Annual Report 2016
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Media Release
MEDIA RELEASE 7 February 2017 Premier awards Tennyson Medal at SACE Merit Ceremony The Premier of South Australia, the Hon. Jay Weatherill MP, awarded the prestigious Tennyson Medal for excellence in English Studies to 2016 Year 12 graduate, Ashleigh Jones at the SACE Merit Ceremony at Government House today. The ceremony, in its twenty-ninth year, saw 996 students awarded with 1302 subject merits for outstanding achievement in SACE Stage 2 subjects. Subject merits are awarded to students who gain an overall subject grade of A+ and demonstrate exceptional achievement in that subject. As part of the Merit Ceremony, His Excellency the Hon. Hieu Van Le AC, the Governor of South Australia, presented the following awards: Governor of South Australia Commendation for outstanding overall achievement in the SACE (twenty-five recipients in 2016) Governor of South Australia Commendation — Aboriginal Student SACE Award for the Aboriginal student with the highest overall achievement in the SACE Governor of South Australia Commendation – Excellence in Modified SACE Award for the student with an identified intellectual disability who demonstrates outstanding achievement exclusively through SACE modified subjects. The Tennyson Medal dates back to 1901 when the former Governor of South Australia, Lord Tennyson, established the Tennyson Medal to encourage the study of English literature. The long list of recipients includes the late John Bannon AO, 39th Premier of South Australia, who was awarded the medal in 1961. For her Year 12 English Studies, Ashleigh studied works by Henrik Ibsen (A Doll’s House), Zhang Yimou who directed Raise the Red Lantern, and Tennessee Williams (The Glass Menagerie). -
2017 Annual Report ABOUT DON
2017 Annual Report ABOUT DON Don Dunstan was one of Australia’s most charismatic, courageous, and visionary politicians; a dedicated reformer with a deep commitment to social justice, a true friend to the Aboriginal people and those newly arrived in Australia, and with a lifelong passion for the arts and education. He took positive steps to enhance the status of women. Most of his reforms have withstood the test of time and ‘We have faltered in our quest to many have been strengthened with time. Many of his reforms in sex discrimination, Aboriginal land rights provide better lives for all our and consumer protection were the first of their kind in citizens, rather than just for the Australia. talented, lucky groups. To regain He was a leading campaigner for immigration reform and our confidence in our power to was instrumental in the elimination of the White Australia shape the society in which we live, Policy. He was instrumental in social welfare and child protection reforms, consumer protection, Aboriginal and to replace fear and just land rights, urban planning, heritage protection, anti- coping with shared joy, optimism discrimination laws, abolition of capital punishment, and mutual respect, needs new environment protection and censorship. imagining and thinking and learning from what succeeds elsewhere.’ The Hon. Don Dunstan AC QC 2 CONTENTS NOTE: The digital copy of this report contains hyperlinks. These include the page numbers below, some images, and social media links throughout the report. 2 About Don 11 Art4Good Fund 4 Chair’s Report 12 Thinkers in Residence 5 Achievements 16 Adelaide Zero Project 6 Governance and Staff 19 Media Coverage Advisory Boards, Donate and Volunteer 7 Interns & Volunteers 20 8 Events 21 Financial Report 10 Scholarships 3 CHAIR’S REPORT In 2017 we celebrated 50 years since Don Dunstan first became Premier. -
Policy Life Cycle Analysis of Three Australian State-Level Public
