DOCSLIB.ORG

Form 3: Initial Environmental Assessment and Sensitive Environments Contingency Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Form 3: Initial Environmental Assessment and Sensitive Environments Contingency Plan FORM 3 Form 3: Initial environmental assessment and sensitive environments contingency plan Regulation 11(c), Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects– Permitted Activities) Regulations 2013 How to use this form: This form should be completed by organisations planning to carry out marine scientific research, prospecting, or exploration. It fulfils the initial environmental assessment and contingency plan requirements of Schedule 2 of the Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects – Permitted Activities) Regulations 2013. This form must be provided to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) at least 5 working days before commencing the activity. Note: Items marked in italics are non-compulsory fields; however, inclusion of this information will assist the EPA in processing this form. Please note that this completed form, once received and processed by EPA, will be posted on the EPA website. Submitting in hard copy: If you wish to provide this form in hard copy, please post your completed form to: Environmental Protection Authority, Private Bag 63002, Wellington, 6140. Submitting electronically: If you wish to provide this form electronically, please email your form to: [email protected] Any form submitted electronically should be attached to an email that sets out: • The details of the person undertaking the permitted activity (the operator); • The name of the person supplying the completed form; and • A statement that the person is authorised to supply the form on behalf of the operator. Note: there is an 8 MB limit on electronic files submitted via email. All forms prescribed by the Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects – Permitted Activities) Regulations 2013, as well as suggested templates for providing other information, may be viewed and downloaded from our website at www.epa.govt.nz or requested by contacting us: Private Bag 63002, Wellington, 6140 Ph +64 4 916 2426 Email [email protected] Fax +64 4 914 0433 www.epa.govt.nz 2 Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects – Permitted Activities) Regulations 2013 Form 3: Initial environmental assessment and sensitive environments contingency plan Operation name: Name used by operator to reference the activity described in this form: Post-drill Monitoring Details of person undertaking permitted activity Company name: Anadarko New Zealand Company Contact person: Phone number: Mobile number: Fax number: Physical address: Postcode: Postal address (if different): Postcode: Email address: General description of permitted activity Type of activity: Post-drill Environmental Monitoring at the Caravel-1 exploratory well (e.g. marine scientific research, location in the Canterbury Basin (PEP38264) prospecting) Description of methods to be The post-drill environmental monitoring will consist of a field survey used to undertake the activity: focused on the sampling of environmental media, parameters/analytes, and locations using appropriate field techniques, analytical procedures, and quality control (QC). The field survey components are as follows: • Water Column Sampling: The water column will be sampled at a randomly selected station within 250 m of each wellsite and at a station located 3,000 m from each wellsite. Hydrographic parameters will be measured with a CTD/water quality profiler, equipped with depth-rated DO and pH sensors. Hydrographic parameters to be measured include conductivity/salinity, DO, pH, and temperature. Hydrographic measurements will be profiled from near-surface to near- bottom during the collection of water samples. Additionally, seawater samples will be collected to analyze nutrients (total nitrogen and phosphorus), metals, total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH), and potentially polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Analyses will be conducted to determine the concentration of various priority pollutants and hydrocarbon-associated metals including arsenic (As), barium (Ba), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), mercury (Hg), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), vanadium (V), and zinc (Zn). Water samples will be transferred into pre-cleaned sample containers, preserved, and handled/stored according to water sample protocols. • Seabed Sediment Sampling: A deepwater winch system will be used to deploy a stainless steel box corer to collect sediment samples. Box core samples will be evaluated for sediment geological and chemical Jun 2013 EPA0263 3 Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects – Permitted Activities) Regulations 2013 Form 3: Initial environmental assessment and sensitive environments contingency plan analyses and macroinfauna. The box core sample will be partitioned using a