DOCSLIB.ORG

IN the UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT for the DISTRICT of DELAWARE in Re: CARBONLITE HOLDINGS LLC, Et Al.,1 Debtors. ) ) ) )

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IN the UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT for the DISTRICT of DELAWARE in Re: CARBONLITE HOLDINGS LLC, Et Al.,1 Debtors. ) ) ) ) Case 21-10527-JTD Doc 475 Filed 05/18/21 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) CARBONLITE HOLDINGS LLC, et al.,1 ) Case No. 21-10527 (JTD) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF DEADLINES FOR THE FILING OF (I) PROOFS OF CLAIM, INCLUDING REQUESTS FOR PAYMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 503(b)(9) OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE, AND (II) REJECTION DAMAGES CLAIMS IN THE NEW YORK TIMES (NATIONAL EDITION) ____________________________________________ 1 The Debtors in these cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are: CarbonLite Holdings LLC (8957); CarbonLite Industries LLC (3596); CarbonLite P Holdings LLC (8957); CarbonLite P LLC (5453); CarbonLite PI Holdings LLC (8957); CarbonLite Pinnpack LLC (8957); CarbonLite Recycling Holdings LLC (8957); CarbonLite Sub-Holdings, LLC (8957); Pinnpack P, LLC (8322); CarbonLite Recycling LLC (3727); and Pinnpack Packaging LLC (9948). The address of the Debtors’ corporate headquarters is 10250 Constellation Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90067. Case 21-10527-JTD Doc 475 Filed 05/18/21 Page 2 of 3 PROOF OF PUBLICATION 21 ___________________________Apr-16, 20___ /͕ĚŐĂƌEŽďůĞƐĂůĂ͕ŝŶŵLJĐĂƉĂĐŝƚLJĂƐĂWƌŝŶĐŝƉĂůůĞƌŬŽĨƚŚĞWƵďůŝƐŚĞƌŽĨ Ă ĚĂŝůLJŶĞǁƐƉĂƉĞƌŽĨŐĞŶĞƌĂůĐŝƌĐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƉƌŝŶƚĞĚĂŶĚƉƵďůŝƐŚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŝƚLJ͕ŽƵŶƚLJĂŶĚ^ƚĂƚĞŽĨEĞǁzŽƌŬ͕ ŚĞƌĞďLJĐĞƌƚŝĨLJƚŚĂƚƚŚĞĂĚǀĞƌƚŝƐĞŵĞŶƚĂŶŶĞdžĞĚŚĞƌĞƚŽǁĂƐƉƵďůŝƐŚĞĚŝŶƚŚĞĞĚŝƚŝŽŶƐŽĨ ŽŶƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐĚĂƚĞŽƌĚĂƚĞƐ͕ƚŽǁŝƚŽŶ Apr 16, 2021, NYT & Natl, pg B5 ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ^ǁŽƌŶƚŽŵĞƚŚŝƐϭϲƚŚĚĂLJŽĨ Ɖƌŝů͕ϮϬϮϭ ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ EŽƚĂƌLJWƵďůŝĐ Case 21-10527-JTD Doc 475 Filed 05/18/21 Page 3 of 3 C M Y K Nxxx,2021-04-16,B,005,Bs-BW,E1 THE NEW YORK TIMES BUSINESS FRIDAY, APRIL 16, 2021 N B5 MEDIA How a Former Alt-Right YouTuber Fed Hate With Video FROM FIRST BUSINESS PAGE their own political views and real- cluding Lauren Southern, Stefan ize the contradiction in being a Molyneux and Alex Jones. hard-core feminist but also sup- The videos were tailored for the porting a religion that, quite “echo chamber” that is often cre- frankly, has questionable prac- ated by social media networks like tices around women,” she said. YouTube. To keep you watching, And, she added, they used video YouTube serves up videos similar techniques that any media com- to those you have watched before. pany would use. But the longer someone watches, The next year, Mr. Robertson the more extreme the videos can and Ms. Southern traveled as far become. as South Africa, Australia and “It can create these very radical New Zealand to create similar vid- people who are like gurus,” said eos. Over the lifetime of Ms. Guillaume Chaslot, a former Southern’s YouTube channel, ac- YouTube engineer who has been cording to channel statistics re- critical of the way the company’s viewed by The Times, her videos algorithms pushed people to ex- were viewed more than 63 million treme content. “In terms of watch times. time, a guru is wonderful.” More than 71 percent of people Tech companies, regulators and who viewed these videos had not individuals across the globe are subscribed to her YouTube chan- struggling to understand and con- nel. In 2018, at the height of her trol the enormous power of popularity, at least 30 percent of YouTube and other social media the views occurred after the vid- services. In 2019, YouTube made eos were automatically recom- “important changes to how we mended to the viewer by recommend videos and prevent YouTube’s algorithms. the spread of misinformation