During a Visit to Wilsons Promontory, Victoria, in November 1978, P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

During a Visit to Wilsons Promontory, Victoria, in November 1978, P AUSTRALIAN 168 WREN: Arctic Terns, Cairns BIRD WATCHER · During a visit to Wilsons Promontory, Victoria, in November 1978, P. Muller (National Parks Service) informed me that cormorants had nested recently on Skull (or Cleft) Rock in the Anser Group. In Decem­ ber 1978, M. P. Harris and D. M . Deerson (in press) found unfledged young and juveniles on Notch Island in the Seal Island Group off the eastern coast of the Promontory; they were informed that the location was a regular nesting site. In November 1979, during a further visit with H. Battam to the islands off Wilsons Promontory, Black-faced Shags were found nesting on Dannevig Island in the Glennie Group on November 10. Thirty birds were counted sitting on nests on a steep, broken granite boulder slope in the centre of the eastern side of the island. A number of shags were roosting on a large, rounded boulder just below this site during our visit to Dannevig Island on November 24, 1978. The rock was well white-washed but there was no evidence of breeding on that occasion. References Cooper, R. P., 1974. The Avifauna of Wilson's Promontory, Part 3, Aust. Bird Watcher 5: 253-276. Harris, M. P. and D. M. Deerson (in press). Seabird Islands, Notch Island, Seal Island Group, Victoria. Serventy, D. L., V. N. Serventy and J. Warham, 1971. The Handbook of Australian Sea-birds. A. H. & A. W. Reed, Sydney. Wheeler, W. R., 1964. Black-faced Cormorant in Victoria, Aust. Bird Watcher 2: 89-90. By S. G. LANE, 65 Wood Street, Lane Cove, N.S.W. 2066. ABW Possible sighting of the Arctic Tern at Cairns, North Queensland On December 3, 1979, I was birdwatching on the Esplanade, Cairns, when I noticed a medium-sized tern in a group of Little Terns Sterna albifrons. As I moved to view the bird from a better position I noticed that it was larger than the Little Terns. I was also lucky to have two Gull-billed Terns Sterna nilotica, standing nearby and it could be clearly seen that the tern was much smaller than the two Gull-billed Terns. Luckily a friend of mine, Bill Whayman, was able to confirm my sighting. From our observations we concluded that the tern must either be the Roseate Tern Sterna dougallii, Common Tern Sterna hirundo, or the Arctic Tern Sterna paradisaea. We took the following description of the bird: At rest: bird in non­ breeding plumage; length: 13 inches; head: extensive white forehead reaching up to the crown, from the crown to well below the nape is black; from the nape to the crown on each side of the black area there is a prominent white patch on the head; back: sooty grey; wing tips well pointed and extending over the tail where they cross; primaries: black edges; throat and breast: white; flank: white. I was unable to get the leg colour. In flight: forehead and black cap quite visible in flight, deeply forked tail; back and scapulars: sooty grey; rump: white; tip of tail: sooty grey but not as dark as the back; underparts: white. The flight of the bird resembled that of the Little Tern and while it was settled in with the group of Little Terns they did not seem to be VOL. 8 (5) MARCH, 1980 ROBINSON: Square-tailed Kite 169 disturbed by its presence. The bird did not utter a call note even though we had it under observation for at least 40 minutes. My colleague and I came to the conclusion that the bird was either the Arctic Tern or the Common Tern, due to the extensive white forehead. The Arctic Tern and Common Tern are difficult to differentiate in the field but both birds have different coloured rumps in flight. The Common Tern has a dark grey rump and the Arctic Tern has a white rump in flight. So we think it is possible that we sighted an Arctic Tern, but there is still that slight bit of doubt and only further sightings of the bird may resolve this problem. By JON WREN, 2/ 205 Greenslope Street, Edgehill , Cairns, North Queensland, 4870. ABW A Square-tailed Kite near Melbourne On December 2, 1979, whilst bird-watching at Narbethong, Victoria, I noticed a large hawk with upswept wings gliding low over the tree tops. It appeared unusually long-winged and slender-bodied, and these, plus other characters, led me to identify it as a Square-tailed Kite Lophoictinia isura. During the course of two hours the Kite was seen three times, each time directly overhead, and against a grey sky. On the following day it was sighted by Chris Corben, Aidan Sudbury and Anita Smyth who agreed with my identification. Field Description: similar in size to a Whistling