Table 7 — National Wilderness Areas by State

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Table 7 — National Wilderness Areas by State Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,769 86 25,855 Alabama Totals 42,217 86 42,303 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 74,785 515 75,300 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 5 5 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,089 0 19,089 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,900 7 39,907 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 967,423 32,197 999,620 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,698 15 60,713 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,685 0 4,685 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,143,404 237 2,143,641 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 47,106 0 47,106 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,267 41 23,308 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 336,149 69 336,218 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 316,704 0 316,704 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,676 835 83,511 South Prince of Wales Wilderness Tongass National Forest 87,304 57 87,361 Stikine-LeConte Wilderness Tongass National Forest 438,119 1,908 440,027 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 5 5 Tebenkof Bay Wilderness Tongass National Forest 67,908 29 67,937 Tracy Arm-Fords Terror Wilderness Tongass National Forest 648,931 7 648,938 Warren Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 11,341 0 11,341 West Chichagof-Yakobi Wilderness Tongass National Forest 272,066 855 272,921 Alaska Totals 5,739,951 37,466 5,777,417 Arizona Apache Creek Wilderness Prescott National Forest 5,633 0 5,633 Bear Wallow Wilderness** Apache National Forest* 11,229 0 11,229 Castle Creek Wilderness Prescott National Forest 25,456 0 25,456 Cedar Bench Wilderness** Prescott National Forest 15,988 0 15,988 Tonto National Forest 21 0 21 Chiricahua Wilderness Coronado National Forest* 87,182 0 87,182 Escudilla Wilderness** Apache National Forest* 5,158 0 5,158 Fossil Springs Wilderness** Coconino National Forest 10,434 0 10,434 Four Peaks Wilderness Tonto National Forest 60,717 18 60,735 Galiuro Wilderness Coronado National Forest* 77,584 0 77,584 Granite Mountain (AZ) Wilderness Prescott National Forest 9,804 0 9,804 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Hellsgate Wilderness Tonto National Forest 37,366 91 37,457 Juniper Mesa Wilderness Prescott National Forest 7,550 0 7,550 Kachina Peaks Wilderness** Coconino National Forest 18,717 0 18,717 Kanab Creek Wilderness** Kaibab National Forest 61,522 0 61,522 Kendrick Mountain Wilderness** Coconino National Forest 2,447 0 2,447 Kaibab National Forest 4,217 0 4,217 Mazatzal Wilderness Coconino National Forest 2,610 0 2,610 Tonto National Forest 247,660 50 247,710 Miller Peak Wilderness** Coronado National Forest* 20,250 0 20,250 Mount Baldy Wilderness Apache National Forest* 6,814 0 6,814 Mt. Wrightson Wilderness** Coronado National Forest* 25,141 0 25,141 Munds Mountain Wilderness** Coconino National Forest 18,109 0 18,109 Pajarita Wilderness Coronado National Forest* 7,499 0 7,499 Pine Mountain Wilderness Prescott National Forest 8,548 0 8,548 Tonto National Forest 11,505 0 11,505 Pusch Ridge Wilderness** Coronado National Forest* 56,965 0 56,965 Red Rock-Secret Mountain Wilderness** Coconino National Forest 48,315 1 48,316 Rincon Mountain Wilderness** Coronado National Forest* 36,954 0 36,954 Saddle Mountain Wilderness Kaibab National Forest 41,140 0 41,140 Salome Wilderness Tonto National Forest 18,534 0 18,534 Salt River Canyon Wilderness Tonto