14 2 Staff 14 3 Research Reports 14 3.1 Interstellar Dust and Near-Infrared spectroscopy 14 3.1.1 Shells in elliptical galaxies 14 3.1.2 Interstellar medium of the Milky Way 15 3.1.3 Integral Field Spectroscopy of Galaxies 15 3.2 High energy processes in Binary Systems 15 3.2.1 On the origin of TeV radiation in LS 5039 15 3.2.2 Modeling the interaction of relativistic and nonrelativistic winds in the binary system 15 PSR 1259-63/SS2883.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eleven Dimensional Supergravity Equations, Resolutions And
    The eleven dimensional supergravity equations, resolutions and Lefschetz fiber metrics by Xuwen Zhu B.S., Peking University (2010) Submitted to the Department of Mathematics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2015 c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2015. All rights reserved. ○ Author................................................................ Department of Mathematics Apr 5, 2015 Certified by. Richard B. Melrose Simons Professor of Mathematics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . William Minicozzi Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Studies 2 The eleven dimensional supergravity equations, resolutions and Lefschetz fiber metrics by Xuwen Zhu Submitted to the Department of Mathematics on Apr 5, 2015, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mathematics Abstract This thesis consists of three parts. In the first part, we study the eleven dimensional supergravity equations on B7 S4 considered as an edge manifold. We compute the indicial roots of the linearized× system using the Hodge decomposition, and using the edge calculus and scattering theory we prove that the moduli space of solutions, near the Freund–Rubin states, is parameterized by three pairs of data on the bounding 6-sphere. In the second part, we consider the family of constant curvature fiber metrics for a Lefschetz fibration with regular fibers of genus greater than one. A result ofObitsu and Wolpert is refined by showing that on an appropriate resolution of the total space, constructed by iterated blow-up, this family is log-smooth, i.e. polyhomogeneous with integral powers but possible multiplicities, at the preimage of the singular fibers in terms of parameters of size comparable to the length of the shrinking geodesic.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamical Supersymmetry Enhancement of Black Hole Horizons Arxiv:1910.01080V3 [Hep-Th] 27 Mar 2020
    Dynamical supersymmetry enhancement of black hole horizons Usman Kayani A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy arXiv:1910.01080v3 [hep-th] 27 Mar 2020 Supervised by: Dr. Jan Gutowski Department of Mathematics King's College London, UK November 2018 Abstract This thesis is devoted to the study of dynamical symmetry enhancement of black hole horizons in string theory. In particular, we consider supersymmetric horizons in the low energy limit of string theory known as supergravity and we prove the horizon conjecture for a number of supergravity theories. We first give important examples of symmetry enhancement in D = 4 and the mathematical preliminaries required for the analysis. Type IIA supergravity is the low energy limit of D = 10 IIA string theory, but also the dimensional reduction of D = 11 supergravity which itself the low energy limit of M-theory. We prove that Killing horizons in IIA supergravity with compact spatial sections preserve an even number of supersymmetries. By analyzing the global properties of the Killing spinors, we prove that the near-horizon geometries undergo a supersymmetry enhancement. This follows from a set of generalized Lichnerowicz-type theorems we establish, together with an index theory argument. We also show that the symmetry algebra of horizons with non-trivial fluxes includes an sl(2; R) subalgebra. As an intermediate step in the proof, we also demonstrate new Lichnerowicz type theorems for spin bundle connections whose holonomy is contained in a general linear group. We prove the same result for Roman's Massive IIA supergravity. We also consider the near-horizon geometry of supersymmetric extremal black holes in un-gauged and gauged 5-dimensional supergravity, coupled to abelian vector multiplets.
