Environmental Assessment Report

Initial E nvironmental E xamination for SH-51: P achor–Chapikheda–Zirapur– P roject Road Project Number: 43063 November 2010

IND: State Roads Project III

Prepared by Government of Madhya Pradesh for the Asian Development Bank (ADB).

The initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

Table of Contents Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………vii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Project Background/Rationale ...... 1 1.2. Project Preparatory Technical Assistance (PPTA) and Environmental Assessment ...... 2 1.3. Purpose of the Study ...... 2 1.4. Extent of IEE ...... 3 1.5. IEE Content ...... 3 1.6. Team Composition and Acknowledgements ...... 3 1.7. Methodology ...... 3 1.7.1. Information/ data Sources ...... 4 1.7.2. Public Consultation ...... 5 2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 6 2.1. Country’s Legal Framework and Regulatory Requirements for the Project ...... 6 2.2. Environmental Clearance Process ...... 7 2.3. Administrative Structure and the Interactive framework ...... 8 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 10 3.1. Project Location ...... 10 3.2. Characteristics of the Existing road ...... 11 3.3. Category of the Project ...... 14 3.4. Need for the Sub-Project ...... 14 3.5. Existing and Projected Traffic ...... 15 3.6. Key Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Activities ...... 16 3.7. Material required and Sourcing ...... 22 3.8. Project Implementation Schedule and Cost ...... 24 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 25 4.2. Physical Environment ...... 26 4.2.1. Meteorology and Climate ...... 26 4.2.2. Air and Noise Quality ...... 28 4.2.3. Topography and Geomorphology ...... 29 4.2.4. Geology/Soil ...... 30 4.2.5. Seismicity ...... 31 4.2.6. Land use ...... 32 4.2.7. Hydrology and Drainage ...... 33 4.2.8. Groundwater ...... 34 4.2.9. Surface water ...... 34 4.3. Ecological Resources ...... 36 4.3.1. Terrestrial Ecology ...... 36 4.3.2. Fauna ...... 40 4.3.3. Aquatic Ecology ...... 45 4.4. Socio-Economic Environment ...... 45 4.5. Social and Cultural Resources ...... 47 4.5.1. Population and Communities ...... 47 4.5.2. Literacy ...... 49 4.5.3. Occupational Status ...... 49 4.5.4. Structures or sites of historical, archaeological, paleontological, or architectural significance ...... 50 ii

5. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND ITS MITIGATION MEASURES 51 5.1.1. Climate ...... 51 5.1.2. Natural Hazard ...... 52 5.1.3. Air Quality ...... 52 5.1.4. Noise ...... 53 5.1.5. Impact on Land and Soil ...... 54 5.1.6. Groundwater ...... 58 5.1.7. Siltation and Surface Water Quality of Rivers and Other Water Bodies ...... 58 5.1.8. Hydrology and Drainage ...... 60 5.2. Impact on Biological Environment ...... 60 5.2.1. Terrestrial Ecology ...... 60 5.2.2. Aquatic Ecology ...... 66 5.2.3. Fauna ...... 67 5.3. Management of Construction Debris/Waste ...... 67 5.4. Socio-Economic Impact ...... 68 5.4.1. Positive Impacts ...... 68 5.4.2. Anticipated Negative Impacts ...... 68 5.4.3. Obstruction and Disruption of Traffic ...... 71 5.4.4. Transportation and Storage of Materials ...... 72 5.5. Cumulative and Induced Impact ...... 74 6. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 75 6.1. Consultation Method and Information Disclosed ...... 75 6.2. Compliance with Relevant Regulatory Requirements ...... 75 6.3. Beneficiaries’ Comments ...... 78 7. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND GRIEVANCE REDDRESS MECHANISM 80 7.1. Environmental Management Plan ...... 80 7.1.1. Social Development and Indigenous People Development Program (IPDP)80 7.1.2. Emergency Response Plan ...... 80 7.2. Environmental Monitoring Program (EMoP) ...... 80 7.2.1. Monitoring schedule and performance indicator ...... 81 7.2.2. Authorities and their Responsibilities for Implementation of EMoP ...... 82 7.3. Institutional Setting and Proposed Implementation Arrangement ...... 82 7.3.2. Institutional / Capacity Building ...... 86 7.4. Grievance Redress Mechanism ...... 88 8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 89 8.1. Conclusions ...... 89 8.2. Key Recommendations: ...... 90

List of Tables Table 1.1 : Road Sections under MP State Highways III Project ...... 1 Table 1.2 : Primary and Secondary Information Sources ...... 4 Table 2.1 : Permissions/Clearances Required for the Sub-Project ...... 6 Table 3.1 : Carriageway Details ...... 11 Table 3.2 : List of Major and Minor Intersections ...... 13 Table 3.3 : ADT of Project Road ...... 15 Table 3.4 : Summary of Projected Traffic for the Project Road ...... 16 Table 3.5 : Cement Concrete Lined Drain ...... 18 Table 3.6 : Crash Barrier Location ...... 19 Table 3.7 : Lighting ...... 20 iii

Table 3.8 : Bus Stop Locations ...... 20 Table 3.9 : Stone Pitching ...... 21 Table 3.10 : List of Borrow Area ...... 22 Table 4.1 : Summary of Important Features of the Project Districts ...... 25 Table 4.2 : Monthly Rainfall data (mm) in the project districts for the last six years ...... 28 Table 4.3 :Ambient Air Quality Along the project section (24 Hourly) ...... 29 Table 4.4 : Noise Level in dB (A) Along the Project Corridor ...... 29 Table 4.5 : Physiochemical Characteristics of soil in the project road ...... 31 Table 4.6 : Land Use Pattern in the State ...... 32 Table 4.7 : Chainage wise land use along the project road...... 33 Table 4.8 : Groundwater Quality Along the Project Corridor ...... 34 Table 4.9 : List of Surface Water Sources Along/Across Project Corridor ...... 35 Table 4.10 : Surface Water Quality in Project Area ...... 36 Table 4.11 : List of Plant Species found in the Study Area ...... 38 Table 4.12 : List of Fauna in the Study Area ...... 41 Table 4.13 : List of Reptiles in the Study Area ...... 41 Table 4.14 : List of Butterflies found in the study area ...... 41 Table 4.15 : List of Avifauna found in the Study Area ...... 42 Table 4.16 : Trees Along Project Road (within 20m width) ...... 43 Table 4.17 : Demographic Profile of the State and the country ...... 48 Table 4.18 : List of villages in the project road ...... 48 Table 5.1 : List of Noise- Sensitive Locations along the Alignment ...... 53 Table 5.2 List of Trees to be Cut ...... 61 Table 5.3 : List of Common Property Resources Along the Alignment ...... 73 Table 6.1 : Summary of Consultation held with various Government Departments ...... 76 Table 6.2 : Summary of Consultation with NGOs ...... 77 Table 6.3 : Consultation with local community ...... 79 Table 7.1 : Roles and Duties of Implementing Agency/Organisations ...... 83 Table 7.2 : Combined Training Budget for MPSRP II ...... 86

List of Figures Figure 2.1 : Environmental Clearance Procedure in ...... 8 Figure 2.2 : Legislative Interface among various regulatory bodies ...... 9 Figure 3.1 : Location Map of SH-51 ...... 10 Figure 3.2 : Connectivity to the project Road ...... 11 Figure 3.3 : Typical Cross section of the project Road ...... 17 Figure 4.1 : Isohyetal map of Madhya Pradesh ...... 27 Figure 4.2 : Hazard and Seismic Zoning Map ...... 32 Figure 4.3 : Drainage map of the project road SH-51 ...... 35 Figure 4.4 : Forest Cover Map of Madhya Pradesh ...... 37 Figure 4.5 : National Parks and Sanctuaries in Madhya pradesh ...... 40 Figure 4.6 : Demographic Status of the Project Section ...... 49 Figure 4.7 Literacy Rate Along the Project Section ...... 49 Figure 4.8 : Occupational status Along the Alignment ...... 50 Figure 7.1 : Proposed Structure for EMP/EMOP Implementation ...... 85

List of Appendix Appendix3.1 : Inventory and Survey Condition of Bridges ...... 92 Appendix3.2 : Rapid Environmental Assessment Checklist ...... 93 Appendix3.3 : Details of Chainage-wise Existing and Proposed Design Speed and Curve Radius ...... 97

iv

Appendix 4.1 : National Ambient Air Quality Standards ...... 98 Appendix 4.2 : Ambient Noise Level Limits (In Leq dB(A)), India ...... 99 Appendix 4.3 : Drinking Water Standards And Probable Effects on Human Health (BIS: IS: 10500, 1991) ...... 100 Appendix 4.4 : Water Quality Criteria And Standards for Freshwater Classification (CPCB, 1979) ...... 103 APPENDIX 5.1: Guidelines for Borrow Areas Management ...... 104 Appendix 7.1: Environmental Management Plan (SH-51: Pachor-Chapikheda-Zirapur- Machalpur-Soyat 86.707 km) ...... 108 Appendix 7.2: Monitoring Plan for the Performance Indicators ...... 130

v

Map 1: Location Map of MP State Highways Project

vi

Map 2: Location Map of SH-51: Pachor-Chapikheda-Zirapur-Machalpur Project vii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction 1. Madhya Pradesh, with abundant mineral resources, and growing agricultural and industrial production, need a well developed road network to cater to the increasing intra-state and regional traffic. Also, since it is centrally located within the country, most of the long haul north-south and east-west bound road traffic passes through the state. Therefore, the existing inadequate and damaged road infrastructure needs to be improved on priority to sustain the economic and social progress of the state. The improved road network with good interlinking between national, state highways and major district roads will not only contribute in significantly developing rural economy and reducing poverty but also increase the road capacity to cater the high projected traffic, reduce travel time and also contribute for lesser vehicular pollution emission. 2. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation (MPRDC), the executing agency (EA), is responsible to provide an integrated transport system in the state that is safe, efficient, affordable, accessible to all and environmentally sustainable. As per its mandate, MPRDC plans to improve various major district roads to at least two lanes carriage way level with funding support from Asian Development Bank (ADB). 3. To address this problem, Government of Madhya Pradesh (GOMP) has approached ADB for financial assistance for improving a total of 15 state roads covering a length of about 1081 kms under Madhya Pradesh State Highways III Project (MPSRSP III) programmed to be processed for implementation in 2010.The project also includes the institutional strengthening of the road sector under separate TA 7198(IND) which will enhance EA’s capacity for road asset development and management.

Description of Project 4. The proposed upgrading/rehabilitation of the State Highway-51: Pachor- Chapikheda-Zirapur-Machalpur-Soyat Sub-project, one of the 15 state highway subprojects, is divided into two sections, the Pachor-Machalpur section in covering 65.7 kms, pasing through border (12.2 km) and ending at Goghatpur-Soyat section covering 8.7 kms. The subproject will upgrade the existing bad to very bad road condition into a paved 2-lane divided carriageway configuration with improved road geometry, proper and adequate embankment, rehabilitation of existing bridges, adequate cross drainage structures and side drains, improvement of junctions/intersections, underpasses, and way side amenities. This road design will be adequate to cater to the volume of traffic until 2030 which is predicted to increase from the current range of 1470- 4689 to 3888-30097 vehicles (average annual daily traffic). The sub-project will be implemented in 18-24 months with an estimated cost of INR 1260 Million. 5. The sub-project was classified as Category-B as provided in the ADB Safeguard Policy Statement (2009) based on screening of likely impacts and sub-project location which does not pass through or located near any national park, wildlife sanctuary, or any other ecologically sensitive or protected areas. No

viii

archaeological/protected monument is located in the project vicinity. Under the EIA Notification, 2006 promulgated under Environment (Protection) Act 1986, the subproject is categorised as Category ‘B” and does not require prior environmental clearance from State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA)1. 6. IEE was conducted based on Detailed Project Report and sub-project details provided by the design team during the preparation of this report. The IEE covers all activities proposed under the project including various bridges and cross- drainage structures constructions. The core zone of impact is taken as 100 meters either side of the alignment. However, the study area impact zone is considered up to 7 km on both sides of road alignment to allow for a larger analysis of landuse and other environmental features.

Description of Environment 7. The Sub-Project passes through the districts – and Rajgarh. The climate of both the districts is characterized by hot summer and general dryness except during the south west monsoon season. The maximum temperature

during the month of May is 39.9 °C and 42.4°C with minimum during the month of January 9.6 °C and 11.3 °C in Shajapur and Rajgarh respectively. During the south- west monsoon season the relative humidity generally exceeds 88% (July / August month). The maximum and minimum wind velocity is observed to be 27.0 km / hr. and 7.1 km/hr during the month of November. 8. The ambient air quality levels conform to the prescribed National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) with concentrations of SPM, RSPM, SO2 and NOx ranging from 73.5 to 195.8 µg/m3, 26.7 to 87.5 µg/m3, 5.4 to 13.6 µg/m3 and 4.2 to 12.7 µg/m3 respectively in the project area. The noise levels are also within the prescribed limits. 9. The topography of the project road section is mixed type. The project road alignment traverses through plain terrain throughout except at two locations near Kushikhedi and Zirapur, where rolling terrain is found. The soil samples reveals that the dominant soil type is sandy clay loam with good organic content. 10. The predominant land use of the of the project districts is agricultural. Landuse/land cover of the proposed sub-project corridor is predominantly agricultural (nearly 48%) followed by Forests (28%). Built-up Area constitutes about less than 10% and rest is occupied for plantation, water bodies, community property resources, and miscellaneous use. 11. The project area is draining by few rivers like Kali sindh, Newaj and Kadal River and other small streams cross the project road. The Kali and Kadal river is found to be perennial on observation. The surface water sample taken from Kalisindh and Kadal River has been found suitable for Irrigation- Class D and propagation of wild life and fisheries -Class-E. The ground water availability along the project road area is poor. However, the quality conforms to the prescribed standards for drinking water.

1 The EA has yet to formally approach MoEF for formal categorisation and grant of environmental clearance.

ix

12. There are no wildlife-sanctuaries and national park near the project area. Since most part of the project corridor passes through open agricultural land, large number of roadside trees is not affected considering to the length of the project road. Trees along roadside are mainly non-fruit bearing in nature whereas privately owned orchards are mostly comprised of fruit bearing trees. The major species observed are Mango, teak, neem, jamun, palas, saja, seasam, mahua etc. During the survey langur and macaque were sighted in different locations. The existence of fauna like jackals, foxes, hare, and macaque was also reported. 13. Despite abundant water bodies in the project area, large scale/organized fishing was not observed along the project road due their seasonal behaviour. There is no breeding or spawning ground of these species in any of the water bodies in the project area since the water availability and flow velocity is quite low and unfavourable for breeding. No migratory fishes are found in these rivers. 14. The economy of Madhya Pradesh is based on agriculture, forest products, industries, mineral resources, and cottage industry sectors. The agriculture along the project section is dominated by Oilseed (Soyabeen in particular). The state is one of the largest producers of cement in the country. The major industries in the state are- cement, Pig Iron, Steel Ingots, News Prints and Sugar mills. The total number of households in the villages of the project road is 8860 and the total population is 51616. Out of these, about 81% is general while SC/ST population accounts for about 19% of the total population. The project road passing through three districts of Madhya Pradesh covering 15 villages have total literacy rate of 55%. The population of literate male (63.2%) is comparatively higher than female (36.7%). Tribal population in the project area is very low (<2% in the project area).

Public Consultation and Information Disclosure 15. All pre-construction, construction, and operation activities that were likely to cause environmental impacts were identified, and evaluated to assess their magnitude, duration, and potential receptors in consultation with the stakeholders. Consultations were made with the government representatives (District Forest Office, State Pollution Control Board, Water Resources Department, Directorate of Economics and Statistics, and the District Rural Development Authority), local communities ( and Goghatpur), and NGOs ( Yuwa Paryavaran Shikshan and Samajik Sansthan, Ecosake Society for Environment Conservation and Social Awareness, Green Heart Nature Club, Forum for Environmental Protection, Energy Environment and Development Group, Centre for Envirocare and Energy Technology) between April to June 2010.

Anticipated Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures 16. The significant impacts during design and construction stage include the constricted sections of the roads which will be by-passed or require road alignment improvement to avoid and minimize resettlement and other sensitive structures and locations particularly in Khujner (14.550), Chapikheda (36.650), Zirapur (54.800), Goghatpur (9.500). Since the sub-project area is having mixed terrain, flood situation may get exacerbated due to inadequate cross drainage

x

structures and raising of embankments without proper balancing culverts. An estimated 331 trees will be removed along the ROW to allow for road expansion but will be compensated at a rate of 1:10 plantations. Short-term deterioration of air quality may take place due to increase in fugitive dust emissions and noise level from earthmoving, ground shaping, unpaved transport, and emissions from heavy equipment and other mobile sources. Water sprinkling to control dust, use of clean fuels, changing the location and timing of construction activities and maintenance of equipments will minimize these impacts. Land use conversion particularly of residential areas and relocation of structures within the ROW will only be implemented following a meaningful consultation and acceptable compensation and relocation agreements. All borrow areas will comply with national laws and regulations. Impacts from the establishment and operation of the construction camps like generation and disposal of solid wastes, sewage, potable water requirements, health/hygiene, and safety is part of the contractor’s responsibility highlighting the need for compliance with applicable laws. Waste and material use minimization will be promoted to decrease the volume of wastes that will be generated. Traffic safety to workers and pedestrian, particularly to children is considered through the strict implementation of a Traffic Control Plan to be prepared by the contractor prior to construction activities and in consultation with the affected communities. 17. During operation stage, the main impacts are on the surface water hydrology since the construction of a road crosses several river/rivulets in the flood-affected sections which can act as impediment to natural flow of water. Other issues relate to increase in mobile emissions, road safety to motorist, pedestrian and animals. To minimize the impact on the local hydrology, adequate cross drains and their proper maintenance will be implemented. Information and education campaign through the use of signs and posters distributed along the roadside encouraging motorist to properly maintain their vehicles, and proper driving habits to reduce emissions, reduce fuel consumption, and promote safety will be made. Finally, traffic control measures will be implemented to ensure safety to pedestrian.

Conclusion 18. In general, the sub-project received immense support from local people with some concerns and apprehensions related to compensation for land and safety on roads. The local people appreciated that besides providing an all weather efficient connectivity to large population and improving the traffic scenario in the region, it will bear out several other positive economic and social benefits which outweigh the negative environmental impacts. 19. This initial environmental examination (IEE) ascertains that the sub-project is unlikely to cause any significant environmental impacts. Few impacts were identified attributable to the proposed sub-project, all of which are localized and temporary in nature and can be easily mitigated with minor to negligible residual impacts. No additional studies or need of undertaking detailed EIA is envisaged at this stage.

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Project Background/Rationale 20. Madhya Pradesh, with abundant mineral resources, and growing agricultural and industrial production, need a well developed road network to cater to the increasing intra-state and regional traffic. Also, since it is centrally located within the country, most of the long haul north-south and east-west bound road traffic passes through the state. Therefore, the existing inadequate and damaged road infrastructure needs to be improved on priority to sustain the economic and social progress of the state. The improved road network with good interlinking between national, state highways and major district roads will not only contribute in significantly developing rural economy and reducing poverty but also increase the road capacity to cater the high projected traffic, reduce travel time and also contribute for lesser vehicular pollution emission. 21. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation (MPRDC), the executing agency (EA), is responsible to provide an integrated transport system in the state that is safe, efficient, affordable, accessible to all and environmentally sustainable. As per its mandate, MPRDC plans to improve various major district roads to at least two lanes carriage way level with funding support from Asian Development Bank (ADB). 22. Government of Madhya Pradesh (GOMP) has approached ADB for financial assistance for improving a total of 15 state roads covering a length of about 1081 kms under Madhya Pradesh State Highways III Project (MPSRSP III) programmed to be processed for implementation in 2010. The road sections details under MPSRSP III are given in Table 1.1

Table 1.1 : Road Sections under MP State Highways III Project

S. Road SH Length Districts Name of Roads No. No. No. (KM) I. BHOPAL PACKAGE 1 1 Bhind-Ater-Porsa SH-2 60.85 Bhind –Morena Mihona-Lahar-Daboh-Bhander- 2 2 SH-45 85.70 Bhind-Datia Chirgaon Shivpuri - Pichhore-Chanderi-Mungawali-Onder- 3 3 SH-19 146.50 Ashoknagar- 4 7 Manawar-Mangod SH-38 49.63 Dhar 5 9 Sardarpur-Rajgarh-Bagh SH-35 50.43 Dhar Shajapur- 6 10 Agar-Barod--Jawara SH-41 108.70 -- Pachor-Chapikheda--Machalpur- Rajgarh- 7 11 SH-51 86.70 Soyat Shajapur 8 13 Badi-Baktar-Dobi-Shahganj- SH-15 58.78 - 2

S. Road SH Length Districts Name of Roads No. No. No. (KM) 9 14 Silwani- Road SH-44 28.58 Raisen Total (Bhopal Pkg) 675.87 II. PACKAGE 10 16 Rahatgarh-Khurai-Khimlasa SH-42 47.48 Sagar Damoh-Hata-Gasiabad i/c Hata Town 11 18 SH-47 62.66 Damoh Portion Hata-Patera-Kumhari & Raipura- Damoh-Panna- 12 19 SH-48 91.28 Salaiya-Bahuribandh-Sihora Katni-Jabalpur 13 20A Amarpatan-Gorsari-Badera SH-13 46.50 Satna-Katni Sundara-Singhpur-Kothi-Jaitwara- Panna-Satna- 14 21 SH-52 85.29 -Semaria Rewa 15 22 Sidhi-Beohari SH-55 71.29 Sidhi-Shahdol Total (Jabalpur Pkg) 404.49 Grand Total (Bhopal Pkg + Jabalpur 1,080.36 Pkg) Source: MPRDC

1.2. Project Preparatory Technical Assistance (PPTA) and Environmental Assessment 23. ADB has fielded TA: 7198 IND to assist MPRDC Road Construction Department (RCD) in project preparation for possible financing of MPSRSP III. As a part of this TA and safeguard requirement of ADB, environmental assessment has been carried out in accordance with relevant country’s applicable laws, regulations and in consistent to ADB’s Environmental Assessment Guidelines, 2003 and Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009. Each sub-project was scrutinized as to its type, location, scale, and sensitivity and the magnitude of its potential environmental impacts. 24. The present report pertains to Pachor-Chapikheda-Zirapur-Machalpur- Soyat (SH-19) sub-project. This sub project is categorized as Category ‘B’ and hence an initial environmental examination (IEE) has been undretaken. 1.3. Purpose of the Study 25. This IEE report documents the environmental assessment of the Pachor- Chapikheda-Zirapur-Machalpur-Soyat Road Subproject and identifies the environmental issues to be considered at project planning and design stage. The IEE addresses the environmental management requirements of (i) the (GOI); (ii) the donor, Asian Development Bank (ADB), and (iii) the Project. In general, an IEE addresses the following:

o Provides information about the baseline environmental setting of the subproject; 3

o Provides information on potential environmental impacts of the proposed subproject activities with its magnitude, distribution and duration o Provides information on required mitigation measures with cost to minimize the impacts o Analyses the alternatives options considering alternative locations, designs, management approaches, for selection of most feasible and environmental acceptable options. o Provides details of stack holders consultation o Suggest environmental management and monitoring plan with institutional measures for effective implementation of mitigative measures proposed. 1.4. Extent of IEE 26. IEE was conducted based on Detailed Project Report (DPR) provided by the design team during the preparation of this report. Certain changes may occur in the sub-project structural components but these changes are unlikely to cause significant environmental impacts. The IEE covers all activities proposed under the project including various bridges and cross-drainage structures constructions. The core zone of impact is taken as 100 meters either side of the alignment. However, the study area is considered up to 7 km on either side of road alignment for larger analysis of landuse and other environmental features. Assessment is carried out for all components of environment covering terrestrial and aquatic ecology, soil, water, noise and socio economic aspects. 1.5. IEE Content 27. The IEE has been largely structured as per SPS, 2009 and ADB’s Environmental Assessment Guidelines (2003). This includes following eight chapters including this introduction Chapter. • Chapter 1- Introduction • Chapter 2- Policy, Legal and Administrative Framework • Chapter 3- Description of Project • Chapter 4- Description of Environment • Chapter 5- Anticipated Impacts and Mitigation Measures • Chapter 6- Information Disclosure, Consultation, and Participation • Chapter 7- Environment Management Plan and Grievance Redress Mechanism • Chapter 8- Conclusion and Recommendation 1.6. Team Composition and Acknowledgements 28. The environmental assessment has been carried out by the team of the environmental Experts of EQMS India Pvt. Ltd. The environmental team acknowledges the support extended by the executing agency, design consultant, and state departments/agency of forest, water resources, and pollution control Board etc. 1.7. Methodology 29. Suitable methodology was adopted to accomplish the study. As the first step, project-scoping exercise was undertaken identifying the parameters

4

needed to be considered for the study and to outline the activities for collecting data on each parameter. Data pertaining to all facets of environment viz. physical, ecological and socio-economic environment both through primary and secondary sources were collected. The stepwise activities includes: • Review of legal requirements • Review of feasibility study • Reconnaissance survey for identification of key issues data requirement and preliminary consultation. • Primary and Secondary data Collection • Consultation with stakeholders • Identification of Impacts and Mitigation measures • Institutional Review and finalization of EMP in consultation with EA. 1.7.1. Information/ data Sources Key relevant information sources has been summarised in Table 1.2.

Table 1.2 : Primary and Secondary Information Sources

Environmental Parameters Information Sources Project objectives, Technical Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation information on existing road (MPRDC) and Design Consultant features and proposed rehabilitation work Inventory of road features like Ground Physical surveys and Strip Plans by water Bodies, Community Design Consultant structures, environmentally sensitive locations areas, congested locations etc. Climatic Condition India meteorological Department, DPR, primary data collection Geology, Seismicity, Soil and Central Ground Water Authority, State of Topography Environment report published by SPCB, Government websites and primary data collection Land Use/ Land Cover Survey of India (SoI) Toposheet, Observation during survey and Satellite Imagery Drainage Pattern Survey of India Toposheet, water resources, field observation and local people, GIS Based land use analysis Status of forest areas. Compensatory afforestation Divisional Forest Office, Rajgarh and Shajapur norms etc. Status of Fishing Activity District Fisheries offices and Local Fishermen Air quality Noise, Soil and Water Onsite monitoring and analysis of field samples Borrow Areas, Quarries and other Design consultant and public consultation during construction material source field visit River geo-morphology, hydrology, Water resources department, DPR and drainage, flood patterns, information from local people, field observations Socio-economic Environment Different Govt. agencies/civic bodies, Official websites maintained by state Govt., census of India 2001 and Public Consultation during the 5

Environmental Parameters Information Sources Field survey, through figures collected from Directorate of Statistics. 1.7.2. Public Consultation 30. Extensive consultations were held with all stakeholders’ viz. local and beneficiary population, govt. departments/agencies, fishermen, road users and NGOs with intent to collect baseline information, for better understanding of the potential impacts and appreciate the perspectives/concerns of the stakeholders. Information thus gathered was used to integrate it in project design and formulating mitigation measures and environmental management plan.

6

2. POLICY, LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK

2.1. Country’s Legal Framework and Regulatory Requirements for the Project 31. The legal framework of the country consists of several acts, notifications, rules and regulations to protect environment and wildlife. Review of Indian legal system has been critically reviewed to identify its applicability to the project. A list of all required clearances/ permissions related to environment has been summarised in Table 2.1.

Table 2.1 : Permissions/Clearances Required for the Sub- Project2

Concerned S.No. Clearances Acts/Rules/Notifications/Guidelines Responsibility Agency A. Pre-construction Stage Environmental EIA Notification, 2006 amended till State Not applicable Clearance3 date, promulgated under Environment Environmental for this (Protection) Act 1986 Impact particular road (not required Assessment stretch as it is 1 for this Sub- Authority an expansion Project) (SEIAA)4. of existing road and no new by- passes are to be constructed Permission for Forest Conservation Act (1980) District Level felling of trees Procedural Guidelines developed by Committee the Department of Environment GoMP, constituted by 2 MPRDC under the orders of the Hon’ble High the State Court; Tree removal will be guided as Govt. per state government rules.

2 Since this project is not passing through any protected areas or ground water authority notified areas, therefore the following list of laws will not be applicable to this project. a. Central Ground Water Authority b. Wildlife (Protection) Act 2002 and rules thereof c. The Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remain Act 1958/Rules 1959

3 This Particular clearance is applicable to all new road projects as mentioned underneath. However for this road stretch as it is expansion of existing road and no bypasses are being constructed so this clearance is not applicable. The Notification and its latest amendment entails requirement of prior environmental clearance to the following road projects. Category A -i) New National High ways; and ii) Expansion of National High ways greater than 30 km, involving additional right of way greater than 20m involving land acquisition and passing through more than one State. Category B-ii) All State High ways; and ii) Expansion projects in hilly terrain (above 100 m mean seal level (msl) and or ecologically sensitive areas)

Note: A general condition applies to both of the above category: “Any project or activity specified in Category ‘B’ will be treated as Category A, if located in whole or in part within 10 km from the boundary of: (i) Protected Areas notified under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, (ii) Critically Polluted areas as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board from time to time, (iii) Notified Eco-sensitive areas, (iv) inter-State boundaries and international boundaries”. 4 The SEIAA has varying opinion about its applicability. EA propose to take official confirmation about applicability of this notification. EA will obtain the environmental clearance in case SEIAA directs about the same. 7

Concerned S.No. Clearances Acts/Rules/Notifications/Guidelines Responsibility Agency B. Implementation Stage River Board Authorities/ Permission for Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Department of 3 Sand Mining Development) Act, 1957 as amended Contractor Mining Govt. from river bed in 1972 of Madhya Pradesh Consent to Madhya operate Hot mix Air (Prevention and Control of Pradesh 4 Contractor plant, Crushers, Pollution) Act 1981 Pollution Batching Plant Control Board Authorization Madhya for Disposal of Hazardous Waste (Management and Pradesh 5 Contractor Hazardous Handling) Rules 1989 Pollution Waste Control Board Consent for Madhya Disposal of Water (Prevention and Control of Pradesh 6 Contractor Sewage from Pollution) Act 1974 Pollution Labour camps Control Board Use of Fly ash within 100 kms Fly Ash Notification, 1999 as amended 7 MoEF Contractor around Thermal up to 17th August 2003: Power plants. Department of Pollution Under Transport, 8 Control Central Motor and Vehicle Act 1988 Govt. of Contractor Certificate Madhya Pradesh The Building and Other Construction Employing District Labour 9 Workers (Regulation of Employment Contractor Labour/workers Commissioner and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996,

2.2. Environmental Clearance Process 32. The environmental clearance is not applicable for this sub-project since expansion is confined along the existing road corridor with no new bypass. However, the procedure for obtaining environmental clearance has been depicted as Figure 2.1 for reference purposes only.