National Forest 32,114 7 32,121 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Santa Teresa Wilderness** Coronado National Forest* 26,909 0 26,909 Sierra Ancha Wilderness Tonto National Forest 21,000 0 21,000 Strawberry Crater Wilderness Coconino National Forest 10,414 0 10,414 Superstition Wilderness Tonto National Forest 160,276 5 160,281 Sycamore Canyon Wilderness Coconino National Forest 23,961 1 23,962 Kaibab National Forest 8,011 0 8,011 Prescott National Forest 26,469 0 26,469 West Clear Creek Wilderness** Coconino National Forest 15,468 0 15,468 Wet Beaver Wilderness Coconino National Forest 6,178 0 6,178 Woodchute Wilderness Prescott National Forest 5,887 0 5,887 Arizona Totals 1,327,756 173 1,327,929 Arkansas Black Fork Mountain Wilderness Ouachita National Forest* 8,249 79 8,328 Caney Creek Wilderness Ouachita National Forest* 14,290 0 14,290 Dry Creek Wilderness Ouachita National Forest* 6,301 0 6,301 East Fork Wilderness Ozark National Forest 10,585 0 10,585 Flatside Wilderness Ouachita National Forest* 9,540 0 9,540 Hurricane Creek Wilderness Ozark National Forest 15,214 119 15,333 Leatherwood Wilderness Ozark National Forest 16,652 139 16,791 Poteau Mountain Wilderness Ouachita National Forest* 11,142 0 11,142 Richland Creek Wilderness Ozark National Forest 11,664 10 11,674 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Upper Buffalo Wilderness Ozark National Forest 12,018 39 12,057 Arkansas Totals 115,655 386 116,041 California Agua Tibia Wilderness Cleveland National Forest 15,898 0 15,898 Agua Tibia Wilderness** Cleveland National Forest 1,530 0 1,530 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 524 524 Ansel Adams Wilderness Inyo National Forest* 78,183 1 78,184 Sierra National Forest 152,134 41 152,175 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 673 673 Ansel Adams Wilderness** Inyo National Forest* 526 0 526 Bighorn Mountain Wilderness San Bernardino National Forest 12,045 0 12,045 Bucks Lake Wilderness** Plumas National Forest 23,735 42 23,777 Cahuilla Mountain Wilderness** San Bernardino National Forest 5,608 0 5,608 Caribou Wilderness** Lassen National Forest 20,833 0 20,833 Carson-Iceberg Wilderness Toiyabe National Forest* 77,885 954 78,839 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 270 270 Carson-Iceberg Wilderness** Stanislaus National Forest 80,235 1 80,236 Castle Crags Wilderness** Shasta National Forest 10,610 469 11,079 Chanchelulla Wilderness** Trinity National Forest 8,062 0 8,062 Chumash Wilderness** Los Padres National Forest 37,791 1 37,792 Cucamonga Wilderness Angeles National Forest 4,204 0 4,204 San Bernardino National Forest 8,787 0 8,787 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Desolation Wilderness Eldorado National Forest* 64,051 4 64,055 Dick Smith Wilderness** Los Padres National Forest 71,364 3 71,367 Dinkey Lakes Wilderness Sierra National Forest 30,863 0 30,863 Domeland Wilderness Sequoia National Forest 94,592 80 94,672 Emigrant Wilderness Stanislaus National Forest 112,721 61 112,782 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 19 19 Garcia Wilderness** Los Padres National Forest 13,912 4 13,916 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 138 138 Golden Trout Wilderness Inyo National Forest* 192,513 1,214 193,727 Sequoia National Forest 111,254 401 111,655 Granite Chief Wilderness Tahoe National Forest 25,111 149 25,260 Granite Mountain (CA) Wilderness** Inyo National Forest* 3,003 0 3,003 Hauser Wilderness Cleveland National Forest 6,919 278 7,197 Hoover Wilderness** Inyo National Forest* 28,586 28 28,614 Stanislaus National Forest 1 0 1 Toiyabe National Forest* 99,536 66 99,602 Inyo Mountains Wilderness Inyo National Forest* 73,799 0 73,799 Ishi Wilderness Lassen National Forest 41,197 623 41,820 Jennie Lakes Wilderness Sequoia National Forest 10,509 1 10,510 John Muir Wilderness Inyo National Forest* 229,127 111 229,238 Sierra National Forest 352,758 751 353,509 Processed Date: 2/5/2014 Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage John Muir Wilderness** Inyo National Forest*
