DOCSLIB.ORG

The Public Eye Fall 2020 1.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Public Eye Fall 2020 1.Pdf FALL 2020 The Public Eye Book Review: Spectres of Fascism • Could Anti-Government Militias Become Pro-State Paramilitaries? No Sanctuary: Anti-Abortion “Abolitionists” Go to City Hall • Conservative, Christian, Corporate: COVID-19 Opportunism and Betsy DeVos’s Education Agenda FALL 2020 Total Life Reform: The Real Consequences of the Far Right’s Self-Help Grift editor’s letter We’re closing this issue of The Public Eye on the eve of Election Day. Whatever this week THE PUBLIC EYE will bring, Political Research Associates will continue to bring sharp, relevant analysis and QUARTERLY insight to the trends shaping our country and world. PUBLISHER In our book review (pg. 3) this issue, Matthew N. Lyons reads Spectres of Fascism, a Tarso Luís Ramos collection of essays considering the rise of right-wing authoritarian and populist move- EDITOR ments across the world, from the U.S. and Hungary to India and the Philippines. “One Kathryn Joyce of the challenges in trying to understand fascism is that it touches on so many different COVER ART aspects of human experience,” writes Lyons, “from the brutality of mass imprisonment Shea Justice and killing to the pageantry of a political rally; from the calculations of geopolitics to the PRINTING intimacies of family life.” Park Press Printers In a piece encompassing original data research, “Could Anti-Government Militias Become Pro-State Paramilitaries?” (pg. 5), Jaclyn Fox and Carolyn Gallaher look at the The Public Eye is published by concerning possibility of overlap and collaboration between various sectors on the far- Political Research Associates right and the Trump administration. While militia movements have traditionally defined Tarso Luís Ramos, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR themselves in opposition to government, this year has shown a worrying trend of these groups’ potential alignment with the state—“engaging in extra-judicial violence states Kevin Chinn, OPERATIONS COORDINATOR desire but can’t or won’t formally sanction.” As Fox and Gallaher write, “By embracing Frederick Clarkson, SENIOR RESEARCH ANALYST Trump, the new generation of militias has accepted, however tacitly, that the power of the federal government, in the ‘right’ hands, may deliver bigger rewards.” Cloee Cooper, RESEARCH ANALYST Cloee Cooper and Tina Vasquez team up for our next feature, “No Sanctuary: Anti- Ethan Fauré, RESEARCH ANALYST Abortion ‘Abolitionists’ Go to City Hall” (pg. 13), to look at the trend of anti-abortion Steven Gardiner, ASSISTANT RESEARCH DIRECTOR advocates engaging in hyper-local activism in support of abortion “sanctuary cities.” In states across the country, activists co-opting the legacy of both anti-slavery activists and the Heron Greenesmith, SENIOR RESEARCH ANALYST immigrants’ rights movement are lobbying for municipal and county-level ordinances that Olivia Lawrence-Weilmann, PROGRAM COORDINATOR purport to criminalize abortion locally. While for the most part, these ordinances are still largely symbolic, they nonetheless have significant repercussions both locally and nationally. Isabelle H. Leighton, DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR In “Conservative, Christian, Corporate: COVID-19 Opportunism and Betsy De- Ben Lorber, RESEARCH ANALYST Vos’s Education Agenda” (pg. 18), Alex DiBranco dives deep into the ways that Trump Koki Mendis, COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER Secretary of Education DeVos has taken advantage of the pandemic to advance her career- long goal of school privatization and taxpayer support for religious education. As DiBran- Anne Murphy, FINANCE DIRECTOR co writes, “Since her deeply contested confirmation hearings, DeVos has been criticized Charles Ocitti, DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS, for incompetence and ignorance regarding the public education system. But this lens ob- scures the extent to which DeVos’s decisions as secretary are less inept bungling than in- Greeley O’Connor, MANAGING DIRECTOR tentional right-wing