Comparisons of Cotton Boll Injury Caused by Four Species of Boll-Feeding Insects (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae and Miridae) James P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparisons of Cotton Boll Injury Caused by Four Species of Boll-Feeding Insects (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae and Miridae) James P The Journal of Cotton Science 24:27–33 (2020) 27 http://journal.cotton.org, © The Cotton Foundation 2020 ARTHROPOD MANAGEMENT AND APPLIED ECOLOGY Comparisons of Cotton Boll Injury Caused by Four Species of Boll-Feeding Insects (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae and Miridae) James P. Glover* and Michael J. Brewer ABSTRACT grandis Boheman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), have substantially decreased the use of broad-spectrum Field experiments with individually caged nonselective pesticides (Allen et al., 2009). As a result, cotton bolls were conducted in 2013 and 2014 stink bugs (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and plant bugs to characterize boll injury from a species com- (Hemiptera: Miridae) have been released from indirect plex of boll-feeding insects represented by the control and their pest status has increased (Glover et verde plant bug, Creontiades signatus (Distant) al., 2019; Lu ., al 2010). Stink bugs and plant bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae); redbanded stink bug, have become recognized as major pests in cotton Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood); brown stink during the last two decades (Greene et al., 2001) in bug, Euschistus servus (Say); and green stink bug, the southern U.S. (Luttrell et al., 2015) and elsewhere Chinavia hilaris (Say) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). (Lu et al., 2010; Soria et al., 2017). Field-collected adult bugs were used individually The sucking-insect complex that feeds on cotton to infest single cotton bolls of several ages (0-7 bolls in South Texas is composed of three stink bugs days post-anthesis) previously maintained free [green stink bug, Chinavia hilaris (Say); brown stink of insect injury. Individual cotton bolls were bug, Euschistus servus (Say); and redbanded stink infested at mid-bloom for seven days with one bug, Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood) (Hemiptera: bug per boll for each species, and an uninfested Pentatomidae)] and one mirid species [verde plant control was included. Species and boll age varied bug, Creontiades signatus (Distant) (Hemiptera: across years, allowing selective within-year com- Miridae)]. These boll-feeding stink bugs also occur parisons. Response to feeding resulted in reduced at other locations in the southern U.S. (Greene et boll retention, increased boll injury in the form of al., 2001; Suh et al., 2013). Injury from the green reduced lint, and increased frequency of boll rot. stink bug and brown stink bug cause decreased boll Results showed that verde plant bugs readily fed retention, lint loss, and seed loss (Greene et al., 2001). on comparatively less mature bolls and feeding Yield loss can be further magnified when bacteria decreased boll retention. In contrast, stink bugs or fungi that cause boll rot are introduced during fed on larger bolls and caused significant injury. probing and feeding activity from stink bugs and Variation in boll retention, boll injury, cotton the verde plant bug (Glover et al., 2019; Medrano boll rot, and yield were associated primarily with et al., 2015). The ability to breach the carpel wall is species differences and secondarily with boll age associated with mouthpart morphology (Esquivel, from 0 to 7 days old. Boll injury was apparent 2019; Esquivel and Hinze, 2019; Esquivel et al., across species and subsequent yield reduction 2019) and possibly other factors, such as boll wall attributed to insect feeding was detected for all thickness (Esquivel and Hinze, 2019). Variablity species, except the redbanded stink bug. associated with boll rot disease transmission is less studied, limited primarily to the southern green stink he advent and widespread adoption of transgenic bug, Nezara viridula (L.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), TBt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton, Gossypium and the brown stink bug (Medrano et al., 2009, 2016). hirsutum L. (Malvaceae: Malvales), and area-wide Soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merr. (Fabales: Faba- eradication of the boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis ceae), grown along the Texas Gulf Coast harbor the redbanded stink bug (Vyavhare et al., 2014), which can move into developing cotton as soybean pods begin to senesce (Bundy and McPherson, 2000). J.P. Glover* and M.J. Brewer, Department of Entomology, Historically, the southern green stink bug, green stink Texas A&M AgriLife Research & Extension Center, 10345 State Hwy 44, Corpus Christi, TX 78406. bug, and brown stink bug are known to be economic *Corresponding author: [email protected] pests of cotton (McPherson and McPherson, 2000). GLOVER AND BREWER: COTTON BOLL INSECT INJURY COMPARISONS 28 The verde plant bug is a significant cotton pest in adults with all appendages were used for infesting South Texas. Armstrong et al. (2013) demonstrated