DOCSLIB.ORG

Investigating the Complexity of Impact Crater Ejecta Michael Raymond Zanetti Washington University in St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Investigating the Complexity of Impact Crater Ejecta Michael Raymond Zanetti Washington University in St Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations Arts & Sciences Winter 12-15-2015 Investigating the Complexity of Impact Crater Ejecta Michael Raymond Zanetti Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Zanetti, Michael Raymond, "Investigating the Complexity of Impact Crater Ejecta" (2015). Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 694. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/art_sci_etds/694 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts & Sciences at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Dissertation Examination Committee: Bradley L. Jolliff, Chair Ramesh K. Agarwal Robert F. Dymek Harald Hiesinger Randy L. Korotev William B. McKinnon Investigating the Complexity of Impact Crater Ejecta by Michael Raymond Zanetti A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts & Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2015 St. Louis, Missouri 1 © 2015, Michael Raymond Zanetti 2 Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ vi List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. ix Acknowledgements ..........................................................................................................................x Abstract of the Dissertation ......................................................................................................... xiv Chapter 1: Introduction to the Dissertation ................................................................................1 1.1 Impact Crater Ejecta Emplacement ...................................................................................... 3 1.2 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................ 7 1.3 Major Results ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.3.1 Chapter 2 ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.3.2 Chapter 3 ..................................................................................................................... 10 1.3.3 Chapter 4 ..................................................................................................................... 12 1.4 Statement of Labor ............................................................................................................. 15 1.5 Copyright and Permissions ................................................................................................. 16 Chapter 1 References ................................................................................................................ 17 Chapter 1 Figures ...................................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2: The Geology and Geomorphology of Aristarchus Crater ....................................21 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 22 2.1.1 Geologic Background of the Aristarchus Region ....................................................... 22 2.1.2 General Geology of the Crater ejecta .......................................................................... 27 2.1.3 Age Estimates ............................................................................................................. 30 2.1.4 Objectives ................................................................................................................... 31 2.2 Data and Methods ............................................................................................................... 31 2.2.1 Datasets ....................................................................................................................... 31 2.2.2 Methods....................................................................................................................... 35 2.3 Results: ............................................................................................................................... 37 2.3.1 Morphometry .............................................................................................................. 38 2.3.2 Geomorphologic Map ................................................................................................. 40 2.3.3 Geologic Map from Image Classification ................................................................... 57 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 59 ii 2.4.1 Influence of pre-existing topography .......................................................................... 59 2.4.2 Impactite distribution .................................................................................................. 61 2.4.3 Central peak Characteristics ....................................................................................... 63 2.4.4 Stratified Boulder Observations and Formation ......................................................... 63 2.4.5 Morphology vs. Composition ..................................................................................... 67 2.5 Geologic Map Discussion: ................................................................................................. 68 2.5.1 Central Peak, Crater Floor, and SW Ejecta (Units CP, CF, SWE) ............................. 69 2.5.2 Crater Wall Units (WW and NW) .............................................................................. 75 2.5.3 Ejecta Units (WE, SE, NE) ......................................................................................... 