strategy.” Aidan Orly, DONOR PROGRAM MANAGER Finally, in “Total Life Reform: The Real Consequences of the Far Right’s Self-Help Harini Rajagopalan, OMMUNICATIONS OORDINATOR Grift” (pg. 25), Shane Burley delivers an in-depth report on Operation Werewolf, an en- C C trepreneurial lifestyle brand created by the co-founder of the far-right pagan group Wolves FELLOWS of Vinland, which uses a self-help model to radicalize men into White supremacist politics. Dan Atkinson • Zoé Samudzi • Tina Vasquez This “Amway for ethno-nationalists” has developed a following among various intersecting INTERNS subcultures, reflecting “an intentional strategy of post-war fascist circles to decontextual- Cat Gonzales Fergesen • Rodrigo Pimental ize far-right politics as cultural and artistic—a means of influencing culture and identity Ava Sasani-Kolori more than immediate politics, with the hope of changing politics further down the line.” Board of Directors In advance of Election Day, PRA published a memo online, “Paramilitaries at the Polls: Jeyn Levison, Chair Fatema Ahmad • Cathy Albisa • Saqib Bhatti What to Expect Around the 2020 Elections,” with key takeaways and thoughts on how to Ginna Green • Ellen Gurzinsky prepare for far-right militancy. Our Winter issue, forthcoming in January, will be a special Orson Moon • Mandisa Moore-O’Neal Mohan Sikka • Zeke Spier post-election issue, looking forward to the various movements and themes that will be im- Carla Wallace • Susan Wefald portant in the coming months. Founder In the meantime, as always, we will be publishing fresh research, reports, and analysis Jean V. Hardisty, Ph.D. online, so be sure to visit us at politicalresearch.org. 1310 Broadway, Suite 201 Thank you, Somerville, MA 02144-1837 Kathryn Joyce Tel: 617.666.5300 [email protected] © Political Research Associates, 2020 All rights reserved. ISN 0275-9322 ISSUE 103 www.politicalresearch.org 2 • The Public Eye FALL 2020 BY MATTHEW N. LYONS Book Review Spectres of Fascism ne of the challenges in trying that today’s fascism is shaped by other to understand fascism is that it factors, such as the dominance of finance Otouches on so many different capital, automation, climate change, and aspects of human experience, from the international mass migration. brutality of mass imprisonment and kill- Some of the book’s range of disciplin- ing to the pageantry of a political rally; ary approaches can be seen in the three from the calculations of geopolitics to the essays that I consider to be its strongest, intimacies of family life. Spectres of Fas- at least from the standpoint of helping us cism: Historical, Theoretical and Interna- understand today’s authoritarian Right. tional Perspectives (London: Pluto Press, In “The Outsider as Insider: Steve Ban- 2020) approaches this challenge by tak- non, Fourth Turnings, and the Neofascist ing an interdisciplinary approach. Edited Threat,” philosopher Joan Braune de- by Samir Gandesha, a scholar of Frank- tails the far-right ideological influences furt School critical theory—a dynamic that have helped shape former Trump school of radical thought that coalesced administration strategist Steve Bannon. in the 1930s—the collection takes in- Notable among them are the apocalyptic spiration from that tradition in two re- mysticism of the Traditionalist School spects. First, the book follows the Frank- (whose ranks included neofascist phi- furt School’s recognition that analysis losopher Julius Evola) and Jean Raspail’s of class struggle and crisis in capitalism racist novel The Camp of the Saints. The ti- is only part of understanding fascism’s tle of Braune’s essay highlights her argu- rise, and that an analysis of subjective ment that Bannon’s populism is rhetori- factors, such as culture and psychology, cal cover for an elitist, anti-egalitarian is also needed. Second, like the school’s worldview. organizational home, the Institute for In contrast to Braune’s ideological fo- Social Research, the book assembles ippines. (See the Winter/Spring 2020 cus, Gandesha’s own essay, “‘A Compos- scholarship from many different fields, “international” issue of The Public Eye ite of