DOCSLIB.ORG

Richard Commission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Richard Commission Report of the Richard Commission Commission on the Powers and Electoral Arrangements of the National Assembly for Wales Spring 2004 contents chapter page 1 Introduction 1 2 The historical and international context 5 3 The views of the people of Wales 23 4 The role and structure of the Assembly 47 5 The scope and adequacy of the devolved powers 85 6 The scrutiny of unelected public bodies 125 7 The Wales–Whitehall relationship 141 8 The Wales–Westminster relationship 169 9 The boundaries of devolution 183 10 The financing of devolved government 197 11 The cost of devolution 215 12 The electoral arrangements 225 13 Developing devolution in Wales 241 14 Conclusions: the way ahead 253 annexes 1 Terms of reference 265 2 Programme of evidence sessions 267 3 Public meetings 281 4 Index of written evidence 283 5 Primary legislation affecting Wales 291 6 Acts of the first session of the Scottish Parliament, 1999-2003 299 7 Acts of the Northern Ireland Assembly, 1999-2002 303 8 Letter to the Chair 305 chapter 1: introduction Introduction This chapter sets out the background to the Commission and explains our approach, processes and the structure of our report. Background 6. In evaluating the evidence submitted, we have sought to distinguish between 2. The Richard Commission was constraints or frustrations arising from appointed in July 2002 by the First the structure of the settlement, and Minister of the National Assembly for those which could be described as Wales. Our Chair, Lord Richard, was ‘teething’ problems, which naturally appointed by the First Minister. Five occur in the first years of such radical Commissioners were appointed constitutional change. following open competition and interview. Four were nominated jointly 7. The Rt Hon Peter Hain MP, Secretary by the four party leaders in the first of State for Wales, suggested to us Assembly. that: Terms of reference a practical delivery benchmark test 3. These are set out in full at Annex 1. should be applied to any proposal for They require us to review two aspects change: how will it benefit life in of the National Assembly, which came Wales? How will it improve it in into being in July 1999: the adequacy practical terms?1 of its powers and its electoral arrangements. 8. We set out in Chapter 13 the vision and principles that have informed our 4. Within the powers part of the remit, enquiry. We have worked on two there are two elements: the depth of assumptions. First, that gains in the powers – the capacity of the democracy and accountability are Assembly to act within the fields that valuable in themselves. Second, that are devolved to it; and the breadth of more open, participative and the powers – whether more fields responsive governance is likely to should be devolved. produce better policy outcomes. We recognise, however, that conclusive The Commission’s approach evidence on this would be elusive even 5. In considering the way forward, we if our review had been conducted at a have been conscious of the fact that much later stage.2 It is also fair to say the current devolution settlement is that better delivery of public services, only four years old, covering one or improvements in the economy, Assembly and barely four UK depend on many factors that are Parliamentary sessions. outside the scope of our enquiry. The Richard Commission 1 chapter 1: introduction 9. We decided to approach our remit 12. Each chapter of the report examines a from a broad and practical perspective. different aspect of the existing We felt that the terms of reference devolution settlement and concludes raised fundamental questions, which with findings specific to that chapter. could only be addressed by looking at The conclusions we have reached, the operation of the devolution based on those findings, are set out in settlement in the round, including the Chapters 13 and 14. work of the Assembly as a parliamentary body and the role of the The scope of our report Welsh Assembly Government. The 13. We were clear that it was not our role questions we have addressed are to evaluate the performance of the practical ones: how are the Assembly or the Welsh Assembly arrangements working at the moment; Government. This would have what, if any, problems have been entailed going outside our terms of encountered; and how could things be reference and making subjective improved in the interests of the people judgements. We have focused on the of Wales? evidence and limited our observations to matters directly relevant to the 10. Our enquiry has drawn on the views of Assembly’s powers and its capacity to those who operate the present exercise them effectively. settlement, of those who work with them on a daily basis and of ordinary 14. On the electoral arrangements, we people in Wales. We are confident that have not tried to go over the ground the analysis of the first four years, set covered by previous and concurrent out in the following chapters, has reviews specialising in electoral provided a sufficient body of evidence systems. We have drawn on these but to enable us to identify in detail the focused on the practical operation of strengths and weaknesses of the the existing system and what seem to present arrangements and to us the realistic alternatives to it. recommend a sustainable settlement for the long term, based upon both The processes we have followed principle and practical experience. 