DOCSLIB.ORG

Conservation Improvement Program Approval Letters 2018-2032 Integrated Resource Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conservation Improvement Program Approval Letters 2018-2032 Integrated Resource Plan APPENDIX E CONSERVATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM APPROVAL LETTERS 2018-2032 INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN Submitted to the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission Docket No. ET2/RP-17-286 April 28, 2017 April 7, 2015 Jeffrey Haase Energy Efficiency Coordinator Great River Energy 12300 Elm Creek Blvd. Maple Grove, MN 55369 RE: All-Requirements Members 2013 CIP Results and 2015 Plan Dear Mr. Haase: Thank you very much for Great River Energy’s (GRE) efforts to report 2013 Conservation Improvement Program (CIP) results and a 2015 CIP plan in ReportingESP on behalf of GRE’s all-requirements members. My staff has finished reviewing this information. 2013 CIP RESULTS Each utility and association has an annual energy savings goal equal to 1.5 percent of gross annual retail sales.1 Based on the information provided, GRE’s all-requirements members saved a total of 99,134,162 total savings kWh at the generator in 2013, equivalent to 1.17 percent of average 2009-2011 retail sales, excluding sales to any CIP-exempt customers.2 We appreciate GRE’s energy efficiency and conservation achievements in 2013 and those of its members. A summary of energy savings by member is as follows: Table 1: 2013 Energy Savings Results Member Organization Energy Savings (kWh) % of Retail Sales Arrowhead 359,054 0.55 % BENCO 5,855,115 2.33 % Brown 974,294 0.94 % Connexus 20,297,090 1.04 % Cooperative 332,227 0.37 % Dakota 26,430,124 1.42 % East Central 8,004,124 0.89 % Elk River 2,378,097 0.96 % Goodhue 929,016 1.06 % 1 See Minn. Stat. §216B.241 subd. 1c (b). 2 Minnesota Statutes 216B.241 subd. 1c(b) states that the energy savings goal is to be calculated based on the most recent three-year weather-normalized average. This review was based on 2009-2011 retail sales as reported in ESP®. Great River Energy – All-Requirements Coops Page 2 Itasca Mantrap 2,898,673 1.45 % Kandiyohi 1,599,660 1.04 % Lake Country 9,340,364 1.52 % Lake Region 4,474,716 1.07 % McLeod 1,233,949 0.88 % Mille Lacs 1,319,006 0.69 % Nobles 1,443,338 1.25 % North Itasca 1,310,148 2.63 % Runestone 1,638,085 0.76 % Stearns 5,967,501 1.22 % Steele Waseca 1,360,850 0.68 % Todd Wadena 988,730 0.64 % TOTAL 99,134,162 1.17 % Each cooperative electric association and municipality utility is required to invest a minimum of 1.5 percent of its Minnesota gross operating revenues (GOR), excluding revenue from any CIP-exempt customers, on CIP.3 For 2013, 2011 revenues were the baseline for establishing these minimum spending requirements. Based on the information provided, Great River Energy Co-ops - All- requirements’s members invested a total of $15,575,524 in 2013, approximately 1.73 percent of 2011 Minnesota GOR, excluding revenue from any CIP-exempt customers. Additionally, Minnesota Statutes require each electric utility and natural gas municipal utility to invest a minimum of 0.2 percent of its residential Minnesota GOR on CIP programs that directly serve the needs of low-income persons, including renters.4 For 2013, 2011 revenues were the baseline for establishing the low-income spending requirements. Each member utility is responsible for meeting the low-income spending requirement. While Department policy currently allows cooperatives and municipalities to count a portion of general residential spending as low-income, the Department strongly encourages all utilities to meet their low-income spending requirements through programs that directly serve the needs of low-income persons, including renters. Also, while utilities may claim energy savings that result from EUI projects on top of a minimum savings goal of one percent from conservation improvements, provided the EUI projects results in energy efficiencies greater than what would occur through normal maintenance activity,5 Minnesota Statutes do not allow spending on EUI projects to count towards the CIP spending requirement.6 Therefore, total 2013 CIP spending does not 3 See Minn. Stat. §216B.241 subd. 1b. 4 See Minn. Stat. §216B.241 subd. 7(a) and (c). 5 Minn. Stat. §216B.241 subd. 1c (d) allows a utility or associated to include in its energy conservation plan energy savings from electric utility infrastructure projects. 