stainless steel insert to separate the chemical and geological samples from the macroinfaunal sample. All chemical and geological subsamples will be collected from the top 2 cm of sediment outside of the steel insert, while sediment to be sieved for macroinfauna will be collected from within the stainless steel insert down to a depth of 15 cm. Within each sampling strata, an additional core for sediment grain size will be collected to a depth of approximately 15 cm to correlate with the macroinfaunal data. Location of permitted activity Co-ordinates of area where PEP Project Approximate Water Depth Distance activity will be undertaken: Area Project Area (m) Offshore (km) (latitude and longitude) PEP 38264 17,492.86 km2 200-1,200 m 20-180 km Latitude and Longitude of the Four Corners of the Project Area 171° 00’ E, 45° 50’ S 174° 10’ E, 44° 45’ S 171° 00’ E, 46° 02’ S 172° 54’ E, 46° 00’ S Description of the current state of the area and the surrounding environment, including any known sensitive environments: The deep sea environment of the Project Area is rarely affected by outside influences. The physical and biological environment is described in detail in Appendix A. According to available information, there are no Protected Natural Areas located within PEP 38264 (UNEP and IUCN, 2009). Description of the likely effects of the activity on the environment: The impacts associated with the Post-drill Monitoring would be of short-term duration and limited to the immediate survey area. The most likely effect of the monitoring would be the interference and/or damage to the benthic environment. This effect could result from the collection of seabed samples and or the potential of dropped objects, such as sampling equipment. In both cases the impact and effected area would be limited, thus the severity of this potential impact is considered to be low. In addition, because of the localized nature of the activity other potential impacts are considered to be of insufficient to low significance with implemented mitigation techniques and best practices. Identification of sensitive environments Describe any sensitive environments likely to exist in the area where the activity will be undertaken: There are no known sensitive environments within the Project Area. The closest Marine Mammal Sanctuaries in the vicinity of the Project Area are the Banks Peninsula marine mammal sanctuary (over 100 km away) and the Catlins Coast marine mammal sanctuary (over 170 km away). Jun 2013 EPA0263 4 Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects – Permitted Activities) Regulations 2013 Form 3: Initial environmental assessment and sensitive environments contingency plan Contingency plan Specify measures that could be taken to avoid, remedy, or mitigate the adverse effects of the activity on sensitive environments: a) Can the activity be undertaken Yes / No in another place? Explain: No, because of the PEP 38264 blocks leased, the Seabed Sampling Program is restricted to that area. b) Can the activity be undertaken Yes / No in a way that reduces the Explain: The activity has been designed to reduce the disturbance of the amount of contact with the seabed as much as possible. seabed? c) Can different methods be used Yes / No in undertaking the activity to Explain: The Post-drill Monitoring methods have been chosen because of lessen its effects on the their minimal effects on the environment. In addition, there are no known sensitive environment? sensitive environments within or in near proximity to the project area. d) Can the activity be undertaken Yes / No in a way that lessens its Explain: The Post-drill Monitoring methods have been chosen because of effects in the sensitive their minimal effects on the environment. In addition, there are no known environment? sensitive environments within or in near proximity to the project area. * Select one December 10, 2014 Signature of authorised contact person Date Name: Title: Note: A signature is not required for electronic (email) forms. Jun 2013 EPA0263 Appendix A – Physical and Biological Environment 6.2 CARAVEL PROSPECT AREA 6.2.1 Physical Environment 6.2.1.1 Climate Detailed climatological data, such as mean temperature and precipitation, are unavailable for PEP 38264, so the following description is based on data from the onshore east coast of the South Island, in the Canterbury region of New Zealand. The climate of the region is dominated by an irregular succession of anticyclones that move eastward, travelling in a more northerly direction during spring and a more southerly direction during autumn and winter. Between the anticyclones, troughs of low pressure occur, bringing north-westerly winds, clouds and rain, followed by cold south westerly winds. The eastern side of the South
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Zealand Comprehensive II Trip Report 31St October to 16Th November 2016 (17 Days)