8

Figure 2.1 : Environmental Clearance Procedure in India 2.3. Administrative Structure and the Interactive framework 9

33. The Government through specific legislations regulates the environmental management system in India. The MoEF and the pollution control boards (CPCB i.e. Central Pollution Control Board and SPCBs i.e. State Pollution Control Boards) together form the regulatory and administrative core of the part. Other Ministries/Statutory Bodies/departments responsible for ensuring environmental compliance and granting various clearances includes State ministry /Dept. of environment, regional offices of MoEF and state forests/wildlife departments. Their key roles and responsibilities and interface among them have been concisely depicted through the flow diagram in Figure 2.2.

Figure 2.2 : Legislative Interface among various regulatory bodies

10

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 3.1. Project Location 34. The sub project road section (Pachor – Chapikheda – Zirapur - Machalpur road) is a part of SH-51 measuring 86.7km in length and located in Rajgarh and Shajapur districts of Madhya Pradesh State. The Location map of project road is given as Figure 3.1. The project road holds strategic importance as both districts shares interstate boundary with Rajasthan State. The project road also provides a vital connectivity with National Highways and State Highways like NH-3 and SH-27. (Refer Figure 3.2 for schematic view))

Figure 3.1 : Location Map of SH-51 11

Figure 3.2 : Connectivity to the project Road 3.2. Characteristics of the Existing road

35. Right of Way and carriage way width: The existing carriageway is a single or intermediate-lane road having flexible pavement, with widths varying between 3.00 m to 3.75 m along the entire length of project road except at one or two locations like Zirapur and Machalpur where width is provided 7.0 to 10.0 m. The existing road has earthen shoulder of about 1.0 m on either sides of the project road. ROW available for the entire project road is around 10m on either sides from road centre line except in built up areas and forest sections where it is noted as low as 10m. Chainage-wise carriageway widths are provided in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 : Carriageway Details Chainage Carriageway Remarks Shoulder Shoulder Start End Width Type Width Pachor - Machalpur Road

12

Chainage Carriageway Remarks Shoulder Shoulder Start End Width Type Width 3/350 27/300 3.00 BT (Black Top) HS (Hard 1.10 Shoulder) 27/300 27/600 7.00 BT HS 1.10 27/600 41/300 3.00 BT HS 1.10 41/300 41/500 7.00 BT HS 1.10 41/500 51/000 3.00 BT HS 1.00 51/000 55/700 3.75 BT HS 1.10 55/700 56/500 10.00 BT HS 1.00 56/500 56/800 3.00 BT HS 1.00 56/800 59/600 3.60 BT HS 1.00 59/600 60/900 3.00 BT HS 1.00 60/900 62/000 3.50 BT HS 1.00 62/000 63/500 3.75 BT HS 1.00 63/500 63/600 10.00 BT HS 1.00 63/600 64/100 7.00 WBM (Water HS 1.00 Bound Mecadam) 64/100 65/000 3.50 BT HS 1.00 65/000 67/600 7.00 WBM - - 67/600 68/700 10.00 WBM - - 68/700 69/800 3.00 BT HS 1.00 69/800 70/400 3.75 BT HS 1.00 Machalpur – Goghatpur (up to Rajasthan border) 1/000 12/100 3.75 BT HS 1.00 Goghatpur - Soyat Road 0/000 4/500 3.00 BT HS 1.00 4/500 5/000 7.00 BT HS 1.00 5/000 5/500 5.00 BT HS 1.00 5/500 6/200 7.00 BT - - 6/200 8/000 3.00 BT HS 1.00 8/000 8/757 5.00 WBM - - Source: DPR 36. Pavement and carriage way conditions: The pavement condition along the entire length of the road can generally be rated as poor. Riding quality is not good. Mostly cracking exists throughout the road except in jirapur town. Raveling and potholes are also exists almost for the entire length. At some places, subgrade failure has been noted and thus warranting immediate reconstruction. To cater the projected traffic, raising and reconstruction from Granular Sub-Base layer is proposed for the entire length of the project road except in Zirapur where overlay is proposed. 37. Alignment and Geometrics: There are many horizontal curves comprising very sharp turns which need to be improved to State highway standards. An average travel speed of 40km/hr could be maintained due to sub standards geometry. There is no coherence between horizontal alignment and vertical profile. Set back distances are almost non- existent at curve locations; especially at sharp curves the provision is worse. 13

38. Cross Drainage (CD) Structures Drainage condition for the entire road is found to be poor to very poor. The existing road does not have proper provision of both side longitudinal drains. There are two major bridges, seventeen minor bridges, three causeways and seventy six culverts along the project road. List of major and minor bridges along with survey chainages and conditions of existing structures are appended as” Inventory and Condition Survey for Bridges” in Appendix 3.1. 39. Terrain and Landuse: The project road alignment traverses through plain terrain throughout the project road except few locations where rolling terrain is encountered. The abutting land along the project road is observed to be utilized mainly for agricultural purposes. At some locations habitation / built up area were encountered whereas in few section land is left barren. The road passes through three important towns Pachor, Khujner, Chapikheda, Zirapur and Machalpur and few villages. 40. Road Intersections: There are 2 major intersection and 48 minor intersections sighted on the road. Almost all of these intersections are poor in geometrics and junction developments. The chainage-wise details of these intersections are given in Table 3.2.

Table 3.2 : List of Major and Minor Intersections Existing S. Width Surface Type Chainage Major/Minor Link No. (m) Type L/R/Cross (Km\m) Pachor - Machalpur 1 3/350 Major Sarangpur-pachor 7.00-7.00 BT-BT Cross 2 5/980 Minor Guhakhedi 3.75 BT Right 3 6/800 Minor Susthaniya 2.6 ER Right 4 7/400 Minor Samli dhakad 3.75 BT Left 5 7/650 Minor Bhandavad-kadiayanala 3.75-2.60 BT-BT Cross 6 10/000 Minor Rayapuri - Dovali 2.60-3.75 ER-BT Cross 7 12/800 Minor Bablda 3.75 BT Left 8 14/850 Minor Khujner bypass start 3.00 BT Left 9 15/650 Minor To Panda 5.00 BT Left 10 16/106 Minor Khujner bypass end 3.75 BT Left 11 16/300 Minor Rajgarh bypass 3.75 BT Right 12 16/750 Minor Khujner 3.0 BT Right 13 18/700 Minor Patakya 3.75 BT Left 14 19/900 Minor Bakhed 3.0 BT Right 15 25/900 Minor Sonpurakheda 3.75 BT Left 16 27/050 Minor Sarangpur-Sandavat 3.00-3.00 BT-BT Cross 17 27/600 Minor Mundrakala-Dovali 3.75-2.60 BT-ER Cross 18 30/220 Minor Kakariya 3.0 ER Right 19 36/640 Minor Nanar 4.25 BT Right 20 31/230 Minor Daliyapur 2.6 WBM Right 21 34/800 Minor Gugakheda 3.75 BT Right 22 36/500 Minor 3.75 BT Right 23 36/510 Minor Natara 3.75 BT Right

14

Existing S. Width Surface Type Chainage Major/Minor Link No. (m) Type L/R/Cross (Km\m) 24 36/800 Minor Nanar 3.75 BT Right 25 36/920 Minor Kankaria 3.75 BT Left 26 36/970 Minor Chhapiheda 4.0 BR Right 27 37/030 Minor Chhapiheda 4.0 BT Right 28 37/200 Minor khujuri 3.5 BT Left 29 37/800 Minor Kaneli 3.3 BT Left 30 41/850 Minor Ramnagar 3.75 BT Left 31 45/600 Minor zadmau 3.75 BT Left 32 47/500 Minor Khejadia-upaheada 3.75-3.75 BT - BT Cross 33 49/200 Minor Jamoliya 3.75 BT Right 34 52/100 Minor Kasikhedi 3.75 BT Right 35 52/200 Minor Kasikhedi 3.75 BT Right 36 54/200 Minor Batavda 3.75 BT Left 37 55/676 Minor Khilchipur 5.42 BT Right 38 55/900 Minor Banpur 7.0 BT Right 39 56/500 Minor 5.0 BT Left 40 56/800 Minor Kharapa 3.0 BT Left 41 60/400 Minor Matkhedi - Chilavat 3.50-2.60 ER-ER Cross 42 64/380 Minor Amalabey 3.0 BT Left 43 65/000 Minor Lakhoni 3.0 BT Right 44 68/700 Minor Lasudiya 3.75 BT Left 45 68/800 Minor Ramgarh 3.0 BT Right 46 69/480 Minor Lamvoda 3.75 BT Left 47 69/600 Minor Pipliya kalni 3.75 CC Right Machalpur - Rajasthan border 48 4/400 Minor Bhagara 3.75 BT Left Goghatpur - Soyat 49 10/120 Minor Soyat- 3.0 BT Left 50 0/000 Major -kota 7.00-7.00 BT-BT Cross Note: BT – Black Top, CC-Cement Concrete, WBM – Water Bound Macadam ER – Earthen Road 3.3. Category of the Project

41. The sub-project has been evaluated using the Rapid Environmental Assessment (REA) checklist issued by ADB (Apendix-3.2) for Roads and Highways of the ADB‘s Environmental Assessment Guidelines 2003. The sub-project road neither passes through nor is located near any Wildlife Sanctuary, National Park, or any other environmentally sensitive or ecologically or archeologically protected areas. The environmental impacts envisaged are minimal and majority are co-terminus with the construction phase. Hence, the project has been classified as Category “B” in accordance with ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement 2009. 3.4. Need for the Sub-Project

42. The main aim of developing this State highway is to provide connectivity to the selected townships with other major social and commercial centres 15

within the districts as well in the other parts of the state. The sub project road Pachor – Chapikheda – Zirapur - Machalpur road section serves as a link connecting Rajgarh and Shajapur Districts. The improvement of roads infrastructure in the region will enhance the tourism potential as well as will lead to increased socio-economic activities in both the districts. The sub project road will benefit more than 1.25 million populations (mainly rural) by providing improved transport and communication facilities which will contribute in accelerating the local economy. 43. The sub project road serves as important link for providing connectivity between National Highways and State Highways like NH-3 and SH-27. The traffic intensity at this sub project road is increasing, necessitating augmentation of capacity for safe and efficient movement. The road condition is poor which reduces the average traffic speed and also results in higher fuel consumption and vehicular pollution. Therefore, improvement of this subproject road is proposed to provide safe movement of increasing traffic at higher travel speeds with reduced travel time, accidents, overloading, and vehicle emissions. 3.5. Existing and Projected Traffic 44. Existing Traffic Volume: 45. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of project road is studies at various locations and is presented in the Table 3.3. The ADT for the project road varies from 1470 in terms of number of vehicles to 4689 number of vehicles and in terms of PCU it varies from 2332 to 5304. Highest traffic volume has been recorded near the CVC Location at Km 58/400 near Zirapur Village. Lowest traffic volume has recorded near the CVC Location at km 0/500 near Goghatpur Village.

Table 3.3 : ADT of Project Road S.No. Location Total Vehicles Total (PCUs) 1 Khujner Village (Km 14/000) 3161 4524 2 Jirapur (Km 58/400) 4689 5304 3 Gogatpur Village (Km 0/500) 1470 2332 Source: DPR 46. Projected Traffic: The maximum traffic is expected to vary from 14487 ADT (18799 PCU) at Khujner Village to 30097 ADT at Jirapur Village (25910 PCU) by the year 2030. The above projection is based on the growth rates of 9.4% for Cars, 6.6 % for Buses, 5.8% for Goods Vehicles, 10.6% for 2-wheeler and 7.5% for Tractors which was derived through “IRC-108, Econometric Model” ) The summary of projected traffic for the year 2009 to 2030 is given at Table 3.4.

16

Table 3.4 : Summary of Projected Traffic for the Project Road Project Road Year Year Year Year Year From To 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Near Khujner Village(14/000) Pachor Jirapur 3888 5378 7491 10439 14487 (5808) (7814) (10532) (14133) (18799) Near Zirapur Village (58/500) Jirapur Soyat 6054 9144 13741 20463 30097 (7024) (9819) (13668) (18899) (25910) Source: DPR; Note: Values in bracket indicate PCUs/day 47. The capacity of different carriageways is 6000, 15000 and 18000 PCUs per day for intermediate lane, 2 lane with earthen shoulders and 2 lane with Paved shoulders respectively. Analysing the capacity of Design Service Volume of Carriage ways and the projected traffic, the sub project road requires two lanes with earthen shoulder by 2009-2011 and section II requires two lane with paved shoulder by 2022. 3.6. Key Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Activities 48. The sub project road rehabilitation involves activities like widening, realignment, intersections improvement, correction in road geometry and raising the embankment height in at certain stretches of the road to meet the design norms defined for state highways under IRC codes. The brief of all key project activities are described below: 3.6.1. Realignment and Curvature Improvement: To avoid resettlement / rehabilitation and land acquisition issues existing alignment is followed with substandard geometry. There are many sharp curves in the existing road which need to be improved to develop a high-speed highway. In plain or rolling terrain, a minimum curve radius of 230 m is considered to achieve design speed. Absolute minimum radius of 150 m is used at location with space constraints (e.g. urban areas, structure approach & Forest Areas). These locations are tabulated in Appendix 3.3 3.6.2. Proposed Cross Section Details 49. Lane Width and Earthen Shoulder: In order to meet future traffic requirement the existing carriageway is proposed to be upgraded to Two Lane with Earthen Shoulder to achieve high speed of travel with comfort and safety. 7m wide carriageway is proposed with basic traffic lane width of 3.50 m. Earthen shoulders of 2.50 m wide is proposed on either side of the proposed main carriageway for rural plain and rolling terrains. 50. Footpath: The minimum width of footpath in urban stretches is proposed to be 1.00 m. The side drain in such stretches may be accommodated under the footpath. 51. Utility Corridor: Minimum width of utility corridor for rural sections will be 2.0 m and for urban/ built-up sections will be 1.00 m. 52. Side Slopes: The side slopes are proposed based on embankment height and is as follows Embankment height up to 3.0 m - 2H: 1V 17

Embankment height from 3.0 m to 6.0 m - 1.5H: 1V Embankment height exceeding 6.0 m - To be designed based on soil parameters. Cut slopes will be Soil - 1H: 1V 53. Cross fall : Carriageway will have crossfall of 3.0%. For earthen shoulders crossfall value will be 4.0%. Figure 3.3 shows the typical cross section to be followed on the project stretch.

Figure 3.3 : Typical Cross section of the project Road 3.6.3. Pavement Design and Widening : 54. Existing road will be widened to improve the capacity as well as horizontal geometrics. A combination of overlay and new construction will be followed for proposed improvements. At a number of places, the vertical profile will be changed to improve the vertical geometrics. This will require reconstruction after partial or full removal of the existing pavement, depending upon sub-grade condition. In urban areas cement concrete pavement along with side drain is proposed. 55. Concentric widening scheme is followed to minimise land acquisition issues and to ensure maximum utilisation of existing carriageway. The improvement is proposed to the existing pavement to meet the design requirement of 2.5 m. In specific stretches where the pavement is damaged / deteriorated special treatments, are proposed. The improvement proposal includes overlay of BC=40mm, DBM=70mm, or raising and reconstruction with WMM, or raising and reconstruction with GSB. As the whole road length is being reconstructed,the proposed carriage way width is 7.000+ES over entire length. And wherever existing carriage way width is more than 7.000 m, paved shoulder is proposed.

18

3.6.4. Improvement Proposal for Intersection 56. Improvement scheme in respect of each junction is prepared to smooth movement of traffic. The improvement proposal suggested include either left in left out approach or channelized intersection design. 3.6.5. Design of Road Side Drains 57. For a sound drainage system open lined drain and chute drains in RCC on hill side in mountainous terrain and slopes of high embankment respectively and as rapids on high cut sections is followed. The construction of an underground drain 1 m x 1 m lined with RCC-20 cm thick and covered with RCC slab10 cm in thickness is proposed at urban and semi-urban stretches. Details about the drainage are given in Table 3.5.

Table 3.5 : Cement Concrete Lined Drain S. No. Existing Chainage (km) Proposed Chainage (km) Length From To From To (m) 1 23/700 24/050 20/340 20/680 340 + 340 2 33/300 35/000 29/970 31/660 1690 + 1690 3 52/500 52/950 49/060 49/500 440 + 440 Source: DPR 3.6.6. Traffic Control and Safety Measures 58. In addition to adequate provisions for roadway width, geometric elements and junction improvement, the following provisions are proposed to enhance the safety of road users. Due consideration has been made for the provisions contained in IRC: SP 44-1994, “Highway Safety Code”. Also, various measures have been proposed to increase traffic control for the High-speed highway. 3.6.6.1 Crash Barrier : 59. Safety barrier of rigid, flexible or semi-rigid type are proposed at following locations. In general W-beam crash barrier is proposed.

♦ Non-traversable road side embankments ♦ Where embankment height is 3m or more ♦ Where embankment is retained by a retaining structure ♦ On valley sides of highway in hill sections ♦ Miscellaneous hazardous locations (like proximity to water structures, non-collapsible sign supports, buildings etc.) ♦ Between main carriageway and footpath in bridges The crash barrier locations are given in Table 3.7:

19

Table 3.6 : Crash Barrier Location Proposed Chainage (m) Length(m) Proposed Chainage (m) Length(m) Left Side Right Side 31/080 31/110 30 7/595 7/625 30 67/660 67/700 40 49/720 49/745 25 68/370 68/460 90 51/065 51/080 15 68/530 68/580 50 52/065 52/105 40 73/070 73/085 15 72/560 72/585 25 73/560 73/655 95 73/065 73/085 20 74/655 74/775 120 73/590 73/685 95 75/720 75/750 30 74/480 74/500 20 4/728 4/758 30 74/655 74/785 130 4/940 4/970 30 4/728 4/758 30 5/680 5/720 40 4/940 4/970 30 5/867 5/897 30 5/867 5/897 30 5/997 6/027 30 5/997 6/027 30 Source: DPR 3.6.6.2 Road Signs 60. Adequate road signs are proposed for the project road in order to provide advance information to regulate/control traffic flow and ensure safety of operations. All road signs are provided in accordance with IRC 67. 61. Appropriate road markings are provided with stop signs, give-way signs, traffic merging and diverging signs, lane closure signs, compulsory keep left/right signs or any other signs as per IRC-67. Advance cautionary signs are proposed for sharp curves along with chevron signs at the outer edge of the curves. In hilly areas, curve-ahead signs are accompanied with appropriate delineators. 62. The signs will be of retro reflective sheetings of high intensity grade with encapsulated lens and fixing details as per of MoRT&H Specifications for Road and Bridge Works, 2001(4th Revision, latest reprint) are proposed. 3.6.6.3 Pavement Markings 63. In project road, pavement markings are proposed as per IRC: 35-1997, “Code of Practice for Road Marking” with centre-line, edge line, continuity line, stop line, give way lines, diagonal/chevron markings and zebra crossings. The pavement marking shall be of hot applied thermoplastic paint with glass beads as per the MORT&H specification for Road and Bridge Works, 2001(4th Revision, latest reprint). 3.6.6.4 Lighting 64. The project road is proposed with lighting systems in urban stretches/built up areas as shown in Table 3.7.

20

Table 3.7 : Lighting Sr. Existing Chainage (km) Proposed Chainage (km) Length No. From To From To (mt.) 1 23/700 24/050 20/340 20/680 340 2 33/300 35/000 29/970 31/660 1690 3 52/500 52/950 49/060 49/500 440 Source: DPR 3.6.7. User Facilities 3.6.7.1 Bus Stop 65. Bus stops are proposed at following locations as given below in Table 3.8. Existing bus stops are proposed to be retained. Appropriate maintenance measures shall be made to keep it in working conditions.

Table 3.8 : Bus Stop Locations Sr. Proposed Chainage Side Village no. (Km) 1 2/661 LHS Kachanar 2 4/200 LHS BhandaVad 3 6/750 RHS Dovali 4 12/920 LHS Khujner 5 18/440 RHS Kalyakhedi 6 26/813 LHS Kakariya 7 33/700 LHS ChhaPiheda Village 8 42/300 LHS Jhadmau 9 44/000 LHS Khejadia 10 48/600 LHS Kashi Khedi 11 61/900 LHS Lakhoni Source: DPR

3.6.8. Slope Stabilisation and Protection Works 66. Erosion is proposed to be minimized largely by the use of flat side slopes, rounded and blended with natural terrain; serrated cut slopes; drainage channels designed with due regard to width, depth, slopes, alignment, and protective treatment; inlets located and spaced for erosion control prevention of erosion at culvert outlets; proper facilities for groundwater interception; dikes, berms, and other protective devices to trap sediment at strategic locations; and protective ground covers and planting. 67. High embankment will be site specifically designed considering the quality of the available material, prevalent moisture condition and associated pore water pressure, bearing capacity of the founding strata and the requirement of any preloading etc. Stone pitching is proposed at the locations mentioned in the Table 3.9. 68. Other stabilisation measures as Concrete block pitching and Launching apron in CC blocks are proposed to be adopted on case to case basis after thorough study of the problematic sites.

21

Table 3.9 : Stone Pitching S. Proposed Chainage Length Side No. From To (mt.) Pachor – Machalpur – up to Rajasthan Border 1 7.600 7.620 20 Both Side 2 9.380 9.390 10 Both Side 3 22.180 22.190 10 Both Side 4 23.270 23.280 10 Both Side 5 26.230 26.240 10 Both Side 6 49.720 49.740 20 Both Side 7 51.070 51.080 10 Both Side 8 52.070 52.100 30 Both Side 9 67.660 67.700 40 Both Side 10 68.370 68.460 90 Both Side 11 68.530 68.580 50 Both Side 12 72.560 72.580 20 Both Side 13 72.710 72.720 10 Both Side 14 73.070 73.080 10 Both Side 15 73.560 73.680 120 Both Side 16 74.480 74.500 20 Both Side 17 74.660 74.780 120 Both Side 18 75.710 75.720 10 Both Side Goghatpur – Soyat 19 4.470 4.480 10 Both Side 20 4.770 4.970 200 Both Side 21 5.680 5.720 40 Both Side 22 5.840 5.850 10 Both Side 23 5.880 6.040 160 Both Side 24 6.070 6.080 10 Both Side 25 6.620 6.630 10 Both Side 26 8.010 8.050 40 Both Side Source: DPR 3.6.9. Improvement Proposal for Bridges and Drainage Structure 69. There are two major bridges, seventeen minor bridges, three causeways and seventy six culverts along the project road. The project road crosses railway line at one location at same grade level. The rehabilitation of the bridge includes the activities like change of damaged handrails, replacement of defective expansion joints, repairing of minor cracks, repairing of solid slab having signs of damage, cleaning by sand blasting of corroded steel reinforcement and additional reinforcement where necessary, strengthening and repairing with PMC of RCC solid slabs which show honeycombing, removal of existing wearing coat and replacement with new wearing coat of 50 mm thick bituminous concrete after laying 12mm thick mastic asphalt, strengthening of approaches. 70. Water way/ ventway will be cleaned if vegetation growth is impeding the main water channel. The channel will be dredged if excessive siltation

22

has blocked the waterway. Spur, dykes will be provided to change the water course if it is found that due to the flow direction, excessive scouring is occurring near one of pier or abutment and it is in danger. 3.6.10. Improvement Proposal for Causeways 71. There is one causeway which is solid slab type. Almost all causeways get overtopped during monsoon. Hence Discharge passing through vent as well as overtopping part is considered for revised structure. Wherever possible additional pipes will be introduced by raising road level to economise cost. In typical cases wherever required box type structure is also proposed. 3.6.11. Improvement Proposal for Culverts 72. There are 63 culverts consisting of 48 pipe culverts and 15 slab culverts. The culverts are proposed to be widened for carriage way width of 12m. The improvement proposal includes dismantling and recasting of head walls, ded replacement with proper designs. Many of the culverts have vegetation in the channels apart from some sand mounds causing vent way obstructions, which need clearing. Pipe diameter less than 0.9 m is to be replaced by 1.2m diameter pipe. The culverts which are completely damaged or distressed are proposed for reconstruction. The culvert retained and repaired as mentioned above will be widen to match with formation width of Road section. 3.6.12. Utilities and Services 73. Utilities and Services are seen only in the vicinity of towns, villages and roadside. All major utilities run adjacent to the road alignment. Electric and telephone lines almost follow the existing road alignment. These have to be relocated. 3.7. Material required and Sourcing 74. The various construction materials which will be required for the project road construction and other activities are listed below. • Borrow Soil • Aggregate • Granular material • Sand • Cement • Bitumen • Steel • Water 3.7.1. Borrow soil 75. Borrow Soil identified during survey for DPR study revealed that it can be used for road embankment as well as for Sub grade layer. The details of available source, location, average lead distance to the project road and approximate available quantity are given in Table 3.10.

Table 3.10 : List of Borrow Area 23

S. Chainage Section Side Type of Approximate Approximate No. Material distance from Quantity project road in (area) (M) 1 39/000 Pachor-Machalpur Right soil 50 100x120 m 2 47/500 Pachor-Machalpur Right soil 50 150x150 m 3 49/600 Pachor-Machalpur Right soil 40 50x50 m 4 50/500 Pachor-Machalpur Right soil 50 80x80 m 5 55/200 Pachor-Machalpur Left soil 40 100x80 m 6 4/500* Machalpur-Rajasthan Both soil 50 50x50 m Border 100x100 m 7 7/000* Machalpur-Rajasthan Both soil 50 100x100 m Border 75x75 m 8 8/000 Machalpur-Rajasthan Both soil 50 100x70 m Border 50x50 m Source: DPR 3.7.2. Aggregate 76. Aggregate stone is basic ingredient in road construction. Investigation of quarry area was carried out for DPR study to ascertain the potential source of aggregate for the construction of different pavement layers like Bituminous Concrete (BC), Dense Bituminous Macadam (DBM), Bituminous Macadam (BM), Wet Mix Macadam (WMM), Granular Sub- base, sand for cement concrete works and GSB. There are two quarries/crushers are located the project road, one is S Stone Crusher at km 3/600 near Pachor and second one is at 53/600 near Machalpur. 3.7.3. Sand 77. Sand to be used in the concrete work during construction is available near the project road at the River Newaj which is about 2 km far from Pachor. 3.7.4. Cement 78. There are so many factories of cement manufacturing in Madhya Pradesh. The cement can be procured from the open market. 3.7.5. Bitumen 79. Nearest source of bitumen is Mathura refinery, Uttar Pradesh and Koyali Refinery, Gujarat. Bitumen of VG-10 equivalent of 80-100 or VG-30 equivalent of 60-70 penetration grade from above mentioned Refinery, is proposed to be used for bituminous work.

3.7.6. Steel 80. There is numbers of steel rolling factories is situated in Madhya Pradesh, with various grade of steel. The steel is to be purchase from the open market.

24

3.7.7. Water 81. Ground water and surface water in the vicinity of the project road is proposed to use as a source of water for construction activities. The approximate quantity of water required for construction activities in the project is 400 kL/day. 3.8. Project Implementation Schedule and Cost 82. The project is in the detailed design stage. The construction of widening of the road to 2- lane road, will be implemented in 18-24 months. The estimated cost of the project excluding R and R and EMP is estimated to be INR 1,26,08,44,166/-.

25

4. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT 83. Baseline environmental conditions about all facets of environment viz. physical, biological and socio-economic have been established using both primary and secondary sources. Efforts have been made to collect the latest information both at regional as well as local level especially along the project corridor. This will help to predict likely changes in the environment due to the project and will serve as performance indicators for various components. 84. The project road is a section of SH-51 (Pachor–Chapikheda–Zirapur- Machalpur road) measuring 86.707 Km in length and located in Rajgarh and Shajapur districts of Madhya Pradesh. A summary Table of the project district is given in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1 : Summary of Important Features of the Project Districts S. Parameters Rajgarh Shajapur No. . Rajgarh is one of the smallest districts of Madhya Pradesh, both in terms of area and population. Rajgarh district is lying in the western part of Madhya Pradesh and . is part of the occupies as area of 6,154 Plateau. Shajpur district is lying in sq km the north-western part of Madhya Pradesh and occupies as area of . The district is bounded by 6,196 sq km. Rajasthan to the north and by the districts of Guna to the . The district is bounded by Ujjain northeast, Bhopal to the east, District to the west, and Sehore to the south, Rajgarh to the 1 General Sehore to the southeast, and Shajapur to the south and east, and District of west. Rajasthan to the north.

