DOCSLIB.ORG

Mole Creek Karst National Park and Conservation Area Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Mole Creek Karst National Park and Conservation Area Management Plan 2004 Mole Creek Karst National Park and Conservation Area Management Plan 2004 Mole Creek Karst National Park Management Plan 2004 MOLE CREEK KARST NATIONAL PARK AND CONSERVATION AREA MANAGEMENT PLAN 2004 This management plan for Mole Creek Karst National Park and Conservation Area has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Part 3 of National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002. The Appendices provide additional information and are not part of the statutory management plan. Unless otherwise specified, this plan adopts the interpretation of terms given in the National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002. The term ‘Minister’ when used in the plan means the Minister administering the Act. The term ‘park’ refers to Mole Creek Karst National Park. The term ‘conservation area’ refers to the Conservation Area at UPI 0962 and UPI 0963. The term ‘PWS’ refers to the Parks and Wildlife Service. In accordance with Section 30 (1) of the National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002, the managing authority for the park and the conservation area, in this case the Director of National Parks and Wildlife, shall carry out his or her duties in relation to the park and conservation for the purpose of giving effect to, and in accordance with, the provisions of this management plan. A draft of this plan was released for public comment in accordance with statutory requirements from 12 May 2001 to 16 July 2001. This plan is a modified version of that draft, having been varied to take account of public representations, the views of the National Parks and Wildlife Advisory Council and the advice to the Minister provided by the Resource Planning and Development Commission report of October 2002. Parts of the park have previously been included in other management plans. The Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan 1999 contains management prescriptions for the Marakoopa Cave block and the Kubla Khan State Reserve Management Plan 1994 contains prescriptions for the Kubla Khan Cave block (formerly Kubla Khan Cave State Reserve). In accordance with Section 19(12) of the National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002 this plan is considered a ‘specific plan’ and the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Management Plan 1999 is considered a ‘general plan’. The provisions of the specific plan will prevail over the provisions of the general plan to the extent of any inconsistency. This plan replaces the Kubla Khan Cave State Reserve Management Plan 1994 for the Kubla Khan Cave block. APPROVAL This management plan was approved by His Excellency, the Governor-in-Council, on 23 December 2003 and took effect on 18 February 2004, being seven days after publication of that approval in the Government Gazette. Those provisions that authorise the exercise of other statutory powers (Section 8.6) are of no effect until their inclusion is approved by both Houses of Parliament. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This plan has been prepared by Rolan Eberhard, Ian Houshold and Vicky Schilvock with assistance from Nick Sawyer in analysis of public comment on the draft plan. Many people have assisted in the preparation of this plan by providing information and comments on earlier drafts (see Appendix 2). Their time and efforts are gratefully acknowledged. Published by Parks and Wildlife Service Department of Tourism, Parks, Heritage and the Arts GPO Box 1751 Hobart, Tasmania 7001 ISBN 0975059998 Cite as: Parks and Wildlife Service (2004). Mole Creek Karst National Park and Conservation Area Management Plan 2004. Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Tourism, Parks, Heritage and the Arts, Hobart. © Crown in Right of State of Tasmania Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Commonwealth Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced for any means without written permission from the Department of Tourism, Parks, Heritage and the Arts, GPO Box 1751, Hobart, Tasmania 7001. Cover photograph: Calcite speleothems, Marakoopa Cave, Mole Creek Karst National Park (Geoffrey Lea). ii Mole Creek Karst National Park Management Plan 2004 Summary Located on the slopes of the Great Western Tiers in northern Tasmania, the Mole Creek Karst National Park and Conservation Area protects a relatively small part of an internationally significant karst system. The park is a disjointed, noncontiguous reserve with the majority of the karst system outside the park. This situation presents a particularly challenging context for management. The karst system is renowned for its numerous spectacular caves, two of which are