MEETING, JULY 13, 2012

A meeting of the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board will be held at 9:00 a.m., in the Auditorium at AQMD Headquarters, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California.

- 2 -

CALL TO ORDER

 Pledge of Allegiance

 Opening Comments: William A. Burke, Ed.D., Chair Other Board Members Barry R. Wallerstein, D. Env., Executive Officer

 Presentations to Outgoing Hearing Board Member Alternates Burke Thomas E. Browne and Steve Zikman

Staff/Phone (909) 396- CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 through 17)

Note: Consent Calendar items held for discussion will be moved to Item No. 18

1. Approve Minutes of June 1, 2012 Board Meeting McDaniel/2500

Budget/Fiscal Impact

2. Authorize Purchase of PeopleSoft and Oracle Software Support Marlia/3148

The AQMD uses the PeopleSoft Integrated Financial/Human Resources System. The software package provides purchasing, accounting, asset management, financial management, project reporting, payroll, and human resource functionality for the AQMD. The PeopleSoft system uses Oracle database software. The maintenance support for this system expires August 13, 2012. This action is to obtain approval for the purchase of PeopleSoft and Oracle software maintenance support for another year. Funds for this expense are included in the FY 2012-13 Budget. (Reviewed: Administrative Committee, June 8, 2012; Recommended for Approval)

3. Authorize Purchase of OnBase Software Support Marlia/3148

The AQMD uses the OnBase software for its electronic document management system to manage critical documents and to support the Record Retention Policy. Software subscription and support for OnBase expires on July 31, 2012. This action is to obtain approval for sole source purchase of OnBase software subscription and support for one year. Funds for this purchase ($110,000) are included in the FY 2012-13 Budget. (Reviewed: Administrative Committee, June 8, 2012; Recommended for Approval)

- 3 -

4. Execute Contract with South Bay Cities Council of Governments Liu/2105 for Demonstration of Battery Electric Vehicles

For many residents within the South Coast Air Basin, commutes and short trips can be accomplished solely on residential streets. The Local Use Vehicle demonstration project has promoted the use of Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEVs) with local residents, select businesses, municipalities and government entities in the South Bay Cities region. A demonstration of longer range battery electric vehicles (BEVs) will help address some limitations of the previous NEV demonstration project and provide guidance for community planning efforts for new BEV models that have recently become available. This action is to execute a contract to demonstrate BEVs in an amount not to exceed $320,000 from the Clean Fuels Fund (31) and execute a loan agreement for a BEV with South Bay Cities Council of Governments. (Reviewed: Technology Committee, June 15, 2012; Recommended for Approval)

5. Execute Contract to Cosponsor Steam Hydrogasification Liu/2105 Reaction Demonstration Project

On October 2, 2009, the Board approved a bench-scale Steam Hydrogasification Reaction demonstration project with the University of California, Riverside, CE-CERT to generate Substitute Natural Gas from biosolids. The project successfully demonstrated high thermal efficiency with approximately 70% carbon conversion rate and the potential to produce high quality natural gas for transportation fueling or electric power generation. This action is to execute a contract with CE-CERT to conduct a larger-scale Steam Hydrogasification Reaction demonstration project incorporating process components that closely simulate commercial-scale operations for an amount not to exceed $72,916 from the Clean Fuels Fund (31). (Reviewed: Technology Committee, June 15, 2012; Recommended for Approval)

6. Recognize Revenue and Appropriate Funds for NATTS; Liu/2105 Recognize Revenue and Reimburse Undesignated Fund Balance with PM2.5 Grant Award; Recognize Revenue, Appropriate and Reallocate Funds for PAMS; and Issue Purchase Order

U.S. EPA has allocated additional Section 103 funds in the amount of $57,734 for the NATTS Program. U.S. EPA has allocated an additional $120,000 in the PM2.5 grant funding for the partial funding of the construction of a new monitoring platform in Los Angeles and support of the PM2.5 monitoring program. Also, funding for the final quarter of the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) must be carried over into the FY 2012-13 Budget. As such, this action is to: (1) recognize revenue and appropriate funds for the NATTS Program; (2) recognize revenue and reimburse the Undesignated Fund Balance from the PM2.5 funding; (3) recognize revenue, appropriate funds and reallocate funding for the final quarter of the FFY, 20th year PAMS funds; and (4) issue a purchase order. (Reviewed: Administrative Committee, June 8, 2012; Recommended for Approval)

- 4 -

7. Issue Program Announcement for Low-Emission Leaf Blower Liu/2105 Vendors

To follow up on the successful Leaf Blower Exchange Programs, staff proposes a similar incentive in the fall of 2012 to generate cost-effective emission reductions. This action is to issue a Program Announcement to solicit competitive bids from manufacturers of low-emission leaf blowers in sufficient quantities and at the lowest possible price. (Reviewed: Mobile Source Committee, June 15, 2012; Recommended for Approval)

8. Authorize Executive Officer to Loan Monies from General Fund Liu/2105 and/or Special Revenue Funds to Provide Cash Flow for Accrued Interest Earned, but Not Yet Received, in Other Special Revenue Funds

Under some incentive funding grants, CARB has required that the entire amount of accrued interest be fully expended at the same date as the subject grant’s expiration date for expenditure of its project funds. As the amount of earned interest is finalized and reported several months after the expenditure deadline of the project funds, it becomes virtually impossible to expend the last portion of the earned interest at the same date as the project funds. One such example is the Proposition 1B-School Bus Program. To avoid the return of any interest funds to CARB, this action is to authorize the Executive Officer to loan and reimburse up to $75,000 from the general and/or special revenue funds to provide cash flow for accrued interest earned, but not yet received, in other special revenue funds. In addition, authorize the Executive Officer to approve expenditures of up to $75,000 from these loans. (Reviewed: Technology Committee, June 15, 2012; Recommended for Approval)

9. Authorize Funding for Air Quality and Clean Technology Liu/2105 Conference for Senior Citizens

This action seeks approval to conduct one follow-on air quality and clean technology conference focused for senior citizens in 2012. The event will continue our efforts from last year to foster awareness and an increased understanding of air quality and related health issues, clean technology applications, and empower seniors to become active participants in improving air quality as well as provide information on what they can do in their home, neighborhood and community and with their extended family. Staff recommends the Board authorize the Executive Officer to approve conference expenditures up to $150,000 to organize and host this senior fair. (No Committee Review)

- 5 -

10. Approve Contract Awards and Modifications Approved by MSRC Winterbottom

The MSRC approved multiple new contracts and/or modifications under the FY 2011-12 Work Program. These include awarding new contracts under the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Program and the Near-Zero Emission Medium- Duty and Medium-Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program. The MSRC also approved a program to provide incentives for the purchase of CNG taxicabs. This item also corrects a modification previously approved by the MSRC under the FY 2007-08 Work Program. At this time the MSRC seeks Board approval of these contract awards, incentive program, and modification. (Reviewed: Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee, April 19 and June 21, 2012; Recommended for Approval)

Items 11 through 17 - Information Only/Receive and File

11. Legislative & Public Affairs Report Alatorre/3122

This report highlights the May 2012 outreach activities of Legislative & Public Affairs, which include Environmental Justice Update, Community Events/Public Meetings, Business Assistance, and Outreach to Business and Federal, State and Local Government. (No Committee Review)

12. Hearing Board Report Camarena/2500

This reports the action taken by the Hearing Board during the period of May 1 through May 31, 2012. (No Committee Review)

13. Civil Filings and Civil Penalties Report Wiese/3460

This reports the monthly penalties from May 1 through May 31, 2012, and legal actions filed by the District Prosecutor during May 1 through May 31, 2012. An Index of District Rules is attached with the penalty report. (Reviewed: Stationary Source Committee, June 15, 2012; Recommended for Approval)

14. Lead Agency Projects and Environmental Documents Received Chang/3186 by AQMD

This report provides, for the Board's consideration, a listing of CEQA documents received by the AQMD between May 1, 2012 and May 31, 2012, and those projects for which the AQMD is acting as lead agency pursuant to CEQA. (Reviewed: Mobile Source Committee, June 15, 2012)

15. Rule and Control Measure Forecast Chang/3186

This report highlights AQMD rulemaking activity and public workshops potentially scheduled for the year 2012. (No Committee Review)

- 6 -

16. Report of RFPs and RFQs Scheduled for Release in July O'Kelly/2828

This report summarizes the RFPs and RFQs for budgeted services over $75,000 scheduled to be released for advertisement for the month of July. (Reviewed: Administrative Committee, June 8, 2012; Recommended for Approval)

17. Report on Major Projects for Information Management Scheduled Marlia/3148 to Start During First Six Months of FY 2012-13

Information Management is responsible for data systems management services in support of all AQMD operations. This action is to report on major automation contracts and projects to be initiated by Information Management during the first six months of FY 2012-13. (Reviewed: Administrative Committee, June 8, 2012; Recommended for Approval)

18. Items Deferred from Consent Calendar

BOARD CALENDAR

19. Administrative Committee (Receive & File) Chair: Burke Wallerstein/3131

20. Legislative Committee Chair: Gonzales Alatorre/3122

Receive and file; and adopt the following positions as recommended:

Agenda Item Recommended Position

AB 1570 (Perea) & SB 984 (Simitian): Oppose Unless Amended

Environmental Quality: California Support With Amendments Environmental Quality Act: Record of Proceedings AB 1532 (Perez) California Global Warning Solutions Act of 2006: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account

SB 1268 (Pavley) Energy: Support Energy Conservation Assistance

21. Mobile Source Committee (Receive & File) Chair: Loveridge Chang/3186

22. Stationary Source Committee (Receive & File) Chair: Yates Nazemi/2662

23. Technology Committee (Receive & File) Chair: Gonzales Liu/2105

- 7 -

24. Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Board Liaison: Antonovich Hogo/3184 Review Committee (Receive & File)

25. California Air Resources Board Monthly Board Rep: Loveridge McDaniel/2500 Report (Receive & File)

Staff Presentation/Board Discussion

26. Update on 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (No Written Chang/3186 Material)

Staff will provide an update on the 2012 AQMP development efforts and associated activities. (No Committee Review)

PUBLIC HEARING

27. Amend Rule 1110.2 – Emissions from Gaseous- and Liquid- Tisopulos/3123 Fueled Engines

Staff is recommending that the public hearing on this item be continued to the September 7, 2012 Board Meeting. A final Board package will be released prior to the Board meeting date consistent with State law.

Consistent with staff’s Technology Assessment findings, the proposed amendments would re-establish the previously adopted emission limits for biogas-powered internal combustion engines. The proposed amendment would provide additional time for compliance, a compliance option for a longer averaging time for engines with superior performance in achieving lower mass emissions, and include other clarifications. This action is to adopt the resolution: 1) Certifying the CEQA Addendum to the 2008 Environmental Assessment; and 2) Amending Rule 1110.2. (Reviewed: Stationary Source Committee, April 20, May 18, and June 15, 2012)

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD – (Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items, Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.3)

BOARD MEMBER TRAVEL – (No Written Material)

Board member travel reports have been filed with the Clerk of the Boards, and copies are available upon request.

CLOSED SESSION - (No Written Material) Wiese/3460

It is necessary for the Board to recess to closed session pursuant to Government Code section 54956.9(a) to confer with its counsel regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the District is a party. The actions are: - 8 -

• American Coatings Association v. South Coast Air Quality Management District, California Supreme Court Case No. S177823;

• Association of Irritated Residents v. EPA, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case Nos. 09-71383 and 09-71404;

• California Communities Against Toxics, et al. v. U.S. EPA, et al., U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 11-71127;

• Coalition for Responsible Regulation, et al., v. EPA, U. S. Court of Appeals, D. C. Circuit, Case No. 10-1073, consolidated with Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc., et al., v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit, Case No. 10-1131 (consolidated cases 10-1132, 10-1145, 10-1147, 10-1148, 10-1199, 10-1200);

• Communities for a Better Environment, California Communities Against Toxics, Desert Citizens Against Pollution, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., and Physicians for Social Responsibility-Los Angeles v. U.S. EPA, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 12-71340;

• Flashberg, et al. v. Dublin, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC463159;

• Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. Goldstene, U.S. District Court, Eastern, Case No. 09-01151, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 09-17765;

• Physicians For Social Responsibility, et al. v. U.S. EPA, U.S. District Court, Central, Case No. 11-5885;

• Physicians for Social Responsibility, et al. v. U.S. EPA, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 12-70016;

• Physicians for Social Responsibility, et al. v. U.S. EPA, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 12-70079; and

• W. M. Barr & Company, Inc. v. SCAQMD, California Court of Appeal Case No. B233892.

It is also necessary for the Board to recess to closed session under Government Code section 54956.9(c) to consider initiation of litigation (two cases) and to confer with legal counsel regarding a significant exposure to litigation against the agency pursuant to subdivision (b) of Government Code section 54956.9 (one potential case).

In addition, it is also necessary for the Board to recess to closed session pursuant to Government Code section 54957.6 to confer regarding upcoming labor negotiations with:

• designated representatives regarding represented employee salaries and benefits or other mandatory subjects within the scope of representation [Negotiator: William Johnson; Represented Employees: SCAQMD Professional Employees Association].

ADJOURNMENT - 9 -

***PUBLIC COMMENTS***

Members of the public are afforded an opportunity to speak on any listed item before or during consideration of that item. Please notify the Clerk of the Board, (909) 396-2500, if you wish to do so. All agendas are posted at AQMD Headquarters, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. At the end of the agenda, an opportunity is also provided for the public to speak on any subject within the AQMD's authority. Speakers may be limited to three (3) minutes each.

Note that on items listed on the Consent Calendar and the balance of the agenda any motion, including action, can be taken (consideration is not limited to listed recommended actions). Additional matters can be added and action taken by two-thirds vote, or in the case of an emergency, by a majority vote. Matters raised under Public Comments may not be acted upon at that meeting other than as provided above.

Written comments will be accepted by the Board and made part of the record, provided 25 copies are presented to the Clerk of the Board. Electronic submittals to [email protected] of 10 pages or less including attachment, in MS WORD, plain or HTML format will also be accepted by the Board and made part of the record if received no later than 5:00 p.m., on the Tuesday prior to the Board meeting.

ACRONYMS

AQIP = Air Quality Investment Program NESHAPS = National Emission Standards for AVR = Average Vehicle Ridership Hazardous Air Pollutants BACT = Best Available Control Technology NGV = Natural Gas Vehicle

Cal/EPA = California Environmental Protection Agency NOx = Oxides of Nitrogen CARB = California Air Resources Board NSPS = New Source Performance Standards CEMS = Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems NSR = New Source Review CEC = California Energy Commission PAMS = Photochemical Assessment Monitoring CEQA = California Environmental Quality Act Stations CE-CERT =College of Engineering-Center for Environmental PAR = Proposed Amended Rule Research and Technology PHEV = Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle

CNG = Compressed Natural Gas PM10 = Particulate Matter  10 microns

CO = Carbon Monoxide PM2.5 = Particulate Matter < 2.5 microns CTG = Control Techniques Guideline PR = Proposed Rule DOE = Department of Energy RFP = Request for Proposals EV = Electric Vehicle RFQ = Request for Quotations FY = Fiscal Year SCAG = Southern California Association of Governments GHG = Greenhouse Gas SIP = State Implementation Plan

HRA = Health Risk Assessment SOx = Oxides of Sulfur

IAIC = Interagency AQMP Implementation Committee SOON = Surplus Off-Road Opt-In for NOx LEV = Low Emission Vehicle SULEV = Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicle LNG = Liquefied Natural Gas TCM = Transportation Control Measure MATES = Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study ULEV = Ultra Low Emission Vehicle MOU = Memorandum of Understanding U.S. EPA = United States Environmental Protection MSERCs = Mobile Source Emission Reduction Credits Agency MSRC = Mobile Source (Air Pollution Reduction) Review VOC = Volatile Organic Compound Committee ZEV = Zero Emission Vehicle NATTS =National Air Toxics Trends Station

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 1

MINUTES: Governing Board Monthly Meeting

SYNOPSIS: Attached are the Minutes of the June 1, 2012 meeting.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve Minutes of the June 1, 2012 Board Meeting.

Saundra McDaniel, Clerk of the Boards SM:dp

FRIDAY, JUNE 1, 2012

Notice having been duly given, the regular meeting of the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board was held at District Headquarters, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California. Members present:

William A. Burke, Ed.D., Chairman Speaker of the Assembly Appointee

Mayor Dennis R. Yates, Vice Chairman Cities of San Bernardino County

Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich County of Los Angeles

Supervisor John J. Benoit County of Riverside

Mayor Michael A. Cacciotti Cities of Los Angeles County – Eastern Region

Supervisor Josie Gonzales County of San Bernardino

Mayor Ronald O. Loveridge Cities of Riverside County

Dr. Joseph K. Lyou Governor’s Appointee

Supervisor Shawn Nelson (arrived at 10:15 a.m.) County of Orange

Clark E. Parker Senate Rules Committee Appointee

Mayor Miguel A. Pulido (arrived at 9:45 a.m. and left at 10:20 a.m.) Cities of Orange County

Members Absent:

Councilmember Judith Mitchell Cities of Los Angeles County – Western Region

Councilmember Jan Perry City of Los Angeles

-2-

CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Burke called the meeting to order at 9:10 a.m.

 Pledge of Allegiance: Led by Mayor Yates

 Opening Comments

Dr. Lyou. Announced that he attended the World Electric Vehicle and Ecosystems Conference on May 5, the EVS26 Conference on May 8, and the ACT Expo on May 16 and 17, all of which offered helpful information regarding new technologies and opportunities for emission reductions, both in the freight sector and public transportation arena. He also noted his attendance at the CARB Workshop regarding AB 32 revenue, where he was pleased with Dr. Wallerstein’s participation on the panel.

Supervisor Gonzales. Noted the great success of the lawnmower exchange event held May 5 in San Bernardino and commended staff, including Shashi Singeetham, for their efforts.

Supervisor Benoit. Expressed his appreciation for the successful lawn mower exchange event that took place in Indio on May 19 and highlighted the good quality and affordable pricing of the equipment.

 Presentation to Outgoing Board Member Jane W. Carney

Chairman Burke presented an award to Jane Carney for her service on the Board from March 2000 to May 2012 as the Senate Rules Committee Appointee.

(Mayor Pulido arrived at 9:45 a.m.)

 Presentation of Retirement Awards to Oscar Abarca and Shams Hasan

Chairman Burke presented retirement awards to Oscar Abarca in recognition of his over 21 years of dedicated District service and Shams Hasan in recognition of his 23 years of dedicated District service.

 Swearing In of Newly Appointed Board Member Clark Parker

Chairman Burke administered the oath of office to Clark Parker, who was appointed to the Board by the Senate Rules Committee, for a term ending January 15, 2016.

(Supervisor Nelson arrived at 10:15 a.m.) -3-

CONSENT CALENDAR

1. Approve Minutes of May 4, 2012 Board Meeting

2. Set Public Hearing July 13, 2012 to Consider Amendments and/or Adoption to AQMD Rules and Regulations

Amend Rule 1110.2 – Emissions from Gaseous- and Liquid-Fueled Engines

Budget/Fiscal Impact

3. Amend Contract for Continuation of Air Quality Institute Program

4. Execute Contract for Geotechnical Investigation at Diamond Bar Headquarters

5. Recognize Revenue and Execute Contracts for Demonstration of Stationary Fuel Cells

6. Authorize Acquisition of Seven Advanced Technology Vehicles and Amend Cost of Three Vehicles Previously Approved for AQMD’s Alternative Fuel Vehicle Demonstration Program

7. Adopt Resolution Accepting Terms and Conditions for FY 2011-12 Multidistrict Award under “Year 14” On-Road Heavy-Duty Vehicle Voucher Incentive Program, Amend Existing Contract under SOON Provision, and Encumber Remaining Contract Balance for Voucher Incentive Program Technical Assistance

8. Recognize Revenue and Appropriate Funds for PM2.5, National Air Toxics Trends Stations, Near Road NO2 and Enhanced Particulate Monitoring Programs, Transfer Funds between Major Objects, and Issue Purchase Orders

9. Transfer Funds from Clean Fuels Program Fund, Carl Moyer AB 923 Program Fund, and Proposition 1B Program Fund for Administrative Support and Related Activities

10. Appoint Members to AQMD Hearing Board

-4-

11. Adopt Resolution Authorizing Acceptance of Electronic Funds Transfer and Credit Card Payments for All Fees Collected by AQMD

12. Approve Contract Awards and Modifications and Issue Solicitations under FYs 2007-08, 2010-11 and 2011-12 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Programs

Items 13 through 20 - Information Only/Receive and File

13. Legislative & Public Affairs

14. Report to Legislature and CARB on AQMD’s Regulatory Activities for Calendar Year 2011

15. Hearing Board Report

16. Civil Filings and Civil Penalties Report

17. Lead Agency Projects and Environmental Documents Received by AQMD

18. Rule and Control Measure Forecast

19. Report of RFPs and RFQs Scheduled for Release in June

20. Status Report on Major Projects for Information Management Scheduled to Start During Last Six Months of FY 2011-12

Dr. Lyou announced his abstention on Item No. 5 because Southern California Gas Company is a potential source of income to him and on Item 12 because City of Long Beach, California Cartage Company, Waste Management, Southern California Gas Company, Velocity Vehicle Group, Los Angeles Freightliner and Silver State Truck & Trailer are potential sources of income to him. -5-

MOVED BY LOVERIDGE, SECONDED BY GONZALES, AGENDA ITEMS 1 THROUGH 20 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED: ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 12-13 RECOGNIZING AND ACCEPTING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE FY 2011-12 MULTIDISTRICT GRANT PROGRAM AND ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 12- 14 APPROVING THE ACCEPTANCE OF ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFERS (ECHECK) AND CREDIT CARD PAYMENTS FOR ALL FEES COLLECTED BY THE SCAQMD, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: Antonovich, Benoit, Burke, Cacciotti, Gonzales, Loveridge, Lyou (except Items #5 & #12), Nelson, Parker, Pulido and Yates.

NOES: None.

ABSTAIN: Lyou (Items #5 & #12 only).

ABSENT: Mitchell and Perry.

21. Items Deferred from Consent Calendar – none.

BOARD CALENDAR

22. Administrative Committee

23. Investment Oversight Committee

24. Legislative Committee

25. Mobile Source Committee

26. Stationary Source Committee

27. Technology Committee

-6-

28. Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee

29. California Air Resources Board Monthly Report

MOVED BY LYOU, SECONDED BY NELSON, AGENDA ITEMS 22 THROUGH 29 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED, RECEIVING AND FILING THE BOARD COMMITTEES, MSRC AND CARB REPORTS AND ADOPTING THE POSITIONS ON LEGISLATION AS SET FORTH BELOW, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: Antonovich, Benoit, Burke, Cacciotti, Gonzales, Loveridge, Lyou, Nelson, Parker, Pulido and Yates.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: Mitchell and Perry.

Agenda Item Recommended Position AB 1900 (Gatto) Support Renewable Energy Resources: Biomethane

AB 1990 (Fong) Support Renewable Energy Resources: Small Scale Renewable Generation Program

AB 2075 (Fong) Energy: Support Powerplant Certification

AB 2405 (Blumenfield) Support Vehicles: High- Occupancy Toll Lanes

AB 2583 (Blumenfield) Support Alternatively Fueled Vehicles: State Fleet Public Parking

SB 1122 (Rubio) Energy: Support Renewable Biomass and Biogas Projects

SB 1455 (Kehoe) Support Alternative Fuels -7-

(Mayor Pulido left at 10:20 a.m.)

Staff Presentation/Board Discussion

30. Air Quality and Other Environmental Issues Related to Hydraulic Fracturing of Shale Gas Reserves

Henry Hogo, Assistant DEO of Science and Technology Advancement, presented the Board with information regarding the emissions associated with the hydraulic fracturing process including hydrocarbons and air toxics pollutants coming from the chemicals such as benzene and ethyl benzene, and added that leaked methane gas from the wells is another source of emissions. He highlighted recent action taken by U.S. EPA on April 17, 2012 to update standards on natural gas production, with the main focus on the production and storage of natural gas; however, distribution of the gas and crude oil production were not covered. He added that the benefits of the regulation nationwide include a 190- to 290-ton reduction in VOCs,12,000 to 20,000 tons of air toxics reductions, and methane reductions of 19 to 33 million metric tons.

Kurt Wiese, General Counsel, addressed the Board’s authority to adopt regulations that address fracturing operations and fracturing materials, confirming that local air pollution control agencies, including the District, have the authority to adopt regulations regarding stationary sources that are more stringent or equally stringent to regulations that the U.S. EPA has adopted. He explained the potential actions the Board could take including 1) adopting regulations that require notification or disclosure of fracturing operations or materials; 2) regulating fracturing materials; 3) regulating emissions from fracturing operations; 4) advancing the date that U.S. EPA’s green completion requirements go into effect from January 1, 2015; and/or 5) adopting a regulation that covers a wider scope of fracturing operations, for example, oil production operations in the South Coast.

Mayor Yates expressed concern for the potential health risks to workers at the fracturing sites. He urged that pertinent scientific data be collected and analyzed before any rules are adopted.

Mr. Hogo explained that past studies have found the presence of air toxics emissions and potential contamination of the water supply, adding that the U.S. EPA is conducting a more substantive study over the coming years to further investigate the impact.

Dr. Lyou requested that staff bring their recommendations regarding the necessity of a rulemaking, taking into consideration the health outcomes and exposure pathways, to the Board for consideration.

Chairman Burke stressed the importance of finding out exactly what is being put into the ground during the process. -8-

Dr. Wallerstein noted that staff plans to host a one-day event that will cover the issue of fracturing for natural gas and for oil and enhanced oil recovery to bring experts together to further discuss the potential health concerns. Subsequently, staff would bring any recommended actions to the Stationary Source Committee for its consideration.

Supervisor Gonzales suggested utilizing data collected from studies completed in other areas to expedite the process, and noted the importance of moving forward with receiving and developing information to lead to a streamlined approach in the potential rule development process.

RECEIVED AND FILED; NO ACTION NECESSARY.

PUBLIC HEARING

31. Adopt Rule 1177 – Liquefied Petroleum Gas Transfer and Dispensing

Naveen Berry, Planning and Rules Manager, gave the staff presentation and presented an errata sheet with a modification to the rule language to extend the compliance deadline, a change to the staff report, and an addition to the Resolution.

The public hearing was opened, and the following individuals addressed the Board on Agenda Item 31.

DOUG RAYMOND, Aeropres and Diversified CPSC Noted that the low-emission connectors for their handling of LPG are not currently available and asked that staff continue to work with the industry to ensure the compliance deadline can be met.

LESLEY GARLAND, Western Propane Gas Association Explained that approximately 2,000 companies in the region are going to be impacted by the rule; expressed appreciation for the consideration of extending the compliance deadline and requested financial assistance to encourage companies to retrofit to low-emission technology more expeditiously.

PHILIP JONES, Suburban Propane Company Noted the increased expenses that his business will encounter to meet the rule requirements, even given the extended compliance time, and welcomed any assistance that could be provided by way of rebates or incentive money to help avoid the need to pass the compliance cost along to their customers. He expressed a concern with the requirement to report gallons purchased and gallons sold since together they are considered proprietary information and requested that the requirement be to provide one or the other, but not both.

-9-

LUIS CABRALES, Coalition for Clean Air Expressed support for Rule 1177 and its potential to further reduce smog- forming emissions and highlighted that nearly 2,300 tons-per-year of VOC emissions will be eliminated as a result of its adoption. (Submitted Written Comments)

There being no further public testimony on this item, the public hearing was closed.

Laki Tisopulos, Assistant DEO of Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources, confirmed that staff will report to the Board regarding the status of the developing technology.

Dr. Lyou noted the disparity among propane customers, with some living in very poor areas that would be greatly impacted if their rates are increased. He noted that he is aware of developing technology that may have an outcome of zero emissions, which would be ideal for all stakeholders.

In response to Supervisor Benoit’s inquiry into whether funds are available to assist stakeholders with the rule requirements, Dr. Wallerstein explained that there is not currently any funding available, but staff will continue to work to identify funding.

Supervisor Gonzales commented that attention should continue to be paid to how the rule may negatively impact those in the areas that utilize propane out of necessity, including those in trailer parks, the desert regions and unincorporated areas.

MOVED BY BENOIT, SECONDED BY LOVERIDGE, AGENDA ITEM NO. 31 APPROVED, ADOPTING RESOLUTION NO. 12-15, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ADOPTING RULE 1177, AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, WITH THE MODIFICATIONS AS STATED IN THE ERRATA SHEET AND SET FORTH BELOW, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE:

AYES: Antonovich, Benoit, Burke, Cacciotti, Gonzales, Loveridge, Lyou, Nelson, Parker and Yates.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: Mitchell, Perry and Pulido.

-10-

Move subparagraph (A) to the end of paragraph (d)(2) where it becomes subparagraph (D), which is stated below with the changes in bold double underlined language. As a result, previous subparagraphs (B), (C) and (D) become subparagraphs (A), (B) and (C). Subparagraph (D) now reads as follows:

(D) Notwithstanding the above effective date of July 1, 2013, the stationary storage tank, cargo tank or cylinder used to transfer or dispense LPG is fitted exclusively with LPG low emission connectors that are maintained in a vapor tight and liquid tight condition, except when actively connecting or disconnecting, after December 31, 2013.

Modify the Staff Report, middle of page 20, as follows:

PVF = Present Value Factor, which is 8.11 for an assumed 10 years equipment life and 4% real rate of inflation interest.

Add the following paragraph to the Resolution on page 4:

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the AQMD Governing Board directs AQMD staff not to submit subdivision (i) of Rule 1177, which refers to Confidentiality of Information, into the State Implementation Plan, in order to avoid potential conflict with federal law requirements, but to otherwise maintain confidentiality consistent with state and federal law.

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD – (Public Comment on Non-Agenda Items, Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.3)

Eddie Estrada, Path of Life Homeless Healthcare, explained the services his organization provides to the Riverside County homeless population and thanked the Board for partnering with them with a grant that funded the Coachella Valley Asthma Program.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES – (No Written Material) Under the approval authority of the Executive Officer, the District will enter into a contract modification (No. 123081) with Gladstein, Neandross & Associates, LLC (“GNA”). GNA is a potential source of income for Governing Board Member Joseph Lyou, but Dr. Lyou qualifies for a remote interest exception of Section 1090. Dr. Lyou had no involvement with making the contract modification.

-11-

CLOSED SESSION

The Board recessed to closed session at 11:10 a.m., pursuant to: (1) Government Code section 54956.9(a) to confer with its counsel regarding pending litigation which has been initiated formally and to which the District is a party, as follows: • California Communities Against Toxics, et al. v. U.S. EPA, et al., U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 11-71127.

(2) Government Code section 54956.9(c) to consider initiation of litigation (two cases).

(3) Government Code section 54957.6 to confer regarding upcoming labor negotiations with designated representatives regarding represented employee salaries and benefits or other mandatory subjects within the scope of representation [Negotiator: William Johnson; Represented Employees: SCAQMD Professional Employees Association].

Following closed session, General Counsel Kurt Wiese announced that a report of any reportable actions taken in closed session will be filed with the Clerk of the Board and made available upon request.

ADJOURNMENT

There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by Kurt Wiese at 11:50 a.m.

The foregoing is a true statement of the proceedings held by the South Coast Air Quality Management District Board on June 1, 2012.

Respectfully Submitted,

Denise Pupo Senior Deputy Clerk

Date Minutes Approved: ______

______Dr. William A. Burke, Chairman

-12-

ACRONYMS

CARB = California Air Resources Board FY = Fiscal Year LPG = Liquefied Petroleum Gas RFP = Request for Proposals RFQ = Request for Quotations U.S. EPA = United States Environmental Protection Agency VOC = Volatile Organic Compound

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 2

PROPOSAL: Authorize Purchase of PeopleSoft and Oracle Software Support

SYNOPSIS: The AQMD uses the PeopleSoft Integrated Financial/Human Resources System. The software package provides purchasing, accounting, asset management, financial management, project reporting, payroll, and human resource functionality for the AQMD. The PeopleSoft system uses Oracle database software. The maintenance support for this system expires August 13, 2012. This action is to obtain approval for the purchase of PeopleSoft and Oracle software maintenance support for another year. Funds for this expense are included in the FY 2012-13 Budget.

COMMITTEE: Administrative, June 8, 2012, Recommended for Approval

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the Procurement Manager to purchase: 1. One year of PeopleSoft software maintenance support for the integrated Financial/Human Resources System at a cost not to exceed $208,400. 2. One year of Oracle database software maintenance support for the integrated Financial/Human Resources System at a cost not to exceed $30,400.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer CJM:MH:ZT:agg

Background In April 1998, the AQMD purchased the PeopleSoft Financial/Human Resources System to enhance the functionality of the overall finance system. The PeopleSoft system eliminated duplicate effort, where possible, and integrated processes that access the same data. The software package provides purchasing, accounting, asset management, financial management, project reporting, payroll, and human resource functionality for the AQMD. Software support includes day-to-day technical support, software patches and bug fixes, and software upgrades. Software maintenance support for the PeopleSoft system expires August 13, 2012.

The PeopleSoft system also uses Oracle database software. The Oracle database is used to store all of the data used in the PeopleSoft system. The database support includes day-to-day technical support, software patches and bug fixes, and software upgrades. Software maintenance support for Oracle database software expires August 11, 2012.

PeopleSoft maintenance support includes the following services:

Software Maintenance Licensed product updates, enhancements, and repairs; Customer Care Business Center Resolution of business issues and aid in finding assistance within PeopleSoft's customer service; PeopleSoft Advisor Business-oriented information needs and advice; PeopleSoft Plugged In Electronic distribution of information on new releases, fixes and patches, and software updates; Customer Connection On-line access to PeopleSoft information including news, documentation, training, and user groups; Global Support Center Assistance in resolving online operating difficulties, system failures, PeopleSoft application-related problems, potential system bugs, and installation and upgrade issues; Access to PeopleSoft Forum Access to database documentation and PeopleSoft application problems and fixes.

Oracle maintenance support includes the following services:

Software Maintenance Licensed product updates, enhancements, and repairs; Software Support Assistance in resolving online operating difficulties, system failures, Oracle application-related problems, potential system bugs, and installation and upgrade issues.

Sole Source Justification Section VIII.B.2 of the Procurement Policy and Procedure identifies circumstances under which a sole source purchase award may be justified. These requests for a sole source award are made under provision VIII.B.2.c.(2) and (3). The services are available from only the sole source; involve the use of proprietary technology; and use key contractor-owned assets for project performance.

- 2 - Proposal Oracle is the sole manufacturer and provider of PeopleSoft and Oracle database software and therefore the only source for software maintenance support licensing agreements. Staff recommends the purchase of one year of PeopleSoft and Oracle database software maintenance support to provide continued annual support for AQMD's integrated financial/human resources system, at costs not to exceed $208,400 and $30,400, respectively.

Resource Impacts Sufficient funds are included in the FY 2012-13 Budget, under District General Professional and Special Services.

- 3 -

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 3

PROPOSAL: Authorize Purchase of OnBase Software Support

SYNOPSIS: The AQMD uses the OnBase software for its electronic document management system to manage critical documents and to support the Record Retention Policy. Software subscription and support for OnBase expires on July 31, 2012. This action is to obtain approval for sole source purchase of OnBase software subscription and support for one year. Funds for this purchase ($110,000) are included in the FY 2012-13 Budget.

COMMITTEE: Administrative, June 8, 2012, Recommended for Approval

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: Authorize the Procurement Manager to purchase OnBase software subscription and support from Hyland Software at a cost not to exceed $110,000, which is allocated in the FY 2012-13 Budget.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer CJM:MH:SJ:nm:agg

Background AQMD uses OnBase software for its records imaging system, which has maintained the AQMD’s application and permit documents and other critical records since 1990. Total storage to date is over three million multi-page documents. OnBase is a Windows- based, menu-driven, document management system designed to store and retrieve critical documents in electronic format. The system provides concurrent information to multiple workstations simultaneously. It has a flexible compound document structure where black and white or color images co-exist with text and data within a single document. It stores numerous types of documents such as Microsoft Word documents, Outlook emails, and PDFs. The system also includes document routing; and distribution offers ad-hoc, scheduled point-to-point, and broadcast distribution of documents. It contains a complete set of markup and annotation tools that allow users to add notes, comments and drawings to pages without compromising the original document’s integrity. The system has full network support so information can be distributed rapidly within an organization regardless of architecture, and can be customized without programmers. Finally, the system has an extensive number of features to allow the secure display of documents on the AQMD’s internal and external websites. OnBase software subscription and support expires on July 31, 2012.

Sole Source Justification Section VIII.B.2 of the Procurement Policy and Procedure identifies circumstances under which a sole source purchase award may be justified. This request for a sole source award is made under provision VIII.B.2.c.(2) and (3). The products and services are available from only the sole source; involve the use of proprietary technology; and use key contractor-owned assets for project performance.

Proposal Hyland Software is the sole manufacturer and provider of OnBase software and is, therefore, the only source for its maintenance support licensing agreements. Staff recommends the purchase of OnBase software subscription and support from Hyland Software at a cost not to exceed $110,000.

Resource Impacts Sufficient funds are included in the FY 2012-13 Budget under Information Management Professional and Special Services.

- 2 -

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 4

PROPOSAL: Execute Contract with South Bay Cities Council of Governments for Demonstration of Battery Electric Vehicles

SYNOPSIS: For many residents within the South Coast Air Basin, commutes and short trips can be accomplished solely on residential streets. The Local Use Vehicle demonstration project has promoted the use of Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEVs) with local residents, select businesses, municipalities and government entities in the South Bay Cities region. A demonstration of longer range battery electric vehicles (BEVs) will help address some limitations of the previous NEV demonstration project and provide guidance for community planning efforts for new BEV models that have recently become available. This action is to execute a contract to demonstrate BEVs in an amount not to exceed $320,000 from the Clean Fuels Fund (31) and execute a loan agreement for a BEV with South Bay Cities Council of Governments.

COMMITTEE: Technology, June 15, 2012, Recommended for Approval

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the Chairman to execute a contract with South Bay Cities Council of Governments (SBCCOG) for BEV demonstration project in an amount not to exceed $320,000 from the Clean Fuels Fund (31).

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer CSL:MMM:DS:LM

Background Achieving federal and state clean air standards in Southern California will require emission reductions from both mobile and stationary sources beyond those expected using current technologies and strategies.

The SBCCOG has demonstrated Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEVs) in their Local Use Vehicle (LUV) program with about 100 drivers and found that NEVs can provide on an average 26% of the total commuter trips and 23 to 33% emission reductions. Beginning in June 2009, SBCCOG evaluated NEVs from several manufacturers for local applications. The LUV project is currently demonstrating six NEVs through 2012 by testing additional community applications such as retiree and multi-family residences and commercial uses, for a total AQMD cost of $298,640.

Additional drivers have expressed interest in participating in a BEV demonstration project, and SBCCOG is interested in applying insight gained from demonstrating NEVs to this proposed BEV demonstration project.

Proposal This proposed program is intended to leverage the previous LUV program and encourage deployment of BEVs in appropriate applications, provide usage data for policy making decisions, complement ongoing and planned initiatives such as sub-regional PEV Readiness Planning, and analyze the transition from current passenger vehicles to include BEVs.

SBCCOG has contacted dealers and leasing agents for several new BEVs and proposes to use four different BEVs that best meet the goals of this demonstration project. The BEVs included in this proposed project are BMW ActiveE, Honda Fit, Ford Focus Electric, and Nissan Leaf. On June 1, 2012, the Board approved $15,533 for a BMW ActiveE to be included in this demonstration project as a loan to SBCCOG.

Applicants will be surveyed to determine their current electrical access, categorized, and prioritized. Those with existing 110V outlets will be asked about their willingness to upgrade to a 220V circuit at their own expense. If they have existing 220V outlets, currently used for clothes dryers for example, they will be provided with a semi-portable charging unit (plug-in not requiring hardwiring by an electrician) that the project will provide, which will then be moved as each vehicle is rotated. The final group will be those households with access to both 110V and 220V outlets. These are the most valuable candidates because they afford the opportunity to test the viability of charging with 110V only for as long a period as possible. A semi-portable charging unit will be provided when it is time to shift to 220V charging.

Each of the BEVs will need to be monitored with GPS devices. These GPS devices need to be hardwired to the car or connected to the On Board Diagnostic port (OBD II). In addition to the device requirements, the GPS vendor will provide a means to download the data. Each of the data categories need to be reported within a single report.

-2- The goal is to document all household travel before vehicle delivery until two weeks after vehicle delivery with separate hand-held devices. Longer durations of household travel demand are desirable but may not be feasible depending on the volume of tracking devices procured for this purpose. Two types of monitoring will be needed to document the full travel demand of each household: participant owned vehicle monitoring, and pedestrian/cycling monitoring.

Participants in the SBCCOG NEV demonstration project needed access only to 110V (Level 1) Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE). BEVs have larger battery packs, longer range, and may need 220V (Level 2) charging infrastructure. Since the South Bay is a built-out community with older electrical infrastructure, SBCCOG wants to determine the minimal level of charging access required to make BEV usage successful. Participants will vary in their existing access to electricity, which will start with Level 1 charging and opportunity to try Level 2 charging will be provided by this project.

The plan for the demonstration is to rotate each of the four BEVs every one or two months over the two-year demonstration period to include a minimum of 48 participants. Participants will be selected from three regions of SBCCOG including the beach, inland, and peninsula communities, and will also include a mix of household incomes. SBCCOG will strive for a 50-50 split between single-family and multi-family residences. Some previous NEV demonstration participants will be included, and the interest list developed during the NEV demonstration will be surveyed and prioritized for the BEV demonstration project. Participants will be provided group driver training including goals of the demonstration, vehicle operation, charging, data collection, other logistics, and vehicle use agreement.

The BEV project is expected to take 30 months which will include set-up, data analysis, and reporting.

Benefits to AQMD The proposed project is included in the Technology Advancement Office 2012 Plan Update under “Assessment and Technical Support of Advanced Technologies and Information Dissemination.” The AQMP relies upon the expedited implementation of advanced technologies in Southern California to achieve air quality standards and to continue reductions in air toxic exposure.

The use of BEVs eliminates nearly all vehicle pollutants, even considering the potential for a minor increase in powerplant emissions. Replacing 1,000 miles of conventional gasoline vehicle usage for one year with one BEV will reduce NOx and PM2.5 emissions by approximately 2.96 and 0.04 pounds, respectively. As the number of electric vehicles increase the emission benefits will grow proportionally.

-3- Sole Source Justification Section VIII.B.2 of the Procurement Policy and Procedure identifies four major provisions under which a sole source award may be justified. This request for a sole source award is made under provision B.2.d.: Other circumstances exist which in the determination of the Executive Officer require such waiver in the best interest of the AQMD. Specifically, these circumstances are: B.2.d.(8) Research and development efforts with educational institutions or nonprofit organizations.

This project will be conducted and managed by the staff of SBCCOG which is a nonprofit joint-powers authority government agency.

Resource Impacts The project partners and proposed funding are as follows:

Project Partners AQMD SBCCOG (In-kind) Program administration $228,533 $192,545 Vehicles, GPS* $107,000 - Total $335,533 $192,545

*The total cost of $107,000 includes acquisition of three BEVs for 24 months, purchase of Level 2 EVSE, GPS monitoring and reporting systems, use of ten handheld data loggers, vehicle insurance for four BEVs, and vehicle wrap when possible. This total cost also includes the cost of a BMW ActiveE BEV which will be loaned to SBCCOG for a period of two years for this project. This action was approved by the Board on June 1, 2012 for an amount not to exceed $15,533; therefore, the contract with SBCCOG will not exceed $320,000.

Sufficient funds are available in the Clean Fuels Fund (31), which is established as special revenue from the state-mandated Clean Fuels Program. The Clean Fuels Program, under Health and Safety Code Sections 40448.5 and 40512 and Vehicle Code Section 9250.11, establishes mechanisms to collect revenues from mobile sources to support projects to increase the utilization of clean fuels, including the development of the necessary advanced enabling technologies. Funds collected from motor vehicles are restricted, by statute, to be used for projects and program activities related to mobile sources that support the objectives of the Clean Fuels Program.

-4-

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 5

PROPOSAL: Execute Contract to Cosponsor Steam Hydrogasification Reaction Demonstration Project

SYNOPSIS: On October 2, 2009, the Board approved a bench-scale Steam Hydrogasification Reaction demonstration project with the University of California, Riverside, CE-CERT to generate Substitute Natural Gas from biosolids. The project successfully demonstrated high thermal efficiency with approximately 70% carbon conversion rate and the potential to produce high quality natural gas for transportation fueling or electric power generation. This action is to execute a contract with CE-CERT to conduct a larger-scale Steam Hydrogasification Reaction demonstration project incorporating process components that closely simulate commercial-scale operations for an amount not to exceed $72,916 from the Clean Fuels Fund (31).

COMMITTEE: Technology, June 15, 2012, Recommended for Approval

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorize the Chairman to execute a contract with the University of California, Riverside, CE-CERT for a Steam Hydrogasification Reaction (SHR) demonstration project to generate Substitute Natural Gas (SNG) from biomass waste in an amount not to exceed $72,916 from the Clean Fuels Fund (31).

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer CSL:MMM:DS:BC

Background Utilization of renewable energy sources is an integral part of California’s strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to diversify domestic energy supplies. As an example, California’s Renewables Portfolio Standard requires that at least 33 percent of the total electricity sold to retail customers by 2020 be generated from renewable energy sources. In order to meet such target and other goals established by state initiatives, it is necessary to develop and implement innovative technologies to convert various renewable feedstocks, including biomass waste, to renewable energy. SHR is a thermo- chemical process, developed by CE-CERT, to convert carbonaceous matter into methane in a hydrogen-rich environment. Since this process is well-suited to handle wet feedstocks, it can provide a viable solution for utilizing solid wastes with high moisture contents like sewage sludge and green waste. The use of biomass waste to produce transportation fuels also reduces the amount of landfill waste.

On October 2, 2009, the AQMD board approved a bench-scale SHR demonstration project with CE-CERT to generate SNG from co-mingled feedstock of biosolids and biomass waste. The project demonstrated that the SHR process is capable of achieving high thermal efficiency with approximately 70% carbon conversion rate and a potential to produce high quality SNG that can be utilized as a transportation fuel as well as for electrical power generation. In July 2011, CE-CERT was awarded $649,214 from CEC’s PIER Program to conduct a larger-scale SHR demonstration project.

Proposal Staff proposes to execute a contract with CE-CERT to cosponsor a SHR demonstration project to produce SNG fuel from biomass waste for use in mobile and stationary source applications. This proposed project will have a larger throughput as compared to the previously funded project, and it will further refine the SHR process towards commercialization. This project will augment the CEC project and also incorporate process components that will closely simulate commercial-scale operations, and provide necessary information for the design of a pilot plant with approximately 5 ton per day throughput as a subsequent project. AQMD’s funding will be used to separate and purify the hydrogen produced by the water gas shift reactor and a portion of this hydrogen will be used to sustain the reactions in the SHR. This will make the overall process more suited for commercial applications.

Benefits to AQMD Generation of clean burning natural gas from renewable biomass waste and biosolids will help to reduce criteria pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions. Successful demonstration of this project will contribute to the attainment of clean air standards in the South Coast Air Basin by the increased use of natural gas in mobile source and stationary source applications. Projects to develop and demonstrate renewable energy alternatives are included in the Technology Advancement Office Clean Fuels Program 2012 Plan Update under the category of “Stationary Clean Fuel Technologies.”

Sole Source Justification Section VIII.B.2 of the Procurement Policy and Procedure identifies provisions under which a sole source award may be justified. The request for a sole source award for this project is made under provision B.2.d.(1): Projects involving cost sharing by multiple

-2- sponsors, and B.2.d.(8): research and development efforts with educational institutions or nonprofit organizations. This demonstration project will be conducted by CE-CERT, at the University of California, Riverside, and will be cost shared by CEC’s PIER Program and Synergy, Inc.

Resource Impacts The total cost for this proposed project is estimated to be $922,130 and AQMD’s contribution from the Clean Fuels Fund (31) will not exceed $72,916 as summarized below:

Project Partners Funding ($) Percent CEC $649,214 70% Synergy, Inc. (in-kind) 200,000 22% AQMD Requested 72,916 8% Total $922,130 100%

Sufficient funds are available in the Clean Fuels Fund (31), which is established as special revenue from the state-mandated Clean Fuels Program. The Clean Fuels Program, under Health and Safety Code Sections 40448.5 and 40512 and Vehicle Code Section 9250.11, establishes mechanisms to collect revenues from mobile and stationary sources to support projects to increase the utilization of clean fuels, including the development of the necessary advanced enabling technologies. Funds collected from motor vehicles are restricted, by statute, to be used for projects and program activities related to mobile sources that support the objectives of the Clean Fuels Program. Funds collected from emission fee surcharges on stationary sources emitting more than 250 tons of pollutants are restricted, by statute, to be used for projects and program activities related to stationary sources that support the objectives of the Clean Fuels Program.

-3-

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 6

PROPOSAL: Recognize Revenue and Appropriate Funds for NATTS; Recognize Revenue and Reimburse Undesignated Fund Balance with PM2.5 Grant Award; Recognize Revenue, Appropriate and Reallocate Funds for PAMS; and Issue Purchase Order

SYNOPSIS: U.S. EPA has allocated additional Section 103 funds in the amount of $57,734 for the NATTS Program. U.S. EPA has allocated an additional $120,000 in the PM2.5 grant funding for the partial funding of the construction of a new monitoring platform in Los Angeles and support of the PM2.5 monitoring program. Also, funding for the final quarter of the Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) must be carried over into the FY 2012-13 Budget. As such, this action is to: (1) recognize revenue and appropriate funds for the NATTS Program; (2) recognize revenue and reimburse the Undesignated Fund Balance from the PM2.5 funding; (3) recognize revenue, appropriate funds and reallocate funding for the final quarter of the FFY, 20th year PAMS funds; and (4) issue a purchase order.

COMMITTEE: Administrative, June 8, 2012, Recommended for Approval

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Recognize an additional $57,734 in revenue from U.S. EPA Section 103 Grant for the NATTS Monitoring Program in the FY 2012-13 Budget. Upon receipt of the NATTS Monitoring Program award, appropriate from the Undesignated Fund balance $57,734 to the Major Objects in Science & Technology Advancement FY 2012-13 Budget as follows; $49,000 to Capital Outlays and $8,734 to Maintenance of Equipment. 2. Recognize up to $120,000 in revenue and reimburse the Undesignated Fund Balance from the U.S. EPA Section 103 PM2.5 grant for the partial funding of the construction of the monitoring platform and support of the PM2.5 monitoring program in the FY 2012-13 Budget. 3. Recognize $1,250 in revenue and appropriate additional 20th year PAMS funds. Reallocate funds of $234,076 for the final quarter of the FFY (July 1 through September 30) from the U.S. EPA Section 105 Grant for the 20th year PAMS Program to the Major Objects in Science and Technology Advancement and Planning, Rule Development, and Area Sources FY 2012-13 Budgets as set forth in Attachment 2. (Expenditure appropriations exclude $63,026 in Salary and Employee Benefits already included in the FY 2012-13 Budget.) 4. Authorize the Procurement Manager to issue a sole source purchase order with Dionex Corporation for one (1) Ion Chromatograph upgrade module at a cost not to exceed $49,000 as budgeted in the FY 2012-13 NATTS Budget.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer

CL:RB:cv

Background NATTS Program There are currently 188 hazardous air pollutants (HAP), or air toxics, regulated under the Clean Air Act that are associated with a wide variety of adverse health effects, including cancer and neurological effects. The U.S. EPA Government Performance Results Act commitments specify a goal of reducing air toxics emissions by 75% from 1993 levels to significantly reduce the health risks. The NATTS Program was developed to fulfill the need for long-term national HAP monitoring data. In calendar year 2007, the U.S. EPA expanded the NATTS Program and awarded Section 103 funds to conduct monitoring for toxic air contaminants at two existing AQMD monitoring sites: Downtown L.A. and Rubidoux. The air toxics data serve as a continuum between past and future air toxics measurements programs such as MATES and allow for more accurate evaluation of toxic trends on a regional basis. Since this is a long-term trends monitoring program, it is anticipated that NATTS funding will be granted annually for the next several years. Initial funding from U.S. EPA for FY 2012-13 was recognized and appropriated in a June 2012 Board action.

PM2.5 Program Since 1998, U.S. EPA has provided funds under a Section 103 Grant for a comprehensive PM2.5 Air Monitoring Program. To date, there are 20 ambient monitoring stations operating 23 PM2.5 samplers under U.S. EPA funding. In addition, U.S EPA has supported the expansion of the network to collect continuous PM2.5 mass and chemical speciation at several sites within the South Coast Air Basin. This augmentation substantially adds to the fine particulate data which will help in the characterization of PM2.5 sources, current air quality conditions, and health impacts.

PAMS Program In February 1993, the U.S. EPA promulgated the Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS) regulations for areas classified as serious, severe or extreme non-attainment for ozone. These regulations require AQMD to conduct monitoring for ozone precursors with enhanced monitoring equipment at a total of seven

2

sites. The PAMS Program is also funding the meteorological upper air profilers sited at LAX and Ontario airports, Moreno Valley in Riverside County, Irvine in Orange County, and Whiteman Airport in the San Fernando Valley. Since the onset of the PAMS Program, U.S. EPA has annually allocated Section 105 supplemental grant funds in support of this requirement.

Proposal NATTS Program The U.S. EPA is expected to provide additional funding in the amount of $57,734 to enhance the NATTS Program for the July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013 time period. This action is to recognize revenue in the amount of $57,724 in the FY 2012-13 Budget. An additional action is proposed to, upon receipt of the award, appropriate $57,734 to the Major Objects in the Science and Technology Advancement FY 2012-13 Budget as follows; $49,000 to Capital Outlays, and $8,734 to Maintenance of Equipment. The allocation includes funds for an upgrade to an existing ion chromatograph to enhance hexavalent chromium analyses and equipment maintenance. The U.S. EPA concurs with staff’s proposed allocation.

Issue Sole Source Purchase Order for One Ion Chromatograph Upgrade Under the NATTS Program Ion Chromatographs are used in the AQMD Laboratory for the analysis of hexavalent chromium (Cr+6) under the NATTS Program. To meet the increased workload for Cr+6 determination, these instruments require upgrades consisting of an autosampler, special post column derivitazation module, and detector to identify and quantify Cr+6. The ion chromatographs that have been purchased in the past through the competitive bid process are manufactured by Dionex Corporation. Only autosamplers, post column modules, and detectors manufactured by Dionex are completely compatible with the existing ion chromatographs. Section VIII, B.3 of the Procurement Policy and Procedure identifies four major provisions under which a sole source award may be justified if funded with federal monies. Under these provisions, procurement by noncompetitive proposals may be used only when the award of a contract is infeasible under small purchase procedures, sealed bids or competitive proposals and the following circumstance applies: The item is available only from a single source.

The request for a sole source purchase of instrumentation and supplies is also justified under Section VIII, B.2.d(6) of the Procurement Policy and Procedure. The equipment must be compatible with existing specialized equipment and is available only from a single source. Therefore, staff recommends that the Board authorize the Procurement Manager to issue a sole source purchase order with Dionex Corp. for an amount not to exceed $49,000 for the purchase of one Ion Chromatograph upgrade module as budgeted in the NATTS award.

3

PM2.5 Program AQMD’s Los Angeles Main Street monitoring site has been located on the roof of a Department of Water and Power (DWP) building since September 1979. DWP is requiring AQMD’s current roof deck, which houses particulate monitors, to be moved by April 2, 2012 due to a solar farm installation on the building. As a result, a new location and platform are needed. DWP has agreed to a new adjacent site, designed a new platform that will meet DWP and City of Los Angeles approval, and agreed to provide funding to assist with construction costs. In April 2012, the Board approved the use of $142,500 from the Undesignated Fund Balance for the construction of AQMD’s Los Angeles Main Street monitoring site. Under the PM2.5 grant award, U.S. EPA has provided funding to cover a portion of the costs for the construction of this monitoring site. This proposed action is to recognize revenue from the PM2.5 award to partially fund the construction of a new platform at the LADWP site as well as support the PM2.5 monitoring program and reimburse the Undesignated Fund Balance up to $120,000.

PAMS Program As in previous years, there is a need to reallocate PAMS funding for the final quarter of the FFY. As shown in Attachment 1, a total balance of $234,076 from the 20th year PAMS Program is proposed for recognition in the FY 2012-13 Budget. The reallocation includes funds for meteorological auditing services. The U.S. EPA concurs with staff’s proposed reallocation. Additionally, U.S. EPA provided supplemental funding of $1,250 for laboratory performance audits.

Resource Impacts U.S. EPA Section 103 Grant funding will support the continuation of the NATTS Program, including equipment, contracts, temporary services, and supplies necessary to meet the objectives of the program.

U.S. EPA Section 103 Grant funding awarded under the PM2.5 Program is available to apply toward the construction of the relocated Los Angeles monitoring platform.

U.S. EPA Section 105 Grant funding supports the 20th year operation of the PAMS Program, including equipment, contracts, temporary services, and supplies necessary to meet the objectives of the program.

Attachments 1 - PAMS 20th Year Budget and Estimated Remaining Balance as of June 30, 2012 2 - Proposed PAMS 20th Year Carryover Budget and Supplemental Funding of $1,250 to FY 2012-13

4

ATTACHMENT 1

PAMS 20th YEAR BUDGET and ESTIMATED REMAINING BALANCE as of JUNE 30, 2012

Salaries & Services & Employee Description Fixed Assets Contracts Supplies Benefits Balance 20th Year PAMS Budget (November 4, 2011 # 10 Board Letter) - - - - $ 1,238,426

Expenditures: Actual Expenditures October 1, 2011 - May 31, 2012 (228,566) (350,924) (182,445) (220,234) (982,169)

Estimated Expenditures June 1, 2012 - June 30, 2012 - - (20,111) (2,070) (22,181)

Carryover 20th Year PAMS Funding to be Recognized in FY 2012-13 Budget $ 234,076 ATTACHMENT 2

PROPOSED PAMS 20th YEAR CARRYOVER BUDGET and SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING of $1,250 to FY 2012-13

Budget Program Estimated Code Code Quantity Expenditure

A. Temporary Agency Services 67460 $57,000 Air Quality Instrument Specialist 67460 44530 2 $27,000 Air Quality Chemist 67460 44530 1 $16,000 Laboratory Technician 67460 44530 1 $14,000

B. Laboratory Supplies 68050 $30,000 Misc. Supplies 68050 44530 $30,000

C. Demurrage 67550 $9,000 Demurrage 67550 44530 $9,000

D. Miscellaneous Parts 67600 $6,000 Miscellaneous Parts 67600 44530 $5,000 Miscellaneous Parts 67600 26530 $1,000

E. Communications 67900 $7,050 Communications 67900 26530 $7,050

F. Upper Air Leases 67350 $9,000 Upper Air Leases 67350 26530 $9,000

G. Building Maintenance 67650 $2,000 Building Maintenance 67650 26530 $2,000

H. Contracts 67450 $51,250 Meteorological Audit Services 67450 44530 $50,000 Laboratory Performance Audits 67450 44530 $1,250

I. Office Expense 68100 $1,000 Office Expense 68100 26530 $1,000

Subtotal $172,300

J. Salary and Benefits $63,026

Total $235,326

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 7

PROPOSAL: Issue Program Announcement for Low-Emission Leaf Blower Vendors

SYNOPSIS: To follow up on the successful Leaf Blower Exchange Programs, staff proposes a similar incentive in the fall of 2012 to generate cost- effective emission reductions. This action is to issue a Program Announcement to solicit competitive bids from manufacturers of low-emission leaf blowers in sufficient quantities and at the lowest possible price.