6 Minn. Stat. §216B.241 subd. 1b (b) requires each electric cooperative association and electric municipal utility to spend 1.5% of gross operating revenues annually on energy conservation improvements. Minn. Stat. Great River Energy – All-Requirements Coops Page 3 reflect any EUI spending. The Department is supportive of EUI projects that increase generation and distribution efficiencies and appreciates that utilities are reporting information about these investments through ReportingESP. A summary of CIP investments by member is as follows: Table 2: 2013 Actual Expenditures Member Total CIP Low-Income Organization Total CIP (% of GOR) Low-Income (% of Res GOR) Arrowhead $112,744 1.36 % $12,373 0.22 % BENCO $514,337 1.81 % $49,585 0.24 % Brown $124,124 1.24 % $9,252 0.14 % Connexus $2,476,346 1.19 % $371,377 0.27 % Cooperative $137,576 1.36 % $17,908 0.28 % Dakota $3,852,053 2.10 % $391,043 0.37 % East Central $1,652,068 1.60 % $90,865 0.13 % Elk River $417,267 1.46 % $28,629 0.30 % Goodhue $221,321 2.16 % $15,529 0.16 % Itasca Mantrap $449,339 2.27 % $22,159 0.17 % Kandiyohi $270,685 1.57 % $7,345 0.06 % Lake Country $1,322,757 1.87 % $148,191 0.26 % Lake Region $788,367 1.83 % $71,867 0.21 % McLeod $372,637 2.50 % $22,499 0.18 % Mille Lacs $379,527 1.77 % $40,798 0.28 % Nobles $134,284 1.19 % $18,833 0.20 % North Itasca $107,504 1.58 % $8,797 0.15 % Runestone $543,281 2.40 % $45,147 0.23 % Stearns $947,148 2.09 % $59,495 0.27 % Steele Waseca $358,141 1.62 % $13,337 0.10 % Todd Wadena $394,018 2.50 % $26,246 0.21 % TOTAL $15,575,524 1.73 % $1,471,277 0.25 % In addition to meeting the energy savings goal and the total and low-income spending requirements, Minnesota Statutes §§216B.241 and 216B.2411 contain provisions that utilities must meet, including the following: Research and Development (R&D): Each utility and association may spend up to 10 percent of a utility’s minimum spending requirement on R&D (§216B.241, subd. 2(c)). §216B.241 subd. 1(e) specifically excludes electric utility infrastructure projects from the definition of energy conservation improvements. Great River Energy – All-Requirements Coops Page 4 Distributed and Renewable Generation (DRG): Each utility and association may spend up to 5 percent of a utility’s minimum spending requirement on DRG (§216B.2411, subd. 1). Utilities may not use green pricing programs to achieve CIP requirements. Green Building Standards: Each utility and association must offer one or more programs that support green building certification of commercial buildings and that support goals consistent with Sustainable Buildings 2030 (SB 2030) standards (§216B.241, subd. 1f(c) and §216B.241, subd. 9(e)). We recommend that at a minimum, utilities offer subsidies for design assistance and/or certification expenses on a case by case basis within their commercial and industrial program(s). Load-Management Activities: Each utility and association may use load-management activities to achieve up to 50 percent of a utility’s minimum spending requirement (§216B.241, subd. 1b(e)). Electric Utility Infrastructure (EUI): As stated above, energy savings from EUI projects count towards CIP energy savings goals. However, according to the Minnesota Statutes, spending on EUI projects may not be counted towards CIP spending requirements. For 2013, GRE’s all-requirements members: • Collectively did not achieve the statutory energy savings goal of 1.5 percent of gross annual retail energy sales excluding sales to any CIP-exempt customers, equivalent to 127,479,516 kWh in 2013. • Collectively met the statutory minimum spending requirement of 1.5 percent of gross operating revenue, excluding revenue from any CIP-exempt customers, equivalent to $13,525,223 in 2013. • Collectively invested $0 on DRG. This amount complies with the statutory spending cap, equal to $676,261 in 2013. • Collectively invested $11,321,734 on conservation programs, equivalent to 83.71 percent of the total CIP minimum spending amount of $13,525,223. This amount complies with the minimum spending amount on conservation programs (programs designed to save energy rather than reduce peak demand and/or shift energy use to off-peak hours), 50 percent of a utility's total minimum spending amount. The following member organizations invested at least 0.2 percent of their Minnesota residential GOR on low-income customers through CIP: • Arrowhead • BENCO • Connexus • Cooperative • Dakota Great River Energy – All-Requirements Coops Page 5 • Elk River • Lake Country • Lake Region • Mille Lacs • Nobles • Runestone • Stearns • Todd Wadena The following member organizations did not invest at least 0.2 percent of Minnesota residential GOR on low-income persons through CIP: • Brown • East Central • Goodhue • Itasca Mantrap • Kandiyohi • McLeod • North Itasca • Steele Waseca 2015 PLAN REVIEW For 2015, the savings goal and minimum spending requirements are calculated as follows: • Savings Goal = 1.5 percent of 2011-2013 annual average retail energy sales, excluding sales to any CIP-exempt customers • Minimum Total Spending = 1.5 percent of 2013 GOR, excluding revenue from any CIP-exempt customers • Minimum Low Income Spending = 0.2 percent of 2013 residential GOR Because GRE had not obtained internal approval of its 2015 budgets and goals by member by the September 5, 2014 deadline, GRE was granted approval to initially enter its 2015 plan at the aggregator-level, with the understanding that budgets and goals would be entered for each member following plan approval.