DOCSLIB.ORG

Report to Council on 17 May 2007 Onparliamentary Consituency Boundaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report to Council on 17 May 2007 Onparliamentary Consituency Boundaries MANCHESTER CITY COUNCIL REPORT FOR RESOLUTION DATE: 17 MAY 2006 SUJECT: PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCY BOUNDARIES – GREATER MANCHESTER REPORT OF: THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND THE CITY SOLICITOR PURPOSE OF REPORT To inform Members of the outcome of the local inquiry in relation to Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in Greater Manchester and the revised and final recommendations of the Boundary Committee for England. RECOMMENDATIONS That the Council welcome the decision of the Boundary Committee for England to confirm its provisional recommendations for constituencies in Manchester as final recommendations. FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR THE REVENUE BUDGET None FINANCIAL CONSEQUENCES FOR THE CAPITAL BUDGET None CONTACT OFFICERS Rodney Lund, Assistant City Solicitor 234 4019 [email protected] Peter Babb, Head of Planning 234 4501 [email protected] BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS 1. Boundary Commission for England (BCE) – Provisional Recommendations for Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in Greater Manchester. 2. Report to Executive on 13 April 2005. 3. Manchester City Council’s evidence to the local inquiry held in Manchester between 31 October and 17 November 2005. 4. Report of Nicholas Elliott Q.C., Assistant Commissioner. H:\COMMIT~1\Fileplan\DEMOCR~1\DECISI~1\COUNCI~1\FULLCO~1\Report\GM - Parliamentary Consituency Boundaries.doc 5. BCE – Revised and Final Recommendations for Parliamentary Constituency Boundaries in Greater Manchester. WARDS AFFECTED All, but in particular Moston and Whalley Range. IMPLICATIONS FOR: Anti Poverty Equal Opportunities Environment Employment No No No No H:\COMMIT~1\Fileplan\DEMOCR~1\DECISI~1\COUNCI~1\FULLCO~1\Report\GM - Parliamentary Consituency Boundaries.doc 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 As Members will be aware, the Boundary Commission for England (BCE) is conducting its fifth general review of Parliamentary Constituencies in England. 1.2 On 10 th March 2005 the BCE published its provisional recommendations for Greater Manchester. These provided for the number of seats in Greater Manchester to reduce by one from 28 to 27 in line with the decline in the electorate of Greater Manchester between 1991 and 2000. 1.3 In order to achieve this reduction it was necessary to change the grouping of boroughs as follows: Borough Number of Seats Bolton/Wigan 6 Bury 2 Manchester/Salford/Trafford 9 Oldham/Rochdale/Tameside 7 Stockport 3 __ 27 2. MANCHESTER/ SALFORD/ TRAFFORD 2.1 Manchester currently has 4 whole constituencies (Blackley, Central, Gorton and Withington) and the larger part of a fifth (Wythenshawe and Sale East). Salford currently has 2 whole constituencies (Salford and Eccles) and the larger part of a third (Worsley) which is shared with Wigan. Trafford currently has 2 whole constituencies (Stretford and Urmston and Altrincham and Sale West) and the smaller part of a third (Wythenshawe and Sale East). The BCE proposed to allocate 9 constituencies to the 3 boroughs as set out below. Manchester 2.2 The provisional recommendations allocated 3 whole constituencies to Manchester (Manchester Central, Manchester Gorton and Manchester Withington) and the larger part of two cross-border seats (Wythenshawe and Sale East, and Blackley and Broughton). 2.3 No change was proposed to the existing Wythenshawe and Sale East constituency, and Manchester Withington was changed only so as to realign ward and constituency boundaries. 2.4 Manchester Gorton is currently undersized. Therefore, in addition to including the six wards wholly or mainly within the existing seat, the BCE proposed to add Whalley Range ward, most of which is currently in Manchester Central. H:\COMMIT~1\Fileplan\DEMOCR~1\DECISI~1\COUNCI~1\FULLCO~1\Report\GM - Parliamentary Consituency Boundaries.doc 2.5 This transfer would leave Manchester Central undersized and therefore the BCE proposed to transfer Moston ward from the Manchester Blackley Constituency to Manchester Central. 2.6 The existing Manchester Blackley seat is already undersized and would be even more so with the removal of Moston ward. The BCE therefore proposed to link the two Salford wards of Broughton and Kersal with the remaining five wards of the Blackley Constituency, thereby using the River Irwell as a constituency boundary. To reflect this, the constituency would be named Blackley and Broughton . Salford 2.7 In addition to the cross-border seat, the BCE recommended 2 constituencies wholly within Salford. In effect, the existing Eccles would be abolished and its wards split between the Salford and Worsley seats. 