AELRED of RIEVAULX on HOLY ROYALTY a Twelfth-Century View

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

AELRED of RIEVAULX on HOLY ROYALTY a Twelfth-Century View KATHERINE M. YOHE AELRED OF RIEVAULX ON HOLY ROYALTY A Twelfth-Century View of Lay Spirituality ‘Who is like you among the kings of the earth, O good king! You have made yourself poor in gold, humble on a throne, mild in arms, pure in delights. You showed yourself modest to the people, just to the soldiers, lowly to the priests. You were made all things to all men that you might exhort them to virtue’.1 Thus the Cistercian abbot, Aelred of Rievaulx, praises the recently deceased King David of Scotland in a lament given to Duke Henry, soon to be King Henry II of England. Several of his later writings are dedicated to portraying models for Christian kings. Such texts are fertile ground for those interested in the history of lay spirituality, or more narrowly, twelfth-century English views of royal piety. They serve as a ‘mirror for kings’, by which Aelred hoped to offer royalty models for how they should conduct themselves as Christians in the world.2 This article will focus on Aelred’s works, asking of them some of the same questions Ann Astell asks in her recent collection Lay Sanctity, Medieval and Modern: A Search for Models: What distinguishes the sanctity of the laity from that of religious? Must it follow a monastic ideal? Can one be holy in the world? Do marriage, sex, property or politics impede sanctity?3 Aelred is considered one of the four major fathers of Cistercian spirituality and theology, though much less famous than his contemporary Bernard of Clairvaux.4 He was born in 1110, the son of a married priest who was respon- sible for a small church and shrine for Northumbrian saints at Hexham. Aelred was educated before he joined the monastery, possibly at the cathedral school at 1 Aelred of Rievaulx, Eulogium Davidis regis Scotorum, in: W.M. Metcalfe (Ed.), Pinkerton’s Lives of the Scottish Saints, Vol. 2, Paisley 1889, Sec. 2. The English translation is by Jane Freeland forthcoming in a collection of Aelred’s historical works by Cistercian Publications. 2 Aelred Squire calls the combined text that Aelred of Rievaulx gave to the future Henry II a ‘mirror for kings and perhaps the earliest twelfth-century example of a type of literature which had Carolingian forbears in treatises of men like Alcuin and Hincmar of Rheims’ (Aelred Squire, Aelred of Rievaulx: A Study, London 1969, 88). 3 Ann Astell (Ed.), Lay Sanctity, Medieval and Modern: A Search for Models, Notre Dame 2000, 2. 4 The other two fathers are Guerric of Igny, who came to Clairvaux in 1123 and William of Saint-Thierry, who joined in 1135. 170 KATHERINE M. YOHE Durham and had been captivated by Cicero’s De amicitia. At some time in his youth he also joined the court of King David of Scotland.5 According to Wal- ter Daniel, who wrote a twelfth-century biography of Aelred, Aelred first saw Rievaulx in 1134 when he was returning from a mission for King David to see Archbishop Thurstan of York.6 The visit was enough to convince him to become a Cistercian, then and there. Eight years after he joined he was made novice master, and then in 1143 was chosen as the first abbot of Reversby. Four years later he was back at Rievaulx to serve as their third abbot until his death in 1167. Aelred’s writings include spiritual and theological treatise, sermons, histories and hagiographies. His first work was Speculum caritatis, a treatise on the nature of love which includes a defense of the rigors of Cistercian life. It was written at the request of Bernard of Clairvaux. The work he is most well-known for today is De spirituali amicitia, a dialogue on spiritual friendship. Yet it is his his- tories and one of his vitae that will be the focus of this article: Genealogia regum anglorum (Genealogy of the Kings of England), which originally includes the already cited lament for the Scottish King David, De bello standardii (on the Battle of the Standard) and Vita Edwardi (Life of Edward the Confessor).7 Aelred wrote his genealogy of the kings to give to Duke Henry, before the latter became King Henry II of England in 1154. Aelred saw in Henry, who 5 James Raine, following information in a poem by Nicholas of Rievaulx, puts Aelred as a ‘member of the suite of prince David’, thus in the company of David before he became king (Priory of Hexham: Its Chronicles, Endowments and Annals, Sortees Society, Vol. 44, Edinburgh 1864, lxxiii). Squire believes Aelred would have been ‘at least’ twelve when he arrived at court to account for Aelred’s reference to affectionate friendships formed in school (Aelred: A Study, 12-13). Frederick Maurice Powicke refuses to guess at a precise year (Walter Daniel’s Life of Ailred of Rievaulx, Oxford 1950, xxxix). William Ducey believes Aelred spent a dozen years at court, thus entering around 1122 (‘St Aelred of Rievaulx and the Speculum Caritatis’, in: Catholic Historical Review 17 (1931), 310). Amédée Hallier is sure he was at court for less than twelve years (The Monastic Theology of Aelred of Rievaulx, trans. Columban Heaney, Spencer (Mass.) 1969, xxi). 