Download Download
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Global histories a student journal From Imperial Science to Post-Patriotism: The Polemics and Ethics of British Imperial History Emma Gattey DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/GHSJ.2021.357 Source: Global Histories, Vol. 6, No. 2 (January 2021), pp. 90-101. ISSN: 2366-780X Copyright © 2021 Emma Gattey License URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Publisher information: ‘Global Histories: A Student Journal’ is an open-access bi-annual journal founded in 2015 by students of the M.A. program Global History at Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. ‘Global Histories’ is published by an editorial board of Global History students in association with the Freie Universität Berlin. Freie Universität Berlin Global Histories: A Student Journal Friedrich-Meinecke-Institut Koserstraße 20 14195 Berlin Contact information: For more information, please consult our website www.globalhistories.com or contact the editor at: [email protected]. From Imperial Science to Post-Patriotism: The Polemics and Ethics of British Imperial History by EMMA GATTEY 90 Global Histories: a student journal | VI - 2 - 2020 Emma Gattey | From Imperial Science to Post-Patriotism 91 VI - 2 - 2020 | ABOUT THE AUTHOR History at the University of Oxford. Emma Gattey is a first-year PhD student in History at on Māori activist-intellectuals and their participation in the University of Cambridge. Her current work focuses the University of Cambridge. century. She is a writer and literary critic from Aotearoa century. transnational anticolonial networks in the late twentieth transnational anticolonial networks New Zealand, a former barrister, and has studied law and New Zealand, a former barrister, history at the University of Otago, and Global and Imperial history at the University of Otago, Global Histories: a student journal ABSTRACT Through a brief intellectual biography of British imperial history, upon recent academic and expands this article examines of history. demands for a renovated ‘professional ethics’ new developments in global environmental It also tracks how global and imperial historians and asks historiography, can best acquit themselves of their professional and ethical The ideological operation responsibilities in the Anthropocene. of imperial history was manifest in the racist self-justification of imperialism and its associated policies of dispossession, and assimilation, as disseminated genocide, exploitation, through British imperial history taught at Oxbridge in the nineteenth to mid-twentieth centuries. But it is also present, if less obvious, in the transnational histories of the late twentieth and twenty-first centuries, which tend to ignore climate change. The latter strand of imperial history thus functions to disguise or vindicate the political and economic interests of the Global North in failing to mitigate and adapt to further climate change, and the resulting crises which will be disproportionately borne by the states and citizens of the Global South. This article argues that in order to identify the harms of empire—both epistemic and physical, past and ongoing—imperial history must address the role of empire-building in the origins and trajectory of the climate crisis. m s i t From its inception in the work. However, these historians’ o i r t late nineteenth century, the field of entreaties are marked by their a P - t British imperial history was intended own positionality, one which s o P to provide ideological and practical focuses on ideological and political o t support for empire. Although this battlegrounds between polities and e c n sub-discipline has evolved through empires, at the expense of a truly e i c S multiple theoretical ‘turns’ in recent global focus on the most pressing l a i r decades, inevitably affected by the planetary conjuncture of our time: e p methodological developments in the climate crisis, and its enduring m I m global history, imperial history is connections with empire. This o r F still used to naturalise global power essay summarises these debates, | y structures as well as geopolitical and which have long tended to sidestep e t t a economic imparities. It is also used environmental and climatic concerns, G a to criticize these same hierarchies, before surveying recent global m m but as several global and imperial histories which have closely analysed E historians have remarked, there are the interconnections between serious ethical challenges associated empire and climate change. Paying with tethering history to policy, and closer attention to the dialectics of to public understandings of the past. world-ecology,2 these new works of To meet these challenges, Richard scholarship signal a tipping point in Drayton and Dane Kennedy have global environmental historiography. urged academics to adopt a ‘post- Taking Drayton and Kennedy’s patriotic’, self-reflective imperial demands for a ‘professional ethics’ history, one which transcends of history as a springboard, this ideology.1 Well-known scholars essay argues that