COMMITTEE: Mobile Source, June 15, 2012; Recommended for Approval

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve issuance of Program Announcement PA #2013-01 to identify potential manufacturers/suppliers of low-emission/low-noise backpack leaf blowers capable of providing up to 1,500 units.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D. Env Executive Officer CSL:MMM:FM:SS

Background Rule 2202 Air Quality Investment Program (AQIP) allows affected employers to participate by electing to invest in an AQMD-administered restricted fund. Investment can be either $60 annually per employee reporting to the worksite during the 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. peak window, or $125 triennially per employee. The restricted monies are to be used by the AQMD to fund projects that achieve mobile source emission reductions that would otherwise have been achieved by implementing a rideshare program.

Upon registering under this option and submitting the designated investment amount, an employer is considered to be in compliance with the Rule and there is no need for the employer to take further action to reduce mobile source emissions. The collected monies are used to fund projects that reduce mobile source emissions in a cost-effective manner.

Since 2006, the AQMD has conducted the leaf blower exchange program annually to encourage professional gardeners and landscapers operating within the AQMD’s four- county jurisdiction to turn in their old, polluting backpack leaf blowers and purchase new, low-emission/low-noise leaf blowers at a reduced price. The program has been very successful, resulting in the exchange of 7,500 leaf blowers. The leaf blower offered was the only model certified by CARB to have emission levels below the “Blue Sky Series” voluntary standards. The Blue Sky Series voluntary standards for hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxides are set at a level that is 50 percent lower than the current emission standards for leaf blowers that qualify for sale in California.

Proposal The purpose of Program Announcement PA #2013-01 is to solicit competitive proposals from qualified contractors for the production and supply of between 1,000 and 1,500 low- emission/low-noise backpack leaf blowers for the AQMD’s 2012 Leaf Blower Exchange Program. In addition to other criteria, to qualify for consideration, the proposed leaf blower must meet the CARB Blue Sky Series emission standards.

AQMD staff will evaluate the proposals based on but not limited to, criteria including the CARB-certified emission levels of the engine, leaf blower noise levels, product specifications, availability, production capacity, lead time, price of the product, and the degree to which the contractor will provide additional services for advertising, organizing and conducting the exchange events.

Outreach In accordance with AQMD’s Procurement Policy and Procedure, a public notice advertising the RFP/RFQ and inviting bids was published in the Los Angeles Times, the Orange County Register, the San Bernardino Sun, and Riverside County Press Enterprise newspapers to leverage the most cost-effective method of outreach to the South Coast Basin.

Additionally, potential bidders may have been notified utilizing AQMD’s own electronic listing of certified minority vendors. Notice of the RFP/RFQ was e-mailed to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses and various minority chambers of commerce and business associations, and has been placed on the Internet at AQMD’s website (http://www.aqmd.gov). Information is also available on AQMD’s bidder’s 24-hour telephone message line (909) 396-2724.

-2- Resource Impact Amount of funding will be determined after the selection of a contractor from the submitted proposals. Funding will be provided from the Air Quality Investment Fund (27) Rule 2202 AQIP Account.

Attachment Program Announcement PA #2013-01

-3-

Announcing the

South Coast Air Quality Management District

Leaf Blower Exchange Program

Program Announcement

PA # 2013-01

July 13, 2012

AQMD reserves the right to change any criteria such as the schedule, qualifications, and selection criteria outlined in this Program Announcement.

DATE: July 13, 2012

TO: All Interested Parties

FROM: Barry Wallerstein, Executive Officer, SCAQMD

SUBJECT: SCAQMD Backpack Leaf Blower Exchange Program Announcement

The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is pleased to announce a funding opportunity for implementation of a Leaf Blower Exchange Program in the fall of 2012. This program is intended to encourage professional gardeners and landscapers operating within the SCAQMD’s 4-county jurisdiction to turn in their old, polluting backpack leaf blowers and purchase new, low- emission/low-noise leaf blowers at a reduced price. Since 2006, 7,500 leaf blowers were exchanged through similar programs.

This Program Announcement is intended to identify potential manufacturers/suppliers of low-emission/low-noise backpack leaf blowers who are willing to provide between 1,000 and 1,500 new blowers at a discounted price to be used for the 2012 Leaf Blower Exchange Program. All interested parties are encouraged to apply. The required product specifications are listed in Section D.

The SCAQMD staff is available to assist applicants during the preparation of their proposals for this program. Points of contact for administrative and technical assistance are included in the attached Program Announcement in Section F.

Should you have any questions regarding this Program Announcement, please contact Mr. Shashi Singeetham, Air Quality Specialist, at (909) 396-3298. The Announcement documents can also be accessed via the internet by visiting SCAQMD’s website at www.aqmd.gov.

Our main objective is to reduce exposure to harmful emissions from the use of gasoline powered leaf blowers within the SCAQMD’s 4-county jurisdiction, and we look forward to receiving your proposal.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A. LEAF BLOWER EXCHANGE PROGRAM OVERVIEW ...... 1 B. PROGRAM SCHEDULE ...... 1 C. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL ...... 2 D. PROJECT PROPOSAL GUIDELINES, REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS ...... 2 Proposal Requirements ...... 2 Required Product Information ...... 3 Additional Contractor Services for Advertising and Conducting Exchange Events ...... 4 Company Contact...... 4 Certifications and Representations ...... 4 E. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION ...... 4 Project Selection Criteria ...... 4 Amount of SCAQMD Funding ...... 4 Project Completion Deadlines ...... 4 F. IF YOU NEED HELP ...... 5 ATTACHMENT A: CERTIFICATIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS

i

A. LEAF BLOWER EXCHANGE PROGRAM OVERVIEW

The purpose of this Program Announcement is to solicit competitive proposals from qualified contractors for the production and supply of low-emission/low-noise backpack leaf blowers to be used in the SCAQMD’s Leaf Blower Exchange Program in the fall of 2012. This program is intended to encourage professional gardeners and landscapers operating within the SCAQMD’s 4-county jurisdiction to turn in their old, polluting backpack leaf blowers and purchase new, low-emission/low- noise leaf blowers at a reduced price. Since 2006, 7,500 leaf blowers were exchanged through similar programs.

This Program Announcement is intended to identify potential manufacturers/suppliers of low- emission/low-noise backpack leaf blowers who are willing to provide between 1,000 and 1,500 new blowers and provide the best value including price and other project criteria herein.

The successful bidders should be knowledgeable and experienced in the manufacture and commercial distribution of reliable low-emission/low noise backpack leaf blowers that meet the requirements set forth in Section D of this Program Announcement. They should have an established network of local dealerships providing product sales and service within the SCAQMD’s 4-county jurisdiction.

Total SCAQMD funding to be allocated will depend upon the availability of funds and the amount of the discount per unit offered by the manufacturer at the time of the leaf blower exchange events.

B. PROGRAM SCHEDULE

The implementation schedule of this program is illustrated below:

July 13, 2012 Issue the Program Announcement (PA# 2013-01)

August 17, 2012 Proposals due no later than 2:00 PM

September 21, 2012 Proposals approved by Mobile Source Committee

October 5, 2012 Proposals approved by Board

November 15, 2012 Contract Execution

November 15, 2013 Completion of Program

1

C. PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL

There is no specific application form for this Program Announcement, but applicants are expected to submit a proposal that addresses all of the items listed in Section D of the Announcement.

The applicant shall submit four copies of the project proposal in a sealed envelope, plainly marked in the upper left-hand corner with the name and address of the applicant and the words “Program Proposal (PA #2013-01).” All proposals for the Leaf Blower Exchange Program are due no later than 2:00 PM., August 17, 2012.

Procurement Unit South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA. 91765

The written proposals must be received by SCAQMD by the specified date and time regardless of when they may be postmarked for delivery. E-mail and faxed copies will not be accepted.

D. PROJECT PROPOSAL GUIDELINES, REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS

Proposal Requirements

There is no specific application form for this Program Announcement, but applicants are expected to submit a proposal that addresses all of the items listed in this section (Section D).

To be considered for this program:

• Bidders must have the capability to produce and supply up to 1,500 low-emission/low-noise backpack leaf blowers by November 30, 2012 that meet the requirements listed below.

• The proposed leaf blower must be a backpack model of sufficient power to be considered suitable for everyday commercial use by professional gardeners and landscapers.

• The proposed leaf blower engine must have been certified by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) for sale in California, and must meet certified emission levels no higher than those identified by CARB as the Blue Sky Series Levels listed below:

Engine Hydrocarbon plus Carbon Particulate Matter Displacement Oxides of Monoxide (PM standard applies Nitrogen only to 2-stroke engines) <50 cc 25 g/kW-hr 536 g/kW-hr 2.0 g/kW-hr 50-80cc 36 g/kW-hr 536 g/kW-hr 2.0 g/kW-hr inclusive

• The manufacturer must agree not to request emissions credits generated by the sale of leaf blowers through this SCAQMD-subsidized program to comply with any CARB or EPA emissions credit averaging, banking, or trading program.

2

• Although no specific noise level is required for a leaf blower to qualify for this program, preference will be given to “low-noise” models that are designed to achieve a noise level of 65 dB(A) while operating at a power level that is satisfactory for use by professional gardeners and landscapers.

Required Product Information

The contractor must provide all of the following information which will be used to evaluate and compare proposals.

Leaf Blower Specifications Blower Model Number Engine Displacement (in cc) 2-Stroke or 4-stroke Noise Rating in dB(A) Engine Power (in both kW and bhp) Air Velocity (mph) Air Volume with tubes (cfm) Air Volume without tubes (cfm) Dry Weight of Blower (pounds) Fuel Tank Capacity (ounces and liters) Warranty Period for Commercial Users Approximate Number of Dealerships/Service Centers within SCAQMD 4-county jurisdiction

CARB-Certified Emission Level Information for Proposed Leaf Blower CARB Executive Order Number and Date Certification Level for HC+NOx (in g/kW-hr) Certification Level for CO (in g/kW-hr) Certification Level for PM (in g/kW-hr) (PM standard applies only to 2-stroke engines) Has manufacturer requested that this engine be specifically designated by CARB as a “Blue Sky Series” engine?

Leaf Blower Cost Information Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price Price per blower to AQMD for 1,000 units Price per blower to AQMD for 1,500 units

3

Additional Contractor Services for Advertising and Conducting Exchange Events

The SCAQMD will give preference to contractors who, in addition to providing a qualifying product at the lowest possible price, will provide additional services to help advertise the program and organize and conduct the exchange events. For planning purposes, contractors should assume there will be a minimum of seven exchange events on different days at various sites located throughout the SCAQMD’s 4-county jurisdiction. The highest scoring proposals will include contractor commitments to:

• Make all the necessary arrangements to secure suitable exchange sites. • Provide outreach and advertising assistance for promoting the program. • Provide the necessary staffing to satisfactorily conduct the exchange events. • Cover the costs of collecting, destroying and properly disposing of the old blowers.

Company Contact

Proposers shall provide the company’s contact person’s name, address, phone numbers and the e-mail address.

Certifications and Representations

Proposers shall complete and sign all the certification and representation forms provided in Attachment A of this package.

E. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION

Project Selection Criteria

A contractor will be selected based on, but not limited to, the following criteria:

• The CARB-certified emission levels of the engine; • Leaf blower noise level; • Product specifications; • Price per unit the manufacturer will charge SCAQMD; • Lead times necessary to provide the required number of units (assuming a maximum of 1,500 units); and • Degree to which contractor’s additional services will reduce SCAQMD expenses and resource needs for advertising, organizing and conducting the exchange events.

Amount of SCAQMD Funding

Total SCAQMD funding to be allocated will depend upon the availability of funds and the amount of the discount per unit offered by the manufacturer at the time of the leaf blower exchange events

Project Completion Deadlines

• The total number of leaf blowers to be used for the 2012 program (up to a maximum of 1,500 blowers) shall be available no later than November 30, 2012.

4

• Overall project shall be completed before November 15, 2013.

F. IF YOU NEED HELP

This Program Announcement can be obtained by accessing the SCAQMD web site at www.aqmd.gov. SCAQMD staff members are available to answer questions during the proposal acceptance period. In order to help expedite assistance, please direct your inquiries to the applicable staff person, as follows:

For General, Administrative, or Technical Assistance, please contact:

Shashi Singeetham, Air Quality Specialist Phone: 909-396-3298 Fax: 909-396-3608 E-mail: [email protected]

5

ATTACHMENT A

CERTIFICATIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS

South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov

Business Information Request

Dear SCAQMD Contractor/Supplier:

The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is committed to ensuring that our contractor/supplier records are current and accurate. If your firm is selected for award of a purchase order or contract, it is imperative that the information requested herein be supplied in a timely manner to facilitate payment of invoices. In order to process your payments, we need the enclosed information regarding your account. Please review and complete the information identified on the following pages, complete the enclosed W-9 form, remember to sign both documents for our files, and return them as soon as possible to the address below:

Attention: Accounts Payable, Accounting Department South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178

If you do not return this information, we will not be able to establish you as a vendor. This will delay any payments and would still necessitate your submittal of the enclosed information to our Accounting department before payment could be initiated. Completion of this document and enclosed forms would ensure that your payments are processed timely and accurately.

If you have any questions or need assistance in completing this information, please contact Accounting at (909) 396-3777. We appreciate your cooperation in completing this necessary information.

Sincerely,

Michael B. O’Kelly Chief Financial Officer

DH:tm

Enclosures: Business Information Request Disadvantaged Business Certification W-9 Federal Contract Debarment Certification Campaign Contribution Disclosure

REV 2/11

A - 1

South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov

BUSINESS INFORMATION REQUEST

Business Name

Division of

Subsidiary of

Website Address Individual DBA, Name ______, County Filed in ______ Type of Business Corporation, ID No. ______Check One: LLC/LLP, ID No. ______ Other ______

REMITTING ADDRESS INFORMATION

Address

City/Town

State/Province Zip

Phone ( ) - Ext Fax ( ) -

Contact Title

E-mail Address Payment Name if Different

All invoices must reference the corresponding Purchase Order Number(s)/Contract Number(s) if applicable and mailed to:

Attention: Accounts Payable, Accounting Department South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178

A - 2

DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS CERTIFICATION

Federal guidance for utilization of disadvantaged business enterprises allows a vendor to be deemed a small business enterprise (SBE), minority business enterprise (MBE) or women business enterprise (WBE) if it meets the criteria below.

• is certified by the Small Business Administration or • is certified by a state or federal agency or • is an independent MBE(s) or WBE(s) business concern which is at least 51 percent owned and controlled by minority group member(s) who are citizens of the United States.

Statements of certification:

As a prime contractor to the SCAQMD, (name of business) will engage in good faith efforts to achieve the fair share in accordance with 40 CFR Section 31.36(e), and will follow the six affirmative steps listed below for contracts or purchase orders funded in whole or in part by federal grants and contracts.

1. Place qualified SBEs, MBEs, and WBEs on solicitation lists. 2. Assure that SBEs, MBEs, and WBEs are solicited whenever possible. 3. When economically feasible, divide total requirements into small tasks or quantities to permit greater participation by SBEs, MBEs, and WBEs. 4. Establish delivery schedules, if possible, to encourage participation by SBEs, MBEs, and WBEs. 5. Use services of Small Business Administration, Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce, and/or any agency authorized as a clearinghouse for SBEs, MBEs, and WBEs. 6. If subcontracts are to be let, take the above affirmative steps.

(a) Self-Certification Verification: Also for use in awarding additional points, as applicable, in accordance with SCAQMD Procurement Policy and Procedure:

Check all that apply:

Small Business Enterprise/Small Business Joint Venture Women-owned Business Enterprise Local business Disabled Veteran-owned Business Enterprise/DVBE Joint Venture Minority-owned Business Enterprise

Percent of ownership: %

Name of Qualifying Owner(s):

I, the undersigned, hereby declare that to the best of my knowledge the above information is accurate. Upon penalty of perjury, I certify information submitted is factual.

B. NAME TITLE

C. TELEPHONE NUMBER DATE

A - 3

Definitions

Disabled Veteran-Owned Business Enterprise means a business that meets all of the following criteria: • is a sole proprietorship or partnership of which is at least 51 percent owned by one or more disabled veterans, or in the case of any business whose stock is publicly held, at least 51 percent of the stock is owned by one or more disabled veterans; a subsidiary which is wholly owned by a parent corporation but only if at least 51 percent of the voting stock of the parent corporation is owned by one or more disabled veterans; or a joint venture in which at least 51 percent of the joint venture’s management and control and earnings are held by one or more disabled veterans. • the management and control of the daily business operations are by one or more disabled veterans. The disabled veterans who exercise management and control are not required to be the same disabled veterans as the owners of the business. • is a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership, or joint venture with its primary headquarters office located in the United States and which is not a branch or subsidiary of a foreign corporation, firm, or other foreign- based business.

Joint Venture means that one party to the joint venture is a DVBE and owns at least 51 percent of the joint venture. In the case of a joint venture formed for a single project this means that DVBE will receive at least 51 percent of the project dollars.

Local Business means a business that meets all of the following criteria:

• has an ongoing business within the boundary of the SCAQMD at the time of bid application. • performs 90 percent of the work within SCAQMD’s jurisdiction.

Minority-Owned Business Enterprise means a business that meets all of the following criteria:

• is at least 51 percent owned by one or more minority persons or in the case of any business whose stock is publicly held, at least 51 percent of the stock is owned by one or more minority persons. • is a business whose management and daily business operations are controlled or owned by one or more minority person. • is a business which is a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership, joint venture, an association, or a cooperative with its primary headquarters office located in the United States, which is not a branch or subsidiary of a foreign corporation, foreign firm, or other foreign business.

“Minority” person means a Black American, Hispanic American, Native American (including American Indian, Eskimo, Aleut, and Native Hawaiian), Asian-Indian American (including a person whose origins are from India, Pakistan, or Bangladesh), Asian-Pacific American (including a person whose origins are from Japan, China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Korea, Samoa, Guam, the United States Trust Territories of the Pacific, Northern Marianas, Laos, Cambodia, or Taiwan).

Small Business Enterprise means a business that meets the following criteria:

a. 1) an independently owned and operated business; 2) not dominant in its field of operation; 3) together with affiliates is either:

• A service, construction, or non-manufacturer with 100 or fewer employees, and average annual gross receipts of ten million dollars ($10,000,000) or less over the previous three years, or

• A manufacturer with 100 or fewer employees.

b. Manufacturer means a business that is both of the following:

1) Primarily engaged in the chemical or mechanical transformation of raw materials or processed substances into new products.

2) Classified between Codes 311000 to 339000, inclusive, of the North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Manual published by the United States Office of Management and Budget, 2007 edition.

Small Business Joint Venture means that one party to the joint venture is a Small Business and owns at least 51 percent of the joint venture. In the case of a joint venture formed for a single project this means that the Small Business will receive at least 51 percent of the project dollars.

A - 4

Women-Owned Business Enterprise means a business that meets all of the following criteria:

• is at least 51 percent owned by one or more women or in the case of any business whose stock is publicly held, at least 51 percent of the stock is owned by one or more women. • is a business whose management and daily business operations are controlled or owned by one or more women. • is a business which is a sole proprietorship, corporation, partnership, or a joint venture, with its primary headquarters office located in the United States, which is not a branch or subsidiary of a foreign corporation, foreign firm, or other foreign business.

A - 5

A - 6

A - 7

A - 8

A - 9

United State Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460

Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters

The prospective participant certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief that it and the principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three year period preceding this proposal been convicted of or had a civil judgement rendered against them or commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction: violation of Federal or State antitrust statute or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property: (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/proposal had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.

I understand that a false statement on this certification may be grounds for rejection of this proposal or termination of the award. In addition, under 18 USC Sec. 1001, a false statement may result in a fine of up to $10,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both.

______Typed Name & Title of Authorized Representative

______Signature of Authorized Representative Date

 I am unable to certify to the above statements. My explanation is attached.

EPA Form 5700-49 (11-88)

A - 10

CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS DISCLOSURE

California law prohibits a party, or an agent, from making campaign contributions to AQMD Governing Board Members or members/alternates of the Mobile Source Pollution Reduction Committee (MSRC) of $250 or more while their contract or permit is pending before the AQMD; and further prohibits a campaign contribution from being made for three (3) months following the date of the final decision by the Governing Board or the MSRC on a donor’s contract or permit. Gov’t Code §84308(d). For purposes of reaching the $250 limit, the campaign contributions of the bidder or contractor plus contributions by its parents, affiliates, and related companies of the contractor or bidder are added together. 2 C.C.R. §18438.5.

In addition, Board Members or members/alternates of the MSRC must abstain from voting on a contract or permit if they have received a campaign contribution from a party or participant to the proceeding, or agent, totaling $250 or more in the 12-month period prior to the consideration of the item by the Governing Board or the MSRC. Gov’t Code §84308(c). When abstaining, the Board Member or members/alternates of the MSRC must announce the source of the campaign contribution on the record. Id. The requirement to abstain is triggered by campaign contributions of $250 or more in total contributions of the bidder or contractor, plus any of its parent, subsidiary, or affiliated companies. 2 C.C.R. §18438.5.

In accordance with California law, bidders and contracting parties are required to disclose, at the time the application is filed, information relating to any campaign contributions made to Board Members or members/alternates of the MSRC, including: the name of the party making the contribution (which includes any parent, subsidiary or otherwise related business entity, as defined below), the amount of the contribution, and the date the contribution was made. 2 C.C.R. §18438.8(b).

The list of current AQMD Governing Board Members can be found at the AQMD website (www.aqmd.gov). The list of current MSRC members/alternates can be found at the MSRC website (http://www.cleantransportationfunding.org).

SECTION I. Please complete Section I.

Contractor: RFP #: PA2013-01

List any parent, subsidiaries, or otherwise affiliated business entities of Contractor: (See definition below).

SECTION II

Has contractor and/or parent, subsidiary, or affiliated company, or agent thereof, made a campaign contribution(s) totaling $250 or more in the aggregate to a current member of the South Coast Air Quality Management Governing Board or members/alternates of the MSRC in the 12 months preceding the date of execution of this disclosure?

A - 11

Yes No If YES, complete Section II below and then sign and date the form. If NO, sign and date below. Include this form with your submittal.

C:\TEST\120707AB.docx

A - 12

Campaign Contributions Disclosure, continued:

Name of Contributor

Governing Board Member or MSRC Member/Alternate Amount of Contribution Date of Contribution

Name of Contributor

Governing Board Member or MSRC Member/Alternate Amount of Contribution Date of Contribution

Name of Contributor

Governing Board Member or MSRC Member/Alternate Amount of Contribution Date of Contribution

Name of Contributor

Governing Board Member or MSRC Member/Alternate Amount of Contribution Date of Contribution

Name of Contributor

Governing Board Member or MSRC Member/alternate Amount of Contribution Date of Contribution

I declare the foregoing disclosures to be true and correct.

By: Title: Date:

A - 13

DEFINITIONS

Parent, Subsidiary, or Otherwise Related Business Entity.

(1) Parent subsidiary. A parent subsidiary relationship exists when one corporation directly or indirectly owns shares possessing more than 50 percent of the voting power of another corporation.

(2) Otherwise related business entity. Business entities, including corporations, partnerships, joint ventures and any other organizations and enterprises operated for profit, which do not have a parent subsidiary relationship are otherwise related if any one of the following three tests is met:

(A) One business entity has a controlling ownership interest in the other business entity. (B) There is shared management and control between the entities. In determining whether there is shared management and control, consideration should be given to the following factors: (i) The same person or substantially the same person owns and manages the two entities; (ii) There are common or commingled funds or assets; (iii) The business entities share the use of the same offices or employees, or otherwise share activities, resources or personnel on a regular basis; (iv) There is otherwise a regular and close working relationship between the entities; or (C) A controlling owner (50% or greater interest as a shareholder or as a general partner) in one entity also is a controlling owner in the other entity.

2 Cal. Code of Regs., §18703.1(d).

C:\TEST\120707AB.docx

A - 14

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 8

PROPOSAL: Authorize Executive Officer to Loan Monies from General Fund and/or Special Revenue Funds to Provide Cash Flow for Accrued Interest Earned, but Not Yet Received, in Other Special Revenue Funds

SYNOPSIS: Under some incentive funding grants, CARB has required that the entire amount of accrued interest be fully expended at the same date as the subject grant’s expiration date for expenditure of its project funds. As the amount of earned interest is finalized and reported several months after the expenditure deadline of the project funds, it becomes virtually impossible to expend the last portion of the earned interest at the same date as the project funds. One such example is the Proposition 1B-School Bus Program. To avoid the return of any interest funds to CARB, this action is to authorize the Executive Officer to loan and reimburse up to $75,000 from the general and/or special revenue funds to provide cash flow for accrued interest earned, but not yet received, in other special revenue funds. In addition, authorize the Executive Officer to approve expenditures of up to $75,000 from these loans.

COMMITTEE: Technology, June 15, 2012, Recommended for Approval

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Authorize the Executive Officer to loan and reimburse up to $75,000 from the general and/or special revenue funds to provide cash flow for accrued interest earned, but not yet received, in other special revenue funds. 2. Authorize the Executive Officer to approve expenditures of up to $75,000 from these loans.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer CSL:MMM:FM

Background Under some incentive funding grants CARB has required that the entire amount of accrued interest be fully expended at the same date as the subject grant’s expiration date for expenditure of its project funds. As the amount of earned interest is finalized and reported a couple of months after the expenditure deadline of the project funds, it becomes virtually impossible to expend the last portion of the earned interests at the same date as the project funds. One such example is the Proposition 1B-School Bus Program. Under this Program the AQMD has successfully expended its entire $71 million in grant funds and $1.2 million in accrued interest, in addition to $12 million of its own AB 923 funds. As such, 465 pre-1987 school buses have been replaced with new CNG buses and 464 school buses have been retrofitted with particulate traps. However, it is estimated that there will be an amount of less than $30,000 available in interest funds that will be calculated and reported several months after the complete liquidation of the project funds.

Proposal To ensure that all interest funds accrued under incentive funding grants are expended in their entirety instead of being returned to CARB, staff recommends the Board’s approval to authorize the Executive Officer to loan and reimburse up to $75,000 from the general and/or special revenue fund to provide cash flow for accrued interest earned, but not yet received, in other special revenue funds and to authorize the Executive Officer to approve expenditures for eligible projects of up to $75,000 from these loans amounts.

Resource Impacts There are no resource impacts as the recommended action is for transfer of funds for payments of projects that have already having been approved by the Board.

-2-

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 9

PROPOSAL: Authorize Funding for Air Quality and Clean Technology Conference for Senior Citizens

SYNOPSIS: This action seeks approval to conduct one follow-on air quality and clean technology conference focused for senior citizens in 2012. The event will continue our efforts from last year to foster awareness and an increased understanding of air quality and related health issues, clean technology applications, and empower seniors to become active participants in improving air quality as well as provide information on what they can do in their home, neighborhood and community and with their extended family. Staff recommends the Board authorize the Executive Officer to approve conference expenditures up to $150,000 to organize and host this senior fair.

COMMITTEE: No Committee Review

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Authorize the Executive Officer to approve expenditures from the Clean Fuels Conference Fund (26) up to $150,000, to organize and host an air quality and clean technology conference for senior citizens in 2012; and 2. Recognize revenue upon receipt from cosponsors and exhibitors into the Clean Fuels Conference Fund to partially offset expenditures from the above senior fair.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer CSL:MMM:DAH

Background In the last few years the AQMD has hosted or co-hosted several conferences that reached out to business and environmental leaders, government policy makers, elected officials, technology companies, procurement and fleet managers, venture capital investors, high schools, colleges and universities and the general public. Last year the AQMD recognized participation from the senior population (55+) had been minimal and to reach this demographic the AQMD conducted a series of highly successful senior air quality fairs throughout the Basin.

Proposal Staff proposes to host one follow-on air quality and clean technology conference for senior citizens in the upcoming fall in Los Angeles County. The event in Los Angeles last fall was very successful with nearly 50 exhibitors and 3,000 attendees. The follow-on senior fair will continue the efforts initiated last year to foster awareness and an increased understanding of air quality and related health issues, clean technology applications, and empower seniors to become active participants in improving air quality as well as provide information on what they can do in their home, neighborhood and community and with their extended family.

Outreach will be conducted throughout Los Angeles County targeting senior centers, religious institutions and other appropriate venues to reach this demographic. The program will include speakers addressing air quality, clean technologies and health, air quality videos, and a keynote speaker during lunch. Sponsor and tabletop exhibits will be on display and, if venue space permits, alternative fuel vehicle displays.

Transportation will be made available to bus senior citizens from centralized locations such as senior centers and religious institutions, to the conference venue and back. The transportation costs will be covered under the conference budget and should greatly enhance participation.

To organize and host this follow-on air quality and clean technology conference for senior citizens in 2012, staff recommends the Board: 1) authorize the Executive Officer to approve expenditures up to $150,000; and 2) recognize revenue from cosponsors and exhibitors into the Clean Fuels Conference Fund to partially offset the expenditures to conduct the senior fair.

Benefits to AQMD The senior population (55+) is a demographic that has great potential to influence healthy lifestyle changes not only for themselves but their extended family members. Conducting events for senior citizens would enhance public education goals for AQMD communities and residents.

Resource Impacts There are sufficient funds available in the Clean Fuels Conference Fund to cover the proposed expenditures.

-2-

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 10

PROPOSAL: Approve Contract Awards and Modifications Approved by MSRC

SYNOPSIS: The MSRC approved multiple new contracts and/or modifications under the FY 2011-12 Work Program. These include awarding new contracts under the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Program and the Near-Zero Emission Medium-Duty and Medium-Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program. The MSRC also approved a program to provide incentives for the purchase of CNG taxicabs. This item also corrects a modification previously approved by the MSRC under the FY 2007-08 Work Program. At this time the MSRC seeks Board approval of these contract awards, incentive program, and modification.

COMMITTEE: Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review, April 19 and June 21, 2012, Recommended for Approval

RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: 1. Approve a corrected modified contract with the City of Anaheim, Contract #ML08024, substituting eight CNG buses for eight liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) buses instead of seven CNG buses for seven LPG buses, as listed in Agenda Item #12 on the June 1, 2012 AQMD Board agenda (Recommended Action 1), as described in this letter; 2. Approve contract award to Southern California Gas Company for the installation of a new publicly accessible natural gas refueling station in Murrieta, in an amount not to exceed $150,000, under the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Program as part of the approval of FY 2011-12 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program, as described in this letter; 3. Approve the award of 12 contracts totaling $2,315,000 under the Medium-Duty and Medium-Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program as part of approval of the FY 2011-12 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program, as described in this letter and as follows: a. A contract with the Silverado Stages in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for the purchase of up to 6 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; b. A contract with U-Haul of California in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for the purchase of up to 23 medium-heavy-duty LPG vehicles;

c. A contract with C.V. Ice Company in an amount not to exceed $75,000 for the purchase of up to 3 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; d. A contract with Dy-Dee Service of Pasadena in an amount not to exceed $45,000 for the purchase of up to 2 medium-duty and 1 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; e. A contract with Community Action Partnership of Orange County in an amount not to exceed $25,000 for the purchase of 1 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicle; f. A contract with Complete Landscape Care in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for the purchase of up to 6 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; g. A contract with Final Assembly in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for the purchase of up to 4 medium-heavy-duty LPG vehicles; h. A contract with Fox Transportation in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for the purchase of up to 20 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; i. A contract with Mike Diamond/Phace Management Services in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for the purchase of up to 20 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; j. A contract with Ware Disposal in an amount not to exceed $195,000 for the purchase of up to 2 medium-duty and 7 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; k. A contract with Disneyland Resort in an amount not to exceed $25,000 for the purchase of 1 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicle; and l. A contract with Jim & Doug Carter’s Automotive/V.S.P. Parking in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for the purchase of up to 2 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; 4. Approve a $750,000 CNG Taxicab Incentive Program to provide incentives for the purchase of new CNG taxicabs, as part of approval of the FY 2011-12 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program as described in this letter; 5. Authorize MSRC the authority to adjust contract awards up to five percent, as necessary and previously granted in prior work programs; and 6. Authorize the Chairman of the Board to execute new and modified contracts under FYs 2004-05 and 2011-12 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Programs, as described above and in this letter.

Greg Winterbottom Chair, MSRC

CSL:HH:CR

Background In September 1990 Assembly Bill 2766 was signed into law (Health & Safety Code Sections 44220-44247) authorizing the imposition of an annual $4 motor vehicle registration fee to fund the implementation of programs exclusively to reduce air pollution from motor vehicles. AB 2766 provides that 30 percent of the annual $4 vehicle registration fee subvened to the AQMD be placed into an account to be allocated pursuant to a work program developed and adopted by the MSRC and approved by the Board. -2- For the FY 2011-12 Work Program, the MSRC selected categories and targeted funding amounts in December 2011. Several solicitation documents have already been developed and released. The MSRC considered recommended awards under the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure and Medium-Duty and Medium-Heavy Duty Vehicles Programs. The MSRC also considered a program to provide incentives for the purchase of new CNG taxicabs. Details are provided below in the Proposals section.

Outreach In accordance with AQMD’s Procurement Policy and Procedure, public notices advertising the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure and Medium-Duty and Medium-Heavy- Duty Vehicles Program Announcements and inviting bids were published in the Los Angeles Times, the Orange County Register, the San Bernardino Sun, and Riverside County Press Enterprise newspapers to leverage the most cost-effective method of outreach to the South Coast Basin. In addition, the Program Announcements were advertised in the Desert Sun newspaper for expanded outreach in the Coachella Valley.

Additionally, potential bidders may have been notified utilizing AQMD’s own electronic listing of certified minority vendors. Notice of the Program Announcements has been e-mailed to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses and various minority chambers of commerce and business associations, and placed on the Internet at AQMD’s website (http://www.aqmd.gov). Information was also available on AQMD’s bidder’s 24-hour telephone message line (909) 396-2724. Further, the solicitations were posted on the MSRC’s website at http://www.cleantransportationfunding.org and electronic notifications were sent to those subscribing to this website’s notification service.

Proposal Evaluation and Panel Composition Applications received in response to the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure and Medium- Duty and Medium-Heavy-Duty Program Announcements were evaluated by members of the MSRC’s Technical Advisory Committee (MSRC-TAC), a diverse group of individuals appointed by participating members as prescribed in the Health & Safety Code.

Proposals At its April 19 and June 21, 2012 meetings, the MSRC considered recommendations from its MSRC-TAC and unanimously approved the following:

FY 2007-08 Local Government Match Program In June 2008, the MSRC approved an award under the FY 2007-08 Local Government Match Program to the City of Anaheim in an amount not to exceed $425,000 for the purchase of 17 LPG buses by Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN). Subsequent to the execution of Contract #ML08024 to effectuate the award, the City requested substitution of 8 CNG buses for 8 of the LPG buses specified in their contract. At its April 19, 2012 meeting, the MSRC considered and approved the City’s requested contract modification. The modification was then presented to the AQMD Board for

-3- approval on June 1, 2012, but it was inaccurately described to the Board as the substitution of 7 CNG buses for 7 LPG buses. At this time the MSRC requests AQMD Board approval of the corrected, modified contract.

FY 2011-12 Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Program As part of the FY 2011-12 Work Program, the MSRC allocated $4.0 million for the implementation of new and expanded CNG and LNG refueling stations and modification of maintenance facilities to accommodate gaseous-fueled vehicles. A Program Announcement, #PA2012-10, was developed and released on March 2, 2012, with a final submission deadline of September 28, 2012. The MSRC previously considered nine applications and awarded a total of $1,219,000 for those projects. One additional application, from Southern California Gas Company, has been received and evaluated for compliance with the requirements set forth in the Program Announcement. The project was found to meet all requirements. On June 21, 2012, the MSRC approved a contract with Southern California Gas Company in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for the installation of a publicly accessible CNG station in Murrieta as part of the FY 2011-12 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program.

FY 2011-12 Medium-Duty and Medium-Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program As part of the FY 2011-12 Work Program, the MSRC allocated $2.5 million for the Medium-Duty and Medium-Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program. A Program Announcement, #PA2012-13, was developed and released on March 2, 2012. The Program offers to co- fund the purchase of qualifying vehicles, equipped with either dedicated alternative fuel or zero-emission drive system technology certified by CARB at or below a NOx standard of 0.2 g/bhp-hr. The incentive level is set at the actual incremental cost of the low- emission option, up to a maximum of $10,000 each for medium-duty and $25,000 each for medium-heavy-duty vehicles. Funding shall be distributed on a first-come, first- served basis with a geographic minimum per county of $300,000. The Program Announcement includes an open application period commencing April 10, 2012 and closing September 28, 2012. A total of 14 applications have been received to date, 12 of which were received on the first day and thus deemed received at the same time. On June 21, 2012, the MSRC considered the first-day applications, deferring consideration of the later applications because one county geographic minimum has not yet been met, and approved funding totaling $2,315,000 for the 12 applications, as follows: a. A contract with the Silverado Stages in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for the purchase of up to 6 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; b. A contract with U-Haul of California in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for the purchase of up to 23 medium-heavy-duty LPG vehicles; c. A contract with C.V. Ice Company in an amount not to exceed $75,000 for the purchase of up to 3 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; d. A contract with Dy-Dee Service of Pasadena in an amount not to exceed $45,000 for the purchase of up to 2 medium-duty and 1 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; e. A contract with Community Action Partnership of Orange County in an amount not to exceed $25,000 for the purchase of 1 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicle;

-4- f. A contract with Complete Landscape Care in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for the purchase of up to 6 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; g. A contract with Final Assembly in an amount not to exceed $100,000 for the purchase of up to 4 medium-heavy-duty LPG vehicles; h. A contract with Fox Transportation in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for the purchase of up to 20 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; i. A contract with Mike Diamond/Phace Management Services in an amount not to exceed $500,000 for the purchase of up to 20 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; j. A contract with Ware Disposal in an amount not to exceed $195,000 for the purchase of up to 2 medium-duty and 7 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles; k. A contract with Disneyland Resort in an amount not to exceed $25,000 for the purchase of 1 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicle; and l. A contract with V.S.P. Parking in an amount not to exceed $50,000 for the purchase of up to 2 medium-heavy-duty CNG vehicles.

FY 2011-12 CNG Taxicab Incentive Program As part of the FY 2011-12 Work Program, the MSRC allocated $750,000 for a program to provide incentives for the purchase of CNG taxicabs. At its June 21, 2012 meeting, the MSRC considered recommendations and approved the establishment of a program to provide $3,000 per CNG taxicab purchased. Qualifying taxicabs must be purchased new and dedicated to operate solely on natural gas. Both taxi fleets and individual owner/operators are eligible to apply. Funding shall be distributed on a first-come, first- served basis with a geographic minimum per county of $93,000, with funding remaining available until exhausted. Program participation forms will be hosted on the MSRC’s website at www.cleantransportationfunding.org. MSRC and AQMD staff will also explore additional opportunities to promote availability of the incentives on a regional basis.

At this time the MSRC requests the AQMD Board to approve the contract awards, incentive program and modification as part of approval of the FYs 2007-08 and 2011-12 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Programs as outlined above. The MSRC also requests the Board to authorize the AQMD Chairman of the Board to authority to execute all agreements described in this letter. The MSRC further requests the authority to adjust the funds allocated to each project specified in this Board letter by up to five percent of the project’s recommended funding. The Board has granted this authority to the MSRC for all past Work Programs.

Resource Impacts The AQMD acts as fiscal administrator for the AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Program (Health & Safety Code Section 44243). Money received for this program is recorded in a special revenue fund (Fund 23) and the contracts specified herein, as well as any contracts awarded in response to the solicitations, will be drawn from this fund.

-5-

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 11

PROPOSAL: Legislative and Public Affairs Report

SYNOPSIS: This report highlights May 2012 outreach activities of Legislative and Public Affairs, which include: Environmental Justice Update, Community Events/Public Meetings, Business Assistance, and Outreach to Business and Federal, State, and Local Government.

COMMITTEE: No Committee Review

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer

DA:MC:DM

Background This report summarizes the activities of Legislative and Public Affairs for May 2012. The report includes four major areas: Environmental Justice Update, Community Events/Public Meetings (including the Speakers Bureau/Visitor Services, Communications Center, and Public Information Center), Business Assistance and Outreach to Business and Federal, State, and Local Governments.

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE UPDATE The following are key environmental justice-related activities in which staff participated during May 2012. These events involve communities which suffer disproportionately from adverse air quality impacts.

 On May 8, staff participated in an environmental justice meeting in Boyle Heights with community stakeholders. This meeting helped identify potential air quality issues in Boyle Heights and the surrounding area. The discussion included a brief history on the Boyle Heights community as well as an update on future projects that might affect local air quality issues.

 On May 16, staff participated in the Inland Empire Asthma Coalition meeting. Staff spoke about air filtration projects in San Bernardino, the Lawn Mower Exchange program and the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The Coalition requested a more detailed briefing on the AQMP which is scheduled for their next meeting in June.

 On May 17, staff led an environmental justice tour in San Bernardino for visiting dignitaries from the Jiangsu Province of China. The tour featured air quality related issues and mitigation efforts that have been implemented in the City of San Bernardino which is part of the Clean Communities Plan pilot program.

 On May 18 and 19, staff met with individuals and organizations interested in submitting funding proposals for Coachella Valley emission reduction projects to be implemented under the AB 1318 Mitigation Fees Fund.

 On May 19, staff represented the District at the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice (CCAEJ) Inland Empire Air Quality Summit. The District was honored as a sponsor of the event which featured presentations and discussion on air quality-related environmental justice issues in the Inland Empire.

 On May 23, staff assisted with an environmental justice tour in Boyle Heights for the Clean Communities Plan Working Group members. The approximately two-hour tour highlighted local air quality issues from heavy industry, traffic sources, and the proximity of residences to potential emissions sources. The tour also showcased the historical landmarks and cultural richness in the Boyle Heights community. There was diverse participation in the tour including representatives of local community groups, staff of elected officials, public agencies, and businesses.

COMMUNITY EVENTS/PUBLIC MEETINGS Each year, thousands of residents engage in valuable information exchanges through events and meetings that AQMD sponsors alone or in partnership with others. Attendees typically receive the following information: tips on reducing their exposure to smog and its health effects, clean air technologies and their deployment, invitations or notices of conferences, seminars, workshops and other public events, ways to participate in AQMD rule and policy development and assistance in resolving air quality-related problems. The events that AQMD staff attended and provided information and updates include:

-2-

 May 2-3 Community Strategy Planning Conference on Clean Air and Better Health in Boyle Heights and Long Beach, California Endowment Center, Los Angeles  May 6-8 International Electric Vehicle Symposium, Los Angeles Convention Center  May 12 7th Annual Cucamonga Challenge, Bike Ride and Run, Central Park, Rancho Cucamonga  May 12 Covina Green Fair, Covina Park  May 15 Transforming Trucking with Natural Gas Conference, Cathedral Plaza, Los Angeles  May 15-17 2012 Alternative Clean Transportation (ACT) Expo, Long Beach Convention Center  May 17 Redlands Health & Fitness Fair, University of Redlands  May 17 Breathmobile Open House, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Colton  May 17 Orange County Green Fair, Civic Center, Santa Ana  May 18 Crescent Elementary School Career Day, Anaheim Hills  May 19 Long Beach Asthma Resource Fair, Admiral Kidd Park  May 19 Inland Valley Clean Air Summit, Riverside Convention Center  May 19 25th Senate District’s Student Honors Luncheon, Cal State Dominquez Hills, Carson  May 19 City of Santa Ana’s 6th Annual Health and Fitness Fair, Centennial Park/Godinez High School  May 19 Ladera Inglewood Health and Wellness Fair, Ladera Senior Center  May 20 2012 Run the Route Event, San Manuel 66ers Stadium, San Bernardino  May 23 City of Pomona Public Works Week Celebration: Open House, City Hall Civic Center  May 23 AQMD’s Boyle Heights Clean Communities Plan Meeting, Salesian High School, Los Angeles  May 24 Partnering for a Greener Future – 5th Annual Navy Sustainability Awareness Fair 2012, Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station  May 24 4th Annual Small Business Expo, Riverside Convention Center  May 30 Mayor’s State of the City Address and Luncheon, Chaffey College, Chino Community Center

-3-

Speakers Bureau/Visitor Services AQMD receives requests for staff to speak on a variety of air quality-related issues. The requests come from organizations such as trade associations, chambers of commerce, community-based groups, schools, hospitals and health-based organizations. AQMD also hosts visitors from around the world who meet with staff on a wide range of air quality issues.

 On May 1, staff provided a general overview presentation on the AQMD and information on air quality to an audience of over 55 people at the Los Angeles County Department of Social Services.

 On May 10, staff provided a general overview presentation on the AQMD and information on air quality to an audience of 40 people at the Grant Neighborhood Association in Long Beach.

 On May 18, staff provided a general overview presentation on the AQMD and information on air quality to 30 students and staff at Crescent Elementary School in Anaheim.

 On May 23, staff served as judge at a Science Fair at Diamond Bar High School and provided information on the AQMD.

Communication Center Statistics The Communication Center handles calls on the AQMD main line, 1-800-CUT- SMOG® line and Spanish line. Calls received in the month of May 2012 are summarized below:

Main Line Calls 2,866 1-800-CUT-SMOG® Line 1,458 After Hours Calls* 483 Spanish Line Calls 67 Total Phone Calls 4,874 * Saturdays, Sundays, holidays and after 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.

-4-

Public Information Center Statistics The Public Information Center (PIC) handles phone calls and walk-in requests for general information. Information for the month of May 2012 is summarized below:

Visitor Transactions 274 Packages Mailed Out 0

Calls Received by PIC Staff 55 Calls to Automated System 1,562 Total Phone Calls 1,617

E-mail Advisories Sent 30,244

BUSINESS ASSISTANCE AQMD assists businesses by notifying them of proposed regulations so they can participate in the development of these rules. AQMD also works with other agencies and governments to identify efficient, cost-effective ways to reduce air pollution and shares that information broadly. Additionally, staff provides personalized assistance to small businesses both over the telephone and by on-site consultation. The information is summarized below.

 Conducted four free on-site consultations  Provided permit application assistance to 179 companies  Issued 17 clearance letters

Types of business assisted:

 Wood products manufacturing  Gas stations  Construction  Air Conditioning  Auto body shops  Restaurants  Powder coating  Dry cleaners  Property/Building management  Paint/Ink manufacturing

-5-

OUTREACH TO BUSINESS AND FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS Field visits and communications were conducted with elected officials or staff from the following cities:

Alhambra, Agoura Hills, Aliso Viejo, Anaheim, Arcadia, Artesia, Avalon, Azusa, Baldwin Park, Banning, Beaumont, Bell, Bell Gardens, Bellflower, Beverly Hills, Big Bear Lake, Bradbury, Brea, Buena Park, Burbank, Calabasas, Calimesa, Canyon Lake, Carson, Cathedral City, Cerritos, Chino, Chino Hills, Claremont, Coachella, Colton, Commerce, Compton, Corona, Costa Mesa, Covina, Cudahy, Culver City, Cypress, Dana Point, Desert Hot Springs, Diamond Bar, Downey, Duarte, Eastvale, El Monte, El Segundo, Fontana, Fountain Valley, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Gardena, Glendale, Glendora, Grand Terrace, Hawaiian Gardens, Hawthorne, Hemet, Hermosa Beach, Hidden Hills, Highland, Huntington Beach, Huntington Park, Indian Wells, Indio, Industry, Inglewood, Irvine, Irwindale, Jurupa Valley, La Cañada Flintridge, La Habra, La Habra Heights, La Mirada, La Palma, La Puente, La Quinta, La Verne, Laguna Beach, Laguna Hills, Laguna Niguel, Laguna Woods, Lake Elsinore, Lake Forest, Lakewood, Lawndale, Loma Linda, Lomita, Long Beach, Los Alamitos, Los Angeles, Lynwood, Malibu, Manhattan Beach, Maywood, Menifee, Mission Viejo, Monrovia, Montclair, Montebello, Monterey Park, Moreno Valley, Murrieta, Newport Beach, Norco, Norwalk, Ontario, Orange, Palm Desert, Palm Springs, Palos Verdes Estates, Paramount, Pasadena, Perris, Pico Rivera, Placentia, Pomona, Rancho Cucamonga, Rancho Mirage, Rancho Palos Verdes, Rancho Santa Margarita, Redlands, Redondo Beach, Rialto, Riverside, Rolling Hills, Rolling Hills Estates, Rosemead, San Bernardino, San Clemente, San Dimas, San Fernando, San Gabriel, San Jacinto, San Juan Capistrano, San Marino, Santa Ana, Santa Clarita, Santa Fe Springs, Santa Monica, Seal Beach, Sierra Madre, Signal Hill, South El Monte, South Gate, South Pasadena, Stanton, Temecula, Temple City, Torrance, Tustin, Upland, Vernon, Villa Park, Walnut, West Covina, West Hollywood, Westlake Village, Westminster, Whittier, Wildomar, Yorba Linda, and Yucaipa.

Visits and/or communications were conducted with elected officials or staff from the following state and federal offices:

 U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein  U.S. Rep. Janice Hahn  U.S. Rep. Grace Napolitano  U.S. Rep. Laura Richardson  U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman  Senator Kevin de León  Senator Alan Lowenthal

-6-

 Senator Fran Pavley  Senator S. Joseph Simitian  Senator Juan Vargas  Senator Rod Wright  Assembly Member Ricardo Lara  Assembly Member Chris Norby  Assembly Member V. Manuel Perez

Staff represented AQMD and/or provided a presentation to the following groups:

Alhambra Chamber of Commerce Breathe California of Los Angeles California Contract Cities Association California Environmental Protection Agency Citizens Climate Lobby, Pasadena/San Gabriel Valley Chapter Diamond Bar High School Five-Mountain Communities Government Affairs Council, Blue Jay Fullerton Chamber of Commerce Gardena Chamber of Commerce Greater Riverside Chambers of Commerce, Riverside Indio Chamber of Commerce Industrial Environmental Coalition of Orange County, Irvine Inglewood Chamber of Commerce Irwindale Chamber of Commerce Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce North Orange County Legislative Alliance, Brea Orange County Council of Governments, Orange Orange County Green Chamber of Commerce, Santa Ana Pasadena Chamber of Commerce Port of Los Angeles Harbor Commission Redlands Chamber of Commerce San Bernardino Association of Governments San Bernardino Chamber of Commerce San Bernardino Unified School District San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments, Pasadena San Gabriel Valley Economic Partnership, Irwindale San Gabriel Valley Mountains Regional Conservancy, Glendora Santa Clarita Valley Chamber of Commerce South Pasadena Chamber of Commerce South Bay Cities Council of Governments, Rancho Palos Verdes San Pedro Chamber of Commerce

-7-

Temecula Chamber of Commerce Upland Chamber of Commerce US Building Council, Inland Empire Chapter Western Riverside Council of Governments, Riverside

-8-

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 12

REPORT: Hearing Board Report

SYNOPSIS: This reports the actions taken by the Hearing Board during the period of May 1 through May 31, 2012.

COMMITTEE: Not Applicable

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file this report.

Edward Camarena Chairman of Hearing Board DP

Two summaries are attached: Rules From Which Variances and Orders for Abatement Were Requested in 2012 and May 2012 Hearing Board Cases.

The total number of appeals filed during the period May 1 to May 31, 2012 is 0; and total number of appeals filed during the period of January 1 to May 31, 2012 is 3.