Recommended publications
  • 1 Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain
    Nevada Areas of Heavy Use December 14, 2013 Trish Swain, Co-Ordinator TrailSafe Nevada 1285 Baring Blvd. Sparks, NV 89434 [email protected] Nev. Dept. of Cons. & Natural Resources | NV.gov | Governor Brian Sandoval | Nev. Maps NEVADA STATE PARKS http://parks.nv.gov/parks/parks-by-name/ Beaver Dam State Park Berlin-Ichthyosaur State Park Big Bend of the Colorado State Recreation Area Cathedral Gorge State Park Cave Lake State Park Dayton State Park Echo Canyon State Park Elgin Schoolhouse State Historic Site Fort Churchill State Historic Park Kershaw-Ryan State Park Lahontan State Recreation Area Lake Tahoe Nevada State Park Sand Harbor Spooner Backcountry Cave Rock Mormon Station State Historic Park Old Las Vegas Mormon Fort State Historic Park Rye Patch State Recreation Area South Fork State Recreation Area Spring Mountain Ranch State Park Spring Valley State Park Valley of Fire State Park Ward Charcoal Ovens State Historic Park Washoe Lake State Park Wild Horse State Recreation Area A SOURCE OF INFORMATION http://www.nvtrailmaps.com/ Great Basin Institute 16750 Mt. Rose Hwy. Reno, NV 89511 Phone: 775.674.5475 Fax: 775.674.5499 NEVADA TRAILS Top Searched Trails: Jumbo Grade Logandale Trails Hunter Lake Trail Whites Canyon route Prison Hill 1 TOURISM AND TRAVEL GUIDES – ALL ONLINE http://travelnevada.com/travel-guides/ For instance: Rides, Scenic Byways, Indian Territory, skiing, museums, Highway 50, Silver Trails, Lake Tahoe, Carson Valley, Eastern Nevada, Southern Nevada, Southeast95 Adventure, I 80 and I50 NEVADA SCENIC BYWAYS Lake
    [Show full text]
  • A Summer Vacation in Arizona
    JUNE 1959 FORTY CENTS IN THIS ISSUE: ASummer Vacation In Arizona VOL. XXXV NO. 6 JUNE 1959 You can't always tell by the cool calculations of the RAYMOND CARLSON, Editor calendar or the bobbing babble of the thermometer. The GEORGE M. A VEY, Art Editor testimony of the wayward sun is not always reliable. You JAMES E . STEVENS, Business Manager awaken one fine morning and for some indefinable reason LEGEND you know summer is just around the corner. There is a languor in the shadows and a soft sleepiness in the air that ARIZONA'S TIM BERED TREASURE 2 FORESTS OF STATE PRODUCE RICHES bespeak summer's approach. There is a drowsiness in the IN I.UMB E, R, Rf:C REATJO NAL ACTIVITIES. gossip of the green, green leaves caressed by the soft, THE PARADOX OF A LA\'A FLOW 8 warm breeze. You know that spring has had her Ring VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS IN NORTHERN ARIZONA CHANGED ENRICHED LAND. and another season is getting ready to cavort over the AN ARIZONA S ui\ Ii\TER VACATION landscape. //~-- ~.-.....,, ~ - JF YOU PL AN YO UR VACATION W"ELL, YOU'LL HAVE ONE COOL AND CAREFREE. we afe -n'i uch conce'_r.n'ea with summer this issue and SNOW IN JuLY 28 our p/ ges are an invitatiot~ ''.1} y ou to plan a cool and WHCN YOU CLIMB SA N FRANCISCO PEAKS careffee vacation in, our state.·, AiJ 'Of Northern Arizona ' , ,_ •. • IN J ULY YOU RUN INTO SURPRISES. is a huge sm:nmer v,ac~ti911 playgrouh~, where the scenery LONG MEADOW RANCH 34 is superb aricF1th.~' )-v:i::i:ther admirable -' for those who like Tms RANCH IN YAVAPAI COUNTY IS ONE //;') \ .
