DOCSLIB.ORG

Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering by Dr. Deepankar Choudhury Professor Department of Civil Engineering IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India. Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.civil.iitb.ac.in/~dc/ Lecture – 11 Module – 4 Strong Ground Motion IIT Bombay, DC 2 Size of Earthquakes IIT Bombay, DC 3 Magnitude and Intensity Intensity • How Strong Earthquake Feels to Observer – Qualitative assessment of the kinds of damage done by an earthquake – Depends on distance to earthquake & strength of earthquake – Determined from the intensity of shaking and damage from the earthquake Magnitude • Related to Energy Release. – Quantitative measurement of the amount of energy released by an earthquake – Depends on the size of the fault that breaks – Determined from Seismic Records 4 IIT Bombay, DC Measuring Earthquakes • Seismogram is visual record of arrival time and magnitude of shaking associated with seismic wave. Analysis of seismogram allows measurement of size of earthquake. • Mercalli Intensity scale Measured by the amount of damage caused in human terms- I (low) to XII (high); drawback: inefficient in uninhabited area • Richter Scale- (logarithmic scale) Magnitude- based on amplitude of the waves Related to earthquake total energy IIT Bombay, DC 5 Intensity How Strong Earthquake Feels to Observer Depends On: • Distance to hypocenter/epicenter • Geology of site • Type of building /structure • Observer’s feeling Value varies from Place to Place • Modified Mercalli Scale - I to XII IIT Bombay, DC 6 Ref: Wikipedia IIT Bombay, DC 7 Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale IIT Bombay, DC 8 Earthquake Magnitude ML - Local (Richter) magnitude MW - Seismic Moment magnitude MS - Surface wave magnitude m b- Body wave magnitude IIT Bombay, DC 9 Local Magnitude of Earthquake • Magnitude – Richter scale measures the magnitude of an earthquake, based on seismogram independent of intensity – Amplitude of the largest wave produced by an event is corrected for distance and assigned a value on an open- ended logarithmic scale – The equation for Richter Magnitude is: ML = log10A(mm) + (Distance correction factor) Here A is the amplitude, in millimeters, measured directly from the photographic paper record of the Wood-Anderson seismograph, a special type of instrument. The distance factor comes from a table given by Richter (1958). 10 IIT Bombay, DC Richter’s Local Magnitude Right side diagram (nomogram) demonstrates how to use Richter's original method to measure a seismogram for a magnitude estimate After you measure the wave amplitude you have to take its logarithm and scale it according to the distance of the seismometer from the earthquake, estimated by the S-P time difference. The S-P time, in seconds, makes t. The equation behind this nomogram, used by Richter in Southern California, is: ML = log10A(mm) +3 log10[8 t (sec)]-2.93 11 IIT Bombay, DC Richter Scale: Related to intensity – M=1 to 3: Recorded on local seismographs, but generally not felt – M= 3 to 4: Often felt, no damage – M=5: Felt widely, slight damage near epicenter – M=6: Damage to poorly constructed buildings and other structures within 10's km – M=7: "Major" earthquake, causes serious damage up to ~100 km (Gujarat 2001 earthquake). – M=8: "Great" earthquake, great destruction, loss of life over several 100 km – M=9: Rare great earthquake, major damage over a large region over 1000 km 12 IIT Bombay, DC Correlations IIT Bombay, DC 13 Surface Wave Magnitude Richter’s local magnitude does not distinguish between different types of waves. At large distances from epicenter, ground motion is dominated by surface waves. Gutenberg and Richter (1956) developed a magnitude scale based on the amplitude of Rayleigh waves. Surface wave magnitude Ms = log10A + 1.66 log10 +2.0 A = Maximum ground displacement in micrometers = Distance of seismograph from the epicenter, in degrees. Surface wave magnitude is used for shallow earthquakes IIT Bombay, DC 14 Body Wave Magnitude For deep focus earthquakes, reliable measurement of amplitude of surface waves is difficult. Amplitudes of P-waves are not strongly affected by focal depth. Gutenberg (1945) developed a magnitude scale based on the amplitude of the first few cycles of P- waves, which is useful for measuring the size of deep earthquakes. Body wave magnitude mb = log10A – log10T +0.01 + 5.9 A = Amplitude of P-waves in micrometers T = period of P-wave = Distance of seismograph from the epicenter, in degrees. IIT Bombay, DC 15 Source: Richter (1958) IIT Bombay, DC 16 Limitations of Ms and mb due to Magnitude Saturation Magnitude saturation, is a general phenomenon for approximately Mb > 6.2 and Ms > 8.3. As Mb approaches 6.2 or MS approaches 8.3, there is an abrupt change in the rate at which frequency of occurrence decreases with magnitude. Though