Kite Haliastur sphe­ nurus, but more slender in both body and wings. Wings very long, especially the primaries (fingers). The tail was long and broadened to the tip which was squarish; seen more closely, it was very slightly forked. Underparts: Breast, reddish-brown with some darker streaking; Belly, brown; Undertail, brown with a dark sub-terminal band. Underwing: Inner primaries, whitish; Outer primaries, greyish; All the primaries were barred with black which formed a series of black bands across the "fingers". At the base of the primaries was a pale, possibly translucent (?) area, the popular "bulls-eye". The remainder of the underwing appeared dark. When flying the wings were always inclined, especially at the fingers which gave them a curved rather than a dihedral effect. The incline was always shallow, less marked than in, e.g. a Spotted Harrier Circus assimilis. In conclusion, the Kite was identified by the combination of slender body, very long and slightly upswept wings, long, square-tipped tail, banded primaries, and a dark sub-terminal tail band. By DOUG ROBINSON, 28 Bath Street, Mornington, Victoria, 3931. ABW .
Recommended publications
  • SPECIAL Victoria Government Gazette
    Victoria Government Gazette No. S 279 Friday 18 August 2017 By Authority of Victorian Government Printer Fisheries Act 1995 FISHERIES NOTICE 2017 I, Travis Dowling, Chief Executive Officer of the Victorian Fisheries Authority, as delegate of the Minister for Agriculture and having undertaken consultation in accordance with section 3A of the Fisheries Act 1995 (the Act), make the following Fisheries Notice under sections 67, 68A, 114 and 152 of the Act: Dated 17 August 2017 TRAVIS DOWLING Chief Executive Officer FISHERIES (CENTRAL ABALONE ZONE – REVISED) NOTICE 2017 1. Title This Notice may be cited as the Fisheries (Central Abalone Zone – Revised) Notice 2017 2. Objectives The objective of this Notice is to: a. fix minimum size limits for blacklip abalone and greenlip abalone taken under an Abalone Fishery Access Licence in the central abalone zone. b. address sustainability concerns for Victorian Central Abalone Zone abalone stocks and related management issues by closing specified marine waters to commercial abalone harvest. 3. Authorising provision This Notice is made under sections 67, 68A, 114 and 152 of the Act. 4. Commencement This Notice comes into operation at the time it is published in the Victoria Government Gazette and the VFA website. 5. Revocation The Fisheries (Central Abalone Zone) Notice 2017 is revoked. 6. Definitions In this fisheries notice – ‘AFAL’ means an Abalone Fishery (Central Zone) Access Licence; ‘central abalone zone’ means all Victorian waters between longitude 142° 31ʹ East and longitude 148° East; ‘CEO’
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue3.7 MB
    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Numbers of Piscivorous Birds in Western Port and West Corner Inlet, Victoria, 1987–2012 P
    Trends in Numbers of Piscivorous Birds in Western Port and West Corner Inlet, Victoria, 1987–2012 P. W. Menkhorst, R. H. Loyn, C. Liu, B. Hansen, M. Mackay and P. Dann February 2015 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Unpublished Client Report for Melbourne Water Trends in numbers of piscivorous birds in Western Port and West Corner Inlet, Victoria, 1987–2012 Peter W. Menkhorst 1, Richard H. Loyn 1,2 , Canran Liu 1, Birgita Hansen 1,3 , Moragh Mackay 4 and Peter Dann 5 1Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 2Current address: Eco Insights Pty Ltd 4 Roderick Close, Viewbank, Victoria 3084 3Current address: Collaborative Research Network, Federation University (Mt Helen) PO Box 663, Ballarat, Victoria 3353 4Riverbend Ecological Services 2620 Bass Highway, Bass, Victoria 3991 5Research Department, Phillip Island Nature Parks P0 Box 97, Cowes, Victoria 3991 February 2015 in partnership with Melbourne Water Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning Heidelberg, Victoria Report produced by: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning PO Box 137 Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Phone (03) 9450 8600 Website: www.delwp.vic.gov.au Citation: Menkhorst, P.W., Loyn, R.H., Liu, C., Hansen, B., McKay, M. and Dann, P. (2015). Trends in numbers of piscivorous birds in Western Port and West Corner Inlet, Victoria, 1987–2012. Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Unpublished Client Report for Melbourne Water. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Victoria. Front cover photo: Crested Terns feed on small fish such as Southern Anchovy Engraulis australis (Photo: Peter Menkhorst).
