Exploring Bankruptcy Cases 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exploring Bankruptcy Cases 2017 SUFFOLK ACADEMY OF LAW The Educational Arm of the Suffolk County Bar Association 560 Wheeler Road, Hauppauge, NY 11788 (631) 234-5588 EXPLORING RECENT BANKRUPTCY CASES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FACULTY Hon. Alan S. Trust, US Bankruptcy Judge for EDNY Bill Rochelle, Editor-at-Large, ABI Matthew V. Spero, Esq., Rivkin Radler Adam P. Wofse, Esq., LaMonica Herbst & Maniscalco, LLP Program Coordinator: Richard L. Stern, Esq. Thank you to Patrick McCormick, Esq., Campolo, Middleton & McCormick, LLP as Benefactor of this program. October 3, 2017 Suffolk County Bar Center, NY Timed Agenda: Abundant Splits and Other Significant Bankruptcy Decisions Nassau County Bar Associations Suffolk County Academy of Law EDNY Chapter, Federal Bar Association Mineola, New York October 3, 2017 6:00 – 8:00 p.m. Registration 5:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Introductions and welcome 6:00 to 6:05 p.m. Richard Stern Macco & Stern, Islandia, NY Program 6:05 to 8:00 p.m. Panelists Bill Rochelle • Editor-at-Large American Bankruptcy Institute Judge Alan S. Trust EDNY Bankruptcy Court Matthew Spero Rivkin Radler, Uniondale, NY Adam Wofse Lamonica, Herbst & Maniscalco, Wantaugh, NY Abundant Splits and Other Significant Bankruptcy Decisions Nassau-Suffolk Bankruptcy Bar Mineola, New York October 3, 2017 Bill Rochelle • Editor-at-Large American Bankruptcy Institute [email protected] • 703. 894.5909 © 2017 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600 • Alexandria, VA 22014 • www.abi.org American Bankruptcy Institute • 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600 • Alexandria, VA 22314 1 www.abi.org Table of Contents Supreme Court ........................................................................................................................ 4 Decided This Term ........................................................................................................................... 5 Supreme Court Reverses Jevic, Bars Structured Dismissals that Violate Priority Rules .............. 6 Supreme Court Allows Debt Collectors to File Time-Barred Proofs of Claim ............................. 9 A Debt Purchaser Is Not a ‘Debt Collector’ Regulated by the FDCPA, Supreme Court Holds .. 12 Did the Supreme Court Hint that Bankruptcy Venue Is Too Broad? .......................................... 14 Next Term ....................................................................................................................................... 18 Supreme Court Grants ‘Cert’ on Appellate Standards for Non-Statutory Insider Status ............ 19 Supreme Court to Decide Whether Using a ‘Mere Conduit’ Invokes the 546(e) ‘Safe Harbor’ . 22 Supreme Court Will Not Resolve Circuit Split on Recharacterization ........................................ 24 Reorganization ...................................................................................................................... 26 Sales ................................................................................................................................................. 27 Ninth Circuit Joins Minority in Allowing Sales Free & Clear of Leases .................................... 28 Sixth Circuit Widens Split on Mooting Appeals from Sale Orders ............................................. 30 Estate Property ............................................................................................................................... 32 Circuit Says a Perfected Assignment of Rents Takes Property Out of the Estate ....................... 33 Jurisdiction & Power ..................................................................................................................... 35 Seventh Circuit Requires Stern Consent from Unserved Defendants in Non-Core Suits............ 36 Retention of Jurisdiction by Itself Does Not Confer Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Circuit Holds 39 Delaware District Judge Issues Important Opinion on Third-Party Releases .............................. 41 Refinancing & Tender Offers ....................................................................................................... 45 Third Circuit Splits with New York by Allowing Make-Whole Premiums in Chapter 11.......... 46 Second Circuit Blesses a Nonconsensual Out-of-Court Restructuring ........................................ 49 Plans & Confirmation .................................................................................................................... 52 Cramdown Value Is Not the Higher of Foreclosure or Replacement Value, Ninth Circuit Says 53 Ninth Circuit Now Requires Paying Default Interest to Cure a Default ...................................... 57 To Establish Record Dates, the Plan Applies, Not Securities Regulations .................................. 60 Fired Worker’s Entire Severance Claim Given Priority in Delaware by Judge Carey ................ 