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Great River Energy, Headquartered in Maple Grove, Minnesota, Is The
    Great River Energy, headquartered in Maple Grove, Minnesota, is the second largest electric utility in state, based on generating capacity, and one of the largest generation and transmission cooperatives in the United States. Great River Energy provides wholesale electric service to 28 distribution cooperatives in Minnesota and into northwestern Wisconsin. Those member cooperatives distribute electricity to approximately 1.7 million people, or more than 700,000 homes, businesses and farms. Great River Energy generates electricity at power plants and transmits that electricity across high voltage transmission lines. Backed by $3.9 billion in assets, a diverse and talented workforce and a board of directors focused on meeting member expectations, Great River Energy is well prepared to meet the needs of its member cooperatives. Great River Energy’s headquarters office in Maple Grove, Minn., is the first LEED Platinum Over the years, Great River Energy has certified building in the state and one of the most energy efficient buildings in the Midwest. evolved its power generation portfolio by reducing its energy supply from fossil fuels and increasing its push into energy- efficiency and renewables. Great River Energy has exited contracts to receive power from two coal-based power plants and retired Stanton Station, a coal power plant that served the cooperative’s membership for 50 years. Great River Energy met the requirements of Minnesota’s renewable energy standard eight years early by achieving 25 percent renewables for all-requirements member systems in 2018. The cooperative also set a goal of 50 percent renewables by 2030. The cooperative consistently receives investment-grade credit ratings and maintains wholesale rates below regional averages.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerating Electric Vehicle Adoption: a Vision for Minnesota
    Accelerating Electric Vehicle Adoption: A Vision for Minnesota Minnesota Department of Transportation Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 2019 Great Plains Institute 2 Acknowledgements Authors Fran Crotty, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Brendan Jordan, Great Plains Institute, Drive Electric Minnesota Dane McFarlane, Great Plains Institute Tim Sexton, Minnesota Department of Transportation Siri Simons, Minnesota Department of Transportation Data Analysis Anne Claflin, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Anne Jackson, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Dorian Kvale, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Amanda Jarrett Smith, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Contributors Katelyn Bocklund, Great Plains Institute Matthew Blackler, ZEF Energy Larry Herke, State of Minnesota Office of Enterprise Sustainability Pat Jones, Metro Transit Jukka Kukkonen, Plug-in Connect Diana McKeown, Great Plains Institute Sophia Parr, Duluth Transit Authority Rebecca Place, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Lisa Thurstin, American Lung Association in Minnesota, Twin Cities Clean Cities Coalition Andrew Twite, Fresh Energy Denise Wilson, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Photographer Will Dunder, Great Plains Institute Layout & Graphics Siri Simons, Minnesota Department of Transportation Accelerating Electric Vehicle Adoption: A Vision for Minnesota 3 Table of Contents 2 Acknowledgements 4 Executive Summary 6 Introduction 7 Collaboration Advances EVs 8 EV Basics 12 What are the Benefits of Electric Vehicles in Minnesota? 18 What are the Challenges? 20 Strategies to Advance Electric Vehicles 31 Utility Electric Vehicle Programs 32 Looking to the Future 35 Appendices 35 Appendix A 35 Appendix B 36 Appendix C 37 Appendix D 39 Appendix E 40 Appendix F 41 Appendix G 42 Appendix H 43 Appendix I 4 Executive Summary A STATEWIDE VISION FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES The goal is admittedly ambitious.
