MEMORANDUM
FROM: Administration
TO: Public Works Committee
SUBJECT: Public Works Committee Meeting
A meeting of the Public Works Committee will be held on:
Monday, July 9, 2018 @ 2:30 p.m. R.M. Council Chambers AGENDA
1. Call to Order 2. Adopt Agenda 3. Public Works Carry forward Action List 4. Public Works Director’s Report 5. R.M. of Laird Road Maintenance Agreement – Division 7 6. North Corman Park Industrial Drainage Project – Division 6 7. Whistle Cessation – Division 1 8. Adjourn Public Works Carryforward Action List - CURRENT Nov. 10, 2014 Corman Park Whistle Cessation • The RM of Corman Park has been pursuing anti-whistling measures at railroad crossings along the CN Railroad from Range Roads 3041 – 3045. • 6 crossings along the Watrous Subdivision have been assessed for whistle cessation purposes • June 7, 2015 Council approved CIMA conduct a railway Safety Assessment on the 6 railway crossings • Sept. 14, 2014 CIMA Safety Assessment complete and report presented to Council • Oct 5. 2015 – Associated costs to bring railways into compliance for whistle cessation were presented to Council and were deemed prohibitive and RM would not proceed with the Whistle Cessation process • Nov. 9, 2015 – Correspondence received from area ratepayers encouraging Council to re-consider their decision, citing minor discrepancies/findings in CIMA’s report – CIMA’s report sent back for review and corrections where applicable. • Dec. 14, 2015 – Update given to Council regarding the discrepancies in the Safety Assessment Report. Determination that 4 of the 6 crossings were still to be considered for compliance for Whistle Cessation as in-house costs to bring 2 of the 4 crossings into compliance had now been minimized • Jan. 15, 2016 – Letter and Safety Assessment Report sent to CN requesting that the Rural Municipality (RM) of Corman Park No. 344 wishes to pursue whistle cessation along several railway grade crossings south –east of Saskatoon, SK., located along the CN Watrous Subdivision Line • May 16, 2016 – Update: CN has reviewed the safety assessment and has some issues with the report and are contacting CIMA directly for the required revisions. • September 9, 2016 – Update: CN is unable to accept the submitted Safety Assessment completed by CIMA and are working with CIMA directly to get the proper regulatory requirements in place before submitting the report to Transport Canada. • December 5, 2016 – Update from CIMA – They have not yet received the additional documentation they requested from CN in previous correspondence. Once the information has been received from CN, CIMA will move forward to assess the full level of effort it will require for them to modify the current report to the revised format that CN has requested. • December 22, 2016 – Administration has been communicating with alternate channels of CN to further the whistle cessation process. • Feb. 15, 2017 – Administration met with CIMA to determine what is required to complete the report. CN requires some changes to the existing report to meet CN standards. These changes will not be charged to the RM.
Page 1 of 7 Printed Date: July 5, 2018 Public Works Carryforward Action List - CURRENT • April 6, 2017 – Revised report sent to CN for review. CN to complete site inspection in June of 2017 with RM staff to give final approval. • July 5, 2017 – CN yet to complete their inspection. • July 19, 2017 – Site meeting with CN to determine next steps for whistle cessation. Awaiting response from CN. • Oct. 2, 2017 – 1st Reading of Anti-Whistle Bylaw approved by Council. • October 26, 2017- Awaiting revised report from CIMA so that CN Rail and Transport Canada can give approval. • November 21, 2017 – CIMA report sent to CN for approval. • January 2, 2018 – CN to verify signal delays and have brush clearing completed within the site triangles. • February 8, 2018- Notice of Intent to Pass Whistle Cessation Bylaw sent to required agencies. • Week of March 5, 2018 – Meeting with CN to review remaining steps. • March 7, 2018- Met with CN. Discussions Ongoing. • April 27, 2018 – Administration contacted CN numerous times for updates. Awaiting response. • June 1, 2018 – CN has indicated additional work is required for the signals, but have not provided a timeline on when any work will be done. • July 9, 2018 – Committee Item May 19, 2016 Boundary Welcome Signs • Council suggested that Administration inquire as to the cost of installing boundary welcome signs along major highways exiting Saskatoon. • Committee to be set up to help to come back with recommendations to Council • December 5, 2016- investigation into where boundary area signage to be installed. Council to review sign placement at December 12, 2016 Committee Meeting. • Dec. 22, 2016 – Administration to investigate the cost of 22 2-post welcome signs that will contain the RM logo to be posted along major roadways when entering into the RM jurisdiction and bring back total cost, to be brought forward as part of the 2017 budget discussions. • Communicating with MOHI to confirm sign specifications • Jan. 24, 2017 – Admin reviewing sign specs and next steps • March 9, 2017 – Administration pricing out signage costs and awaiting confirmation from MOHI for permission to erect signs within MOHI right of ways. • June 6, 2017 – Administration working on application received from MOHI. • July 24, 2017 – Public works determining sign locations. • October 3, 2017 – Director of Public Works to review a few locations that already have multiple existing signage to assess what will work. • January 5, 2018 – Public Works to submit application for each location to MHI for approval. Page 2 of 7 Printed Date: July 5, 2018 Public Works Carryforward Action List - CURRENT • March 21, 2018 – 10 Applications sent into MHI for site approval of signage. • May 5, 2018 – MHI has reviewed a few of the sites and so far there are no issues. Once the remaining locations have been reviewed The Ministry will issue permits and sign off to install the signs. Signs will be RM responsibility for ordering and installation. (Ministry will be providing specifics) • June 7, 2018 – MHI has approved all locations and have given specifics for sign placement/ • June 7, 2018- Signs have been ordered from ATS Traffic.
June 20, 2016 Gordie Howe Recognition • Reeve Harwood put forward a motion that Administration investigate the birth place of Gordie Howe and once determined that a portion of the road by the property be named Gordie Howe Road. • Aug 3, 2016 – Administration continues to investigate the homestead of Gordie Howe. • Sept 12, 2016 – Council passed a motion to that administration contact the Howe family to confirm that they are comfortable with Council’s intentions to honor Gordie Howe and to investigate the erection of a monument and/or the naming of a road in his honor. • Sept 22, 2016 – Administration contacted the Howe Foundation, no response to date. • Oct 12, 2016 – A reply was received from the Foundation stating that the Council’s intentions were appreciated and advised as to the birth place of Gordie Howie, Section 15-35-4-W3. • Oct 17, 2016 – Council directed that Administration undertake a 1 mile mail-out public consultation to determine what would be an appropriate recognition of the birth place of Gordie Howe, the erection of a monument and/or the naming of the road in his honor. • Nov. 21, 2016 – Council Created Honor Committee regarding the determination of recognition in honor of Gordie Howe. • Jan. 10, 2017 – Letter sent out to area residents for input into type of recognition for Gordie Howe. Deadline for responses is February 28, 2017 • March 6, 2017 – Committee reviewed the correspondence received and Administration will investigate the options of erecting a monument as well as re-naming a road in honor of Gordie Howe. Administration to look into costing for monument as well as location for same. • June 6, 2017 – Committee visited site to determine location for monument. • July 17, 2017 - Administration to purchase and subdivide 0.25 acres, build an approach and purchase the crushed rock and fencing to create a roadside turnout for the memorial. • November 9, 2017 – Construction of approach and memorial site to occur in 2018. • March 28, 2018 – The Monument Rock has been procured. Feb 8, 2018 Valley Rd Phase III Tender • ST183443 Construction of a surfacing structure on Valley Rd (Twp352) for a total distance of 5.2 KM Page 3 of 7 Printed Date: July 5, 2018 Public Works Carryforward Action List - CURRENT • February 8, 2018 - Tender posted on SaskTenders website and closes on February 21, 2018 @ 10 AM. • February 26, 2018 – Tender awarded to HJR Asphalt LP • May 8, 2018 – HJR tentative start up after the May Long Weekend pending the removal of Spring Rd Bans. • June 6, 2018 – HJR is planning to start construction during the week of June 11, 2018. • June 25, 2018 –Project complete. Awaiting final bid items. Feb 8, 2018 Neuhorst Road Tender • ST183441 – Construction of a surfacing structure on Neuhorst Rd between Twp 392 & Twp 393 for a total distance of 1.6KM. • February 8, 2018 - Tender posted on SaskTenders website and closes on February 21, 2018 @ 10 AM. • February 26, 2018 – Tender awarded to Ruszkowski Enterprises Ltd. • May 8, 2018 – Ruszkowski Enterprises Ltd. has not yet provided a start date. • June 4, 2018 – Ruszkowski Enterprises Ltd. has a tentative start date of late July. • July 3, 2018 – Contractor began interim stockpiling of aggregate near project site. Roadwork is not expected to start until late July early August. Feb. 20, 2018 Unlicensed Equipment • At the January 15, 2018 Council meeting Administration was directed to bring back information in regards to the transportation of unlicensed construction equipment on municipal roadways. Currently unlicensed construction equipment must be trailered for movement in order to minimize damage to RM roadways. Two options were presented to Council: Option 1: • Status Quo – No unlicensed equipment allowed on the roadways unless trailered. Option 2: • Allow some unlicensed vehicles to be driven on roads dependent on width – Conditions would be • That pilot vehicles would be required on all moves • Tracked vehicles not allowed to be driven on roads • No loaded vehicles allowed • Council recommendation was that Option 2 be adopted and included in the R.M. Traffic Bylaw to come back to Council for approval. • Upon review by the Director of Public Works and Corman Park Police further amendments to the bylaw were reviewed and presented for Council approval. • May 22, 2018 – Administration was directed to forward the draft of the Traffic Bylaw for legal review, noting the definition of “highway.” Page 4 of 7 Printed Date: July 5, 2018 Public Works Carryforward Action List - CURRENT • June 18, 2018 – Council Item. Council gave 3 readings to Traffic Bylaw 21/18. • Complete.
April 3, 2018 Recycle Bin at 33rd St Shop • At the March 19, 2018 Committee meeting, Administration was asked to review the current status of the recycling bins located at the old 33rd St shop location on Dalmeny Road and bring back a report to Council. • Currently the RM is under contract with Loraas Disposal/Recycle to provide the 33rd St location with biweekly pickup of two (2) 6 yard recycle bins with a Bi-weekly pickup. The RM pays a flat rate of $63.00/bin plus applicable taxes. Extra pick up charge is $45.00. To add a third bin to this location would increase the costs accordingly. • April 3, 2018 – Council resolved to add another 6yd3 recycling bin and monitor the usage until July 30, 2018 and that Administration look at alternate location options for the bins at that time. • May 14, 2018 Committee Item. • May 22, 2018 – Administration directed to investigate the installation of a fence at the 33rd St Shop location and relocating the 3 bins inside the perimeter fence. • July 4, 2018 – Administration looking at perimeter fencing configurations. April 9, 2018 North Corman Park Industrial • In 2011 RM Council commissioned UMA Engineering (now AECOM) to conduct a drainage Drainage Project improvement assessment for the Corman Industrial Park located in the S ½ of 14-38-5 W3. AECOM was contracted by the RM of North Corman Park to complete an intrusive geotechnical investigation for a drainage ditch upgrade for the North Corman Industrial Park. The study followed a proposed drainage plan which was commissioned in December of 2006. • In February 2012 the Municipality rejected the tender of $997,900.00, received for the road boring aspect of the Corman Industrial Park Drainage Project as this amount was not factored into the budget. This was to be re-tendered at a future date. • Administration has recently reviewed the North Corman Park Industrial Drainage Project tender documents from AECOM dated January 24, 2012, and determined this tender did not include any excavation for drainage improvement to the Opimihaw Creek or Industrial Park internal roads. The estimated cost to undertake this project is $1,600,000.00 plus any utility moves. Utility moves not limited to SaskPower, SaskEnergy, SaskTel and Industrial Park waterlines. • April 16, 2018 – Council made 2 recommendations: 1. The R.M. work to obtain commitments for overall drainage plans and infrastructure partnerships for the Corman Industrial area, including urban partners; and 2. Administration investigate and bring to Council financing options for installing drainage infrastructure to provide for drainage for the North Corman area investigating provincial contributions and including Martensville and Warman and other P4G members.
Page 5 of 7 Printed Date: July 5, 2018 Public Works Carryforward Action List - CURRENT • June 5, 2018 – Financing options to be presented at July 9th Committee Meeting • July 9, 2018 – Committee Item. May 7, 2018 Baker Rd Tender • At the March 26, 2018 Council meeting, Council resolved that the Baker Road Project (from Rge Rd 3052 to Hwy #219) be brought forward for tender in 2018 with results to be presented to Council for consideration. • ST183444 Construction of a Surfacing Structure on Baker Rd (from Rge Rd 3052 to Hwy #219) for a total distance of 3.22 km. • April 20, 2018 - Tender posted on SaskTenders website closed on May 1, 2018. • May 7, 2018 – Tender awarded to Potzus Paving & Road Maintenance. • June 4, 2018 – Tentative start date of early August.
