Weed Identification

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Weed Identification WEED Management in TURF COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND COOPERATIVE EXTENSION CONTENTS TABLES Weed life cycles .................................................................1 Table 1. Some preemergence herbicides for the control of summer annual grasses. ................................. 18 Weed identification ............................................................2 Table 2. Some postemergence herbicides for the control Growth habits of grasses ........................................... 2 of summer annual grasses. ............................. 18 Vegetative structures of grasses ................................. 3 Table 3. Some broadleaf herbicides and herbicide combi- Grass seedheads ........................................................ 4 nations for use in cool-season turf. ................ 20 Weed descriptions: Grasses and grasslike weeds .............5 Table 4. Suggestions for selective control of turfgrass Crabgrass .................................................................. 5 weeds in Pennsylvania, by weed species.......... 22 Goosegrass ................................................................ 5 Table 5. Suggestions for nonselective control of turfgrass Barnyardgrass ............................................................ 6 weeds in Pennsylvania, by weed species.......... 27 Foxtail ....................................................................... 6 Annual bluegrass ....................................................... 7 Bentgrass ................................................................... 7 Orchardgrass ............................................................. 8 Nimblewill ................................................................. 8 Yellow nutsedge ......................................................... 9 Wild garlic ................................................................. 9 Weed descriptions: Broadleaf weeds ...............................10 Black medic ..............................................................10 Prostrate knotweed ...................................................10 Prostrate spurge ........................................................10 Purslane....................................................................11 Common chickweed .................................................11 Corn speedwell .........................................................11 Dog fennel ................................................................12 Henbit ......................................................................12 Mallow .....................................................................12 Yellow rocket ............................................................13 Broadleaf plantain ...................................................13 Buckhorn plantain ...................................................13 Creeping speedwell ..................................................14 Cinquefoil .................................................................14 Creeping buttercup ..................................................14 Dandelion ................................................................15 Ground ivy ...............................................................15 Heal-all.....................................................................15 Wild violet ................................................................16 White clover .............................................................16 Yellow woodsorrel ...................................................16 Yellow and orange hawkweed ...................................17 Cultural practices for improved weed management........17 Chemical weed control ....................................................17 Chemical control of grass and grasslike weeds .........18 Grateful acknowledgment is made to the Scotts Chemical control of broadleaf weeds .......................19 Company for permission to reproduce drawings of Chemical control, by weed species ............................21 broadleaf weeds from Scotts® Guide to the Identification of Dicot Turf Weeds. 1 WEED LIFE CYCLES The simplest definition of a weed Turfgrass weeds can be grouped into one of three life is a plant that grows where it is cycles: annual, biennial, or perennial. Annuals are plants that complete their life cycle in one growing season. not wanted. Creeping bentgrass, Seeds of summer annuals germinate in spring, produce vegetative growth in spring and summer, then produce a turfgrass used on golf courses, seed and die in the fall. Winter annual seeds germinate in fall; grow during fall, winter, and early spring; then is often considered a weed produce seed and die in late spring. Examples of summer annual weeds are crabgrass and prostrate knotweed. Two because it is unwanted in winter annual weeds are annual bluegrass and common chickweed. Kentucky bluegrass lawns. Weeds Biennials require two growing seasons to complete