developed as show caves and are important local attractions. The majority of the caves are undeveloped, however, and are visited primarily by recreational cavers, who regard Mole Creek as a mecca for their sport. Surface karst features such as sinkholes, blind valleys and major springs form a conspicuously different landscape to non-karst systems. A management approach that recognises the three dimensional nature of the karst system is essential. The Mole Creek karst system is highly significant from scientific and conservation perspectives. The caves it contains are also very sensitive places which can be readily degraded by a range of potential impacts. Careful management is required if the caves and karst system are to be protected and maintained. The park contains notable areas of white gum Eucalyptus viminalis grassy forest, E. viminalis wet sclerophyll forest and swamp gum E. ovata shrubby forest found on the well drained, fertile soils overlying limestone. The Regional Forest Agreement process identified these as priority communities, which are poorly reserved elsewhere in the State. It also protects a number of threatened flora and fauna species, including invertebrate cave fauna such as Cockerills cave beetle Tasmanotrechus cockerilli, the cave harvestman Hickmanoxyomma gibbergunyar and the extremely rare cave false scorpion Pseudotyrannochthonius typhlus. All three are endemic to the Mole Creek karst and are listed in the Threatened Species Protection Act 1995. Tourism to the caves in the early 20th century has left visible remains, including carbide lighting generators, stairwells and piping. The park also contains important European cultural sites, including a snarer’s hut and parts of a significant heritage landscape. The park will be managed to protect its natural and cultural values, and provide for a range of recreational opportunities, including guided cave tours, recreational caving and walking. Visitor facilities will be high quality and reflect the nature of the area. To these ends, the management plan prescribes: • a site plan for the Wet Cave area, to address visitor facilities including an interpreted karst walk; • upgrading walking tracks at Marakoopa Cave and King Solomons Cave; • a business plan to guide the operation of the show caves; • environmentally appropriate toilets at Marakoopa Cave and King Solomons Cave; • a cave classification process as a framework for managing undeveloped caves; • access protocols and a range of other measures to promote sustainable management of undeveloped caves; • a program to monitor impacts at show caves and undeveloped caves; • implementation of a joint protocol with Forestry Tasmania for the management of caves and karst in the Mill Creek-Kansas Creek catchment; • liaison and collaboration with neighbours and catchment users to better manage the karst system; and visitor research to build a comprehensive visitor management model to better predict and respond to visitor growth and impact trends, over the long term. iii Mole Creek Karst National Park Management Plan 2004 CONTENTS 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................1 1.1 An Overview of the Park .................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 The Park and Conservation Area.........................................................................................1 1.1.2 Importance of the Park and Conservation Area...................................................................2 1.1.3 Threats.................................................................................................................................2 1.2 Creation of the Park ............................................................................................................ 3 1.2.1 Reservation History............................................................................................................3 1.2.2 Area and Boundaries ...........................................................................................................3 1.2.3 Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area......................................................................4 1.3 The Management Plan ........................................................................................................ 4 1.3.1 Preparation of the Plan ........................................................................................................4 2 Vision and Objectives.....................................................................................................8 2.1 The Vision for the Park .......................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Purposes and Management Objectives of National Parks..................................................
Recommended publications
  • OFR21 a Guide to Fossil Sharks, Skates, and Rays from The

