DOCSLIB.ORG

NYS Senate HSR Task Force Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NYS Senate HSR Task Force Study January 4, 2006 Dear Senator Bruno and Task Force Members, On June 29, 2005, we were challenged to “develop an adequate high speed rail system that can effectively move people and products between cities in New York State and the nation’s economic centers in order to grow businesses and create jobs and opportunities.” The action plan was to be completed in six months or less. While the task was formidable, the potential rewards were compelling and in the public interest. The accompaniment of our report with this letter is the result of a collaborative effort between private sector and public officials. Working from temporary offices at the Albany-Rensselaer Railroad Station, the group drew expertise from many transportation professionals as well as a cross section of railroad officials. This team of industry experts spent many productive hours examining existing conditions, agreements, and overall governance to determine options for both short- and long-term improvement to New York State’s rail system. I am proud of the enthusiasm, professionalism, and commitment of this group and on their behalf I thank you for your confidence. We are available for further discussion or follow through on implementation of our recommendations. Sincerely, John C. Egan Executive Director New York State Senate High Speed Rail Task Force Intentionally blank Empire Corridor Action Program Summary Program A B C D E Total Phase 2006 2009 2013 2013 2015 Improvements and Benefits NYC to • Initial • Additional • New • 3 non-stop • Double 46% Albany Express Express service to Express current Train Train-2hrs Schen- Trains service to ectady & 23 daily • New • Purchase • New Saratoga trains Agreement CSXT right- operations with Amtrak of-way Springs and • Achieve • Track, • Stations, service 95% on- signal, parking & schedule time capacity access service Albany to • New • Remove • Additional • New • Additional 19% Buffalo/ Agreement key service to sidings & service Niagara with CSXT bottlenecks Syracuse crossover between Falls & repair • Initiate tracks, Albany & Livingston grade Buffalo station Ave. Bridge improve- crossings • Achieve • Improve ments 90% on- on-time time service service to 70+% Equipment Additional refurbished cars 20 ”New York Car” trainsets 35% Annual 1.14 1.33 1.90 2.47 2.96 Ridership +17% +67% +117% +160% (millions) Total Costs (millions 2005 $) Capital $22 $516 $407 $412 $444 $1.801 Annual -$45 -$39 -$20 -$26 +$0.4 by 2025 Operating Cost to NYS With Federal Partnership Strategy (millions 2005 $) Capital* $10 $81 $259 $228 $222 $0.800 Annual** -$30 to -$39 -$24 to -$33 -$5 to -$14 -$11 to -$20 +$6.8 by 2025 Operating * 80/20 Federal/NYS contribution for deferred projects & “state of good repair”: 50/50 for new capacity & reliability projects. ** Federal responsibility for interstate & international trains; NYS for intrastate trains. Benefit detail page 2-15. Intentionally blank Acknowledgements New York State Senate High Speed Rail Task Force Joseph L. Bruno Senator Frank Padavan Senator William Larkin Senate Majority Leader (R-C, Bellerose) (R-C, Cornwall on Hudson) Senator Dean Skelos Senator Michael Nozzolio Senator Nicholas Spano (R, Rockville Centre) (R-C, Fayette) (R-C, Westchester) Senator Thomas Libous Senator Charles Fuschillo Senator John D. Sabini (R-C, Binghamton) (R-C, Merrick) (D, Queens) David A. Paterson Senator John Flanagan Senator George D. Maziarz Senate Minority Leader (R-C, East Northport) (R-C, Wheatfield) Senator Caesar Trunzo Senator Joseph Robach (R, Brentwood) (R-C-I-WF, Rochester) Senator Owen Johnson Senator James L. Seward (R-C, Babylon) (R-C-I, Oneonta) High Speed Rail Action Program Consultant Team Parsons Brinckerhoff, Inc. Integrated Strategic Resources, William (Al) Wallace, RPI CRA International, Inc. Inc. Donald Nelson, Consultant Creighton Manning Engineering, Whiteman, Osterman & Hanna, Henry Peyrebrune, Consultant LLP L.L.P. Jack Reilly, Consultant Participating Stakeholders Albany Port Railroad O’Connell, Director of Community Ministere des Transport du Corporation: Richard M. Stack, Relations Quebec (MTQ): Serge Routhier, General Manager Empire State Passengers Rail Analyst Amtrak: Drew Galloway, Director Association: Bruce B. Becker, NYSDOT: John Guinan, Director of Planning and Analysis; Peter President of Customer and Stakeholder Cohen, Director of Government GBNRTC: Hal Morse, Executive