their life cycles. They usually produce vegetative growth are undesirable because they dis- the first year, then flower and set seed during the second year. Examples of biennial weeds are yellow rocket and rupt turf uniformity and wild carrot. Perennial weeds live for three or more years (al- compete with desirable grass spe- though leaves and aboveground stems often die back at the end of the growing season). Perennials produce new cies for moisture, light, and nutri- vegetative growth from growing points at or below the soil surface. Perennials also produce new plants from ents. Some weeds are harmful to seed. Examples of perennial weeds are orchardgrass and dandelion. people because they attract bees, cause skin irritation, or cause poisoning if ingested. An effective weed manage- ment program depends on your ability to identify weeds and to understand their life cycles. This information is essential for developing a good cultural weed management program. It is also necessary for selecting herbicides and for determining the proper time of year to apply them. 2 In plants having the stoloniferous growth habit, lateral WEED IDENTIFICATION growth occurs by horizontal creeping aboveground stems called stolons. Stolons are produced from buds in the To identify weeds you must first distinguish between crown that break through the outer leaf sheath. Stolons broadleaf weeds and grass weeds. Broadleaf weeds usu- produce nodes that can give rise to new tillers. Stolons are ally have wider leaf blades than grass weeds. Each leaf usually green, whereas rhizomes are usually white. typically has a main vein that divides the leaf in half with a network of smaller veins (originating from the main Bunch-type, rhizomatous, and vein) forming a netlike pattern. stoloniferous growth habits Broadleaf weeds have distinct leaf shapes and surface characteristics that can be used in identification. The arrangement of leaves on stems can also be a useful identification aid. Leaves either are alternately arranged (when a leaf grows from a node on one side of the stem and another is produced on the opposite side further up the stem) or arranged opposite one another. Leaf arrangement Bunch-type Alternate Opposite Some broadleaf weeds produce leaves in a circular pattern (rosette) from a central growing point located at or beneath the soil surface. Others grow and spread by means of creeping aboveground stems called stolons or belowground stems called rhizomes. Broadleaf weeds can produce a fibrous root system or a root system domi- nated by a large, fleshy taproot. Broadleaf weeds often bear colorful flowers of differ- ent sizes and shapes. At certain times of the year flowers can be very useful identification aids. Grass weeds have long, narrow leaves with veins run- ning parallel to each other (they do not form a netlike pattern). Grasses do not have showy or colorful flowers, and leaf shapes are similar among species. The ability to Rhizomatous identify grasses depends on recognizing growth habits, certain vegetative features, and seedheads. Growth habits of grasses Growth habits of grasses can be divided into three differ- ent categories: bunch-type, rhizomatous, and stolonifer- ous. In plants having a bunch-type growth habit, new stems are produced by tillering. A tiller is a stem that arises from a bud in the crown and grows vertically, re- maining enclosed by the leaf sheath. Although all grasses produce tillers, only those that spread by tillering alone are referred to as bunch-type grasses. In plants with the rhizomatous growth habit, lateral growth occurs by horizontal creeping underground stems called rhizomes. Rhizomes are produced from buds in the crown that break through the outer leaf sheath. Rhi- Stoloniferous zomes produce nodes that can give rise to new tillers. 3 Vegetative structures of grasses Leaf blades of grasses can vary in width and hairiness. Several vegetative features can be used to identify grass Some grasses have leaf blades that are dominated by a weeds. The most important are leaf blade characteristics single prominent vein in the center of the leaf. Others have and the structures associated with the collar. equal-sized veins running lengthwise over the entire width Vernation is a term used to describe the arrangement of of the blade. Leaf blade tips may terminate in a sharp point, a blunt tip, or keeled shape (boat-shaped tip). The grass leaf Leaf blade tips Leaf blade Collar region Blunt shape Keeled shape Tapering to a sharp point Leaf sheath The collar region is located between the leaf blade and leaf sheath. It may or may not contain
Recommended publications
  • An IPM Pocket Guide for Weed Identification in Nurseries and Landscapes Produced by Michigan State University Extension