May 7, 2018 2018 Rock Mulching Projects • At the April 4, 2018 Public Works Committee meeting, Council was presented with information on the in-house projects to be undertaken as part of the grid road revitalization process for the 2018 construction season. Public Works does not have the required equipment to undertake the mulching process so it would need to be sourced to BMTR, the only company that does this type of project work within the Province. There are other rotomixers available but they do not crush the rock down like the BMTR rock mulchers. The rotomixers currently being used only mix up the soil but they leave the rocks untouched. Administration has investigated similar tender operations on the MOHI website, and has determined that the pricing submitted by BMTR compares with industry standards. • As part of the approved Internal Construction List for 2018 the following projects were identified for Grid Road Revitalization: o Rge Rd 3052 from Corman Industrial Park northern boundary to the City of Martensville boundary (1.0 mile) Div. 6 o Rge Rd 3053 from Twp Rd 380 to Twp Rd 381 (1.0 mile) Div. 6 o Twp Rd 394 from Hwy 11 to Rge Rd 3043 (1.0 mile) Div. 5 o Twp Rd 380 from Hwy 684 to Rge Rd 3064 (1.7 miles) Div. 4 • May 7, 2018 – Rock Mulching work awarded to BMTR. • June 4, 2018 – BMTR has not provided a start date. • July 3, 2018 – BMTR mobilizing equipment during the week of July 9th, 2018. May 22, 2018 Roadway Upgrade • Administration has been asked by Council to review the option of providing refunds on Compensation roadway upgrades. Currently, no policy in place to deal with this type of compensation. In certain scenarios, road-service agreements allow for compensation to be provided to the original builder of an initial roadway within in a specified period of time when future
Page 6 of 7 Printed Date: July 5, 2018 Public Works Carryforward Action List - CURRENT applicant(s) move in the area or build adjacent to the roadway. Often, a ratepayer will build an initial roadway to create an access point to their property. • Council approve the policy that if a Development/Building Permit for a single parcel residential development is sought within a period of 5 years from the date a road building agreement was signed for a single parcel development, the applicant of the Development/Building Permit shall agree to repay a portion of the original road cost based on the portion of road used by the applicant. The policy is nullified on the sale of the original property that was developed or upon expiration of 5 years, whichever comes first. Council has final authority in determining the charge levied to the Development/Building Permit applicant. • June 4, 2018 – Administration in the process of drafting a policy in this regard. • July 16, 2018 – Council Item.
Page 7 of 7 Printed Date: July 5, 2018 Public Works Committee Item
July 9, 2018
Reeve and Councillors
Re: Public Works Director’s Report
Please find attached a copy of the Public Works Director’s Report, highlighting the current projects underway.
See attached.
Recommendation:
That Council receive the Director of Public Works Monthly Report as information.
Page 1 of 1 Public Works Directors Report July 9, 2018
A) Staffing: • Seasonal staff start date was May 7, 2018. • Temporary seasonal grader position remains to be filled. • Temporary seasonal mowing position remains to be filled. • Temporary seasonal construction assistant position remains to be filled.
B) Road Maintenance: Gravel: • 2018 Gravel Program o 178 projects over 335 miles of road – approximately 80% complete. o Contractors portion end date June 20, 2018.
• ST173442 Gravel Crush and Stockpile – 2 year (2017 & 2018) Contract awarded to Mocon in 2017. Gravel to be spread in parts of Divisions 6 & 7. o Crushing to start the week of July 9, 2018 for material required in 2018. o Liquidated damages of $500/day for going past the completion date of July 15, 2018.
Grading:
• More focus on intersections and approaches when regular blading is caught up. • Improvements have been made over the past year. Work will continue to improve intersections and approaches. • The current grading rotation follows a 9-13 day rotation, dependent upon the weather.
Road Construction:
• June 12, 2018 In-House - Twp Rd 382 from Hwy 16 to Rge Rd 3064 (1.0 mile). Topsoil and rock picking remain to be completed. • June 13, 2018 In-House - Twp Rd 382 from Rge Rd 3064 to Rge Rd 3065 (1.0 mile). Estimated completion date of August 15, 2018. • Upcoming In-House project - Twp Rd 382 from Rge Rd 3065 to Rge Rd 3070 (1.0 mile). Project will depend upon the availability of borrow sources. Public Works is in the process of contacting landowners. • In-house Patching crew repairing potholes as required. • In-house Chip sealing expected start the week of July 9, 2018 dependent on weather.
Mowing:
• Began on June 11, 2018 on the east side of the river. • Expecting to cross the river back to the west side mid to late July.
Public Works Directors Report July 9, 2018
Culverts: • Culverts that require a full replacement will be completed on an as needed basis.
Other: Staff working on garbage pick-up.
C) Tenders: • ST183443 Construction of a Surfacing Structure on Valley Rd (Twp Rd 352) for a total distance of 5.2 km. o February 8, 2018 - Tender posted on SaskTenders website closed on February 21, 2018. o February 26, 2018 - Tender awarded to HJR Asphalt LP. o June 11, 2018 - Contractor to begin project on Valley Road. o June 21, 2018 - Project complete.
• Mulching BMTR - mobilizing equipment during the week of July 9, 2018. Construction will occur at the following projects: o Twp Rd 380 from Hwy 684 to Rge Rd 3064 (1.7 miles) o Rge Rd 3053 from Twp Rd 380 to Twp Rd 381 (1.0 mile) o Rge Rd 3052 from Corman Industrial Park northern boundary to the city of Martensville boundary (1.0 mile) o Twp Rd 394 from Hwy 11 to Rge Rd 3043 (1.0 mile)
• ST183441 Construction of a Surfacing Structure on Neuhorst Rd between Twp Rd 392 & Twp Rd 393 for a total distance of 1.6 km. o February 8, 2018 - Tender posted on SaskTenders website closed February 21, 2018. o February 26, 2018 - Tender awarded to Ruszkowski Enterprises Ltd. o July 3, 2018 Contractor to begin stockpiling material close to project site. o Roadwork is not expected to start until late July early August.
• ST183444 Construction of a Surfacing Structure on Baker Rd (from Rge Rd 3052 to Hwy #219) for a total distance of 3.22 km. o April 20, 2018 - Tender posted on SaskTenders website closed on May 1, 2018. o May 7, 2018 - Tender awarded to Potzus Paving & Road Maintenance. o Project start date - Tentative start up in early August.
D) Shop & Equipment: • June 14, 2018 - Addition of a new gravel trailer to the fleet. • Items going to July 17th auction at Ritchie Bros.: o 3 light duty trucks o 2 tractors o 1 gravel trailer Public Works Directors Report July 9, 2018
• The rubber tire backhoe (L50) is in the shop for engine repair. This is a 2007 Volvo BL70 with approximately 5,800 HRS on it. Approximately $15,000 has been spent on injectors and heads. It is currently at Red Head Equipment for trouble-shooting. • Grader unit G27 - 2018 CAT 140M is in for engine repair. This is covered under warranty. Finning CAT has provided the RM with a loaner until the repairs are complete. • 2005 Kello-Bit Model 225, 12ft discer, fully reconditioned from the factory, acquired for $16,900. Includes delivery from Red Deer, AB to Lutheran Shop.
E) Waterworks: • Installation of three (3) new sampling stations in the unorganized Hamlet of Grasswood. Two (2) of three (3) installations are complete.
Respectfully Submitted
Craig Habermehl Director of Public Works
Public Works Committee Item
July 9, 2018
Reeve and Councillors
Re: R.M. of Laird Road Maintenance Agreement – Division 7
Background: In June of 2008 the RM of Corman Park No.344 and the RM of Laird No. 404 entered into a Road Maintenance Agreement for Range Road 3074 north of the Town of Langham where Laird pays 100% of the associated costs of the northern most 1.15 miles of road, and 20% of the remaining 1.0 mile of road leading into the Town of Langham, where responsibility becomes that of Langham. The RM of Laird approved the Sarilia development and acknowledged that the traffic to and from the development would primarily use the RM of Corman Park roadway.
A copy of the current agreement is included for Council’s review.
Update: Administration recently received correspondence from the RM of Laird requesting permission to take full responsibility for the maintenance and upgrade of Rge Rd 3074 for a total distance of one (1) mile south of the RM of Laird border. Laird Council is proposing that Corman Park maintain the second mile further south to the Town of Langham with no cost-share arrangements.
The proposed road maintenance agreement is attached for Council review. This agreement would nullify the existing agreement signed on June 9, 2008.
Administration has reviewed the site and has determined that since the agreement is only for one (1) mile, it would be more efficient for Corman Park to maintain this roadway and charge the RM of Laird accordingly or for the RM of Laird to maintain the entire 2.15 miles.
See attached maps and correspondence
Recommendation: That Council review the proposed agreement from the RM of Laird, and determine a course of action.
Page 1 of 1
From: RM of Laird (Administrator) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: June-18-18 1:31 PM To: Adam Tittemore
Good morning Adam and Council:
Council discussed the issue of road maintenance on Range Road 3074 from the RM of Laird boundary south to Langham at the last council meeting. They feel that the second mile south should be the responsibility of RM Corman Park, due to the subdivisions and potential for a golf course and Langham’s sewer lagoon location. They will take full responsibility for maintenance, gravelling, etc. on the first mile south of the boundary in recognition of the residents from Sarilia Estates usage.
The agreement would stay in effect continuously and be re addressed once the proposed golf course or other large scale development occurs and traffic patterns change.
I have taken the initiative to draw up a road maintenance agreement for your consideration. Should you feel changes to the agreement please advise.
Yours truly,
Paulette Wolkowski, R.M.A.
Rge Rd 3074 Legend Red line indicates 1.0 mile to be maintained by RM of Laird. llW:ll llWDC nmj-·'" 1111'.m 8~ ~ ~ 1(1.tX ll.001 RRl:'I, •• )f'Ml( ~ • !U.A1 tAl\lMl ~ UlMJ t lJlS ~ lU:U: I~ k.'WIJ Mm J.llJJO s-· -4- llJDT um UWll I: 'Pl:l~rm ; RUAN 1IJ) • l/j) .... :· !Wd11ll l D.lml 9WtOI • tr. Pl.11 - -32I ~~!~~ rmum- 32- EJlf. l'IKI (llllC1 . HM llU • 8IJ!l:IJi • i l l I: '· M'lll ~"1'::\J. ·' !IDS - ~ ~ lO'il!JJl1· .. a' ...,:~ l'BfR • Sl.'X. ]! 911.llH =®n f2DI /JlJ;l. W>U .. OOICA DJlllJA ICIUI ! 11.llJll' •:~JIJ lllRJU fllfU. DNiCI'. a:mc ()IA:'I * IUro t>ml'll \Im. wm af'i- M.ll l!Ml.'nt ltCl'l:£ (I ~ I !ITT)! 1au.un llll.'l:S rr9F- l !J I~~ IRClll ROAD MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN: Rural Municipality of Laird No. 404 Hereinafter called LAIRD of the FIRST PART, and
The Rural Municipality of Corman Park No. 344 Hereinafter called CORMAN PARK of the SECOND PART
WHEREAS laird has approved the Sarilia development consisting of rural, high density, multi-parcel residential land use on lands adjacent to Corman Park, and acknowledges that the traffic to and from that development will mainly use Corman Park Roadway 3074. from the north boundary of Corman Park to the corporate boundary of the Town of Langham (see attached map), with the traffic from R.M. of Laird constituting the majority of vehicles on the first mlle south, and a significant portion of the vehicles from there to Langham once the Sarilia development is substantially occupied;
AND WHEREAS the Parties hereto desire to enter into an agreement for the maintenance of the above noted roadway located within Corman Park;
NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained the parties agree as follows:
1. With respect to the first 1.15 miles of roadway south from Laird to the curve of existing 307 4 (see map):
a) Laird shall be responsible for carrying out, or having the work carried out, to upgrade this section of roadway to the standards compatible to the existing portion of 3074; and
b) Laird shall be responsible for the cost of all maintenance, gravel application, dust abatement, routine repairs and agreed upgrades.
2. With respect to the existing 3074 roadway from the above note 1.15 miles to the Town of Langham (see map):
a) Laird shall be responsible for paying a share of ongoing routine maintenance, gravel application, dust abatement, and any other general_repairs as may be required in proportion to the percentage of traffic from the Laird connection, this percentage being set initially at 20% and adjusted from time to time based on traffic counts to be carried out by Corman Park; and
b) The costs noted In 2.a) being charged at standard Corman Park rates as set each year.
3. This agreement shall remain in effect until both parties have agreed to terminate the agreement and it may be amended by mutual consent.
4. Payment shall be made annually upon the anniversary of this agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement.
SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIV this 9./1- day of -::f'f.).,N._, I 20 02'. <,\(,\PAl/'r --- ;:~ 0-<- THE RU Seal{¥·' \~
Seal Road Maintenance Agreement
Between: Rural Municipality of Laird No. 404 (“Laird”) And Rural Municipality of Corman Park No. 344 (“Corman Park”)
WHEREAS the parties desire to enter into an agreement for the maintenance of the road located within Corman Park described as Range Road 3074 south of the RM of Laird border for a distance of 1 mile.
