DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) ICES WGITMO REPORT 2016 SCICOM STEERING GROUP ON ECOSYSTEM PRESSURES AND IMPACTS ICES CM 2016/SSGEPI:10 REF. ACOM, SCICOM Report of the Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) 16-18 March 2016 Olbia, Italy International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44–46 DK-1553 Copenhagen V Denmark Telephone (+45) 33 38 67 00 Telefax (+45) 33 93 42 15 www.ices.dk [email protected] Recommended format for purposes of citation: ICES. 2016. Report of the Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO), 16–18 March 2016, Olbia, Italy. ICES CM 2016/SSGEPI:10. 201 pp. For permission to reproduce material from this publication, please apply to the Gen- eral Secretary. The document is a report of an Expert Group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. © 2016 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea ICES WGITMO REPORT 2016 | i Contents Executive summary ................................................................................................................ 3 1 Opening of the meeting ................................................................................................ 4 2 Adoption of the agenda ................................................................................................ 4 3 WGITMO Terms of Reference .................................................................................... 4 4 Progress in relation to Terms of Reference ............................................................... 6 4.1 Term of Reference a) ............................................................................................. 6 4.1.1 Belgium ..................................................................................................... 6 4.1.2 Canada ....................................................................................................... 6 4.1.3 Denmark .................................................................................................... 6 4.1.4 Estonia ....................................................................................................... 7 4.1.5 Finland ....................................................................................................... 7 4.1.6 France ........................................................................................................ 7 4.1.7 Germany .................................................................................................... 8 4.1.8 Israel .......................................................................................................... 8 4.1.9 Italy ............................................................................................................ 9 4.1.10 Lithuania ................................................................................................... 9 4.1.11 Norway ...................................................................................................... 9 4.1.12 Poland ........................................................................................................ 9 4.1.13 Portugal ................................................................................................... 10 4.1.14 Russia ....................................................................................................... 10 4.1.15 Sweden .................................................................................................... 11 4.1.16 United Kingdom ..................................................................................... 11 4.1.17 United States ........................................................................................... 12 4.2 Term of Reference b) .......................................................................................... 16 4.3 Term of Reference c) ........................................................................................... 25 4.4 Term of Reference d) .......................................................................................... 30 4.5 Term of Reference e) ........................................................................................... 34 4.6 Term of Reference f) ........................................................................................... 35 4.7 Other discussion items and any other business ............................................. 41 4.7.1 Election of the chair ............................................................................... 41 4.7.2 Assessing biological invasions in European seas: biological traits of the most widespread non-indigenous species (by Alice Cardeccia) ..................................................................................... 41 4.7.3 Caulerpa cylindracea in the Mediterranean Sea: an overview (by Giulia Ceccherelli) ........................................................................... 41 4.7.4 Work in progress: North Sea overview (by Kathe Jensen) ............... 42 4.7.5 Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization (by Amelia Curd) .......................................................................................... 42 4.7.6 ICES–PICES cooperation....................................................................... 43 4.7.7 ICES request of further info on NIS..................................................... 44 ii | ICES WGITMO REPORT 2016 4.7.8 Timing of WGITMO meetings ............................................................. 