Article Journal of Development Policy Life Cycle Policy and Practice 6(1) 9–35, 2021 Analysis of Three © 2021 Aequitas Consulting Pvt. Ltd. and SAGE Australian State-level Reprints and permissions: in.sagepub.com/journals-permissions-india Public Policies: DOI: 10.1177/2455133321998805 Exploring the journals.sagepub.com/home/jdp Political Dimension of Sustainable Development Kuntal Goswami1,2 and Rolf Gerritsen1 Abstract This article analyses the life cycle of three Australian public policies (Tasmania Together [TT], South Australia’s Strategic Plan [SASP,] and Western Australia’s State Sustainability Strategy [WA’s SSS]). These policies were formulated at the state level and were structured around sustainable development concepts (the environmental, economic, and social dimensions). This study highlights contexts that led to the making of these public policies, as well as factors that led to their discontinuation. The case studies are based on analysis of parliamentary debates, state governments’ budget reports, public agencies’ annual reports, government media releases, and stakeholders’ feedback. The empirical findings highlight the importance of understanding the political dimension of sustainable development. This fact highlights the need to look beyond the traditional three-dimensional view of sustainability when assessing the success (or lack thereof) of sustainable development policies. Equally important, the analysis indicates that despite these policies’ limited success (and even one of these policies not being implemented at all), sustainability policies can have a legacy beyond their life cycle. Hence, the evaluation of these policies is likely to provide insight into the process of policymaking. 1 Charles Darwin University (CDU), Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia. 2 Australian Centre for Sustainable Development Research & Innovation (ACSDRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. -
Sixteen Years of Labor Government in South Australia, 2002-2018
AUSTRALASIAN PARLIAMENTARY REVIEW Parliament in the Periphery: Sixteen Years of Labor Government in South Australia, 2002-2018* Mark Dean Research Associate, Australian Industrial Transformation Institute, Flinders University of South Australia * Double-blind reviewed article. Abstract This article examines the sixteen years of Labor government in South Australia from 2002 to 2018. With reference to industry policy and strategy in the context of deindustrialisation, it analyses the impact and implications of policy choices made under Premiers Mike Rann and Jay Weatherill in attempts to progress South Australia beyond its growing status as a ‘rustbelt state’. Previous research has shown how, despite half of Labor’s term in office as a minority government and Rann’s apparent disregard for the Parliament, the executive’s ‘third way’ brand of policymaking was a powerful force in shaping the State’s development. This article approaches this contention from a new perspective to suggest that although this approach produced innovative policy outcomes, these were a vehicle for neo-liberal transformations to the State’s institutions. In strategically avoiding much legislative scrutiny, the Rann and Weatherill governments’ brand of policymaking was arguably unable to produce a coordinated response to South Australia’s deindustrialisation in a State historically shaped by more interventionist government and a clear role for the legislature. In undermining public services and hollowing out policy, the Rann and Wethearill governments reflected the path dependency of responses to earlier neo-liberal reforms, further entrenching neo-liberal responses to social and economic crisis and aiding a smooth transition to Liberal government in 2018. INTRODUCTION For sixteen years, from March 2002 to March 2018, South Australia was governed by the Labor Party. -
Peter Sandeman an Interview With
STATE LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA J.D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION Full transcript of Peter Sandeman an interview with: Conducted on: 21 June 2019 Interviewer: Allison Murchie Transcribed by: Deborah Gard For: The Don Dunstan Foundation 20th Anniversary Oral History Project 1152/8 Peter Sandeman NOTES TO THE TRANSCRIPT This transcript was created, proofread and donated by Deborah Gard, SA State Library volunteer. A second proofreading was undertaken by Rosemary Purcell, accredited editor. It conforms to the Somerville Collection’s policies for transcription which are explained below. Readers of this oral history transcript should bear in mind that it is a record of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The State Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the interview, nor for the views expressed therein. As with any historical source, these are for the reader to judge. It is the Somerville Collection’s policy to produce a transcript that is, so far as possible, a verbatim transcript that preserves the