King Kong and a Suburban Barber’: with contributors representing political to read more about some of these coun- Adorno’s ‘Freudian Theory and the Pat- science, philosophy, economics, sociol- tries.) In the introduction, Gandesha ar- tern of Fascist Propaganda,’” explores ogy, anthropology, law, history, psycho- gues that today’s authoritarian populist the social psychology of fascism. As Gan- analysis, and aesthetics. Right represents not a simple return to desha relates, Adorno argued that adula- Spectres of Fascism grows out of the lec- fascism as it emerged in Europe in the tion of and identification with the leader tures and discussions in a year-long “free 1920s and ’30s, but a reworking of fas- caused people to give up their individu- school” of the same title that Gandesha cist elements in new forms and under ality and even their interest in self-pres- organized in 2017 as director of Simon new conditions. For example, while clas- ervation. (Think mask-less Trump rallies Fraser University’s Institute for the Hu- sical fascism attacked liberal democracy in the age of COVID-19.) Adorno empha- manities. The collection seeks to make head on, contemporary fascism erodes sized the role of mass-produced culture sense of the recent upsurge of right-wing or suffocates it gradually from within. (at the time, radio and film) in promoting authoritarian populist movements, par- And while 1930s fascism emerged as a “the authoritarian personality” by teach- ties, and governments in countries as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Measurement Study of Genetic Testing Conversations on Reddit and 4Chan
    Proceedings of the Fourteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2020) “And We Will Fight for Our Race!” A Measurement Study of Genetic Testing Conversations on Reddit and 4chan Alexandros Mittos, Savvas Zannettou,† Jeremy Blackburn,‡ Emiliano De Cristofaro University College London, †Max-Planck-Institut fur¨ Informatik, ‡Binghamton University {a.mittos, e.decristofaro}@ucl.ac.uk, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Alas, increased popularity of self-administered genetic tests has also been accompanied by media reports of far-right Progress in genomics has enabled the emergence of a boom- ing market for “direct-to-consumer” genetic testing. Nowa- groups using it to attack minorities or prove their genetic days, companies like 23andMe and AncestryDNA provide af- “purity” (Reeve 2016), mirroring concerns of a new wave of fordable health, genealogy, and ancestry reports, and have al- scientific racism (Reich 2018). Also, statements from Don- ready tested tens of millions of customers. At the same time, ald Trump led Senator Warren to publicly confirm her Native alt- and far-right groups have also taken an interest in genetic American ancestry via genetic testing (Linskey 2018). testing, using them to attack minorities and prove their ge- Interest in DTC genetic testing by right-wing communi- netic “purity.” In this paper, we present a measurement study ties comes at a time when racism, hate, and antisemitism on shedding light on how genetic testing is being discussed on platforms like 4chan, Gab, and certain communities on Red- Web communities in Reddit and 4chan. We collect 1.3M comments posted over 27 months on the two platforms, us- dit is on the rise (Hine et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Documents to the Amicus Brief Submitted to the Jerusalem District Court
    בבית המשפט המחוזי בירושלים עת"מ 36759-05-18 בשבתו כבית משפט לעניינים מנהליים בעניין שבין: 1( ארגון Human Rights Watch 2( עומר שאקר העותרים באמצעות עו"ד מיכאל ספרד ו/או אמילי שפר עומר-מן ו/או סופיה ברודסקי מרח' דוד חכמי 12, תל אביב 6777812 טל: 03-6206947/8/9, פקס 03-6206950 - נ ג ד - שר הפנים המשיב באמצעות ב"כ, מפרקליטות מחוז ירושלים, רחוב מח"ל 7, מעלות דפנה, ירושלים ת.