45 5 Closing of the meeting ................................................................................................ 45 Annex 1: List of participants............................................................................................... 46 Annex 2: Meeting agenda ................................................................................................... 51 Annex 3: National reports ................................................................................................... 55 Belgium .................................................................................................................................. 55 Canada .................................................................................................................................... 56 Denmark ................................................................................................................................ 61 Estonia .................................................................................................................................... 65 Finland ................................................................................................................................... 75 France ...................................................................................................................................... 77 Germany................................................................................................................................. 85 Israel ....................................................................................................................................... 91 Italy ....................................................................................................................................... 103 Lithuania .............................................................................................................................. 114 Norway ................................................................................................................................. 116 Poland ................................................................................................................................... 125 Portugal ................................................................................................................................ 133 Russia ................................................................................................................................... 143 Sweden ................................................................................................................................. 152 United Kingdom ................................................................................................................. 156 United States ....................................................................................................................... 165 Annex 4: Information on new invasions and range expansions of non- indigenous species as reported by Denmark ....................................................... 174 Annex 5: Information on secies and population status for non-indigenous (NIS) and cryptogenic (CS) species for ICES ecoregions ................................... 176 Annex 6: WGITMO draft resolution for multi-annual ToRs 2017–2019 .................. 199 ICES WGITMO REPORT 2016 | 3 Executive summary The 42th meeting of the ICES Working Group on Introductions and Transfers of Marine Organisms (WGITMO) was held in Olbia, Italy, 16–18 March 2016, with Anna Occhipinti- Ambrogi as host and Henn Ojaveer as chairperson. Representatives from 19 countries participated in the meeting. Attendants were from Belgium, Canada, Dennark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Lithuania, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Sweden contributed by cor- respondence. The objectives of the meeting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Recent Molluscan Marine Fauna of the Islas Galápagos
    THE FESTIVUS ISSN 0738-9388 A publication of the San Diego Shell Club Volume XXIX December 4, 1997 Supplement The Recent Molluscan Marine Fauna of the Islas Galapagos Kirstie L. Kaiser Vol. XXIX: Supplement THE FESTIVUS Page i THE RECENT MOLLUSCAN MARINE FAUNA OF THE ISLAS GALApAGOS KIRSTIE L. KAISER Museum Associate, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA 4 December 1997 SiL jo Cover: Adapted from a painting by John Chancellor - H.M.S. Beagle in the Galapagos. “This reproduction is gifi from a Fine Art Limited Edition published by Alexander Gallery Publications Limited, Bristol, England.” Anon, QU Lf a - ‘S” / ^ ^ 1 Vol. XXIX Supplement THE FESTIVUS Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS 1 DISCUSSION 2 RESULTS 2 Table 1: Deep-Water Species 3 Table 2: Additions to the verified species list of Finet (1994b) 4 Table 3: Species listed as endemic by Finet (1994b) which are no longer restricted to the Galapagos .... 6 Table 4: Summary of annotated checklist of Galapagan mollusks 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 6 LITERATURE CITED 7 APPENDIX 1: ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF GALAPAGAN MOLLUSKS 17 APPENDIX 2: REJECTED SPECIES 47 INDEX TO TAXA 57 Vol. XXIX: Supplement THE FESTIVUS Page 1 THE RECENT MOLLUSCAN MARINE EAUNA OE THE ISLAS GALAPAGOS KIRSTIE L. KAISER' Museum Associate, Los Angeles County Museum of Natural History, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA Introduction marine mollusks (Appendix 2). The first list includes The marine mollusks of the Galapagos are of additional earlier citations, recent reported citings, interest to those who study eastern Pacific mollusks, taxonomic changes and confirmations of 31 species particularly because the Archipelago is far enough from previously listed as doubtful.