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Meeting Packet
    PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE Nevada Land Management Task Force (Established Pursuant to Assembly Bill 227 enacted in the 2013 Legislative Session) August 16, 2013, 1:00 p.m. Eureka Opera House 31 S. Main St. Eureka, NV 89316 AGENDA Some Task Force members may attend via telephone from other locations. Items on the agenda may be taken out of order. The Task Force may combine two or more agenda items for consideration. The Task Force may remove an item from the agenda or delay discussion relating to an item on the agenda at any time. Call to Order, Roll Call 1. Public Comment. Please Limit Comments to 3 Minutes 2. Approval of Agenda. For Possible Action. 3. Approval of the Minutes of the June 28, 2013 Meeting of the Nevada Land Management Task Force. For Possible Action. (Attachment) 4. Overview of Legislation in Other Western States Regarding the Transfer of Public Lands. 5. Presentation on Studies Commissioned by Eureka County in 1994 and 1996 on Public Lands Transfer Issues. 6. Initial Discussion on Potential Lands to be Included in a Transfer of Public Lands from the Federal Government to Nevada. (Attachment) 7. Initial Discussion of Cost and Revenue Implications of the Transfer of Public Lands to Nevada. (Attachment) 8. Initial Discussion on Transferring Multiple Uses, Including but not Limited to Outdoor Recreation, Mining and Prospecting, Timber, Grazing, and Fish and Wildlife Purposes, with the Transfer of Public Lands. 9. Initial Discussion on Which Public Lands, if Transferred to State Ownership, Should be Sold or Exchanged into the Private Sector and How Should the Sales Take Place? 10.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2018 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2018 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2018 As of September 30, 2018 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, D.C. 20250-0003 Web site: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover photo courtesy of: Chris Chavez Statistics are current as of: 10/15/2018 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,948,059 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 506 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 128 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 446 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The FS also administers several other types of nationally-designated areas: 1 National Historic Area in 1 State 1 National Scenic Research Area in 1 State 1 Scenic Recreation Area in 1 State 1 Scenic Wildlife Area in 1 State 2 National Botanical Areas in 1 State 2 National Volcanic Monument Areas in 2 States 2 Recreation Management Areas in 2 States 6 National Protection Areas in 3 States 8 National Scenic Areas in 6 States 12 National Monument Areas in 6 States 12 Special Management Areas in 5 States 21 National Game Refuge or Wildlife Preserves in 12 States 22 National Recreation Areas in 20 States Table of Contents Acreage Calculation ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix F3.14 Special Designations
    Appendix F3.14 Special Designations Clark, Lincoln, and White Pine Counties Groundwater Development Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement 228 ALT 93 93 Elko County White Pine County 278 Tooele County 2 Callao 489 Juab County Blue Mass Scenic Area 893 Gandy Salt Marsh Juab County 892 93 Millard County Eureka Opt. 1 McGill Delta Gandy Mountain Caves 50 486 Swamp Cedar Ely Rose Guano Bat Cave Baker Eureka Honeymoon Archaeological Site County Hill / City of Rocks Eskdale 6 White Pine County 487 159 Baker Snake Creek Nye County Shoshone Ponds Garrison Indian Burial Cave Fossil Mountain Opt. 2 894 Wah Baking Powder Flat Wah 318 Mountains 15 Sev Millard County Coun 6 Beaver County 21 White River Valley 93 Beaver County Iron County Opt. 3 Nye County Highland Range Lincoln County 375 Pioche Condor Canyon Panaca Garfield County Pahroc Rock Art Schlesser Mount Irish Pincushion 56 Iron County 318 Caliente 120 Hiko Washington County Opt. 4 317 93 Alamo Shooting Upper Beaver Kane Gallery Lower Meadow Dam Wash Valley Wash County Lower Meadow 89 Valley Mormon Wash 15 Mesa - Ely Nevada Utah Kane Springs Mormon Mesa - Ely Arizona 389 Lincoln County Mesquite Beaver Dam Slope Mormon Mesa Clark County 15 168 Virgin River Mormon Mesa/Arrow Canyon Virgin Mountains Project Components Gold Buried Storage Reservoir and Indian Coyote Arrow Canyon Springs Butte, Water Treatment Facility Springs 95 Part A Construction Support Area Pressure Reducing Station Primary Electrical Substation Hidden Secondary Electrical Substation Valley Pumping Station and Primary