interviewee’s manner of speaking and the conversational style of the interview. Certain conventions of transcription have been applied (ie. the omission of meaningless noises, false starts and a percentage of the interviewee’s crutch words). Where the interviewee has had the opportunity to read the transcript, their suggested alterations have been incorporated in the text (see below). On the whole, the document can be regarded as a raw transcript. Abbreviations: The interviewee’s alterations may be identified by their initials in insertions in the transcript. Punctuation: Square brackets [ ] indicate material in the transcript that does not occur on the original tape recording. -
Volume 40, Number 1 the ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW Law.Adelaide.Edu.Au Adelaide Law Review ADVISORY BOARD
Volume 40, Number 1 THE ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW law.adelaide.edu.au Adelaide Law Review ADVISORY BOARD The Honourable Professor Catherine Branson AC QC Deputy Chancellor, The University of Adelaide; Former President, Australian Human Rights Commission; Former Justice, Federal Court of Australia Emeritus Professor William R Cornish CMG QC Emeritus Herchel Smith Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of Cambridge His Excellency Judge James R Crawford AC SC International Court of Justice The Honourable Professor John J Doyle AC QC Former Chief Justice, Supreme Court of South Australia Professor John V Orth William Rand Kenan Jr Professor of Law, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Professor Emerita Rosemary J Owens AO Former Dean, Adelaide Law School The Honourable Justice Melissa Perry Federal Court of Australia Emeritus Professor Ivan Shearer AM RFD Sydney Law School The Honourable Margaret White AO Former Justice, Supreme Court of Queensland Professor John M Williams Dame Roma Mitchell Chair of Law and Former Dean, Adelaide Law School ADELAIDE LAW REVIEW Editors Associate Professor Matthew Stubbs and Dr Michelle Lim Book Review and Comment Editor Dr Stacey Henderson Associate Editors Charles Hamra, Kyriaco Nikias and Azaara Perakath Student Editors Joshua Aikens Christian Andreotti Mitchell Brunker Peter Dalrymple Henry Materne-Smith Holly Nicholls Clare Nolan Eleanor Nolan Vincent Rocca India Short Christine Vu Kate Walsh Noel Williams Publications Officer Panita Hirunboot Volume 40 Issue 1 2019 The Adelaide Law Review is a double-blind peer reviewed journal that is published twice a year by the Adelaide Law School, The University of Adelaide. A guide for the submission of manuscripts is set out at the back of this issue. -
The South Australian Government Gazette
No. 10 769 THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE www.governmentgazette.sa.gov.au PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ALL PUBLIC ACTS appearing in this GAZETTE are to be considered official, and obeyed as such ADELAIDE, THURSDAY, 18 FEBRUARY 2010 CONTENTS Page Page Adelaide Park Lands Act 2005—Notice....................................771 Petroleum and Geothermal Energy Act 2000—Notice.............. 788 Appointments, Resignations, Etc...............................................770 Proclamations ............................................................................ 816 Corporations and District Councils—Notices............................863 Public Trustee Office—Administration of Estates .................... 864 Crown Lands Act 1929—Notice ...............................................771 REGULATIONS Development Act 1993—Notices..............................................771 Development Act 1993 (No. 18 of 2010) .............................. 846 Environment Protection (Waste to Resources) Notice 2010......795 Crown Land Management Act 2009 (No. 19 of 2010) .......... 848 Environment Protection (Waste to Resources) Liquor Licensing Act 1997— Policy 2010—Notice..............................................................796 (No. 20 of 2010)................................................................. 851 Equal Opportunity Tribunal—Notice ........................................771 (No. 21 of 2010)................................................................. 853 Fisheries Management Act 2007—Notices ...............................776 -
Front Section2010 V2.Indd