    [Show full text]
  • Caulerpa Racemosa Var. Cylindracea (Forsskal) J.Agardh ; Devant La Côte Ouest Algérienne
    REPUBLIQUE ALGERIENNE DEMOCRATIQUE ET POPULAIRE MINISTERE DE L’ENSEIGNEMENT SUPERIEUR ET DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE UNIVERSITE ABDELHAMID IBN BADIS MOSTAGANEM FACULTE DES SCIENCES DE LA NATURE ET DE LA VIE DEPARTEMENT DES SCIENCES DE LA MER ET DE L’AQUACULTURE FILIERE : HYDROBIOLOGIE MARINE ET CONTINENTALE SPECIALITE : ECOLOGIE ET ENVIRONNEMENT THESE POUR L’OBTENTION DU DIPLOME DE DOCTORAT EN SCIENCES Présentée par : GHELLAI Malika Intitulée : L’expansion, le contrôle et le suivi de l’algue marine invasive : Caulerpa racemosa Var. cylindracea (Forsskal) J.Agardh ; devant la côte ouest algérienne Soutenue le : 1 Juin 2021 Devant le jury composé de : Mme. BENAMAR Nardjess Professeur Université de Mostaganem Présidente Mme. NEMCHI Fadela Maître de conférences A Université de Mostaganem Examinatrice M. KERFOUF Ahmed Professeur Université de Sidi Bel-Abbes Examinateur M. MOUFFOK Salim Professeur Université Oran1 Examinateur M.CHAHROUR Fayçal Maître de conférences A Université Oran 1 Examinateur M.BACHIR BOUIADJRA Benabdellah Maître de conférences A Université de Mostaganem Rapporteur Année universitaire 2020-2021 DEDICACE Je dédie ce travail A ma famille, elle qui m’a doté d’une éducation digne, son amour a fait de moi ce que je suis aujourd’hui : Particulièrement à mes parents, pour le gout à l’effort qu’ils ont suscité en moi, de par leur rigueur, que cette thèse soit le meilleur cadeau que je puisse vous offrir. A mon frère, mes sœurs qui m’ont toujours soutenu et encouragé durant ces années d’études A mon mari qui a toujours été à mes cotés pour me soutenir et m’encourager pour la réalisation de ce travail.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Mussels (Mytilus Edulis Spp.) As Sentinel Organisms in Coastal Pollution Monitoring: a Review
    Accepted Manuscript Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis spp.) as sentinel organisms in coastal pollution monitoring: A review Jonny Beyer, Norman W. Green, Steven Brooks, Ian J. Allan, Anders Ruus, Tânia Gomes, Inger Lise N. Bråte, Merete Schøyen PII: S0141-1136(17)30266-0 DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.07.024 Reference: MERE 4356 To appear in: Marine Environmental Research Received Date: 20 April 2017 Revised Date: 28 July 2017 Accepted Date: 31 July 2017 Please cite this article as: Beyer, J., Green, N.W., Brooks, S., Allan, I.J., Ruus, A., Gomes, Tâ., Bråte, I.L.N., Schøyen, M., Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis spp.) as sentinel organisms in coastal pollution monitoring: A review, Marine Environmental Research (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.07.024. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis spp.) as sentinel organisms in coastal pollution 2 monitoring: A review 3 Jonny Beyer a,*, Norman W. Green a, Steven Brooks a, Ian J. Allan a, Anders Ruus a,b , Tânia Gomes a, 4 Inger Lise N. Bråte a, Merete Schøyen a 5 a Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway 6 b University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway 7 *Corresponding author: Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadallèen 21, NO-0349 OSLO, 8 Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Neanthes Limnicola Class: Polychaeta Order: Phyllodocida a Mussel Worm Family: Nereididae
    Phylum: Annelida Neanthes limnicola Class: Polychaeta Order: Phyllodocida A mussel worm Family: Nereididae Taxonomy: Depending on the author, Trunk: Very thick segments that are Neanthes is currently considered a separate wider than they are long, gently tapers or subspecies to the genus Nereis (Hilbig to posterior (Fig. 1). 1997). Nereis sensu stricto differs from the Posterior: Pygidium bears two, genus Neanthes because the latter genus styliform ventrolateral anal cirri that includes species with spinigerous notosetae are as long as last seven segments only. Furthermore, N. limnicola has most (Fig. 1) (Hartman 1938). recently been included in the genus (or Parapodia: The first two setigers are subgenus) Hediste due to the neuropodial uniramous. All other parapodia are biramous setal morphology (Sato 1999; Bakken and (Nereididae, Blake and Ruff 2007) where both Wilson 2005; Tusuji and Sato 2012). notopodia and neuropodia have acicular However, reproduction is markedly different in lobes and each lobe bears 1–3 additional, N. limnicola than other Hediste species (Sato medial and triangular lobes (above and 1999). Thus, synonyms of Neanthes below), called ligules (Blake and Ruff 2007) limnicola include Nereis limnicola (which was (Figs. 1, 5). The notopodial ligule is always synonymized with Neanthes lighti in 1959 smaller than the neuropodial one. The (Smith)), Nereis (Neanthes) limnicola, Nereis parapodial lobes are conical and not leaf-like (Hediste) limnicola and Hediste limnicola. or globular as in the family Phyllodocidae. (A The predominating name in current local parapodium should be removed and viewed intertidal guides (e.g. Blake and Ruff 2007) is at 100x for accurate identification). Neanthes limnicola.