77 2.5.4 Pre-impact Surface (WP, SM) .................................................................................... 82 2.5.5 Anomalous Plateau Units Correlated with Aristarchus Ejecta ................................... 83 2.5.6 Regional Emplacement of Evolved-Lithologies ......................................................... 85 2.5.7 On the possibility of a South AP Crater ..................................................................... 88 2.6 Geologic History of the Southern Aristarchus Plateau ...................................................... 90 2.7 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................ 91 2.8 Acknowledgements: ........................................................................................................... 93 Chapter 2 References: ............................................................................................................... 94 Chapter 2 Figures: ..................................................................................................................... 97 Chapter 2 Tables: .................................................................................................................... 135 Chapter 3: Evidence for Auto-Secondary Cratering of Copernican-Age Continuous Ejecta Deposits on the Moon.................................................................................................................138 Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 138 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 139 3.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................ 142 3.3 Results .............................................................................................................................. 145 3.3.1 Crater Density Mapping At Tycho ........................................................................... 145 3.3.2 Crater Density Variation at Aristarchus Crater:........................................................ 146 3.3.3 Ejecta Blanket CSFDs............................................................................................... 146 3.3.4 CSFD Based on Density ........................................................................................... 147 3.3.5 High-resolution Melt-Ejecta CSFD comparison:...................................................... 148 3.4 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 148 iii 3.4.1 Crater Density Variation on Copernican Ejecta Blankets: ....................................... 148 3.4.2 Crater Density and Apparent Age ............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3-D Seismic Characterization of a Cryptoexplosion Structure
    Cryptoexplosion structure 3-D seismic characterization of a eryptoexplosion structure J. Helen Isaac and Robert R. Stewart ABSTRACT Three-quarters of a circular structure is observed on three-dimensional (3-D) seismic data from James River, Alberta. The structure has an outer diameter of 4.8 km and a raised central uplift surrounded by a rim synform. The central uplift has a diameter of 2.4 km and its crest appears to be uplifted about 400 m above regional levels. The structure is at a depth of about 4500 m. This is below the zone of economic interest and the feature has not been penetrated by any wells. The disturbed sediments are interpreted to be Cambrian. We infer that the structure was formed in Late Cambrian to Middle Devonian time and suffered erosion before the deposition of the overlying Middle Devonian carbonates. Rim faults, probably caused by slumping of material into the depression, are observed on the outside limb of the synform. Reverse faults are evident underneath the feature and the central uplift appears to have coherent internal reflections. The amount of uplift decreases with increasing depth in the section. The entire feature is interpreted to be a cryptoexplosion structure, possibly caused by a meteorite impact. INTRODUCTION Several enigmatic circular structures, of different sizes and ages, have been observed on seismic data from the Western Canadian sedimentary basin (WCSB) (e.g., Sawatzky, 1976; Isaac and Stewart, 1993) and other parts of Canada (Scott and Hajnal, 1988; Jansa et al., 1989). The structures present startling interruptions in otherwise planar seismic features.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-References ASTEROID IMPACT Definition and Introduction History of Impact Cratering Studies
    18 ASTEROID IMPACT Tedesco, E. F., Noah, P. V., Noah, M., and Price, S. D., 2002. The identification and confirmation of impact structures on supplemental IRAS minor planet survey. The Astronomical Earth were developed: (a) crater morphology, (b) geo- 123 – Journal, , 1056 1085. physical anomalies, (c) evidence for shock metamor- Tholen, D. J., and Barucci, M. A., 1989. Asteroid taxonomy. In Binzel, R. P., Gehrels, T., and Matthews, M. S. (eds.), phism, and (d) the presence of meteorites or geochemical Asteroids II. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, pp. 298–315. evidence for traces of the meteoritic projectile – of which Yeomans, D., and Baalke, R., 2009. Near Earth Object Program. only (c) and (d) can provide confirming evidence. Remote Available from World Wide Web: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/ sensing, including morphological observations, as well programs. as geophysical studies, cannot provide confirming evi- dence – which requires the study of actual rock samples. Cross-references Impacts influenced the geological and biological evolu- tion of our own planet; the best known example is the link Albedo between the 200-km-diameter Chicxulub impact structure Asteroid Impact Asteroid Impact Mitigation in Mexico and the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Under- Asteroid Impact Prediction standing impact structures, their formation processes, Torino Scale and their consequences should be of interest not only to Earth and planetary scientists, but also to society in general. ASTEROID IMPACT History of impact cratering studies In the geological sciences, it has only recently been recog- Christian Koeberl nized how important the process of impact cratering is on Natural History Museum, Vienna, Austria a planetary scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Aitken Basin
