DOCSLIB.ORG

Research Statement Netanel Rubin-Blaier

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Research Statement Netanel Rubin-Blaier Research Statement Netanel Rubin-Blaier 1. Introduction "Algebra is the offer made by the devil to the mathematician..." Michael Atiyah In 1872, Felix Klein suggested the "Erlangen program": studying geometry by looking at the group of symmetries. Manifolds are no different : every oriented manifold X has an associated group of diffeomorphism Diff+(X); every symplectic manifold (X; !) has a group of symplectic automorphism Symp(X; !), and we can (almost) reconstruct the geometry completely from the group-theoretic picture. However, in turns out that in some sense these groups behave in opposite ways: • In the smooth case, there isn't a single example (!) of a smooth closed 4-manifold X for + which π0Diff (X) is known, while in higher dimensions we have the miracle of surgery and + rational homotopy in our disposal to tame Diff (X) (at least when π1(X) is trivial) • In the symplectic case, one of Gromov's original application of the technique of J-holomorphic 2 1 1 curve was to prove that Symp(CP ;!std) = PU(3) and Symp(P × P ;! ⊕ !) = (SO(3) × SO(3)) n Z2. But in higher dimensions virtually nothing is known. The main tool in symplectic topology is the study of J-holomorphic curves. This is a result of Gro- mov and Floer foundational who told us that much of classical enumerative geometry can be recast as the study of solutions to (perturbed) Cauchy-Riemann equations (and therefore generalized to the symplectic setting). Ultimately, the counts of this solutions are organized into two families of algebraic gadgets: • Open string. Fukaya showed us how to encode all the inter-dependencies in Lagrangian Floer theory in a single A1-category; • Closed string. Witten interpreted and generalized Gromov's invariants as n-point correla- tion functions in a topologically twisted version of string theory. Guided by the uniqueness of 2D quantum gravity, he conjectured an integrable hierarchy of equations governing them. This was subsequently proved by Kontsevich. My research can be characterized as "applied" Homological Mirror Symmetry. Namely he (conjec- tured) existence of open{closed and closed{open isomorphisms [Kon95] OC • CO • HH•−n(F uk(M; !)) −! QH (M; !) −! HH (F uk(M; !)); combined with the dg-PROP action of chains on Kimura–Stasheff–Voronov moduli spaces on the left-hand side (seen as the closed state space of an open-closed TCFT) [Cos07], as well as the fun- damental Koszul duality in genus zero between the Gravity and Deligne-Mumford operads all point to the fact that quantum cohomology and Gromov-Witten invariants are just the tip of a much richer chain-level iceberg forming a "derived version" of the classical invariants of mirror symmetry. I use this and the formal similarities between the resulting invariant and some classical ones from the fields of low-dimensional topology, and rational homotopy, to answer some concrete question about the symplectic mapping class group. Although the origin of my work is in symplectic topology, the results should have a broader appeal: Kontsevich's celebrated HMS conjecture allows us to transfer symmetries from the A-side to actions on bounded derived categories, and categorical MCG actions are interesting from a rep- resentation theoretical and categorification point of view. Moreover, if we take X to be the moduli of stable bundles over a curve of genus g, this mapping class group action has intriguing connections 1 to Monopole and Instanton Floer theories (Atiyah-Floer conjectures), and maybe even S-duality and geometric langlands (via Kapustin-Witten and Nadler-Zaslow). 2. Symplectic Mapping Class Groups and the Quantum Johnson homomorphism "Groups, as men, will be known by their actions" Guillermo Moreno 2.1. Summary of Past work [RB17]. We are confronted by a group we don't understand, so we do what mathematicians have always done: search for something it naturally acts upon. Of course (given the introduction), the obvious thing to consider is the natural map π (1) π0Symp(X; !) ! AuteqCY (D F uk(X; !))