DOCSLIB.ORG

Feeding and Eating Conditions Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC) in DSM-5

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Feeding and Eating Conditions Not Elsewhere Classified (NEC) inDSM-5 Tiffany A. Brown, MS; Pamela K. Keel, PhD; and Ruth H. Striegel, PhD long with changes to the formally recognized eating disorders, the ADiagnostic and Statistical Man- ual, Fifth Edition Eating Disorder Work Group has recommended that the DSM- IV eating disorder not otherwise specified category be renamed: Feeding and eating conditions not elsewhere classified. This change reflects the inclusion of childhood feeding disorders within the eat- ing disorder classification scheme, as well as the focus on reducing the ambiguous and “catch-all” nature of eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS). While there is not currently enough rigorous sci- Tiffany A. Brown, MS, is a doctoral candi- date in Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Florida State University. Pamela K. Keel, PhD, is Professor of Psychology, De- partment of Psychology, Florida State Uni- versity. Ruth H. Striegel, PhD, is Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychology, Wes- leyan University. Address correspondence to: Ruth H. Strie- gel, PhD, Department of Psychology, Wesley- an University, 207 High Street, Middletown, CT 06459; email: [email protected]. Disclosure: The authors have no relevant financial relationships to disclose. Copyright ©2012, American Psychiatric Association. All rights reserved. doi: 10.3928/00485713-20121105-08 © Shutterstock PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS 42:11 | NOVEMBER 2012 Healio.com/Psychiatry | 421 entific evidence to categorize the proposed category. The inclusion of BED as a for- specified nature of the residualDSM-IV conditions as disorders, a diagnosis of not mally recognized disorder, along with the EDNOS category itself has been a major elsewhere classified (NEC) is warranted expansion of the AN and BN categories, roadblock to initiating research and pro- if the individual has an eating disturbance has helped reduce what conditions remain viding useful guidelines for clinical prac- that is clinically significant, but does not in the “residual” diagnostic group by re- tice. With this issue in mind, further reor- meet criteria for any other feeding or eat- allocating what were formerly several ganization and specification was needed ing disorder. Thus, the NEC category is atypical or subthreshold presentations within this category to facilitate greater not meant to capture disordered eating, (eg, AN without amenorrhea or BN with understanding regarding some of the al- which can be present among the general once per week binge/purge episodes). ternative syndromes that have been iden- population, but rather, eating conditions tified in research and clinical practice. that may cause significant distress, inter- Consistent with the broader change ference with daily life, and/or increased in the nomenclature from “not otherwise risk of death or disability. specified” to “not elsewhere classified,” From a practitioner’s standpoint, in- the DSM-5 work group has focused dividuals seeking treatment for eating on specifying and defining subgroups problems are likely either experiencing within EDNOS. While DSM-IV EDNOS distress and/or impairment that are clini- included several examples of unnamed cally significant. Proposed conditions in- syndromes, DSM-5 will include several cluded in NEC are: atypical anorexia ner- named syndromes with brief descriptions vosa (atypical AN); subthreshold bulimia (but without formal diagnostic criteria) nervosa (subthreshold BN); subthresh- within three categories: (1) atypical, old binge eating disorder (subthreshold mixed, or subthreshold syndromes; (2) BED); purging disorder (PD); and night other specific syndromes; and (3) condi- eating syndrome (NES). Treatment-seek- Several studies have shown tions with insufficient information. Nota- ing samples of bulimic-related EDNOS bly, for all NEC conditions, no minimum syndromes, which would include many, that with these revisions, the frequency or duration requirements are if not most, of the conditions proposed designated. This decision was made, in for NEC, are at increased risk of death by proportion of NEC diagnoses large part, because there is no available suicide,1 supporting the severity of illness will decrease dramatically. research that would have guided more among patients who will fall within the specific frequency or duration thresh- NEC category. olds. Thus, it is left to clinical judgment Unlike the clear hierarchy proposed for Indeed, several studies have shown to distinguish a clinically significant eat- diagnoses of AN, BN, and BED, there is that with these revisions, the proportion ing disorder from disordered eating. currently no specified diagnostic hierarchy of NEC diagnoses will decrease dramati- for