    [Show full text]
  • Supergravity & Generalised Geometry
    Supergravity & Generalised Geometry Nicholas Houston 24th September 2010 Submitted for partial fulfilment of the degree of Master of Science Theoretical Physics Department Imperial College London Declaration I hereby declare that this thesis is entirely my own work, and has not been sub- mitted, either in the same or different form, to this or any other university. Nicholas Houston ....................................................................................... i Contents Declaration i 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Historical perspective . 1 1.1.1 The first superstring revolution . 3 1.1.2 The second superstring revolution . 3 1.2 Supermotivations . 3 1.2.1 Supergravity as an effective field theory . 4 1.2.2 AdS/CFT . 4 1.2.3 Phenomenology . 4 1.3 Overview . 5 2 Supersymmetry 6 2.1 A little background . 7 2.2 Motivations . 7 2.3 The Poincar´egroup . 8 2.4 The SuperPoincar´egroup . 9 2.4.1 Supersymmetry representations . 10 2.4.2 N = 1 Supermultiplets . 10 2.5 Extended supersymmetry . 11 2.5.1 N = 2 Supermultiplets . 11 2.6 N > 2 Supersymmetries . 12 ii 2.7 Supersymmetry transformations . 12 3 Supergravity I 14 3.1 Local supersymmetry . 15 3.2 Vielbeins . 16 3.3 Type II supergravity . 17 3.3.1 Field equations . 19 3.3.2 SUSY variations . 19 3.4 Fundamental strings . 20 3.5 NS 5 branes . 21 4 Generalised Geometry 23 4.0.1 Conventions . 24 4.1 Generalised Tangent Spaces . 24 4.1.1 Inner product & Flat metric . 25 4.1.2 SO(D; D) action . 26 4.2 The Courant Bracket . 26 4.2.1 Diffeomorphism Invariance .
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Tagungsbericht 16/1999 Mathematical Aspects of String Theory
    Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach Tagungsbericht 16/1999 Mathematical Aspects of String Theory 18.–24.04.1999 Introduction The conference was organised by David R. Morrison (Duke University, Durham) and by Werner Nahm (Physikalisches Institut der Universit¨at Bonn). String theory is the field of mathematical physics which has created by far the most in- tense interactions between mathematicians and theoretical physicists in the past years. It contains a perturbative domain which is described by two–dimensional superconformal quantum field theories and mathematically well defined. Non–perturbative string theory (M–theory) has made much progress in recent years and promises new insights, but it is not yet well understood from any point of view. Perturbative string theories have a moduli space with many rational points (this may generalise to the non–perturbative domain). Their classification is very far from being complete, but makes steady progress. The understanding of theories with continuous parameters, most importantly of the sigma models on Calabi–Yau manifolds, is rapidly gaining in maturity, such that decisive break–throughs seem possible in the near future. Non–perturbative string theory involves solitonic objects (branes) of higher dimension. Since strings can end on them, the study of boundary states in perturbative string theory has become important. Further interesting new results concern the breaking of supersym- metry. A major tool in non–perturbative string theory is the study of its low mass states, which yield conventional quantum field theories. The conjectured dualities of some of them have been put into a firm mathematical context by Seiberg and Witten. One expects these dualities to lift to all states of the string theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Atiyah: Geometry and Physics
    Michael Atiyah: Geometry and Physics Nigel Hitchin Mathematical Institute, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG [email protected] December 31, 2020 1 Introduction Over the years, since I was a student, I experienced the many ways in which Michael Atiyah brought mathematics to life by importing new ideas, reformulating them in his own way, communicating them in his inimitable style and using these fresh insights to advance his own research. While in Oxford he would take every opportunity to travel to the USA and listen to what was currently interesting to him, then explain the results with his added contributions at his regular Monday seminar, hoping that some of these themes would be taken up by his audience. He was at heart a geometer, but in the mid 1970s he became convinced that theo- retical physics was by far the most promising source of new ideas. From that point on he became a facilitator of interactions between mathematicians and physicists, attacking mathematical challenges posed by physicists, using physical ideas to prove pure mathematical results, and feeding the physicist community with the parts of modern mathematics he regarded as important but were unfamiliar to them. Here is what he wrote in a retrospective view [24], producing two lists of the historical influences in both directions. It gives an impression of the weighting he applied to areas of the two disciplines. Mathematics ahead of physics: curved space, Lie groups, higher dimensions, fibre bundles, spinors, exterior algebra, non-commutative algebra, Hilbert space, special holonomy. Physics ahead of mathematics: infinite-dimensional representations, Maxwell theory, Dirac theory, supersymmetry, quantum cohomology, conformal field theory, quantum 1 field theory in 3 and 4 dimensions.
    [Show full text]