. . Rajgarh District extends The district extends between the ° ° between the parallels of latitude of 23 06’ and 77 19’ north, Latitude 23° 27' 12" North longitude of 75° 41’ and 77° 02” east. and 24°17' 20" North and between the meridians of . It is located at an elevation of 453 m Longitude 76° 11' 15" and above MSL 77° 14' East.

. Rajgarh district is 390 meters above the mean sea level. . Temperature goes up to . Temperature goes up to 39.9° C 42.4°C (max.) and min. 11.3° (max.) and min. 9.6° C 2 Climate C. . It receives a normal rainfall of . It receives a normal rainfall of 1047.9 mm of annually. 813.6 mm of annually. Ecologically Sensitive Area Wild Life Narsinghgarh Wild Life Sanctuary

Sanctuaries 3 National Parks None None Tiger Reserves None None Elephant Reserves None None

26

Reserve/

Protected Forests Geomorphology Basically a part of the huge Physio-cultural diversities in the district Malwa plateau. have led to sub-divide it into the following sub-micro regions:- • Denudatiional Landforms 1. Major • Fluvial Landforms • Agar plateau Physiographic Units 4 • Malwa Plateau • Shajapur Forested Upland • Kali Sindh Basin • Kali Sindh Basin • Shajapur Upland The Newaj River and Parbati Kali Sindh, Lakhundar Nevaj, Parbati 2. Major Drainage River flow through this district. River and Ganga basin.

Medium to deep Black soil and Black Cotton soil, lateritic soil, alluvium 5 Major Soil Type mixed red and black soil. mixed silt + clay Soyabean is the major economic crop of 6 Principal Crops the district. Wheat and is also major crop of this district. Deccan Trap Basalts (Upper Predominant Cretaceous to Lower Eocene in Recent alluvium, laterite and Deccan 7 Geological age), overlain by variable traps Formations thickness of Alluvium of Recent origin. Alluvium weathered vesicular and Alluvium, laterite, weathered vesicular 8 Hydrogeology fractured basalts. and fractured basalts.

Source: District/Govt. Websites 4.2. Physical Environment 4.2.1. Meteorology and Climate 85. Madhya Pradesh has a subtropical climate characterized by hot summer season and dryness except southwest monsoon season. Like most of north India it has a hot dry summer (April-June) followed by monsoon rains (July-September) and a cool and relatively dry winter (December- February). The maximum temperature during summer season ranges from 33 to 44 ºC and 10 to 27 ºC during winter season. The average rainfall is about 1,370 mm which decreases from east to west. The south- eastern districts have the heaviest rainfall, some places receiving as much as 2,150 mm, while the western and north-western districts receive 1,000 mm or less. 27

Figure 4.1 : Isohyetal map of Madhya Pradesh 86. Climate: The Sub-Project passes through the districts – Shajapur and Rajgarh. The climate of both the districts is characterized by hot summer and general dryness except during the south west monsoon season. The year may be divided into four seasons. The cold season, December to February is followed by the hot season from March to about the middle of June. The period from the middle of June to September is the south west monsoon season. October and November form the post monsoon or

transition period. The normal maximum temperature during the month of May is 39.9 °C and 42.4°C with minimum during the month of January 9.6 °C and 11.3 °C in Shajapur and Rajgarh respectively. During the south- west monsoon season the relative humidity generally exceeds 88% (July / August month). The rest of the year is drier. April is the driest month of the year. The wind velocity is higher during the pre monsoon period as compared to post monsoon period. The maximum wind velocity is 27.0 km / hr. observed during the month of June and minimum 7.1 km/hr during the month of November. 87. During the last five years, highest amount of rainfall was received in both districts in year 2006. About 92.3% of annual rainfall was received during monsoon season. Only 7.7% of annual rainfall takes place between October to May period. A monthly rainfall detail for last five years in the both project districts has been summarized in Table 4.2.

28

Table 4.2 : Monthly Rainfall data (mm) in the project districts for the last six years Year Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Total Shajapur 2004 19.8 0 0 0 0 43.7 218.6 477 56.5 12.4 0 0 828 2005 0 0 0 9.2 12.9 72.5 273.8 150.1 124 0 0 0 642.5 2006 0 0 37.5 4 44 103.6 324.1 783.4 308.7 23 0 0 1628.3 2007 0 0.7 0 5.5 25.7 85.7 555.7 240.9 145.8 0 0.9 0 1060.9 2008 0 0 4.5 2 0.1 156.2 198.3 155.3 160.7 4.3 11.3 0 692.7 Rajgarh 2004 8.9 0 0 0 1.1 138.6 270.3 516.3 19.9 55.3 4.5 0 1014.9 2005 0 0 15.2 5 0 103.4 370 85.1 138.6 0 0 0 717.3 2006 0 0 N.A. 0 38.5 52.9 277.6 496 337.6 4.6 0 0 N.A. 2007 0.3 12.7 0.8 0 14.4 108.8 433 142.9 129.4 0 0 0 842.3 2008 0 0 7.4 0.8 0.7 230.2 187 189 116.6 5 7 0 743.7 Source: India Meteorological Department, Delhi 4.2.2. Air and Noise Quality 88. In absence of any existing data on ambient air quality and noise levels of the project area, onsite monitoring was conducted at few selected locations. Most of the project area lies in vast open agricultural land and is largely free from air pollution and noise generating sources other than traffic and few brick-kilns existing in the area. However, these are located in open area and operate only for few months. 4.2.2.1 Air Quality 89. The 24 hourly average ambient air quality levels with respect to suspended particulate matter (SPM), respirable particulate matter (RSPM), Sulphur Dioxide and Oxides of Nitrogen are shown in Table 4.3. The Table reveals that SPM, RSPM, SO2 and NOx range from 73.5 to 195.8 µg/m3, 26.7 to 87.5 µg/m3, 5.4 to 13.6 µg/m3 and 4.2 to 12.7 µg/m3 respectively in the project area. These ambient air quality levels conform to the prescribed National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) (Appendix 4.1).

29

Table 4.3 :Ambient Air Quality Along the project section (24 Hourly) Location RSPM SPM SO2 Nox Max 87.5 195.8 13.6 12.7 Chapikheda Min 54.3 146.5 8.4 6.8 Avg 68.2 170.3 10.5 9.1 Max 58.7 127.3 9.6 10.2 Zirapur Min 26.7 73.5 4.5 4.2 Avg 33.6 96.1 6.2 6 Max 78.2 142.6 11.2 12.5 Gautampura Kheda Min 44.5 107.2 7.5 6.4 Avg 66.7 122 9.4 10.3 Max 84.6 152.4 10.3 11.8 Dhanoda Min 33.6 88.6 5.4 5.4 Avg 65.2 132.3 7.8 8.7 Source: Field Monitoring 4.2.2.2 Noise 90. The ambient noise levels (Table 4.4) at most of the locations is well within the permissible limits as prescribed by CPCB for day time and night time. Overall the noise level in the project region is not disturbing.

Table 4.4 : Noise Level in dB (A) Along the Project Corridor Noise level in dB (A) Station Location Day Night Code Leq Leq N-1 Khujner 52.3 40.1 N-2 Chapikheda 45.7 38.3 N-3 Dhatuniya 46.4 39.6 N-4 Kundikheda 48.5 40.2 Source: Field Monitoring 4.2.3. Topography and Geomorphology 91. The project road lies between 76º 10’ E to 76º 41’ E and 23º 42’ N to 24º 11’ N and lies in Shajapur and Rajgarh districts. The topography of the project road section is mixed type. The project road alignment traverses through plain terrain throughout except at two locations near kushikhedi and Zirapur, where rolling terrain is found. 92. The Rajgarh district lies on the northern edge of the Malwa plateau, and the Parbati River forms the eastern boundary of the district, while the forms the western boundary. The physiology of the road in this region is basically. • Denudatiional Landforms • Fluvial Landforms • Malwa Plateau • Kali Sindh Basin 93. The rest of the road section passes through the Shajapur District. Physio- cultural diversities in the district have led to sub-divide it into the following sub-micro regions:

B

30

• Agar plateau • Shajapur Forested Upland • Kali Sindh Basin • Shajapur Upland 94. The road section passing through the Shajapur District falls under the Kali Sindh Basin and the Shajapur Upland. Kali Sindh Basin: The region is elongated between the southern and northern limits of the district. Southern part of the region is hilly whereas northern part has plain land characteristics. The hills gradually decrease in height form south to north. There are a few scattered hillocks in the central and northern parts also. Geologically the entire region is a part of Deccan Trap of Cretaceous Eocene period. Shajapur Upland: Being a part of Malwa plateau, it presents the dissected topography. A hill range enters this region from the north and extends towards the south. The southern part of the region is an upland area and northern part is relatively low lying. In the south, the hills are scattered and are eroded by various streams. 4.2.4. Geology/Soil 95. Geologically the project area constitutes the extensive Deccan Trap Basalts (Upper Cretaceous to Lower Eocene in age), overlain by variable thickness of Alluvium of Recent origin. Basalts are massive, fractured/jointed and vesicular in nature. Most of the vesicles are filled with secondary minerals like quartz, calcite and zeolite. The uppermost unit of basaltic flow is highly weathered. Alluvium is confined mainly along the rivers and streams, consisting of sand silt and clay, brought by rivers, mixed with line kankar and material derived from nearby hilly terrain. 96. Soil: The Soil type of Rajgarh district is mainly the medium to deep Black soil and mixed red and black soil. In some portion of the district River alluvial soil is also found. The alluvium consists of clay, silt, sand, gravels and pebbles. The soil in Shajapur district is of mixed type and there is no distinct boundary in between any two type of soils. There are three categories of soils, identified in the district area:- • Black cotton Soil • Lateritic soil • Alluvium soil 97. The project road section is basically Black soil. These soils are dark grey to black in color, composed of clay and are plastic and sticky in nature. These soils are fertile in nature and derived from decomposition of trappean rocks having thickness of 15 cm to 2m. In some portion Lateritic soil is also found. The soil sample has been collected at four locations in the project section as shown in Table 4.5. The results reveal that the dominant soil type is sandy clay loam with good organic content.

31

Table 4.5 : Physiochemical Characteristics of soil in the project road S. Parameters Location No. Chapikheda Jirapur Devnagar Kundikheda 1 Colour Light Brown Brown Yellow Light Yellow 2 pH(20% slurry) 8.6 9.3 7.8 8.2 3 Conductivity ( μmhos / cm, 20% slurry) 276 265 304 285 4 Moisture (%) 1.53 1.63 1.48 1.75 5 Chlorides (%) 0.0654 0.0732 0.0541 0.0588 6 Bulk density (g/cc) 1.35 1.44 1.25 1.3 7 Porosity (%v/v) 0.77 0.74 0.82 0.79 8 Water Holding Capacity (%) 28 30 25 28 9 CEC meq/100g 28.3 27.5 26.8 29.5 10 Carbonate (%) NT NT NT NT 11 Bicarbonate (%) 0.0695 0.0742 0.0664 0.0722 12 Organic Matter (%) 0.052 0.064 0.071 0.048 13 Texture Sandy Sandy Clay Clay Sandy Clay Clay Loam Loam Loam Loam 14 Nitrogen % 1.42 1.44 1.38 1.26 15 Potassium ,kg/h 1.65 1.54 1.63 1.42 16 Phosphorous, kg/h 27.8 29.8 30.5 31.2 Source: Field Monitoring and Analysis 4.2.5. Seismicity 98. The project region falls in Zones I & II of seismicity & low hazard zone in the hazard and seismic zoning map respectively as shown in the Figure 4.2 below.

32

Source: Amateur Seismic Centre, Pune Source: IS 1893 (Part 1) 2002

Figure 4.2 : Hazard and Seismic Zoning Map

4.2.6. Land use 99. The area under various land uses in the state is presented in Table 4.6. The Table shows that the major portion of the land use is under agriculture (48.69%) followed by forest cover (28%).

Table 4.6 : Land Use Pattern in the State Land Use Area in '000 ha Percentage Total geographical area 30824 Reporting Area for land utilization 30756 100 Net area Sown 14975 48.7 Forest* 8688 28.2 Area not available for cultivation 3364 10.9 Permanent Pasture & Grazing land 1341 4.3 Land under misc. tree crops & groves 20 0.06 Cultivable waste land 1175 3.8 Fallow land other than current fallows 596 1.9 Current fallows 596 1.9 Source: DPR • The data is given for 2004-05 (as per availability) including Reserved & Protected Forest 100. Land Use Pattern along the project road Section: Land use pattern along the project road is also mixed type dominated by agriculture and residential areas. Chainage-wise land use along the project road is given in Table 4.7. About 10.1 km of road length passes through forest areas.There are also few public and private settlements along the project road. 33

Table 4.7 : Chainage wise land use along the project road Chainage (km) Existing land use Village From To Pachor - Machalpur 3 10 Agricultural land with roadside settlements Pachor 10 20 Built-up area Khujner Kalyakhedi, 20 27 Agricultural land with roadside settlements Sandavata 27 39 Commercial / residential settlements Chapikhedia 39 50 Agricultural land with settlements Mohan 50 58 Mixture of barren land and settlement Kashikhedi, Zirapur 58 69 Agricultural land with settlements Dhatuniya, Machalpur Gogatpur - Soyat 0 4 Commercial / residential settlements Dhanoda 4 8.7 Agricultural land Machalpur - Rajasthan Border 0 2 Mixture of barren and agriculture land Devnagar, 2 8 Agricultural land with settlements Kundilkheda 8 12.2 Commercial / residential settlements Gogatpur Source: DPR 4.2.7. Hydrology and Drainage 101. Madhya Pradesh represents great river basins and the watershed of a number of rivers. Catchments of many rivers of India lie in Madhya Pradesh. The Narmada (originating from Amarkantak) and Tapti (originating from Multai of ) rivers and their basins divide the state in two, with the northern part draining largely into the Ganga basin and the southern part into the Godavari and Mahanadi systems. All the rivers, which drain into the Ganga, flow from south to north. The Chambal, Sipra, Kali Sind, Parbati, Kuno, Sind, Betwa, Dhasan and Ken rivers are the main tributaries of the . 102. Hydrology of Rajgarh District: The project road in the Rajgarh district falls in the Ganga Basin and Chambal sub basin. The whole Rajgarh districts fall in the Ganga Basin. The watershed areas of the Rajgarh district are Upper-Kalisind, Lower Kalisind, Newaz, Chapi-Ghani, Upper Parbati , AjnarGhoraphachar and Lower Parbati . The district is drained by few rivers Kalisindh, Newaj, Parwati, Ajnaar and Gadganga. Some important water bodies of Rajgarh district are Parasram talab (Narsinghgarh), Chidikho (Narsinghgarh), Napanera () and Chhapidam (Zirapur). Hydrology of Shajapur District: The entire District lies in the drainage area of the Chambal which is a major tributary of the Yamuna. The Chambal itself flows towards the north beyond the western boundary of the district. Its tributaries flowing in the district, are the Parbati, the Nawaj, the Kali Sindh, the Lakhundar, the Ahu and the Au and the Chhoti Kali Sindh. The watershed areas of the Shajapur district are Upper-Kalisind, Sind , Lakhundar, Ahu, Lower Kalisind, Rewan, Newaz , Ajnar, Chapi-Ghani , Upper Parbati and Lower Parbati.

34

103. The project area is draining by few rivers like Kali sindh, Newaj and Kadal River and other small streams cross the project road. The Kali Sindh river and Kadal river is found to be perennial on observation. Other tributaries are non perennial in nature. 4.2.8. Groundwater 104. The ground water availability along the project road area is poor. The depth of water table varies from 48.0 mbgl -290.41 mbgl Most of the wells become dry except in monsoon season. The groundwater quality of the samples collected during field survey in the study area has been summarised in Table 4.8. The results reveal that the ground water quality conforms to the drinking water standards (Appendix 4.3).

Table 4.8 : Groundwater Quality Along the Project Corridor S. Locations Parameters No 1 Colour Colourless Colourless Colourless Colourless 2 pH 7.8 7.5 8 7.4 3 Conductivity (μmhos / cm) 475 488 435 406 4 Turbidity, NTU 2 2 3 2 5 TDS (mg/l) 295 307 275 264 6 TSS (mg/l) 6 6 6 5

7 Total Hardness as CaCO3 (mg/l) 74 85 72 70 8 Chlorides as Cl (mg/l) 45 38 45.3 38.3

9 Sulphates as SO4 (mg/l) 21.1 22.4 20.7 21.5

10 Nitrates as NO3 (mg/l) ND ND ND ND

11 Phosphates as PO4 (mg/l) 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.07 12 Fluorides as F (mg/l) 0.65 0.72 0.61 0.58 13 Iron as Fe (mg/l) 0.18 0.22 0.16 0.25 14 Lead as Pb (mg/l) ND ND ND ND 15 Copper as Cu (mg/l) ND ND ND ND 16 Nickel as Ni (mg/l) ND ND ND ND 17 Zinc as Zn (mg/l) 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 18 Chromium Total as Cr (mg/l) ND ND ND ND 19 Manganese as Mn (mg/l) 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.06 20 Oil & grease (mg/l) ND ND ND ND 21 Calcium as Ca (mg/l) 30.8 32.4 28.7 26.6 22 Magnesium as Mg (mg/l) 17.5 18.6 15.4 16.3 Source: Analysis of Field Samples 4.2.9. Surface water 4.2.9.1 River System and Water bodies of the Project Area 105. The project road in the Rajgarh district falls in the Ganga Basin. Project area is drained by few rivers like Kali sindh and Kadal and other small streams cross the project road. The Kali sindh river and Kadal river is found to be perennial in ground observation. Other tributaries are non perennial in nature. 35

106. The project road in the Shajapur district falls in the Ganga Basin and Chambal sub basin. The project area is draining by Kali Sindh river. Kali Sindh also crosses the road which is perennial in nature. The water bodies along the corridor are given at Table 4.9. Table 4.9 : List of Surface Water Sources Along/Across Project Corridor S. Name Whether Crossing or in Buffer Area No. 1. Kali sindh River Crossing the project alignment 2. Kadal Nadi Crossing the project alignment 3. Newaj River Buffer Zone 4. Lakhundar River Buffer Zone Source: Survey of India Toposheet/ Google Earth/Wikimapia site

Figure 4.3 : Drainage map of the project road SH-51

36

107. Water sample taken from Kali sindh river and Kadal Nadi has been compared with the standards prescribed by Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) for Irrigation- Class D and propagation of wild life and fisheries -Class-E (Appendix 4.4). The results of the samples conforms their suitability for both these purposes. Results of the surface water quality in the project area have been summarized in Table 4.10.

Table 4.10 : Surface Water Quality in Project Area Location S.No. Parameters Kali Sindh Kadal 1 Colour Colourless Colourless 2 pH 7.3 7.8 3 Conductivity (μmhos / cm) 608 530 4 Turbidity, NTU 6 6 5 TDS (mg/l) 395 340 6 TSS (mg/l) 16 18

7 Total Hardness as CaCO3 (mg/l) 130 146 8 Chlorides as Cl (mg/l) 45 42.5

9 Sulphates as SO4 (mg/l) 20.5 17.5

10 Nitrates as NO3 (mg/l) 0.54 0.46

11 Phosphates as PO4 (mg/l) 0.07 0.07 12 Fluorides as F (mg/l) 0.4 0.36 13 Iron as Fe (mg/l) 0.16 0.22 14 Lead as Pb (mg/l) ND ND 15 Copper as Cu (mg/l) ND ND 16 Nickel as Ni (mg/l) ND ND 17 Zinc as Zn (mg/l) 0.8 0.7 18 Chromium Total as Cr (mg/l) ND ND 19 Manganese as Mn (mg/l) 0.08 0.08 20 Oil & grease (mg/l) ND ND 21 Calcium as Ca (mg/l) 46.2 40.3 22 Magnesium as Mg (mg/l) 24.5 21.7 23 Total Coliform 33 27 24 DO 5.5 5.3 25 BOD 4.5 6.3 26 COD 18.3 17.6 Source: Analysis of field Samples 4.3. Ecological Resources 4.3.1. Terrestrial Ecology 4.3.1.1 Forests 108. Madhya Pradesh is endowed with rich and diverse forest resources. Lying between lat. 21° 04' N and long. 74° 02' and 82° 49' E, it is a reservoir of biodiversity. The geographical area of the state is 308,144 km2 (118,975 sq mi) which constitutes 9.38% of the land area of the country. 37

The forest area of the state is 95,221 km2 (36,765 sq mi) constituting 31% of the geographical area of the state and 12.44% of the forest area of the country. Legally this area has been classified into "Reserved Forest, Protected Forest and Unclassified Forest", which constitute 61.7%, 37.4% and 0.9% of the forest area respectively. Central, eastern and southern parts of the state are rich, whereas northern and western parts are deficient in forest. The forest cover of Madhya Pradesh is shown in Figure 4.4.

Figure 4.4 : Forest Cover Map of Madhya Pradesh 4.3.1.2 Floristic structure of the study area

109. The study area is dominated by agricultural fields. The vegetation in the study area is found on the edges of fields and along the roadside. However, there are few orchards enroute the corridor which are fruit bearing in nature like Mangifera indica Syzygium cumini Tamarindus indica etc. Dominant species found along the road side are Shisham or Indian Rosewood- Dalbergia sissoo, Aam or Mango-Mangifera indica, Eucalyptus spp., Jamun or Java Plum- Syzygium cumini, Teak- Tectona grandis, Khair- Acacia catechu, Neem- Azadirachta indica, Kikar or Babul- Acacia nilotica, Siris - Albizia lebek, Ber or Indian Jujube- Zizyphus mauritiana, Kair or Teat -Capparis deciduas, Barh or Banyan- Ficus benghalensis, Pipal or Bo Tree - Ficus religiosa, Bogori - Zizyphus jujuba, Imli or Tamarind- Tamarindus indica, Ghoranim – Melia azedarach, Mahua - Madhuca indica and Bamboo Plantations. The list of common trees observed during the present survey along the road is given in Table 4.11. 110. The study area shows presence of medicinal plants. The area abounds in production of many kinds of fruits, flowers, seeds and leaves which have medicinal properties. Study area has got a variety of trees and plants owing to the climatic and geological factors. There are many plants like

38

Brahmi, Satavari, Safed Musli, Bahera, Amla, Dhavas, Arjuna which have medicinal value found in the study area. 111. No loss of any threatened, rare or endangered plant species is envisaged in the project area. Table 4.11 : List of Plant Species found in the Study Area

S. No. Local Name Botanical Name Family Large Trees 1. Achar Buchanania lanzan (spreg) Anacardiaceae 2. Arjun Terminalia arjuna (Bedd) Combretaceae 3. Aam Mangifera indica (Linn) Anacardiaceae 4. Awla Emblica officinalis Euphorbiaceae 5. Imli Tamarindus indica (Linn) Caesalpiniaceae 6. Kardhai Anogeissus pendula Combrataceae 7. Kala siras Albizia lebbek Leguminosae (Mimoseae) 8. Kevlor Bauhinia purpurea Caesalpinaceae 9. Kumbhi Careya arborea Myrtaceae 10. Kullu Sterculia urens Stcrculiaceae 11. Kem Mitragyna parvifolia Rubiaceae 12. Khair Acacia catechu Leguminosae (Mimoseae) 13. Gular Ficus glomerata Moraceae 14. Gunja Gardenia pinnata Burseraceae 15. Chchwa Albizzia odoratissima Leguminosae (Mimoseae) 16. Chirol Holoptelea integrifolia Legumenosae (Mimoseae) 17. Jamun Syzygium cuimini Myrataceae 18. Kankar Lannea coromandalica Anacardiaceae 19. Tendu Diospyros melanoxeon Ebenaceae 20. Dhavda Anogeissus latifolia Combretaceae 21. Dhobin Dalbergia paniculata Leguminosae (Papilionaceae) 22. Nilgiri Eucalyptus spp Myrtaceae 23. Neem Azadirachta indica Meliaceae 24. Palas Butea monosperma Leguminosea (papilionaceae) 25. Pakar Ficus infectoria Moraceae 26. Padar Stereospermum suaveolens Bignoniaceae 27. Pangra Erythrina Suberosa Leguminosae (Pipilionaceae) 28. Pipal Ficus religiosa Moraceae 29. Bad Ficus bengalensis Moraceae 30. Bahera Terminalia belerica Combretaceae 31. Babul Acacia nilotica Legumenosae 39

S. No. Local Name Botanical Name Family (Mimoseae) 32. Bel Aegle marmelos Rutaceae 33. Bhirra Chloroxylon Swietenia, D.C. Meliaceae 34. Maharukh Ailanthus excelsa Simarubiaceae 35. Mahua Madhuca indica Sapotaceae 36. Shisham Delbergia latifolia, Roxb Leguminosae (Papilionaceae) 37. Safed Siras Albizzia procera, Benth Leguminosae (Mimoseae) 38. Sagwan Tectona grandis Verbenaceae 39. Saj Terminalia tomentosa Combretaceae 40. Salai Boswellia serrata Burseraceae 41. Seja Lagerstroemia parviflora Lythraceae 42. Semal Salmalia malabarica, Bombaxcieba Malvaceae 43. Haldu Adina Cardifolia Rubiaceae Small Trees 44. Amaltash Cassia fistula Leguminosae (Caesalpiniaceae) 45. Astara Bauhinia malabarica Leguminosae (Caesalpiniaceae) 46. Asta Bauhinia racermosa Leguminosae (Caesalpiniaceae) 47. Ghont Zizyphus xylopyra Rhamnaceae 48. Ber Zizyphus jujube Rhamnaceae 49. Lokhandi Ixora arborea Rubiaceae 50. Sehra Bauhinia retusa Leguminosae (Caesalpiniaceae) Shrubs and Under Shrubs 51. Adusa Adhatoda vasica Acanthaceae 52. Apamarg Achyranthes aspera Amaranthaceae 53. Arandi Ricinus Communis Euphorbiaceae 54. Aak Calotropis gigantean Asclepiadaceae 55. Gokhru Tribulus terrestris Zygophllaceae 56. Zhadneri Zizyphus nummularia Rhamnaceae 57. Tulsi Ocimum Sanctum Labiatae 58. Thuar Euphorbia nerifolia Euphorbiaceae 59. Dhavai Woodfordia fruticosa Lythraceae 60. Nirgudi Vitex negundo Verbenaceae 61. Neel Indigofera pulchella Leguminosae 62. Pawar Cassia tora Leguminosae (Caesalpiniaceae) 63. Beshram Ipomoea pescaparae Convolvulaceae 64. Bhatkatiya Solanum nigrum Solanaceae 65. s Vidyasini Lantana camara Verbenaceae

40

S. No. Local Name Botanical Name Family 66. Shatavari Asparagus recemosus Liliaceae 67. Sitafal Anona Squamosa Anonaceae 68. Harsingar Nyctanthes arbortristis Oleacaae 69. Ratanjot Jatropha curacas Evphorbiaceae 70. Gunja Abrus precatorious Leguminosea 71. Gauj Millietia auriculata Leguminosea (Pipilionaceae) 72. Palasbel Butea superba Leguminosea (Pipilionaceae) 73. Amrbel Cuscuta reflexa Convolvulaceae 74. Bans Dendrocalamus Strictus Gramineae Source: Field Survey and Secondary Sources

4.3.2. Fauna

4.3.2.1 Wild Life and Protected Areas

112. There are 9 National Parks and 25 Sanctuaries spread over an area of 10,862 km2 constituting 11.40% of the total forest area and 3.52% of the geographical area of the state. The details of National Park and Sanctuaries is shown in Figure 4.5

Figure 4.5 : National Parks and Sanctuaries in Madhya pradesh 113. The vegetation density and diversity is an important factor determining the habitat and thus for particular wild animals. Different animals prefer different types of habitat for food and shelter. During the survey langur and macaque were sighted in different locations. Grazing activity mostly performed by domestic animals like cow, buffaloes, goat etc. however, the public consultation revealed the existence of Jackals, Foxes, Hare, 41

macaque in the study area are also found co existing in the similar habitat conditions. List of fauna present in study area is given in Table 4.12. Table 4.12 : List of Fauna in the Study Area S. No. Local Name Zoological Name Family 1. Common Langur Presbytia entellus Colobidae 2. Rhesus macaque Macaca mulatta Circopthecidae 3. Common jungle cat Felis chaus Felidae 4. Common Mongoose Herpestes edwardsi Herpestidae 5. Jackal Canis aureus Canidae 6. Indian Fox Vulpes benglensis Canidae 7. Common five Stripped Funambulus pennanti Sciuridae squirrel 8. Field rat Bandicota bengalensis Muridae 9. Common house rat Rattus rattus-refescena Muridae 10. Common India Porcupine Hystrix indica Hystricidae 11. Common Indian hare Lepus nigricollis Leporidae Source: Secondary sources and Public consultation 114. The reptile includes the snakes and lizards of various types. Non poisonous snakes include rat snake, Dhaman etc. the poisonous snakes include the cobra, common Krait, Russell’s viper etc. lizards including monitor lizard are also observed. The agriculture field in the study area provides an ideal habitat for many snakes and other reptiles. Reptiles such as Russell viper, cobra, and python were found occasionally in the dense vegetation areas as per-narrated by local people. The list of common reptiles found in the study area is shown in Table 4.13 Table 4.13 : List of Reptiles in the Study Area S. No. Scientific Name English Name Family 1. Python molurus Indian python Pythonidae 2. Mabuya carinata Common skink Scincidae 3. Ptyas mucosus Rat snake Colubridae 4. Hemidactyhus flaviviridis House Lizard Gekkonidae 5. Calotes versicolor Garden Lizard Agamidae 6. Bungarus caeruleus Common India Krait Elapidae 7. Viper russelli Russel’s Viper Viperidae 8. Naja naja Indian cobra Elapidae 9. Varanus bengalensis Moniter Lizard varanidae 10. Dendrelaphis tristis Tree snake Colubridae Source: Secondary Sources and Public Consultation 115. The common Butterflies found in the study area are Danaus chrysippus, Tirumala limniace, Euploea core etc the list of Butterflies found in the study area is given in Table 4.14. Table 4.14 : List of Butterflies found in the study area S. No. Scientific name Common name 1 Danaus chrysippus Plain tiger 2 Euthalia nais Baronet