62 Committees ..................................................................................................................................... 64 Delaware Judge Narrows Jevic to Prohibit Only End-of-Case Priority Skipping ....................... 65 Split Sixth Circuit Bars Litigation Trustees from Suing on D&O Policies ................................. 67 Existence of a Committee Precludes Tolling the Statute for Adverse Domination ..................... 70 Ninth Circuit Extends Barton to Protect Creditors’ Committee Members .................................. 72 New York Judge Requires Hedge Funds to Disclose Their Investors ......................................... 74 Stays & Injunctions ........................................................................................................................ 76 Circuit Split Widens on Stay Violation for Failure to Turn Over Repossessed Collateral .......... 77 State Law Determines Whether Post-Filing Mechanic’s Liens Are Voidable ............................ 80 Cutting Off Medicare Funding Is Exempt from the Automatic Stay, First Circuit Says ............. 82 Executory Contracts & Leases ...................................................................................................... 84 Lease Rejection Cap Doesn’t Apply to Past-Due Rent Accrued Before Rejection ..................... 85 First Circuit BAP Rejects Lubrizol on Rejection of Trademark Licenses ................................... 87 Compensation ................................................................................................................................. 89 American Bankruptcy Institute • 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600 • Alexandria, VA 22314 1 www.abi.org Delaware Judge Disregards Committee Fee Cap if a Chapter 11 Plan Is Confirmed ................. 90 Baker Botts Read Narrowly on Compensation for Defending Fee Application .......................... 92 Fraudulent Transfers ..................................................................................................................... 94 Ninth Circuit Splits with Seventh on Sovereign Immunity and Derivative Suits by a Trustee ... 95 Circuits Split on Objective vs. Subjective Value for Fraudulent Transfer Consideration ........... 98 New York District Judges Are Split on Drawing Inferences of Fraud from Executives ........... 100 Sixth Circuit Pens Major Decision on Duty to Investigate Suspicions of Fraud ....................... 103 Judge Bonapfel Sides with Fifth Circuit on ‘Equivalent Value’ in Ponzi Schemes .................. 106 Preferences & Claims .................................................................................................................. 110 Receipt under Section 503(b)(9) Occurs on Physical Possession, Third Circuit Holds ............ 111 Preference Analysis Permits ‘Hypothetical-Within-a-Hypothetical’ on Chapter 7 Recovery ... 113 Allowing WARN Claims in Liquidating Chapter 11s, Chicago Judge Splits with 3d Circuit .. 117 Courts Divided on Electric Service as ‘Goods’ Under Section 503(b)(9) ................................. 120 Subordination & Dismissal.......................................................................................................... 122 No Subordination in Ninth Circuit for a Stock Conversion Claim ............................................ 123 Judge Punts on How the Rule of Explicitness Survived Adoption of the Code ........................ 125 Consumer Bankruptcy ....................................................................................................... 127 Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ............................................................................................. 128 Eighth Circuit Broadly Interprets the FDCPA to Protect Consumers ....................................... 129 Lawyers Violate FDCPA with Factually Inaccurate Allegations in Bankruptcy Pleadings ...... 132 Courts Can’t Sanction Debt Collectors for Filing Stale Claims after Midland Funding ........... 134 Discharge/Dischargeability.......................................................................................................... 136 Discharge Denied for Omitting Name of a Retirement Account ............................................... 137 Co-Conspirator’s Intent Is Enough for Nondischargeability, Fifth Circuit Holds ..................... 139 Circuits Now Split on Dischargeability for Third Party’s Violation of Securities Laws .......... 141 Falsely Misrepresenting One Asset Isn’t Grounds for Nondischargeability, Circuit Holds ...... 143 Undervaluing One Asset Can Result in Denial of Discharge, Fourth Circuit Holds ................. 145 Subjective Feeling of Coercion Doesn’t State a Claim for Discharge Violation ....................... 147 No Contempt
Recommended publications
  • An Empirical Study of the Ideologies of Judges on the Unites States
