Appendix E.05 Hydrologic/Water Resources (Waterbody Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix E.05 Hydrologic/Water Resources (Waterbody Analysis Appendix E.05 – Hydrologic/Water Resources Waterbody Analysis Tier 1 Draft EIS NEC FUTURE Appendix E.05 Water Resources Exisiting NEC Special WQ Wild and Freshwater Saltwater Construction State County Waterbody Name HUC12 HUC12 Name Navigable SFHA CZMA Swath Consideration Scenic River Wetlands Wetlands Type DC District of Columbia Hickey Run 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No 303(d) No No No Yes No Affected Environment DC District of Columbia Anacostia River 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Representative Route MAJOR BRIDGE DC District of Columbia Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No 303(d) No No No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Anacostia River 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No 303(d)-Shellfish No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Cabin Branch 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No No No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Cattail Branch 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No No No Yes No Affected Environment MD Prince George's Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No Yes No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE MD Prince George's Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No Yes No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE MD Prince George's Beaverdam Creek 020700100204 Lower Anacostia River No No Yes No Yes No Station Northwest Branch of the MD Prince George's Bald Hill Branch 020600060302 Western Branch Patuxent No Tier II No No No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE River Northwest Branch of the MD Prince George's Folly Branch 020600060302 Western Branch Patuxent No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE River Northwest Branch of the MD Prince George's Folly Branch 020600060302 Western Branch Patuxent No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment River Horsepen Branch-Patuxent MD Prince George's Newstop Branch 020600060401 No 303(d) No Yes No No No Representative Route AT GRADE River Anne Arundel / Prince Horsepen Branch-Patuxent MD Patuxent River 020600060401 No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Representative Route AERIAL George's River Towsers Branch-Little MD Anne Arundel Little Patuxent River 020600060203 No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Representative Route EMBANKMENT Patuxent River Towsers Branch-Little MD Anne Arundel Midway Branch 020600060203 No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Representative Route EMBANKMENT Patuxent River MD Anne Arundel Severn Run 020600040201 Severn Run No Shellfish No Yes No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE MD Anne Arundel Stony Run 020600031102 Deep Run-Patapsco River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Anne Arundel Stony Run 020600031102 Deep Run-Patapsco River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Anne Arundel Stony Run 020600031102 Deep Run-Patapsco River No No Yes No Yes No Station MD Anne Arundel Stony Run 020600031102 Deep Run-Patapsco River No No Yes No Yes No Station MD Anne Arundel / Howard Deep Run 020600031102 Deep Run-Patapsco River No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment Anne Arundel / Howard MD Patapsco River 020600031102 Deep Run-Patapsco River No Tier II No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment / Baltimore County Anne Arundel / Herbert Run-Patapsco MD Patapsco River 020600031103 No Tier II No Yes No Yes No Representative Route MAJOR BRIDGE Baltimore County River Herbert Run-Patapsco MD Baltimore County Herbert Run 020600031103 No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE River 1 NEC FUTURE Appendix E.05 Water Resources Exisiting NEC Special WQ Wild and Freshwater Saltwater Construction State County Waterbody Name HUC12 HUC12 Name Navigable SFHA CZMA Swath Consideration Scenic River Wetlands Wetlands Type Herbert Run-Patapsco MD Baltimore County Herbert Run 020600031103 No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE River Herbert Run-Patapsco MD Baltimore County Herbert Run 020600031103 No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE River West Branch Herbert Herbert Run-Patapsco MD Baltimore County 020600031103 No 303(d) No No No Yes No Affected Environment Run River East Branch Herbert Herbert Run-Patapsco MD Baltimore County 020600031103 No No Yes No Yes No Station Run River West Branch Herbert Herbert Run-Patapsco MD Baltimore County 020600031103 No 303(d) No No No Yes No Affected Environment Run River MD Baltimore City Maidens Choice Run 020600030902 Dead Run-Gywnns Falls No No No No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE MD Baltimore City Gwynns Falls 020600030902 Dead Run-Gywnns Falls No No Yes No Yes No Representative Route MAJOR BRIDGE MD Baltimore City Jones Falls 020600031201 Jones Falls No No No No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE Redhouse Creek-Back MD Baltimore County Back River 020600030702 No 303(d) No No Yes Yes Yes Representative Route AERIAL River Back River-Hawk Cove- MD Baltimore County Northeast Creek 020600030703 No No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment Chesapeake Bay Back River-Hawk Cove- MD Baltimore County Stemmers Run 020600030703 