2.8 The proposed new Salford and Eccles seat would include the five wards wholly or mainly in the existing Salford seat (after the transfer of Broughton and Kersal), plus four wards from Eccles. 2.9 The proposed new Worsley constituency would include the five Salford wards in the existing Worsley constituency, plus the remaining four wards from the Eccles seat. Trafford 2.10 In addition to the underchanged cross-border seat of Wythenshawe and Sale East, Trafford was allocated two whole constituencies – Altrincham and Sale West , and Stretford and Urmston which were changed only so as to re-align ward and constituency boundaries. 3. REPRESENTATIVES AND COUNTER-PROPOSALS 3.1 The City Council resolved to support the BCE proposal insofar as they affected Manchester. This position was backed by both the Labour and Liberal Democrat groups on the Council. 3.2 The BCE received many representations and several counter-proposals from political parties, local authorities and members of the public throughout Greater Manchester. Therefore, the BCE were obliged to call a local inquiry to consider the provisional recommendations relating to nine of the boroughs. The only exception was Bury where the provisional recommendations for two seats in the borough were generally supported and the BCE decided to confirm them as final recommendations. 3.3 There were two main county-wide counter-proposals – one from Trafford Borough Council and the Conservative Party and one from Salford City Council – and several more limited counter-proposals. H:\COMMIT~1\Fileplan\DEMOCR~1\DECISI~1\COUNCI~1\FULLCO~1\Report\GM - Parliamentary Consituency Boundaries.doc Trafford/ Conservative Counter-Proposal 3.4 This counter-proposal sought to group Manchester with Tameside and Oldham (rather than Trafford and Salford) and to abolish the Manchester Gorton Constituency rather than Eccles. It would have made major changes to the constituencies in Trafford and Manchester by recreating a Davyhulme seat, similar, (but not identical) to the one abolished in the previous review. 3.5 In Manchester, its main effect would have been to combine the two Didsbury wards with Wythenshawe, and place the two Gorton wards and Longsight in a cross-border seat with five Tameside wards. There would have been further minor changes consequential on the abolition of the Manchester Gorton seat. Salford Counter-Proposal 3.6 This counter-proposal also sought to preserve the Eccles constituency at the expense of a Manchester seat. It proposed major disruption in Manchester by putting Cheetham ward in the Salford seat, Charlestown ward in the Oldham West, and the Gorton North and Gorton South wards in a mainly Tameside seat. The remainder of the Manchester Blackley, Central and Gorton constituencies would be divided into two seats. Other Counter-Proposals 3.7 Other representations included several objections to the transfer of Whalley Range ward from Manchester Central to Manchester Gorton and a counter- proposal which suggested that Ardwick ward should be transferred instead. There were also objections to the transfer of Moston ward from Blackley to Manchester Central and a counter-proposal that Cheetham ward should be transferred instead. 4. LOCAL INQUIRY AND REPORT OF THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER 4.1 The local inquiry was held in Manchester Town Hall on twelve days between 31 October and 17 November 2005. It was conducted by the Assistant Commissioner, Mr Nicholas Elliott QC. 4.2 The City Council’s case in support of the BCE’s provisional recommendation for Manchester was prepared by a small team from the City Solicitor’s and Planning Sections and the Head of Planning gave evidence on behalf of the Council. 4.3 Following the local inquiry, the Assistant Commissioner prepared a lengthy report for the BCE which supported the provisional recommendations of the BCE in relation to Manchester, Salford and Trafford. The report accepted the arguments put forward by the Council, the Labour Party and the Liberal Democratic Party in favour of the BCE recommendations, and rejected the counter-proposals from Trafford and the Conservative Party and from Salford. It also rejected the counter-proposals in relation to Whalley Range and Moston Wards. The only change suggested by the Assistant Commissioner in relation to Manchester/ Salford/ Trafford related to the name of the Worsley constituency whilst he H:\COMMIT~1\Fileplan\DEMOCR~1\DECISI~1\COUNCI~1\FULLCO~1\Report\GM - Parliamentary Consituency Boundaries.doc proposed should be called Worsley and Eccles South to reflect the representations made at the inquiry that the four wards currently in the Eccles constituency did not have much affinity with Worsley. 4.4 The Assistant Commissioner also supported the BCE provisional recommendations for Bolton and Wigan. However, in the east of the county he recommended changes. In particular, he recommended that Rochdale should stand alone (rather than be grouped with Oldham and Tameside) and be allocated two seats. He also recommended that Stockport be grouped with Oldham