    New Zealand Comprehensive II Trip Report 31st October to 16th November 2016 (17 days) The Critically Endangered South Island Takahe by Erik Forsyth Trip report compiled by Tour Leader: Erik Forsyth RBL New Zealand – Comprehensive II Trip Report 2016 2 Tour Summary New Zealand is a must for the serious seabird enthusiast. Not only will you see a variety of albatross, petrels and shearwaters, there are multiple- chances of getting out on the high seas and finding something unusual. Seabirds dominate this tour and views of most birds are alongside the boat. There are also several land birds which are unique to these islands: kiwis - terrestrial nocturnal inhabitants, the huge swamp hen-like Takahe - prehistoric in its looks and movements, and wattlebirds, the saddlebacks and Kokako - poor flyers with short wings Salvin’s Albatross by Erik Forsyth which bound along the branches and on the ground. On this tour we had so many highlights, including close encounters with North Island, South Island and Little Spotted Kiwi, Wandering, Northern and Southern Royal, Black-browed, Shy, Salvin’s and Chatham Albatrosses, Mottled and Black Petrels, Buller’s and Hutton’s Shearwater and South Island Takahe, North Island Kokako, the tiny Rifleman and the very cute New Zealand (South Island wren) Rockwren. With a few members of the group already at the hotel (the afternoon before the tour started), we jumped into our van and drove to the nearby Puketutu Island. Here we had a good introduction to New Zealand birding. Arriving at a bay, the canals were teeming with Black Swans, Australasian Shovelers, Mallard and several White-faced Herons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wrybill Newsletter of the Canterbury Region, Ornithological Society of New Zealand
    The Wrybill Newsletter of the Canterbury Region, Ornithological Society of New Zealand Regional representative: Jan Walker 305 Kennedys Bush Road, Christchurch 8025 Ph 03 322 7187. Email: [email protected] January 2010 Droppings from the Regional Rep him anyway. It was richly deserved. The Ashley/Rakahuri Group also won the Wondering where to start, why not the partiest Canterbury/Aoraki Conservation Award for 2009. party of the bird calendar for OSNZ Canterbury? This is of course the Xmas BBQ at Colin and There are some good outings planned for this Cherry’s Fenland House farm. Around 15 folk year, so do come along even if you haven’t done rose to the occasion. Five teams went out so in the past. We are a friendly lot and not at all around the lake before lunch and two later on, competitive, well perhaps a little…… much later on, to mop up the left-overs. Nothing exceptional was seen except 3 Bitterns and a Some excellent evening meetings took place at small colony of nesting Caspian Terns, neither of the end of last year. Sara Kross, studying which are waders, unfortunately. The event Falcons in a Marlborough vineyard, had a continues to be one of Canterbury’s finest, fascinating video record of the birds to show rivaling the Show, Cup Week and an All-Black their lives in detail. She asked for small-bird Test, put together. If that didn’t get you reading experts to help her identify the prey items shown this, I give up. in the film, not that there was much left to see.
    [Show full text]
  • Mauri Ora, Volume 9, 1981
    MAURI ORA, 1981, 9: 53-58 53 ECOLOGY OF ORUAh'AIRUA ISLAND MARLBOROUGH SOUNDS, NEV.] ZEALAND IV THE VERTEBRATES R. G. Powlesland* Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand ABSTRACT During three visits 33 species of birds and five other species of vertebrates ,<Jere seen on and about Orua\Vairua Island. The most conspicuous, and probably most abundant, forest birds \Vere the silvereye, bellbird, grey \Varbler and fantail. INTRODUCTION This paper gives the species of vertebrates seen on and about Oruawairua Island (also known as Blumine Island) in Queen Charlotte Sound during visits by the University of Canterbury Biological Society (9-12 November 1978 and 1-5 February 1980) and a combined party from the 1'Ji1dlife Service, Department of Internal Affairs and Ecology Division, Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (25-27 February 1981). The university group concentrated on the northern, southern and western parts of the island and the W.L.S./D.S.I.R. party made their * Present address: Wildlife Service, Department of Internal Affairs, Private Bag, Wellington, New Zealand 54 MAURI ORA, 1981, Vol. 9 observations on the eastern part. Forty 5-minute bird counts were carried out. BIRDS Given below is a list of the species of blrds seen during the three visits to the island (Table 1). The nomenclature and order of the birds listed follow the "Annotated Checklist of the Birds of New Zealand" (Kinsky 1970) and' "Amendments and Additions to the 1970 Annotated Checklist of the Birds of New Zealand" (Kinsky 1980) . TABLE 1. SPECIES OF BIRDS SEEN DURING THREE VISITS TO ORUAWAIRUA ISLAND 9-12 1-5 25-27 Species Nov.1978 Feb.1980 Feb.1981 Eudyptula minor (little blue penguin) x* x Sula bass ana (Australasian gannet) x x Phalacrocorax varius (pied shag) x x x P.
