DOCSLIB.ORG

Species List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Species List The species collected in your Malaise trap are listed below. They are organized by group and are listed in the order of the 'Species Image Library'. ‘New’ refers to species that are brand new to our DNA barcode library. 'Rare' refers to species that were only collected in your trap out of all 68 that were deployed for the program. BIN Group (scientific name) Species Common Name Scientific Name New Rare BOLD:AAA3681 Spiders (Araneae) Furrow spider Larinioides patagiatus BOLD:ACE5877 Spiders (Araneae) Dwarf spider Erigone atra BOLD:ACC9616 Mites (Arachnida) Ascid mite Ascidae BOLD:ACU5120 Mites (Arachnida) Mite Mesostigmata BOLD:ACL6239 Springtails (Collembola) Slender springtail Entomobrya BOLD:ACF1714 Springtails (Collembola) Slender springtail Lepidocyrtus BOLD:AAA7249 Springtails (Collembola) Slender springtail Entomobryidae BOLD:AAG4445 Beetles (Coleoptera) Leaf beetle Altica corni BOLD:ABA9947 Beetles (Coleoptera) Northern plantain flea beetle Dibolia borealis BOLD:AAL5267 Beetles (Coleoptera) Striped flea beetle Phyllotreta striolata BOLD:AAP7016 Beetles (Coleoptera) Leaf beetle Galerucinae BOLD:AAU6970 Beetles (Coleoptera) Checkered beetle Enoclerus BOLD:AAF4976 Beetles (Coleoptera) Diurnal firefly Ellychnia BOLD:AAN6154 Beetles (Coleoptera) Minute brown scavenger beetle Corticaria BOLD:AAG4452 Beetles (Coleoptera) Ravenous leaf beetle Orsodacninae BOLD:ABA5313 Beetles (Coleoptera) Rove beetle Amischa BOLD:AAY6531 Beetles (Coleoptera) Large rove beetle Nudobius BOLD:AAM7338 Flies (Diptera) Leaf miner fly Phytobia BOLD:AAP2967 Flies (Diptera) Root-maggot fly Hylemya BOLD:AAL7525 Flies (Diptera) Root-maggot fly Lasiomma BOLD:AAV0437 Flies (Diptera) Sap fly Aulacigaster neoleucopeza BOLD:AAG6745 Flies (Diptera) Cluster fly Pollenia pediculata BOLD:ABA1242 Flies (Diptera) Gall midge Cecidomyiidae BOLD:ACU5372 Flies (Diptera) Gall midge Cecidomyiidae BOLD:ACK9889 Flies (Diptera) Gall midge Cecidomyiidae BOLD:ACU4683 Flies (Diptera) Gall midge Cecidomyiidae BOLD:ACK4497 Flies (Diptera) Gall midge Cecidomyiinae BOLD:AAN5358 Flies (Diptera) Non-biting midge Smittia BOLD:AAP9071 Flies (Diptera) Fungus gnat Phronia BOLD:AAG3274 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Megaselia rufipes BOLD:ABU5529 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Megaselia BOLD:AAU6524 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Megaselia BOLD:AAL9076 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Megaselia BOLD:ABA1225 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Phoridae BOLD:ABA1213 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Phoridae BOLD:ACM1336 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Phoridae BOLD:ACG4438 Flies (Diptera) Scuttle fly Phoridae BOLD:AAZ5612 Flies (Diptera) Dark-winged fungus gnat Sciaridae BOLD:AAH3927 Flies (Diptera) Dark-winged fungus gnat Sciaridae BOLD:ACD3001 Flies (Diptera) Lesser dung fly Ischiolepta BOLD:AAP6440 Flies (Diptera) Lesser dung fly Spelobia BOLD:AAP3780 Flies (Diptera) Tachinid fly Cyrtophleba BOLD:ABA5875 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Empoasca BOLD:ABA5787 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Eratoneura BOLD:AAN8287 True bugs (Hemiptera) Leafhopper Erythridula wysongi BOLD:AAA5803 True bugs (Hemiptera) Tarnished plant bug Lygus lineolaris BOLD:AAN8179 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Diapriid wasp Trichopria basalis BOLD:AAD5318 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Ichneumon wasp Ichneumoninae BOLD:ACU4576 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Ichneumon wasp Tersilochinae BOLD:ACU5044 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Platygastrid wasp Platygastridae BOLD:AAG7886 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Platygastrid wasp Platygastridae BOLD:ACU4520 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Platygastrid wasp Platygastridae BOLD:ACF8276 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Platygastrid wasp Platygastridae BOLD:ACF7988 Bees, wasps & ants (Hymenoptera) Common sawfly Amauronematus BOLD:AAC4176 Moths & butterflies (Lepidoptera) Leaf blotch miner moth Caloptilia serotinella BOLD:AAA7131 Moths & butterflies (Lepidoptera) Tortricid moth Pseudexentera oregonana .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CERTAIN INSECT VECTORS of APLANOBACTER STEWARTI ' by F