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electoral Review of Salford City Council
    Electoral review of Salford City Council Response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s consultation on Warding Patterns August 2018 1 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Salford in 2018 has changed dramatically since the city’s previous electoral review of 2002. Salford has seen a turnaround in its fortunes over recent years, reversing decades of population decline and securing high levels of investment. The city is now delivering high levels of growth, in both new housing and new jobs, and is helping to drive forward both Salford’s and the Greater Manchester economies. 1.2 The election of the Greater Manchester Mayor and increased devolution of responsibilities to Greater Manchester, and the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, is fundamentally changing the way Salford City Council works in areas of economic development, transport, work and skills, planning, policing and more recently health and social care. 1.3 Salford’s directly elected City Mayor has galvanised the city around eight core priorities – the Great Eight. Delivering against these core priorities will require the sustained commitment and partnership between councillors, partners in the private, public, community and voluntary and social enterprise sectors, and the city’s residents. This is even more the case in the light of ongoing national policy changes, the impending departure of the UK from the EU, and continued austerity in funding for vital local services. The city’s councillors will have an absolutely central role in delivering against these core priorities, working with all our partners and residents to harness the energies and talents of all of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment
    Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment A Report for the Trafford Economic Alliance By EKOS, CBRE, URBED and WSP August 2008 EKOS Consulting (UK) Ltd 2 Mount Street Manchester M2 5WQ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES............................................................................................ 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 12 2 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY CONTEXT ..................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 STUDY CONTEXT.................................................................................................................... 23 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 24 STUDY CONTEXT AND MASTERPLAN OBJECTIVES .................................................................... 29 STUDY AREA.......................................................................................................................... 31 BASELINE REPORT OBJECTIVES AND STRUCTURE.................................................................... 31 3 REGENERATION AND PLANNING POLICY REVIEW.................................................. 33 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 33 NATIONAL POLICY
    [Show full text]
  • WARD: Gorse Hill 1308 (08/18) TRAFFORD METROPOLITAN
    TRAFFORD METROPOLITAN BOROUGH COUNCIL Report to: Executive Member for Environment, Air Quality and Climate Change Date: September 2018 Report for: Approval Report of: Principal Engineer, Traffic and Transportation, One Trafford. ELTON STREET, STRETFORD Proposal to introduce a new Disabled Residents’ Permit Parking Space Consideration of objections and proposal to introduce a 2nd disabled residents’ permit bay Summary To consider the objection received and to seek approval to introduce a new disabled residents’ permit parking space on Elton Street, Stretford To seek approval to advertise the intention to introduce a second disabled residents’ permit parking space on Elton Street, Stretford Recommendations Agreement is sought to the following: 1. That the introduction of a disabled residents’ permit parking space on Elton Street, Stretford be approved. 2. That, following careful consideration of the objection received, authorisation be given to make and introduce the Traffic Regulation Order, as advertised. 3. That the objector be notified of the Council’s decision. 4. That the introduction of a second disabled residents’ permit parking space on Elton Street, Stretford be approved. 5. That authorisation be given to advertise the intention of making the Traffic Regulation Order referred to in schedule 3 to this report and, if no objections are maintained, that the Order be made and the proposal implemented. 6. That a consultation be carried out with nearby residents. Contact person for further information: Name: Dorothy Stagg Extension: 0161 6726534 Background Papers: None WARD: Gorse Hill 1308 (08/18) 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 Following the receipt of a request from a disabled resident of 18 Elton Street, Stretford, who is a blue badge holder, a report was circulated in January 2018, considering a proposal to introduce a disabled persons’ permit bay.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Elections 23 June 2019 and New Walkden South Election 20 June