15. We began our work in September 11. Many aspects of the remit – the 2002 when we decided on a process Assembly’s size, powers, structure, designed to enable us to gather solid capacity and electoral system – are evidence on which to base our inter-dependent. In reaching conclusions. conclusions on individual aspects, we have sought to take account of the 16. Between October 2002 and impact on the Assembly as a whole, September 2003 we held 115 3 and on the governance of Wales more evidence sessions, 3 seminars, and 4 widely, and to present a coherent and issued 2 consultation papers. We integrated set of recommendations for received over 300 written the way ahead. submissions. We held 9 public 2 The Richard Commission chapter 1: introduction meetings, starting in Swansea and I Chapter 4 describes the role and ending at the National Eisteddfod in structure of the National Assembly. It Meifod. We observed the Assembly in examines the capacity of the plenary and in committee, visited the Assembly and its committees to carry Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh, met out the role of scrutiny and holding the Speaker of the Northern Ireland the government to account, and the Assembly and visited Westminster, to implications for the organisation of meet MPs, Peers and others, three acquiring further powers. The main times. focus is on the experience of the First Assembly, but relevant developments 17. Since our appointment, the during the Second Assembly are also Parliament at Westminster has considered; produced two reports that have been I Chapter 5 considers the nature of the of great value to us, as discussed in 5 powers conferred on the Assembly later chapters. These are: and how they have been used in I Devolution: Inter-institutional relations practice by the Welsh Assembly in the United Kingdom – Report of Government; the House of Lords Select Committee I Chapter 6 reviews the Assembly’s on the Constitution, HL 28 of 2002- powers in relation to the non-elected 03; public bodies it sponsors and how the I The Primary Legislative Process as it relationship between government and affects Wales – Report of the Welsh these bodies has changed since Affairs Committee of the House of 1999; Commons, HC 79 of 2002-03. I Chapter 7 examines the relationship between the Welsh Assembly The structure of the report Government and the UK Government 18. The structure of our report is as at Ministerial and official level. It follows. considers the strengths and weaknesses of present arrangements I Chapter 2 reviews the history and and their sustainability in the future; wider context of the Government of I Chapter 8 considers the way primary Wales Act 1998 and demonstrates legislation affecting Wales is handled how the establishment of the at Westminster and the impact of Assembly built upon and changed the devolution on the arrangements for model of administrative devolution scrutiny and debate. Again the that existed before. It also provides a advantages and disadvantages of the summary of the international context; system are discussed; I Chapter 3 reviews the evidence on I Chapter 9 reviews proposals for the views of the people of Wales – broadening the powers of the drawing on views put to us at our Assembly and considers the public meetings as well as public implications of further transfers of opinion survey evidence; powers from the UK Government; The Richard Commission 3 chapter 1: introduction I Chapter 10 examines the Assembly’s relevant, thoughtful and perceptive and financial powers and the scope for gave a unique insight into the far- extending them; reaching implications of devolution for public life in Wales. We are also most I Chapter 11 looks at the cost of devolution in Wales and the possible grateful to many others who have implications of further development; helped our research, including officers of the Parliament at Westminster and I Chapter 12 considers the Assembly’s the devolved bodies, and officials in electoral system, examines its merits Whitehall and the devolved and weaknesses and the case for administrations. change; I Chapter 13 sets out our vision for 20. We hope that our report does justice to developing devolution in Wales; the evidence we received.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Better Governance for Wales Key Materials