and Mr. Molyneux shied away from hateful content,” Farshad Shad- the kind of conflict that Ms. South- loo, a spokesman for the company, ern embraced. He fashioned him- said in a statement. It barred Mr. self as an online philosopher. But Molyneaux and Mr. Jones. But ex- the material Mr. Robertson edited treme videos continue to spread. slipped in “far-right ideas that ap- In time, Mr. Robertson said, he pealed to the ethnonationalists — realized that the videos he worked the extreme right-wing audience,” on stoked dangerous hatred. And he said. in 2019, at a conference in Britain In 2018, the two traveled to Po- run by a left-wing newspaper, The land for a video that painted the Byline Times, Mr. Robertson dis- GUY SMALLMAN/GETTY IMAGES country as a place free of hardship tanced himself from his work with and strife. The subtext was that A video showing Tommy Robinson, above, punching a migrant was viewed 2.8 the far right. His change of heart was because Poland is predomi- million times. YouTube routinely recommended Lauren Southern’s videos. was met with some skepticism. nantly white. In an email to The “He was presented as a prodi- Times, Mr. Molyneux said, “It was gal son,” said Louise Raw, an an- 49 people and wounded 53 more — part of a television reporter, ap- nice being in a country wherein I tifascist activist who was onstage Mr. Robertson developed an ex- proached each woman with the didn’t have to hire protective secu- for Mr. Robertson’s mea culpa. treme animosity toward Muslims, same four-word question: “Wom- rity.” He added that he felt the “But he has not been held to ac- particularly immigrants. His an- en’s rights or Islam?” same way when he visited Hong count.” ger was fueled in large part, he They often received a confused, Kong. Now, Mr. Robertson is detailing said, by videos he watched on measured or polite response, ac- By early 2019, Mr. Robertson the ways he and his collaborators YouTube. cording to Mr. Robertson. They said, he grew disillusioned. There searched for confrontations to He began watching videos from continued to ask the question and was a noticeable drop in traffic on gain popularity on YouTube. mainstream outlets, like an sharpened it. Ms. Southern, for Ms. Southern’s YouTube channel. Efforts to contact Mr. Robinson episode of the HBO show “Real example, said it would be difficult Around the same time, YouTube were unsuccessful, and Mr. Jones Time With Bill Maher” in which for Muslim women to answer the began to remove more videos the did not respond to multiple re- Sam Harris, an author and a pod- question because their husbands company thought encouraged vio- quests for comment. Ms. South- cast host, advocated greater criti- wouldn’t let them attend the lence and spread misinformation. ern said she should not be de- cism of Muslim beliefs. YouTube’s march. That caused anger to build After an Australian man killed scribed as a far-right activist, say- recommendation algorithm sug- in the crowd. 51 people at two mosques in ing she is merely a conservative. JOSH EDELSON/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE — GETTY IMAGES gested more-extreme videos in- “It appears in the videos that Christchurch, New Zealand — She was not involved in “some volving personalities like Mr. Rob- we are just trying to figure out driven in part by anti-immigrant horrible far-right grift that tried to and told him to live his own life, more extreme videos,” Mr. Rob- inson, a former member of the what is going on, gather informa- beliefs propagated by YouTube — deceive people into watching our Mr. Robinson escalated the argu- ertson said. neo-fascist and white nationalist tion, understand people,” Mr. Rob- Mr. Robertson realized, he said, content,” she added. “We were ment. Mr. Robertson grew up in Ire- British National Party who was ertson said. “But really, we were that the videos he had made led to just doing what any other YouTu- “There’s one way this is going to land, and after his parents di- born Stephen Yaxley-Lennon. trying to find the most incendiary the same kind of violence in the ber