    JUDGED BY THE COMPANY YOU KEEP: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE IDEOLOGIES OF JUDGES ON THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS Corey Rayburn Yung* Abstract: Although there has been an explosion of empirical legal schol- arship about the federal judiciary, with a particular focus on judicial ide- ology, the question remains: how do we know what the ideology of a judge actually is? For federal courts below the U.S. Supreme Court, legal aca- demics and political scientists have offered only crude proxies to identify the ideologies of judges. This Article attempts to cure this deficiency in empirical research about the federal courts by introducing a new tech- nique for measuring the ideology of judges based upon judicial behavior in the U.S. courts of appeals. This study measures ideology, not by subjec- tively coding the ideological direction of case outcomes, but by determin- ing the degree to which federal appellate judges agree and disagree with their liberal and conservative colleagues at both the appellate and district court levels. Further, through regression analysis, several important find- ings related to the Ideology Scores emerge. First, the Ideology Scores in this Article offer substantial improvements in predicting civil rights case outcomes over the leading measures of ideology. Second, there were very different levels and heterogeneity of ideology among the judges on the studied circuits. Third, the data did not support the conventional wisdom that Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush appointed uniquely ideological judges. Fourth, in general judges appointed by Republican presidents were more ideological than those appointed by Democratic presidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Circuit
    Full_Name City State Last_Name Next Clerkship Opening Accepting Applications Mail, Email or OSCAR? Post Grad Experience? Notes Thomas L. Ambro Wilmington DE Ambro 2021 posted on OSCAR online preferred Stephanos Bibas Philadelphia PA Bibas 2020 and 2021 posted on OSCAR online, email, do not send paper preferred Michael A. Chagares Newark NJ Chagares 2022 posted on OSCAR online, paper requires district court clerkship Robert E. Cowen Trenton NJ Cowen No longer hiring term clerks n/a n/a D. Michael Fisher Pittsburgh PA Fisher 2020 posted on OSCAR online May be reducing workload/going to 2021 but not accepting applications 3 clerks. Does not want paper Julio M. Fuentes Newark NJ Fuentes now no online prefers prior clerkship or work experience applications, will post on OSCAR Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr. Newark NJ Greenaway 2020 yes paper requires one year post-grad work experience not hiring at this time, no other Morton I. Greenberg Trenton NJ Greenberg information no paper prefers prior clerkship Thomas M. Hardiman Pittsburgh PA Hardiman 2020 posted on OSCAR online Kent A. Jordan Wilmington DE Jordan 2021 yes paper Cheryl Ann Krause Philadelphia PA Krause 2021 posted on OSCAR online prefers prior clerkship Paul Matey Newark NJ Matey 2021 posted on OSCAR mail, email preferred Prefers candidates with a public interest background and work Theodore A. McKee Philadelphia PA McKee not accepting applications no paper experience Richard Lowell Nygaard Erie PA Nygaard No longer hiring term clerks n/a n/a David J. Porter Pittsburgh PA Porter 2020, 2021, 2022 posted on OSCAR online, paper, email May be reducing workload/going to Marjorie O.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Nominations Submitted to The
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2014 Nominations Submitted to the Senate November 21, 2014 The following list does not include promotions of members of the Uniformed Services, nominations to the Service Academies, or nominations of Foreign Service Officers. Submitted January 6 Jill A. Pryor, of Georgia, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 11th Circuit, vice Stanley F. Birch, Jr., retired. Carolyn B. McHugh, of Utah, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 10th Circuit, vice Michael R. Murphy, retired. Michelle T. Friedland, of California, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, vice Raymond C. Fisher, retired. Nancy L. Moritz, of Kansas, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 10th Circuit, vice Deanell Reece Tacha, retired. John B. Owens, of California, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit, vice Stephen S. Trott, retired. David Jeremiah Barron, of Massachusetts, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the First Circuit, vice Michael Boudin, retired. Robin S. Rosenbaum, of Florida, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 11th Circuit, vice Rosemary Barkett, resigned. Julie E. Carnes, of Georgia, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the 11th Circuit, vice James Larry Edmondson, retired. Gregg Jeffrey Costa, of Texas, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Fifth Circuit, vice Fortunato P. Benavides, retired. Rosemary Márquez, of Arizona, to be U.S. District Judge for the District of Arizona, vice Frank R. Zapata, retired. Pamela L. Reeves, of Tennessee, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Tennessee, vice Thomas W. Phillips, retiring.