    [Show full text]
  • Great River Energy
    Great River Energy Jon Brekke VP and Chief Power Supply Officer Great River Energy membership Commercial and industrial 42% Residential 56% Seasonal 2% Total member cooperatives……………….28 Total members served………..700,000 Total people served………………..….1.7M GRE portfolio evolution Increased MISO market interaction 1,700+ 2025 MW 650 2020 MW Increasing renewables 144 2005 MW Peaking Generation Capacity GRE resource portfolio evolution Key components ■ Shut-down 1,100 MW Coal Creek Station facility by 2023 ■ Convert Spiritwood CHP Station from coal to natural gas ■ Add 1,100 MW of new wind energy in MN, SD, IA and ND ■ Invest in existing natural gas facilities to increase capacity ■ Increase market energy and capacity sources Key driver ■ Economic best-interest of our members Coal Creek Station (CCS) cost and market prices $250,000,000 $60.00 $200,000,000 $50.00 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $40.00 $50,000,000 $- $30.00 $(50,000,000) $20.00 CCS Net market position position market Net CCS $(100,000,000) MISO Market ($/MWh)Prices Market MISO $(150,000,000) $10.00 $(200,000,000) $(250,000,000) $- 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 MISO Market Prices ($/MWh) CCS Net Market Position Average annual gas prices 2005-2019 $10.00 $60.00 Natural gas heavily $9.00 influences MISO energy $50.00 $8.00 prices $7.00 $40.00 ■ Prices down ~70% since $6.00 2005 $5.00 $30.00 Future – New generation $4.00 in MISO queue > 95% $20.00 $3.00 wind/solar $2.00 MISO Market Pricing ($/MWh) $10.00 ■ MISO energy prices Henry Hub Natural
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue July 2018
    CIRCUITS NEWS FOR DAKOTA ELECTRIC MEMBERS Great River Energy announces 50-percent renewable energy goal for 2030 Voluntary goal will more than double current renewable energy supply Great River Energy recently announced Executive Officer David Saggau. “We and retaining business as well as meet- a company goal to supply its member- look forward to meeting this goal for the ing the expectations of members who owner cooperatives with 50-percent benefit of our members while maintain- value renewable energy. energy from renewable resources by ing strong system reliability.” 2030. “I applaud the leadership and strategic The announcement of the vision that this announcement by Great “Great River Energy has already met 50-percent renewable goal River Energy represents. Consumers of Minnesota’s 25-percent renewable en- comes at a time when home- all kinds — companies, cities, govern- ergy standard eight years ahead of re- and business-owners are ments and households — are asking for quirements. We continue to evolve our increasingly interested in more renewable energy, and competing power supply portfolio, delivering even having more renewables in for their loyalty and selling them more more renewable energy to our member- their energy supplies. electricity for more uses will increasing- owner cooperatives to help them remain ly hinge on it being as clean and close competitive in a changing market,” said Increasing renewables can present ad- to zero-carbon as it can be,” said Rolf Great River Energy President and Chief vantages to cooperatives for attracting Nordstrom, president and chief execu- - continued on page 2 In This Issue July 2018 Member Appreciation Event details ......
