DOCSLIB.ORG

The Biology of Triticum Aestivum L. Em Thell (Bread Wheat)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Biology of Triticum Aestivum L. Em Thell (Bread Wheat) The Biology of Triticum aestivum L. em Thell. (Bread Wheat) Picture reproduced from <http://www.acpfg.com.au/files/education/factsheets/wheat_barley_book.pdf> with permission from the Australian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics. Version 2: February 2008 This document provides an overview of baseline biological information relevant to risk assessment of genetically modified forms of the species that may be released into the Australian environment. For information on the Australian Government Office of the Gene Technology Regulator visit <http://www.ogtr.gov.au> The Biology of Triticum aestivum L. em Thell. (bread wheat) Office of the Gene Technology Regulator TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE ...........................................................................................................................................1 SECTION 1 TAXONOMY..............................................................................................................1 SECTION 2 ORIGIN AND CULTIVATION................................................................................2 2.1 CENTRE OF DIVERSITY AND DOMESTICATION................................................................2 2.2 COMMERCIAL USES .......................................................................................................5 2.3 CULTIVATION IN AUSTRALIA ........................................................................................6 2.3.1 Commercial propagation ...............................................................................6 2.3.2 Scale of cultivation.........................................................................................6 2.3.3 Cultivation practices ......................................................................................8 2.4 CROP IMPROVEMENT.....................................................................................................9 2.4.1 Breeding .........................................................................................................9 2.4.2 Genetic modification ....................................................................................11 SECTION 3 MORPHOLOGY......................................................................................................12 3.1 PLANT MORPHOLOGY..................................................................................................12 3.1.1 The Stem.......................................................................................................12 3.1.2 The Leaf........................................................................................................13 3.1.3 Tillers ...........................................................................................................13 3.1.4 The Roots......................................................................................................13 3.2 REPRODUCTIVE MORPHOLOGY....................................................................................13 3.2.1 The Ear.........................................................................................................13 3.2.1 The Caryopsis...............................................................................................14 SECTION 4 DEVELOPMENT.....................................................................................................14 4.1 REPRODUCTION...........................................................................................................14 4.1.1 Sexual reproduction .....................................................................................14 4.2 POLLINATION AND POLLEN DISPERSAL........................................................................14 4.3 FRUIT/SEED DEVELOPMENT AND SEED DISPERSAL.......................................................16 4.4 SEED DORMANCY AND GERMINATION .........................................................................17 4.5 VEGETATIVE GROWTH ................................................................................................19 4.5.1 Root development .........................................................................................19 4.5.2 Leaf development..........................................................................................19 4.5.3 Stem development.........................................................................................20 4.5.4 Tiller development........................................................................................20 SECTION 5 BIOCHEMISTRY....................................................................................................20 5.1 TOXINS........................................................................................................................20 5.2 ALLERGENS.................................................................................................................20 5.2.1 Coeliac Disease............................................................................................21 5.3 OTHER UNDESIRABLE PHYTOCHEMICALS ....................................................................21 5.3.1 Enzyme inhibitors.........................................................................................21 5.3.2 Lectins ..........................................................................................................21 5.3.3 Phytic acid....................................................................................................22 5.3.4 Nitrate poisoning..........................................................................................22 5.4 BENEFICIAL PHYTOCHEMICALS ...................................................................................22 SECTION 6 ABIOTIC INTERACTIONS...................................................................................24 6.1 ABIOTIC STRESS LIMITING GROWTH ............................................................................24 6.1.1 Nutrient stress ..............................................................................................24 6.1.2 Temperature stress .......................................................................................24 6.1.3 Water stress..................................................................................................24 6.2 ABIOTIC TOLERANCES.................................................................................................25 iii The Biology of Triticum aestivum L. em Thell. (bread wheat) Office of the Gene Technology Regulator