Effects of Fertilizer Type and Rate on the Quality and Nutrient Content Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Calophyllum Inophyllum L
Calophyllum inophyllum L. Guttiferae poon, beach calophyllum LOCAL NAMES Bengali (sultanachampa,punnang,kathchampa); Burmese (ph’ông,ponnyet); English (oil nut tree,beauty leaf,Borneo mahogany,dilo oil tree,alexandrian laurel); Filipino (bitaog,palo maria); Hindi (surpunka,pinnai,undi,surpan,sultanachampa,polanga); Javanese (njamplung); Malay (bentagor bunga,penaga pudek,pegana laut); Sanskrit (punnaga,nagachampa); Sinhala (domba); Swahili (mtondoo,mtomondo); Tamil (punnai,punnagam,pinnay); Thai (saraphee neen,naowakan,krathing); Trade name (poon,beach calophyllum); Vietnamese (c[aa]y m[uf]u) Calophyllum inophyllum leaves and fruit (Zhou Guangyi) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Calophyllum inophyllum is a medium-sized tree up to 25 m tall, sometimes as large as 35 m, with sticky latex either clear or opaque and white, cream or yellow; bole usually twisted or leaning, up to 150 cm in diameter, without buttresses. Outer bark often with characteristic diamond to boat- shaped fissures becoming confluent with age, smooth, often with a yellowish or ochre tint, inner bark usually thick, soft, firm, fibrous and laminated, pink to red, darkening to brownish on exposure. Crown evenly conical to narrowly hemispherical; twigs 4-angled and rounded, with plump terminal buds 4-9 mm long. Shade tree in park (Rafael T. Cadiz) Leaves elliptical, thick, smooth and polished, ovate, obovate or oblong (min. 5.5) 8-20 (max. 23) cm long, rounded to cuneate at base, rounded, retuse or subacute at apex with latex canals that are usually less prominent; stipules absent. Inflorescence axillary, racemose, usually unbranched but occasionally with 3-flowered branches, 5-15 (max. 30)-flowered. Flowers usually bisexual but sometimes functionally unisexual, sweetly scented, with perianth of 8 (max. -
Calophyllum Inophyllum (Kamani) Clusiaceae (Syn
April 2006 Species Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry ver. 2.1 www.traditionaltree.org Calophyllum inophyllum (kamani) Clusiaceae (syn. Guttiferae) (mangosteen family) Alexandrian laurel, beach mahogany, beauty leaf, poon, oil nut tree (English); beach calophyllum (Papua New Guinea), biyuch (Yap); btaches (Palau); daog, daok (Guam, N. Marianas); dilo (Fiji); eet (Kosrae); feta‘u (Tonga); fetau (Samoa); isou (Pohnpei); kamani, kamanu (Hawai‘i); lueg (Marshalls); rakich (Chuuk); tamanu (Cook Islands, Society Islands, Marquesas); te itai (Kiribati) J. B. Friday and Dana Okano photo: J. B. Friday B. J. photo: Kamani trees are most commonly seen along the shoreline (Hilo, Hawai‘i). IN BRIEF Growth rate May initially grow up to 1 m (3.3 ft) in height Distribution Widely dispersed throughout the tropics, in- per year on good sites, although usually much more slowly. cluding the Hawaiian and other Pacific islands. Main agroforestry uses Mixed-species woodlot, wind- break, homegarden. Size Typically 8–20 m (25–65 ft) tall at maturity. Main products Timber, seed oil. Habitat Strand or low-elevation riverine, 0–200 m (660 ft) Yields No timber yield data available; 100 kg (220 lb) in Hawai‘i, up to 800 m (2000 ft) at the equator; mean an- nuts/tree/yr yielding 5 kg (11 lb) oil. nual temperatures 18–33°C (64–91°F); annual rainfall 1000– Intercropping Casts a heavy shade, so not suitable as an 5000 mm (40–200 in). overstory tree; has been grown successfully in mixed-species Vegetation Occurs on beach and in coastal forests. timber stands. Soils Grows best in sandy, well drained soils. -
Calophyllum Inophyllum Beauty Leaf1 Edward F