    [Show full text]
  • Few Bills, but Many Nominees, Approved Last Year
    VOTE STUDIES Few Bills, but Many Nominees, Approved Last Year Nothing worked for Democrats in 2014. setting records for its opposition to the presi- In the Senate, Majority Leader Harry Reid of dent. Of 66 House votes on which Obama Nevada tried to shield his caucus from tough had a view in 2014, only 10 went Obama’s MIRROR IMAGES votes, limiting amendments and keeping the way, a 15.2 percent success rate that is the President Barack Obama won on House agenda focused on only the issues that Dem- lowest in the 61 years that CQ Roll Call has votes at the lowest rate in the 61 years ocrats wanted to run on in November, such been tracking presidential success. The aver- that CQ Roll Call has been tracking as equal pay for women and an increased age Republican representative voted with presidential votes. Because of a glut minimum wage. It didn’t help. Endangered Obama 12 percent of the time, matching the of nomination votes, Obama’s Senate Democrats in the South and West were ham- record low that the party set in 2013. score was the second highest ever. mered in the midterm elections for sticking Because of the 60-vote threshold needed with Reid and President Barack Obama. to advance controversial legislation, Obama Share of votes on which the In the House, Republican Speaker John A. also had a bad year in the Senate on policy president took a clear position: Boehner of Ohio pushed through bill after votes. His 55 percent success rate on them House Senate bill designed to please the GOP’s base and was his lowest ever.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Courts of the United States
    66 U.S. GOVERNMENT MANUAL of Decisions, the Librarian, the Marshal, Court Term The term of the Court the Director of Budget and Personnel, begins on the first Monday in October the Court Counsel, the Curator, the and lasts until the first Monday in Director of Data Systems, and the Public October of the next year. Approximately Information Officer. 8,000 cases are filed with the Court in Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate the course of a term, and some 1,000 jurisdiction has been conferred upon the applications of various kinds are filed Supreme Court by various statutes under each year that can be acted upon by a the authority given Congress by the single Justice. Constitution. The basic statute effective at this time in conferring and controlling Access to Facilities The Supreme Court jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may is open to the public from 9 a.m. to 4:30 be found in 28 U.S.C. 1251, 1253, p.m., Monday through Friday, except on 1254, 1257–1259, and various special Federal holidays. Unless the Court or statutes. Congress has no authority to Chief Justice orders otherwise, the change the original jurisdiction of this Clerk’s office is open from 9 a.m. to 5 Court. p.m., Monday through Friday, except on Rulemaking Power Congress has from Federal legal holidays. The library is time to time conferred upon the open to members of the bar of the Court, Supreme Court power to prescribe rules attorneys for the various Federal of procedure to be followed by the departments and agencies, and Members lower courts of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Panel Assignment in the Federal Courts of Appeals Marin K
    Cornell Law Review Volume 103 Article 2 Issue 1 November 2017 Panel Assignment in the Federal Courts of Appeals Marin K. Levy Duke University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr Part of the Courts Commons Recommended Citation Marin K. Levy, Panel Assignment in the Federal Courts of Appeals, 103 Cornell L. Rev. 65 (2017) Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol103/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. \\jciprod01\productn\C\CRN\103-1\CRN102.txt unknown Seq: 1 17-NOV-17 13:58 PANEL ASSIGNMENT IN THE FEDERAL COURTS OF APPEALS Marin K. Levy† It is common knowledge that the federal courts of appeals typically hear cases in panels of three judges and that the composition of the panel can have significant consequences for case outcomes and for legal doctrine more generally. Yet neither legal scholars nor social scientists have focused on the question of how judges are selected for their panels. Instead, a substantial body of scholarship simply assumes that panel assignment is random. This Article provides what, up until this point, has been a missing account of panel assignment. Drawing on a multiyear qualitative study of five circuit courts, including in-depth inter- views with thirty-five judges and senior administrators, I show that strictly random selection is a myth, and an improb- able one at that—in many instances, it would have been im- possible as a practical matter for the courts studied here to create their panels by random draw.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundant Splits and Other Significant Bankruptcy Decisions