does.” go,” he told the man. “You’re going vorced, he moved with his father In 2017, Mr. Robertson con- way of making them mad.” Orlando nightclub in 2016. Raw footage of the episode in to end up knocked down uncon- to a predominantly working-class tacted Mr. Robinson and soon be- The thumbnail image for the “I felt like I had gone full circle Rome, provided by Mr. Robertson scious.” area in the north of England. Real- gan working with him as a video YouTube video was indicative of a that day,” he said. and reviewed by The New York Over the more than two years izing from a very young age that producer. By the end of the year, confrontation: a woman scream- Now, Mr. Robertson oversees Times, shows that the YouTube he helped produce and publish he is gay, he often felt like an out- he was also collaborating with Ms. ing as Ms. Southern walked away. Byline TV, a video offshoot of The video was edited to give the false videos for Mr. Robinson and oth- sider. But he said he encountered Southern, an activist from Cana- As he often did, Mr. Robertson Byline Times. He also runs a new impression that Mr. Robinson was ers, Mr. Robertson learned how more overt homophobia when he da. sharpened the video’s visual con- organization, Future of Freedom, threatened. The full footage making clever edits and focusing moved to London for college and Knowing what garnered the trast — lightening the white colors which seeks to de-radicalize right- shows he was the aggressor. on confrontation could help draw walked through the largely Mus- most attention on YouTube, Mr. and darkening the blacks — to wing extremists. He is still count- When the man noticed he was millions of views on YouTube and lim neighborhoods at the East Robertson said, he and Ms. South- subtly make the scene seem more ing YouTube views. being filmed from across the other services. He also learned End of the city. ern would devise public appear- dramatic. Mr. Robertson recently boasted street, he approached the camera, how YouTube’s recommendation After the 2016 shooting at a gay ances meant to generate conflict.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Measurement Study of Genetic Testing Conversations on Reddit and 4Chan
    Proceedings of the Fourteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2020) “And We Will Fight for Our Race!” A Measurement Study of Genetic Testing Conversations on Reddit and 4chan Alexandros Mittos, Savvas Zannettou,† Jeremy Blackburn,‡ Emiliano De Cristofaro University College London, †Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Informatik, ‡Binghamton University {a.mittos, e.decristofaro}@ucl.ac.uk, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Alas, increased popularity of self-administered genetic tests has also been accompanied by media reports of far-right Progress in genomics has enabled the emergence of a boom- ing market for “direct-to-consumer” genetic testing. Nowa- groups using it to attack minorities or prove their genetic days, companies like 23andMe and AncestryDNA provide af- “purity” (Reeve 2016), mirroring concerns of a new wave of fordable health, genealogy, and ancestry reports, and have al- scientific racism (Reich 2018). Also, statements from Don- ready tested tens of millions of customers. At the same time, ald Trump led Senator Warren to publicly confirm her Native alt- and far-right groups have also taken an interest in genetic American ancestry via genetic testing (Linskey 2018). testing, using them to attack minorities and prove their ge- Interest in DTC genetic testing by right-wing communi- netic “purity.” In this paper, we present a measurement study ties comes at a time when racism, hate, and antisemitism on shedding light on how genetic testing is being discussed on platforms like 4chan, Gab, and certain communities on Red- Web communities in Reddit and 4chan. We collect 1.3M comments posted over 27 months on the two platforms, us- dit is on the rise (Hine et al.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Gab? a Bastion of Free Speech Or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?