No No No No Yes No Affected Environment Chesapeake Bay Back River-Hawk Cove- MD Baltimore County Northeast Creek 020600030703 No No No No Yes No Representative Route AERIAL Chesapeake Bay Back River-Hawk Cove- MD Baltimore County Brien Run 020600030703 No No No No Yes No Affected Environment Chesapeake Bay MD Baltimore County Middle River 020600030701 Middle River No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Representative Route AT GRADE MD Baltimore County Cowpen Creek 020600030701 Middle River No No No No No No Representative Route AERIAL MD Baltimore County Frog Mortar Creek 020600030701 Middle River No No No No No No Affected Environment Saltpeter Creek- MD Baltimore County Dundee Creek 020600030602 No No No No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE Gunpowder River Whitemarsh Run-Bird MD Baltimore County Railroad Creek 020600030601 No No No Yes Yes Yes Representative Route AT GRADE River Baltimore County / Whitemarsh Run-Bird MD Bird River 020600030601 No No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment Harford River Baltimore County / Saltpeter Creek- MD Gunpowder Falls 020600030602 No Tier II No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment Harford Gunpowder River Baltimore County / Saltpeter Creek- MD Gunpowder River 020600030602 Yes Shellfish No No Yes Yes Yes Representative Route MAJOR BRIDGE Harford Gunpowder River Saltpeter Creek- MD Harford Emmord Branch 020600030602 No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Representative Route EMBANKMENT Gunpowder River MD Harford Lauderick Creek 020600030106 Bush River No No Yes Yes No Yes Representative Route EMBANKMENT MD Harford Bush River 020600030106 Bush River Yes Shellfish No No Yes Yes No Representative Route MAJOR BRIDGE MD Harford Deep Spring Branch 020600030106 Bush River No No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment MD Harford Deep Spring Branch 020600030106 Bush River No No No Yes Yes Yes Affected Environment MD Harford Deep Spring Branch 020600030106 Bush River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Harford Deep Spring Branch 020600030106 Bush River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Harford Deep Spring Branch 020600030106 Bush River No No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Harford Romney Creek 020600030203 Upper Romney Creek No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE Tributary 4 to Swan Swan Creek-Chesapeake MD Harford 020600030201 No 303(d) No No No Yes No Representative Route EMBANKMENT Creek Bay 2 NEC FUTURE Appendix E.05 Water Resources Exisiting NEC Special WQ Wild and Freshwater Saltwater Construction State County Waterbody Name HUC12 HUC12 Name Navigable SFHA CZMA Swath Consideration Scenic River Wetlands Wetlands Type Tributary 4 to Swan Swan Creek-Chesapeake MD Harford 020600030201 No 303(d) No No No Yes No Representative Route EMBANKMENT Creek Bay Tributary 4 to Swan Swan Creek-Chesapeake MD Harford 020600030201 No 303(d) No No No Yes No Representative Route AERIAL Creek Bay Swan Creek-Chesapeake MD Harford Swan Creek 020600030201 No 303(d) No No No Yes No Representative Route AERIAL Bay Tributary 1 to Swan Swan Creek-Chesapeake MD Harford 020600030201 No 303(d) No No No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE Creek Bay Swan Creek-Chesapeake MD Harford Gasheys Creek 020600030201 No 303(d) No No No Yes No Representative Route AT GRADE Bay Rock Run-Susquehanna MD Cecil Susquehanna River 020503061713 No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Representative Route MAJOR BRIDGE River MD Cecil Mill Creek 020600020103 Mill Creek-Furnace Bay No Reservoir Protection-Tier II No No No Yes No Representative Route AERIAL Tributary to Furnace MD Cecil 020600020103 Mill Creek-Furnace Bay No 303(d) No Yes No Yes Yes Representative Route EMBANKMENT Bay MD Cecil Stony Run 020600020102 North East Creek No 303(d)-Shellfish No Yes No Yes No Representative Route AERIAL MD Cecil North East Creek 020600020102 North East Creek No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Cecil North East Creek 020600020102 North East Creek No 303(d) No Yes No Yes No Representative Route AERIAL MD Cecil Little North East Creek 020600020102 North East Creek No Tier II No No No Yes No Affected Environment MD Cecil Little North East Creek 020600020101 Little North East Creek No Tier II No Yes No Yes No Affected Environment MD Cecil
Recommended publications
  • Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds
    Defining the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for The Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds Prepared By: Scott M. Strickland Virginia R. Busby Julia A. King With Contributions From: Francis Gray • Diana Harley • Mervin Savoy • Piscataway Conoy Tribe of Maryland Mark Tayac • Piscataway Indian Nation Joan Watson • Piscataway Conoy Confederacy and Subtribes Rico Newman • Barry Wilson • Choptico Band of Piscataway Indians Hope Butler • Cedarville Band of Piscataway Indians Prepared For: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, Maryland St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland November 2015 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this project was to identify and represent the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for the Nanjemoy and Mattawoman creek watersheds on the north shore of the Potomac River in Charles and Prince George’s counties, Maryland. The project was undertaken as an initiative of the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay office, which supports and manages the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail. One of the goals of the Captain John Smith Trail is to interpret Native life in the Middle Atlantic in the early years of colonization by Europeans. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept, developed as an important tool for identifying Native landscapes, has been incorporated into the Smith Trail’s Comprehensive Management Plan in an effort to identify Native communities along the trail as they existed in the early17th century and as they exist today. Identifying ICLs along the Smith Trail serves land and cultural conservation, education, historic preservation, and economic development goals. Identifying ICLs empowers descendant indigenous communities to participate fully in achieving these goals.
    [Show full text]
  • NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5
    NON-TIDAL BENTHIC MONITORING DATABASE: Version 3.5 DATABASE DESIGN DOCUMENTATION AND DATA DICTIONARY 1 June 2013 Prepared for: United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, Maryland 21403 Prepared By: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 Prepared for United States Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program 410 Severn Avenue Annapolis, MD 21403 By Jacqueline Johnson Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin To receive additional copies of the report please call or write: The Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 51 Monroe Street, PE-08 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301-984-1908 Funds to support the document The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.0; Database Design Documentation And Data Dictionary was supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency Grant CB- CBxxxxxxxxxx-x Disclaimer The opinion expressed are those of the authors and should not be construed as representing the U.S. Government, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the several states or the signatories or Commissioners to the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin: Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia or the District of Columbia. ii The Non-Tidal Benthic Monitoring Database: Version 3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State Owned and Maintained Structurally Deficient Bridges
    State Owned and Maintained Structurally Deficient Bridges (4,016 bridges - includes NHS, Non-NHS, NBI, and Non-NBI) Most Travelled (sorted by ADT) Data is based on the condition data of our entire bridge inventory (both NBI and Non-NBI bridges) at the time of the 2018 NBI submittal to FHWA on 03/15/18, which included inspection condition data due in 2017 and the most recent inspection condition data at the time of the submittal NBI 29: Average NBI 112: NBIS Daily Traffic (ADT) NBI 27: Year NBI 7: Facility Carried by Structure NBI 6A: Feature Intersected: NBI 4: City or Town NBI 104: Highway System of the Bridge Length [General Built [General Bridge No. Bridge Name [Classification] Narrative [Classification] [Classification] Inventory Route [Classification] [Classification] Information] Information] YANKEE DOODLE 1 00059 BRIDGE INTERSTATE-95 NORWALK RV,HENDRICKS AVE 56060 - NORWALK 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 145000 1957 2 06798 INTERSTATE-95 STUBBY PLAIN BROOK 47535 - MILFORD 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS No 137500 1958 3 00162 INTERSTATE-95 METRO NORTH 82870 - WEST HAVEN 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 136400 1956 4 03093 INTERSTATE 91 N FRONT ST & QUINN RIVER 52070 - NEW HAVEN 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 133900 1964 5 03094 INTERSTATE-91 AMTRAK RAILROAD 52070 - NEW HAVEN 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 133900 1965 BYRAM RIVER 6 00001 BRIDGE INTERSTATE-95 BYRAM RIVER,S WATER ST 33620 - GREENWICH 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS Yes 131600 1958 7 00062 INTERSTATE-95 ROUTE 33 83500 - WESTPORT 1 - Structure/Route is on NHS
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Town Guides: Compiled from Collections at the CT State Library
    Connecticut Town Guides: Compiled from Collections at the CT State Library Compiled by Jeannie Sherman, Reference Librarian, History & Genealogy Unit, Connecticut State Library, 2016 Introduction Many people visit the Connecticut State Library to research their family history. We hold one of the best genealogy collections in Connecticut including our indexes to pre-1850 vital records, cemetery inscriptions, church & family bible records, marriage & death notices, and probate estate papers. Though these indexes are state-wide by surname, we also hold records for each town. As any person who attempts to do genealogy research in Connecticut discovers, knowing what town a family lived in is very important. Connecticut currently has one hundred and sixty-nine towns each with their own vital, land, and probate district chronology. As towns in Connecticut were created, most were set off from a parent town. County boundaries also changed throughout Connecticut's history, so knowing a parent town or knowing in which county a town was located over time can help researchers search for court and other records. The purpose of these Town Guides is to have in one place basic information about each town. This includes the year it was established, the parent town, historical county information, vital and church record information, a probate district chronology, and a list of cemeteries that were inventoried in the Hale Collection. For town vital records and church records, both the Connecticut State Library (CSL) microfilm number and the Latter-Day Saint (LDS) microfilm number are given where applicable. Researchers are encouraged to search by film number within the LDS catalog as many vital records can be found online.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Environmental Protection Inland Waters And
    Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies TITLE 26. Fisheries & Game Agency Department of Environmental Protection Subject Inland Waters and Marine District Defined Section § 26-108-1 CONTENTS Sec. 26-108-1. Inland waters and marine district defined Revised: 2015-3-6 R.C.S.A. § 26-108-1 - I- Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies TITLE 26. Fisheries & Game Department of Environmental Protection §26-108-1 Inland Waters and Marine District Defined Sec. 26-108-1. Inland waters and marine district defined The following lines across streams flowing into Long Island Sound, Fisher’s Island Sound, Little Narragansett Bay and tributaries thereof shall be known as the inland-marine demarcation lines above which lines such water shall be known as the “inland district” and below which lines such water shall be known as the “marine district”: FAIRFIELD COUNTY Byram River, Greenwich marine district—up to and including the railroad crossing inland district—all waters above Horse Neck Brook, Greenwich marine district—none inland district—above junction with mouth of harbor Indian Harbor, Greenwich marine district—up to and including the first railroad crossing inland district—all waters above Mianus River, Greenwich marine district—below dam just above Boston Post Road inland district—all waters above Rippowam River, Stamford marine district—up to and including the first railroad crossing inland district—all waters above Noroton River, Stamford-Darien marine district—up to and including Boston Post Road inland district—all waters above Goodwives River,
    [Show full text]
  • Ph River, Brook and Tributary Sites the Normal Ph Range For
    2016 Parameter Data: pH River, Brook and Tributary Sites The standard measurement of acidity is pH. A pH of less than 7 is acidic; above pH 7 is alkaline, also known by the term “basic.” The pH measurement is a logarithmic measurement, which means that each unit decrease in pH equals a ten-fold increase in acidity. In other words, pH 5 water is ten times more acidic than pH 6 water. Aquatic organisms need the pH of their water body to be within a certain range for optimal growth and survival. Although each organism has an ideal pH, most aquatic organisms prefer pH of 6.5 – 8.0. Watershed LOCATION MAY JUNE JULY AUG. SEPT. OCT. Miniumum Code RIVERS - - - - - - Standard pH units - - - - - - A Annaquatucket River - 7.2 6.9 6.6 6.8 6.9 6.7 6.6 Belleville @ Railroad Crossing WD Ashaway River @ Rte 216 6.8 6.6 6.5 6.8 7.1 6.8 6.5 WD Beaver River @ Rte 138 6.3 6.5 6.6 6.8 6.3 6.1 6.1 NA Buckeye Brook #1 @ Novelty Rd 7.0 7.2 6.5 7.2 6.9 7.0 6.5 NA Buckeye Brk #2 @ Lockwood Brk - 6.7 6.9 6.8 - - 6.7 NA Buckeye Brk #3 @ Warner Brook 6.7 6.5 6.4 6.5 6.5 - 6.4 NA Buckeye Brook #4 @ Mill Cove 6.9 7.0 6.4 7.0 7.0 - 6.4 WD Falls River D - Step Stone Falls 6.4 6.4 6.6 6.5 6.6 6.3 6.3 WD Falls River C - Austin Farm Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • Open PDF File, 783.6 KB, for Ten Mile River Watershed 2002 Water
    TEN MILE RIVER WATERSHED 2002 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT REPORT COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS ROBERT W. GOLLEDGE, JR., SECRETARY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ARLEEN O’DONNELL, ACTING COMMISSIONER BUREAU OF RESOURCE PROTECTION GLENN HAAS, ACTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY LIMITED COPIES OF THIS REPORT ARE AVAILABLE AT NO COST BY WRITTEN REQUEST TO: MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION OF WATERSHED MANAGEMENT 627 MAIN STREET WORCESTER, MA 01608 This report is also available from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP’s) home page on the World Wide Web at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/wqassess.htm#wqar Furthermore, at the time of first printing, eight copies of each report published by this office are submitted to the State Library at the State House in Boston; these copies are subsequently distributed as follows: • On shelf; retained at the State Library (two copies); • Microfilmed retained at the State Library; • Delivered to the Boston Public Library at Copley Square; • Delivered to the Worcester Public Library; • Delivered to the Springfield Public Library; • Delivered to the University Library at UMass, Amherst; • Delivered to the Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. Moreover, this wide circulation is augmented by inter-library loans from the above-listed libraries. For example a resident in Bridgewater can apply at their local library for loan of any MA DEP/Division of Watershed Management (DWM) report from the Worcester Public Library. A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. This report, entitled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester.