    [Show full text]
  • The Wild Cascades
    THE WILD CASCADES Fall, 1984 2 The Wild Cascades PRESIDENT'S MESSAGE ONCE THE LINES ARE DRAWN, THE BATTLE IS NOT OVER The North Cascades Conservation Council has developed a reputation for consistent, hard-hitting, responsible action to protect wildland resources in the Washington Cascades. It is perhaps best known for leading the fight to preserve and protect the North Cascades in the North Cascades National Park, the Pasayten and Glacier Peak Wilderness Areas, and the Ross Lake and Lake Chelan National Recreation Areas. Despite the recent passage of the Washington Wilderness Act, many areas which deserve and require wilderness designation remain unprotected. One of the goals of the N3C must be to assure protection for these areas. In this issue of the Wild Cascades we have analyzed the Washington Wilderness Act to see what we won and what still hangs in the balance (page ). The N3C will continue to fight to establish new wilderness areas, but there is also a new challenge. Our expertise is increasingly being sought by government agencies to assist in developing appropriate management plans and to support them against attempts to undermine such plans. The invitation to participate more fully in management activities will require considerable effort, but it represents a challenge and an opportunity that cannot be ignored. If we are to meet this challenge we will need members who are either knowledgable or willing to learn about an issue and to guide the Board in its actions. The Spring issue of the Wild Cascades carried a center section with two requests: 1) volunteers to assist and guide the organization on various issues; and 2) payment of dues.
    [Show full text]
  • DIVISION C—OTHER PROVISIONS TITLE III—WHITE PINE COUNTY CON- SERVATION, RECREATION, and DE- VELOPMENT Subtitle A—Land Disp
    G:\COMP\109\WHITE PINE COUNTY CONSERVATION, RECREATION, A....XML White Pine County Conservation, Recreation, and Development Act of 2006 [Title III of division C of Public Law 109–432] [As Amended Through P.L. 116–9, Enacted March 12, 2019] øCurrency: This publication is a compilation of the text of Public Law 109–432. It was last amended by the public law listed in the As Amended Through note above and below at the bottom of each page of the pdf version and reflects current law through the date of the enactment of the public law listed at https:// www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/comps/¿ øNote: While this publication does not represent an official version of any Federal statute, substantial efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of its contents. The official version of Federal law is found in the United States Statutes at Large and in the United States Code. The legal effect to be given to the Statutes at Large and the United States Code is established by statute (1 U.S.C. 112, 204).¿ AN ACT To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expiring provisions, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, * * * * * * * DIVISION C—OTHER PROVISIONS * * * * * * * TITLE III—WHITE PINE COUNTY CON- SERVATION, RECREATION, AND DE- VELOPMENT SEC. 301. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec- essary to carry out this title. SEC. 302. ø16 U.S.C. 1241 note¿ SHORT TITLE This title may be cited as the ‘‘White Pine County Conserva- tion, Recreation, and Development Act of 2006’’.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Use and Seasonal Movement of Isolated Mountain Goat Populations in the North Cascades, WA
    Space Use and Seasonal Movement of Isolated Mountain Goat Populations in the North Cascades, WA Jennifer Sevigny ( [email protected] ) Amanda Summers: Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, Natural Resources Department, 22712 6th Avenue NE, Arlington, WA 98223 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1839-3872 Amanda Summers Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians Emily George-Wirtz Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Research Keywords: mountain goat, home range, spatial overlap, utilization distribution overlap index, seasonal range, Cascades Posted Date: October 5th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-84165/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/25 Abstract Background: The spatial distribution and seasonal movement patterns of isolated populations of mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) in the North Cascade range of Washington State is not fully