    [Show full text]
  • WLM Cover.Eps
    Seabird fauna of Long Point: a historical perspective Jens Andre Weller A report submitted in partial fulfilment of the Post-graduate Diploma in Wildlife Management University of Otago 2011 University of Otago Department of Zoology P.O. Box 56, Dunedin New Zealand WLM Report Number: 248 Seabird fauna of Long Point: a historical perspective By Jens Andre Weller University of Otago; Department of Zoology; 403 Wildlife Management Report; Po Box 56; Dunedin; NZ ©1929 Owaka museum 1 What is a scietist after all? It is a curious a lookig through a keyhole, the keyhole of nature, trying to know what’s goig o. Jacques Yves Cousteau 2 Contents: Page 1.0 Summary 5 2.0 Long Points/ Irahukas location and legal status 6 Figure 1: Sections of the Long Point/ Irahuka Reserve administered by YEP and DOC 7 2.2 Geological history of the Catlins 8 2.3 Climate in the Catlins 9 Figure 2: Geographical and geological details from Long Point/ Catlins 10 Figure 3: Southland Syncline overview 10 3.0 The Catlins flora before human arrival 11 3.1 Relative (sea) bird abundance and distribution in pre-human times 12 3.1.1 Table of historical baseline of breeding seabirds on the South Island 13-14 3.1.2 Table of extinct oceanic birds from New Zealand 15 4.0 The Catlins flora after the arrival of men 16-18 4.1.1 Table of vascular plant succession times 17 Figure 4: Possible deforestation after human occupation of the South Island 18 4.1 Recent vegetation patterns at Long Point 19-22 4.2 Investigations from Hamel at the Long Point midden 22 4.3 Changes in the (sea) bird
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the Snares Islands, New Zealand
    Notornis, 2001, Vol. 48: 1-40 0029-4470 0 The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. 2001 Birds of the Snares Islands, New Zealand COLIN M. MISKELLY Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand Current address: Wellington Conservancy, Department of Conservation, PO. Box 5086, Wellington, New Zealand [email protected] PAUL M. SAGAR National Institute of Water &Atmospheric Research, PO. Box 8602, Christchurch ALAN J.D. TENNYSON Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO. Box 467, Wellington R. PAUL SCOFIELD Department of Zoology, University of Otago, PO. Box 56, Dunedin Abstract Bird records from the Snares Islands between Dec 1982 and Oct 2000 are summarised. Population estimates and distributions are given for the 29 breeding species. Bird species recorded breeding on the Snares Is for the first time since 1982 were southern black-browed albatross (Diomedea melanophtys), Chatham Island albatross (D. eremita), mallard (Anasplatyrhynchos), southern black-backed gull (Larus dominicanus), fantail (Rhipidura Juliginosa), and starling (Sturnus vulyaris). Fantails are now abundant on the Snares Is. Published work on the breeding chronology and breeding success of 8 intensively studied species is summarised, and new information on breeding ecology is presented for all breeding species. Sighting of 70 non-breeding and vagrant species are summarised;34 of these were new records from the Snares Is since 1980. The total bird list for the Snares Is is now 99 species, with a further 8 species reported from boats offshore. Miskelly, C.M.; Sagar, EM.; Tennyson, A.J.D;Scofield, R.l? 2001. Birds of the Snares Islands, New Zealand.Notornis 48(1): 1-40.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of New Zealand Birds, 2008