Relations; Steve Slavick, Director Affairs; James F. Turngren, Director of Policy and Strategic Planning; District Superintendent GTC: Richard Perrin, Executive John Reed, Director of Rail Canadian Pacific Railway (CP): Director Passenger Service Evaluation Section; Anthony Torre, Director, Stephen Fisk, Senior Business Hudson River Estuary Program: Highway Data Services Bureau Manager Beth Waterman, Information CDTA: Steve Bland, Executive Officer SMTC: Charles Poltenson, Senior Intermodal Planner Director Metro North: Howard Permut, CDTC: John Poorman, Staff Cooperation by all stakeholders served as Vice President of Planning and a valuable and timely input to the Task Director Development; John Kennard, Force efforts. The recommendations CSXT: John Gibson, Vice Director of Capital and Long- contained in this report are those of the President for Operations Range Planning Senate Task Force. Participation by the Stakeholders does not imply their or their Research and Planning; Maurice respective agency’s concurrence or endorsement of the recommendations. New York State Senate High Speed Rail Task Force Staff John Egan, Executive Director Louise Alessi, Executive Assistant Carla Chiaro, Administrative Director Jim Cartin, Consultant to the Task Force page i Table of Contents Acknowledgements................................................................................................ i Table of Contents.................................................................................................. ii Glossary................................................................................................................iii Executive Summary 1. Introduction 1.1 Background.................................................................................................1-2 1.2 Task Force Vision, Goals, and Objectives .............................................1-16 1.3 The Empire Rail Corridor Today and Tomorrow ...................................1-23 2. Long- and Short-Range Improvement Programs 2.1 A Future Integrated Statewide Rail Network............................................2-2 2.2 Empire Corridor Incremental Improvements .........................................2-11 2.3 Program Summary and Costs.................................................................2-83 3. Transportation, Economic, and Development Benefits 3.1 Ridership and Service Quality...................................................................3-2 3.2 Economic Impact and Development Potential ......................................3-11 3.3 Impacts to Owners and Operators..........................................................3-20 3.4 Environmental and Other Impacts..........................................................3-22 3.5 Revenue, Cost, and Benefits Analysis ...................................................3-27 4. Implementation Strategy 4.1 Institutional Arrangements........................................................................4-2 4.2 Funding and Financing..............................................................................4-8 4.3 Overview of Implementation Schedule ..................................................4-18 4.4 Next Steps Forward – Action Agenda ....................................................4-24 4.5 Recommendations...................................................................................4-26 page ii Glossary ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act): HSGT (High Speed Ground Federal legislation that prohibits Transportation): intercity passenger discrimination based on disability. ground transportation, by steel wheel Criteria for accessibility of new rail station railroad or magnetic levitation, that is or rail equipment projects stem from this time-competitive with air and/or auto for legislation. travel markets in the range of 100 to 500 miles. Amtrak: intercity passenger rail service operator. LAB (Livingston Avenue Bridge): rail bridge over the Hudson River at Albany CP (Canadian Pacific Railway): rail freight that is used by Empire Corridor operator of the former Delaware & passenger service. Hudson Lines. LIRR (Long Island Rail Road): commuter CP (control point): a location with a name rail service operator between New York or numeric designation that dispatchers Penn Station and points on Long Island. can reference when controlling trains. Numbered Control Points generally Maglev (magnetic levitation): electrically conform to the nearest milepost (see MP powered transportation