NEC conditions. With this understood, cally.2,3 In a community-based sample, Atypical and Subthreshold practitioners should only diagnose an indi- the use of DSM-IV vs. DSM-5 criteria Presentations vidual with a single NEC condition, based resulted in 63% EDNOS versus 53% Regarding the first category of NEC on the best match between the description NEC, respectively (P < .001).2 Similarly, (atypical AN, subthreshold BN, sub- of NEC conditions and that individual’s among a treatment-seeking sample, esti- threshold BED), descriptive changes specific constellation of symptoms. mates of EDNOS decreased from 53% were warranted based on revisions to to 25% for NEC (P < .001).3 As evident diagnostic criteria for full threshold CLINICAL UTILITY OF NEC from these studies, while proposed revi- disorders. Given that the changes to A large emphasis for revisions of sions will reduce the “catch-all” nature of diagnostic criteria for AN and BN and DSM-5 was to reduce the preponderance the EDNOS category somewhat, DSM-5 the inclusion of BED as a formal diag- of DSM-IV EDNOS diagnoses without NEC is still likely to represent a sizeable nosis reallocated a substantial propor- reducing diagnostic validity of recog- minority of patients in clinical settings tion of patients from DSM-IV EDNOS nized categories, such as AN and BN. and the majority of clinically significant to DSM-5 full-threshold diagnoses, the Perhaps the largest revision is the recom- eating disorders in community settings. definitions of what constitute atypical or mendation that BED be “promoted” from In addition to the need to reduce the subthreshold presentations were in need a form of EDNOS to a formal diagnostic profusion of EDNOS diagnoses, the un- of modification. 422 | Healio.com/Psychiatry PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS 42:11 | NOVEMBER 2012 Purging Disorder contributed to the chronicity of obesity Given that increased freedom has been Regarding other specific syndromes, among a case series of 23 obese individu- designated to the practitioner to define purging disorder (PD), which reflects the als.14 While NES has not been mentioned what qualifies as “low weight” when di- most commonly used specific name for in any iteration of the DSM, advocacy agnosing AN, diagnoses of AN among this symptom configuration across recent from researchers led to a rigorous scien- those who are underweight will largely ex- studies,4 was first introduced as a poten- tific evaluation of NES to determine how clude them from being assigned to NEC. tial description of an atypical eating dis- it may be addressed within DSM-5. Because a central feature of AN is low order in 1986.5 An unnamed version of The largest limitation within the NES weight, the descriptor of “atypical” ap- PD was added as an example descriptor research literature has been lack of agree- pears appropriate for this NEC condition. of EDNOS in DSM-III-R,6 and as Ex- ment on a definitive syndromal definition The other two conditions in this sub- ample 4 in DSM-IV7 (“the regular use of and some debate regarding whether the category of NEC include subthreshold inappropriate compensatory behavior by condition described as NES best repre- conditions. Example 3 from DSM-IV individuals with normal body weight af- sents a syndrome or a set of symptoms.15 EDNOS has been aptly named sub- ter eating small amounts of food”). More Several studies have found support for in- threshold BN, which accurately reflects detailed and rigorous studies of the con- creased pathology on a number of psycho- a syndrome identical to DSM-5 BN, al- dition have produced a clearer descrip- logical correlates for NES as compared to beit with a frequency of less than once tion and name for purging disorder. healthy controls; however, the variables per week or less than 3 months in dura- Several studies have demonstrated examined have differed across research tion. Since the designation of BED as a the clinical significance of PD and its studies (eg, depressive symptoms, anxiety full-threshold eating disorder, subthresh- distinction from non-eating disordered symptoms, substance-use problems, psy- old BED also will be included within the individuals.8-10 A lesser number of stud- chiatric diagnoses) making it difficult to NEC conditions (with identical frequen- ies have demonstrated physiological and draw definitive conclusions overall.15 cy criteria as for subthreshold BN). psychological differences between PD Further, several other methodological Reflecting the definition used in re- and BN;11,12 however, these differences issues exist within the NES research lit- search on PD in recent years, PD will be have been less consistently studied and erature, including lack of data regarding described by recurrent purging behaviors found.13 Finally, studies examining the the prevalence and course of NES, and
Recommended publications
  • GUIDEBOOK for NUTRITION TREATMENT of EATING DISORDERS