    What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber? Savvas Zannettou Barry Bradlyn Emiliano De Cristofaro Cyprus University of Technology Princeton Center for Theoretical Science University College London [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Haewoon Kwak Michael Sirivianos Gianluca Stringhini Qatar Computing Research Institute Cyprus University of Technology University College London & Hamad Bin Khalifa University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jeremy Blackburn University of Alabama at Birmingham [email protected] ABSTRACT ACM Reference Format: Over the past few years, a number of new “fringe” communities, Savvas Zannettou, Barry Bradlyn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Haewoon Kwak, like 4chan or certain subreddits, have gained traction on the Web Michael Sirivianos, Gianluca Stringhini, and Jeremy Blackburn. 2018. What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?. In WWW at a rapid pace. However, more often than not, little is known about ’18 Companion: The 2018 Web Conference Companion, April 23–27, 2018, Lyon, how they evolve or what kind of activities they attract, despite France. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558. recent research has shown that they influence how false informa- 3191531 tion reaches mainstream communities. This motivates the need to monitor these communities and analyze their impact on the Web’s information ecosystem. 1 INTRODUCTION In August 2016, a new social network called Gab was created The Web’s information ecosystem is composed of multiple com- as an alternative to Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fringe Insurgency Connectivity, Convergence and Mainstreaming of the Extreme Right
    The Fringe Insurgency Connectivity, Convergence and Mainstreaming of the Extreme Right Jacob Davey Julia Ebner About this paper About the authors This report maps the ecosystem of the burgeoning Jacob Davey is a Researcher and Project Coordinator at ‘new’ extreme right across Europe and the US, which is the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), overseeing the characterised by its international outlook, technological development and delivery of a range of online counter- sophistication, and overtures to groups outside of the extremism initiatives. His research interests include the traditional recruitment pool for the extreme-right. This role of communications technologies in intercommunal movement is marked by its opportunistic pragmatism, conflict, the use of internet culture in information seeing movements which hold seemingly contradictory operations, and the extreme-right globally. He has ideologies share a bed for the sake of achieving provided commentary on the extreme right in a range common goals. It examines points of connectivity of media sources including The Guardian, The New York and collaboration between disparate groups and Times and the BBC. assesses the interplay between different extreme-right movements, key influencers and subcultures both Julia Ebner is a Research Fellow at the Institute for online and offline. Strategic Dialogue (ISD) and author of The Rage: The Vicious Circle of Islamist and Far-Right Extremism. Her research focuses on extreme right-wing mobilisation strategies, cumulative extremism and European terrorism prevention initiatives. She advises policy makers and tech industry leaders, regularly writes for The Guardian and The Independent and provides commentary on broadcast media, including the BBC and CNN. © ISD, 2017 London Washington DC Beirut Toronto This material is offered free of charge for personal and non-commercial use, provided the source is acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses to the White-Supremacist Terrorist Attacks
    | 11 Editorial After 15 March: Responses to the White-Supremacist Terrorist Attacks MURDOCH STEPHENS, JACK FOSTER, DYLAN TAYLOR, AMANDA THOMAS & CHAMSY EL-OJEILI For many of us who do not encounter forms of racial and religious hatred in daily life, the white-supremacist terrorist attacks of 15 March, which killed 51 people and injured 49 others at the Al-Noor mosque and Linwood Islamic Centre in Christchurch, were experienced as a traumatic blow seemingly from nowhere. Explaining and politically responding to the tragedy felt imperative, but collective grief, indignation, and empathy were quite rightly the most immediate feelings and responses in the weeks that followed. Here, writing from a Pākehā, non- Muslim perspective, we want to consider some of the wider explanatory and strategic questions that the Left must face in the wake of these attacks. A call to prioritise Muslim voices in the country’s media followed the shootings. We begin this editorial by briefly surveying some of the key themes that appeared across Muslim responses to the attacks and their aftermath. This discussion draws on a selection of the responses produced in the immediate wake of the attacks or in the weeks that followed.1 This survey is only a partial coverage of the responses, and we do not claim to be representing 1 These references were drawn from those compiled by the Grappling with Ethnography blog, https:// grapplingwithethnography.net/ 12 | COUNTERFUTURES 7 the full range of positions held within the Muslim community. Many of the responses welcomed the sympathy and support the Muslim community received after the attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • " and We Will Fight for Our Race!" a Measurement Study of Genetic Testing Conversations on Reddit and 4Chan