    Geological and geochemical analysis of units in the South Pole – Aitken Basin A.M. Borst¹,², F.S. Bexkens¹,², B. H. Foing², D. Koschny² ¹ Department of Petrology, VU University Amsterdam ² SCI-S. Research and Scientific Support Department, ESA – ESTEC Student Planetary Workshop 10-10-2008 ESA/ESTEC The Netherlands The South Pole – Aitken Basin Largest and oldest Lunar impact basin - Diameter > 2500 km - Depth > 12 km - Age 4.2 - 3.9 Ga Formed during Late heavy bombardment? Window into the interior and evolution of the Moon Priority target for future sample return missions Digital Elevation Model from Clementine altimetry data. Produced in ENVI, 50x vertical exaggeration, orthographic projection centered on the far side. Red +10 km, purple/black -10km. (A.M.Borst et.al. 2008) 1 The Moon and the SPA Basin Geochemistry Iron map South Pole – Aitken Basin mafic anomaly • High Fe, Th, Ti and Mg abundances • Excavation of mafic deep crustal / upper mantle material Thorium map Clementine 750 nm albedo map from USGS From Paul Lucey, J. Geophys. Res., 2000 Map-a-Planet What can we learn from the SPA Basin? • Large impacts; Implications and processes • Volcanism; Origin, age and difference with near side mare basalts • Cratering record; Age, frequency and size distribution • Late Heavy Bombardment; Intensity, duration and origin • Composition of the deeper crust and possibly upper mantle 2 Topics of SPA Basin study 1) Global structure of the basin (F.S. Bexkens et al, 2008) • Rims, rings, ejecta distribution, subsequent craters modifications, reconstructive
    [Show full text]
  • Qiao Et Al., Sosigenes Pit Crater Age 1/51
    Qiao et al., Sosigenes pit crater age 1 2 The role of substrate characteristics in producing anomalously young crater 3 retention ages in volcanic deposits on the Moon: Morphology, topography, 4 sub-resolution roughness and mode of emplacement of the Sosigenes Lunar 5 Irregular Mare Patch (IMP) 6 7 Le QIAO1,2,*, James W. HEAD2, Long XIAO1, Lionel WILSON3, and Josef D. 8 DUFEK4 9 1Planetary Science Institute, School of Earth Sciences, China University of 10 Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China. 11 2Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Brown University, 12 Providence, RI 02912, USA. 13 3Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK. 14 4School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 15 Georgia 30332, USA. 16 *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected] 17 18 19 20 Key words: Lunar/Moon, Sosigenes, irregular mare patches, mare volcanism, 21 magmatic foam, lava lake, dike emplacement 22 23 24 25 1/51 Qiao et al., Sosigenes pit crater age 26 Abstract: Lunar Irregular Mare Patches (IMPs) are comprised of dozens of small, 27 distinctive and enigmatic lunar mare features. Characterized by their irregular shapes, 28 well-preserved state of relief, apparent optical immaturity and few superposed impact 29 craters, IMPs are interpreted to have been formed or modified geologically very 30 recently (<~100 Ma; Braden et al. 2014). However, their apparent relatively recent 31 formation/modification dates and emplacement mechanisms are debated. We focus in 32 detail on one of the major IMPs, Sosigenes, located in western Mare Tranquillitatis, 33 and dated by Braden et al.
    [Show full text]
  • LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned
    Space Sci Rev DOI 10.1007/s11214-011-9759-y LCROSS (Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite) Observation Campaign: Strategies, Implementation, and Lessons Learned Jennifer L. Heldmann · Anthony Colaprete · Diane H. Wooden · Robert F. Ackermann · David D. Acton · Peter R. Backus · Vanessa Bailey · Jesse G. Ball · William C. Barott · Samantha K. Blair · Marc W. Buie · Shawn Callahan · Nancy J. Chanover · Young-Jun Choi · Al Conrad · Dolores M. Coulson · Kirk B. Crawford · Russell DeHart · Imke de Pater · Michael Disanti · James R. Forster · Reiko Furusho · Tetsuharu Fuse · Tom Geballe · J. Duane Gibson · David Goldstein · Stephen A. Gregory · David J. Gutierrez · Ryan T. Hamilton · Taiga Hamura · David E. Harker · Gerry R. Harp · Junichi Haruyama · Morag Hastie · Yutaka Hayano · Phillip Hinz · Peng K. Hong · Steven P. James · Toshihiko Kadono · Hideyo Kawakita · Michael S. Kelley · Daryl L. Kim · Kosuke Kurosawa · Duk-Hang Lee · Michael Long · Paul G. Lucey · Keith Marach · Anthony C. Matulonis · Richard M. McDermid · Russet McMillan · Charles Miller · Hong-Kyu Moon · Ryosuke Nakamura · Hirotomo Noda · Natsuko Okamura · Lawrence Ong · Dallan Porter · Jeffery J. Puschell · John T. Rayner · J. Jedadiah Rembold · Katherine C. Roth · Richard J. Rudy · Ray W. Russell · Eileen V. Ryan · William H. Ryan · Tomohiko Sekiguchi · Yasuhito Sekine · Mark A. Skinner · Mitsuru Sôma · Andrew W. Stephens · Alex Storrs · Robert M. Suggs · Seiji Sugita · Eon-Chang Sung · Naruhisa Takatoh · Jill C. Tarter · Scott M. Taylor · Hiroshi Terada · Chadwick J. Trujillo · Vidhya Vaitheeswaran · Faith Vilas · Brian D. Walls · Jun-ihi Watanabe · William J. Welch · Charles E. Woodward · Hong-Suh Yim · Eliot F. Young Received: 9 October 2010 / Accepted: 8 February 2011 © The Author(s) 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 40. the System of Lunar Craters, Quadrant Ii Alice P