ד. 49333 ירושלים 9149301 טל: 02-5419555, פקס: 026468053 המכון לחקר ארגונים לא ממשלתיים )עמותה רשומה 58-0465508( ידיד בית המשפט באמצעות ב"כ עו"ד מוריס הירש מרח' יד חרוצים 10, ירושלים טל: 02-566-1020 פקס: 077-511-7030 השלמת מסמכים מטעם ידיד בית המשפט בהמשך לדיון שהתקיים ביום 11 במרץ 2019, ובהתאם להחלטת כב' בית המשפט, מתכבד ידיד בית המשפט להגיש את ריכוז הציוציו של העותר מס' 2 החל מיום 25 ליוני 2018 ועד ליום 10 למרץ 2019. כפי שניתן להבחין בנקל מהתמצית המצ"ב כנספח 1, בתקופה האמורה, אל אף טענתו שהינו "פעיל זכויות אדם", בפועל ציוציו )וציוציו מחדש Retweets( התמקדו בנושאים שבהם הביע תמיכה בתנועת החרם או ביקורת כלפי מדינת ישראל ומדיניותה, אך נמנע, כמעט לחלוטין, מלגנות פגיעות בזכיות אדם של אזרחי מדינת ישראל, ובכלל זה, גינוי כלשהו ביחס למעשי רצח של אזרחים ישראלים בידי רוצחים פלסטינים. באשר לטענתו של העותר מס' 2 שחשבון הטוויטר שלו הינו, בפועל, חשבון של העותר מס' 1, הרי שגם כאן ניתן להבין בנקל שטענה זו חסרת בסיס כלשהי. ראשית, החשבון מפנה לתפקידו הקודם בארגון CCR, אליו התייחסנו בחוות הדעת המקורית מטעם ידיד בית המשפט בסעיף 51.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: to Stop the Defamation of the Jewish People and to Secure Justice and Fair Treatment for All
    A report from the Center on Extremism 09 18 New Hate and Old: The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment for all. ABOUT T H E CENTER ON EXTREMISM The ADL Center on Extremism (COE) is one of the world’s foremost authorities ADL (Anti-Defamation on extremism, terrorism, anti-Semitism and all forms of hate. For decades, League) fights anti-Semitism COE’s staff of seasoned investigators, analysts and researchers have tracked and promotes justice for all. extremist activity and hate in the U.S. and abroad – online and on the ground. The staff, which represent a combined total of substantially more than 100 Join ADL to give a voice to years of experience in this arena, routinely assist law enforcement with those without one and to extremist-related investigations, provide tech companies with critical data protect our civil rights. and expertise, and respond to wide-ranging media requests. Learn more: adl.org As ADL’s research and investigative arm, COE is a clearinghouse of real-time information about extremism and hate of all types. COE staff regularly serve as expert witnesses, provide congressional testimony and speak to national and international conference audiences about the threats posed by extremism and anti-Semitism. You can find the full complement of COE’s research and publications at ADL.org. Cover: White supremacists exchange insults with counter-protesters as they attempt to guard the entrance to Emancipation Park during the ‘Unite the Right’ rally August 12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • MAP Act Coalition Letter Freedomworks
    April 13, 2021 Dear Members of Congress, We, the undersigned organizations representing millions of Americans nationwide highly concerned by our country’s unsustainable fiscal trajectory, write in support of the Maximizing America’s Prosperity (MAP) Act, to be introduced by Rep. Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.). As we stare down a mounting national debt of over $28 trillion, the MAP Act presents a long-term solution to our ever-worsening spending patterns by implementing a Swiss-style debt brake that would prevent large budget deficits and increased national debt. Since the introduction of the MAP Act in the 116th Congress, our national debt has increased by more than 25 percent, totaling six trillion dollars higher than the $22 trillion we faced less than two years ago in July of 2019. Similarly, nearly 25 percent of all U.S. debt accumulated since the inception of our country has come since the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Now more than ever, it is critical that legislators take a serious look at the fiscal situation we find ourselves in, with a budget deficit for Fiscal Year 2020 of $3.132 trillion and a projected share of the national debt held by the public of 102.3 percent of GDP. While markets continue to finance our debt in the current moment, the simple and unavoidable fact remains that our country is not immune from the basic economics of massive debt, that history tells us leads to inevitable crisis. Increased levels of debt even before a resulting crisis slows economic activity -- a phenomenon referred to as “debt drag” -- which especially as we seek recovery from COVID-19 lockdowns, our nation cannot afford.