    Better Governance for Wales – key material: Statements and Debates, September 2005 – November 2005 Abstract This paper draws together the key statements and debates relating to the White Paper ‘Better Governance for Wales’ from September to November 2005. It includes transcripts of proceedings from the Assembly and Westminster. The paper will be updated regularly by the Members’ Research Service. December 2005 Members’ Research Service / Gwasanaeth Ymchwil yr Aelodau Members’ Research Service: Research Paper Gwasanaeth Ymchwil yr Aelodau: Papur Ymchwil Better Governance for Wales – key material Statements and debates, September 2005 – November 2005 Members’ Research Service December 2005 Paper number: 05/0040/mrs © Crown copyright 2005 Enquiry no: 05/0040/mrs Date: December 2005 This document has been prepared by the Members’ Research Service to provide Assembly Members and their staff with information and for no other purpose. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information is accurate, however, we cannot be held responsible for any inaccuracies found later in the original source material, provided that the original source is not the Members’ Research Service itself. This document does not constitute an expression of opinion by the National Assembly, the Welsh Assembly Government or any other of the Assembly’s constituent parts or connected bodies. Members’ Research Service: Research Paper Gwasanaeth Ymchwil yr Aelodau: Papur Ymchwil Contents 1 Statement by the Rt Hon Rhodri Morgan AM, First Minister on the White Paper, ‘Better Governance for Wales’ during Questions to the First Minister, 20 September 2005 .............................................................................................................. 1 2 Debate on the Report of the Committee on the Better Governance for Wales White Paper in the Assembly, 21 September 2005 ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Act
    c t EVIDENCE ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 2, 2015. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This document is not the official version of the Act. The Act and the amendments as printed under the authority of the Queen’s Printer for the province should be consulted to determine the authoritative statement of the law. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts on the Prince Edward Island Government web site (www.princeedwardisland.ca). If you find any errors or omissions in this consolidation, please contact: Legislative Counsel Office Tel: (902) 368-4292 Email: [email protected] Evidence Act Table of Contents c EVIDENCE ACT Table of Contents Section Page 1. Definitions................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Spouse ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Competency of witnesses, persons with criminal record ......................................................................... 5 3. Persons with an interest in the matter....................................................................................................... 5 4. Parties to proceedings & spouses competent & compellable ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • People, Places and Policy
    People, Places and Policy Set within the context of UK devolution and constitutional change, People, Places and Policy offers important and interesting insights into ‘place-making’ and ‘locality-making’ in contemporary Wales. Combining policy research with policy-maker and stakeholder interviews at various spatial scales (local, regional, national), it examines the historical processes and working practices that have produced the complex political geography of Wales. This book looks at the economic, social and political geographies of Wales, which in the context of devolution and public service governance are hotly debated. It offers a novel ‘new localities’ theoretical framework for capturing the dynamics of locality-making, to go beyond the obsession with boundaries and coterminous geog- raphies expressed by policy-makers and politicians. Three localities – Heads of the Valleys (north of Cardiff), central and west coast regions (Ceredigion, Pembrokeshire and the former district of Montgomeryshire in Powys) and the A55 corridor (from Wrexham to Holyhead) – are discussed in detail to illustrate this and also reveal the geographical tensions of devolution in contemporary Wales. This book is an original statement on the making of contemporary Wales from the Wales Institute of Social and Economic Research, Data and Methods (WISERD) researchers. It deploys a novel ‘new localities’ theoretical framework and innovative mapping techniques to represent spatial patterns in data. This allows the timely uncovering of both unbounded and fuzzy relational policy geographies, and the more bounded administrative concerns, which come together to produce and reproduce over time Wales’ regional geography. The Open Access version of this book, available at www.tandfebooks.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 3.0 license.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Paper on Consolidation of Evidence Legislation