    OFR21 a Guide to Fossil Sharks, Skates, and Rays from The

    STATE OF DELAWARE UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE DELAWARE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OPEN FILE REPORT No. 21 A GUIDE TO FOSSIL SHARKS J SKATES J AND RAYS FROM THE CHESAPEAKE ANU DELAWARE CANAL AREA) DELAWARE BY EDWARD M. LAUGINIGER AND EUGENE F. HARTSTEIN NEWARK) DELAWARE MAY 1983 Reprinted 6-95 FOREWORD The authors of this paper are serious avocational students of paleontology. We are pleased to present their work on vertebrate fossils found in Delaware, a subject that has not before been adequately investigated. Edward M. Lauginiger of Wilmington, Delaware teaches biology at Academy Park High School in Sharon Hill, Pennsyl­ vania. He is especially interested in fossils from the Cretaceous. Eugene F. Hartstein, also of Wilmington, is a chemical engineer with a particular interest in echinoderm and vertebrate fossils. Their combined efforts on this study total 13 years. They have pursued the subject in New Jersey, Maryland, and Texas as well as in Delaware. Both authors are members of the Mid-America Paleontology Society, the Delaware Valley Paleontology Society, and the Delaware Mineralogical Society. We believe that Messrs. Lauginiger and Hartstein have made a significant technical contribution that will be of interest to both professional and amateur paleontologists. Robert R. Jordan State Geologist A GUIDE TO FOSSIL SHARKS, SKATES, AND RAYS FROM THE CHESAPEAKE AND DELAWARE CANAL AREA, DELAWARE Edward M. Lauginiger and Eugene F. Hartstein INTRODUCTION In recent years there has been a renewed interest by both amateur and professional paleontologists in the rich upper Cretaceous exposures along the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal, Delaware (Fig. 1). Large quantities of fossil material, mostly clams, oysters, and snails have been collected as a result of this activity.
  • Description Distribution and Habitat Mole Creek Cave Beetle

    Description Distribution and Habitat Mole Creek Cave Beetle

    THREATENED SPECIES LISTING STATEMENT Mole Creek Cave Beetle, Tasmanotrechus cockerilli Moore 1972 Status Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.............................…...........…………………………………....Not listed Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Act 1995…………………....Rare Description The Mole Creek cave beetle is found only in caves; Tasmanotrechus cockerilli such species are referred to as ‘troglobites’. Troglobitic beetles show varying degrees of adaptation to a cave existence, including loss of body colouring, a reduction or complete loss of eyes, and a lengthening of legs and other appendages. The Mole Creek cave beetle is small (body length approximately 6 mm), with an elongated head and vestigial eyes. For a full description refer to Moore (1972). Distribution and Habitat Tasmanotrechus cockerilli is known only from the 5mm Mole Creek karst system in central north Tasmania. Within this cave system it is fairly widely distributed, Illustration: Karen Richards having so far been located in nine caves, however, the species is extremely rare in the caves where it has been found (Eberhard et al. 1991). A number of specimens of a beetle very similar to the Mole Creek cave beetle were also collected by Eberhard (2000) from six new cave sites within the Mole Creek karst system. These have been tentatively assigned to the same species. However, the specimens have yet to be formally identified as belonging to the species T. cockerilli. The species is confined mostly to the deep cave zone, where it is found under stones, in or near flood litter, and on moist surfaces near water. Occasionally the species has also been found some distance from permanent water.
  • Dpiw – Surface Water Models Mersey River Catchment

    Dpiw – Surface Water Models Mersey River Catchment

    DPIW – SURFACE WATER MODELS MERSEY RIVER CATCHMENT Mersey River Surface Water Model Hydro Tasmania Version No: 1.1 DOCUMENT INFORMATION JOB/PROJECT TITLE Surface Water Hydrological Models for DPIW CLIENT ORGANISATION Department of Primary Industries and Water CLIENT CONTACT Bryce Graham DOCUMENT ID NUMBER WR 2007/027 JOB/PROJECT MANAGER Mark Willis JOB/PROJECT NUMBER E200690/P202167 Document History and Status Revision Prepared Reviewed Approved Date Revision by by by approved type 1.0 J. Bennett Dr Fiona C. Smythe July 2007 Final Ling 1.1 J. Bennett Dr Fiona C. Smythe July 2008 Final Ling Current Document Approval PREPARED BY James Bennett Water Resources Mngt Sign Date REVIEWED BY Dr Fiona Ling Water Resources Mngt Sign Date APPROVED FOR Crispin Smythe SUBMISSION Water Resources Mngt Sign Date Current Document Distribution List Organisation Date Issued To DPIW July 2008 Bryce Graham The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Hydro Tasmania. This document may only be used for the purposes of assessing our offer of services and for inclusion in documentation for the engagement of Hydro Tasmania. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part for any other purpose without the written permission of Hydro Tasmania constitutes an infringement of copyright. i Mersey River Surface Water Model Hydro Tasmania Version No: 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the results of the hydrological model developed for the Mersey River catchment in central-north Tasmania. This report is one of a series of reports that present the methods and results from the development and calibration of surface water hydrological models for 26 Tasmanian catchments under both current and natural flow conditions.
  • 1 Deborah Hunter President, Friends of Great Western Tiers Kooparoona Niara Conservation Officer, Mole Creek Caving Club. Corres