    [Show full text]
  • Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S
    Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy October 2020 Acknowledgments Human Rights First is a nonprofit, nonpartisan human rights advocacy and action organization based in Washington D.C., New York, and Los Angeles. © 2020 Human Rights First. All Rights Reserved. Walking the Talk: 2021 Blueprints for a Human Rights-Centered U.S. Foreign Policy was authored by Human Rights First’s staff and consultants. Senior Vice President for Policy Rob Berschinski served as lead author and editor-in-chief, assisted by Tolan Foreign Policy Legal Fellow Reece Pelley and intern Anna Van Niekerk. Contributing authors include: Eleanor Acer Scott Johnston Trevor Sutton Rob Berschinski David Mizner Raha Wala Cole Blum Reece Pelley Benjamin Haas Rita Siemion Significant assistance was provided by: Chris Anders Steven Feldstein Stephen Pomper Abigail Bellows Becky Gendelman Jennifer Quigley Brittany Benowitz Ryan Kaminski Scott Roehm Jim Bernfield Colleen Kelly Hina Shamsi Heather Brandon-Smith Kate Kizer Annie Shiel Christen Broecker Kennji Kizuka Mandy Smithberger Felice Gaer Dan Mahanty Sophia Swanson Bishop Garrison Kate Martin Yasmine Taeb Clark Gascoigne Jenny McAvoy Bailey Ulbricht Liza Goitein Sharon McBride Anna Van Niekerk Shannon Green Ian Moss Human Rights First challenges the United States of America to live up to its ideals. We believe American leadership is essential in the struggle for human dignity and the rule of law, and so we focus our advocacy on the U.S. government and other key actors able to leverage U.S. influence. When the U.S. government falters in its commitment to promote and protect human rights, we step in to demand reform, accountability, and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy
    The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'Annibale University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada Abstract This article explores how Donald Trump capitalized on the right's decades-long, carefully choreographed and well-financed campaign against political correctness in relation to the broader strategy of 'cultural conservatism.' It provides an historical overview of various iterations of this campaign, discusses the mainstream media's complicity in promulgating conservative talking points about higher education at the height of the 1990s 'culture wars,' examines the reconfigured anti- PC/pro-free speech crusade of recent years, its contemporary currency in the Trump era and the implications for academia and educational policy. Keywords: political correctness, culture wars, free speech, cultural conservatism, critical pedagogy Introduction More than two years after Donald Trump's ascendancy to the White House, post-mortems of the 2016 American election continue to explore the factors that propelled him to office. Some have pointed to the spread of right-wing populism in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis that culminated in Brexit in Europe and Trump's victory (Kagarlitsky, 2017; Tufts & Thomas, 2017) while Fuchs (2018) lays bare the deleterious role of social media in facilitating the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. and elsewhere. Other 69 | P a g e The 'Culture Wars' Reloaded: Trump, Anti-Political Correctness and the Right's 'Free Speech' Hypocrisy explanations refer to deep-rooted misogyny that worked against Hillary Clinton (Wilz, 2016), a backlash against Barack Obama, sedimented racism and the demonization of diversity as a public good (Major, Blodorn and Blascovich, 2016; Shafer, 2017).
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Is It O.K. to Punch a Nazi?
    13. Is it O.K. to Punch a Nazi? On January 20, 2017, Richard Spencer, a well-known member of the American “alt-right”, was punched in the face by an unknown assailant while he was being interviewed by an Australian journalist. The attack, which was captured on video, was almost certainly a reaction to Spencer’s vocal form of white nationalism, which includes his public support for the establishment of the U.S. as a white ethnostate.1 Footage of the attack soon became a popular internet meme, accompanied by the question, “Is it O.K. to punch a Nazi?”2 with some people comparing the masked assailant to Captain America and Indiana Jones. The punch, and the internet memes that followed it, have spawned vigorous debates about how people should respond to increasingly frequent, public displays of racism. Critics of the assault argue that violence is not the right response to political disagreement. Instead, according to this view, racism and other repugnant attitudes are best combatted with open conversation and rational argument. Such violence, in contrast, seems to be incompatible with treating someone else as a fellow citizen. This seems to be Spencer’s view of the attack: "I kind of like getting into vigorous back and forth with people who disagree with me. … But punching like that just crosses a line—totally unacceptable." He admitted that he feared future attacks, saying, "Certainly, some people think I'm not a human being and I can just be attacked at will."3 Some anti-racists, by contrast, maintain that violence and intimidation are perfectly legitimate response—and perhaps even the best response to political views that themselves seem to call for or condone violence against vulnerable groups.