6 The diplomatic mission most likely concerned Thurstan’s jurisdiction, as Archbishop of York, over Glasgow. Bishop John of Glasgow was refusing to accept the Archbishop’s authority, and continued to refuse, even with papal orders in 1135-36 demanding that he submit. See Robert Lindsay Graeme Ritchie, The Normans in Scotland, Edinburgh 1954, 253; Squire, Aelred: A Study, 19; and Powicke, Life of Ailred, xliv. 7 Genealogia regum anglorum is in: J.P. Migne, Patrologiae cursus completus […] series Latina (PL), no. 195, Paris 1855, cols. 716-738; De bello standardii is in PL 195, cols. 701-712. Translations for both of these used in this article are by Jane Freeman, forthcoming in the Cis- tercian Publications’ collection of Aelred’s historical works. Vita Edwardi is in PL 195, cols. 737-790 (trans. Jerome Bertram, The Life of Saint Edward, King and Confessor, by Blessed Aelred, Abbot of Rievaulx, Southampton 1997). AELRED OF RIEVAULX ON HOLY ROYALTY 171 through his father was the great-grandson of William the Conqueror and through his mother, a descendent of famous Saxon kings, a symbolic union of the diverse people on the land and thus a hope for peace. In a style reminiscent of Bede, Aelred used past kings (and a few queens) as edifying models of holi- ness and exhorted Henry to follow their example. The genealogy focuses on the Saxon line, through which Henry was related to St. Margaret, Edward the Con- fessor and Alfred the Great. Aelred also pauses to mention a few of the Scottish Kings who married into the Saxon line.8 Aelred includes, with the genealogy he sent to Duke Henry, a lament for David who had ruled Scotland from 1124 to 1153.9 Aelred’s lament for David has similarities to Bernard’s lament for his brother and fellow monk, Gerard, and Ambrose’s lament for his brother Satyrus. In 1155, seventeen years after the De bello standardii, Aelred wrote his own account. The battle was fought between forces fighting under David of Scot- land and those loyal to Stephen of Blois, the reigning King of England. David was fighting, in part, as matter of loyalty to his niece Matilda whom he consid- ered the rightful heir to the throne of England. Unlike Richard of Hexham’s and Henry of Huntingdon’s previous accounts of the battle, Aelred’s account emphasizes the nobility of the Scottish king David and his son Henry. He also gives a significant and honorable role to Walter Espec as the man who rallied, in the name of Christ, the victorious forces which gathered against David. This piece may have been written at the request of Walter who is thought to have spent the last two years of his life, 1153-55, at Rievaulx.10 8 Genealogia regum, col. 716. In terms of sources, Aelred mentions in his introduction that he was making use of ‘the most reliable and ancient records and chronicles’. Aelred Squire notes possible reliance on Simeon of Durham’s History of the Kings, Asser’s Life of Alfred, the Old English Chronicle, Henry of Huntingdon’s History of England, a Durham document on the miracles and translation of Cuthbert, Rufinus’ History of the Church, Osbern of Canterbury’s Life of Dunstan, in addition to a few stories personally narrated to him by King David of Scot- land (Aelred: A Study, 90-92). 9 Apparently, this king was widely-liked. ‘David had the gift of inspiring intense personal loyalty. Praise comes from quarters too many and too close to be insincere or ill informed’, according to Robert Ritchie, The Normans in Scotland, 215. See also Squire, Aelred: A Study, 86. 10 Squire, noting where Aelred departed from the versions of the battle composed by Henry of Huntington and Richard of Hexham, concludes that ‘the real hero of his [Aelred’s] piece is Walter Espec’, and suspects that Aelred may have written the piece at the request of Walter in order to honor Rievaulx’s founder (Aelred: A Study, 78). Aelred Glidden, however, believes Aelred’s intention was not to create a hero of Walter, but rather to clear King David’s name. Henry of Huntington blamed David for some of the atrocities committed by the army fight- ing under him. In contrast, Aelred portrayed David as a loving and kind king who almost can- celed the battle (‘Aelred the Historian: The Account of the Battle of the Standard’, in: John Sommerfeldt (Ed.), Erudition at God’s Service, Kalamazoo 1987, 175-184).