the rupture area on the fault is large, the predictions will saturate at these magnitudes. Because of this magnitude saturation, estimation of magnitude for large earthquakes through Mb and M becomes erroneous. s IIT Bombay, DC 17 Seismic - Moment Magnitude A Seismograph Measures Ground Motion at One Instant But -- • A Really Great Earthquake Lasts Minutes • Releases Energy over Hundreds of Kilometers • Need to Sum Energy of Entire Record • Moment magnitude scale based on seismic moment (Kanamori, 1977) and doesn’t depend upon ground shaking levels. • It’s the only magnitude scale efficient for any size of earthquake. IIT Bombay, DC 18 Moment Magnitude • Moment-Magnitude Scale – Seismic Moment = Strength of Rock x Fault Area x Total amount of Slip along Rupture M0 = A D (in N.m) [Idriss, 1985] Where, = shear modulus of material along the fault plane in N/m2 (= 3x1010 N/m2 for surface crust and 7x1012 N/m2 for mantle) A = area of fault plane undergoing slip (m2) D = average displacement of ruptured segment of fault (m) Moment Magnitude, Mw = 2/3 x [log10M0(dyne-cm) –16] Moment Magnitude, Mw = - 6.0 + 0.67 log10M0(N.m) [Hanks and Kanamori (1979)] – Measurement Analysis requires Time IIT Bombay, DC 19 Seismic - Moment Magnitude • Most magnitude scales saturate towards large earthquakes with m b > 6.0, M L > 6.5, and M S > 8.0. The moment magnitude M w (Kanamori 1977) represents true size of earthquakes, as it is based on seismic moment, which in turn is proportional to the product of the rupture area and dislocation of an earthquake fault (Aki 1966). M W is defined as, MW = 2/3log10M0− 6.05 where M 0 is the scalar seismic moment in Nm. MW does not saturate, this is the most reliable magnitude for describing the size of an earthquake (Scordilis 2006). IIT Bombay, DC 20 Rigidity of Crust and Mantle for Seismic Moment Estimation IIT Bombay, DC 21 Correlation between Mw and ML • The distribution of M W versus M L is shown Fig. and the correlation is given by Kolathayar et al. (2012) for India by considering 69 earthquake data, 2 MW=0.815(±0.04)ML+0.767(±0.174), 3.3≤ML≤7, R =0.884 IIT Bombay, DC 22 Correlations between various magnitude scales Heaton et al. (1982) IIT Bombay, DC 23 Seismic Energy Both the magnitude and the seismic moment are related to the amount of energy that is radiated by an earthquake. Gutenberg and Richter (1956), developed a relationship between magnitude and energy. Their relationship is: logES = 11.8 + 1.5Ms Energy ES in ergs from the surface wave magnitude Ms. ES is not the total “intrinsic” energy of the earthquake, transferred from sources such as gravitational energy or to sinks such as heat energy. It is only the amount radiated from the earthquake as seismic waves, which ought to be a small fraction of the total energy transferred during the earthquake process. IIT Bombay, DC 24 Local Magnitude - Seismic Energy correlation Gujarat (2001) Size of an earthquake using the Richter’s Local Magnitude Scale is shown on the left hand side of the figure above. The larger the number, the bigger the earthquake. The scale on the right hand side of the figure represents the amount of high explosive required to produce the energy released by the earthquake. 25 Frequency of earthquakes IIT Bombay, DC 26 Frequency of earthquakes IIT Bombay, DC 27 Example Problem IIT Bombay, DC 28 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • STRUCTURE of EARTH S-Wave Shadow P-Wave Shadow P-Wave
    STRUCTURE OF EARTH Earthquake Focus P-wave P-wave shadow shadow S-wave shadow P waves = Primary waves = Pressure waves S waves = Secondary waves = Shear waves (Don't penetrate liquids) CRUST < 50-70 km thick MANTLE = 2900 km thick OUTER CORE (Liquid) = 3200 km thick INNER CORE (Solid) = 1300 km radius. STRUCTURE OF EARTH Low Velocity Crust Zone Whole Mantle Convection Lithosphere Upper Mantle Transition Zone Layered Mantle Convection Lower Mantle S-wave P-wave CRUST : Conrad discontinuity = upper / lower crust boundary Mohorovicic discontinuity = base of Continental Crust (35-50 km continents; 6-8 km oceans) MANTLE: Lithosphere = Rigid Mantle < 100 km depth Asthenosphere = Plastic Mantle > 150 km depth Low Velocity Zone = Partially Melted, 100-150 km depth Upper Mantle < 410 km Transition Zone = 400-600 km --> Velocity increases rapidly Lower Mantle = 600 - 2900 km Outer Core (Liquid) 2900-5100 km Inner Core (Solid) 5100-6400 km Center = 6400 km UPPER MANTLE AND MAGMA GENERATION A. Composition of Earth Density of the Bulk Earth (Uncompressed) = 5.45 gm/cm3 Densities of Common Rocks: Granite = 2.55 gm/cm3 Peridotite, Eclogite = 3.2 to 3.4 gm/cm3 Basalt = 2.85 gm/cm3 Density of the CORE (estimated) = 7.2 gm/cm3 Fe-metal = 8.0 gm/cm3, Ni-metal = 8.5 gm/cm3 EARTH must contain a mix of Rock and Metal . Stony meteorites Remains of broken planets Planetary Interior Rock=Stony Meteorites ÒChondritesÓ = Olivine, Pyroxene, Metal (Fe-Ni) Metal = Fe-Ni Meteorites Core density = 7.2 gm/cm3 -- Too Light for Pure Fe-Ni Light elements = O2 (FeO) or S (FeS) B.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Wavefield Imaging of Earth's Interior Across Scales