    CERTAIN INSECT VECTORS OF APLANOBACTER STEWARTI ' By F. W. Poos, senior entomologist, Division of Cereal and Forage Insects, Bureau of Entomology and Plant Quarantine; and CHARLOTTE ELLIOTT, associate pa- thologist, Division of Cereal Crops and Diseases, Bureau of Plant Industry, United States Department of Agriculture ^ INTRODUCTION Bacterial wilt of corn (Zea mays L.) caused by Aplanobacter stewarti (E. F. Sm.) McC. was exceedingly destructive and more widely dis- tributed during 1932 and 1933 than during any previous time in the history of the disease. Since 1897, when it was first described by Stewart, it has been studied by a number of investigators whose work has pointed more and more toward insects as a means of dis- semination of the causal organism. Kand and Cash (7) ^ during 1920-23 found that bacterial wilt could be transmitted from diseased to healthy com plants by two species of flea beetles, Chaetocnema pulicaria Melsh. and C, denticulata (111.), and by the spotted cucum- ber beetle, Diabrotica duodecimpunctata (Fab.). IvanoíF (ö) reported transmission from diseased to healthy plants by the larval stage of the corn rootworm, Diabrotica longicornis (Say), as it attacked the roots of young seedling com plants. He also reported that the bac- teria of A. stewarti entered the corn plants through wounds made by white grubs, the larvae of Phyllophaga sp., feeding upon the roots in infested soil. A summary of this work, together with a brief review of the other literature on this disease, has recently appeared else- where (1), The results of experiments by previous investigators on soil trans- mission of the causal organism indicate that transmission through the soil to uninjured roots of com plants is exceedingly rare, if it ever occurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Economic Insects and Related Arthropods
    April 1989 · Bulletin 752 OHIO ECONOMIC INSECTS AND RELATED ARTHROPODS Armyworm feeding on com; 2x. (USDA) This list was prepared in cooperation with faculty of the Ohio Cooperative Extension Service, the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, the Ohio Department of Agriculture, the Ohio Department of Health, The Ohio State University and the Plant Pest Control Division of the United States Department of Agriculture . .Uhio Cooperative Extension Service The Ohio State University 2 OHIO ECONOMIC INSECTS AND RELATED ARTUROPODS For additional information, contact William F. Lyon, Extension Entomologist, The Ohio State University, 1991 Kenny Road, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1090. Phone: (614) m-5274. INTRODUCTION This list of Ohio Economic Insects and Related Arthropods was first assembled back in 1962-1964 while employed as the first "Survey Entomologist" of Ohio based at The Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, Ohio. It was felt that such a list would serve as a valuable reference and useful purpose for commercial, government and public needs. This list was prepared and updated in cooperation with faculty of the Ohio Cooperative Extension Service, the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, the Ohio Department of Agriculture, the Ohio Department of Health, the Ohio State University and the Plant Pest Control Division of the United States Department of Agriculture. Common and scientific names are listed under various host and habitat categories. ACKNQWLEDGEMENT Several individuals have made valuable contributions to this list of Ohio Insects and Related Arthropods. by updating common names, scientific names, hosts and habitats. Carl W. Albrecht George Keeney Bruce Eisley Richard K. Lindquist John K.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: a Compilation and Review
    Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: A Compilation and Review Nancy Hampton Abstract—Large tracts of important sagebrush (Artemisia L.) Major portions of the INL have been burned by wildfires habitat in southeastern Idaho, including thousands of acres at the over the past several years, and restoration and recovery of Idaho National Laboratory (INL), continue to be lost and degraded sagebrush habitat are current topics of investigation (Ander- through wildland fire and other disturbances. The roles of most son and Patrick 2000; Blew 2000). Most restoration projects, insects in sagebrush ecosystems are not well understood, and the including those at the INL, are focused on the reestablish- effects of habitat loss and alteration on their populations and ment of vegetation communities (Anderson and Shumar communities have not been well studied. Although a comprehen- 1989; Williams 1997). Insects also have important roles in sive survey of insects at the INL has not been performed, smaller restored communities (Williams 1997) and show promise as scale studies have been concentrated in sagebrush and associated indicators of restoration success in shrub-steppe (Karr and communities at the site. Here, I compile a taxonomic inventory of Kimberling 2003; Kimberling and others 2001) and other insects identified in these studies. The baseline inventory of more habitats (Jansen 1997; Williams 1997). than 1,240 species, representing 747 genera in 212 families, can be The purpose of this paper is to present a taxonomic list of used to build models of insect diversity in natural and restored insects identified by researchers studying cold desert com- sagebrush habitats. munities at the INL.