Recommended publications
  • Fables of King Arthur
    MIRATOR 9:1 (2008) 19 Fables of King Arthur Aelred of Rievaulx and Secular Pastimes Jaakko Tahkokallio Introduction This article sets out to contextualise the famous Arthurian anecdote found in the Speculum Caritatis by Aelred of Rievaulx (c. 1110–1167) on two different levels. Firstly, I shall offer an analysis of the immediate textual context of this controversial passage, by which I wish to demonstrate that it is best interpreted as a reference to orally circulated stories, not to the Latin history of Geoffrey of Monmouth, as has often been argued. Secondly, I explore the ways in which Aelred speaks of storytelling and other secular pastimes elsewhere in his works, since I understand that his more general views on these topics provide important contextual information for the interpretation of the Arthurian anecdote. Doing this, I wish to emphasise how the anecdote is related to communication with monks who were probably strongly associated with lay aristocratic culture, and how, in consequence, the passage is all the more likely to refer to forms of vernacular storytelling pertaining to the settings of secular life. Furthermore, I shall address the issue of how Aelred, contrasting monastic and secular ways of life, invoked the views of St. Augustine on pagan theatre, entertainers, and poetry. I shall briefly examine the relationship between the ideas of these two writers, and argue that Aelred used St. Augustine's ideas not only because they were topoi of a literary tradition in which he was writing, but because he found them useful in his analysis of contemporaneous cultural phenomena, even though these were certainly very different from those St.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile Aelred of Rievaulx
    KNOWING & DOING A Teaching Quarterly for Discipleship of Heart and Mind This article originally appeared in the Fall 2007 issue of Knowing & Doing. C.S. LEWIS INSTITUTE PROFILES IN FAITH Aelred of Rievaulx (1110-1167) Friend and Counselor by James M. Houston Senior Fellow, C.S. Lewis Institute Founder of Regent College, Professor of Spiritual Theology (retired), and Lecturer at Wycliffe Hall, Oxford University elred of Rievaulx was born at Hexham, No, no, I beg; no, my sons, do not strip your father of an area considered remote in today’s the vesture of suffering. I am quite all right, I am not England, but a rich cultural center of hurt, I am not upset; this son of mine who threw me Northumbria in his day. Neither Eng- into the fire, has cleansed, not destroyed me. He is my AA lish nor Scottish in its independence, its son, but he is ill. I am indeed not sound of body, but he frontier character enabled Aelred’s family to exert in his sickness has made me sound in soul, for blessed ecclesial influence over both countries as devout and are the peacemakers, for they shall be called the sons godly priests. With such moral exemplars, it is under- of God’. And then taking his head in his hands, the standable that priestly celibacy, enforced elsewhere most blessed man kisses him, blesses and embraces by the Gregorian Reform, was so slow in entering him, and gently sought to soothe his senseless anger into their realm of influence; it must have seemed against himself, just as though he felt no pain from unnecessary.