    [Show full text]
  • South-East Marine Region Profile
    South-east marine region profile A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region June 2015 © Commonwealth of Australia 2015 South-east marine region profile: A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region is licensed by the Commonwealth of Australia for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence with the exception of the Coat of Arms of the Commonwealth of Australia, the logo of the agency responsible for publishing the report, content supplied by third parties, and any images depicting people. For licence conditions see: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/ This report should be attributed as ‘South-east marine region profile: A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region, Commonwealth of Australia 2015’. The Commonwealth of Australia has made all reasonable efforts to identify content supplied by third parties using the following format ‘© Copyright, [name of third party] ’. Front cover: Seamount (CSIRO) Back cover: Royal penguin colony at Finch Creek, Macquarie Island (Melinda Brouwer) B / South-east marine region profile South-east marine region profile A description of the ecosystems, conservation values and uses of the South-east Marine Region Contents Figures iv Tables iv Executive Summary 1 The marine environment of the South-east Marine Region 1 Provincial bioregions of the South-east Marine Region 2 Conservation values of the South-east Marine Region 2 Key ecological features 2 Protected species 2 Protected places 2 Human activities and the marine environment 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 4.7MB .Pdf File
    . https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1979.40.04 31 July 1979 VERTEBRATE FAUNA OF SOUTH GIPPSLAND, VICTORIA By K. C. Norris, A. M. Gilmore and P. W. Menkhorst Fisheries and Wildlife Division, Ministry for Conservation, Arthur Ryiah Institute for Environmental Research, 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Abstract The South Gippsland area of eastern Victoria is the most southerly part of the Australian mainland and is contained within the Bassian zoogeographic subregion. The survey area contains most Bassian environments, including ranges, river flats, swamps, coastal plains, mountainous promontories and continental islands. The area was settled in the mid 180()s and much of the native vegetation was cleared for farming. The status (both present and historical) of 375 vertebrate taxa, 50 mammals, 285 birds, 25 reptiles and 15 amphibians is discussed in terms of distribution, habitat and abundance. As a result of European settlement, 4 mammal species are now extinct and several bird species are extinct or rare. Wildlife populations in the area now appear relatively stable and are catered for by six National Parks and Wildlife Reserves. Introduction TOPOGRAPHY AND PHYSIOGRAPHY {see Hills 1967; and Central Planning Authority 1968) Surveys of wildlife are being conducted by The north and central portions of the area the Fisheries and Wildlife Division of the are dominated by the South Gippsland High- Ministry for Conservation as part of the Land lands (Strzelecki Range) which is an eroded, Conservation Council's review of the use of rounded range of uplifted Mesozoic sand- Crown Land in Victoria. stones and mudstones rising to 730 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Onshore/Offshore Maps A3 FINAL.Indd
    ºÑ 470000 520000 ± Star of the ºÑ SEASPRAY )" SEASPRAY # 0 0 m 470000 0 520000 0 k " 5 ) South - NINETY MILE BEACH 7 0 )" 5 MELBOURNE VVIICCTTORRIIAA )" 5 LAKES ENTRANCE -20 ºÑ VI C TOR IA ºÑ o shore map MCLOUGHLINS BEACH – SEASPRAY COASTAL RESERVE # )"PORT ALBERT Ñ º 470000 MCGAURAN BEACH )" 520000 470000 0 520000 ± Ñ -2 º April 2020 m 470000 520000 k Ñ º SEASPRAY )" 0 470000 520000 4 )" VVIICCTTOORRIIAA KING ISLAND ± 470000 SEASPRAY # 520000 0 SEASPRAY )" 0 m )" SEASPRAY )" 0 ± # HUNTER ISLAND 0 k SEASPRAY " )" 5 ) SEASPRAY # 0 ± NINETY MILE BEACH SEASPRAY 7 0 m )" 0 0 0 5 VICTORIA " 0 " MELBOURNE VICTORIA ) 0 km