42

3 Euploea core Common crow 4 Catopsilia Pomona Common emigrant 5 Danaus genutia Stripped tiger 6 Tirumala limniace Blue tiger Source: Secondary Sources and Public Consultation 4.3.2.2 Avifauna

116. A total number of 22 species of birds were encountered during the present survey. Dominant bird species observed during the survey are blue rock pigeon, rose ringed parakeet, small blue kingfisher, green bee eater, house crow, common myna, House sparrow etc. List of bird species found in study area is given in Table 4.15 Table 4.15 : List of Avifauna found in the Study Area S. No. Standard English Name Zoological Name Family 1. Gray Heron Ardea Cinerea Ardeidae 2. Paddy Bird Ardeola grayii Ardeidae 3. Cattle egret Bulbulcus ibis Ardeidae 4. White egret Egretta alba Ardeidae 5. Little Egret Egretta garzetta Ardeidae 6. Black parteidge Francolinus from Colinus Phasianidae 7. Gray partridge Francolinus pond-icerianus Phasianidae 8. Common or gray quail Cotuenix coturnix Phasianidae 9. Red wattled lapwing Vanellus indicus Charadridae 10. Yellow wattled lapwing Vanellus malabaricus Charadridae 11. Common green pigeon Treron Phoenicoptera Collumbidae 12. Blue rock pigeon Columba livia Collumbidae 13. Indian ring dove Streptopelia decaocto Collumbidae 14. Spotted dove Streptopelia chinensis Collumbidae 15. Large Indian Parakeet Psittacula eupatria Psittacidae 16. Rose ringed Parakeet Psittacula Krameri Psittacidae 17. Blossom headed parakeet Psittacula cyanocephala Psittacidae 18. Koel Eudynamys scolopaceae Cuculidae 19. Coucal Centropus sinensis Cuculidae 20. Pied king fisher Ceryle rudis Alcedinidae 21. Small Blue king fisher or Alcedo atthis Alcedinidae Common king fisher 22. White breasted king fisher Halcyon smyrnensis Alcedinidae 23. Green bee eater Merops orientalis Meropidae 24. Indian roller blue jay Coracias benghalensis Coracidae 25. Indian pitta Pitta brachyuran Pittiade 26. Golden oriole Oriolus oriolus Orioladae 27. King crow; Black Drongo Dicrurus adsimilis Dicruidae 28. Large Racket tailed drango Dicrurus paradiseus Dicruidae 29. Pied myna Sturnus contra Sturnidae 30. Common myna Aeridotheres tristis Sturnidae 31. Jungle myna Aeridotheres Sturnidae 32. House crow Corvus splendens Corvidae 33. Jungle crow Corvus macrorhynchos Corvidae 34. Red whisked bulbul Pycnonotus jocosus Pycnontidae 35. Redvented bulbul Pyenonotus cafer Pycnontidae 36. Jungle babbler Turdoidesstriatus Muscicapidae Timalinae 43

S. No. Standard English Name Zoological Name Family 37. Pied Bushchat Saxicola caprata Muscicapidae 38. Magpie Robin Copsychus-saularis Muscicapidae Turdinae 39. Indian Robin Saxicola fulicatus Muscicapidae Turdinae 40. Grey wagtail Motacilla cinerea Motacillidae 41. Yellow Wagtail Motacilla glava Motacillidae 42. Purple sun Bird Nectarinia asiatica Nectarinidae 43. House sparrow Passer-domesticus passerinae 44. Weaver bird Ploceus philippinus passerinae 45. Red Munia Estrilda amandava Estrildinae Source: DPR 4.3.2.3 Roadside Plantation 117. The major species observed are Mango, teak, neem, jamun, palas, saja, seasam, mahua etc. About 5497 numbers of trees were observed along 20 m width of the project road. The Chainage-wise list of trees along the project road is given in Table 4.16. Table 4.16 : Trees Along Project Road (within 20m width) Chainage (km) Left Right Total From To 3.000 4.000 25 15 40 4.000 5.000 131 40 171 5.000 6.000 98 60 158 6.000 7.000 34 20 54 7.000 8.000 29 25 54 8.000 9.000 46 10 56 9.000 10.000 32 25 57 10.000 11.000 71 40 111 11.000 12.000 96 8 104 12.000 13.000 45 15 60 13.000 14.000 51 30 81 14.000 15.000 28 20 48 15.000 16.000 14 15 29 16.000 17.000 51 20 71 17.000 18.000 16 10 26 18.000 19.000 59 12 71 19.000 20.000 50 50 100 20.000 21.000 64 30 94 21.000 22.000 79 35 114 22.000 23.000 90 15 105 23.000 24.000 16 14 30 24.000 25.000 19 24 43 25.000 26.000 26 11 37 26.000 27.000 38 9 47 27.000 28.000 84 40 124 28.000 29.000 27 50 77 29.000 30.000 69 15 84

44

Chainage (km) Left Right Total From To 30.000 31.000 51 30 81 31.000 32.000 136 20 156 32.000 33.000 80 40 120 33.000 34.000 70 20 90 34.000 35.000 18 25 43 35.000 36.000 57 60 117 36.000 37.000 39 20 59 37.000 38.000 1 15 16 38.000 39.000 18 30 48 39.000 40.000 60 40 100 40.000 41.000 25 50 75 41.000 42.000 52 20 72 42.000 43.000 41 30 71 43.000 44.000 48 20 68 44.000 45.000 41 15 56 45.000 46.000 45 20 65 46.000 47.000 41 15 56 47.000 48.000 47 10 57 48.000 49.000 45 8 53 49.000 50.000 67 7 74 50.000 51.000 19 11 30 51.000 52.000 24 8 32 52.000 53.000 17 9 26 53.000 54.000 24 4 28 54.000 55.000 10 5 15 55.000 56.000 14 9 23 56.000 57.000 12 10 22 57.000 58.000 15 2 17 58.000 59.000 19 12 31 59.000 60.000 40 25 65 60.000 61.000 57 20 77 61.000 62.000 46 18 64 62.000 63.000 69 60 129 63.000 64.000 21 12 33 64.000 65.000 30 17 47 65.000 66.000 16 14 30 66.000 67.000 12 20 32 67.000 68.000 20 0 20 68.000 69.000 19 15 34 69.000 70.000 10 5 15 0.000 1.000 0 8 8 1.000 2.000 4 11 15 2.000 3.000 11 6 17 3.000 4.000 5 8 13 4.000 5.000 15 12 27 5.000 6.000 15 5 20 45

Chainage (km) Left Right Total From To 6.000 7.000 0 0 0 7.000 8.000 11 2 13 8.000 9.000 11 5 16 9.000 10.000 9 6 15 0.000 1.000 63 12 75 1.000 2.000 27 10 37 2.000 3.000 30 20 50 3.000 4.000 12 15 27 4.000 5.000 69 9 78 5.000 6.000 37 11 48 6.000 7.000 16 6 22 7.000 8.000 19 8 27 8.000 9.000 9 5 14 0.000 1.000 63 65 128 1.000 2.000 80 40 120 2.000 3.000 14 14 28 3.000 4.000 21 24 45 4.000 5.000 61 12 73 5.000 6.000 26 9 35 6.000 7.000 56 18 74 7.000 8.000 25 16 41 8.000 9.000 19 10 29 9.000 10.000 15 17 32 10.000 11.000 44 15 59 11.000 12.000 9 9 18 Total 3660 1837 5497 Source: DPR

4.3.3. Aquatic Ecology 118. No commercial fishing was observed in the project site. Small scale fishing was observed for local purpose. Only two major fish species were observed viz. Rohu (Labeo rohita) and Catla (Catla catla) only during Monsoon period. There is no breeding or spawning ground of these species in any of the water bodies in the project area since the water availability and flow velocity is quite low and unfavourable for breeding. No migratory fishes are found in these rivers. 4.4. Socio-Economic Environment 4.4.1. Economic Progress 119. The economy of Madhya Pradesh is based on agriculture, forest products, industries, mineral resources, and cottage industry sectors. The gross domestic product of the state amounted to Rs. 304,720 million in 1990, in 1995 this figure amounted to Rs. 478,410 million, and in 2000 this figure was Rs. 737,150 million. 4.4.1.1 Agriculture

46

120. In 2004-05, the state has produced about 14.1million tones of food grains (comprising Cereals 10.7million tonnes and 3.4million tonnes of pulses) and about 4.8 million tones of total Oilseed (Soyabean production is 3.75 million tones). The state has contributed 7.43% food grains, 8.7% cereals and 21.4% pulses to the national food storage. The contribution of national oil seed production was 22.1% in the 2003-04. Thus the state became highest producer of pulses and second oilseed producer in the country in 2003-04. 121. Agriculture of the Project District: The economy of Rajgarh district is agriculture based and wheat, pea and soybean are the main crops cultivated. The district has fairly good cultivated lands, with about 412,714 hectares of total area that are sown. Of this, the total gross area being irrigated amounts to about 160,096 hectares. The occupation of Shajapur is also mainly agriculture. Total land for Agriculture in the district is about 446,000 hectares. Soyabean is the major crop in this district. Main plants production is taken in 396,000 hectares. The other main crops are wheat, Jawar. Maize, Gram, Rice, Bajra, Sugarcane, Groundnut are the less important crops. 4.4.1.2 Mineral Resources 122. Madhya Pradesh is rich in minerals. There are large reserves of coal and important deposits of iron ore, manganese ore, bauxite, limestone, dolomite, copper, fire clay & china clay. Diamond reserves at Panna are of particular interest. There are 24 cement factories in the state. The state is one of the largest producers of cement in the country. The reserves of dolomite (66 million tonnes), fuller’s earth (1.2 lakh million tonnes), clay (12030 million tonnes), lime stone, quartz etc. reported in project area. The project districts are not very rich in mineral deposits. Few secondary minerals like Quartz, calcite and zeolite are found in the project districts. 4.4.1.3 Industries 123. The major industries of the state are electronics, telecommunications, petrochemicals, food processing and automobiles. The state has also taken a lead in the production of cement. The state is also famous for its traditional handicrafts and handlooms manufactured at Chanderi and Maheshwar. The major industrial unit in the state are- cement, Pig Iron, Steel Ingots, News Prints and Sugar mills. 4.4.2. Infrastructure Facilities 4.4.2.1 Water Supply 124. Madhya Pradesh ranks among top states in accessibility and availability of safe drinking water supply. Nearly 90% of the total population gets safe drinking water. Projects districts are also richly endowed by groundwater and surface water resources. Groundwater is primarily used for drinking and domestic purposes in the project influence area. 4.4.2.2 Transportation 125. Madhya Pradesh is poorly served with transport and communication facilities. State has about 21km of roads per 100 sq. km, as amongst an all India average of 62 km per sq. km. The road network is deficient both 47

in the quantum network connectivity as well as in riding quality of the roads, mainly the state highways, district roads and village roads. 126. The main railroads that pass through the state were originally laid down to connect the ports of Chennai, Mumbai and Kolkota with their surrounding areas. Important railway junctions include Bhopal, Ratlam, Khandwa, Itarsi and Katni. Major airports connecting the states with other part of the country are at Bhopal, , Indore, Jabalpur, Rewa and Khajuraho, as well as several national highways. 127. Transportation of the Project District: Shajapur district is well connected by rail and road. Railway line is well connected to various cities. Here the Ujjain-Bhopal, Ujjain-Guna, Makshi-Indoreon, Ujjain- Bhopal, Makshi, Bercha, Akodiya, , Kalapipal are major railway stations. NH-3 is passing through the district. On the railway track Ujjain- Guna, Shajapur is the main railway station. Districts main bus routes are Agra-Mumbai national high way Agar-Kota, Shajapur-Shujalpu and Shajapur-Agar. Rajgarh district is well connected by rail and road. NH-12 is passing through the middle of the district. 128. The proposed road Pachor – Chapikheda – Zirapur - Machalpur section serves as a link connecting these important cities of Rajgarh districts. The improvement of roads infrastructure in the region will enhance the tourism potential as well as will lead to increased socio-economic activities in both the districts. Therefore, the existing road infrastructure urgently needs improvement by widening and reconstruction. 4.4.2.3 Power Sources and Availability 129. The state is well endowed with potential hydroelectric power. Main hydroelectric projects (jointly developed with other states) are the Babanthadi with Maharashtra, the Ban Sagar with Bihar and uttar Pradesh, Chambal Valley with Rajasthan, Narmada Sagar with Gujarat and Rajasthan, and Rajghat and Urmil with Uttar Pradesh. The Hasdeo Bango, Bargi, and Birsinghapur thermal power projects are also within the state. 130. Installed power capacity of Madhya Pradesh is 6305 MW, of which 2990 MW is produced from state’s own projects, 1599 MW from joint-venture projects and 1716MW from the central sector allocation. Per capita electricity consumption in the state is 270 Kwh. About 97.43% villages in the state have been electrified. 4.5. Social and Cultural Resources 4.5.1. Population and Communities 131. Madhya Pradesh is a landlocked state in the central part of the country with a population of 60.3million with more than 74% of the population living in the rural areas. The population density of the .state is 196persons/km2 in compare to 325 persons/km2 of India. Sex ratio of the state is 920 against the 933 in the country. According to the census 2001, the state of Madhya Pradesh and India has following facts on Population (Table 4.17).

48

Table 4.17 : Demographic Profile of the State and the country S. Feature Madhya Pradesh India No. 1 Geographical Area (sq. km) 308824 3287240 2 Total Population 60385118 1028737436 3 Male population 31456873 532223090 4 Female population 28928245 496514346 5 Rural Population 44282528 742490639 6 Urban Population 16102590 286119689 7 Density 196 325 8 Sex ratio (female/1000 male) 920 933 9 Literacy (%) 64.08 64.8 Source: Census Data, Census of India, 2001 132. The project road SH-51 is passing through the 15 villages of the Rajgarh and Shajapur districts. The villages are listed in Table 4.18.

Table 4.18 : List of villages in the project road

Location Start Chainage (km) End Chainage (km) Pachor- Machalpur Khujner 14/550 16/000 KalyaKhedi 21/500 22/000 Sandavata 27/000 27/400 Chapikheda 36/650 38/500 Mohan 41/100 41/700 Kashikhedi 51/900 52/200 Jirapur 54/800 56/800 Mona Khedi 60/000 60/200 Dhatunya 60/700 60/900 Machalpur 68/200 69/700 Machalpur – Goghatpur (up to Rajasthan border) Devnagar 2/600 2/700 Gautampura Kheda 4/400 4/700 KundiKheda 5/000 5/100 Goghatpur 9/500 10/100 Goghatpur – Soyat Dhanoda 2/300 2/800 Source: DPR 133. The total number of households in the villages of the project road is 8860 and the total population is 51616. Out of these, about 81% is general. The SC/ST population accounts for about 19% of the total population as shown in Figure 4.6. The figure also reveals that the gender ratio among SC/ST population is almost the same.

49

1.99% 16.93% 5000 4500 M F 4000 3500 3000 GEN 2500 SC 2000 ST 1500 Population (Nos) Population 1000 500 0 81.07% SC ST

Source: Census of India, 2001 Figure 4.6 : Demographic Status of the Project Section 4.5.2. Literacy 134. The overall literacy rate of Madhya Pradesh is 64.08 %, which is almost equivalent to the countries literacy rate (64.8%) (Figure 4.7). The project road passing through the Rajgarh and Shajapur districts of Madhya Pradesh covering villages have total literacy rate of 54.56%.The population of literate male (63.24%) is comparatively high than female literate (36.76%).

20000 18000 16000 14000 LIT ILL 12000 10000 8000 6000 Population (Nos) Population 4000 2000 0 Male Female

Figure 4.7 Literacy Rate Along the Project Section 4.5.3. Occupational Status 135. In the villages of the project road 39.87% of the total population comprise the workforce of the project area. 66.45% comprise the male working class population. Marginal population of villages of the project road is 8.73% with 69.1% represented by female population is comparatively high. Maximum percentage of the workers is in the agriculture sector as cultivators or agricultural labourers or employee in agro based industries. Tribal population in the project area is low (1.99 %) and they also live in the mainstream of the society as shown in Figure 4.8.

50

29%

31% MA IN CL MA IN WORKER MAIN AL MA RG WORKER MA IN HH MA IN OT NON WORKER 56%

60% 12% 9% 3%

8000 1600 7000 M F 1400 M F 6000 1200 5000 1000 4000 800 3000 600

Population (Nos) Population 400

Population (Nos) Population 2000 1000 200 0 0 MA RG CL MARG AL MA RG HH MARG OT MA IN CL MAIN AL MA IN HH MA IN OT

Figure 4.8 : Occupational status Along the Alignment 4.5.4. Structures or sites of historical, archaeological, paleontological, or architectural significance 136. There is no such site of significance either impacted or in the close vicinity of the project area. 4.5.4.1 Areas of Eco-Sensitivity/Protected Area/Restricted Area legislative and others 137. The project road does not pass through any National Park / Wildlife Sanctuary, reserve or protected forest. 51

5. ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND ITS MITIGATION MEASURES 138. Environmental impacts have been assessed considering present environmental setting of the project area, nature, and extent of the proposed activities. Suitable approach and qualitative and quantitative techniques were used to ascertain likely direct and indirect impacts during design, construction and operation stages of the project. Impacts are classified as being insignificant, minor, moderate and major. The mitigation measures have been presented along with the impacts. 139. During the field study, a number of informal consultations were held with people in the locality including those presently living along the various stretches of the sub project corridor. Some NGOs working in the areas were also contacted. Discussions were held with various concerned Government authorities like with Forests Departments, pollution control boards, State environmental impact assessment authority. Outcome of these consultations is referred for environmental impact assessment and designing of mitigative measures. 5.1. Impact on Physical Environment 5.1.1. Climate Design and Construction Phase 140. Project will have no impact on climate of the area. The subproject may have minor impact on weather conditions of the area due to cutting of the 311 trees. Mitigation Measures 141. All efforts are made to minimise the cutting of trees. Supervision consultants will further ensure minimal cutting of the trees during the construction stage. The compensatory afforestation shall be made on the basis 1:5. The plantations shall begin with start of construction. The survival of plantation will be ensured, even if they are planted through concerned forest department. Tree of native variety only will be planted. In addition to above plantation, additional trees shall be planted through village Panchayats to improve microclimatic conditions of the area. Operation Stage 142. The sub-project road is located in vast open agricultural land which will provide adequate dispersion of gaseous emission from vehicle. Further, extensive plantation will ameliorate/enhance the micro-climate. It also has associated benefits with respect to Green House Gas (GHG) emission reduction. The GHG emission reduction is anticipated due to improved road conditions and better connectivity. The GHG reduction is anticipated due to reduced idling of vehicle. Mitigation Measures

52

143. It is proposed that MPRDC may initiate study to assess the GHG emission reduction and reap the economic benefits from road improvement projects including higher tree plantation.

5.1.2. Natural Hazard 144. Earthquake: The sub project roads lies in seismic zone II/III as per classification by Bureau of Indian Standards. This means lower to medium seismic intensity. Mitigation Measures 145. All subproject structures shall be designed with consideration of above

seismicity. 5.1.3. Air Quality Design and Construction Phase 146. The potential sources of air emission during the construction phase of the project are: (i) dust from earth works (during site preparation), (ii) emissions from the operation of construction equipment and machines, (iii) fugitive emissions from vehicles plying on the road, (iv) fugitive emissions during the transport of construction materials, (v) air emissions other than dust arise from combustion of hydrocarbons particularly from the hot mix plants, and (vi) localised increased traffic congestion in construction areas. Most of the emissions will be in the form of coarse particulate matter which will settle down in close vicinity of construction site. Hot mix plant will generate carbon monoxide (CO), un-burnt hydrocarbon (HC), sulphur dioxide (SO2), particulate matters (PM), and nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions. This may affect the air quality of nearby areas, especially, due to emission discharge from low height of the stack. However, this will be a temporary phase and hence, no significant impact is envisaged. 147. The stone aggregate will be sourced from licensed quarries. No new quarries shall be open for the project. The pollution related aspects to these quarries are independently complied by the quarry owner. Mitigation Measures 148. Road pavement design should be such that tyre friction due to vehicle movement will be reduced. Vehicles delivering loose and fine materials like sand and aggregates shall be covered. Dust suppression measures like water sprinkling, water fogging shall be applied in all dust prone locations such as unpaved haulage roads5, earthworks, stockpiles and asphalt mixing plant areas. PPE shall be provided to the construction workers to minimise inhalation of respirable suspended particulate matter. 149. Mixing plants and asphalt (hot mix) plants shall be located at least 1 km away and in downwind direction of the human settlements. Material storage areas shall also be located downwind of the habitation area. Contractor shall obtain consent to establish and operate from concerned

5 Water suppression of fugitive dust can reduce emissions from 12% to 98% 53

State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) before its use for the project road. Hot mix plant shall be fitted with stack of adequate height (30 m) or as may be prescribed by SPCB to ensure enough dispersion of exit gases. Diesel Generating (DG) sets shall also be fitted with stack of adequate height. Low sulphur diesel shall be used in DG sets and other construction machineries. Construction vehicles and machineries shall be periodically maintained. LPG should be used as fuel source in construction camps instead of wood, wherever possible. 150. Air quality monitoring shall be carried out during construction phase. Suitable pollution control measures shall be adopted if monitored parameters are found above the prescribed limit. 151. The aggregate will be transported in the covered quarries through existing national and state highways. Operation Phase 152. The bad road conditions, the idling of vehicles are the main causes of the air and noise pollution at present. The improved road conditions will result in the improved ambient air quality. Since traffic is projected to increase with improved roads and better connectivity, the impact will remain more or less same. Since subproject is largely traverse through vast open agriculture areas, which provides adequate dispersion to gaseous pollutants generated from vehicles. Mitigation Measures 153. It is proposed to maintain the road conditions including shoulders and embankment turfing. Thick trees shall be planted close to sensitive locations such as hospital, school boundaries and near religious places. 154. Caution sign for speed regulation and lane driving shall be fixed near habitat areas. Educative awareness boards for safe and fuel efficient driving shall be fixed at selective locations. 5.1.4. Noise Design and Construction Phase 155. Ambient noise level may increase temporarily in the close vicinity of various construction activities, maintenance workshops and vehicles and earthmoving equipment. These construction activities are expected to produce noise levels in the range of 80 – 95 dB(A) (at a distance of about 5 m from the source). Although this level of noise is higher the permissible limit for ambient noise level for residential/commercial levels but will occur only intermittently and temporary. This noise level will attenuate fast with increase in distance from noise source. Impact due to noise during construction activities will be minimal to inhabitants since most of the built-up areas are located at safer distance from the road. However, there are few noise sensitive locations especially schools close to the alignment (Table 5.1)

Table 5.1 : List of Noise- Sensitive Locations along the Alignment

54

Offset from Chainage S. No. Village District Feature Side the edge of (km) the road(m) Pachor to Machalpur 1 13.800 Khujner Rajgarh Temple Right 2.30 2 14.200 Khujner Rajgarh Temple Right 5.87 3 15.800 Khujner Rajgarh Temple Right 9.97 4 27.100 Sandavata Rajgarh Temple Left 8.40 5 41.550 Mohan Rajgarh School Left 6.03 6 49.200 Kashikhedi Rajgarh Temple Right 3.50 7 51.400 Kashikhedi Rajgarh Temple Right 8.62 8 54.900 Zirapur Rajgarh Temple Left 9.90 9 60.000 Monakhedi Rajgarh School Right 6.90 10 60.800 Dhatuniya Rajgarh Temple Left 7.60 Machalpur to Rajasthan border 11 2.750 Devnagar Rajgarh Temple Left 8.30 12 8.200 Goghatpur Rajgarh Temple Right 2.17 13 9.800 Goghatpur Rajgarh Temple Left 4.61 Source: DPR Mitigation Measures 156. Vehicles and equipments should be fitted with silencers and maintained well. The workers shall be provided with personal protection devices such as earplugs and earmuffs. Tree plantation shall be started along with the construction activities. Noise and vibration monitoring shall be carried out as per the suggested monitoring plan. The construction equipments/machinery (stationary) shall be placed away from habitat areas Operation Phase 157. During the operational phase, movement of traffic will be the prime source of noise. Traffic congestion and pedestrian interferences increase the use of horns. This may result in increase noise levels at commercial areas, nearby schools and religious places. Mitigation Measures 158. Effective traffic management and good riding conditions shall be maintained to reduce the noise level throughout the stretch and speed limitation and honking restrictions may be enforced near sensitive locations especially at Khujner (14.550), Chapikheda (36.650), Zirapur (54.800), Goghatpur (9.500). Multilayer trees shall be planted close to the sensitive locations. 5.1.5. Impact on Land and Soil 5.1.5.1 Loss of Productive Soil and Change in Land use Design and Construction Phase 55

159. No land use will change due to the project since required ROW is available throughout the alignment. Land-use though will change temporarily of construction camp areas and for the period of construction. This will also result in loss of soil productivity. 160. Land use may also change due to borrowing the earth. Land will also loose its productivity if top soil is not preserved. Mitigation Measures 161. It shall be ensured that the land taken on lease for access road and construction camp is restored back to its original land use before handing it over back to land owner. 162. The top soil from the productive land (borrow areas, road widening areas etc.) shall be preserved and reused for plantation purposes. It shall also be used as top cover of embankment slope for growing vegetation to protect soil erosion. Operation Phase 163. The better access can lead to conversion of agriculture land for residential and commercial purposes close to roads and especially in rural and urban area. This may result in loss of productive land and agricultural produce. Mitigation Measures 164. The EA may explore the feasibility of restricting about 50 m area on either side of the road as no development zone on the line restriction is imposed for National Highways in India. 5.1.5.2 Soil Erosion Design and Construction Phase 165. Soil erosion may take place along steep and uncompacted embankment slope, and wherever vegetation is cleared. Soil erosion may have cumulative effect viz. siltation, embankment damage, drainage problem etc. Loss of soil due to run off from earth stock-piles may also lead to siltation. The intensity of soil erosion at different locations will be influenced by the lithology, topography, soil type and climatic condition (mainly rainfall) and drainage pattern. Mitigation Measures 166. Bank protection measures shall be taken at erosion prone areas. The protection measures may include use of geo-textiles matting. Provision of side drain shall be made to guide the water to natural outfalls. Stone pitching shall be carried out wherever necessary. When soil is spread on slopes for permanent disposal, it shall be buttressed at the toe by retaining walls. Side slopes of the embankment shall not be steeper than 2H:1V. Turfing/bio-turfing of embankment and slopes shall be done along the stretch. IRC: 56 -1974 recommended practice for treatment of embankment slopes for erosion control shall be taken into consideration. Soil erosion shall be visually checked on slopes and high embankment areas. In case soil erosion is found, suitable measures shall be taken to control the soil erosion.

56

167. Though terrain is flat all through the stretch, except at few locations where it is rolling. Therefore, all steep cuts shall be flattened and benched. Retaining wall on both sides shall be provided. Shrubs shall be planted in loose soil area.

Plate 1: Ch. 15.5 (Near Khujner) Plate 2: Ch. 2.3 (Near Soyat) Operation Phase 168. Soil of steep slopes of embankment and near bridge approaches may erode the embankment formation due to unexpected rainfall. Soil erosion condition may arise if borrow areas are not stabilized/restored properly. Regular monitoring for effectiveness of soil erosion measures (turfing, stone pitching, etc.) shall form part of the environmental monitoring during project operation). Suitable strengthening measures shall be taken to prevent reoccurrence of soil erosion at existing erosion prone locations and prevent them at newer locations. 5.1.5.3 Borrow Areas and Quarries Design and Construction Phase 169. The project area is generally having a flat terrain with some portion under rolling terrain, particularly between Machalpur-Soyat section. Farmers were ready to provide earth from their field up to certain depth on adequate compensation based on agreements between them and the respective contractor. 170. Borrow areas if left un-rehabilitated may pose risk to people, particularly children and animals of accidentally falling into it as well as become potential breeding ground for mosquitoes and vector born disease. 171. Illegal quarrying may lead to unstable soil condition; destroy the landscape of the terrain, air and noise pollution. Opening of new quarries is not envisaged due to the proposed project. Quarry material will be sourced from existing nearby quarries. Mitigation Measures 172. It is recommended that borrowing from agricultural land shall be minimised to the extent possible. Further, no earth shall be borrowed from already low lying areas. 57

173. Borrow pits shall be selected from barren land/wasteland to the extent possible. Borrow areas should not be located on cultivable lands except in the situations where land owners desires to level the land. The top soil shall be preserved and depth shall be restricted to the desired level. Borrow areas should be excavated as per the intended end use by the owner. The Indian Road Congress (IRC):10-1961 guideline should be used for selection of borrow pits and amount that can be borrowed 174. The depths in borrow pits should be so regulated that the sides are not be steeper than 25%. To the extent possible, borrow areas shall be sited away from habited areas. Borrow areas shall be levelled with salvaged material or other filling materials which do not pose contamination of soil. Else, it shall be converted into intended use as per the requirement of land owner/community. The borrow area shall be located/ rehabilitated as per the guidelines given at Appendix 5.1 5.1.5.4 Compaction and Contamination of Soil Design and Construction Stage 175. Soil in the adjoining productive lands beyond the ROW, haulage roads, and construction camp area may be compacted due to movement of construction vehicles, machineries, equipments and due to siting of construction camps and workshops. 176. Soil may get contaminated due to inappropriate disposal of liquid waste, (lubricating oil and fuel spills, waste oil and lubricant and vehicle/equipment washing effluent) and solid waste (fuel filters, oily rags) likely to be generated from repair and maintenance of transport vehicles, construction equipment and machinery. Soil may get contaminated due to inappropriate disposal of domestic solid waste and sewage from construction camps. Mitigation Measures 177. To prevent soil compaction in the adjoining productive lands beyond the ROW, the movement of construction vehicles, machinery and equipment shall be restricted to the designated haulage route. The productive land shall be reclaimed after construction activity. Septic tank or mobile toilets fitted with anaerobic treatment facility shall be provided at construction camp. Domestic solid waste at construction camp shall be segregated into bio-degradable and non-biodegradable waste. The non- biodegradable and recyclable waste shall be sold off. Efforts shall be made that bio-degradable waste shall be composted in the mechanised and movable composter by the contractor. Non biodegradable and non saleable waste shall be disposed off to authorised land fill site. If land fill site not available then burial of the waste in a secured manner shall be ensured. 178. Fuel and lubricants shall be stored at the predefined storage location. The storage area shall be paved with gentle slope to a corner and connected with a chamber to collect any spills of the oils. All efforts shall be made to minimise the waste generation. Unavoidable waste shall be stored at the designated place prior to disposal. To avoid soil contamination at the wash-down and re-fuelling areas, “oil interceptors” shall be provided. Oil

58

and grease spill and oil soaked materials are to be collected and stored in labelled containers (Labelled: WASTE OIL; and hazardous sign be displayed) and sold off to SPCB/ MoEF authorized re-refiners. Operation Stage 179. No impact on soil is anticipated during operation phase of the project except along slope lying areas and near bridge approaches where unexpected rainfall may erode the embankment formation and deterioration of borrow areas if not rehabilitated properly.