    [Show full text]
  • HVDC Transmission System
    HVDC transmission system Great River Energy’s unique high-voltage direct- When Great River Energy’s predecessor current (HVDC) transmission system is one of companies, Cooperative Power and United the best-performing HVDC systems in the world, Power Association, were planning to build Coal and it has maintained an outstanding record for Creek Station, they determined it would be less reliability since it was energized in 1978. expensive to transmit electricity over a long distance than to haul coal over a long distance. In basic terms, the system acts as an extension That’s why the plant was built near the Falkirk cord between Great River Energy’s Coal Creek coal mine near Underwood, N.D. Station power plant in North Dakota and the Minnesota transmission system. The transmission This vision included an innovative transmission line begins at a “converter station” at Coal system to deliver the electricity from the plant to Creek Station and ends at another converter Minnesota. The end result was the unique 436- station, the Dickinson Converter Station, near mile HVDC transmission line that Great River Buffalo, Minn. Energy still has today. A unique, long-distance way How unique is it? to save money There are two kinds of electric current: alternating There is a reason that Coal Creek Station is current (AC) and direct current (DC). Almost all located in central North Dakota even though it electric systems use AC current. In fact, there are provides electricity for homes and businesses in only five HVDC systems in the United States, and Minnesota and Wisconsin. Great River Energy has one of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L
    Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L. 2016 Work Plan Date of Report: December 4, 2015 Date of Next Status Update Report: January 31, 2017 Date of Work Plan Approval: Project Completion Date: June 30, 2018 Does this submission include an amendment request? _No_ PROJECT TITLE: Youth-led Energy Action Projects in 50 Minnesota Communities - Phase 3 Project Manager: Shelli-Kae Foster Organization: Prairie Woods Environmental Learning Center Mailing Address: 12718 Tenth Street NE City/State/Zip Code: Spicer, MN 56288 Telephone Number: 320-354-5894 Email Address: [email protected] and [email protected] Web Address: http://www.prairiewoodselc.org and www.youthenergysummit.org Location: State-wide Total ENRTF Project Budget: ENRTF $400,000 Appropriation: Amount Spent: $0 Balance: $400,000 Legal Citation: M.L. 2016, Chp. xx, Sec. xx, Subd. xx Appropriation Language: Page 1 of 16 02/19/2016 Subd. 05c - DRAFT I. PROJECT TITLE: Youth-led Sustainability Projects in 50 Minnesota Communities - Phase 3 II. PROJECT STATEMENT: Previous support for the Youth Energy Summit (YES!) program from the M.L. 2011 & 2014 sessions resulted in over 500 energy action projects in 108 communities, having an impact on over 53,000 youth and 56,000 community members. With this 3rd and final phase of funding from the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF), YES! will expand this award-winning model state-wide to complete over 200 new youth-led climate change mitigation and adaptation projects, impacting an additional 40,000 students and community members in over 50 MN communities. Working with our partners, YES! plans to fully transition from ENRTF funds to private and public sector partnerships.
    [Show full text]
  • Member Dr Community Energy
    member driven. communityPOWER focused. ™ energyCONNECTION smart. member driven. community focused. energy smart. MARCH 2021 MEMBER SURVEY NOTICE Stearns Electric Association and appreciate about six minutes of your experience. Whether it’s restoring a NRECA Market Research will perform time to share your opinions about power outage or discussing energy a Member Satisfaction Survey this the Cooperative. Your information improvement options for your home, Spring. and your responses will remain answering a billing question or confidential. hosting a community event, we are In April, Stearns Electric Association working hard for you every day. is partnering with the National Rural Although Stearns Electric conducts Electric Cooperative Association surveys among its member- We know your time is valuable, so (NRECA) Market Research Services consumers every year, the rest assured, we will use the results to to complete a residential member Cooperative, through the help of make decisions on matters important satisfaction survey. NRECA, completes these larger to the future of your Cooperative and surveys every three years. By that benefit you, your family and your The survey will take place both by participating in the survey, you will neighbors. phone and email during the week of help us identify where we are serving April 26. Please be aware that you you well and where we might need to Thank you for your honest feedback. may be one of several members who improve. If you have any questions regarding are randomly selected to participate this upcoming survey, please contact in the survey. If you get a call or email We strive to safely provide all us at (800) 962-0655 during regular about a survey from us, it’s legitimate.