    GUIDEBOOK for NUTRITION TREATMENT of EATING DISORDERS

    GUIDEBOOK for NUTRITION TREATMENT of EATING DISORDERS Authored by ACADEMY FOR EATING DISORDERS NUTRITION WORKING GROUP GUIDEBOOK for NUTRITION TREATMENT of EATING DISORDERS AUTHORED BY ACADEMY FOR EATING DISORDERS NUTRITION WORKING GROUP Jillian G. (Croll) Lampert, PhD, RDN, LDN, MPH, FAED; Chief Strategy Officer, The Emily Program, St. Paul, MN Therese S. Waterhous, PhD, CEDRD-S, FAED; Owner, Willamette Nutrition Source, Corvallis, OR Leah L. Graves, RDN, LDN, CEDRD-S, FAED; Vice President of Nutrition and Culinary Services, Veritas Collaborative, Durham, NC Julia Cassidy, MS, RDN, CEDRDS; Director of Nutrition and Wellness for Adolescent Programs, ED RTC Division Operations Team, Center for Discovery, Long Beach, CA Marcia Herrin, EdD, MPH, RDN, LD, FAED; Clinical Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine and Owner, Herrin Nutrition Services, Lebanon, NH GUIDEBOOK FOR NUTRITION TREATMENT OF EATING DISORDERS ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction to this Guide . 1 2. Introduction to Eating Disorders . 1 3. Working with Individuals and Support Systems. 6 4. Nutritional Assessment for Eating Disorders . 7 5. Weight Stigma . .14 6. Body Image Concerns. .15 7. Laboratory Values Related to Nutrition Status . 18 8. Refeeding Syndrome . .23 9. Medications with Nutrition Implications . .26 10. Nutrition Counseling for Each Diagnosis. .31 11. Managing Eating Disordered-Related Behaviors . 42 12. Food Plans: Prescriptive Eating to Mindful and Intuitive Eating . 46 13. Treatment Approaches for Excessive Exercise/Activity . 48 14. Treatment Approach for Vegetarianism and Veganism . 50 15. Levels of Care. .55 16. Nutrition and Mental Function . 57 17. Conclusions . .59 GUIDEBOOK FOR NUTRITION TREATMENT OF EATING DISORDERS iii 1. INTRODUCTION TO THIS GUIDE Nutrition issues in AN: The diets of individuals with AN are typically low in calories, limited in This publication, created by the Academy for Eating variety, and marked by avoidance or fears about Disorders Nutrition Working Group, contains basic foods high in fat, sugar, and/or carbohydrates.
  • Eating Disorders 101 Understanding Eating Disorders Anne Marie O’Melia, MS, MD, FAAP Chief Medical Officer Eating Recovery Center

    Eating Disorders 101 Understanding Eating Disorders Anne Marie O’Melia, MS, MD, FAAP Chief Medical Officer Eating Recovery Center