    [Show full text]
  • (Approx) Mixed Micro Shells (22G Bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22G Bag Provides Hours of Fun; Some Interesting Foraminifera Also Included
    Special Price £ US$ Family Genus, species Country Quality Size Remarks w/o Photo Date added Category characteristic (€) (approx) (approx) Mixed micro shells (22g bags) Philippines € 10,00 £8,64 $11,69 Each 22g bag provides hours of fun; some interesting Foraminifera also included. 17/06/21 Mixed micro shells Ischnochitonidae Callistochiton pulchrior Panama F+++ 89mm € 1,80 £1,55 $2,10 21/12/16 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Chaetopleura lurida Panama F+++ 2022mm € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 Hairy girdles, beautifully preserved. Web 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Ischnochiton textilis South Africa F+++ 30mm+ € 4,00 £3,45 $4,68 30/04/21 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Ischnochiton textilis South Africa F+++ 27.9mm € 2,80 £2,42 $3,27 30/04/21 Polyplacophora Ischnochitonidae Stenoplax limaciformis Panama F+++ 16mm+ € 6,50 £5,61 $7,60 Uncommon. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura gemmata Philippines F+++ 25mm+ € 2,50 £2,16 $2,92 Hairy margins, beautifully preserved. 04/08/17 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura gemmata Australia F+++ 25mm+ € 2,60 £2,25 $3,04 02/06/18 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura granulata Panama F+++ 41mm+ € 4,00 £3,45 $4,68 West Indian 'fuzzy' chiton. Web 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Acanthopleura granulata Panama F+++ 32mm+ € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 West Indian 'fuzzy' chiton. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F+++ 44mm+ € 5,00 £4,32 $5,85 Caribbean. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F++ 35mm € 2,50 £2,16 $2,92 Caribbean. 24/12/16 Polyplacophora Chitonidae Chiton tuberculatus Panama F+++ 29mm+ € 3,00 £2,59 $3,51 Caribbean.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Impact of Key Marine Invasive Non-Native Species on Welsh MPA Habitat Features, Fisheries and Aquaculture
    Assessing the impact of key Marine Invasive Non-Native Species on Welsh MPA habitat features, fisheries and aquaculture. Tillin, H.M., Kessel, C., Sewell, J., Wood, C.A. Bishop, J.D.D Marine Biological Association of the UK Report No. 454 Date www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk About Natural Resources Wales Natural Resources Wales’ purpose is to pursue sustainable management of natural resources. This means looking after air, land, water, wildlife, plants and soil to improve Wales’ well-being, and provide a better future for everyone. Evidence at Natural Resources Wales Natural Resources Wales is an evidence based organisation. We seek to ensure that our strategy, decisions, operations and advice to Welsh Government and others are underpinned by sound and quality-assured evidence. We recognise that it is critically important to have a good understanding of our changing environment. We will realise this vision by: Maintaining and developing the technical specialist skills of our staff; Securing our data and information; Having a well resourced proactive programme of evidence work; Continuing to review and add to our evidence to ensure it is fit for the challenges facing us; and Communicating our evidence in an open and transparent way. This Evidence Report series serves as a record of work carried out or commissioned by Natural Resources Wales. It also helps us to share and promote use of our evidence by others and develop future collaborations. However, the views and recommendations presented in this report are not necessarily those of
    [Show full text]
  • R on Anew British Sea Anemone. by T
    [ 880 ~ r On aNew British Sea Anemone. By T. A~ Stephenson, D.Se., Department of Zoology, University Oollege, London With 1 Figure in the Text. IT is a curious fact that the majority of the British anemones had been discovered by 1860, and that half of them, as listed at that date, had been established during a burst of energy on the part of Gosse and his collectingfriends. Gosseadded 28 speciesto the BritishFauna himself. It is still more surprising that since Gosse ceased work, no authentic new ones have been added, other than more or less offshore forms, with'the ex- ception of Sagartia luci()3,'and this species appears to have been imported from abroad. There is, however, an anemone which occurs on the Break- water and Pier at Plymouth, which has not yet been described. Dr. Allen tells me it has been on the Breakwater as long as he can remember, and to him I am indebted for the details of its habitat given further on. Whether it occurs elsewhere than in the Plymouth district and has been seen but mistaken for the young of Metridiurn dianthus, is as yet unknown. The anemone in question, which is the subject of this paper, is a small creature, bright orange or fawn in colour, and presenting at first sight some resemblance to. young specimens of certain colour-varieties of Metridium. When the two forms are observed carefully, however, and irnder heaJ:thy conditions, it becomes evident that they are perfectly distinct from each other; and a study of their anatomy bears out this fact.