    TECHNICAL REVIEWS Seismic wavefield imaging of Earth’s interior across scales Jeroen Tromp Abstract | Seismic full- waveform inversion (FWI) for imaging Earth’s interior was introduced in the late 1970s. Its ultimate goal is to use all of the information in a seismogram to understand the structure and dynamics of Earth, such as hydrocarbon reservoirs, the nature of hotspots and the forces behind plate motions and earthquakes. Thanks to developments in high- performance computing and advances in modern numerical methods in the past 10 years, 3D FWI has become feasible for a wide range of applications and is currently used across nine orders of magnitude in frequency and wavelength. A typical FWI workflow includes selecting seismic sources and a starting model, conducting forward simulations, calculating and evaluating the misfit, and optimizing the simulated model until the observed and modelled seismograms converge on a single model. This method has revealed Pleistocene ice scrapes beneath a gas cloud in the Valhall oil field, overthrusted Iberian crust in the western Pyrenees mountains, deep slabs in subduction zones throughout the world and the shape of the African superplume. The increased use of multi- parameter inversions, improved computational and algorithmic efficiency , and the inclusion of Bayesian statistics in the optimization process all stand to substantially improve FWI, overcoming current computational or data- quality constraints. In this Technical Review, FWI methods and applications in controlled- source and earthquake seismology are discussed, followed by a perspective on the future of FWI, which will ultimately result in increased insight into the physics and chemistry of Earth’s interior.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthquake Measurements
    EARTHQUAKE MEASUREMENTS The vibrations produced by earthquakes are detected, recorded, and measured by instruments call seismographs1. The zig-zag line made by a seismograph, called a "seismogram," reflects the changing intensity of the vibrations by responding to the motion of the ground surface beneath the instrument. From the data expressed in seismograms, scientists can determine the time, the epicenter, the focal depth, and the type of faulting of an earthquake and can estimate how much energy was released. Seismograph/Seismometer Earthquake recording instrument, seismograph has a base that sets firmly in the ground, and a heavy weight that hangs free2. When an earthquake causes the ground to shake, the base of the seismograph shakes too, but the hanging weight does not. Instead the spring or string that it is hanging from absorbs all the movement. The difference in position between the shaking part of the seismograph and the motionless part is Seismograph what is recorded. Measuring Size of Earthquakes The size of an earthquake depends on the size of the fault and the amount of slip on the fault, but that’s not something scientists can simply measure with a measuring tape since faults are many kilometers deep beneath the earth’s surface. They use the seismogram recordings made on the seismographs at the surface of the earth to determine how large the earthquake was. A short wiggly line that doesn’t wiggle very much means a small earthquake, and a long wiggly line that wiggles a lot means a large earthquake2. The length of the wiggle depends on the size of the fault, and the size of the wiggle depends on the amount of slip.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy and Magnitude: a Historical Perspective
    Pure Appl. Geophys. 176 (2019), 3815–3849 Ó 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-1994-7 Pure and Applied Geophysics Energy and Magnitude: A Historical Perspective 1 EMILE A. OKAL Abstract—We present a detailed historical review of early referred to as ‘‘Gutenberg [and Richter]’s energy– attempts to quantify seismic sources through a measure of the magnitude relation’’ features a slope of 1.5 which is energy radiated into seismic waves, in connection with the parallel development of the concept of magnitude. In particular, we explore not predicted a priori by simple physical arguments. the derivation of the widely quoted ‘‘Gutenberg–Richter energy– We will use Gutenberg and Richter’s (1956a) nota- magnitude relationship’’ tion, Q [their Eq. (16) p. 133], for the slope of log10 E versus magnitude [1.5 in (1)]. log10 E ¼ 1:5Ms þ 11:8 ð1Þ We are motivated by the fact that Eq. (1)istobe (E in ergs), and especially the origin of the value 1.5 for the slope. found nowhere in this exact form in any of the tra- By examining all of the relevant papers by Gutenberg and Richter, we note that estimates of this slope kept decreasing for more than ditional references in its support, which incidentally 20 years before Gutenberg’s sudden death, and that the value 1.5 were most probably copied from one referring pub- was obtained through the complex computation of an estimate of lication to the next. They consist of Gutenberg and the energy flux above the hypocenter, based on a number of assumptions and models lacking robustness in the context of Richter (1954)(Seismicity of the Earth), Gutenberg modern seismological theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Foreshocks and Short Term Deformation in the Source Area of Major Earthquakes