    Part 1 - Open to the Public ITEM NO. REPORT OF THE RETURNING OFFICER TO COUNCIL ON WEDNESDAY 17 JULY 2019 TITLE: RESULTS OF THE EUROPEAN ELECTION AND NEW ELECTION FOR WALKDEN SOUTH WARD 2019. RECOMMENDATIONS: That the report be noted. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This report is to inform the City Mayor and Members of the City Council the results from the European Election held on Thursday 23 May 2019 and of the New Election for Walkden South held on 20 June 2019. BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS: Statement of local totals for the European Election 23 May 2019 Declaration of result of poll Walkden South Thursday 20 June 2019. KEY DECISION: NO 1 DETAILS: 1. The Salford results for the European Election held on 23 May 2019 were as follows: Party Results Change UK - The Independent Group 1,436 Conservative and Unionist Party 3,401 English Democrats 384 Green Party 6,689 Labour Party 11,376 Liberal Democrats 7,110 The Brexit Party 14,867 UK European Union Party (UKEUP) 269 UK Independence Party 2,286 Mohmmad Aslam 68 Tommy Robinson 1,921 Electorate: 166,512 Verified ballot paper: polling stations: 30,519 postal votes: 19,582 Percentage turnout: 30.09% 2. The election of Borough Councillor to the ward of Walkden South was sadly countermanded, by virtue of rule 55 of the Local Elections (Principal Areas) (England and Wales) Rules 2006 following the death of one of the candidates, George Andrew Darlington . The New Election for Walkden South Ward was held on Thursday 20 June 2019. The turnout for the election was 23.7 per cent with 2,030 votes cast.
    [Show full text]
  • North Locality: Life Expectancy
    TRAFFORD NORTH LOCALITY HEALTH PROFILE JANUARY 2021 NORTH LOCALITY: WARDS • Clifford: Small and densely populated ward at north-east tip of the borough. Dense residential area of Victorian terraced housing and a diverse range of housing stock. Clifford has a diverse population with active community groups The area is undergoing significant transformation with the Old Trafford Master Plan. • Gorse Hill: Northern most ward with the third largest area size. Trafford town hall, coronation street studio and Manchester United stadium are located in this ward. Media city development on the Salford side has led to significant development in parts of the ward. Trafford Park and Humphrey Park railway stations serve the ward for commuting to both Manchester and Liverpool. • Longford: Longford is a densely populated urban area in north east of the Borough. It is home to the world famous Lancashire County Cricket Club. Longford Park, one of the Borough's larger parks, has been the finishing point for the annual Stretford Pageant. Longford Athletics stadium can also be found adjacent to the park. • Stretford: Densely populated ward with the M60 and Bridgewater canal running through the ward. The ward itself does not rank particularly highly in terms of deprivation but has pockets of very high deprivation. Source: Trafford Data Lab, 2020 NORTH LOCALITY: DEMOGRAPHICS • The North locality has an estimated population of 48,419 across the four wards (Clifford, Gorse Hill, Stretford & Longford) (ONS, 2019). • Data at the ward level suggests that all 4 wards in the north locality are amongst the wards with lowest percentages of 65+ years population (ONS, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Central Ward
    Swindon Borough Council Open Space Audit and Assessment Update Part B: Ward Profiles March 2014 Open Space Audit and Assessment Update: Part B NOTES 1. For the purposes of assessing open space provision, the standard of 3.2 ha per 1000 population will be used as set out in the Swindon Borough Local Plan 2011 (saved policy R4 ‘Protection of Recreation Open Space’ (March 2011)). The draft Swindon Borough Local Plan 2026 seeks to continue this standard and will inform emerging work on Green Infrastructure. 2. This update has predominantly been prepared to reflect the ward boundary changes in 2012; data collated in May 2010 has therefore been used for this update to the open space ward profiles. 3. Outdoor sports facilities and playing pitches have not been updated since the review of the Playing Pitch Strategy in 2007. An update of the Playing Pitch Strategy will be undertaken in 2014. 4. All school playing fields and private pitches that do not have community access have been excluded from these profiles. 5. Playing pitches with community access are included within the overall totals for outdoor sports facilities. 6. Where country parks and golf courses exist, they have been listed in the Ward Profile schedules; however they do not contribute towards the open space standard as they are considered to be a Borough wide resource. 7. All population figures have been taken from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Census 2011. A SASPEC methodology was then used to align the data with the revised Swindon Borough ward boundaries. 8. The quality for each open space is illustrated through the use of the following colours: Quality Standard Scoring Range Colour Under Standard Under 49.99% At Standard 50% - 69.99% Above standard Above 70% 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Copy of the Report