    NO. 40. THE SYSTEM OF LUNAR CRATERS, QUADRANT II by D. W. G. ARTHUR, ALICE P. AGNIERAY, RUTH A. HORVATH ,tl l C.A. WOOD AND C. R. CHAPMAN \_9 (_ /_) March 14, 1964 ABSTRACT The designation, diameter, position, central-peak information, and state of completeness arc listed for each discernible crater in the second lunar quadrant with a diameter exceeding 3.5 km. The catalog contains more than 2,000 items and is illustrated by a map in 11 sections. his Communication is the second part of The However, since we also have suppressed many Greek System of Lunar Craters, which is a catalog in letters used by these authorities, there was need for four parts of all craters recognizable with reasonable some care in the incorporation of new letters to certainty on photographs and having diameters avoid confusion. Accordingly, the Greek letters greater than 3.5 kilometers. Thus it is a continua- added by us are always different from those that tion of Comm. LPL No. 30 of September 1963. The have been suppressed. Observers who wish may use format is the same except for some minor changes the omitted symbols of Blagg and Miiller without to improve clarity and legibility. The information in fear of ambiguity. the text of Comm. LPL No. 30 therefore applies to The photographic coverage of the second quad- this Communication also. rant is by no means uniform in quality, and certain Some of the minor changes mentioned above phases are not well represented. Thus for small cra- have been introduced because of the particular ters in certain longitudes there are no good determi- nature of the second lunar quadrant, most of which nations of the diameters, and our values are little is covered by the dark areas Mare Imbrium and better than rough estimates.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary Glossary
    Glossary Glossary Albedo A measure of an object’s reflectivity. A pure white reflecting surface has an albedo of 1.0 (100%). A pitch-black, nonreflecting surface has an albedo of 0.0. The Moon is a fairly dark object with a combined albedo of 0.07 (reflecting 7% of the sunlight that falls upon it). The albedo range of the lunar maria is between 0.05 and 0.08. The brighter highlands have an albedo range from 0.09 to 0.15. Anorthosite Rocks rich in the mineral feldspar, making up much of the Moon’s bright highland regions. Aperture The diameter of a telescope’s objective lens or primary mirror. Apogee The point in the Moon’s orbit where it is furthest from the Earth. At apogee, the Moon can reach a maximum distance of 406,700 km from the Earth. Apollo The manned lunar program of the United States. Between July 1969 and December 1972, six Apollo missions landed on the Moon, allowing a total of 12 astronauts to explore its surface. Asteroid A minor planet. A large solid body of rock in orbit around the Sun. Banded crater A crater that displays dusky linear tracts on its inner walls and/or floor. 250 Basalt A dark, fine-grained volcanic rock, low in silicon, with a low viscosity. Basaltic material fills many of the Moon’s major basins, especially on the near side. Glossary Basin A very large circular impact structure (usually comprising multiple concentric rings) that usually displays some degree of flooding with lava. The largest and most conspicuous lava- flooded basins on the Moon are found on the near side, and most are filled to their outer edges with mare basalts.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Impact Structures Provide the Only Ground Truth Against Which Computational and Experimental Results Can Be Com­ Pared
    Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 1987. 15:245-70 Copyright([;; /987 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved TERRESTRIAL IMI!ACT STRUCTURES ··- Richard A. F. Grieve Geophysics Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario KIA OY3, Canada INTRODUCTION Impact structures are the dominant landform on planets that have retained portions of their earliest crust. The present surface of the Earth, however, has comparatively few recognized impact structures. This is due to its relative youthfulness and the dynamic nature of the terrestrial geosphere, both of which serve to obscure and remove the impact record. Although not generally viewed as an important terrestrial (as opposed to planetary) geologic process, the role of impact in Earth evolution is now receiving mounting consideration. For example, large-scale impact events may hav~~ been responsible for such phenomena as the formation of the Earth's moon and certain mass extinctions in the biologic record. The importance of the terrestrial impact record is greater than the relatively small number of known structures would indicate. Impact is a highly transient, high-energy event. It is inherently difficult to study through experimentation because of the problem of scale. In addition, sophisticated finite-element code calculations of impact cratering are gen­ erally limited to relatively early-time phenomena as a result of high com­ putational costs. Terrestrial impact structures provide the only ground truth against which computational and experimental results can be com­ pared. These structures provide information on aspects of the third dimen­ sion, the pre- and postimpact distribution of target lithologies, and the nature of the lithologic and mineralogic changes produced by the passage of a shock wave.