    Issues Paper Number 3 Consolidation of evidence legislation (LRC IP 3-2013) This is the third Issues Paper published by the Law Reform Commission. The purpose of an Issues Paper is to provide a summary or outline of a project on which the Commission is embarking or on which work is already underway, and to provide readers with an opportunity to express views and to make suggestions and comments on specific questions. The Issues Papers are circulated to members of the legal professions and to other professionals and groups who are likely to have a particular interest in, or specialist knowledge of, the relevant topic. They are also published on the Commission’s website (www.lawreform.ie) to ensure they are available to all members of the public. These Issues Papers represent current thinking within the Commission on the various items mentioned. They should not be taken as representing settled positions that have been taken by the Commission. Comments and suggestions are warmly welcomed from all interested parties and all responses will be treated in the strictest confidence. These should be sent to the Law Reform Commission: via email to [email protected] with the subject line Evidence or via post to IPC House, 35-39 Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, marked for the attention of Evidence Researcher We would like to receive replies no later than close of business on 13th September 2013 if possible. ACTS CONSIDERED IN THIS ISSUE PAPER 1. WITNESSES ACT 1806 (REPEAL WITH RE-ENACTMENT PROPOSED) 2. EVIDENCE ACT 1843 (REPEAL WITH PARTIAL RE-ENACTMENT PROPOSED) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Metacognition ‘An Introduction’
    Metacognition ‘An Introduction’ 17 January 2019 Alex Quigley [email protected] @EducEndowFoundn 1 Task ‘Think-pair-share’ Describe the specific knowledge, skills, behaviours and traits of one of the most effective pupils in your school that you teach. @EducEndowFoundn @EducEndowFoundn Task How do people in the following high performing occupations think metacognitively in their daily work? @EducEndowFoundn Introducing the guidance… @EducEndowFoundn How did we create the guidance reports? @EducEndowFoundn EEF-Sutton Trust Teaching and Learning Toolkit How did we create the guidance reports? • Conversations with teachers, academics, providers • What is the interest in the issue? What are the misconceptions? Scoping • What is the gap between evidence and practice? • Kate Atkins (Rosendale), Alex Quigley (Huntington), David Whitebread (Cambridge), Steve Higgins (Durham) Jonathan Sharples (EEF and Advisory Panel UCL). Ellie Stringer • Undertaken by Daniel Muijs and Christian Bokhove (Southampton) • Systematic review of evidence and summarizing findings related to Evidence review questions we’re interested in (1300 research papers) • Daniel, Ellie and I draft and edit guidance Draft • Consult with Panel throughout guidance • Share draft with academics, teachers, Research Schools, developers mentioned. Consultation @EducEndowFoundn @EducEndowFoundn Dyw arweinydd Plaid Cymru, Leanne Wood, ddim wedi sicrhau cefnogaeth yr un o Aelodau Seneddol y blaid yn y ras am yr arweinyddiaeth, gyda'r rhan fwyaf yn cefnogi Adam Price i arwain y blaid. Ddydd Mawrth, fe gyhoeddodd Liz Saville Roberts a Hywel Williams eu bod yn ymuno â Jonathan Edwards, sydd hefyd yn cefnogi Mr Price. Gan fod Ben Lake yn cefnogi Rhun ap Iorwerth, mae'n golygu fod pedwar AS Plaid Cymru yn cefnogi newid yr arweinydd.
    [Show full text]
  • Bread and Butter Actions to Solve Poverty Listening to People 2Nd
    Spring 2019 Wales’ best policy and politics magazine Bread and butter actions to solve poverty Mark Drakeford AM Listening to people Suzy Davies AM 2nd home tax loophole Siân Gwenllian AM ISSN 2059-8416 Print ISSN 2398-2063 Online CONTENTS: SPRING 2019 Wales’ best policy and politics magazine 50.open.ac.uk A unique space in the heart of Cardiff for everything connected with your wellbeing. 50 MLYNEDD O 50 YEARS OF Created by Gofal, the charity thinking differently about YSBRYDOLIAETH INSPIRATION mental health. Wedi’i seilio ar ei chred gadarn sef y dylai addysg fod yn Dedicated Workplace Wellbeing Programmes agored i bawb, mae’r Brifysgol Agored wedi treulio’r hanner A team of professional counsellors with a range of approaches canrif ddiwethaf yn helpu dysgwyr ledled Cymru a’r byd i droi’r Employee Assistant Programmes offering quality support amhosibl yn bosibl. Yn ystod carreg filltir ein pen-blwydd yn 50 oed, rydym yn creu rhaglen o ddigwyddiadau a gweithgareddau cyrous a fydd yn All profits will be reinvested into Gofal - amlygu’r myfyrwyr, sta, partneriaid a theulu’r Brifysgol sustainable wellbeing for all Agored sydd wedi gwneud ein sefydliad yr hyn ydyw heddiw. Mark Drakeford AM Alicja Zalesinska Alun Michael Company Number: 2546880 2 Solving poverty in Wales 10 Housing is a human right 18 The challenge of austerity Registered in England and Wales Registered Charity Number: 1000889 Founded on the firm belief that education should be open to to policing all, The Open University has spent the past fifty years helping learners from all over Wales and the world to make the impossible possible.