    Back to table of contents Back to index 2020 PDF An IPM Pocket Guide for Weed Identification in Nurseries and Landscapes Produced by Michigan State University Extension Contents Index of weeds (clickable) ........................ 2-8 Weed identification ............................... 9-183 Using this scouting guide..........................184 Weed classification ...................................185 Grass and broadleaf characteristics . 186-189 Glossary ........................................... 190-192 Credits and acknowledgments ......... 193-194 Suggested reading ...................................195 1 Back to table of contents Back to index Index By common name Annual bluegrass ...........................................32-33 Annual sowthistle................................................73 Asiatic (common) dayflower ..........................18-19 Barnyardgrass ....................................................27 Bindweed, field ..........................................101-103 Bindweed, hedge .......................................102-103 Birdseye pearlwort ..............................................98 Birdsfoot trefoil...........................................109-110 Bittercress, hairy ............................................83-85 Bittercress, smallflowered...................................85 Black medic ............................................... 112-113 Blackseed plantain ...........................................150 Bluegrass, annual ..........................................32-33 Brambles ...................................................164-165
    [Show full text]
  • Pollination Ecology Summary
    Pollination Ecology Summary Prof. em. Klaus Ammann, Neuchâtel [email protected] June 2013 Ohne den Pollenübertragungs-Service blütenbesuchender Tiere könnten sich viele Blütenpanzen nicht geschlechtlich fortpanzen. Die komplexen und faszinierenden Bestäubungsvorgänge bei Blütenpanzen sind Ausdruck von Jahrmillionen von Selektionsvorgängen, verbunden mit Selbstorganisation der Lebewesen; eine Sicht, die auch Darwin schon unterstützte. Bei vielen zwischenartlichen Beziehungen haben sich zwei oder auch mehrere Arten in ihrer Entwicklung gegenseitig beeinusst. Man spricht hier von sogenannter Coevolution. Deutlich ist die Coevolution auch bei verschiedenen Bestäubungssystemen und -mechanismen, die von symbiontischer bis parasitischer Natur sein können. Die Art-Entstehung, die Vegetationsökologie und die Entstehung von Kulturpanzen sind eng damit verbunden Veranstalter: Naturforschende Gesellschaft Schaffhausen 1. Pollination Ecology Darwin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollination_syndrome http://www.cas.vanderbilt.edu/bioimages/pages/pollination.htm Fenster, C.B., Armbruster, W.S., Wilson, P., Dudash, M.R., & Thomson, J.D. (2004) Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35, pp 375-403 http://www.botanischergarten.ch/Pollination/Fenster-Pollination-Syndromes-2004.pdf invitation to browse in the website of the Friends of Charles Darwin http://darwin.gruts.com/weblog/archive/2008/02/ Working Place of Darwin in Downe Village http://www.focus.de/wissen/wissenschaft/wissenschaft-darwin-genoss-ein-suesses-studentenleben_aid_383172.html Darwin as a human being and as a scientist Darwin, C. (1862), On the various contrivances by which orchids are fertilized by insects and on the good effects of intercrossing The Complete Work of Charles Darwin online, Scanned, OCRed and corrected by John van Wyhe 2003; further corrections 8.2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Native Plants
    - AA GUIDEGUIDE TOTO THETHE NATIVENATIVE PLANTS,PLANTS, NATURALNATURAL PLANTPLANT COMMUNITIESCOMMUNITIES ANDAND THETHE EXOTICEXOTIC ANDAND INVASIVEINVASIVE SPECIESSPECIES OFOF EASTEAST HAMPTONHAMPTON TOWNTOWN EAST HAMPTON TOWN Natural Resources Department TableTable ofof Contents:Contents: Spotted Beebalm (Monarda punctata) Narrative: Pages 1-17 Quick Reference Max Clearing Table: Page 18 Map: East Hampton Native Plant Habitats Map TABS: East Hampton Plant Habitats (1-12); Wetlands flora (13-15): 1. Outer Dunes Plant Spacing 2. Bay Bluffs 3. Amagansett Inner Dunes (AID) 4. Tidal Marsh (TM) Table: A 5. Montauk Mesic Forest (MMF) 6. Montauk Moorland (MM) guideline for the 7. North of Moraine Coastal Deciduous (NMCD) 8. Morainal Deciduous (MD) 9. Pine Barrens or Pitch Pine Oak Forest (PB) (PPO) number of 10. Montauk Grasslands (MG) 11. Northwest Woods (NWW) plants needed 12. Old Fields 13. Freshwater Wetlands 14. Brackish Wetlands and Buffer for an area: 15. East Hampton Wetland Flora by Type Page 19 Native Plants-Resistance to Deer Damage: Pages 20-21 Local Native Plant Landscapers, Arborists, Native Plant Growers and Suppliers: Pages 22-23 Exotic and Invasive Species: Pages 24-33 Native Wildflower Pictures: Pages 34-45 Samdplain Gerardia (Agalinas acuta) Introduction to our native landscape What is a native plant? Native plants are plants that are indigenous to a particular area or region. In North America we are referring to the flora that existed in an area or region before European settlement. Native plants occur within specific plant communities that vary in species composition depending on the habitat in which they are found. A few examples of habitats are tidal wetlands, woodlands, meadows and dunelands.