Fact Sheet ST-115 November 1993 Calophyllum inophyllum Beauty Leaf1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION This upright, pyramidal, densely foliated evergreen tree can reach 60 feet in height in the forest with a 30 to 40-foot spread, but is generally much smaller because it grows slowly (Fig. 1). This is an asset in tropical landscapes, where many other plants grow so fast. Greenish, showy, 3/4-inch, very fragrant flowers are produced on eight-inch racemes in the summer. The round, yellow, 1.5-inch-wide fruit contains a single seed with a nutlike kernel that may be poisonous. The seven-inch-long, glossy, dark green, stiff, leathery leaves have numerous, distinct parallel veins at right angles to the midrib. The trunk has light grey, shallowly-ridged bark, and the wood is valued for boat building and cabinet work. GENERAL INFORMATION Scientific name: Calophyllum inophyllum Figure 1. Middle-aged Beauty Leaf. Pronunciation: kal-oh-FILL-um EYE-no-fill-um Common name(s): Beauty Leaf where air pollution, poor drainage, compacted soil, Family: Clusiaceae and/or drought are common USDA hardiness zones: 10B through 11 (Fig. 2) Availability: grown in small quantities by a small Origin: not native to North America number of nurseries Uses: container or above-ground planter; espalier; hedge; large parking lot islands (> 200 square feet in DESCRIPTION size); wide tree lawns (>6 feet wide); medium-sized parking lot islands (100-200 square feet in size); Height: 35 to 50 feet medium-sized tree lawns (4-6 feet wide); Spread: 30 to 50 feet recommended for buffer strips around parking lots or Crown uniformity: irregular outline or silhouette for median strip plantings in the highway; near a deck Crown shape: round; pyramidal or patio; reclamation plant; screen; shade tree; Crown density: dense specimen; sidewalk cutout (tree pit); residential street Growth rate: medium tree; tree has been successfully grown in urban areas 1. -
Calophyllum Inophyllum Linn
Calophyllum inophyllum Linn. Scientific classification Kingdom: Plantae Order: Malpighiales Family: Calophyllaceae Genus: Calophyllum Species: C. inophyllum de.wikipedia.org Plant profile Calophyllum inophyllum is a low-branching and slow-growing tree with a broad and irregular crown. It usually reaches 8 to 20 metres (26 to 66 ft) in height. The flower is 25 millimetres (0.98 in) wide and occurs in racemose or paniculate inflorescences consisting of 4 to 15 flowers. Flowering can occur year-round, but usually two distinct flowering periods are observed, in late spring and in late autumn. The fruit (the ballnut) is a round, green drupe reaching 2 to 4 centimetres (0.79 to 1.57 in) in diameter and having a single large seed. When ripe, the fruit is wrinkled and its color varies from yellow to brownish-red. Uses Calophyllum inophyllum is a popular ornamental plant, its wood is hard and strong and has been used in construction or boatbuilding. Traditional Pacific Islanders used Calophyllum wood to construct the keel of their canoes while the boat sides were made from breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) wood. The seeds yield a thick, dark green tamanu oil for medicinal use or hair grease. Active ingredients in the oil are believed to regenerate tissue, so is sought after by cosmetics manufacturers as an ingredient in skin cremes. The nuts should be well dried before cracking, after which the oil-laden kernel should be further dried. The first neoflavone isolated in 1951 from natural sources was calophyllolide from Calophyllum inophyllum seeds. The leaves are also used for skin care in Papua New Guinea, New Caledonia, and Samoa. -
Ancistrocladaceae
Soltis et al—American Journal of Botany 98(4):704-730. 2011. – Data Supplement S2 – page 1 Soltis, Douglas E., Stephen A. Smith, Nico Cellinese, Kenneth J. Wurdack, David C. Tank, Samuel F. Brockington, Nancy F. Refulio-Rodriguez, Jay B. Walker, Michael J. Moore, Barbara S. Carlsward, Charles D. Bell, Maribeth Latvis, Sunny Crawley, Chelsea Black, Diaga Diouf, Zhenxiang Xi, Catherine A. Rushworth, Matthew A. Gitzendanner, Kenneth J. Sytsma, Yin-Long Qiu, Khidir W. Hilu, Charles C. Davis, Michael J. Sanderson, Reed S. Beaman, Richard G. Olmstead, Walter S. Judd, Michael J. Donoghue, and Pamela S. Soltis. Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 genes, 640 taxa. American Journal of Botany 98(4): 704-730. Appendix S2. The maximum likelihood majority-rule consensus from the 17-gene analysis shown as a phylogram with mtDNA included for Polyosma. Names of the orders and families follow APG III (2009); other names follow Cantino et al. (2007). Numbers above branches are bootstrap percentages. 67 Acalypha Spathiostemon 100 Ricinus 97 100 Dalechampia Lasiocroton 100 100 Conceveiba Homalanthus 96 Hura Euphorbia 88 Pimelodendron 100 Trigonostemon Euphorbiaceae Codiaeum (incl. Peraceae) 100 Croton Hevea Manihot 10083 Moultonianthus Suregada 98 81 Tetrorchidium Omphalea 100 Endospermum Neoscortechinia 100 98 Pera Clutia Pogonophora 99 Cespedesia Sauvagesia 99 Luxemburgia Ochna Ochnaceae 100 100 53 Quiina Touroulia Medusagyne Caryocar Caryocaraceae 100 Chrysobalanus 100 Atuna Chrysobalananaceae 100 100 Licania Hirtella 100 Euphronia Euphroniaceae 100 Dichapetalum 100 -