=[2] taking each symplectic isotopy class to a Calabi-Yau A1-auto-equivalence of the split-closed Fukaya category. However, this is a problematic choice { the Fukaya category of a closed manifold is an extremely complicated object and we do not know how to compute it (almost always). So we look at the first (and easiest) strata of chain-level Gromov-Witten theory: the A1-enhancement of the usual star product ?. This is classical, and goes back to Fukaya's first papers in 1997. We proceed to explicitly constructing a family version of it (which should morally correspond to Hochschild cohomology of a "family of Fukaya categories over the circle" via some parametrized version of the closed{open map) and show that it already has some non-trivial applications to symplectic isotopy problems: Following Kaledin, we look at the obstruction class of the resulting A1-structure, and argue that it can be related to a quantum version of Massey products on the one hand (which, in nice cases, can be related to actual counts of rational curves) and to the classical Andreadakis- Johnson theory of the Torelli group on the other hand. This are the main technical results (see Theorem 1.1 for a summary and sections 2,3,10,11,12 for the Floer theory and homological algbra that goes into the construction). In the second part of the paper, we apply this machine to go hunting for exotic symplectomorphism: these are elements of infinite order in the kernel + K(M; !) := π0Symp(M; !) ! π0Diff (M; !) of the forgetful map from the symplectic mapping class group to the ordinary MCG. We demon- strate how we can apply the theory above to prove the existence of such elements Y for certain a 3 Fano 3-fold obtained by blowing-up P at a genus 4 curve. Unlike the four-dimensional case, no power of a Dehn twist around Lagrangian 3-spheres can be exotic (because they have infinite order in smooth MCG). In the final part of the paper, the classical connection between our Fano varieties and cubic 3-folds allows us to prove the existence of a new phenomena: "exotic relations" in the subgroup generated by all Dehn twists. Namely, it turns out we can factor some power of [ Y ] in π0Symp(Y; !) into 3-dimensional Dehn twists. So the isotopy class of the product in the ordinary MCG is torsion, but of infinite order in the symplectic MCG. The main result in the paper is Theorem 0.5 which states: 3 Theorem 2.1. Let C be a smooth, non-hyperelliptic curve of genus 4, embedded in P . Let X be 3 the Fano 3-fold obtained by blowing up C in P . We equip X with a monotone symplectic form !X . 0 0 00 00 There exists Lagrangian spheres fL1; ··· ;L5g and fL1; ··· ;L5g in X and an integer N > 0, such that the symplectic isotopy class κ of the following product of generalized Dehn twists N 6N 6N := (τ 0 ◦ · · · ◦ τ 0 ) ◦ (τ 00 ◦ · · · ◦ τ 00 ) : X ! X L1 L5 L1 L5 is of infinite order in the kernel of the natural map + π0Symp(X; !X ) ! π0Diff (X): 2 2.2. Current projects. First, the technical apparatus described in the previous section admits a generalization to the second strata of chain-level GW theory: B1-algebras (i.e., homotopy Gersten- haber). This are essentially described by picking a suitable chain model for quantum cohomology and looking at Getzler-Neuwirth cells, see [Vor00]. As a consequence, we can define a schematic homotopy types of symplectic manifolds using [KPT08] and make connection with the group- theoretic definition of Johnson homomorphism in terms of lower central sequence by looking at the monodromy or parallel transport of a family of B1-algebras. Second, I am working on using the technical result above to prove the faithfulness action of the entire Torelli group on (some eigen- component under c1? a ) of the Fukaya categories of various Fano n-folds with intimate connection to curves. Such "2-linear" representations are also interesting from a categorification point of view. The most important one to consider is probably the moduli of stable bundles M(Σg) of curves of genus g. Ivan Smith [Smi12] has proven there is a faithful action in the case g = 2 and there are classical descriptions of the cohomology, quantum cohomology, rational homotopy, and a very nice (and recursive in genus) construction of a perfect Morse function by Thaddeus, making the problem very amenable to the computation of Quantum Massey products. Remark 2.2. The Fukaya categories of compact group representation varieties are part of Don- aldson theory (N = 2 super Yang-Mills). A related problem (perhaps a pipe-dream?) is to study the mapping class group on the Fukaya categories of the moduli space of Higgs bundles, i.e., A-side of N = 4 super Yang-Mills. In that context, there are some interesting and encourging results by Ben{Zvi, Brochier and Jorda which prove faithfulness of the categorical MCG action on the B-side. Two other related reseach questions I am working on (motivated by results in low-dimensional topology) are the construction of quantum Miller-Morita-Mumford classes for locally Hamiltonian bundles over surfaces, and what is the relation between the entropy of the auto-equivalence as defined in Dimitrov-Haiden-Katzarkov-Kontsevich which measures dynamical complexity and the algebraic complexity of the dynamics as seen by the quantum Johnson homomorphism (is there some kind of an asymptotic bound?) Finally, in a joint with Bong H. Lian and Jingyu Zhau) we trying to prove some physics conjecturs regarding the B-side monodromy around this loci of bad N = (2; 2)-SCFT theories in the categorical level.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ricci, Levi-Civita, and the Birth of General Relativity Reviewed by David E