    1 Deborah Hunter President, Friends of Great Western Tiers Kooparoona Niara Conservation Officer, Mole Creek Caving Club. Corres

    Deborah Hunter President, Friends of Great Western Tiers Kooparoona Niara Conservation Officer, Mole Creek Caving Club. Correspondence: Submission for the Senate inquiry 15th April 2016 The response to, and lessons learnt from, recent fires in remote Tasmanian wilderness affecting the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area, with particular reference to: a. the impact of global warming on fire frequency and magnitude; b. the availability and provisions of financial, human and mechanical resources; c. the adequacy of fire assessment and modelling capacity; d. Australia’s obligations as State Party to the World Heritage Convention; e. world best practice in remote area fire management; and f. any related matter. 1 Preamble This submission concerns the fire known as the Lake Mackenzie, Tasmanian Fire Service (TFS) incident number 236227. It later became known as the Mersey Forest complex of fires. We welcome any opportunity to make further representation should there be hearings into the fires. The catastrophic losses incurred elsewhere in the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area (TWWHA) and high conservation value areas of recognised World Heritage status, 1 such as the Tarkine forests (takayna) are acknowledged but are beyond the scope of this submission. In making this submission, we express the greatest respect for all personnel involved in the dangerous and protracted effort to control and contain the fires. We make this submission in the spirit of helping to understand, address and prevent such devastation in the future. The first Tasmanians are respectfully acknowledged as traditional owners of this land, as is the name kooparoona niara. 2 Summary It is submitted that • Research on climate change and fire response must be restored and increased including CSIRO.
  • Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms

    Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms

    Title 430 – National Soil Survey Handbook Part 629 – Glossary of Landform and Geologic Terms Subpart A – General Information 629.0 Definition and Purpose This glossary provides the NCSS soil survey program, soil scientists, and natural resource specialists with landform, geologic, and related terms and their definitions to— (1) Improve soil landscape description with a standard, single source landform and geologic glossary. (2) Enhance geomorphic content and clarity of soil map unit descriptions by use of accurate, defined terms. (3) Establish consistent geomorphic term usage in soil science and the National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS). (4) Provide standard geomorphic definitions for databases and soil survey technical publications. (5) Train soil scientists and related professionals in soils as landscape and geomorphic entities. 629.1 Responsibilities This glossary serves as the official NCSS reference for landform, geologic, and related terms. The staff of the National Soil Survey Center, located in Lincoln, NE, is responsible for maintaining and updating this glossary. Soil Science Division staff and NCSS participants are encouraged to propose additions and changes to the glossary for use in pedon descriptions, soil map unit descriptions, and soil survey publications. The Glossary of Geology (GG, 2005) serves as a major source for many glossary terms. The American Geologic Institute (AGI) granted the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) permission (in letters dated September 11, 1985, and September 22, 1993) to use existing definitions. Sources of, and modifications to, original definitions are explained immediately below. 629.2 Definitions A. Reference Codes Sources from which definitions were taken, whole or in part, are identified by a code (e.g., GG) following each definition.
  • Mersey River Anglers Access