    Eating Disorders 101 Understanding Eating Disorders Anne Marie O’Melia, MS, MD, FAAP Chief Medical Officer Eating Recovery Center 1 Learning Objectives 1. List the diagnostic criteria and review the typical clinical symptoms for common eating disorders. 2. Become familiar with the biopsychosocial model for understanding the causes of eating disorders. 3. Understand treatment options and goals for eating disorder recovery 2 Declaration of Conflict of Interest I have no relevant financial relationships with the manufacturer(s) of any commercial product(s) and/or provider (s) of commercial services discussed in this CE/CME activity. 3 What is an eating disorder? Eating disorders are serious, life- threatening, multi-determined illnesses that require expert care. 4 Eating Disorders May Be Invisible • Eating disorders occur in males and females • People in average and large size bodies can experience starvation and malnourishment • Even experienced clinicians may not recognize the medical consequences of EDs 5 Importance of Screening and Early Detection . Delay in appropriate treatment results in – Associated with numerous med/psych/social complications – These may not be completely reversible – Long-lasting implications on development . Longer the ED persists, the harder it is to treat – Crude mortality rate is 4 - 5%, higher than any other psychiatric disorder (Crow et al 2009). – Costs for AN treatment and quality of life indicators, if progresses into adulthood, rivals Schizophrenia (Streigel- Moore et al, 2000). 6 AN-Diagnostic Criteria
  • The Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Disorders Bob Boland MD Slide 1

    The Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Disorders Bob Boland MD Slide 1

    The Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Disorders Bob Boland MD Slide 1 Psychotic Disorders Slide 2 As with all the disorders, it is preferable to pick Archetype one “archetypal” disorder for the category of • Schizophrenia disorder, understand it well, and then know the others as they compare. For the psychotic disorders, the diagnosis we will concentrate on will be Schizophrenia. Slide 3 A good way to organize discussions of Phenomenology phenomenology is by using the same structure • The mental status exam as the mental status examination. – Appearance –Mood – Thought – Cognition – Judgment and Insight Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Disorders. Slide 4 Motor disturbances include disorders of Appearance mobility, activity and volition. Catatonic – Motor disturbances • Catatonia stupor is a state in which patients are •Stereotypy • Mannerisms immobile, mute, yet conscious. They exhibit – Behavioral problems •Hygiene waxy flexibility, or assumption of bizarre • Social functioning – “Soft signs” postures as most dramatic example. Catatonic excitement is uncontrolled and aimless motor activity. It is important to differentiate from substance-induced movement disorders, such as extrapyramidal symptoms and tardive dyskinesia. Slide 5 Disorders of behavior may involve Appearance deterioration of social functioning-- social • Behavioral Problems • Social functioning withdrawal, self neglect, neglect of • Other – Ex. Neuro soft signs environment (deterioration of housing, etc.), or socially inappropriate behaviors (talking to themselves in
  • Dsm-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Eating Disorders Anorexia Nervosa

    Dsm-5 Diagnostic Criteria for Eating Disorders Anorexia Nervosa

    DSM-5 DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR EATING DISORDERS ANOREXIA NERVOSA DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA To be diagnosed with anorexia nervosa according to the DSM-5, the following criteria must be met: 1. Restriction of energy intaKe relative to requirements leading to a significantly low body weight in the context of age, sex, developmental trajectory, and physical health. 2. Intense fear of gaining weight or becoming fat, even though underweight. 3. Disturbance in the way in which one's body weight or shape is experienced, undue influence of body weight or shape on self-evaluation, or denial of the seriousness of the current low body weight. Even if all the DSM-5 criteria for anorexia are not met, a serious eating disorder can still be present. Atypical anorexia includes those individuals who meet the criteria for anorexia but who are not underweight despite significant weight loss. Research studies have not found a difference in the medical and psychological impacts of anorexia and atypical anorexia. BULIMIA NERVOSA DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA According to the DSM-5, the official diagnostic criteria for bulimia nervosa are: • Recurrent episodes of binge eating. An episode of binge eating is characterized by both of the following: o Eating, in a discrete period of time (e.g. within any 2-hour period), an amount of food that is definitely larger than most people would eat during a similar period of time and under similar circumstances. o A sense of lacK of control over eating during the episode (e.g. a feeling that one cannot stop eating or control what or how much one is eating).
  • Is Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified Less