    [Show full text]
  • Veronica Plants—Drifting from Farm to Traditional Healing, Food Application, and Phytopharmacology
    molecules Review Veronica Plants—Drifting from Farm to Traditional Healing, Food Application, and Phytopharmacology Bahare Salehi 1 , Mangalpady Shivaprasad Shetty 2, Nanjangud V. Anil Kumar 3 , Jelena Živkovi´c 4, Daniela Calina 5 , Anca Oana Docea 6, Simin Emamzadeh-Yazdi 7, Ceyda Sibel Kılıç 8, Tamar Goloshvili 9, Silvana Nicola 10 , Giuseppe Pignata 10, Farukh Sharopov 11,* , María del Mar Contreras 12,* , William C. Cho 13,* , Natália Martins 14,15,* and Javad Sharifi-Rad 16,* 1 Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Bam University of Medical Sciences, Bam 44340847, Iran 2 Department of Chemistry, NMAM Institute of Technology, Karkala 574110, India 3 Department of Chemistry, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India 4 Institute for Medicinal Plants Research “Dr. Josif Panˇci´c”,Tadeuša Koš´cuška1, Belgrade 11000, Serbia 5 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova 200349, Romania 6 Department of Toxicology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Craiova 200349, Romania 7 Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Gauteng 0002, South Africa 8 Department of Pharmaceutical Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Ankara 06100, Turkey 9 Department of Plant Physiology and Genetic Resources, Institute of Botany, Ilia State University, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia 10 Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Turin, I-10095 Grugliasco, Italy 11 Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Rudaki 139, Dushanbe 734003, Tajikistan 12 Department of Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain 13 Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR 999077, China 14 Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Buchbesprechungen 247-296 ©Verein Zur Erforschung Der Flora Österreichs; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Neilreichia - Zeitschrift für Pflanzensystematik und Floristik Österreichs Jahr/Year: 2006 Band/Volume: 4 Autor(en)/Author(s): Mrkvicka Alexander Ch., Fischer Manfred Adalbert, Schneeweiß Gerald M., Raabe Uwe Artikel/Article: Buchbesprechungen 247-296 ©Verein zur Erforschung der Flora Österreichs; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Neilreichia 4: 247–297 (2006) Buchbesprechungen Arndt KÄSTNER, Eckehart J. JÄGER & Rudolf SCHUBERT, 2001: Handbuch der Se- getalpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Unter Mitarbeit von Uwe BRAUN, Günter FEYERABEND, Gerhard KARRER, Doris SEIDEL, Franz TIETZE, Klaus WERNER. – Wien & New York: Springer. – X + 609 pp.; 32 × 25 cm; fest gebunden. – ISBN 3-211-83562-8. – Preis: 177, – €. Dieses imposante Kompendium – wohl das umfangreichste Werk zu diesem Thema – behandelt praktisch alle Aspekte der reinen und angewandten Botanik rund um die Ackerbeikräuter. Es entstand in der Hauptsache aufgrund jahrzehntelanger Forschungs- arbeiten am Institut für Geobotanik der Universität Halle über Ökologie und Verbrei- tung der Segetalpflanzen. Im Zentrum des Werkes stehen 182 Arten, die ausführlich behandelt werden, wobei deren eindrucksvolle und umfassende „Porträt-Zeichnungen“ und genaue Verbreitungskarten am wichtigsten sind. Der „Allgemeine“ Teil („I.“) beginnt mit der Erläuterung einiger (vor allem morpholo- gischer, ökologischer, chorologischer und zoologischer) Fachausdrücke, darauf
    [Show full text]
  • Plantaginaceae)
    TAXON 61 (4) • August 2012: 867–870 Sánchez Agudo & al. • Contribution to the nomenclature of Veronica A contribution toward clarifying the nomenclature of Veronica L. (Plantaginaceae) Jose Ángel Sánchez Agudo,1 M. Montserrat Martínez-Ortega,1 Steve Cafferty2 & Enrique Rico1 1 Departamento de Botánica, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007, Spain 2 Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SWH 5BD, U.K. Author for correspondence: Jose Ángel Sánchez Agudo, [email protected] Abstract During a taxonomic revision of the genus Veronica L. for the Flora iberica project, an attempt was made to fix the correct status of the names cited in the study area. With this aim, here we have designated lectotypes, neotypes and epitypes for 18 previously untypified names, mainly belonging to annual species, some of them widely distributed such as V. persica and V. praecox. These newly proposed types support the current use of the names concerned and therefore contribute to estab- lishing the correct nomenclature of the genus. Keywords nomenclature; Plantaginaceae; Scrophulariaceae; Veronica; taxonomy; typification