Rules from which Variances and Order for Abatements were Requested in 2012

2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Action # of HB Actions* Involving Rules 109 0 109(c) 0 109(c)(1) 0 201 0 201.1 0 202 0 202(a) 4 4 202(b) 0 202(c) 1 1 203 0 203(a) 0 203(b) 6 6 204 1 208 0 218 0 218.1 0 218.1(b)(4)(C) 0 218(b)(2) 0 218(c)(1)(A) 0 218(d)(1)(A) 0 218(d)(1)(B) 0 218(f)(2) 0 221(b) 0 221(c) 0 221(d) 0 222 0 401(a) 0 401(b) 0 401(b)(1) 0 401(b)(1)(A) 0 401(b)(1)(B) 0 402 0 403(d)(1) 0 403(d)(1)(A) 0 403(d)(2) 0 404 0 404(a) 0 405 0 405(a) 0 407 0 407(a) 0 407(a) 0 407(a)(1) 0 407(a)(2)(A) 0 Rules from which Variances and Order for Abatements were Requested in 2012

2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Action 410(d) 0 430(b)(3)(A)(iv) 0 431.1 0 431.1 0 431.1(c)(1) 0 431.1(c)(2) 0 431.1(c)(3)(C) 0 431.1(d)(1) 0 431.1(d)(1), Att A(1) 0 442 0 444 0 444(a) 0 444(c) 0 444(d) 0 461 0 461(c)(1) 0 461(c)(1)(A) 0 461(c)(1)(B) 0 461(c)(1)(C) 0 461(c)(1)(E) 0 461(c)(1)(F)(i) 0 461(c)(1)(F)(iv) 0 461(c)(1)(F)(v) 0 461(c)(1)(H) 0 461(c)(2) 0 461(c)(2)(A) 0 461(c)(2)(B) 0 461(c)(2)(C) 0 461(c)(3) 0 461(c)(3)(A) 0 461(c)(3)(B) 0 461(c)(3)(C) 0 461(c)(3)(D)(ii) 0 461(c)(3)(E) 0 461(c)(3)(H) 0 461(c)(3)(M) 0 461(c)(4)(B) 0 461(c)(4)(B)(ii) 0 461(d)(5)(A) 0 461(e)(1) 0 461(e)(2) 0 461(e)(2)(A) 0 461(e)(2)(A)(i) 0 461(e)(2)(B)(i) 0 461(e)(2)(C) 0 461(e)(3) 0 461(e)(3)(A) 0 Rules from which Variances and Order for Abatements were Requested in 2012

2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Action 461(e)(3)(C)(i)(I) 0 461(e)(3)(D) 0 461(e)(3)(E) 0 461(e)(5) 0 461(e)(7) 0 462 0 462(c)(4)(B)(i) 0 462(c)(7)(A)(ii) 0 462(d) 0 462(d)(1) 0 462(d)(1)(A) 0 462(d)(1)(A)(i) 0 462(d)(1)(B) 0 462(d)(1)(C) 0 462(d)(1)(E)(ii) 0 462(d)(1)(F) 0 462(d)(1)(G) 0 462(d)(2)(A)(i) 0 462(e)(1) 0 462(e)(1)(E) 0 462(e)(1)(E)(ii) 0 462(e)(1)(E)(i)(II) 0 462(e)(2)(A)(i) 0 462(e)(4) 0 462(h)(1) 0 463 0 463(c) 0 463(c)(1) 0 463(c)(1)(A)(I)-(iv) 0 463(c)(1)(B) 0 463(c)(1)(C) 0 463(c)(1)(D) 0 463(c)(1)(E) 0 463(c)(2) 0 463(c)(2)(B) 0 463(c)(2)(C) 0 463(c)(3) 0 463(c)(3)(A) 0 463(c)(3)(B) 0 463(c)(3)(C) 0 463(d) 0 463(d)(2) 0 463(e)(3)(C) 0 463(e)(4) 0 463(e)(5)(C) 0 464(b)(1)(A) 0 464(b)(2) 0 Rules from which Variances and Order for Abatements were Requested in 2012

2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Action 468 0 468(a) 0 468(b) 0 1102 0 1102(c)(2) 0 1102(c)(5) 0 1103(d)(2) 0 1105.1(d)(1)(A)(i) 0 1105.1(d)(1)(A)(iii) 0 1106(c)(1) 0 1106.1(c)(1) 0 1106.1(c)(1)(A) 0 1107(c)(1) 0 1107(c)(2) 0 1107(c)(7) 0 1107 0 1110.1 0 1110.2 0 1110.2(c)(14) 0 1110.2(d) 0 1110.2(d)(1)(A) 0 1110.2(d)(1)(B)(ii) 0 1110.2(d)(1)(C) 0 1110.2(d)(1)(D) 0 1110.2(d)(1)(E) 0 1110.2(e)(1)(A) 0 1110.2(e)(1)(B)(i)(II) 0 1110.2(e)(1)(B)(i)(III) 0 1110.2(e)(4)(B) 0 1110.2(f) 0 1110.2(f)(1)(A) 0 1110.2(f)(1)(A)(iii)(l) 0 1113(c)(2) 0 1113(d)(3) 0 1118(c)(4) 0 1118(c)(5) 0 1118(d)(1)(2) 0 1118(d)(1)(2) 0 1118(d)(2) 0 1118(d)(3) 0 1118(d)(4)(B) 0 1118(d)(5)(A) 0 1118(d)(5)(B) 0 1118(d)(10) 0 1118(d)(12) 0 1118(e) 0 1118(g)(1) 0 Rules from which Variances and Order for Abatements were Requested in 2012

2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Action 1118(g)(3) 0 1118(i)(5)(B)(i) 0 1118(i)(5)(B)(ii) 0 1118(j)(1)(A)(ii) 0 1118(j)(1)(B)(ii) 0 1118(j)(1)(C) 0 1121(c)(2)(C) 0 1121(c)(3) 0 1121(c)(6) 0 1121(c)(7) 0 1121(c)(8) 0 1121(e)(3) 0 1121(h) 0 1121(h)(1) 0 1121(h)(2) 0 1121(h)(3) 0 1122(c)(2)(A) 0 1122(c)(2)(E) 0 1122(d)(1)(A) 0 1122(d)(1)(B) 0 1122(d)(3) 0 1122(e)(2)(A) 0 1122(e)(2)(B) 0 1122(e)(2)(C) 0 1122(e)(2)(D) 0 1122(e)(3) 0 1122(e)(4)(A) 0 1122(e)(4)(B) 0 1122(g)(3) 0 1122(j) 0 1124 0 1124(c)(1)(A) 0 1124(c)(1)(E) 0 1124(c)(4) 0 1125(c)(1) 0 1125(c)(1)(C) 0 1125(c)(2) 0 1128(c)(1) 0 1128(c)(2) 0 1130 0 1130(c)(1) 0 1130(c)(4) 0 1131 0 1131(d) 0 1132(d)(2) 0 1132(d)(3) 0 1133(d)(8) 0 Rules from which Variances and Order for Abatements were Requested in 2012

2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Action 1133.2(d)(8) 0 1134(c) 0 1134(c)(1) 0 1134(d) 0 1134(d)(1) 0 1134(d)(2)(B)(ii) 0 1134(f) 0 1134(g)(2) 0 1135(c)(3) 0 1135(c)(3)(B) 0 1135(c)(3)(C) 0 1135(c)(4) 0 1135(c)(4)(D) 0 1136 0 1145(c)(2) 0 1136(c)(1)(A)(i) 0 1137(d)(2) 0 1145(c)(1) 0 1145(c)(2) 0 1145(g)(2) 0 1145(h)(1)(E) 0 1146(c)(7)(B) 0 1146.1(e)(1) 0 1150.1(d)(5) 0 1150.1(d)(6) 0 1150.1(e) 0 1150.1(e)(1)(C) 0 1150.1(e)(2) 0 1150.1(e)(2)(C) 0 1146 0 1146(c)(3)(A) 0 1146(c)(5) 0 1146(d)(6) 0 1146.1 0 1146.1(a)(2) 0 1146.1(a)(8) 0 1146.1(b) 0 1146.1(c)(1) 0 1146.1(c)(2) 2 2 1146.1(c)(3) 0 1146.1(e) 0 1146.1(e)(1)(B) 0 1146.2 0 1146.2(c)(1) 0 1147 0 1150.1 0 1150.1(d)(C)(i) 0 Rules from which Variances and Order for Abatements were Requested in 2012

2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Action 1150.1(d)(1)(C)(i) 0 1150.1(d)(4) 0 1150.1(d)(5) 0 1150.1(d)(6) 0 1150.1(d)(7) 0 1150.1(e) 0 1150.1(e)(1) 0 1150.1(e)(2) 0 1150.1(e)(3) 0 1150.1(e)(1)(B)(C) 0 1150.1(e)(1)(C) 0 1151.1(e)(2)(B)(C) 0 1150.1(e)(2)(C) 0 1150.1(e)(3)(B) 0 1150.1(e)(3)(B)(C) 0 1150.1(e)(3)(C) 0 1150.1(e)(4) 0 1150.1(e)(6)(A)(I) 0 1150.1(e)(6)(A)(ii) 0 1150.1(f)(1)(A)(iii)(I) 0 1150.1(f)(1)(H)(i) 0 1151 0 1151(c)(8) 0 1151(2) 0 1151(5) 0 1151(d)(1) 0 1151(e)(1) 0 1151(e)(2) 0 1151(f)(1) 0 1153(c)(1) 0 1153(c)(1)(B) 0 1156(d)(5)(C)(i) 0 1158 0 1158(d)(2) 0 1158(d)(5) 0 1158(d)(7) 0 1158(d)(7)(A)(ii) 0 1158(d)(10) 0 1164(c)(1)(B) 0 1164(c)(2) 0 1166(c)(2) 0 1166(c)(2)(F) 0 1168 0 1168(c)(1) 0 1168(h)(2) 0 1171 0 1171(c) 0 Rules from which Variances and Order for Abatements were Requested in 2012

2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Action 1171(c)(1) 0 1171(c)(1)(A)(i) 0 1171(c)(1)(b)(i) 0 1171(c)(4) 0 1171(c)(5) 0 1171(c)(5)(A)(i) 0 1171(c)(6) 0 1173 0 1173(c) 0 1173(d) 0 1173(e)(1) 0 1173(f)(1) 0 1173(g) 0 1175 0 1175(c)(2) 0 1175(c)(4)(B) 0 1175(c)(4)(B)(i) 0 1175(c)(4)(B)(ii) 0 1175(c)(4)(B)(ii)(I) 0 1175(b)(1) (C) 0 1175(d)(4)(ii)(II) 0 1176 0 1176(e) 0 1176(e)(1) 0 1176(e)(2) 0 1176(e)(2)(A) 0 1176(e)(2)(A)(ii) 0 1176(e)(2)(B)(v) 0 1178(d)(1)(A)(xiii) 0 1178(d)(1)(A)(xiv) 0 1178(d)(1)(B) 0 1176(f)(3) 0 1178(d)(1)(C) 0 1178(d)(3)(C) 0 1178(d)(3)(D) 0 1178(d)(3)(E) 0 1178(d)(4)(A)(i) 0 1178(g) 0 1186.1 0 1186.1 0 1189(c)(3) 0 1195 0 1195(d)(1)(D) 0 1303 0 1303(a)(1) 0 1303(a)(2) 0 1401 0 Rules from which Variances and Order for Abatements were Requested in 2012

2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Action 1401(d)(1) 0 1401(d)(1)(A) 0 1401(d)(1)(B) 0 1405(d)(3)(C) 0 1407(d) 0 1407(d)(1) 0 1407(d)(2) 0 1407(d)(4) 0 1407(f)(1) 0 1415(d)(3) 0 1418(d)(2)(A) 0 1420 0 1420(g) 0 1421(d) 0 1421(d)(1)(C) 0 1421(d)(1)(G) 0 1421(d)(3)(A) 0 1421(e)(2)(c) 0 1421(e)(1)(A)(vii) 0 1421(e)(3)(B) 0 1421(h)(1)(A) 0 1421(h)(1)(B) 0 1421(h)(1)(C) 0 1421(h)(1)(E) 0 1421(h)(3) 0 1421(i)(1)(C) 0 1425(d)(1)(A) 0 1469 0 1469(c) 0 1469(c)(8) 0 1469(c)(11)(A) 0 1469(d)(5) 0 1469(e)(1) 0 1469(e)(2) 0 1469(g)(2) 0 1469(h) 0 1469(I) 0 1469(j)(4)(A) 0 1469(j)(4)(D) 0 1469(k)(3)(A) 0 1470 1 1 1470(c)(8)(c)(iii)(II) 0 1470(c)(2)(C)(iv) 0 1470(c)(3)(B) 0 1470(c)(3)(C) 0 1470(c)(9) 0 2004 0 Rules from which Variances and Order for Abatements were Requested in 2012

2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Action 2004(b)(1) 0 2004(b)(4) 0 2004(c)(1) 0 2004(c)(1)(C) 0 2004(f)(1) 6 6 2004(f)(2) 0 2004(k) 0 2005 0 2009(b)(2) 0 2009(c) 0 2009(f)(1) 0 2009(f)(2) 0 2009.1 0 2009.1(c) 0 2009.1(f)(1) 0 2009.1(f)(2) 0 2009.1(f)(3) 0 2011 0 2011 Attachment C 0 2011(c)(2) 0 2011(c)(2)(A) 0 2011(c)(2)(B) 0 2011(c)(3)(A) 0 2011(e)(1) 0 2011(f)(3) 0 2011(g) 0 2011(g)(1) 0 2011(k) 0 2011(k) Appen. A, Chap. 2, except E & Attach C 0 2011(k) Appen. A, Chap. 2, Section A.3 a-c, A.5 and B. 1-4 0 and Appen. A, Chap. 2, Section C.2.a, c & d 0 2011(k) Appen. A, Chap. 2, Sections A.3.,a.-c.,e.g. and B.1.-4 0 2012.0 0 2012 Attach. C, B.2.a 0 2012 Appen. A, Attach. C, Section B.2. 0 2012 Appen. A, Attach. C, Section B.2.a. & b. 0 2012 Appen. A 0 2012 Appen. A, Chap. 2 0 2012 Appen A, Chap. 2, Sec. A 0 2012 Appen A. Chap. 2. Sec. A1.g. 0 2012 Appen A, Chap. 2, Sec. B 0 2012 Appen A, Chap. 4.A.4 0 2012(c)(2) 0 2012(c)(2)(A) 0 2012(c)(2)(B) 0 2012(c)(3) 0 2012(c)(3)(A) 0 Rules from which Variances and Order for Abatements were Requested in 2012

2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Action 2012(c)(3)(B) 0 2012(c)(10) 0 2012(d)(2) 0 2012(d)(2)(A) 0 2012(d)(2)(D) 0 2012(f)(2)(A) 1 1 2012(g)(1) 0 2012(g)(3) 0 2012(h)(3) 0 2012(h)(4) 0 2012(h)(5) 0 2012(h)(6) 0 2012(i) 0 2012(j)(1) 0 2012(j)(2) 0 2012, Protocol (Appen. A) Chap. 2, Part A.1.a 0 2012, Protocol (Appen. A) Chap. 2, Part B.4 0 2012(m) 0 2012(m) Appen. A, Chp 2, except Sections E & Attach C. 0 2012(m) Appen. A, Attach. C 0 2012(m) Appen. A, Chap. 2, Sections 2.A.1 a-c, e.g, 0 and B. 1-4 and Appendix A, Chapter 3, Section C.2 a, c & d 0 2012(m) Appen. A, Chap 3, Section (A)(6) 0 2012(m) Appen. A, Chap 5, Para G, Table 5B and Att. D 0 3002 0 3002(a) 0 3002(c) 0 3002(c)(1) 5 5 3002(c)(2) 0 Regulation II 0 Regulation IX 0 Regulation IX, 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart J 0 Regulation XI 0 Regulation XIII 0 H&S 39152(b) 0 H&S 41510 0 H&S 41700 0 H&S 41701 0 H&S 93115.6(c)(2)(C)(1) 0 H&S 42303 0 Rules from which Variances and Order for Abatements were Requested in 2012

2012 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Total Action Report of May 2012 Hearing Board Cases

Case Name and Case No. Rules Reason for Petition District Position/ Type and Length of Variance Excess Emissions Hearing Board Action or Order 1. ExxonMobil Oil 202(a) NOx limits will be Not IV & AOC dismissed without N/A Corporation 203(b) exceeded on restart of Opposed/Dismissed prejudice for lack of good Case No. 1183-466 2004(f)(1) boiler after repair. cause. J. Panasiti 3002(c)(1) 2. Linn Operating Inc 203(b) Petitioner’s newly Not Opposed/Granted SV granted commencing CO: 135.4 lbs/day Case No. 5711-8 2004(f)(1) purchased and installed 5/3/12 and continuing through NOx: 2.99 lbs/day J. Voge 3002(c)(1) flare is not operating in 6/12/12 for the RV hearing. compliance with its NOx and CO permit emission limits and/or BACT. These limits were based on manufacturer guarantees. Petitioner needs to operate the flare on a limited basis, while it determines whether the flare can comply or a replacement is needed. 3. Los Angeles County 203(a) Petitioner may need to Not Opposed/Granted SV granted commencing upon PM: 0.247 lbs/hour Sheriff’s Dept 1470(c)(2)(C)(i)(I) operate standby notification pursuant to per generator Case No. 4270-3 emergency engines Condition No. 4 and shall J. Voge without filters in the event continue for 90 days or until the of a power outage. installation and testing of the particulate filters occur, whichever comes first. 4. Los Angeles County 3002(c)(1) Petitioner may need to Not Opposed/Granted SV granted commencing upon PM: 0.247 lbs/hour Sheriff’s Dept operate standby notification pursuant to per generator Case No. 4270-3 emergency engines Condition No. 4 and shall (Consent Calendar without filters in the event continue for 90 days or until the J. Voge) of a power outage. installation and testing of the particulate filters occur, whichever comes first. 5. Pacific Oil and Gas 461(e)(5) GDF vent lines blocked, Not Opposed/Granted Ex Parte EV granted None Company cannot pass required commencing 5/22/12 and Case No. 5879-1 tests. continuing through to the EV J. Panasiti hearing currently scheduled for 5/23/12.

1 6. Pacific Oil and Gas 461(e)(5) GDF vent lines blocked, Not Opposed/ Granted EV upon stipulation changed to None Company cannot pass required IV granted commencing Case No. 5879-1 tests. 5/23/12 and continuing for 90 J. Panasiti days or until the RV hearing currently scheduled for 7/11/12, whichever comes first. 7. Paramount Petroleum 202(b) Petitioner intends to Not Opposed/Granted SV granted for 72 non- NOx: TBD by 5/31/12 Corporation 203(b) upgrade its ammonia consecutive hours in a window Case No. 2914-115 2004(f)(1) control system for its of time commencing 5/16/12 NH3: TBD by 5/31/12 M. Reichert 3002(c)(1) Cogeneration Unit during and continuing through a planned maintenance 5/31/12. period. To tune the system properly, it needs to do so while the Cogeneration Unit is in operation in violation of its permit. 8. SCAQMD vs. Frito- 1303 Respondent installed and Stipulated/Issued Mod. O/A issued commencing N/A Lay, Inc. operates an oil mist 5/11/12 and continuing through Case No. 5141-5 eliminator on its chip fryer 11/30/12. The Hearing Board N. Feldman line in compliance with shall retain jurisdiction until the original O/A. The 11/30/12. District requires additional time beyond the final compliance date of that order to complete a BACT determination as contemplated therein. 9. SCAQMD vs. Los 1146.2(c)(3) Respondent operates Stipulated/Issued O/A issued commencing N/A Angeles Unified 1146.2(e) noncompliant boiler. 5/22/12 and continuing through School District, La 10/31/13. The Hearing Board Salle Elementary shall retain jurisdiction over this School matter until 10/31/13. Case No. 3985-8 N. Sanchez 10. SGL Technic Inc., 203(b) Critical component (98% Not Opposed/Granted IV granted commencing None Polycarbon Division 2004(f)(1) nitric acid) for production 5/31/12 and continuing for 90 Case No. 3923-8 of primary feedstock days or until the RV hearing M. Reichert material became currently scheduled for unavailable. Petitioner 7/18/12, whichever comes first. seeks to use unpermitted process to meet customer demand for product.

2 11. WWL Vehicle Services 203(a) Petitioner has a non- Not Opposed/Denied EX Parte EV denied N/A Americas, Inc. operational mobile Case No. 5875-1 refueling truck. Petitioner T. Barrera seeks to operate a replacement truck without vapor recovery equipment until its permanent truck is repaired or replaced. Acronyms AOC: Alternative Operating Conditions BACT: Best Available Control Technology CEMS: Continuous Emissions Monitoring System CO: Carbon Monoxide EV: Emergency Variance FCD: Final Compliance Date GDF: Gasoline Dispensing Facility H2S: Hydrogen Sulfide H&S: Health & Safety Code ICE: Internal Combustion Engine I/P: Increments of Progress IV: Interim Variance MFCD/EXT: Modification of a Final Compliance Date and Extension of a Variance Mod. O/A: Modification of an Order for Abatement NH3: Ammonia NOV: Notice of Violation NOx: Oxides of Nitrogen N/A: Not Applicable O/A: Order for Abatement PM: Particulate Matter PPM: Parts Per Million RATA: Relative Accuracy Test Audit ROG: Reactive Organic Gases RTO: Regenerative Thermal Oxidizer RV: Regular Variance SCR: Selective Catalytic Reduction SOx: Oxides of Sulfur SV: Short Variance TBD: To be determined VOC: Volatile Organic Compound VRS: Vapor Recovery System

3

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 13

REPORT: Civil Filings and Civil Penalties Report

SYNOPSIS: This reports the monthly penalties from May 1 through May 31, 2012, and legal actions filed by the District Prosecutor during May 1 through May 31, 2012. An Index of District Rules is attached with the penalty report.

COMMITTEE: Stationary Source, June 15, 2012, Reviewed

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file this report.

Kurt R. Wiese General Counsel KRW:lc ______

Violations Civil Actions Filed

2 FAUSTO VERGARA PONCE dba MONICA’S CLEANERS* Los Angeles Superior Court – Central Court Case No. LAM12M0420; Filed: 5.1.12 (PH) P56420, P56441 R. 203 – Permit to Operate R. 1421 – Control of Perchloroethylene Emissions from Dry Cleaning Operations

2 DAVID FARSHID SINAI dba CLASSIC OIL INC. Los Angeles Superior Court – Central Court Case No. 12K07271; Filed: 5.14.12 (NAS) P35774, P54013 R. 461 – Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing

2 ANTONE ELIAS NINO dba AAA GAS INC. Superior Court Northeast District – Van Nuys Branch Court Case No. 12E05280; Filed: 5.13.12 (NAS) Hearing Board Case Nos. 5795-1 and 5833-1 R. 203 – Permit to Operate R. 461 – Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing

6 Violations 3 Cases

*Small Claims Court Filing

ATTACHMENTS May 2012 Penalty Report Index of District Rules and Regulations

2 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT District Prosecutor's Office

May 2012 Penalty Report

Total Penalties

Civil Penalties: $724,100.00 MSPAP Penalties: $68,410.00 Hearing Board Penalties: $2,000.00

Total Cash Penalties: $794,510.00 Total SEP Value: $0.00

Fiscal Year through May 2012 Cash Total: $4,541,309.31 Fiscal Year through May 2012 SEP Value Only Total: $216,953.00

FAC COMPANY RULE RECLAIM SETTLED ATTY NOTICE TOTAL ID NAME NUMBER ID DATE INT NO SETTLEMENT

CIVIL PENALTIES:

Page 1 of 11 FAC COMPANY RULE RECLAIM SETTLED ATTY NOTICE TOTAL ID NAME NUMBER ID DATE INT NO SETTLEMENT

17171 AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF SOUTHERN CALIFORN 2202 5/29/2012 TRB P55272 $35,000.00 2202 P55271 2202 P55270

157732 BENJAMIN MOORE & CO. 1113 5/18/2012 JMP P55493 $15,000.00

800022 CALNEV PIPE LINE, LLC 1178, 3002(C)(1) 5/7/2012 NAS P37219 $10,000.00

800189 DISNEYLAND RESORT 1107 Y 5/25/2012 JMP P50619 $50,000.00

166071 FIRESTONE BUILDING PRODUCTS 1168 5/16/2012 NSF P55149 $400,000.00

161993 GST INTERNATIONAL 1113(C)(2) 5/2/2012 JMP P55491 $2,000.00

160361 INLAND AMERICAN LODGING GARDEN GROVE 222, 203(A), 1415 5/29/2012 KCM P58552 $2,250.00

108620 KRYSTAL INFINITY, LLC 3002(C)(1) 5/30/2012 JGV P57665 $600.00

21505 LA CITY COLLEGE 203 (A) 5/3/2012 JGV P55978 $1,000.00

141295 LEKOS DYE AND FINISHING, INC 2004 Y 5/10/2012 KCM P57055 $43,500.00 $10,000 suspended penalties so long as compliant with 2004, 2012 P52574 RECLAIM and compliant with terms stated in settlement 2012(E)(2)(B) P52570 agreement; including timely payments. 2012, 2004

Page 2 of 11 FAC COMPANY RULE RECLAIM SETTLED ATTY NOTICE TOTAL ID NAME NUMBER ID DATE INT NO SETTLEMENT

2004 P57053 2004 P57061

89050 LOS ANGELES MISSION COLLEGE 201, 203(A) 5/30/2012 NAS P58168 $4,000.00

3029 MATCHMASTER DYEING & FINISHING INC 2004 Y 5/3/2012 JMP P52180 $9,000.00 2004(D) P52571 2004 P52575

142433 NP GAS INC 461(C)(2)(B) 5/29/2012 PH P58633 $450.00 small claims filing 41960.2

115767 ON LINE GRAPHICS, INC. 203 (B), 1469 5/17/2012 KCM P56074 $900.00

150947 PACIFIC CLAY PRODUCTS INC 201, 203(A) 5/25/2012 NSF P30659 $100,000.00 203(A), 203 (B), Title 13 P53345 2004 P50338 403(D)(1) P53337 403 P30663

800168 PASADENA CITY, DWP (EIS USE) 429, 3002(C)(1) Y 5/29/2012 MJR P51970 $1,000.00 $3,000 stipulated penalty that requires PWP to conduct 2004(F)(1) additional training during all operating hours at least one 2004(F)(1) P37217 employee to be present & familiar with rule/permit 3002(C)(1) requirements and have technical and/or mechanical expertise to ensure compliance & must certify training by 8/31/12.

126672 RANCHO SPRINGS MEDICAL CENTER 222, 1146.2, 1415.1 5/3/2012 JGV P58030 $30,000.00

Page 3 of 11 FAC COMPANY RULE RECLAIM SETTLED ATTY NOTICE TOTAL ID NAME NUMBER ID DATE INT NO SETTLEMENT

203 (A) 1146.2 P58038

157406 SAN BERNARDINO CITY USD, WHAA 203 (A) 5/25/2012 NSF P46742 $4,000.00 203 (A) P46725 203 (A) P46736 203 (A) P46737 203 (A) P46738 203 (A) P46739 203 (A) P46740 203 (A) P46741

101977 SIGNAL HILL PETROLEUM INC 2012(C)(3)(A) 5/2/2012 NSF P37218 $2,500.00

30909 SO CAL EDISON CO 203(B), 462 5/8/2012 KCM P51149 $3,700.00

119464 STEAMER CLEANERS, H MANUELIAN, DBA 203 (A), 1402 5/23/2012 JGV P56266 $400.00

155149 STREIGHT EDJE CUSTOM PAINT, M MCCLEL 203 (A) 5/23/2012 JGV P58013 $100.00

158265 SUPER 8 GAS CORPORATION 41960.2 5/23/2012 NAS P54554 $4,000.00 203, 461(C)(1)(A) 461 P49221 203, 461, 41960.2 P54398 41960.3, 41960.4

128698 UNIQUE CLEANERS 1102 5/22/2012 TRB P53427 $500.00 203 (A)

Page 4 of 11 FAC COMPANY RULE RECLAIM SETTLED ATTY NOTICE TOTAL ID NAME NUMBER ID DATE INT NO SETTLEMENT

160719 W PLASTICS INC. DBA WESTERN PLASTICS 201, 203(B) 5/30/2012 JGV P58033 $4,200.00

TOTAL CIVIL PENALTIES: $724,100.00

MSPAP SETTLEMENTS:

79776 2000 CSTORE, INC 461(C)(2)(B), 41960.2 5/18/2012 P59023 $360.00

159464 A B PETROLEUM 461 5/17/2012 P56782 $410.00

121759 ACE CLEANERS 203(B), 1421 5/22/2012 P55618 $4,500.00

121759 ACE CLEANERS 203(B), 1421 5/22/2012 P55616 $3,900.00

167301 AJ AUTO BODY 109, 203(A) 5/16/2012 P57130 $1,100.00

141126 AM/PM OF DIAMOND BAR 461(C)(2)(B) 5/17/2012 P58373 $500.00

149235 AMF ANAHEIM LLC 3002(C)(1) 5/3/2012 P56073 $650.00

41167 ANDY'S AUTO CENTER, INC. 41960.2 5/11/2012 P59037 $585.00 461(C)(2)(B)

142287 ANGEL'S GAS AND MART, SOON HWAN OH D 461 5/30/2012 P59117 $585.00

Page 5 of 11 FAC COMPANY RULE RECLAIM SETTLED ATTY NOTICE TOTAL ID NAME NUMBER ID DATE INT NO SETTLEMENT

123899 ART'S AUTO BODY & PAINT SHOP 203 (A) 5/4/2012 P54140 $600.00

158488 BEAUMONT SERVICE STATION INC. 203 (B) 5/30/2012 P57796 $2,200.00

159485 BOB KASHANI 41960.2 5/22/2012 P59036 $490.00 461(C)(2)(B)

107632 BRYAN ARCO,MORCOS KHALIL BENYAMIN 461(C)(2)(B) 5/10/2012 P58634 $300.00 41960.2

108434 CALEX ENGINEERING COMPANY 203(A) 5/22/2012 P49291 $600.00

167614 CALIFORNIA PACIFIC DRILLING 203 5/8/2012 P49149 $550.00

141220 CASDEN PARK LA BREA B LLC 203 (A) 5/11/2012 P57933 $600.00

127764 CENTRAL JUVENILE HALL (GIRLS) 203 5/10/2012 P51582 $1,600.00

127384 CIRCLE K STORES INC. #2705786 203(B), 41960.2 5/11/2012 P59856 $790.00 461(C)(2)(A)

141103 CITY OF ALHAMBRA/ALHAMBRA POLICE DEP 203(B), 1470 5/17/2012 P48478 $1,200.00

148453 CITY OF HIGHLAND 203 (B) 5/11/2012 P58957 $1,200.00

Page 6 of 11 FAC COMPANY RULE RECLAIM SETTLED ATTY NOTICE TOTAL ID NAME NUMBER ID DATE INT NO SETTLEMENT

15481 COASTCRAFT RUBBER CO 1146.2 5/3/2012 P54746 $550.00

144505 COLLEGE HOSPITAL, INC. 1470 5/3/2012 P52983 $410.00

158808 CONICO LOMITA LLC. 41960.2 5/11/2012 P56689 $620.00 461(C)(2)(B)

161161 CONVENIENCE RETAILERS, LLC #2705946 203(B), 206, 461 5/22/2012 P59858 $2,950.00

152228 COX PETROLEUM TRANSPORT 461 5/29/2012 P57795 $690.00

169233 DOUBLE TREE 203 (A), 222 5/29/2012 P57667 $600.00

169233 DOUBLE TREE 203(A), 222, 1470 5/29/2012 P57670 $600.00

103052 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 1110.2 5/25/2012 P58034 $338.00

158174 EKD FUEL CORP 461(C)(1)(A) 5/25/2012 P58517 $300.00

43870 FONTANA UNI SCH DIST 203(A) 5/31/2012 P54698 $400.00

158113 G & M OIL CO, LLC #187 461 5/10/2012 P58643 $500.00

130675 GENERAL PETROLEUM/PACIFIC PRIDE 461 5/25/2012 P59008 $680.00

126847 GLENDALE PLAZA 1146.1 5/31/2012 P56284 $640.00

Page 7 of 11 FAC COMPANY RULE RECLAIM SETTLED ATTY NOTICE TOTAL ID NAME NUMBER ID DATE INT NO SETTLEMENT

164986 GLENDORA TREE SURGERY 203 5/18/2012 P49150 $650.00

156762 GOLDEN VALLEY CONSTRUCTION INC 403 5/16/2012 P54699 $1,600.00 403 P59250

70023 GRAND AVENUE MEDICAL JOINT VENTURE 1470 5/10/2012 P58809 $1,300.00 222 203 (B)

165097 HENRY'S TRACTOR 403(D)(1) 5/16/2012 P53433 $900.00 403(D)(2)

99869 J & R SERVICE STATION, BOUQUET MOBIL 41960.2 5/25/2012 P52230 $550.00

168295 K.S.I. METALS 203(A) 5/10/2012 P49286 $600.00

138755 KELLY'S SHELL, KHALIL KHOURY DBA 41960.2 5/30/2012 P59029 $500.00 461

13302 LA CO., ENGINEERING DEPT, WHITEMAN A 461 5/29/2012 P58171 $750.00

163506 LBA IVPPI, LLC 201 5/22/2012 P58860 $500.00 203 (A)

164400 LARRY & BOB'S MINI MARKET, INC. 41960.2 5/10/2012 P59206 $1,100.00 461(C)(2)(B)

156502 M & A INDUSTRIES 461, 41960.2 5/22/2012 P56779 $500.00

153576 MATICH CORPORATION CABAZON PLANT 203 (B) 5/1/2012 P57546 $550.00

170195 MIKE ROVNER CONSTRUCTION INC. 403(D)(1) 5/22/2012 P57970 $600.00

Page 8 of 11 FAC COMPANY RULE RECLAIM SETTLED ATTY NOTICE TOTAL ID NAME NUMBER ID DATE INT NO SETTLEMENT

148217 NORTH AMERICA ENTERPRISE INVESTMENT 461 5/22/2012 P59024 $750.00

139334 PACIFIC WEST GENERAL STORE, INC. 461, 41960.2 5/1/2012 P58521 $1,125.00

151742 PALMIRA ASSOCIATES, INC. 461 5/1/2012 P59011 $1,100.00

14357 PENHALL CO 203 (A) 5/23/2012 P57856 $550.00

5076 PIONEER CIRCUITS INC 203 (A) 5/23/2012 P58909 $600.00

132269 REMINGTON PLAZA HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATI 203(B), 1470 5/2/2012 P57940 $1,200.00

104880 RIV CO, TRANSPORTAION DEPT 403 5/15/2012 P59251 $3,710.00

142642 SAND CANYON OIL CORPORATION/SAND CYN 41960.2 5/1/2012 P59209 $360.00 461(C)(2)(B)

119135 SCI CALIFORNIA FUNERAL SERVICE 461 5/23/2012 P56883 $600.00

170320 SEA GATE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1403 5/3/2012 P53073 $2,750.00 1403 P53074

140518 SHAN COR 461 5/31/2012 P56821 $975.00

157667 SHORENSTEIN REALITY SERVICES 1415 5/29/2012 P58864 $825.00

61536 SPECIALTY FINISHES CO 3003, 3004 5/25/2012 P52312 $1,800.00

Page 9 of 11 FAC COMPANY RULE RECLAIM SETTLED ATTY NOTICE TOTAL ID NAME NUMBER ID DATE INT NO SETTLEMENT

167199 STARSHINE MOBIL KINETIC ENERGY, INC 461(E)(2)(A) 5/23/2012 P59854 $550.00

123688 TARGET CORPORATION,TARGET PASADENA T 1470 5/25/2012 P48485 $550.00 203 (B)

115286 THE CHEVY SHOP, BERT ERIC MANTILLA 109, 203(A) 5/22/2012 P57133 $1,100.00

147879 THE HOME DEPOT 203 (B) 5/29/2012 P57544 $722.00

143241 TRUMAN FUEL 41960.2 5/30/2012 P59214 $330.00 461(C)(2)(B)

74824 UNITED OIL, RAPID GAS #27 203(B), 41960.2 5/3/2012 P58142 $720.00 461(C)(2)(B)

134301 UNIVERSAL CITY GAS & MART 461 5/31/2012 P59014 $420.00

117825 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELE 203(B), 1470 5/23/2012 P57939 $550.00

157864 URBAN TREE CARE, INC. Title 13 5/25/2012 P56027 $75.00

170077 VANTAGE LED 109, 201, 203(A) 5/23/2012 P58061 $1,650.00

53788 VICTOR'S PAINT & BODY 203(A) 5/11/2012 P58167 $600.00

23399 WEST HILLS HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENT 1146 5/31/2012 P53939 $1,200.00

Page 10 of 11 FAC COMPANY RULE RECLAIM SETTLED ATTY NOTICE TOTAL ID NAME NUMBER ID DATE INT NO SETTLEMENT

158710 WVC RANCHO MIRAGE, INC. 203, 1470 5/18/2012 P58324 $1,500.00

HEARING BOARD SETTLEMENTS:

156672 AAA GASOLINE, NORTH HOLLYWOOD 461 5/15/2012 NAS HRB2054 $1,000.00 Hearing Board Case No. 58334 Facility entered into a stipulated Order for Abatement in February 13, 2011 and failed to install and successfully

165209 WESTCOAST PLATING, INC. 1469 5/8/2012 JMP HRB2053 $1,000.00 Hearing Board Case No. 58401 Monthly stipulated until permits obtained for plating line.

TOTAL HEARING BOARD SETTLEMENTS: $2,000.00

Total Penalties

Civil Penalties: $724,100.00 MSPAP Penalties: $68,410.00 Hearing Board Penalties: $2,000.00

Total Cash Penalties: $794,510.00 Total SEP Value: $0.00

Fiscal Year through May 2012 Cash Total: $4,541,309.31 Fiscal Year through May 2012 SEP Value Only Total: $216,953.00

Page 11 of 11 DISTRICT RULES AND REGULATIONS INDEX FOR MAY 2012 PENALTY REPORTS

REGULATION I - GENERAL PROVISIONS

Rule 109 Recordkeeping for Volatile Organic Compound Emissions (Amended 5/2/03)

REGULATION II – PERMITS

List and Criteria Identifying Information Required of Applicants Seeking A Permit to Construct from the South Coast Air Quality Management - District (Amended 4/10/98)

Rule 201 Permit to Construct (Amended 12/3/04) Rule 203 Permit to Operate (Amended 12/3/04) Rule 206 Posting of Permit to Operate (Amended 10/8/93) Explains how and where permits are to be displayed Rule 222 Filing Requirements for Specific Emission Sources Not Requiring a Written permit Pursuant to Regulation II. (Amended 5/19/00)

REGULATION IV - PROHIBITIONS

Rule 403 Fugitive Dust (Amended 12/11/98) Pertains to solid particulate matter emitted from man-made activities. Rule 429 Start-Up and Shutdown Exemption Provisions for Oxides of Nitrogen (Amended 12/21/90) Rule 461 Gasoline Transfer and Dispensing (Amended 6/15/01 Rule 462 Organic Liquid Loading (Amended 5/14/99)

REGULATION XI - SOURCE SPECIFIC STANDARDS

Rule 1102 Petroleum Solvent Dry Cleaners Rule 1107 Coating of Metal Parts and Products (Amended 11/17/00) Rule 1110.2 Emissions from Gaseous- and Liquid-Fueled Internal Combustion Engines (Amended 11/14/97) Rule 1113 Architectural Coatings (Amended 6/20/01) Rule 1146 Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Industrial, Institutional and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters (Amended Rule) Rule 1146.1 Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Small Industrial, Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters (Amended 5/13/94) Rule 1146.2 Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Large Water Heaters and Small Boilers (Adopted 1/9/98) Rule 1168 Adhesive and Sealant Applications (Amended 9/15/00) Rule 1178 Further Reductions of VOC Emissions from Storage Tanks at Petroleum Facilities (Amended 4/7/06)

REGULATION XIV - TOXICS

Rule 1402 Control of Toxic Air Contaminants from Existing Sources (Amended 3/17/00) Rule 1403 Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities (Amended 4/8/94) Rule 1415 Reduction of Refrigerant Emissions from Stationary Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Systems (Amended 10/14/94) Rule 1421 Control of Perchloroethylene Emissions from Dry Cleaning Operations (Amended 6/13/97) Rule 1469 Hexavalent Chromium Emissions From Chrome Plating and Chromic Acid Anodizing Operations (Adopted 10/9/98) Rule 1470 Requirements for Stationary Diesel-Fueled Internal Combustion and Other Compression Ignition Engines

REGULATION XX - REGIONAL CLEAN AIR INCENTIVES MARKET (RECLAIM)

Rule 2004 Requirements (Amended 4/6/07) Rule 2012 Requirements for Monitoring, Reporting, and Recordkeeping for Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Emissions (Amended 5/6/05) Rule 2202 On-Road Motor Vehicle Mitigation Options (Amended 10/9/98)

REGULATION XXX - TITLE V PERMITS

Rule 3002 Requirements (Amended 11/14/97) Rule 3003 Applications (Amended 3/16/01) Rule 3004 Permit Types and Content (Amended 12/12/97)

CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE § 41700

41960 Gasoline Vapor Recovery

CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS

Title 13 Mobile Sources and Fuels

f:\laura\boardltr\2012\rules-may2012.doc

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 14

REPORT: Lead Agency Projects and Environmental Documents Received by the AQMD

SYNOPSIS: This report provides, for the Board’s consideration, a listing of CEQA documents received by the AQMD between May 1, 2012, and May 31, 2012, and those projects for which the AQMD is acting as lead agency pursuant to CEQA.

COMMITTEE: Mobile Source, June 15, 2012, Reviewed

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer EC:LT:SN:SS:IM:AK

Background CEQA Document Receipt and Review Logs (Attachments A and B) – Each month, the AQMD receives numerous CEQA documents from other public agencies on projects that could adversely affect air quality. A listing of all documents received during the reporting period of May 1, 2012 through May 31, 2012, is contained in Attachment A. A list of active projects from previous reporting periods for which AQMD staff is continuing to evaluate or prepare comments is included as Attachment B.

The Intergovernmental Review function, which consists of reviewing and commenting on the adequacy of the air quality analysis in CEQA documents prepared by other lead agencies, is consistent with the Board’s 1997 Environmental Justice Guiding Principles and Initiative #4. Consistent with the Environmental Justice Program Enhancements for FY 2002-03 approved by the Board in September 2002, each of the attachments notes those proposed projects where the AQMD has been contacted regarding potential air quality-related environmental justice concerns. The AQMD has established an internal central contact to receive information on projects with potential air quality-related environmental justice concerns. The public may contact the AQMD about projects of concern by the following means: in writing via fax, e-mail, or standard letters; through telephone communication; as part of oral comments at AQMD meetings or other meetings where AQMD staff is present; or submitting newspaper articles. The attachments also identify for each project the dates of the public comment period and the public hearing date, if known at the time the CEQA document is received by the AQMD.

At the January 6, 2006 Board meeting, the Board approved the Workplan for the Chairman’s Clean Port Initiatives. One action item of the Chairman’s Initiatives was to prepare a monthly report describing CEQA documents for projects related to goods movement and to make full use of the process to ensure the air quality impacts of such projects are thoroughly mitigated. In response to describing goods movement CEQA documents, Attachments A and B were reorganized to group projects of interest into the following categories: goods movement projects; schools; landfills and wastewater projects; airports; and general land use projects; etc. In response to the mitigation component, guidance information on mitigation measures were compiled into a series of tables relative to the following equipment: off-road engines, on-road engines, harbor craft, ocean-going vessels, locomotives, and fugitive dust. These mitigation measure tables are on the CEQA webpages portion of the AQMD’s website. Staff will continue compiling tables of mitigation measures for other emission sources including airport ground support equipment, etc.

As resources permit, staff focuses on reviewing and preparing comments for projects: where the AQMD is a responsible agency; that may have significant adverse regional air quality impacts (e.g., special event centers, landfills, goods movement, etc.); that may have localized or toxic air quality impacts (e.g., warehouse and distribution centers); where environmental justice concerns have been raised; and those projects for which a lead or responsible agency has specifically requested AQMD review.

During the period May 1, 2012, through May 31, 2012, the AQMD received 74 CEQA documents. Of the total of 97 documents listed in Attachments A and B:

• 21 comment letters were sent; • 15 documents were reviewed, but no comments were made; • 57 documents are currently under review; • 2 documents did not require comments (e.g., public notices, plot plans, Final Environmental Impact Reports); and • 2 document was not reviewed.

Copies of all comment letters sent to lead agencies can be found on the AQMD’s CEQA webpage at the following internet address: www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/letters.html.

2

AQMD Lead Agency Projects (Attachment C) – Pursuant to CEQA, the AQMD periodically acts as lead agency for stationary source permit projects. Under CEQA, the lead agency is responsible for determining whether an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or a Negative Declaration (ND) is appropriate for any proposal considered to be a “project” as defined by CEQA. An EIR is prepared when the AQMD, as lead agency, finds substantial evidence that the proposed project may have significant adverse effects on the environment. A ND or Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) may be prepared if the AQMD determines that the proposed project will not generate significant adverse environmental impacts, or the impacts can be mitigated to less than significance. The ND and MND are written statements describing the reasons why proposed projects will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and, therefore, do not require the preparation of an EIR.

Attachment C to this report summarizes the active projects for which the AQMD is lead agency and is currently preparing or has prepared environmental documentation. Through the end of May, the AQMD received one new request to be the lead agency for a stationary source permit application project. No CEQA documents for permit application projects were certified in May. As noted in Attachment C, through the end of May 2012, the AQMD continued working on the CEQA documents for six active projects.

In 2012, AQMD staff has been responsible for preparing or having prepared CEQA documents for eight CEQA documents, five continuing from 2011. One project was withdrawn by the project proponent in January. Through the end of May 2012, one CEQA document has been certified for a permit application project.

Attachments A. Incoming CEQA Documents Log B. Ongoing Active Projects for Which AQMD Has or Will Conduct a CEQA Review C. Active AQMD Lead Agency Projects

3

ATTACHMENT A** INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012

SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Airports This document consists of a notice of availability of a Draft EIR and notice of community open Other March Joint Currently LAC120508-02 house. The proposed project consists of construction of a 150,000 square-foot concrete aircraft Powers Authority under review parking apron; construction of a connecting taxilane to Taxiway A; realignment and extension of a March Joint Port Airport General service road to connect with an existing on-airport emergency/service road; drainage improvements; Aviation Facilities construction of two 10,000 square-foot General Aviation aircraft hangars; parking lot and access road construction; installation of a 10,000-gallon aboveground aircraft fuel storage tank; and demolition of an existing 2,000 square-foot structure. Comment Period: 5/3/2012 - 6/18/2012 Public Hearing: 6/7/2012 Airports This document consists of a notice of preparation of an Environmental Assessment. The proposed Other Federal Aviation AQMD SBC120510-04 project would improve the Runway 8R-26L object free area to Chino Airport. Administration commented 5/29/2012 Improvements to the Runway 8R-26L Object Free Area at the Chino Airport, San Bernardino Comment Period: 5/10/2012 - 6/11/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Airports This document consists of a notice of availability for review and comment on the Draft EIS for the Other National Guard Currently SBC120511-02 Conversion of F-16 Fighting Falcon aircraft and operations to the F-15 Eagle aircraft and operations Bureau under review for the 144th Fighter Wing at Fresno-Yosemite International Airport in Fresno, California and the F-15 Aircraft Conversion EIS, 114th 144 FW Detachment 1 at March Air Reserve Base in Moreno Valley. Fighter Wing, California Air National Guard Fresno-Yosemite International Airport Comment Period: 5/11/2012 - 6/25/2012 Public Hearing: 6/5/2012 General Land Use (residential, etc.) The proposed project consists of a 58-acre development area, including 44 acres of new onsite DEIR County of Los Currently LAC120503-01 development. The 44-acre area would be developed with a maximum of 555,950 square feet, Angeles under review including 12 soundstages, six production offices, six mills, six writer/producer bungalows, one Disney/ABC Studios at the Ranch warehouse, one commissary, and one administration building. Project Comment Period: 5/4/2012 - 6/18/2012 Public Hearing: N/A General Land Use (residential, etc.) The proposed project consists of the subdivision of an approximately 24-acre property into seven NOP/IS City of Malibu AQMD LAC120511-04 individual parcels for the development of five new single-family residences and associated accessory commented structures, landscaping, a new private gated road with a guardhouse, and dedication of an 5/29/2012 Crummer Site Subdivision approximately 24-acre property into seven individual parcels for the development of five new single family residences and associated accessory structures. Comment Period: 5/10/2012 - 6/11/2012 Public Hearing: N/A **Sorted by Land Use Type (in alpha order), followed by County, then date received. DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐1 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE General Land Use (residential, etc.) This document consists of a Final EIR. The proposed project consists of analyzing two different FEIR City of Los Angeles Currently LAC120517-01 project development options. Option A would remove the existing hotel and construct two 49-story under review buildings containing 293 residential dwelling units and a mix of office, hotel and retail uses. Option Century Plaza Mixed-Use Development B would construct a similar mixed-use development but would rehabilitate and integrate the existing hotel into the project design. The net increase for Option A is 684,409 square feet and for Option B is 774,964 square feet of floor area. Both Option A and B would include an approximately two-acre publicly accessible plaza. Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A General Land Use (residential, etc.) This document consists of a Final EIR. The proposed project consists of removing the Beverly FEIR City of Los Angeles Currently LAC120518-04 Fairfax building and developing a six-story mixed-use building, which would contain 71 residential under review condominium units over 3 commercial condominium units (approximately 11,454 square feet of Beverly & Fairfax Mixed-Use Project commercial/retail land uses, which could include a maximum of 5,000 square feet of restaurant use). Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A General Land Use (residential, etc.) This document consists of a public notice for the Pacific Battleship Center - Development of the Other Port of Los Currently LAC120523-01 USS Iowa Project at Berths 87-89. Angeles under review

Pacific Battleship Center - Development of the USS Iowa Project at Berths 87-89 Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: 6/7/2012 General Land Use (residential, etc.) The proposed project consists of an 18-unit multi-family residential townhome complex within eight Mitigated ND City of Agoura Currently LAC120523-02 buildings on a 0.94-acre parcel. Hills under review

Hillel 18-Unit Townhome Project Comment Period: 5/24/2012 - 6/25/2012 Public Hearing: N/A General Land Use (residential, etc.) The proposed project consists of the development of a senior-restricted for-sale residential NOP/IS City of Rancho Currently LAC120530-01 community. The proposed project would include 60 attached residential units at an overall density of Palos Verdes under review 6.15 units per acre. Crestridge Senior Housing Project Comment Period: 5/30/2012 - 6/29/2012 Public Hearing: 6/26/2012 General Land Use (residential, etc.) The proposed project consists of mass grading of the 25-acre Jefferson Crosswinds site and the 18- Mitigated ND City of Murrieta Currently ORC120516-01 acre Import site. The project would take/cut approximately 237,500 cubic yards of soil from the under review Jefferson Crosswinds site to place/fill onto the Import site, which would level and prepare the two Murrieta 18 & 25 Grading Project sites for future development. Comment Period: 5/16/2012 - 6/5/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐2 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE General Land Use (residential, etc.) This document consists of an initial case transmittal. The proposed project consists of a revised Other County of Riverside Document RVC120502-01 permit to allow the addition of a 50' x 50' playground area with equipment for approximately 15-20 does not children at an existing labor camp; allow church services on Sunday with the multi-purpose building, require CUP 3406, Revised Permit No. 3 and reduce the number of detention basins from 5 basins to 2 basins. comments Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: 5/17/2012 General Land Use (residential, etc.) The proposed project consists of a Conditional Use Permit and an approved Plot Plan to develop a Mitigated ND City of Menifee Currently 74.17- acre park for open space recreation. under review RVC120524-01 Eastvale Community Park Project Comment Period: 5/17/2012 - 6/18/2012 Public Hearing: 6/20/2012 General Land Use (residential, etc.) The proposed project consists of subdividing a vacant parcel of approximately 83,000 square feet Mitigated ND City of Rancho Currently SBC120516-03 into eight lots, and a request to allow walls in excess of 6 feet, the maximum wall height permitted in Cucamonga under review residential districts, for noise attenuation and soil retaining purposes along the perimeter of a Tentative Tract Map SUBTT 18826 proposed subdivision of a property of approximately 83,000 square feet into eight, and request to remove six or more trees. Comment Period: 5/24/2012 - 6/13/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Goods Movement The proposed project consists of accommodating the current and anticipated needs of Berths 195- Mitigated ND Port of Los Currently LAC120522-01 200A WWL Vehicle Services Americas, Inc (WWL), while accommodating necessary boundary Angeles under review changes resulting from the previously evaluated and approved Berth 200 Rail Yard Project. Berths 195-200A WWL Vehicle Implementation of the proposed project would result in the rehabilitation of Berths 196-199 and Services Americas, Inc. Project construction of two additional railroad-loading tracks on the southern portion of the project site. Comment Period: 5/21/2012 - 6/20/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Goods Movement This document consists of a Final EIR which includes response to comments. The proposed project FEIR Port of Los Currently LAC120529-06 consists of improving and expanding an existing container terminal that would facilitate the transfer Angeles under review of shipping containers between ocean-going vessels and ground transportation modes such as trucks Berths 302 to 306 [APL] Container and trains. Terminal Project Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: 6/7/2012 Industrial and Commercial The proposed project consists of demolishing the existing buildings on the sites and construction of NOP (No IS City of Santa AQMD LAC120501-04 two six-story hotels. The proposed Courtyard by Marriott Hotel at 1554 5th Street would be Attached) Monica commented approximately 69 feet in height and would include 131 guest rooms, 78,750 square feet of floor 5/25/2012 Hotels at 1554 5th Street and 501 area and between 80-100 parking spaces within a two-level subterranean parking garage. Colorado Avenue Comment Period: 5/1/2012 - 5/30/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐3 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Industrial and Commercial The proposed project consists of a combination of three vacant parcels totaling 27.8 acres located in NOP (No IS City Malibu AQMD LAC120504-07 a triangle-shaped area formed by the intersections of Malibu Canyon Road, Pacific Coast Highway, Attached) commented and Civic Center Highway. The proposed development is designed as a 146-room luxury hotel 5/25/2012 Rancho Malibu Hotel Project resort. Approximately 274,936 square feet of development is proposed both for the main hotel building and the 21 detached, two-story casitas which house the majority of hotel rooms. Comment Period: 5/3/2012 - 6/4/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Industrial and Commercial This document consists of a notice of intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Notice of Other City of La Verne Document LAC120510-02 Public Hearing. The proposed project consists of constructing an industrial business park comprising reviewed - 11 painted concrete tilt-up buildings for a total of 374,536 square feet of new office, manufacturing No La Verne Technology Center Project and warehouse development for Option 1. Option 2 would involve construction of an industrial comments business park comprising 6 painted tilt-up buildings for a total of 384,835 square feet of new office, Sent manufacturing and warehouse development. Comment Period: 4/27/2012 - 5/26/2012 Public Hearing: 6/6/2012 Industrial and Commercial The proposed project consists of constructing a new 250,330 square-foot office building and DEIR County of Los Currently LAC120529-01 associated five-level parking structure on a 6.78-acre site. The new county building would house the Angeles under review seven County departments, 4,000 square feet of retail space for employees and visitor use, and a San Fernando Valley Family Support 2,750 square-foot pharmacy. An 8,180 square-foot green space area and a 3,600 square-foot Center Project children's play area would be also provided. Comment Period: 5/25/2012 - 7/23/2012 Public Hearing: 6/18/2012 Institutional (schools, government, etc.) The proposed project consists of construction of a joint-use facility and parking structure on DEIR Los Angeles Document LAC120504-03 approximately 1.7-acres within the University High School campus. The project entails the Unified School reviewed - construction of a two-level 62,500 square-foot YMCA that would include a pool room, weight and District No Westside YMCA at University High fitness center with accompanying locker rooms, multipurpose room/indoor court, lobby area with comments School community room, classroom and examination areas, lounge, and sections for child watch and school- Sent age child care. Comment Period: 4/26/2012 - 6/10/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Institutional (schools, government, etc.) The proposed project consists of two alternatives. Alternative 1 would rehabilitate and restore the NOP (No IS City of Los Angeles AQMD LAC120509-02 existing Parker Center building and Alternative 2 would consist of demolition, renovation, and Attached) commented addition of up to approximately 500,000 square feet of building area and a parking garage containing 5/30/2012 LA Street Civic Building Project approximately 500 parking spaces. Comment Period: 5/9/2012 - 6/8/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐4 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Institutional (schools, government, etc.) The proposed project consists of the 2012 Facility Master Plan (FMP) which identifies the Future NOP (No IS Mt. San Antonio AQMD LAC120511-05 New Buildings proposed on campus, and the existing buildings to be renovated. Attached) College commented 5/29/2012 Mt. San Antonio College 2012 Facility Master Plan Comment Period: 5/11/2012 - 6/10/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Institutional (schools, government, etc.) The proposed project consists of developing a 255,000 gross square foot 8-level project on the site of DEIR University of Currently LAC120515-02 the existing Parking Structure 6. The new Meyer and Renee Luskin Conference and Guest Center California, Los under review would include conference/meeting space and associated support facilities, up to 260 guest rooms and Angeles Meyer and Renee Luskin Conference amenities, service and support facilities, a loading dock, and one-level of subterranean parking. and Guest Center Comment Period: 5/14/2012 - 6/29/2012 Public Hearing: 6/5/2012 Institutional (schools, government, etc.) The proposed project consists of demolishing the existing Sheriff's Station building, and the new NOP (No IS Santa Monica Currently LAC120518-08 construction of a 2-story above-grade, approximately 27,500 square-foot educational facility Attached) Community under review including an approximately 5,700 square-foot Community Sheriff's Substation and Emergency College District Santa Monica College- Malibu Campus Operations and Planning Center on the ground floor. Comment Period: 5/18/2012 - 6/17/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Institutional (schools, government, etc.) The proposed project consists of updates to the Biola University Master plan. Updates include DEIR City of La Mirada Currently LAC120529-03 increases in enrollment from the currently allowed maximum enrollment of 5,000 full time under review equivalent students to a maximum allowed enrollment of 6,800 FTES, with a rough proportionate Biola University Master Plan Update increase in the numbers of faculty and staff from the current level of 924 to approximately 1,257; and increasing the total square footage of campus buildings by approximately 30% over present PUD limits. Comment Period: 5/29/2012 - 7/13/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Institutional (schools, government, etc.) The proposed project consists of the development of an urban marine research center within a 28- DEIR Port of Los Currently LAC120529-05 acre portion of the 400-acre San Pedro Waterfront Master Plan area along the west side of the Los Angeles under review Angeles Harbor’s Main Channel. City Dock No. 1 Marine Research Center Project Comment Period: 5/29/2012 - 7/9/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐5 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Institutional (schools, government, etc.) The proposed project consists of conducting training and testing activities to ensure the Navy DEIR Department of the Currently ODP120531-05 accomplishes its mission to maintain, train and equip combat - ready military forces. The proposed Navy under review action includes the use of active sonar and explosives. Navy's Hawaii - Southern California Training and Testing Activities Comment Period: 5/31/2012 - 7/10/2012 Public Hearing: 6/12/2012

Medical Facility The proposed project consists of developing and constructing a two-story steel frame office building NOP/IS City of Newport AQMD ORC120501-05 that encompasses 12,917 gross square feet of medical office floor area that will be complementary to Beach commented the three existing buildings that currently occupy the site. 5/25/2012 Westcliff Medical Arts Building Comment Period: 5/1/2012 - 5/31/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Plans and Regulations The proposed project consists of the Lincoln Avenue Specific Plan and zone change which proposes NOP/IS City of Pasadena AQMD LAC120501-06 to change land uses as well as establish new development standards within the Lincoln corridor. The commented specific plan proposes to gradually convert existing industrial and auto-related land uses to a 5/25/2012 Lincoln Specific Plan neighborhood-serving retail/commercial district. Build-out of the project would allow up to an additional 500,000 square feet of commercial/office/retail uses and 91 additional residential units. Comment Period: 5/1/2012 - 5/30/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Plans and Regulations The proposed project consists of a comprehensive update of the City's General Plan. Each of the NOP (No IS City of Pomona AQMD LAC120508-01 General Plan elements will be updated with goals and policies that reflect the vision of Pomona that Attached) commented the General Plan seeks to achieve. 5/29/2012 City of Pomona 2011 General Plan Update and Pomona Corridors Specific Plan. Comment Period: 5/8/2012 - 6/7/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Plans and Regulations The project consists of a General Plan Amendment to the Land Use Plan and policy map to bring IS City of Gardena Document LAC120508-04 consistency between the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance; a Zoning Ordinance to fulfill the reviewed - City's commitments under the adopted 2008-2014 Housing Element; and overall Zoning Ordinance No Amendment of Land Use Plan and Land to update the text and zoning map for clarity and internal consistency with other parts of the comments Use Map of Community Development Municipal Code. Sent Element of the General Plan, Amendments to the Zoning Provisions to Title 18 of the Gardena Municipal Code and Amendments to the Zoning Map of the City Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐6 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Plans and Regulations This document consists of a public notice for the completion of a Draft Amendment to the Port of Los Other Port of Los Angeles Currently LAC120518-01 Angeles Port Master Plan. The amendment would allow Al Larson Boat Shop to modernize and under review upgrade their existing facility and would create 0.9 acres of new land by constructing two confined Draft Port Master Plan Amendment No. disposal facilities of 0.2 and 0.7 in Planning Area 8 and assigned an "industrial" land use. 27 Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: 6/21/2012 Plans and Regulations The proposed project consists of the Cornfield Arroyo Seco Specific Plan which will guide the future Recirculated City of Los Angeles Currently LAC120531-01 development of the Project Area by creating a series of mixed-use zoning districts that allow private, DEIR under review public, and nonprofit sector developers to combine retail, residential, commercial, civic, and industrial Cornfield Arroyo Seco Specific Plan uses while ensuring that this development contributes to a human-scale, engaging urban fabric. Comment Period: 5/31/2012 - 7/16/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

Plans and Regulations This document consists of Changes to the Draft EIR as well as response to comments, and Mitigation Other City of Corona Document RVC120504-02 Monitoring Program. The proposed project consists of the Corona Climate Action Plan which is an reviewed - implementation tool of the General Plan that can be used to guide development in the City by focusing No City of Corona Climate Action Plan on attaining the various goals and policies of the General Plan as well as the GHG reduction goals. comments Volume II: Changes to the Draft EIR, Sent Response to Comments, and Mitigation Monitoring Program Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A

Plans and Regulations This document consists of an initial case transmittal. The proposed project consists of replacing 25 Other County of Riverside Document RVC120509-01 residential lots with a total of 179,298 square feet of open space areas and recreational amenities does not within Specific Plan 323. require Spring Mountain Ranch (Specific Plan comments 323) Comment Period: 5/9/2012 - 7/5/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Plans and Regulations The proposed project consists of a General Plan Amendment which will change the current DEIR City of Corona Currently RVC120515-01 designation of Agriculture on 276 acres west of Interstate 15, southwest of Cajalco Road, to a range of under review land uses to accommodate General Commercial, Mixed Use-Commercial Residential; Mixed Use - Arantine Hills Specific Plan Commercial Business Park; Low Density Residential; Medium Density Residential; High Density Residential; Parks; Open Space. The Specific Plan will establish a master plan for the same 276 acres establishing corresponding land use designations to the General Plan Amendment. A master tentative map will subdivide the 276 acres into 16 lots. Comment Period: 5/14/2012 - 6/28/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐7 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Plans and Regulations This document consists of a notice of public hearing to modify and expand the existing conditional Other City of Upland Document SBC120508-03 use permit for Imagine That! consisting of three existing banquet rooms and allowing two new reviewed - banquet rooms, for a total of 5 banquet rooms, with live entertainment, dancing, alcoholic beverage No CUP 11-08 service, on-site catering for events and a weekly church service. comments Sent Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: 5/16/2012 Plans and Regulations This document consists of an announcement of release of a Notice of Intent to Prepare a Other U.S. Dept. of AQMD SBC120510-01 Supplemental EIS for a proposed amendment to the Land Management Plans. The proposed Agriculture commented amendment would modify the existing land use zones allocations in selected Inventoried Roadless 5/29/2012 Land Management Plans Areas to include more Back Country Non-Motorized and Recommended Wilderness areas. Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Retail The proposed project consists of approximately 395,140 square feet of new retail/commercial uses NOP/IS City of Pomona AQMD LAC120502-02 within the approximately 36.84-acre site. commented 5/25/2012 Rio Rancho Towne Center Project Comment Period: 5/2/2012 - 5/31/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Retail The proposed project consists of demolishing approximately 103,000 square feet of commercial Other City of Pomona Currently LAC120518-03 buildings associated with former auto dealerships, and the construction and operation of under review approximately 419,190 square feet of general commercial/retail uses within the approximately 36.84- Rio Rancho Towne Center Project acre site. Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: 5/30/2012 Retail This document consists of a notice of public hearing and intent to adopt a Negative Declaration. The Other City of Menifee Document RVC120501-02 proposed project a 3,860 square-foot McDonald's fast food restaurant with drive-thru on 1.14 gross reviewed - acres. No Menifee McDonald's comments Sent Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: 6/12/2012

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐8 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Retail The proposed project consists of constructing a new 8,320 square-foot Family Dollar Store, ND City of Highland Currently SBC120516-02 installing parking and landscaping improvements. under review