SECTION 7 BIOTIC INTERACTIONS......................................................................................25 7.1 WEEDS ........................................................................................................................25 7.2 PESTS AND PATHOGENS...............................................................................................25 SECTION 8 WEEDINESS ............................................................................................................26 8.1 WEEDINESS STATUS ON A GLOBAL SCALE ...................................................................28 8.2 WEEDINESS STATUS IN AUSTRALIA.............................................................................28 8.3 WEEDINESS IN AGRICULTURAL ECOSYSTEMS ..............................................................28 8.4 WEEDINESS IN NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS .......................................................................29 8.5 CONTROL MEASURES ..................................................................................................29 SECTION 9 POTENTIAL FOR VERTICAL GENE TRANSFER ..........................................29 9.1 INTRASPECIFIC CROSSING............................................................................................29 9.2 NATURAL INTERSPECIFIC AND INTERGENERIC CROSSING ............................................30 9.3 CROSSING UNDER EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS ..........................................................31 REFERENCES .....................................................................................................................................34 iv The Biology of Triticum aestivum L. em Thell. (bread wheat) Office of the Gene Technology Regulator PREAMBLE This document describes the biology of Triticum aestivum L. em Thell. (bread wheat), with particular reference to the Australian environment, cultivation and use. Information included relates to the taxonomy and origins of cultivated T. aestivum, general descriptions of its morphology, reproductive biology, development, biochemistry, biotic and abiotic interactions. This document also addresses the potential for gene transfer to occur to closely related species. The purpose of this document is to provide baseline information about the parent organism in risk assessments of genetically modified T. aestivum that may be released into the Australian environment. In Australia, the majority of wheat grown is T. aestivum and its cultivars. The other wheat species grown in Australia is Triticum turgidum ssp. durum L, also know as durum or pasta wheat. The terms ‘wheat’ and ‘bread wheat’ will be used as general terms to refer to T. aestivum. Bread wheat is an annual grass generally grown in Australia as a rotation crop. The varieties grown in Australia are spring wheat varieties although they are grown during the winter growing season and harvested in early summer. Bread wheat is the most widely grown food crop in the world and Australia is one of the four major exporters of wheat in the world. SECTION 1 TAXONOMY Triticum aestivum L. em Thell. is recorded
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canadian Wheat
    Canadian Wheat By: J. E. Dexter1, K.R. Preston1 and N. J. Woodbeck2 Chapter 6: Future of flour a compendium of flour improvement, 2006, pg - 43-62 Edited by Lutz Popper, Wermer Schafer and Walter Freund. Agrimedia, Bergen. Dunne, Germany. 1 Canadian Grain Commission, Grain Research Laboratory, 1404-303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 3G8, Canada 2 Canadian Grain Commission, Industry Services, 900-303 Main Street, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3C 3G8, Canada Introduction The vast majority of Canadian wheat is produced in western Canada (Manitoba and provinces to the west). A high proportion of western Canadian wheat is exported, and it is marketed in a highly regulated fashion. As soon as western Canadian wheat is delivered by producers to a grain elevator the wheat becomes the property of the Canadian Wheat Board, which is a single desk seller for western Canadian wheat. Approval for registration into any of the eight classes of wheat in western Canada is based on merit according to disease resistance, agronomic performance and processing quality. Wheat is also produced in eastern Canada, primarily in southern Ontario. Eastern Canadian wheat is also registered on the basis of merit, although processing quality models are not quite as strictly defined as for western Canada. There is no single desk seller for eastern Canadian wheat. Eastern Canadian wheat is marketed by private trading companies and the Ontario Wheat Producers Marketing Board. Approximately 50% of eastern Canadian wheat disappears domestically. The Canadian Grain Commission (CGC), a Department within Agriculture and Agri- Food Canada (AAFC), oversees quality assurance of Canadian grains, oilseeds, pulses and special crops.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canadian Wheat Board, Warburtons, and the Creative
    The Canadian Wheat Board and the creative re- constitution of the Canada-UK wheat trade: wheat and bread in food regime history by André J. R. Magnan A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Sociology University of Toronto © Copyright by André Magnan 2010. Abstract Title: The Canadian Wheat Board and the creative re-constitution of the Canada-UK wheat trade: wheat and bread in food regime history Author: André J. R. Magnan Submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Sociology University of Toronto, 2010. This dissertation traces the historical transformation of the Canada-UK commodity chain for wheat-bread as a lens on processes of local and global change in agrofood relations. During the 1990s, the Canadian Wheat Board (Canada‟s monopoly wheat seller) and Warburtons, a British bakery, pioneered an innovative identity- preserved sourcing relationship that ties contracted prairie farmers to consumers of premium bread in the UK. Emblematic of the increasing importance of quality claims, traceability, and private standards in the reorganization of agrifood supply chains, I argue that the changes of the 1990s cannot be understood outside of historical legacies giving shape to unique institutions for regulating agrofood relations on the Canadian prairies and in the UK food sector. I trace the rise, fall, and re-invention of the Canada-UK commodity chain across successive food regimes, examining the changing significance of wheat- bread, inter-state relations between Canada, the UK, and the US, and public and private forms of agrofood regulation over time.