INTRODUCTION newly proposed types would support the current use of the valid names studied. We always chose to typify by the most The genus Veronica (Plantaginaceae sensu APG, 1998; complete specimen whenever a choice was possible between formerly Scrophulariaceae) is the largest genus within the tribe specimens and illustrations, except in cases where the extant Veroniceae. It includes 12 subgenera (Albach & al., 2009) with specimens might disrupt current use of the name. When this ca. 450 species (including the Hebe complex, Albach & al., was not possible owing to the ambiguity of the original ma- 2004a, 2009) worldwide, although most of them are only pres- terial or lack thereof, an epitype or neotype, as appropriate, ent in the floras of temperate regions of the Northern Hemi- was designated.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Importance of Seed Morphology of Veronica L. Subsect
    Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 50: 39-52, 2018 BRC www.brc.amu.edu.pl DOI 10.2478/biorc-2018-0008 Submitted 14.05.2018, Accepted 29.06.2018 Taxonomic importance of seed morphology of Veronica L. subsect. Agrestes Benth. (Plantaginaceae) Małgorzata Mazur1*, Magdalena Gawlak2, Elżbieta Sandurska3, Tomasz Kałuski2 & Katarzyna Marcysiak1 1Botanical Garden, Kazimierz Wielki University, Ossolińskich 12, 85-093 Bydgoszcz, Poland 2Research Centre of Quarantine, Invasive and Genetically Modified Organism, Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland 3Department of Genetics, Kazimierz Wielki University, Powstańców Wielkopolskich 10, 85-090 Bydgoszcz, Poland * correspondence author (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract. The study was conducted on five species ofVeronica L. subsection Agrestes occurring in Central Europe: Veronica agrestis L., V. polita Fr., V. opaca Fr., V. persica Poir. and V. filiformisSm. These species are very similar morphologically and are often misidentified. Last thorough studies of morphology and micromorphology of their seeds were conducted in 1960s. Based on 48 herbarium specimens, we examined SEM images of 422 seeds. We found that 22 of the 30 studied morphological traits differentiated five species at statistical level and V. agrestis and V. persica differed with the greatest number of features from other species. Our measurements of seed size were not fully congruent with previous studies, suggesting dependence of these features on external conditions. Seeds were usually cochlidiospermous and ovoid with a reticulate-verrucate seed coat, but these features were, at the same time, quite variable. The results of discriminant function confirmed that some characters of the seed size, shape and coat sculpture could be taxonomically useful in distinguishing species of Veronica subsect.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California
    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Sexual Reproduction in Veronica (Plantaginaceae)
    EVOLUTION OF THE SEXUAL REPRODUCTION IN VERONICA (PLANTAGINACEAE): PHYLOGENY, PHYLOGEOGRAPHY AND INVASION Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften Am Fachbereich Biologie der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Romain Scalone geboren am 7 Mai 1981 in Colombes Hauts de Seine (Frankreich) Mainz, 2011 Dekan: 1 Berichterstatter: 2 Berichterstatter: Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 20. Dezember 2011 1 « Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. » Theodosius DOBZHANSKY (1900-1975) « We do not even in the least know the final cause of sexuality; why new beings should be produced by the union of the two sexual elements, […] The whole subject is as yet hidden in darkness. » Charles DARWIN (1809-1882) Veronica filiformis Smith 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 LIST OF FIGURE, TABLE, APPENDIX & ILLUSTRATION 4 1 INTRODUCTION 8 2 PAPER ONE: PHYLOGENY OF SEXUAL REPRODUCTION 18 “Evolution of the pollen-ovule ratio in Veronica (Plantaginaceae)” 3 PAPER TWO: SPECIATION AFFECTED BY SEXUAL REPRODUCTION 52 “Phylogenetic analysis and differentiation of V. subgenus Stenocarpon in the Balkans” 4 PAPER THREE: DEGRADATION OF SEXUAL REPRODUCTION 90 “Degradation of sexual reproduction in V. filiformis after introduction to Europe” 5 THREE SHORT RESEARCH NOTES 156 “Induction of flower production in Veronica” “Evolution of self-sterility in Veronica” “Variation of capsule size in V. filiformis” 6 ABSTRACTS 196 3 LIST OF FIGURE Variation of P-O and estimated sexual systems across the Veronica phylogeny 42 Relationships among sexual
    [Show full text]
  • View (Marszalkowska, Unpubl.)