    Is Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified Less

    J Autism Dev Disord DOI 10.1007/s10803-010-1155-z ORIGINAL PAPER Is Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified Less Stable Than Autistic Disorder? A Meta-Analysis Eme´lie Rondeau • Leslie S. Klein • Andre´ Masse • Nicolas Bodeau • David Cohen • Jean-Marc Guile´ Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 Abstract We reviewed the stability of the diagnosis of Keywords Validity Á Diagnosis Á Autistic disorder Á pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified Pervasive developmental disorder Á Autism Á Meta-analysis (PDD-NOS). A Medline search found eight studies reiter- ating a diagnostic assessment for PDD-NOS. The pooled group included 322 autistic disorder (AD) and 122 PDD- Introduction NOS cases. We used percentage of individuals with same diagnose at Times 1 and 2 as response criterion. The Over the past 15 years, there has been increasing interest in pooled Relative Risk was 1.95 (p \ 0.001) showing that the early identification of autism spectrum disorders AD diagnostic stability was higher than PDD-NOS. When (ASD). In that respect, several studies have examined the diagnosed before 36 months PDD-NOS bore a 3-year sta- stability of early diagnosis (Lord 1995; Cox et al. 1999; bility rate of 35%. Examining the developmental trajecto- Moore and Goodson 2003; Charman et al. 2005). In ries showed that PDD-NOS corresponded to a group of keeping with those studies, we conducted a meta-analysis heterogeneous pathological conditions including prodromic focussing on the stability of the diagnosis of pervasive forms of later AD, remitted or less severe forms of AD, and developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD- developmental delays in interaction and communication.
  • CREDN Gaudiani Talk 2.2018

    CREDN Gaudiani Talk 2.2018

    2/12/18 Beyond the Basics: Medical Topics Important for Special Populations with Eating Disorders Jennifer L. Gaudiani, MD, CEDS, FAED Founder & Medical Director, Gaudiani Clinic Columbia River Eating Disorder Network Conference Objectives: By the end of the presentation, attendees will: 1. Feel more confident managing a variety of outpatient presentations medically, and communicating with patients, families, and other providers accordingly 2. Recognize when a patient may be appropriate for a palliative care approach 3. Have a stronger understanding of the unmeasurable medical problems experienced by those with eating disorders Purging 1 2/12/18 Cassie • Cassie is a 24 year old cis-gender female with bulimia nervosa • She binges and purges for a few hours, four days a week (with rinsing) • Escalating use of laxatives (now using 8 senna a day) • Distressed that every time she reduces her laxatives, or has a day where she only binges and purges once, her weight shoots up 5 lbs • Her cheeks swell painfully on days she doesn’t vomit • She’s sure she’s “not sick,” because her body weight is “normal.” Types of purging • About 50% of patients vomit only • 25% vomit and abuse laxatives • Fewer than 10% vomit & use laxatives & use diuretics • Fewer than 5% use diuretics or laxatives only Rinsing • Drinking water after purging and then purging up the water to “rinse” the stomach of any further kcals missed • Use of cold water can cause hypothermia • Patients can feel extremely cold, with particularly white/cold hands and feet • Hypothermia can kill 2 2/12/18 Diuretics • Strongest are loop diuretics • Lasix (name) • Causes excretion of salt and water from the kidneys • Can lead to kidney failure, profound volume depletion, contraction metabolic alkalosis, hypokalemia • Severe Pseudo-Bartter syndrome Laxatives • Good guys (not typically harmful): Miralax, milk of magnesia, magnesium citrate, colace • Bad guys (when overused): Senna/Senokot, Bisacodyl, Dulcolax Laxatives • Use is highly prevalent in those who purge: 14- 75% Winstead NS, Willard SG.
  • Towards Specifying Pervasive Developmental Disorder – Not