    Mersey River Anglers Access

    EDITION 3 Protect our Waters Recreational anglers have a responsibility to look after Mersey River fisheries resources for the benefit of the environment and future generations. • Do not bring live or dead fish, fish products, animals Anglers or aquatic plants into Tasmania. • Do not bring any used fishing gear or any other Access freshwater recreational equipment that may be damp, wet or contain water into Tasmania. Check, clean and dry your fishing equipment before REGION: NORTH WEST entering Tasmania. • Do not transfer any freshwater fish, frogs, tadpoles, invertebrates or plants between inland waters. • Check your boat, trailer, waders and fishing gear for weed and other pests that should not be transferred before moving between waters. • Do not use willow (which is a plant pest) as a rod support as it has the ability to propagate from a cutting. Warning ANGLING DEEP SLIPPERY REGULATIONS WATER SURFACES APPLY STRONG ELECTRIC FALLING CURRENTS FENCE TREES AND LIMBS CONTACT DETAILS 17 Back River Road, New Norfolk, 7140 Ph: 1300 INFISH www.ifs.tas.gov.au STEEP BANKS CATTLE Caution: Environmental water releases from Lake Parangana may cause the river to rise suddenly. BL11111 Inland Fisheries Service Getting There Angling Notes Angling Regulations The Mersey River rises on the Central Plateau south of Like many Tasmanian rivers, the Mersey boasts deep, To fish in any open public inland water in Tasmania Lake Rowallan and enters Bass Strait at Devonport. This slow-flowing pools and shallow fast sections of water you must hold a current Inland Angling Licence unless brochure refers to a 55 km stretch of the river from Lake that produce good quality trout.
  • Uvalas and Their Relationship to Sinkholes in an Evaporite Karst Setting, Dead Sea Eastern Shore, Jordan

    Uvalas and Their Relationship to Sinkholes in an Evaporite Karst Setting, Dead Sea Eastern Shore, Jordan

    Uvalas and their relationship to sinkholes in an evaporite karst setting, Dead Sea eastern shore, Jordan R. A. Watson (1), E. P. Holohan (1), D. Al-Halbouni (2), H. Alrshdan (3), D. Closson (4), & T. Dahm (2) (1) UCD School of Earth (2) GFZ-Potsdam, (3) Ministry of Energy and (4) SkyMap Global Ltd, Sciences, Ireland Germany Mineral Resources, Jordan Singapore What is an uvala? • Enclosed karst depressions: › Doline (sinkhole) › Uvala Increasing size Doline: Slieve Carran, Burren, Co. Clare Area: 0.012 km2 › Polje Uvala: Aillwee Hill, Burren, Co. Clare • Depth/Diameter ratios: Area: 0.4 km2 › Doline: ~ 0.1 › Uvala: ~ 0.01 • Proposed formation mechanisms for uvalas: Photo source: Aerpas › Surface dissolution Polje: Carran, Burren, Co. Clare Flood conditions Area: 9 km2 › Coalescence of sinkholes › Subsidence Photo source: Colin BuncePhoto source: GSI Dead Sea evaporite karst: → Also hosts depressions on multiple scales → Form in 10 years, not 10000 years! Fundamental Research Questions 1) How do sinkholes and uvalas interrelate in space and time? 2) What is the mechanism of uvala formation? 3) How do these karst landforms relate to subsurface hydrology? The Dead Sea: a natural laboratory for sinkhole studies... The Dead Sea: a natural laboratory for sinkhole studies... The Dead Sea is a terminal lake: needs inflow to sustain sea level! River Jordan Western Shore Data from Avni et al., 2016 Zukim Quane Samar Lisan Mineral Beach Peninsula 1972 1998 2011 Ein Gedi Mazor Hever Asa’el Ze’elim Lynch Str. Ghor Al- Haditha sinkhole 10 km area Nasa
  • Davisian's Normal Cycle of Erosion