    Degradation of sexual reproduction in Veronica filiformis after introduction to Europe Scalone and Albach Scalone and Albach BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012, 12:233 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/12/233 Scalone and Albach BMC Evolutionary Biology 2012, 12:233 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/12/233 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Degradation of sexual reproduction in Veronica filiformis after introduction to Europe Romain Scalone1,2 and Dirk C Albach3* Abstract Background: Baker’s law predicts that self-incompatible plant species are generally poor colonizers because their mating system requires a high diversity of genetically differentiated individuals and thus self-compatibility should develop after long-distance dispersal. However, cases like the introduction of the self-incompatible Veronica filiformis (Plantaginaceae) to Europe constitute an often overlooked alternative to this rule. This species was introduced from subalpine areas of the Pontic-Caucasian Mountains and colonized many parts of Central and Western Europe in the last century, apparently without producing seeds. To investigate the consequences of the absence of sexual reproduction in this obligate outcrosser since its introduction, AFLP fingerprints, flower morphology, pollen and ovule production and seed vitality were studied in introduced and native populations. Results: Interpopulation crossings of 19 introduced German populations performed in the greenhouse demonstrated that introduced populations are often unable to reproduce sexually. These results were similar to intrapopulation crossings, but this depended on the populations used for crossings. Results from AFLP fingerprinting confirmed a lack of genetic diversity in the area of introduction, which is best explained by the dispersal of clones. Flower morphology revealed the frequent presence of mutations affecting the androecium of the flower and decreasing pollen production in introduced populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Plants and Ferns of Keele University David W
    Flowering Plants and Ferns of Keele University David W. Emley Updated June 2019 Keele is perhaps more interesting for its trees than for its flowering plants, however there are a few unusual species amongst them. The deciduous woodland, consisting mainly of Oak and Sycamore, has a poor ground flora which makes for a fine display of Bluebells in the spring. It also has Yellow Archangel, a plant associated with ancient woodland as well as the lovely Wood Sorrel. The former sewage-works site, just south of Lake 5, was once home to a small colony of Harebell and Betony. The area between that site and the entrance to Lymes Road used to be very good for plants. Indeed, there was a colony of Common Spotted Orchids and a few Northern Marsh Orchids. These appear to have gone - it is too overgrown now. The small gully that leads into Lake 7 is lined with Bluebells but also Ramsons or Wild Garlic; its main site at Keele. Keele has a good bramble flora and is the type locality for Rubus sneydii, named by Eric Edees; a national expert on brambles who lived nearby. One plant, Rhododendron ponticum, is causing problems in the deciduous woodland where it is very invasive and is unfortunately the host of Phytophthora ramorum. This virus can seriously affect oaks, larches and many other trees. Because of this Keele has to remove all its Larch and most of its Rhododendron. This will, of course, open up the woodland to let the native ground flora grow up and extensive replanting with native trees is scheduled to start in autumn 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • TAXON:Veronica Plebeia R. Br. SCORE:14.0 RATING:High Risk
    TAXON: Veronica plebeia R. Br. SCORE: 14.0 RATING: High Risk Taxon: Veronica plebeia R. Br. Family: Plantaginaceae Common Name(s): common speedwell Synonym(s): creeping speedwell trailing speedwell Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 12 Apr 2018 WRA Score: 14.0 Designation: H(HPWRA) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Annual Herb, Disturbance Weed, Pasture Weed, Shade-Tolerant, Roots at Nodes Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 y Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 n outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 y 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) y 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 n 402 Allelopathic 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals 405 Toxic to animals y=1, n=0 n 406 Host for recognized pests and pathogens 407 Causes allergies or is otherwise toxic to humans y=1, n=0 n 408 Creates a fire hazard in natural ecosystems y=1, n=0 n 409 Is a shade tolerant plant at some stage of its life cycle y=1, n=0 y Creation Date: 12 Apr 2018 (Veronica plebeia R.
    [Show full text]