    BOOK REVIEW Einstein’s Italian Mathematicians: Ricci, Levi-Civita, and the Birth of General Relativity Reviewed by David E. Rowe Einstein’s Italian modern Italy. Nor does the author shy away from topics Mathematicians: like how Ricci developed his absolute differential calculus Ricci, Levi-Civita, and the as a generalization of E. B. Christoffel’s (1829–1900) work Birth of General Relativity on quadratic differential forms or why it served as a key By Judith R. Goodstein tool for Einstein in his efforts to generalize the special theory of relativity in order to incorporate gravitation. In This delightful little book re- like manner, she describes how Levi-Civita was able to sulted from the author’s long- give a clear geometric interpretation of curvature effects standing enchantment with Tul- in Einstein’s theory by appealing to his concept of parallel lio Levi-Civita (1873–1941), his displacement of vectors (see below). For these and other mentor Gregorio Ricci Curbastro topics, Goodstein draws on and cites a great deal of the (1853–1925), and the special AMS, 2018, 211 pp. 211 AMS, 2018, vast secondary literature produced in recent decades by the world that these and other Ital- “Einstein industry,” in particular the ongoing project that ian mathematicians occupied and helped to shape. The has produced the first 15 volumes of The Collected Papers importance of their work for Einstein’s general theory of of Albert Einstein [CPAE 1–15, 1987–2018]. relativity is one of the more celebrated topics in the history Her account proceeds in three parts spread out over of modern mathematical physics; this is told, for example, twelve chapters, the first seven of which cover episodes in [Pais 1982], the standard biography of Einstein.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes for Felix Klein Lectures
    Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION Lecture Notes for Felix Klein Lectures Gregory W. Moore Abstract: These are lecture notes for a series of talks at the Hausdorff Mathematical Institute, Bonn, Oct. 1-11, 2012 December 5, 2012 Contents 1. Prologue 7 2. Lecture 1, Monday Oct. 1: Introduction: (2,0) Theory and Physical Mathematics 7 2.1 Quantum Field Theory 8 2.1.1 Extended QFT, defects, and bordism categories 9 2.1.2 Traditional Wilsonian Viewpoint 12 2.2 Compactification, Low Energy Limit, and Reduction 13 2.3 Relations between theories 15 3. Background material on superconformal and super-Poincar´ealgebras 18 3.1 Why study these? 18 3.2 Poincar´eand conformal symmetry 18 3.3 Super-Poincar´ealgebras 19 3.4 Superconformal algebras 20 3.5 Six-dimensional superconformal algebras 21 3.5.1 Some group theory 21 3.5.2 The (2, 0) superconformal algebra SC(M1,5|32) 23 3.6 d = 6 (2, 0) super-Poincar´e SP(M1,5|16) and the central charge extensions 24 3.7 Compactification and preserved supersymmetries 25 3.7.1 Emergent symmetries 26 3.7.2 Partial Topological Twisting 26 3.7.3 Embedded Four-dimensional = 2 algebras and defects 28 N 3.8 Unitary Representations of the (2, 0) algebra 29 3.9 List of topological twists of the (2, 0) algebra 29 4. Four-dimensional BPS States and (primitive) Wall-Crossing 30 4.1 The d = 4, = 2 super-Poincar´ealgebra SP(M1,3|8). 30 N 4.2 BPS particle representations of four-dimensional = 2 superpoincar´eal- N gebras 31 4.2.1 Particle representations 31 4.2.2 The half-hypermultiplet 33 4.2.3 Long representations 34
    [Show full text]
  • Felix Klein and His Erlanger Programm D
    WDS'07 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, Part I, 251–256, 2007. ISBN 978-80-7378-023-4 © MATFYZPRESS Felix Klein and his Erlanger Programm D. Trkovsk´a Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague, Czech Republic. Abstract. The present paper is dedicated to Felix Klein (1849–1925), one of the leading German mathematicians in the second half of the 19th century. It gives a brief account of his professional life. Some of his activities connected with the reform of mathematics teaching at German schools are mentioned as well. In the following text, we describe fundamental ideas of his Erlanger Programm in more detail. References containing selected papers relevant to this theme are attached. Introduction The Erlanger Programm plays an important role in the development