    Davisian's Normal Cycle of Erosion

    UNIT – IV GEOMORPHIC PROCESSES: DAVISIAN’S NORMAL CYCLE OF EROSION: 1. INTRODUCTION i. This is the most important concept develop in geomorphology between 1890-1900. ii. It was proposed by W.M. Davis. iii. It explains evolution of landforms in a region. iv. Davis got the idea from many scholars they include work of Brothers of purity in Dark Ages, Hutton, Powell, Hilbert and many others. v. Davis synthesized the earlier ideas put them in a logical frame work and explained the concept. So, he has not given any new idea but only terms like pheneplain. vi. The terms “cycle” is used because the beginning and the end have same condition the end may be the beginning for next cycle. vii. The term “Normal” indicate temperate humid climate which is Normal for Davis. viii. Davis calls Glacial and Arid conditions as “climatic accident”. ix. Since, the temperate humid condition is normal, river is the major processes. Therefore it is also known as “Fluvial cycle of Erosion” (Fluv means water). 2. BASIC POINTS TO REMEMBER A few basic points should be kept in mind when explanation is given for cycle of erosion. They are, 1. They cycle concept is an idealized modal. 2. Stages in the cycle of erosion do not undergo the same rate of development. 3. Stages in the cycle of erosion cannot be equated with specific amount of time. 4. The theoretical final stage of the cycle, pheniplain is not absorbed any were in the world. One possible area may be the Siberian plain. 3. BACKROUND Brothers of purity, Hutton, school of denudation.
  • The Glacial History of the Upper Mersey Valley

    The Glacial History of the Upper Mersey Valley

    THE GLACIAL HISTORY OF THE UPPER MERSEY VALLEY by A a" D. G. Hannan, B.Sc., B. Ed., M. Ed. (Hons.) • Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA HOBART February, 1989 CONTENTS Summary of Figures and Tables Acknowledgements ix Declaration ix Abstract 1 Chapter 1 The upper Mersey Valley and adjacent areas: geographical 3 background Location and topography 3 Lithology and geological structure of the upper Mersey region 4 Access to the region 9 Climate 10 Vegetation 10 Fauna 13 Land use 14 Chapter 2 Literature review, aims and methodology 16 Review of previous studies of glaciation in the upper Mersey 16 region Problems arising from the literature 21 Aims of the study and methodology 23 Chapter $ Landforms produced by glacial and periglacial processes 28 Landforms of glacial erosion 28 Landforms of glacial deposition 37 Periglacial landforms and deposits 43 Chapter 4 Stratigraphic relationships between the Rowallan, Arm and Croesus glaciations 51 Regional stratigraphy 51 Weathering characteristics of the glacial, glacifluvial and solifluction deposits 58 Geographic extent and location of glacial sediments 75 Chapter 5 The Rowallan Glaciation 77 The extent of Rowallan Glaciation ice 77 Sediments associated with Rowallan Glaciation ice 94 Directions of ice movement 106 Deglaciation of Rowallan Glaciation ice 109 The age of the Rowallan Glaciation 113 Climate during the Rowallan Glaciation 116 Chapter The Arm, Croesus and older glaciations 119 The Arm Glaciation 119 The Croesus Glaciation 132 Tertiary Glaciation 135 Late Palaeozoic Glaciation 136 Chapter 7 Conclusions 139 , Possible correlations of other glaciations with the upper Mersey region 139 Concluding remarks 146 References 153 Appendix A INDEX OF FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Follows page Figure 1: Location of the study area.
  • Council Community News – February 2020