AND WHEREAS the parties agree that Laird shall be responsible for the maintenance of the aforementioned road due to the road being primarily used by residents of Laird, and increased development within Laird requiring additional road use.
THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. All maintenance of the road 1 mile south from the Laird border shall be the sole responsibility of Laird, to the minimum standard of Municipal Maintained Road set by Corman Park, including but not limited to regular maintenance, gravelling, mowing and dust control at the sole cost of Laird. 2. All capital upgrades to the road shall be subject to prior approval in writing from the Council of Corman Park. 3. All road haul agreements required on this route shall be acquired through Corman Park in consultation with Laird. 4. All liability associated related to maintenance with the road shall be the sole responsibility of Laird. 5. Costs associated with capital upgrades shall be determined on a case by case basis through approvals by respective Councils. 6. This agreement shall remain in effect until there is major change in development along Range Road 3074 or six month written notice be either party has been issued. 7. This agreement replaces and nullifies any existing agreements between the parties with respect to this road. 8. Dated this ___ day of ______,Draft 20____.
The Rural Municipality of The Rural Municipality of Corman Park No. 344 Laird No. 404
______Reeve Reeve (SEAL) (SEAL) ______Administrator Administrator
Public Works Committee Item
July 9, 2018
Reeve and Councillors
Re: North Corman Park Industrial Drainage Project – Division 6 (Relating to: S ½ 14 – 38 – 05 W3, East of Highway #11 and surrounding area)
Background:
In 2011, the RM Council commissioned UMA Engineering (now AECOM) to conduct a drainage improvement assessment for the Corman Industrial Park located in the S ½ of 14-38-5 W3. AECOM was contracted by the RM of North Corman Park to complete an intrusive geotechnical investigation for a drainage ditch upgrade for the North Corman Industrial Park. The study followed a proposed drainage plan which was commissioned in December of 2006.
In February 2012, the Municipality rejected the tender of $997,900.00 received for the road boring aspect of the Corman Industrial Park Drainage Project. The project was to be re-evaluated for tender at a future date.
Update: Administration has recently reviewed the North Corman Park Industrial Drainage Project tender documents from AECOM dated January 24, 2012. In the review, it was determined that the initial tender did not include costs for drainage improvements to Opimihaw Creek or Industrial Park internal roads and utility moves.
At the April 26, 2018 Council Meeting, Administration was directed to review the total cost of the project and provide financing options which are summarized below:
Construction of Ditches & Installation of Culverts (Industrial Park & Highway) $ 1,600,000 Waterline Removal and Install (Industrial Park) $ 400,000 Sasktel Utility Moves (27 Lots) $ 205,000 SaskEnergy Utility Moves (27 Lots) $ 135,000 SaskPower Utility Moves (27 Lots) $ 135,000 SaskPower – Relocation of PowerPoles in South Ditch along Township Road 382 $ 225,000 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 2,700,000
See attached rejected quote for culvert construction and project maps
Page 1 of 2
Financing Options (10 year Loan) North Corman Industrial Drainage Project
Annual Total Project Reserves Loan Financing Payment Costs Option A: 0% Reserves, 100% Financing $0 $2,700,000 $316,610 $3,166,097
Option B: 25% Reserves, 75% Financing $675,000 $2,025,000 $237,457 $3,049,572
Option C: 50% Reserves, 50% Financing $1,350,000 $1,350,000 $158,305 $2,933,048
Option D: 75% Reserves, 25% Financing $2,025,000 $675,000 $79,152 $2,816,524
Option E: 100% Reserves, 0% Financing $2,700,000 $0 $0 $2,700,000
* Loan payments calculated at 3.25% (Current Municipal Financing Corporation Rate)
Infrastructure Reserve Status Infrastructure Reserve Balance – December 31, 2017 $11,491,886 Less: 2018 Baker Road Capital Project ($1,689,640) 2018 Neuhorst Road Capital Project ($1,400,000) Projected Infrastructure Reserve Funds Available $8,402,246
See attached 10-year Capital Plan as reference
Recommendation: Administration recommends that Council receives the information presented on the North Corman Industrial Drainage Project and determine a course of action.
Page 2 of 2
Capital Roads
Distance Distance Rating (miles) (kms) Description 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Hard Surface Roads 5 3.8 6.0 Valley Road Phase II , from 300 m north of Merrill School Road to 5.7 km south of Merrill School Road (3.8 miles) 2.5 4.0 Twp Rd 384 from Citv of Martensville Limits to Hwv 11 (2.5 miles) with MREP fundinQ (Two other Partnerships) 550,000 6 3.4 5.5 Valley Road Phase Ill from the end of Phase II to Hwv 60 (3.4 miles) 850,000 3 1.7 2.8 Baker Road (Twp Rd 354) Phase I from Hwv 11 to RQe Road 3052 (1 .7 miles) x 2,000,000 5 2.6 4.3 Clarence Ave CRae Rd 3053) Phase II from Twp Rd 360 to Twp Rd 354 and South of Caso Rio (2.6 miles) 2,750,000 4 2.0 3.2 Baker Road Phase (Twp Rd 354) II from Rge Road 3052 to Hwy 21912.0 miles) 1,850,000 x 2 1.0 1.6 Neuhorst Road (RR 3050) Phase II from Twp Rd 392 to Twp Rd 393 (1 .0 mile) 1,400,000 x 5 0.6 0.9 Floral Road (Twp Rd 360) from Hwv 16 east to RR tracks (0.6 miles) 1,680,000 x 6 1.1 1.8 Lutheran Rd from Hwy 11 to RQe Rd 3052 (1 .1 miles) 1,470,000 x 8 0.5 0.9 Neuhorst Road (RR 3050) Phase I from Hwv 305 to Twp Rd 392 (0.5 miles) 840,000 7 2.0 3.2 Lutheran Rd from Hwv 12 to RQe Rd 3052 (2.0 miles) 1,680,000 x 2 3.0 4.8 Neuhorst Rd (Rae Rd 3050) Phase Ill from Twp Rd 393 to Twp Rd 400 (3.0 miles) x 3,990,000 2 7.5 12.0 Blumenheim Road (Twp Rd 390 from Hwy 11 to Twp Rd 394 and Rge Rd 3035 C7.5 miles) x 8,400,000 7 2.2 3.5 (*New Addition) Penner Rd (Twp Rd 380) from Wanuskewin Rd to RQe Rd 3050 (2.2 miles) 2,200,000 6 1.1 1.8 (*New Addition) Penner Rd (Two Rd 380) from Rae 3050 to the Hamlet of Cathederal Bluffs (1.1 miles) 1,100,000 Assumptions: Each project is different from one another therefore estimates are based on what commodity prices will do each year going forward.
:x. Placement on 1n1t1al Plan trom April 2017
SUBTOTAL 2,250,000 2,400,000 2,750,000 2,000,000 1,680,000 1,470,000 2,520,000 3,300,000 3,990,000 8,400,000
Distance (miles) Description 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
Mulching 5.0 Various Miles (5.0 miles) 250,000 5.0 Various Miles (5.0 miles) 258,000 5.0 Various Miles (5.0 miles) 266,000 5.0 Various Miles (5.0 miles) 274,000 5.0 Various Miles (5.0 miles) 282,000 5.0 Various Miles (5.0 miles) 291 000 5.0 Various Miles (5.0 miles) 300,000 5.0 Various Miles (5.0 miles) 309,000 5.0 Various Miles (5.0 miles) 318,000 328,000 Assumptions: Cost increase of 3% each year, uncertain if rock mulching would be required every year SUBTOTAL 250,000 258,000 266,000 274,000 282,000 291,000 300,000 309,000 318,000 650,000
TOTAL 2,500,000 2,658,000 3,016,000 2,274,000 1,962,000 1,761 ,000 2,820,000 3,609,000 4,308,000 9,050,000
All RED Text indicates either an addition to the fleet or a disposal or a replacement. Page 1 Equipment List
Unit# Model Yr Equipment Description Model No Keep 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 GRADERS G03-07 2007 CAT 140H 300,000 270,000 G10-08 2008 CAT 140M 300,000 270,000 G13-10 2010 JOHN DEERE 6WD 770G 335,000 320,000 G14 2014 JOHN DEERE 772G 270,000 270,000 G15 2014 JOHN DEERE 770G 270,000 270,000 G16 2014 JOHN DEERE 770G 270,000 270,000 G17 2015 VOLVO G940C 270,000 270,000 G18 2015 VOLVO G940C 270,000 270,000 G19 2015 VOLVO G940C 270,000 270,000 G-AT01 ATTACHMENT G20 2016 CAT-4WD 140M BR 270,000 270,000 G21 2016 CAT6WD 140M AWDBR 320,000 320,000 G22 2017 JOHN DEERE 770G 270,000 G23 2017 NEW GRADER 770G 270,000 G24 2017 NEW GRADER 770G 270,000 GRADER TOTALS 0 935,000 810,000 0 810,000 590,000 810,000 860,000 810.000 1 810,000 590,000
TRACTORS TR52 1975 JD TRACTOR 50HP (POST POUNDER) 401 12,000 TR53 1992 WHITE 1OOHP (PUMPING) 125F PFA 140,000 TR60 1990 JOHN DEERE 70HP 2755 ~dQ , QQQ 130,000 TR63 2006 JOHN DEERE 1OOHP 6603 130,000 TR64 1998 JOHN DEERE 1OOHP 7210 MFWD 130,000
X-New TR67-09 1999 FORD 160HP (CONSTRUCTION PACKING) TW35 meter 130,000 TR68-10 2010 JOHN DEERE 90HP 6430 130,000 TR69-11 2012 JOHN DEERE 125 HP 7330 130,000 TR70 2014 JOHN DEERE & H260 TRACTOR (SHOP) 5115M x TR71 2015 CASEIH PURMA 165 x TRACTOR TOTALS 0 260,000 0 282,000 130,0001 130,0001 0 130,000 0 0 0
All RED Text indicates either an addition to the fleet or a disposal or a replacement. Page 1 Equipment List
Unit# Model Yr Equipment Description Model Yr Keep 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
HEAVY TRUCKS TG31 1993 MACK 1 OYDS (SNOW & 2') RD688 210,000 TG33-08 1991 PETERBILT ASPHALT DIST 1000 GAL TNK 320 x TG35-07 1998 FREIGHTLINER TANDEM 1OYDS FL112 80,000 TG36 1998 MACK (GRAVEL) RD688S 115,000 X-New TG43-12 2012 FREIGHTLINER TANDEM 1 OYDS (SNOW PLOW) M2 meter TG44-09 2009 MACK SEMI (GRAVEL) GU813 215,000 TG45-10 2002 FORD WATER TRUCK-(16000L TANK} 32,000 TG46-10 2009 VOLVO SEMI (GRAVEL) - VJ064B200 115,000 TG47-11 2000 FREIGHTUNER (GRAVEL) FL80 x TG49-14 2014 FREIGHTLINER(GRAVEL) 114SD x HEAVY TRUCKS TOTAL 0 0 210,000 80,000 115,000 0 0 0 362,000 0 0
LIGHT TRUCKS T12-13 2013 FORD -F450 DECK TRUCK/SIGNS F450 T13-12 2012 CHEVROLET SILVERADO 1500 EXT CAB 1500 30,000 JQ,QQQ T14-10 2006 CHEVROLET EQUINOX LS (OFFICE VEHICLE) LS 2Q,QQQ 20,000 T15-10 2010 CHEVROLET SILVE RADO 1500 30,000 T16-10 2010 CHEVROLET- SILVERADO (WEED TRUCK) 1500 JQ,QQQ 30,000 T17-12 2012 GMC SIERRA 1500 4X4 REG CAB 1500 30,000 T24 1997 FORD 3/4 TON F350 40,000 T24-2 2014 JOHN DEERE WELDER/ AIR COMPRESSOR x T29-07 2003 GMC 3/4 TON 2500 67,000 07,QQQ T32 2012 FORD -F350 SUPER CREW CAB-ASPHALT F350 40,000 T33 2012 FORD -F350 SUPER CREW CAB -MOWING F350 40,000 T34 2012 FORD -F350 SUPER CREW CAB - CONST F350 40,000 T35 2014 CHEV SILVERADO 1500 4WD CREW CAB 1500 30,000 I T36 2012 FORD- F250 F250 40,000 T37 2013 FORD -F350 SUPER CREW CAB F350 40,000 T38 2013 FORD -F350 SUPER CREW CAB F350 40,000 T39 2013 FORD -F350 SUPER CREW CAB F350 40,000 2017 1 TON TRUCK WITH PICKER (REPL T12-13) T40 2017 CHEV 2500 CREW CAB 4WD WT 2500 T41 2017 CHEV 2500 CREW CAB 4WD WT 2500 LIGHT TRUCKS TOTAL 0 127,000 90,000 120,000 80,000 110,000 30,000 0 0 0 0
All RED Text indicates either an addition to the fleet or a disposal or a replacement. Page 2 Equipment List