of mathematics in the 19th century. It is the title of Klein’s famous lecture Vergleichende Betrachtungen ¨uber neuere geometrische Forschungen [A Comparative Review of Recent Researches in Geometry] which was presented on the occasion of his admission as a professor at the Philosophical Faculty of the University of Erlangen in October 1872. In this lecture, Felix Klein elucidated the importance of the term group for the classification of various geometries and presented his unified way of looking at various geometries. Klein’s basic idea is that each geometry can be characterized by a group of transformations which preserve elementary properties of the given geometry. Professional Life of Felix Klein Felix Klein was born on April 25, 1849 in D¨usseldorf,Prussia. Having finished his study at the grammar school in D¨usseldorf,he entered the University of Bonn in 1865 to study natural sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of Mathematics in America, Peter Duren Et Ai., (Eds.), Vol
    Garrett Birkhoff has had a lifelong connection with Harvard mathematics. He was an infant when his father, the famous mathematician G. D. Birkhoff, joined the Harvard faculty. He has had a long academic career at Harvard: A.B. in 1932, Society of Fellows in 1933-1936, and a faculty appointmentfrom 1936 until his retirement in 1981. His research has ranged widely through alge­ bra, lattice theory, hydrodynamics, differential equations, scientific computing, and history of mathematics. Among his many publications are books on lattice theory and hydrodynamics, and the pioneering textbook A Survey of Modern Algebra, written jointly with S. Mac Lane. He has served as president ofSIAM and is a member of the National Academy of Sciences. Mathematics at Harvard, 1836-1944 GARRETT BIRKHOFF O. OUTLINE As my contribution to the history of mathematics in America, I decided to write a connected account of mathematical activity at Harvard from 1836 (Harvard's bicentennial) to the present day. During that time, many mathe­ maticians at Harvard have tried to respond constructively to the challenges and opportunities confronting them in a rapidly changing world. This essay reviews what might be called the indigenous period, lasting through World War II, during which most members of the Harvard mathe­ matical faculty had also studied there. Indeed, as will be explained in §§ 1-3 below, mathematical activity at Harvard was dominated by Benjamin Peirce and his students in the first half of this period. Then, from 1890 until around 1920, while our country was becoming a great power economically, basic mathematical research of high quality, mostly in traditional areas of analysis and theoretical celestial mechanics, was carried on by several faculty members.
    [Show full text]
  • The “Geometrical Equations:” Forgotten Premises of Felix Klein's
    The “Geometrical Equations:” Forgotten Premises of Felix Klein’s Erlanger Programm François Lê October 2013 Abstract Felix Klein’s Erlanger Programm (1872) has been extensively studied by historians. If the early geometrical works in Klein’s career are now well-known, his links to the theory of algebraic equations before 1872 remain only evoked in the historiography. The aim of this paper is precisely to study this algebraic background, centered around particular equations arising from geometry, and participating on the elaboration of the Erlanger Programm. An- other result of the investigation is to complete the historiography of the theory of general algebraic equations, in which those “geometrical equations” do not appear. 1 Introduction Felix Klein’s Erlanger Programm1 is one of those famous mathematical works that are often invoked by current mathematicians, most of the time in a condensed and modernized form: doing geometry comes down to studying (transformation) group actions on various sets, while taking particular care of invariant objects.2 As rough and anachronistic this description may be, it does represent Klein’s motto to praise the importance of transformation groups and their invariants to unify and classify geometries. The Erlanger Programm has been abundantly studied by historians.3 In particular, [Hawkins 1984] questioned the commonly believed revolutionary character of the Programm, giving evi- dence of both a relative ignorance of it by mathematicians from its date of publication (1872) to 1890 and the importance of Sophus Lie’s ideas4 about continuous transformations for its elabora- tion. These ideas are only a part of the many facets of the Programm’s geometrical background of which other parts (non-Euclidean geometries, line geometry) have been studied in detail in [Rowe 1989b].