    [Show full text]
  • La Ronge Lynn Lake Bridge Project: Geology of the Southern Reindeer Lake Area
    Saskatchewan Open File Report 2003-1 Industry and Resources Saskatchewan Geological Survey _ La Ronge Lynn Lake Bridge Project: Geology of the Southern Reindeer Lake Area Executive Summary (part of CD1) R.O. Maxeiner, C.T. Harper, D. Corrigan, and D.G. MacDougall 2004 Saskatchewan Open File Report 2003-1 Industry and Resources Saskatchewan Geological Survey La Ronge–Lynn Lake Bridge Project: Geology of the Southern Reindeer Lake Area Executive Summary (part of CD1) R.O. Maxeiner, C.T. Harper, D. Corrigan, and D.G. MacDougall 2004 19 48 Printed under the authority of the Minister of Industry and Resources Although the Department of Industry and Resources has exercised all reasonable care in the compilation, interpretation, and production of this report, it is not possible to ensure total accuracy, and all persons who rely on the information contained herein do so at their own risk. The Department of Industry and Resources and the Government of Saskatchewan do not accept liability for any errors, omissions or inaccuracies that may be included in, or derived from, this report. Cover: Garnet-anthophyllite alteration assemblage from the Numabin Bay area (Reindeer Lake). This report is available for viewing and additional copies are available for purchase at: Publications Office Saskatchewan Industry and Resources 2101 Scarth Street, 3rd floor Regina, SK SA4P 3V7 (306) 787-2528 or FAX (306) 787-2488 E-mail: [email protected] and the Resident Geologists’ offices in La Ronge and Creighton Parts of this publication may be quoted if credit is given. It is recommended that reference to this report be made as follows: Maxeiner, R.O., Harper, C.T., Corrigan, D., and MacDougall, D.G.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Brushy Creek Feature, Saint Helena Parish, Louisiana Andrew Schedl
    Open-File Series No. 18-01 Fall 2018 A Study of the Brushy Creek Feature, Saint Helena Parish, Louisiana Andrew Schedl Abstract This study was unable to determine the origin of the Brushy Creek feature. New¯ thin sections were made and new and old thin sections were examined using the opti- cal and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Powdered samples from the center of Brushy Creek were examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD). In sample 16SHPA, a half dozen new grains with probable planar deformation features (PDF) were found with orientations of {1012} and {1011}. Preliminary SEM studies of zircons showed no evidence for PDFs or reidite. Only one grain from the center of Brushy Creek structure showed possible rectangular fracture. XRD analysis found no evidence for high-pressure forms of quartz, coesite and stishovite. Suggestions for further study are included. Introduction North-south oriented ridges and ravines dominate the landscape in this part of Louisiana. The Brushy Creek is a “noticeable circular hole” in the ridge/ravine topography (Heinrich, 2003). The feature is about 2 kilometers in diameter and has a relief of 15 meters and Brushy Creek breeches the southeast rim of this feature. Exposed in the rim is the poorly lithified and highly fractured Pliocene Citronelle Formation. Near the Brushy Creek feature, the Citronelle formation consists of cross-bedded, massive, poorly sorted fine to coarse sand 9-12 meters thick underlain by 6 meters of laminated clay and silt. The Kentwood Brick and Tile Company has drilled the center of the feature and have found that the laminated clay and silt is absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Martian Crater Morphology
    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
    [Show full text]
  • Production and Saturation of Porosity in the Lunar Highlands from Impact Cratering
    The fractured Moon: Production and saturation of porosity in the lunar highlands from impact cratering The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Soderblom, Jason M., et al. “The Fractured Moon: Production and Saturation of Porosity in the Lunar Highlands from Impact Cratering.” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 42, no. 17, Sept. 2015, pp. 6939–44. © 2015 American Geophysical Union As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2015GL065022 Publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU) Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/118615 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. PUBLICATIONS Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER The fractured Moon: Production and saturation 10.1002/2015GL065022 of porosity in the lunar highlands Key Points: from impact cratering • The relation between impact-generated porosity and crater size is quantified Jason M. Soderblom1, Alexander J. Evans2, Brandon C. Johnson1, H. Jay Melosh3, Katarina Miljković1,4, • Impacts into highly porous targets 5 6 7 8 3 result in positive gravity anomalies Roger J. Phillips , Jeffrey C. Andrews-Hanna , Carver J. Bierson , James W. Head III , Colleen Milbury , 9 7 1 2,10 11 • The cratering record of the oldest Gregory A. Neumann , Francis Nimmo , David E. Smith , Sean C. Solomon , Michael M. Sori , lunar surfaces is preserved in the
    [Show full text]