Unit# Unit# Equipment Description Unit# Keep 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 HEAVY CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 019 2016 CAT D7E D7E x S15 1997 TEREX SCRAPER TS14D x S16 1997 TEREX SCRAPER TS14D x S17 1990 CAT SCRAPER 627E x S20 1986 BOMAG PACKER-BW213PD BW213 x HEAVY CONTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PAVING/CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT AH 01 2014 STEPP -ASPHALT HOT BOX SPHOJ-3.0 x AZ 1 2015 ASPHALT ZIPPER WITH TRAILER x AS 1 2011 BLAW-KNOX MID-MOUNTED SWEEPER CB90 x P090 1996 CAT - PNEUMATIC TIRE COMPACTOR PS180 x P099 1993 TAMPO SHEEPSFOOT PACKER x P100 1995 WOBBLY WHEEL PACKER WRT x P101 1995 WOBBLY WHEEL PACKER WRT x P102 1986 TOWNER DISK TANDUM 25,000 P104 1992 WACKER 1 TON SMOOTH DRUM ST ROLLER RD880V 58,000 P105 2001 WHEATHEART POST POUNDER 9,000 P106 1986 WH CHIP SPREADER 14-6 x P108 2012 BOMAG BW55E 65,000 N/A 2004 ASPHALT PUMP x PUMP ELECTRIC MOTOR ATTACHMENT x N/A 2011 ASPHALT COMPACTOR x P110 2013 CASEPADFOOTCOMPACTOR x PAVING/CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT TOTAL 0 25,000 123,000 0 0 Oj 01 9,0001 0 01 0
MISC
WP-1 2010 GODWIN ORI-PRIME PUMP x WP-2 2012 ORI-PRIME PUMP x L49 1993 CAT LOADER -936F 160,000 L50-07 2007 VOLVO BACKHOE - BL70 105,000 L51-10 2007 JOHN DEERE - 624J 100,000 L53 2014 VOLVO SKID STEER- MC115C 50 ,000 MISC TOTALS - - - I 265,000 50,000 100,000 - I - I - - -
HEAVY EQUIPMENT TOTAL (Heavy Equip+ Paving + Misc) - 25,000 123,000 265,000 50,000 100,000 - 9,000 - - -
MOWERS M85 2007 DELGEMAN SIDE ARM 1820 x 2G ,GGG M86 2008 DEGELMAN SIDE ARM 1820 x 2G ,GGG M87-09 2009 DEGELMAN MOWER 1409 20,000 M88-09 2005 DELGEMAN MOWER RG 1510 20,000 M89-09 2005 DEGELMAN SIDE ARM 1800 20,000 M90-11 2011 SCHUL TE MOWER XH1500 20,000
All RED Text indicates either an addition to the fleet or a disposal or a replacement. Page 3 Equipment List
M91 2013 SCHUL TE MOWER FX1800 20,000 20,000 M92 2014 BUSH HOG MOWER 3815 20,000 M93 2014 BUSH HOG MOWER 3815 20,000 MOWERS TOTAL 0 40,000\ 40,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 0 0 0 0 0
MULCHERS & KUBOTA SPRAYERS UTV 1 2015 UTV (UTILITY VEHICLE) - 4WD CAB 15,000 UTV2 2016 UTV (UTILITY VEHICLE) - 4WD CAB 15,000 SM - 1 1998 SOD MULCHER - FOR CAT 50,000 SM-2 2013 SOD MULCHER FOR JD 45,000 SM-3 SOD MULCHER 45,000 SM-3 AT SOD MULCHER ATTACHMENT x 2 UNITS 2007 SPRAYER x SP01 2016 SPRAYER TANK ( 100 GALLON TANK) x MULCHERS & KUBOTA SPRAYERS TOTAL 0 50,000 ol 15,000 15,000 0 45,000 45,000 0 0 0
Unit# Unit# Equipment Description Unit# Keep 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027
TRAILERS TT39-12 2012 Hl-TEC-GARBAGE TRLR 7,000 TT47-08 2008 ARNE'S- BELLY DUMP TRI-AXLE 65,000 TT48-08 2008 ARNE'S- BELLY DUMP TRI-AXLE 65,000 TT50 1999 TRAIL TECH - GARBAGE TRLR 6,000 TT51 1971 WESTTANK WILOCK-SEAL COAT TRLR x TT53-05 2005 ARN ES - BELLY DUMP TRI-AXLE 65,000 TT54-09 2007 TALBERT-RUBBER TIRE 70,000 TT55-10 2003 TRAILMOBILE - OFFICE CONST TRLR x TT56-10 2011 ARN ES - BELLY DUMP TRI-AXLE 65,000 TT57-11 2011 TRAILTECH-FLAT DECK x TT58-14 2014 TL8321072-15012- CONST FUEL TRLR x TT60 2004 TRAILTECH WEEDS SPRAYER TRLR 8,000 TT38 2017 ASPHALT TRAILER TRAILERS TOTAL - 65,000 130,000 I 15,000 6,ooo I 65 ,000 - 70,000 - - -
MOWER AND OTHER TOTAL (Mowers+ Mulchers + Trailers) 0 155,000 170,000 50,000 41,000 105,000 45 ,000 115,000 0 0 0 I I I I I TOTAL 0 1,502,000 1,403,000 797,000 1,226,000 1,035,000 885,000 1,114 ,000 1,172,000 \ 810,000 590,000
All RED Text indicates either an addition to the fleet or a disposal or a replacement. Page4 BID TABULATION
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
JOB NO.:
CLOSING TIME: DATE: FGd . zt , 2ct2..
BIDDERS BIDPRI CE ATTENDING
~ ~ / ~ 5 1\st.ee,..J ~6MI R. ~ices t..Tl) . t '197 I ioo • IX> ":----: .~--7 - //" "' ~
A.P.E.G.S. Certificate of Authorization No. 210 PART II • BID FORM A.:COM SCHEDULE"A" OWNER: RM of Corman Park No. 344 FILENO.: 60160419(450.1) PROJECT: Corman Industrial Park Drainage Improvements Contract for Construction of Culverts
NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT UNITPRICE QUANTITY AMOUNT
1.0 CULVERTS 450 mm Dia. Culvert Installed by Trenchleas Method .1 m 86 (2 locations) 2,150 $184,9011. oo 900 mm Dia. Culvert Installed by Trenchless Method .3 m 152 (1 location) 5,000 $760,00U .oo ·1 450 mm Dia. Culvert End Treatment .2 each 4 (including bevelled or flared end. geote>Ctile, oravel and·rlp-rap) 6,000 $24,00U .oo 900 mm Dia. Culvert End Treatment .4 each 2 (including bevelled a nared end, geotextile, gravel and rip-rap) 8 , 000 $16. 00< .oo Rehabilitation of Disturbed Areas .5 m2 500 (Including sub-grade prep, loaming, leveling' and seedlng) 20 $10,000 .oo .6 Install Temporary Plugs each 1,000 3 $3 '001• .oo
; •
TOTAL $997 ' 90( .oo
Schedule A . Page 10 Public Works Committee Item
December 12, 2016 Reeve and Councillors
Re: Corman Park Industrial Drainage -Division 6
Synopsis: Council will recall that the proposed drainage plan for the Corman Park Industrial area has been previously presented. The project essentially consists of approximately 725 meters of ditching which will tie into the existing drainage to allow for runoff from the Industrial holding pond to maintain its holding capacity.
Issues with the proposed project have been that the water from the proposed plan would drain into the property of an adjacent landowner located at NW 11-.38-5 W3. Multiple routes for the drainage project were explored to determine the best drainage path, and this path was selected.
Update: As per Council's request, at the November 21 51 Council, the issue of the Corman Park Industrial Drainage project was revisited.
Three options to address this project have been devised:
Option #1 : Drain the water from Corman Industrial Park on NW 11 -38-5 W3. The landowner is not in favor and would like all of the water drained from his land as well. A survey was completed and it was determined that due to a small change in elevation, this would result in a canal full water.
Option #2: To bore culverts through the CN railway and Highway #1 1 to drain the area . Several utilities would have to be moved at great cost to the RM .
Option #3: Utilizing the Martensville Lagoon discharge line as a catch basin. Currently this line is owned by the City of Martensville. They will not need this line, once they are connected to the City of Saskatoon service. The earliest this line would be available, would be in 2018. This option would also require a 725m ditch be trenched from the Industrial Park holding pond.
On December 1, 2016 The Director of Public Works and the Superintendents reviewed the site, and determined that Option #1 will not be feasible, if the landowner at NW 11 -38-5W3 does not give his consent.
Page 1of2 See attached maps and survey information
Recommendation: Administration recommends that Council receive this as information.
Page 2 of 2 -~· 1 1 I/) I/) .c Q) "\",j > 'O c c ~ ro .B ::J @J ~ cs ,I §'i .c ~ QJ C'I ~ ,::L._ C'I Q) j n:J :I: l'O c: c. II .::,!. 0.. ._0 1 VI c ·e 0.. c.J') ro Q "' E._ 'O 0 Q) u I/) c.0 0..e
·- ..• l'J\ f;- - •... -...... t ~•rj ..""'. . ~ l\i ..: 1ll
I I ..." ?. • .. . I ~
·'.\ · 't L·• L-· -;_- Ls= ! . .. . _. ~ -L -,- .. _. ,. I • : , ! . • UMA I AE COM
R.M. of Corman Park No. 344 Corman Industrial Park Drainage Improvement Assessment
Prepared by: UMA Engineering Ltd. 1 200 - 2100 8 " Street East Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7H OV1
Project Number 1465-049
December 2006 UMA IAF COM
UMA Engineering Ltd. ;>(I:). 21vo Blti S1r e1.:t :: as: Be>r. 5~8 S?.skatoon. Saskalche-wan S7H 0 \1 1 T 30u ::; ;.~ .3:300 F 30C. !l5~> OO December 6, 2006 File No.: 1465-049-00 (1.2) Doug Dafosse Director of Operations R.M. of Corman Park No. 344 111 Pinehouse Drive Saskatoon, SK S7V 5W1 Dear Doug: Re: Corman Industrial Park Drainage Assessment We are pleased to submit Fourteen (14) copies of the report for the drainage improvement assessment at Corman Industrial Park. Our report includes evaluation of existing topography, proposed alternatives including cost estimates and a recommended alter native. If you have any questions or comments we would be pleased to discuss them with you. Sincerely, UMA Engineering Ltd. L~/4~ Justen McArthur, E.l.T. T ransportation Engineer [email protected] ~~oage•[email protected] JM:jm Encl. UMA AECOM D:b.cl21m<:. 1 1 ~ 11! ;--:t:~;,;,i; : d .... i!,":'j .:,;;' • :iC.1': i · 1 •· j 1.:-~ 1; ;; : 1' •: ! ,·, l ' ,.,., r 1i 0:1 !· ;, u •0 . 10 R:.)f.:i.£:. .. , : :1 · :ii.: Lv1 ;t f;: ';: r; hi, .. f '.. .f,,.;"; ... : •• , i '.h ~: I J,: ~1-~!, · ...:io :1:' , :: : ; : t:' .:~".:t •• :' "n:: • 1, ".!\.• · ;.:~a ..~ ·:· : 1-.; 1 .~ ·1~ 1 • • -i··.:'., I :!1 1:- . >.r:: r:.f•·,·1(1r' ·, ;1"i• i ·~ ~ljL 1 ~~i f· I!·";! 011:.il_)~~L~1\• !1 ·, ,,... :.-• 1: ! .):! .·., ~· ,,; i• , !•~.uiis. ~ .("' ' J! t' ;, :t·r; '"'~ f.i;:i;\('J,t l:". "' •· :r.._u·- ..,1· ·::1l)I '. '!.'!:. ". ..,.:;-! · L• 1' ,,f tl •l· I·•· ~~: 1-.:•.•\11 :t: l(!• . ·:' ~ 1 ; ~.,:.. :: 1 11 . !i ,(..! .• • -= '~'' ·11 ( ,1· k,~1 -: t ;: •. 1; ~1~ : : 1·; i' Ci1o: .. "·)~t h 1,ir,1:.:. :',; d:-' ~IJi" . ' ',q !H ~1;: l 'I,.:.:,., 1.;,r;. : : . ;;: t·~·~ 11( l,.J;; :;-,1 u ;:t- '";t ~-.. r.::::ti'+I ·~:-. .,.~... :."''-- '~: r1 f. if : '~· r :: p1 •_'l,' tH •'1't ·h· ,~ ..r,IJ .. !-of ~ (•! '' [; !'"l!P H'·1·.. ,. ll •t ' 1; l!_'r!P ~•1r:r .. , ; ;il,· ;Jri11 ::·,~,-::~-,. : 1r . r~ 1.. !1.·i l'~. 'l: :: ·:c,: n• · llit hU n: ;1iuP ·:• tin ·:~ c 1~$1 11r. :; !. 1: !~ t~ ;~01 i :..1·1::' II''-· lnfo1ma:1011 t~e OC?.('m1:;~ J 1 ~ h;:, ~,_... 1Pp1•.:!;t 1: r.•d :•\. 1 :tv 1;1..:;:t1r -:;1th:: i• , .. : ,·,1°r,: • ::1;(.1r•1.11 :.•;::1:-··1'' in (. (1 ii'l:~· ~i:; 1_,: epPl• t :!~: .= • : :: :~''i ::.;1 r~c1t1c !J~·r- 0 i ~ .·>~:1:·1 f~ n;:1u1:-..:_i n~ :1..-.• :;·1·"' fl ··;,1 ~ .•·1 ;,.-, _: i: .t• :•,! : l' n~ ,,: •; 1 11 ~-= r~ . :;,·. ~ 1~ :; ~ !!ii':' ~ i.,'.. <.t.d 1 i 1 ~f:!H~!rit .~IK' 11111£:'::1:-- 1 11/:;.1 '1:-:.r ~i ;.:;rc.:.n •• , t.v IJh,.\' -~.1· 1 (.' l1c i1I :1-. ~I"!- :·:;t-r: .~ n •.: q. r.-, '·i1r;:, ,,.,., I' ••:' ':r :· .: •1•"': -:c ~ Hi· .~: · S ~··~(: .. :·•.. Atr,·~ · ,.,:- .;::!·,,\". 1 : · !!l "· !:'''.. C.fJ1: l 11t. n:! ~ ; 1 r·1:~· IJkif. . 1 •~ > ·r-t '.' l ~ r.;; 1 q-i:1vm~1:"l i:1 t , ~ · t~ : ~~::r.=E··· ~1' \' 11/1:,thf·. v .,,,,.,,..>L'y · t•J :;.-.rlH·.:. :;;·.1.. r 1i t·'I'' i:11 ..:.11: \•,11 1 ~ :"'I.fl•.. ._,, ,: ~::1 ::-' rt'.' =-... -;.:: • ; !!'\~ H!:,.. :. i .•: :t'•'. •11k"':t"1:111 · 11 ft.1: ~~':· , ,,.,.,:~ J, ~ :-: •"!.(. tr ~qv t:1i!':•..:·: '•~· :-.i .J, p;,n1~~: i•ra;\.: t:;,:n :I r:•r 11c:r: !'I 1 :' 1 1~ 1 1{'.: t:1)l!!" ~ " jP.·.1;;u1n! :-,: : ~::11{ 1· 1~.. :).·,:~ (',,J •l': ;! 1'= f"'.~: .·: ..- 1 ' )! r t·y ";' ::·~ l11H.'Uli.! ! 'l:I' o1 :1!•.~ !>;. ltrfJ~ 0 p:u ;u:.. p:1:.11 1(1 ~!3 1fl:J :ii !t'l ':l"~i (.1( UH> ; ··:t~ .·:; n ~:~ !!) 1.I i1:•o·m:in111: ·-.~wt:. 'J1, 101· 1 ~;.·j tl•1 ;:.,, f;1 -?t,~ ,·:n' !t :• ·.:.>11SP.: t1 \ , : \ H·t- :• :111') (' !tc:, 1 ) ~ I(' 1J!:-8 'H o ~ noc UME I n 1$ i"F1(, of.(. Tl; c ?.~· C:\lF· y ::u.::;;.: ·, LAW AN[.' f;,J, y N0T 8[ ~\ Ei' 1100UC F.D IJ-1 ,,,,,~· h•i MJ l~ I. !' OF- • c1r1 ;;1~,· f- •U RPOS.E , !· ~CE~~l p;y ~\ ' Pi Tl r ~·~ i'~~i.ri!SSIO~~ o ~ Ul/. /\ l:l lJU U,~EC: Ril~ G L :·u .. UMA I,\ECOM Table of Contents Executive Summary ...... •...... 1 1.0 Introduction...... 2 2.0 Study Area ...... 3 3.0 Improvement Options ...... 5 3.1 Alternative No. 1 - Upgrading Existing System ...... 