    [Show full text]
  • Letters from William Burnside to Robert Fricke: Automorphic Functions, and the Emergence of the Burnside Problem
    LETTERS FROM WILLIAM BURNSIDE TO ROBERT FRICKE: AUTOMORPHIC FUNCTIONS, AND THE EMERGENCE OF THE BURNSIDE PROBLEM CLEMENS ADELMANN AND EBERHARD H.-A. GERBRACHT Abstract. Two letters from William Burnside have recently been found in the Nachlass of Robert Fricke that contain instances of Burnside's Problem prior to its first publication. We present these letters as a whole to the public for the first time. We draw a picture of these two mathematicians and describe their activities leading to their correspondence. We thus gain an insight into their respective motivations, reactions, and attitudes, which may sharpen the current understanding of professional and social interactions of the mathemat- ical community at the turn of the 20th century. 1. The simple group of order 504 { a first meeting of minds Until 1902, when the publication list of the then fifty-year-old William Burnside already encompassed 90 papers, only one of these had appeared in a non-British journal: a three-page article [5] entitled \Note on the simple group of order 504" in volume 52 of Mathematische Annalen in 1898. In this paper Burnside deduced a presentation of that group in terms of generators and relations,1 which is based on the fact that it is isomorphic to the group of linear fractional transformations with coefficients in the finite field with 8 elements. The proof presented is very concise and terse, consisting only of a succession of algebraic identities, while calculations in the concrete group of transformations are omitted. In the very same volume of Mathematische Annalen, only one issue later, there can be found a paper [18] by Robert Fricke entitled \Ueber eine einfache Gruppe von 504 Operationen" (On a simple group of 504 operations), which is on exactly the same subject.
    [Show full text]
  • The Felix Klein Protocols
    THE FELIX KLEIN PROTOCOLS EUGENE CHISLENKO AND YURI TSCHINKEL 1 2 EUGENE CHISLENKO AND YURI TSCHINKEL 1. The Gottingen¨ Archive Two plain shelves in G¨ottingen,in the entrance room of the Mathe- matisches Institut library, hold an astounding collection of mathemat- ical manuscripts and rare books. In this locked Giftschrank, or poi- son cabinet, stand several hundred volumes, largely handwritten and mostly unique, that form an extensive archive documenting the de- velopment of one of the world's most important mathematical centers { the home of Gauss, Riemann, Dirichlet, Klein, Hilbert, Minkowski, Courant, Weyl, and other leading mathematicians and physicists of the 19th and early 20th centuries. A recent Report on the G¨ottingen Mathematical Institute Archive [2] cites \a range of material unrivalled in quantity and quality": \No single archive is even remotely compa- rable", not only because G¨ottingenwas \the leading place for mathe- matics in the world", but also because \no other community has left such a detailed record of its activity ... usually we are lucky to have lecture lists, with no indication of the contents." The collection runs from early handwritten lectures by Dirichlet, Rie- mann and Clebsch through almost 100 volumes by Hilbert to volumes of Minkowski, Hasse and Siegel on number theory, Noether on algebra, and Max Born on quantum mechanics. But the largest and most im- pressive of its centerpieces is the Seminar-Protokolle of Felix Klein: a detailed handwritten registry, spanning over 8000 pages in 29 volumes, of 40 years of seminar lectures by him, his colleagues and students, and distinguished visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ostwald-Gibbs Correspondence: an Interesting Component in the History of the Energy Concept