    [Show full text]
  • C00490045 Restore Our Future, Inc. $4116274
    Independent Expenditure Table 2 Committees/Persons Reporting Independent Expenditures from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011 ID # Committee/Individual Amount C00490045 RESTORE OUR FUTURE, INC. $4,116,274 C00499731 MAKE US GREAT AGAIN, INC $3,793,524 C00501098 OUR DESTINY PAC $2,323,481 C00000935 DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE $1,759,111 C00495028 HOUSE MAJORITY PAC $1,073,851 C00487363 AMERICAN CROSSROADS $1,016,349 C00075820 NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE $810,157 C00507525 WINNING OUR FUTURE $788,381 C00442319 REPUBLICAN MAJORITY CAMPAIGN $710,400 C00503417 RED WHITE AND BLUE FUND $573,680 C00448696 SENATE CONSERVATIVES FUND $479,867 C90012758 CITIZENS FOR A WORKING AMERICA INC. $475,000 C00484642 MAJORITY PAC $471,728 C00495861 PRIORITIES USA ACTION $306,229 C00495010 CAMPAIGN TO DEFEAT BARACK OBAMA $266,432 C00499020 FREEDOMWORKS FOR AMERICA $241,542 C00504241 9-9-9 FUND $226,530 C00498261 RESTORING PROSPERITY FUND $202,873 C00503870 RETHINK PAC $156,000 C00432260 CLUB FOR GROWTH PAC $145,459 C90011057 NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR MARRIAGE $142,841 C00454074 OUR COUNTRY DESERVES BETTER PAC - TEAPARTYEXPRESS.ORG $141,526 C00473918 WOMEN VOTE! $133,976 C00508317 LEADERS FOR FAMILIES SUPER PAC INC $122,767 C00488486 COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA WORKING VOICES $107,000 C00492116 COOPERATIVE OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS IE COMMITTEE $102,184 C90011230 AMERICAN ACTION NETWORK INC $96,694 C00348540 1199 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INT'L UNION FEDERAL POLITICAL ACTION FUND $83,975 C00505081 STRONG AMERICA NOW SUPER PAC
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Unlearned—The Gun Lobby and the Siren Song of Anti
    Lessons Unlearned The Gun Lobby and the Siren Song of Anti-Government Rhetoric Violence Policy Center April 2010 The Violence Policy Center (VPC) is a national non-profit educational organization that conducts research and public education on violence in America and provides information and analysis to policymakers, journalists, advocates, and the general public. This report was authored by VPC Executive Director Josh Sugarmann and VPC Policy Analyst Marty Langley. The study was funded in part with the support of the David Bohnett Foundation, The Joyce Foundation, and the Public Welfare Foundation. Past studies released by the VPC include: ! Target: Law Enforcement—Assault Weapons in the News (February 2010) ! Black Homicide Victimization in the United States: An Analysis of 2007 Homicide Data (January 2010) ! When Men Murder Women—An Analysis of 2007 Homicide Data (September 2009) ! Law Enforcement and Private Citizens Killed by Concealed Handgun Permit Holders—An Analysis of News Reports, May 2007 to April 2009 (July 2009) ! Indicted: Types of Firearms and Methods of Gun Trafficking from the United States to Mexico as Revealed in U.S. Court Documents (April 2009) ! Iron River: Gun Violence and Illegal Firearms Trafficking on the U.S.-Mexico Border (March 2009) ! Youth Gang Violence and Guns: Data Collection in California (February 2009) ! “Big Boomers”—Rifle Power Designed Into Handguns (December 2008) ! American Roulette: Murder-Suicide in the United States (April 2008) ! An Analysis of the Decline in Gun Dealers: 1994 to 2007 (August
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Gab? a Bastion of Free Speech Or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?