ANNUAL REPORT 31 December 2009 July 2010 © SACE Board of South Australia ABN 87 604 513 459 ISBN 978 1 74102 731 0 (online version) ISBN 978 1 74102 732 7 (printed version) ISSN 0815–2004 Prepared by the Communications Unit SACE Board of South Australia 60 Greenhill Road Wayville South Australia 5034 Telephone: +61 8 8372 7400 Facsimile: +61 8 8372 7590 Email: [email protected] Website Address: www.sace.sa.edu.au South Australian Certificate of Education 60 Greenhill Road Wayville SA 5034 Phone +61 8 8372 7400 Fax +61 8 8372 7590 [email protected] www.saceboard.sa.edu.au ABN 87 604 513 459 Tuesday 30 March 2010 To the Honourable Jay Weatherill, MP Minister for Education Dear Minister I am pleased to submit the 2009 Annual Report of the SACE Board of South Australia, in accordance with the SACE Board of South Australia Act 1983 and the Department of Premier and Cabinet Circular, PC013 — Annual Reporting Requirements (September 2009). This report documents the activities and achievements of the SACE Board of South Australia for the period 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2009. Yours sincerely Allan Dooley Presiding Member of the Board SACE Board of South Australia CONTENTS Presiding Member’s Statement 1 Chief Executive’s Statement 2 The SACE Board of South Australia 4 Plans and Objectives 7 Curriculum, Assessment, and Standards 9 Curriculum 9 Recognition of Other Learning 11 Quality Assurance 13 Assessment 14 Implementation of the new SACE 16 Policy Framework for the new SACE 16 Assessment and Reporting Model 16 Leaders Professional -
A Better Future for All Our Children: the Why and The
i C A N Impacts of Child Abuse & Neglect With evidence we can change Life Trajectories A better future for all our children: The Why and the How Showcasing new evidence on the Health, Social & Economic costs of failing our most vulnerable children Exploring the elements of an evidence-informed system response. Date/time: Monday August 16th 9:00am to 2:00pm “Purpose Drives Strategy” Location: SAHMRI Auditorium, Adelaide CE Dept of Premier & Cabinet 2021 Forum Program Chair first session: Professor Marnie Hughes-Warrington Deputy Vice Chancellor Research, UniSA 9:15 Open Professor Marnie Hughes-Warrington DVC Research, University of South Australia 9:20 Professor Leonie Segal: The Why - Health, Social & Economic Consequences of Child Maltreatment The theory (causal pathways) and empirical evidence on the impact of child abuse and neglect on early death, ED presentations, intergenerational transmission, and child development. The case for a new approach that prioritises infants, children, and their families. Includes a short Q & A. 10:15 Helen Connolly: SA Commissioner for Children and Young People The Why? What children say about their lives and the things that matter to them. 10:25 Thrive by Five, CEO Jay Weatherill The How? A focus on early childhood education. Break 10:40 - 11:00 Chair second session: Penny Wright, Guardian for Children and Young People, SA 11:00 Professor Leonie Segal – Elements of an evidence-based response – Needs-driven early child development and parent-infant services. Build on SA Children’s Centres as a universal platform- to offer a response proportionate to need, with cross portfolio governance including Education, Health, Human Services, DCP. -
Winter 2016 a Publication of South Australian Native Title Services
Aboriginal Way Issue 63, Winter 2016 A publication of South Australian Native Title Services NAIDOC Week Jack Buckskin performing at NAIDOC ceremony. Full story and more photos on page 11. Photo: Clark Rodda at Festival Photo. Inside: APY Land Rights Act changes 6 Recognition or Treaty – is there an either/or choice? 8 Reconciliation Day 14 National Sorry Day 22 State Government seeks social and community consent for new nuclear waste site The South Australian Government is currently looking to set up a nuclear waste storage facility in the state. The facility would receive and store used nuclear fuel and intermediate level waste from overseas. The state nuclear waste site would be in addition to a new Federal Government nuclear waste site, which has been proposed for Barnidoota north of Port Augusta, situated on Adnyamathanha land. The South Australian Government dump was recommended by the final report of the Royal Commission into the Nuclear Fuel Cycle which was released in May 2016. The report rejected the idea of further mining or processing of