SEASPRAY # ) 0 SE"ASPRAY LAKES ENTRANCE 5 5 ± ) 0 k m NINETY MILE BEACH 7 " 0 " ) 5 0 ) 5 NINETY MILE BEACH MELTBAOUSRMNEANIAVVIICCTTORRIIAA )" 0 " TASMANIA 7 m k ) 50 SEASPRAY # )" LAKES ENTRANCE 0 SEASPRAY 5 MELBOURNE VVIICCTTORRIIAA )" 0 5 k LAKES ENTRANCE 0 " 5 0 NINETY MILE BEACH ) 0 7 m WOODSIDE BEACH # 0 " -20 SEASPRAY )" 0 ) 5 3 Ñ -20 MELBOURNE VVIICCTTORRIIAA )" VI C TOR IA 0 k 5 # ºSS GLENELG VI C TOR IA LAKES ENTRANCE 0 WOODSIDE BEACH SLSC " 5 ) -20 0 NINETY MILE BEACH VI C TOR IA 7 m 0 )" 0 " 5 0 5" MELBOUR1NE0kmVVIICCTTORR)IIAA )" 0 5 k MCLOUGHLINS BEACH – SEASPRAY COASTAL RESERVE ) PORT ALBERT LAKES ENTRANCE " )" 5 # ) MCLOUGHLINS BEACH – SEASPRAY COASTAL RESERVE MCLOUGHLINS BEACH – SEASPRAY COASTAL RENSEINREVTEY MILE BEACH -20 PORT ALBERT PORT ALBERT 7 0 # MCGAURAN BEACH )" # )" VI C TOR IA 5 Scale @ A3 MELBOURNE VVIICCTTORRIIAA )" 5 )" )" MCGAURAN BEACH )" 0 LAKES ENTRANCE MCGAURAN BEACH REEVES BEACH 2 )" MCLOUGHLINS
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Act 1995
    Fisheries Act 1995 FISHERIES NOTICE 2021 I, Travis Dowling, Chief Executive Officer of the Victorian Fisheries Authority, as delegate of the Minister for Fishing and Boating, and having undertaken consultation in accordance with Section 3A of the Fisheries Act 1995 (the Act), make the following Fisheries Notice under Sections 67, 68A, 114 and 152 of the Act: Date: 09 / 06 / 2021 Travis Dowling Chief Executive Officer FISHERIES (CENTRAL ABALONE ZONE) NOTICE 2021 1. Title This Notice may be cited as the Fisheries (Central Abalone Zone) Notice 2021 2. Objectives The objective of this Notice is to: a. fix minimum size limits for blacklip abalone and greenlip abalone taken under an Abalone Fishery Access Licence in the Central Abalone Zone. b. address sustainability concerns for Victorian Central Abalone Zone abalone stocks and related management issues by closing specified marine waters to commercial abalone harvest. 3. Authorising provision This Notice is made under sections 67, 68A, 114 and 152 of the Act. 4. Commencement This Notice comes into operation on 1 July 2021. 5. Definitions In this fisheries notice – “AFAL” means an Abalone Fishery (Central Zone) Access Licence; "central abalone zone" means all Victorian waters between longitude 142° 31' East and longitude 148° East; “CEO” means the Chief Executive Officer of the VFA; “closed waters” means the marine waters within a spatial management unit for which the upper limit has been reached or exceeded as specified in Column 3 of Schedule 3; “nominated operator” means – (a) a licence
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced Animals on Victorian Islands: Improving Australia’S Ability to Protect Its Island Habitats from Feral Animals
    Introduced animals on Victorian islands: improving Australia’s ability to protect its island habitats from feral animals. Michael Johnston 2008 Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Client Report Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Client Report Introduced animals on Victorian islands: improving Australia’s ability to protect its island habitats from feral animals Michael Johnston Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research 123 Brown Street, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 May 2008 Prepared by Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Sustainability and Environment, for the Australian Government Department of Environment, Water Resources, Heritage and the Arts. Report produced by: Arthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research Department of Sustainability and Environment PO Box 137 Heidelberg, Victoria 3084 Phone (03) 9450 8600 Website: www.dse.vic.gov.au/ari © State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment 2008 This publication is copyright. Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced, copied, transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical or graphic) without the prior written permission of the Sate of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment. All requests and enquires should be directed to the Customer Service Centre, 136 186 or email [email protected] Citation Johnston, M. (2008) ‘Introduced animals on Victorian