    [Show full text]
  • 386134 HC44 Welsh Affairs
    House of Commons Welsh Affairs Committee The proposed Legislative Competence Order in Council on additional learning needs Second Report of Session 2007-08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 17 December 2007 HC 44 Published on 21 December 2007 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £13.50 The Welsh Affairs Committee The Welsh Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Office of the Secretary of State for Wales (including relations with the National Assembly for Wales). Current membership Dr Hywel Francis MP (Labour, Aberavon) (Chairman) Mr David T.C. Davies MP (Conservative, Monmouth) Ms Nia Griffith MP (Labour, Llanelli) Mrs Siân C. James MP (Labour, Swansea East) Mr David Jones MP (Conservative, Clwyd West) Mr Martyn Jones MP (Labour, Clwyd South) Rt Hon Alun Michael MP (Labour, Cardiff South and Penarth) Mr Albert Owen MP (Labour, Ynys Môn) Mr Mark Pritchard MP (Conservative, The Wrekin) Mr Mark Williams MP (Liberal Democrat, Ceredigion) Mr Hywel Williams MP (Plaid Cymru, Caernarfon) Stephen Crabb MP was a Member of the Committee during this inquiry. Powers The committee is one of the Departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications The reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the internet at www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/welsh_affairs_committee.cfm.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Scotland's Stem Education And
    SUPPORTING SCOTLAND’S STEM EDUCATION AND CULTURE Science and Engineering Education Advisory Group (SEEAG) Second Report: January 2012 CONTENTS Part 1 Introduction and context 3 Part 2 Initial Teacher Education (ITE) 14 Part 3 Professional development 22 Part 4 The new curriculum: additional challenges 35 Part 5 Support structures for teachers and learners of STEM subjects 52 Part 6 Real life science, engineering and technology: Increasing young people’s engagement and Understanding 68 Part 7 Beyond school: further learning, training and employment 76 Part 8 Supporting a creative science culture 90 List of recommendations 104 Appendix 1 – Bibliography 119 Appendix 2 – SEEAG membership 125 Appendix 3 – List of contributors 127 Appendix 4 – Supporting documents and evidence 130 PART 1 INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT Scotland has a long, distinctive and distinguished record of discovery and innovation in science, engineering and technology through the industrial revolution and the 20th century, and is widely renowned for the quality and inclusiveness of its education system. Innovative science, engineering and technology are as fundamental to Scotland’s future economic prosperity as they have been to its economic development over the past two centuries, driving growth in the fast-changing world of the 21st century. They are a major element of Scotland’s heritage, culture and well-being, and our prospects as a successful nation in the 21st century will require new generations of ambitious young scientists and engineers to drive forward innovative technologies. Scotland also needs a scientifically-literate population of well-informed and responsible citizens to engage in driving forward not only our economic ambitions but also those of sustainability, the improvement of our natural and living environments, and the delivery of our climate change targets.