historians must within the burgeoning sub-discipline expand our professional ethical of global and imperial history, and agenda to a fully global, or planetary, with extensive publications on scale. This essay recognises the the history of science, race, and ‘special responsibilities’ of global and British imperialism, both Drayton imperial historians to spur a post- and Kennedy have cast a keen imperial ‘global studies’ movement.3 methodological eye towards global It highlights our related obligations history’s longevity, morality and to be self-reflexive about our impact. This is no doubt meaningful practices and positionality, and to expose presentist, ideological claims about the past.4 But it also takes 1 Richard Drayton, “Where Does the World these arguments further, in order to Historian Write From? Objectivity, Moral Conscience and the Past and Present of Imperialism,” Journal of Contemporary History 46, no. 3 (July 2011): 684, https:// 2 See Jason W. Moore, Capitalism in www.jstor.org/stable/41305352; Dane the Web of Life: Ecology and the Kennedy, “The Imperial History Wars,” Accumulation of Capital (London: Verso, Journal of British Studies 54 (January 2015). 2015): 5–22, https://doi.org/10.1017/ 3 Drayton, “Human Future,” 158, 166-9. jbr.2014.166. 4 Kennedy, “Imperial History Wars,” 5-6, 22. 92 Global Histories: a student journal | VI - 2 - 2020 E m augment both the discipline itself and associated with imperialism during m a 9 G the public response to anthropogenic the interwar period, imperial history, a t t e climate change. In short, to identify too, was a crucial weapon in the y | 10 the harms of empire, imperial history pedagogical arsenal of empire. F r o must address the role of empire- From the late twentieth century, in m I building in the origins and trajectory the wake of postcolonial studies, m p e of the climate crisis. The twenty-first deconstructionism and structuralism, r i a l century ‘professional ethics’ of history anticolonial critiques have spread S c i demands nothing less. to encompass anthropology and e n c ethnography. Both disciplines have e t o grappled with issues of appropriation, P o s AN ‘IMPERIAL SCIENCE’? decolonisation and representation, t - P a often being equated with colonial t r i 11 o Assuming ‘specifically ideology. Imperial history, however, t i s imperial roles’ by training colonial has not faced the same degree of m administrators in both theory and external critique and disciplinary praxis, select British universities soul-searching. Since each of these became ‘stakeholders in Empire’ disciplines had such a formative and an integral part of ‘the position in shaping racist knowledge, apparatus of Britain’s imperial their practitioners bear a special system’.5 Within this apparatus, responsibility to acknowledge imperial history served as both past wrongs and to reorient and ideological justification for empire decolonise methodologies for the and colonization, and as an integral present and future.12 part in the training programme Against this evolving for colonial administrators.6 The background of intra-disciplinary twentieth-century consolidation politics, several leading historians of colonial rule in Britain’s newer have stepped into the breach. colonies in Africa led to, amongst Drayton has repeatedly traced the other things, the inauguration of intellectual genealogy of British Colonial Service training at Oxford imperial history as a ‘patriotic and Cambridge in 1926.7 Both universities developed particular expertise in the emergent subfield of 9 Stockwell, British End, 27. 10 8 Dane Kennedy, “Imperial History and imperial and Commonwealth history. Post-Colonial Theory,” The Journal of Although anthropology became Imperial and Commonwealth History 24, the social science most intimately no. 3 (September 1996): 345, https://doi. org/10.1080/03086539608582983. 11 Nicholas Thomas, The Return of Curiosity: What Museums are Good for in the 5 Sarah E. Stockwell, The British End of the Twenty-first Century (London: Reaktion British Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge Books, 2016), 12, 20. University Press, 2018), 7-8, 23. 12 See Gurminder K Bhambra, Dalia 6 Stockwell, British End, 26-7. Gebrial and Kerem Nişancioğlu (eds.), 7 Stockwell, British End, 23. Decolonising the University (London: Pluto 8 Stockwell, British End, 27, 30. Press, 2018). Global Histories: a student journal | VI - 2 - 2020 93 m s 17 i t enterprise’ which inflicts both British polity.’ The scholarship of Sir o i r t epistemic and physical violence by Reginald Coupland, Beit Professor of a P - t obscuring the role of coercion and Colonial History at Oxford (1920-1948), s o 13 P violence in the expansion of empire. epitomises the ideological defence of o t Writing most recently as Rhodes empire. Coupland spoke and wrote of e c n Professor of Imperial History at King’s the British Empire as an honourable e i c S College London, Drayton’s self- trustee: a benevolent force in the l a i r described polemics are animated by world, operating according to ‘the e 18 p a sense of professional responsibility doctrine of trusteeship’.