5 3.2 Alternative No. 2 - Surface Drainage to the East ...... 8 3.3 Alternative No. 3 - Sub-Surface Storm Sewer System ...... 10 4.0 Lot Dreinage ...... 12 5.0 Cost Estimate ...... 13 6.0 Recommendations ...... 16 List of Appendices Appendix A Ph otos List of Tables Table 1: Alternative No. 1 - Upgrading Existing System ...... 13 Table 2: Alternative No. 2 - Surface Drainage to the East ...... 14 Table 3: Alternative No. 3 - Sub-Surface Storm Sewer System ...... 15 List of Figures Figure 1 - Existing Topography and Drainage Patterns ...... 4 Figure 2 - Alternative No. 1 - Upgrading Existing System ...... 7 Figure 3 - Alternative No. 2 - Surlace Drainage to the East ...... 9 Figure 4 - Alternative No. 3 - Sub- Surface Storm Sewer System ...... 11 F lo.A ' · ~ C: ~lq l ·,:,i, p Ml': '~ '~ 3,:4 T A6LE OF COtfl ENTS Cc;:...(tA.\!·j JtJ.) }S · =o,\. P,;n •~ D f) t., 1NtC! l 1 , 1 P i ~th' l M: 1\ l\~ s r ~:--~ 11.r r -J UMA If. \ l:.COM I Executive Sun1mary UMA Engineering Ltd. {UMA) has been commissioned by the R.M. of Corman Park No. 344 {RM) to conduct a drainage improvement assessment for the Corman Industrial Park located in the S 1/2·14·38·5· W3M. Corman Industrial Park is located approximately 5 km south of Warman, SK adjacent to Highway No. 11 and paralleling CN Railway. Grading designs have not been previously developed for the Industrial Park and drainage improvements have come about by individual tenants grading their own lots away from the buildings and not necessarily following a consistent drainage plan throughout the Park. Presently, valves in the southeast corner of the Park allow some surface water to be diverted into the Town of Martensville sanitary effluent sewage discharge pipeline running eas1/west along the municipal road. Existing drainage patterns were determined following a topographic survey of the site. Current drainage patterns for the site are illustrated in Figure 1. In general the topography is relatively llat throughout the Industrial Park. Lots to the west of Peters Avenue primarily drain into the sloug h south of the Park. Little effort will be required in the northwest section of the Park, as its elevation is suttic1ently higher than the rest of the Park, ensuring positive drainage. Trenches, dug by the tenants east of Peters Avenue , tend to hold water for the majority of the year. Alternative No. 1 - Upgrading the Existing System is recommended. In summary it is recommended that the RM install a second catch basin and valves to tie into the Town of Martensville sanitary effluent sewer discharge line. The catch basin and valve should tie-in near the Wurtz Avenue intersection, adjacent to the existing thru-grade culvert. Installation of a second catch basin, improvements to the existing system and ditch grading improvements throughout the Industrial Park will improve the drainage. Due to the relative flatness of these locations, only minimal ditch gradients are achievable throughout the Park. Standing water at specific locations will still be present throughout the year. The recommended alternative will improve drainage issues arising in the Corman Industrial Park; however. it will not completely rectify the problem. Alternative Nos. 2 and 3 more adequately address the drainage problems but are very costly and may not be economical due to budgetary constraints of the RM. Cooperation with the Town of Martensville is essential for the implementation and operation of the recommended alternative. The estimated cost to implement the recommended Alternative No. 1 is $180,000. H h/1 n• C \ •RMlll·: P •1Rv. f~ ( '.;44 EXEClJTIVE SVMMAHY C o:.1:... ~/ .i : lr1c.us1 ,, ;., P :"lit ~~ ~)n : ll>1t·< .. l\ 'i... H:)v:.. :\·~ t ·.:: /\:-.~ I f.:S r.. ~ ! 111 UMA IA FCOM 1.0 Introduction The R.M. of Corman Park No. 344 (RM) has commissioned UMA Engineering Ltd. (UMA) to conduct a drainage improvement assessment for the Corman Industrial Park located in the S 1/2-14-38-5-W3M. The Pa rk, which has been experiencing recurring drainage problems, is located approximately 5 km south of Warman, SK adjacent to Highway No. 11 and the paralleling CN Railway. The most significant drainage concerns occur in Lot 5. 6 and 7 in Block 6 of the east portion of the Park. There are also other drainage issues through Blocks 1, 2 and 5. Grading designs have not been previously developed for the Industrial Park and drainage improvements have come about by individual tenants grading their own lots away from their buildings and not necessarily following a consistent drainage plan throughout the Park. R l\'1 ~ C :H-(Hi~'" i' P~~,r r~o . 144 IN1ROOUCTION CoP·.·::, t·: h.f ·1us i ~ tA t P,. r11"' D 1t.\1 l·f\·~~[ IM•"•4;::.•vi:. '··1L rf" A .:~ ~~'v'i·'.1 r 2.0 Study Area Corman Industrial Park is located approximately 5 km south of Warman, SK adjacent to Highway No. 11 and paralleling CN Railway. The Park was developed in the mid 19BO's, with the construction of the interior roads. Grading designs have not been previously developed for the Industrial Park and drainage improvements have come about by individual tenants grading their own lots. Presently, a catch basin and series of valves in the southeast corner of the Park allow some surface water to be diverted to the Town of Martensville sewage effluent discharge line running easVwest along the north side of the municipal road and discharging into the South Saskatchewan River. Existing drainage patterns were determined following a topographic survey of the site. Current drainage patterns for the site are illustrated in Figure 1. A number of trenches have been dug by individual tenants throughout Blocks 2, 5 and 6. Low lying areas that pose problems are throughout Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Block 2; Lots 2, 3 and 4 of Block 5; Lots 5, 6 and 7 of Block 6. In general the topography is flat throughout the Industrial Park. Most of the runoff west of Peters Avenue drains into the slough on the south side of Lutheran Road, the main access into the Industrial Park. Trenches dug through lots hold water for the majority of the year. The northwest corner of the Industrial Park is higher in elevation in relation to the rest of the Park. Less effort will be required for positive drainage in this section of the Park . Topography maps indicate that a natural drainage path runs through the Industrial Park as part of the Opimihaw Creek tributary. F "" . ,, Gr;· P•.v.~. J'l •,HK r-l l' 344 S TUDY AREA 3 Cun; .. ~, ..1 , t : ·~Dl!S .. "11 '- t p ;,~~ I"!' D;;(n ·~·\\L ll\:1>n· ,.,1r u.f t·; h '.-,~: ci:_~,t. ·::- ·:1 cx_-:i____ -;! - Cb I i i I - i J j I. a . ' DODO ! ,..-. ... ~ I •"./ I . ....•• --. ·-- ---; ·-t ~- UMA IAF. CO M I 3.0 Improvement Options Improvement options for the drainage of the Industrial Park are limited due to 1he relative flatness of the Park. Surface drainage u1ilizing the existing ditches will result in minimal achievable grades. Standing water is to be expected in any ditches that are implemented through a major portion of the site. Ditch improvements to the existing internal road network is essential in all of the alternatives addressed. Review of survey information followed by site visits indicates that roadway ditches are lacking a defined and sufficiently sized ditch in which to convey surface water. Approaches to individual lots have improperly sized and installed culverts while some have no culverts at all. It is recommended that all roadway di1ches be regraded to ensure positive drainage and approaches and culvert be removed and replaced. Regulatory Agencies should be contacted and approvals ob1ained before any type of works are conducted to improve the drainage patterns. 3.1 Alternative No. 1 - Upgrading Existing System Improving the existing drainage system in the lndustnal Park, as shown in Figure 2, is the main focus of this alternative. Re·grading of the existing Block 6 ditch to ensure positive drainage into the existing catch basin in the southeast corner of the Park is essential for drainage of the east portion of the Industrial Park. Improvements to the ditch in Block 6 require reshaping and grading of the existing ditch. Replacement of the culverts through the spur line grade would also be required. It appears that sloughing occurs in the ditching between the main railway and the spurline. Should poor soil conditions lead to sloughing of material the RM may choose to install a ditch liner system for this section of ditch. This liner is not essential for the system operation, however it may reduce long term maintenance of the ditch. Further investigation should be taken into the possibility of lowering the existing catch basin. Construction of the system was designed and earned out by the AM and at this time as-constructed records are not available. Lowering of the existing catch basin would increase the grade, and improve drainage in the Block 6 ditch. A ditch through Blocks 2 and 5 is also recommended, to provide tenants of low lying lots a chance to grade and drain their lots. This ditch will daylight in the south portion or the east ditch of Wurtz Avenue which will then drain to the north ditch of Lutheran Road and into the thru-grade culvert which allows water passage to the slough south of the Park. Installation of a second set of valves and catch basin, south of Lot 1 Block 2. tying into the Martensville sanitary sewer at a point near Wurtz Avenue intersection and the slough to the south of the Industrial Park is also fundamental in this alternative. Installation of a second set of valves and catch basin tying into the Martensville sanitary sewer line south of Lot 1 Block 2 will allow an outlet for the slough during higher seasonal runoff periods. It is anticipated that should this alternative be implemented that operation of this tie-in will occur only during years in which there is above average precipitation which results in higher runoff and higher water levels. The elevation of this catch basin should be set to prevent the slough water from backing up into the area north of Lutheran Road. The water elevation in the slough should be lowered in the fall to allow for additional storage capacity in the slough during the summer period. Advantages to this include less manual operating time. as well as a storage capacity for above average seasonal runofl or precipitation. P M " ' C,,,,, ,, ,,:~ P~ • · . J·,;r,. 3.:4 IM"AOVHl.(NT O ?TIONS 5 c or 1 /.r, 1·~ ' '~ Lt 1F ";' :-! 1:... l r "~ v :J nAtl~i• G f. l 1"~rr ~< ,·.:[ l·/i·I.,: I .A.~.~ ...... :..::/: : 1 UMA !/~FC OrVl Roadway ditch improvements throughout the Industrial Park are required to ensure positive drainage. Ditches should be deepened to increase the flow and storage capacity. Standing water is inevitable in this alternative. The flat topography and low lying areas in the interior of the Industrial Pa rk has led to minimal grades in lhe ditches. Standing water will sporadically be present throughout the Park. During larger spring runotts and higher intensity rainfalls the ditches will convey water to the designated outlets. · Cooperation with the Town of Martensville will be required in order lor successful implementation and continued operation of this alternative. Cost estimates tor this alternative are $180,000. Detailed cost estimates of Alternative No. 1 are in Section 5.0 of this report. ~ r;, o• C-:l=a.