    What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber? Savvas Zannettou Barry Bradlyn Emiliano De Cristofaro Cyprus University of Technology Princeton Center for Theoretical Science University College London [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Haewoon Kwak Michael Sirivianos Gianluca Stringhini Qatar Computing Research Institute Cyprus University of Technology University College London & Hamad Bin Khalifa University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Jeremy Blackburn University of Alabama at Birmingham [email protected] ABSTRACT ACM Reference Format: Over the past few years, a number of new “fringe” communities, Savvas Zannettou, Barry Bradlyn, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Haewoon Kwak, like 4chan or certain subreddits, have gained traction on the Web Michael Sirivianos, Gianluca Stringhini, and Jeremy Blackburn. 2018. What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?. In WWW at a rapid pace. However, more often than not, little is known about ’18 Companion: The 2018 Web Conference Companion, April 23–27, 2018, Lyon, how they evolve or what kind of activities they attract, despite France. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558. recent research has shown that they influence how false informa- 3191531 tion reaches mainstream communities. This motivates the need to monitor these communities and analyze their impact on the Web’s information ecosystem. 1 INTRODUCTION In August 2016, a new social network called Gab was created The Web’s information ecosystem is composed of multiple com- as an alternative to Twitter.
    [Show full text]
  • How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics
    GETTY CORUM IMAGES/SAMUEL How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Tracing the origins of white supremacist ideas 13 How did this start, and how can it end? 16 Conclusion 17 About the author and acknowledgments 18 Endnotes Introduction and summary The United States is living through a moment of profound and positive change in attitudes toward race, with a large majority of citizens1 coming to grips with the deeply embedded historical legacy of racist structures and ideas. The recent protests and public reaction to George Floyd’s murder are a testament to many individu- als’ deep commitment to renewing the founding ideals of the republic. But there is another, more dangerous, side to this debate—one that seeks to rehabilitate toxic political notions of racial superiority, stokes fear of immigrants and minorities to inflame grievances for political ends, and attempts to build a notion of an embat- tled white majority which has to defend its power by any means necessary. These notions, once the preserve of fringe white nationalist groups, have increasingly infiltrated the mainstream of American political and cultural discussion, with poi- sonous results. For a starting point, one must look no further than President Donald Trump’s senior adviser for policy and chief speechwriter, Stephen Miller. In December 2019, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch published a cache of more than 900 emails2 Miller wrote to his contacts at Breitbart News before the 2016 presidential election.
    [Show full text]
  • 1396 the Platforms of Our Discontent (Social Media, Social Destruction)
    #1396 The Pla-orms of Our Discontent (Social Media, Social Destruc?on) JAY TOMLINSON - HOST, BEST OF THE LEFT: [00:00:00] Welcome to this episode of the award-winning Best of the Le; Podcast in which we shall learn about the role that social media plays in the radicalizaAon of discontented communiAes, and engage in the debate over content moderaAon and de-plaDorming of individuals. Clips today are from The Weeds, Newsbroke from AJ Plus, On the Media, Off-Kilter, a piece of a speech from Sasha Baron Cohen, Big Tech, Vox ConversaAons, the Medhi Hasan Show, and Your Undivided AVenAon. Why everyone hates Big Tech, with The Verge's Nilay Patel - The Weeds - Air Date 7-19-19 NILAY PATEL: [00:00:34] I think one thing everyone will agree on, just universally, is that these companies are not necessarily well-run. And even if they were perfectly run, the nature of wriAng and enforcing speech regulaAon is such that you're sAll gonna do a bad job. The United States has been trying to develop a free speech policy in our courts for 220+ years and we're preVy bad at it, but four guys at Facebook aren't going to do a good job up in 20 years. So there's that problem, where does the line cross from being a preVy funny joke to being overtly bigoted? It really depends on context. We all understand this. So it absolutely depends on the context. It depends on who you think you are speaking to, whether it's a group of your friends or whether suddenly TwiVer's algorithm grabs you and amplifies you to millions of people.
    [Show full text]