Mitigation measures 180. Erosion prone areas shall be visually checked periodically for any erosion and appropriate corrective action shall be taken if any erosion is identified. Regular monitoring of side drains and cross drainage structures to check blockade situation. 5.1.6. Groundwater Design and Construction Stage 181. Water will be mainly required for compaction of formation and domestic purposes in the workers camp. These requirements will be mainly sourced from groundwater (approximately 400 KL per day). However, any uncontrolled abstraction can further deteriorate the situation. Contamination of groundwater is not envisaged since all construction camps will have septic tanks or mobile toilets depending on the number of workers in each camp. Mitigation Measures 182. Requisite permission shall be obtained for abstraction of groundwater from State Ground Water Board/Central Ground Water Authority. 183. The contractor shall make arrangements for water required during construction in such a way that the water availability and supply to nearby communities remains unaffected depending on site specific conditions. 184. Water intensive activities shall not be undertaken during summer period to the extent feasible. 185. Provision shall be made to link side drains with the nearby ponds for facilitating water harvesting. Where ponds are not available, the water harvesting pits shall be constructed as per the requirement and rainfall intensity. Operation Stage 186. No impact is anticipated on groundwater due to the project during operation phase, hence, no specific mitigation is proposed. 5.1.7. Siltation and Surface Water Quality of Rivers and Other Water Bodies Design and Construction Stage 187. The project section is being crossed by Newaj, Kali Sindh and Kanthal Rivers which are perennial rivers. However, since no new bridge 59

construction is proposed, hence, no impact is envisaged on surface water bodies in the project section. Minimal impacts are anticipated on new water harvesting ponds that maybe formed from borrow areas 188. Since most of the major water bodies are seasonal in nature, siltation impact due to bridge rehabilitation works will be negligible, if construction debris/other waste are cleared immediately after construction. The temporary pollution of water bodies from spillage of chemicals and oil at construction sites and waste from construction camps may occur. Soil erosion has direct bearing on siltation. The siltation likely to be caused due to bank erosion has already been addressed above in soil erosion section. 189. Accidental oil and chemicals spills can contaminate the water.

Mitigation Measure 190. Siltation Issues: Required mitigation as suggested in soil erosion section shall be taken into consideration. Bridge rehabilitation activity is recommended during non-monsoon (mid-September to mid-June) period. Silt fencing and/or brush barrier shall be installed for collecting sediments before letting them into the water body. Silt/sediment should be collected and stockpiled for possible reuse as surfacing of slopes where they have to be re-vegetated. Chute drains shall be provided to drain surface runoff and prevent erosion from slopes. 191. Fuel and Lubricant Spillage Issue: All equipment operators, drivers, and warehouse personnel will be trained in immediate response for spill containment and eventual cleanup. No vehicles or equipment should be parked or refuelled near water-bodies, so as to avoid contamination from fuel and lubricants. All chemicals and oil shall be stored away from water and concreted platform with catchment pit for spills collection. The emergency response procedures including reporting, preferably written in the local language and simple to understand shall be provided by the contractors. The slopes of embankments leading to water bodies should be modified and re-channelised to prevent entry of contaminants. Large construction camps shall be avoided along the alignment and located away from habitation and water bodies. 192. Waste Disposal Issues: All wastes arising from the construction should be disposed in an environmentally accepted manner so as not to block the flow of water in the channels. The wastes should be collected, stored and transported to the approved disposal sites. Construction labourers shall be preferable from local population. Sewage from labour camps will be treated through septic tanks. No untreated sanitary wastewater shall be discharged into surface water bodies. Operation Stage 193. No major or long-term impact is anticipated during the operation phase on the surface water bodies due to the project implementation activities. Oil-contaminated runoff from the road during monsoon will have minimal impacts considering their low concentration. However, regular visual

60

checks shall be made to observe any incidence of blockage of drains. Regular checks shall be made for soil erosion and turfing conditions of river training structures to ensure for its effective maintenance. 5.1.8. Hydrology and Drainage Design and Construction Stage 194. The activities involved with proposed road development will be carried out along with existing alignment. No new bridge is proposed to be constructed. Existing bridges/cross drainage structures are only to be improved. Diversion of water channels during rehabilitation of cross drainage structures is not envisaged.

Mitigation Measures 195. Elaborate drainage system shall be provided to drain the storm water from the roadway and embankment and to ensure minimum disturbance to natural drainage of surface and subsurface water of the area. The design of drainage system such as surface and sub-surface drainage shall be carried out as per IRC: SP: 42 and IRC: SP: 50. Surface runoff from the main highway, embankment slopes and the service roads shall be discharged through longitudinal drains, designed for adequate cross section, bed slopes, invert levels and the outfalls. If necessary, the walls of the drains shall be designed to retain the adjoining earth. IRC: 34- 1970: Recommendations for road construction in waterlogged area and IRC: 75 and MOSRTH guidelines for Design of High Embankments shall be referred. 196. Provision of additional cross drainage structure shall be made in the areas where nearby land is sloping towards road alignment in both the both sides. Operation Stage 197. Water accumulation incidence may occur due to inadequate availability of cross drainage structure or clogging of cross drainage structures. Mitigation Measures 198. Regular removal/cleaning of deposited silt shall be done from drainage channels and outlet points before the monsoon season. Rejuvenation of the drainage system by removing encroachments/ congestions will be regularly conducted. 5.2. Impact on Biological Environment 5.2.1. Terrestrial Ecology 199. It is estimated that out of 5497 about 311 trees will be cut due to the proposed road improvement work. The impact and mitigation due to tree cutting has been discussed in following paragraphs. Design and Construction Stage 200. One month before the construction starts, clearing and grubbing will be performed by the contractor. All trees within the ROW with 300 mm 61

diameter at 1 m above the ground will be cut, including the removal of stumps. All stumps and roots of trees of girth more than 33 mm at above 1 m from the ground level will be culled. 201. There are altogether 311 trees likely to be affected due to the project. Most of the roadside trees are non-fruit bearing in nature. The list of trees that will be cut is given in Table 5.2. The cutting of trees will have minor to negligible impact on local environment. Moreover, this will be temporary since large number of trees have been planned to be planted on both sides of the road. This will improve the local climatic conditions in long term.

Table 5.2 List of Trees to be Cut Proposed Offset from Proposed Offset from Sr. Sr. Chainage Side Centreline Chainage Side Centreline No. No. (km) (m) (km) (m) to machalpur (km 0.000 to km 24 7.420 Left 4.3 78.317) 25 7.620 Left 4.8 1 0.000 Left 5.9 26 7.690 Right 7.8 2 0.000 Left 7.0 27 9.050 Left 3.7 3 0.100 Right 5.8 28 9.110 Left 7.6 4 1.100 Left 4.9 29 10.420 Left 5.3 5 1.100 Left 6.0 30 11.300 Left 7.6 6 2.170 Left 7.1 31 11.680 Right 3.0 7 2.660 Right 5.1 32 12.870 Right 3.2 8 3.730 Left 4.3 33 12.900 Right 5.2 9 4.240 Left 5.5 34 12.920 Right 6.7 10 4.410 Left 5.3 35 12.920 Left 3.5 11 5.120 Left 4.8 36 13.090 Right 5.7 12 5.340 Left 6.5 37 13.360 Right 4.9 13 5.370 Left 5.5 38 13.370 Right 5.7 14 6.230 Left 4.0 39 13.380 Left 6.1 15 6.630 Right 6.8 40 13.500 Left 5.8 16 6.660 Left 4.7 41 13.500 Right 5.5 17 6.670 Right 6.9 42 14.350 Right 7.7 18 6.700 Left 6.3 43 16.220 Left 5.8 19 6.940 Left 3.6 44 16.330 Right 6.2 20 6.990 Left 6.4 45 16.390 Right 5.9 21 7.000 Left 6.7 46 16.550 Left 4.0 22 7.010 Left 7.6 47 16.710 Left 3.6 23 7.360 Left 4.2 48 17.470 Right 3.9

62

Proposed Offset from Proposed Offset from Sr. Sr. Chainage Side Centreline Chainage Side Centreline No. No. (km) (m) (km) (m) 49 17.520 Right 4.8 88 29.040 Right 5.4 50 17.580 Right 5.6 89 29.050 Left 3.9 51 17.800 Left 2.7 90 29.240 Left 4.7 52 17.800 Right 3.6 91 29.300 Right 8.0 53 17.820 Left 7.1 92 29.310 Left 4.7 54 17.820 Right 3.2 93 29.480 Left 5.5 55 18.090 Right 5.5 94 29.640 Left 6.7 56 18.100 Left 4.8 95 29.660 Right 4.4 57 18.340 Right 6.5 96 32.160 Right 7.1 58 18.410 Right 4.5 97 32.580 Right 8.0 59 19.200 Left 4.3 98 33.290 Right 8.0 60 19.450 Left 5.5 99 33.490 Left 5.1 61 19.750 Right 7.3 100 33.630 Right 5.8 62 21.060 Right 3.5 101 33.720 Left 6.0 63 22.260 Right 7.2 102 33.930 Right 5.0 64 23.110 Right 4.3 103 33.960 Left 5.8 65 23.330 Left 4.8 104 34.020 Right 3.8 66 23.400 Left 3.7 105 34.400 Right 6.1 67 23.630 Right 5.7 106 34.630 Left 7.7 68 23.730 Right 5.2 107 34.960 Right 6.3 69 23.790 Right 5.5 108 34.960 Right 5.8 70 23.840 Left 5.3 109 35.190 Right 6.9 71 23.950 Left 5.6 110 35.200 Right 6.9 72 23.950 Right 4.2 111 35.300 Right 5.0 73 23.960 Left 5.8 112 35.500 Right 7.2 74 24.450 Right 5.3 113 35.520 Right 6.6 75 25.970 Left 5.6 114 35.650 Right 4.6 76 26.100 Left 4.8 115 35.700 Right 4.6 77 26.410 Left 3.6 116 35.850 Right 3.8 78 26.410 Right 6.9 117 35.920 Right 4.6 79 26.740 Left 5.5 118 36.020 Right 5.1 80 26.750 Right 7.4 119 36.310 Left 7.0 81 26.990 Right 4.3 120 36.330 Left 3.6 82 27.470 Left 5.1 121 36.350 Left 5.7 83 28.230 Left 3.5 122 36.360 Left 6.5 84 28.410 Left 6.8 123 36.410 Left 5.1 85 28.630 Right 6.8 124 35.510 Right 4.7 86 29.010 Left 5.0 125 36.560 Right 4.8 87 29.010 Right 5.1 126 36.590 Left 7.0 63

Proposed Offset from Proposed Offset from Sr. Sr. Chainage Side Centreline Chainage Side Centreline No. No. (km) (m) (km) (m) 127 36.700 Left 6.5 166 41.590 Left 6.7 128 36.700 Right 7.2 167 41.590 Right 6.0 129 37.250 Left 7.6 168 41.690 Left 5.1 130 37.420 Left 6.1 169 41.690 Left 7.7 131 37.950 Right 7.6 170 42.130 Right 4.5 132 37.980 Right 7.1 171 42.340 Left 5.3 133 38.180 Right 4.8 172 42.400 Right 7.6 134 38.190 Left 6.2 173 42.590 Left 7.3 135 38.210 Right 5.7 174 42.900 Right 7.1 136 38.250 Left 5.0 175 43.330 Left 6.2 137 38.250 Right 4.6 176 43.820 Left 5.6 138 38.260 Right 4.8 177 44.060 Right 4.0 139 38.270 Right 5.2 178 46.300 Left 5.7 140 38.290 Left 3.4 179 47.800 Left 5.7 141 38.450 Left 4.5 180 47.950 Right 7.9 142 38.480 Left 8.0 181 48.600 Right 7.6 143 38.500 Right 7.4 182 49.630 Right 5.1 144 39.260 Left 7.4 183 51.990 Right 3.9 145 39.910 Left 4.0 184 52.100 Right 3.9 146 40.050 Left 6.1 185 53.800 Right 5.5 147 40.440 Right 5.1 186 54.050 Left 5.4 148 40.690 Left 5.7 187 54.120 Left 4.7 149 40.790 Left 4.3 188 54.200 Left 5.5 150 40.800 Left 7.2 189 54.200 Right 7.6 151 40.890 Left 4.3 190 54.210 Left 5.6 152 40.950 Left 4.8 191 54.270 Left 5.9 153 40.980 Left 7.0 192 54.310 Right 7.3 154 40.990 Left 6.9 193 54.330 Right 7.3 155 41.040 Right 5.2 194 54.370 Right 6.8 156 41.050 Right 5.9 195 54.380 Left 5.2 157 41.120 Left 5.9 196 54.410 Right 6.5 158 41.120 Left 5.9 197 54.480 Left 4.7 159 41.180 Left 5.8 198 54.700 Right 3.7 160 41.280 Left 6.6 199 56.200 Left 7.1 161 41.300 Right 5.2 200 56.510 Right 6.6 162 41.340 Left 5.7 201 56.880 Right 7.5 163 41.410 Right 4.8 202 56.940 Right 6.5 164 41.430 Left 5.1 203 56.950 Left 7.9 165 41.440 Left 5.2 204 56.980 Left 5.8

64

Proposed Offset from Proposed Offset from Sr. Sr. Chainage Side Centreline Chainage Side Centreline No. No. (km) (m) (km) (m) 205 56.990 Left 6.5 244 70.790 Left 4.5 206 57.200 Right 5.6 245 72.420 Left 6.1 207 57.570 Right 6.3 246 72.440 Right 6.9 208 57.930 Right 6.3 247 72.460 Left 3.2 209 58.030 Right 6.0 248 72.530 Left 5.1 210 58.320 Right 7.5 249 74.440 Left 4.0 211 59.900 Left 7.6 250 74.500 Left 2.9 212 61.110 Right 7.1 251 74.600 Right 6.7 213 61.120 Right 7.9 252 74.600 Right 5.8 214 61.130 Right 6.4 253 74.750 Left 3.9 215 61.190 Right 7.6 254 74.760 Right 4.3 216 61.200 Right 7.5 255 75.320 Right 4.0 217 61.210 Right 7.7 256 75.390 Right 5.5 218 61.220 Right 6.4 257 75.470 Left 6.3 219 61.230 Left 6.4 258 75.500 Right 7.6 220 61.240 Left 6.4 259 75.790 Right 3.9 221 61.320 Right 6.8 260 75.800 Right 3.0 222 61.330 Right 5.1 261 75.800 Left 7.1 223 61.450 Right 6.6 262 75.810 Right 3.2 224 61.860 Right 8.0 263 75.840 Right 3.3 225 68.050 Left 4.7 264 75.900 Left 5.8 226 68.350 Left 3.8 265 75.950 Left 4.1 227 68.900 Left 2.7 266 76.080 Left 4.7 228 68.940 Left 6.8 267 76.090 Left 6.4 229 69.150 Right 4.1 268 76.100 Left 6.2 230 69.160 Right 3.4 269 76.270 Right 3.8 231 69.310 Right 5.2 270 76.290 Right 3.6 232 69.320 Left 6.3 271 76.390 Left 7.4 233 69.370 Left 5.0 272 76.450 Right 4.1 234 69.490 Right 4.9 273 73.480 Right 3.2 235 69.510 Left 4.6 274 76.800 Right 4.7 236 69.550 Right 4.9 275 76.820 Left 4.0 237 69.600 Left 7.3 276 77.050 Left 5.5 238 69.680 Right 7.0 277 77.140 Right 3.6 239 70.050 Right 4.2 278 77.160 Right 3.6 240 70.080 Left 5.6 279 77.250 Left 4.5 241 70.350 Right 6.8 280 77.350 Right 8.0 242 70.380 Right 7.2 281 77.440 Right 5.0 243 70.650 Left 4.4 282 77.450 Right 4.9 65

Proposed Offset from Sr. Chainage Side Centreline No. (km) (m) 283 77.500 Left 4.9 284 77.750 Left 4.4 285 77.760 Right 5.7 286 77.900 Right 6.9 Goghatpur to Soyat (km 0.000 to km 8.757) 287 0.000 Left 4.7 288 0.020 Right 4.5 289 0.030 Right 5.0 290 0.050 Left 4.5 291 0.110 Right 4.2 292 0.180 Right 4.5 293 0.740 Right 5.1 294 0.780 Left 8.0 295 0.820 Right 5.2 296 0.880 Left 6.9 297 0.890 Right 3.9 298 0.950 Left 7.6 299 1.010 Left 5.3 300 1.270 Right 2.5 301 1.570 Left 4.7 302 1.850 Right 5.6 303 1.870 Right 7.2 304 3.050 Left 4.0 305 3.110 Left 4.3 306 3.720 Left 3.5 307 3.800 Right 4.4 308 3.810 Left 4.7 309 3.970 Right 3.7 310 7.120 Left 7.2 311 7.450 Left 7.5

66

Mitigation Measures 202. Requisite permission from forest department shall be obtained for cutting of roadside trees. 203. The project envisages plantation of approximately 2177 trees along both sides of road as per IRC SP: 21 specifications as part of providing compensatory plantation as per prevailing guidelines of State’s forest department on 1:5 basis replacement rate. Besides, additional plantation on 1:2 basis shall be done on to enhance the aesthetics and check soil erosion. All tree plantations will be carried out in close consultation with forest department. 204. A range of 10-15 m centre-to-centre is recommended for spacing of trees (parallel to the road). Setback distance of trees in different situations shall be based on IRC: SP: 21 and IRC: 66. The distance between the kerb, if any, and the nearest edge of tree trunk shall be at least 2 m. The plantation in median shall comprise shrubs whose height would normally not exceed 1-1.5 m and shall be as per IRC SP: 21. 205. For safe traffic operation, vertical clearance between the crown of the carriageway and lowest part of overhang of the tree available across the roadway shall conform to the standards laid down in IRC: SP: 21. The pit size, fencing, watering, and manuring requirements shall also conform to the above standard. Excess use of pesticides shall be restricted. Planting shall be such that it does not obstruct the visibility of traffic from any side and shall be pleasing in appearance. Operation Stage 206. Positive impacts on terrestrial ecology are expected during the project operation due to the increase in vegetation and landscaping along the state highway. The Project will coordinate with the local communities to maintain and enhance the trees planted along the state road. ”No adverse impact is anticipated during operation stage except accidental damages or absence of proper tree management“. 207. No direct impact is anticipated during operation stage except accidental damages or absence of proper tree management. Mitigation Measures 208. Arrangement shall be made to ensure survivability of the tree plantation. The Social Forest Department or Divisional Forest Offices shall be consulted or involved in this programme. The tree survivability audit shall also be conducted at least once in a year to assess the effectiveness of the programme. 5.2.2. Aquatic Ecology Design and Construction Stage 209. Large scale/organised fishing was not observed in the rivers/water bodies of the project area. All water bodies are seasonal in nature 67

210. Improvement of existing embankments particularly along the waterways will increase silt while accidental spill of materials, chemicals, and fuels will deteriorate receiving water quality. Mitigation Measures 211. Siltation shall be avoided by measures suggested in Para 170. Operation Stage 212. No impact is envisaged during operation phase of the project and hence no mitigation proposed. However, periodic surveillance shall be conducted to check erosion and siltation in major water bodies. 5.2.3. Fauna Design and Construction Stage 213. Movement of herbivores like Cattle, Goats, Cows, Bulls etc., have been observed in the project section. Mitigation measures 214. Disturbance to these animals will be avoided to the extent possible by restricting the construction time from 6 am – 6 pm. No food and waste littering will be ensured to disturb their natural habitat. 215. All precautions will be taken to minimise noise in these areas. Operation Stage 216. Movement of herbivores like Cattle, Goats, Cows, Bulls. Mitigation measures 217. Disturbance to these animals will be avoided to the extent possible. No food and waste littering will be ensured to disturb their natural habitat. 218. All precautions will be taken to minimise noise in these areas. 5.3. Management of Construction Debris/Waste 219. Quarry dust and unused iron bars or damaged support structures constitute significant wastes. Mitigation for solid waste from construction camp has been given in construction camp section. Mitigation measures 220. The existing bitumen surface can be utilized for paving of crossroads, access roads, and paving works in construction sites and camps, temporary traffic diversions, haulage routes etc. 221. All excavated materials from roadway, shoulders, verges, drains, cross drainage will be used for backfilling embankments, filling pits, and landscaping. 222. Unusable debris material should be suitably disposed off at pre- designated disposal locations, with approval of the concerned authority. The bituminous wastes shall be disposed in secure landfill sites only in environmentally accepted manner. For removal of debris, wastes and its disposal MOSRTH guidelines should be followed.

68

223. Unusable and surplus materials, as determined by the Project Engineer, will be removed and disposed off-site. 224. The locations of dumping sites should be selected with following considerations. 225. Unproductive/wastelands shall be selected for dumping sites. 226. Away from residential areas and located at least 1000 m downwind side of these locations, 227. Dumping sites do not contaminate any water sources, rivers etc, and 228. Dumping sites have adequate capacity equal to the amount of debris generated. 229. Public perception and consent from the village Panchayats about the location of debris disposal site has to be obtained before finalizing the location. 230. Form works will be re-used to the extent possible, more than 20 times as dictated by good practice. All stripped formworks will be examined for any damage and rectified in the workshop for re-use. Rectification includes plugging holes, and straightening bent steel props. 5.4. Socio-Economic Impact 231. Assessment of project impact on socio-economic conditions point to the conclusions that positive benefits are many fold compared to its adverse impact. 5.4.1. Positive Impacts 232. Road-side economic activities will increase due to increased number of vehicle using the road. Economic activities supporting transport like gasoline stations, automotive repair shops, lodging, and restaurants are expected to increase. Increase agro-industrial activities are also expected to take advantage of improved access to urban centres where there are higher demands and better prices for agricultural products. Other generic benefits of such projects are (i) Reduction in travel time (ii) better mode and frequency of transport (iii) access to quality heath care facilities, educational and other infrastructural facilities (iv) enhanced tourism activities in the area and state which in many terms will boost the local economy (v) better investment climate for industries creating more employment opportunities to local people. 5.4.2. Anticipated Negative Impacts 233. Minor losses like problems in accessibility and community linkage, health and safety during and after construction, and temporary change in demographic configuration are mitigable with minor to negligible residual impacts. 5.4.2.1 Impacts due to Construction Camp and Immigration of Workers 234. Poor siting and improper management of construction camp may lead to several adverse impacts on environment viz. (i) loss of vegetation due to use of wood as fuel source for cooking (ii) deterioration in nearby surface water bodies’ quality (iii) compaction and contamination of soil due to 69

uncontrolled disposal of solid waste (iv) Poor sanitation may result to transmission of communicable diseases among the workers and the host communities. This include the possible spread of sexually transmitted disease, diseases from improper handling and supply of foodstuffs, poor water supply, insect-borne diseases, and alcoholic and drug. Mitigation measures 235. Construction camp shall be sited at such locations so as to utilise the existing infrastructure. No productive land should be utilised for construction camp. All sites must be graded, ditched and rendered free from depressions to avoid water stagnation and necessary provisions for adequate drainage must be made. Accommodation and ancillary facilities including recreational facility for workers shall be erected and maintained to standards and scales approved by the resident engineer. All camps should maintain minimum distance of 500 m from habitation and water bodies. 236. All construction camps shall be provided with sanitary latrines and urinals with provision of septic tanks attached with soak pits. Storm water drains shall be provided for the flow of used water outside the camp. Drains and ditches shall be treated with bleaching powder on a regular basis. Garbage bins must be provided in the camp and regularly emptied and disposed off in a hygienic manner. The possibility of using LPG cylinders as fuel source for cooking to avoid any tree cutting should be explored. 237. At every workplace, the Contactor will ensure, in collaboration with local health authorities that a readily available first-aid unit including an adequate supply of sterilized dressing materials and appliances shall be provided. Workplaces remote and far away from regular hospitals shall have indoor health units with one bed for every 250 workers. 238. The Contractor will ensure the good health and hygiene of all workers to prevent sickness and epidemics. These include the HIV/AIDS prevention program to reduce the risk and transfer of HIV virus between and among the workers and community, promote early diagnosis and assist affected individuals. Activities under the program include monthly information, education, and consultation communication campaigns to workers, drivers, delivery crew, and communities on the risk, dangers, and impacts of STD and HIV/AIDS. 239. The Contractor will ensure that sufficient supply of suitable and hygienically prepared food at reasonable price is available to the workers. 240. The Contractor will provide adequate and safe water supply for the use of the workers. 241. The Contractor will ensure that all precautions to protect the workers from insect and pest to reduce the risk to health. This includes the use of insecticides which should comply with local regulations. 242. No alcoholic liquor or prohibited drugs will be imported to, sell, give, and barter to the workers of host community. 243. Migrant workers may be the potential carriers of various diseases. Local community may get exposed to the diseases carried by migrant workers.