    114 Bull. Hist. Chem., VOLUME 27, Number 2 (2002) THE OSTWALD-GIBBS CORRESPONDENCE: AN INTERESTING COMPONENT IN THE HISTORY OF THE ENERGY CONCEPT Carl E. Moore, Alfred von Smolinski, and Bruno Jaselskis, Loyola University, Chicago In the late 1800s and early 1900s, one of the premier In support of the energy cosmological model, in figures in German chemistry and physics was the emi- 1892 he wrote (4): nent natural philosopher and scientist Wilhelm Ostwald. Thatsächlich ist die Energie das einzige Reale in der Early in his career Ostwald developed a strong interest Welt und die Materie nicht etwa ein Träger, sondern in the concept of energy from eine Erscheinungsform both the perspective of the phi- derselben. (Actually energy is losopher and the outlook of what the unique real entity (das was later to be called the physi- einzige Reale) in the world, and cal chemist. He became a leader matter is not a transporter (Träger) [of energy] but rather in a community of scientists with a state of the former.) (5) somewhat similar leanings who called themselves energeticists This energy-mass equivalence (1) . They supported and pro- concept was later stated by moted what they hoped would Einstein and by G. N. Lewis (6, become a universally accepted 7). cosmological construct based on Ostwald’s deep and abiding the unifying concept of energy interests in energetics most (2). This energy-based paradigm likely were the motivating forces embraced thermodynamics as an that caused him forcefully and integral part of its structure. tenaciously to approach Josiah As a consequence of this Willard Gibbs (who was to be- view, for a time Ostwald did not come a prominent figure in subscribe to matter-based atom- American science) with the pro- istic models and even declared posal that Gibbs rewrite and re- that the concept of matter itself publish his masterpieces on ther- was superfluous and that the in- modynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of Felix Klein
    The Legacy of Thematic Afternoon Felix Klein The Legacy of Felix Klein The Legacy of The legacy of Felix Klein Felix Klein First Hour: Panel (15.00–16.00 h) 1. Introduction: What is and what could be the legacy of Felix Klein? Hans-Georg Weigand (Würzburg, GER) 2. Felix Klein - Biographical Notes Renate Tobies (Jena, GER): 3. Introduction to the Two Hour Session (16.30–18.30 h): • Strand A: Functional thinking Bill McCallum (Arizona, USA). • Strand B: Intuitive thinking and visualization Michael Neubrand (Oldenburg, GER). • Strand C: Elementary Mathematics from a higher standpoint Marta Menghini (Rome, IT) & Gert Schubring (Bielefeld, GER). 1 The Legacy of The legacy of Felix Klein Felix Klein First Hour: Panel (15.00–16.00 h) 1. Introduction: What is and what could be the legacy of Felix Klein? Hans-Georg Weigand (Würzburg, GER) 2. Felix Klein - Biographical Notes Renate Tobies (Jena, GER): 3. Introduction to the Two Hour Session (16.30–18.30 h): • Strand A: Functional thinking Bill McCallum (Arizona, USA). • Strand B: Intuitive thinking and visualization Michael Neubrand (Oldenburg, GER). • Strand C: Elementary Mathematics from a higher standpoint Marta Menghini (Rome, IT) & Gert Schubring (Bielefeld, GER). The Legacy of The legacy of Felix Klein Felix Klein First Hour: Panel (15.00–16.00 h) 1. Introduction: What is and what could be the legacy of Felix Klein? Hans-Georg Weigand (Würzburg, GER) 2. Felix Klein - Biographical Notes Renate Tobies (Jena, GER): 3. Introduction to the Two Hour Session (16.30–18.30 h): • Strand A: Functional thinking Bill McCallum (Arizona, USA).