CUP 012-002, Design Review Application, and Accessory Sign Review Application Family Dollar Comment Period: 5/4/2012 - 5/29/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Retail This document consists of a notice of public hearing and intent to adopt a Mitigated Negative Other City of Upland Currently SBC120518-02 Declaration, to demolish a vacant approximately 1,653 square-foot automotive repair building and under review construct a new 2,940 square-foot convenience store. EAR-12, Site Plan No. 11-07, and Variance No. 11-01 Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Transportation The proposed project would implement circulation modifications, streetscape improvements, and Mitigated ND City of Santa Document LAC120509-03 design enhancements to create a gateway into the City from the Exposition Light Rail Station and a Monica reviewed - multi-modal street that provide connections between the Expo LRT Station, Downtown, the Civic No Colorado Esplanade Project Center, and specific destinations such as Palisades Park, Palisades Garden Walk, and the Pier. comments Sent Comment Period: 5/8/2012 - 6/8/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Transportation This document consists of a Final EIR which includes response to comments. The proposed project FEIR Los Angeles No review LAC120511-06 consists of implementing a heavy rail transit subway that would operate as an extension of the Metro County conducted - Purple Line heavy rail transit subway system from its current western terminus at Wilshire/Western Metropolitan No Westside Subway Extension Station to a new western terminus near the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Hospital. The Transportation comments extension will be nearly 9 miles and will include a total of seven new stations Authority sent Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Transportation The proposed project consists of improving the operation on the I-405 primarily in the County of DEIR Department of Currently ORC120523-03 Orange for approximately 16 miles between Bristol Street and just north of the I-605, including Transportation under review portion of SR-22, SR-73, and I 605. I-405 Improvement Project Comment Period: 5/23/2012 - 7/22/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐9 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Transportation The proposed project consists of widening the bridge from 52 feet to 104 feet to accommodate traffic Mitigated ND County of Orange Currently ORC120524-02 lanes, sidewalks, and bicycle lanes. In addition, as a transition between the bridge and the existing under review roadway, approximately 500 feet of Edinger Avenue would be widened to 84 feet west of the bridge, Edinger Avenue Bridge Widening and 78 feet east of the bridge. Comment Period: 5/29/2012 - 6/29/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Transportation The proposed project consists of approximately 0.30 miles of roadway improvements within the City ND County of Riverside Document reviewed - RVC120504-04 of Rancho Mirage along Highway 111 and Frank Sinatra Drive. No Highway 111/Frank Sinatra Drive comments Intersection Improvement Project Sent Comment Period: 5/2/2012 - 6/1/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Transportation The proposed project consists of two phases of construction. Phase 1 would include construction of EA California Dept. Currently RVC120518-06 a new 6-lane bridge overcrossing at SR-60 extension of 2-lanes of Potrero Boulevard; and a of Transportation under review temporary connection to existing Western Knolls Avenue. Phase 2 would include completing the (Caltrans) SR-60 /Potrero Boulevard New interchange by widening Potrero Boulevard to 6 lanes; constructing westbound/eastbound exit and Interchange Project entry ramps; construction of westbound and eastbound loop entry ramps; extended ramp acceleration/deceleration lanes; realignment of Western Knolls Avenue; and removal of the Western Knolls Avenue connection to SR-60. Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Transportation This document consists of comments from the US EPA on the proposed Redlands Passenger Rail Other San Bernardino Currently SBC120518-07 project. The project includes developing new railroad infrastructure along an approximately nine- Associated under review mile section of rail corridor. The project would include the development of four new stations Governments Comments on the Redlands Passenger consisting of boarding platforms with supporting amenities, parking, and pedestrian access Rail Project improvements. Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Utilities The proposed project consists of removing the existing Scattergood Generating Station (SGS) DEIR City of Los Angeles Currently electrical generation Unit 3 from operation and replacing its generating capacity with modern high- under review LAC120517-02 efficiency generation units constructed within the SGS property boundaries. The existing unit 3 has Scattergood Generating Station Unit 3 a maximum gross generation capacity of 460 megawatts (MW). The unit that would replace unit 3 Repowering Project under the proposed project would have a gross generating capacity of up to 590 MW. Comment Period: 5/17/2012 - 7/2/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐10 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Utilities The proposed project consists of a proposed 150 foot monopole tower with equipment shelter and Mitigated ND Imperial County Document ODP120511-03 generator within a block wall enclosure, from Spectrum Surveying and Engineering on behalf of reviewed - Verizon Wireless. No CUP No. 12-0002 (Union Pacific comments Railroad) Sent Comment Period: 5/3/2012 - 5/23/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Utilities This document consists of a notice of application for a certificate of public convenience and Other San Diego Gas & Currently ORC120531-03 necessity. The proposed project consists of rebuilding and upgrading the existing 138/12kV Electric under review Capistrano Substation with a 230/138/12 kilovolt (kV) substation and replace an existing 138kV South Orange County Reliability transmission line with a new 230kV double-circuit extension between SDG&E's Capistrano and Enhancement Project Talega Substations to increase reliability and reduce the risk of a system-wide outage affecting all of its customers and substations in South Orange County area. Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Warehouse & Distribution Centers This document consists of responses to comments. The proposed project consists of developing a Other City of Bell Document LAC120504-06 490,000 square-foot warehouse, manufacturing, and office building and associated parking on the reviewed - 21.26-acre project site. No Bandini Industrial Center Project comments Sent Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related This document consists of a notice of completion of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Other City of Los Angeles Document LAC120501-03 proposed project consists of a new solid waste facility permit for a new location. The site's design reviewed - capacity is for 5,865.70 tons per day (TPD) and would be expanding from a 1,000 tpd traditional No Potential Industries Transfer Station paper recycling operation to a 5,000 tpd materials recycling facility. comments Sent Comment Period: 4/30/2012 - 5/29/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related This document consists of a fact sheet for the proposed corrective action complete determination Other Department of Document Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems, Space Park Facility. The Department of Toxic Substances Toxic Substances reviewed - LAC120510-05 Control (DTSC) is inviting public comments on the draft Statement of Basis which announces the Control No Corrective Action Complete completion of corrective action for the Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems. DTSC has comments Determination for Northrop Grumman determined that no cleanup is necessary. Sent Aerospace Systems, Space Park Facility Comment Period: 4/30/2012 - 6/1/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐11 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Waste and Water-related This document consists of a notice to interested members of the public of the preparation of an Other U.S. Dept. of Currently LAC120511-01 Environmental Assessment for the proposed removal of 4.4 million cubic yards sediment from the Agriculture under review Big Tujunga Reservoir and place it in the Maple Canyon Sediment Placement Site. Big Tujunga Sediment Removal Project Comment Period: 5/11/2012 - 6/15/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related This document consists of an air quality impact analysis and air toxics risk assessment for the Other County of Los Currently LAC120511-07 proposed transfer station project. The project includes increasing the waste throughput to 1,500 tons Angeles under review per day of waste. East Los Angeles Recycling and Transfer Station Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related This document consists of a fact sheet invitation to review and comment on a draft plan to clean up Other Department of Currently LAC120515-03 contaminated soil from the former Pechiney Cast Plate, Inc. Toxics Substances under review Control Pechiney Cast Plate, Inc. Facility Comment Period: 5/10/2012 - 6/10/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related This document consists of a public notice for the termination of corrective action at the D/K Other Department of Currently LAC120515-04 Environmental Facility in Vernon. Toxic Substances under review Control D/K Environmental Facility Comment Period: 5/10/2012 - 6/25/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related This document consists of a second public comment period notice for the Draft Hazardous Waste Other Department of Currently Facility Permit and proposed Negative Declaration. The proposed project consists of construction Toxic Substance under review LAC120525-01 and operation of a used oil recycling facility. Control CleanTech Environmental Inc. Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related This document consists of a fact sheet informing the acceptance of public comments on the proposed Other Department of Currently LAC120525-02 approval of the draft Interim Measures Workplan for the cleanup of the soil and soil vapor impacted Toxic Substances under review by chlorinated volatile organic compounds, which the former Northrop Grumman Systems Control Draft Interim Measures Workplan for Corporation used as industrial cleaning solvents at its East Complex Facility. the Plant 1 of the former Northrop Grumman East Complex Facility in Hawthorne Comment Period: 5/7/2012 - 6/6/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐12 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Waste and Water-related This document consists of a notice of final permit decision to issue a Hazardous Waste Facility Other Department of Currently LAC120529-02 Permit to the Pacific Resource Recovery Services. Toxic Substances under review Control Pacific Resource Recovery Services (PRRS) Comment Period: 5/29/2012 - 6/27/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related This document consists of a public notice of for an interim status document modification for a Other Department of Currently LAC120531-04 hazardous waste facility. Toxic Substance under review Control Interim Status Document Modification Hazardous Waste Facility, Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related The proposed project consists of a revision of the Closure/Post-Closure Plan for the Class III, non- Mitigated ND County of Imperial Document ODP120504-01 hazardous solid waste Brawley landfill, and the required stabilization of the southern bank of the reviewed - New River. No Brawley Solid Waste Landfill Closure comments & New River Bank Stabilization Project Sent Comment Period: 4/30/2012 - 6/4/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related The proposed project consists of replacing the existing trapezoidal channel with a concrete ND County of Orange Document ORC120501-01 rectangular open channel, replace existing single-barrel roadway undercrossing structures with reviewed - double-barrel reinforced concrete box, install two new traffic signals and relocate three existing No Newland Storm Channel (C05S01) signals, resurface, adjacent traffic lanes, and install traffic barriers, landscaping, hardscape surfaces, comments Improvements chain link fencing, and storm water quality features. The project would expand the capacity of Sent Newland Channel from 25-year flood to 100-year flood, and is needed to reduce flood risks in the Newland Channel drainage area. Comment Period: 5/2/2012 - 6/4/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related The proposed project consists of maintaining an existing sewer pipeline that crosses Canada Mitigated ND El Toro Water Document ORC120504-05 Channel. The existing pipeline is an eight-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) with a three-foot wide District reviewed - concrete encasement. The project would protect the existing eight-inch VCP sewer pipeline and No Canada Channel Sewer Protection concrete encasement with loose rip rap along the channel bottom and sides adjacent to the existing comments Project sewer pipeline. Sent Comment Period: 5/4/2012 - 6/4/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐13 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Waste and Water-related This document consists of a request to review and comment on the Draft Environmental Other U.S. Army Corps of No review ORC120510-03 Assessment. The Corps proposes to remove sediment along the Marsh channels to restore tidal Engineers conducted - circulation and maintain coastal salt marsh habitat that supports endangered species. No Santa Ana River Marsh Dredging comments Project sent Comment Period: 5/10/2012 - 5/18/2012 Public Hearing: 4/30/2012 Waste and Water-related The proposed project consists of a waste-to-energy facility at the Western Riverside County Regional NOP (No IS City of Norco AQMD RVC120504-08 Wastewater Authority's regional wastewater treatment and reclamation facility. Attached) commented 5/25/2012 Horse Manure to Energy Conversion Facility Comment Period: 5/4/2012 - 6/3/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related The proposed project consists of improvements and would involve construction at four locations in DEIR Metropolitan Water Currently RVC120522-02 an unincorporated portion of Riverside County: 1) the Whitewater River/CRA Siphon and 2) the District of under review White Water Mine Pit (mine reclamation) improvements are both located north of Interstate 10 (I- Southern California Whitewater River/Colorado River 10) and east of Whitewater Canyon Road; 3) the Cabazon Spoil site (source of mining pit fill and Aqueduct Siphon Scour Protection, possible gabion material), located south of Esperanza Avenue at the northern base of the San Jacinto Whitewater Mine Pit Reclamation and Mountains and south of the unincorporated Cabazon community; and 4) the Cabazon Radial Gate Cabazon Radial Gate Project improvement, located south of I-10 and east of Elm Street in the unincorporated Cabazon community. Comment Period: 5/18/2012 - 7/3/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related The proposed project consists of constructing a 2.0 million gallon water storage tank, including a Mitigated ND Eastern Municipal Currently RVC120529-04 detention basin, and an access road. The new Daily II tank would be an above-ground welded steel Water District under review tank measuring 32 feet in height, with an internal diameter of 102 feet. Daily II Water Storage Tank Replacement Project Comment Period: 5/29/2012 - 6/29/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related The proposed project consists of diverting the recycled water to decrease the amount of recycled Draft PEIR Western Riverside Currently RVC120531-02 water that must be discharged to the Santa Ana River; increase the use of recycled water within County Regional under review economic distance of the Western Riverside County Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant for non- Wastewater Recycled Wastewater Authority potable use; and decreasing the dependence on imported water supplies with the areas of the Western Authority Riverside County Regional Wastewater Authority members. Comment Period: 5/31/2012 - 7/13/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐14 ATTACHMENT A INCOMING CEQA DOCUMENTS LOG

MAY 1, 2012 TO MAY 31, 2012 SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Waste and Water-related This document consists of a planning project notice for a minor use permit to establish a closed Other County of San Currently SBC120518-05 system wastewater treatment and recycled water plant on 377.60 acres. Bernardino under review

P201200171/MUP Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A TOTAL DOCUMENTS RECEIVED THIS REPORTING PERIOD: 74

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. A‐15 ATTACHMENT B ONGOING ACTIVE PROJECTS FOR WHICH AQMD HAS

OR WILL CONDUCT A CEQA REVIEW SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE General Land Use (residential, etc.) The proposed project consists of redeveloping a 4.1-acre site with 648 dwelling units with up to DEIR City of Los Angeles Currently LAC120418-01 39,996 square feet of commercial retail space. under review

Bixel and Lucas Project Comment Period: 4/18/2012 - 6/4/2012 Public Hearing: N/A General Land Use (residential, etc.) The proposed project consists of developing a gated community comprised of 65 detached single DEIR County of Orange Currently ORC120417-01 family residential units. under review

Saddle Crest Homes Comment Period: 4/20/2012 - 6/4/2012 Public Hearing: N/A General Land Use (residential, etc.) The proposed project consists of a 92-acre mixed-use development that consists of retail and/or DEIR City of Indio Currently entertainment structure, multi-residential housing, a hotel or convention center, and corporate or under review RVC120418-02 medical office campuses. Las Montanas Marketplace Comment Period: 4/18/2012 - 6/1/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Industrial and Commercial This document consists of an amended reclamation plan for the Reliance I Quarry. Other City of Irwindale Currently under review LAC111027-01 Reliance Azusa Reclamation Plan Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Institutional (schools, government, etc.) The proposed project consists of modifying operating conditions and redeveloping facilities, parking, DEIR City of San Marino Currently LAC120403-05 landscaping, and other improvements within the existing entry complex area. under review

Huntington Education and Visitor Center Project Comment Period: 4/3/2012 - 7/2/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Institutional (schools, government, etc.) The proposed project consists of the 2011 Facilities Master Plans (FMPs) for Saddleback College DEIR South Orange Currently ORC120413-01 and Irvine Valley College (IVC), including Advanced Technology & Education Park. The FMPs County Community under review establish 20-year plans for the campuses and allow for their expansion from 6,971 to 13,081 full- CollegeDistrict 2011 Facilities Master Plans time equivalent students FTES at the Saddleback College and from 4,001 to 7,511 FTES at IVC. Comment Period: 4/17/2012 - 5/31/2012 Public Hearing: 6/25/2012

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. B‐1 ATTACHMENT B ONGOING ACTIVE PROJECTS FOR WHICH AQMD HAS

OR WILL CONDUCT A CEQA REVIEW SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Medical Facility The proposed project consists of replacing the existing 49-bed facility with a new 56-bed acute care DEIR City of Los Angeles Currently LAC120427-02 hospital in compliance with SB 1953, the State's Hospital Facilities Seismic Safety Act, as well as a under review 24-bed sub acute care skilled nursing facility, and administration and support facility. Proposed Barlow Hospital Replacement and hospital facilities would total approximately 131,000 square feet and would be located on a 3.25-acre Master Plan Project portion of the Project site. Eleven existing buildings on the Project site would be retained and adaptively reused by the hospital and for community use. The remainder of the Project site would be subdivided into 13 parcels and redeveloped with 888 multi-family residential dwelling units totaling approximately 1,065,600 square feet; approximately 15,000 square feet of neighborhood-serving commercial uses; and 1,552 parking spaces. Development on-site following Project build-out would total approximately 1,211,115 square feet. Comment Period: 4/27/2012 - 6/11/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Plans and Regulations The proposed project consists of a Master Use Plan that would address uses on a 94-acre property in Mitigated ND City of Rancho Currently LAC120417-02 the Portuguese Bend area. The Master Use Plan contains three distinct components: the expansion of Palos Verdes under review agriculture uses; development of a private executive golf course and improvements to an existing York Point View Properties landscaped patio/event garden area with the purpose of holding 30 annual events; and the provision of a paved internal driveway through the property. Comment Period: 4/18/2012 - 5/18/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Utilities This document consists of a notice of availability of a Draft EIR. The proposed project consists of a Other County of Riverside Currently RVC120413-06 1,208-acre, 150-megawatt solar energy project and 220-kilovolt generation-intertie transmission line. under review The proposed solar facility would include several components. A main generation area would Desert Harvest Solar Project include photovoltaic arrays, a switchyard, inverters, overhead lines, and access corridors. The solar facility would also include an operations and maintenance facility, an on-site substation with switchgear, site security, fencing, and lighting. Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Utilities The proposed project consists of constructing, operating and maintaining 233 miles of new 16-inch DEIR Bureau of Land Currently SBC120327-02 diameter pipeline on approximately 2,841 acres of land under multiple ownership in the counties of Management under review San Bernardino, CA and Clark, NV. In addition to the new pipeline, the proposed project would Calnev (Kinder-Morgan) Pipeline include a new pump station, electrical substation, and ancillary facilities near Baker, California; a Expansion Project new 3-mile lateral from the Bracken Junction to McCarran International Airport; and new or modified connections to new or modified laterals, valves and ancillary modifications.

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. B‐2 ATTACHMENT B ONGOING ACTIVE PROJECTS FOR WHICH AQMD HAS

OR WILL CONDUCT A CEQA REVIEW SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Warehouse & Distribution Centers The proposed project consists of developing a 1,616,133 square-foot warehouse distribution building DEIR City of Moreno Currently SBC120420-02 on a 71.13 net acre site. The building includes 268 dock high doors and 44,000 square feet of office Valley under review area in four potential office locations. VIP Moreno Valley Project Comment Period: 4/20/2012 - 6/4/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Warehouse & Distribution Centers The proposed project consists of a tentative parcel map, master plot plan and four plot plans to DEIR City of Moreno Currently SBC120427-05 subdivide a 75.05-acre portion of land into four separate parcels to include four individual industrial Valley under review buildings totaling 1,484,407 square feet within the Industrial Land Use district. March Business Center Comment Period: 4/27/2012 - 6/13/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related The proposed project is a groundwater recharge facilities maintenance plan that provides for the long- DEIR Orange County Currently term maintenance of Orange County Water District groundwater recharge facilities. Water District under review ORC120427-08 Orange County Water District Groundwater Recharge Facilities Comment Period: 4/27/2012 - 6/16/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related The proposed project consists of mitigating excessive dissolved air from East Valley Water District's Mitigated ND East Valley Water Currently SBC120417-03 Upper Pressure Zone by aerating the water in a tank at Plant 143 and in particular, Well 143. The District under review objectives of the project include (1) continued use of all wells at maximum capacity; (2) decrease Plant 143 Improvement Project excessive dissolved air from wells 143, 146, 146A, and 147; and (3) additional water storage capacity to meet Master Plan design requirements. Comment Period: 4/13/2012 - 5/14/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Industrial and Commercial The proposed project consists of modernizing the existing Los Angeles Convention Center and DEIR City of Los Angeles AQMD LAC120405-01 creating an event center, a multi-purpose entertainment and sports venue on 68 acres. The floor area commented would increase by 1.8 million square feet to a total of approximately 4.1 million square feet. 5/22/2012 Convention and Event Center Project Approximately 1.1 million square feet of existing buildings would be demolished as part of the proposed project. Comment Period: 4/5/2012 - 5/21/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Industrial and Commercial The proposed project consists of a 53-acre triangular site, located in the City of Carson. The site will NOP/IS City of Carson AQMD LAC120427-04 be developed with a driver training facility which includes two tracks, an acceleration/deceleration commented area, a "kick plate" area, an off-road course, and ice/low-friction course, a second low friction 5/25/2012 Porsche Experience Driving Center course, and a young drivers' event area. Comment Period: 4/26/2012 - 5/28/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. B‐3 ATTACHMENT B ONGOING ACTIVE PROJECTS FOR WHICH AQMD HAS

OR WILL CONDUCT A CEQA REVIEW SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Industrial and Commercial The proposed project consists of developing two vacant parcels totaling 5.88 acres to include a NOP (No IS City of Malibu AQMD LAC120427-09 Whole Foods Market and four small commercial buildings, for a total of five buildings. In addition Attached) commented to the 24,549 square-foot Whole Foods market, the proposed project includes tenant spaces, outdoor 5/11/2012 Whole Foods in the Park dining, a central surface parking area, and pedestrian and open space amenities. The additional buildings would range from 3,015 square feet to 4,183 square feet. The total commercial development associated with the project is anticipated to be 38,425 square feet in five structures with a floor area ratio of 0.15. Comment Period: 4/26/2012 - 5/29/2012 Public Hearing: 5/22/2012 Plans and Regulations The proposed project consists of new regulations for future development occurring within the NOP/IS City of Los Angeles AQMD LAC120410-04 Northside area of the LAX Specific Plan, an area of approximately 340 acres north of LAX. commented Adoption of the proposed project would enable the development of up to 2,320,000 square feet of 5/1/2012 LAX Northside Plan Update new commercial and industrial development and would permit areas for recreation, open space, and buffer space. Comment Period: 4/10/2012 - 5/4/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Transportation This document is a notice of development of a Supplemental EIS and associated Travel Management Other U.S. Dept of AQMD ODP120403-04 Plans to analyze a proposed plan amendment and alternatives covering the designation of routes and the Interior commented management of motorized vehicles on public lands in the West Mojave portion of the California 5/1/2012 West Mojave Route Network Project Desert Conservation Area. Comment Period: N/A Public Hearing: N/A Transportation The proposed project consists of developing new railroad infrastructure along an approximately nine- NOP (No IS San Bernardino AQMD SBC120410-01 mile section of rail corridor. The project would include the development of four new stations Attached) Associated commented consisting of boarding platforms with supporting amenities, parking, and pedestrian access Governments 5/1/2012 Redlands Passenger Rail Project improvements. Comment Period: 4/10/2012 - 5/12/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Utilities The proposed project consists of a new, electric-driven Central Compressor Station to replace the DEIR Public Utilities AQMD LAC120404-01 existing gas turbine-driven compressor; relocation of office facilities and guardhouse; and a new, Commission commented four-circuit, approximately 1,200-foot, 12 kilovolt Plant Power Line that would provide dedicated 5/22/2012 Aliso Canyon Turbine Replacement electric services to the proposed Central Compressor Station. Project Comment Period: 4/4/2012 - 5/22/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. B‐4 ATTACHMENT B ONGOING ACTIVE PROJECTS FOR WHICH AQMD HAS

OR WILL CONDUCT A CEQA REVIEW SCAQMD LOG-IN NUMBER PROJECT DESCRIPTION TYPE OF LEAD AGENCY COMMENT DOC. STATUS PROJECT TITLE Warehouse & Distribution Centers This document consists of a Working Draft for the Specific Plan encompassing 2,684 acres to Other City of Moreno AQMD RVC120413-10 accommodate up to 41.6 million square feet of high cube industrial warehouse distribution buildings; Valley commented General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone for 3,820 acres from various residential, commercial, 5/1/2012 World Logistics (Highland/Fairview) building park, and open space designation to logistics, public facility and open space designations; Annexation of 85 acres at the northwest border of Alessandro Blvd. and Gilman Springs Rd.; Development Agreement covering properties controlled by Highland Fairview; Tentative Parcel Map 36457 with 26 parcels for financing purposes. Comment Period: 4/13/2012 - 5/3/2012 Public Hearing: N/A Waste and Water-related The proposed project consists of constructing replacement facilities for the existing 25 year old NOP Orange County AQMD ORC120424-03 sludge dewatering system and associated odor control ventilation system operating at Plant 2. Sanitation District commented 5/25/2012 P2-92 Sludge Dewatering and Odor Control Project Comment Period: 4/23/2012 - 5/23/2012 Public Hearing: N/A

TOTAL NUMBER OF REQUESTS TO AQMD FOR DOCUMENT REVIEW THIS REPORTING PERIOD: 74 TOTAL NUMBER OF COMMENT LETTERS SENT OUT THIS REPORTING PERIOD: 21 TOTAL NUMBER OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED, BUT NO COMMENTS WERE SENT: 15 TOTAL NUMBER OF DOCUMENTS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW: 57 TOTAL NUMBER OF DOCUMENTS THAT DID NOT REQUIRE COMMENTS: 2 TOTAL NUMBER OF DOCUMENTS THAT WERE NOT REVIEWED: 2

DEIR - Draft Environmental Impact Report NOI - Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS0 FONSI - Finding of No Significant Impact FEIR - Final Environmental Impact Report0 NOP - Notice of Preparation0 ND - Negative Declaration0 RDEIR - Revised Draft Environmental Impact Report0 IS - Initial Study0 Other - Typically notices of public meetings0 SEIR - Subsequent Environmental Impact Report0 DEA - Draft Environmental Assessment0 N/A - Not Applicable SupEIR – Supplemental EIR0 EIS - Environmental Impact Statement0 # - Project has potential environmental justice concerns due to the nature and/or location of the project. B‐5 ATTACHMENT C ACTIVE AQMD LEAD AGENCY PROJECTS THROUGH MAY 31, 2012 Project Description Project Type of Status Consultant The proposed project is a biomass-to-energy project that would be located Sunshine Canyon Subsequent Final Subsequent EIR certified April 27, ARCADIS/Environ at the Sunshine Canyon Landfill. Specifically, landfill operators are Landfill EIR 2012. proposing to generate electricity by installing turbines to burn landfill gas that is currently flared. Shell Carson Terminal operators are proposing a permit modification to Shell Carson EIR Public comment period for Notice of AECOM base throughput on ethanol and gasoline, not just ethanol. Distribution Preparation/Initial Study closed May 18, Terminal 2010. SCAQMD Staff is reviewing revised administrative Draft EIR. Petro Diamond operators are proposing to change current permit conditions Petro Diamond Not Yet Consultant preparing Initial Study SABS to allow an increase in the number of annual marine vessel visits to the Terminal Company Determined Environmental terminal, but limit ship visits per month. Services Operators of the Ultramar Wilmington Refinery are proposing to construct Ultramar EIR Notice of Preparation/Initial Study Environmental and install a 49 MW cogeneration unit to reduce the Refinery’s reliance on Wilmington circulated for a 30-day public comment Audit, Inc. electricity from the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power and Refinery period on April 3, 2012. Comment produce steam to meet internal needs. No other refinery modifications are Period ended May 3, 2012. Consultant proposed. preparing administrative Draft EIR.

The operators of the Chevron Products El Segundo Refinery are proposing Chevron Products EIR Notice of Preparation/ Initial Study Environmental to remove six old coke “drums” and replace them with new coke drums that Company, El circulated for a 30-day public comment Audit, Inc. will meet best available control technology requirements. Segundo Refinery period on October 11, 2011. Comment period ended November 10, 2011. SCAQMD staff is reviewing revised administrative DEIR.

The ConocoPhillips Los Angeles Refinery Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel project ConocoPhillips, EIR Notice of Preparation circulated for a 30- Environmental was originally proposed to comply with federal state, and SCAQMD Los Angeles day public comment period on March Audit, Inc. requirements to limit the sulfur content of diesel fuels. Litigation against Refinery 26, 2012. Comment period ended April the CEQA document was filed. Ultimately the California Supreme Court 26, 2012. Consultant is preparing concluded that the SCAQMD had used an inappropriate baseline and administrative Draft EIR. directed the SCAQMD to prepare an EIR, even though the project has been built and has been in operation since 2006. The purpose of this CEQA document is to comply with the Supreme Court's direction to prepare an EIR.

The Carpenter company is proposing to install one 10,000 gallon bulk tank Carpenter Company ND SCAQMD staff is reviewing the Environmental for storage of methyl formate, a flammable substance that may also have Storage Tank administrative Draft ND. Audit, Inc. non-cancer acute health risks to humans. Installation Project A shaded row indicates a new project. # = AQMD was contacted regarding potential environmental justice concerns due to the natural and/or location of the project.

C‐1

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 15

REPORT: Rule and Control Measure Forecast

SYNOPSIS: This report highlights AQMD rulemaking activity and public workshops potentially scheduled for the year 2012.

COMMITTEE: No Committee Review

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer

EC:LT:cg

The Rule and Control Measure Forecast Report provides the Board with a monthly update of AQMD’s rulemaking and control measure implementation schedule.

219 Equipment Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant to Regulation II Rule 219 is moved to October from September as staff is working with interested stakeholders to evaluate additional equipment that may be considered exempt from permit requirements, but may be included into the registration program under Rule 222. 222 Filing Requirements for Specific Emission Sources Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant to Regulation II Rule 222 is moved to October from September as Staff is continuing to study the broad range of equipment under consideration to include into the registration program. 1107 Coating of Metal Parts and Products (MCS-07) Rule 1107 is moved to November from September to provide additional time for staff to continue to evaluate approaches to address environmental impacts from the proposed rule.

1114 Control of Emissions from Refinery Coking Operations (MCS-07) Rule 1114 is moved to November from September to allow additional time for staff to work with stakeholders to identify approaches to achieve emission reductions with minimal socio-economic or environmental impacts. 1450 Indirect Sources Proposed Rule 1450 is moved to December from September to allow additional time for staff to perform the necessary background analysis and data collection.

-2- 2012 MASTER CALENDAR (continued)

Below is a list of all rulemaking activity scheduled for the year 2012. The last four columns refer to the type of rule adoption or amendment. A more detailed description of the proposed rule adoption or amendment is located in the Attachments (A through D) under the type of rule adoption or amendment (i.e. AQMP, Toxics, Other and Climate Change).

*An asterisk indicates that the rulemaking is a potentially significant hearing. +This proposed rule will reduce criteria air contaminants and assist toward attainment of ambient air quality standards. 1Subject to Board approval California Environmental Quality Act shall be referred to as "CEQA." Socioeconomic Analysis shall be referred to as "Socio."

2012

October AQMP Toxics Other Climate Change 2191 Equipment Not Requiring a Written √ Permit Pursuant to Regulation II 2221 Filing Requirements for Specific √ Emission Sources Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant to Regulation II 1401 New Source Review of Toxic Air √ Contaminants 1402 Control of Toxic Air Contaminants √ from Existing Sources 1902 Transportation Conformity √ November 1107+1 Coating of Metal Parts and √ Products (MCS-07) 1114*+1 Control of Emissions from √ Refinery Coking Operations (MCS-07) 1123 Pilot Program for Refinery Start- √ up, Shutdown and Turnaround Procedures (MCS-06) 1138 Control of Emissions from √ Restaurant Operations (BCM-05)

-3- 2012 MASTER CALENDAR (continued)

2012 November (continued) AQMP Toxics Other Climate Change 1420 Emissions Standard for Lead √ 1420.2 Emissions Standard for Lead from √ Medium Lead Emitting Facilities December 415 Odors from Rendering Plants √ 1450*1 Indirect Sources √ 2301 Control of Emissions from New or √ Redevelopment Projects (EGM-01)

2012 TO-BE DETERMINED

TBD AQMP Toxics Other Climate Change 102 Definition of Terms √ 314 Fees for Architectural Coatings √ 402 Nuisance √ 463 Storage of Organic Liquids √ 1178 Further Reductions of VOC √ Emissions from Storage Tanks at Petroleum Facilities 701 Air Pollution Emergency √ Contingency Actions 1106 Marine Coating Operations √ (MCS-07) 1106.1 Pleasure Craft Coating Operations √ (MCS-07) 1118 Control of Emissions from √ √ Refinery Flares 1143 Consumer Paint Thinners & Multi- √ Purpose Solvents 1144 Metalworking Fluids and Direct- √ Contact Lubricants

-4- 2012 MASTER CALENDAR (continued)

2012 TO-BE DETERMINED

TBD (continued) AQMP Toxics Other Climate Change 1146 Emission of Oxides of Nitrogen √ from Industrial, Institutional and Commercial Broilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters 1146.1 Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen √ from Small Industrial Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators and Process Heaters 1147 NOx Reductions from √ Miscellaneous Sources 1151*+ Motor Vehicle and Mobile √ Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations 1155 Particulate Matter (PM) Control √ Devices 1166 Volatile Organic Compound √ Emissions from Decontamination of Soil 1168 Adhesive and Sealant Applications √ 1171 Solvent Cleaning Operations √ 1173 Control of Volatile Organic √ √ Compound Leaks and Releases from Components at Petroleum Facilities and Chemical Plants 1190 Series Fleet Vehicle Requirements √ Reg. XIII New Source Review √ 1469.1 Spraying Operations Using √ Coatings Containing Chromium Reg. XX Regional Clean Air Incentives √ Market (RECLAIM) 2511 Credit Generation Program for √ Locomotive Head End Power Unit Engines 2512 Credit Generation Program for √ Ocean-Going Vessels at Berth

-5- 2012 MASTER CALENDAR (continued)

2012 TO-BE DETERMINED

TBD (continued) AQMP Toxics Other Climate Change Reg. Climate Change √ XXVII 4010*+ General Provisions and √ √ Requirements for Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (MOB-03) 4020*+ Backstop Requirements for Ports of √ √ Los Angeles and Long Beach (MOB-03) Reg. IV, Various rule amendments may be √ √ √ √ IX, X, XI, needed to meet the requirements of XIV, XX state and federal laws, address and XXX variance issues/technology-forcing Rules limits, or to seek additional reductions to meet the SIP short- term measure commitment. The Clean Communities Plan (CCP has been updated to include new measures to address toxic emissions in the basin. The CCP includes a variety of measures that will reduce exposure to air toxics from stationary, mobile, and area sources. Rule amendments may include updates to provide consistency with CARB Statewide Air Toxic Control Measures. Note: AQMD may add control measures necessary to satisfy federal requirements, to abate a substantial endangerment to public health or welfare, state regulatory requirements or SIP commitment.

-6- ATTACHMENT A

AQMP Rule Activity Schedule

This attachment lists those control measures that are being developed into rules or rule amendments for the Governing Board consideration that are designed to implement the amendments to the 2007 Air Quality Management Plan.

2012

October 1902 Transportation Conformity [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Amendments to Rule 1902 will bring the District’s Transportation Conformity rule in line with current U.S. EPA requirements. Carol Gomez 909.396.3264 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) November 1107+1 Coating of Metal Parts and Products (MCS-07) [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Amendments to Rule 1107 would further reduce VOC emissions and improve rule clarity and enforceability. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1114*+1 Control of Emissions from Refinery Coking Operations (MCS-07) [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Proposed Rule 1114 will establish emission limits and other requirements for the operation of coking units at petroleum refineries. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1123 Pilot Program for Refinery Start-up, Shutdown and Turnaround Procedures (MCS-06) [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] Rule 1123 would implement 2007 AQMP Control Measure MCS-06 by identifying improved operating procedures and best management practices to reduce emissions from start-up, shutdown and turnaround operations. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Leu (3059) 1138 Control of Emissions from Restaurant Operations (BCM-05) [Projected Emission Reduction: 2007 AQMP Commitment of 1.1 tpd PM2.5 reductions by 2014] Rule 1138 currently applies solely to chain-driven charbroilers. PAR 1138 will implement 2007 AQMP Control Measure BCM-05 for the reduction of PM2.5 emissions from under-fired charbroilers. Staff has contracted with UCR CE-CERT for the testing and demonstration of affordable and effective particulate control technologies for under-fired charbroilers. Staff will propose amendments to Rule 1138 based on the results of those studies. Philip Fine 909.396.2239 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059)

A-1 ATTACHMENT A

AQMP Rule Activity Schedule (continued)

2012

December 2301 Control of Emissions from New or Redevelopment Projects (EGM-01) [Projected Emission Reduction: Committed to reduce 0.5 tons per day of VOC, 0.8 tons per day of NOx, and 0.5 tons per day of PM2.5 in 2023.] The proposed rule will implement the 2007 AQMP Control Measure EGM-01 – Emission Reductions from New or Redevelopment Projects. Since the initial proposal was released for PR2301, CARB in compliance with an SB 375 requirement has set greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for each metropolitan planning organization (MPO). SCAG’s 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) will contain the plan for how these target emission reductions will be met. In light of this development, PR2301 will be drafted as a backstop/contingency measure to ensure that the co-benefits of VOC, NOx, and PM 2.5 emission reductions from the SCS will meet the 2007 AQMP targets. Carol Gomez 909.396. 3264 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059)

To-Be Determined 2012

To-Be Determined 1106 Marine Coating Operations (MCS-07) [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Proposed amendments will further reduce VOC emissions from the application of marine coatings. Amendments may also improve clarity and enforceability. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1106.1 Pleasure Craft Coating Operations (MCS-07) [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Amendments to Rule 1106.1 will reduce VOC emissions from the application of coatings to pleasure craft and improve the enforceability and clarity of the rule. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059)

A-2 ATTACHMENT A

AQMP Rule Activity Schedule (continued)

To-Be Determined 2012

To-Be Determined 4010*+ General Provisions and Requirements for Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (MOB-03) 4020*+ Backstop Requirements for Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (MOB-03) [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] The proposed rules will address toxic and criteria pollutant emissions from new and existing port-related sources. Susan Nakamura 909.396.3105 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) Reg. IV, IX, Various rule amendments may be needed to meet the requirements of X, XI, XIV, state and federal laws, address variance issues/technology-forcing limits, XX and or to seek additional reductions to meet the SIP short-term measure XXX Rules commitment.

A-3 ATTACHMENT B

Toxics Rule Activity Schedule

This attachment lists those rules or rule amendments for the Governing Board consideration that are designed to implement the Air Toxics Control Plan.

2012

October 1401 New Source Review of Toxic Air Contaminants 1402 Control of Toxic Air Contaminants from Existing Sources [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) periodically reviews the list of toxic compounds and revises or establishes risk values. Rules 1401 and 1402 will be amended to revise the list of TACs. OEHHA is currently revising their risk assessment guidelines and, when adopted, District guidelines will be amended requiring Board approval. In addition, other administrative changes may be proposed. Susan Nakamura 909.396.3105 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) November 1420 Emissions Standard for Lead 1420.2 Emissions Standard for Lead from Medium Lead Emitting Facilities [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] In October 2008, U.S. EPA lowered the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for lead from 1.5 to 0.15 ug/m3. Proposed Amended Rule 1420 and Proposed Rule 1420.2 will apply to lead sources and will include requirements to ensure the Basin meets the new lead standard. Susan Nakamura 909.396.3105 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) December 1450*1 Indirect Sources [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Proposed Rule 1450 will identify approaches to reduce localized NOx and air toxic emissions and exposure from facilities associated with large indirect sources (i.e. facilities that attract mobile sources). Susan Nakamura 909.396.3105 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059)

B-1 ATTACHMENT B

Toxics Rule Activity Schedule (continued)

To-Be Determined 2012

To-Be Determined 1469.1 Spraying Operations Using Coatings Containing Chromium [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Staff will evaluate opportunities for reducing chrome emissions from various spray coating operations. Susan Nakamura 909.396.3105 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 4010*+ General Provisions and Requirements for Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (MOB-03) 4020*+ Backstop Requirements for Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach (MOB-03) [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] The proposed rules will address toxic and criteria pollutant emissions from new and existing port-related sources. Susan Nakamura 909.396.3105 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) Reg. IV, IX, Various rule amendments may be needed to meet the requirements of X, XI, XIV, state and federal laws, address variance issues/technology-forcing limits. XX and Rule amendments may include updates to provide consistency with XXX Rules CARB Statewide Air Toxic Control Measures.

B-2 ATTACHMENT C

Other Rule Activity Schedule

This attachment lists those rules or rule amendments for the Governing Board consideration that are designed to improve rule enforceability, SIP corrections, or implementing state or federal regulations.

2012

October 2191 Equipment Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant to Regulation II [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] Staff will consider exempting low emitting processes/equipment that require written permits, and include them under the Rule 222 Filing Program, thus streamlining the permitting process and reducing the cost for facilities and clarify permitting requirements for several other processes. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 2221 Filing Requirements for Specific Emission Sources Not Requiring a Written Permit Pursuant to Regulation II [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] Staff will evaluate currently permitted equipment with very low emissions and consider incorporating into the Rule 222 Filing Program. In addition, staff will evaluate other equipment currently exempt from permits, but subject to source specific rules, for inclusion into Rule 222 Filing Program. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) December 415 Odors from Rendering Plants [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] As part of the implementation of the 2010 Clean Communities Plan, staff is examining odor control techniques for rendering facilities and may propose a new regulation based on the staff analysis. Susan Nakamura 909.396.3105 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059)

C-1 ATTACHMENT C

Other Rule Activity Schedule (continued)

To-Be Determined 2012

To-Be Determined 102 Definition of Terms [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] Proposed amendments to Rule 102 may be necessary to include compounds exempted by the U.S. EPA with consideration for health risks as defined by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 314 Fees of Architectural Coatings [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] The proposed amendments would improve clarity and reporting requirements as well as consider an exemption from fees for small manufacturers. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 402 Nuisance [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] The AQMD staff will assess the feasibility of expanding the current nuisance rule as part of a proposed measure in the Clean Communities Plan (CCP). The assessment may result in a recommendation to amend Rule 402 to make it more effective and more responsive to public complaints. Susan Nakamura 909.396.3105 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 463 Storage of Organic Liquids 1178 Further Reductions of VOC Emissions from Storage Tanks at Petroleum Facilities [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Staff will evaluate the opportunity of harmonizing the two rules into one and be prepared to address any stakeholder feedback in response to recent amendments to Rule 463. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 701 Air Pollution Emergency Contingency Actions [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] Proposed amendments to Rule 701 will update air quality standards and episode criteria. Joe Cassmassi 909.396.3155 909.396.3155 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1118 Control of Emissions from Refinery Flares [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Amendments may be necessary to address results of the additional analysis required by the adopting resolution for the last amendment and to consider the advances in monitoring technology. Amendments may also be necessary to implement an AB 32 measure. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059)

C-2 ATTACHMENT C

Other Rule Activity Schedule (continued)

To-Be Determined 2012

To-Be (continued) Determined 1143 Consumer Paint Thinners & Multi-Purpose Solvents [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] Proposed amendments may be necessary for further clarification and possible exemptions. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1144 Metalworking Fluids and Direct-Contact Lubricants [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] Proposed amendments may be necessary to incorporate results from ongoing technology assessments for specific facilities. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1146 Emission of Oxides of Nitrogen from Industrial, Institutional and Commercial Broilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters [Projected Emission Reduction: unknown] Proposed amendments will address expected U.S. EPA comments on compliance issues. Joe Cassmassi 909.396.3155 909.396.3155 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1146.1 Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Small Industrial, Institutional and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters [Projected Emission Reduction: unknown] Proposed amendments to will address expected U.S. EPA comments on compliance issues. Joe Cassmassi 909.396.3155 909.396.3155 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1147 NOx Reductions from Miscellaneous Sources [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] Proposed amendments will provide ongoing staff reports to committee relative to impacts to less-than-one-ton-per-day sources. Joe Cassmassi 909.396.3155 909.396.3155 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1151*+ Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Non-Assembly Line Coating Operations [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] Amendments to the rule may be necessary to reflect further findings relative to recordkeeping requirements for tertiary butyl acetate (TBAc). Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1155 Particulate Matter (PM) Control Devices [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD With the implementation Rule 1155, amendments may be necessary to address the potential exemption of small PM emitters to minimize adverse impacts of the rule requirements where there is no real impact on visible emissions. Philip Fine 909.396.2239 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059)

C-3 ATTACHMENT C

Other Rule Activity Schedule (continued)

To-Be Determined 2012

To-Be (continued) Determined 1166 Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Decontamination of Soil [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] Amendments to Rule 1166 may be necessary to clarify certain elements of the rule. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1168 Adhesive and Sealant Applications [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] Amendments to Rule 1168 may be necessary to reflect improvements in adhesive and sealants technology. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1171 Solvent Cleaning Operations [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] The proposed amendment may consider technology assessments for the cleanup of affected equipment. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1173 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks and Releases from Components at Petroleum Facilities and Chemical Plants [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Amendment to Rule 1173 may be necessary to address greenhouse gas emissions from petroleum facilities and chemical plants and clarify other provisions of the rule. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1190 Series Fleet Vehicle Requirements [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Amendments to Rule 1190 series fleet rules may be necessary to address remaining outstanding implementation issues and in the event the court’s future action requires amendments. In addition, the current fleet rules may be expanded to achieve additional air quality and air toxic benefits. Dean Saito 909.396.2647 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) Reg. XIII New Source Review [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Proposed amendments will address U.S. EPA comments on SIP approvability issues and/or requirements that may result from U.S. EPA amendments, legislation or CARB requirements. Amendments may also be proposed for clarity and improved enforceability. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) Reg. XX Regional Clean Air Incentives Market (RECLAIM) [Projected Emission Reduction: N/A] Staff will explore opportunities to improve the administrative efficiency of the program. Joe Cassmassi 909.396.3155 909.396.3155 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059)

C-4 ATTACHMENT C

Other Rule Activity Schedule (continued)

To-Be Determined 2012

To-Be Determined 2511 Credit Generation Program for Locomotive Head End Power Unit Engines [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Develop a rule to allow generation of PM mobile source emission reduction credits from Locomotive Head End Power Unit Engines. Credits will be generated by retrofitting engines with PM controls or replacing the engines with new lower-emitting engines. Randall Pasek 909.396.2251 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 2512 Credit Generation Program for Ocean-Going Vessels at Berth [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Develop a rule to allow generation of PM, NOx and SOx emission reduction credits from ocean-going vessels while at berth. Credits will be generated by controlling the emissions from auxiliary engines and boilers of ships while docked. Randall Pasek 909.396.2251 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) Reg. IV, IX, Various rule amendments may be needed to meet the requirements of X, XI, XIV, state and federal laws, address variance issues/technology-forcing limits. XX and XXX Rules

C-5 ATTACHMENT D

Climate Change

This attachments lists rules or rule amendments for the Governing Board consideration that are designed to implement South Coast Air Quality Managements District’s Climate Change Policy or for consistency with state or federal rules.

To-Be Determined 2012

To-Be Determined 1118 Control of Emissions from Refinery Flares [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Amendments may be necessary to address findings from the additional analysis required by the adopting resolution for the last amendment. Amendments may also be necessary to implement an AB 32 measure. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) 1173 Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks and Releases from Components at Petroleum Facilities and Chemical Plants [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Amendment to Rule 1173 may be necessary to address greenhouse gas emissions from petroleum facilities and chemical plants and clarify other provisions of the rule. Naveen Berry 909.396.2363 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) Reg. XXVII Climate Change [Projected Emission Reduction: TBD] Additional protocols may be added to Rules 2701 and 2702. Philip Fine 909.396.2239 CEQA: Smith (3054) Socio: Lieu (3059) Reg. IV, IX, Various rule amendments may be needed to meet the requirements of X, XI, XIV, state and federal laws to address variance issues/technology-forcing XX and limits. XXX Rules

D-1

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 16

PROPOSAL: Report of RFPs and RFQs Scheduled for Release in July

SYNOPSIS: This report summarizes the RFPs and RFQs for budgeted services over $75,000 scheduled to be released for advertisement for the month of July.

COMMITTEE: Administrative, June 8, 2012; Recommended for Approval

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve the release of RFPs/RFQs for the month of July.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer MBO:lg

Background At its January 8, 2010 meeting, the Board approved a revised Procurement Policy and Procedure. Under the revised policy, RFPs and RFQs for budgeted items over $75,000, which follow the Procurement Policy and Procedure, no longer require individual Board approval. However, a monthly report of all RFPs and RFQs over $75,000 is included as part of the Board agenda package and the Board may, if desired, take individual action on any item. The report provides the title and synopsis of the RFP or RFQ, the budgeted funds available, and the name of the Deputy Executive Officer/Asst. Deputy Executive Officer responsible for that item. Further detail including closing dates, contact information, and detailed proposal criteria will be available online at http://www.aqmd.gov/rfp/index.html following Board approval on July 13, 2012.

Outreach In accordance with AQMD’s Procurement Policy and Procedure, a public notice advertising the RFP/RFQ and inviting bids will be published in the Los Angeles Times, the Orange County Register, the San Bernardino Sun, and Riverside County Press Enterprise newspapers to leverage the most cost-effective method of outreach to the South Coast Basin.

Additionally, potential bidders may be notified utilizing AQMD’s own electronic listing of certified minority vendors. Notice of the RFP/RFQ will be e-mailed to the Black and Latino Legislative Caucuses and various minority chambers of commerce and business associations, and placed on the Internet at AQMD’s website (http://www.aqmd.gov where it can be viewed by making menu selections “Inside AQMD”/“Employment and Business Opportunities”/“Business Opportunities” or by going directly to http://www.aqmd.gov/rfp/index.html). Information is also available on AQMD’s bidder’s 24-hour telephone message line (909) 396-2724.

Proposal Evaluation Proposals received will be evaluated by applicable diverse panels of technically qualified individuals familiar with the subject matter of the project or equipment and may include outside public sector or academic community expertise.

Attachment Report of RFPs and RFQs Scheduled for Release in July

-2- July 13, 2012 Board Meeting Report on RFPs and RFQs Scheduled for Release on July 13, 2012

(For detailed information visit AQMD’s website at http://www.aqmd.gov/rfp/index.html following Board approval on July 13, 2012)

STANDARDIZED SERVICES

RFP #P2013-02 Issue RFP to Audit AB 2766 Fee Revenue Recipients O’KELLY/2828 for FYs 2009-10 and 2010-11

AB 2766 requires any agency that receives fee revenues subvened to AQMD from the Department of Motor Vehicles to be audited once every two years. This action is to issue an RFP for an independent Certified Public Accountant to conduct the audits. Funds for this expense are included in the FY 2012-13 Budget.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT OR SPECIAL TECHNICAL EXPERTISE

RFP #P2013-01 Issue RFP for Telecommunication Services MARLIA/3148

On September 11, 2009, the Board approved contracts with various vendors to provide telecommunication services to the District. These telecommunication services include local, long distance, and toll-free; private IP (PIP)/frame relay network; dedicated T1 lines, internet access; phone switch maintenance; and wireless voice and data. The contracts will expire on November 30, 2012. This action is to issue an RFP to select vendors capable of providing these services for a three-year period. Funds for this expense are included in the FY 2012-13 Budget, and will be included in each of the two remaining fiscal years of the contract.

REQUESTS FOR QUALIFICATIONS - Prequalified Vendor List

NONE

REQUEST FOR QUOTATIONS – Commercial Off-the-Shelf Equipment

NONE

-3-

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 17

PROPOSAL: Report on Major Projects for Information Management Scheduled to Start During First Six Months of FY 2012-13

SYNOPSIS: Information Management is responsible for data systems management services in support of all AQMD operations. This action is to report on major automation contracts and projects to be initiated by Information Management during the first six months of FY 2012-13.

COMMITTEE: Administrative, June 8, 2012, Recommended for Approval

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. Executive Officer

JCM:MAH:OSM:nv

Background Information Management (IM) provides a wide range of information systems and services in support of all AQMD operations. IM’s primary goal is to provide automated tools and systems to implement Board-approved rules and regulations, and to improve internal efficiencies. The annual Budget specifies projects planned during the fiscal year to develop, acquire, enhance, or maintain mission-critical information systems.

Summary of Report The attached report identifies each of the major projects/contracts or purchases that are expected to come before the Board between July 1 and December 31, 2012. Information provided for each project includes a brief project description, FY 2012-13 Budget, and the schedule associated with known major milestones (issue RFP/RFQ, execute contract, etc.).

Attachment Information Management Major Projects for Period July 1 through December 31, 2012

ATTACHMENT July 13, 2012 Board Meeting Information Management Major Projects for the Period of July 1 through December 31, 2012

Budgeted Schedule of Item Brief Description Status Funds Board Actions $750,000 Release RFP Telecommunications Select vendor(s) to provide local, long On Schedule July 13, 2012; Services distance, internet, cellular services, and phone Award Contract(s) equipment maintenance for a three-year November 2, 2012 period.

PeopleSoft and Oracle Purchase PeopleSoft and Oracle software $238,800 Approve Sole On Schedule Software Support support maintenance for the integrated Source Purchase HR/Finance system. July 13, 2012

Authorize Purchase of Authorize the sole source purchase of $125,000 Approve Purchase On Schedule OnBase Software OnBase software subscription and support for July 13, 2012 Support one year.

Systems Maintenance Provide enhancements for: TBD September 7, 2012 On Schedule and Enhancements • CLASS System(s) • eGovernment Applications & Infrastructure • Software Version Upgrades • PeopleSoft Upgrade

Website Redesign and Purchase Content Management System $210,000 Release RFP On Schedule Content Management (CMS) software and associated hardware. September 7, 2012 System

Systems Replacement Initiate detail work planning for Systems TBD November 2, 2012 On Schedule Replacement: • Stakeholder Vision Survey • Resource Procurement • Proof of Concept Prototyping

Desktop Computer Authorize the purchase of desktop upgrades. $150,000 Authorize Purchase On Schedule Hardware Upgrades from Approved Vendors List November 2, 2012

CLASS Database Purchase Ingres database software support $169,000 Approve Sole On Schedule Software Support and maintenance for the CLASS system. Source Purchase November 2, 2012

Double-lined Rows - Board Agenda items current for this month Shaded Rows - activities completed

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 19

REPORT: Administrative Committee

SYNOPSIS: The Administrative Committee met on Friday, June 8, 2012. The Committee discussed various issues detailed in the Committee report. The next Administrative Committee meeting is scheduled for Friday, July 20, 2012, which begins at 10 a.m. in CC-8.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file.

Dr. William A. Burke, Chair Administrative Committee tc

Attendance: Attending the June 8, 2012, meeting via VT were Committee Members William Burke and Supervisor Josie Gonzales. Committee Member Mayor Dennis Yates attended at AQMD headquarters, while Mayor Ron Loveridge was absent due to a conflict in his schedule.

ACTION/DISCUSSION ITEMS:

1. Board Members’ Concerns: Committee Member Yates congratulated Committee Member Gonzales on her re-election to the County of San Bernardino Board of Supervisors.

2. Chairman’s Report of Approved Travel: None.

3. Approval of Compensation for Board Member Assistant(s)/Consultant(s): Dr. Wallerstein stated that new Board Member Clark E. Parker requested approval of his Board Consultant, Tristie A. Miller. Staff reviewed the proposal and is requesting approval.

Moved by Yates; seconded by Gonzales; unanimously approved.

4. Report of Approved Out-of-Country Travel: None.

JULY AGENDA ITEMS:

5. Recognize Revenue and Appropriate Funds for NATTS, Reallocate Revenue and Reimburse Undesignated Fund Balance with PM2.5 Grant Award, Reallocate Funds for PAMS, and Issue Purchase Order: Chung Liu, DEO/Science & Technology Advancement, explained that this request is for laboratory and monitoring programs to assist with the MATES IV program to receive additional Section 103 grant from U.S. EPA. This item is also to receive money from U. S. EPA to administer Section 103 PM2.5 grant funds to replace a monitoring deck at our Downtown Los Angeles monitoring site, to carry over PAMS funds from this fiscal year to next fiscal year and to purchase one ion chromatograph to perform additional laboratory analysis.

Moved by Yates; seconded by Gonzales; unanimously approved.

6. Report on Major Projects for Information Management Scheduled to Start During First Six Months of FY 2012-2013: Chris Marlia, Asst. DEO/Information Management, stated that this is a standard item to request approval of eight projects throughout the year.

Moved by Yates; seconded by Gonzales; unanimously approved.

7. Authorize Purchase of Onbase Software Support

Moved by Yates; seconded by Gonzales; and unanimously approved.

8. Authorize Purchase of PeopleSoft and Oracle Software Support:

Moved by Yates; seconded by Gonzales; and unanimously approved.

-2- 9. Local Government & Small Business Advisory Group Minutes for the March 9, 2012 Meeting: Derrick Alatorre, Assistant DEO/Legislative & Public Affairs mentioned that this is a monthly item for information only.

Receive and file report.

10. Environmental Justice Advisory Group Minutes for the March 23, 2012 Meeting: Attached for information only are the Environmental Justice Advisory Group minutes for the March 23, 2012 meeting.

Receive and file report.

11. Report of RFPs and RFQs Scheduled for Release in July: Michael O’Kelly, Chief Financial Officer, stated there are two items for release in July – Audit services for AB 2766 Fee Revenue Recipients for FYs 2009-10 and 2010-11; and procure telecommunication services. Committee Chair Burke asked what telecommunication services were being requested, and Mr. Marlia answered there are 11 categories of services in the RFP and vendors selected must be capable of providing their respective service for a three-year period.

Moved by Gonzales; seconded by Yates; and unanimously approved.

12. Review July 13, 2012 Governing Board Agenda: Dr. Wallerstein mentioned that staff will provide an update on the Draft 2012 AQMP, and bring to the Board Amended Rule 1110.2 for consideration.

13. Other Business: None.

14. Public Comment: None.

Meeting adjourned at 10:14 a.m.

Attachments Local Government & Small Business Advisory Group Minutes for the March 9, 2012 Meeting Environmental Justice Advisory Group Minutes for the March 23, 2012 Meeting

-3- South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov

LOCAL GOVERNMENT & SMALL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE ADVISORY GROUP FRIDAY, March 9, 2012 MEETING MINUTES

MEMBERS PRESENT: Dennis Yates, Mayor, City of Chino and LGSBA Chairman Greg Adams, L.A. County Sanitation District Felipe Aguirre, Vice Mayor, City of Maywood Paul Avila, P.B.A. & Associates Geoffrey Blake, Metal Finishers of Southern California/All Metals Todd Campbell, Clean Energy Daniel Cunningham, Metal Finishing Association of Southern California Maria Elena Kennedy, Kennedy Communications Rita Loof, RadTech International Mary Ann Lutz, City of Monrovia Steve Mugg, South Orange County Representative, City of Mission Viejo

MEMBERS ABSENT: Ronald Loveridge, Mayor, City of Riverside and LGSBA Vice Chairman Lucy Dunn, Orange County Business Council Jacob Haik, Office of School Board Member Richard Vladovic Angelo Logan, East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice Kelly Moulton, Paralegal

OTHERS PRESENT: Earl Elrod, Board Member Assistant (Yates) Vlad Kogan, Orange County Sanitation District

AQMD STAFF: Philip Fine, Planning and Rules Manager Anupom Ganguli, Asst. Deputy Executive Officer/Public Advisor Michael Krause, Program Supervisor Lori Langrell, Secretary John Olvera, Principal Deputy District Counsel Jean Ospital, Health Effects Officer Jeanette Short, Senior Administrative Secretary Laki Tisopulos, Asst. Deputy Executive Officer Greg Ushijima, Air Quality Engineer II Lisa Tanaka O’Malley, Community Relations Manager Rev 3/17/12 1

Agenda Item #1 - Call to Order/Opening Remarks Mayor Dennis Yates called the meeting to order at 11:07 a.m.

Agenda Item #2 – Approval of January 13, 2012 Meeting Minutes/Review of Follow- Up/Action Items Mayor Yates called for approval of the meeting minutes. The January 13, 2012 meeting minutes were approved.

The LGSBA meeting in April conflicts with the Board Retreat, therefore it is cancelled and the next LGSBA meeting will be in May.

Action Item: Provide an overview of the different air pollutants regulated by the AQMD as part of the Air Quality Management Plan briefing to the Advisory Group.