understood. Determining harvest potential in these populations is challenging without a clear understanding of spatiotemporal movement, space use, and spatial overlap. Mountain goat populations in the North Cascades are fragmented and many have declined considerably from historic estimates. Identication of harvestable populations requires a clear understanding of population size, distribution, and movement. We investigated the population trends and spatial distribution of mountain goats in the Boulder River North Harvest Area in Boulder River Wilderness of Washington State. Methods: We reviewed recent mountain goat population estimates and used Global Positioning System collar data to determine year-round and seasonal home range distributions, spatial overlap within these ranges, and proximity of mountain goats to roads and trails. Results: We found 2 populations of mountain goats inhabiting the Whitehorse and Three Fingers Mountains in the Boulder River North Harvest Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Ranger at Wori(
    FOREST RANGER AT WORI( TilE 1961 \EARBOOK l T. s. IJEP \RTME T 0(· GRICULTU RE FOREST SER\ ICE I Tt:HlUl)ll. '1'\1110 HEGIO: FOREWORD The story of the Forest Ranger, key man in multiple-use management of the National Forests, is told in this booklet.Professionally trained, through college courses and the realities of work on the range and in the woods, he faces the challenge of making multiple use work. His is a tale of public service, hard work, long hours, but deep satisfaction. The Forest Ranger's work has been guided over the years by the principles of multiple use and sustained yield - "for the greatest good of the greatest number in the long run." With the enactment of the Multiple Use-Sustained Yield Act on June 12, 1960, he was given a mandate to guide him and broaden his understanding. It set forth the coordination requirenients needed in the management of land under his jurisdiction in the best long-time interest for the people of America. Multiple-use management provides for a system of zoning which recog- nizes that while there are great differences in the climate, vegetation, development and use of National Forest lands, itis possible to group similar areas for management purposes. In the first grouping are three zones based on climatic andvegetative similarities; the Crest Zone, the Intermediate Zone and theFoothill Zone. Superimposed on these, either within a single zone or in parts ofseveral are the Water and TravelInfluence Zones. Then, in a separate category are the Special Zones which include areas established byregulation for specific purposes; wilderness, scenic andarchaeological.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Joel Holtrop Deputy Chief for the National Forest System U.S
    Final Testimony 1 Statement of Joel Holtrop Deputy Chief for the National Forest System U.S. Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Before the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Natural Resources Committee United States House of Representatives November 13, 2007 Concerning H.R. 2334, Rocky Mountain National Park Wilderness and Indian Peaks Wilderness Expansion Act H.R. 3287, Tumacacori Highlands Wilderness Act of 2007 H.R. 3513, Copper Salmon Wilderness Act H.R. 3682, California Desert and Mountain Heritage Act Mr. Chairman and members of the subcommittee, I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today to provide the Department’s view on the Rocky Mountain National Park Wilderness and Indian Peaks Wilderness Expansion Act, the Tumacacori Highlands Wilderness Act of 2007, the Copper Salmon Wilderness Act, and the California Desert and Mountain Heritage Act. I will address each of these individually. H.R. 2334, Rocky Mountain National Park Wilderness and Indian Peaks Wilderness Expansion Act Section 6 of H.R. 2332 would remove acreage from the Arapaho National Recreation Area in the Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest and designate the land as an addition to the existing Indian Peaks Wilderness Area. The Department of Agriculture supports the addition to the Indian Peaks Wilderness. We defer to the Department of the Interior regarding those portions of the bill affecting lands administered by the National Park Service. H.R. 3287, Tumacacori Highlands Wilderness Act of 2007 This bill would designate new wilderness areas on the Coronado National Forest in Arizona by expanding the Pajarita Wilderness approximately 5,500 acres (for a total of about 13,300 acres) and designating some additional 70,000 acres as the Tumacacori Highlands Wilderness.
    [Show full text]