    Towards Specifying Pervasive Developmental Disorder – Not

    Toward specifying pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified. Mandy W, Charman T, Gilmour J, Skuse D. Autism Res. 2011 Feb 4. doi: 10.1002/aur.178. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 21298812 Towards specifying Pervasive Developmental Disorder – Not Otherwise Specified. William Mandy DClinPsy Tony Charman PhD Jane Gilmour PhD David Skuse MD Running title: PDD-NOS Drs Mandy and Gilmour are at the Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK, WC1N 6BT. Professor Charman is at the Centre for Research in Autism Education, Institute of Education, 15 Woburn Square, London, UK, WC1H 0AL. Professor Skuse is at the Behavioural and Brain Science Unit, UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, UK, WC1E 1EH. Correspondence to Dr William Mandy, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, UK, WC1N 6BT. Email [email protected] Telephone: 00 44 (0)207 679 1675 Fax: 00 44 (0)207 916 1989 1 Towards Specifying Pervasive Developmental Disorder – Not Otherwise Specified LAY ABSTRACT Pervasive developmental disorder – not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS) is the most common and least satisfactory of the PDD diagnoses. It is not clearly defined in the diagnostic manuals, limiting the consistency with which it is used by researchers and clinicians. This in turn limits the amount that we have learnt about people with PDD-NOS. In a sample of 256 young people (mean age = 9.1 years) we aimed to implement a clear, transparent definition of PDD-NOS, and then to describe those receiving this diagnosis (n=66), investigating whether they differed from people with autistic disorder (n=97) and Asperger’s disorder (n=93).
  • The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders Diagnostic Criteria for Research

    The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders Diagnostic Criteria for Research

    The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders Diagnostic criteria for research World Health Organization Geneva The World Health Organization is a specialized agency of the United Nations with primary responsibility for international health matters and public health. Through this organization, which was created in 1948, the health professions of some 180 countries exchange their knowledge and experience with the aim of making possible the attainment by all citizens of the world by the year 2000 of a level of health that will permit them to lead a socially and economically productive life. By means of direct technical cooperation with its Member States, and by stimulating such cooperation among them, WHO promotes the development of comprehensive health services, the prevention and control of diseases, the improvement of environmental conditions, the development of human resources for health, the coordination and development of biomedical and health services research, and the planning and implementation of health programmes. These broad fields of endeavour encompass a wide variety of activities, such as developing systems of primary health care that reach the whole population of Member countries; promoting the health of mothers and children; combating malnutrition; controlling malaria and other communicable diseases including tuberculosis and leprosy; coordinating the global strategy for the prevention and control of AIDS; having achieved the eradication of smallpox, promoting mass immunization against a number of other
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder 299.00 (F84.0)

    Autism Spectrum Disorder 299.00 (F84.0)

    Autism Spectrum Disorder 299.00 (F84.0) Diagnostic Criteria according to the Diagnostic Statistical Manual V A. Persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction across multiple contexts, as manifested by the following, currently or by history (examples are illustrative, not exhaustive, see text): 1. Deficits in social-emotional reciprocity, ranging, for example, from abnormal social approach and failure of normal back-and-forth conversation; to reduced sharing of interests, emotions, or affect; to failure to initiate or respond to social interactions. 2. Deficits in nonverbal communicative behaviors used for social interaction, ranging, for example, from poorly integrated verbal and nonverbal communication; to abnormalities in eye contact and body language or deficits in understanding and use of gestures; to a total lack of facial expressions and nonverbal communication. 3. Deficits in developing, maintaining, and understanding relationships, ranging, for example, from difficulties adjusting behavior to suit various social contexts; to difficulties in sharing imaginative play or in making friends; to absence of interest in peers. Specify current severity – Social Communication: Level 1 – Requiring Support 2- Substantial Support 3-Very Substantial Support Please refer to attached table for definition of levels. B. Restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities, as manifested by at least two of the following, currently or by history (examples are illustrative, not exhaustive; see text): 1. Stereotyped or repetitive motor movements, use of objects, or speech (e.g., simple motor stereotypies, lining up toys or flipping objects, echolalia, idiosyncratic phrases). 2. Insistence on sameness, inflexible adherence to routines, or ritualized patterns or verbal nonverbal behavior (e.g., extreme distress at small changes, difficulties with transitions, rigid thinking patterns, greeting rituals, need to take same route or eat food every day).
  • A Guide to Selecting Evidence-Based Psychological Therapies for Eating Disorders