uranium, or nuclear power generation, but said that a waste facility could generate Above left: Khatija Thomas. Above right: SANTS CEO Keith Thomas. considerable income for the state. landowners to launch an alliance to The Government has also established a the work of CARA, the Nuclear Fuel Cycle protest the two dumps. new unit within the Department of Royal Commission Consultation and Social consent Premier and Cabinet – the Nuclear Fuel Response Advisory Board. The No Dump Alliance says on its Cycle Royal Commission Consultation means that there website that “South Australia is a proud Mr Parry Agius is a member of and Response Agency (CARA), which needs to be sufficient state rich in possibilities, clever people, that Board, he was selected for his will “aid community understanding culture, creativity and breathtaking commitment to effective consultation broad public support of the Royal Commission’s report and nature. -
Philip Payton Contents
Labor and the Radical Tradition in South Australia Philip Payton Contents Foreword – Hon. Jay Weatherill vii Labor or Labour? x Preface xi PART ONE RADICAL TRADITIONS 1 Radical Traditions – South Australia 3 2 Radical Traditions – The Cornish at Home and Abroad 25 PART TWO COPPER AND ORGANISED LABOR 3 1848 and All That – Antipodean Chartists? 55 4 Moonta, Wallaroo and the Rise of Trade Unionism 75 PART THREE RISE AND FALL 5 Towards Parliamentary Representation 121 6 Labor in Power – Tom Price and John Verran 152 7 Labor and the Conscription Crisis 187 8 Between the Wars 222 PART FOUR THE NATURAL PARTY OF GOVERNMENT? 9 The Dunstan Era 261 10 Life After Dunstan – To Bannon and Beyond 290 Epilogue 306 Notes 310 Index 349 Foreword The election, in May 1891, of Richard ‘Dicky’ Hooper – a Cornish miner from Moonta – as the first Labor MP in State Parliament might have represented a shock to the political establishment of South Australia. But his historic victory, in fact, resulted from the inception and steady growth of a determined and well-organised local labor movement – one that owed much of its origins to the zeal of Cornish copper miners who settled in the Mid North and on Yorke Peninsula during the early decades of the colony. As Philip Payton explains in this meticulously researched and superbly told story, among the many cultural traditions the Cornish brought with them was a belief in education and self-improvement, a deep devotion to the Methodist faith and an oftentimes fiery attachment to radical politics. In their vii adopted home of South Australia, these traits helped create an embryonic trade union movement and, in turn, led to the formation of the forerunner of today’s Labor Party. -
Ministers Responsible for Agriculture Since Parliamentary Government Commenced in October 1856 and Heads of the Department of Agriculture/PISA/PIRSA
Ministers responsible for Agriculture since Parliamentary government commenced in October 1856 and Heads of the Department of Agriculture/PISA/PIRSA Dates Government Dates of Minister Ministerial title Name of Head of Date range portfolio Department Department of Head 1856– Boyle Travers 24.10.1856– Charles Bonney Commissioner of Crown 1857 Finniss 21.8.1857 Lands and Immigration 1857 John Baker 21.8.1857– William Milne Commissioner of Crown 1.9.1857 Lands and Immigration 1857 Robert Torrens 1.9.1857– Marshall McDermott Commissioner of Crown 30.10.1857 Lands and Immigration 1857– Richard Hanson 30.9.1857– Francis Stacker Dutton Commissioner of Crown 1860 2.6.1859 Lands and Immigration 2.6.1859– John Bentham Neales Commissioner of Crown 5.7.1859 Lands and Immigration 5.7.1859– William Milne Commissioner of Crown 9.5.1860 Lands and Immigration 1860– Thomas 9.5.1860– John Tuthill Bagot Commissioner of Crown 1861 Reynolds 20.5.1861 Lands and Immigration 1861 Thomas 20.5.1861– Henry Bull Templar Commissioner of Crown Reynolds 8.10.1861 Strangways Lands and Immigration 1861 George 8.10.1861– Matthew Moorhouse Commissioner of Crown Waterhouse 17.10.1861 Lands and Immigration 1861– George 17.10.1861– Henry Bull Templar Commissioner of Crown 1863 Waterhouse 4.7.1863 Strangways Lands and Immigration 1863 Francis Dutton 4.7.1863– Francis Stacker Dutton Commissioner of Crown 15.7.1863 Lands and Immigration 1863– Henry Ayers 15.7.1863– Lavington Glyde Commissioner of Crown 1864 22.7.1864 Lands and Immigration 1864 Henry Ayers 22.7.1864– William Milne