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Victoria's Coastal Reserves Draft Report
    Assessment of Victoria’s Coastal Reserves Draft Report For Public Comment October 2019 Victorian Environmental Assessment Council The Victorian Environmental Assessment Council (VEAC) was established in 2001 under the Victorian Environmental Assessment Council Act 2001. It provides the State Government of Victoria with independent advice on protection and management of the environment and natural resources of public land. The five Council members are: Ms Janine Haddow (Chairperson) Ms Joanne Duncan Ms Anna Kilborn Dr Charles Meredith Dr Geoffrey Wescott Acknowledgement of Aboriginal Victorians The Victorian Environmental Assessment Council pays its respects to Victoria’s Aboriginal peoples, Native Title Holders and Traditional Owners and acknowledges their rich cultural and intrinsic connections to Country. Council recognises that the land and sea is of spiritual, cultural, environmental and economic importance to Aboriginal people and values their contribution and interest in the management of land and sea. Written submissions are invited on this draft report. The closing date for submissions is Monday 11 November 2019. You may make an online submission via VEAC’s website at www. veac.vic.gov.au or send your written submission by post or by email (see contact details). There is no required format for submissions, except that you must provide your name, address and your contact details, including an email address if you have one. All submissions will be treated as public documents and will be published on VEAC’s website. Please contact VEAC if you do not wish your submission to be published. The name of each submitter will be identified as part of each published submission, but personal contact details will be removed before publishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 1. Summary of Eradication Projects in Australia (Successes, Current Projects and Failures, 2000-2012)
    Table 1. Summary of eradication projects in Australia (successes, current projects and failures, 2000-2012) Invasive organisms National eradications State eradications Island eradications Regional eradications Vertebrate animals - succeeded 0 7 (mostly fish) >120 (mostly rats, goats, cats) 22 (mostly fish) - current 0 1 4 NA - recently failed 0 3 0 NA Invertebrate animals - succeeded 4 4 2 0 - current 2 1 2 NA - recently failed 2 1 0 NA Plants - succeeded 5 10 0 ?? - current 8 3 20 (Lord Howe Island) NA - recently failed 1 2 0 NA Pathogens - succeeded 24 (agricultural) 0 0 0 - current 3 0 0 NA - recently failed 1 0 0 NA Total succeeded 34 23 ~120 Total current 13 5 26 NA Total recently failed 4 4 0 NA Table 2. Eradication projects (current in 2012) State/Site Species Scale of eradication area invaded / Date started Cost to date / Threat category population estimated total cost Victoria14 Pigeon paramyxovirus National 62 properties (Jan 2011 ? environmental & 2012) economic Queensland Cocoa pod borer National 1 property 2011 ? economic (Conopomorpha cramerella) North-east Victoria15 Chestnut blight National 9 properties / 400 2010 economic (Cryphonectria infected trees parasitica) North Queensland16 Electric ants National ? 2006 $7 million? Economic, (Wasmannia environmental & auropunctata) social Queensland17 Limnocharis National <3 ha 2004 2.4 million / ? Environmental & (Limnocharis flava) economic Koster’s curse 4 ha, 1 site (Clidemia hirta) Mikania vine <30 ha (Mikania micrantha) Miconia (Miconia calvescens, M. racemosa, M. nervosa.) Southeast Red imported fire National 37,000 ha? 2001 $202 million /? environmental, Queensland ants (Solenopsis health, social & invicta) economic Darwin, Northern Fringed spider flower National 4.5 ha 2000 ? Economic, Territory18 (Cleome environmental rutidosperma) North Queensland19 Siam weed National 11,000 ha 1994 $5 million /$15 Economic, (Chromolaena million environmental, social odorata), C.