    [Show full text]
  • RIEVAULX ABBEY and ITS SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT, 1132-1300 Emilia
    RIEVAULX ABBEY AND ITS SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT, 1132-1300 Emilia Maria JAMROZIAK Submitted in Accordance with the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of History September 2001 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Dr Wendy Childs for her continuous help and encouragement at all stages of my research. I would also like to thank other faculty members in the School of History, in particular Professor David Palliser and Dr Graham Loud for their advice. My thanks go also to Dr Mary Swan and students of the Centre for Medieval Studies who welcomed me to the thriving community of medievalists. I would like to thank the librarians and archivists in the Brotherton Library Leeds, Bodleian Library Oxford, British Library in London and Public Record Office in Kew for their assistance. Many people outside the University of Leeds discussed several aspects of Rievaulx abbey's history with me and I would like to thank particularly Dr Janet Burton, Dr David Crouch, Professor Marsha Dutton, Professor Peter Fergusson, Dr Brian Golding, Professor Nancy Partner, Dr Benjamin Thompson and Dr David Postles as well as numerous participants of the conferences at Leeds, Canterbury, Glasgow, Nottingham and Kalamazoo, who offered their ideas and suggestions. I would like to thank my friends, Gina Hill who kindly helped me with questions about English language, Philip Shaw who helped me to draw the maps and Jacek Wallusch who helped me to create the graphs and tables.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovering Male Same-Sex Friendships in the Modern Era Presented to the Faculty of the Adler Graduate School ______
    Running head: SPIRITUAL FRIENDSHIP 1 Spiritual Friendship: Recovering Male Same-Sex Friendships in the Modern Era Presented to The Faculty of the Adler Graduate School __________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Master of Arts in Adlerian Counseling and Psychotherapy __________________________ By Matthew James Holley __________________________ Chair: Richard Close Member: Meghan Williams __________________________ May 2017 SPIRITUAL FRIENDSHIP 2 Abstract This paper explores a brief history, overview and current state of male same-sex friendship in the broader context of the Christian tradition of spiritual friendship, specifically in the developed Western world. The Adlerian viewpoint on friendship is integrated into this examination, specifically those aspects which correspond to the intersection between individuals and the greater community, as well as the connection to the suprasocial aspects of Adlerian theory. Research presented in this paper indicates that the basic experience of friendship has become more uncertain with the increasing prevalence of social networking and the preference for immediate gratification rather than the intentionality that deep, intimate friendships require. This paper supports the continued study and encouragement of spiritual friendships as a viable option for males seeking lasting and rewarding same-sex deep friendships. SPIRITUAL FRIENDSHIP 3 Acknowledgements Joanne Holley: My mother, for believing in me and being a constant source of encouragement in my academic endeavors. Carroll Franklin Holley: My late father, to whom I am forever indebted for his kindness and insight and thankful for his lessons in thinking the best of people. Anna Holley: My sister, for supporting me throughout this exacting writing process and believing in me achieving my goals.
    [Show full text]
  • David Luscombe: Publications
    David Luscombe: Publications 1963 Review: David Knowles, Great Historical Enterprises. Problems in Monastic History (London, 1963), in The Cambridge Review, 85/2064, November 30, 169-71 Review: M. Wilks, The Problem of Sovereignty in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge, 1963), in Theology 66, 341 1964 Review: Jean Décarreaux, Monks and Civilisation (London, 1964), in Theology 67, 464-6 1965 “Towards a new edition of Peter Abelard's Ethica or Scito te ipsum: an introduction to the manuscripts,” Vivarium 3, 115-27 Review: Donald Nicholl, Thurstan, Archbishop of York (1114-1140) (York, 1964), in New Blackfriars 46, 257-8 Review: G. Constable, Monastic Tithes from their Origins to the Twelfth Century (London, 1964), in New Blackfriars 46, 486 Review: Studies in Church History, 1, eds. C.W. Dugmore and C. Duggan (London, 1964) and The English Church and the Papacy in the Middle Ages, ed. C.H. Lawrence (London, 1965), in New Blackfriars 47, 48 1966 “Berengar, Defender of Peter Abelard,” Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 33, 319-37 “Anselm of Laon,” Colliers Encyclopedia, 1 “Nature in the Thought of Peter Abelard,” La Filosofia della Natura nel Medioevo. Atti del Terzo Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia Medioevale (Milan), 314-19 Review: Dom Adrian Morey and C.N.L. Brooke, Gilbert Foliot and his Letters (Cambridge, 1965), in New Blackfriars 47, 612 Review: B. Pullan, Sources for the History of Medieval Europe from the Mid-Eighth to the Mid-Thirteenth Century (Oxford, 1966), in The Cambridge Review, 29 October 1966, 73 1967 “Bernard of Chartres,” in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. P.