    Characteristics of Foreshocks and Short Term Deformation in the Source Area of Major Earthquakes Peter Molnar Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 USGS CONTRACT NO. 14-08-0001-17759 Supported by the EARTHQUAKE HAZARDS REDUCTION PROGRAM OPEN-FILE NO.81-287 U.S. Geological Survey OPEN FILE REPORT This report was prepared under contract to the U.S. Geological Survey and has not been reviewed for conformity with USGS editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. Opinions and conclusions expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of the USGS. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS. Appendix A A Study of the Haicheng Foreshock Sequence By Lucile Jones, Wang Biquan and Xu Shaoxie (English Translation of a Paper Published in Di Zhen Xue Bao (Journal of Seismology), 1980.) Abstract We have examined the locations and radiation patterns of the foreshocks to the 4 February 1978 Haicheng earthquake. Using four stations, the foreshocks were located relative to a master event. They occurred very close together, no more than 6 kilo­ meters apart. Nevertheless, there appear to have been too clusters of foreshock activity. The majority of events seem to have occurred in a cluster to the east of the master event along a NNE-SSW trend. Moreover, all eight foreshocks that we could locate and with a magnitude greater than 3.0 occurred in this group. The're also "appears to be a second cluster of foresfiocks located to the northwest of the first. Thus it seems possible that the majority of foreshocks did not occur on the rupture plane of the mainshock, which trends WNW, but on another plane nearly perpendicualr to the mainshock.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 the Evolution of Seismic Monitoring Systems at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory
    Characteristics of Hawaiian Volcanoes Editors: Michael P. Poland, Taeko Jane Takahashi, and Claire M. Landowski U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1801, 2014 Chapter 2 The Evolution of Seismic Monitoring Systems at the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory By Paul G. Okubo1, Jennifer S. Nakata1, and Robert Y. Koyanagi1 Abstract the Island of Hawai‘i. Over the past century, thousands of sci- entific reports and articles have been published in connection In the century since the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory with Hawaiian volcanism, and an extensive bibliography has (HVO) put its first seismographs into operation at the edge of accumulated, including numerous discussions of the history of Kīlauea Volcano’s summit caldera, seismic monitoring at HVO HVO and its seismic monitoring operations, as well as research (now administered by the U.S. Geological Survey [USGS]) has results. From among these references, we point to Klein and evolved considerably. The HVO seismic network extends across Koyanagi (1980), Apple (1987), Eaton (1996), and Klein and the entire Island of Hawai‘i and is complemented by stations Wright (2000) for details of the early growth of HVO’s seismic installed and operated by monitoring partners in both the USGS network. In particular, the work of Klein and Wright stands and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The out because their compilation uses newspaper accounts and seismic data stream that is available to HVO for its monitoring other reports of the effects of historical earthquakes to extend of volcanic and seismic activity in Hawai‘i, therefore, is built Hawai‘i’s detailed seismic history to nearly a century before from hundreds of data channels from a diverse collection of instrumental monitoring began at HVO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moment Magnitude and the Energy Magnitude: Common Roots