 On today’s agenda – Jean Ospital to give presentation

Agenda Item #3 – Nomination of LG&SBA Advisory Group Member to SCAQMD Advisory Council Dr. Ganguli explained that each advisory group shall appoint one of its members to serve on the District’s Advisory Council to review the health effects from particulate matter in the South Coast Air Basin.

Mr. Michael Krause explained the process and formation of the Advisory Council.

Mr. Todd Campbell was appointed to represent the LG&SBA Advisory Group on the SCAQMD’s Advisory Council to review the Air Quality Management Plan.

Agenda Item #4 – Governor Executive Order to Identify and Eliminate Unnecessary Legislative Reports Dr. Anupom Ganguli discussed Governor Brown’s Executive Order B-14-11 requiring agencies to list reports they are required to submit to the Legislature and identify reports that may no longer be of significant value.

Mr. Geoffrey Blake stated that if the public can extract the information from the AQMD website then we should eliminate sending the same information to the Legislature.

Ms. Mary Ann Lutz recommended that a task force be formed to review the reports, get a consensus and make recommendations.

Mayor Yates stated that it’s up to the governor which reports they receive.

Agenda Item #5 – 2011 Ozone Season and Ongoing Air Quality Trends Mr. Philip Fine provided an overview of the 2011 ozone season and an analysis of the ongoing trends of ozone and PM2.5.

Mr. Paul Avila asked if the data was based on all the stations collectively which Mr. Fine concurred.

Rev 3/17/12 2 Ms. Rita Loof asked if there was a new one hour standard since slide 5 states “Former NAAQS Standard”. Mr. Fine replied that the former standard has been revoked but there are still some planning requirements associated with the one-hour standards which are currently tied up in court.

Ms. Elena Maria Kennedy asked why Crestline had the highest ozone. Mr. Fine replied that Crestline has one of the highest ozone readings due to meteorology. He added that ozone is the worst inland because the pollution blows inland and collects along the mountains.

Mr. Avila asked if fire influences the readings. Mr. Fine responded that fires influence many pollutants including PM2.5, PM10, NO2 and CO and can increase ozone, but not always, depending on proximity to the fire. He added that studies have shown that the further you are from the fire; ozone has time to cook and form in the air due to photochemical activity. Mr. Avila asked if a big fire is excluded from the analysis of air quality trends. Mr. Fine replied that for PM there is an exceptional event exclusion but not for ozone.

Mr. Geoff Blake asked if the ozone information is on our website. Mr. Fine stated that the 2011 is not final yet but will be posted once the data is finalized. Mr. Blake asked what the term “design value” means. Mr. Fine replied that it’s the mathematically determined pollutant concentration EPA uses to determine attainment with the federal standards.

Mr. Avila inquired about the Mira Loma site. Mr. Fine explained that Rubidoux used to be the worst location for PM2.5 until the Mira Loma site was put in service. Mira Loma is now AQMD’s “design value” site, mostly for the particulate matter.

Agenda Item #6 – Overview of Air Pollution & Health Effects Dr. Jean Ospital provided a general overview of criteria air pollutants and major toxic air pollutants regulated by the AQMD, including associated health effects resulting from those air pollutants.

Mr. Avila asked if there was a difference when you measured the air lung capacity between being outside and inside a building where the air is controlled. Dr. Ospital stated that they wouldn’t expect a difference unless you were outside and exposed to ozone for a while which could, consequently, constrict your airways.

Ms. Rita Loof stated that a study conducted by ARB years ago found the air quality was worse in portable school classrooms than outdoor air quality and wanted to know if the children who were surveyed in this study, were in portable classrooms. Dr. Ospital responded that there were 12 communities where children were recruited for the study and the outdoor levels were measured but did not think the indoor levels were addressed.

Mr. Blake asked what ability the body has to remove these particles once they are inhaled into our lungs. Dr. Ospital replied that some of the particles will go in and some will go out with the air but a higher percentage of the smaller particles will remain in our lungs. He added that the lung does have mechanisms to remove the particles but the ultrafine particles get into the blood stream and end up in other organs. Mr. Blake asked if the HEPA filters are going to help. Dr. Ospital responded that HEPA filters do work in terms of reducing particles in the air.

Mr. Avila asked if the data shows a correlation between air pollutants and stress causing death. Dr. Ospital replied that the data is broad and not that refined. Rev 3/17/12 3

Ms. Loof, in reference to some of the results of a children’s health study that were presented, stated that some schools still spray pesticides during school hours and asked if they were taken into consideration, to which Dr. Ospital replied that he thought that they did not.

Mayor Yates asked what year the study was conducted. Dr. Ospital responded that the children were studied from about the 1992 timeframe, when they were in the 4th grade, and were followed through high school graduation.

Ms. Loof stated the PM2.5 information in Mr. Fine’s presentation was in compliance and asked about the study Dr. Ospital was referring to in regards to cost savings due to compliance with the standards. Dr. Ospital replied that the study was conducted in 2004/2005 when we were not meeting the air quality standards. Ms. Loof asked if we are achieving those savings now that we have met those air quality standards, to which Dr. Ospital concurred that we likely would be realizing savings if the standards were met.

Mr. Blake asked why plating operations were listed stating that in regards to chromium, they only represent a small percentage. Dr. Ospital stated that these were examples of emissions sources that occur near communities and can result in exposures. He also stated that if emissions data were from the toxics release inventory from EPA, it could include emissions that are not in the air, such as, if it’s hauled offsite, if it’s buried, if it’s taken to a waste disposal site, or if it’s discharged in water, which all count in the emissions released inventory.

Mr. Campbell asked if the diesel filters are performing as expected. Dr. Ospital responded that the MATES study will start again this summer and we will have some information regarding diesel particulate levels in the basin. He added that elemental carbon, which is one of the tracers for diesel exhaust, has been going down since 2008, likely due at least in part to the recession, but also likely due to control measures reducing emissions.

Mr. Avila asked about the 70 year health risk. Dr. Ospital replied that it’s an assumption that is made for cancer risk, as it’s a long term disease, you have to be exposed for decades for it to come up and so that is the standard practice recommended by our state Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). He added that OEHHA has proposed to shorten the exposure period to 35 years and also proposed some other methodological changes such as in breathing rates, potency in terms of age at exposure, and that the net effect, as related to him by OEHHA staff, would be an increase in estimated risk. These are currently proposed changes, and have not been reviewed by the state’s Scientific Review Panel.

Agenda Item #7 – Annual Report on AB 2766 Funds from Motor Vehicle Registration Fees for FY 2009-10 This Agenda item was not heard due to limited time.

Agenda Item #8 – Monthly Report on Small Business Assistance Activities No comments.

Agenda Item #9 - Other Business Ms. Loof inquired about a request for an update presentation on Rule 1107. Dr. Ganguli responded that staff was not ready to present the update but will schedule a presentation soon.

Agenda Item #10 - Public Comment Rev 3/17/12 4 No comments.

Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 12:25 p.m.

Rev 3/17/12 5 South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmd.gov

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ADVISORY GROUP FRIDAY, MARCH 23, 2012 MEETING MINUTES

MEMBERS PRESENT: Dr. Joseph Lyou, AQMD Governing Board Member, EJAG Chairman Lawrence Beeson, Loma Linda University, School of Public Health Suzanne Bilodeau, Knott’s Berry Farm Paul Choe, Korean Drycleaners & Laundry Association Afif El-Hasan, American Lung Association Mary Figueroa, Riverside Community College Maria Elena Kennedy, Quail Valley Task Force Pat Kennedy, Greater Long Beach Interfaith Community Evelyn Knight, Long Beach Economic Development Commission Brenda LaMothe, S. Los Angeles Service Representative for L.A. Mayor Angelo Logan, East Yard Communities for Environmental Justice Margaret Mapes, St. Joseph Center John Moretta, Resurrection Church William Nelson, OC Signature Properties Woodie Rucker-Hughes, NAACP – Riverside Branch Rafael Yanez, Member of the Public

MEMBERS ABSENT: Rhetta Alexander, San Fernando Valley Interfaith Council Alycia Enciso, Small Business Owner Andrea Hricko, Southern California Environmental Health Sciences Daniel Morales, National Alliance for Human Rights Elina Nasser, Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, UCLA Neal Richman, Breathe LA

AQMD STAFF: Jean Ospital, Health Effects Officer Lisa Tanaka O’Malley, Community Relations Manager Jeanette Short, Sr. Administrative Secretary

Agenda Item #1 - Call to Order/Opening Remarks Chair Dr. Joseph Lyou called the meeting to order at 12:46 PM.

Agenda Item #2 – Nomination of EJAG Member to SCAQMD Advisory Council Chair Lyou explained that each AQMD advisory group shall appoint one of its members to serve on the District’s Advisory Council to review the health effects from particulate matter in the South Coast Air Basin, for the 2012 Air Quality Management Plan. Rev. 7/3/2012 1

Dr. Jean Ospital explained the process and formation of the Advisory Council.

Dr. Afif El-Hasan was appointed to represent EJAG on the SCAQMD’s Advisory Council.

The meeting was adjourned at 1:05 PM.

Rev. 7/3/2012 2

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 20

REPORT: Legislative Committee

SYNOPSIS: The Legislative Committee held a meeting on Friday, June 8, 2012. The next Legislative Committee is scheduled for Friday, July 20, 2012 at 9 a.m. in Conference Room CC8. The Committee deliberated on agenda items for Board consideration and recommended the following actions:

Agenda Item Recommended Position AB 1570 (Perea) & SB 984 (Simitian): Environmental Quality: OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED California Environmental Quality Act: Record of Proceedings AB 1532 (Perez) California Global SUPPORT WITH Warning Solutions Act of 2006: AMENDMENTS Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account

SB 1268 ( Pavley) Energy: Energy SUPPORT Conservation Assistance

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file this report, and approve agenda items as specified in this letter.

Josie Gonzales, Chair Legislative Committee

DA: MC: PC: DM

Attendance [Attachment 1] The Legislative Committee met on June 8, 2012. Committee Chair, Supervisor Josie Gonzales, Committee Vice Chair, Councilwoman Jan Perry, and Committee Members, Supervisor Michael Antonovich, and Councilwoman Judy Mitchell were all present via videoconference.

Update on Federal Legislative Issues Andy Ehrlich, AQMD federal legislative consultant, reported that the big question currently in Washington D.C. is whether anything will get done before the November election. He stated that at this point it is uncertain, and that the most important bill being worked on is the Surface Transportation Reauthorization Bill. It was reported that if the conference committee on the bill is not completed by the end of June, when the current authorization expires, then House Republicans may wait until after the November election to finalize the bill. It was further reported that there was language in the House Surface Transportation bill that authorizes air quality agencies to participate in the freight planning process and that the signatures of 11 House members were secured for a support letter encouraging the conference report to include such language.

Mr. Ehrlich also reported that it is possible that later this month the House Interior Appropriations bill will get started in the House Appropriations Committee. The bill’s progress will be monitored because it has funding programs that are very important to AQMD. Mr. Ehrlich also reported that there is work being done to get support for a Department of Energy grant application submitted recently by AQMD for Zero Emission Cargo Transport technology. One member of the House has already sent in a support letter and more are expected.

Mark Kadesh, AQMD federal legislative consultant, confirmed Mr. Ehrlich’s comments on the progress of the Surface Transportation Bill, and reported that at this point they are optimistic about keeping in the revised language that benefits AQMD which was added to the Senate version of the bill.

Warren Weinstein, AQMD federal legislative consultant, reported that Senator Inhofe introduced a resolution of disapproval that is due to come up next week, that is intended to prevent EPA from issuing new rules for air pollution, following a past court decision that made previous EPA rules invalid. The vote on the resolution is expected to be close. Ultimately, however, a veto by the President would be expected if it passed both houses.

Chris Kierig, AQMD federal legislative consultant, provided an update on the Senate version of the Interior Appropriations bill. He reported that on the House side there are significant proposed cuts and that on the Senate side it is going much slower, and there are no plans to mark up the bill at this time.

2

Update on Sacramento Legislative Issues Will Gonzalez, AQMD state legislative consultant, updated the committee on major energy issues in Sacramento. California is leading the nation in greenhouse gas reduction efforts. There will be the first auction of emission reduction credits soon, and it is expected to generate about $1 billion in revenue.

Two key legislative vehicles designed to direct how these funds are spent are:

 AB 1532 (Perez) - This bill would provide a broad outline of GHG reducing measures that could access funding (includes energy efficiency, low-carbon transportation, and natural resources management). AB 1532 was approved by the Assembly this week and now heads to the Senate.  AB 1186 (Skinner) - This is a newly amended bill that directs an unspecified amount of cap and trade revenue to energy efficiency improvements in schools. This bill is pending in the Senate Energy Committee.

The Governor has stated that a cap and trade expenditure plan will be generated by CARB and will be reflected in the Governor's next budget.

Mr. Gonzalez reported that the California Energy Commission last week approved new updates to the Title 24 energy efficiency building standards for new residential and commercial construction. The new regulations are by far the toughest in the nation. Among other things, beginning in 2015, all new construction will be required to be constructed with roofs and electrical capabilities that are compatible with solar systems. Also, AQMD continues talks with WD-40 regarding recent lubricant-related rules adopted by the District. AQMD and WD-40 will be meeting with CARB staff in the coming weeks.

Jason Gonsalves, AQMD state legislative consultant, reported on the state budget, and said that a June 15th budget adoption is expected. Legislators will stop receiving compensation if the process goes beyond that date. The budget committees are now up and running this week after the election and the leadership, including the Governor, Senate and Assembly leaders are meeting this week. The parties seem to be about $2 billion apart currently, and the Legislative leaders are resisting significant cuts proposed by the Governor.

Also, the Governor is applying pressure on the Legislature regarding pension reform. The deadline for legislative passage of the portion of pension reform that would need to be placed on the ballot for voter approval is June 28th. It is unknown whether pension reform will become part of the budget compromise. He also reported on the voter approved Proposition 28, which limits service in the Senate and Assembly to 12 years, respectively. As of its adoption, it will apply to all new legislative members and

3 senators. It was also reported that the Governor’s tax increase ballot measure is expected to meet the July 6th deadline to qualify for the November ballot.

Recommend Position of the following State Bills [Attachment 2] Mr. Philip Crabbe, Community Relations Manager for Legislative & Public Affairs, briefed the Committee on the following state bills:

AB 1570 (Perea) Environmental Quality: California Environmental Quality Act: Record of Proceedings & SB 984 (Simitian) Environmental Quality: California Environmental Quality Act: Record of Proceedings

Mr. Crabbe explained to the Committee that these two bills are essentially identical; however SB 984 is an urgency bill. These bills would, until January 1, 2016, require a lead agency at a project applicant’s request, to prepare a certified record of proceedings concurrently with the preparation of environmental documents, and to promptly post all documents on the Internet. However, these bills could pose a substantial administrative burden, as the entire permitting file is to be included as part of the CEQA record. Staff recommended the following amendments:

1. Provide exemptions to web posting requirements since some documents may include copyrighted materials, confidential trade secrets, or be so voluminous that they are not convertible to downloadable form or should not be widely disclosed. 2. An agency should be allowed a reasonable time to post documents, and not be restricted to the bill’s proposed five business day posting requirement, under certain conditions, such as with public comments that are voluminous and/or in awkward formats, or for documents that require special handling, such as the redaction of confidential information. These types of documents may not reasonably be able to be converted and posted within five business days. 3. Finally, the bill’s requirements could create opportunities to invalidate a lead agency’s ultimate action for failure to strictly comply. The bill should be amended to avoid invalidations based on technicalities.

Staff recommended a position of OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED.

Chair Gonzales asked why there are two identical bills such as these. Mr. Crabbe responded that the bills are companion bills, one in the Senate, and one in the Assembly, potentially allowing for an accelerated passage process.

Councilwoman Mitchell asked why a certified record would have to be prepared before an EIR was issued, and before any lawsuit was filed. Barbara Baird, AQMD District Counsel, responded that this bill was intended to expedite the preparation of the record to accommodate the more streamlined judicial review process that exists.

4

Barry R. Wallerstein, AQMD Executive Officer, commented that this stems from legislation passed last year that provided CEQA streamlining for a football stadium in downtown Los Angeles, via an expedited court review process. He said that the problem is that the added requirements of these bills could cause a greater risk of CEQA documents being set aside due to technicalities. We would like to make sure that the authors are aware of these issues and propose appropriate changes to the bill language. We hope that they will be receptive to these important changes.

Chair Gonzales abstained from the vote. The Legislative Committee supported staff’s recommendation to Oppose AB 1570 and SB 984 Unless Amended

AB 1532 (Perez) California Global Warning Solutions Act of 2006: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account Mr. Crabbe stated that this bill would establish the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account (GHGRA) to receive regulatory fee revenue from the auction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission allowances per AB 32, and would direct uses for those revenues. This bill is the lead bill among others, to determine this issue. This bill could help fund efforts to reduce emissions and improve air quality within the South Coast, and make funds available for efforts that promote: Clean and efficient energy and Low-carbon transportation, including goods movement and freight vehicle technologies and infrastructure. It is recommended that the bill be amended to enhance priority for projects with co-benefits that reduce criteria pollutant emissions in nonattainment areas.

Staff recommended a position of SUPPORT WITH AMENDMENTS.

Chairperson Gonzales stated that at the recent SANBAG meeting, AB 1532 was referenced and that SANBAG needed to play a stronger role in supporting the bill.

Chairperson Gonzales also stated the importance of cities and counties need to have a stronger relationship with AQMD and legislation the District is supporting to help reduce air pollution.

Chairperson Gonzales stated that she has instructed the county’s lobbyist in Sacramento and the lobbyist for SANBAG to assist AQMD’s efforts in Sacramento to have a united voice. She urged other supervisors and councilmembers to do the same in urging their lobbyists to support AQMD’s efforts in Sacramento.

Comments: None

The Legislative Committee supported staff’s recommendation to Support AB 1532 With Amendments

5

SB 1268 (Pavley) Energy: Energy Conservation Assistance Mr. Crabbe stated that this bill would extend the sunset dates of the Energy Conservation Assistance Account program (ECAA) and the Local Jurisdiction Energy Assistance Account program (LJEAA) to January 1, 2028. These two programs, which sunset in 2013 and 2016 respectively, are focused on reducing statewide energy consumption through energy efficiency. Energy efficiency measures are beneficial to air quality and greenhouse gas reduction goals. This bill would allow existing programs, with current funding, to continue to provide assistance at the local level, including within the South Coast.

Staff recommended a position of SUPPORT.

The Legislative Committee supported staff’s recommendation to Support SB 1268

Update on Hydraulic Fracturing Legislation Mr. Crabbe updated the committee on the status of two state bills recently supported by the Governing Board related to Hydraulic Fracturing, also known as fracking; and on other state and federal efforts.

Mr. Crabbe reported, that as presented by Henry Hogo at the Governing Board meeting, US EPA recently issued regulations mandating gas recovery practices at fracking sites that will have emission reduction benefits. Additionally, several federal bills have been introduced that relate to fracking to varying degrees. However, consultants have reported that none of these bills appear to be moving this year.

At the state level, the California Department of Conservation is hosting a series of workshops focused on fracking, to gain more information, as a precursor to developing fracking regulations. AQMD’s consultants anticipate that the Assembly may be inserting language in the Budget next week to set guidelines for the Department, to facilitate the development of these regulations. The Department’s public workshops began in mid-May and continue through July. Two local hearings scheduled are:

 June 12th from 7:00 to 9:00 PM at Culver City - City Council Chambers  June 13th from 7:00 to 9:00 PM at Cal State Long Beach Student Union

Additionally, the California Legislature considered two key bills, SB 1054 by Senator Pavley and AB 591 by Assemblyman Wieckowski, which the Governing Board recently considered and supported as initial steps towards ensuring that fracking is conducted safely in California. SB 1054 would extend the time that the state has to reply to a request to begin drilling a well from 10 to 15 working days. It would also establish who should receive notice of well drilling and hydraulic fracturing operations and the timing of such notice. It would also require a well owner or operator to keep a history of the hydraulic fracturing treatments performed, and calls for an annual report to the

6

Legislature. AB 591 requires a well owner or operator to disclose the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing and to post it on the Internet, and requires the preparation of an annual report to the Legislature on hydraulic fracturing in the exploration and production of oil and gas resources in California.

Both bills moved through the committee process with solid support, but on May 31st, SB 1054 failed passage on the Assembly floor. Industry lobbied heavily against the bill, arguing that legislation was premature given the public workshops being conducted. With SB 1054 failing in the Senate, passage of AB 591 in the Senate is uncertain. AB 591 most recently has been re-referred to the Senate Appropriations Committee.

Chair Gonzales asked if SB 1054 failed because there is heavy lobbying going on to kill these bills, and the workshops are considered the main reason, what was on the other side to counter these efforts to show the negative consequences of fracking based on previous studies? Dr. Wallerstein responded that as has been described to the Governing Board previously, this is a relatively new area of policy for both the federal and state government, and for AQMD, but this issue is not going away and is in the spotlight. Workshops will take place here in Southern California and the Department of Oil and Gas has pressure being placed upon it. The Governing Board has given direction at the last meeting for AQMD to hold a one-day conference/symposium on the fracking issue and then to come back to make recommendations based on information gathered and on available studies. This could lead to some form of rule making here at the agency that would require disclosure of certain information to us, so that we could be assured that there are not toxics or other air emissions of concern to us from these operations. These issues will be addressed over the next few months and state legislation could be possible for next year.

Mr. Bill LaMarr, Executive Director of the California Small Business Alliance, gave public comment asking if the one-day conference will be similar in respect to the subject material that is being discussed by the state. Chair Gonzales suggested that Mr. LaMarr submit any suggestions to AQMD relating to our planning of the AQMD fracking event. Mr. Wallerstein reported that we are still in a preliminary stage of formulating an agenda and the direction given to Dr. Chung Liu, Deputy Executive Officer for Science & Technology Advancement, was to avoid duplication of the efforts of others, and to do something focused on Southern California. The intent of the conference is to have a balanced group of participants from various viewpoints in order to have a robust dialogue and gather information to discuss potential policy options.

Report from AQMD Home Rule Advisory Group [Attachment 2] Please refer to Attachment 2 for written report.

Other Businesses: None

7

Public Comment Period: None

Attachments 1. Attendance Record 2. Recommended Positions on State Bills 3. Home Rule Advisory Committee Report

8

Attachment 1

ATTENDANCE RECORD – June 8, 2012

DISTRICT BOARD MEMBERS: Josie Gonzales, Committee Chair Jan Perry, Committee Vice Chair Michael D. Antonovich Judy Mitchell

STAFF TO COMMITTEE: Derrick Alatorre, Assistant Deputy Executive Officer/Public Advisor Julie Franco, Senior Administrative Secretary

DISTRICT STAFF: Barry Wallerstein, Executive Officer Barbara Baird, District Counsel Elaine Chang, Deputy Executive Officer Nancy Feldman, Principal Deputy District Counsel Peter Greenwald, Senior Policy Advisor Mohsen Nazemi, Deputy Executive Officer Laki Tisopulos, Assistant Deputy Executive Officer Sam Atwood, Media Manager Marc Carrel, Program Supervisor Philip Crabbe, Community Relations Manager David Madsen, Senior Public Information Specialist Lauren Nevitt, Deputy District Counsel II Veera Tyagi, Senior Deputy District Counsel Kim White, Public Information Specialist Patti Whiting, Staff Specialist Paul Wright, Audio Video Specialist

OTHERS PRESENT: Mark Abramowitz, Board Member Assistant (Lyou) Jeff Catalano, Board Member Assistant (Perry) Andy Ehrlich, Faegre, Baker, Daniel Consulting Kris Flaig, City of Los Angeles Jason Gonsalves, Gonsalves & Son (teleconference) Paul Gonsalves, Gonsalves & Son (teleconference) Will Gonzalez, Gonzalez, Quintana & Hunter (teleconference) Sue Gornick, BP Bill LaMarr, California Small Business Association Mark Kadesh, Kadesh & Associates Chris Kierig, Kadesh & Associates Rita Loof, RadTech Max Pike, CEA Consulting David Rothbart, LACSD Warren Weinstein, Faegre, Baker, Daniels (teleconference) South Coast Air Quality Management District Legislative Analysis Summary – AB 1570 (Perea) Attachment 2 Bill Version: As amended April 10, 2012 WS

AB 1570 (Perea) Environmental Quality: California Environmental Quality Act: Record of Proceedings.

Summary: Until January 1, 2016, this bill would require the lead agency, at the request of a project applicant, to, among other things, prepare a record of proceedings concurrently with the preparation of negative declarations, mitigated negative declarations, Environmental Impact Reports (EIRs) or other environmental documents.

Background: The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an EIR on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. Currently, CEQA establishes a procedure for the preparation and certification of the record of proceedings upon the filing of an action or proceeding challenging a lead agency's action on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA.

Status: 5/31/12 - In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

Specific Provisions: Provides procedures for a lead agency to prepare and certify the record of proceedings concurrently with the administrative process for environmental documents, and to promptly post all documents on the Internet.

a) Requires these procedures for any project of statewide, regional or area-wide environmental significance (those projects where the draft EIR, proposed negative declaration or proposed mitigated negative declaration must be submitted to appropriate state agencies for review and comment) and certain other infill development projects.

b) Permits these procedures for other projects upon the request of the project applicant and consent of the lead agency, provided the project applicant agrees to pay the lead agency's costs of preparation.

Sunsets January 1, 2016.

Impacts on AQMD’s mission, operations or initiatives: In the few instances where AQMD is a lead agency, this bill may pose a substantial additional administrative burden to prepare the record of proceedings concurrently with the EIR as the entire (publicly disclosable) permitting file should be included as part of the CEQA record, as well as web postings.

Recommended Position: OPPOSE, UNLESS AMENDED

1. Some of the documents relied upon may be either copyrighted, or confidential trade secret information if received from applicant, and thus not convertible to downloadable form, or too voluminous and unable to be put into such form. Exemptions from the requirement to put on the web should be made for these. In the case of documents that are simply too voluminous, we may suggest that they be made available thru CD or other electronic means instead. In the case of copyrighted material, it should just be required to be made available for review upon request at the lead agency’s offices. As for trade secret—it should not be disclosed.

2. Some public comments may be so voluminous and/or in awkward form that it is not reasonable to convert and post them within 5 business days. An agency should be allowed to take a reasonable time, as determined by the agency, if it makes a finding of good cause and justifies it in writing. Similarly, an agency should be allowed to take a reasonable time, as determined by the agency, in instances where a public member submits copyrighted material (or a copy of such) or confidential business information and the time to redact that material may prevent timely compliance.

3. The requirements of this bill, especially the electronic posting requirements, present potential opportunities to challenge the agency’s ultimate action for failure to strictly comply. The bill should be amended to provide that a “Failure to comply with any of the requirements of Sect. 21167.6.2 shall not constitute grounds for invalidating any document approved or action taken by the agency.”

Support California Manufacturers & Technology Association City of Firebaugh City of Fowler Fresno Chamber of Commerce City of Mendota City of Orange Cove City of Selma Fresno Chamber of Commerce

Opposition

None on file

2 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 10, 2012 california legislature—2011–12 regular session

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1570

1 Introduced by Assembly Member Perea

February 1, 2012

1 An act to amend, repeal, and add Section 21167.6 of, and to add and r2 epeal Section 21167.6.2 to of, the Public Resources Code, relating to en3 vironmental quality.

legislative counsel’s digest AB 1570, as amended, Perea. Environmental quality: California Environmental Quality Act: record of proceedings. (1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes a procedure for the preparation and certification of the record of proceedings upon the filing of an action or proceeding challenging a lead agency’s action on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA. This bill would require, until January 1, 2016, the lead agency, at the request of a project applicant, to, among other things, prepare a record of proceedings concurrently with the preparation and certification of

98 AB 1570 — 2 — an EIR of negative declarations, mitigated negative declarations, EIRs, or other environmental documents for specified projects. Because the bill would require a lead agency to prepare the record of proceedings as provided, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

1 SECTION 1. Section 21167.6 of the Public Resources Code 2 is amended to read: 3 21167.6. Notwithstanding any other law, in all actions or 4 proceedings brought pursuant to Section 21167, except as provided 5 for in Section 21167.6.2 or those involving the Public Utilities 6 Commission, all of the following shall apply: 7 (a) At the time that the action or proceeding is filed, the plaintiff 8 or petitioner shall file a request that the respondent public agency 9 prepare the record of proceedings relating to the subject of the 10 action or proceeding. The request, together with the complaint or 11 petition, shall be served personally upon the public agency not 12 later than 10 business days from the date that the action or 13 proceeding was filed. 14 (b) (1) The public agency shall prepare and certify the record 15 of proceedings not later than 60 days from the date that the request 16 specified in subdivision (a) was served upon the public agency. 17 Upon certification, the public agency shall lodge a copy of the 18 record of proceedings with the court and shall serve on the parties 19 notice that the record of proceedings has been certified and lodged 20 with the court. The parties shall pay any reasonable costs or fees 21 imposed for the preparation of the record of proceedings in 22 conformance with any law or rule of court. 23 (2) The plaintiff or petitioner may elect to prepare the record 24 of proceedings or the parties may agree to an alternative method 25 of preparation of the record of proceedings, subject to certification

98 — 3 — AB 1570

1 of its accuracy by the public agency, within the time limit specified 2 in this subdivision. 3 (c) The time limit established by subdivision (b) may be 4 extended only upon the stipulation of all parties who have been 5 properly served in the action or proceeding or upon order of the 6 court. Extensions shall be liberally granted by the court when the 7 size of the record of proceedings renders infeasible compliance 8 with that time limit. There is no limit on the number of extensions 9 that may be granted by the court, but no single extension shall 10 exceed 60 days unless the court determines that a longer extension 11 is in the public interest. 12 (d) If the public agency fails to prepare and certify the record 13 within the time limit established in paragraph (1) of subdivision 14 (b), or any continuances of that time limit, the plaintiff or petitioner 15 may move for sanctions, and the court may, upon that motion, 16 grant appropriate sanctions. 17 (e) The record of proceedings shall include, but is not limited 18 to, all of the following items: 19 (1) All project application materials. 20 (2) All staff reports and related documents prepared by the 21 respondent public agency with respect to its compliance with the 22 substantive and procedural requirements of this division and with 23 respect to the action on the project. 24 (3) All staff reports and related documents prepared by the 25 respondent public agency and written testimony or documents 26 submitted by any person relevant to any findings or statement of 27 overriding considerations adopted by the respondent agency 28 pursuant to this division. 29 (4) Any transcript or minutes of the proceedings at which the 30 decisionmaking body of the respondent public agency heard 31 testimony on, or considered any environmental document on, the 32 project, and any transcript or minutes of proceedings before any 33 advisory body to the respondent public agency that were presented 34 to the decisionmaking body prior to action on the environmental 35 documents or on the project. 36 (5) All notices issued by the respondent public agency to comply 37 with this division or with any other law governing the processing 38 and approval of the project.

98 AB 1570 — 4 —

1 (6) All written comments received in response to, or in 2 connection with, environmental documents prepared for the project, 3 including responses to the notice of preparation. 4 (7) All written evidence or correspondence submitted to, or 5 transferred from, the respondent public agency with respect to 6 compliance with this division or with respect to the project. 7 (8) Any proposed decisions or findings submitted to the 8 decisionmaking body of the respondent public agency by its staff, 9 or the project proponent, project opponents, or other persons. 10 (9) The documentation of the final public agency decision, 11 including the final environmental impact report, mitigated negative 12 declaration, or negative declaration, and all documents, in addition 13 to those referenced in paragraph (3), cited or relied on in the 14 findings or in a statement of overriding considerations adopted 15 pursuant to this division. 16 (10) Any other written materials relevant to the respondent 17 public agency’s compliance with this division or to its decision on 18 the merits of the project, including the initial study, any drafts of 19 any environmental document, or portions thereof, that have been 20 released for public review, and copies of studies or other documents 21 relied upon in any environmental document prepared for the project 22 and either made available to the public during the public review 23 period or included in the respondent public agency’s files on the 24 project, and all internal agency communications, including staff 25 notes and memoranda related to the project or to compliance with 26 this division. 27 (11) The full written record before any inferior administrative 28 decisionmaking body whose decision was appealed to a superior 29 administrative decisionmaking body prior to the filing of litigation. 30 (f) In preparing the record of proceedings, the party preparing 31 the record shall strive to do so at reasonable cost in light of the 32 scope of the record. 33 (g) The clerk of the superior court shall prepare and certify the 34 clerk’s transcript on appeal not later than 60 days from the date 35 that the notice designating the papers or records to be included in 36 the clerk’s transcript was filed with the superior court, if the party 37 or parties pay any costs or fees for the preparation of the clerk’s 38 transcript imposed in conformance with any law or rules of court. 39 Nothing in this subdivision precludes an election to proceed by

98 — 5 — AB 1570

1 appendix, as provided in Rule 8.124 of the California Rules of 2 Court. 3 (h) Extensions of the period for the filing of any brief on appeal 4 may be allowed only by stipulation of the parties or by order of 5 the court for good cause shown. Extensions for the filing of a brief 6 on appeal shall be limited to one 30-day extension for the 7 preparation of an opening brief, and one 30-day extension for the 8 preparation of a responding brief, except that the court may grant 9 a longer extension or additional extensions if it determines that 10 there is a substantial likelihood of settlement that would avoid the 11 necessity of completing the appeal. 12 (i) At the completion of the filing of briefs on appeal, the 13 appellant shall notify the court of the completion of the filing of 14 briefs, whereupon the clerk of the reviewing court shall set the 15 appeal for hearing on the first available calendar date. 16 (j) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2016, 17 and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that 18 is enacted before January 1, 2016, deletes or extends that date. 19 SEC. 2. Section 21167.6 is added to the Public Resources Code, 20 to read: 21 21167.6. Notwithstanding any other law, in all actions or 22 proceedings brought pursuant to Section 21167, except those 23 involving the Public Utilities Commission, all of the following 24 shall apply: 25 (a) At the time that the action or proceeding is filed, the plaintiff 26 or petitioner shall file a request that the respondent public agency 27 prepare the record of proceedings relating to the subject of the 28 action or proceeding. The request, together with the complaint or 29 petition, shall be served personally upon the public agency not 30 later than 10 business days from the date that the action or 31 proceeding was filed. 32 (b) (1) The public agency shall prepare and certify the record 33 of proceedings not later than 60 days from the date that the request 34 specified in subdivision (a) was served upon the public agency. 35 Upon certification, the public agency shall lodge a copy of the 36 record of proceedings with the court and shall serve on the parties 37 notice that the record of proceedings has been certified and lodged 38 with the court. The parties shall pay any reasonable costs or fees 39 imposed for the preparation of the record of proceedings in 40 conformance with any law or rule of court.

98 AB 1570 — 6 —

1 (2) The plaintiff or petitioner may elect to prepare the record 2 of proceedings or the parties may agree to an alternative method 3 of preparation of the record of proceedings, subject to certification 4 of its accuracy by the public agency, within the time limit specified 5 in this subdivision. 6 (c) The time limit established by subdivision (b) may be extended 7 only upon the stipulation of all parties who have been properly 8 served in the action or proceeding or upon order of the court. 9 Extensions shall be liberally granted by the court when the size of 10 the record of proceedings renders infeasible compliance with that 11 time limit. There is no limit on the number of extensions that may 12 be granted by the court, but no single extension shall exceed 60 13 days unless the court determines that a longer extension is in the 14 public interest. 15 (d) If the public agency fails to prepare and certify the record 16 within the time limit established in paragraph (1) of subdivision 17 (b), or any continuances of that time limit, the plaintiff or petitioner 18 may move for sanctions, and the court may, upon that motion, 19 grant appropriate sanctions. 20 (e) The record of proceedings shall include, but is not limited 21 to, all of the following items: 22 (1) All project application materials. 23 (2) All staff reports and related documents prepared by the 24 respondent public agency with respect to its compliance with the 25 substantive and procedural requirements of this division and with 26 respect to the action on the project. 27 (3) All staff reports and related documents prepared by the 28 respondent public agency and written testimony or documents 29 submitted by any person relevant to any findings or statement of 30 overriding considerations adopted by the respondent agency 31 pursuant to this division. 32 (4) Any transcript or minutes of the proceedings at which the 33 decisionmaking body of the respondent public agency heard 34 testimony on, or considered any environmental document on, the 35 project, and any transcript or minutes of proceedings before any 36 advisory body to the respondent public agency that were presented 37 to the decisionmaking body prior to action on the environmental 38 documents or on the project.

98 — 7 — AB 1570

1 (5) All notices issued by the respondent public agency to comply 2 with this division or with any other law governing the processing 3 and approval of the project. 4 (6) All written comments received in response to, or in 5 connection with, environmental documents prepared for the 6 project, including responses to the notice of preparation. 7 (7) All written evidence or correspondence submitted to, or 8 transferred from, the respondent public agency with respect to 9 compliance with this division or with respect to the project. 10 (8) Any proposed decisions or findings submitted to the 11 decisionmaking body of the respondent public agency by its staff, 12 or the project proponent, project opponents, or other persons. 13 (9) The documentation of the final public agency decision, 14 including the final environmental impact report, mitigated negative 15 declaration, or negative declaration, and all documents, in addition 16 to those referenced in paragraph (3), cited or relied on in the 17 findings or in a statement of overriding considerations adopted 18 pursuant to this division. 19 (10) Any other written materials relevant to the respondent 20 public agency’s compliance with this division or to its decision on 21 the merits of the project, including the initial study, any drafts of 22 any environmental document, or portions thereof, that have been 23 released for public review, and copies of studies or other 24 documents relied upon in any environmental document prepared 25 for the project and either made available to the public during the 26 public review period or included in the respondent public agency’s 27 files on the project, and all internal agency communications, 28 including staff notes and memoranda related to the project or to 29 compliance with this division. 30 (11) The full written record before any inferior administrative 31 decisionmaking body whose decision was appealed to a superior 32 administrative decisionmaking body prior to the filing of litigation. 33 (f) In preparing the record of proceedings, the party preparing 34 the record shall strive to do so at reasonable cost in light of the 35 scope of the record. 36 (g) The clerk of the superior court shall prepare and certify the 37 clerk’s transcript on appeal not later than 60 days from the date 38 that the notice designating the papers or records to be included 39 in the clerk’s transcript was filed with the superior court, if the 40 party or parties pay any costs or fees for the preparation of the

98 AB 1570 — 8 —

1 clerk’s transcript imposed in conformance with any law or rules 2 of court. Nothing in this subdivision precludes an election to 3 proceed by appendix, as provided in Rule 8.124 of the California 4 Rules of Court. 5 (h) Extensions of the period for the filing of any brief on appeal 6 may be allowed only by stipulation of the parties or by order of 7 the court for good cause shown. Extensions for the filing of a brief 8 on appeal shall be limited to one 30-day extension for the 9 preparation of an opening brief, and one 30-day extension for the 10 preparation of a responding brief, except that the court may grant 11 a longer extension or additional extensions if it determines that 12 there is a substantial likelihood of settlement that would avoid the 13 necessity of completing the appeal. 14 (i) At the completion of the filing of briefs on appeal, the 15 appellant shall notify the court of the completion of the filing of 16 briefs, whereupon the clerk of the reviewing court shall set the 17 appeal for hearing on the first available calendar date. 18 (j) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2016. 19 SEC. 2. 20 SEC. 3. Section 21167.6.2 is added to the Public Resources 21 Code, to read: 22 21167.6.2. (a) Notwithstanding Section 21167.6, for a project 23 described in subdivision (f), the lead agency, upon the written 24 request of a project applicant received no later than 30 days after 25 the date that the lead agency makes a determination pursuant to 26 subdivision (a) of Section 21080.1, Section 21094.5, or Chapter 27 4.2 (commencing with Section 21155), shall prepare and certify 28 the record of proceedings for an environmental impact report in 29 the following manner: 30 (1) The lead agency for the project shall prepare the record of 31 proceedings pursuant to this division concurrently with the 32 administrative process. 33 (2) All documents and other materials placed in the record of 34 proceedings shall be posted on, and be downloadable from, an 35 Internet Web site maintained by the lead agency commencing with 36 the date of the release of the draft environmental impact report 37 environmental document for a project specified in subdivision (f). 38 If the lead agency cannot maintain an Internet Web site with the 39 information required pursuant to this section, the lead agency

98 — 9 — AB 1570

1 shall provide a link on the agency’s Internet Web site to that 2 information. 3 (3) The Except as provided in subdivision (d) of Section 15120 4 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the lead agency 5 shall make available to the public in a readily accessible electronic 6 format the draft environmental impact report environmental 7 document for a project specified in subdivision (f), and all other 8 documents submitted to, cited by, or relied on by, the lead agency 9 in the preparation of the draft environmental impact report 10 environmental document for a project specified in subdivision (f). 11 (4) A document prepared by the lead agency or submitted by 12 the applicant after the date of the release of the draft environmental 13 impact report environmental document for a project specified in 14 subdivision (f) that is a part of the record of the proceedings shall 15 be made available to the public in a readily accessible electronic 16 format within five business days after the document is released or 17 received by the lead agency. 18 (5) The lead agency shall encourage written comments on the 19 project to be submitted in a readily accessible electronic format, 20 and shall make any comment available to the public in a readily 21 accessible electronic format within five days of its receipt. 22 (6) Within seven business days after the receipt of any comment 23 that is not in an electronic format, the lead agency shall convert 24 that comment into a readily accessible electronic format and make 25 it available to the public in that format. 26 (7) The lead agency shall certify the record of proceedings 27 within five 30 days of its approval of the project after the filing of 28 the notice required pursuant to Section 21108 or 21152. 29 (b) Any dispute regarding the record of proceedings shall be 30 resolved by the court in an action or proceeding brought pursuant 31 to subdivision (c) of Section 21167. 32 (c) The content of the record of proceedings shall be as specified 33 in subdivision (e) of Section 21167.6. 34 (d) Subdivisions (g) to (i), inclusive, of Section 21167.6 are 35 applicable to an appeal of a decision in an action or proceeding 36 brought pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 21167. 37 (e) The negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, 38 draft and final environmental impact report, or other 39 environmental document for a project specified in subdivision (f)

98 AB 1570 — 10 —

1 shall include a notice in no less than 12-point type stating the 2 following: 3 4 “THIS NEGATIVE DECLARATION, MITIGATED NEGATIVE 5 DECLARATION, EIR, OR ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT IS 6 SUBJECT TO SECTION 21167.6.2 OF THE PUBLIC 7 RESOURCES CODE, WHICH REQUIRES THE RECORD OF 8 PROCEEDINGS FOR THIS PROJECT TO BE PREPARED 9 CONCURRENTLY WITH THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS, 10 DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY, OR SUBMITTED TO, THE LEAD 11 AGENCY TO BE POSTED ON THE LEAD AGENCY’S INTERNET 12 WEB SITE, AND THE LEAD AGENCY TO ENCOURAGE 13 WRITTEN COMMENTS ON THE PROJECT TO BE SUBMITTED 14 TO THE LEAD AGENCY IN A READILY ACCESSIBLE 15 ELECTRONIC FORMAT.” 16 17 (f) This section applies to the record of proceedings for the 18 preparation of a negative declaration, mitigated negative 19 declaration, environmental impact report, or other environmental 20 document prepared for any of the following: 21 (1) A project determined to be of statewide, regional, or 22 areawide environmental significance pursuant to subdivision (d) 23 of Section 21083. 24 (2) A project subject to Section 21094.5 or Chapter 4.2 25 (commencing with Section 21155). 26 (3) (A) A project, other than one described in paragraphs (1) 27 and (2), for which the lead agency consents to prepare the record 28 of proceeding pursuant to this paragraph. 29 (B) The lead agency shall respond to a request by the project 30 applicant within 10 business days from the date that the request 31 pursuant to subdivision (a) is received by the lead agency. 32 (C) A project applicant and the lead agency may mutually agree, 33 in writing, to extend the time period for the lead agency to respond 34 pursuant to subparagraph (B), but they shall not extend that period 35 beyond the commencement of the public review period for the 36 proposed negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or 37 draft environmental impact report. 38 (D) The request to prepare a record of proceedings pursuant 39 to this paragraph shall be deemed denied if the lead agency fails 40 to respond within 10 business days of receiving the request or

98 — 11 — AB 1570

1 within the time period agreed upon pursuant to subparagraph (C), 2 whichever ends later. 3 (g) The project applicant shall reimburse the lead agency for 4 the costs incurred in compliance with this section in a manner 5 specified by the lead agency and a plaintiff or petitioner in an 6 action or proceeding filed pursuant to Section 21167, if any, is 7 not required to pay these costs. 8 (h) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2016, 9 and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that 10 is enacted before January 1, 2016, deletes or extends that date. 11 SEC. 3. 12 SEC. 4. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to 13 Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because 14 a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service 15 charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or 16 level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 17 17556 of the Government Code.

O

98 South Coast Air Quality Management District Legislative Analysis Summary – SB 984 (Simitian) Bill Version: As amended April 9, 2012 WS

SB 984 (Simitian) Environmental Quality: California Environmental Quality Act: Record of Proceedings.

Summary: This bill would, until January 1, 2016, require the lead agency, at the request of a project applicant, to, among other things, prepare a record of proceedings concurrently with the preparation of negative declarations, mitigated negative declarations, EIRs or other environmental documents for specified projects. This is an urgency bill.

Background: The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an EIR on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. Currently, CEQA establishes a procedure for the preparation and certification of the record of proceedings upon the filing of an action or proceeding challenging a lead agency's action on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA.

Purpose of this bill. AB 900 (Buchanan and Gordon), Chapter 354, Statutes of 2011, enacted The Jobs and Economic Improvement Through Environmental Leadership Act of 2011, to set procedures relating to an ELDP selected by the Governor. An ELDP must meet certain requirements, the record of proceedings must be prepared concurrently with the administrative process, and any action alleging that the lead agency has approved a project in violation of CEQA must meet certain requirements (e.g., filing the action in the Court of Appeal with geographic jurisdiction over the project, the Court of Appeal must issue a decision in 175 days).

According to the author, “Since enactment of The Jobs and Economic Improvement Through Environmental Leadership Act of 2011, there is interest by various parties to provide for the record of proceedings to be prepared concurrently with the administrative process for certain other projects at the request of the applicant to save a great deal of time in the event that a party challenges the project.”

The author notes that “Because SB 984 applies to a broader range of environmental documents and projects, amendments were needed that are not part of the AB 900 procedures to address concerns of various interests.”

Status: 4/23/12 - In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

Specific Provisions: This bill would provide that: • The lead agency, upon the written request of a project applicant received no later than 30 days after the date that the lead agency makes a determination, shall prepare and certify the record of proceedings in the following manner: o Prepare concurrently with the administrative process. South Coast Air Quality Management District Legislative Analysis Summary – SB 984 (Simitian) Bill Version: As amended April 9, 2012 WS

o Within seven business days after the receipt of any comment that is not in an electronic format, the lead agency shall convert that comment into a readily accessible electronic format and make it available to the public in that format. o The lead agency shall certify the record of proceedings within thirty days after filing specified required notices. • Any dispute regarding the record of proceedings shall be resolved by the court in an action or proceeding. • These provisions apply to the record of proceedings for the preparation of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, environmental impact report, or other environmental document prepared for various specified types of projects.

Impacts on AQMD’s mission, operations or initiatives: In the few instances where AQMD is a lead agency, this bill may pose a substantial additional administrative burden to prepare the record of proceedings concurrently with the EIR or other applicable documents, as the entire (publicly disclosable) permitting file should be included as part of the CEQA record, as well as web postings.

Recommended Position: OPPOSE, UNLESS AMENDED

1. Some of the documents relied upon may be either copyrighted, or confidential trade secret information if received from applicant, and thus not convertible to downloadable form, or too voluminous and unable to be put into such form. Exemptions from the requirement to put on the web should be made for these. In the case of documents that are simply too voluminous, we may suggest that they be made available thru CD or other electronic means instead. In the case of copyrighted material, it should just be required to be made available for review upon request at the lead agency’s offices. As for trade secret—it should not be disclosed

2. Some public comments may be so voluminous and/or in awkward form that it is not reasonable to convert and post them within 5 business days. An agency should be allowed to take a reasonable time, as determined by the agency, if it makes a finding of good cause and justifies it in writing. Similarly, an agency should be allowed to take a reasonable time, as determined by the agency, in instances where a public member submits copyrighted material (or a copy of such) or confidential business information and the time to redact that material may prevent timely compliance.

3. The requirements of this bill, especially the electronic posting requirements, present potential opportunities to challenge the agency’s ultimate action for failure to strictly comply. The bill should be amended to provide that a “Failure to comply with any of the requirements of Sect. 21167.6.2 shall not constitute grounds for invalidating any document approved or action taken by the agency.” AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 9, 2012 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 12, 2012 SENATE BILL No. 984

1 Introduced by Senators Simitian, Steinberg, and Strickland 2 (Coauthors: Senators Blakeslee and Rubio)

January 30, 2012

1 An act to amend, repeal, and add Section 21167.6 of, and to add and repeal2 Section 21167.6.2 of, the Public Resources Code, relating to en3 vironmental quality, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately4 .

legislative counsel’s digest SB 984, as amended, Simitian. Environmental quality: California Environmental Quality Act: record of proceedings. (1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes a procedure for the preparation and certification of the record of proceedings upon the filing of an action or proceeding challenging a lead agency’s action on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA.

97 SB 984 — 2 —

This bill would require, until January 1, 2016, the lead agency, at the request of a project applicant, to, among other things, prepare a record of proceedings concurrently with the preparation of negative declarations, mitigated negative declarations, EIRs or other environmental documents for specified projects. Because the bill would require a lead agency to prepare the record of proceedings as provided, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (3) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute. 2 Vote: ⁄3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

1 SECTION 1. Section 21167.6 of the Public Resources Code 2 is amended to read: 3 21167.6. Notwithstanding any other law, in all actions or 4 proceedings brought pursuant to Section 21167, except as provided 5 for in Section 21167.6.2 or those involving the Public Utilities 6 Commission, all of the following shall apply: 7 (a) At the time that the action or proceeding is filed, the plaintiff 8 or petitioner shall file a request that the respondent public agency 9 prepare the record of proceedings relating to the subject of the 10 action or proceeding. The request, together with the complaint or 11 petition, shall be served personally upon the public agency not 12 later than 10 business days from the date that the action or 13 proceeding was filed. 14 (b) (1) The public agency shall prepare and certify the record 15 of proceedings not later than 60 days from the date that the request 16 specified in subdivision (a) was served upon the public agency. 17 Upon certification, the public agency shall lodge a copy of the 18 record of proceedings with the court and shall serve on the parties 19 notice that the record of proceedings has been certified and lodged 20 with the court. The parties shall pay any reasonable costs or fees

97 — 3 — SB 984

1 imposed for the preparation of the record of proceedings in 2 conformance with any law or rule of court. 3 (2) The plaintiff or petitioner may elect to prepare the record 4 of proceedings or the parties may agree to an alternative method 5 of preparation of the record of proceedings, subject to certification 6 of its accuracy by the public agency, within the time limit specified 7 in this subdivision. 8 (c) The time limit established by subdivision (b) may be 9 extended only upon the stipulation of all parties who have been 10 properly served in the action or proceeding or upon order of the 11 court. Extensions shall be liberally granted by the court when the 12 size of the record of proceedings renders infeasible compliance 13 with that time limit. There is no limit on the number of extensions 14 that may be granted by the court, but no single extension shall 15 exceed 60 days unless the court determines that a longer extension 16 is in the public interest. 17 (d) If the public agency fails to prepare and certify the record 18 within the time limit established in paragraph (1) of subdivision 19 (b), or any continuances of that time limit, the plaintiff or petitioner 20 may move for sanctions, and the court may, upon that motion, 21 grant appropriate sanctions. 22 (e) The record of proceedings shall include, but is not limited 23 to, all of the following items: 24 (1) All project application materials. 25 (2) All staff reports and related documents prepared by the 26 respondent public agency with respect to its compliance with the 27 substantive and procedural requirements of this division and with 28 respect to the action on the project. 29 (3) All staff reports and related documents prepared by the 30 respondent public agency and written testimony or documents 31 submitted by any person relevant to any findings or statement of 32 overriding considerations adopted by the respondent agency 33 pursuant to this division. 34 (4) Any transcript or minutes of the proceedings at which the 35 decisionmaking body of the respondent public agency heard 36 testimony on, or considered any environmental document on, the 37 project, and any transcript or minutes of proceedings before any 38 advisory body to the respondent public agency that were presented 39 to the decisionmaking body prior to action on the environmental 40 documents or on the project.

97 SB 984 — 4 —

1 (5) All notices issued by the respondent public agency to comply 2 with this division or with any other law governing the processing 3 and approval of the project. 4 (6) All written comments received in response to, or in 5 connection with, environmental documents prepared for the project, 6 including responses to the notice of preparation. 7 (7) All written evidence or correspondence submitted to, or 8 transferred from, the respondent public agency with respect to 9 compliance with this division or with respect to the project. 10 (8) Any proposed decisions or findings submitted to the 11 decisionmaking body of the respondent public agency by its staff, 12 or the project proponent, project opponents, or other persons. 13 (9) The documentation of the final public agency decision, 14 including the final environmental impact report, mitigated negative 15 declaration, or negative declaration, and all documents, in addition 16 to those referenced in paragraph (3), cited or relied on in the 17 findings or in a statement of overriding considerations adopted 18 pursuant to this division. 19 (10) Any other written materials relevant to the respondent 20 public agency’s compliance with this division or to its decision on 21 the merits of the project, including the initial study, any drafts of 22 any environmental document, or portions thereof, that have been 23 released for public review, and copies of studies or other documents 24 relied upon in any environmental document prepared for the project 25 and either made available to the public during the public review 26 period or included in the respondent public agency’s files on the 27 project, and all internal agency communications, including staff 28 notes and memoranda related to the project or to compliance with 29 this division. 30 (11) The full written record before any inferior administrative 31 decisionmaking body whose decision was appealed to a superior 32 administrative decisionmaking body prior to the filing of litigation. 33 (f) In preparing the record of proceedings, the party preparing 34 the record shall strive to do so at reasonable cost in light of the 35 scope of the record. 36 (g) The clerk of the superior court shall prepare and certify the 37 clerk’s transcript on appeal not later than 60 days from the date 38 that the notice designating the papers or records to be included in 39 the clerk’s transcript was filed with the superior court, if the party 40 or parties pay any costs or fees for the preparation of the clerk’s

97 — 5 — SB 984

1 transcript imposed in conformance with any law or rules of court. 2 Nothing in this subdivision precludes an election to proceed by 3 appendix, as provided in Rule 8.124 of the California Rules of 4 Court. 5 (h) Extensions of the period for the filing of any brief on appeal 6 may be allowed only by stipulation of the parties or by order of 7 the court for good cause shown. Extensions for the filing of a brief 8 on appeal shall be limited to one 30-day extension for the 9 preparation of an opening brief, and one 30-day extension for the 10 preparation of a responding brief, except that the court may grant 11 a longer extension or additional extensions if it determines that 12 there is a substantial likelihood of settlement that would avoid the 13 necessity of completing the appeal. 14 (i) At the completion of the filing of briefs on appeal, the 15 appellant shall notify the court of the completion of the filing of 16 briefs, whereupon the clerk of the reviewing court shall set the 17 appeal for hearing on the first available calendar date. 18 (j) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2016, 19 and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that 20 is enacted before January 1, 2016, deletes or extends that date. 21 SEC. 2. Section 21167.6 is added to the Public Resources Code, 22 to read: 23 21167.6. Notwithstanding any other law, in all actions or 24 proceedings brought pursuant to Section 21167, except those 25 involving the Public Utilities Commission, all of the following 26 shall apply: 27 (a) At the time that the action or proceeding is filed, the plaintiff 28 or petitioner shall file a request that the respondent public agency 29 prepare the record of proceedings relating to the subject of the 30 action or proceeding. The request, together with the complaint or 31 petition, shall be served personally upon the public agency not 32 later than 10 business days from the date that the action or 33 proceeding was filed. 34 (b) (1) The public agency shall prepare and certify the record 35 of proceedings not later than 60 days from the date that the request 36 specified in subdivision (a) was served upon the public agency. 37 Upon certification, the public agency shall lodge a copy of the 38 record of proceedings with the court and shall serve on the parties 39 notice that the record of proceedings has been certified and lodged 40 with the court. The parties shall pay any reasonable costs or fees

97 SB 984 — 6 —

1 imposed for the preparation of the record of proceedings in 2 conformance with any law or rule of court. 3 (2) The plaintiff or petitioner may elect to prepare the record 4 of proceedings or the parties may agree to an alternative method 5 of preparation of the record of proceedings, subject to certification 6 of its accuracy by the public agency, within the time limit specified 7 in this subdivision. 8 (c) The time limit established by subdivision (b) may be 9 extended only upon the stipulation of all parties who have been 10 properly served in the action or proceeding or upon order of the 11 court. Extensions shall be liberally granted by the court when the 12 size of the record of proceedings renders infeasible compliance 13 with that time limit. There is no limit on the number of extensions 14 that may be granted by the court, but no single extension shall 15 exceed 60 days unless the court determines that a longer extension 16 is in the public interest. 17 (d) If the public agency fails to prepare and certify the record 18 within the time limit established in paragraph (1) of subdivision 19 (b), or any continuances of that time limit, the plaintiff or petitioner 20 may move for sanctions, and the court may, upon that motion, 21 grant appropriate sanctions. 22 (e) The record of proceedings shall include, but is not limited 23 to, all of the following items: 24 (1) All project application materials. 25 (2) All staff reports and related documents prepared by the 26 respondent public agency with respect to its compliance with the 27 substantive and procedural requirements of this division and with 28 respect to the action on the project. 29 (3) All staff reports and related documents prepared by the 30 respondent public agency and written testimony or documents 31 submitted by any person relevant to any findings or statement of 32 overriding considerations adopted by the respondent agency 33 pursuant to this division. 34 (4) Any transcript or minutes of the proceedings at which the 35 decisionmaking body of the respondent public agency heard 36 testimony on, or considered any environmental document on, the 37 project, and any transcript or minutes of proceedings before any 38 advisory body to the respondent public agency that were presented 39 to the decisionmaking body prior to action on the environmental 40 documents or on the project.