70

Regular health check-up and immunization camps shall also be organized for the workers and nearby population. 5.4.2.2 Safety of Construction Workers and Accident Risk to Local Community Design and Construction Stage 244. The following safety aspects viz. (i) safety of construction workers, (ii) safety of road users including pedestrians and cyclists (iii) safety to cattle; (iv) safety of local community (iv) unsafe/ hazardous traffic conditions due to construction vehicle movement need to be considered during design and construction stage and (v) conduct of safety audit. Mitigation measures 245. During the construction phase, contractors shall be required to adopt and maintain safe working practices. Internationally accepted and widely used safety procedures should be followed during (i) road works (ii) handling of large construction equipment and machineries, (iii) handling of chemicals and hazardous materials and inflammable substances (iii) welding (iv) electrical works etc. A set of mitigation measures for construction workers have been provided in EMP matrix table. 246. Contractor shall arrange all PPEs for workers, first-aid and fire fighting equipments at construction sites. An emergency plan shall be prepared duly approved by engineer in charge to respond to any instance of safety hazard. The contractor will be required to appoint an Accident Prevention Officer (APO) who will conduct regular safety inspections at construction sites. The APO will have the authority to issue instructions and take protective measures to prevent accidents. 247. The partial control on access for the project road shall be achieved through measures like service road with physical separation for local traffic, intersections, acceleration/deceleration lanes, vehicular and pedestrian underpasses, median openings with shelter lane. 248. Grade separated intersections/junctions shall be provided at all major intersections in consistent to IRC: 92 249. Pedestrian/cyclist and cattle passageways shall be provided near identified locations. These facilities shall be planned in accordance with the relevant provisions contained in IRC-11, IRC-17 and IRC-103. The crossing facilities can be designed either in conjunction with grade intersections or through underpasses. 250. To avoid disruption of the existing traffic due to construction activities, comprehensive traffic management plan shall be drawn up by the concessionaire. Traffic in construction zones shall be managed as per the provisions of IRC SP 55. 251. After construction is completed in a particular zone, it shall be opened for normal operation. All diversions/access roads should be closed before start of normal operation. 252. Use of retro-reflectorized traffic signs, and cantilever/gantry types overhead signs, thermoplastic road marking paints, delineators, traffic cones, empty bitumen drums, barricades, and flagmen will be used to 71

ensure traffic management and safety. Conduct of regular safety audit on safety measures adopted during construction. The audit will cover manpower and their safety, machinery, temporary works, equipment and vehicles, materials storage and handling, construction procedures, environment, site safety guidelines, and miscellaneous services. Operation phase 253. Important issues related with safety during operational phase are monitoring of emergencies and establishing procedures to carry out rescues during sudden disasters such as floods, fires especially near habited areas. Mitigation Measures 254. It is proposed to explore the feasibility of providing the following facilities:

o Highway patrol unit(s) for round the clock patrolling to provide assistance to the users in case of any need, monitor the travel conditions to provide information to the control section and to undertake immediate measures for managing the traffic flow in case of any incident.

o Phone booths for accidental reporting and ambulance services with minimum response time for rescue of any accident victims.

o Tow-away facility for the break down vehicles. 255. MPRDC may also explore the possibility of coordination with operating agency of intersecting National Highways to have common facilities and share the costs as appropriate. 5.4.3. Obstruction and Disruption of Traffic Construction Phase 256. Disruption of access to infrastructure or social resource due to construction activity will cause nuisance and to a certain extent additional cost to the public in terms of longer travel period due to diversion or heavier traffic. It will also pose risk of accident to motorist at night if these blockages and disruption are not clearly demarcated. Mitigation Measures 257. The contractor will submit a Traffic Plan to the Project Engineer at least two weeks before the construction starts that will result to obstruction. The plan will include a drawing of temporary diversions and details of arrangement. It will also include plan for transportation of raw materials like quarry, sand etc. A section of the Traffic Plan will be a Control Plan that details how the safety of the pedestrians and workers and delineation of the roadway at night. This plan will recommend for approval of safe and convenient temporary diversion of traffic during construction, design of barricades, delineators, signs, markings, lights, and flagmen, among others. 258. Paved shoulder will be provided on one side of the existing road by the contractor with the following minimum requirements: • At least one 3.5 m lane to remain to traffic at all times

72

• The surface used by the through traffic will be firm bituminous compacted surface free of defect • The maximum continuous length over which construction under traffic may take place is limited to 750 meters. • Construction activity will be restricted to only one side of the existing road. 259. On stretches where it is not possible to pass the traffic on the part width of existing carriageway, temporary paved diversions will be constructed. These paved diversions will comply with standards on junctions and temporary cross drainage. 260. Transportation of quarry material to the construction sites through heavy vehicles shall be done through existing major roads to the extent possible. This will restrict wear and tear to the village/minor roads. Small vehicles/un-motorised vehicle can also be used for its further transportation to the construction sites from temporary storage areas. 5.4.4. Transportation and Storage of Materials 261. The construction material primarily will consist off aggregate, sand, cement, bitumen, lubricating oil and fuel for vehicle and construction equipments. These will be stored temporarily at construction camps. Oils, fuels and chemicals will be stored on concreted platform with spill collection pits while cement will be stored under cover. All these temporary storage areas will be located at least 150 m away from the habitat areas. The likely impacts due to transportation and storage including fugitive emission have already been covered under different section above. 5.4.4.1 Impact on Land and Private Properties 262. The assessment made by the resettlement expert shall be referred for exact loss of private properties and measures to compensate such losses. Environmental screening of resettlement sites, if required for the project, shall be carried out. Besides monetary compensation for any loss of private trees, compensatory afforestation and extensive plantation has been incorporated in the EMP to have long-term environmental benefits. 263. Income restoration measures/livelihood options for vulnerable group/resource poor sections and other affected persons as recommended by social development/resettlement expert shall be implemented. 5.4.4.2 Impact on Common Property Resources 264. There are various types of community structures/ facilities/utilities along the proposed alignment. Geometric adjustments have been made to minimize the loss to any such facilities. Any such structures even falling within ROW but out of required formation width shall be saved. Alternate access has to be provided to these structures during construction stage. No community structures are likely to be dismantled/relocated. The impact on other community properties has been provided at Table 5.2. 73

Table 5.3 : List of Common Property Resources Along the Alignment

Side Offset from edge of S. No. Chainage (km) Feature road (m) Pachor to Machalpur 1 3.400 Temple Left 22 2 3.400 School Right 18 3 6.000 Bus shelter Left 4 4 7.600 Bus shelter Left 8 5 10.000 Bus shelter Right 9 6 13.800 Temple Right 3 7 14.200 Temple Right 6 8 14.600 Petrol Pump Right 12 9 14.700 Temple Left 11 10 15.800 Temple Right 10 11 16.300 Bus shelter Right 10 12 18.300 Petrol Pump Left 24 13 21.800 Bus shelter Right 3 14 27.100 Temple Left 8 15 30.200 Bus shelter Left 10 16 32.300 Temple Left 13 17 36.200 Petrol Pump Right 6 18 37.200 Bus shelter Left 4 19 38.200 School Left 19 20 38.300 Bus shelter Left 7 21 38.600 Petrol Pump Right 20 22 41.550 School Left 6 23 41.700 Temple Left 21 24 45.600 Petrol Pump Right 16 25 45.700 Bus shelter Left 9 26 45.700 Temple Left 12 27 47.400 Bus shelter Left 4 28 48.600 Petrol Pump Right 6 29 49.200 Temple Left 36 30 49.200 Temple Right 4 31 51.400 Temple Right 9 32 52.000 Health Clinic Left 36 33 52.000 Bus shelter Left 6 34 52.100 Petrol Pump Left 11 35 53.350 School Left 15 36 54.900 Temple Left 10 37 55.200 School Left 24 38 55.300 Temple Right 13 39 55.600 Mosque Left 10 40 56.000 Petrol Pump Left 10 41 56.000 Bank Right 3 42 56.400 Temple Left 16 43 56.800 School Right 12

74

Side Offset from edge of S. No. Chainage (km) Feature road (m) 44 57.000 Petrol Pump Left 11 45 59.350 Temple Right 15 46 60.000 School Right 7 47 60.800 Temple Left 8 48 65.000 Bus shelter Left 17 49 66.000 Check Post Right 15 50 67.800 Petrol Pump Right 22 51 68.800 School Left 14 52 69.500 School Right 11 Machalpur to Rajasthan border 1 2.600 School Left 13 2 2.750 Temple Left 8 3 4.700 Temple Right 10 4 5.200 Temple Right 2 5 8.200 Temple Right 5 6 9.800 Temple Left Goghatpur to Soyat 1 8.950 Hospital Right 14 Source: DPR 5.5. Cumulative and Induced Impact 265. Cumulative Impact: The area along the present road sections SH-51 is developing. The road already exists and proposed project will facilitate the pace of development. Some of the cumulative impacts will be deterioration in the air and noise quality especially at the congested locations like Khujner, Chapikheda, Dhanoda, Zirapur, Goghatpur etc. due to increased traffic. The ancillary development activity due to the improved road conditions will further put pressure on agricultural lands and vegetated areas such as Pachor, Kalvakhedi, Sandavta, Dhatuniya. However, these activities will be slow and impacts are expected to be minimal. 266. The project is expected to improve long time water flooding, soil erosion conditions especially near Kalisindh, Newaj and Kanthal Rivers and other rolling terrain areas due to additional culverts and over-toppings. The higher amount of compensatory afforestation (1:7) will increase the aesthetics along the ROW and help in bringing the positive impact on the sourroundings. The improved accessibility will also result in increased industrial and commercial developments especially near Dhanoda, Zirapur, Khujner, Goghatpur etc. The net impacts are expected to be more positive. 267. Induced Impact - The induced impact from the project will be mainly due to the related developmental activities and improved infrastructural development like building construction and commercial establishment. This is likely to result in net positive impact due to overall social development

75

6. PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND INFORMATION DISCLOSURE 6.1. Consultation Method and Information Disclosed 268. Consultations were held during different stages of the preparation of IEE. To address the key environmental issues, consultations at various levels with local people and government departments were conducted to arrive at socially and technically accepted solutions. A comprehensive consultation with all stakeholders was conducted at the project section. 269. Stakeholder’s consultations were held with the intent to understand their concerns, apprehensions, overall opinion and solicit recommendations to improve project design. Informal meetings, interviews were organized covering the entire project stretch. The informal consultation generally started with explaining the sub projects, followed by an explanation to potential impacts. Participant’s views were gathered with regard to loss of agricultural land, effect on air and noise quality of the area due to traffic, water availability, accident and risk. 270. The discussions were designed to receive maximum inputs from the participants regarding their acceptability and environmental concerns arising out of the sub-project. They were given the brief outline of the project to which their opinion was sought. Suggestions were also sought for mitigating any potential adverse impact. 6.2. Compliance with Relevant Regulatory Requirements 271. In India, public consultation is mandatory in case of Category A and B1 category projects6 in select conditions. Being a category B project as per ADB SPS 2009, consultation was carried out during the early stage of IEE report preparation. The requirement of public consultation during the implementation of the project has been proposed as part of the mitigation plan. 272. Public consultation was undertaken consistent with the ADB requirements. All the five principles of information dissemination, information solicitation, integration, co-ordination and engagement into dialogue were incorporated in the consultation process. A framework of different environmental impacts likely from the project was strengthened and modified based on opinions of all those consulted, especially in the micro level by setting up dialogues with the village people from whom information on site facts and prevailing conditions were collected.

6 As per schedule I of EIA notification number S.O. 1533, dated 14th September 2006. This notification also defines when a public consultation is mandatory.

76

6.2.1. Consultation with Executing Agency 273. Officials of executing agency provided technical information’s about the project. All issues related to effective implementation of EMP, grievance redress mechanism, various clearances/consent and permission required prior to and during implementation were discussed. Mr. Vivek Agarwal and Mr. P.K. Chaturvedi, Managing Director and Deputy General Manager of Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation (MPRDC), expressed their organization’s commitment to implement the project in environmentally sustainable way and as per the applicable laws/regulations/guidelines and safeguard requirements of ADB and the country. They also shared about lessons learnt from ongoing project. 6.2.2. Consultation with other Government Departments 274. All relevant government departments/agencies including forest and wildlife, fisheries, pollution control board, water resources, and DRDA were consulted for collection of available information their views/ comments and suggestions about the project. 275. The list of government officials contacted, along with purpose/objective has been summarised in Table 6.1.

Table 6.1 : Summary of Consultation held with various Government Departments S. Name of Official Department Issue discussed No. Consulted PCCF (Working Plan), Status of forest in state, Impacts on 1. Mr. Dubey Forest Department, forest, mitigation options, Satpura Bhavan, Bhopal Environmental friendly forest activities Sr. Scientist, Environmental Issues in the state, legal Madhya Pradesh framework of MoEF and revised EIA 2. Dr. Rita Kauri Pollution Control Board notification 2006, applicable permits & Paryavaran Bhavan, clearances, Impacts of proposed project Bhopal on environment, Scientist, Environmental Issues in the state, legal Madhya Pradesh framework of MoEF and revised EIA 3. Dr. Abhay Saxena Pollution Control Board notification 2006, applicable permits & Paryavaran Bhavan, clearances, Impacts of proposed project Bhopal on environment, Environmental quality in the state and Superintending Engineer major urban centres. Capacity of Mr. Rajesh Madhya Pradesh pollution control board in environmental 4. Srivastava Pollution Control Board management and monitoring Paryavaran Bhavan, requirements of SPCB in the proposed Bhopal project.

Dy. Conservator of Status of forest in state, Impacts on 5. Mr. S. P. Sharma Forest, Forest forest, mitigation options, Department, Bhopal Environmental friendly forest activities 77

S. Name of Official Department Issue discussed No. Consulted Conditions of road network in state, scope of road improvement, Managing Director, 6. Mr. Vivek Aggarwal environmental issues related with road MPRDC, Bhopal improvement, capacity enhancement of MPRDC, future plans Conditions of road network in state, DGM (Enviornment), scope of road improvement, 7. Mr. Alok Chaturvedi MPRDC, Bhopal environmental issues related with road improvement Conditions of road network in state, scope of road improvement, Mr. Piyush K. environmental issues related with road 8 DGM, MPRDC, Bhopal Chaturvedi improvement, implementation schedule of various activities, organizational setting of MPRDC, Sitaram Chaubey, Status of forests along the project road, Forest Guards, Range Shantanu Ghosh, presence of flora and fauna species in 9. officers, local community Premsingh – the forests, forest boundaries and road leaders community leaders encroachments

6.2.3. Consultation with NGOs 276. All the NGOs welcome the project. They express concern over afforestation programme. NGOs also demand to pay attention for survival rate of the trees. Awareness camp among the people regarding road safety is also suggested. The outcome of consultation with NGOs is summarised below in Table 6.2.

Table 6.2 : Summary of Consultation with NGOs Name of NGOs Contact Remarks Person BYPASS - Bhopal Yuwa Mr. Akhilesh • Welcomed the project Paryavaran Shikshan Singh Yadav • Raised concerns about the impact on and Samajik Sansthan reserve forests through the project stretch Chunabhatti, • Expressed his concern about use of fodder Bhopal,M.P.-16 from the forest being used during construction phase • Suggested minimal tree cutting and proportional afforestation Ecosake Society for Mr. Kinshuk • Welcomed the project Environment Tiwary • Expressed his desire that adequate Conservation and Social compensation should be provided, as per Awareness the latest R&R policy, to the people Bhopal-16 affected from this project • Desired minimal impacts on forest and other mineral resources in the region from the project • Desired involvement of Local skilled and unskilled labour during construction activities Green Hurt Nature Club Jai Sharma • Welcomed the project M.P. Nagar, Bhopal-11 • Emphasized the need of plantation of local

78

tree species for the roadside plantations. • Raised his concerns on the land filing/borrow activity suggested about prevention of top soil • Desired the need of awareness/ training program for the contractors and labourers to educate them for environmental issues. Forum for Environmental Dr. R. Mathur • Welcomed the project Protection • Expressed his concern regarding water Gwalior - 474011 logging problem during construction phase at many places. • Raised his concerns about health and safety schemes to be provided to construction labours especially during monsoon period. • Emphasized on the need of identification of sites for disposal of construction debris before the start of civil works. • Wanted banning of old vehicles on these roads by Government to reduce the pollution. Energy Environment and Ajit Kumar • Welcomed the project Development Group Saxena • Raised his concerns about the problem of R-12, II Floor electricity and its role in number of Above Central Color Lab accidents that occurred on this road due to Bhopal - 462003 it. • Enquired about the compensation to be provided to the displaced/affected people. Centre for Envirocare Mahendra • Welcomed the project and Energy Technology Kumar Shukla • Expressed his concerns about the cutting E-7/466 Arera Colony of trees and stressed the need for their Bhopal - 462016 rehabilitation and afforestation. Madhya Pradesh • Suggested the need of increasing the awareness among contractors, labourers and villagers.

6.3. Beneficiaries’ Comments 277. The project has immense acceptability among the local people. They perceived that in addition to providing all weather connectivity, the sub- project road will bring positive socio-economic changes in the area. Local people mainly discussed on issues related to rehabilitation and resettlement and proper vigilance of construction work. They suggested minimising acquisition of agricultural land as much as possible since livelihood of the people is principally dependent on agriculture. 278. Other common demands included issues related with increase in traffic due to improved road conditions The list of participants, their views, and outcome of the consultations have been summarised in Table 6.3.

79

Table 6.3 : Consultation with local community S. No. Village Name of Participant Issues and Outcomes 1. Khujner Radheyshyam Nagar . Welcomed the project (teacher) . Complained about the bad road conditions especially Boondi lal (farmer) due to which many accidents take place (about 10-11 Bal Krishna (labour) in a month). Kanhaiya lal (tea shop) . Expressed their concern on the safety aspect in the Radhey shyam tyagi post-project scenario. (student) . Concerned about land acquisition and compensation Vijay singh baghel to the affected people. (constable) . Electricity problem is also acute Mahesh (villager) . No fishery activity reported by the villagers . Informed about use of fertilizers and pesticides for agricultural activities . Informed about the problem of drinking water which is obtained from tanker. . Informed about the frequent movement of animals like deer and peacock on the road during night time. . Informed that drainage of the road is poor. Rainwater is drained in sewer. 2. Goghatp Hari singh (farmer) . Welcomed the project ur Nathuram (labour) . Complained about the bad road conditions especially Chanchal chaudhary due to which many accidents take place (about 6-7 in (villager) a month). Swagat gupta (vendor) . Interested to know specific compensation for the Naunihal singh (farmer) affected persons. Rajesh kumar (student) . Least concerned about tree cuttings Pinku chaubey . Problem of dust was also mentioned by some (villager) villagers. Ashish Yadav (farmer) . Problem of electricity in the village. . Informed about the groundwater availability which is obtained at about more than 150 feet below the ground.

Plate 1: Discussion with local people at Khujner

80

7. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND GRIEVANCE REDDRESS MECHANISM 7.1. Environmental Management Plan 1. The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is prepared to facilitate effective implementation of recommended mitigations measures with defined roles and responsibility, regulatory compliance requirements, stages of implementation with location, time frame and costs. The mitigation measures are proposed to eliminate or minimise the identified impact associated with design, construction and operation stages of the project, to acceptable level by adopting the most feasible options. 2. The EMP consists of action plans for (i) implementation of recommended mitigation measures, (ii) environment quality monitoring during construction and operation stage to assess the effectiveness of mitigation measures proposed, and (iii) institutional capacity building and training. The EMP is detailed at Appendix 7.1.

7.1.1. Social Development and Indigenous People Development Program (IPDP) 3. A separate Social Impact Assessment study is undertaken and social development programme is addressed as per this study. The involuntary resettlement issue is also addressed under separate study. However, the correlated issues like safety of habitats and workers, protection of common physical cultural resources, safe passage of habitats are addressed under environmental assessment and mitigation plan. 4. Since there is no indigenous population likely to be affected in the project area, IPDP is not envisaged. This has to be confirmed based on the social assessment.

7.1.2. Emergency Response Plan 5. Assessment of nature, type and extent of project activities establishes that accidents on paved roads and consequent spillage can be the more frequent emergency. Other situation includes road overtopping due to heavy flood. It is suggested to develop a communication and response system to minimize the response time. The project authorities shall be prepared to counteract against such emergency either by developing in- house capabilities or by associating with any competent agency. 7.2. Environmental Monitoring Program (EMoP) 6. The environmental monitoring programme is prepared with the aim to monitor the environmental performance of environmental management plan. The EMOP is planned with the focus on following objectives: • To the assess the effectiveness of mitigation measures proposed • To assess the change in environmental quality during construction and operation stage with respect to before the project scenario. • To assess compliance to regulatory requirements 81

• To monitor the status of corrective action taken in case of deviation from the planned measures or regulatory requirements. This will be used as performance indicators for the project. A monitoring plan defining the parameters to be monitored, with sampling locations, frequency of measurements, cost and responsibility for various component of environment is prepared for all stages of project and provided as Appendix 7.2.

7.2.1. Monitoring schedule and performance indicator 7. The monitoring schedule has been developed based on the possible occurrence of adverse impacts and required mitigation actions. However, this schedule is subject to change depending on the analysis results obtained. The performance indicators and protocol for changing the monitoring schedule is given below. 7.2.1.1.1 Tree Plantation 8. The 75% survival rate of re-plantation shall be monitored on the first year of the operation phase. If the survival rate is found below 75%, necessary measures will be taken to increase the survival rate and monitoring shall be again taken up on the third year of operation. This cycle should continue until the 75% survival rate is achieved. 7.2.1.1.2 Soil Erosion and Drainage Congestion 9. No significant soil erosion problem is anticipated due to the project either in the construction phase or in the operation phase. However, in the construction phase, some localised soil erosion may be noticed owing to construction activities. However, if soil erosion is noticed during construction and operation phase, the corrective action shall be initiated and frequency of check be increased to assess the tendency of occurrence. 10. The cross drainage structure shall be free from siltation. Visual check shall be made periodically to identify any drainage congestion or water logging along the road. Appropriate corrective action shall be taken to clear the congestion and prevent reoccurrence. 7.2.1.1.3 Air and Noise Quality 11. Due to the variability of the construction activities, namely changes in batch composition, type of construction activity and other anthropogenic influences, the ambient air quality of the project area may change. If the air quality with respect to any parameter exceeds by more than 25% of its last monitored value, the monitoring frequency shall be doubled and cause of the increase investigated. If the construction activities are found to be the reason for this increase, suitable measures should be adopted. 12. Similarly, due to the variability in traffic movement, namely changes in traffic volume, traffic compositions and other anthropogenic influences, the noise quality in the project area is likely to change. If the noise quality exceeds by 20% of the applicable ambient noise quality standard or 10% of its last monitored value, the monitoring frequency

82

shall be increased and the cause of the increase investigated. If the construction activities are found to be the reason for this increase, suitable measures should be adopted. 7.2.1.1.4 Water Quality 13. No significant change in water quality is perceived due to the project in the operation phase. However, in the construction phase, the monitored values for pH, BOD, COD, TDS, DO and Oil & Grease might change owing to construction activities. Hence, it is suggested that if the monitored value for any water quality parameter exceeds by more than 20% of its last monitored status the monitoring frequency shall be increased.

7.2.2. Authorities and their Responsibilities for Implementation of EMoP 14. The most essential component of the Environment Monitoring Plan is the execution of the Plan in accordance with the monitoring schedule provided therein. The field officer concerned at PIU will be responsible for timely monitoring of various parameters and compliance with the mitigative measure proposed. He can execute this task through supervision consultant. A resultant database is proposed to be maintained. A Management Information System (MIS) is also put in place for effective flow of information between various levels and functions within the MPRDC. 15. The monitoring reports shall be sent to Sr. Manager (Environment & Social) at head office with copy to Divisional Officer. 7.3. Institutional Setting and Proposed Implementation Arrangement 16. M. P. State Road Development Corporation (MPRDC) is responsible for the development of state roads. MPRDC has set up divisional offices which act as Project Implementation Unit (PIU). Each PIU is headed by Divisional officer who is supported by various engineers (field officers). These field officers also have the responsibility to comply with various regulatory permitting and compliance monitoring requirement. A Sr Manager (Environment & Social) is posted at Head Quarter who is responsible for overall environment and social management of sub projects. He reports to Dy General Manager who is responsible for the implementation of MPSRP_II and co-ordinate with ADB to monitor all environmental requirements of this subproject. 17. For subproject planning and implementation, Project Implementation Unit/s (PIUs) are established. This is headed by Divisional Officer and supported by Field officers. It is proposed to designate one of the field officers with additional responsibility of environment and social management. This officer shall be given adequate training for effective environmental management and monitoring. The designated field officer will be responsible for implementation and monitoring of EMP. Field Officer will monitor the compliance directly or with the help of supervision consultant. SQC will also supervise the contractor for complying the EMP requirements, monitoring requirements and obtaining the required permits. Divisional officer will be overall responsible for ensuring effective 83

implementation of EMP at PIU level who will ensure it through field officer and SQC. Field officer will be fully responsible for operation stage monitoring. 18. The EMP will be included in the construction contract and the contractor will be responsible for its implementation. MPRDC will monitor the implementation of these mitigation measures by the contractors through Sr Manager Environment, Field Officers at PIU and SQC. The field officers at PIU level will be responsible for compliance monitoring and periodic reporting to divisional officer and Sr. Manager Environment at Head office. 19. The roles and duties of various agencies responsible for monitoring have been outlined in Table 7.1. The flow diagram depicting the institutional arrangement for implementation EMP and EMoP has been given as Figure 7.1. Table 7.1 : Roles and Duties of Implementing Agency/Organisations HQ MPRDC Contractor PIU Supervision Consultant • Obtain statutory • Obtain permits as • Joint verification to • Assist and advise the clearances required required during be carried out by PIU in matters relating during pre-construction construction stage HQ, PIU, SC to environment and stage Contractor Env. social matters. • Joint Verification Manager. • overall project Exercise including, • Compliance reporting coordination and PMU CMU, SC for • Overall Supervision to EMP and clearance management through review of EMP of implementation of conditions PIU supported by SC EMP • Interaction with Sr • Provide corrective • Interaction and Manager (Env. & • Environmental action if any deviation Reporting to ADB. Social) , PIU and SC monitoring through to EMP is identified Submission of approved laboratory progress reports to • Contractor’s Env. or through SC • Part of Joint ADB atleast once in a Officer will be primarily Verification Exercise • Verification of year. responsible for to be carried out by implementation EMP consent taken by HQ, PIU and • Effective contractor for Contractor for review • implementation of Filling of Reporting opening of borrow of EMP for EMP and Monitoring of Format and submitting areas, and setting up modification in EMP to SC labour camps. enhancement Ensuring restoration • Compilation of data • Monitoring through measures (if required) as per initial relating to approved agency. agreement with land • Ensure that the implementation of • Preparation of various owner contractor define the EMP. plans for effective cost of environmental • Keeping records of • Advising and implementation of measures like borrow all consents obtained suggesting corrective EMP as detailed out in area rehabilitation etc by contractor. measures to adhere to EMP and submitting it which are shown as time schedule for for approval to SC • Compilation of data part of construction implementation of relating to cost under EMP • EMP. Identification of sites implementation of matrix (Appendix 7.1) for labour camps, hot before the start of • EMP. Carry out mix plant, batch mix construction. This • verification/supervision plant, debris disposal Filling of Summary amount shall be exercises for etc Sheets and reporting released against implementation of to HQ. completion of EMP with respect to • Approval of plans respective EMP

84

modification (if prepared by measures. required) for contractor • enhancement Supervise • Addressing measures. implementation of grievances of local EMP/EMoP by community and contractor information dissemination • Develop good through practices construction NGOs/CBOs. guidelines to assist contractor in implementation of EMP • Conduct Consultations programs with the stakeholders on regular basis to get first hand information on the inconvenience caused to contractor’s activities such as noise, debris disposal etc. • Ensure submission of compliance report to EMP/EMoP once in six month to PIU

85

HQ MPRDC Asian DY General Manager Developmen (MPSRSP II) t Bank

Social and Env. Group (Proposed) Sr. Manager (Env and Social) Supported by Manager Env. and Social (proposed)

PIU Supervision Consultant Contractor Divisional Officer supported by field Officers

Field Officer – (Proposed to be designated with additional responsibility of Env. And Social)

Need Based Support from Approved Monitoring Agency and Independent Subject Experts and Institutions

Figure 7.1 : Proposed Structure for EMP/EMOP Implementation

86

7.3.2. Institutional / Capacity Building 20. Capacity Building: As per the existing structure, one officer at Sr Manager level is responsible for Environmental and social aspect at MPRDC. Considering the increasing magnitude of activities, it is proposed that another manager level officer be appointed to support Sr manager’s activities. The group shall be named as Environmental and Social Group. To facilitate and streamline this group’s activities it is proposed to develop the Environmental and social impact guidelines. This will standardise the impact assessment, regulatory compliance and environmental quality monitoring mechanism. 21. Training and Awareness: To enhance the capacity of officials for effective implementation of proposed mitigation measures and monitoring the resultant effects, as well as create awareness amongst workers and public, the training and awareness programme is planned and is given as Table 7.2. The institutions/agencies like regional office of MoEF, SPCB/CPCB, and Indian Institute of Technologies can be consulted for such trainings. Independent subject’s experts/consultants (e.g., for the environmental awareness program, impact assessment specialist will be the resource person) can also be the resource persons to impart trainings. These experts /agencies shall be appointed based on specific need for the training. Table 7.2 : Combined Training Budget for MPSRP II

Combined Training Budget for MPSRP II S. Target Subject(s) Method Time Basis for Costs Estimation No. group Frame and Training Training Delivery Estimate Material d Cost Preparation 1 All staffs Environmental Lectures Before @ Rs 2.0 Lacs Reproduction of Training of MPRDC Overview: cum beginning Material Rs 24,000 (@ Rs. including Environmental interactio of the 200 per set for 120 sets ) PIU Regulations, sub- n implemen project project related tation of Training Delivery: staff provisions of the sub- Honorarium and travel cost involved in various Acts/ project. of the faculty Rs 2.0 lac (@ implement Guidelines, EIA 50,000 per programme for 4 ation of notification, process INR 6.24 programmes) the project and methodology Lakhs and Select for IEE, EMPs Venue and other facility NGOs. costs Rs 2.0 lacs ( @ Rs 50000 per programme with 25 participants in each) 2 Field Implementation of Worksho Before @ Rs 2.0 Lacs -do- Officer EMPs: ps and the (Env) at Basic features of an Seminars constructi PIU, EMP, Planning, on begins Supervisio designing and n execution of INR 6.24 Consultant environmental Lakhs 87

’s mitigation and Environme enhancement ntal measures, Specialists monitoring and and Select evaluation of NGOs environmental conditions – during construction and operation 3 Sr. Environmentally Worksho Before @ Rs 3.0 Lacs -do- Manager, Sound ps and the Manager Construction Site visits constructi at Head Practices: on Quarter Clean construction and Field technology, INR 6.24 officer at alternatives Lakhs PIU, , materials and design techniques for team, construction, Waste Supervisio Management and n minimization in Consultant construction, Constructi pollution control on devices and Contractor methods for s’ staff construction sites and equipment, Environmental clauses in contract documents and their implications, protection of flora and fauna Environmental monitoring during construction 4 PIU and Monitoring Lectures, During @ Rs 1.5 Lacs Reproduction of Training Supervisio Environmental Worksho initial Material Rs 24,000 (@ Rs. n Performance p and site phases of 200 per set for 120 persons Consultant during visits constructi ) , NGOs Construction: on and Air, Water, Soil and Training Delivery: communit Noise, tree survival INR 5.0 Honorarium and travel cost y Monitoring Lakhs of the faculty Rs 1.6 lac (@ representa requirement and 40,000 per programme for 4 tives techniques, programmes) Evaluation and Review of results, Venue and other facility Performance costs Rs 1.6 lacs ( @ Rs indicators and their 40,000 per programme with applicability, 25 participants in each) possible corrective actions, reporting requirements and mechanisms

88

Total Rs 23.72 Training lacs or Costs Say Rs. 24 lacs

22. Management System: It is proposed to develop standard environmental guidelines for impact assessment, management plan, and monitoring. It is recommended to develop an Environmental Management and Reporting Systems following international standards like ISO 14001. 7.4. Grievance Redress Mechanism 23. Any environmental grievance received from public or stakeholders concerning the project will be directed to the concerned PIU. Firstly, field officer will assess if the grievances are genuine or suggestion is acceptable. Accordingly, response will be given within 15-30 days through suitable mode by the field officer with the approval of Divisional Officer. In case PIU is unable to resolve the issue, the matter will be forwarded to Sr. Manager ( Environment & Social) at head quarter who will take it up further and resolve. The corrective and preventing action will be taken in a time bound manner as per response given to the stakeholders. The outcome shall also form part of quarterly report to ADB. 24. The local community will be informed by the respective supervision consultants about the option to express their grievances if any through the mechanism described above before the start of construction activities. The grievance redress mechanism with the name of concerned official shall also be displayed at MPRDC website, and on notice boards of the PIU office and construction sites. 89