    “And We Will Fight For Our Race!” A Measurement Study of Genetic Testing Conversations on Reddit and 4chan∗ Alexandros Mittos1, Savvas Zannettou2, Jeremy Blackburn3, and Emiliano De Cristofaro1 1University College London 2Cyprus University of Technology 3Binghamton University fa.mittos,[email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract include genetic ancestry tests, which promise a way to discover one’s ancestral roots, building on patterns of genetic variations Progress in genomics has enabled the emergence of a boom- common in people from similar backgrounds [57]. However, ing market for “direct-to-consumer” genetic testing. Nowadays, these are subject to limitations, e.g., results differ from provider companies like 23andMe and AncestryDNA provide affordable to provider due to different control groups [72]. AncestryDNA health, genealogy, and ancestry reports, and have already tested alone has tested more than 10M customers as of Jan 2019 [6]. tens of millions of customers. At the same time, alt- and far- Alas, increased popularity of self-administered genetic tests, right groups have also taken an interest in genetic testing, using and in particular ancestry, has also been accompanied by me- them to attack minorities and prove their genetic “purity.” In dia reports of far-right groups using it to attack minorities or this paper, we present a measurement study shedding light on prove their genetic “purity” [15, 66] mirroring concerns of a how genetic testing is being discussed on Web communities in new wave of scientific racism [68]. For example, white na- Reddit and 4chan. We collect 1.3M comments posted over 27 tionalists were recently taped chugging milk at gatherings to months on the two platforms, using a set of 280 keywords re- demonstrate the ability of white people to better digest lac- lated to genetic testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right
    Maik Fielitz, Nick Thurston (eds.) Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right Political Science | Volume 71 Maik Fielitz, Nick Thurston (eds.) Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US With kind support of Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Na- tionalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available in the Internet at http://dnb.d-nb.de This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No- Derivatives 4.0 (BY-NC-ND) which means that the text may be used for non-commer- cial purposes, provided credit is given to the author. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ To create an adaptation, translation, or derivative of the original work and for com- mercial use, further permission is required and can be obtained by contacting [email protected] Creative Commons license terms for re-use do not apply to any content (such as graphs, figures, photos, excerpts, etc.) not original to the Open Access publication and further permission may be required from the rights holder. The obligation to research and clear permission lies solely with the party re-using the material. © 2019 transcript Verlag, Bielefeld Cover layout: Kordula Röckenhaus, Bielefeld Typeset by Alexander Masch, Bielefeld Printed by Majuskel Medienproduktion GmbH, Wetzlar Print-ISBN 978-3-8376-4670-2 PDF-ISBN 978-3-8394-4670-6 https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839446706 Contents Introduction | 7 Stephen Albrecht, Maik Fielitz and Nick Thurston ANALYZING Understanding the Alt-Right.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on CBS Is a Whitewash
    VOLUME 12 ISSUE 2 FEBRUARY 2005 www.MediaResearch.org The Media Research Center’s Monthly Members’ Report Report on CBS Is a Whitewash INSIDE PAGE 3 Dear Member, Former CBS CBS has released its report on the history of scurrilously bashing the President President Laments investigation into its National Guard forgery and the GOP. (The MRC’s own news division, Network’s Liberalism story, and predictably has whitewashed its CNSNews.com, broke the story on the forged ● scandalous behavior, again. documents.) Furthermore, the wife and son PAGE 3 As we repeatedly noted since the of the man who supposedly “typed” the Media Downplay ‘Memogate’ scandal broke in September, CBS documents warned CBS that the documents Tsunami-Victim and the independent reviewers needed to were forgeries. And CBS’s own document Aid from Oil-Rich answer four questions: 1) What did CBS do experts warned the net-work that the memos Middle East wrong? 2) Who’s were unreliable. ● responsible? 3) Why did Marcel Matley, the PAGE 4 CBS get it so wrong? lead expert Dan Rather Bits & Pieces: And 4) How will CBS put forward as an New Poll: Americans correct the problem? authenticator of the Don’t Trust the Press, The independent memos, said, “There’s Ted Turner Compares reviewers did a decent no way that I, as a FNC to Hitler job answering the first document expert, can ● two questions, but they authenticate them.” PAGE 6 completely dodged on In response, Dan CNSNews.com the last two. Let’s look Rather, snug as a bug in Teams Up With at the facts.