~ '" ' f'M'•· r~c... ~G4 lt1<>ROV£MENT OPTIONS 6 C OPr 1 1·~·\C i 1 · .1 :-: 1 .0·1 ~'.t. ;N -: A~~ : !.,::u: t·1 1 I I I - -- I ·- - ~=--...... ;.. -- -===~=:==: _ ·~ - · - :-:::---=--..:.! :-=:::::.... ' l _ I I Ii ,-, ~. - '· i 1 ~:.~ ~ ~\ ' 1-·1 - i I I•: ' ·-· ii I . I I I ill. ! I I t--.- - --·- ---1 I 11l ! ) ! - ' • -~ I I ~ I I ' l I ..., J / I I I I l I ~-~ I I ' I '. ' I T I I t ~ -- J UMA 1.ti,ECOM 3.2 Alternative No. 2 - Surface Drainage to the East Installat ion of culverts through the existing railway and Highway is the main component of this alternative, which is illustrated in Figure 3. Improvements to the ditch in Block 6, grading a ditch through Blocks 2 and 5 and grading of the internal roadway ditches will be essential to provide positive drainage to the southeast quadrant at the intersection of Lutheran Road and H ighway No. 11 . Thru·grade culverts installed through Lutheran Road and under the Railway and Highway No. 11 will allow drainage in the south ditch of the easVwest municipal road to flow east. ultimately into the Opimihaw Creek tributary. Ditch work will be required in the south ditch of the easVwest municipal road to ensu re positive drainage. It is estimated that ditching would be required for approximately 800 m, or until sufficient grade is established to convey the water. Improvements of the ditch in Block 6 will include re·grading to ensure positive drainage. It appears that sloughing occurs in the ditching between the main railway and the spurline. Should poor soil conditions lead to sloughing of material the AM may choose to install a ditch liner system fo r this section of ditch. This liner is not essential for the system operation, however 11 may reduce long term maintenance of the ditch. An additional ditch through Blocks 2 and 5 is recommended to provide tenants in the low lying areas an outlet to drain their lots. This ditch will daylight in the south portion of the east ditch of Wurtz Avenue. Drainage wi ll then follow the east ditch to the north ditch of Lutheran Road, eventually draining through the existmg through-grade culvert on Lutheran Road to the slough south of the Industrial Park. Blocks 1, 2 and 5 will continue to drain to the s lough south of the Industrial Park. Once a given high water elevation is attained by the slough an outlet, in the form of surtace drainage. will be provided by re grading the south ditch of Lutheran Road east to the installed thru-grade culverts, crossing under the main Railway and Highway No. 11 . Although ditch grades are greater then those achieved in Alternative No. 1. this alternative similarly will have standing water in some of the ditches and swales during lower intensity runoff events. During larger spring runoffs and higher intensity ra infalls the ditches will convey water to the designated out let. It is estimated that the total cost of constructing this alternative is $403,000. Detailed cost estimates for Alternative No. 2 are found in Table 2 of the Cost Estimates section of this report. R, l,'i n• C t>t.if. ·~ 1\•., P "' ~ " N0 :)4~ IMPROVFMENT 0PT10 NS B C0rv ..1 l.f ~ I : ~ : ·· !-. l f\.1 ... F/\f.K D1;,\ 1hJr i.l If .. {~ " · ~;\·:- :'lo,~:.. N . A:.. ::..r !-- :- :./.~ \ ' ~ . 1 ·~ ; ~ :1- 1 ... I ·I I I ! I ; I I I ' ,.,- ' . ! ' ' I ~ ( 1 .. I ·- ,, I 11 I L 11 ~---+--f: -----<1 I '-PROPOSED ORlllNllGE 1. ii\·r-\""'"\ -----"4----~ DITCH :j ~-L.._-..,,_-_-_ --:...-· - - - . -- . - ,~.,..d,.l~~~~~~==-;~..,...=-====~~~~~~..,,,..7+=~~ "-- l,/I-- - - R.M. of Corman Park No. 344 ~ Corman Industrial Partt 1 LEGEND Or"1nf1ge lmprov•ment Assessment ~ I PROPOSED Dcv.INl\GE Alternative No. 2 • Surface .:.. Drainage to the East UMA I/'>F..COH Figure - 3 UMA I AECOM 3.3 Alternative No. 3 - Sub-Surface Storm Sewer System A sub-surface storm sewer system, similar to tha1 shown in Figure 4, is 1he main locus of Alternative 3. Although very costly, implementation of a storm sewer system will provide a continuous drainage solution. Maintenance will still be required to ensure catch basins are free of debris, however coordination and operation of the system will be minimum compared to Allernat1ve 1. There is greater flexibility when considering a storm sewer system. A catch basin could be provided to each individual lot owner to which they could grade their lots. This however would increase costs substantially. A basic storm sewer system which included two lead pipes running parallel to Wu rtz Avenue and between Blocks 2 and 5, complete with catch basin leads was considered. The two lead pipes would tie into a main pipe on the south side of Lutheran Road, which would outlet by means of a basic lift station consisting of a maintenance hole with pump. A lorcemain would then convey the storm water to the south ditch of the east/west municipal road. Surlace drainage through the ditch would then carry the runoff to the Opimihaw Creek tributary. The estimated cost of the above storm sewer system 1s $1 ,476,000. Detailed cost estimates are found in Table 3 of Section 5.0. F. r~ti (.\( C c:?.\o\ t.h P1.. ~v I Jr, :; ~4 IMPROVEMEN1 O=>T IONS 10 C0 : ;u.;.r.: l r-.. :; l 1 ~:;-·11, 1 P t\l·~t( O;:~,; ''·'i·:,r i:;.; :r_1•'i-kif I\ 1 A:-.!,t ~ · ,: ~ ! '"" I l I - -;- .:;__ __ =--- -LJNGER'StREEl•.. ------. 1------·------;::--.-...J - -- .....:,', · .... .: I 'I.-:---- -.--- f \'. I ·..... ! I I I ' i' i ·I' ,, ' - ,. I; I J I I / I I ~ ' t. ·I t-l ------11--·_ )_ -----1 i I I II 11------lct------1 Jr-- ---~ , . I Ti1:-L_-_--_- --_------= ;~,;'Z;;',:','.";~c-: i·L-:--=-~-~--=-:~-,~------=-R-m--.R·a--ii-o-:._ ___ ---_---;:.__-,~ITT~-=---.:----_-_-_.-_--".~- =""~= ~ ~ PROPOSED MAINTENANCE HOLE/CATCH RASIN a ~~~! ""; I PROPOSED MAINTENANCE HOLE/LIFT STATION PROPOSED STORM SEWER UMA I AF:COM I , UMA /:,,f~ C- Ohli 4.0 Lot D-ra]nage At the time of development of the Corman Industrial Park there were no gu idelines in place for drainage of each lot. As a result each tenant has taken it upon themselves to develop site drainage to suit their needs. Clearly defined drainage is lacking, with trenches dug by tenants acting as storage ponds rather then a surface drainage solution. Individual lot drainage can be coordinated with each tenant of the Industrial Park. Each of the improvement options identifies ditches in which lots can be drained into. Any work carried out to improve drainage on the lots should be coordinated with the R.M. prior to work being carried out. Waste material from ditch grading of the recommended alternative should be made available for tenant's usage to build up their lots. Priority should be set on lots located in the lower lying areas of Blocks 2 and 5, as well as undeveloped Lots in Block 6. l 01 O RlllNAGE 12 ~Jr.; :~ ·· I I,· 1; '• 1 Class 0 cost estimates were determined for each of the three alternatives and are presented below. Table 1: Alternative No. 1 - Upgrading Ellisting System ..__ - ~ --- - - Roadway Ditch Improvements------Unqer Street m 800 $10 $8,000 Peters Avenue m 860 $10 $8,600 Wurtz Avenue m 800 $10 $8,000 East ditch of North/South Municipal Road m 800 $10 $8,000 Sub-Total $32,600 Ditch Improvements Lutheran Road m3 1400 $15 $21,000 Sub-Total $21 000 Industrial Park Ditch Work ExistinQ Block 6 ditch Earthworks m3 1200 $15 $1B000 Lined Channel m 0 $185 $0 Re-installation of steel f)ipes m 10 S3,000 $30,000 Block 5 Ditch Earthworks m3 1800 $15 $27 000 lump Contingencies sum , $5,000 $5000 Sub-Total $80, 000 -- Installation of Sanitary Sewer Tie-In lump Valve sum 2 $2,500 $5,000 lump Catchbasin I sum 1 52,000 $2,000 Jump Maintenance Hole sum 1 $500 $500 12" pipina m 35 $300 $10 500 BorinQ through Lutheran Road m 25 S450 $11,250 Sub-Total $29,250 Sub-Total $162,850 Contingencies (10%) $16,285 Total $179, 135 Say $180,000 Rf./. q r C ::.ir~ #: 1 • ~ ., HM; h.J ~ 34~ Cos1 Es11M1.Tr 13 C0 1:o1.- 1\t-.: l 1 ~ :1 l 1 :- . ~ : .'- P,- k,.. LH ' ' .·, !.. I,,,. l·'~ •.' · -1 p, ~ ·I ' : ':' UMA ! !\F CO !vi i Table 2: Alternative No. 2 - Surface Drainage to the East j ... ' . . )J~"'i) •liiifH ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ' ~ ------L -~-- ---Road Drainage Improvements Unaer Street rn 800 $10 $8,000 Peters Avenue m 860 $10 $8,600 Wurtz Avenue m 800 $10 $8,000 East ditch of North/South Municipal Road m 800 $10 $8,000 Sub-Total $32,600 Ditch Improvements Lutheran Road m3 2200 $15 $33,000 South ditch of East/West Municipal Road m3 2250 $15 $33,750 . Sub-Total $66,750 Industrial Park Ditch Work Existino Block 6 ditch Earthworks m3 1200 $15 $18,000 Lined Channel m 0 $185 $0 Re-installation of steel oioes m 10 $3,000 $30,000 Block 5 Dhch Earthworks m3 1800 $15 $27,000 lump Contin.qencies sum 1 $5,000 $5,000 - Sub-Total $80 000 Installation of Steel Pine Materials · 800 mm Steel Pioe m 15 $2,500 $37,500 Borina throuah Railway m 15 $500 $7,500 Materials - 800 mm CSP Culvert m 120 $180 $21,600 Borina throuah Hwv 11 m 95 $1 .ooo $95,000 Borina throuah Lutheran Road rn 25 $1,000 $25,000 Sub-Total $186,600 Sub· Total S365,950 Contingencies (10%) $36,595 Total S402 545 Say S403,0DO P. 1,'t. 1. C· ·- w 1: "-':.ho. N<, :;:i:.:: Cos1 Es1 1Mt,1E 14 {.,:· ;;1 t -. h J·.1 ) , 1.... ri ". Pt.. ~· v. [)1 :. , . ; , .,t I ·'" • •v ··· '' P~ ·~~ '- .... 1 .. I 1 UMA I Af::J.' /l\ 1 Table 3: Alternative No. 3 - Sub-Surface Storm Sewer System , - ___ ,_ Roadway Ditch Improvements - -- Unqer Street m 800 $10 $8,000 Peters Avenu e m 860 $1 0 $8,600 Wurtz Avenue m 800 $10 $8,000 East ditch of North/South Municipal Road m 800 $10 $8,000 Sub·Tot.af $32 600 Industrial Park Ditch Work Existino Block 6 ditch Earthworks mJ 1200 $15 $1 8,000 Re-installation of steel pipes m 30 $3 ,000 $90,000 Continoencies $2,500 Sub-Total $110,500 Installation Storm Sewer Pipes m 1500 $300 $450,000 Forcemain m 500 $100 SS0,000 Borinq of forcemain m 135 $450 $60,750 Catch basin leads m 1000 $400 $400,000 lump Catch basin sum 6 $2,000 $12, 000 lump Maintenance hole sum 13 $2,000 $26,000 lump Maintenance hole with pumo sum , $200,000 S200,000 Sub-Total $1, 198, 750 Sub-Total S1 ,341,850 Contingencies (1 0%) S134,185 Total $1,476,035 Say S1 ,476,000 r. l/1 ,.,, (,· ,. .. "" ' Pt.t Standing water is inevitable in the Industrial Park due to the relatively flat topography. To elim inate standing water and to ensure positive drainage throughout the Park will result in substantially high costs to develop a system. The recommended alternative will improve drainage issues arising in the Corman Industrial Park; however, it will not completely rectify the problem. Alternative No. 2 and 3, which address the problems at hand are very costly and may not be economical due to budgetary constraints to the RM. The most cost ettective solution for a drainage improvement is to improve and upgrade the existing system primarily by making improvements to the existing ditch in Block 6 and also installation of a catch basin and valve discharge connection to the Martensville sewage effluent discharge line at the location of the slough. The total cost of this system is estimated to be $180,000. Communication and coordination with the Town of Martensville is essential for the success of this alternative. Contact with the user of the sanitary line for the use of irrigation is also fundamental when considering this option. Operation and maintenance of the system along with regulating drainage improvements carried out by tenants will improve the drainage patterns for the Industrial Park. ~ M ,.,. c ·~ ._, ./'"' ~ ,, ,., l~ u 3.d1 RECOMMENDA1 ION~ 16 C( •"$ ;.. ·.)r, 11 .. ; .. ,;:., hv.: r·..