Giant African Snail Cooperative Eradication Program
United States Department of Agriculture Giant African Snail Marketing and Regulatory Cooperative Programs Animal and Eradication Program Plant Health Inspection Service Miami-Dade County, Florida Environmental Assessment, October 2011 Giant African Snail Cooperative Eradication Program Environmental Assessment October 2011 Agency Contact: Andrea Simao USDA–APHIS–PPQ Emergency and Domestic Programs 4700 River Road, Unit 26 Riverdale, MD 20737 __________________________________________________________ The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’S TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. __________________________________________________________ Mention of companies or commercial products in this report does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of any product -
Woody and Herbaceous Plants Native to Haiti for Use in Miami-Dade Landscapes1
Woody and Herbaceous Plants Native to Haiti For use in Miami-Dade Landscapes1 Haiti occupies the western one third of the island of Hispaniola with the Dominican Republic the remainder. Of all the islands within the Caribbean basin Hispaniola possesses the most varied flora after that of Cuba. The plants contained in this review have been recorded as native to Haiti, though some may now have been extirpated due in large part to severe deforestation. Less than 1.5% of the country’s original tree-cover remains. Haiti’s future is critically tied to re- forestation; loss of tree cover has been so profound that exotic fast growing trees, rather than native species, are being used to halt soil erosion and lessen the risk of mudslides. For more information concerning Haiti’s ecological plight consult references at the end of this document. For present purposes all of the trees listed below are native to Haiti, which is why non-natives such as mango (the most widely planted tree) and other important trees such as citrus, kassod tree (Senna siamea) and lead tree (Leucanea leucocephala) are not included. The latter two trees are among the fast growing species used for re-forestation. The Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History’s Flora of the West Indies was an invaluable tool in assessing the range of plants native to Haiti. Not surprisingly many of the listed trees and shrubs 1 John McLaughlin Ph.D. U.F./Miami-Dade County Extension Office, Homestead, FL 33030 Page | 1 are found in other parts of the Caribbean with some also native to South Florida. -
A Short Review on Calophyllum Inophyllum and Thespesia Populnea
Available online on www.ijppr.com International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research 2016; 8(12); 2056-2062 ISSN: 0975-4873 Review Article Medicinal Plants of Sandy Shores: A Short Review on Calophyllum inophyllum and Thespesia populnea Mami Kainuma1, Shigeyuki Baba1, Hung Tuck Chan1, Tomomi Inoue2, Joseph Tangah3, Eric Wei Chiang Chan4* 1Secretariat, International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems, c/o Faculty of Agriculture, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0129, Japan 2Centre for Environmental Biology and Ecosystem Studies, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Onogawa, Tsukuba 305-0053, Japan 3Forest Research Centre, Sabah Forestry Department, Sandakan 90009, Sabah, Malaysia 4Faculty of Applied Sciences, UCSI University, Cheras 56000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Available Online: 15th December, 2016 ABSTRACT The phytochemistry and pharmacology of two common tree species of sandy shores, namely, Calophyllum inophyllum and Thespesia