system that uses below). magnetic forces to elevate and propel vehicles operating on a fully dedicated CSXT (CSX Transportation): rail freight guideway at speeds in excess of 200 operator. CSXT generally owns the mph. Empire Corridor right-of-way between Poughkeepsie and Buffalo that was Metro North: commuter rail service formerly owned by Conrail. operator. In the Empire Corridor, Metro- North’s Hudson Line service operates FRA (Federal Railroad Administration): a between Poughkeepsie and New York division of the U.S. Department of City. Transportation. This agency has jurisdiction over Class I railroads such as MP (mile post): distance along a rail line CSXT (see above), CP (see
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The ESPA EXPRESS NEWS from the EMPIRE STATE PASSENGERS ASSOCIATION
    The ESPA EXPRESS NEWS FROM THE EMPIRE STATE PASSENGERS ASSOCIATION http://www.esparail.org WORKING FOR A MORE BALANCED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Vol. 35 No. 6 November/December 2011 Amtrak to Lease 85 Miles of Empire possibly changing the Lake Shore Limited schedule by departing Corridor from CSX Chicago 3 hours earlier and also departing New York about an hour earlier. One improvement considered would extend the In an extremely welcomed announcement, it was confirmed hours of the Diner to encourage more purchases, and to make on October 18 that Amtrak intends to enter into a long-term the Diner cashless (Debit/Credit cards only), which would save lease with CSX to gain full operational control of the 85 route time counting and tracking cash. Forty seven percent of the miles of the Empire Corridor between Control Point 75 north Diner guests are coach passengers, which is very high compared of Poughkeepsie (the north end of Metro-North territory) and to other Amtrak routes. Upgrading the food in the lounge car CP 160 at the Schenectady station. Amtrak already controls the also will be considered. Of interest in the report was that 62% 9 mile segment west of Schenectady to Hoffmans at CP 169 of the Lake Shore’s passengers are female and that 61% of where the CSX freight line from Selkirk Yard joins the main passengers are traveling alone. The top three city pairs on the line heading west. CSX will retain full freight rights on the Lake Shore Limited are: New York-Chicago, Buffalo-Chicago, leased line. and Syracuse-Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • Trails in the Niagara River Greenway
    Lower River Upper River The Headwaters LAKE ONTARIO 4 1 2 5 93 3 y. Pk es s PORTER Mo ert b Ro 6 7 Buffalo Ave. 7 8 1 WHEATFIELD 9 18 3 4 5 Ri NIAGARA RIVER ver Rd. LEWISTON 2 8 104 17 CITY OF NORTH 22 VILLAGE OF 190 14 LEWISTON TONAWANDA THE LANDSCAPE 1 12 15 15 16 14 16 TUSCARORA 13 CANADA 18 Parks INDIAN RESERVARION 12 17 E. Robinson KENMORE 17 21 2 GRAND ISLAND 23-26 Aqua Lane Park . 1 13 CANADA Whitehaven Rd. 27/28 34 Black Rock Canal Park. 3 11 . 30-33 20 19 Broderick Park . 3 22 er Rd40 Buffalo River Fest Park . 68 31 23 Riv 4 17 21 38 CITY OF 5 198 16 20 H Cazenovia Park* . 92 10 13 yde 37 TONAWANDA 36 290 Delaware Park* . 13 8 11,12 P 9 190 Lockport Rd. 35 265 Forest 15 27 ar Erie Basin Marina & Gardents . 65 25 k 31 26 30 Front Park* . 25 190 NIAGARA d. Baseline Rd. West Ferry East Ferry R Gallagher Beach . .. 90 28 29 WHEATFIELD r TONAWANDA 20 33 e CITY OF 34 Rd. Ward Sheridan Dr. LaSalle Park . 33 CANADA 21 e. Riv t. BUFFALO 67 Av NIAGARA FALLS 66 S . e Niaga Martin Luther King Jr. Park*. 30 r ra Falls B 22 26 30 35 36 lvd. 68 Rd wa 190 2 23 a Main y Riverside Park* . 62 25 l 31 37 38/39 Ni 27 ar 24 ag De it l South Park* . 93 41 40-54 i 33 63 65 41 KENMORE ara M 33 56 57 58-60 64 Squaw Island Park.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning Urban and Regional Planning January 2007 High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2 Allison deCerreno Shishir Mathur San Jose State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/urban_plan_pub Part of the Infrastructure Commons, Public Economics Commons, Public Policy Commons, Real Estate Commons, Transportation Commons, Urban, Community and Regional Planning Commons, Urban Studies Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation Allison deCerreno and Shishir Mathur. "High-Speed Rail Projects in the United States: Identifying the Elements of Success Part 2" Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning (2007). This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Urban and Regional Planning