- u- I 1- .. ; UMA I . C ; ilv~ Appendix A Photos UMA CORMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK DRAINA GE ASSESSMENT PHOTOS PHOTO NO. P9260002.JPG DESCRIPTION: West ditch of Wurtz Avenue facing South PHOTO NO. P9260004 .•JPG DESCRIPTION: West ditch of Wurtz Avenue facing South - r ··-. ~ __,,.. I • ~ I - .. .,; ' . ~~ , . ,..,. > ~ •• . .. ii'; ~. , '; . i . , ...... ,,·- -·-~ -- ~--~: ._'..:_ ... UMA CORMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT = PHOTOS PHOTO NO. P9260006.JPG DESCRIPTION: Trench through Lot 2 of Block 2 facing East ~- L j ------11 PHOTO NO. P9260007.JPG DESCRIPTION: East ditch of Wurtz Avenue iacing South "'i 1 !\, ::#)$f,11· ~-- J ~ll...... ~ r- ..J - I ,, UMA CORMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK DRAJNAGE ASSESSMENT PHOTOS PHOTO NO. P9260009.JPG DESCRIPTION: Standing water in Lot North of Lutheran Road PHOTO NO. P926001 O.JPG DESCRIPTION: Slough to the Sou1l1 of t11 e industrial park .J UMA CORMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT = · = PHOTOS PHOTO NO. P9260011.JPG DESCRIPTION: East ditch of Peters Avenue facing North at Lot 1 of Block 6 PHOTO NO. P9260012.JPG DESCRIPTION: North ditch of Lutheran Road facing West at Lot 1 of Block 5 I,'::;::.:. r: ~ ::;, l·:·.. ) ,.·, UMA CORMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT !PHOTOS PHOTO NO. P926001 ~l JP G DESCRIPTION: West ditch of Peters Avenue facing North at Lot 1 of Block 5 ,, --~ - ---~~- PHOTO NO . P9260016.JPG DESCRIPTION: W est ditch of Peters Avenue facing South ~ · ]' I j r ,,. .L ;_,.. I '· I I I I ·. ' •r [. " . .. . l _____._,. _ : -'....:..i---· · ,_ -·------· - ·- - -- .!. ' UMA · CORMAN INDUSTRIAL PARK DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT = PHOTOS PHOTO NO. P9260020.JPG DESCRIPTION: Peters Avenue fac ing South 1- 1 I I ~ I I 11------+------11 PHOTO NO. P9260022.JPG DESCRIPTION: Existing trench through Block 6 facing East between Lots 6 and 7 of Block 6 J UMA PHOTOS PHOTO NO. P9260024.JPG DESCRIPTION: Existing Block 6 trench near ca!ch basin and valve tie in L, .---~ - PHOTO NO. P9260023.JPG DESCRIPTION: Existing Block 6 trench at catch basin outle1 "===~=~-~=~~~==~~======~======'------··· ·- RM of Corman Park Corman Industrial Park Drainage l I i LIST OF PROJECT DRAWINGS --~ rn..ct·1n St•fl'l.aol &Uf"lil 02C"JCD C2.c-Tl'2 L~~t•l00 · ..n1 01<.flt) l~~'M,..., ,'400 . ..~ C1..Ct l04I lt.-gsfl:Md l0!.11~·2• •00 01..CHU C.,...... f.. 01..CttOt Issued For Construction lnueD1t1: 12101'20 Set No.: _____ IOtlOl11 02.CT001 L 0 _J Ir l o~ I l ~ i I :>t I d~n• ' j ~ H i ~ HI J i ... 0 111111 ~! H , I 11I 11: !i! ~j i ! ~ w 1 1 I ~ .. Clw i ! ... l i i 1! ~p "'" Ill. I i i . ' ' i! ' g I l -·--J I 1I i • l ...... L ~' I '. ' I · I ...... , .• :I j ...... I • . :i I --·1' i .. , •I ::; ! I I I _..... _,, L _J e f I I I '· '.-- i -,..,. ,I -- ! -- ! --,,.,.. ,.. I ' -1 J I -- ~ L I I I I I · ' I I :: ! . I -·••I I I 'I l ~ -- --..4 ; 11 11 . -ir,. :: I - I I ' • I -· I . ! ' ! ' ' ii ' 3 r A ··J! l ' :: ! I :: ' • ! 1 I·11 M••.1 f1·n· ~ 1- I I i ... I ..... ~ I I I I ...... L _J -·. -•I. I• • ... .p I L -- · ··~ ...... rv1 [I , 1 111I 1•1,·;, • , • 1 ' "1l 1 1'1 Jrl!H f:. "tit' • I • i Hd ·.· · l v11 u: ' , .: ~ -- I f-· , I l .·1 · I I j 1i Vlii ! J.1 !Ji 1, ~ · .. i • ! • i • I . l j jr :: Ii:: I' it ,1 it •·. ~-~ 1 I ~ 1· •·11 I ;~ •-*t• I '41t i ? _ 11 I I I ·- 1.1 ~~ n:11 • c 0 ~ :itj!I. g ! tf ;[ ~ ~ ., • I , I § f I • :i: ... ! i t -s § h I1 : ns I - f ~ 1 > o I i iii 11ur iiP r•i 11 • -1 • i . I ·JI 1 1 ' I 1 1 ~ ! I . .11' I 1. lij! • 1!11 11 ! 11 I I I I c -- ...... I l I , 1 I 11,1111 i! 1 ~ ..- I ii ·ii! I il~I ~ 0 i i I· d I ~ I I I ! I I I :; o 1i -- l~~ l . 1..._1• - : I . I . • I . •I ·- / 11 I . .. t .... j • - • • I· -- J' -'I[ "'I 1--1 ..1 ·I ·I ,I · -f' -i-ni j_- r-1· . 1·~-· ~r1 ;,r . .- , ' 1 ~,·~- ·-· 11;~ ~ ijjl • I • ~ ·· · ·- ·l 1 I ' -·· ' r-.;u;; --1 - -- -1 ' ! -: ' 1. -r.--·: - - ... ·t • 1'. - ' , I • .f ~ •M l . .- -i ti --.. 1 ! : I I - - I . I I - - • ~-' • I • .-J . i-. . .. I • : . 1r1 ! . . • : j ' . i- i -- IS : I . ! I • -· i.. ~ i : '' I ·: I Iri I • -f . . • I ~ • .,. I I -, i -- 1--~ ' I I rl \ a ~- •.• I I I ' f I I • . l 1i . j '1 -- 111-. ' .•: . . - -· I _,_.. - :~~ l:.: : i • 1 1, · j'I1 .I I .· i ' i . i-'.. ~ 1 ·'[1111. .,. · '11 ' 1 i i -- . ' . ns.- I -- . - ,... 1 ...."! - T _,., t -- 0.-. ....,,.-- ..--. iH!IHUiiHHIHiHHllil!IHi!!!i ! ~iH aaiaa111111111111!1•99••9••••• •~ •• ••ee•·~· · • •••f clis6 i fl t*taastcc::•ae t 1 1 1•1•a111c J t1~1• t 81 1 1 i 11!!11 f ! If! If I I I IIf ff f If •l•i ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! I ! ! I! J - tflffflflfffffftfftltftffffflfffttlf: '"' ii • i n u ii . .' .• .• :I ~ • I .. ~ .~ i .• i ~ n .i .t li • s·r rs-i~" 1 ~·r ·~ · r s· r s-s·s· 1 · ·n~ r s 1 ·~ r~ r ,?e¥ 1 ~i e'~!~~i;i; ~'i~nie~g~ 1~ei ~~,;;z P~~Pi~~~~ ~ ~~: r .~ .~,e 1 ·1·H ·H·l·M +H+H +i ·1·H +I Pl ·H+1 ~i !! ·H ! 0 l-+-~-+--l-l--1-H-~1--+-+-+-++--1-++-+--+--+~-+--+-+--41-+-+-+--++--H-l-+-l-l-+-Y ~ i I ; ; ii;i; ir~ i i i i .... l-li-;1-1-+-i-+-l-+-l-+l-+1+- II i H n ;n i ; ;; H ; 11 ; ~ ; n I 11 JI~ a ' i ' I iiiiiHiiHHiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil~ - " ~ ;11~11:UHIHIUHllll~lllHl~~nn ~HU ••••••• •••• • ••••• ,,; 11 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •• • II ~ i--1-1-1--+-+-+-+--++-1--+-+-+-+-++-+--++-+-+---++--+-il--+-l-+-+-+-+-++-+-l-l--+-+-!-Hll ~ ~ ~ E I I I H I 1•I I l I I JI I ! ! I I JI I ! I I J I I I 11 I I J J I I hf i • c ~ ! ! ! ! ! ~ - ~ ! ! ! ! ! ~ ! ~ ! ! ! ~ ! ! ! ~ ! ~ ! ! ! ~ ! ~ ! ! ! ! ! • !t n~ ~ 1-+-~-+-+--+-1-H-+-1--+-+-+-++-+-++-+--+--+-+-+--+--+-+--41-+-+-+--++--H-l-+-l-l++-I ~ !ll!!!!IU!!!ll!IU!!U!!!!!!!ltnn I !!U1 ! 11 ! I ! ! I! ! ! I ! ! ! 111 ! ! ! I! ! ! I ! ! ! I ! ! I! 11 111 !• 1 ll!!ll!!Uli!l!l!l!ll!lll!l!illU!ll 11111 - n< ..."" .. 3 !I. 1 r: ! !~n 1 J~1 11I!!I!111 ! ! I!!!! I!!!!! I!! I!!!! 111 ! I 11 I !• ! i ..!i...... ;1 H f- ..~~ f ~ I i i Ic: - l ! 0 i L.= I :_j ,.,,. ., ...... -. - a ,__ i I 1·1 ~ .111J. : 1 ~11il .. •> :: ,, &t I: B ~ i H . ~- c- [ ~ . II II ~ r di 11 u u 11 p I f ·u ~ i • 1; u n 1~ I • > " i I !n QI i= :: I n i ' ~ l-~ ...~ ! ' m i • ; ~ ••• c- ' u~ ll ~ •• !~ ..•• ;; =~ i i · ~ u !~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ! ::•• H ii ii =· •• •• •• i u~:~ · :: :: :: I H§ ,__ > "" q~ •0 I• i !I n ! i I!:;S H >------ns i ~ I > ...~ .i Ic: >------l ~ 0 i L: I ~ •-w...... ~ rvI 1·11''!liI i,., :iI t ;•H I 1~11!i' ·~· Il j , • I : t~Hll ; · I •l1··' I UH~ 1 1 I lilii'1 .. • 1 I l·:~t·a ' I'1 h i I HJi : 1il I \ I I i) ~ I I 0 I ~ I I pa .. ! I: I I J I ...I I h I l • H> - [ p I I I f I' i ' I' ...... I I - I I j i • I I ! ' n I • i • I i ; I I I ,= - ' . ! I I - .. I ' ~ ' - " 1 : j \ 1 i P I I - I ,) ,· / c / / I ! '. :I I I :I I' I l I \ I ::'.J 1 ,.---~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---~~~~~ i •oi ! : -,- ... . . ~-:- -;- · -.:...... ---:-~ °"""°lillOt!T.,. · -=' ======;;;;;===- ~_.___:~====~-:::~==---1- 1=~ ~""""';;=;:::~-·-· · ~. _:_- ==------=-=----""'~----'---·;.._,_~ I : -- ~ ~- . ;_-__-·-: -- . I --~.... - -- -:-----_ -·------.. - . I ii !I .. .. ~- - ~ __f!_ ___ .. ,. CREEK PLAN -- Ff'l=A- c•"- CREEK PROFILES ~- = .m 1. JOO.WCWH~-....-AWIMOl' ...... , A ---0.,. I •- .,...._ar•>-..o•ra•l'UlaDUl'CJ(1t1U.•- ._ I •-- -~- ' I •- "'~·::::.CMl!ltlOT'tOll ! 1'CPC.-lltl'llllor10•l'CM 1• • ~ ...IG"Qll.llCI ,__~ ....CU .~l'O-~ "°""'Oit.Y10 ::::.""'°'Clllttlt -Ml.Wll'WIT -Ol•~"Cl'lt,..... 119TllU.AfDI I ! II ....." - SECTION ftM or Corman P•rtt Ho. 314 Corman lndr.ntrlel Part& Or.ln•O- Ae'"""""' Updltu Cf'ffll:Ottatls I01I041t 02.CT302 0 =:'.J ...... -.•~ ~ : : ii ... !!5: ! •••Hi i :: : H;j ! .·=~ ~ . c•~ ~. i ~ : : I:: 3 r~ ~~~ .A : .!Ji . ~=! fE:~ ..n . I 1" !! - is~ . g•• :! !iii...... g • ~ ~ Cn. s ;=~ "~ .. ~ : ~ l i :;I: :i ••=I .. ;s=~ .. ~ ,. E: I ~~- ~p .. 0 ~ :::a ;H ! : =~ :r. :1 "4 • I J ~ ~1!~ I~ ;:1 ..... :: : ~ s "-• I . .. '!I ; a~ § !;i . ~ :: ~ ~ .. ::i .. . n t\ C:: D' ~ ~ ; i. .. .. ;; s..-A ~ • • < ~:! •I - t ..... 1 ~~ . i ~ •• i: . ~ ~ i ~ :i ! .. g ,, !I ;1 B ~ .-!! ~; ~ ~ N •5' ft.~ - i ~~ .. ~ . a =i ;j ~= ::•:; i :, ~ "i I q- l i I • J -; =~ :. ;.-~ ~ -~ .. ~ i it:f·1N ... 1: .; I i ~ ~ ,. ~ ..... ~:; ! ~ 2 lit ~ ~ • ;_ : I !; ~!: : I n ; ~ :s ~ := .. ii i • - a· ;;~ ~: ~ ! ~ ~ : n • "~ -4 i .. rt c '~ ...... ~~ I 3 ill ,. ;: : ~ ~ SE l I' :: . ~ ==·~ ; .: : J i I I C> Public Works Committee Item July 9, 2018 Reeve and Councillors Re: Whistle Cessation - Division 1 Background: In July of 2014, South East boundary area residents expressed concerns about the train whistle blowing which occurs along the Watrous subdivision line belonging to Canadian National Railway (CN). The following six (6) railroad crossings are located between Range Roads 3041- 3050: Range Road Township Mileage 3041 345 178.30 3042 342 179.49 3043 354 180.59 3044 354 181.70 3045 360 182.98 3050 183.92 In November of 2014, Administration investigated the cost of conducting a Safety Assessment on all six (6) crossings and CIMA Canada Inc (CIMA +) was retained by Administration to conduct a Safety Assessment Study along the afore-mentioned railway line for the purpose of whistle cessation. After evaluating the requirements for whistle cessation at each crossing, Council determined that they still wanted to move forward in the pursuit of whistle cessation at the following three crossings: 1. Mile 179.49 (Grid Road 663) 2. Mile 180.59 (Range Road 3043) and 3. Mile 181.70 (Range Road 3044) In January of 2016 correspondence was sent to CN requesting that they consider CIMA’s Safety Assessment report and move ahead with the notification to Transport Canada. In May of 2016 CN reviewed the safety assessment report provided by CIMA and were in contact directly with CIMA for the required revisions and regulatory requirements prior to submitting the report to Transport Canada. Meetings between CIMA and CN continued through December of 2016. In February of 2017, Administration met with CIMA to determine