97 — 7 — SB 984

1 (5) All notices issued by the respondent public agency to comply 2 with this division or with any other law governing the processing 3 and approval of the project. 4 (6) All written comments received in response to, or in 5 connection with, environmental documents prepared for the project, 6 including responses to the notice of preparation. 7 (7) All written evidence or correspondence submitted to, or 8 transferred from, the respondent public agency with respect to 9 compliance with this division or with respect to the project. 10 (8) Any proposed decisions or findings submitted to the 11 decisionmaking body of the respondent public agency by its staff, 12 or the project proponent, project opponents, or other persons. 13 (9) The documentation of the final public agency decision, 14 including the final environmental impact report, mitigated negative 15 declaration, or negative declaration, and all documents, in addition 16 to those referenced in paragraph (3), cited or relied on in the 17 findings or in a statement of overriding considerations adopted 18 pursuant to this division. 19 (10) Any other written materials relevant to the respondent 20 public agency’s compliance with this division or to its decision on 21 the merits of the project, including the initial study, any drafts of 22 any environmental document, or portions thereof, that have been 23 released for public review, and copies of studies or other documents 24 relied upon in any environmental document prepared for the project 25 and either made available to the public during the public review 26 period or included in the respondent public agency’s files on the 27 project, and all internal agency communications, including staff 28 notes and memoranda related to the project or to compliance with 29 this division. 30 (11) The full written record before any inferior administrative 31 decisionmaking body whose decision was appealed to a superior 32 administrative decisionmaking body prior to the filing of litigation. 33 (f) In preparing the record of proceedings, the party preparing 34 the record shall strive to do so at reasonable cost in light of the 35 scope of the record. 36 (g) The clerk of the superior court shall prepare and certify the 37 clerk’s transcript on appeal not later than 60 days from the date 38 that the notice designating the papers or records to be included in 39 the clerk’s transcript was filed with the superior court, if the party 40 or parties pay any costs or fees for the preparation of the clerk’s

97 SB 984 — 8 —

1 transcript imposed in conformance with any law or rules of court. 2 Nothing in this subdivision precludes an election to proceed by 3 appendix, as provided in Rule 8.124 of the California Rules of 4 Court. 5 (h) Extensions of the period for the filing of any brief on appeal 6 may be allowed only by stipulation of the parties or by order of 7 the court for good cause shown. Extensions for the filing of a brief 8 on appeal shall be limited to one 30-day extension for the 9 preparation of an opening brief, and one 30-day extension for the 10 preparation of a responding brief, except that the court may grant 11 a longer extension or additional extensions if it determines that 12 there is a substantial likelihood of settlement that would avoid the 13 necessity of completing the appeal. 14 (i) At the completion of the filing of briefs on appeal, the 15 appellant shall notify the court of the completion of the filing of 16 briefs, whereupon the clerk of the reviewing court shall set the 17 appeal for hearing on the first available calendar date. 18 (j) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2016. 19 SEC. 3. Section 21167.6.2 is added to the Public Resources 20 Code, to read: 21 21167.6.2. (a) Notwithstanding Section 21167.6, for a project 22 described in subdivision (f), the lead agency, upon the written 23 request of a project applicant received no later than 30 days after 24 the date that the lead agency makes a determination pursuant to 25 subdivision (a) of Section 21080.1, Section 21094.5, or Chapter 26 4.2 (commencing with Section 21155), shall prepare and certify 27 the record of proceedings in the following manner: 28 (1) The lead agency for the project shall prepare the record of 29 proceedings pursuant to this division concurrently with the 30 administrative process. 31 (2) All documents and other materials placed in the record of 32 proceedings shall be posted on, and be downloadable from, an 33 Internet Web site maintained by the lead agency commencing with 34 the date of the release of the environmental document for a project 35 specified in subdivision (f). If the lead agency cannot maintain an 36 Internet Web site with the information required pursuant to this 37 section, the lead agency shall provide a link on the agency’s 38 Internet Web site to that information. 39 (3) Except as provided in subdivision (d) of Section 15120 of 40 Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the lead agency

97 — 9 — SB 984

1 shall make available to the public in a readily accessible electronic 2 format the environmental document for a project specified in 3 subdivision (f), and all other documents submitted to, cited by, or 4 relied on by, the lead agency in the preparation of the 5 environmental document for a project specified in subdivision (f). 6 (4) A document prepared by the lead agency or submitted by 7 the applicant after the date of the release of the environmental 8 document for a project specified in subdivision (f) that is a part of 9 the record of the proceedings shall be made available to the public 10 in a readily accessible electronic format within five business days 11 after the document is released or received by the lead agency. 12 (5) The lead agency shall encourage written comments on the 13 project to be submitted in a readily accessible electronic format, 14 and shall make any comment available to the public in a readily 15 accessible electronic format within five business days of its receipt. 16 (6) Within seven business days after the receipt of any comment 17 that is not in an electronic format, the lead agency shall convert 18 that comment into a readily accessible electronic format and make 19 it available to the public in that format. 20 (7) The lead agency shall certify the record of proceedings 21 within 30 days after the filing of the notice required pursuant to 22 Section 21108 or 21152. 23 (b) Any dispute regarding the record of proceedings shall be 24 resolved by the court in an action or proceeding brought pursuant 25 to subdivision (c) of Section 21167. 26 (c) The content of the record of proceedings shall be as specified 27 in subdivision (e) of Section 21167.6. 28 (d) Subdivisions (g) to (i), inclusive, of Section 21167.6 are 29 applicable to an appeal of a decision in an action or proceeding 30 brought pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 21167. 31 (e) The negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, 32 draft and final environmental impact report, or other environmental 33 document for a project specified in subdivision (f) shall include a 34 notice in no less than 12-point type stating the following: 35 36 “THIS NEGATIVE DECLARATION, MITIGATED 37 NEGATIVE DECLARATION, EIR, OR ENVIRONMENTAL 38 DOCUMENT IS SUBJECT TO SECTION 21167.6.2 OF THE 39 PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE, WHICH REQUIRES THE 40 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THIS PROJECT TO BE

97 SB 984 — 10 —

1 PREPARED CONCURRENTLY WITH THE 2 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS, DOCUMENTS PREPARED 3 BY, OR SUBMITTED TO, THE LEAD AGENCY TO BE 4 POSTED ON THE LEAD AGENCY’S INTERNET WEB SITE, 5 AND THE LEAD AGENCY TO ENCOURAGE WRITTEN 6 COMMENTS ON THE PROJECT TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE 7 LEAD AGENCY IN A READILY ACCESSIBLE ELECTRONIC 8 FORMAT.” 9 10 (f) (1) This section applies to the record of proceedings for the 11 preparation of a negative declaration, mitigated negative 12 declaration, environmental impact report, or other environmental 13 document prepared for any of the following: 14 (A) 15 (1) A project determined to be of statewide, regional, or 16 areawide environmental significance pursuant to subdivision (d) 17 of Section 21083. 18 (B) 19 (2) A project subject to Section 21094.5 or Chapter 4.2 20 (commencing with Section 21155). 21 (C) (i) 22 (3) (A) A project, other than one described in subparagraphs 23 (A) and (B) paragraphs (1) and (2), for which the lead agency 24 consents to prepare the record of proceeding pursuant to this 25 subparagraph paragraph. 26 (ii) 27 (B) The lead agency shall respond to a request by the project 28 applicant within 10 business days from the date that the request 29 pursuant to subdivision (a) is received by the lead agency. 30 (iii) 31 (C) A project applicant and the lead agency may mutually agree, 32 in writing, to extend the time period for the lead agency to respond 33 pursuant to clause (ii) subparagraph (B), but the extension shall 34 be no later than the commencement of the public review period 35 for the proposed negative declaration, mitigated negative 36 declaration, or draft environmental impact report. 37 (iv) 38 (D) The request is deemed denied if the lead agency fails to 39 respond within 10 business days of receiving the request or within

97 — 11 — SB 984

1 the time period agreed upon pursuant to clause (iii) subparagraph 2 (C), whichever is later. 3 (g) The project applicant shall reimburse the lead agency for 4 the costs incurred in compliance with this section in a manner 5 specified by the lead agency and a plaintiff or petitioner, if any, is 6 not required to pay these costs. 7 (h) This section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2016, 8 and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, that 9 is enacted before January 1, 2016, deletes or extends that date. 10 SEC. 4. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to 11 Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because 12 a local agency or school district has the authority to levy service 13 charges, fees, or assessments sufficient to pay for the program or 14 level of service mandated by this act, within the meaning of Section 15 17556 of the Government Code. 16 SEC. 5. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the 17 immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety within 18 the meaning of Article IV of the Constitution and shall go into 19 immediate effect. The facts constituting the necessity are: 20 To expedite the preparation of the record of proceeding of an 21 environmental impact report for judicial review thereby protecting 22 the environment and public health, and promote job creation at 23 the earliest possible time, it is necessary for this act to take effect 24 immediately.

O

97 South Coast Air Quality Management District Legislative Analysis Summary – AB 1532 (Perez) Bill Version: As Amended 5/1/12 Analyst: PC – 5/30/12

AB 1532 (Perez) California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account.

Summary: This bill would establish the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account (GHGRA) to receive regulatory fee revenue from the auction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission allowances per the cap and trade program adopted by the Air Resources Board (CARB) per the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32), and directs eligible uses of those revenues.

Background: Existing law establishes CARB within the California Environmental Protection Agency. AB 32 designates CARB as the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of emissions of greenhouse gases. CARB is required to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit equivalent to the statewide greenhouse gas emissions level in 1990, to be achieved by 2020, and to adopt rules and regulations in an open public process to achieve the maximum, technologically feasible, and cost-effective greenhouse gas emission reductions. AB 32 authorizes CARB to include use of market- based compliance mechanisms. AB 32 authorizes CARB to adopt a schedule of fees to be paid by the sources of greenhouse gas emissions regulated pursuant to AB 32, and requires the revenues collected pursuant to that fee schedule be deposited into the Air Pollution Control Fund and be available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of carrying out AB 32. Status: 5/29/12 – In Senate. Read first time. To Senate Com. on Rules for assignment.

Specific Provisions: Specifically, this bill would:

1) Create the GHGRA within the Air Pollution Control Fund.

2) Direct all GHG emission allowance auction revenue to the GHGRA.

3) Limit use of money in the GHGRA to purposes consistent with the requirements of the Sinclair Paint decision that facilitate cost-effective reductions of greenhouse gas emissions.

4) Charge CARB and any other state agency identified by the Legislature with implementing programs involving grants, revolving loans, loan guarantees, loans or other funding measures to achieve greenhouse gas reductions by investments in the following categories:

a) Clean and efficient energy; b) Low-carbon transportation and infrastructure; c) Natural resource protection; and d) Research, development and deployment of innovative technologies and measures. South Coast Air Quality Management District Legislative Analysis Summary – AB 1532 (Perez) Bill Version: As Amended 5/1/12 Analyst: PC – 5/30/12

5) Require CARB to adopt every three years, an investment plan of anticipated expenditures from the GHGRA, and to include an investment plan prepared by the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) within its plan as well.

6) Require CARB to submit an annual report to the Legislature on the status of projects and any recommended changes to the investment plan.

Impacts on AQMD’s Mission, Operations or Initiatives: This bill could have a positive impact on AQMD’s mission and initiatives by providing additional funding for efforts that will help reduce emissions and improve air quality within the South Coast region. It is estimated that as much as $1 billion could be generated through a cap and trade auction as part of AB 32. This bill would make these funds available for measures and programs that achieve, among other things:

1) Clean and efficient energy, through energy efficiency, and clean and renewable energy, and distributed energy generation; and 2) Low-carbon transportation, including the development of low-carbon goods movement and freight vehicle technologies and infrastructure, the programs for clean vehicles and the advancement of transportation technologies, and the development of sustainable public transportation and infrastructure.

These types of activities could help reduce mobile and stationery source emissions within the South Coast region and would assist in the achievement of AQMD’s mission and initiatives which are focused on cleaning the air and preserving the public health.

The bill could be further strengthened by prioritizing projects that have co-benefits for criteria pollutants in nonattainment areas.

Note: A related bill, SB 1572 (Pavley), also seeks to direct how AB 32 cap and trade revenue will be allocated. However, it has amended to be essentially a spot bill and provides no specific direction on how the funds would be spent, except to say that the funds will be used for the purposes of carrying out AB 32. AB 1532 may be preferable to the District because it specifically calls for categories of expenditures that would help support AQMD’s mission to reduce air pollution and toxic air contaminant emissions within the South Coast region.

Recommended Position: SUPPORT WITH AMENDMENTS

AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 1, 2012 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 17, 2012 california legislature—2011–12 regular session

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1532

1 Introduced by Assembly Member John A. Pérez 2 (Coauthors: Assembly Members Chesbro, Dickinson, Monning, and 3 Skinner)

January 23, 2012

1 An act to add Part 8 (commencing with Section 38700) to Division 25.52 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to greenhouse gas emissions.3

legislative counsel’s digest AB 1532, as amended, John A. Pérez. California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006: Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account. The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency charged with monitoring and regulating sources of emissions of greenhouse gases. The state board is required to adopt a statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit equivalent to the statewide greenhouse gas emissions level in 1990 to be achieved by 2020, and to adopt rules and regulations in an open public process to achieve the maximum, technologically feasible, and cost-effective greenhouse gas emissions reductions. The act authorizes the state board to include use of market-based compliance mechanisms. The act authorizes the state board to adopt a schedule of fees to be paid by the sources of greenhouse gas emissions regulated pursuant to the act, and requires the revenues collected pursuant to that fee schedule be deposited into the Air Pollution Control Fund and be

97 AB 1532 — 2 — available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes of carrying out the act. This bill would create the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account within the Air Pollution Control Fund. The bill would require moneys, as specified, collected pursuant to a market-based compliance mechanism be deposited in this account. The bill also would require those moneys, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be used for specified purposes. The bill would require the state board administering agencies, including the state board and any other state agencies agency identified by the Legislature, to award allocate those moneys to measures and programs that meet specified criteria. The bill would require the state board to develop and adopt every 3 years, as specified, an investment plan that identifies the anticipated expenditures of moneys appropriated from the account to the budget committees of each house of the Legislature, as specified. The bill would require the state board to annually submit a report no later than December of each year to the appropriate committees of the Legislature on the status of projects and their outcomes and any changes the state board recommends need to be made to the investment plan. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

1 SECTION 1. Part 8 (commencing with Section 38700) is added 2 to Division 25.5 of the Health and Safety Code, to read: 3 4 PART 8. GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION ACCOUNT 5 6 38700. For purposes of this part, the following terms have the 7 following meanings: 8 (a) “Account” means the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account. 9 (b) “Qualified recipients” means public agencies, businesses, 10 nonprofit organizations, academic institutions, public-private 11 partnerships, and workforce training partnerships. 12 38701. (a) The Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account is hereby 13 created within the Air Pollution Control Fund. 14 (b) Notwithstanding Section 38597, all moneys, excluding 15 penalties and fines, collected pursuant to Part 5 (commencing with 16 Section 38570) shall be deposited in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction

97 — 3 — AB 1532

1 Account and shall be available, upon appropriation by the 2 Legislature, to the state board or any state agency for purposes of 3 carrying out this division. 4 38702. (a) The Legislature finds and declares any program 5 that might be established by the state board pursuant to Part 5 6 (commencing with Section 38570) shall be a regulatory program 7 and any moneys collected by that regulatory program are regulatory 8 fees that shall conform to Sinclair Paint Co. v. State Bd. of 9 Equalization (1997) 15 Cal.4th 866. 10 (b) 11 38702. (a) The state shall not approve funding for a measure 12 or program using moneys appropriated from the account except 13 after determining, based on the available evidence, that the use of 14 moneys for that measure or program is consistent with the 15 requirements for the use of moneys derived from valid regulatory 16 fees, as established by the California Supreme Court in Sinclair 17 Paint Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1997) 15 Cal.4th 866. 18 (c) 19 (b) It is the intent of the Legislature that funds shall be 20 appropriated from the account only in a manner consistent with 21 the requirements of this part. 22 (d) 23 (c) Moneys shall be used to facilitate the achievement of feasible 24 and cost-effective reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in this 25 state consistent with this division and, where applicable and to the 26 extent feasible, do all of the following: 27 (1) Maximize economic, environmental, and public health 28 benefits to the state. 29 (2) Foster job creation by promoting in-state greenhouse gas 30 emissions reduction projects carried out by California workers and 31 businesses. 32 (3) Complement efforts to improve air quality. 33 (4) Direct investment toward the most disadvantaged 34 communities in the state. 35 (5) Provide opportunities for small businesses, schools, 36 affordable housing associations, water agencies, local governments, 37 and other community institutions to participate in and benefit from 38 statewide efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 39 (e)

97 AB 1532 — 4 —

1 (d) Funds appropriated from the account may be allocated, 2 consistent with subdivision (b) (a), for the purpose of reducing 3 greenhouse gas emissions in this state through investments that 4 may include, but are not limited to, any of the following: 5 (1) Investments in clean and efficient energy, including, but not 6 limited to, any of the following: 7 (A) Industrial and manufacturing facilities to reduce greenhouse 8 gas emissions by investment in energy efficiency, energy storage, 9 and clean and renewable energy projects. 10 (B) Public universities, schools, water agencies, and other public 11 facilities and fleets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 12 investment in energy and water use efficiency, energy storage, and 13 clean and renewable energy and fuel projects. 14 (C) Residential and commercial distributed generation and 15 energy efficiency programs that serve to reduce greenhouse gas 16 emissions, including, but not limited to, the federal Energy 17 Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program, established 18 pursuant to Section 542 of the Energy Independence and Security 19 Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 17152), and the Weatherization 20 Assistance Program. 21 (D) Waste reduction and low-carbon recycled-content processing 22 and manufacturing that serve to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, 23 including market development activities. 24 (2) Investments in low-carbon transportation and infrastructure, 25 including, but not limited to, any of the following: 26 (A) Public transportation and sustainable transportation and 27 infrastructure development. 28 (B) Programs for clean vehicles and the advancement of 29 transportation technologies, including, but not limited to, the 30 Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program 31 (Article 2 (commencing with Section 44272) of Chapter 8.9 of 32 Part 5 of Division 26) and the Air Quality Improvement Program 33 (Article 3 (commencing with Section 44274) of Chapter 8.9 of 34 Part 5 of Division 26). 35 (C) Advanced transportation and fueling infrastructure. 36 (D) Local and regional sustainable development efforts that are, 37 to the extent applicable, consistent with the sustainable 38 communities strategy or alternative planning strategy adopted and 39 approved pursuant to Section 65080 of the Government Code.

97 — 5 — AB 1532

1 (E) Low-carbon goods movement and freight vehicle 2 technologies and infrastructure, including, but not limited to, 3 locomotives and heavy-duty trucks. 4 (3) Investments in natural resource protection, including, but 5 not limited to, any of the following: 6 (A) Natural resource management programs and projects. 7 (B) Land conservation and restoration. 8 (C) Development and implementation of sustainable agriculture, 9 forestry, and related water, land, and resource management 10 practices. 11 (4) Investments in research, development, and deployment of 12 innovative technologies, measures, and practices related to 13 programs and projects funded pursuant to this part. 14 38703. (a) The state board and any other state agency identified 15 by the Legislature are the administering agencies for moneys 16 appropriated in accordance with this part. 17 (b) The administering agencies shall, upon appropriation by the 18 Legislature, carry out a program to allocate moneys appropriated 19 pursuant to this part through competitive grants, revolving loans, 20 loan guarantees, loans, or other appropriate funding measures to 21 qualified recipients to reduce greenhouse gas emissions consistent 22 with subdivisions (d) and (e) (c) and (d) of Section 38702. 23 (c) Prior to the initial allocation of moneys in accordance with 24 this part, the state board shall, pursuant to the Administrative 25 Procedure Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of 26 Part 1 of Division 3 of the Government Code), adopt guidelines 27 to provide state agencies guidance as well as guidance to potential 28 funding applicants and the public regarding the allocation and 29 allowable uses of moneys. The guidelines shall, at a minimum, do 30 all of the following: 31 (1) Establish minimum criteria for receiving funding and 32 additional criteria, including, but not limited to, those identified 33 in subdivision (d) (c) of Section 38702, that the state agencies shall 34 take into account in establishing preferences for awarding moneys. 35 (2) Provide a process to verify the qualifications of recipients. 36 (3) Provide for the monitoring and, as deemed necessary, the 37 audit of expenditures and outcomes. 38 (d) Any state agency that administers moneys pursuant to 39 subdivision (b) shall adopt guidelines that meet the requirements 40 of subdivision (c).

97 AB 1532 — 6 —

1 38704. (a) (1) The state board shall develop and adopt every 2 three years, consistent with the schedule described in Section 3 38705, an investment plan that identifies the anticipated 4 expenditures of moneys appropriated from the account in 5 accordance with this part. The investment plan shall, consistent 6 with the requirements of Section 38702, establish priorities for the 7 expenditure of moneys, identify specific categories of programs 8 and projects, identify proposed levels of expenditures for each 9 category, and identify the state agencies best qualified to implement 10 the programs pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 38703. 11 (2) The Public Utilities Commission shall develop and send to 12 the state board an investment plan to be included in the investment 13 plan prepared by the state board pursuant to subdivision (a). The 14 Public Utilities Commission’s investment plan shall include its 15 requirements on how investor-owned utilities may use any 16 allowance auction moneys the investor-owned utilities might 17 collect pursuant to a market-based compliance mechanism. 18 (b) The state board shall, in developing an investment plan, 19 consult with the Public Utilities Commission to ensure the 20 investment plan is coordinated with, and does not conflict with or 21 unduly overlap with, any expenditure plan the Public Utilities 22 Commission might adopt pursuant to Part 5 (commencing with 23 Section 38570). 24 (c) The state board shall receive input from an advisory body 25 that shall provide information and oversight to the state board to 26 assist in its development of each investment plan. The advisory 27 body shall include the secretaries for the Natural Resources 28 Agency, the California Environmental Protection Agency, the 29 Department of Food and Agriculture, and the Business, 30 Transportation and Housing Agency. The advisory body shall 31 participate in each public workshop on the draft investment plans 32 and provide testimony to the state board and Legislature on the 33 proposed and draft investment plans. 34 (d) If, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 38705, the budget 35 committees of each house of the Legislature with jurisdiction over 36 the State Budget adopt changes to the final investment plan or the 37 state board presents any proposed significant modifications to the 38 advisory body prior to the adoption of the final investment plan, 39 the state board shall hold at least two public workshops in different

97 — 7 — AB 1532

1 regions of the state and one public hearing prior to adopting each 2 final investment plan. 3 38705. (a) Beginning April 1, 2013, and by January 10 every 4 three years thereafter, concurrent with the submission of the 5 Governor’s Budget in 2016 and 2019, the state board shall submit 6 a proposed investment plan, as developed pursuant to Section 7 38704, to the budget committees of each house of the Legislature 8 with jurisdiction over the State Budget. 9 (b) The budget committees of each house of the Legislature 10 with jurisdiction over the State Budget shall, in consultation with 11 all relevant policy committees, adopt changes to the state board’s 12 proposed investment plan and transmit the changes to the state 13 board. The state board shall then incorporate the changes into the 14 investment plan and adopt a final investment plan at a public 15 hearing. 16 (c) The Legislature shall include appropriations for the 17 implementation of the final investment plan in the annual Budget 18 Act for the subsequent fiscal year for each of the three years for 19 each final investment plan. 20 (d) Subsequent to the adoption of each final investment plan, 21 the state board may adopt minor modifications to the proposed 22 investment plan, provided it notifies the Joint Legislative Budget 23 Committee within 90 days, or within 30 days if the aggregate total 24 of unreported modifications equals five million dollars 25 ($5,000,000) or more. If the state board adopts a significant 26 modification to a final investment plan, it shall, within 30 days, 27 notify the Joint Legislative Budget Committee. For purposes of 28 this subdivision, “significant modification” means an augmentation 29 or reduction, the value of which individually exceeds 50 percent 30 of the previously adopted allocation to an investment plan 31 subcategory or is at least two million dollars ($2,000,000). 32 38706. (a) Notwithstanding Section 10231.5 of the 33 Government Code, the state board shall annually submit a report 34 no later than December of each year to the appropriate committees 35 of the Legislature on the status of projects and their outcomes and 36 any changes the state board recommends to the investment plan 37 completed pursuant to Section 38705. It is the intent of the 38 Legislature that the appropriations required for the implementation 39 of these changes to the three-year investment plan shall be included 40 in the annual Budget Act for the subsequent fiscal year.

97 AB 1532 — 8 —

1 (b) A report submitted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be 2 submitted in compliance with Section 9795 of the Government 3 Code.

O

97 South Coast Air Quality Management District Legislative Analysis Summary – SB 1268 (Pavley) Bill Version: As Amended 5/1/12 Analyst: PC – 5/30/12

SB 1268 (Pavley) Energy: energy conservation assistance.

Summary: This bill would extend the sunset date of the Energy Conservation Assistance Account (ECAA) program to January 1, 2028, and require that certain unexpended funds revert to the General Fund and that funds deriving from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) revert to the Federal Trust Fund. This bill would also extend the sunset date of the Local Jurisdiction Energy Assistance Account (LJEAA) program to January 1, 2028 and require unexpended funds to revert to the Petroleum Violation Escrow Account (PVEA).

Background: Existing law:

1. Effective until January 1, 2013, establishes the ECAA program and requires the California Energy Commission (CEC) to administer the program and provide grants and loans at not less than one percent interest for local governments, public schools, hospitals, government buildings and non-profit organizations to finance energy efficiency projects.

2. Establishes the LJEAA program, effective until January 1, 2016, and requires CEC to administer the program and provide grants and loans at not less than three percent interest for local governments, public schools, hospitals, government buildings and non-profit organizations to finance energy efficiency projects, with funding from the PVEA.

3. Authorizes issuance of revenue bonds to provide funding for ECAA and LJEAA.

4. Appropriated $25 million of funds from ARRA to CEC for the ECAA program.

5. Appropriates $25 million, effective January 1, 2012, to ECAA for making energy efficiency loans and requires any account funds remaining on January 1, 2013, to revert to the Renewable Resources Trust Fund (RRTF).

6. Makes a unit of local government or special district eligible for an ECAA loan.

7. Appropriates to the account $25 million of the unencumbered balance of the $50 million from the RRTF that was appropriated to the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority. Existing law reverts, on and after January 1, 2013, the unencumbered balance of this $25,000,000 to the RRTF for use by the Authority. Status: 5/25/12 – In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

South Coast Air Quality Management District Legislative Analysis Summary – SB 1268 (Pavley) Bill Version: As Amended 5/1/12 Analyst: PC – 5/30/12

Specific Provisions: Specifically, this bill would:

1) Extend the sunset date of the ECAA program to January 1, 2028; and

2) Require that unexpended ECAA funds on that date deriving from bonds and the Renewable Resource Trust Fund revert to the General Fund and that ECAA funds deriving from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 revert to the Federal Trust Fund;

3) Extend the sunset date of the LJEAA program to January 1, 2028; and

4) Require that unexpended LJEAA funds on that date revert to the Petroleum Violation Escrow Account.

5) Make a joint powers authority eligible for an ECAA loan,

6) Require CEC to establish the interest rate for a LJEAA loan at not less than 1%.

Impacts on AQMD’s Mission, Operations or Initiatives: ECAA, which sunsets in 2013, was established more than 30 years ago by the Energy Conservation Assistance Act of 1979 and is one of the oldest of California’s programs designed to reduce statewide energy consumption through energy efficiency measures. The LJEAA program, which was established in 1986 and sunsets in 2016, is substantially similar to the ECAA program but allows for greater eligibility for assistance at the local level.

Energy efficiency measures are in line with AQMD priorities because of their benefit to air quality and greenhouse gas reduction goals of AB 32. This bill would allow existing programs that currently have funding to continue to provide assistance at the local level, including to entities within the South Coast region.

Recommended Position: SUPPORT AMENDED IN SENATE MAY 1, 2012 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 10, 2012 SENATE BILL No. 1268

1 Introduced by Senator Pavley

February 23, 2012

1 An act to amend Sections 25411, 25415, 25421, 25443, and 25449.4, and2 26142of the Public Resources Code, relating to energy, and making an3 appropriation therefor.

legislative counsel’s digest SB 1268, as amended, Pavley. Energy: energy conservation assistance. (1) The Energy Conservation Assistance Act of 1979 requires the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, until January 1, 2013, to administer the State Energy Conservation Assistance Account, a continuously appropriated account, to provide grants and loans to local governments and public institutions to maximize energy use savings. The act defines “energy conservation measures” to include measures primarily intended to reduce energy consumption or allow the use of a more desirable energy source. The act defines “unit of local government” to be a unit of general purpose government below the state or a special district. The act requires entities receiving a loan to repay the loan plus interest in not more than 30 equal semiannual payments with the first semiannual payment made on or before December 22 of the fiscal year following the year in which the project is completed. The act authorizes the commission to borrow moneys from specified entities from proceeds of revenue bonds issued by those entities. The act requires unencumbered funds in the account, on January 1, 2013, to revert back to the General Fund. Existing law

97 SB 1268 — 2 — appropriates to the account $25,000,000 of the unencumbered balance of the $50,000,000 from the Renewable Resource Trust Fund that was appropriated to the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority for specified purposes. Existing law reverts, on and after January 1, 2013, the unencumbered balance of the above $25,000,000 to the Renewable Resource Trust Fund for use by the authority. This bill would extend the act to January 1, 2028. The bill would additionally include measures primarily intended to reduce peak electricity demand as “energy conservation measures” and any combination of units of local government below the state and special districts formed for the joint exercise of power as “units of local government” for the purposes of the act. The bill would provide instead that the loan repayments be made in accordance with a schedule established by the commission. The bill would require any unexpended funds from the proceeds of revenue bonds sold for the purposes of the act remaining in the account on January 1, 2028, to remain in the account until all bond obligations have been satisfied and thereafter revert the remaining unexpended funds to the General Fund. The bill would require unexpended funds from the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 remaining in the account on January 1, 2028, to revert to the Federal Trust Fund. The bill would require, on and after January 1, 2028, the unencumbered balance of the $25,000,000 appropriated to the account from the Renewable Resource Trust Fund to be available for appropriation by the Legislature for the benefit of ratepayers. Because this bill would extend the operation of a continuously appropriated account and would expand the purpose of and entities qualified for assistance from the account, this bill would make an appropriation. (2) Existing law establishes, until January 1, 2016, the Local Jurisdiction Energy Assistance Account to provide funds administrated by the commission for loans to local jurisdictions to reduce energy costs. Existing law requires the commission to periodically set interest rates on the loans based on surveys of existing financial markets and at rates not less than 3% per annum. Existing law requires that unencumbered funds in the account on January 1, 2028, be deposited in the Federal Trust Fund. This bill would extend the operation of the account to January 1, 2028. The bill would require the act to set the interest rates on the loans at not less than 1% per annum. The bill, instead, would require

97 — 3 — SB 1268 unencumbered funds in the account on January 1, 2028, to be deposited in the Petroleum Violation Escrow Account. 2 Vote: ⁄3. Appropriation: yes. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no.

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:

1 SECTION 1. Section 25411 of the Public Resources Code is 2 amended to read: 3 25411. As used in this chapter: 4 (a) “Allocation” means a loan of funds by the commission 5 pursuant to the procedures specified in this chapter. 6 (b) “Building” means any existing or planned structure that 7 includes a heating or cooling system, or both. Additions to an 8 original building shall be considered part of that building rather 9 than a separate building. 10 (c) “Eligible institution” means a school, hospital, public care 11 institution, or a unit of local government. 12 (d) “Energy audit” means a determination of the energy 13 consumption characteristics of a building or facility that does all 14 of the following: 15 (1) Identifies the type, size, and energy use level of the building 16 or facility and the major energy using systems of the building or 17 facility. 18 (2) Determines appropriate energy conservation maintenance 19 and operating procedures. 20 (3) Indicates the need, if any, for the acquisition and installation 21 of energy conservation measures. 22 (e) “Energy conservation maintenance and operating procedure” 23 means a modification or modifications in the maintenance and 24 operations of a building or facility, and any installations therein 25 (based on the use time schedule of the building or facility), which 26 are designed to reduce energy consumption in the building or 27 facility and that require no significant expenditure of funds. 28 (f) “Energy conservation measure” means an installation or 29 modification of an installation in a building or facility that is 30 primarily intended to reduce energy consumption or peak electricity 31 demand, or allow the use of a more desirable energy source. 32 (g) “Energy conservation project” means an undertaking to 33 acquire and to install one or more energy conservation measures

97 SB 1268 — 4 —

1 in a building or facility, and technical assistance in connection 2 with that undertaking. 3 (h) “Facility” means any major energy using system of an 4 eligible institution whether or not housed in a building. 5 (i) “Hospital” means a public or nonprofit institution that is both 6 of the following: 7 (1) A general hospital, tuberculosis hospital, or any other type 8 of hospital, other than a hospital furnishing primarily domiciliary 9 care. 10 (2) Duly authorized to provide hospital services under the laws 11 of this state. 12 (j) “Hospital building” means a building housing a hospital and 13 related operations, including laboratories, laundries, outpatient 14 departments, nurses’ home and training activities, and central 15 service operations in connection with a hospital, and also includes 16 a building housing education or training activities for health 17 professions personnel operated as an integral part of a hospital. 18 (k) “Local government building” means a building that is 19 primarily occupied by offices or agencies of a unit of local 20 government or by a public care institution. 21 (l) “Project” means a purpose for which an allocation may be 22 requested and made under this chapter. Those purposes shall 23 include energy audits, energy conservation and operating 24 procedures, and energy conservation measures in existing and 25 planned buildings and facilities, energy conservation projects, and 26 technical assistance programs. 27 (m) “Public care institution” means a public or nonprofit 28 institution that owns: 29 (1) A long-term care institution. 30 (2) A rehabilitation institution. 31 (3) An institution for the provision of public health services, 32 including related publicly owned services such as laboratories, 33 clinics, and administrative offices operated in connection with the 34 institution. 35 (4) A residential child care center. 36 (n) “Public or nonprofit institution” means an institution owned 37 and operated by: 38 (1) The state, a political subdivision of the state, or an agency 39 or instrumentality of either.

97 — 5 — SB 1268

1 (2) An organization exempt from income tax under Section 2 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. 3 (3) In the case of public care institutions, an organization also 4 exempt from income tax under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal 5 Revenue Code of 1954. 6 (o) “School” means a public or nonprofit institution, including 7 a local educational agency, which: 8 (1) Provides, and is legally authorized to provide, elementary 9 education or secondary education, or both, on a day or residential 10 basis. 11 (2) Provides, and is legally authorized to provide, a program of 12 education beyond secondary education, on a day or residential 13 basis and meets all of the following requirements: 14 (A) Admits as students only persons having a certificate of 15 graduation from a school providing secondary education, or the 16 recognized equivalent of that certificate. 17 (B) Is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency 18 or association. 19 (C) Provides an education program for which it awards a 20 bachelor’s degree or higher degree or provides not less than a 21 two-year program that is acceptable for full credit toward a degree 22 at any institution that meets the requirements of subparagraphs 23 (A) and (B) and provides that program. 24 (3) Provides not less than a one-year program of training to 25 prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation 26 and that meets the provisions of paragraph (2). 27 (p) “School building” means a building housing classrooms, 28 laboratories, dormitories, athletic facilities, or related facilities 29 operated in connection with a school. 30 (q) “Technical assistance costs” means costs incurred for the 31 use of existing personnel or the temporary employment of other 32 qualified personnel, or both, necessary for providing technical 33 assistance. 34 (r) “Technical assistance program” means assistance to schools, 35 hospitals, local government, and public care institutions and 36 includes, but is not limited to: 37 (1) Conducting specialized studies identifying and specifying 38 energy savings and related cost savings that are likely to be realized 39 as a result of:

97 SB 1268 — 6 —

1 (A) Modification of maintenance and operating procedures in 2 a building or facility, in addition to those modifications 3 implemented after the preliminary energy audit, or 4 (B) Acquisition and installation of one or more specified energy 5 conservation measures in the building or facility, or as a result of 6 both. 7 (C) New construction activities. 8 (2) Planning of specific remodeling, renovation, repair, 9 replacement, or insulation projects related to the installation of 10 energy conservation measures in the building or facility. 11 (3) Developing and evaluating alternative project 12 implementation methods and proposals. 13 (s) “Unit of local government” means a unit of general purpose 14 government below the state, a special district, or any combination 15 of that unit and special district formed for the joint exercise of 16 power. 17 SEC. 2. Section 25415 of the Public Resources Code is 18 amended to read: 19 25415. (a) Each eligible institution to which an allocation has 20 been made under this chapter shall repay the principal amount of 21 the allocation, plus interest, in not more than 30 equal semiannual 22 payments, as determined by the commission. Loan repayments 23 shall be made in accordance with a schedule established by the 24 commission. The repayment period may not exceed the life of the 25 equipment, as determined by the commission or the lease term of 26 the building in which the energy conservation measures will be 27 installed. 28 (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the commission 29 shall, unless it determines that the purposes of this chapter would 30 be better served by establishing an alternative interest rate schedule, 31 periodically set interest rates on the loans based on surveys of 32 existing financial markets and at rates not less than 1 percent per 33 annum. 34 (c) The governing body of each eligible institution shall annually 35 budget an amount at least sufficient to make the semiannual 36 payments required in this section. The amount shall not be raised 37 by the levy of additional taxes but shall instead be obtained by a 38 savings in energy costs or other sources. 39 SEC. 3. Section 25421 of the Public Resources Code is 40 amended to read:

97 — 7 — SB 1268

1 25421. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), this chapter 2 shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2028, and as of that 3 date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted 4 before January 1, 2028, deletes or extends that date. 5 (b) Except as specified in subdivisions (c) and (d), all loans 6 outstanding as of January 1, 2028, shall continue to be repaid on 7 a semiannual basis, as specified in Section 25415, until paid in 8 full. All unexpended funds in the State Energy Conservation 9 Assistance Account on January 1, 2028, and thereafter shall revert 10 to the General Fund. 11 (c) To the extent required under applicable bond obligations, 12 unexpended funds from the proceeds of bonds sold pursuant to 13 Section 25417.5 that remain in the State Energy Conservation 14 Assistance Account on January 1, 2028, shall remain in the 15 account. These funds shall be expended pursuant to the applicable 16 requirements for bond proceeds. Once all applicable bond 17 obligations have been satisfied, unexpended funds shall revert to 18 the General Fund. 19 (d) Unexpended funds from the federal American Recovery and 20 Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-5) remaining in the 21 State Energy Conservation Assistance Account on January 1, 2028, 22 shall revert to the Federal Trust Fund. 23 SEC. 4. Section 25443 of the Public Resources Code is 24 amended to read: 25 25443. (a) Principal and interest payments on loans under this 26 article shall be returned to the commission and shall be used to 27 make additional loans to local jurisdictions pursuant to Section 28 25442 or to provide financial assistance to local jurisdictions 29 pursuant to Section 25441. 30 (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the commission 31 shall, unless it determines that the purposes of this chapter would 32 be better served by establishing an alternative interest rate schedule, 33 periodically set interest rates on the loans based on surveys of 34 existing financial markets and at rates not less than 1 percent per 35 annum. 36 SEC. 5. Section 25449.4 of the Public Resources Code is 37 amended to read: 38 25449.4. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (b), this chapter 39 shall remain in effect until January 1, 2028, and as of that date is

97 SB 1268 — 8 —

1 repealed, unless a later enacted statute which is enacted before 2 January 1, 2028, deletes or extends that date. 3 (b) All loans outstanding as of January 1, 2028, shall continue 4 to be repaid in accordance with a schedule established by the 5 commission pursuant to Section 25442.7, until paid in full. All 6 unexpended funds in the Local Jurisdiction Energy Assistance 7 Account on January 1, 2028, and thereafter, except to the extent 8 that those funds are encumbered pursuant to Section 25443.5, shall 9 be deposited in the Petroleum Violation Escrow Account and be 10 available for the purposes for which federal oil overcharge funds 11 are available pursuant to court judgment or federal agency order. 12 SEC. 6. Section 26142 of the Public Resources Code is 13 amended to read: 14 26142. (a) Notwithstanding Section 26140, twenty-five million 15 dollars ($25,000,000) of the unencumbered balance of the fifty 16 million dollars ($50,000,000) that was appropriated to the authority 17 pursuant to Section 26140 and is in the Renewable Resource Trust 18 Fund is hereby appropriated to the Energy Conservation Assistance 19 Account established pursuant to Section 25416. 20 (b) Notwithstanding Section 25421, any unexpended funds 21 appropriated pursuant to subdivision (a) remaining in the Energy 22 Conservation Assistance Account on and after January 1, 2013 23 2028, except to the extent those funds are encumbered pursuant 24 to Section 25417.5, shall revert to the Renewable Resource Trust 25 Fund and be available to the authority for the purposes of this 26 division for appropriation by the Legislature for the benefit of 27 ratepayers from whom the moneys from the Renewable Resource 28 Trust Fund are collected.

O

97 Attachment 3

SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT LEGISLATIVE REPORT

FROM HOME RULE ADVISORY GROUP MEETING OF MAY 16, 2012

HRAG members present: Dr. Elaine Chang, SCAQMD Elizabeth Adams, EPA (participated by phone) Greg Adams, L.A. County Sanitation Districts Mike Carroll, Latham & Watkins for the Regulatory Flexibility Group Curtis Coleman, Southern California Air Quality Alliance Chris Gallenstein, CARB (participated by phone) Jayne Joy, Eastern Municipal Water District Bill LaMarr, California Small Business Alliance Rongsheng Luo, SCAG (participated by phone) Dan McGivney on behalf of Lee Wallace, So Cal Gas and SDG&E Art Montez, AMA International Bill Quinn, CCEEB (participated by phone) Larry Rubio, Riverside Transit Agency (participated by phone) Mike Wang, WSPA

LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Philip Crabbe provided the following report to the Home Rule Advisory Group (HRAG) on what was discussed at the Legislative Committee meeting on May 11, 2012.

Federal The AQMD consultants reported that the Senate is currently conferencing with the House of Representatives on the transportation reauthorization bill. So far all of the amendments that AQMD has placed in the bill are still in play. At least two issues are holding up the bill’s progress: (1) the Keystone pipeline issue and (2) funding for the two-year bill. The conference is expected to have a longer timeline.

Additionally, the House and Senate versions of the of the FY 2013 energy and water appropriations bill have moved out of committee; however, the timelines for passage are uncertain.

State Governor Brown was scheduled to release the May revised proposed budget this past Monday. The $92 billion budget that Governor Brown proposed back in January is expected to be reduced to about $85 to $90 billion, with a $15 billion to $20 billion shortfall anticipated.

The District previously took a position of support for AB 1704 (Huffman) and opposed AB 2257 (Achadjian). AB 1704, which would ban the use of coal tar on roadway surfaces in California, was sent to the Assembly Appropriations Committee’s suspense file due to its significant costs.

1 With the potential budget deficit, passage of this bill will be difficult. AB 2257, which would interfere with AQMD rules relating to landfills, had its scheduled hearing in the Local Government Committee canceled by the author due to the District’s opposition.

In response to an inquiry made by an HRAG member at a previous meeting, Mr. Crabbe responded that AQMD has taken an interim support position on AB 1900 (Gatto) and has not taken a position on SB 1230 (Wright).

At their meeting on May 11, 2012, the Legislative Committee adopted staff’s recommended positions on the following bills:

Bill/Title Recommended Position AB 1900 (Gatto) Renewable Energy Resources: Biomethane Support AB 1990 (Fong) Renewable Energy Resources: Small-Scale Renewable Generation Program Support AB 2075 (Fong) Energy: Powerplant Certification Support AB 2405 (Blumenfield) Vehicles: High-Occupancy Toll Lanes Support AB 2583 (Blumenfield) Alternatively Fueled Vehicles: State Fleet Public Parking Support SB 1122 (Rubio) Energy: Renewable Biomass and Biogas Projects Support SB 1455 (Kehoe) Alternative Fuels Support

AB 1900 (Gatto) Renewable Energy Resources: Biomethane This bill would revise toxic compound standards and testing requirements for landfill gas to be sold to a gas utility for transportation in a common carrier pipeline. The bill would also require policies and programs to be adopted to promote in-state production and distribution of biomethane.

AB 1990 (Fong) Renewable Energy Resources: Small-Scale Renewable Generation Program This bill would establish a small-scale renewable generation program with the goal of installing 375 megawatts of electrical generating capacity from small scale renewable generation facilities in California’s most impacted and disadvantaged communities.

AB 2075 (Fong) Energy: Powerplant Certification This bill would repeal current provisions in law that authorize a person proposing to construct a solar power plant facility not subject to the California Energy Commission’s jurisdiction to opt out of local permitting requirements and to choose the less stringent CEC certification process.

AB 2405 (Blumenfield) Vehicles: High-Occupancy Toll Lanes This bill would exempt low emission and hybrid vehicles that are currently eligible to use the HOV lanes from toll lane charges.

2 AB 2583 (Blumenfield) Alternatively Fueled Vehicles: State Fleet Public Parking This bill would require the Department of General Services and the California Department of Transportation to increase use of alternative fueled vehicles in the state’s fleets and to increase infrastructure to support those alternative fueled vehicles.

SB 1122 (Rubio) Energy: Renewable Biomass and Biogas Projects This bill would require the Public Utilities Commission to mandate, no later than June 1, 2013, that each of the state’s three largest investor-owned utilities collectively procure at least 250 megawatts of renewable generating capacity from small renewable biomass or biogas projects.

SB 1455 (Kehoe) Alternative Fuels This bill would set an alternative fuels goal of 26% by 2022 for the State of California and direct relevant agencies to work toward diversifying the state’s transportation fuel supply.

HRAG members’ questions and responses to the questions are below:

Q. How does SB 1455 (Kehoe) relate to the current ARB targets for alternative fuels? A. The bill would codify current policies and help achieve GHG reductions (note: staff modified the response after the meeting). Q. Why would the District want to support a bill that codifies what is already in existence? A. (See response above).

Discussion With respect to SB 1455 (Kehoe), one HRAG member stated that it would be helpful to understand the economic impact of the proposed bill. District staff responded that the bill analysis explains that the purpose is to ensure the long-term commitment to clean transportation and to the alternative fuels industry and to attract and increase private investment. The HRAG member asked for more specificity with regard to costs in future bill analyses.

With respect to SB 1455 (Kehoe), one HRAG member expressed concern that there are inequities and inequalities with the bill. For example, the government is able to purchase discounted fuel in bulk while the same cost savings is not passed on to the constituents, placing an unfair economic burden on small businesses.

3

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 21

REPORT: Mobile Source Committee

SYNOPSIS: The Mobile Source Committee met Friday, June 15, 2012 Following is a summary of that meeting.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file.

Ronald O. Loveridge, Chair Mobile Source Committee EC:fmt

Attendance Mayor Ronald Loveridge called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m. Present was Dr. Clark E. Parker. Present via teleconference was Supervisor Shawn Nelson and Councilwoman Jan Perry via videoconference (arrived at 9:15 a.m.). Supervisor John J. Benoit was absent.

INFORMATIONAL ITEM: 3) Plug-in Electric Vehicle Status As requested by the Committee at its January 25, 2012 meeting, Dr. Matt Miyasato, Assistant Deputy Executive Officer/Technology Advancement Office provided an update on plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs).

Dr. Miyasato stated that electric vehicles are commercialized by several original equipment manufacturers, and are now becoming more mainstream in the marketplace. He presented a comparison table to highlight several electric vehicles and information that consumers may be interested in such as the sticker price; the range in miles, as established by the U.S. EPA; the time it takes to recharge; the cost per 25 miles based on the FuelEconomy.gov website, which shows that for less than $1.00 these vehicles can be driven for 25 miles.

Dr. Miyasato also provided an update on the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) settlement agreement with NRG, an energy service provider based in Texas. The settlement has not yet been approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, but it is anticipated that it will be settled within 30 to 60 days. AQMD staff will continue to meet with NRG to help in placing stations where they would be more utilized.

Dr. Miyasato provided an overview of staff activities, including the purchase of five additional vehicles, which was recently approved by the Board. Staff has also been working on statewide applications with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District, California Plug-in Electric Vehicle Collaborative, the California Fuel Cell Partnership and the Clean Cities Coalition in response to the Department of Energy (DOE) Clean Cities proposal to push alternative fuel in the workplace and large corporations.

Mayor Loveridge asked whether a lot of money is available through the DOE. Dr. Miyasato stated that there is approximately $10 million available nationwide and that the DOE will select different locations. Dr. Parker asked whether the areas are being selected based on air pollution contribution or whether the locations are selected ad hoc. Dr. Miyasato responded that the locations are selected ad hoc, but the funding is distributed equitably around the United States. He also noted that the selection criteria for some of the solicitations is based on air quality.

Dr. Miyasato concluded his presentation by showing PEV sales nationwide from December 2010, which has been increasing substantially since the start of 2012. Dr. Parker asked whether the AQMD is given a special break on the vehicles that they purchase, or whether state agencies are prohibited from getting breaks. Ms. Barbara Baird, District Counsel, responded that she was not aware of any legal prohibition. Councilwoman Perry asked why Mitsubishi is not spending a lot of money on marketing. Staff suspects that it is because Mitsubishi is a smaller manufacturer with a smaller budget and a smaller market share. Councilwoman Perry also asked which vehicle has the greatest range. Dr. Miyasato stated that of the commercial vehicles, the Honda Fit has the greatest range, with 82 miles on a single charge.

Mayor Loveridge commented on the City of Riverside’s efforts to promote EVs, including an EV outreach initiative developed by Mr. Gary Polakovic. Mayor Loveridge recommended that staff encourage other cities to ask how they can be EV-friendly, and that staff look at how AB 2766 money is spent towards this effort. He also recommended that staff get a copy of Mr. Polakovic’s proposal.

ACTION ITEM: 1) Issue Program Announcement for Low-Emission Leaf Blower Vendors Mr. Shashi Singeetham provided an overview of the Program Announcement for Low-Emission Leaf Blower Vendors. His presentation included background

-2- information on the Air Quality Investment Program, a summary of the 2010-11 Leaf Blower Exchange Program, proposed events for 2012, and the proposal requirements and recommended action for the proposed Leaf Blower Exchange Program Announcement PA #2013-01.

Dr. Parker asked if the program was restricted to commercial gardeners or if other entities were eligible to participate. Mr. Singeetham stated that the program is also open to other public entities. Dr. Parker then asked how the proposal would be advertised. Mr. Singeetham stated that the Program Announcement would be made available to all the major manufacturers and to all the parties that have shown interest in the past. Councilwoman Perry commended staff on the program and their efforts in the south side of Los Angeles where a lot of gardeners reside.

Moved by Nelson; seconded by Perry; unanimously approved.

INFORMATIONAL ITEM: 2) Update on 2012 AQMP Development Efforts Dr. Elaine Chang, Deputy Executive Officer/Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources, provided an update on the 2012 AQMP development including integration of SCAG’s transportation control measures (TCMs) and reasonable available control measure (RACM) analysis for TCMs into the 2012 AQMP and the status of the PM2.5 and ozone analysis. SCAG’s Energy and Environment Committee approved, on June 7, 2012, the transmittal of its TCM and RACM analysis to AQMD and for public review as part of SIP process.

The two air quality models (CAMx and CMAQ) used to predict PM2.5 and ozone concentrations are now producing similar results. Specifically, both models projected attainment of the 24-hr PM2.5 by 2019 with existing controls. In an effort to demonstrate expeditious progress and necessary extension, staff performed more detailed air quality analysis and sensitivity model runs surrounding the Mira Loma monitoring station, the only station that currently exceeded the standard to identify key precursors to the PM2.5 formation in the area. As a result, staff is proposing a three-part localized and episodic control program for sources near the Mira Loma area: more stringent residential wood burning curtailment; salt additive to control dairy ammonia emissions, and a voluntary incentive program for accelerated turnover of trucks and cargo handling equipment servicing the warehouses and distribution centers in the Mira Loma area. The preliminary modeling analysis indicated that these three measures can produce up to 0.75 ug/m3 of improvement in PM2.5 air quality that it can potentially move up the attainment date for the SCAB by 2 two years (i.e., 2017). Mayor Loveridge raised an issue regarding the appropriateness to call out Mira Loma after its incorporation as city of Jurupa Valley and the importance of

-3- reaching out to the city since AQMD plans to implement geographic controls in the area. Dr. Chang responded that staff is still refining the technical analysis to identify the affected areas, but committed to reaching out to local stakeholders. Dr. Parker inquired about filter technologies for fireplace applications and the potential of a targeted grant program for the Mira Loma area. Staff stated that there are U.S. EPA certified wood-burning heaters (e.g., wood stoves) and qualified low-emissions fireplaces, but both still have significantly higher emissions than gaseous-fueled fired fireplaces and that we currently have a gas log buy down program throughout the basin and we could consider a more targeted incentive program for the area.

Dr. Chang also presented the challenge in meeting the contingency measure requirement in the Clean Air Act and U.S. EPA’s guidelines to adopt one-year worth of reductions (i.e., 90+tpd of NOx equivalent reductions or 1 to 1.5 ug/m3 of air quality improvement) as contingency that needs to be implemented should the air basin fail to meet the standard as projected. The only contingency that staff is considering is to have CARB adopt a mandatory program for the mobile sources related to warehouses and distribution centers in the Mira Loma area. Staff is also researching past U.S. EPA actions for other states to explore possible alternative approaches.

With respect to ozone attainment, the modeling analysis indicated that the basin needs another 65% reductions in NOx emissions beyond the current regulations to meet the 2023 8-hr ozone standard of 80 ppb and 75% reductions needed to meet the 2032 ozone standard of 75 ppb. Coachella Valley will be meeting the 80 ppb ozone standard by 2019 as required based on existing regulations. Updated control measures to address the 80 ppb ozone standard were also presented including actions to be taken by CARB.

Dr. Chang also presented an overview of the AQMP schedule for draft release, public workshops, regional public hearings, etc. She also provided information on outreach efforts including past meetings and upcoming outreach calendar.

Mayor Loveridge also inquired about what staff sees as the emerging issue for this Plan as compared to previous plans. Dr. Chang responded that the business community is in general concerned that if we commit too much too soon in the SIP, it could cause unnecessary adverse economic impacts. Staff is cognizant about it as well, but at same time staff does not want to delay all the development of control programs post 2015, potentially making it impossible to attain and/or causing greater economic impacts by the backload of all 200 tons per day of NOx reductions in a short period of time.

-4- Dr. Parker inquired about how often air quality models are updated and expressed an interest in participating in a future technical meeting on air quality modeling. Staff responded that almost on a yearly basis models are refined or upgraded to better simulate air contaminants in the atmosphere, and that there is a technical review group, and that they will inform him of the next meeting.

Councilwoman Perry left the meeting at 9:54 a.m.

WRITTEN REPORTS:

4) Rule 2202 Activity Report Written report submitted. No comments.

5) Monthly Report on Environmental Justice Initiatives – CEQA Document Commenting Update Written report submitted. No comments.

6) Report on Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Group Meetings Written report submitted. No comments.

OTHER BUSINESS None

PUBLIC COMMENT Mr. Lee Wallace, So Cal Gas/SDG&E, thanked staff for meeting with So Cal Gas multiple times to discuss the AQMP, and he stated that smaller businesses will appreciate the outreach that staff has scheduled. Mr. Wallace also commented on the joint “Vision” document that is being prepared by CARB, SCAQMD and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District that integrates the criteria pollutant demands of the State as well as its GHG and air toxic objectives. Mr. Wallace suggested that the Committee consider having staff provide a briefing on the “Vision” document, since it is causing a lot of discussion and debate. Mayor Loveridge agreed and requested that staff brief the Committee at a future meeting.

The meeting was adjourned at 10:18 a.m.

Attachment Attendance Roster

-5- SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT MOBILE SOURCE COMMITTEE MEETING Attendance Roster- June 15, 2012

NAME AFFILIATION Chair Ron Loveridge AQMD Governing Board Committee Member Clark E. Parker AQMD Governing Board Committee Member Shawn Nelson AQMD Governing Board (via teleconference) Committee Member Jan Perry AQMD Governing Board (via videoconference) Board Consultant/Asst. Mark Abramowitz AQMD Governing Board (Lyou) Board Consultant/Asst. Debra Mendelsohn AQMD Governing Board (Antonovich) Lee Wallace Southern California Gas Co./SDG&E Curt Coleman Southern California Air Quality Alliance Sue Gornick BP Ron Wilkniss Consultant to Western States Petroleum Assn. Daniel McGivney Southern California Gas Co. Elaine Chang AQMD Staff Laki Tisopulos AQMD Staff Barbara Baird AQMD Staff Chung Liu AQMD Staff Henry Hogo AQMD Staff Matt Miyasato AQMD Staff Joe Cassmassi AQMD Staff Carol Gomez AQMD Staff Dean Saito AQMD Staff Kathryn Higgins AQMD Staff Vicki Moaveni AQMD Staff Patti Whiting AQMD Staff Kim White AQMD Staff

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 22

REPORT: Stationary Source Committee

SYNOPSIS: The Stationary Source Committee met Friday, June 15, 2012. Fol- lowing is a summary of that meeting. The next meeting will be July 27, at 10:30 a.m., in Conference Room CC8.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file.

Dennis Yates, Chair Stationary Source Committee MN:am

Attendance The meeting began at 10:30 a.m. Present were Mayor Dennis Yates, Mayor Ronald Loveridge (left the meeting at 11:00), Councilwoman Judith Mitchell and Dr. Joseph Lyou. Absent was Supervisor Shawn Nelson.

INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

1. Rule 1110.2 – Emissions from Gaseous- and Liquid-Fueled Engines Dr. Laki Tisopulos, Assistant Deputy Executive Officer, provided the Committee with a status report on the revised staff proposal on Proposed Amended Rule 1110.2. Staff is recommending delaying the previously adopted 2012 emission limits for biogas-powered internal combustion engines. The revised staff proposal would pro- vide additional time for compliance, by further extending the already extended com- pliance schedule from three to four years (July 2015/2016). The staff proposal also provides a compliance option for a longer averaging time for engines with superior performance in achieving lower mass emissions, and include other clarifications. In addition, staff is committing to continue the technology/implementation review process.

Nine representatives of the affected facilities addressed the Committee: Greg Kester (CASA), Frank Caponi (LACSD), Vlad Kogan (OCSD), Jayne Joy (EMWD), John Claus (City of San Bernardino Water Department), Brennon Flahive (SOCWA), Da- vid Tieu (OCWR), Suparna Chakladar (Fortistar), and Rosalie Mulé (WM).

All of the commentators expressed the desire to extend the compliance deadline to 2017 (5 years from the original July 1, 2012 date) and are requesting one compliance date instead of the current phased compliance deadlines. Also, the stakeholders ex- pressed their interest in keeping the Technology Assessment open in order for other technologies to be demonstrated. Additionally, the stakeholders feel that the costs are underestimated and that SCR-based technology will be very expensive, especial- ly for smaller engines. In addition, the stakeholders requested AQMD’s support for state legislation to enable sources to inject cleaned biogas into the pipeline.

Mr. Frank Caponi commented on the Ox Mountain installation in the Bay Area. He is still requesting from staff complete CEMS data to show that the equipment is meeting the proposed rule requirements. Mr. David Tieu requested that staff look into the shorter equipment life for landfills that are closed or will soon close as the gas quantity will decline over time.

In contrast, the tenth representative, Mr. Jim Stewart (Sierra Club) commented that dirty biogas engines produce a lot of NOx, and given the District’s emission reduc- tion obligations for the next AQMP, the reductions from biogas engines are neces- sary.

The Board Members in the Committee also commented on the proposed rule. Dr. Joseph Lyou commented that he supports the efforts for legislation to clean and in- ject landfill gas to the natural gas pipeline. Councilwoman Mitchell asked if the AQMD can implement the rule without making a SIP commitment. Staff responded that the 2008 amendment was not submitted into the SIP because of the technologi- cal feasibility concerns, but that staff does not believe the feasibility to be an issue any longer given the performance of the OCSD and Ox Mountain (in Bay Area) projects, and reminded the Committee about the need to reduce the size of the black box in the AQMP for attainment.