    City of Manchester Plan 1945, abridged edition This report has been digitised by Joe Blakey and Martin Dodge from the Department of Geography, University of Manchester. The digitisation was supported by the Manchester Statistical Society’s Campion Fund. The copy of the report digitised kindly provided by Richard Brook, Manchester School of Architecture. Permission to digitise and release the report under Creative Commons license was kindly granted by Manchester Libraries, Information and Archives, Manchester City Council. (Email: [email protected]) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 20 July 2013. C O NTENTS PR A .. page 2 I. TH D · I N 3 The Purpose of Pla nning- The Pla n in Outline-Ways and Mean II . H F UN I ATION 7 Basic Surveys-Popula tion- The Fa mily Unit J II . II • RAM WORK 10 The Z ning Scheme- Indu trial Planning- Highways JV. T H STR TUR 16 Design fo r Li ving- Ho mes- Types of Dwelling - l ndoor Space- Outdoor Space- School - The eighbo urhood- The District Y. R H SJN 28 Density- The Overspi ll Pro blem- The Redevelopment Programme- The Satellite VJ. 36 Sy tem- Ri vers- A mokeless ity- District H eating YJL. T li E R , IONAL A PJT L 40 Learning, Med icine a nd Lhe rts-The ity Centre-Transport- C ivic Building V LJL. T I-l - OND IT IONS 0 u ss 51 Fu rther Legisla ti o n- Loca l Government- T he Prospect Th e author\· acknowl dgment and thanks ore due to MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Commissioning Across Government: Review of Evidence
    T hird Sector Research Centre Research Report (86) Commissioning across government: review of evidence Tony Bovaird, Helen Dickinson and Kerry Allen August 2012 Project for National Audit Office Revised version of Final Report (submitted 17 May 2010) Research Report Report Research ( 86 ) August 2012 2012 August Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Approach and methods ........................................................................................................................ 6 Scoping phase ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Scanning and analysing the literature ..................................................................................................... 6 Updating government commissioning models......................................................................................... 7 What is commissioning? ...................................................................................................................... 8 Lack of agreed definition ......................................................................................................................... 8 Drivers of interest in commissioning ........................................................................................................ 8 Definitions of commissioning ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Local Transport Capital Funding Schemes
    Local Transport Capital Funding Schemes Scheme Location Ward Ash Lane - Between Grove Lane and Lichfield Avenue Bowdon Basford Road Longford Bollin Drive Timperley Canterbury Road Davyhulme West Cavendish Road (junction with Ashley Road & Portland Road) Bowdon Chepstow Avenue junction with Firs Way St Mary's Coniston Road Gorse Hill Cornhill Avenue Davyhulme West Craig Avenue Urmston Darley Road Clifford Eastway junction with Langdale Road Brooklands Glebelands Road - Park Road junction Ashton Upon Mersey Greenway Altrincham Hale Road (Various locations between Hill Top and Park Road) Hale Barns Hope Road, junction Glenthorn Road Priory Humphrey Lane Urmston Irlam Road Flixton Kingsway Stretford Kirkstall Road junction with Furness Road Davyhulme East Langdale Road junction with Washway Road Brooklands Langdale Road - No Entry end Brooklands Leamington Road Davyhulme West Leicester Road near Junction with Ollerbarrow Road Hale Central Lulworth Avenue Flixton Lytham Road Flixton Malvern Avenue Urmston Manchester Road Bucklow St Martins Marlborough Road junction with Irlam Road Flixton Marlborough Road Priory Marsland Road (outside Broughton Mews) Priory Moorlands Avenue Davyhulme West Northenden Road Sale Moor Northenden Road Priory Northumberland Road Clifford Oaklea Road junction with Firs Road St Mary's Old Crofts Bank Davyhulme East Park Drive/Park Avenue Hale Central Park Road, Malpas Drive Timperley Park Road - opposite Brookfield Drive Timperley Park Road - several Locations Timperley Princess Road - junction of Charleston to Pelican