    [Show full text]
  • STORY of ANGLICANISM
    STORY of ANGLICANISM PART 1 (26th May 2018) ANCIENT & MEDIEVAL FOUNDATIONS When does Anglican history begin? The 16th century division of medieval Christendom into national and denominational jurisdictions marked the beginning of separate development in English religion. But to understand the particular shape of Anglicanism, it is helpful to know the pre-Reformation church from which it evolved. Our study of the ancient and medieval English Church will not only illumine generic topics of Christian history (eg. conversion of the barbarians, the monastic ideal the struggles of bishops and kings, etc.), but it will also reveal certain Anglican traits rooted deeply in the past of Britain’s relatively pragmatic and moderate peoples. This is perhaps a point not to be pressed too far, lest the increasingly diverse branches of the Anglican Communion begin to slight the particulars of their own local histories in favour of a romanticised pedigree of Celts, cathedrals and kings. Nevertheless, the English reformers repeatedly stressed that theirs was not a new church, but one that had its origins in earliest centuries of the faith. And while a majority of the Communion no longer confuses being Anglican with being English, we may still find considerable pleasure in claiming these stories as part of our family lore. The Church and History 1. Why do we study history? What do these stories have to do with us? What was your favourite part of the video? Why? 2. What makes you a Christian? Can you be a Christian by yourself? What are the essential components of the Christian life? 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Isaac of Stella, the Cistercians and the Thomas Becket Controversy: a Bibliographical and Contextual Study
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (1934 -) Projects Isaac of Stella, the Cistercians and the Thomas Becket Controversy: A Bibliographical and Contextual Study Travis D. Stolz Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Stolz, Travis D., "Isaac of Stella, the Cistercians and the Thomas Becket Controversy: A Bibliographical and Contextual Study" (2010). Dissertations (1934 -). 87. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/87 ISAAC OF STELLA, THE CISTERCIANS AND THE THOMAS BECKET CONTROVERSY: A BIBLIOGRAPHICAL AND CONTEXTUAL STUDY by Travis D. Stolz, B.A., M.Div. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty ofthe Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment ofthe Requirements for the Degree ofDoctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin December 2010 ABSTRACT ISAAC OF STELLA, THE CISTERCIANS AND THE THOMAS BECKET CONTROVERSY: A BIBLIOGRAPHICAL AND CONTEXTUAL STUDY Travis D. Stolz, B.A., M.Div. Marquette University, 2010 Isaac of Stella (ca. 1IOO-ca. 1169), an English-born Cistercian and abbot, has been dwarfed by Bernard of Clairvaux and other ofhis twelfth-century Cistercian contemporaries in terms ofliterary output and influence, giving him a reputation as an elusive and marginal figure. Isaac's 55 sermons and two treatises are modest compared to the productivity of other monastic writers and his position as the abbot of an obscure monastery in western France has not helped to raise his visibility among the luminaries of the twelfth century. He is remembered as a mysterious and often tragic figure in the annals ofhistory.