    The moment magnitude and the energy magnitude : common roots and differences Peter Bormann, Domenico Giacomo To cite this version: Peter Bormann, Domenico Giacomo. The moment magnitude and the energy magnitude : com- mon roots and differences. Journal of Seismology, Springer Verlag, 2010, 15 (2), pp.411-427. 10.1007/s10950-010-9219-2. hal-00646919 HAL Id: hal-00646919 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00646919 Submitted on 1 Dec 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Click here to download Manuscript: JOSE_MS_Mw-Me_final_Nov2010.doc Click here to view linked References The moment magnitude Mw and the energy magnitude Me: common roots 1 and differences 2 3 by 4 Peter Bormann and Domenico Di Giacomo* 5 GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany 6 *Now at the International Seismological Centre, Pipers Lane, RG19 4NS Thatcham, UK 7 8 9 Abstract 10 11 Starting from the classical empirical magnitude-energy relationships, in this article the 12 derivation of the modern scales for moment magnitude M and energy magnitude M is 13 w e 14 outlined and critically discussed. The formulas for Mw and Me calculation are presented in a 15 way that reveals, besides the contributions of the physically defined measurement parameters 16 seismic moment M0 and radiated seismic energy ES, the role of the constants in the classical 17 Gutenberg-Richter magnitude-energy relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • PEAT8002 - SEISMOLOGY Lecture 13: Earthquake Magnitudes and Moment
    PEAT8002 - SEISMOLOGY Lecture 13: Earthquake magnitudes and moment Nick Rawlinson Research School of Earth Sciences Australian National University Earthquake magnitudes and moment Introduction In the last two lectures, the effects of the source rupture process on the pattern of radiated seismic energy was discussed. However, even before earthquake mechanisms were studied, the priority of seismologists, after locating an earthquake, was to quantify their size, both for scientific purposes and hazard assessment. The first measure introduced was the magnitude, which is based on the amplitude of the emanating waves recorded on a seismogram. The idea is that the wave amplitude reflects the earthquake size once the amplitudes are corrected for the decrease with distance due to geometric spreading and attenuation. Earthquake magnitudes and moment Introduction Magnitude scales thus have the general form: A M = log + F(h, ∆) + C T where A is the amplitude of the signal, T is its dominant period, F is a correction for the variation of amplitude with the earthquake’s depth h and angular distance ∆ from the seismometer, and C is a regional scaling factor. Magnitude scales are logarithmic, so an increase in one unit e.g. from 5 to 6, indicates a ten-fold increase in seismic wave amplitude. Note that since a log10 scale is used, magnitudes can be negative for very small displacements. For example, a magnitude -1 earthquake might correspond to a hammer blow. Earthquake magnitudes and moment Richter magnitude The concept of earthquake magnitude was introduced by Charles Richter in 1935 for southern California earthquakes. He originally defined earthquake magnitude as the logarithm (to the base 10) of maximum amplitude measured in microns on the record of a standard torsion seismograph with a pendulum period of 0.8 s, magnification of 2800, and damping factor 0.8, located at a distance of 100 km from the epicenter.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 4: Seismic Methods for Determining Earthquake Source
    Paper 4: Seismic methods for determining earthquake source parameters and lithospheric structure WALTER D. MOONEY U.S. Geological Survey, MS 977, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025 For referring to this paper: Mooney, W. D., 1989, Seismic methods for determining earthquake source parameters and lithospheric structure, in Pakiser, L. C., and Mooney, W. D., Geophysical framework of the continental United States: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America Memoir 172. ABSTRACT The seismologic methods most commonly used in studies of earthquakes and the structure of the continental lithosphere are reviewed in three main sections: earthquake source parameter determinations, the determination of earth structure using natural sources, and controlled-source seismology. The emphasis in each section is on a description of data, the principles behind the analysis techniques, and the assumptions and uncertainties in interpretation. Rather than focusing on future directions in seismology, the goal here is to summarize past and current practice as a companion to the review papers in this volume. Reliable earthquake hypocenters and focal mechanisms require seismograph locations with a broad distribution in azimuth and distance from the earthquakes; a recording within one focal depth of the epicenter provides excellent hypocentral depth control. For earthquakes of magnitude greater than 4.5, waveform modeling methods may be used to determine source parameters. The seismic moment tensor provides the most complete and accurate measure of earthquake source parameters, and offers a dynamic picture of the faulting process. Methods for determining the Earth's structure from natural sources exist for local, regional, and teleseismic sources. One-dimensional models of structure are obtained from body and surface waves using both forward and inverse modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling Seismic Wave Propagation for Geophysical Imaging J