    [Show full text]
  • 24 Relationships Within the Ellobiidae
    Origin atld evoltctiorzai-y radiatiotz of the Mollrisca (ed. J. Taylor) pp. 285-294, Oxford University Press. O The Malacological Sociery of London 1996 R. Clarke. 24 paleozoic .ine sna~ls. RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE ELLOBIIDAE ANTONIO M. DE FRIAS MARTINS Departamento de Biologia, Universidade dos Aqores, P-9502 Porzta Delgada, S6o Miguel, Agores, Portugal ssification , MusCum r Curie. INTRODUCTION complex, and an assessment is made of its relevance in :eny and phylogenetic relationships. 'ulmonata: The Ellobiidae are a group of primitive pulmonate gastropods, Although not treated in this paper, conchological features (apertural dentition, inner whorl resorption and protoconch) . in press. predominantly tropical. Mostly halophilic, they live above the 28s rRNA high-tide mark on mangrove regions, salt-marshes and rolled- and radular morphology were studied also and reference to ~t limpets stone shores. One subfamily, the Carychiinae, is terrestrial, them will be made in the Discussion. inhabiting the forest leaf-litter on mountains throughout ago1 from the world. MATERIAL AND METHODS 'finities of The Ellobiidae were elevated to family rank by Lamarck (1809) under the vernacular name "Les AuriculacCes", The anatomy of 35 species representing 19 genera was ~Ctiquedu properly latinized to Auriculidae by Gray (1840). Odhner studied (Table 24.1). )llusques). (1925), in a revision of the systematics of the family, preferred For the most part the animals were immersed directly in sciences, H. and A. Adarns' name Ellobiidae (in Pfeiffer, 1854). which 70% ethanol. Some were relaxed overnight in isotonic MgCl, ochemical has been in general use since that time. and then preserved in 70% ethanol. A reduced number of Grouping of the increasingly growing number of genera in specimens of most species was fixed in Bouin's, serially Gebriider the family was based mostly on conchological characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Mediterranean Marine Science Vol. 17, 2016 Review of alien marine macrophytes in Tunisia SGHAIER Y. Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA) ZAKHAMA-SRAIEB R. Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, UR 11ES11 Bio- Ecologie et Systématique Evolutive, 2092 Tunis MOUELHI S. Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, UR 11ES11 Bio- Ecologie et Systématique Evolutive, 2092 Tunis VAZQUEZ M. Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Baleares, Muelle de Poniente s/n, 07015 Palma de Mallorca VALLE C. Universidad de Alicante, Departamento de Ciencias del Mar y Biología Aplicada, 03080 Alicante RAMOS-ESPLA A.A. Universidad de Alicante, Departamento de Ciencias del Mar y Biología Aplicada, 03080 Alicante ASTIER J.M. 79 Bvd St Hélène, Le Mourillon, Toulon VERLAQUE M. Aix-Marseille University and Toulon University, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO), CNRS, IRD, UM 110, F-13288 Marseille Cedex 09 CHARFI-CHEIKHROUHA F. Université de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, UR 11ES11 Bio- Ecologie et Systématique Evolutive, 2092 Tunis https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.1366 Copyright © 2016 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 28/09/2021 15:54:37 | To cite this article: SGHAIER, Y., ZAKHAMA-SRAIEB, R., MOUELHI, S., VAZQUEZ, M., VALLE, C., RAMOS-ESPLA, A.A., ASTIER, J.M., VERLAQUE, M., & CHARFI-CHEIKHROUHA, F. (2015). Review of alien marine macrophytes in Tunisia. Mediterranean Marine Science, 17(1), 109-123. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/mms.1366 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 28/09/2021 15:54:38 | Review Article Mediterranean Marine Science Indexed in WoS (Web of Science, ISI Thomson) and SCOPUS The journal is available on line at http://www.medit-mar-sc.net DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/mms.1366 Review of alien marine macrophytes in Tunisia Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Investigation of the Cnidarian-Dinoflagellate Symbiosis
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Laura Lynn Hauck for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Zoology presented on March 20, 2007. Title: Molecular Investigation of the Cnidarian-dinoflagellate Symbiosis and the Identification of Genes Differentially Expressed during Bleaching in the Coral Montipora capitata. Abstract approved: _________________________________________ Virginia M. Weis Cnidarians, such as anemones and corals, engage in an intracellular symbiosis with photosynthetic dinoflagellates. Corals form both the trophic and structural foundation of reef ecosystems. Despite their environmental importance, little is known about the molecular basis of this symbiosis. In this dissertation we explored the cnidarian- dinoflagellate symbiosis from two perspectives: 1) by examining the gene, CnidEF, which