    Abundant Splits and Other Significant Bankruptcy Decisions Inns of Court Houston, Texas October 25, 2016 Bill Rochelle • Editor-at-Large American Bankruptcy Institute [email protected] • 703. 894.5909 © 2016 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600 • Alexandria, VA 22014 • www.abi.org American Bankruptcy Institute • 66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600 • Alexandria, VA 22314 1 www.abi.org Table of Contents Supreme Court ........................................................................................................................ 4 Last Term ..........................................................................................................................................5 Supreme Court Invalidates Puerto Rico’s Local Law for Municipal Debt Adjustment .................6 Supreme Court: Misrepresentation Not Required for ‘Actual Fraud’ Nondischargeability ..........9 Supreme Court Temporarily Ducks Case on Individuals’ Right to Sue .......................................13 Next Term ........................................................................................................................................17 Supreme Court Will Review Jevic to Rule on Structured Dismissals and Gift Plans ..................18 Supreme Court to Resolve Circuit Splits on the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ...................20 Reorganization ...................................................................................................................... 23 Sales ..................................................................................................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Third Circuit Bar Association Newsletter 14-1 January 2020
    Bar Association for the Third Federal Circuit On Appeal January 2020 SAVE THE DATES – THIRD CIRCUIT JUDICIAL CONFERENCE Volume XIV, Number 1 The next Third Circuit Judicial Conference will be open to members of the bar and will • Save the Dates – Third Circuit Judicial be held from Wednesday, May 13 through Friday, May 15, 2020 at the Penn’s Landing Conference – Page 1 Hilton in Philadelphia. As at past conferences, the Third Circuit Bar Association will be • Third Circuit Bar Association Welcomes sponsoring the Wednesday night cocktail reception that precedes the bench-bar dinner Judge Paul B. Matey and Judge Peter J. and will host a breakfast meeting on Thursday morning. The Court has asked us to Phipps to the Court – Page 2 organize and present the ethics segment of the CLE offerings, which will be presented • Third Circuit Maintains Longstanding on Friday morning. Information about registering will be forthcoming from the Court and View that Private Citizens Lack Judicially we will disseminate that information as soon as we receive it. Cognizable Interest in the Prosecution of Another – Page 3 Past bench-bar judicial conferences have offered opportunities to learn about judicial • Fleeing the Cave of Polyphemus administrative issues (at both the trial and appellate level) that are of concern to the and Journeying Between Scylla and courts within the Circuit and to offer feedback about issues that concern attorneys Charybdis – Page 4 who practice in federal courts. The CLE offerings are first rate and relevant to issues that federal practitioners within the Circuit face. The Third Circuit’s judges and their • U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • What Judges Want and Need: User-Friendly Foundations for Effective Judicial Education
    Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 2015 Issue 1 Article 3 2015 What Judges Want and Need: User-Friendly Foundations for Effective Judicial Education Duane Benton Jennifer A.L. Sheldon-Sherman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, and the Legal Education Commons Recommended Citation Duane Benton and Jennifer A.L. Sheldon-Sherman, What Judges Want and Need: User-Friendly Foundations for Effective Judicial Education, 2015 J. Disp. Resol. (2015) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2015/iss1/3 This Conference is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Dispute Resolution by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Benton and Sheldon-Sherman: What Judges Want and Need: User-Friendly Foundations for Effectiv What Judges Want and Need: User- Friendly Foundations for Effective Judicial Education DUANE BENTON* JENNIFER A.L. SHELDON-SHERMAN** INTRODUCTION Over the past fifty years, judicial education has become “integral and essen- tial” to judicial systems.1 Most states have judicial education divisions or research organizations.2 Many also have significant funding for judicial education.3 Scholars increasingly study judicial education programming. Dozens of organiza- tions now design, evaluate, and implement judicial education.4 Despite these advancements, it is not clear how closely judicial education is grounded in the needs and preferences of judges. This article evaluates the connection between judicial education and judges’ needs and preferences.