    [Show full text]
  • View This Volume's Front and Back Matter
    Titles in This Series Volume 8 Kare n Hunger Parshall and David £. Rowe The emergenc e o f th e America n mathematica l researc h community , 1876-1900: J . J. Sylvester, Felix Klein, and E. H. Moore 1994 7 Hen k J. M. Bos Lectures in the history of mathematic s 1993 6 Smilk a Zdravkovska and Peter L. Duren, Editors Golden years of Moscow mathematic s 1993 5 Georg e W. Mackey The scop e an d histor y o f commutativ e an d noncommutativ e harmoni c analysis 1992 4 Charle s W. McArthur Operations analysis in the U.S. Army Eighth Air Force in World War II 1990 3 Pete r L. Duren, editor, et al. A century of mathematics in America, part III 1989 2 Pete r L. Duren, editor, et al. A century of mathematics in America, part II 1989 1 Pete r L. Duren, editor, et al. A century of mathematics in America, part I 1988 This page intentionally left blank https://doi.org/10.1090/hmath/008 History of Mathematics Volume 8 The Emergence o f the American Mathematical Research Community, 1876-1900: J . J. Sylvester, Felix Klein, and E. H. Moor e Karen Hunger Parshall David E. Rowe American Mathematical Societ y London Mathematical Societ y 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 01A55 , 01A72, 01A73; Secondary 01A60 , 01A74, 01A80. Photographs o n th e cove r ar e (clockwis e fro m right ) th e Gottinge n Mathematisch e Ges - selschafft, Feli x Klein, J. J. Sylvester, and E. H. Moore.
    [Show full text]
  • A CRITICAL EVALUATION of MODERN PHYSICS by Claudio Voarino
    A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF MODERN PHYSICS By Claudio Voarino A Few Words of Introduction In his article, Science and the Mountain Peak, Professor Isaac Asimov wrote: “There has been at least one occasion in history, when Greek secular and rational thought bowed to the mystical aspect of Christianity, and what followed was a Dark Age. We can’t afford another!” I don’t think I am exaggerating when I say that, when it comes to Modern Physics (also known as New Physics), we have indeed been in some sort of intellectual dark age, whether we can afford it or not. In fact, we have been in it since the end of the 19 th Century; and this is when Classical Physics started to be substituted with Modern Physics. This despite the fact there were lots of instances that clearly show the absurdity and science-fictional character of most of the theories of this kind of physics, which I will be discussing in details further on in this article. But for now, the following few examples should prove the correctness of my opinion on this topic. Incidentally, for the purpose of this article, the word ‘physics’ means mostly ‘astrophysics’. Also, whenever referring to modern physicists, I think it is more accurate to add the adjective ‘theoretical’ before the word ‘physicists’. I am saying that because I just cannot associate the main tenets of Relativity and Quantum Physics theories with physical reality. The following example should attest the truth of my statement. Back on September 10, 1989, the Australian newspaper Sunday Telegraph carried the following bizarre article entitled Keep Looking or the Moon May Vanish.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of GH Hardy and the London Mathematical Society
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Historia Mathematica 30 (2003) 173–194 www.elsevier.com/locate/hm The rise of British analysis in the early 20th century: the role of G.H. Hardy and the London Mathematical Society Adrian C. Rice a and Robin J. Wilson b,∗ a Department of Mathematics, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA 23005-5505, USA b Department of Pure Mathematics, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK Abstract It has often been observed that the early years of the 20th century witnessed a significant and noticeable rise in both the quantity and quality of British analysis. Invariably in these accounts, the name of G.H. Hardy (1877–1947) features most prominently as the driving force behind this development. But how accurate is this interpretation? This paper attempts to reevaluate Hardy’s influence on the British mathematical research community and its analysis during the early 20th century, with particular reference to his relationship with the London Mathematical Society. 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Résumé On a souvent remarqué que les premières années du 20ème siècle ont été témoins d’une augmentation significative et perceptible dans la quantité et aussi la qualité des travaux d’analyse en Grande-Bretagne. Dans ce contexte, le nom de G.H. Hardy (1877–1947) est toujours indiqué comme celui de l’instigateur principal qui était derrière ce développement. Mais, est-ce-que cette interprétation est exacte ? Cet article se propose d’analyser à nouveau l’influence d’Hardy sur la communauté britannique sur la communauté des mathématiciens et des analystes britanniques au début du 20ème siècle, en tenant compte en particulier de son rapport avec la Société Mathématique de Londres.
    [Show full text]