    Council Community News – February 2020

    COUNCIL COMMUNITY NEWS – FEBRUARY 2020 Council Notices Council appoints new General Manager Mr John Jordan will commence a four-year term as General Manager at the end of January 2020. John is currently working with Queensland Health and has extensive management experience in the Queensland public sector as well as with Brisbane City Council. He has demonstrated an ability to manage diverse issues in government and this experience will help lead Meander Valley in the next phase of its development. New support for community projects The Great Regional City Challenge has now launched and is offering individuals, groups and organisations the chance to share in > $100,000 of cash and support services. The funds and support are for projects that can help make Launceston and NE Tasmania one of the great regions of the world. Projects can focus on ways to build on our innovation and creativity, or our liveability, or our diversity or our connectedness. Meander Valley community groups are eligible to participate with local projects . A meeting for interested applicants has been scheduled for Thurs 13 Feb 3.30pm at Council Offices, Westbury. RSVP by 12/2 to 6393 5300 or [email protected]. https://launcestontogether.com.au/how-it-works . Work underway on major intersection upgrade on Westbury Road Work has commenced on the construction of a new roundabout at the intersection of Meander Valley Road and Westbury Road in Prospect Vale. This priority project is being undertaken at a cost of $1.6m, with funding from the Federal Liberal Government’s election commitment, the Commonwealth Government’s Infrastructure Investment Grant Programme and Meander Valley Council.
  • This Issue of Southern Caver Is Assumed to Be No. 52 ISSN 0157-8464

    This Issue of Southern Caver Is Assumed to Be No. 52 ISSN 0157-8464

    This issue of Southern Caver is assumed to be No. 52 ISSN 0157-8464 SOUTHERN CAVER This index was compiled by Russell Fulton Typing: Nell Gill Published by the SOUTHERN CAVING SOCIETY Postal Address: P.O. Box 121, Moonah, Tasmania, 7009 Club Room 132 Davey Street, Hobart, 7000 OCTOBER 1985 1. INTRODUCTION This is an index to the contents of Southern Cavep published by the Southern Caving Society from Volume l'number 1 to Volume 12 number 4 and then in the new series numbers 49 to 51 inclusive. These were published between July 1967 and December 1982, a period spanning 15 years. The quarterly issue of the magazine ended with Volume 12 number 4 and it subsequently became an occasional publication commencing with number 49 (the magazines between Volume 1 and Volume 12 inclusive were counted as 48 issues). The Southern Caving Society was formed in April 1965 with the aim of furthering the exploration of Tasmanian caves and promoting their study and conservation. The Southern Cavep is an invaluable record of 15 years of Tasmanian speleology and the diversity of contributions to the magazine reflect a wide range of interests including for example, cave fauna, explora­ tion, diving in sea caves, snow cave geomorphology and underground photography. The list could go on. Copies of some of the issues are still available. For information on availability and cost, write to the Secretary, Southern Caving Society, P.O. Box 121, Moonah, Tasmania 7009. ARRANGEMENT OF THE INDEX There are 5 Sections A to E. These are: A. Tasmanian Caving Areas.
  • You'll Love Getting There

    You'll Love Getting There

    You’ll love getting there SELF DRIVE Peppers Cradle Mountain Lodge is located 81km from Devonport The other route is via Derwent Bridge to Queenstown (A10) and (1½ hrs), 110km from Burnie (1½ hrs), 142km from Launceston (2½ up the West Coast on A10 through Zeehan, Rosebery and Tullah. hrs) and 375km from Hobart (4½ hrs). Allow additional travelling Turn right onto the C132 towards Cradle Mountain. This route takes time during adverse conditions. approximately 6 hours. Car rental is available through all major car rental companies in From Launceston – 2½ Hours Drive airport or city locations. Follow the signs from Launceston towards the North West Coast From Hobart – 4½ Hours Drive along the A1. Bypass the towns of Hagley, Westbury and Deloraine. At Elizabeth Town turn left (B13) towards Kimberley. At Kimberley There are two main routes to Peppers Cradle Mountain Lodge from cross the Mersey River and continue to Railton then turn left onto the Hobart. The most direct route takes you up the Midlands Highway (B14) to Sheffield. At Sheffield turn left (C136) following the signs to (A1) to Perth, and then through Sheffield, and will take around 4½ Cradle Mountain. You will travel through Claude Road and Gowrie hours. Park, crossing the Forth River at Cethana. At Moina turn left (C132). From Hobart follow the Midlands Highway (A1) north towards Perth After approximately 20km turn left at the intersection to Cradle travelling through Campbell Town. As you enter the town turn left Mountain. Follow this road for 4km and you will see the Lodge on towards Longford (B52).