Mayors Yates stated that he does not support flaring and understands that the costs for the cities and municipalities to comply with the rule requirements will be passed on to the consumer. He advised staff to keep in mind the real costs of compliance. In addition, he advised Fortistar to provide its power purchase agreement contracts to the District for review.

2 The Board Members in the Committee agreed that more time for compliance may be needed, but that a final date of compliance would be left for the entire Governing Board to decide at the Public Hearing.

2. Implementation Update on Rule 1147 – Nox Reductions from Miscellaneous Sources At the May 2012 Stationary Source Committee meeting, a request was made to have the Committee discuss the status of Rule 1147. In response to the request, Joe Cassmassi, Planning and Rules Manager provided the Committee with a presenta- tion outlining the status of rule implementation and other staff activities conducted since the last rule implementation update presented at the January 2012 Stationary Source Committee meeting. Mr. Cassmassi summarized the commitments made through the rule development process and actions taken to address those commit- ments over the past five months. Most notably, the AQMD had issued a compliance advisory for the first group of sources to be impacted by the July 1, 2012 compliance date. He stated that over 880 Rule 1147 permit applications had been received and that 91 source tests were either completed or in progress. Mr. Cassmassi provided an overview of the staff’s efforts to speed up permit processing, clarify < 1 lb/day source applicability and the ongoing efforts to refine the emissions characteristics of those small sources. This data would be included in a technology assessment as well as be provided to companion Rule 219/222 (for equipment not requiring written permit) rule development to determine if selected categories of source could be ex- cluded from the provisions of Rule 1147. To date, approximately 2,700 equipment permits have been analyzed in ten categories of Rule 1147 sources for possible in- clusion in Rule 219. Mr. Cassmassi concluded that when the technology assessment was completed, the results would be made available to the Task Force and an inde- pendent assessment would be contracted with members of the Task Force contribut- ing to the selection process.

The Committee Members received several comments at the conclusion of the pres- entation. Mr. Bill LaMarr of CSBA restated many of the commitments that had been made to the Task Force throughout the rule development process. He com- mented to the Committee that there have been no meetings of the 1147 Task Force since January 2012. He further stated that the technology assessment has not been completed and that there was a lack of transparency in the implementation process. Mr. LaMarr suggested that the rule compliance date be postponed several months to allow sources to better respond to the rule implementation schedule.

Mr. Tony Endres discussed that he had submitted a permit application by December 1, 2011 to the AQMD and the client has not yet received their permit to construct for a Rule 1147 modification. He also stated that there should be a way for businesses to get out of the requirement based on cost effectiveness and technology considera- tions. Four additional commenters expressed concerns about the notification

3 process, industry’s awareness of pending rule implementation and the responsive- ness of staff to permit and compliance questions.

Councilwoman Mitchell questioned staff as to whether units with < 1 lb/day emis- sions are exempt from the rule? How many are less than 1 lb/day? She also com- mented that the issues raised were important, in that the technology assessment was not done, and no third party review had been conducted. She also asked if the AQMD could let business know if they are in the <1 lb/day category. Staff respond- ed that approximately half of the affected sources fell into the < 1 lb per day catego- ry and that they had until 2017 to comply with the rule. Staff also responded that they were committed to fulfilling all their commitments and that the technology as- sessment was already initiated and preliminary results will be made public within the next several weeks. Mr. Cassmassi also stated that efforts had been made to simpli- fy a means of assisting the low emitters to be identified by compliance staff. Coun- cilwoman Mitchell stated that this issue be further discussed at the July Stationary Source Committee meeting.

Dr. Lyou commented that the AQMD had an obligation to let people know how to comply with regulations, particularly in this case for many small sources. He seconded Councilwoman Mitchell’s request to meet next month on Rule 1147 im- plementation. Mayor Yates directed that staff not wait to confer with stakeholders but to meet with them prior to bringing information to the Committee. He joined the consensus for a call to discuss the issue again in July.

WRITTEN REPORTS

All written reports were acknowledged by the Committee.

PUBLIC COMMENTS

During the Public Comment period Mr. LaMarr restated his request to have the Board delay rule implementation. Mayor Yates responded that his Committee does not have the power to delay rule implementation. Mr. LaMarr further asked whether enforce- ment discretion could be applied. Mr. Nazemi, Deputy Executive Officer, replied that he would discuss the issue of enforcement discretion with the Executive Officer and in the past Dr. Wallerstein has presented enforcement discretion proposals to the full Board.

Attachment Attendance Roster

4 SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT STATIONARY SOURCE COMMITTEE June 15, 2012 ATTENDANCE ROSTER (Voluntary)

NAME AFFILIATION Mayor Dennis Yates AQMD Governing Board Dr. Joseph Lyou AQMD Governing Board Councilwoman Judith Mitchell AQMD Governing Board Mayor Ronald Loveridge AQMD Governing Board Marisa Perez AQMD Governing Board (Mitchell) Mark Abramowitz AQMD Governing Board (Lyou) Mohsen Nazemi AQMD Staff Laki Tisopulos AQMD Staff Elaine Chang AQMD Staff Barbara Baird AQMD Staff Bill Wong AQMD Staff Joe Cassmassi AQMD Staff Jennifer Shepardson SBMUD Bill LaMarr CSBA Al Javier EMWD Noel Muyco So Cal Gas Co. Tony Endres Furnace Dynamics, Inc. Greg Kester CASA Scott Blacklock Noxtech Jayne Joy EMWD Carlos Casillas Sara Lee Fresh Bakery Kelly Bowles Bimbo Bakeries USA Ron Wilkness Consultant to WSPA SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT STATIONARY SOURCE COMMITTEE June 15, 2012 ATTENDANCE ROSTER (Voluntary)

David Tieu OC Waste & Recycling Daniel McGivney So Cal Gas Heather Macleod Edison Mission Energy Frank Caponi LACSD Rosalie Mule Waste Management Suparna Chakladar Fortistar Chris Berch LEUA Brennon Flahive SOCWA Mike Ramirez Gyant Complance Jon Gypsyn Gyant Compliance Jim Stewart Sierra Club Vlad Kogan OCSD Terry Ahn OCSD David Rothbart LACSD Jerald Cole Hydrogen Ventura Danielle Movone Gatzla Dillon & Balance LLP Geoffrey Blake MFASE/All Metals Processing Rita Loof Rad Tech

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 23 REPORT: Technology Committee SYNOPSIS: The Technology Committee met on June 15, 2012. Major topics included Technology Advancement items reflected in the regular Board Agenda for the July Board meeting. A summary of these topics with the Committee's comments is provided. The next Technology Committee meeting will be on July 27, 2012 at 12 p.m. in CC-8.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file.

Josie Gonzales Technology Committee Chair CSL:pmk

Attendance: Supervisor Josie Gonzales participated by videoconference. Councilwoman Judith Mitchell and Mayor Dennis Yates were in attendance at District headquarters. Supervisor John Benoit, Dr. William Burke, and Mayor Miguel Pulido were absent due to conflicts with their schedules.

JULY BOARD AGENDA ITEMS

1. Execute Contract to Cosponsor Steam Hydrogasification Reaction Demonstration Project On October 2, 2009, the Board approved a bench-scale Steam Hydrogasification Reaction demonstration project with the University of California, Riverside, CE- CERT to generate Substitute Natural Gas from biosolids. The project successfully demonstrated high thermal efficiency with approximately 70% carbon conversion rate and the potential to produce high quality natural gas for transportation fueling or electric power generation. This action is to execute a contract with CE-CERT to conduct a larger-scale Steam Hydrogasification Reaction demonstration project incorporating process components that closely simulate commercial-scale operations for an amount not to exceed $72,916 from the Clean Fuels Fund (31).

Mayor Yates asked where the proposed project will be conducted. Staff responded that it will be conducted at UC Riverside, CE-CERT. The next phase of this project could be a larger pilot project which could be conducted at a sanitation district. Mayor Yates commented that it would be a good idea to look into the possibility of conducting a pilot project in Rancho Cucamonga.

Moved by Yates; seconded by Mitchell; unanimously approved.

2. Execute Contract with South Bay Cities Council of Governments for Demonstration of Battery Electric Vehicles For many residents within the South Coast Air Basin, commutes and short trips can be accomplished solely on residential streets. The Local Use Vehicle demonstration project has promoted the use of Neighborhood Electric Vehicles (NEVs) with local residents, select businesses, municipalities and government entities in the South Bay Cities region. A demonstration of longer range battery electric vehicles (BEVs) will help address some limitations of the previous NEV demonstration project and provide guidance for community planning efforts for new BEV models that have recently become available. This action is to execute a contract to demonstrate BEVs in an amount not to exceed $320,000 from the Clean Fuels Fund (31) and execute a loan agreement for a BEV with South Bay Cities Council of Governments.

Mayor Yates asked questions relating to the installation and cost of electricity for the charging stations. Staff responded that these chargers can be purchased at stores like Home Depot and contractors can install them, and this program does not pay for the cost of electricity that is required to charge the electric vehicles. Councilwoman Mitchell further added that this project is important in a place like South Bay Cities COG region, an area that does not have good public transportation.

Supervisor Gonzales mentioned that there are difficulties in implementing new technologies, so successful implementation of this project should be highlighted. She also suggested that other groups like seniors be considered to participate in the demonstration project.

Moved by Mitchell; seconded by Yates; unanimously approved.

3. Authorize Executive Officer to Loan Monies from General Fund and/or Special Revenue Funds to Provide Cash Flow for Accrued Interest Earned, but Not Yet Received, in Other Special Revenue Funds Under some incentive funding grants, CARB has required that the entire amount of accrued interest be fully expended at the same date as the subject grant’s expiration date for expenditure of its project funds. As the amount of earned interest is

-2- finalized and reported several months after the expenditure deadline of the project funds, it becomes virtually impossible to expend the last portion of the earned interest at the same date as the project funds. One such example is the Proposition 1B-School Bus Program. To avoid the return of any interest funds to CARB, this action is to authorize the Executive Officer to loan and reimburse up to $75,000 from the general and/or special revenue funds to provide cash flow for accrued interest earned, but not yet received, in other special revenue funds. In addition, authorize the Executive Officer to approve expenditures of up to $75,000 from these loans.

Councilwoman Mitchell asked how the interest funds are typically used. Staff responded funds are used toward additional projects.

Supervisor Gonzales questioned whether we have ever had to return state incentive funds in the past. Staff indicated no, but this will remedy any possible situation in the future.

Moved by Mitchell; seconded by Yates; unanimously approved.

Public Comment Period – There was no public comment.

Other Business – There was no other business.

The next meeting will be July 27, 2012.

Attachment Attendance

-3-

Attachment A – Attendance

Supervisor Josie Gonzales ...... AQMD Governing Baord (via VT) Councilmember Judith Mitchell ...... AQMD Governing Board Mayor Dennis Yates ...... AQMD Governing Board Mark Abramowitz ...... Board Assistant (Lyou) Allis Druffel ...... Board Assistant (Cacciotti) Marisa Perez ...... Board Assistant (Mitchell) Lisha Smith ...... Board Assistant (Gonzales) (via VT) Bob Ulloa ...... Board Assistant (Yates) Michael O’Kelly, Chief Financial Officer ...... AQMD John Olvera, Principal Deputy District Counsel ...... AQMD Ruby Fernandez, Sr. Deputy District Counsel ...... AQMD Chung Liu, STA ...... AQMD Henry Hogo, STA ...... AQMD Matt Miyasato, STA ...... AQMD Fred Minassian, STA ...... AQMD Lourdes Cordova Martinez, STA ...... AQMD Dean Saito, STA ...... AQMD Dipankar Sarkar, STA ...... AQMD Brian Choe, STA ...... AQMD Lisa Mirisola, STA ...... AQMD Leeor Alpern, L&PA ...... AQMD Paul Wright, IM ...... AQMD Penny Shaw Cedillo, STA ...... AQMD Pat Krayser, STA ...... AQMD Henry Cheung, STA ...... AQMD Co-op Student Danielle Robinson ...... ARB Candice Gantt ...... SCE Bob Graham ...... SCE Tom Gross ...... SCE

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 24

REPORT: Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee

SYNOPSIS: Below is a summary of key issues addressed at the MSRC’s meeting on June 21, 2012. Since the MSRC canceled its meetings in August, the MSRC’s next meeting is scheduled for Thursday, September 20, 2012, at 2:00 p.m. in Conference Room CC8.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file.

Michael D. Antonovich AQMD Representative on MSRC

CSL:HH:DAH

Meeting Minutes Approved At its June 21, 2012 meeting, the MSRC unanimously approved the minutes from its May 17, 2012 meeting. Those approved minutes are attached for your information (Attachment 1).

Additional Award for Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Approved As part of the FY 2011-12 Work Program, the MSRC allocated $4 million for implementation of new and expanded CNG and LNG refueling stations and modification of maintenance facilities to accommodate gaseous-fueled vehicles. Program Announcement #PA2012-10 was released on March 2, 2012, with a final submission deadline of September 28, 2012. The MSRC previously approved awards for nine applications total $1,219,000. One additional application for the installation of a publicly accessible CNG station in Murrieta was received from Southern California Gas Company and was deemed eligible, having met all requirements of the Program. At its June 21, 2012 meeting, the MSRC approved a contract with Southern California Gas in an amount not to exceed $150,000 for the installation of this station as part of the FY 2011-12 AB 2766 Discretionary Fund Work Program. This award will be considered by the AQMD Board at its July 13, 2012 meeting.

Multiple Awards Approved for Medium-Duty and Medium-Heavy-Duty Vehicle Incentives The MSRC also allocated $2.5 million for a Medium-Duty and Medium-Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program as part of its FY 2011-12 Work Program. Program Announcement #PA2012-13 was released on March 2, 2012, offering co-funding towards the purchase of qualifying vehicles, equipped with either dedicated alternative fuel or zero-emission drive system technology and certified by CARB at or below a NOx standard of 0.2 g/bhp-hr. The incentive level is set at the actual incremental cost of the low-emission option, up to a maximum of $10,000 each for medium-duty and $25,000 each for medium-heavy-duty vehicles. Funding would be distributed on a first-come, first-served basis with a geographic minimum per county of $300,000. The PA includes an open application period commencing April 10 through September 28, 2012. To date a total of 14 applications have been received, 12 of which were received the first day and thus deemed received at the same time.

At its June 21, 2012 meeting, the MSRC considered only the first day applications of this Program and unanimously awarded a total of $2,315,000 in funding. They deferred consideration of applications received after the first day because Riverside County’s geographic minimum has not yet been met. In order to award full funding for the first day applications and still set aside the remaining county minimum for Riverside ($225,000), the MSRC allocated an additional $40,000 from unallocated revenues. These awards will be considered by the AQMD Board at its July 13, 2012 meeting.

MSRC staff has been tasked with performing additional outreach to Riverside County to ensure this area of the region has sufficient opportunity to participate in this vehicle incentive program.

Approval to Implement CNG Taxicab Incentive Program Under the FY 2011-12 Work Program, the MSRC allocated $750,000 for a program to provide incentives for the purchase of CNG taxicabs. At its June 21, 2012 meeting, the MSRC approved implementing an incentive program to provide $3,000 per CNG taxicab purchased. Qualifying taxicabs must be purchased new and dedicated to operate solely on natural gas. Both taxi fleets and individual owner/operators are eligible to apply. Funding shall be distributed on a first-come, first-served basis with a geographic minimum per county of $93,000, with funding remaining available until exhausted. The AQMD Board will consider this item at its July 13, 2012 meeting.

The MSRC has asked for monthly reports on the progress of this incentive program. If funding is not exhausted within what the MSRC deems a reasonable timeframe, they could choose to terminate the program and revert unused funds back to the AB 2766 Discretionary Fund. If so, they will seek approval from the AQMD Board to do so. -2-

New Vendor Approved for Participation in Alternative Fuel School Bus Incentive Program The MSRC set aside $1.5 million in its FY 2011-12 Work Program to continue offering incentives for alternative fuel school buses. Two school bus vendors (A-Z Bus Sales and BusWest) had previously been deemed qualified for participation, but an RFQ #Q2012- 10 was released on March 2, 2012, to seek applications from new vendors seeking to qualify their school buses for participation. Creative Bus Sales submitted two qualification packages, one for an LPG (propane) TransTech Type A school bus and a second for a Type D full-size Smith Electric school bus. The MSRC unanimously approved Creative Bus Sales as a new vendor qualifying the LPG TransTech Type A school bus for a $15,000 incentive. However, the second qualification package for the Type D bus was denied for two reasons: 1) the RFQ was not written in such a way as to allow a fully electric school bus to qualify; and 2) the cofounding requested for this school bus exceeded the allowable cost-share in the program. The MSRC may consider this type of bus in its next work program cycle. When one or more vendors have received orders for these qualifying buses, they will seek funding approval from the MSRC. If approved, at that time the MSRC will submit to the AQMD Board for approval of a contact award(s).

Allocate Funding to CTCs for Rideshare Incentive Programs As part of their FY 2011-12 Work Program, the MSRC allocated $1 million towards a “Rideshare Thursday” public awareness marketing campaign and $500,000 to implement one or more rideshare programs to provide incentives for the use of alternative commute modes. A Subcommittee of the MSRC’s Technical Advisory Committee is currently evaluating bids received from companies seeking to conduct the public awareness campaign and the MSRC will consider these bids and possible awards in the near future. At its June 21, 2012 meeting, however, the MSRC approved allocating the $500,000 for incentives equally among the region’s four county transportation commissions (CTCs). Each of the four CTCs will submit concise work plans to the MSRC on how they will utilize the incentive funding. Once the work plans have been finalized and approved, the MSRC will seek approval from the AQMD Board to award sole-source contracts to each of the four CTCs in the amount of $125,000 each to implement their respective rideshare programs.

Received and Approved Final Report The MSRC received and approved only one final report summary for Go Natural Gas Contract #MS08062, which provided $400,000 towards the construction of a CNG fueling station.

-3-

All final reports are filed in the AQMD’s library and a two-page summary of each closed project can be viewed in the electronic library on the MSRC's website at http://www.cleantransportationfunding.org.

Contract Modification Requests The MSRC considered three contract modification requests and took the following unanimous actions:

1. For County of Los Angeles/Department of Public Works Contract #ML05013, which provides $313,000 to implement a Santa Clarita Valley Intelligent Transportation System, approval of the addition of six more signals for synchronization at no additional cost plus a six-month contractual term extension; 2. For Elham Shirazi Contract #MS10025, which provides $199,449 to implement a Telework Demonstration Program, approval to reduce the number of employers for recruitment, reallocation of funds from implementation to recruitment tasks, and a ten-month, no-cost contractual term extension; and 3. For Nationwide Environmental Services Contract #MS10006, which provides $94,887 towards the purchase of up to three CNG street sweepers, approval for a 17-month, no-cost contractual term extension.

Contracts Administrator’s Report The MSRC’s AB 2766 Contracts Administrator provides a written status report on all open contracts from FY 2003-04 through the present. The Contracts Administrator’s Report for June 2012 is attached (Attachment 2) for your information.

Attachments Attachment 1 – Approved May 17, 2012 MSRC Minutes Attachment 2 – June 2012 Contracts Administrator’s Report

-4-

MEETING OF THE MOBILE SOURCE AIR POLLUTION REDUCTION REVIEW COMMITTEE THURSDAY, MAY 17, 2012 MEETING MINUTES 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond, Bar, CA 91765- Conference Room CC-8

MEMBERS PRESENT: (Chair) Greg Winterbottom, representing OCTA (Vice-Chair) Greg Pettis, representing RCTC Chino Hills Council Member Gwenn Norton-Perry, rep. SANBAG Temecula Council Member Ron Roberts, representing SCAG April McKay (Alt.), representing Los Angeles County MTA (via v/c) Earl Withycombe, representing CARB (via v/c) Ric Teano (Alt.), rep. Orange County Transportation Authority Adam Rush (Alt), representing RCTC

MSRC MEMBERS ABSENT: County of LA Supervisor Michael Antonovich, rep. SCAQMD Matthew Raymond, representing Regional Rideshare Agency San Fernando Council Member Steve Veres, rep. LA County MTA

MSRC-TAC MEMBERS PRESENT: MSRC-TAC Vice-Chair Tanya Love Rongsheng Luo, (Alt) representing SCAG

OTHERS PRESENT: Ann Hempelmann, Southern California Gas Debra Mendelsohn, AQMD Board Asst. (Antonovich)

AQMD STAFF AND CONTRACTORS Cynthia Ravenstein, MSRC Contracts Administrator Ray Gorski, MSRC Technical Advisor-Contractor Rachel Valenzuela, MSRC Contracts Assistant John Olvera, Principal Deputy District Counsel Veera Tyagi, Senior Deputy District Counsel Paul Wright, Audio-Visual Specialist

5/17/12 MSRC Meeting Minutes 2

CALL TO ORDER

 Opening Comments

MSRC Chair Greg Winterbottom called the meeting to order at 2:02 p.m.

 Nomination for MSRC Chair Legal Liaison for MSRC John Olvera opened the floor for nomination for Chair of MSRC. MSRC member Ron Roberts nominated MSRC member Greg Winterbottom. The MSRC voted Mr. Winterbottom to serve as Chair of the MSRC; unopposed.

 Nomination for MSRC Vice Chair Legal Liaison for MSRC John Olvera opened the floor for nomination for Vice Chair of MSRC. MSRC member Ron Roberts nominated MSRC member Greg Pettis. The MSRC voted Mr. Pettis to serve as Vice Chair of the MSRC; unopposed.

PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD

Public comments were allowed during the discussion of each agenda item. No comments were made on non-agenda items.

Cynthia Ravenstein, MSRC Contract’s Administrator, asked to move Agenda Item #8 to end of the Action Calendar.

CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 1 through 5) Receive and Approve Items Agenda Item #1 – Minutes of the March 15 AND APRIL 19, 2012 MSRC Meetings

The minutes of the March 15 and April 19, 2012 meetings were approved with one abstention on the April minutes.

ON MOTION BY MSRC MEMBER EARL WITHYCOMBE, AND SECONDED BY MSRC ALTERNATE MEMBER APRIL MCKAY, UNDER APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS #1-5, THE MSRC UNANMOUSLY APPROVED THE MARCH 15, 2012 MINUTES, APRIL 19, 2012 MINUTES WERE ALSO APPROVED WITH ONE ABSTENSION BY MSRC MEMBER GWENN NORTON-PERRY.

Agenda Item #2 – Summary of Final Reports by MSRC Contractors

The agenda package included two final report summaries, as follows: 1) Omnitrans, Contract MS08017, which provided $900,000 for the purchase of 30 CNG Buses; and 2) 5/17/12 MSRC Meeting Minutes 3

American Reclamation, Inc., Contract MS10020, which provided $18,977 to purchase one CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicle.

ON MOTION BY MSRC MEMBER EARL WITHYCOMBE, AND SECONDED BY MSRC ALTERNATE APRIL MCKAY, UNDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS #1 THROUGH #5, THE MSRC UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FINAL REPORTS ABOVE.

ACTION: MSRC staff will file the final reports in the AQMD’s library and release any retention on these contracts.

Receive and File Items Agenda Item #3 – MSRC Contracts Administrator’s Report

The MSRC AB 2766 Contracts Administrator’s Report for May 2012 was included in the agenda package.

ON MOTION BY MSRC MEMBER EARL WITHYCOMBE, AND SECONDED BY MSRC ALTERNATE APRIL MCKAY, UNDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS #1 THROUGH #5, THE MSRC UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE CONTRACT ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT FOR MAY 2012.

ACTION: AQMD staff will include the MSRC Contract Administrator’s Report in Supervisor Antonovich’s MSRC Committee Report for the June 1, 2012 AQMD Board meeting.

Agenda Item #4 – Financial Report on AB 2766 Discretionary Fund

A financial report on the AB 2766 Discretionary Fund for the period ending April 30, 2012, was included in the agenda package.

ON MOTION BY MSRC MEMBER EARL WITHYCOMBE, AND SECONDED BY MSRC ALTERNATE APRIL MCKAY, UNDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS #1 THROUGH #5, THE MSRC UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE FINANCIAL REPORT ABOVE.

No further action is required.

For Approval - As Recommended

Agenda Item #5 – Revert $1,500,000 from FY 2010-11 School Bus Life Extension Program to AB 2766 Discretionary Fund.

5/17/12 MSRC Meeting Minutes 4

The MSRC reverted $1,500,000 to the AB 2766 Discretionary Fund which had previously been allocated for a School Bus Life Extension Program as part of the FY 2010-11 Work Program. These monies are now available to fund other projects. The MSRC has already allocated $1,000,000 for a School Bus Life Extension Program as part of the FY 2011-12 Work Program.

ON MOTION BY MSRC MEMBER EARL WITHYCOMBE, AND SECONDED BY MSRC ALTERNATE APRIL MCKAY, UNDER APPROVAL OF CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS #1 THROUGH #5, THE MSRC UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED TO REVERT $1,500,000 FROM FY 2010-11 SCHOOL BUS LIFE EXTENSION PROGRAM TO AB 2766 DISCRETIONARY FUND.

ACTION CALENDAR (Items 6 through 11)

Agenda Item #6 – Consider Modified Scope of Work and Three-Year No-Cost Term Extension by County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Works, Contract # ML05014 ($204,221 – Florence/Mills Avenue Report Signal Synchronization Project)

The County of Los Angeles requests to substitute the synchronization of two additional signals in the project for the installation of traffic signal upgrades within the City of Downey, as well as a three-year term extension due to delays associated with their project co-funding. Due to concerns about the County’s ability to meet the Program requirement to have a project partner contributing at least 5% of the project cost, the MSRC-TAC had recommended approval of an 18-month extension only based on the expectation that the County will be in a better position to know actual costs once they have received responses to their own procurement.

ON MOTION BY MSRC MEMBER GWENN NORTON-PERRY, AND SECONDED BY MSRC VICE-CHAIR GREG PETTIS, THE MSRC UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED OF AN EIGHTEEN-MONTH, NO-COST TERM EXTENSION FOR COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, CONTRACT #ML05014.

ACTION: MSRC staff will modify this contract accordingly.

Agenda Item #7 – Consider Contract Value Increase by BusWest, Contract #MS11003 ($540,000 – Incentives for Alternative Fuel School Buses)

BusWest requests a $45,000 contract value increase in order to fulfill an order from Student Transportation of America.

ON MOTION BY MSRC MEMBER GWENN NORTON-PERRY, AND SECONDED BY MSRC MEMBER RON ROBERTS, THE MSRC 5/17/12 MSRC Meeting Minutes 5

UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED A CONTRACT VALUE INCREASE OF $45, 000 TO BUSWEST.

ACTION: MSRC staff will seek approval of this modified award by the AQMD Board at its June 1, 2012 Board meeting.

FY 2011-12 WORK PROGRAM

Agenda Item #9 – Consider Solicitation Documents for “Showcase III” Program to Demonstrate After-Treatment Devices on Off-Road Vehicles

In December 2011 as an element of the FY 2011-12 Work Program, the MSRC allocated $1.5 million for a Showcase III Program to demonstrate the viability and effectiveness of diesel emission control technologies on off-road heavy-duty diesel vehicles. An RFQ, #Q2012-13, was developed to solicit applications from manufacturers interested in having their emission reduction technologies demonstrated on off-road vehicles. Candidate devices will be evaluated and pre-qualified before they can be matched with vehicles under the Program Announcement. The Program Announcement #PA2012-17, with a targeted funding level of $1,500,000, seeks applications for vehicles to be equipped with, and demonstrate, devices pre-qualified under the RFQ. A vehicle may be submitted as a part of a complete “package” to be retrofitted with a specified device, or the applicant can request that their vehicle be matched with an appropriate device by the MSRC. Demonstrations which fit specified profiles, including compliance with Cal/OSHA visibility requirements, engines with exhaust gas recirculation, and hybridization, will be given priority for funding. Both the RFQ and the PA have application submission periods closing September 5, 2012.

ON MOTION BY MSRC MEMBER GWENN NORTON-PERRY, AND SECONDED BY MSRC MEMBER RON ROBERTS, THE MSRC UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED RFQ #Q2012 SOLICITING APPLICATIONS FROM MANUFACTURERS INTERESTED IN EMSSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES DEMONSTRATED ON OFF-ROAD VEHICLES. THE MSRC ALSO UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE PROGRAM ANNOUNCEMENT #PA2012-17 SOLICITING APPLICATIONS FOR VEHICLES TO BE EQUIPPED WITH, AND DEMONSTRATE, DEVICES PRE-QUALIFIED UNDER THE RFQ.

ACTION: MSRC staff will seek approval of the solicitations by the AQMD Board at its June 1, 2012 Board meeting and subsequently release the RFQ.

Agenda Item #10 - Consider Funding for Applications Received under the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Program

As part of the FY 2011-12 Work Program, the MSRC released a $4,000,000 Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Program Announcement #PA2012-10. Eligible projects include new 5/17/12 MSRC Meeting Minutes 6 and expanded CNG and LNG refueling stations and modification of maintenance facilities to accommodate gaseous-fueled vehicles. Stations are eligible for up to 50 percent of station capital equipment, site construction, signage, and reasonable project management costs. The maximum MSRC funding which may be requested per project varies from $100,000 to $350,000 depending upon whether the applicant is a public or private entity, accessibility level of the proposed project, number of fuels offered, and whether the fuel is generated from a renewable source. Proposals meeting requirements would be considered for funding on a first-come, first-served basis. The PA sets a final submission deadline of September 28, 2012.

To date, 10 applications have been received requesting a total of $1,369,000. The applications were evaluated for compliance with the requirements set forth in the PA, and one application was rejected for failure to include a memorandum of understanding with the owner of the proposed site. The MSRC-TAC reviewed the recommendations of the Infrastructure Subcommittee at their May 3, 2012 meeting and recommended approval of funding totaling $1,219,000 for these 9 applications. It is anticipated that additional applications will be received before the PA’s closing date, and any additional funding awards will be brought forward for consideration at that time.

ON MOTION BY MSRC VICE-CHAIR GREG PETTIS, AND SECONDED BY MSRC MEMBER EARL WITHYCOMBE, THE MSRC UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED FUNDING OF $1,219,000 FOR NINE APPLICATIONS RECEIVED UNDER THE ALTERNATIVE FUEL INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM

ACTION: MSRC staff will include this item for consideration at the June 1, 2012 AQMD Board meeting.

Agenda Item #11 – Consider Funding for Applications Received Under the Local Government Match Program

As part of the FY 2011-12 Work Program, the MSRC released a $6,500,000 Local Government Match Program Announcement #PA2012-14. offers to co-fund qualifying alternative fuel vehicle purchases at a funding level of up to $10,000 each for medium- duty and up to $30,000 each for heavy-duty vehicles. Other categories in the FY 2011-12 Match Program include: alternative fuel infrastructure, up to a maximum of $400,000 per project; and electric vehicle charging infrastructure, up to a maximum of $500,000. Finally, $250,000 is reserved for qualifying AB 2766 Subvention Fund recipients in the Coachella Valley to support regional street sweeping programs. In all categories funding is provided on a dollar-for-dollar match basis, and funding for all eligible entities shall be distributed on a first-come, first-served basis.

To date, 11 applications have been received. These applications were evaluated and found to be compliant with the requirements set forth in the PA. The MSRC-TAC reviewed the recommendations of the Local Government Match Subcommittee at their May 3, 2012 meeting and recommended approval of funding totaling $2,873,000 for these 11 applications. It is anticipated that additional applications will be received before 5/17/12 MSRC Meeting Minutes 7 the PA’s closing date, and any additional funding awards will be brought forward for consideration at that time.

ON MOTION BY MSRC ALTERNATE APRIL MCKAY, AND SECONDED BY MSRC MEMBER GWENN NORTON-PERRY, THE MSRC UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED FUNDING OF $2,873,000 FOR 11 APPLICATIONS RECEIVED UNDER THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT MATCH PROGRAM

ACTION: MSRC staff will include this item for consideration at the June 1, 2012 AQMD Board meeting.

FY 2010-11 WORK PROGRAM Agenda Item #8 – Consider Funding for Applications Received under the Showcase II Off-Road Retrofit Program

The MSRC approved a $2.25 million “Showcase II” diesel exhaust aftertreatment demonstration program as an element of its FY 2010-11 Work Program. The Showcase II Program specified a maximum award of $500,000 per fleet, with the MSRC reserving the discretion to waive this requirement if additional funds were allocated. To date, funding totaling $2,009,925 to retrofit 65 vehicles has been awarded, but additional applications have been under evaluation. The MSRC-TAC considered the remaining applications at their May 3, 2012 meeting and recommended approval of funding totaling $225,762 for 2 applications. The MSRC-TAC also forwarded a backup list of qualified projects for MSRC consideration, with cumulative funding requests of $1,893,504. The backup list projects were ranked in order of application receipt, except that requests for funding in excess of $500,000 per fleet were placed at the end of the list.

ON MOTION BY MSRC MEMBER RON ROBERTS, AND SECONDED BY MSRC ALTERNATE APRIL MCKAY, THE MSRC UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED FUNDING OF $225,762 FOR TWO ADDITIONAL APPLICATIONS UNDER THE SHOWCASE II OFF- ROAD RETROFIT PROGRAM

ACTION: MSRC staff will include this item for consideration at the June 1, 2012 AQMD Board meeting.

ON MOTION BY MSRC MEMBER GWENN NORTON-PERRY, AND SECONDED BY MSRC MEMBER RON ROBERTS, THE MSRC APPROVED FUNDING OF $1,502,771 FOR SEVEN ADDITIONAL ELIGIBLE PROJECTS ON THE BACKUP LIST, USING THE REMAINING $14,313 ORIGINALLY ALLOCATED PLUS AN ADDITIONAL $1,488,458 PREVIOUSLY UNALLOCATED.

ACTION: MSRC staff will include this item for consideration at the June 1, 2012 AQMD Board meeting. 5/17/12 MSRC Meeting Minutes 8

Agenda Item #12 – OTHER BUSINESS

FY 2012-13 Work Program Development Workshops

Similar to last year, the MSRC directed staff to work with the MSRC’s Programmatic Outreach Coordinator to coordinate and implement a series of mini-workshops in each of the four counties, soliciting input on the development of the FY 2012-13 Work Program. This year the workshops will precede the MSRC’s annual offsite retreat, which is tentatively scheduled for September 2012.

ADJOURNMENT

THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS, THE MSRC MEETING ADJOURNED AT 3:00 P.M.

NEXT MEETING: Thursday, June 21, 2012, at 2 p.m.

[Prepared by Rachel Valenzuela]

MSRC Agenda Item No. 3

DATE: June 21, 2012

FROM: Cynthia Ravenstein

SUBJECT: AB 2766 Contracts Administrator’s Report

SYNOPSIS: This report covers key issues addressed by MSRC staff, status of open contracts, and administrative scope changes from April 26 through May 30, 2012.

RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file report

WORK PROGRAM IMPACT: None

Contract Execution Status

2011-12 Work Program On April 6, 2012, the AQMD Governing Board approved an award to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority under the Event Center Transportation Program and an award to Mansfield Gas Equipment Systems under the Home Refueling Apparatus Purchase Incentive Program. The Event Center contract is with the prospective contractor for signature. The award to Mansfield is being combined with AQMD funding and included in AQMD’s contract, which is with the prospective contractor for signature.

On May 4, 2012, the AQMD Governing Board approved two awards to Orange County Transportation Authority under the Event Center Transportation Program. These contracts are undergoing internal review.

2010-11 Work Program On March 4, 2011, the AQMD Governing Board approved an award to the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority under the Event Center Transportation Program. This contract is executed.

On April 1, 2011, the AQMD Governing Board approved an award to the Orange County Transportation Authority for Orange County Fair service under the Event Center Transportation Program. This contract is executed.

On May 6, 2011, the AQMD Governing Board approved an award to the Orange County Transportation Authority for Angels game service under the Event Center Transportation Program, as well as two awards under the Alternative Fuel School Bus Incentive Program. These contracts are executed.

On June 3, 2011, the AQMD Governing Board approved 10 awards under the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Program, as well as an award to Coachella Valley Association of Governments under the Local Government Match Program, as part of the MSRC’s FY 2010-11 Work Program. These contracts are under development, awaiting clarifying information, or executed.

On September 9, 2011, the AQMD Governing Board approved: an award under the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Program; 26 awards under the Local Government Match Program; 9 awards under the Alternative Fuel On-Road Engines Program; an award under the Off-Road Heavy-Duty Vehicles Program; an award to the Better World Group for programmatic outreach services; and two awards for development and implementation of 511 “smart phone” applications. These contracts are under development, awaiting additional information, with the prospective contractor for signature, or executed. MSRC staff has been informed, and is attempting to obtain confirmation, that 8 of the 9 On-Road Engines awards will be declined.

On October 7, 2011, the AQMD Governing Board approved two awards under the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Program and three awards under the “Showcase II” Off-Road After- treatment Demonstration Program. These contracts are under development or with the prospective contractor for signature.

On November 4, 2011, the AQMD Governing Board approved one award under the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Program and one award under the Major Event Center Transportation Program, as part of the MSRC’s FY 2010-11 Work Program. These contracts are with the prospective contractor or executed.

On December 2, 2011, the AQMD Governing Board approved: 10 awards under the Alternative Fuel Infrastructure Program; one award under the Major Event Center Transportation Program; and three awards under the “Showcase II” Off-Road After-treatment Demonstration Program. These contracts are under development, undergoing internal review, with the prospective contractor for signature, or executed.

On April 6, 2012, the AQMD Governing Board approved: five awards under the “Showcase II” Off-Road After-treatment Demonstration Program. These contracts are under development or undergoing internal review.

2009-10 Work Program Except as discussed below, contracts for this Work Program are executed or declined.

On July 9, 2010, the AQMD Governing Board approved 21 awards under the Heavy-Duty Alternative Fuel Engines for On-Road Vehicles Program as part of the FY 2009-10 Work Program. These contracts are with the prospective contractor for signature or executed.

Work Program Status

Contract Status Reports for work program years with open and pending contracts are attached. MSRC or MSRC-TAC members may request spreadsheets covering any other work program year.

2 FY 2003-04 Work Program Contracts One regular contract from this work program year is open. All Local Government Match Program contracts are now closed.

FY 2003-04 Regular Work Program Invoices Paid No invoices were paid during this period.

FY 2004-05 Work Program Contracts All regular work program contracts are now closed. Two Local Match contracts from this work program year are open. All Diesel Exhaust After-treatment contracts are now closed. FY 2004-05 Local Government Match Program Invoices Paid No invoices were paid during this period.

FY 2005-06 Work Program Contracts 1 regular, 7 Local Match, and one Diesel Exhaust After-treatment contracts from this work program year are open; and 10 regular and 27 Local Match contracts are in “Open/Complete” status, having completed all obligations save ongoing operation.

FY 2005-06 Regular Work Program Invoices Paid One invoice in the amount of $55,500.00 was paid during this period. FY 2005-06 Local Government Match Program Invoices Paid No invoices were paid during this period.

FY 2005-06 Diesel Exhaust After-treatment Program Invoices Paid No invoices were paid during this period.

FY 2006-07 Work Program Contracts 10 regular and 5 Local Match contracts from this work program year are open; and 15 regular and 14 Local Match contracts are in “Open/Complete” status, having completed all obligations save ongoing operation. One contract passed into “Open/Complete” status during this period: City of Alhambra, Contract #ML07036 – Purchase Two Heavy-Duty CNG Vehicles. One contract closed during this period: Sukut Equipment, Contract #MS07068 – “Showcase” off-road retrofit demonstrations. FY 2006-07 Regular Work Program Invoices Paid One invoice in the amount of $35,510.00 was paid during this period. FY 2006-07 Local Government Match Program Invoices Paid No invoices were paid during this period.

FY 2007-08 Work Program Contracts 18 regular and 12 Local Match contracts from this work program year are open; and 16 regular and 12 Local Match contracts are in “Open/Complete” status, having completed all obligations save ongoing operation.

FY 2007-08 Regular Work Program Invoices Paid One invoice in the amount of $171,000.00 was paid during this period.

3 FY 2007-08 Local Government Match Program Invoices Paid No invoices were paid during this period.

FY 2008-09 Work Program Contracts One regular and 22 Local Match contracts from this work program year are open; and 6 Local Match contracts are in “Open/Complete” status. One contract passed into “Open/Complete” status during this period: City of Los Angeles, Department of General Services, Contract #ML09031 – Purchase 33 Natural Gas Heavy Duty Vehicles. One contract was cancelled during this period: Los Angeles County Department of Water and Power, Contract #ML09018 – Retrofit 85 Off-Road Vehicles. Two contracts closed during this period: City of Rancho Cucamonga, Contract #ML09007 – Maintenance Facility Modifications; City of Palm Desert, Contract #ML09021 – Traffic Signal Synchronization. FY 2008-09 Regular Work Program Invoices Paid No invoices were paid during this period.

FY 2008-09 Local Government Match Program Invoices Paid One invoice in the amount of $825,000.00 was paid during this period.

FY 2009-10 Work Program Contracts 16 regular contracts from this work program year are open. FY 2009-10 Regular Work Program Invoices Paid One invoice in the amount of $3,694.01 was paid during this period.

FY 2010-11 Work Program Contracts 14 regular and 15 Local Match contracts from this work program year are open.

FY 2010-11 Regular Work Program Invoices Paid Six invoices totaling $126,385.77 were paid during this period.

Administrative Scope Changes Two administrative scope changes were initiated during the period of April 26 through May 30, 2012:  ML11021 – City of Whittier (Purchase Seven Heavy-Duty CNG Vehicles) – Substitute an aerial truck for a refuse truck  ML09035 – City of Fullerton (Purchase Two Heavy-Duty CNG Vehicles and Install CNG Station) – Six-month no-cost term extension

Attachments  FY 2003-04 through FY 2010-11 Contract Status Reports  FY 2003-04 through FY 2010-11 Progress Report Tracking

4 AB2766 Discretionary Fund Program Invoices Database April 26, 2012 to May 30, 2012

Contract MSRC MSRC Admin. Chair Liaison Finance Contract # Contractor Invoice # Amount Paid 2005-2006 Work Program 5/10/2012 5/11/2012 5/11/2012 5/15/2012 MS06002 Orange County Transportation Authority FR134323 $55,500.00 Total: $55,500.00 2006-2007 Work Program 5/24/2012 MS07076 Reed Thomas Company, Inc. 119574 $35,510.00 Total: $35,510.00 2007-2008 Work Program 5/24/2012 MS08017 Omnitrans Final $171,000.00 Total: $171,000.00 2008-2009 Work Program 5/2/2012 5/11/2012 5/11/2012 5/15/2012 ML09031 City of Los Angeles, Department of General Ser Final $825,000.00 Total: $825,000.00 2009-2010 Work Program 5/9/2012 5/11/2012 5/11/2012 5/15/2012 MS10025 Elham Shirazi 12 $3,694.01 Total: $3,694.01 2010-2011 Work Program 5/25/2012 MS11056 The Better World Group 1032 $11,552.45 5/24/2012 5/17/2012 5/17/2012 5/18/2012 MS11001 Mineral LLC 104306 $500.00 5/23/2012 MS11001 Mineral LLC 104298 $700.00 5/16/2012 5/17/2012 5/17/2012 5/18/2012 MS11001 Mineral LLC 104287 $300.00 5/16/2012 5/17/2012 5/17/2012 5/18/2012 ML11021 City of Whittier 1 $30,000.00 5/2/2012 5/11/2012 5/11/2012 5/15/2012 ML11007 Coachella Valley Association of Governments (C CV 12115-12 $83,333.32 Total: $126,385.77

Total This Period: $1,217,089.78 Database

2003-04 AB2766 Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts MS04063 Riverside County Transportation Co 6/3/2011 6/3/2012 $225,000.00 $0.00 Regional Rideshare Database Enhancement $225,000.00 No Total: 1 Declined/Cancelled Contracts MS04002 City of Riverside $58,096.00 $0.00 3 Refuse Trucks, 3 Dump Trucks, 2 Water T $58,096.00 No MS04051 NorthStar, Inc. $250,000.00 $0.00 New LNG Station $250,000.00 No MS04053 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. $250,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Mid-Wilshire $250,000.00 No MS04054 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. $250,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Mission Viejo $250,000.00 No Total: 4 Closed Contracts MS04001 City of Ontario 8/27/2004 9/26/2005 $35,082.00 $35,082.00 2 CNG Refuse Trucks $0.00 Yes MS04003 Long Beach Transit 8/27/2004 6/26/2006 $335,453.00 $330,453.00 27 Gasoline-Electric Hybrid Buses/Mech. Tr $5,000.00 Yes MS04005 City of Norwalk Transportation Dept. 11/27/2004 1/27/2007 $118,052.00 $88,539.00 4 Gas-Electric Hybrid Vehicles $29,513.00 Yes MS04006 Orange County Transportation Autho 10/1/2004 4/30/2006 7/31/2008 $405,000.00 $405,000.00 2 Gas-Electric Hybrid and 20 CNG Transit B $0.00 Yes MS04007 Foothill Transit Agency 6/24/2005 11/23/2006 $715,000.00 $714,100.00 75 CNG Buses, Fueling Station $900.00 No MS04008 Los Angeles County MTA 11/1/2004 9/30/2007 $854,050.00 $854,050.00 50 CNG Buses $0.00 Yes MS04017 Road Builders, Inc. 10/13/2004 4/12/2006 12/31/2006 $953,080.00 $953,080.00 Repower 12 Scrapers & 1 Loader $0.00 Yes MS04027 Larry Jacinto Construction 9/13/2004 3/12/2006 $454,510.00 $454,510.00 Repower 6 Scrapers $0.00 Yes MS04029 Herigstad Equipment Rental 9/16/2004 3/15/2006 $1,190,024.00 $830,172.00 Repower 10 Scrapers $359,852.00 Yes MS04036 Sukut Equipment, Inc. 12/15/2004 2/15/2006 $466,807.00 $466,807.00 Repower 4 Scrapers & 3 Dozers $0.00 Yes MS04039 CR&R, Inc. 1/25/2005 3/24/2007 2/24/2009 $463,168.00 $461,550.00 30 LNG Refuse Trucks $1,618.00 Yes MS04041 CR&R, Inc. 7/25/2005 9/24/2007 9/24/2008 $155,468.00 $153,850.00 10 LNG Refuse Trucks, Mechanic Training $1,618.00 Yes MS04050 R.F. Dickson Co., Inc. 6/3/2005 6/2/2006 10/2/2007 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 Upgrade CNG Station $0.00 Yes MS04052 Downs Energy 5/6/2005 6/5/2006 6/30/2009 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 New LNG/L-CNG Station $0.00 Yes MS04058 American Honda Motor Company 11/2/2005 6/30/2007 3/31/2008 $300,000.00 $4,000.00 Home Refueling Apparatus Lease Incentives $296,000.00 Yes MS04059 FuelMaker Corporation 9/9/2005 6/30/2006 12/31/2006 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Home Refueling Apparatus Incentives $0.00 Yes MS04062 Los Angeles County MTA 10/1/2010 3/31/2011 $53,500.00 $53,500.00 Regional Rideshare Database Enhancement $0.00 Yes Total: 17 Closed/Incomplete Contracts MS04004 Athens Services, Inc. 9/3/2004 3/2/2006 9/2/2006 $311,421.00 $197,503.50 14 LNG Waste Haulers, Maint. Facility. Mod $113,917.50 No MS04055 Riverside County Transportation Co 6/29/2006 8/28/2007 2/28/2008 $225,000.00 $0.00 Regional Rideshare Database Enhancement $225,000.00 No MS04056 Los Angeles County MTA 6/13/2006 12/12/2007 1/12/2010 $120,000.00 $66,488.40 Regional Rideshare Database Enhancement $53,511.60 Yes Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? MS04061 Riverside County Transportation Co 6/29/2009 8/31/2010 $225,000.00 $0.00 Regional Rideshare Database Enhancement $225,000.00 No Total: 4 Database

2004-05 AB2766 Local Government Match Program Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts ML05013 Los Angeles County Department of 1/5/2007 7/4/2008 7/4/2012 $313,000.00 $0.00 Traffic Signal Synchronization $313,000.00 No ML05014 Los Angeles County Department of 5/21/2007 11/20/2008 6/20/2012 $204,221.00 $0.00 Traffic Signal Synchronization $204,221.00 No Total: 2 Declined/Cancelled Contracts ML05005 City of Highland $20,000.00 $0.00 2 Medium Duty CNG Vehicles $20,000.00 No ML05008 Los Angeles County Department of $140,000.00 $0.00 7 Heavy Duty LPG Street Sweepers $140,000.00 No ML05010 Los Angeles County Department of $20,000.00 $0.00 1 Heavy Duty CNG Bus $20,000.00 No Total: 3 Closed Contracts ML05006 City of Colton Public Works 7/27/2005 7/26/2006 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 3 Medium Duty CNG Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML05011 Los Angeles County Department of 8/10/2006 12/9/2007 6/9/2008 $52,409.00 $51,048.46 3 Heavy Duty LPG Shuttle Vans $1,360.54 Yes ML05015 City of Lawndale 7/27/2005 7/26/2006 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1 Medium Duty CNG Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML05016 City of Santa Monica 9/23/2005 9/22/2006 9/22/2007 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 6 MD CNG Vehicles, 1 LPG Sweep, 13 CNG $0.00 Yes ML05017 City of Signal Hill 1/16/2006 7/15/2007 $126,000.00 $126,000.00 Traffic Signal Synchronization $0.00 Yes ML05018 City of San Bernardino 4/19/2005 4/18/2006 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 4 M.D. CNG Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML05019 City of Lakewood 5/6/2005 5/5/2006 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1 M.D. CNG Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML05020 City of Pomona 6/24/2005 6/23/2006 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1 M.D. CNG Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML05021 City of Whittier 7/7/2005 7/6/2006 4/6/2008 $100,000.00 $80,000.00 Sweeper, Aerial Truck, & 3 Refuse Trucks $20,000.00 Yes ML05022 City of Claremont 9/23/2005 9/22/2006 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 2 M.D. CNG Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML05024 City of Cerritos 4/18/2005 3/17/2006 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1 M.D. CNG Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML05025 City of Malibu 5/6/2005 3/5/2006 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1 Medium-Duty CNG Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML05026 City of Inglewood 1/6/2006 1/5/2007 2/5/2009 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 2 CNG Transit Buses, 1 CNG Pothole Patch $0.00 Yes ML05027 City of Beaumont 2/23/2006 4/22/2007 6/22/2010 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 1 H.D. CNG Bus $0.00 Yes ML05028 City of Anaheim 9/8/2006 9/7/2007 5/7/2008 $85,331.00 $85,331.00 Traffic signal coordination & synchronization $0.00 Yes ML05029 Los Angeles World Airports 5/5/2006 9/4/2007 $140,000.00 $140,000.00 Seven CNG Buses $0.00 Yes ML05071 City of La Canada Flintridge 1/30/2009 1/29/2011 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 1 CNG Bus $0.00 Yes ML05072 Los Angeles County Department of 8/24/2009 5/23/2010 1/23/2011 $349,000.00 $349,000.00 Traffic Signal Synchronization (LADOT) $0.00 Yes Total: 18 Closed/Incomplete Contracts ML05007 Los Angeles County Dept of Beache 6/23/2006 6/22/2007 12/22/2007 $50,000.00 $0.00 5 Medium Duty CNG Vehicles $50,000.00 No ML05009 Los Angeles County Department of 6/22/2006 12/21/2007 9/30/2011 $56,666.00 $0.00 2 Propane Refueling Stations $56,666.00 No Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? ML05012 Los Angeles County Department of 11/10/2006 5/9/2008 1/9/2009 $349,000.00 $0.00 Traffic Signal Synchronization (LADOT) $349,000.00 No ML05023 City of La Canada Flintridge 3/30/2005 2/28/2006 8/28/2008 $20,000.00 $0.00 1 CNG Bus $20,000.00 No Total: 4 Database

2005-06 AB2766 Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts MS06002 Orange County Transportation Autho 11/7/2007 11/6/2013 $928,740.00 $853,770.00 New Freeway Service Patrol $74,970.00 No Total: 1 Declined/Cancelled Contracts MS06009 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 6/23/2006 12/22/2012 $250,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Laguna Niguel $250,000.00 Yes MS06040 Capistrano Unified School District $136,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Fueling Station $136,000.00 No MS06041 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 12/1/2006 3/31/2013 6/18/2009 $250,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station-Newport Beach $250,000.00 No MS06046 City of Long Beach, Dept. of Public $250,000.00 $0.00 LNG Fueling Station $250,000.00 No MS06051 Menifee Union School District 3/2/2007 7/1/2014 $150,000.00 $0.00 CNG Fueling Station $150,000.00 No Total: 5 Closed Contracts MS06001 Riverside County Transportation Co 8/3/2007 9/2/2011 $825,037.00 $825,037.00 New Freeway Service Patrol $0.00 Yes MS06003 San Bernardino Associated Govern 10/19/2006 6/18/2010 $804,240.00 $804,239.87 New Freeway Service Patrol $0.13 Yes MS06004 Los Angeles County MTA 8/10/2006 7/9/2010 $1,391,983.00 $1,391,791.98 New Freeway Service Patrol $191.02 Yes MS06043X Westport Fuel Systems, Inc. 2/3/2007 12/31/2010 9/30/2011 $2,000,000.00 $2,000,000.00 Advanced Natural Gas Engine Incentive Pro $0.00 Yes Total: 4 Open/Complete Contracts MS06010 US Airconditioning Distributors 12/28/2006 6/27/2012 $83,506.00 $83,506.00 New CNG Station - Industry $0.00 Yes MS06011 County Sanitation Districts of L.A. C 6/1/2006 7/31/2012 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 New CNG Station - Carson $0.00 Yes MS06012 Consolidated Disposal Service 7/14/2006 9/13/2012 $297,981.00 $297,981.00 New LNG Station & Facility Upgrades $0.00 Yes MS06013 City of Commerce 1/9/2008 7/8/2014 7/8/2015 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 New L/CNG Station - Commerce $0.00 Yes MS06042 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 1/5/2007 1/4/2013 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 New CNG Station-Baldwin Park $0.00 No MS06045 Orange County Transportation Autho 8/17/2007 12/16/2013 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 CNG Fueling Station/Maint. Fac. Mods $0.00 Yes MS06047 Hemet Unified School District 9/19/2007 11/18/2013 $125,000.00 $125,000.00 CNG Refueling Station $0.00 Yes MS06048 Newport-Mesa Unified School Distric 6/25/2007 8/24/2013 8/24/2014 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 CNG Fueling Station $0.00 Yes MS06049 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 4/20/2007 7/19/2013 $250,000.00 $228,491.18 CNG Fueling Station - L.B.P.D. $21,508.82 Yes MS06050 Rossmoor Pastries 1/24/2007 10/23/2012 $18,750.00 $14,910.50 CNG Fueling Station $3,839.50 Yes Total: 10 Database

2005-06 AB2766 Local Government Match Program Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts ML06020 Los Angeles Department of Water a 3/19/2007 9/18/2013 4/18/2014 $25,000.00 $0.00 CNG Aerial Truck $25,000.00 No ML06031 City of Inglewood 4/4/2007 6/3/2013 9/3/2015 $150,000.00 $65,602.40 Purchase 4 H-D LPG Vehicles & Install LPG $84,397.60 No ML06035 City of Hemet, Public Works 11/10/2006 12/9/2012 10/9/2014 $414,000.00 $175,000.00 7 Nat Gas Trucks & New Nat Gas Infrastruct $239,000.00 No ML06054 Los Angeles County Department of 6/17/2009 6/16/2016 $150,000.00 $0.00 3 CNG & 3 LPG HD Trucks $150,000.00 No ML06058 City of Santa Monica 7/12/2007 7/11/2013 $149,925.00 $0.00 3 H.D. CNG Trucks & CNG Fueling Station $149,925.00 No ML06060 City of Temple City 6/12/2007 6/11/2013 $31,885.00 $0.00 Upgrade existing CNG infrastructure $31,885.00 No ML06070 City of Colton 4/30/2008 2/28/2015 $50,000.00 $0.00 Two CNG Pickups $50,000.00 No Total: 7 Declined/Cancelled Contracts ML06018 Los Angeles County Dept of Beache $375,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station & 2 CNG Dump Trucks $375,000.00 No ML06019 Los Angeles County Dept of Beache $250,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station & 2 CNG Dump Trucks $250,000.00 No ML06023 City of Baldwin Park 6/16/2006 9/15/2012 $20,000.00 $0.00 CNG Dump Truck $20,000.00 No ML06024 City of Pomona 8/3/2007 7/2/2013 7/2/2014 $286,450.00 $0.00 New CNG Station $286,450.00 No ML06030 City of Burbank 3/19/2007 9/18/2011 $287,700.00 $0.00 New CNG Fueling Station $287,700.00 No ML06037 City of Lynwood $25,000.00 $0.00 1 Nat Gas Dump Truck $25,000.00 No ML06039 City of Inglewood 2/9/2007 2/8/2008 4/8/2011 $50,000.00 $0.00 Modify Maintenance Facility for CNG Vehicle $50,000.00 No ML06055 City of Los Angeles, Dept. of Genera $125,000.00 $0.00 5 Gas-Electric Hybrid Buses $125,000.00 No ML06059 City of Fountain Valley $25,000.00 $0.00 One H.D. CNG Truck $25,000.00 No Total: 9 Closed Contracts ML06056 City of Los Angeles, Dept. of Genera 11/30/2007 11/29/2008 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 Maintenance Facility Mods. $0.00 Yes Total: 1 Open/Complete Contracts ML06016 City of Whittier 5/25/2006 5/24/2012 11/24/2012 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 2 CNG Refuse Trucks $0.00 Yes ML06017 City of Claremont 8/2/2006 4/1/2012 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 2 CNG Refuse Trucks $0.00 Yes ML06021 Los Angeles World Airports 9/13/2006 5/12/2013 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 6 CNG Buses $0.00 Yes ML06022 City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Sanit 5/4/2007 1/3/2014 $1,250,000.00 $1,250,000.00 50 LNG Refuse Trucks $0.00 Yes ML06025 City of Santa Monica 1/5/2007 11/4/2012 12/14/2014 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 12 H.D. CNG Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML06026 City of Cerritos 10/27/2006 9/26/2010 $60,500.00 $60,500.00 CNG Station Upgrade $0.00 Yes ML06027 City of Redondo Beach 9/5/2006 5/4/2012 10/4/2012 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 2 Heavy-Duty CNG Trucks $0.00 Yes ML06028 City of Pasadena 9/29/2006 11/28/2012 3/28/2014 $245,000.00 $245,000.00 New CNG Station & Maint. Fac. Upgrades $0.00 Yes Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? ML06029 City of Culver City Transportation De 9/29/2006 12/28/2012 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 2 CNG Heavy-Duty Trucks $0.00 Yes ML06032 City of Rancho Cucamonga 2/13/2007 3/12/2013 2/12/2014 $237,079.00 $237,079.00 New CNG Station & 2 CNG Dump Trucks $0.00 Yes ML06033 City of Cathedral City 11/17/2006 12/16/2012 12/16/2013 $125,000.00 $125,000.00 5 Heavy-Duty CNG Trucks $0.00 Yes ML06034 City of South Pasadena 9/25/2006 9/24/2012 $16,422.42 $16,422.42 2 Nat. Gas Transit Buses $0.00 Yes ML06036 City of Riverside 3/23/2007 3/22/2013 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 8 Heavy-Duty Nat Gas Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML06038 City of Los Angeles, Department of 5/21/2007 1/20/2014 $625,000.00 $625,000.00 25 CNG Street Sweepers $0.00 Yes ML06044 City of Pomona 12/15/2006 3/14/2013 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 2 CNG Street Sweepers $0.00 Yes ML06052 City of Hemet, Public Works 4/20/2007 2/19/2013 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Purchase One CNG Dump Truck $0.00 Yes ML06053 City of Burbank 5/4/2007 7/3/2013 $125,000.00 $125,000.00 Five Nat. Gas Refuse Trucks $0.00 Yes ML06057 City of Rancho Cucamonga 8/28/2007 6/27/2013 8/27/2014 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 4 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML06061 City of Chino Hills 4/30/2007 4/29/2013 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 One H.D. CNG Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML06062 City of Redlands 5/11/2007 5/10/2013 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 4 H.D. LNG Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML06063 City of Moreno Valley 3/23/2007 11/22/2012 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 One H.D. CNG Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML06064 City of South Pasadena 1/25/2008 11/24/2013 11/24/2014 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 2 H.D. CNG Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML06065 City of Walnut 6/29/2007 6/28/2013 $44,203.00 $44,203.00 Upgrade Existing CNG Infrastructure $0.00 Yes ML06066 City of Ontario 5/30/2007 1/29/2013 $125,000.00 $125,000.00 5 H.D. CNG Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML06067 City of El Monte 3/17/2008 5/16/2014 11/16/2014 $157,957.00 $157,957.00 Upgrade existing CNG infrastructure $0.00 Yes ML06068 City of Claremont 8/28/2007 6/27/2013 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 Expand existing CNG infrastructure $0.00 Yes ML06069 City of Palos Verdes Estates 11/19/2007 11/18/2013 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 One H.D. CNG Vehicle $0.00 Yes Total: 27 Database