    Notornis, 2008, Vol. 55: 117-135 117 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. Conservation status of New Zealand birds, 2008 Colin M. Miskelly* Wellington Conservancy, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 5086, Wellington 6145, New Zealand [email protected] JOHN E. DOWDING DM Consultants, P.O. Box 36274, Merivale, Christchurch 8146, New Zealand GRAEME P. ELLIOTT Research & Development Group, Department of Conservation, Private Bag 5, Nelson 7042, New Zealand RODNEY A. HITCHMOUGH RALPH G. POWLESLAND HUGH A. ROBERTSON Research & Development Group, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand PAUL M. SAGAR National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 8602, Christchurch 8440, New Zealand R. PAUL SCOFIELD Canterbury Museum, Rolleston Ave, Christchurch 8001, New Zealand GRAEME A. TAYLOR Research & Development Group, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand Abstract An appraisal of the conservation status of the post-1800 New Zealand avifauna is presented. The list comprises 428 taxa in the following categories: ‘Extinct’ 20, ‘Threatened’ 77 (comprising 24 ‘Nationally Critical’, 15 ‘Nationally Endangered’, 38 ‘Nationally Vulnerable’), ‘At Risk’ 93 (comprising 18 ‘Declining’, 10 ‘Recovering’, 17 ‘Relict’, 48 ‘Naturally Uncommon’), ‘Not Threatened’ (native and resident) 36, ‘Coloniser’ 8, ‘Migrant’ 27, ‘Vagrant’ 130, and ‘Introduced and Naturalised’ 36. One species was assessed as ‘Data Deficient’. The list uses the New Zealand Threat Classification System, which provides greater resolution of naturally uncommon taxa typical of insular environments than the IUCN threat ranking system. New Zealand taxa are here ranked at subspecies level, and in some cases population level, when populations are judged to be potentially taxonomically distinct on the basis of genetic data or morphological observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Trip Report January 6 – 24, 2019 | Written by Client Karen Worcester
    New Zealand Birding & Nature | Trip Report January 6 – 24, 2019 | Written by Client Karen Worcester With Guide Greg Smith, and participants Karen, Fiona, Kay, Lesley, Kit, Elena, Jan, and Linda Sun., January 6 | North to Hauraki Gulf Welcome to New Zealand! Some of us met yesterday while getting to know Auckland a little better, and were happy to meet Mark Ayre, our New Zealand guide. We gathered in the lobby of the Grand Millennium Hotel, and then out we went to the comfy Mercedes bus we’d be calling home for the next few weeks. We left Auckland and drove south towards Mangere. Along the freeways here and in other open spaces, restoration plantings of native plants are common, and include New Zealand flax, cabbage tree (Cordyline, reminiscent of Dracaena), putokahwa (or New Zealand Christmas Tree) and toi toi (Austroderia - looks somewhat like pampas grass). The area is dominated by small volcanic peaks, often covered with lush vegetation. Some of the small volcanoes near the coast were used by the Maori as lookouts. Their sides still show the remnants of war trenches they used for cover. We drove along the south edge of Mangere Bay, out onto a causeway towards Puketutu Island. Wastewater ponds parallel the causeway on one side, with tidal mud flats on the other - this made for excellent views of shorebirds and waterfowl. Elegant Black Swans floated in the ponds, along with Mallard/Grey Duck hybrids. Welcome Swallows flew overhead, welcoming us to the first morning of our trip. As always, the first morning of the first day is a rush of new species.