    [Show full text]
  • How White Supremacist Groups Have Embraced Crowdfunding
    From Classifieds to Crypto: How White Supremacist Groups Have Embraced Crowdfunding ALEX NEWHOUSE Center on Terrorism, Extremism, and Counterterrorism www.middlebury.edu/institute/academics/centers-initiatives/ctec The Center on Terrorism, Extremism, and Counterterrorism (CTEC) conducts in-depth research on terrorism and other forms of extremism. Formerly known as the Monterey Terrorism Research and Education Program, CTEC collaborates with world-renowned faculty and their graduate students in the Middlebury Institute’s Nonproliferation and Terrorism Studies degree program. CTEC’s research informs private, government, and multilateral institutional understanding of and responses to terrorism threats. Middlebury Institute for International Studies at Monterey www.miis.edu The Middlebury Institute for International Studies at Monterey provides international professional education in areas of critical importance to a rapidly changing global community, including international policy and management, translation and interpretation, language teaching, sustainable development, and nonproliferation. We prepare students from all over the world to make a meaningful impact in their chosen fields through degree programs characterized by immersive and collaborative learning, and opportunities to acquire and apply practical professional skills. Our students are emerging leaders capable of bridging cultural, organizational, and language divides to produce sustainable, equitable solutions to a variety of global challenges. Center on Terrorism, Extremism, and Counterterrorism Middlebury Institute of International Studies 460 Pierce Street Monterey, CA 93940, USA Tel: +1 (831) 647-4634 The views, judgments, and conclusions in this report are the sole representations of the authors and do not necessarily represent either the official position or policy or bear the endorsement of CTEC or the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey.
    [Show full text]
  • "A Different Light"
    Read our CEO Jonny Wilkinson's regular column in The Northern Advocate "A different Light" A Different Light 18 August 2018 – Speech Marks You have got to know when to hold them, know when to fold them, and know when to bugger off back to Canada. Lauren Southern and Stefan Molyneux, Canada’s Alt- Righters knew this when they wanted to peddle their white supremist wears in New Zealand to the turn of $99 a pop(minimum). Phil Goff told them to bog off from his Town Hall and Aucklander’s protestations caused them a cessation. “They were not wanted. When they were in New Zealand. Knowing this they left.” A Haiku leaving them bemused but they got what they wanted, publicity and know doubt a bigger demand for their next gig. It certainly freed up a lot of speech in New Zealand. I am always gobsmacked at how easy it is to awaken amoebic logic and how people who you thought were relatively sophisticated revert to the most basic of arguments. “Free speech is free speech end of”, “everyone is allowed to speak their point of view”, and “there is no harm in a point of view”. There has been some very good pieces written on the differences between free speech and hate speech. I think a very good way of recognising hate speech is when the speaker starts to wine about their rights to free speech. When people speak about free speech there is always an agenda and it’s usually self serving. Re-wind to 2004 in Orewa where Donald(familiar?) Brash made a brash speech that cajoled and regurgitated support for then flailing National Party by what many people felt was fuelling racist sentiment toward Māoridom The speech itself was framed in terms of equality and pragmatism, arguing for doing away with policies that proactively targeted Maori to address the obvious marginalisation and obscure references to the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Eye Fall 2020 1.Pdf