what was required to complete the report in order to further the whistle cessation process. CN required more changes to the existing report to meet their standards. In July of 2017 Administration was set to meet with CN to determine next steps but was unable to acquire a response from CN to proceed with whistle cessation. In November of 2017, Administration received word that the final revised Safety Assessment report was sent to CN. Update: In early January of this year, CN was to verify signal delays and have brush clearing completed within site triangles and in February, Administration sent out a Notice of Intent to Pass Whistle Cessation Bylaw to all required agencies. In March of 2017 Administration met with CN to review remaining steps in the process and in April Administration contacted CN numerous times for updates, no response was forthcoming from CN. On June 1, 2018, CN contacted Administration and indicated that additional work was still required for the signals, but no timeline was provided as to when the work would be done. The work that remains outstanding requires CN to relocate the time delay sensors that activate the signals. On July 4, 2018, CN contacted Administration and stated that cost estimates for the signal upgrades at the three crossings would be provided. CN mentioned that funding was available for safety improvements until August 1, 2018. If approved for funding, Transport Canada would provide coverage for up to 50% of the project. Work would not occur until 2019. See attached maps and correspondence Administration Recommends: Council review the information as presented, and determine a course of action. Rural Municipality of Corman Park #344 Whistle Cessation Railway Study Mile 178.3 to i... 3 92 Watrous Subdivision Line November 2017 Executive Summary CIMA+ was retained by the RM of Corman Park #344 to conduct a whistle cessation study along several railway grade crossings southeast of Saskatoon, SK. This report is intended for use by the RM in discussions with Canadian National Railway (CN) regarding whistle cessation at the subject crossings. There are six (6) at-grade railway crossings along the CN Watrous Subdivision Line within the project limits. It is understood that no roadway or railway changes are planned for the area. Figure A illustrates the study area and study crossings. They are, from east to west: 1. Mile 178.30 (Range Road 3041) 2. Mile 179.49 (Grid Road 663) 3. Mile 180.59 (Range Road 3043) 4. Mile 181 .70 (Range Road 3044) 5. Mile 182.98 (Township Road 360 I Floral Road) 6. Mile 183.92 (Range Road 3050 I Prairie View Road) Figure A - Study Locations CIMA+ // Partners 1n excellence II Rural Municipality of Corman Park #344 Whistle Cessation Railway Study Mile 178.3 to 183.92 Watrous Subdivision. Line November 2017 2.2.2 Location of Grade Crossing "D" is the distance from the edge of travelled way of the nearest roadway to the nearest rail of the grade crossing and should not be less than 30 m, per Section 11 of the GCS. "D" is: + 140 m to the north of the crossing (Township Road 354A); + 70 m to the south of the crossing (private driveway). A CN access is located 9 m north of the crossing. There are no pedestrian crossings on the road approaches that could cause vehicles to queue back to the tracks. The location of the grade crossing is compliant with Section 11 of the GCS. A scene sketch illustrating the general location of the crossing is provided in Figure 4. General site photos can be found in Section 2.2.1 of this report. Figure 3 - Grid Road 663 {Mile 179.49) General Scene Sketch CIMA+ /I Partners rn excellence Rural Municipality of Corman Park #344 Whistle Cessation Railway Study Mile 178.3 to 183.92 Watrous Subdivision Line November 2017 2.3.2 Location of Grade Crossing "D" is the distance from the edge of travelled way of the nearest roadway to the nearest rail of the grade crossing and should not be less than 30 m, per Section 11 of the GCS. "D" is: + 20 m to the north of the crossing (farm approach); + 50 m to the south of the crossing (farm approach). There are no pedestrian crossings on the road approaches that could cause vehicles to queue back to the tracks. "D" is insufficient north of the crossing, per Section 11 of the GCS. It is recommended that the north approach be closed or relocated to greater than 30 m from the crossing to comply with the GCS. A scene sketch illustrating the general location of the crossing is provided in Figure 4. General site photos can be found in Section 2.3.1 of this report. Figure 4 · Range Road 3043 (Mile 180.59) General Scene Sketch CIMA+ // Partners 1n excellence Rural Municipality of Corman Park #344 Whistle Cessation Railway Study Mile 178.3 to 183.92 Watrous Subdivision Une November 2017 2.4.2 Location of Grade Crossing "D" is the distance from the edge of travelled way of the nearest roadway to the nearest rail of the grade crossing and should not be less than 30 m, per Section 11 of the GCS. "D" is: + 70 m to the north of the crossing (farm approach); + 80 m to the south of the crossing {farm approach I private driveway). There are no pedestrian crossings on the road approaches that could cause vehicles to queue back to the tracks. The location of the grade crossing is compliant with Section 11 of the GCS. A scene sketch illustrating the general location of the crossing is provided in Figure 5. General site photos can be found in Section 2.4.1 of this report. Figure 5 - Range Road 3044 (Mile 181.70) General Scene Sketch CIMA+ /I Partners 1n excellence Craig Habermehl From: Linda Vergata < [email protected] > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2018 10:52 AM To: Adam Tittemore Cc: Craig Habermehl Subject: RE: Corman Park Whistle Cessation Attachments: Whistle Cessation (002).pdf Good Morning Adam, Thank you for the email. To follow up with our meeting in March at your office, as well, to address below email; CN has performed a review of the 3 locations MP 179.49 Grid Road 663, MP 180.59 Range Road 3043 and MP 181.70 Range Road 3044 and has determined that proceeding with the anti-whistling process is feasible, however, add itional work needs to be carried out to enhance the safety at each noted location to replace the safety mechanism of whistling. As we have had ongoing discussions for some time, and due to recent changes with design vehicle, approach improvements, these modifications are required with the current road crossing warning systems, complying with Transport Canada Grade Crossing Standards and Regulations. I have attached a one page document explaining some of the criteria from a wa rn ing system perspective- I hope t his helps a bit with explanat ion. CN believes whistling is a safety tool for which, if being removed, safety items need to be addressed as such, but not limited to crossing arm decent times, trespassing concerns, and upgrades to or the installation/ modification of additional warning systems. I understa nd the process has taken a very long time, as we have had to overcome incomplete reports, revisions, and several cha nges. At this time CN will continue to work with M unicipality of Corman Park towards anti-whistling at the above noted locations and remain open t o further discussions. Regards, O\J Canadian National Linda Vergata I Public Works Officer I Design & Construction I 821 Lagimodiere Blvd. Bldg M Winnipeg, MB R2J OT8 I (204) 231-7859 WI (204) 801-4237 CI [email protected] From: Adam Tittemore [mailto:atittemore@ rmcormanpark.ca] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 9:39 AM To: Linda Vergata 1 Hi Linda, I am requesting an update from you with regards to the request from the RM of Corman Park for whistle cessation at three locations along the CN rail tracks within our municipality to the southeast of the City of Saskatoon. Having hired a consultant, completed the necessary study, and completed identified remedial items that are the responsibility of the municipality we would like to see this move forward. During our last meeting on March 7 it was indicated that the only question rema ining from a CN standpoint was with regards to a rail signal timing issue and that you were going to look into it and get back to us. Since that time both myself and our Director of Public Works, Craig Habermehl have reached out a number of times via phone and email, with no response. Council and residents of the area are extremely frustrated with this process and the time it has taken, in particular when we feel that we have completed all necessary items and are not receiving due consideration. Having begun this process in excess of three years ago and having made large investments into the project we would expect that if there is an issue that we would receive information in a timely manner. Please let me know as soon as possible the current status of this request so that I can report back to Council and area residents as to an expected timeline. Thanks, Adam Tittemore Administrator R.M . of Corman Park No . 344 (306) 975-1651 (Office) (306) 242-6965 (Fax) www.rmcormanpa rk.ca 2 In order for us to say Whistle Cessation (Anti Whistling) is applicable, the following information is documented: Criteria in "Appendix D - Whistle Cessation" in the Grade Crossing Standards dated July 2014 is complied with. Road authority and CN to confirm that the area does not have repeated incidents of trespass: Based on the design vehicle, road speed, and grades on the road approach and from the stop position calculate: • Determine the Stopping Sightline Distance as Article I 0 in the Grade crossing handbook dated 2016-12-14 • Provide Gate Arm Clearance time from SSD position: Referred to article l 0.4 of the Grade Crossings Standards, TG ssd =(Stopping sight Distance +2m +Design Vehic le Length) divided by (0.27 x road speed) • Provide Gate Arm Clearance time from stopped position: Us ing fi gure I 0-2 in GCS, time fo r travelling (2m +design vehicle length) s. TG stop = (2 sec + time, in seconds, required for the design vehic le to accelerate through the Gate Arm C learance Distance) times ratio of Acceleration Times on Grades • Provide calculated Warning System's Warning time (minimum): Mi nimum Warning time = Add: Gate Decent Delay Gate Decent Time Gate Buffer Time TOTAL = minimum time in seconds • Provide calculated Warning System Activation time: Warning time = Add: Gate Decent Delay Gate Decent Time Gate Buffer Time Buffer time fo r Train handling TOTAL = warning time programmed into devices • Provide copy of the design calculations/board plans for the warning system times: Board plan with calculations will be provided fo r review • Confirm whether or not the design parameters of the warning system meets the detailed design and operating requirements contained in articles 12 to 16 and I 0.4 of the GCS, and section I 05 GCR and if not, provide specific details of any requirement that has not been met: List changes that will be required to be compliant