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Morphology of Systena Blanda Melsheimer (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticinae)
    16 July 1998 PROC. ENTOMOL. SOC. WASH. 100(3), 1998, pp. 484-488 LARVAL MORPHOLOGY OF SYSTENA BLANDA MELSHEIMER (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE: ALTICINAE) JONG EUN LEE, STEVEN W. LINGAFELTER, AND ALEXANDERS. KONSTANTINOV (JEL) Department of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Andong National Univer­ sity, Andong, Kyungbuk 760-749, South Korea; (SWL, ASK) Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, c/o Na­ tinal Museum of Natural History, MRC-168, Washington, D.C. 20560, U.S.A. (email: [email protected]; [email protected]). Abstract. -The first detailed morphological description and illustrations are presented for the larva of a species of Systena (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticinae), S. blanda (Melsheimer). Compound microscopic examination of the head, antennae, mouthparts, and legs revealed characters typical of other soil dwelling and root feeding alticine genera. Key Words: Systena, Alticinae, Chrysomelidae, larva, morphology, character, system- atic, flea beetle, leaf beetle The morphology and biology of many al­ acters of the anal plate. Drake and Harris ticine larvae, particularly those including (1931) provided a slightly larger lateral forest and agricultural pests have been stud­ habitus illustration of the larva but no dis­ ied by many workers, although much more cussion of characters important in identifi­ is known for Old World taxa. Notable cation. Peters and Barton (1969) provided works on Old World taxa include those of a brief description of the larva of Systena Ogloblin and Medvedev (1971), Kimoto frontalis Fabricius but did not provide ad­ and Takizawa (1994) and Steinhausen equate detail to understand unique and (1994) who studied many genera of alticine shared characters of this and related taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report on the Leaf Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Cove Point LNG Property and Vicinity, Calvert County, Maryland
    Survey Report on the Leaf Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Cove Point LNG Property and Vicinity, Calvert County, Maryland Prepared by Joseph F. Cavey June 2004 Survey Report on the Leaf Beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of Cove Point LNG Property and Vicinity, Calvert County, Maryland Joseph F. Cavey 6207 Guthrie Court Eldersburg, Maryland 21784 Submitted June 2004 Abstract A survey was funded by the Cove Point Natural Heritage Trust to document the leaf beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of the Cove Point Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Limited Partnership Site in Calvert County, Maryland. The survey was conducted during periods of seasonal beetle activity from March 2002 to October 2003. The survey detected 92 leaf beetle species, including two species not formerly recorded for the State of Maryland and 55 additional species new to Calvert County. The detection of the rare flea beetle, Glyptina maritima Fall, represents only the third recorded collection of this species and the only recorded collection in the past 32 years. Dichanthelium (Panicum) dichromatum (L.) Gould is reported as the larval host plant of the leaf-mining hispine beetle Glyphuroplata pluto (Newman), representing the first such association for this beetle. Introduction This manuscript summarizes work completed in a two year survey effort begun in March 2002 to document the leaf beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) of the Cove Point Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Limited Partnership Site in Calvert County, Maryland, USA. Fieldwork for this study was conducted under contract with the Cove Point Natural Heritage Trust, dated February 28, 2002. One of the largest insect families, the