    [Show full text]
  • SPOKES Leaflet 86 Late 2003 and Richard Lochhead [SNP]
    POLITICIANS WE LIKE!! Following the Scottish Parliament election the Cross Party ESSENTIAL CONTACTS Cycle Group re-formed. Mark Ruskell [Green] is new Cycle training: 01505,614302 [email protected]. convener, with vice-conveners Bristow Muldoon [Uib] Traveline Scotland: rail, bus, ferry info [lo include cycle aspects SPOKES Leaflet 86 Late 2003 and Richard Lochhead [SNP]. Meetings are open to the and eyclemap lealleis?] 0870,608,2508 tvww.lraveline.org.uk. public. Details: [email protected]. Potholes, glass on cycleroutes, broken lights, etc anywhere SPOKES, The Lothian Cycle Campaign, St Martins Church, 232 Dairy Road, Edinburgh EHll 2JG ® 0131.313,2114 hIlD;//www,spokes,or£,uk/ /This is a mail address and answerphone - SPOKES is a voluntary organisation mtk nasiaffj Some 15 MSPs [below] signed up for Bike to Work day in Lothian [including Edinburgh], or Falkirk District: and/or joined the Bike Breakfast MSP ride 118.5.03.phoio]. [Use number oti nearesi lamp-posi lo report exact location]. Phone Lab: Sarah Boyack.KcnMcIniosh, PaulintMcNcill, B-Muldoiin 0800.232.123; Or see www.adinburfih.^ov.uk - Iransporl -Clarence. BIKE FUNDS THREAT Grn: Mark Ballard, Cliris Ballance, Robin Harper, Mark Ruskell Bad glass/dumping [Ed only]: Rapid Response 0808.100.3365 Despite two welcome government announcements which SNP: Richard Lochhead, Jim Mather SS/"; Rosie Kane Smoky commercial vehicles: 01506.445216. will assist smaller cycle projects, overall cycle project LibD: Tavish Scotl, Nora Radcliffe Con: Brian Monlcilh Drink-driving, speeding, driving whilst disqualified, and spending is set to fall drastically in less than two years. other road crime: Freephone Crimestoppers 0800.555.111.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Flood Alleviation Scheme, Beaumaris
    1200 Proposed Flood Alleviation Scheme, Beaumaris Heritage Impact Assessment Ymddiriedolaeth Archaeolegol Gwynedd Gwynedd Archaeological Trust Proposed Flood Alleviation Scheme, Beaumaris Heritage Impact Assessment Project No. G2347 Report No. 1200 Prepared for: Ymgynghoriaeth Gwynedd Consultancy August 2014 Written by: Iwan Parry Illustration by: Iwan Parry Cyhoeddwyd gan Ymddiriedolaeth Achaeolegol Gwynedd Ymddiriedolaeth Archaeolegol Gwynedd Craig Beuno, Ffordd y Garth, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2RT Published by Gwynedd Archaeological Trust Gwynedd Archaeological Trust Craig Beuno, Garth Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2RT Cadeiryddes/Chair - Yr Athro/Professor Nancy Edwards, B.A., PhD, F.S.A. Prif Archaeolegydd/Chief Archaeologist - Andrew Davidson, B.A., M.I.F.A. Mae Ymddiriedolaeth Archaeolegol Gwynedd yn Gwmni Cyfyngedig (Ref Cof. 1180515) ac yn Elusen (Rhif Cof. 508849) Gwynedd Archaeological Trust is both a Limited Company (Reg No. 1180515) and a Charity (reg No. 508849) Figures Figure 01: Reproduction of The Beaumaris Castle World Heritage Site Management Plan Map B2.4.7 Figure 02: Plan of Proposed Scheme Elements Figure 03: Plan of Identified Impact Areas Figure 04: Plan Showing Listed Buildings Currently Threatened by Flooding Figure 05: Plan Showing Archaeological Receptors Currently Threatened by Flooding Figure 06: Plan Showing Listed Buildings Remaining at Reduced Risk of Flooding After Implementation of Scheme Figure 07: Plan Showing Archaeological Receptors Remaining at Reduced Risk of Flooding After Implementation of Scheme