    [Show full text]
  • Examples of Nondual Thinkers and Mystics B.C
    Examples of Nondual Thinkers and Mystics B.C. Abraham, Jacob, Elijah 2000-800 (MesopotamiaVedic Period c.1500-c.500 (Indian Subcontinent) Pre-Classical Hinduism c.500-c.200 (Indian Subcontinent) Upanishads 800-300 (India) Pythagoras c.570-c.495 (Ionia) Buddha c. Late 6th century-Early 5th century (India) Heraclitus c.535-c.475 (Ionia) Parmenides c.515 (Magna Graecia) Socrates c.470-399 (Greece) Plato c.425-c.348 (Greece) The Republic; Timaeus Lao-Tsu c.5th to 6th century (China) Tao Te Ching A.D. FIRST CENTURY Philo of Alexandria c.25 B.C.-c.50 A.D. (Egypt) Jesus of Nazareth c.4 B.C.-c.33 A.D. (Roman Empire; Palestine) Paul of Tarsus c.5-66 (Roman Empire) Ignatius of Antioch c.35-c.107 (Syria; Rome) SECOND CENTURY Clement of Alexandria c.150-c.215 (Egypt) THIRD CENTURY Origen c.185-254 (Egypt) On First Principles; On Prayer Plotinus c.205-270 (Egypt; Roman Empire) Enneads Anthony the Great c.251-356 (Egypt) Desert Fathers and Mothers begin 3rd century (Egypt; Turkey; Syria; Palestine) FOURTH CENTURY Syncletica of Alexandria c.280-c.350 (Egypt) Athanasius of Alexandria c.296-373 (Egypt) Life of Antony; On the Incarnation of the Word Macarius of Egypt c.300-391 (Egypt) Ephrem the Syrian c.306-373 (Syria) Gregory Naziansus c.329-390 (Cappadocia) Basil of Caesarea c.330-379 (Cappadocia) On the Holy Spirit Gregory of Nyssa c.335-c.395 (Cappadocia) Abba Poemen c.340-450 (Egypt) Evagrius Ponticus 345-399 (Pontus; Constantinople; Egypt) The Praktikos Augustine of Hippo 354-430 (Numidia) Confessions; City of God Copyright © 2019 Center for Action and Contemplation Page 1 of 5 FIFTH CENTURY Pseudo-Dyonisius c.
    [Show full text]
  • Aelred of Rievaulx*
    A Spirituality of Mercy: Aelred of Rievaulx* Katherine M. TePas Characteristics of Our Culture at the Juncture We are here to reflect together on spirituality at the juncture of modernity and postmodernity. What are the characteristics of our cul­ ture at this juncture? What are the questions and concerns of the human spirit? My reflections in these introductory remarks will focus on that culture which I have had the most time to ponder: the youth and aca­ demic culture in the United States as it moves toward the third­ millennium. Six years of high-school teaching, years of graduate studies at three universities, and my first semester of teaching at the univer­ sity level have not made me an expert on the postmodern world, but they have given me plenty to ponder. Two summers ago I was one of a dozen individuals taking an intensive Latin course at a university in the Chicago area. We were all aspiring scholars, united by our common effort to memorize Latin grammar and painstakingly work our way through Cicero's De amicitia. In spite of this common ground, we had an underlying philosophical and spiritual diversity that fascinated me. We included a devout Mor­ mon; a young evangelical whose eyes sparkled when he spoke of knowing Jesus personally; a Catholic who appreciated the Jesus story, but not necessarily the person of Jesus; a philosophy professor who did not believe in God but admired the rigorous thought of Catholic philosophers such as Aquinas and Alasdair Macintyre; and a second •This paper was presented at the January 9-12, 1993 "Scholars' Retreat" sponsored by The Abbey Center For The Study Of Ethics And Culture, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • CORRIGENDA 54Th International Congress on Medieval Studies May 9–12, 2019 Advance Notice—2020 Congress
    CORRIGENDA 54th International Congress on Medieval Studies May 9–12, 2019 Advance Notice—2020 Congress 55th International Congress on Medieval Studies May 7–10, 2020 YOUR ACTION If you want to organize a session or sessions: work through the appropriate organization and its representatives for a place as a Sponsored Session, OR propose a Special Session or Sessions. The deadline for session proposals—including sessions of papers, demonstrations, panel discussions, performances, poster sessions, practica, roundtables, and workshops—is June 1. By the end of June the Committee will have chosen its slate for inclusion in the call for papers posted on the Congress website in July. We encourage