Chrysomelidae, or leaf beetles, contains more than 37,000 species worldwide, including some 1,700 North American species (Jolivet 1988, Riley et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Megalopodidae and Chrysomelidae 321 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.179.2625 Research Article Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeysNew 179: 321–348Coleoptera (2012) records from New Brunswick, Canada: Megalopodidae and Chrysomelidae 321 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.179.2625 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research New Coleoptera records from New Brunswick, Canada: Megalopodidae and Chrysomelidae Reginald P. Webster1, Laurent LeSage2, Ian DeMerchant1 1 Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service - Atlantic Forestry Centre, 1350 Regent St., P.O. Box 4000, Fredericton, NB, Canada E3B 5P7 2 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids, and Nema- todes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada Corresponding author: Reginald P. Webster ([email protected]) Academic editor: R. Anderson | Received 6 January 2012 | Accepted 16 March 2012 | Published 4 April 2012 Citation: Webster RP, LeSage L, DeMerchant I (2012) New Coleoptera records from New Brunswick, Canada: Megalopodidae and Chrysomelidae. In: Anderson R, Klimaszewski J (Eds) Biodiversity and Ecology of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada. ZooKeys 179: 321–348. Abstract Zeugophora varians Crotch and the family Megalopodidae are newly recorded for New Brunswick, Cana- da. Twenty-eight species of Chrysomelidae are newly recorded for New Brunswick, including Acalymma gouldi Barber, Altica knabii Blatchley, Altica rosae Woods, Altica woodsi Isely, Bassareus mammifer (New- man), Chrysolina marginata (Linnaeus), Chrysomela laurentia Brown, Crepidodera violacea Melsheimer, Cryptocephalus venustus Fabricius, Neohaemonia melsheimeri (Lacordaire), N. nigricornis (Kirby), Pachybra- chis bivittatus (Say), Pachybrachis m-nigrum (Melsheimer), Phyllobrotica limbata (Fabricius), Psylliodes af- finis (Paykull), Odontota dorsalis (Thunberg),Ophraella communa (LeSage), Ophraella cribrata (LeConte), Ophraella notata (Fabricius), Systena hudsonias (Forster), Tricholochmaea ribicola (Brown), and Tricholoch- maea rufosanguinea (Say), which are also newly recorded for the Maritime provinces.
    [Show full text]
  • Species List
    The species collected in your Malaise trap are listed below. They are organized by group and are listed in the order of the 'Species Image Library'. ‘New’ refers to species that are brand new to our DNA barcode library. 'Rare' refers to species that were only collected in your trap out of all 58 that were deployed for the program. BIN Group (scientific name) Species common name Scientific name New Rare BOLD:AAF9236 Mites (Arachnida) Whirligig mite Anystidae BOLD:ACE1890 Mites (Arachnida) Mite Rhagidiidae BOLD:AAA7249 Springtails (Collembola) Slender springtail Entomobrya BOLD:AAB7915 Springtails (Collembola) Globular springtail Deuterosminthurus BOLD:ACC0359 Springtails (Collembola) Springtail Bourletiellidae BOLD:ABA9947 Beetles (Coleoptera) Northern plantain flea beetle Dibolia borealis BOLD:AAY6553 Beetles (Coleoptera) Leaf beetle Longitarsus erro BOLD:AAG3633 Beetles (Coleoptera) Marsh beetle Cyphon BOLD:AAV5544 Flies (Diptera) Gall midge Cecidomyiidae BOLD:ABA1223 Flies (Diptera) Gall midge Cecidomyiidae BOLD:ACM5965 Flies (Diptera) Gall midge Cecidomyiidae BOLD:AAJ4295 Flies (Diptera) Non-biting midge Chironomus acidophilus BOLD:AAB4657 Flies (Diptera) Non-biting midge Chironomus maturus BOLD:AAI4303 Flies (Diptera) Non-biting midge Chironomus melanescens BOLD:AAP6873 Flies (Diptera) Non-biting midge Gymnometriocnemus brumalis BOLD:AAI1981 Flies (Diptera) Non-biting midge Gymnometriocnemus BOLD:ABU5525 Flies (Diptera) Non-biting midge Limnophyes BOLD:ABZ5071 Flies (Diptera) Non-biting midge Micropsectra nigripila BOLD:AAL7382