8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1. Conclusions 25. The findings of Environment Assessment indicate that project is unlikely to cause any significant environmental impacts. While some of the impacts are negative, there are many bearing benefits to the area. Most of the impacts are likely to occur during construction stage and are temporary in nature and can be mitigated with minor to negligible residual impacts. Some impacts require design consideration and are suitably addressed. The project received immense support from local people as they perceive that this project will improve the overall connectivity and bring various economic opportunities to the people of the area. 26. The alignment does not pass through or located nearby any ecologically sensitive or protected areas. No archaeological/protected monument is located in the project vicinity. The land use pattern around the alignment is predominantly agricultural. The significant impact during construction is mainly associated with minor increase in dust borne air pollution, increased noise level, nuisance due to movement and operation of vehicles, establishment of temporary facilities, hindrance in accessibility to common property resources etc. During operation stage, the main impact may be related to air quality and noise. Other issues relates to road safety including pedestrian and cattles. 27. Environmental screening and assessment of likely impacts, the project has been categorised as Category ‘B’. The effective implementation of environmental management plan will facilitate in minimising the environmental impact to acceptable level. No additional studies or need of undertaking detailed EIA is envisaged at this stage. 28. Key findings of the IEE are summarised in following paragraphs: • There are several canals and drains cutting across the project alignment. The major rivers crossing the project area are Kali Sindh, Newaj and Kadal River. Therefore adequate cross drainage structures are required to avoid flooding during monsoon season. All necessary measures as suggested in IEE including IRC specifications for embankment formation in waterlogged areas shall be taken into account. • The groundwater condition in the project section is poor. Hence, provisions of water harvesting should be adopted. • Since no land acquisition is involved, the project will not affect any family. Also, there will be no Impact on community infrastructure as the upgradation is limited to the available ROW. • Ambient noise level is within prescribed limit except near busy intersections such as Khujner, Chapikheda, Zirapur, Goghatpur, Monakhedi etc. Some of the key suggested measures during construction are provision of temporary noise barriers and regulating construction timings near sensitive locations. Operation stage mitigation includes multilayered plantation and restricting honking near

90

sensitive areas, maintaining good road conditions and congestion free traffic movement. • Large quantity of earth is required for the project. The availability of government waste land/barren land/uplands etc. is limited in the area. It is recommended to follow the guidelines for borrow area management as suggested in IEE. • The compensatory afforestation should be undertaken at 1:5 basis in close consultation with forest department. Roadside plantation should be done as per IRC specifications. Additional plantation should be done in consultation at river banks especially at major bridge locations. • Soil erosion along embankment slope, river banks, bridge sites and river training structures shall be checked through measures suggested in IEE. These measures coupled with silt fencing/brush barrier etc will also help to minimise siltation of water bodies though required at only few locations since most of the water bodies are seasonal in nature. • Predominant land use along the project alignment is agricultural/open area which helps in adequate dispersion of air emission. The increased pollution level during construction stage will be largely localised and temporary in nature. Corridor specific measures to curb emission include maintaining good road conditions, improved traffic regulations and roadside plantation with pollutant absorbent species. • Siting and management of temporary construction facilities i.e. construction camp, workers camp, hot mix plant, batching plant, dumping sites, stone crusher etc. shall be done in environmentally accepted manner as mentioned in IEE. • Dismantled material shall be reused to the extent possible. Leftover debris shall be disposed off in environmentally acceptable method and at designated sites. • Risk involved with accidents, community and occupational health safety should be mitigated as per measures provided in IEE. A proper traffic management plan shall be in place well before start of the construction. 29. Post Environmental Assessment Surveillance and Monitoring is essential to sustain the effectiveness of the mitigative measures suggested. A detailed monitoring plan has been prepared as part of the Environmental Management Plan. The focus areas of monitoring covers air, surface water quality, noise, soil erosion, drainage congestion and tree survival rate. The reporting requirements along with the follow up actions in case of deviation from the norms have been detailed out as a part of EMP. The frequency has been set in consideration of the likely impacts. 8.2. Key Recommendations: 30. Any major changes or any major additional work other than the proposed project activities will require preparation of another environmental assessment. This additional assessment will have to be submitted to concerned Government authorities and ADB for concurrence before civil works commence. 91

31. The implementation of prescribed mitigation measures will minimize/avoid the adverse impacts. Moreover, the impacts shall be monitored continually by implementing and updating the Environmental Management plan and Environmental Monitoring Plan. Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan may be updated if deemed necessary as per site conditions. MPRDC shall submit six monthly compliance/update reports to ADB. 32. All necessary clearances/permissions/No-objections/Consents should be obtained as required at different stages and as outlined in legal framework chapter of IEE. MPRDC shall ensure that environmental clearance as may be required is obtained before start of construction. 33. Executing agency shall ensure that EMP and EMoP is included in Bill of Quantity (BOQ) and forms part of bid document and civil works contract. The same shall be revised if necessary during project implementation or if there is any change in the project design and with approval of ADB.

92

APPENDIX3.1 : INVENTORY AND SURVEY CONDITION OF BRIDGES

93

APPENDIX3.2 : RAPID ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST

Roads and Highways

PACHOR-CHAPIKHEDA-ZIRAPUR-MACHALPUR-SOYAT (SH-51) SECTION

Instructions:

(i) The project team completes this checklist to support the environmental classification of a project. It is to be attached to the environmental categorization form and submitted to the Environment and Safeguards Division (RSES), for endorsement by Director, RSES and for approval by the Chief Compliance Officer.

(ii) This checklist focuses on environmental issues and concerns. To ensure that social dimensions are adequately considered, refer also to ADB's (a) checklists on involuntary resettlement and Indigenous Peoples; (b) poverty reduction handbook; (c) staff guide to consultation and participation; and (d) gender checklists.

(iii) Answer the questions assuming the “without mitigation” case. The purpose is to identify potential impacts. Use the “remarks” section to discuss any anticipated mitigation measures.

IND/Sub-regional Transport Enhancement Project – Road improvement w/ Country/Project Title: bituminous overlay: Pachor-Chapikheda-Machalpur-Soyat (86.70 km)

Sector Division: IND TA: 7198

SCREENING QUESTIONS Yes No REMARKS A. PROJECT SITING

IS THE PROJECT AREA ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS? . Cultural Heritage Site None

. Protected Area None

None . Wetland

. Mangrove None

. Estuarine None

. Buffer Zone of Protected Area None

. Special Area for Protecting Biodiversity None

B. POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

WILL THE PROJECT CAUSE…

94

SCREENING QUESTIONS Yes No REMARKS No encroachment on historical or Encroachment on historical/cultural areas; cultural areas is envisaged. disfiguration of landscape by road embankments, cuts, fills, and quarries? The topography of project road is mainly flat. But, minor impacts on landscape by road embankments to improve profile, cuts and fills cannot be ruled out.

None. The project road does not Encroachment on precious ecology (e.g. sensitive pass through sensitive ecological or protected areas)? areas. Minimal, since no new construction Alteration of surface water hydrology of waterways of bridges is proposed. Most rivers crossed by roads, resulting in increased sediment in project area are seasonal. in streams affected by increased soil erosion at Necessary measures shall be taken construction site? to prevent impacts on watercourses. Suitable prevention measures such Deterioration of surface water quality due to silt as silt fencing will reduce silt run runoff and sanitary wastes from worker-based off. camps and chemicals used in construction? Adequate measures for sanitary waste and silt runoff shall be taken to prevent any such condition. Local air pollution level is likely to Increased local air pollution due to rock crushing, be increased for short duration cutting and filling works, and chemicals from during construction period asphalt processing? particularly due to earth work. Appropriate distance from settlement area and wind direction may be taken into account to locate air polluting facility like stone crushing unit etc., if required. Risk is temporary and associated Risks and vulnerabilities related to occupational with construction phase. health and safety due to physical, chemical, biological, and radiological hazards during project Construction workers will be construction and operation during project provided with proper occupational, construction and operation? health and safety gear. Safety officer will be appointed by contractor to lead implementation of occupational and community health and safety plan during construction phase Minimal increase in ambient noise Noise and vibration due to blasting and other civil level is expected due to various works? construction activities. Necessary mitigation measures will be taken in noise sensitive locations such as schools, temples and forest areas. 95

SCREENING QUESTIONS Yes No REMARKS None. Dislocation or involuntary resettlement of people

No displacement. Dislocation and compulsory resettlement of people Project improvement work is to be living in right-of-way? carried out within existing available ROW, no resettlement is envisaged. None. Disproportionate impacts on the poor, women and children, Indigenous Peoples or other vulnerable groups?

All possible mitigation measures Other social concerns relating to inconveniences in will be taken to avoid any living conditions in the project areas that may inconvenience due to the project. trigger cases of upper respiratory problems and Efforts will also be made to keep stress? air pollution within permissible levels to prevent respiratory problems and stress among the nearby inhabitants. Traffic management plan to be Hazardous driving conditions where construction followed during construction will interferes with pre-existing roads? be prepared.

Appropriate waste management Poor sanitation and solid waste disposal in shall be adopted to prevent any construction camps and work sites, and possible such conditions. Awareness plan transmission of communicable diseases from for workers will be prepared to workers to local populations? educate them about communicable diseases. No such condition is anticipated Creation of temporary breeding habitats for mosquito vectors of disease?

Temporarily during construction Accident risks associated with increased vehicular stage. Adequate measures will be traffic, leading to accidental spills of toxic materials provided to prevent them such as and loss of life? speed reduction, provision of crash barrier & proper traffic signage system at sensitive places will ensure smooth traffic flow which will reduce accidental risk Increased noise and air pollution resulting from Temporarily during construction traffic volume? phase. Increased risk of water pollution from oil, grease Temporarily during construction and fuel spills, and other materials from vehicles phase. using the road? Adequate preventive measures will take to prevent such risks. Most of the workers will be hired Social conflicts if workers from other regions or locally. countries are hired?

96

SCREENING QUESTIONS Yes No REMARKS Most of the workers will be hired Large population influx during project construction locally. All groundwater extraction and operation that causes increased burden on will be covered by necessary social infrastructure and services (such as water permits and all construction sites supply and sanitation systems)? will have sanitary toilets with septic tank. No blasting will be made, bitumen Risks to community health and safety due to the handling will be consistent with the transport, storage, and use and/or disposal of Material Safety Data Sheet, materials such as explosives, fuel and other occupational and community chemicals during construction and operation? health and safety provisions included in the EMP Community and occupational Community safety risks due to both accidental and health and safety plan will form natural causes, especially where the structural part of EMP. elements or components of the project are accessible to members of the affected community or where their failure could result in injury to the community throughout project construction, operation and decommissioning.

The Project is categorized as B. As per MOEF latest EIA notification, Environmental Clearance for the project is not required. However, other consent conditions will be required.

97

APPENDIX3.3 : Details of Chainage-wise Existing and Proposed Design Speed and Curve Radius

Sr. Existing Proposed Remarks No. Chainage Radii Speed Chainage Radii Speed Start End (mt) (kmph) Start End (mt) (kmph) Khujner Bypass 1 0.087 0.224 110 20 11.593 11.730 130 20 Commercial + Junction 2 0.490 0.549 170 20 11.996 12.054 200 20 Fencing 3 0.632 0.636 70 20 12.138 12.142 100 20 Fencing 4 0.719 0.720 80 20 12.225 12.226 100 20 5 0.828 0.865 80 20 12.329 12.366 100 20 Fencing + Kachha Build. 6 0.969 0.993 25 15 12.468 12.492 30 20 Fencing + Building 7 1.156 1.167 90 20 12.655 12.665 100 20 8 1.252 1.266 90 20 12.750 12.764 100 20 9 1.358 1.421 140 20 12.856 12.918 170 20 Urban Area Pachor - Machalpur 10 36.491 36.556 30 20 33.217 33.282 40 20 Junction 11 39.626 39.636 170 30 33.659 33.669 200 40 Urban Area 12 39.722 39.752 45 20 33.720 33.749 60 20 Urban Area 13 37.242 37.256 80 40 33.973 33.988 100 40 Urban Area 14 38.142 38.169 140 40 34.862 34.889 150 40 Urban Area Machalpur – Rajasthan Border 15 12.076 12.092 200 30 2.210 2.226 250 40 Approach Slab Culvert 16 12.175 12.240 75 20 2.309 2.373 150 40 Slab Culvert 17 12.355 12.366 50 20 2.489 2.499 80 40 Junction 18 4.672 4.733 70 20 4.123 4.162 100 20 Bridge Approach 19 4.581 4.620 70 20 4.213 4.274 100 20 Bridge Approach

98

APPENDIX 4.1 : NATIONAL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS

The finding as Notified on 16th November 2009 by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) in exercise of its powers conferred under Section 6 and Section 25 of the Environment Protect Act, 1986.

Time-Weighted Concentration in Ambient Air

Ecologically Industrial, Pollutant Sensitive Area Residential Average (Notified by and other Central rural area Government) Annual* 50 20 3 SO2 ug/m 24 hours** 80 80 Annual* 40 30 3 NOx ug/m 24 hours** 80 80 Annual* 60 60 3 PM10 ug/m 24 hours** 100 100 Annual* 40 40 3 PM2.5 ug/m 24 hours** 60 60

Annual* 0.50 0.50 3 Lead ug/m

24 hours** 1.0 1.0

8 Hours** 2000 2000 3 CO ug/m 1 Hour** 4000 4000 8 Hours** 100 100 3 O3 ug/m 1 Hour** 180 180 Annual* 100 100 3 NH3 ug/m 24 hours** 400 400 Source: Gazette of India, Part II-Section-3-Subsection (i)

* Annual Arithmetic Mean of minimum 104 measurements in a year taken twice a week 24-hourly at uniform interval. ** 24-horly / 8-hourly values or 0.1 hourly monitored values shall be complied with 98% of the time in the year. However, 2% of the time, it may exceed but not on two consecutive days.

99

APPENDIX 4.2 : Ambient Noise Level Limits (In Leq dB(A)), India

Day Time Night Time Area/Class (6:00 AM to 9:00 PM) (9:00 PM to 6:00 am)

Standard Standard

Industrial 75 70

Commercial 65 55

Residential 55 45

Silence 50 40 Source: Environment Protection Rules, 1986, Schedule III

100

APPENDIX 4.3 : Drinking Water Standards And Probable Effects on Human Health (BIS: IS: 10500, 1991)

S. Prescribed limits Parameters Probable effects No. Desirable Permissible 1 COLOUR (HAZEN UNIT) 5 25 Aesthetically undesirable. 2 ODOUR Essentially free Aesthetically undesirable. 3 TASTE Agreeable Aesthetically undesirable. 4 TURBIDITY (NTU) 5 10 Indicates pollution/ contamination. Affects taste, corrodes supply 5 pH 6.5 8.5 system. Causes scaling, excessive soap HARDNESS, as CaCO3, 6 300 600 consumption, calcification of mg/l arteries. Causes staining of laundry and 7 IRON, as Fe , mg/l 0.30 1.00 porcelain. In traces it is essential for nutrition. May be injurious to heart or kidney patients. Taste, indigestion, 8 CHLORIDE, as Cl , mg/l 250 1000 corrosion and palatability are affected. RESIDUAL CHLORINE, only Excessive chlorination causes 9 when 0.20 - asthma, colitis and eczema Water is chlorinated May cause gastro-intestinal TOTAL DISSOLVED 10 500 2000 irritation, corrosion and laxative SOLIDS, mg/l effect to new users. Excessive Cause incrustation, deficiency causes rickets, 11 CALCIUM, as Ca, mg/l 75 200 essential for nervous, muscular, cardiac functions and in coagulation of blood. Its salts are cathartics and diuretic. Excessive may cause laxative effect; deficiency causes 12 MAGNESIUM, as Mg, mg/l 30 100 structural and functional changes. It is activator of many enzyme systems. Beneficial in human metabolism, deficiency results in nutritional anaemia in infants. Large amounts may result in liver damage, 13 COPPER, as Cu, mg/l 0.05 1.50 causes central nervous system irritation and depression. Enhances corrosion of Al in water supply systems. Causes gastro-intestinal irritation. Along with Mg or Na can have a 14 SULPHATE, as SO4, mg/l 200 400 cathartic effect. Concentration more than 750 mg/l may have laxative effect. Causes infant methaemoglobinaemia, at very 15 NITRATE, as N, mg/l 45 100 high concentration causes gastric cancer and effects central nervous 101

S. Prescribed limits Parameters Probable effects No. Desirable Permissible and cardiovascular system.

Reduces dental carries, very high 16 FLUORIDE, as F, mg/l 1.00 1.50 concentration may cause crippling skeletal fluorosis. Acute toxicity may be associated with renal, arterial hypertension, 17 CADMIUM, as Cd, mg/l 0.01 No relaxation itai-itai (bone disease). Cd salts cause cramps, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea. Burning in mouth, severe inflammation of gastro-intestinal tract with vomiting and diarrhoea. 18 LEAD, as Pb, mg/l 0.05 No relaxation Chronic toxicity produces nausea, severe abdominal pain, paralysis, mental confusion, visual disturbances, and anaemia etc. Essential and beneficial in human 19 ZINC, as Zn , mg/l 5 15 metabolism. Imparts astringent taste to water. Cr6+ produces lung tumours, 20 CHROMIUM, as Cr, mg/l 0.05 No relaxation coetaneous and nasal mucous membrane ulcers and dermatitis. Causes skin damage, circulatory 21 ARSENIC, as As, mg/l 0.05 No relaxation problems, and increased risk of skin cancer. Raises blood cholesterol, lowers 22 ANTIMONY, as Sb, mg/l 0.006 No relaxation blood sugar. 23 ALUMINIUM, as Al, mg/l 0.030 0.200 Leads to neurological disorders. 24 BARIUM, as Ba, mg/l 2 No relaxation Increases blood pressure. 25 BERYLLIUM, as Be, mg/l nil 0.0002 Is carcinogenic Causes nerve damage, thyroid 26 CYANIDE, as CN, mg/l 0.05 No relaxation problem. Neurological and renal disturbances. Excess causes 27 MERCURY, as Hg, mg/l 0.001 No relaxation gonadotoxic and mutagenic effects and disturbs the cholesterol metabolism. Essential as a cofactor in enzyme systems and metabolism processes. Excessive causes change in appetite and reduction 28 MANGANESE, as Mn, mg/l 0.10 0.30 in metabolism of iron to form haemoglobin. Imparts undesirable taste and stains plumbing fixtures and laundry. Leads to hair, finger loss, and 29 SELENIUM, as Se, mg/l 0.01 No relaxation numbness in fingers or toes, circulatory problems. Affects central nervous system, 30 BORON, as B, mg/l 1.00 5.00 salts may cause nausea, cramps, convulsions, coma, etc. 31 ALKALINITY, as CaCO3, 200 600 Imparts unpleasant taste,

102

S. Prescribed limits Parameters Probable effects No. Desirable Permissible mg/l deleterious to humans in presence of high pH, hardness and TDS. Imparts toxicity, accumulates in different organs of body, and 32 PESTICIDES, ug/l nil 0.001 affects immune and nervous systems. Carcinogenic. High concentration causes vomiting and diarrhoea stimulates 33 PHOSPHATE, as PO4, mg/l No guideline secondary hyperthyroidism and bone loss. Harmful to persons suffering from 34 SODIUM, as Na, mg/l No guideline cardiac, renal and circulatory diseases. Essential nutrition element but 35 POTASSIUM, as K, mg/l No guideline excessive amounts are cathartic. Non-toxic element but may be carcinogenic in animals, can react 36 NICKEL, as Ni , mg/l No guideline with DNA resulting in DNA damage in animals. PATHOGENS Causes water borne diseases like a)TOTAL COLIFORM coliform jaundice; Typhoid, 37 No/dl 1 10 Cholera etc. produces infections

b)FAECAL COLIFORM involving skin mucous membrane No/dl of eyes, ears and throat. RADIOACTIVITY: -BETA PARTICLES 0-4 milligram/year 38 Increases risk of cancer. -ALPHA PARTICLES 0-15 picocuries/year -RADIUM 0-05 picocuries/year

103

APPENDIX 4.4 : Water Quality Criteria And Standards for Freshwater Classification (CPCB, 1979)

Characteristics A B C D E

Dissolved Oxygen (DO), 6 5 4 4 - mg/L, Min Biological Oxygen Demand, BOD, mg/L, 2 3 3 - - max Total Coliform organism 50 500 5000 - - **, MPN/100ml, Max pH value 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5 6 – 9 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5 Free Ammonia (as N), - - - 1.2 - mg/L, Max Electrical Conductivity, - - - - 2250 µmhos/cm, max Sodium absorption Ratio - - - - 26 Boron, mg/L, Max - - - - 2

A) Drinking water sources without conventional treatment but after disinfecting B) Outdoor Bathing (organized) C) Drinking water source with conventional treatment followed by disinfecting D) Propagation of wildlife, fisheries E) Irrigation, industrial cooling, controlled waste disposal

104

APPENDIX 5.1: Guidelines for Borrow Areas Management

1. SELECTION OF BORROW AREAS Location of borrow areas shall be finalized as per IRC: 10-1961guidlines. The finalization of locations in case of borrows areas identified in private land shall depend upon the formal agreement between landowners and contractor. If, agreement is not reached between the contractor and landowners for the identified borrow areas sites, arrangement for locating the source of supply of material for embankment and sub-grade as well as compliance to environment requirements in respect of excavation and borrow areas as stipulated from time to time by the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, and local bodies, as applicable shall be the sole responsibility of the contractor. The contractor in addition to the established practices, rules and regulation will also consider following criteria before finalizing the locations. (1) The borrow area should not be located in agriculture field unless unavoidable i.e. barren land is not available. (2) The borrow pits preferably should not be located along the roads. (3) The loss of productive and agriculture soil should be minimum. (4) The loss of vegetation is almost nil or minimum. (5) The Contractor will ensure that suitable earth is available. 2. CONTRACTOR’S RESPONSIBILTY The Contractor shall obtain representative samples from each of the identified borrow areas and have these tested at the site laboratory following a testing programme approved by the Engineer. It shall be ensured that the sub-grade material when compacted to the density requirements shall yield the design CBR value of the sub-grade. Contractor shall begin operations keeping in mind following; (1) Haulage of material to embankments or other areas of fill shall proceed only when sufficient spreading and compaction plants is operating at the place of deposition. (2) No excavated acceptable material other than surplus to requirements of the Contract shall be removed from the site. Contractor should be permitted to remove acceptable material from the site to suit his operational procedure, then shall make consequent deficit of material arising there from. (3) Where the excavation reveals a combination of acceptable and un- acceptable materials, the Contractor shall, unless otherwise agreed by the Engineer, carry out the excavation in such a manner that the acceptable materials are excavated separately for use in the permanent works without contamination by the un-acceptable materials. The acceptable material shall be stockpiled separately. (4) The Contractor shall ensure that he does not adversely affect the stability of excavation or fills by the methods of stockpiling materials, use of plants are siting of temporary buildings or structures.

105

3. BORROWING FROM DIFFERENT LAND-FORMS

A. Borrow Areas located in Agricultural Lands

(i) The preservation of topsoil will be carried out in stockpile. (ii) A 15 cm topsoil will be stripped off from the borrow pit and this will be stored in stockpiles in a designated area for height not exceeding 2m and side slopes not steeper than 1:2 (Vertical: Horizontal). (iii) Borrowing of earth will be carried out up to a depth of 1.5m from the existing ground level. (iv) Borrowing of earth will not be done continuously through out the stretch. (v) Ridges of not less than 8m widths will be left at intervals not exceeding 300m. (vi) Small drains will be cut through the ridges, if necessary, to facilitate drainage. (vii) The slope of the edges will be maintained not steeper than 1:4 (vertical: Horizontal). (viii) The depth of borrow pits will not be more than 30 cm after stripping the 15 cm topsoil aside.

B. Borrow Areas located in Elevated Lands

(i) The preservation of topsoil will be carried out in stockpile. (ii) A 15 cm topsoil will be stripped off from the borrow pit and this will be stored in stockpiles in a designated area for height not exceeding 2m and side slopes not steeper than 1:2 (Vertical: Horizontal). (iii) At location where private owners desire their fields to be levelled, the borrowing shall be done to a depth of not more than 1.5m or up to the level of surrounding fields

C. Borrow Areas near River side

(i) The preservation of topsoil will be carried out in stockpile. (ii) A 15 cm topsoil will be stripped off from the borrow pit and this will be stored in stockpiles in a designated area for height not exceeding 2m and side slopes not steeper than 1:2 (Vertical: Horizontal). (iii) Borrow area near to any surface water body will be at least at a distance of 15m from the toe of the bank or high flood level, whichever is maximum.

D. Borrow Areas near Settlements

(i) The preservation of topsoil will be carried out in stockpile.

106

(ii) A 15 cm topsoil will be stripped off from the borrow pit and this will be stored in stockpiles in a designated area for height not exceeding 2m and side slopes not steeper than 1:2 (Vertical: Horizontal). (iii) Borrow pit location will be located at least 0.75 km from villages and settlements. If un-avoidable, the pit will not be dug for more than 30 cm and drains will be cut to facilitate drainage. (iv) Borrow pits located in such location will be re-developed immediately after borrowing is completed. If spoils are dumped, that will be covered with a layers of stockpiled topsoil in accordance with compliance requirements with respect MOEF/PPCB guidelines.

E. Borrow Pits along the Road

Borrow pits along the road shall be discouraged and if deemed necessary and permitted by the Engineer; following precautions are recommended (i) The preservation of topsoil will be carried out in stockpile. (ii) A 15 cm topsoil will be stripped off from the borrow pit and this will be stored in stockpiles in a designated area for height not exceeding 2m and side slopes not steeper than 1:2 (Vertical: Horizontal). (iii) Ridges of not less than 8m widths should be left at intervals not exceeding 300m. (iv) Small drains shall be cut through the ridges of facilitate drainage. (v) The depth of the pits shall be so regulated that there bottom does not cut an imaginary line having a slope of 1 vertical to 4 horizontal projected from the edge of the final section of bank, the maximum depth of any case being limited to 1.5m. (vi) Also, no pit shall be dug within the offset width from the toe of the embankment required as per the consideration of stability with a minimum width of 10m. 4. REHABILITATION OF BORROW AREAS The objective of the rehabilitation programme is to return the borrow pit sites to a safe and secure area, which the general public should be able to safely enter and enjoy. Securing borrow pits in a stable condition is fundamental requirement of the rehabilitation process. This could be achieved by filling the borrow pit floor to approximately the access road level.

Re-development plan shall be prepared by the Contractor before the start of work inline with the owners will require and to the satisfaction of owner. The Borrow Areas shall be rehabilitated as per following; • Borrow pits shall be backfilled with rejected construction wastes and will be given a vegetative cover. If this is not possible, then excavation sloped will be smoothed and depression will be filled in such a way that it looks more or less like the original round surface. • Borrow areas might be used for aquaculture in case landowner wants such development. In that case, such borrow area will be photographed 107

after their post use restoration and Environment Expert of Supervision Consultant will certify the post use redevelopment. The Contractor will keep record of photographs of various stages i.e., before using materials from the location (pre-project), for the period borrowing activities (construction Phase) and after rehabilitation (post development), to ascertain the pre and post borrowing status of the area.

108

APPENDIX 7.1: Environmental Management Plan (SH-51: Pachor-Chapikheda-Zirapur-Machalpur-Soyat 86.707 km) All activity for supervision is on part of SQC unless involvement of different department Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision A. Design and Construction Stage 1. Alignment  Pavement • Selection of suitable pavement Design requirement • All habitat areas throughout During the Included in Design SQC/MPRD damage and design in habitat areas the alignment design construction Consultant C inadequate considering alignment level and stage cost drainage drainage provisions in • Raise road level above the habitat areas nearby areas with provision of adequate side drains to evacuate the rain water and domestic discharges (drained by habitats occasionally) to prevent damage to road and rain water entry to habitats’ houses. • Provision of adequate no of cross drainage structures based on drainage pattern around the alignment  Safety along the • Make provisions of crash barriers Design requirement • Crash barriers are proposed During the Included in Design SQC/MPRD proposed at accident prone areas at the following chainages design construction Consultant C alignment • Provision of rumble strips in along the project corridor stage cost habitat areas to regulate speed. • Provision of retro-reflective Chainage (m) Chainage (m) warning sign boards nears Left Right school, hospital, religious places 31/08 31/11 7/59 7/62 and forests areas 67/66 67/70 49/72 49/74 • Provision of footpaths along the 68/37 68/46 51/06 51/08 road near habitat areas, school, 68/53 68/58 52/06 52/10 hospital, religious places and 73/07 73/08 72/56 72/58 forests 73/56 73/65 73/06 73/08 • Compliance with norms specified 74/65 74/77 73/59 73/68 in IRC codes for state highway 75/72 75/75 74/48 74/50 for curvature and grading 4/72 4/75 74/65 74/78 • Provision of safety kerb with 4/94 4/97 4/72 4/75 109

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision footpath at all bridges 5/68 5/72 4/94 4/97 • The design should attempt to 5/86 5/89 5/86 5/89 equalize cut and fill. The 5/99 6/02 5/99 6/02 centerline should be aligned so that on all slopes below 60 degrees, half cut and half fill can be achieved. • Minimize the cutting in hill areas. Incorporate slope stabilization measures to prevent any land slide situation. • 2. Natural Hazards  Protection from • Design considering the IRC:34 Throughout the stretch Design Project Design SQC/MPRD damage from earthquake potential though the Recommendations Stage preparation Consultant C Earthquake area falls under low earthquake for road construction Cost intensity of 2/3 in waterlogged area and IRC: 75 and MOSRTH guidelines  Protection of road • Raise embankment height above for Design of High All the existing culverts/bridges Design Included in Design SQC/MPRD embankment in the HFL levels in the flood prone Embankments are improved to increase their and construction Consultant C Flood prone areas. carrying capacity. Constructi cost Areas • Provision of adequate balancing on Stage culverts. 3. Weather Conditions and Air Quality  Local Weather • Geometric adjustment to reduce Kyoto Protocol, Throughout project corridor, Design Road Side Design SQC conditions tree cutting. Environmental mainly at level crossings, and Plantations Consultant /MPRDC • Compensatory tree Plantation Protection Act, haulage roads, earthwork, Constructi +Additional and Contractor (1:5) 1986; The Air construction sites, loading on stage Plantation • Additional Plantation on river (Prevention and areas, storage areas, transport During the cost7=2.6 banks, borrow areas and Control of Pollution) route Constructi Million sensitive locations to increase Act, 1981 on stage (@1200/tree)

7 The total no. trees likely to be cut are estimated to be 311. Compensatory afforestation norm is 1:5. Additional Plantation of 1:2 is suggested. Hence, 2177 trees have to be planted in lieu of compensatory plantation. Project has the provision of planting trees on both sides of the road. The lump sum cost of cutting a tree, its afforestation and maintenance is taken as Rs. 1200.