    [Show full text]
  • Form Energy Announces Pilot with Great River Energy to Enable the Utility’S Transition to an Affordable, Reliable and Renewable Electricity Grid
    Form Energy Announces Pilot with Great River Energy to Enable the Utility’s Transition to an Affordable, Reliable and Renewable Electricity Grid Long-duration battery paves the way to a carbon-free future by enabling renewable energy to power the grid reliably even in extreme weather conditions. SOMERVILLE, MA. — Form Energy, a company developing ultra-low-cost, long-duration energy storage for the grid, today announced it signed a contract with Minnesota-based utility Great River Energy to jointly deploy a 1MW / 150MWh pilot project to be located in Cambridge, MN. Great River Energy is Minnesota’s second-largest electric utility and the fifth largest generation and transmission cooperative in the U.S. This system will be the first commercial deployment of Form Energy’s proprietary long-duration energy storage system. Form Energy’s aqueous air battery system leverages some of the safest, cheapest, most abundant materials on the planet and offers a clear path to transformationally low-cost, long-duration energy storage. The project with Great River Energy will be a 1-MW, grid-connected storage system capable of delivering its rated power continuously for 150 hours, far longer than the two to four hour usage period common among lithium-ion batteries being deployed at utility-scale today. This duration allows for a fundamentally new reliability function to be provided to the grid from storage, one historically only available from thermal generation resources. Leading up to the decision to deploy the pilot project, Form Energy conducted a portfolio optimization study of Great River Energy's unique system characteristics with Formware™, a proprietary software analytics platform design to help energy planners model future grids.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments of Great River Energy
    Before the Department of Energy Washington, D.C. 20585 In the Matter of ) ) Implementing the National Broadband ) Plan by Studying the Communications ) Requirements of Electric Utilities To ) Inform Federal Smart Grid Policy ) NBP RFI: Communications Requirements COMMENTS OF GREAT RIVER ENERGY I. Introduction a. Identification/description of our company Great River Energy (GRE) is a not-for-profit generation and transmission cooperative which provides wholesale electricity to more than 1.7 million people through 28 member distribution cooperatives in Minnesota and Wisconsin. Great River Energy is the second largest utility in the state, based on generating capacity, and the sixth largest generation and transmission (G&T) cooperative in the United States. Great River Energy’s member cooperatives range from those in the outer-ring suburbs of the Twin Cities to the Arrowhead region of Minnesota to the farmland of southwestern Minnesota. Great River Energy’s largest distribution cooperative serves more than 120,000 meters; the smallest serves just over 2,400. II. Executive Summary Great River Energy has deployed a fully integrated IP network to 750 remote sites of our electric system, 18 remote offices and 11 electric generating facilities. The IP network transports data information for SCADA, mobile radio voice traffic, metering information, corporate data and voice traffic between office sites, protection operations for power lines, and video surveillance. Private networks were developed by Great River Energy due to lack of ubiquitous coverage by major carriers or operating telephone companies. No single vendor or combination of several vendors could provide an integrated solution. Prior to building out the private network we now have in place, proposals were solicited from carriers and telephone companies to provide a comprehensive integrated solution to serve the locations previously described above.
    [Show full text]
  • Member Owned.Trusted.Responsible.Efficient.Open
    2015 ANNUAL REPORT MEMBER OWNED.TRUSTED.RESPONSIBLE.EFFICIENT.OPEN. INNOVATIVE.PROGRESSIVE.SAFE.DEPENDABLE.SUSTAINABLE. COLLABORATIVE.FLEXIBLE.STRONG.COMPETITIVE.DEDICATED. ACCOUNTABLE.HONEST.RELIABLE.POWERING WHAT’S POSSIBLE. CONTENTS TO OUR STAKEHOLDERS ...................................................................2 ABOUT GREAT RIVER ENERGY ...........................................................4 OUR RESOURCE PORTFOLIO ..............................................................6 MEETING THE NEEDS OF A CHANGING MEMBERSHIP .........................8 POWER SUPPLY CONTINUES TO EVOLVE ..........................................11 TRANSMISSION: SERVING MEMBERS AND THE REGIONAL GRID........14 2015 FINANCIAL REPORT ................................................................17 MANAGEMENT AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS ...................................53 GREAT RIVER ENERGY IS A GENERATION AND TRANSMISSION COOPERATIVE THAT SUPPLIES WHOLESALE ELECTRICITY TO 28 MEMBER-OWNED DISTRIBUTION COOPERATIVES IN MINNESOTA AND PARTS OF WISCONSIN. WITH A DIVERSE PORTFOLIO OF GENERATION RESOURCES AND AN EXPANSIVE NETWORK OF TRANSMISSION INFRASTRUCTURE, GREAT RIVER ENERGY PROVIDES ITS MEMBERSHIP WITH A RELIABLE AND AFFORDABLE POWER SUPPLY IN HARMONY WITH A SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENT. GREAT RIVER ENERGY IS GUIDED BY THE SEVEN COOPERATIVE PRINCIPLES, WHICH INCLUDE DEMOCRATIC MEMBER CONTROL AND CONCERN FOR COMMUNITY. TOGETHER WITH ITS MEMBERS, GREAT RIVER ENERGY’S EMPLOYEES ARE DEDICATED TO KEEPING COOPERATIVE ENERGY COMPETITIVE. 1 2015 ANNUAL REPORT TO OUR