    [Show full text]
  • N SA Appendix 3 Details of Baseline Information
    Publication Salford Local Plan: Development Management and Allocations Document Sustainability Appraisal Appendix 3 Details of Baseline Information APPENDIX 3 Details of Baseline Information Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 2 2 Social .................................................................................................................. 3 2A Population .............................................................................................................. 3 2B Health ..................................................................................................................... 7 2C Crime ................................................................................................................... 10 2D Accessibility .......................................................................................................... 11 2E Housing ................................................................................................................ 15 2F Education ............................................................................................................. 21 3. Economic .......................................................................................................... 25 3A Economic health ................................................................................................... 25 3B Structure of the economy ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • De Trafford LOCATION: Navigation House, 1 Furness Quay, Salford, M50 3XZ PROPOSAL
    APPLICATION No: 17/69345/FUL APPLICANT: De Trafford LOCATION: Navigation House, 1 Furness Quay, Salford, M50 3XZ PROPOSAL: Demolition of office building and construction of residential development comprising 421 apartments (C3), 408 sqm of ground floor commercial space (A1, A2, A3, A4, B1, D2) across buildings ranging from 6 to 27 storeys, along with associated access and landscaping works. WARD: Ordsall Description of Site and Surrounding Area This application relates to an approximately 0.5ha site located within Salford Quays, off Furness Quay. The site is occupied by Navigation House which is a 3 storey office building with a pitched roof that stands on the southern part of the site, fronting The Quays road. The remainder of the site, although subdivided into two parcels of land, is in the main hard surfaced and used for car parking. There are landscaped areas with tree planting around the perimeter of the site, with some landscaped areas within the car parks. The site is relatively flat, but is on higher ground than the site to the north and the site rises up to meet The Quays road. All the buildings immediately adjacent to this development are accessed from Furness Quay. This includes the Dock Office and Ontario House, to the east and south east, and to the northwest is Custom and Furness House and the northeast Northern House and Parkside Court. The Dock Office has been redeveloped into apartments and Custom and Furness House have recently been granted planning consent for the redevelopment of the buildings and the wider site for residential use, this is known as the Fortis Quay scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • Organisation Forename Surname Job Title Region Herefordshire County
    Organisation Forename Surname Job Title Region Herefordshire County Council Rachel Andrews Organisational Development and Recruitment AdviserMidlands Wales Fenland District Council Sam Anthony Head of HR & OD South East (Inc London) Gedling Borough Council David Archer Service Manager - Organisational Development Midlands Wales Lincolnshire County Council Deborah Arrand HR Business Partner Midlands Wales Rochdale Borough Council Rosemary Barker TBC North Warwickshire County Council Dawn Barr Manager of OD Midlands Wales North Yorkshire Council Sarah Barron Senior HR Advisor North Sheffield City Council Mark Bennett Director of HR & Customer Services Midlands Wales Tameside Borough Council Tracy Berennand TBC North Manchester City Council Steven berry HROD Specialist (One to Watch Winner) North Financial Ombudsman Service Hannah Bornet Wellbeing Manager South East (Inc London) London Borough of Redbridge Andrea Bradley Human Resources Business Partner South East (Inc London) Cornwall Council Anne Branett Service Lead : Organisation & Workforce DevelopmentSouth West Leeds City Council Emma Browes HR Service Manager North Thurrock Council Andrew Brown Strategic Lead - Pay & Operations South East (Inc London) Fermanagh & Omagh District Council Themla Browne Head of HR & OD North Herefordshire County Council Lucy Campion Learning & OD Advisor Midlands Wales Onesource Hayley Camporese PPMA Rising Star Winner South East (Inc London) Essex County Council Alex Carlton Head of People Insight and Technology South East (Inc London) Lincolnshire County
    [Show full text]