    [Show full text]
  • Burger-Blackmun Relationship: Lessons for Collegiality from the Blackmun Papers, The
    Missouri Law Review Volume 70 Issue 4 Fall 2005 Article 4 Fall 2005 Burger-Blackmun Relationship: Lessons for Collegiality from the Blackmun Papers, The Duane Benton Barrett J. Vahle Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Duane Benton and Barrett J. Vahle, Burger-Blackmun Relationship: Lessons for Collegiality from the Blackmun Papers, The, 70 MO. L. REV. (2005) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol70/iss4/4 This Conference is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Benton and Vahle: Benton: Burger-Blackmun Relationship: The Burger-Blackmun Relationship: Lessons for Collegiality from the Blackmun Papers Duane Benton 2 Barrett J. Vahle On March 4, 2004, the Harry A. Blackmun Papers became available to the public at the Library of Congress.3 The Papers shed new light on Justice Blackmun's relationship with Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, providing a case study in collegiality. Before Blackmun's confirmation, an article in Time magazine stated, "No one seems to feel that Blackmun would be subservient to his lifelong friend, Chief Justice Warren Burger.' 4 The Senate appeared to agree, seemingly satis- fied with Blackmun's response to Senator Edward M. Kennedy's direct ques- tion about his relationship with Chief Justice Burger.5 The Associated Press, 6 New York Times, and Wall Street Journalwere, however, less sanguine.
    [Show full text]
  • CQ Presidential Support Scores
    2014 Vote Studies Presidential Support Running on Empty Few bills, but many nominees, approved last year BY SHAWN ZELLER of the votes on which the president had a MIRROR IMAGES Nothing worked for Democrats in 2014. position, close to the record score of 96 per- President Barack Obama won on House In the Senate, Majority Leader Harry Reid of cent in 2013. But the Republican House was votes at the lowest rate in the 61 years Nevada tried to shield his caucus from tough setting records for its opposition to the presi- that CQ Roll Call has been tracking votes, limiting amendments and keeping the dent. Of 66 House votes on which Obama presidential votes. Because of a glut agenda focused on only the issues that Dem- had a view in 2014, only 10 went Obama’s of nomination votes, Obama’s Senate ocrats wanted to run on in November, such way, a 15.2 percent success rate that is the score was the second highest ever. as equal pay for women and an increased lowest in the 61 years that CQ Roll Call has minimum wage. It didn’t help. Endangered been tracking presidential success. The aver- Share of votes on which the Democrats in the South and West were ham- age Republican representative voted with president took a clear position: mered in the midterm elections for sticking Obama 12 percent of the time, matching the House Senate with Reid and President Barack Obama. record low that the party set in 2013. 11.7% 39.6% In the House, Republican Speaker John A.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Courts of the United States
    66 U.S. GOVERNMENT MANUAL include the Administrative Assistant to of procedure to be followed by the the Chief Justice, the Clerk, the Reporter lower courts of the United States. of Decisions, the Librarian, the Marshal, Court Term The term of the Court the Director of Budget and Personnel, begins on the first Monday in October the Court Counsel, the Curator, the and lasts until the first Monday in Director of Data Systems, and the Public October of the next year. Approximately 8,000 cases are filed with the Court in Information Officer. the course of a term, and some 1,000 Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate applications of various kinds are filed jurisdiction has been conferred upon the each year that can be acted upon by a Supreme Court by various statutes under single Justice. the authority given Congress by the Access to Facilities The Supreme Court Constitution. The basic statute effective is open to the public from 9 a.m. to 4:30 at this time in conferring and controlling p.m., Monday through Friday, except on jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may Federal holidays. Unless the Court or be found in 28 U.S.C. 1251, 1253, Chief Justice orders otherwise, the 1254, 1257–1259, and various special Clerk’s office is open from 9 a.m. to 5 statutes. Congress has no authority to p.m., Monday through Friday, except on change the original jurisdiction of this Federal legal holidays. The library is Court. open to members of the bar of the Court, Rulemaking Power Congress has from attorneys for the various Federal time to time conferred upon the departments and agencies, and Members Supreme Court power to prescribe rules of Congress.
    [Show full text]