    [Show full text]
  • Middlesex Public Hearing Minutes
    State of New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS STATE PLANNING COMMISSION OFFICE OF SMART GROWTH PO BOX 204 TRENTON NJ 08625-0204 JON S. CORZINE SUSAN BASS LEVIN BENJAMIN L. SPINELLI Governor Commissioner Acting Executive Director & Secretary Middlesex County Cross-acceptance III Public Hearing New Jersey State Planning Commission Minutes of the Meeting Held June 14, 2007 Middlesex County Planning Department Middlesex County Planning Board Meeting Room 40 Livingston Avenue New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901 WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS Benjamin Spinelli, Acting Executive Director in the Office of Smart Growth (OSG), called the June 14, 2007 meeting of the New Jersey State Planning Commission to order at 5:10 p.m. Mr. Spinelli proceeded to introduce the State Planning Commission (SPC) members in attendance. Louise Wilson, Local Government Representative and Deborah Mans, State Agency Representative attended on behalf of the SPC. Mr. Spinelli then introduced Middlesex County Planning Department staff in attendance. George Veverides, Middlesex County Planning Director and Mirah Becker, Middlesex County Supervising Planner attended on behalf of the Middlesex County Planning staff. John Sully, Nicolas Tufaro and Daniel Ryan also attended on behalf of the Middlesex County Planning Department. The Honorable Camille Fernicola, Freeholder also attended on behalf of the Middlesex County Board of Chosen Freeholders. Mr. Spinelli then introduced staff attending on behalf of the Office of Smart Growth (OSG) and OSG’s State Agency partners. The following people were in attendance on behalf of OSG: Barry Ableman, Principal Planner and Lorissa Whitaker, Area Planner. The following people were in attendance on behalf of OSG’s State Agency partners: Helene Rubin, New Jersey Department of Transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey
    imiF.NT OF Tim BULLETIN UN ITKI) STATKS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 115 A (lECKJKAPHIC DKTIOXARY OF KHODK ISLAM; WASHINGTON GOVKRNMKNT PRINTING OFF1OK 181)4 LIBRARY CATALOGUE SLIPS. i United States. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Department of the interior | | Bulletin | of the | United States | geological survey | no. 115 | [Seal of the department] | Washington | government printing office | 1894 Second title: United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | A | geographic dictionary | of | Rhode Island | by | Henry Gannett | [Vignette] | Washington | government printing office 11894 8°. 31 pp. Gannett (Henry). United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | A | geographic dictionary | of | Khode Island | hy | Henry Gannett | [Vignette] Washington | government printing office | 1894 8°. 31 pp. [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (U. S. geological survey). Bulletin 115]. 8 United States geological survey | J. W. Powell, director | | * A | geographic dictionary | of | Ehode Island | by | Henry -| Gannett | [Vignette] | . g Washington | government printing office | 1894 JS 8°. 31pp. a* [UNITED STATES. Department of the interior. (Z7. S. geological survey). ~ . Bulletin 115]. ADVERTISEMENT. [Bulletin No. 115.] The publications of the United States Geological Survey are issued in accordance with the statute approved March 3, 1879, which declares that "The publications of the Geological Survey shall consist of the annual report of operations, geological and economic maps illustrating the resources and classification of the lands, and reports upon general and economic geology and paleontology. The annual report of operations of the Geological Survey shall accompany the annual report of the Secretary of the Interior. All special memoirs and reports of said Survey shall be issued in uniform quarto series if deemed necessary by tlie Director, but other­ wise in ordinary octavos.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Stream Waders 10 Year Report