110

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision the green cover and improve the + aesthetics IRC and  Dust Generation • Transport, loading and unloading MORTH Included in Design SQC/MPRD due to of loose and fine materials Specifications for project cost Consultant C construction through covered vehicles. Road and Bridge and Contractor SQC/MPRD activities and • Paved approach roads. works C Air (P and CP) transport, storage • Storage areas to be located Act 1974 and and handling of downwind of the habitation area. • Water spraying on earthworks, Central Motor and construction unpaved haulage roads and Vehicle materials other dust prone areas. Act 1988 • Provision of PPEs to workers.  Emission of air • Regular maintenance of Asphalt mixing plants, crushers, During the Included in Contractor SQC/MPRD pollutants (HC, machinery and equipment. DG sets locations Constructi project cost C SO2, NOX, CO • Batching, asphalt mixing plants on stage etc) from vehicles and crushers at downwind (1km) due to traffic direction from the nearest congestion and settlement. use of equipment • Only crushers licensed by the and machinery PCB shall be used Included in • DG sets with stacks of adequate monitoring cost height and use of low sulphur diesel as fuel. • Ambient air quality monitoring • Follow traffic management plan as given in Section 8. 4. Noise  Noise from • All equipment to be timely Legal requirement Throughout project section During the Cost for Contractor SQC/MPRD construction serviced and properly Noise Pollution especially at construction sites, Constructi Plantation C vehicle, maintained. (Regulation and residential areas such as on stage already equipment and • Bottlenecks to be removed. Control) Rules, Khujner, Chapikheda, Zirapur, indicated machinery. • Construction equipment and 2000 and Goghatpur, Monakhedi etc. above. machinery to be fitted with amendments and identified sensitive locations silencers and maintained thereof as given in Table 5.1 properly. + • Only IS approved equipments Clause No 501.8.6. shall be used for construction MoSRTH 111

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision activities. Specifications for • Timing of noisy construction Road and Bridge activities shall be done during works Monitoring night time and weekends near Cost as sensitive receptors such as indicated In schools and temples, concurrent EMoP. noisy operations may be separated to reduce the total noise generated, and if possible re-route traffic during construction to avoid the accumulation of noise beyond standards. Else provision of temporary noise barrier at sensitive locations or near sources. • Time regulation near residential and forest areas construction shall be restricted to daylight hours. • Initiation of multi layered plantation, to serve as mitigation option for operation phase • Honking restrictions near sensitive areas • PPEs to workers • Noise monitoring as per EMoP. 5. Land and Soil  Land use • For construction non-agricultural Project requirement Throughout the project section During Included in Contractor SQC/MPRD Change and Loss areas to be used as borrow and borrow areas design construction C of productive/top areas. and cost soil • If using agricultural land, top soil constructi to be preserved and laid over on Stage either on the embankment slope for growing vegetation to protect soil erosion.  Slope protection • Bio-turfing of embankments to IRC: 56 -1974 Throughout the stretch Design Construction Design SQC/MPRD and Soil erosion protect slopes. recommended especially along hilly areas and cost consultant and C

112

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision due to • Slope protection by providing practice for constructi Contractor, construction frames, dry stone pitching, treatment of on stage activities, masonry retaining walls, planting embankment slopes earthwork, and of grass and trees. for erosion control cut and fill etc. • The side slopes of all cut and fill Clause No. 306 and areas will be graded and covered 305.2.2 with stone pitching, grass and MoSRTH shrub as per design Specifications for specifications. Care should be Road and Bridge taken that the slope gradient works shall not be greater than 2:1. Guidelines IX for  Soil erosion at • The earth stockpiles to be Soil erosion At earth stockpiles Design Construction Contractor SQC/MPRD earth stockpiles provided with gentle slopes to and cost C prevent soil erosion. constructi on stage  Borrow areas • Non-productive, barren lands, IRC Guidelines on Borrow sites location. During Construction Contractor SQC/MPRD upland shall be used for borrow areas and Design cost C borrowing earth with the for quarries and necessary permissions/consents. (Environmental constructi • Depths of borrow pits to be Protection Act and on Stage regulated and sides not steeper Rules, 1986; Water than 25%. Act, Air Act) • Topsoil to be stockpiled and + Clause No. protected for use at the 305.2.2 MoSRTH rehabilitation stage. Specifications for • Transportation of earth materials Road and Bridge through covered vehicles. works • IRC recommended practice for Guidelines V for borrow pits (IRC 10: 1961). Borrow Areas • Borrow areas not to be dug Management continuously. • To the extent borrow areas shall be sited away from habitated areas. Borrow areas shall be leveled with salvaged material or other filling materials which do not pose contamination of soil. Else, it shall be converted into 113

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision fishpond in consultation with fishery department and land owner/community. Rehabilitation of the borrow areas as per Guidelines for redevelopment of Borrow Areas.  Quarry • Aggregates will be sourced from Clause No. 111.3 Operations existing licensed quarries. MoSRTH • Copies of consent/ approval / Specifications for rehabilitation plan for a new Road and Bridge quarry or use of existing source works Guidelines VI will be submitted to EO, MPRDC. for Quarry Areas • The contractor will develop a Management Quarry Redevelopment plan, as per the Mining Rules of the state and submit a copy of the approval to EA.  Compaction of • Construction vehicles, Design Parking areas, Haulage roads Just Included in Contractor SQC/MPRD soil and impact on machinery, and equipment to be requirement and construction yards. before construction C quarry haul roads stationed in the designated ROW commenc cost due to movement to avoid compaction. ement of of vehicles and • Approach roads/haulage roads constructi equipments shall be designed along the on barren and hard soil area to reduce the compaction. • Transportation of quarry material to the dumping site through heavy vehicles shall be done through existing major roads to the extent possible to restrict wear and tear to the village/minor roads. • Land taken for construction camp and other temporary facility shall be restored to its original conditions.  Contamination • Construction vehicles and Design Fuelling station, construction Just Monitoring Contractor SQC/MPRD of soil due to equipment will be maintained requirement sites, and construction camps before Cost Included C leakage/spillage and disposal location. commenc in EMoP

114

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision of oil, bituminous and refueled in such a fashion ement of and non that oil/diesel spillage does not constructi bituminous debris contaminate the soil. on generated from • Fuel storage and refueling sites demolition and to be kept away from drainage road construction channels. • Unusable debris shall be dumped in ditches and low lying areas. • To avoid soil contamination Oil- Interceptors shall be provided at wash down and refueling areas. • Waste oil and oil soaked cotton/ cloth shall be stored in containers labeled ‘Waste Oil’ and ‘Hazardous’ sold off to MoEF/SPCB authorized vendors • Non-bituminous wastes to be dumped in borrow pits with the concurrence of landowner and covered with a layer of topsoil conserved from opening the pit. • Bituminous wastes will be disposed off in an identified dumping site approved by the State Pollution Control Board • Soil quality monitoring 6. Water Resources Sourcing of water • Requisite permission shall be - Throughout the Project section During Included in Contractor SQC/MPRD during Construction obtained for abstraction of Constructi construction C groundwater from Central on stage cost Groundwater Authority • Arrangements shall be made by contractor that the water availability and supply to nearby communities remain unaffected.  Disposal of water • Provisions shall be made to Clause No. 1010 EP Throughout the Project section During Included in Contractor SQC/MPRD during connect road side drains with Act 1986 MoSRTH Constructi construction C 115

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision Construction exiting nearby ponds otherwise Specifications for on stage cost make provision of water Road and Bridge harvesting pits intermittently. works  Alteration in • Existing drainage system to be Design requirement, Near all drainage channels, river During Included in Contractor SQC surface water maintained and further Clause No 501.8.6. crossings etc. Constructi construction hydrology due to enhanced. MoSRTH on stage cost embankment • Provision shall be made for Specifications for adequate size and number of Road and Bridge cross drainage structures esp. in the areas where land is sloping towards road alignment. • Road level shall be raised above HFL level wherever road level is lesser than HFL.  Siltation in water • Embankment slopes to be Design requirement Near all river water bodies, such During Included in Contractor SQC bodies due to modified suitably to restrict the , as Newaj, Kali Sindh, Kanthal Constructi construction construction soil debris entering water bodies. Clause No 501.8.6. river embankment slopes. on stage cost activities/ • Provision of Silt fencing shall be MoSRTH earthwork made at water bodies. Specifications for • Silt/sediment should be collected Road and Bridge and stockpiled for possible reuse works as surfacing of slopes where (CP and CP) they have to be re-vegetated. and worldwide best • Earthworks and stone works to practices be prevented from impeding natural flow of rivers, streams and water canals or existing drainage system.  Deterioration in • No vehicles or equipment should The Water Water bodies, refueling stations, During Construction Contractor SQC Surface water be parked or refuelled near (Prevention and construction camps. Constructi cost quality due to water-bodies, so as to avoid Control of Pollution) on Stage leakage from contamination from fuel and Act, 1974 and Monitoring cost vehicles and lubricants. amendments as indicated in equipments and • Oil and grease traps and fuelling thereof. EMoP waste from platforms to be provided at re- construction fuelling locations. camps. • All chemicals and oil shall be stored away from water and

116

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision concreted platform with catchment pit for spills collection. • All equipment operators, drivers, and warehouse personnel will be trained in immediate response for spill containment and eventual cleanup. Readily available, simple to understand and preferably written in the local language emergency response procedure, including reporting, will be provided by the contractors • Construction camp to be sited away from water bodies. • Wastes must be collected, stored and taken to approve disposal site only. • Water quality shall be monitored periodically. 7. Flora and Fauna  Vegetation loss • Minimize tree cutting to the Forest Conservation Throughout project corridor During the Indicated MPRDC SQC due to site extent possible. Act 1980 design above through preparation and • Roadside trees to be removed + and competent construction with prior approval of competent IRC SP: 21 and IRC Constructi authority activities and authority. SP:66 on stage Plantation Strategy • Compensatory plantation at 1:5 basis and additional plantation as per the IRC guidelines in consultation with Forest Department. • Regular maintenance of all trees planted. • Provision of LPG in construction camp as fuel source to avoid tree cutting, wherever possible. • Plantation of trees on both sides of the road. Integrate vegetation 117

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision management (IVM) with the carriage way completely clear of vegetation. From the edge of the road to the boundary of ROW, vegetation structured with smaller plants near the line and larger trees further away to avoid costly and provide habitats for a wide variety of plants and animals. Additional plantation near river banks to check erosion as part of compensatory plantation. • In the event of design changes during the construction stages additional assessments including the possibility to save trees shall be made by the EA. • Road side Plantation Strategy as per IRC specifications including manuring. • Control use of pesticides/fertilizers 8. Construction Camps  Impact associated • All camps should maintain Design Requirement All construction camps During Included in Contractor and SQC with location minimum distance from Constructi construction EO following: on stage cost # 500 m from habitation # 1000 m from forest areas where possible # 500 m from water bodies where possible # 500 m from through traffic route where possible • The average distance between two camps should be 50 km

118

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision  worker’s Health in • The location, layout and basic The Building and All construction camps During Part of the Contractor SQC construction facility provision of each labor Other Construction constructi Contract camp camp will be submitted to SQC workers (Regulation on stage prior to their construction. The of Employment and construction shall commence Conditions of only after approval of SQC. Service) Act 1996 • The contractor will maintain and necessary living accommodation The Water and ancillary facilities in (Prevention and functional and hygienic manner Control of Pollution) as approved by the EA. Act, 1974 and • Adequate water and sanitary amendments latrines with septic tanks thereof attached to soak pits shall be provided. • Preventive medical care to be provided to workers including a First-Aid kit that must be available in the camp. • Waste disposal facilities such as dust bins must be provided in the camps and regular disposal of waste must be carried out . • The Contractor will take all precautions to protect the workers from insect and pest to reduce the risk to health. This includes the use of insecticides which should comply with local regulations. • No alcoholic liquor or prohibited drugs will be imported to, sell, give, barter to the workers of host community. • Awareness raising to immigrant workers/local community on communicable and sexually transmitted diseases. 119

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision 8. Management of Construction Waste/Dismantled Debris  Selection of • Unproductive/wastelands shall Design Requirement At all Dumping Sites Constructi Part of the Contractor. SQC Dumping Sites be selected for dumping sites. and MoSRTH on contract • Away from residential areas and guidelines water bodies • Dumping sites have adequate capacity equal to the amount of debris generated. • Public perception and consent from the village Panchayats has to be obtained before finalizing the location.

120

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision  Reuse and • The existing bitumen surface disposal of shall be utilized for paving of construction and cross roads, access roads, and dismantled waste paving works in construction sites and camps, temporary traffic diversions, and haulage routes. • All excavated materials from roadway, shoulders, verges, drains, cross drainage will be used for backfilling embankments, filling pits, and landscaping. • Unusable debris material should be suitably disposed off at pre- designated disposal locations, with approval of the concerned authority. The bituminous wastes shall be disposed in secure landfill sites only in environmentally accepted manner. For removal of debris, wastes and its disposal MOSRTH guidelines should be followed. • Unusable and surplus materials, as determined by the Project Engineer, will be removed and disposed off-site. 8. Accessibility, Traffic Management, Accident and Safety Risks  Design • Temporary traffic diversion shall Throughout the project corridor During Project Contractor SQC requirement and be planned by the contractor and Design requirement especially at intersections. constructi preparation Traffic Planning approved by the ‘Engineer’. and on stage and During • The traffic control plans shall IRC SP:55 construction Construction contain details of diversions; cost Stage traffic safety arrangements during construction; safety measures for nighttime traffic 121

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision and precautions for transportation of hazardous materials. Traffic control plans shall be prepared in line with requirements of IRC’s SP 55 document’. • The Contractor will ensure that the diversion/detour is always maintained in running condition, particularly during the monsoon to avoid disruption to traffic flow. • On stretches where it is not possible to pass the traffic on the part width of existing carriageway, temporary paved diversions will be constructed. • Restriction of construction activity to only one side of the existing road. • The contractor shall inform local community of changes to traffic routes, and pedestrian access arrangements with assistance from “Engineer”. • Use of adequate signages to ensure traffic management and safety. Conduct of regular safety audit on safety measures.  Pedestrians, • All measures for the safety of Design requirement Near habitation on both sides of Included in Contractor in SQC animal and traffic during construction viz. and schools, temples, hospitals, construction consultation Vehicular signs, markings, flags, lights and • IRC: SP: 27 - graveyards, construction sites, cost. with Forest movement, flagmen as proposed in the 1984 Report haulage roads, diversion sites department Traffic Control Plan/Drawings Containing (refer Table 5.3. Some of the and MPRDC shall be taken. Recommendation specific locations are: Khujner, s of IRC Regional • Temporary access and diversion, Workshops on Chapikheda, Zirapur, with proper drainage facilities. Highway Safety Goghatpur, Monakhedi etc. • Access to the schools, temples • IRC:SP: 32 -1988 and other public places must be Road Safety for maintained when construction Children (5-12

122

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision takes place near them. Years Old) • Fencing wherever cattle • IRC:SP: 44 -1994 movement is expected. To avoid Highway Safety Code the need for cattle underpasses, • IRC: SP: 55 - some of the proposed culverts 2001 Guidelines `near habitations may be for Safety in widened to facilitate cattle Construction movement. Zones  Safety of Workers • Contractors to adopt and • The Building and Construction sites Constructi Included in Obligation of SQC and accident risk maintain safe working practices. other on period construction Contractor from construction • Usage of fluorescent and Construction cost activities workers Act 1996 retroflectory signage, in local and Cess Act of language at the construction 1996 sites • Factories Act • Training to workers on safety 1948 procedures and precautions. • Mandatory appointment of safety officer. • All regulations regarding safe scaffolding, ladders, working platforms, gangway, stairwells, excavations, trenches and safe means of entry and egress shall be complied with. • Provision of PPEs to workers. • Provision of a readily available first aid unit including an adequate supply of dressing materials. • The contractor will not employ any person below the age of 14 years for any work • Use of hazardous material should be minimized and/or restricted. • Emergency plan (to be approved by engineer) shall be prepared to respond to any accidents or 123

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision emergencies. • Accident Prevention Officer must be appointed by the contractor.  Accident risk to • Restrict access to construction Construction sites local community sites to authorized personnels • Physical separation must be provided for movement of vehicular and human traffic. • Adequate signages must be provided for safe traffic movement 9. Common Property Resources and other Utilities  Utilities • All telephone and electrical Project requirement Throughout the corridor Before Included in Contractor/SQ SQC poles/wires and underground Constructi construction / C cables should be shifted before on R and R cost. start of construction 10. Enhancement Measures  Environmental • Maintenance of tree Environmental Throughout the corridor Design Construction Contractor SQC enhancement plantations. Enhancement as and cost along the corridor • Enhancement/rehabilitation of part of project Constructi borrow areas and camp sites requirement on Stage etc. 11. Contractor Demobilization

124

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision  Clean-up • Contractor will prepare site Project requirement Throughout the Corridor and Immediate ---- Contractor SQC Operations, restoration plans, which will be borrow areas ly after Restoration and approved by the ‘Engineer’. Constructi Rehabilitation The clean-up and restoration on operations are to be implemented by the contractor prior to demobilization. • All construction zones including river-beds, culverts, road-side areas, camps, hot mix plant sites, crushers, batching plant sites and any other area used/affected by the project will be left clean and tidy, at the contractor's expense, to the satisfaction of the Environmental officer. All the opened borrow areas will be rehabilitated .and ‘Engineer’ will certify in this regard. B. Operation Stage 1. Climate and Air quality  Air pollution due • Roadside tree plantations shall Environmental Throughout the Corridor Througho Indicated In SQC/contractor to due to be maintained. Protection Act, ut EMoP vehicular • Regular maintenance of the road 1986; The Air operation movement will be done to ensure good (Prevention and period surface condition Control of Pollution) • Vehicular air pollution will be Act, 1981 managed and monitored at the toll plazas. • Ambient air quality monitoring. If monitored parameters are above the prescribed limit, suitable control measures must be taken. • Technological and behavioral changes • Road signs shall be provided reminding the motorist to 125

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision properly maintain their vehicles to economize on fuel consumption and protect the environment. 2. Noise Environment  Noise due to • Effective traffic management Noise Pollution Noise sensitive locations as Througho Included in SQC movement of and good riding conditions shall (Regulation and given in Table 5.1 (chapter 5) ut additional traffic be maintained to reduce the Control) Rules, operation plantation cost. noise level throughout the 2000 and period stretch and speed limitation and amendments honking restrictions may be thereof enforced near sensitive locations. • The effectiveness of the multilayered plantation should be monitored and if need be, solid noise barrier shall be placed. • Create awareness amongst the residents about likely noise levels from road operation at different distances, the safe ambient noise limits and easy to implement noise reduction measures while constructing a building close to the road.

3. Land and Soil  Soil erosion at • Periodic checking to be carried Project requirement At bridge locations specifically at Througho Included in SQC embankment to assess the effectiveness of Newaj, Kali Sindh, Kanthal river ut Operation/ during heavy the stabilization measures viz. and embankment slopes and operation Maintenance rain fall. turfing, stone pitching, river other probable soil erosion period cost training structures etc. areas. • Necessary measures to be followed wherever there are failures 4. Water Resources

126

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision  Contamination of • Monitoring of surface water Near surface Water bodies surface water bodies specifically at Newaj, Kali Sindh, Indicated in quality due to Kanthal river EMoP leakage of oil  Siltation • Regular visual checks shall be made to observe any incidence of blockage of drains/culverts. Regular checks shall be made for soil erosion and turfing conditions of river training structures for its effective maintenance.  Water logging • Regular checks shall be done Throughout the corridor due to blockage along the alignment to ensure of streams that flow of water is maintained through cross drains and other channels/streams. • Monitoring of water borne diseases due to stagnant water bodies  Protection of • Immediate removal of deposited Project requirement Identified Flood prone areas During Operation and SQC Embankment in silt from drainage channels and whole Maintenance Flood prone out-let points. Rejuvenation of operation Cost Areas the drainage system by removing stage encroachments/ congestions. This shall be done in close coordination with concerned department. • Long term strategy to be worked out with water resources, agriculture, soil and other department. 5. Flora and Fauna 127

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision  Vegetation • Planted trees, shrubs, and Forest Conservation Throughout project section During Indicated in SQC grasses to be properly Act 1980 whole Monitoring cost maintained. operation in EMoP • The tree survivalist audit to be period conducted at least once in a year to assess the effectiveness • Maintenance of box culverts, wherever provided. 6. Flooding/ inundation  Road inundation • MPRDC will ensure that all Project operation Throughout the stretch During Overall SQC due to choking of drains (side drains and all cross requirement particularly in rolling topography whole Operation cost drainage drainages) are periodically section operation channels cleared especially before period monsoon season to facilitate the quick passage of rainwater and avoid flooding. 7. Right-of-Way Maintenance  Accident Risk due • Efforts shall be made to make Project requirement Throughout the Project route During Included in SQC to uncontrolled shoulder completely clear of whole operation/ growth of vegetation. operation Maintenance vegetation • Regular maintenance of period. cost plantation along the roadside • Invasive plant not to be planted near the road. 8. Accidents and Safety  Accident risks • Traffic control measures, IRC:SP:55 Throughout the Project route During Included in SQC associated with including speed limits, will be whole operation/ traffic movement. enforced strictly. operation Maintenance • Further encroachment and period. cost squatting within the ROW will be prevented. • No school or hospital will be allowed to be established within 100 m of the highway without permission from the planning authorities.

128

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision • Monitor/ensure that all safety provisions included in design and construction phase are properly maintained • Highway patrol unit(s) for round the clock patrolling. Phone booths for accidental reporting and ambulance services with minimum response time for rescue of any accident victims if possible. • Tow-away facility for the break down vehicles if possible. • Coordination with operating agency of intersecting National Highways to have common facilities and share the costs as appropriate if possible.  Transport of • Preparation of spill prevention Throughout the project stretch Included in SQC Dangerous and control and emergency operation/ Goods preparedness and responsive Maintenance plans based on an analysis of cost. hazards, implementation of presentation and control measures. • Emergency plan for vehicles carrying hazardous material 9. Monitoring Operation Performance  Monitoring • The MPRDC will monitor the Throughout the corridor Included in SQC Operation operational performance of the EMoP Performance various mitigation/ enhancement measures carried out as a part of the project • The indicators selected for monitoring include the survival rate of trees; utility of enhancement provision, status of rehabilitation of borrow areas, Air 129

Environmental Remedial Measure Reference to laws Approximate Time Mitigation Institutional Responsibility Issue/ Component /guidelines Location Frame Cost Implementation Supervision quality, water quality, noise levels, soil quality, drainage pattern, etc. EA: Executing Agency, MPRDC: Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation, SQC: Supervision Quality Controller, EO: Environmental Officer, IRC: Indian Road Congress

130

APPENDIX 7.2: Monitoring Plan for the Performance Indicators Env. Project Frequency Approximate Indicator Parameters Method/Guidelines Location Standards Implementation Supervision Stage and Duration cost (Rs) s High volume sampler Hot mix plants, stone crushers to be located 50 m 24 hr Contractor and construction/ earthwork Construction from the plant in the continuous, 6x5000x3x3 through approved sites and as suggested by NAAQS SQC stage downwind direction. 3/year for 3 =Rs. 2,70,000 monitoring SQC Use method specified years agency SPM, (Total 6 Locations) by CPCB for analysis Air RSPM, SO2, High volume sampler Quality NOX, CO, to be located 50 m Major Road Intersections and 24 hr SQC through HC from the selected 6X5000x3X1 Operation Residential area continuous, approved locations in the NAAQS =Rs 90,000 SQC stage (6 Locations) 3/year for 1 monitoring downwind direction. year agency Use method specified by CPCB for analysis Groundwater at Construction Camps/site and Surface water Ground at and downstream of Newaj, Contractor Construction water: (IS: 3/year for 3 6x 4000x3X3 through approved Kali Sindh, Kanthal river and CPCB SQC stage 10500:1991) years =Rs 216, 000 monitoring and Grab sample collected any large pond located close agency Surface from source and to the alignment being used by water for analyze as per local community. Water Class D and Quality Class E as Standard Methods for Groundwater at 2 locations and Prescribed Examination of Water Surface water sample of by CPCB and Wastewater Newaj, Kali Sindh, Kanthal EO through Operation 3/year for 1 6X3x4000 approved and for river (downstream of bridge CPCB SQC stage vector borne year =Rs 72, 000 monitoring Location) and stagnant water agency diseases bodies developed due to borrow areas 131

Env. Project Frequency Approximate Indicator Parameters Method/Guidelines Location Standards Implementation Supervision Stage and Duration cost (Rs) s Once during Guidelines rainy seasons Routine work from water Construction of the of Engineering Contractor SQC resources Siltation Visual Checks for presence of All rivers/streams/drainage construction Team department in Water construction debris/waste and channels and major water period. Bodies bodies along the stretch Guidelines EO, with support blockade of drainage channels Once during Routine work from water of Water Operation operation of of Engineering SQC st resources Resource 1 year Team department Department Construction sites, major road Free field at 1 m from intersections and 1 each at 24 hr 10x1500x3x3 Construction the equipment whose residential, commercial and continuous, =Rs. 1,35,000 SQC SQC stage noise levels are being sensitive locations along the 3*/year for 3 Equivalent determined. alignment. years Noise levels Noise (10 Locations) on dB (A) MoEF levels Equivalent Noise scale for day levels using an Near residential, commercial and night Operation integrated noise level and silence zone. 3 / year for 1 6x3000x3X1 SQC SQC stage meter kept at a (6 Locations) year =Rs 54, 000 distance of 15 m from edge of Pavement NPK (ICAR standard ) Once during CPCB and Construction and heavy agricultural land and HMP whole NPK as per 12,000 SQC SQC Stage metals for sites construction ICAR Soil dredging stage standard Quality sites At oil spillage locations and Once for the Operation Oil and As specified by the other probable soil first year of CPCB 12,000 SQC SQC stage grease site engineer contamination location operation MPRDC/SQC Part of routine Construction Visual action of After first rain Contractor MPRDC Stage Visual check Throughout the project Checks engineering Soil for Soil corridor especially at River team Erosion erosion and banks, bridge locations Part of routine Once during Operation siltation structures Visual action of operation of Engineering Team of MPRDC Stage st Checks engineering 1 year team

132

Env. Project Frequency Approximate Indicator Parameters Method/Guidelines Location Standards Implementation Supervision Stage and Duration cost (Rs) s Part of routine Once in a Construction None action of Contractor’s year before SQC stage Throughout the Project Specific engineering Engineering Team Drainage rainy season Corridor especially at probable team Congesti Visual Checks drainage congestion areas as Once in a Part of routine on Operation described in IEE year before None action of MPRDC Engineering Team Stage rainy season Specific engineering for 3 yrs team IRC guidelines Identification of and Best Contractor with Construction Visual Once in a borrow areas as per Borrow areas to be operated Practices approval from SQC Stage Checks month IEE for Borrow MPRDC Borrow Part of the area Areas Contract operation Borrow Operation Visual Rehabilitation as Quarterly for 1 Area Closed Borrow Areas MPRDC Stage Checks recommended in IEE year rehabilitatio n Plan Storage Area, Construct Construction IRC Quarterly ion Sites for guidelines Part of the Contractor with Construction Rapid audit as per during Sites and Hygiene, Construction Sites and Camp and to the regular approval from SQC stage reporting format construction Labour drainage satisfaction monitoring E.O., MPRDC period Camp Medical of SQC Facilities Etc. During site Surveillance monitoring of trees Construction Throughout the Project clearance in felling SQC/Local Forest Departments Stage Section construction As phase Included in Tree suggested overall The Engineer will be responsible Plantatio by Forest plantation Cost for monitoring upto the Defect n Operation Audit for survival rate of trees Throughout the Project Once in a Dept. Liability Period in any particular stage plantation Section year for years stretch. After this period the SQC will be responsible for monitoring 133

Env. Project Frequency Approximate Indicator Parameters Method/Guidelines Location Standards Implementation Supervision Stage and Duration cost (Rs) s Monitoring Costs: INR 0.86 Million MPRDC – Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Limited, EO: Environmental Officer, SQC-Supervision Quality Controller; IS - India standard; NOx - Nitrogen Oxide; Pb - Plumbum, (lead); RPM - Respirable Particulate Matter; SO2 - Sulfur Dioxide; SPM - Suspended Particulate Matter, HC- Hydrocarbon, CO- Carbon monoxide