    [Show full text]
  • Submission 210 Attachment 14 Received 14/09/2016
    SUBMISSION 210 ATTACHMENT 14 RECEIVED 14/09/2016 Authorised and published by Parks Victoria Level 10, 535 Bourke Street, Melbourne VIC 3000 Copyright © 2016 Parks Victoria, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in- Publication entry: Wilsons Promontory Landscape and Seascape Conservation Plan. ISBN: 9780000000000 (pbk) National parks and reserves – Victoria – Management. Parks – Victoria – Management. Protected areas – Victoria – Management. Parks Victoria 333.720899915 For further information Phone: 13 1963 Copies may be downloaded from the Parks Victoria website www.parkweb.vic.gov.au [DRAFT] Conservation Action Plan for parks and reserves managed by Parks Victoria Wilsons Promontory Disclaimer This plan is prepared without prejudice to any negotiated or litigated outcome of any native title determination applications covering land or waters within the plan’s area. It is acknowledged that any future outcomes of native title determination applications may necessitate amendment of this plan; and the implementation of this plan may require further notifications under the procedures in Division 3 of Part 2 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cwlth). The plan is also prepared without prejudice to any future negotiated outcomes between the Government/s and Victorian Aboriginal communities. It is acknowledged that such negotiated outcomes may necessitate amendment of this plan. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information in this plan is accurate. Parks Victoria does not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in the publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritisation of High Conservation Status Offshore Islands
    report prioritisation of high conservation status offshore islands 0809-1197 prepared for the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts Revision History Revision Revision date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by number Dr Louise A Shilton Principal Ecologist, Beth Kramer Ecosure Environmental Neil Taylor 00 13/07/09 Draft Report Dr Ray Pierce Scientist, Ecosure CEO, Ecosure Director, Eco Oceania Julie Whelan Environmental Dr Louise A Shilton Scientist, Ecosure Neil Taylor 01 19/08/2009 Final Report Principal Ecologist, Dr Ray Pierce CEO, Ecosure Ecosure Director, Eco Oceania Distribution List Copy Date type Issued to Name number 1 19/08/09 electronic DEWHA Dr Julie Quinn 2 19/08/09 electronic Ecosure Pty Ltd Dr Louise A Shilton 3 19/08/09 electronic Eco Oceania Pty Ltd Dr Ray Pierce Report compiled by Ecosure Pty Ltd. Please cite as: Ecosure (2009). Prioritisation of high conservation status of offshore islands. Report to the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Ecosure, Cairns, Queensland. Gold Coast Cairns Sydney PO Box 404 PO Box 1130 PO Box 880 West Burleigh Qld 4219 Cairns Qld 4870 Surrey Hills NSW 2010 P +61 7 5508 2046 P +61 7 4031 9599 P +61 2 9690 1295 F +61 7 5508 2544 F +61 7 4031 9388 [email protected] www.ecosure.com.au Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts.
    [Show full text]