    [Show full text]
  • BIRD LIST NEW ZEALAND South Island – (31
    AROUND THE WORLD – BIRD LIST NEW ZEALAND South Island – (31) North Island – (10) Yellow-eyed penguin North Island robin Blue penguin Saddleback White-faced heron Stitchbird (hihi) Black swan Eastern rosella South Island pied oystercatcher Banded rail Variable oystercatcher Pied shag New Zealand pigeon Welcome swallow Bellbird Banded dotterel Tui New Zealand pipit Australian magpie Paradise shelduck Tomtit Silvereye Blackbird Song thrush Chaffinch Yellow hammer Royal spoonbill New Zealand falcon New Zealand fantail Red-billed gull Black-backed gull Gray warbler Bar-tailed godwit Pied stilt Goldfinch Black shag Black-billed gull Spur-winged plover (masked lapwing) California quail Pukeko Common mynah Cook Strait Ferry – (5) Spotted shag Westland petrel Gannet Fluttering shearwater Buller’s albatross AUSTRALIA Queensland (QLD) – (33) Tasmania (TAS) – (11) Whimbrel Superb fairywren Willie wagtail Tasmanian nativehen (turbo chook) Magpie-lark Dusky moorhen White-breasted wood swallow Green rosella Red-tailed black cockatoo Yellow wattlebird (endemic) Sulphur-crested cockatoo Hooded dotterel (plover) Figbird Galah Rainbow lorikeet Crescent honeyeater Pied (Torresian) imperial pigeon Great cormorant Australian pelican Swamp harrier Greater sand plover Forest raven Pectoral sandpiper Peaceful dove Victoria (VIC) – (10) Australian brush-turkey Emu Australian (Torresian) crow Gray fantail Common noddy Pacific black duck Brown booby King parrot Australian white ibis Australian wood duck Straw-necked ibis Red wattlebird Magpie goose Bell miner Bridled
    [Show full text]
  • Foveaux Strait Seabirds: Assessment of Environmental Effects for Project South
    FOVEAUX STRAIT SEABIRDS: ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS FOR PROJECT SOUTH R5155a FOVEAUX STRAIT SEABIRDS: ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS FOR PROJECT SOUTH Contract Report No. 5155a March 2020 Project Team: Rachel McClellan - Report author Alex Reid - Data collation, report author Tom Pyatt - GIS analysis and mapping Prepared for: Sanford Ltd PO Box 443 Shortland Street Auckland 1140 Reviewed and approved for release by: _______________________ William Shaw Principal Ecologist/Director Wildland Consultants Ltd WELLINGTON OFFICE: 22 RAIHA STREET, ELSDON, P.O. BOX 50-539, PORIRUA Ph 04-237-7341; Fax 04-237-7496 HEAD OFFICE: 99 SALA STREET, P.O. BOX 7137, TE NGAE, ROTORUA Ph 07-343-9017; Fax 07-343-9018, email [email protected], www.wildlands.co.nz CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. METHODS 1 2.1 Overview 1 2.2 eBird database 4 2.3 Fisheries observer database 4 2.4 National aquatic biodiversity information system 5 2.5 Important bird areas - seabirds 5 2.6 GIS analysis 6 3. IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS 8 4. SEABIRDS OF THE RAKIURA-FOVEAUX STRAIT REGION 13 4.1 Overview 13 4.2 Penguins 16 4.2.1 Blue penguin 16 4.2.2 Fiordland crested penguin 17 4.2.3 Yellow-eyed penguin 17 4.3 Albatrosses and mollymawks 20 4.4 Shearwaters, petrels, and prions 21 4.4.1 Overview 21 4.4.2 Sooty shearwater 21 4.4.3 Common diving petrel 22 4.4.4 Whenua Hou diving petrel 22 4.4.5 Cape petrel 23 4.4.6 Fairy prion 23 4.4.7 Cook’s petrel 23 4.4.8 Giant petrels 24 4.5 Gannets and shags 24 4.5.1 Foveaux shag 24 4.5.2 Pied shag 27 4.5.3 Spotted shag 28 4.5.4 Other shag species 28 4.5.5 Australasian gannet 29 4.6 Skuas, gulls, and terns 29 4.6.1 Southern black-backed gull 30 4.6.2 Red-billed gull 30 4.6.3 Black-billed gull 31 4.6.4 Brown skua 31 4.6.5 White-fronted tern 32 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix I Ecology Company Assessment of Effects on Presence of Birds in Picton Harbour(PDF, 1
    Presence of Birds in Picton Harbour and Implications for the Proposed Waitohi Picton Ferry Terminal Precinct Redevelopment. PREPARED FOR: Port Marlborough New Zealand Limited and KiwiRail Holdings Limited 30 November 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 3 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................ 4 1.3 EXISTING ENVIRONMENT........................................................................................................ 6 2. METHODS ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 DATABASE SEARCH AND DATA SUMMARY .......................................................................... 7 2.2 SITE VISIT .................................................................................................................................. 8 2.3 ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS METHODOLOGY ......................................................................... 9 3. RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Protection of New Zealand's Indigenous Terrestrial Fauna