was thought to be induced during symbiosis, and 2) by profiling the gene expression patterns of a coral during the break down of symbiosis, which is called bleaching. The first chapter characterizes a novel EF-hand cDNA, CnidEF, from the anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. CnidEF was found to contain two EF-hand motifs. A combination of bioinformatic and molecular phylogenetic analyses were used to compare CnidEF to EF-hand proteins in other organisms. The closest homologues identified from these analyses were a luciferin binding protein involved in the bioluminescence of the anthozoan Renilla reniformis, and a sarcoplasmic calcium- binding protein involved in fluorescence of the annelid worm Nereis diversicolor. Northern blot analysis refuted link of the regulation of this gene to the symbiotic state. The second and third chapters of this dissertation are devoted to identifying those genes that are induced or repressed as a function of coral bleaching. In the first of these two studies we created a 2,304 feature custom DNA microarray platform from a cDNA subtracted library made from experimentally bleached Montipora capitata, which was then used for high-throughput screening of the subtracted library.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasearch Seasearch Wales 2012 Summary Report Summary Report
    Seasearch Wales 2012 Summary Report report prepared by Kate Lock, South and West Wales coco----ordinatorordinator Liz MorMorris,ris, North Wales coco----ordinatorordinator Chris Wood, National coco----ordinatorordinator Seasearch Wales 2012 Seasearch is a volunteer marine habitat and species surveying scheme for recreational divers in Britain and Ireland. It is coordinated by the Marine Conservation Society. This report summarises the Seasearch activity in Wales in 2012. It includes summaries of the sites surveyed and identifies rare or unusual species and habitats encountered. These include a number of Welsh Biodiversity Action Plan habitats and species. It does not include all of the detailed data as this has been entered into the Marine Recorder database and supplied to Natural Resources Wales for use in its marine conservation activities. The data is also available on-line through the National Biodiversity Network. During 2012 we continued to focus on Biodiversity Action Plan species and habitats and on sites that had not been previously surveyed. Data from Wales in 2012 comprised 192 Observation Forms, 154 Survey Forms and 1 sea fan record. The total of 347 represents 19% of the data for the whole of Britain and Ireland. Seasearch in Wales is delivered by two Seasearch regional coordinators. Kate Lock coordinates the South and West Wales region which extends from the Severn estuary to Aberystwyth. Liz Morris coordinates the North Wales region which extends from Aberystwyth to the Dee. The two coordinators are assisted by a number of active Seasearch Tutors, Assistant Tutors and Dive Organisers. Overall guidance and support is provided by the National Seasearch Coordinator, Chris Wood.
    [Show full text]
  • Mollusc Fauna of Iskenderun Bay with a Checklist of the Region
    www.trjfas.org ISSN 1303-2712 Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 12: 171-184 (2012) DOI: 10.4194/1303-2712-v12_1_20 SHORT PAPER Mollusc Fauna of Iskenderun Bay with a Checklist of the Region Banu Bitlis Bakır1, Bilal Öztürk1*, Alper Doğan1, Mesut Önen1 1 Ege University, Faculty of Fisheries, Department of Hydrobiology Bornova, Izmir. * Corresponding Author: Tel.: +90. 232 3115215; Fax: +90. 232 3883685 Received 27 June 2011 E-mail: [email protected] Accepted 13 December 2011 Abstract This study was performed to determine the molluscs distributed in Iskenderun Bay (Levantine Sea). For this purpose, the material collected from the area between the years 2005 and 2009, within the framework of different projects, was investigated. The investigation of the material taken from various biotopes ranging at depths between 0 and 100 m resulted in identification of 286 mollusc species and 27542 specimens belonging to them. Among the encountered species, Vitreolina cf. perminima (Jeffreys, 1883) is new record for the Turkish molluscan fauna and 18 species are being new records for the Turkish Levantine coast. A checklist of Iskenderun mollusc fauna is given based on the present study and the studies carried out beforehand, and a total of 424 moluscan species are known to be distributed in Iskenderun Bay. Keywords: Levantine Sea, Iskenderun Bay, Turkish coast, Mollusca, Checklist İskenderun Körfezi’nin Mollusca Faunası ve Bölgenin Tür Listesi Özet Bu çalışma İskenderun Körfezi (Levanten Denizi)’nde dağılım gösteren Mollusca türlerini tespit etmek için gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu amaçla, 2005 ve 2009 yılları arasında sürdürülen değişik proje çalışmaları kapsamında bölgeden elde edilen materyal incelenmiştir.
    [Show full text]