    A Guide to Selecting Evidence-Based Psychological Therapies for Eating Disorders

    A Guide to Selecting Evidence-based Psychological Therapies for Eating Disorders Academy for Eating Disorders® (First edition, 2020) A Guide to Selecting Evidence-based Psychological Therapies for Eating Disorders Academy for Eating Disorders® (First edition, 2020) DISCLAIMER: This document, created by the Academy for Eating Disorders’ Psychological Care Guidelines Task Force, is intended as a resource to promote the use of evidence-based psychological treatments for eating disorders. It is not a comprehensive clinical guide. Every attempt was made to provide information based on the best available evidence. For further resources, visit: www.aedweb.org Members of the AED Psychological Care Guidelines Task Force Lucy Serpell (Co-chair) Laura Collins Lyster-Mensh (Co-chair) Anja Hilbert Carol Peterson Glenn Waller Lucene Wisniewski A GUIDE TO SELECTING EVIDENCE-BASED PSYCHOLOGICAL THERAPIES FOR EATING DISORDERS II Table of Contents Background .....................................................................................................................1 Eating Disorders .............................................................................................................1 Important Facts about Eating Disorders ...............................................................2 Purpose of this Guide ..................................................................................................2 A Note to Patients and Their Loved Ones and Policymakers ..........................3 Evidence-Based Guidelines for Psychological Therapies
  • Eating Disorders

    Eating Disorders

    Care Process Model AUGUST 2013 MANAGEMENT OF Eating Disorders This care process model (CPM) and accompanying patient education were developed by a multidisciplinary team including primary care physicians (PCPs), mental health specialists, registered dietitians, and eating disorder specialists, under the leadership of Intermountain Healthcare’s Behavioral Health Clinical Program. Based on national guidelines and emerging evidence and shaped by local expert opinion, this CPM provides practical strategies for early recognition, diagnosis, and effective treatment of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge-eating disorder, and other eating disorders. Why Focus ON EATING DISORDERS? WHAT’S INSIDE? • Eating disorders are more common than assumed, especially in young OVERVIEW . 2 women — and often underdiagnosed . In the U.S., 20 million women and 10 ALGORITHM AND NOTES . 4 million men suffer from a clinically significant eating disorder during their lives, DIAGNOSIS IN PRIMARY CARE . 6 and many cases are unlikely to be reported.NEDA Median age of onset for eating disorders is 18 to 21.AFP2 Diagnosis can be challenging due to the denial and MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM . 9 secretive behaviors associated with eating disorders. GENERAL TREATMENT • Eating disorders can lead to significant morbidity and mortality . Risk of GUIDELINES . 15 premature death is 6 to 12 times higher in women with anorexia nervosa.AED EMERGENCY TREATMENT . 16 • Early diagnosis and treatment can prevent hospitalizations, morbidity, INPATIENT TREATMENT . 17 and mortality . Early
  • ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2018 (October 1, 2017 - September 30, 2018)

    ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2018 (October 1, 2017 - September 30, 2018)

    ICD-10-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting FY 2018 (October 1, 2017 - September 30, 2018) Narrative changes appear in bold text Items underlined have been moved within the guidelines since the FY 2017 version Italics are used to indicate revisions to heading changes The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), two departments within the U.S. Federal Government’s Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) provide the following guidelines for coding and reporting using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM). These guidelines should be used as a companion document to the official version of the ICD-10- CM as published on the NCHS website. The ICD-10-CM is a morbidity classification published by the United States for classifying diagnoses and reason for visits in all health care settings. The ICD-10-CM is based on the ICD-10, the statistical classification of disease published by the World Health Organization (WHO). These guidelines have been approved by the four organizations that make up the Cooperating Parties for the ICD-10-CM: the American Hospital Association (AHA), the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA), CMS, and NCHS. These guidelines are a set of rules that have been developed to accompany and complement the official conventions and instructions provided within the ICD-10-CM itself. The instructions and conventions of the classification take precedence over guidelines. These guidelines are based on the coding and sequencing instructions in the Tabular List and Alphabetic Index of ICD-10-CM, but provide additional instruction.