the caged cotton bolls. that the verde plant bug readily injured bolls < 12 The experiment was conducted in 2013 and 2014 d old from the first day of bloom (white flower), at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension whereas older bolls incurred little or no injury in a Center farm at Corpus Christi, TX. PHY 367 WRF no-choice test. When given a choice of varied-age (PhytoGen Cottonseed, Dow AgroSciences, India- squares and bolls on a branch, Brewer et al. (2012a) napolis, IN) cottonseed was planted in early May on found that older squares and young bolls were pre- 91-m length rows and 96-cm row centers at a field site ferred, which decreased boll retention and increased of ≈0.4 ha, resulting in a plant stand of ≈77,800 plants subsequent yield decline. Verde plant bug was also per ha (31,500 plants per acre). Cotton plots were associated with cotton boll rot (Brewer et al., 2012b; grown without irrigation in 2013 when 235 mm of Glover et al., 2020). A related species, Creontiades rainfall occurred from 15 April to 1 August (National distant (Stal) (Hemiptera: Miridae), also has been Weather Service, 2019). Supplemental irrigation was shown to injure pre-bloom and early-bloom cotton provided by a drip system in 2014 (drought year) to in Australia (Khan et al., 2006). attain a total of 241 mm of water inputs from 15 April Glover et al. (2019) compared several species to 1 August (Glover et al., 2019). Thiamethoxam in- of stink bugs and the verde plant bug to generate secticide (Centric 40WG, Syngenta Crop Protection, economic injury levels using whole-plant caging Greensboro, NC) was applied at labelled rates every experiments. They found severity of boll injury and 10 d to maintain plots free of pests before and after yield decline was greater when cotton was infested at infestation. Thiamethoxam application was discontin- mid-bloom compared with late-bloom. Differences ued 14 d prior to infesting with experimental insects, in injury and yield decline were observed among and applications resumed at the conclusion of the in- insect species, but these differences were less ap- festation period. Cages were thoroughly examined for parent. The objectives of this study were to compare any remaining live experimental insects and removed boll retention, boll injury, boll rot, and yield decline when found. Other agronomic practices were normal as a result of feeding activity by the green stink bug, for the region (Morgan, 2018). brown stink bug, redbanded stink bug, and verde Insect Infestation and Experimental Design. plant bug on individual bolls varying in age. Individual insects were released into individually caged cotton bolls for a 1-wk period to characterize MATERIALS AND METHODS the effects of insect species and boll age on boll re- tention, cotton boll injury, cotton boll rot, and yield. Insect Collection and Cotton Management. Treatments were comprised of a species (including Adult insects used for infesting caged, single cotton a no-insect control) by boll age factorial. In 2013, bolls were collected from wild and cultivated host available species included verde plant bug, red- plants, including cotton, sorghum, Sorghum bicolor banded stink bug, brown stink bug, and green stink (L.) Moench (Cyperales: Poaceae), soybean, and bug; boll ages were 0- and 3-d post-anthesis. In 2014, several seepweeds, Suaeda spp. (Caryophyllales:C species available included verde plant bug, brown henopodiaceae). Insects were collected using a KISS stink bug, and green stink bug; boll ages were 3-, (keep it simple) sampler (Beerwinkle et al., 1997); 5-, and 7-d-old post-anthesis. In 2014, the boll age the sampler is a modified leaf blower that aspirates range was modified to eliminate the 0-d interval and insects from vegetation and transfers them into an increase the age ranges based on first year data that inflatable sock that fits on the opposite end of the showed a large amount of boll abscission for 0-d-old blower’s fanned nozzle. Verde plant bugs were col- bolls. Treatment combinations of species and boll lected from a mixture of cotton, seepweeds, and ages were replicated 12 times in 2013 and 14 times grain sorghum from milk through hard dough stages. in 2014; replications were set out in randomized All stink bug species were collected from cotton blocks in uniform cotton planting. and various pod-filling stages of soybean. Follow- Prior to experimental infestation, the bolls were ing collection, all insects were held individually in enclosed as white blooms within small organza plastic portion cups (model S-20778, Uline, Pleasant fabric cages (12 by 13 cm, ~240 µ mesh, JoAnn’s Prairie, WI) for a 24-h fasting period. Individuals that Fabrics, Hudson, OH) that protected them from feed- survived the fasting period were inspected and only ing by any naturally occurring insects (Armstrong JOURNAL OF COTTON SCIENCE, Volume 24, Issue 1, 2020 29 et al., 2005). At this time, the cotton was in the damaged locule count (Brewer et al., 2013; Glover second week of bloom and was characterized as 10 et al., 2019). Next, the boll interior was thoroughly to 12 nodes above white flower (Kerby et al., 2010). inspected for symptoms of cotton boll rot (Medrano Four days before each infestation, plants were hand et al., 2009).