    Modelling Seismic Wave Propagation for Geophysical Imaging J. Virieux, V. Etienne, V. Cruz-Atienza, R. Brossier, E. Chaljub, O. Coutant, S. Garambois, D. Mercerat, V. Prieux, S. Operto, et al. To cite this version: J. Virieux, V. Etienne, V. Cruz-Atienza, R. Brossier, E. Chaljub, et al.. Modelling Seismic Wave Propagation for Geophysical Imaging. Seismic Waves - Research and Analysis, Masaki Kanao, 253- 304, Chap.13, 2012, 978-953-307-944-8. hal-00682707 HAL Id: hal-00682707 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00682707 Submitted on 5 Apr 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 130 Modelling Seismic Wave Propagation for Geophysical Imaging Jean Virieux et al.1,* Vincent Etienne et al.2†and Victor Cruz-Atienza et al.3‡ 1ISTerre, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble 2GeoAzur, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut de Recherche pour le développement 3Instituto de Geofisica, Departamento de Sismologia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México 1,2France 3Mexico 1. Introduction − The Earth is an heterogeneous complex media from
    [Show full text]
  • Three New Fundamental Problems in Physics of the Aftershocks
    arXiv 2020 Three New Fundamental Problems in Physics of the Aftershocks Anatol V. Guglielmi, Alexey D. Zavyalov, Oleg D. Zotov Institute of Physics of the Earth RAS, Moscow, Russia [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Recently, the physics of aftershocks has been enriched by three new problems. We will conditionally call them dynamic, inverse, and morphological problems. They were clearly formulated, partially resolved and are fundamental. Dynamic problem is to search for the cumulative effect of a round-the-world seismic echo appearing after the mainshock of earthquake. According to the theory, a converging surface seismic wave excited by the main shock returns to the epicenter about 3 hours after the main shock and stimulates the excitation of a strong aftershock. Our observations confirm the theoretical expectation. The second problem is an adequate description of the averaged evolution of the aftershock flow. We introduced a new concept about the coefficient of deactivation of the earthquake source, “cooling down” after the main mainshock, and proposed an equation that describes the evolution of aftershocks. Based on the equation of evolution, we posed and solved the inverse problem of the physics of the earthquake source and created an Atlas of aftershocks demonstrating the diversity of variations of the deactivation coefficient. The third task is to model the spatial and spatio-temporal distribution of aftershocks. Its solution refines our understanding of the structure of the earthquake source. We also discuss in detail interesting unsolved problems in the physics of aftershocks. Keywords: round-the-world echo, deactivation coefficient, evolution equation, inverse problem, spatio-temporal distribution of aftershocks 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Earthquake Location Accuracy
    Theme IV - Understanding Seismicity Catalogs and their Problems Earthquake Location Accuracy 1 2 Stephan Husen • Jeanne L. Hardebeck 1. Swiss Seismological Service, ETH Zurich 2. United States Geological Survey How to cite this article: Husen, S., and J.L. Hardebeck (2010), Earthquake location accuracy, Community Online Resource for Statistical Seismicity Analysis, doi:10.5078/corssa-55815573. Available at http://www.corssa.org. Document Information: Issue date: 1 September 2010 Version: 1.0 2 www.corssa.org Contents 1 Motivation .................................................................................................................................................. 3 2 Location Techniques ................................................................................................................................... 4 3 Uncertainty and Artifacts .......................................................................................................................... 9 4 Choosing a Catalog, and What to Expect ................................................................................................ 25 5 Summary, Further Reading, Next Steps ................................................................................................... 30 Earthquake Location Accuracy 3 Abstract Earthquake location catalogs are not an exact representation of the true earthquake locations. They contain random error, for example from errors in the arrival time picks, as well as systematic biases. The most important source of systematic
    [Show full text]