organizers of Sponsored Sessions to consider pursuing co-sponsors for envisioned sessions. The Congress itself provides an excellent opportunity for the leadership of sponsoring organizations to seek connections with other organizations that might be interested in co-sponsoring a future session or future sessions. TIMING, EFFICIENCY, FAIRNESS Planning for sessions at the next year’s Congress should be well under way at each Congress as attendees interact and exchange ideas. The efficient organizer generally tries to line up speakers as soon as possible. Sessions that are “open” on June 2 may be closing or closed at any point along the timeline to the September 15 deadline. The organizer or the person proposing a paper who waits until the last minute may be very disappointed, failing to build a promising session or to place a paper, respectively. ABSOLUTE
    [Show full text]
  • Twelfth-Century Cistercian and Premonstratensian Teachings
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository CHARITY, ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: TWELFTH-CENTURY CISTERCIAN AND PREMONSTRATENSIAN TEACHINGS Beatrise Bandeniece A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of MPhil at the University of St Andrews 2017 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/12069 This item is protected by original copyright Charity, Action and Contemplation: Twelfth-century Cistercian and Premonstratensian Teachings Beatrise Bandeniece This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of MPhil at the University of St Andrews 30 May 2017 1. Candidate’s declarations: I, Beatrise Bandeniece, hereby certify that this thesis, which is approximately 39,868 words in length, has been written by me, and that it is the record of work carried out by me, or principally by myself in collaboration with others as acknowledged, and that it has not been submitted in any previous application for a higher degree. I was admitted as a research student in September 2015 and as a candidate for the degree of MPhil in May 2017; the higher study for which this is a record was carried out in the University of St Andrews between 2015 and 2017. Date 30 May 2017 signature of candidate ……… 2. Supervisor’s declaration: I hereby certify that the candidate has fulfilled the conditions of the Resolution and Regulations appropriate for the degree of MPhil in the University of St Andrews and that the candidate is qualified to submit this thesis in application for that degree.
    [Show full text]
  • 54Th International Congress on Medieval Studies May 9–12, 2019
    54th International Congress on Medieval Studies May 9–12, 2019 Corrigenda THURSDAY, MAY 9 The Gatehouse Café is open 8:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Thursday, May 9, 10:00–11:30 a.m. Sessions 18 Messy Bodies I: Bodies That Are. Christopher T. Richards, Institue of Fine Arts, New York Univ., will preside 27 Whose Middle Ages? Confronting Claims to the Past beyond Medievalism (A Roundtable). Stephennie Mulder will not participate. 30 Returning and Not Returning from War: Interdisciplinary Approaches to Loss of Self and Others in Medieval Depictions of Conflict. Stefanie A. Goyette will not participate. 36 Patrons of the Franciscans. The name of the first speaker is Ethan Leong Yee. 41 Transfer of Cultural Products: France and the Mediterranean Area in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries I. Lindsay Cook, Vassar College, will preside. Thursday, May 9, Lunchtime Events 12:00 noon, BERNHARD G10: Medieval Association of the Midwest (MAM). Executive Council Meeting. Thursday, May 9, 1:30–3:00 p.m. Sessions 48 New Directions in Carolingian and Ottonian Art History I: Models and Invention. The paper by Sabine Utz has been withdrawn. 53 “Big Data” in Medieval Studies I: Creating Corpora. The co-authors of the last paper are Joel Kalvesmaki, Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, and Chris L. Nighman, Wilfrid Laurier Univ. 63 Philosophical Themes and Issues in Malory’s World. The paper by Felicia Nimue Ackerman has been withdrawn. 68 Late Medieval and Renaissance Art. The papers by Tamara Golan and Javiera Barrientos have been withdrawn. 77 Medieval and Modern Anti-Semitisms.
    [Show full text]