Recommended publications
  • Biology of Cochlochila Bullita Stal As Potential Pest of Orthosiphon Aristatus (Blume) Miq
    UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA BIOLOGY OF COCHLOCHILA BULLITA STAL AS POTENTIAL PEST OF ORTHOSIPHON ARISTATUS (BLUME) MIQ. IN MALAYSIA UPM TAN LI PENG COPYRIGHT © FH 2014 2 BIOLOGY OF Cochlochila bullita (STÅL) (HEMIPTERA: TINGIDAE), A POTENTIAL PEST OF Orthosiphon aristatus (BLUME) MIQ. (LAMIALES: LAMIACEAE) IN MALAYSIA UPM By TAN LI PENG Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, in Fulfilment to the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2014 COPYRIGHT © COPYRIGHT All material contained within the thesis, including without limitation text, logos, icons, photographs and all other artwork, is copyright material of Universiti Putra Malaysia unless otherwise stated. Use may be made of any material contained within the thesis for non-commercial purposes from the copyright holder. Commercial use of material may only be made with the express, prior, written permission of Universiti Putra Malaysia. Copyright © Universiti Putra Malaysia UPM COPYRIGHT © Abstract of thesis presented to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy BIOLOGY OF Cochlochila bullita (STÅL) (HEMIPTERA: TINGIDAE), A POTENTIAL PEST OF Orthosiphon aristatus (BLUME) MIQ. (LAMIALES: LAMIACEAE) IN MALAYSIA By TAN LI PENG July 2014 Chairman: Prof. Ahmad Said Sajap, PhD UPM Faculty: Forestry Cochlochila bullita (Stål) is an importance pest in some Asia countries such as India, Kanpur and Thailand attacking plants form the genus Ocimum, herein its common name, ocimum tingid. Cochlochila bullita is first recorded in Malaysia in the year 2009, attacking one of the important medicinal herbs in this country, the Orthosiphon aristatus (Blume) Miq. Biology of this pest was studied to get a deeper understanding of this bug associated with O.
    [Show full text]
  • (Heteroptera: Miridae) Feeding on Cotton Bolls'
    Actual and Simulated Injury of Creonfiades s/gnaws (Heteroptera: Miridae) Feeding on Cotton Bolls' J. Scott Armstrong, 2 Randy J. Coleman and Brian L. Duggan3 USDA, ARS, Beneficial insect Research Unit, Weslaco, Texas 78596 USA J. Entomol. Sci. 45(2): 170-177 (April 2010) Abstract The actual feeding injury of Creontiades signatus Distant (Heteroptera: Miridae) was compared with a simulated technique during 2005, 2006 and 2008 by injecting varying dilutions of pectinase into cotton boils at different boll sizes (ages) and into 2 or 4 locules to determine if such a technique could be used to reduce the time and labor involved with conducting economic injury level studies in the field. The most accurate simulation occurred in 2008 by injecting I ItL of 10% pecti- nase into all 4 locules of a cotton boll. This improved the relationships of injury score to seed cotton, seed, and lint weights. The youngest boll age class of > 2 cm diam. (2 d of, age) was not significantly (8 more damaged than the medium age !! 2.5 cm d of age) boils, and both sustained significantly more injury than the large boll classification of ^! 3 cm (12 d of age) However, small boils were at least 3 times more likely to abscise than medium-sized boils, and large boils did not abscise regard- less of treatment. Some damage was observed for large boils from the ' injected and actual feeding compared with the controls, but the lint and seed weights were not significantly different for any of the treatments including the controls. Our study characterizes the feeding injury caused by C.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 2008 Contents Page IPM Principles
    E-7 4-08 Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 2008 Contents Page IPM Principles ................................................................................................. 3 Insecticide Resistance Management ............................................................. 3 Biological Control ............................................................................................. 3 Bt Transgenic Cotton ....................................................................................... 4 Crop Management ............................................................................................ 4 Short-season Production .................................................................................... 4 Full-season Production ...................................................................................... 5 Monitoring Cotton Growth and Fruiting Rate .................................................... 5 Early Stalk Destruction and Field Clean-up ....................................................... 6 Stalk Destruction Laws ..................................................................................... 6 Management Decisions ................................................................................... 7 Scouting Decisions ........................................................................................... 7 Early-season Pests ........................................................................................... 8 Silverleaf Whitefly ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heteroptera, Miridae), Ravageur Du Manguier `Ala R´Eunion Morguen Atiama
    Bio´ecologie et diversit´eg´en´etiqued'Orthops palus (Heteroptera, Miridae), ravageur du manguier `aLa R´eunion Morguen Atiama To cite this version: Morguen Atiama. Bio´ecologieet diversit´eg´en´etique d'Orthops palus (Heteroptera, Miridae), ravageur du manguier `aLa R´eunion.Zoologie des invert´ebr´es.Universit´ede la R´eunion,2016. Fran¸cais. <NNT : 2016LARE0007>. <tel-01391431> HAL Id: tel-01391431 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01391431 Submitted on 3 Nov 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. UNIVERSITÉ DE LA RÉUNION Faculté des Sciences et Technologies Ecole Doctorale Sciences, Technologies et Santé (E.D.S.T.S-542) THÈSE Présentée à l’Université de La Réunion pour obtenir le DIPLÔME DE DOCTORAT Discipline : Biologie des populations et écologie UMR Peuplements Végétaux et Bioagresseurs en Milieu Tropical CIRAD - Université de La Réunion Bioécologie et diversité génétique d'Orthops palus (Heteroptera, Miridae), ravageur du manguier à La Réunion par Morguen ATIAMA Soutenue publiquement le 31 mars 2016 à l'IUT de Saint-Pierre, devant le jury composé de : Bernard REYNAUD, Professeur, PVBMT, Université de La Réunion Président Anne-Marie CORTESERO, Professeur, IGEPP, Université de Rennes 1 Rapportrice Alain RATNADASS, Chercheur, HORTSYS, CIRAD Rapporteur Karen McCOY, Directrice de recherche, MiVEGEC, IRD Examinatrice Encadrement de thèse Jean-Philippe DEGUINE, Chercheur, PVBMT, CIRAD Directeur "Je n'ai pas d'obligation plus pressante que celle d'être passionnement curieux" Albert Einstein "To remain indifferent to the challenges we face is indefensible.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology September 20-22, 2018 Rome, Italy
    2nd Global Conference on Plant Science and Molecular Biology September 20-22, 2018 Rome, Italy Theme: Accentuate Innovations and Emerging Novel Research in Plant Sciences Holiday Inn Rome Aurelia Via Aurelia, Km 8.400, 00165 Rome, Italy @Plant_GPMB GPMB 2018 BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 2nd Global Conference on PLANT SCIENCE AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Theme: Accentuate Innovations and Emerging Novel Research in Plant Sciences September 20-22, 2018 Rome, Italy INDEX Contents Pages Welcome Message 11 Keynote Speakers 15 About the Host 16 Keynote Sessions (Day 1) 17 Speaker Sessions (Day 1) 23 Keynote Sessions (Day 2) 41 Workshop 45 Speaker Sessions (Day 2) 47 Poster Presentations 65 Keynote Sessions (Day 3) 135 Speaker Sessions (Day 3) 139 GPMB 2018 Adel Saleh Hussein Al-Abed Adriana Bastias Adriana Lima Moro Adriano Stinca Ahmed Z. Abdel Azeiz National Center for Agricul- Universidad Autonoma de UNOESTE University of Campania Luigi College of Biotechnology, tural Research and Extension Chile, Chile Brazil Vanvitelli Misr University for Science Jordan Italy and Technology, Egypt Aiming Wang Ali M. Missaoui Ananda Virginia de Aguiar Andrej Pavlovic Antanas Sarkinas Agriculture and Agri-Food The University of Georgia Embrapa Florestas Palacky University Kaunas University of Canada, Canada USA Brazil Czech Republic Technology, Lithuania Avihai Ilan Bastian Kolkmeyer Beata Gabrys Beitzen-Heineke Wilhelm Berger Monique Private consultant KWS Saat SE University of Zielona Gora BIOCARE GmbH EI Purpan, Universite de Israel Germany Poland Germany Toulouse, France
    [Show full text]
  • National Program 304 – Crop Protection and Quarantine
    APPENDIX 1 National Program 304 – Crop Protection and Quarantine ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT 2007 – 2012 Current Research Projects in National Program 304* SYSTEMATICS 1245-22000-262-00D SYSTEMATICS OF FLIES OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPORTANCE; Allen Norrbom (P), Sonja Jean Scheffer, and Norman E. Woodley; Beltsville, Maryland. 1245-22000-263-00D SYSTEMATICS OF BEETLES IMPORTANT TO AGRICULTURE, LANDSCAPE PLANTS, AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; Steven W. Lingafelter (P), Alexander Konstantinov, and Natalie Vandenberg; Washington, D.C. 1245-22000-264-00D SYSTEMATICS OF LEPIDOPTERA: INVASIVE SPECIES, PESTS, AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS; John W. Brown (P), Maria A. Solis, and Michael G. Pogue; Washington, D.C. 1245-22000-265-00D SYSTEMATICS OF PARASITIC AND HERBIVOROUS WASPS OF AGRICULTURAL IMPORTANCE; Robert R. Kula (P), Matthew Buffington, and Michael W. Gates; Washington, D.C. 1245-22000-266-00D MITE SYSTEMATICS AND ARTHROPOD DIAGNOSTICS WITH EMPHASIS ON INVASIVE SPECIES; Ronald Ochoa (P); Washington, D.C. 1245-22000-267-00D SYSTEMATICS OF HEMIPTERA AND RELATED GROUPS: PLANT PESTS, PREDATORS, AND DISEASE VECTORS; Thomas J. Henry (P), Stuart H. McKamey, and Gary L. Miller; Washington, D.C. INSECTS 0101-88888-040-00D OFFICE OF PEST MANAGEMENT; Sheryl Kunickis (P); Washington, D.C. 0212-22000-024-00D DISCOVERY, BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF NATURAL ENEMIES OF INSECT PESTS OF CROP AND URBAN AND NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS; Livy H. Williams III (P) and Kim Hoelmer; Montpellier, France. * Because of the nature of their research, many NP 304 projects contribute to multiple Problem Statements, so for the sake of clarity they have been grouped by focus area. For the sake of consistency, projects are listed and organized in Appendix 1 and 2 according to the ARS project number used to track projects in the Agency’s internal database.
    [Show full text]
  • Background and General Information 2
    United States Department of National Program 304: Agriculture Agricultural Crop Protection and Research Service Quarantine National Program Staff August 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background and General Information 2 Component I: Identification and Classification of Insects and Mites 5 Component II: Biology of Pests and Natural Enemies (Including Microbes) 8 Component III: Plant, Pest, and Natural Enemy Interactions and Ecology 17 Component IV: Postharvest, Pest Exclusion, and Quarantine Treatment 24 Component V: Pest Control Technologies 30 Component VI: Integrated Pest Management Systems and Areawide Suppression 41 Component VII: Weed Biology and Ecology 48 Component VIII: Chemical Control of Weeds 53 Component IX: Biological Control of Weeds 56 Component X: Weed Management Systems 64 APPENDIXES – Appendix 1: ARS National Program Assessment 70 Appendix 2: Documentation of NP 304 Accomplishments 73 NP 304 Accomplishment Report, 2001-2006 Page 2 BACKGROUND AND GENERAL INFORMATION THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE The Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the intramural research agency for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and is one of four agencies that make up the Research, Education, and Economics mission area of the Department. ARS research comprises 21 National Programs and is conducted at 108 laboratories spread throughout the United States and overseas by over 2,200 full-time scientists within a total workforce of 8,000 ARS employees. The research in National Program 304, Crop Protection and Quarantine, is organized into 140 projects, conducted by 236 full-time scientists at 41 geographic locations. At $102.8 million, the fiscal year (FY) 2007 net research budget for National Program 304 represents almost 10 percent of ARS’s total FY 2007 net research budget of $1.12 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Genbank to Female Eclosion at 9 Days
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 02 June 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.670383 Gut Bacterial Diversity in Different Life Cycle Stages of Adelphocoris suturalis (Hemiptera: Miridae) Hui Xue 1,2, Xiangzhen Zhu 1,2, Li Wang 1,2, Kaixin Zhang 1,2, Dongyang Li 1,2, Jichao Ji 1,2, Lin Niu 1,2, Changcai Wu 1,2, Xueke Gao 1,2*, Junyu Luo 1,2* and Jinjie Cui 1,2* 1 State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, China, 2 Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China Bacteria and insects have a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship. Bacteria participate in several physiological processes such as reproduction, metabolism, and detoxification Edited by: Adly M. M. Abdalla, of the host. Adelphocoris suturalis is considered a pest by the agricultural industry and International Atomic Energy Agency, is now a major pest in cotton, posing a serious threat to agricultural production. As with Vienna, Austria many insects, various microbes live inside A. suturalis. However, the microbial composition Reviewed by: Mohammad Mehrabadi, and diversity of its life cycle have not been well-studied. To identify the species and Tarbiat Modares University, Iran community structure of symbiotic bacteria in A. suturalis, we used the HiSeq platform to Monica Rosenblueth, perform high-throughput sequencing of the V3–V4 region in the 16S rRNA of symbiotic National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico bacteria found in A. suturalis throughout its life stages. Our results demonstrated that *Correspondence: younger nymphs (1st and 2nd instar nymphs) have higher species richness.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 2009 Contents Page IPM Principles
    E-7 7-09 Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 2009 Contents Page IPM Principles ................................................................................................. 3 Insecticide Resistance Management ............................................................. 3 Biological Control ............................................................................................. 3 Bt Transgenic Cotton ....................................................................................... 4 Crop Management ............................................................................................ 4 Short-season Production .................................................................................... 4 Full-season Production ...................................................................................... 5 Monitoring Cotton Growth and Fruiting Rate .................................................... 5 Early Stalk Destruction and Field Clean-up ....................................................... 6 Stalk Destruction Laws ..................................................................................... 6 Management Decisions ................................................................................... 7 Scouting Decisions ........................................................................................... 7 Early-season Pests ........................................................................................... 8 Silverleaf Whitefly ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Common Name Proposal
    ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 10001 Derekwood Lane, Suite 100, Lanham, MD 20706-4876 Phone: (301) 731-4535 • Fax: (301) 731-4538 E-mail: [email protected] • http://www.entsoc.org Proposal Form for new Common Name or Change of ESA-Approved Common Name Complete this form and send or e-mail to the above address. Submissions will not be considered unless this form is filled out completely. The proposer is expected to be familiar with the rules, recommendations, and procedures outlined in the “Use and Submission of Common Names” on the ESA website and with the discussion by A.B. Gurney, 1953, Journal of Economic Entomology 46:207-211. 1. Proposed new common name: verde plant bug 2. Previously approved common name (if any): None 3. Scientific name (genus, species, author): Creontiades signatus Distant Order: Hemiptera Family: Miridae Supporting Information 4. Reasons supporting the need for the proposed common name: This insect has been recognized as a pest of cotton in the southern parts of Texas and in the northern Mexico inland from areas associated with the Gulf Coast cotton growing regions. Extension and refereed publications would benefit from having a common name for lay people to identify with. The insect was initially, and erroneously, thought to be Creontiades dilutus (Stål) with the common name “green mirid”. The green mirid is the number one plant bug pest of Australian cotton. However, molecular and taxanomic work have recently identified the mirid as a native species C. signatus Distant (Coleman et al 2008). Giving C. signatus a common name would help differentiate it from the Australian plant bug and help reduce any confusion of the two cotton pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Oviposition Patterns of Creontiades Signatus (Hemiptera: Miridae) on Okra-Leaf and Normal-Leaf Cotton
    ECOLOGY AND POPULATION BIOLOGY Oviposition Patterns of Creontiades signatus (Hemiptera: Miridae) on Okra-Leaf and Normal-Leaf Cotton 1,2 1 3 J. SCOTT ARMSTRONG, RANDY J. COLEMAN, AND MAMOUDOU SE´ TAMOU Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 102(2): 196Ð200 (2009) ABSTRACT We investigated the oviposition behavior of Creontiades signatus Distant (Hemiptera: Miridae), a relatively new plant bug pest of south Texas cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., on okra-leaf and normal-leaf genotypes that differed signiÞcantly in their leaf morphology and trichome densities. In a no-choice study, the site preference and numbers of eggs oviposited by C. signatus were identical for the okra-leaf and normal-leaf. In a free-choice test, C. signatus showed a signiÞcant preference for the normal-leaf by ovipositing 3 times the number of eggs than on okra-leaf, but the site locations and percentages of egg distributions were similar for the two cotton types. The leaf petiole was the most preferred site for oviposition, followed by the main stem, and fruiting structures (squares and small bolls). The majority of eggs were oviposited in the leaf petioles associated with the mid-portion (nodes 4Ð8) of the plant. Trichome densities on the leaf petioles, main stem, and leaf veins were similar for node 3, but they were signiÞcantly higher on these structures for nodes 5 and 8 for the okra-leaf compared with the normal-leaf. The strong selection of oviposition sites in the normal-leaf cotton in this study may be due to some factor other than trichome density. This information should increase the knowledge for scouting for the presence of eggs and young nymphs and serve as a starting point for the selection of nonpreferred cotton varieties for oviposition by this mirid.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Growth Stage-Specific Injury and Economic Injury Level for Verde
    FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS Plant Growth Stage-Specific Injury and Economic Injury Level for Verde Plant Bug, Creontiades signatus (Hemiptera: Miridae), on Cotton: Effect of Bloom Period of Infestation 1,2 1 3 MICHAEL J. BREWER, DARWIN J. ANDERSON, AND J. SCOTT ARMSTRONG J. Econ. Entomol. 106(5): 2077Ð2083 (2013); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EC13248 ABSTRACT Verde plant bugs, Creontiades signatus Distant (Hemiptera: Miridae), were released onto caged cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., for a 1-wk period to characterize the effects of insect density and bloom period of infestation on cotton injury and yield in 2011 and 2012, Corpus Christi, TX. When plants were infested during early bloom (10Ð11 nodes above Þrst white ßower), a linear decline in fruit retention and boll load and a linear increase in boll injury were detected as verde plant bug infestation levels increased from an average of 0.5 to 4 bugs per plant. Lint and seed yield per plant showed a corresponding decline. Fruit retention, boll load, and yield were not affected on plants infested 1 wk later at peak bloom (8Ð9 nodes above Þrst white ßower), even though boll injury increased as infestation levels increased. Second-year testing veriÞed boll injury but not yield loss, when infestations occurred at peak bloom. Incidence of cotton boll rot, known to be associated with verde plant bug feeding, was low to modest (Ͻ1% [2012] to 12% [2011] of bolls with disease symptoms), and drought stress persisted throughout the study. Caging effect was minimal: a 10% fruit retention decline was associated with caging, and the effect was not detectable in the other mea- surements.
    [Show full text]