    Tuhinga 25: 25–101 Copyright © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa (2014) Legal protection of New Zealand’s indigenous terrestrial fauna – an historical review Colin M. Miskelly Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington, New Zealand ([email protected]) ABSTRACT: New Zealand has had a complex history of wildlife protection, with at least 609 different pieces of legislation affecting the protection of native wildlife between 1861 and 2013. The first species to be fully protected was the tüï (Prosthemadera novaeseelandiae), which was listed as a native game species in 1873 and excluded from hunting in all game season notices continuously from 1878, until being absolutely protected in 1906. The white heron (Ardea modesta) and crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus) were similarly protected nationwide from 1888, and the huia (Heteralocha acutirostris) from 1892. Other species listed as native game before 1903 were not consistently excluded from hunting in game season notices, meaning that such iconic species as kiwi (Apteryx spp.), käkäpö (Strigops habroptilus), kökako (Callaeas spp.), saddlebacks (Philesturnus spp.), stitchbird (Notiomystis cincta) and bellbird (Anthornis melanura) could still be taken or killed during the game season until they were absolutely protected in 1906. The tuatara (Sphenodon punctatus) was added to the native game list in 1895, but due to inadequate legislation was not absolutely protected until 1907. The Governor of the Colony of New Zealand had the power to absolutely protect native birds from 1886, but this was not used until 1903, when first the blue duck (Hymenolaimus malacorhynchus) and then the huia were given the status of absolutely protected, followed by more than 130 bird species by the end of 1906.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Comprehensive I 5 - 21 Feb 2017 (17 Days) Trip Report
    New Zealand Comprehensive I 5 - 21 Feb 2017 (17 Days) Trip Report The Critically Endangered South Island Takahe, by Erik Forsyth Trip Report compiled by Tour Leader, Erik Forsyth Trip Report – RBL New Zealand - Comprehensive I 2017 2 ________________________________________________________________________________ Tour Summary New Zealand is a must for the serious seabird enthusiast. Not only will you see a variety of albatrosses, petrels and shearwaters, there are also multiple chances of getting out on the high seas and finding something unusual. Seabirds dominate this tour, and views of most birds are alongside the boat. There are also several land birds which are unique to these islands: terrestrial, nocturnal inhabitants, the kiwis, the huge, swamphen-like Takahe, prehistoric in its looks and movements, and then the wattlebirds: saddlebacks and Kokako – poor flyers, with short wings, who bound along the branches and the ground. On this tour we had so many highlights, including close encounters with North Island, South Island and Little Spotted Kiwi. With many boat trips, the pelagic list was long and included Wandering, Antipodean, Northern and Southern Royal, Buller’s, Salvin’s and Shy (White-capped) Albatrosses, Westland, Cook’s and White-chinned Petrels, Buller’s, Flesh-footed and Hutton’s Shearwaters, Common Diving Petrel and the highly sought-after New Zealand Storm-petrel. Other major highlights included South Island Takahe, North Island Kokako, Kaka, the entertaining Kea, Long-tailed Cuckoo, North and South Island Saddlebacks, the tiny Rifleman and the striking Yellowhead, to Southern Royal, White-capped and Salvin’s name a few. Albatross by Erik Forsyth With the whole group already at the Auckland hotel, we jumped into our van and started our tour with a drive to nearby Puketutu Island.
    [Show full text]