at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Urban and Regional Planning by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MTI Report 06-03 MTI HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS-PART 2 IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS-PART HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: Funded by U.S. Department of HIGH-SPEED RAIL Transportation and California Department PROJECTS IN THE UNITED of Transportation STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS PART 2 Report 06-03 Mineta Transportation November Institute Created by 2006 Congress in 1991 MTI REPORT 06-03 HIGH-SPEED RAIL PROJECTS IN THE UNITED STATES: IDENTIFYING THE ELEMENTS OF SUCCESS PART 2 November 2006 Allison L.
    [Show full text]
  • Syracuse Transit System Analysis
    Syracuse Transit System Analysis Prepared For: NYSDOT CENTRO Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council January 2014 The I‐81 Challenge Syracuse Transit System Analysis This report has been prepared for the New York State Department of Transportation by: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Prudent Engineering In coordination with: Central New York Regional Transportation Authority (CENTRO) Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council The I‐81 Challenge Executive Summary of the Syracuse Transit System Analysis I. Introduction The Syracuse Transit System Analysis (STSA) presents a summary of the methodology, evaluation, and recommendations that were developed for the transit system in the Syracuse metropolitan area. The recommendations included in this document will provide a public transit system plan that can be used as a basis for CENTRO to pursue state and federal funding sources for transit improvements. The study has been conducted with funding from the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) through The I‐81 Challenge study, with coordination from CENTRO, the Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council (SMTC), and through public outreach via The I‐81 Challenge public participation plan and Study Advisory Committee (SAC). The recommendations included in this system analysis are based on a combination of technical analyses (alternatives evaluation, regional modeling), public survey of current transit riders and non‐riders/former riders, meetings with key community representatives, and The I‐81 Challenge public workshops. The STSA is intended to serve as a long‐range vision that is consistent with the overall vision of the I‐81 corridor being developed as part of The I‐81 Challenge. The STSA will present a series of short‐term, mid‐term, and long‐ term recommendations detailing how the Syracuse metropolitan area’s transit system could be structured to meet identified needs in a cost‐effective manner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Empire State Express Races Toward Buffalo Headlight NEWS BRIEFS SEPTEMBER, 1964
    SEPTEMBER • 1964 The Empire State Express Races Toward Buffalo Headlight NEWS BRIEFS SEPTEMBER, 1964 Vol. 25 No. 8 LOADINGS OF REVENUE CARS... net income figure is the highest since the first Printed in U.S.A. for the New York Central System reached a total six months of 1957. of 123,534 during the month of July. The figure On the other hand, however, it was also reported IN THIS ISSUE represents a decrease of 4,241 cars (or 1.8 per cent) by the Association that 23 of the 101 railroads did from July, 1963. not earn enough operating revenues to cover their NEWS BRIEFS 3 Varying amounts of decreases were noted in fixed charges for the first six months of 1964. FREIGHT SERVICE CENTER .... 4 all commodity classifications over the July, 1963, • • • HANDLING DIMENSION LOADS . 6 period. These ranged from automobile revenue PROMOTIONS 7 car loadings, which dropped to a total of 3,409 cars (or BILLION-DOLLAR IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ... HEADLIGHT HILITES 8 18.3 per cent), to packing house products, down has given American railroads their most extensive FLEXI-VAN & CHICAGO DIAL ...10 53 cars (or 1 per cent) from July of last year. physical face-lifting in the past six years. The STEEL SHUTTLE 10 In the period from January 1st to July 31st, 1964, figure is for 1963 and may be exceeded by 25 per cent P&LE CROSSES A RIVER .... 1 1 car loadings totaled 1,710,525. This represents a in 1964, according to J. Elmer Monroe, an official SAFETY MEMO 12 decrease of 16,432 (or 1 per cent) from the correspond• of the Association of American Railroads.