2005-06 Diesel Exhaust Retrofit Program Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts PT06006 Los Angeles County Sheriff's Depart 5/15/2006 2/14/2008 $98,000.00 $0.00 Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Program $98,000.00 No Total: 1 Closed Contracts PT06005 Los Angeles County Department of 6/29/2006 3/28/2008 12/28/2008 $184,500.00 $184,500.00 Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Program $0.00 Yes PT06007 County Sanitation Districts of L.A. C 6/16/2006 12/15/2007 12/28/2008 $108,000.00 $108,000.00 Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Program $0.00 Yes PT06008 City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Sanit 9/6/2006 6/5/2008 $184,500.00 $184,500.00 Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Program $0.00 Yes PT06014 Los Angeles Department of Water a 2/8/2007 8/7/2008 9/30/2009 $112,500.00 $103,500.00 Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Program $9,000.00 Yes PT06015 City of San Bernardino 10/23/2006 4/22/2008 $66,000.00 $66,000.00 Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Program $0.00 Yes Total: 5 Database

2006-07 AB2766 Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts MS07008 City of Los Angeles, Department of T 9/18/2009 5/17/2020 $2,040,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 102 Transit Buses $2,040,000.00 No MS07022 California State University, Los Ange 10/30/2009 12/29/2015 12/29/2016 $250,000.00 $0.00 New Hydrogen Fueling Station $250,000.00 No MS07059 County Sanitation Districts of L.A. C 9/5/2008 9/4/2010 7/14/2012 $231,500.00 $231,500.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $0.00 Yes MS07060 Community Recycling & Resource R 3/7/2008 1/6/2010 7/6/2011 $177,460.00 $98,471.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $78,989.00 No MS07061 City of Los Angeles, Department of 10/31/2008 8/30/2010 2/28/2013 $40,626.00 $40,626.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $0.00 No MS07070 Griffith Company 4/30/2008 2/28/2010 8/28/2012 $168,434.00 $125,504.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $42,930.00 No MS07071 Tiger 4 Equipment Leasing 9/19/2008 7/18/2010 1/18/2013 $210,937.00 $108,808.97 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $102,128.03 No MS07076 Reed Thomas Company, Inc. 8/15/2008 6/14/2010 3/14/2012 $339,073.00 $100,540.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $238,533.00 No MS07079 Riverside County Transportation Co 1/30/2009 7/29/2013 12/31/2011 $20,000.00 $13,785.45 BikeMetro Website Migration $6,214.55 No MS07080 City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Sanit 10/31/2008 8/30/2010 8/28/2013 $63,192.00 $52,265.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $10,927.00 No Total: 10 Declined/Cancelled Contracts MS07010 Palos Verdes Peninsula Transit Auth $80,000.00 $0.00 Repower 4 Transit Buses $80,000.00 No MS07014 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. $350,000.00 $0.00 New L/CNG Station - SERRF $350,000.00 No MS07015 Baldwin Park Unified School District $57,500.00 $0.00 New CNG Station $57,500.00 No MS07016 County of Riverside Fleet Services D $36,359.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Rubidoux $36,359.00 No MS07017 County of Riverside Fleet Services D $33,829.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Indio $33,829.00 No MS07018 City of Cathedral City $350,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station $350,000.00 No MS07021 City of Riverside $350,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station $350,000.00 No MS07050 Southern California Disposal Co. $320,000.00 $0.00 Ten Nat. Gas Refuse Trucks $320,000.00 No MS07062 Caltrans Division of Equipment $1,081,818.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $1,081,818.00 No MS07065 ECCO Equipment Corp. $174,525.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $174,525.00 No MS07067 Recycled Materials Company of Calif $99,900.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $99,900.00 No MS07069 City of Burbank 5/9/2008 3/8/2010 9/8/2011 $8,895.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $8,895.00 No MS07074 Albert W. Davies, Inc. 1/25/2008 11/24/2009 $39,200.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $39,200.00 No MS07081 Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. $240,347.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $240,347.00 No MS07082 DCL International, Inc. $153,010.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $153,010.00 No MS07083 Dinex Exhausts, Inc. $52,381.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $52,381.00 No MS07084 Donaldson Company, Inc. $42,416.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $42,416.00 No MS07085 Engine Control Systems Limited $155,746.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $155,746.00 No MS07086 Huss, LLC $84,871.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $84,871.00 No Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? MS07087 Mann+Hummel GmbH $189,361.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $189,361.00 No MS07088 Nett Technologies, Inc. $118,760.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $118,760.00 No MS07089 Rypos, Inc. $68,055.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $68,055.00 No MS07090 Sud-Chemie $27,345.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $27,345.00 No Total: 23 Closed Contracts MS07001 A-Z Bus Sales, Inc. 12/28/2006 12/31/2007 2/29/2008 $1,920,000.00 $1,380,000.00 CNG School Bus Buydown $540,000.00 Yes MS07002 BusWest 1/19/2007 12/31/2007 3/31/2008 $840,000.00 $840,000.00 CNG School Bus Buydown $0.00 Yes MS07005 S-W Compressors 3/17/2008 3/16/2010 $60,000.00 $7,500.00 Mountain CNG School Bus Demo Program- $52,500.00 Yes MS07006 Coachella Valley Association of Gov 2/28/2008 10/27/2008 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 Coachella Valley PM10 Reduction Street Sw $0.00 Yes MS07011 Los Angeles Service Authority for Fr 3/12/2010 5/31/2011 9/30/2011 $700,000.00 $700,000.00 "511" Commuter Services Campaign $0.00 Yes MS07012 City of Los Angeles, General Service 6/13/2008 6/12/2009 6/12/2010 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Maintenance Facility Modifications $0.00 Yes MS07019 City of Cathedral City 1/9/2009 6/8/2010 $32,500.00 $32,500.00 Maintenance Facility Modifications $0.00 Yes MS07058 The Better World Group 11/17/2007 11/16/2009 11/16/2011 $247,690.00 $201,946.21 MSRC Programmatic Outreach Services $45,743.79 Yes MS07063 Shimmick Construction Company, In 4/26/2008 2/25/2010 8/25/2011 $80,800.00 $11,956.37 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $68,843.63 No MS07064 Altfillisch Contractors, Inc. 9/19/2008 7/18/2010 1/18/2011 $160,000.00 $155,667.14 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $4,332.86 Yes MS07068 Sukut Equipment Inc. 1/23/2009 11/22/2010 5/22/2012 $26,900.00 $26,900.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $0.00 Yes MS07072 City of Culver City Transportation De 4/4/2008 2/3/2010 8/3/2011 $72,865.00 $72,865.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $0.00 Yes MS07075 Dan Copp Crushing 9/17/2008 7/16/2010 1/16/2012 $73,600.00 $40,200.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $33,400.00 No MS07091 BusWest 10/16/2009 3/15/2010 $33,660.00 $33,660.00 Provide Lease for 2 CNG School Buses $0.00 Yes MS07092 Riverside County Transportation Co 9/1/2010 10/31/2011 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 "511" Commuter Services Campaign $0.00 Yes Total: 15 Closed/Incomplete Contracts MS07004 BusWest 7/2/2007 7/1/2009 $90,928.00 $68,196.00 Provide Lease for 2 CNG School Buses $22,732.00 No MS07066 Skanska USA Civil West California D 6/28/2008 4/27/2010 10/27/2010 $111,700.00 $36,128.19 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $75,571.81 No MS07073 PEED Equipment Co. 10/31/2008 8/30/2010 $11,600.00 $0.00 Off-Road Diesel Equipment Retrofit Program $11,600.00 No Total: 3 Open/Complete Contracts MS07003 Westport Fuel Systems, Inc. 11/2/2007 12/31/2011 6/30/2013 $1,500,000.00 $1,499,990.00 Advanced Nat. Gas Engine Incentive Progra $10.00 Yes MS07007 Los Angeles World Airports 5/2/2008 11/1/2014 $420,000.00 $420,000.00 Purchase CNG 21 Transit Buses $0.00 Yes MS07009 Orange County Transportation Autho 5/14/2008 4/13/2016 $800,000.00 $800,000.00 Purchase 40 Transit Buses $0.00 Yes MS07013 Rainbow Disposal Company, Inc. 1/25/2008 3/24/2014 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 New High-Volume CNG Station $0.00 Yes MS07020 Avery Petroleum 5/20/2009 7/19/2015 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 New CNG Station $0.00 Yes MS07049 Palm Springs Disposal Services 10/23/2008 11/22/2014 9/22/2016 $96,000.00 $96,000.00 Three Nat. Gas Refuse Trucks $0.00 Yes MS07051 City of San Bernardino 8/12/2008 12/11/2014 $480,000.00 $480,000.00 15 Nat. Gas Refuse Trucks $0.00 Yes MS07052 City of Redlands 7/30/2008 11/29/2014 $160,000.00 $160,000.00 Five Nat. Gas Refuse Trucks $0.00 Yes MS07053 City of Claremont 7/31/2008 12/30/2014 $96,000.00 $96,000.00 Three Nat. Gas Refuse Trucks $0.00 Yes Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? MS07054 Republic Services, Inc. 3/7/2008 9/6/2014 9/6/2016 $1,280,000.00 $1,280,000.00 40 Nat. Gas Refuse Trucks $0.00 Yes MS07055 City of Culver City Transportation De 7/8/2008 9/7/2014 $192,000.00 $192,000.00 Six Nat. Gas Refuse Trucks $0.00 Yes MS07056 City of Whittier 9/5/2008 3/4/2015 $32,000.00 $32,000.00 One Nat. Gas Refuse Trucks $0.00 Yes MS07057 CR&R, Inc. 7/31/2008 8/30/2014 6/30/2015 $896,000.00 $896,000.00 28 Nat. Gas Refuse Trucks $0.00 No MS07077 Waste Management Collection and 5/1/2009 12/31/2014 $160,000.00 $160,000.00 Five Nat. Gas Refuse Trucks (Santa Ana) $0.00 Yes MS07078 Waste Management Collection and 5/1/2009 12/31/2014 12/31/2015 $256,000.00 $256,000.00 Eight Nat. Gas Refuse Trucks (Dewey's) $0.00 Yes Total: 15 Database

2006-07 AB2766 Local Government Match Program Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts ML07023 City of Riverside 6/20/2008 10/19/2014 7/19/2016 $462,500.00 $350,000.00 CNG Station Expansion/Purch. 14 H.D. Vehi $112,500.00 No ML07033 City of La Habra 5/21/2008 6/20/2014 7/31/2017 $75,000.00 $25,000.00 One H.D. Nat Gas Vehicle/Expand Fueling S $50,000.00 No ML07043 City of Redondo Beach 9/28/2008 7/27/2014 7/27/2016 $125,000.00 $0.00 Five H.D. CNG Transit Vehicles $125,000.00 No ML07044 City of Santa Monica 9/8/2008 3/7/2015 $600,000.00 $50,000.00 24 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles $550,000.00 No ML07045 City of Inglewood 2/6/2009 4/5/2015 $75,000.00 $25,000.00 3 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles $50,000.00 No Total: 5 Declined/Cancelled Contracts ML07031 City of Santa Monica $180,000.00 $0.00 Upgrade N.G. Station to Add Hythane $180,000.00 No ML07032 City of Huntington Beach Public Wor $25,000.00 $0.00 One H.D. CNG Vehicle $25,000.00 No ML07035 City of Los Angeles, General Service $350,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Refueling Station/Southeast Yard $350,000.00 No ML07038 City of Palos Verdes Estates $25,000.00 $0.00 One H.D. LPG Vehicle $25,000.00 No Total: 4 Closed Contracts ML07025 City of San Bernardino 8/12/2008 7/11/2010 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 Maintenance Facility Modifications $0.00 Yes ML07042 City of La Quinta 8/15/2008 9/14/2010 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Street Sweeping Operations $0.00 Yes ML07048 City of Cathedral City 9/19/2008 10/18/2010 $100,000.00 $84,972.45 Street Sweeping Operations $15,027.55 Yes Total: 3 Open/Complete Contracts ML07024 City of Garden Grove 3/7/2008 9/6/2014 7/6/2016 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 Three H.D. CNG Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML07026 City of South Pasadena 6/13/2008 6/12/2014 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 One H.D. CNG Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML07027 Los Angeles World Airports 6/3/2008 7/2/2014 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 One H.D. LNG Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML07028 City of Los Angeles, General Service 3/13/2009 3/12/2014 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 New CNG Refueling Station/Hollywood Yard $0.00Yes ML07029 City of Los Angeles, General Service 3/13/2009 3/12/2014 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 New CNG Refueling Station/Venice Yard $0.00 Yes ML07030 County of San Bernardino Public Wo 7/11/2008 9/10/2015 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 8 Natural Gas H.D. Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML07034 City of Los Angeles, General Service 3/13/2009 3/12/2014 $350,000.00 $350,000.00 New CNG Refueling Station/Van Nuys Yard $0.00 Yes ML07036 City of Alhambra 1/23/2009 2/22/2015 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 2 H.D. CNG Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML07037 City of Los Angeles, General Service 10/8/2008 10/7/2015 $255,222.00 $255,222.00 Upgrade LNG/LCNG Station/East Valley Yar $0.00Yes ML07039 City of Baldwin Park 6/6/2008 6/5/2014 8/5/2015 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Two N.G. H.D. Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML07040 City of Moreno Valley 6/3/2008 9/2/2014 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 One Heavy-Duty CNG Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML07041 City of La Quinta 6/6/2008 6/5/2014 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 One CNG Street Sweeper $0.00 Yes ML07046 City of Culver City Transportation De 5/2/2008 5/1/2014 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 One H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicle $0.00 Yes Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? ML07047 City of Cathedral City 6/16/2008 9/15/2014 3/15/2015 $225,000.00 $225,000.00 Two H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles/New CNG Fueli $0.00 Yes Total: 14 Database

2007-08 AB2766 Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts MS08001 Los Angeles County MTA 12/10/2010 6/9/2014 $1,500,000.00 $416,666.66 Big Rig Freeway Service Patrol $1,083,333.34 No MS08007 United Parcel Service 12/10/2008 10/9/2014 $300,000.00 $0.00 10 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles $300,000.00 No MS08012 California Cartage Company, LLC 12/21/2009 10/20/2015 4/20/2016 $480,000.00 $432,000.00 12 H.D. Nat. Gas Yard Tractors $48,000.00 No MS08013 United Parcel Service 12/10/2008 10/9/2014 10/9/2016 $480,000.00 $216,000.00 12 H.D. Nat. Gas Yard Tractors $264,000.00 No MS08015 Yosemite Waters 5/12/2009 5/11/2015 $180,000.00 $117,813.60 11 H.D. Propane Vehicles $62,186.40 No MS08017 Omnitrans 12/13/2008 12/12/2015 12/12/2016 $900,000.00 $900,000.00 30 CNG Buses $0.00 No MS08018 Los Angeles County Department of 8/7/2009 10/6/2016 $90,000.00 $0.00 3 CNG Vehicles $90,000.00 No MS08021 CalMet Services, Inc. 1/9/2009 1/8/2016 7/8/2016 $900,000.00 $810,000.00 30 CNG Vehicles $90,000.00 No MS08056 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 11/26/2009 2/25/2015 $400,000.00 $240,000.00 New LNG Station - POLB-Anah. & I $160,000.00 No MS08058 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 11/26/2009 3/25/2016 3/25/2017 $400,000.00 $80,000.00 New CNG Station - Ontario Airport $320,000.00 No MS08061 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 12/4/2009 3/3/2015 $400,000.00 $240,000.00 New CNG Station - L.A.-La Cienega $160,000.00 No MS08063 Go Natural Gas 9/25/2009 1/24/2016 1/24/2017 $400,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Moreno Valley $400,000.00 No MS08066 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 11/26/2009 2/25/2015 $400,000.00 $240,000.00 New CNG Station - Palm Spring Airport $160,000.00 No MS08068 The Regents of the University of Cali 11/5/2010 11/4/2017 $400,000.00 $0.00 Hydrogen Station $400,000.00 No MS08070 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 11/26/2009 2/25/2015 $400,000.00 $240,000.00 New CNG Station - Paramount $160,000.00 No MS08072 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 12/4/2009 3/3/2015 $400,000.00 $226,178.64 New CNG Station - Burbank $173,821.36 No MS08073 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 11/26/2009 2/25/2015 $400,000.00 $240,000.00 New CNG Station - Norwalk $160,000.00 No MS08078 SunLine Transit Agency 12/10/2008 6/9/2015 2/9/2016 $189,000.00 $0.00 CNG Station Upgrade $189,000.00 No Total: 18 Declined/Cancelled Contracts MS08002 Orange County Transportation Autho $1,500,000.00 $0.00 Big Rig Freeway Service Patrol $1,500,000.00 No MS08008 Diversified Truck Rental & Leasing $300,000.00 $0.00 10 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles $300,000.00 No MS08010 Orange County Transportation Autho $10,000.00 $0.00 20 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles $10,000.00 No MS08011 Green Fleet Systems, LLC $10,000.00 $0.00 30 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles $10,000.00 No MS08052 Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. 12/24/2008 11/23/2014 11/23/2015 $100,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Fontana $100,000.00 No MS08054 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. $400,000.00 $0.00 New LNG Station - Fontana $400,000.00 No MS08055 Clean Energy Fuels Corp. 11/26/2009 3/25/2016 3/25/2017 $400,000.00 $0.00 New LNG Station - Long Beach-Pier S $400,000.00 No MS08059 Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. 12/24/2008 11/23/2014 $100,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - San Bernardino $100,000.00 No MS08060 Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. 12/24/2008 11/23/2014 $100,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Azusa $100,000.00 No MS08062 Go Natural Gas 9/25/2009 1/24/2016 1/24/2017 $400,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Rialto $400,000.00 No MS08074 Fontana Unified School District 11/14/2008 12/13/2014 $200,000.00 $0.00 Expansion of Existing CNG station $200,000.00 No Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? MS08077 Hythane Company, LLC $144,000.00 $0.00 Upgrade Station to Hythane $144,000.00 No Total: 12 Closed Contracts MS08003 A-Z Bus Sales, Inc. 5/2/2008 12/31/2008 2/28/2009 $1,480,000.00 $1,400,000.00 Alternative Fuel School Bus Incentive Progr $80,000.00 Yes MS08004 BusWest 5/2/2008 12/31/2008 $1,440,000.00 $1,440,000.00 Alternative Fuel School Bus Incentive Progr $0.00 Yes MS08016 TransVironmental Solutions, Inc. 1/23/2009 12/31/2010 9/30/2011 $227,198.00 $80,351.34 Rideshare 2 School Program $146,846.66 Yes Total: 3 Closed/Incomplete Contracts MS08079 ABC Unified School District 1/16/2009 12/15/2009 12/15/2010 $50,000.00 $0.00 Maintenance Facility Modifications $50,000.00 No Total: 1 Open/Complete Contracts MS08005 Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. 10/23/2008 11/22/2014 10/22/2015 $450,000.00 $450,000.00 15 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles - Azusa $0.00 Yes MS08006 Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. 10/23/2008 11/22/2014 10/22/2015 $450,000.00 $450,000.00 15 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles - Saugus $0.00Yes MS08009 Los Angeles World Airports 12/24/2008 12/23/2014 $870,000.00 $870,000.00 29 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles $0.00 Yes MS08014 City of San Bernardino 12/5/2008 6/4/2015 $390,000.00 $360,000.00 13 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles $30,000.00 Yes MS08019 Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of L 2/12/2010 7/11/2016 $300,000.00 $300,000.00 10 CNG Vehicles $0.00 Yes MS08020 Ware Disposal Company, Inc. 11/25/2008 2/24/2016 $900,000.00 $900,000.00 30 CNG Vehicles $0.00 Yes MS08022 SunLine Transit Agency 12/18/2008 3/17/2015 $311,625.00 $311,625.00 15 CNG Buses $0.00 Yes MS08053 City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Sanit 2/18/2009 12/17/2015 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 New LNG/CNG Station $0.00 Yes MS08057 Orange County Transportation Autho 5/14/2009 7/13/2015 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 New CNG Station - Garden Grove $0.00 Yes MS08064 Hemet Unified School District 1/9/2009 3/8/2015 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 Expansion of Existing Infrastructure $0.00 Yes MS08065 Pupil Transportation Cooperative 11/20/2008 7/19/2014 $10,500.00 $10,500.00 Existing CNG Station Modifications $0.00 Yes MS08067 California Trillium Company 3/19/2009 6/18/2015 $311,600.00 $254,330.00 New CNG Station $57,270.00 Yes MS08069 Perris Union High School District 6/5/2009 8/4/2015 8/4/2016 $225,000.00 $225,000.00 New CNG Station $0.00 Yes MS08071 ABC Unified School District 1/16/2009 1/15/2015 $63,000.00 $63,000.00 New CNG Station $0.00 Yes MS08075 Disneyland Resort Environmentla Aff 12/10/2008 2/1/2015 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 Expansion of Existing CNG Infrastructure $0.00 Yes MS08076 Azusa Unified School District 10/17/2008 11/16/2014 11/16/2015 $172,500.00 $172,500.00 New CNG station and maint. Fac. Modificati $0.00 Yes Total: 16 Database

2007-08 AB2766 Local Government Match Program Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts ML08024 City of Anaheim 7/9/2010 7/8/2017 $425,000.00 $225,000.00 17 LPG Buses $200,000.00 No ML08025 Los Angeles County Department of 10/30/2009 3/29/2011 $75,000.00 $0.00 150 Vehicles (Diagnostic) $75,000.00 No ML08027 Los Angeles County Department of 7/20/2009 1/19/2011 1/19/2012 $6,901.00 $0.00 34 Vehicles (Diagnostic) $6,901.00 No ML08028 City of Santa Monica 9/11/2009 9/10/2016 $600,000.00 $0.00 24 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicles $600,000.00 No ML08030 City of Azusa 5/14/2010 3/13/2016 $25,000.00 $0.00 1 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicle $25,000.00 No ML08034 County of San Bernardino Public Wo 3/27/2009 7/26/2015 $150,000.00 $0.00 8 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicles $150,000.00 No ML08036 City of South Pasadena 5/12/2009 7/11/2013 $169,421.00 $0.00 New CNG Station $169,421.00 No ML08038 Los Angeles Department of Water a 7/16/2010 7/15/2017 $1,050,000.00 $0.00 42 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicles $1,050,000.00 No ML08040 City of Riverside 9/11/2009 9/10/2016 $505,500.00 $0.00 16 CNG Vehicles, Expand CNG Station & M $505,500.00 No ML08043 City of Desert Hot Springs 9/25/2009 3/24/2016 $25,000.00 $0.00 1 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicle $25,000.00 No ML08049 City of Cerritos 3/20/2009 1/19/2015 2/19/2017 $25,000.00 $0.00 1 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicle $25,000.00 No ML08080 City of Irvine 5/1/2009 5/31/2015 $50,000.00 $0.00 Two Heavy-Duty Nat. Gas Vehicles $50,000.00 No Total: 12 Declined/Cancelled Contracts ML08032 City of Irvine 5/1/2009 8/31/2010 $9,000.00 $0.00 36 Vehicles (Diagnostic) $9,000.00 No ML08041 City of Los Angeles, Dept of Transpo 8/6/2010 7/5/2011 12/5/2011 $8,800.00 $0.00 73 Vehicles (Diagnostic) $8,800.00 No ML08051 City of Colton $75,000.00 $0.00 3 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicles $75,000.00 No Total: 3 Closed Contracts ML08033 County of San Bernardino Public Wo 4/3/2009 2/2/2010 $14,875.00 $14,875.00 70 Vehicles (Diagnostic) $0.00 Yes ML08035 City of La Verne 3/6/2009 11/5/2009 $11,925.00 $11,925.00 53 Vehicles (Diagnostic) $0.00 Yes ML08045 City of Santa Clarita 2/20/2009 6/19/2010 $3,213.00 $3,150.00 14 Vehicles (Diagnostic) $63.00 Yes Total: 3 Open/Complete Contracts ML08023 City of Villa Park 11/7/2008 10/6/2012 $6,500.00 $5,102.50 Upgrade of Existing Refueling Facility $1,397.50 Yes ML08026 Los Angeles County Department of 7/20/2009 7/19/2016 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 10 LPG Heavy-Duty Vehicles $0.00 No ML08029 City of Gardena 3/19/2009 1/18/2015 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 1 Propane Heavy-Duty Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML08031 City of Claremont 3/27/2009 3/26/2013 3/26/2015 $97,500.00 $97,500.00 Upgrade of Existing CNG Station, Purchase $0.00 Yes ML08037 City of Glendale 5/20/2009 5/19/2015 $325,000.00 $325,000.00 13 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML08039 City of Rancho Palos Verdes 6/5/2009 8/4/2015 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 2 LPG Transit Buses $0.00 Yes ML08042 City of Ontario 5/1/2009 1/31/2016 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 7 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicles $0.00 Yes Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? ML08044 City of Chino 3/19/2009 3/18/2015 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 1 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML08046 City of Paramount 2/20/2009 2/19/2015 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 1 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML08047 City of Culver City Transportation De 5/12/2009 8/11/2015 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 6 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML08048 City of Santa Clarita 2/20/2009 6/19/2015 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 1 CNG Heavy-Duty Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML08050 City of Laguna Beach Public Works 8/12/2009 4/11/2016 10/11/2016 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 3 LPG Trolleys $0.00 Yes Total: 12 Database

2008-09 AB2766 Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts MS09001 Administrative Services Co-Op/Long 3/5/2009 6/30/2012 12/31/2013 $225,000.00 $150,000.00 15 CNG Taxicabs $75,000.00 No Total: 1 Declined/Cancelled Contracts MS09003 FuelMaker Corporation $296,000.00 $0.00 Home Refueling Apparatus Incentives $296,000.00 No Total: 1 Closed Contracts MS09002 A-Z Bus Sales, Inc. 11/7/2008 12/31/2009 12/31/2010 $2,520,000.00 $2,460,000.00 Alternative Fuel School Bus Incentive Progr $60,000.00 No MS09004 A-Z Bus Sales, Inc. 1/30/2009 3/31/2009 $156,000.00 $156,000.00 Alternative Fuel School Bus Incentive Progr $0.00 Yes MS09005 Gas Equipment Systems, Inc. 6/19/2009 10/18/2010 $71,000.00 $71,000.00 Provide Temp. Fueling for Mountain Area C $0.00 Yes MS09047 BusWest 7/9/2010 12/31/2010 4/30/2011 $480,000.00 $480,000.00 Alternative Fuel School Bus Incentive Progr $0.00 Yes Total: 4 Database

2008-09 AB2766 Local Government Match Program Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts ML09008 City of Culver City Transportation De 1/19/2010 7/18/2016 7/18/2017 $200,000.00 $175,000.00 8 Nat. Gas Heavy-Duty Vehicles $25,000.00 No ML09009 City of South Pasadena 11/5/2010 12/4/2016 $152,000.00 $0.00 CNG Station Expansion $152,000.00 No ML09010 City of Palm Springs 1/8/2010 2/7/2016 $25,000.00 $0.00 1 Nat. Gas Heavy-Duty Vehicle $25,000.00 No ML09011 City of San Bernardino 2/19/2010 5/18/2016 $250,000.00 $0.00 10 Nat. Gas Heavy-Duty Vehicles $250,000.00 No ML09013 City of Riverside Public Works 9/10/2010 12/9/2011 12/9/2012 $144,470.00 $0.00 Traffic Signal Synchr./Moreno Valley $144,470.00 No ML09014 City of Riverside Public Works 9/10/2010 12/9/2011 12/9/2012 $113,030.00 $0.00 Traffic Signal Synchr./Corona $113,030.00 No ML09015 City of Riverside Public Works 9/10/2010 12/9/2011 12/9/2012 $80,060.00 $0.00 Traffic Signal Synchr./Co. of Riverside $80,060.00No ML09016 County of San Bernardino Public Wo 1/28/2010 3/27/2014 $50,000.00 $0.00 Install New CNG Station $50,000.00 No ML09023 Los Angeles County Department of 12/10/2010 12/9/2017 $50,000.00 $0.00 2 Heavy-Duty Alternative Fuel Transit Vehic $50,000.00No ML09024 Los Angeles County Department of 10/15/2010 12/14/2012 $400,000.00 $0.00 Maintenance Facility Modifications $400,000.00 No ML09025 Los Angeles County Department of 10/15/2010 12/14/2012 $50,000.00 $0.00 Remote Vehicle Diagnostics/85 Vehicles $50,000.00 No ML09026 Los Angeles County Department of 10/15/2010 10/14/2017 $250,000.00 $0.00 5 Off-Road Vehicle Repowers $250,000.00 No ML09027 Los Angeles County Department of 7/23/2010 3/22/2012 6/22/2012 $150,000.00 $0.00 Freeway Detector Map Interface $150,000.00 No ML09030 City of Los Angeles GSD/Fleet Servi 6/18/2010 6/17/2011 $22,310.00 $0.00 Remote Vehicle Diagnostics/107 Vehicles $22,310.00 No ML09032 Los Angeles World Airports 4/8/2011 4/7/2018 $175,000.00 $0.00 7 Nat. Gas Heavy-Duty Vehicles $175,000.00 No ML09033 City of Beverly Hills 3/4/2011 5/3/2018 $550,000.00 $100,000.00 10 Nat. Gas Heavy-Duty Vehicles & CNG St $450,000.00 No ML09035 City of Fullerton 6/17/2010 6/16/2017 $450,000.00 $50,000.00 2 Nat. Gas Heavy-Duty Vehicles & CNG Sta $400,000.00 No ML09036 City of Long Beach Fleet Services B 5/7/2010 5/6/2017 5/6/2018 $875,000.00 $450,000.00 Purchase 35 LNG Refuse Trucks $425,000.00No ML09038 City of Chino 9/27/2010 5/26/2017 $250,000.00 $0.00 Upgrade Existing CNG Station $250,000.00 No ML09041 City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Sanit 10/1/2010 9/30/2017 $875,000.00 $250,000.00 Purchase 35 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles $625,000.00No ML09042 Los Angeles Department of Water a 12/10/2010 12/9/2017 $1,400,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 56 Dump Trucks $1,400,000.00 No ML09043 City of Covina 10/8/2010 4/7/2017 $186,591.00 $0.00 Upgrade Existing CNG Station $186,591.00 No Total: 22 Declined/Cancelled Contracts ML09017 County of San Bernardino Public Wo 1/28/2010 7/27/2016 $200,000.00 $0.00 8 Nat. Gas Heavy-Duty Vehicles $200,000.00 No ML09018 Los Angeles Department of Water a 7/16/2010 9/15/2012 $850,000.00 $0.00 Retrofit 85 Off-Road Vehicles w/DECS $850,000.00 No ML09019 City of San Juan Capistrano Public 12/4/2009 11/3/2010 $10,125.00 $0.00 Remote Vehicle Diagnostics/45 Vehicles $10,125.00 No ML09022 Los Angeles County Department of $8,250.00 $0.00 Remote Vehicle Diagnostics/15 Vehicles $8,250.00 No ML09028 Riverside County Waste Manageme $140,000.00 $0.00 Retrofit 7 Off-Road Vehicles w/DECS $140,000.00 No ML09039 City of Inglewood $310,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 12 H.D. CNG Vehicles and Remot $310,000.00 No ML09040 City of Cathedral City $83,125.00 $0.00 Purchase 3 H.D. CNG Vehicles and Remote $83,125.00 No Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? ML09044 City of San Dimas $425,000.00 $0.00 Install CNG Station and Purchase 1 CNG S $425,000.00 No ML09045 City of Orange $125,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 5 CNG Sweepers $125,000.00 No Total: 9 Closed Contracts ML09007 City of Rancho Cucamonga 2/26/2010 4/25/2012 $117,500.00 $62,452.57 Maintenance Facility Modification $55,047.43 No ML09020 County of San Bernardino 8/16/2010 2/15/2012 $49,770.00 $49,770.00 Remote Vehicle Diagnostics/252 Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML09021 City of Palm Desert 7/9/2010 3/8/2012 $39,450.00 $38,248.87 Traffic Signal Synchr./Rancho Mirage $1,201.13 Yes Total: 3 Open/Complete Contracts ML09012 City of Gardena 3/12/2010 11/11/2015 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 1 Nat. Gas Heavy-Duty Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML09029 City of Whittier 11/6/2009 4/5/2016 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 1 Nat. Gas Heavy-Duty Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML09031 City of Los Angeles, Department of 10/29/2010 10/28/2017 $825,000.00 $825,000.00 33 Nat. Gas Heavy-Duty Vehicles $0.00 Yes ML09034 City of La Palma 11/25/2009 6/24/2015 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 1 LPG Heavy-Duty Vehicle $0.00 Yes ML09037 City of Redondo Beach 6/18/2010 6/17/2016 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Purchase Two CNG Sweepers $0.00 Yes ML09046 City of Newport Beach 5/20/2010 5/19/2016 $162,500.00 $162,500.00 Upgrade Existing CNG Station, Maintenance $0.00 Yes Total: 6 Database

2009-10 AB2766 Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts MS10004 Linde LLC 3/2/2012 6/1/2018 $56,932.00 $0.00 Purchase 6 H.D. CNG Vehicles $56,932.00 No MS10005 Domestic Linen Supply Company, In 10/8/2010 7/7/2016 $47,444.00 $0.00 Purchase 5 Gas-Electric Hybrid Vehicles $47,444.00 No MS10006 Nationwide Environmental Services 11/19/2010 4/18/2017 $94,887.00 $0.00 Purchase Three Street Sweepers $94,887.00 No MS10007 Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company of L 7/15/2011 10/14/2017 $18,976.00 $17,078.40 Purchase 2 H.D. CNG Vehicles $1,897.60 No MS10008 Republic Services, Inc. 12/10/2010 5/9/2017 $123,354.00 $111,018.60 Purchase 4 CNG Refuse Collection Vehicles $12,335.40 No MS10009 Ware Disposal Company, Inc. 10/29/2010 3/28/2017 $123,353.00 $123,352.00 Purchase 4 CNG Refuse Trucks $1.00 No MS10010 New Bern Transport Corporation 10/29/2010 3/28/2017 $113,864.00 $102,477.60 Repower 4 Heavy-Duty Vehicles $11,386.40 No MS10011 Foothill Transit Agency 3/9/2012 2/8/2018 $113,865.00 $0.00 Purchase 12 H.D. CNG Vehicles $113,865.00 No MS10012 Foothill Transit Agency 3/9/2012 3/8/2019 $85,399.00 $0.00 Purchase 9 H.D. Electric Vehicles $85,399.00 No MS10016 Rio Hondo Community College 11/5/2010 5/4/2017 $16,077.00 $14,469.30 Purchase 1 CNG Shuttle Bus $1,607.70 No MS10017 Ryder System Inc. 12/30/2011 6/29/2018 $651,377.00 $0.00 Purchase 60 H.D. CNG and LNG Vehicles $651,377.00 No MS10019 EDCO Disposal Corporation 11/19/2010 2/18/2017 $379,549.00 $341,355.43 Purchase 11 H.D. CNG Refuse Trucks $38,193.57 No MS10020 American Reclamation, Inc. 5/6/2011 2/5/2018 $18,977.00 $17,079.30 Purchase 1 H.D. CNG Vehicle $1,897.70 No MS10021 City of Glendora 10/29/2010 11/28/2016 $9,489.00 $0.00 Purchase 1 H.D. CNG Vehicle $9,489.00 No MS10024 Frito-Lay North America 7/29/2011 9/28/2017 $47,444.00 $42,699.60 Purchase 5 Electric Vehicles $4,744.40 No MS10025 Elham Shirazi 2/18/2011 10/17/2012 $199,449.00 $108,410.58 Telework Demonstration Program $91,038.42 No Total: 16 Pending Execution Contracts MS10003 City of Sierra Madre $13,555.00 $0.00 Purchase 1 H.D. CNG Vehicle $13,555.00 No MS10015 County of Los Angeles Department o $37,955.00 $0.00 Purchase 4 H.D. CNG Vehicles $37,955.00 No Total: 2 Declined/Cancelled Contracts MS10013 City of San Bernardino $68,834.00 $0.00 Purchase 9 H.D. LNG Vehicles $68,834.00 No MS10014 Serv-Wel Disposal $18,977.00 $0.00 Purchase 2 H.D. CNG Vehicles $18,977.00 No MS10018 Shaw Transport Inc. $81,332.00 $0.00 Purchase 6 H.D. LNG Vehicles $81,332.00 No MS10022 Los Angeles World Airports $123,353.00 $0.00 Purchase 13 H.D. CNG Vehicles $123,353.00 No MS10023 Dix Leasing $105,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 3 H.D. LNG Vehicles $105,000.00 No Total: 5 Closed Contracts MS10001 Los Angeles County MTA 3/19/2010 2/28/2011 4/28/2011 $300,000.00 $196,790.61 Clean Fuel Transit Bus Service to Dodger St $103,209.39 No MS10002 Coachella Valley Association of Gov 6/18/2010 2/17/2011 $400,000.00 $400,000.00 Coachella Valley PM10 Reduction Street Sw $0.00Yes Database

2010-11 AB2766 Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts MS11001 Mineral LLC 4/22/2011 4/30/2013 $94,627.00 $82,786.83 Design, Develop, Host and Maintain MSRC $11,840.17 No MS11002 A-Z Bus Sales, Inc. 7/15/2011 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 $1,000,000.00 $525,000.00 Alternative Fuel School Bus Incentive Progr $475,000.00 No MS11003 BusWest 7/26/2011 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 $540,000.00 $540,000.00 Alternative Fuel School Bus Incentive Progr $0.00 No MS11004 Los Angeles County MTA 9/9/2011 2/29/2012 $450,000.00 $92,649.00 Clean Fuel Transit Service to Dodger Stadiu $357,351.00 No MS11006 Orange County Transportation Autho 10/7/2011 2/29/2012 8/31/2012 $268,207.00 $0.00 Metrolink Service to Angel Stadium $268,207.00 No MS11010 Border Valley Trading 8/26/2011 10/25/2017 10/25/2018 $150,000.00 $0.00 New LNG Station $150,000.00 No MS11011 EDCO Disposal Corporation 12/30/2011 4/29/2019 $100,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Signal Hill $100,000.00 No MS11012 EDCO Disposal Corporation 12/30/2011 4/29/2019 $100,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Buena Park $100,000.00 No MS11017 CR&R, Inc. 3/2/2012 2/1/2018 $100,000.00 $0.00 Expansion of existing station - Garden Grov $100,000.00 No MS11018 Orange County Transportation Autho 10/14/2011 1/31/2012 $211,360.00 $211,360.00 Express Bus Service to Orange County Fair $0.00No MS11055 KEC Engineering 2/3/2012 8/2/2018 $250,000.00 $0.00 Repower 5 H.D. Off-Road Vehicles $250,000.00 No MS11056 The Better World Group 12/30/2011 12/29/2013 $98,418.00 $11,552.45 Programmatic Outreach Services $86,865.55 No MS11061 Eastern Municipal Water District 3/29/2012 5/28/2015 $11,659.00 $0.00 Retrofit One Off-Road Vehicle under Showc $11,659.00 No MS11080 Southern California Regional Rail Au 4/6/2012 7/31/2012 $26,000.00 $0.00 Metrolink Service to Auto Club Speedway $26,000.00 No Total: 14 Pending Execution Contracts MS11008 USA Waste of California, Inc. $125,000.00 $0.00 Expansion of Existing LCNG Station $125,000.00 No MS11009 Waste Management Collection and $125,000.00 $0.00 Expansion of Existing LCNG Station $125,000.00 No MS11013 Go Natural Gas, Inc. $150,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Huntington Beach $150,000.00 No MS11014 Go Natural Gas, Inc. $150,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Santa Ana $150,000.00 No MS11015 Go Natural Gas, Inc. $150,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Inglewood $150,000.00 No MS11016 CR&R, Inc. $150,000.00 $0.00 New CNG Station - Perris $150,000.00 No MS11019 City of Corona $225,000.00 $0.00 Expansion of Existing CNG Station $225,000.00 No MS11046 Louis Castro $40,000.00 $0.00 Repower One Heavy-Duty Vehicle $40,000.00 No MS11047 Ivan Borjas $40,000.00 $0.00 Repower One Heavy-Duty Vehicle $40,000.00 No MS11048 Phase II Transportation $1,080,000.00 $0.00 Repower 27 Heavy-Duty Vehicles $1,080,000.00 No MS11049 Ruben Caceras $40,000.00 $0.00 Repower One Heavy-Duty Vehicle $40,000.00 No MS11050 Carlos Arrue $40,000.00 $0.00 Repower One Heavy-Duty Vehicle $40,000.00 No MS11051 Francisco Vargas $40,000.00 $0.00 Repower One Heavy-Duty Vehicle $40,000.00 No MS11052 Krisda Inc $120,000.00 $0.00 Repower Three Heavy-Duty Vehicles $120,000.00 No MS11053 Jose Ivan Soltero $40,000.00 $0.00 Repower One Heavy-Duty Vehicle $40,000.00 No Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? MS11054 Albino Meza $40,000.00 $0.00 Repower One Heavy-Duty Vehicle $40,000.00 No MS11057 Riverside County Transportation Co $100,000.00 $0.00 Develop and Implement 511 "Smart Phone" $100,000.00 No MS11058 Los Angeles Service Authority for Fr $123,395.00 $0.00 Develop and Implement 511 "Smart Phone" $123,395.00 No MS11059 Go Natural Gas $150,000.00 $0.00 New Public Access CNG Station - Paramou $150,000.00 No MS11060 Rowland Unified School District $175,000.00 $0.00 New Limited Access CNG Station $175,000.00 No MS11062 Load Center $100,449.00 $0.00 Retrofit Six Off-Road Vehicles under Showc $100,449.00 No MS11063 Standard Concrete Products $310,825.00 $0.00 Retrofit Two Off-Road Vehicles under Show $310,825.00 No MS11064 City of Hawthorne $175,000.00 $0.00 New Limited Access CNG Station $175,000.00 No MS11065 Temecula Valley Unified School Distr $50,000.00 $0.00 Expansion of Existing CNG Station $50,000.00 No MS11066 Torrance Unified School District $76,850.00 $0.00 Expansion of Existing CNG Station $76,850.00 No MS11067 City of Redlands $85,000.00 $0.00 Expansion of Existing CNG Station $85,000.00 No MS11068 Ryder System Inc. $175,000.00 $0.00 New Public Access L/CNG Station (Fontana $175,000.00 No MS11069 Ryder System Inc. $175,000.00 $0.00 New Public Access L/CNG Station (Orange) $175,000.00 No MS11070 American Honda Motor Company $100,000.00 $0.00 Expansion of Existing CNG Station $100,000.00 No MS11071 City of Torrance Transit Department $175,000.00 $0.00 New Limited Access CNG Station $175,000.00 No MS11072 Trillium USA Company DBA Californi $150,000.00 $0.00 New Public Access CNG Station $150,000.00 No MS11073 Los Angeles Unified School District $175,000.00 $0.00 Expansion of Existing CNG Station $175,000.00 No MS11074 SunLine Transit Agency $41,849.00 $0.00 Transit Service for Coachella Valley Festival $41,849.00 No MS11075 Standard Concrete Products $76,840.00 $0.00 Retrofit Two Off-Road Vehicles under Show $76,840.00 No MS11076 SA Recycling, LLC $424,801.00 $0.00 Retrofit of 13 Off-Road Diesel Vehicles with $424,801.00 No MS11077 DCL America Inc. $263,107.00 $0.00 Retrofit of 13 Off-Road Diesel Vehicles with $263,107.00 No MS11079 Bear Valley Unified School District $175,000.00 $0.00 New Limited Access CNG Station $175,000.00 No MS11081 Metropolitan Stevedore Company $45,416.00 $0.00 Install DECS on Two Off-Road Vehicles $45,416.00 No MS11082 Baumot North America, LLC $65,958.00 $0.00 Install DECS on Four Off-Road Vehicles $65,958.00 No MS11083 Cattrac Construction, Inc. $500,000.00 $0.00 Install DECS on Eight Off-Road Vehicles $500,000.00 No Total: 40 Database

2010-11 AB2766 Local Government Match Program Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Open Contracts ML11007 Coachella Valley Association of Gov 7/29/2011 7/28/2012 $250,000.00 $187,499.97 Regional PM10 Street Sweeping Program $62,500.03 No ML11021 City of Whittier 1/27/2012 9/26/2018 $210,000.00 $30,000.00 Purchase 7 Nat. Gas H.D. Vehicles $180,000.00 No ML11022 City of Anaheim 3/16/2012 7/15/2018 $175,000.00 $0.00 Install CNG Fueling Station, purchase 5 H.D $175,000.00 No ML11026 City of Redlands 3/2/2012 10/1/2018 $90,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 3 Nat. Gas H.D. Vehicles $90,000.00 No ML11028 City of Glendale 1/13/2012 5/12/2018 $300,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 10 H.D. CNG Vehicles $300,000.00 No ML11030 City of Fullerton 2/3/2012 3/2/2018 $109,200.00 $0.00 Purchase 2 Nat. Gas H.D. Vehicles, Retrofit $109,200.00 No ML11031 City of Culver City Transportation De 12/2/2011 12/1/2018 $300,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 10 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles $300,000.00 No ML11032 City of Gardena 3/2/2012 9/1/2018 $102,500.00 $0.00 Modify Maint. Facility, Expand CNG station, $102,500.00 No ML11033 City of Los Angeles, Bureau of Sanit 3/16/2012 1/15/2019 $1,080,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 36 LNG H.D. Vehicles $1,080,000.00 No ML11036 City of Riverside 1/27/2012 1/26/2019 $670,000.00 $0.00 Install New CNG Station, Purchase 9 H.D. N $670,000.00 No ML11039 City of Ontario 1/27/2012 9/26/2018 $180,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 6 Nat. Gas H.D. Vehicles $180,000.00 No ML11042 City of Chino 2/17/2012 4/16/2018 $35,077.00 $0.00 Purchase 1 Nat. Gas H.D. Vehicle, Repower $35,077.00 No ML11043 City of Hemet Public Works 2/3/2012 2/2/2019 $60,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 2 H.D. Nat. Gas Vehicles $60,000.00 No ML11044 City of Ontario 1/27/2012 6/26/2019 $400,000.00 $0.00 Expand Existing CNG Station $400,000.00 No ML11045 City of Newport Beach 2/3/2012 8/2/2018 $30,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 1 Nat. Gas H.D. Vehicle $30,000.00 No Total: 15 Pending Execution Contracts ML11020 City of Indio $30,000.00 $0.00 Retrofit one H.D. Vehicles w/DECS, repower $30,000.00 No ML11023 City of Rancho Cucamonga $260,000.00 $0.00 Expand Existing CNG Station, 2 H.D. Vehicl $260,000.00 No ML11024 County of Los Angeles Department o $150,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 5 Nat. Gas H.D. Vehicles $150,000.00 No ML11025 County of Los Angeles Department o $150,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 5 Nat. Gas H.D. Vehicles $150,000.00 No ML11027 City of Los Angeles, Dept. of Genera $300,000.00 $0.00 Maintenance Facility Modifications $300,000.00 No ML11029 City of Santa Ana $265,500.00 $0.00 Expansion of Existing CNG Station, Install N $265,500.00 No ML11034 City of Los Angeles, Department of $630,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 21 H.D. CNG Vehicles $630,000.00 No ML11037 City of Anaheim $300,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 12 Nat. Gas H.D. Vehicles $300,000.00 No ML11038 City of Santa Monica $400,000.00 $0.00 Maintenance Facility Modifications $400,000.00 No ML11040 City of South Pasadena $30,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 1 Nat. Gas H.D. Vehicle $30,000.00 No ML11041 City of Santa Ana $265,000.00 $0.00 Purchase 7 LPG H.D. Vehicles, Retrofit 6 H. $265,000.00 No Total: 11 Closed Contracts ML11035 City of La Quinta 11/18/2011 11/17/2012 $25,368.00 $25,368.00 Retrofit 3 On-Road Vehicles w/DECS $0.00 Yes Database

2011-12 AB2766 Contract Status Report 5/31/2012

Original Amended Contract Award Billing Cont.# Contractor Start Date End Date End Date Value Remitted Project Description Balance Complete? Pending Execution Contracts MS12001 Los Angeles County MTA $300,000.00 $0.00 Clean Fuel Transit Service to Dodger Stadiu $300,000.00 No MS12003 Orange County Transportation Autho $234,669.00 $0.00 Implement Metrolink Service to Angel Stadiu $234,669.00 No MS12Hom Mansfield Gas Equipment Systems $296,000.00 $0.00 Home Refueling Apparatus Incentive Progra $296,000.00 No Total: 3

BOARD MEETING DATE: July 13, 2012 AGENDA NO. 25

REPORT: California Air Resources Board Monthly Meeting

SYNOPSIS: The California Air Resources Board met on June 28, 2012. The following is a summary of this meeting.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Receive and file.

Ronald O. Loveridge, Member SCAQMD Governing Board sm

The Air Resources Board’s (ARB or Board) June meeting was held in Sacramento, at the California Environmental Protection Agency Building. Key items presented are summarized below.

1. Public Meeting to Hear a Status Report on Vision for Clean Air: A Framework for Air Quality and Climate Planning

The Board heard an informational item on the Vision for Clean Air: A Framework for Air Quality and Climate Planning, a document developed by the staff of the Air Resources Board, the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. This joint agency effort defines a framework for identifying the technology, energy, and efficiency implications of meeting California’s multiple air quality and climate goals now and in the future.

AQMD Staff Comments/Testimony: Staff provided comments regarding the joint effort in producing the draft document and the significance the document has in providing a path towards the development of zero- and near-zero emission technologies and cleaner combustion engines. Staff indicated that we looked forward to working with ARB and San Joaquin Valley APCD during the public review process.

This was an informational item. No Board action was taken.

2. Public Meeting to Consider the Planned Air Pollution Research Fiscal Year 2012-2013

The Board approved funding for a portfolio of research projects that will provide the necessary background for strengthening ARB’s programs. The plan includes 13 projects in four areas: mobile source strategies; scientific foundational research; transportation, land use, and community design; and program effectiveness.

3. Public Meeting to Consider Approval of the Proposed Assembly Bill 118 Air Quality Improvement Program Funding Plan for Fiscal Year 2012-2013

The Board approved the proposed Air Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) Funding Plan, which allocated the bulk of the $40 million of AQIP project funding in the Governor’s proposed budget to continue incentives for the purchase of zero-emission passenger cars and new hybrid and zero-emission trucks and buses. The AQIP was created under Assembly Bill 118 and provides incentive funding through 2015 for clean vehicle and equipment projects.

4. Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to the California Cap on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Market-Based Compliance Mechanisms, and to Consider Amendments Allowing Use of Compliance Instruments Issued by Linked Jurisdictions

Staff reported to the Board on the status of proposed amendments to link California’s program with Quebec. Consistent with statutory language in the latest state budget, ARB will submit an analysis of Quebec’s program to the Governor for a determination as to whether the stringency of Quebec’s program is equivalent to California’s program. If the Governor makes that determination, the Board will hold a future public hearing to consider approval of the rule amendments to link with Quebec. At the June 28, 2012 hearing the Board also approved clean-up provisions to the cap and trade rule that are unrelated to the linkage proposal.

Attachment CARB June 28, 2012 Meeting Agenda LOCATION:

Air Resources Board

1001 I Street, 2nd Floor Byron Sher Auditorium Sacramento, California 95814 http://www.calepa.ca.gov/EPAbldg/location. htm

This facility is accessible by public transit. For transit information, call: (916) 321-BUSS, website PUBLIC MEETING http://www.sacrt.com/ (This facility is accessible to persons with AGENDA disabilities.)

June 28, 2012

TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS ON AN Webcast AGENDA ITEM IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING GO TO: Board Book http://www.arb.ca.gov/lispub/comm/bclist/ php

June 28, 2012 9:00 a.m.

DISCUSSION ITEMS:

Note: The following agenda items may be heard in a different order at the Board meeting. Agenda Agenda Topic Item #

12-4-1 Public Meeting to Consider a Status Report on "Vision For Clean Air: 2012-2050" Staff will update the Board on development of a report on future technology and energy scenarios illustrating how California's combined air quality and climate goals could be met.

Staff Presentation

12-4-2 Public Meeting to Present the Planned Air Pollution Research Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Staff will present to the Board the portfolio of research projects recommended for funding in Fiscal Year 2012-2013. Staff will describe the objective of each of the proposed projects and how it relates to previous research. Staff will also discuss how the proposed research projects strengthen the Board's programs, including guiding policy making, developing new regulations, and ensuring adopted regulations are effectively implemented. More Information Staff Presentation

Public Meeting to Consider Approval of the Proposed Assembly Bill 12-4-4 118 Air Quality Improvement Program Funding Plan For Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Staff will present to the Board the proposed Air Quality Improvement Program (AQIP) Funding Plan for fiscal year 2012-2013 which provides staff's recommendations for allocating the $40 million of AQIP project funding in the Governor's proposed budget. Staff recommends directing most of the AQIP funding to continue incentives for the purchase of zero- emission passenger cars and new hybrid and zero-emission trucks and buses. The remaining funding would be allocated to advanced technology demonstration projects. The AQIP, created under Assembly Bill 118 (3007), provides incentive funding through 2015 for clean vehicle and equipment projects. More Information Staff Presentation

Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to California Cap on 12-4-5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Market-Based Compliance Mechanisms, and to Consider Amendments Allowing Use of Compliance Instruments Issued by Linked Jurisdictions Staff will present proposed amendments to the cap and trade regulation relating to program implementation, as well as to clarify regulatory requirements. Staff will also present proposed amendments to allow California and Quebec to have a linked cap and trade program. More Information Staff Presentation

CLOSED SESSION – LITIGATION

The Board will hold a closed session, as authorized by Government Code section 11126(e), to confer with, and receive advice from, its legal counsel regarding the following pending or potential litigation:

Pacific Merchant Shipping Association v. Goldstene, U.S. District Court (E.D. Cal. Sacramento), Case No. 2:09-CV-01151-MCE-EFB.

POET, LLC, et al. v. Goldstene, et al., Superior Court of California (Fresno County), Case No. 09CECG04850.

Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al. v. Goldstene, U.S. District Court (E.D. Cal. Fresno), Case No. 1:09−CV−02234−LJO−DLB.

National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, et al. v. Goldstene, et al., U.S. District Court (E.D. Cal. Fresno) Case No. 1:10-CV-00163- AWI-GSA.

Association of Irritated Residents, et al. v. California Air Resources Board, Superior Court of California (San Francisco County), Case No. CPF-09-509562.

Association of Irritated Residents, et al. v. U.S. E.P.A., 2011 WL 310357 (C.A.9), (Feb. 2, 2011).

California Dump Truck Owners Association v. California Air Resources Board, U.S. District Court (E.D. Cal. Sacramento) Case No. 2:11-CV-00384-MCE-GGH.

Engine Manufacturers Association v. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2010-00082774.

Citizens Climate Lobby and Our Children's Earth Foundation v. California Air Resources Board, San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-12-519554

OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE BOARD TO COMMENT ON MATTERS OF INTEREST

Board members may identify matters they would like to have noticed for consideration at future meetings and comment on topics of interest; no formal action on these topics will be taken without further notice.

OPEN SESSION TO PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECT MATTERS WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF THE BOARD

Although no formal Board action may be taken, the Board is allowing an opportunity to interested members of the public to address the Board on items of interest that are within the Board’s jurisdiction, but that do not specifically appear on the agenda. Each person will be allowed a maximum of three minutes to ensure that everyone has a chance to speak.

TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS ON AN AGENDA ITEM IN ADVANCE OF THE MEETING GO TO: http://www.arb.ca.gov/lispub/comm/bclist/php

ONLINE SIGN-UP: You can sign up online in advance to speak at the Board hearing when you submit an electronic Board item comment. For more information go to: http://www.arb.ca.gov/board/online-signup.htm

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT THE CLERK OF THE BOARD 1001 I Street, 23rd Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814, (916) 322-5594 ARB Homepage: http://www.arb.ca.gov

To request a special accommodation or language needs for any of the following:

• An interpreter to be available at the hearing. • Have documents available in an alternate format or another language. • A disability-related reasonable accommodation.

Please contact the Clerk of the Board at (916) 322-5594 or by facsimile at (916) 322- 3928 as soon as possible, but no later than 7 business days before the scheduled Board hearing. TTY/TDD/Speech to Speech users may dial 711 for the California Relay Service.

Para solicitar alguna comodidad especial o necesidad de otro idioma para alguna de las siguientes:

• Un intérprete que esté disponible en la audiencia • Tener documentos disponibles en un formato alterno u otro idioma. • Una acomodación razonable relacionados con una incapacidad.

Por favor llame a la oficina del Secretario del Consejo de Recursos Atmosféricos al (916) 322-5594 o envíe un fax al (916) 322-3928 no menos de 7 días laborales antes del día programado para la audiencia. Para el Servicio Telefónico de California para Personas con Problemas Auditivos, ó de teléfonos TDD pueden marcar al 711.

SMOKING IS NOT PERMITTED AT MEETINGS OF THE CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD