DOCSLIB.ORG

Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 2008 Contents Page IPM Principles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 2008 Contents Page IPM Principles E-7 4-08 Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 2008 Contents Page IPM Principles ................................................................................................. 3 Insecticide Resistance Management ............................................................. 3 Biological Control ............................................................................................. 3 Bt Transgenic Cotton ....................................................................................... 4 Crop Management ............................................................................................ 4 Short-season Production .................................................................................... 4 Full-season Production ...................................................................................... 5 Monitoring Cotton Growth and Fruiting Rate .................................................... 5 Early Stalk Destruction and Field Clean-up ....................................................... 6 Stalk Destruction Laws ..................................................................................... 6 Management Decisions ................................................................................... 7 Scouting Decisions ........................................................................................... 7 Early-season Pests ........................................................................................... 8 Silverleaf Whitefly ............................................................................................ 8 Cotton Fleahopper ............................................................................................ 8 Overwintered Boll Weevil ................................................................................. 8 Mid-season and Late-season Pests ................................................................ 9 Silverleaf Whitefly .................................................................................................. 9 Boll Weevil ............................................................................................................10 Bollworm and Tobacco Budworm ....................................................................10 Plant Bugs (Creontiades spp.) ............................................................................11 Occasional Pests ..............................................................................................11 Aphids .............................................................................................................11 Beet Armyworms .............................................................................................12 Cabbage Looper ...............................................................................................12 Cutworms ........................................................................................................12 Saltmarsh Caterpillar .......................................................................................12 Thrips..............................................................................................................13 Spider Mites ....................................................................................................13 Fall Armyworms ..............................................................................................13 Ovicides .............................................................................................................14 Microbial Insecticides ....................................................................................14 Protecting Bees from Insecticides ................................................................15 Policy Statement for Making Pest Management Suggestions .................15 Endangered Species Regulations ..................................................................15 Worker Protection Standard ..........................................................................15 Additional References ....................................................................................16 For recommended insecticides refer to E-7A, "Suggested Insecticides for Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 2008": http://insects.tamu.edu/extension/publications/index.cfm or http://AgriLifebookstore.org Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley D. L Kerns and M. G. Cattaneo* A committee of state and federal research person- Insecticide Resistance Management nel and Extension specialists meets annually to review cotton integrated pest management (IPM) research and Experience has shown that reliance on a single class management guidelines. These guidelines are directed of insecticides that act in the same way may cause pests toward maximizing profits for the Texas cotton produc- to develop resistance to the entire group of insecticides. er by optimizing inputs and production. To delay resistance, it is strongly recommended that growers use IPM principles and integrate other control methods into insect or mite control programs. One strat- IPM Principles egy to help avoid pest resistance is to rotate the use of insecticide groups, taking advantage of different modes The term “integrated pest management” (IPM) ap- of action. In addition, do not tank-mix products from plies to a philosophy used in the design of insect, mite, the same insecticide class. Such insecticide management disease and weed pest control programs. It encourages practices should delay the development of resistance the use of the most compatible and ecologically sound and also provide better overall insect control. combination of available pest suppression techniques. These management techniques include cultural control, Insecticides with similar chemical structures af- such as manipulation of planting dates and stalk de- fect insects in similar ways. For example, pyrethroids struction; crop management practices, such as variety (including esfenvalerate, bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, cyhalot- selection and timing of irrigation; biological control, hrin, deltamethrin, zeta-cypermethrin and tralomethrin) involving conservation of existing natural enemies; host all act on an insect’s nervous system in the same way. plant resistance; and the wise use of selective insecti- Other types of insecticides — organophosphates (methyl cides and rates to keep pest populations below econom- parathion, dicrotophos) or carbamates (thiodicarb) — ically damaging levels. also affect the insect’s nervous system, but in a differ- ent way than do the pyrethroids. Major factors to be considered when using insec- ticides include protecting natural enemies of cotton The Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) pests, possible resurgence of primary pests, increased has developed a mode of action classification system numbers of secondary pests following applications and that is based on a numbering system (see http://www. pest resistance to insecticides. Therefore, insecticides irac-online.org/). This system makes it simpler for pro- should be applied at the proper rates and used only ducers and consultants to determine different modes when necessary, as determined by frequent field in- of action among the insecticides. Insecticides with spections, to prevent economic losses from pests. the same number (e.g., 1) are considered to have the same mode of action. Producers should rotate among The IPM concept rests on the assumption that pests different numbers where appropriate to delay resis- will be present to some degree in a production system, tance. The objective of successful insecticide resistance and that at some levels they may not cause significant management is to delay the selection of resistance to losses in production. The first line of defense against insecticides. The IRAC numbering system is used in the pests is prevention through the use of good agronomic "Suggested Insecticides for Cotton Management" publi- practices or cultural methods which are unfavorable for cations to assist producers with their choices. the development of pest problems (discussed below). Properly selected control measures should be taken only when pest populations reach levels at which crop Biological Control damage suffered could result in losses greater than the cost of the treatment. This potentially injurious pest Insect and mite infestations are often held below population or plant damage level, determined through damaging levels by weather, inadequate food sources and natural enemies such as disease, predators and regular field scouting activities, is called aneconomic parasites. It is important to recognize the impact of threshold or action threshold. Precise timing and execution of each production operation is essential. In these natural control factors and, where possible, en- short, pest management strives to optimize rather than courage their action. (See E-357, "Field Guide to Preda- maximize pest control efforts. tors, Parasites and Pathogens Attacking Insect and Mite Pests of Cotton," Texas AgriLife Extension Service.) Biological control is the use of predators, parasites and *Extension Entomologist, Extension Agent—IPM , respectively, Texas AgriLife Extension Service, The Texas A&M System. disease to control pests. Important natural enemies in 3 cotton include minute pirate bugs, damsel bugs, big- Bt Transgenic Cotton eyed bugs, assassin bugs, lady beetles, lacewing larvae, syrphid fly larvae, spiders, ground beetles and a variety Bt cottons are insect-resistant cultivars and one of of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biology of Cochlochila Bullita Stal As Potential Pest of Orthosiphon Aristatus (Blume) Miq
    UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA BIOLOGY OF COCHLOCHILA BULLITA STAL AS POTENTIAL PEST OF ORTHOSIPHON ARISTATUS (BLUME) MIQ. IN MALAYSIA UPM TAN LI PENG COPYRIGHT © FH 2014 2 BIOLOGY OF Cochlochila bullita (STÅL) (HEMIPTERA: TINGIDAE), A POTENTIAL PEST OF Orthosiphon aristatus (BLUME) MIQ. (LAMIALES: LAMIACEAE) IN MALAYSIA UPM By TAN LI PENG Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, in Fulfilment to the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2014 COPYRIGHT © COPYRIGHT All material contained within the thesis, including without limitation text, logos, icons, photographs and all other artwork, is copyright material of Universiti Putra Malaysia unless otherwise stated. Use may be made of any material contained within the thesis for non-commercial purposes from the copyright holder. Commercial use of material may only be made with the express, prior, written permission of Universiti Putra Malaysia. Copyright © Universiti Putra Malaysia UPM COPYRIGHT © Abstract of thesis presented to the Senate of Universiti Putra Malaysia in fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy BIOLOGY OF Cochlochila bullita (STÅL) (HEMIPTERA: TINGIDAE), A POTENTIAL PEST OF Orthosiphon aristatus (BLUME) MIQ. (LAMIALES: LAMIACEAE) IN MALAYSIA By TAN LI PENG July 2014 Chairman: Prof. Ahmad Said Sajap, PhD UPM Faculty: Forestry Cochlochila bullita (Stål) is an importance pest in some Asia countries such as India, Kanpur and Thailand attacking plants form the genus Ocimum, herein its common name, ocimum tingid. Cochlochila bullita is first recorded in Malaysia in the year 2009, attacking one of the important medicinal herbs in this country, the Orthosiphon aristatus (Blume) Miq. Biology of this pest was studied to get a deeper understanding of this bug associated with O.
    [Show full text]
  • (Heteroptera: Miridae) Feeding on Cotton Bolls'
    Actual and Simulated Injury of Creonfiades s/gnaws (Heteroptera: Miridae) Feeding on Cotton Bolls' J. Scott Armstrong, 2 Randy J. Coleman and Brian L. Duggan3 USDA, ARS, Beneficial insect Research Unit, Weslaco, Texas 78596 USA J. Entomol. Sci. 45(2): 170-177 (April 2010) Abstract The actual feeding injury of Creontiades signatus Distant (Heteroptera: Miridae) was compared with a simulated technique during 2005, 2006 and 2008 by injecting varying dilutions of pectinase into cotton boils at different boll sizes (ages) and into 2 or 4 locules to determine if such a technique could be used to reduce the time and labor involved with conducting economic injury level studies in the field. The most accurate simulation occurred in 2008 by injecting I ItL of 10% pecti- nase into all 4 locules of a cotton boll. This improved the relationships of injury score to seed cotton, seed, and lint weights. The youngest boll age class of > 2 cm diam. (2 d of, age) was not significantly (8 more damaged than the medium age !! 2.5 cm d of age) boils, and both sustained significantly more injury than the large boll classification of ^! 3 cm (12 d of age) However, small boils were at least 3 times more likely to abscise than medium-sized boils, and large boils did not abscise regard- less of treatment. Some damage was observed for large boils from the ' injected and actual feeding compared with the controls, but the lint and seed weights were not significantly different for any of the treatments including the controls. Our study characterizes the feeding injury caused by C.
    [Show full text]
  • Heteroptera, Miridae), Ravageur Du Manguier `Ala R´Eunion Morguen Atiama
    Bio´ecologie et diversit´eg´en´etiqued'Orthops palus (Heteroptera, Miridae), ravageur du manguier `aLa R´eunion Morguen Atiama To cite this version: Morguen Atiama. Bio´ecologieet diversit´eg´en´etique d'Orthops palus (Heteroptera, Miridae), ravageur du manguier `aLa R´eunion.Zoologie des invert´ebr´es.Universit´ede la R´eunion,2016. Fran¸cais. <NNT : 2016LARE0007>. <tel-01391431> HAL Id: tel-01391431 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01391431 Submitted on 3 Nov 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L'archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destin´eeau d´ep^otet `ala diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publi´esou non, lished or not. The documents may come from ´emanant des ´etablissements d'enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche fran¸caisou ´etrangers,des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou priv´es. UNIVERSITÉ DE LA RÉUNION Faculté des Sciences et Technologies Ecole Doctorale Sciences, Technologies et Santé (E.D.S.T.S-542) THÈSE Présentée à l’Université de La Réunion pour obtenir le DIPLÔME DE DOCTORAT Discipline : Biologie des populations et écologie UMR Peuplements Végétaux et Bioagresseurs en Milieu Tropical CIRAD - Université de La Réunion Bioécologie et diversité génétique d'Orthops palus (Heteroptera, Miridae), ravageur du manguier à La Réunion par Morguen ATIAMA Soutenue publiquement le 31 mars 2016 à l'IUT de Saint-Pierre, devant le jury composé de : Bernard REYNAUD, Professeur, PVBMT, Université de La Réunion Président Anne-Marie CORTESERO, Professeur, IGEPP, Université de Rennes 1 Rapportrice Alain RATNADASS, Chercheur, HORTSYS, CIRAD Rapporteur Karen McCOY, Directrice de recherche, MiVEGEC, IRD Examinatrice Encadrement de thèse Jean-Philippe DEGUINE, Chercheur, PVBMT, CIRAD Directeur "Je n'ai pas d'obligation plus pressante que celle d'être passionnement curieux" Albert Einstein "To remain indifferent to the challenges we face is indefensible.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology September 20-22, 2018 Rome, Italy
    2nd Global Conference on Plant Science and Molecular Biology September 20-22, 2018 Rome, Italy Theme: Accentuate Innovations and Emerging Novel Research in Plant Sciences Holiday Inn Rome Aurelia Via Aurelia, Km 8.400, 00165 Rome, Italy @Plant_GPMB GPMB 2018 BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 2nd Global Conference on PLANT SCIENCE AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Theme: Accentuate Innovations and Emerging Novel Research in Plant Sciences September 20-22, 2018 Rome, Italy INDEX Contents Pages Welcome Message 11 Keynote Speakers 15 About the Host 16 Keynote Sessions (Day 1) 17 Speaker Sessions (Day 1) 23 Keynote Sessions (Day 2) 41 Workshop 45 Speaker Sessions (Day 2) 47 Poster Presentations 65 Keynote Sessions (Day 3) 135 Speaker Sessions (Day 3) 139 GPMB 2018 Adel Saleh Hussein Al-Abed Adriana Bastias Adriana Lima Moro Adriano Stinca Ahmed Z. Abdel Azeiz National Center for Agricul- Universidad Autonoma de UNOESTE University of Campania Luigi College of Biotechnology, tural Research and Extension Chile, Chile Brazil Vanvitelli Misr University for Science Jordan Italy and Technology, Egypt Aiming Wang Ali M. Missaoui Ananda Virginia de Aguiar Andrej Pavlovic Antanas Sarkinas Agriculture and Agri-Food The University of Georgia Embrapa Florestas Palacky University Kaunas University of Canada, Canada USA Brazil Czech Republic Technology, Lithuania Avihai Ilan Bastian Kolkmeyer Beata Gabrys Beitzen-Heineke Wilhelm Berger Monique Private consultant KWS Saat SE University of Zielona Gora BIOCARE GmbH EI Purpan, Universite de Israel Germany Poland Germany Toulouse, France
    [Show full text]
  • National Program 304 – Crop Protection and Quarantine
    APPENDIX 1 National Program 304 – Crop Protection and Quarantine ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT 2007 – 2012 Current Research Projects in National Program 304* SYSTEMATICS 1245-22000-262-00D SYSTEMATICS OF FLIES OF AGRICULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPORTANCE; Allen Norrbom (P), Sonja Jean Scheffer, and Norman E. Woodley; Beltsville, Maryland. 1245-22000-263-00D SYSTEMATICS OF BEETLES IMPORTANT TO AGRICULTURE, LANDSCAPE PLANTS, AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; Steven W. Lingafelter (P), Alexander Konstantinov, and Natalie Vandenberg; Washington, D.C. 1245-22000-264-00D SYSTEMATICS OF LEPIDOPTERA: INVASIVE SPECIES, PESTS, AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS; John W. Brown (P), Maria A. Solis, and Michael G. Pogue; Washington, D.C. 1245-22000-265-00D SYSTEMATICS OF PARASITIC AND HERBIVOROUS WASPS OF AGRICULTURAL IMPORTANCE; Robert R. Kula (P), Matthew Buffington, and Michael W. Gates; Washington, D.C. 1245-22000-266-00D MITE SYSTEMATICS AND ARTHROPOD DIAGNOSTICS WITH EMPHASIS ON INVASIVE SPECIES; Ronald Ochoa (P); Washington, D.C. 1245-22000-267-00D SYSTEMATICS OF HEMIPTERA AND RELATED GROUPS: PLANT PESTS, PREDATORS, AND DISEASE VECTORS; Thomas J. Henry (P), Stuart H. McKamey, and Gary L. Miller; Washington, D.C. INSECTS 0101-88888-040-00D OFFICE OF PEST MANAGEMENT; Sheryl Kunickis (P); Washington, D.C. 0212-22000-024-00D DISCOVERY, BIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY OF NATURAL ENEMIES OF INSECT PESTS OF CROP AND URBAN AND NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS; Livy H. Williams III (P) and Kim Hoelmer; Montpellier, France. * Because of the nature of their research, many NP 304 projects contribute to multiple Problem Statements, so for the sake of clarity they have been grouped by focus area. For the sake of consistency, projects are listed and organized in Appendix 1 and 2 according to the ARS project number used to track projects in the Agency’s internal database.
    [Show full text]
  • Background and General Information 2
    United States Department of National Program 304: Agriculture Agricultural Crop Protection and Research Service Quarantine National Program Staff August 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background and General Information 2 Component I: Identification and Classification of Insects and Mites 5 Component II: Biology of Pests and Natural Enemies (Including Microbes) 8 Component III: Plant, Pest, and Natural Enemy Interactions and Ecology 17 Component IV: Postharvest, Pest Exclusion, and Quarantine Treatment 24 Component V: Pest Control Technologies 30 Component VI: Integrated Pest Management Systems and Areawide Suppression 41 Component VII: Weed Biology and Ecology 48 Component VIII: Chemical Control of Weeds 53 Component IX: Biological Control of Weeds 56 Component X: Weed Management Systems 64 APPENDIXES – Appendix 1: ARS National Program Assessment 70 Appendix 2: Documentation of NP 304 Accomplishments 73 NP 304 Accomplishment Report, 2001-2006 Page 2 BACKGROUND AND GENERAL INFORMATION THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE The Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the intramural research agency for the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and is one of four agencies that make up the Research, Education, and Economics mission area of the Department. ARS research comprises 21 National Programs and is conducted at 108 laboratories spread throughout the United States and overseas by over 2,200 full-time scientists within a total workforce of 8,000 ARS employees. The research in National Program 304, Crop Protection and Quarantine, is organized into 140 projects, conducted by 236 full-time scientists at 41 geographic locations. At $102.8 million, the fiscal year (FY) 2007 net research budget for National Program 304 represents almost 10 percent of ARS’s total FY 2007 net research budget of $1.12 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Genbank to Female Eclosion at 9 Days
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 02 June 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.670383 Gut Bacterial Diversity in Different Life Cycle Stages of Adelphocoris suturalis (Hemiptera: Miridae) Hui Xue 1,2, Xiangzhen Zhu 1,2, Li Wang 1,2, Kaixin Zhang 1,2, Dongyang Li 1,2, Jichao Ji 1,2, Lin Niu 1,2, Changcai Wu 1,2, Xueke Gao 1,2*, Junyu Luo 1,2* and Jinjie Cui 1,2* 1 State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang, China, 2 Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China Bacteria and insects have a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship. Bacteria participate in several physiological processes such as reproduction, metabolism, and detoxification Edited by: Adly M. M. Abdalla, of the host. Adelphocoris suturalis is considered a pest by the agricultural industry and International Atomic Energy Agency, is now a major pest in cotton, posing a serious threat to agricultural production. As with Vienna, Austria many insects, various microbes live inside A. suturalis. However, the microbial composition Reviewed by: Mohammad Mehrabadi, and diversity of its life cycle have not been well-studied. To identify the species and Tarbiat Modares University, Iran community structure of symbiotic bacteria in A. suturalis, we used the HiSeq platform to Monica Rosenblueth, perform high-throughput sequencing of the V3–V4 region in the 16S rRNA of symbiotic National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico bacteria found in A. suturalis throughout its life stages. Our results demonstrated that *Correspondence: younger nymphs (1st and 2nd instar nymphs) have higher species richness.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 2009 Contents Page IPM Principles
    E-7 7-09 Managing Cotton Insects in the Lower Rio Grande Valley 2009 Contents Page IPM Principles ................................................................................................. 3 Insecticide Resistance Management ............................................................. 3 Biological Control ............................................................................................. 3 Bt Transgenic Cotton ....................................................................................... 4 Crop Management ............................................................................................ 4 Short-season Production .................................................................................... 4 Full-season Production ...................................................................................... 5 Monitoring Cotton Growth and Fruiting Rate .................................................... 5 Early Stalk Destruction and Field Clean-up ....................................................... 6 Stalk Destruction Laws ..................................................................................... 6 Management Decisions ................................................................................... 7 Scouting Decisions ........................................................................................... 7 Early-season Pests ........................................................................................... 8 Silverleaf Whitefly ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Common Name Proposal
    ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 10001 Derekwood Lane, Suite 100, Lanham, MD 20706-4876 Phone: (301) 731-4535 • Fax: (301) 731-4538 E-mail: [email protected] • http://www.entsoc.org Proposal Form for new Common Name or Change of ESA-Approved Common Name Complete this form and send or e-mail to the above address. Submissions will not be considered unless this form is filled out completely. The proposer is expected to be familiar with the rules, recommendations, and procedures outlined in the “Use and Submission of Common Names” on the ESA website and with the discussion by A.B. Gurney, 1953, Journal of Economic Entomology 46:207-211. 1. Proposed new common name: verde plant bug 2. Previously approved common name (if any): None 3. Scientific name (genus, species, author): Creontiades signatus Distant Order: Hemiptera Family: Miridae Supporting Information 4. Reasons supporting the need for the proposed common name: This insect has been recognized as a pest of cotton in the southern parts of Texas and in the northern Mexico inland from areas associated with the Gulf Coast cotton growing regions. Extension and refereed publications would benefit from having a common name for lay people to identify with. The insect was initially, and erroneously, thought to be Creontiades dilutus (Stål) with the common name “green mirid”. The green mirid is the number one plant bug pest of Australian cotton. However, molecular and taxanomic work have recently identified the mirid as a native species C. signatus Distant (Coleman et al 2008). Giving C. signatus a common name would help differentiate it from the Australian plant bug and help reduce any confusion of the two cotton pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Oviposition Patterns of Creontiades Signatus (Hemiptera: Miridae) on Okra-Leaf and Normal-Leaf Cotton
    ECOLOGY AND POPULATION BIOLOGY Oviposition Patterns of Creontiades signatus (Hemiptera: Miridae) on Okra-Leaf and Normal-Leaf Cotton 1,2 1 3 J. SCOTT ARMSTRONG, RANDY J. COLEMAN, AND MAMOUDOU SE´ TAMOU Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 102(2): 196Ð200 (2009) ABSTRACT We investigated the oviposition behavior of Creontiades signatus Distant (Hemiptera: Miridae), a relatively new plant bug pest of south Texas cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., on okra-leaf and normal-leaf genotypes that differed signiÞcantly in their leaf morphology and trichome densities. In a no-choice study, the site preference and numbers of eggs oviposited by C. signatus were identical for the okra-leaf and normal-leaf. In a free-choice test, C. signatus showed a signiÞcant preference for the normal-leaf by ovipositing 3 times the number of eggs than on okra-leaf, but the site locations and percentages of egg distributions were similar for the two cotton types. The leaf petiole was the most preferred site for oviposition, followed by the main stem, and fruiting structures (squares and small bolls). The majority of eggs were oviposited in the leaf petioles associated with the mid-portion (nodes 4Ð8) of the plant. Trichome densities on the leaf petioles, main stem, and leaf veins were similar for node 3, but they were signiÞcantly higher on these structures for nodes 5 and 8 for the okra-leaf compared with the normal-leaf. The strong selection of oviposition sites in the normal-leaf cotton in this study may be due to some factor other than trichome density. This information should increase the knowledge for scouting for the presence of eggs and young nymphs and serve as a starting point for the selection of nonpreferred cotton varieties for oviposition by this mirid.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Growth Stage-Specific Injury and Economic Injury Level for Verde
    FIELD AND FORAGE CROPS Plant Growth Stage-Specific Injury and Economic Injury Level for Verde Plant Bug, Creontiades signatus (Hemiptera: Miridae), on Cotton: Effect of Bloom Period of Infestation 1,2 1 3 MICHAEL J. BREWER, DARWIN J. ANDERSON, AND J. SCOTT ARMSTRONG J. Econ. Entomol. 106(5): 2077Ð2083 (2013); DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/EC13248 ABSTRACT Verde plant bugs, Creontiades signatus Distant (Hemiptera: Miridae), were released onto caged cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L., for a 1-wk period to characterize the effects of insect density and bloom period of infestation on cotton injury and yield in 2011 and 2012, Corpus Christi, TX. When plants were infested during early bloom (10Ð11 nodes above Þrst white ßower), a linear decline in fruit retention and boll load and a linear increase in boll injury were detected as verde plant bug infestation levels increased from an average of 0.5 to 4 bugs per plant. Lint and seed yield per plant showed a corresponding decline. Fruit retention, boll load, and yield were not affected on plants infested 1 wk later at peak bloom (8Ð9 nodes above Þrst white ßower), even though boll injury increased as infestation levels increased. Second-year testing veriÞed boll injury but not yield loss, when infestations occurred at peak bloom. Incidence of cotton boll rot, known to be associated with verde plant bug feeding, was low to modest (Ͻ1% [2012] to 12% [2011] of bolls with disease symptoms), and drought stress persisted throughout the study. Caging effect was minimal: a 10% fruit retention decline was associated with caging, and the effect was not detectable in the other mea- surements.
    [Show full text]
  • Cotton Industry Biosecurity Plan
    Biosecurity Plan for the Cotton Industry Version 3.0 August 2015 PLANT HEALTH AUSTRALIA | Biosecurity Plan for the Cotton Industry 2015 Location: Level 1 1 Phipps Close DEAKIN ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6215 7700 Fax: +61 2 6260 4321 E-mail: [email protected] Visit our web site: www.planthealthaustralia.com.au An electronic copy of this plan is available through the email address listed above. © Plant Health Australia Limited 2006 Copyright in this publication is owned by Plant Health Australia Limited, except when content has been provided by other contributors, in which case copyright may be owned by another person. With the exception of any material protected by a trade mark, this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivs 3.0 Australia licence. Any use of this publication, other than as authorised under this licence or copyright law, is prohibited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/ - This details the relevant licence conditions, including the full legal code. This licence allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to Plant Health Australia (as below). In referencing this document, the preferred citation is: Plant Health Australia Ltd (2006) Biosecurity Plan for the Cotton Industry (Version 3.0 – August 2015). Plant Health Australia, Canberra, ACT. Disclaimer: The material contained in this publication is produced for general information only. It is not intended as professional advice on any particular matter. No person should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained in this publication without first obtaining specific and independent professional advice.
    [Show full text]