    [Show full text]
  • 276 Florida Entomologist 83(3) September, 2000
    276 Florida Entomologist 83(3) September, 2000 LARVAL MORPHOLOGY AND BIOLOGY OF A NORTH AMERICAN AND AN ISRAELI ALTICA SPECIES (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE: ALTICINAE) JONG EUN LEE1 AND DAVID G. FURTH2 1Department of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Andong National University Andong, Kyungbuk, 760-749 Korea 2Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560-0165, U.S.A. ABSTRACT The mature larvae of Altica bicarinata (Kutschera) and A. marevagans Horn, col- lected in Israel and North America, respectively, are described and illustrated in de- tail for the first time. Some remarks on their taxonomy and biology are also given along with some discussion of the state of knowledge of alticine larvae. Key Words: Altica, larvae, Florida, Israel, Rubus, Oenothera RESUMEN Las larvas maduras de Altica bicarinata (Kutschera) y A. marevagans Horn, colec- tadas en Norte América e Israel, estan descritas e ilustradas en detalle por primera vez. Algunos comentarios sobre su taxonomía y biología están incluidos, así como tam- bién una discusión sobre el estado de conocimiento de las larvas de Alticinae. Alticinae larvae, including forest and agricultural pests, were studied by many workers from morphological and biological perspectives. Ogloblin & Medvedev (1971), Kimoto & Takizawa (1994), and Steinhausen (1994) studied many genera of alticine larvae taxonomically using the chaetotaxy of the anal plate. Some workers conducted a variety of studies: Rupertsberger (1894); Sanderson (1902); Henriksen (1927); Reed (1927); Böving & Craighead (1931); Grandi (1932, 1938); Newton (1933); Anderson (1938); Paterson (1931, 1943); Dobson (1960); Yano (1963, 1965); Giljarov & Medvedev (1964); Steinhausen (1966, 1978, 1994); Welch (1972); Westdal & Romanov (1972); Zaitev & Medvedev (1977); Medvedev & Zaitev (1978); Vig (1989); Lawson (1991); Lee (1992); Medvedev (1992); Doguet (1994); Lee et al.
    [Show full text]
  • An All-Taxa Biodiversity Inventory of the Huron Mountain Club
    AN ALL-TAXA BIODIVERSITY INVENTORY OF THE HURON MOUNTAIN CLUB Version: August 2016 Cite as: Woods, K.D. (Compiler). 2016. An all-taxa biodiversity inventory of the Huron Mountain Club. Version August 2016. Occasional papers of the Huron Mountain Wildlife Foundation, No. 5. [http://www.hmwf.org/species_list.php] Introduction and general compilation by: Kerry D. Woods Natural Sciences Bennington College Bennington VT 05201 Kingdom Fungi compiled by: Dana L. Richter School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science Michigan Technological University Houghton, MI 49931 DEDICATION This project is dedicated to Dr. William R. Manierre, who is responsible, directly and indirectly, for documenting a large proportion of the taxa listed here. Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 5 SOURCES 7 DOMAIN BACTERIA 11 KINGDOM MONERA 11 DOMAIN EUCARYA 13 KINGDOM EUGLENOZOA 13 KINGDOM RHODOPHYTA 13 KINGDOM DINOFLAGELLATA 14 KINGDOM XANTHOPHYTA 15 KINGDOM CHRYSOPHYTA 15 KINGDOM CHROMISTA 16 KINGDOM VIRIDAEPLANTAE 17 Phylum CHLOROPHYTA 18 Phylum BRYOPHYTA 20 Phylum MARCHANTIOPHYTA 27 Phylum ANTHOCEROTOPHYTA 29 Phylum LYCOPODIOPHYTA 30 Phylum EQUISETOPHYTA 31 Phylum POLYPODIOPHYTA 31 Phylum PINOPHYTA 32 Phylum MAGNOLIOPHYTA 32 Class Magnoliopsida 32 Class Liliopsida 44 KINGDOM FUNGI 50 Phylum DEUTEROMYCOTA 50 Phylum CHYTRIDIOMYCOTA 51 Phylum ZYGOMYCOTA 52 Phylum ASCOMYCOTA 52 Phylum BASIDIOMYCOTA 53 LICHENS 68 KINGDOM ANIMALIA 75 Phylum ANNELIDA 76 Phylum MOLLUSCA 77 Phylum ARTHROPODA 79 Class Insecta 80 Order Ephemeroptera 81 Order Odonata 83 Order Orthoptera 85 Order Coleoptera 88 Order Hymenoptera 96 Class Arachnida 110 Phylum CHORDATA 111 Class Actinopterygii 112 Class Amphibia 114 Class Reptilia 115 Class Aves 115 Class Mammalia 121 INTRODUCTION No complete species inventory exists for any area.