    [Show full text]
  • The Pit and the Pendulum: a Cooperative Future for Work in The
    Pit and the Pendulum Prelims.qxd 02/03/04 13:34 Page i POLITICS AND SOCIETY IN WALES The Pit and the Pendulum Pit and the Pendulum Prelims.qxd 02/03/04 13:34 Page ii POLITICS AND SOCIETY IN WALES SERIES Series editor: Ralph Fevre Previous volumes in the series: Paul Chaney, Tom Hall and Andrew Pithouse (eds), New Governance – New Democracy? Post-Devolution Wales Neil Selwyn and Stephen Gorard, The Information Age: Technology, Learning and Exclusion in Wales Graham Day, Making Sense of Wales: A Sociological Perspective Richard Rawlings, Delineating Wales: Constitutional, Legal and Administrative Aspects of National Devolution The Politics and Society in Wales Series examines issues of politics and government, and particularly the effects of devolution on policy-making and implementation, and the way in which Wales is governed as the National Assembly gains in maturity. It will also increase our knowledge and understanding of Welsh society and analyse the most important aspects of social and economic change in Wales. Where necessary, studies in the series will incorporate strong comparative elements which will allow a more fully informed appraisal of the condition of Wales. Pit and the Pendulum Prelims.qxd 02/03/04 13:34 Page iii POLITICS AND SOCIETY IN WALES The Pit and the Pendulum A COOPERATIVE FUTURE FOR WORK IN THE WELSH VALLEYS By MOLLY SCOTT CATO Published on behalf of the Social Science Committee of the Board of Celtic Studies of the University of Wales UNIVERSITY OF WALES PRESS CARDIFF 2004 Pit and the Pendulum Prelims.qxd 04/03/04 16:01 Page iv © Molly Scott Cato, 2004 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.
    [Show full text]
  • CEÜCIC LEAGUE COMMEEYS CELTIAGH Danmhairceach Agus an Rùnaire No A' Bhan- Ritnaire Aige, a Dhol Limcheall Air an Roinn I R ^ » Eòrpa Air Sgath Nan Cànain Bheaga
    No. 105 Spring 1999 £2.00 • Gaelic in the Scottish Parliament • Diwan Pressing on • The Challenge of the Assembly for Wales • League Secretary General in South Armagh • Matearn? Drew Manmn Hedna? • Building Inter-Celtic Links - An Opportunity through Sport for Mannin ALBA: C O M U N N B r e i z h CEILTEACH • BREIZH: KEVRE KELTIEK • CYMRU: UNDEB CELTAIDD • EIRE: CONRADH CEILTEACH • KERNOW: KESUNYANS KELTEK • MANNIN: CEÜCIC LEAGUE COMMEEYS CELTIAGH Danmhairceach agus an rùnaire no a' bhan- ritnaire aige, a dhol limcheall air an Roinn i r ^ » Eòrpa air sgath nan cànain bheaga... Chunnaic sibh iomadh uair agus bha sibh scachd sgith dhen Phàrlamaid agus cr 1 3 a sliopadh sibh a-mach gu aighcaraeh air lorg obair sna cuirtean-lagha. Chan eil neach i____ ____ ii nas freagarraiche na sibh p-fhèin feadh Dainmheag uile gu leir! “Ach an aontaich luchd na Pàrlamaid?” “Aontaichidh iad, gun teagamh... nach Hans Skaggemk, do chord iad an òraid agaibh mu cor na cànain againn ann an Schleswig-Holstein! Abair gun robh Hans lan de Ball Vàidaojaid dh’aoibhneas. Dhèanadh a dhicheall air sgath nan cànain beaga san Roinn Eòrpa direach mar a rinn e airson na Daineis ann atha airchoireiginn, fhuair Rinn Skagerrak a dhicheall a an Schieswig-I lolstein! Skaggerak ]¡l¡r ori dio-uglm ami an mhinicheadh nach robh e ach na neo-ncach “Ach tha an obair seo ro chunnartach," LSchlesvvig-Molstein. De thuirt e sa Phàrlamaid. Ach cha do thuig a cho- arsa bodach na Pàrlamaid gu trom- innte ach:- ogha idir. chridheach. “Posda?” arsa esan.
    [Show full text]