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Blue Ribbon Panel on Hyperloop
    Chairman Lt. Governor Mike Kehoe Vice Chairman Andrew G. Smith Panelists Jeff Aboussie Cathy Bennett Tom Blair Travis Brown Mun Choi Tom Dempsey Rob Dixon Warren Erdman Rep. Travis Fitzwater Michael X. Gallagher Rep. Derek Grier Chris Gutierrez Rhonda Hamm-Niebruegge Mike Lally Mary Lamie Elizabeth Loboa Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer MISSOURI BLUE RIBBON Patrick McKenna Dan Mehan Joe Reagan Clint Robinson PANEL ON HYPERLOOP Sen. Caleb Rowden Greg Steinhoff Report prepared for The Honorable Elijah Haahr Tariq Taherbhai Leonard Toenjes Speaker of the Missouri House of Representatives Bill Turpin Austin Walker Ryan Weber Sen. Brian Williams Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 A National Certification Track in Missouri .................................................................................................... 8 Track Specifications ................................................................................................................................. 10 SECTION 1: International Tube Transport Center of Excellence (ITTCE) ................................................... 12 Center Objectives ................................................................................................................................ 12 Research Areas ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Syracuse Consolidated Plan Year 30 2004-2005
    Mayor Matthew J. Driscoll City of Syracuse Consolidated Plan Year 30 2004-2005 Prepared by the Department of Community Development 201 E. Washington Street, Room 612 Syracuse, New York 13202 April 2004 Consolidated Plan 2004-2005 Public Comments Consolidated Plan 2004-2005 Public Hearing March 29, 2004 Consolidated Plan 2004-2005 Newspaper Articles Draft Consolidated Plan 2004-2005 Announcement of Availability Draft Consolidated Plan 2004-2005 Public Meeting March 10, 2004 Community Needs Meeting October 23, 2003 Request for Proposals September 2003 Table of Contents 2004-2005 (Year 30) Consolidated Plan Page No. Executive Summary 1 Section 1 Introduction 10 Purpose 11 Key Participants 13 Citizen Participation 18 Community Profile 35 Section 2 Housing Market Analysis 41 Housing Market Study 42 Syracuse Housing Authority 45 Assisted Housing 55 Continuum of Care Strategy 61 Barriers to Affordable Housing 76 Fair Housing Initiatives 79 Section 3 Housing and Homeless Needs Assessment 90 Housing Needs 91 Housing Needs Assessment 92 Homeless Population Needs 99 Special Needs Population 106 Section 4 Economic Development 112 Section 5 Historic Preservation 124 Collaborative Preservation Efforts 125 Historic Preservation: 290 E. Onondaga Street 126 Section 6 Strategic Plan 140 Housing Strategic Plan 141 Homeless Strategic Plan 146 Community Development Strategic Plan 147 Public Facilities 148 Planning & Administration 149 Infrastructure 150 Public Services 151 Economic Development 152 Barriers to Affordable Housing 156 Lead-Based Paint Hazards
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Building Project
    BUFFALO BUILDING reuse PROJECT Developed at the request of Mayor Byron Brown TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary............................................................... pg 2 Project Recommendations - Overview..................................... pg 3-4 Project Background............................................................... pg 5 Project Participants............................................................... pg 6 Project Scope and Focus........................................................ pg 7-11 Downtown Challenges and Opportunities............................... pg 12-16 Project Recommendations in Detail........................................ pg 17-25 Anticipated Outcomes........................................................... pg 26-28 Resources and References .................................................... pg 29-30 Resources and References................................................... Thank you to National Fuel for their generous support on this project 1 Buffalo Building Reuse | Report 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY visible part. However, redeveloping To stimulate near-term investments Mayor Brown calls for downtown’s class B and C buildings in this type of redevelopment, recommendations to entails a difficult and complicated it is recommended programs revitalize downtown and process, which requires a multi-year and incentives be targeted to dedicated investment of resources strategic mixed use and residential encourage investment. (staff, tools and funding), which should opportunities. These programs come
    [Show full text]
  • Final Alternatives Selection Report: Identification of Reasonable and Feasible Passenger Rail Alternatives
    Final Alternatives Selection Report: Identification of Reasonable and Feasible Passenger Rail Alternatives Milwaukee-Twin Cities High-Speed Rail Corridor Program Prepared for: Minnesota Department of Transportation Wisconsin Department of Transportation Prepared by: Quandel Consultants, LLC Version: October 26, 2011 Revised November 1, 2012 Alternatives Selection Report Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………………………...vi 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Purpose of Alternatives Selection Report .................................................................................. 1‐1 1.2 Background of Midwest Regional Rail Initiative ........................................................................ 1‐1 1.3 Background of Milwaukee‐Twin Cities High‐Speed Rail Corridor Program ............................... 1‐4 1.4 Project Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................... 1‐13 1.5 Route Alternatives Analysis ..................................................................................................... 1‐15 1.6 Public Involvement ................................................................................................................... 1‐16 1.7 Identification of Potential Passenger Rail Alternatives ............................................................ 1‐17 1.8 Technical Documentation .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION ANNOUNCES PLANS for SCHENECTADY RAIL STATION Project to Be Bid in January, Construction Set to Start in Spring
    For Immediate Release: Thursday, Oct. 29, 2015 Contact: Gary Holmes | [email protected] | (518) 457-6400 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ANNOUNCES PLANS FOR SCHENECTADY RAIL STATION Project to be Bid in January, Construction Set to Start in Spring New York State Department of Transportation Commissioner Matthew J. Driscoll today announced plans for the new Schenectady Train Station, which will be a modern, fully accessible transportation hub connecting travelers to New York City, Niagara Falls and destinations between and beyond. Station construction is scheduled to get under way in the spring. “The new Schenectady rail station is one more way Governor Cuomo is leveraging smart investments in transportation to support business, tourism and local economies across New York,” Commissioner Driscoll said. “A new train station in downtown Schenectady will help further the city’s resurgence and support local revitalization efforts.” NYSDOT today issued a pre-bid notice containing important contract details for perspective project contractors. Bidding details, including project plans and specifications, will be available in December. Bid proposals will be due in January. Station construction is expected to start next spring as the new second rail track between Albany and Schenectady is being placed. The double track will help minimize train delays between the two cities, enhancing service all along Amtrak’s Empire Corridor. Station construction is expected to be completed in early 2018. The design of the new Schenectady Station is inspired by the aesthetics and architecture of the former Union Station, built on the same site in 1910. The new station, which will be owned by Amtrak, will be slightly larger than the existing station, which was built in the 1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Buffalo Harbor Brownfield Opportunity Area