    [Show full text]
  • Leaf-Mining Chrysomelids 1 Leaf-Mining Chrysomelids
    Leaf-mining chrysomelids 1 Leaf-mining chrysomelids Jorge A. Santiago-Blay Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” (Act I, Scene 5, Lines 66-167) “To be or not to be; that is the question” (Act III, Section 1, Line 58) both quotes from “The Tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark” by William Shakespeare (1564-1616) Abstract into two morphological categories: the eruciform, less modi- fied type (Galerucinae and some Alticinae); and the flattened, Leaf-mining is the relatively prolonged consumption of foliar sometimes onisciform type characteristic of the Zeugophorinae, material contained within the epidermal layers, without elicit- many Alticinae, the Cassidinae, and the Hispinae. There are ing a major histological response from the plant. This type of no published data on the larval structure of leaf-mining herbivory is relatively uncommon in the Chrysomelidae and criocerines. Larval leaf-mining chrysomelids are reported to has been reported in 103 genera, representing 4% of the ap- have rather broad host-plant feeding preferences. For adults, proximately 2600 described genera and amounting to over the ranges are broader. The Index of Feeding Range (IFR) is 500 reported species, or 1-2% of the 40-50,000 described introduced herein as a scalar to quantify the feeding range of species. Larvae in the following subfamilies are known leaf- the larvae (IFRi) and adults (IFRa). For the Zeugophorinae, miners, with numbers and percentages of taxa also being in- IFRi is 2.0 and IFRa 2.9.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science - Volume 26 1972 Academy Editors
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 26 Article 1 1972 Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science - Volume 26 1972 Academy Editors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Recommended Citation Editors, Academy (1972) "Proceedings of the Arkansas Academy of Science - Volume 26 1972," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 26 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol26/iss1/1 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Entire Issue is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. <- Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 26 [1972], Art. 1 AKASO p.3- ARKANSAS ACADEMYOF SCIENCE VOLUME XXVI 1972 Flagella and basal body of Trypanosoma ARKANSAS ACADEMYOF SCIENCE BOX 1709 UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS 72701 Published by Arkansas Academy of Science, 1972 1 EDITOR J. L. WICKLIFF Department of Botany and Bacteriology JournalUniversity of the Arkansasof Arkansas, AcademyFayettevi of Science,lie. Vol.Arkansas 26 [1972],72701 Art. 1 EDITORIALBOARD John K. Beadles Lester C.Howick Jack W. Sears James L.Dale Joe F.
    [Show full text]
  • On Quantifying Mate Search in a Perfect Insect 211 on RESEARCH and ENTOMOLOGICAL EDUCATION IV
    Lloyd: On Quantifying Mate Search in a Perfect Insect 211 ON RESEARCH AND ENTOMOLOGICAL EDUCATION IV: QUANTIFYING MATE SEARCH IN A PERFECT INSECT— SEEKING TRUE FACTS AND INSIGHT (COLEOPTERA: LAMPYRIDAE, PHOTINUS) JAMES E. LLOYD Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 ABSTRACT Male Photinus collustrans LeConte fireflies fly over their grassland habitats flash- ing and seeking their flightless females. I followed individual males, measured, and took note of various aspects of their behavior. Then, from a sample of 255 male runs, with a total distance of 13.9 miles and 10,306 flashes, various sets of these males, those seemingly directed by other than search flight-plans, were removed to leave a sample to characterize “pure” search flight. Fireflies are good subjects for students to study foraging ecology and sexual selection, and from studies of common grassland fireflies it will be clear to students that even simple behavior by males of a single spe- cies, under seemingly uncomplicated and homogeneous conditions, can be complex, but provide opportunity for theoretical and empirical exploration. Among factors identified here as influencing male mate-seeking behavior were ambient tempera- ture, ambient light level, and time of night. Other influencing factors, enigmas, and student explorations are indicated. Key Words: Lampyridae, Photinus, mate search, sexual selection, foraging, teaching RESUMEN Las luciérnagas machos de la especie Photinus collustrans LeConte vuelan sobre los pastizales destellando su luz y buscando a las hembras que no pueden volar. Seguí a los machos, los medí y tome notas de varios aspectos de su comportamiento. Luego, de una muestra de 255 vuelos de los machos, con una distancia total de 13,9 millas y de 10.306 destellos, varios grupos de estos machos, esos dirigidos aparentemente por alguna otra razón que la de un vuelo de búsqueda, fueron removidos para formar una muestra que caracterice el vuelo de búsqueda “puro”.
    [Show full text]