    FALL 2020 The Public Eye Book Review: Spectres of Fascism • Could Anti-Government Militias Become Pro-State Paramilitaries? No Sanctuary: Anti-Abortion “Abolitionists” Go to City Hall • Conservative, Christian, Corporate: COVID-19 Opportunism and Betsy DeVos’s Education Agenda FALL 2020 Total Life Reform: The Real Consequences of the Far Right’s Self-Help Grift editor’s letter We’re closing this issue of The Public Eye on the eve of Election Day. Whatever this week THE PUBLIC EYE will bring, Political Research Associates will continue to bring sharp, relevant analysis and QUARTERLY insight to the trends shaping our country and world. PUBLISHER In our book review (pg. 3) this issue, Matthew N. Lyons reads Spectres of Fascism, a Tarso Luís Ramos collection of essays considering the rise of right-wing authoritarian and populist move- EDITOR ments across the world, from the U.S. and Hungary to India and the Philippines. “One Kathryn Joyce of the challenges in trying to understand fascism is that it touches on so many different COVER ART aspects of human experience,” writes Lyons, “from the brutality of mass imprisonment Shea Justice and killing to the pageantry of a political rally; from the calculations of geopolitics to the PRINTING intimacies of family life.” Park Press Printers In a piece encompassing original data research, “Could Anti-Government Militias Become Pro-State Paramilitaries?” (pg. 5), Jaclyn Fox and Carolyn Gallaher look at the The Public Eye is published by concerning possibility of overlap and collaboration between various sectors on the far- Political Research Associates right and the Trump administration.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Alt-Right', and from the Margins to the Mainstream Aaron Winter (UEL)
    Online Hate: From the Far-Right to the ‘Alt-Right’, and from the Margins to the Mainstream Aaron Winter (UEL) DRAFT. For citation: Winter, Aaron. 2019. ‘Online Hate: From the Far-Right to the ‘Alt-Right’, and from the Margins to the Mainstream’. Online Othering: Exploring violence and discrimination on the web. eds. Karen Lumsden and Emily Harmer. London: Palgrave. Abstract In the 1990s and early 2000s, there was much discussion about the democratic and anti-democratic implications of the internet, the latter particularly focused on the far-right using it to spread hate and recruit. Despite this, the American far-right did not harness it quickly, effectively or widely. More recently though, they have experienced a resurgence and mainstreaming, benefitting greatly from social media. This chapter will examine the history of the American far-right’s use of the internet in light of this, in respect to: 1. How this history developed in response to political changes and emerging technologies; 2. How it reflected and changed the status of such movements and their brand of hate; and 3. The relationship between online activity and traditional forms and methods of communication. Introduction In the late 1990s and early 2000s there was much discussion of both the democratizing and anti-democratic implications of the internet, in the absence of clear controls or regulations and boundaries. In relation to the former thesis were progressive social movements, and in the latter, the far-right using the internet to spread their racist hate, network and recruit both domestically and globally (Back, Keith and Solomos 1998, 73; Daniels 2009, 39-40; Neiwert 2017, 215-216).
    [Show full text]
  • After Christchurch: Hate, Harm and the Limits of Censorship
    After Christchurch: Hate, harm and the limits of censorship 3. Challenges in regulating online content David Bromell Working Paper 21/04 INSTITUTE FOR GOVERNANCE AND POLICY STUDIES WORKING PAPER 21/04 MONTH/YEAR March 2021 AUTHOR David Bromell Senior Associate Institute for Governance and Policy Studies INSTITUTE FOR GOVERNANCE AND School of Government POLICY STUDIES Victoria University of Wellington PO Box 600 Wellington 6140 New Zealand For any queries relating to this working paper, please contact [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Research on this series of working papers has been financially supported by a fellowship at the Center for Advanced Internet Studies (CAIS) in Bochum, NRW, Germany (Oct 2020—Mar 2021). DISCLAIMER The views, opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are strictly those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the Institute for Governance and Policy Studies, the School of Government, Victoria University of Wellington, or the Center for Advanced Internet Studies (CAIS). This is paper three in a series of seven working papers, After Christchurch: Hate, harm and the limits of censorship. The series aims to stimulate debate among policy advisors, legislators and the public as New Zealand considers regulatory responses to ‘hate speech’ and terrorist and violent extremist content online following the terrorist attack on Christchurch mosques in March 2019 and the Royal Commission of Inquiry that reported in November 2020. The seven working papers in this series are: Title Reference 1. The terrorist attack on Christchurch mosques and the Christchurch Call WP 21/02 2. ‘Hate speech’: Defining the problem and some key terms WP 21/03 3.
    [Show full text]