    [Show full text]
  • Great River Energy
    Tie-line and Substation Transmission Division Interconnection Guideline Page 1 of 36 Operating Guidelines TDOG204 Document approved by: Priti Patel, Vice President, Transmission Effective date: 04/15/2020 Revision number: 6.0 OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this guideline is to provide technical guidance to assist the applicant desiring to interconnect new or materially modify existing facilities to an electric transmission system owned and/or operated by Great River Energy (GRE), in establishing the interconnection in an efficient and consistent manner to meet the minimum requirements for safe and reliable operation of the interconnection. This document is designed to comply with the North American Electric Reliability Corporation’s (NERC) compliance directive to establish facility connection standards. SCOPE: This document governs the interconnection of new or materially modify existing facilities transmission to transmission tie-lines or transmission-connected, load serving substation. It does not cover interconnection of generators to transmission or connection to distribution facilities. Generation interconnection requirements are described in Transmission Division Operating Guideline 202 (TDOG 202), “Generation Interconnection Guidelines.” BACKGROUND: Process documentation is a reference for those interconnecting to GRE’s System and ensures compliance with NERC Reliability Standards that address Facility Interconnection requirements. Reference documents Name of document, not version If the document refers to other TDOGs, department procedures or GRE policies or procedures, list here. Property of Great River Energy Public Page 1 of 36 Printed document is for information only. Effective date: 04/15/2020 Please refer to the electronic copy in SharePoint for the most current, approved version. TDOG204 Tie-Line and Substation Interconnection Guideline, Version 6.0 All revisions prior to January 2013 are contained in the record of revisions document.
    [Show full text]
  • Market: Consensus Principles for Utility EV Program Design
    WHITE PAPER Electric Utility Roles in the Electric Vehicle (EV) Market: Consensus Principles for Utility EV Program Design MIDCONTINENT TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION COLLABORATIVE (M-TEC) APRIL 2018 WWW.BETTERENERGY.ORG About the Midcontinent Transportation Electrification Collaborative (M-TEC) M-TEC is composed of representatives from automakers, state government, electric utilities and cooperatives, charging companies, and environmental organizations. M-TEC coordinates regionally in the Midcontinent region1 to increase electric vehicle (EV) use, decarbonize the transportation sector, improve air quality, improve electric system efficiency, provide a great customer experience, and build infrastructure to support EV travel throughout the Midcontinent region. The group aims to inform decision-makers' thinking around policies and initiatives to speed the electrification of transportation in the region. The group carries out collective research, develops white papers and policy recommendations, and hosts public workshops for policymakers and stakeholders in the Midcontinent region. M-TEC is co-convened by the Midcontinent Power Sector Collaborative and the Charge Up Midwest coalition. About the Great Plains Institute (GPI) GPI convenes the Midcontinent Power Sector Collaborative and is a member of the Charge Up Midwest coalition. GPI is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization transforming the energy system to benefit the economy and environment. GPI works on solutions that strengthen communities and provide greater economic opportunity through creation of higher-paying jobs, expansion of the nation’s industrial base, and greater domestic energy independence while eliminating carbon emissions. 1 Including participants from Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, Wisconsin, and national organizations. 2 MIDCONTINENT TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION COLLABORATIVE | March 2018 Participants The following participating entities took part in the discussion of M-TEC and the development of this white paper.
    [Show full text]