    MARYLAND STREAM WADERS TEN YEAR (2000-2009) REPORT October 2012 Maryland Stream Waders Ten Year (2000-2009) Report Prepared for: Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 1-877-620-8DNR (x8623) [email protected] Prepared by: Daniel Boward1 Sara Weglein1 Erik W. Leppo2 1 Maryland Department of Natural Resources Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division 580 Taylor Avenue; C-2 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2 Tetra Tech, Inc. Center for Ecological Studies 400 Red Brook Boulevard, Suite 200 Owings Mills, Maryland 21117 October 2012 This page intentionally blank. Foreword This document reports on the firstt en years (2000-2009) of sampling and results for the Maryland Stream Waders (MSW) statewide volunteer stream monitoring program managed by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Monitoring and Non-tidal Assessment Division (MANTA). Stream Waders data are intended to supplementt hose collected for the Maryland Biological Stream Survey (MBSS) by DNR and University of Maryland biologists. This report provides an overview oft he Program and summarizes results from the firstt en years of sampling. Acknowledgments We wish to acknowledge, first and foremost, the dedicated volunteers who collected data for this report (Appendix A): Thanks also to the following individuals for helping to make the Program a success. • The DNR Benthic Macroinvertebrate Lab staffof Neal Dziepak, Ellen Friedman, and Kerry Tebbs, for their countless hours in
    [Show full text]
  • RI DEM/Water Resources
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Water Resources WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS July 2006 AUTHORITY: These regulations are adopted in accordance with Chapter 42-35 pursuant to Chapters 46-12 and 42-17.1 of the Rhode Island General Laws of 1956, as amended STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Water Resources WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS RULE 1. PURPOSE............................................................................................................ 1 RULE 2. LEGAL AUTHORITY ........................................................................................ 1 RULE 3. SUPERSEDED RULES ...................................................................................... 1 RULE 4. LIBERAL APPLICATION ................................................................................. 1 RULE 5. SEVERABILITY................................................................................................. 1 RULE 6. APPLICATION OF THESE REGULATIONS .................................................. 2 RULE 7. DEFINITIONS....................................................................................................... 2 RULE 8. SURFACE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS............................................... 10 RULE 9. EFFECT OF ACTIVITIES ON WATER QUALITY STANDARDS .............. 23 RULE 10. PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINING ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS, TREATMENT AND PRETREATMENT........... 24 RULE 11. PROHIBITED
    [Show full text]
  • Capper-Cramton Resource Guide 2019
    Resource Guide Review of Projects on Lands Acquired Under the Capper-Cramton Act TAME Coalition TAME F A Martin Northwest Branch Trail Indian Creek Stream Valley Park Overview The Capper-Cramton Act (CCA) of 1930 (46 Stat. 482) was enacted for the acquisition, establishment, and development of the George Washington Memorial Parkway and stream valley parks in Maryland and Virginia to create a comprehensive park, parkway, and playground system in the National Capital.1 In addition to authorizing funding for acquisition, the act granted the National Capital Park and Planning Commission, now the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC), review authority to approve any Capper-Cramton park development or management plan in order to ensure the protection and preservation of the region’s valuable watersheds and parklands. Subsequent amendments to the Capper-Cramton Act2 allocated funds for the acquisition and extension of this park and parkway system in Maryland and Virginia. Title to lands acquired with such funds or lands donated to the United States as Capper Cramton land is vested in the state in which it is located. The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission (M-NCPPC) utilized Capper-Cramton funds to protect stream valleys in parts of Montgomery and Prince George’s Counties. Similarly, the District of Columbia used federal funds to develop recreation centers, playgrounds, and park systems. There is no evidence that Virginia utilized Capper-Cramton funds to acquire stream valley parks under the CCA. Today, over 10,000 acres of Capper-Cramton land have been established and preserved as a result of the act. This resource guide is for general information purposes, and is not a regulatory document.
    [Show full text]