    BUFFALO HARBOR BROWNFIELD OPPORTUNITY AREA NOMINATION DOCUMENT JULY 2014 WORKING DRAFT (MAPS/GRAPHICS INCOMPLETE) This document was prepared for the City of Buffalo and the New York State Department of State with state funds provided through the Brownfield Opportunity Areas Program. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Project Description ……………………………………………….……… 1 2. Community Participation …………………………………………..……. 5 3. Analysis ………………………………………………………………….. 9 4. Inventory …………………………………………………….…………… 22 5. Alternative Scenarios Exercise …………………………………….…….. 75 6. Land Use Plan …..……..……………………..………………..…….…… 86 Appendix A: Place Type Definitions …………….……..……..…………. 90 MAPS 1. Boundaries 17. Existing Land Use 2. Soils 18. Land Ownership 3. Topography 19. Large Parcels 4. Wetlands and Flood Hazard Areas 20. Key Buildings 5. Water Infrastructure 21. Major Facilities 6. Sewer Infrastructure 22. Underutilized Sites 7. Pedestrian/Bicycle Infrastructure 23. Potential Brownfields 8. Public Transportation Infrastructure 24. Strategic Sites 9. Road Infrastructure 25. North Scenario 1 10. Rail Infrastructure 26. North Scenario 2 11. Navigable Waterways 27. North Scenario 3 12. Parks and Open Space 28. South Scenario 1 13. Trails 29. South Scenario 2 14. Water Access 30. South Scenario 3 15. Archeological / Historical Resources 31. Proposed Place Types 16. Existing Zoning 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 1.1 OVERVIEW The City of Buffalo was awarded New York State Department of State funding to establish a Buffalo Harbor Brownfield Opportunity Area. This funding allows recipients to plan for the revitalization of underutilized, vacant, and brownfield sites by establishing a vision for their redevelopment, and strategies to return the sites to productive use. The 1,045-acre Buffalo Harbor BOA includes the Inner and Outer Harbors and a portion of the city’s Central Business District.
    [Show full text]
  • CED-78-80 Commuter Railroad Safety Activities on Conrail's Lines in New
    DOURPSNT RESURE 05618 - [B07656911 to Z A Com,:ter ailroad Safety Activities on Conrail's Lies in ew York Should Be Iproved. CD-78-80; B-164497(5). arch 15, 1978. Released arch 15, 19780 27 pp. + 5 appendices (12 pp.). Report to Rsp. Fred B. Rooey, Chairman, ouse Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce: Transportation and Commerce Subcommittee; by obert F. Keller, cting Comptroller General. Issue Area: Transportation Syst,i~s and Policies (2400). contact: Cosaunity and conomic Developseut Div. Budget Function: Conserce and Traasportation: Ground Transportation (404). Organization Concerned: Department of T ansportation; Federal Railroad Adainistration. Consolidated Rail Corp. Congressional Reevance: ouse Cosmittee on Iterstate and Foreign Coamore; House Coamittee on Interstate and Foreign Coamerce: Transportation ani Coamerce Subcommittee; Senate Committee o Commserce. Rep. Fred B. Rooney. Authority: Locomotive Inspection Act (45 U.S.C. 22). ccident Reforts Act (45 U.S.C. 38). ors of Service Act (45 U.S.C. 61). signal Inspection ct 49 U.S.C. 26). Federal Railroad Safety Act ,f 1970. 45 U.S.C. 431. =49 C.P.R. 213. 49 C..R. 230. 49 .i.R. 236. =49 C.F.R. 217. 49 C.F.R. 228. The Federal Railroad Adainistration (RA) is responsible for regulating safety functions, investigating acci.dent and issuing reports on them, and adinistering railroad safety laws. The Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), which operates cosmuter services in the few York metropolitan aria, is responsible for implementing safety requirements through inspection, setting of standards, accident reporting, and recordkeeping. T'indings/Conclusicns: Conrail did rot conduct all safety activities prescribed by FRA regulations.
    [Show full text]