populnea have been selected for review. There was global interest in C. inophyllum after its leaves were reported to possess anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) properties. Since then, extensive research has been conducted on Calophyllum species. Endowed with prenylated xanthones, pyranocoumarins and friedelane triterpenoids, C. inophyllum possesses anti-HIV and anticancer properties. Other pharmacological properties include anti-inflammatory, analgesic, anti- dyslipidemic and wound healing activities. Phytochemical constituents of T. populnea include sesquiterpene quinones, sesquiterpenoids and flavonoids. Many studies have been conducted on the pharmacological properties of T. populnea with major activities of analgesic, anti-inflammatory, anti-diabetic and anti-hyperglycaemic reported in the bark, leaf, fruit and seed. Anticancer properties are reported in the wood. Representing the flora of sandy shores, both C. inophyllum and T. populnea have promising and exciting medicinal potentials. -
Systematics of the Thai Calophyllaceae and Hypericaceae with Comments on the Kielmeyeroidae (Clusiaceae)
THAI FOREST BULL., BOT. 46(2): 162–216. 2018. DOI https://doi.org/10.20531/tfb.2018.46.2.08 Systematics of the Thai Calophyllaceae and Hypericaceae with comments on the Kielmeyeroidae (Clusiaceae) CAROLINE BYRNE1, JOHN ADRIAN NAICKER PARNELL1,2,* & KONGKANDA CHAYAMARIT3 ABSTRACT The Calophyllaceae and Hypericaceae are revised for Thailand and their relationships to the Clusiaceae and Guttiferae are briefly discussed. Thirty-two species are definitively recognised in six genera, namely: Calophyllum L., Kayea Wall., Mammea L. and Mesua L. in the Calophyllaceae and Cratoxylum Blume. and Hypericum L. in the Hypericaceae. A further four species of Calophyllum are tentatively noted as likely to occur in Thailand. Descriptions, full synonyms relevant to the Thai taxa, distribution maps, ecology, phenology, vernacular names, specimens examined and provisional keys are given. All species previously classified in the genus Mesua have been moved to the genus Kayea, except Mesua ferrea L. Two taxa were found to be endemic to Thailand: Mammea harmandii (Pierre) Kosterm. and Hypericum siamense N.Robson. The distribution for the families in Thailand was found to vary with the Thai Calophyllaceae being found mainly in Central and Peninsular Thailand whilst the Thai Hypericaceae were found mainly in the North and the North-East of Thailand. Overall the numbers of collections housed in herbaria are few and more collections are necessary in order to give a comprehensive account of their distributions in Thailand. KEYWORDS: Guttiferae, Flora of Thailand. Published online: 24 December 2018 INTRODUCTION from herbarium notes or directly from dried material. Ecological information was taken from specimens, The present work forms the basis of an account from field observations and from the literature. -
Systematics and Biogeography of the Clusioid Clade (Malpighiales) Brad R
Eastern Kentucky University Encompass Biological Sciences Faculty and Staff Research Biological Sciences January 2011 Systematics and Biogeography of the Clusioid Clade (Malpighiales) Brad R. Ruhfel Eastern Kentucky University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://encompass.eku.edu/bio_fsresearch Part of the Plant Biology Commons Recommended Citation Ruhfel, Brad R., "Systematics and Biogeography of the Clusioid Clade (Malpighiales)" (2011). Biological Sciences Faculty and Staff Research. Paper 3. http://encompass.eku.edu/bio_fsresearch/3 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at Encompass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biological Sciences Faculty and Staff Research by an authorized administrator of Encompass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HARVARD UNIVERSITY Graduate School of Arts and Sciences DISSERTATION ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE The undersigned, appointed by the Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology have examined a dissertation entitled Systematics and biogeography of the clusioid clade (Malpighiales) presented by Brad R. Ruhfel candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy and hereby certify that it is worthy of acceptance. Signature Typed name: Prof. Charles C. Davis Signature ( ^^^M^ *-^£<& Typed name: Profy^ndrew I^4*ooll Signature / / l^'^ i •*" Typed name: Signature Typed name Signature ^ft/V ^VC^L • Typed name: Prof. Peter Sfe^cnS* Date: 29 April 2011 Systematics and biogeography of the clusioid clade (Malpighiales) A dissertation presented by Brad R. Ruhfel to The Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Biology Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2011 UMI Number: 3462126 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. -
Flora of Singapore Precursors, 17: Clarification of Some Names in the Genus Calophyllum As Known in Singapore
Gardens' Bulletin Singapore 71 (2): 407–414. 2019 407 doi: 10.26492/gbs71(2).2019-08 Flora of Singapore precursors, 17: Clarification of some names in the genus Calophyllum as known in Singapore W.W. Seah1, S.M.X. Hung2 & K.Y. Chong2 1Singapore Botanic Gardens, National Parks Board, 1 Cluny Road, 259569 Singapore [email protected] 2Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, 117543 Singapore ABSTRACT. The species, Calophyllum soulattri, is found to have been wrongly included in Singapore’s native flora. The nameCalophyllum wallichianum var. wallichianum is also found to have been misapplied to a taxon in Singapore and should rather be called Calophyllum rufigemmatum. The nomenclatural history and problems of both taxa are discussed in this paper. Keywords. Calophyllaceae, C. rufigemmatum, C. wallichianum, Clusiaceae, nomenclature, taxonomy Introduction The genus Calophyllum L. had long been included in the family Clusiaceae Lindl. (alternate name: Guttiferae Juss.) until recent molecular phylogenetic studies showed that it was necessary to transfer it, along with several other genera (e.g. Kayea Wall., Mammea L. and Mesua L.) from the Clusiaceae subfamily Kielmeyeroideae, to the reinstated family Calophyllaceae J.Agardh (APG III, 2009; Wurdack & Davis, 2009). The genus was last revised by Stevens (1980) for the Old World, including the Indo- Malesian region, where it is mainly distributed. It now comprises about 190 recognised species worldwide (Stevens, 2001 onwards; Ramesh et al., 2012). In his revision of the genus, Stevens (1980) reported 17 taxa—including an unnamed species—for Singapore. Following his account, several authors (Keng, 1990; Turner, 1993; Chong et al., 2009) enumerated the species of the genus and recorded different numbers of taxa for Singapore (Table 1). -
Branch Xylem Density Variations Across the Amazon Basin
Biogeosciences, 6, 545–568, 2009 www.biogeosciences.net/6/545/2009/ Biogeosciences © Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Branch xylem density variations across the Amazon Basin S. Patino˜ 1,2,*, J. Lloyd2, R. Paiva3,**, T. R. Baker2,*, C. A. Quesada2,3, L. M. Mercado4,*, J. Schmerler5,*, † M. Schwarz5,*, A. J. B. Santos6, , A. Aguilar1, C. I.Czimczik7,*, J. Gallo8, V. Horna9,*, E. J. Hoyos10, E. M. Jimenez1, W. Palomino11, J. Peacock2, A. Pena-Cruz˜ 12, C. Sarmiento13, A. Sota5,*, J. D. Turriago8, B. Villanueva8, P. Vitzthum1, E. Alvarez14, L. Arroyo15, C. Baraloto13, D. Bonal13, J. Chave16, A. C. L. Costa17, R. Herrera*, N. Higuchi3, T. Killeen18, E. Leal19, F. Luizao˜ 3, P. Meir20, A. Monteagudo11,12, D. Neil21, P. Nu´nez-Vargas˜ 11, M. C. Penuela˜ 1, N. Pitman22, N. Priante Filho23, A. Prieto24, S. N. Panfil25, A. Rudas26, R. Salomao˜ 19, N.Silva27,28, M. Silveira29, S. Soares deAlmeida19, A. Torres-Lezama30, R. Vasquez-Mart´ ´ınez11, I. Vieira19, Y. Malhi31, and O. L. Phillips2,*** 1Grupo de Ecolog´ıa de Ecosistemas Terrestres Tropicales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Amazonia, Instituto Amazonico´ de Investigaciones-Imani, km. 2, v´ıa Tarapaca,´ Leticia, Amazonas, Colombia 2Earth and Biosphere Institute, School of Geography, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, England, UK 3Institito National de Pesquisas Amazonicas,ˆ Manaus, Brazil 4Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, England, UK 5Fieldwork Assistance, Postfach 101022, 07710 Jena, Germany 6Departamento de Ecologia,