    [Show full text]
  • 179 RICE HUSK USED AS a BREAD INGREDIENT Matheus Francisco
    Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, Campina Grande, v.20, n.2, p.179-184, 2018 179 ISSN: 1517-8595 RICE HUSK USED AS A BREAD INGREDIENT Matheus Francisco da Paz1, Roger Vasques Marques2, Camilo Bruno Fonseca3, Lauren Andrade Vieira4, Luciara Bilhalva Corrêa5, Érico Kunde Corrêa6 ABSTRACT The rice husk corresponds to approximately one fifth of the grain mass and is usually a devalued byproduct. However, it presents a significant amount of insoluble fibers, which may favor its use as a source of fiber in the human diet. On the other hand, the insertion of these fibers into baking may drastically affect the technological characteristics of the breads. In this context, the objective of this experiment was to evaluate the loss of cooking mass, the color of the crust and the crumb, and the specific volume of bread with inclusion of different rice husk contents in its formulation. For this, the rice husk was previously dried, milled with a gram weight fixed at 0.5 mm and mixed in bread formulations with substitution of wheat flour by rice husk in the following proportions, respectively: T1 (100: 0), T2 (95: 5), T3 (90:10), T4 (85:15) and T5 (80:20). The experiment was performed in triplicate and the data processed statically. The results demonstrated that there was no difference of specific volume and loss of mass between the formulations. However, in relation to color, the parameter of luminosity was largely affected, with a marked decrease in both crust and crumb, since there was greater substitution of wheat flour by rice husks.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Morphology and Palynology of Aegilops Vavilovii (Zhuk.) Chennav
    African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 5(20), pp. 2841-2849, 18 October, 2010 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR ISSN 1991-637X ©2010 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Taxonomy, morphology and palynology of Aegilops vavilovii (Zhuk.) Chennav. (Poaceae: Triticeae) Evren Cabi1* Musa Doan1 Hülya Özler2, Galip Akaydin3 and Alptekin Karagöz4 1Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Sinop University, Sinop Turkey. 3Department of Biology Education, Hacettepe University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey. 4Department of Biology, Aksaray University, Aksaray, Turkey. Accepted 23 September, 2010 Aegilops vavilovii (Zhuk.) Chennav., a rare species, was collected from Southeast Anatolia, Turkey. During the field studies of the project “Taxonomic revision of Tribe Triticeae in Turkey”, Ae. vavilovii was accidentally recollected from three localities in anliurfa and Mardin provinces in 2007 and 2008, respectively. The main objective of this study is to shed light on the diagnostic characteristics of this rare species including its morphological, palynological and micro morphological features. Moreover, an emended and expanded description, distribution, phenology and ecology of this rare species are also provided. A. vavilovii and A. crassa are naturally found in the Southeastern part of Turkey and they share similar morphological features that caused a confused taxonomy. Pollen grains of A. vavilovii are heteropolar, monoporate and spheroidal (A/B: 1,13) typically as Poaceous. However, it generally, prefers clayish loam soils that are slightly alkaline (pH 7.7) with low organic content (1.54%). Although it is a rare species with very narrow area of distribution, very few samples have been represented in ex situ collections and the species has not been involved in any in situ conservation activities to save its genetic resources in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Agro-Morphological Diversity in Wild Relatives of Wheat Collected in Iran
    J. Agr. Sci. Tech. (2017) Vol. 19: 943-956 Evaluation of Agro-Morphological Diversity in Wild Relatives of Wheat Collected in Iran A. Pour-Aboughadareh1*, J. Ahmadi1, A. A. Mehrabi2, M. Moghaddam3, and A. Etminan4 ABSTRACT In this study, a core collection of 180 Aegilops and Triticum accessions belonging to six diploid (T. boeoticum Bioss., T. urartu Gandilyan., Ae. speltoides Tausch., Ae. tauschii Coss., Ae. caudata L. and Ae. umbellulata Zhuk.), five tetraploid (T. durum, Ae. neglecta Req. ex Bertol., Ae. cylindrica Host. and Ae. crassa Boiss) and one hexaploid (T. aestivum L.) species collected from different regions of Iran were evaluated using 20 agro- morphological characters. Statistical analysis showed significant differences among accessions. The Shannon-Weaver (HʹSW) and Nei’s (HʹN) genetic diversity indices disclosed intermediate to high diversity for most characters in both Aegilops and Triticum core sets. In factor analysis, the first five components justified 82.17% of the total of agro- morphological variation. Based on measured characters, the 180 accessions were separated into two major groups by cluster analysis. Furthermore, based on the 2D-plot generated using two discriminant functions, different species were separated into six groups, so that distribution of species accorded with their genome construction. Overall, our results revealed considerable levels of genetic diversity among studied Iranian Aegilops and Triticum accessions, which can open up new avenues for rethinking the connections between wild relatives to explore valuable agronomic traits for the improvement and adaptation of wheat. Keywords: Aegilops, Multivariate analysis, Phenotypic diversity, Triticum. INTRODUCTION traits, such as disease- or pest-resistance and even yield improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • GENETICALLY MODIFIED WHEAT 2018 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), 2018
    Incident Report GENETICALLY MODIFIED WHEAT 2018 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (Canadian Food Inspection Agency), 2018. CFIA P0951-18 ISBN: 978-0-660-26780-7 Catalogue No.: A104-141/2018E-PDF Aussi disponible en français. Request other formats online or call 1-800-442-2342. If you use a teletypewriter (TTY), call 1-800-465-7735. Alternative format are available on demand. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ࢝ The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) was notified on January 31, 2018, about a few wheat plants found on an access road in southern Alberta that survived a spraying treatment for weeds. ࢝ The CFIA’s tests confirmed that the wheat found is genetically modified to be herbicide tolerant. Genetically modified (GM) wheat is not authorized to be grown commercially in any country. ࢝ Since being notified, the CFIA worked diligently with federal and provincial partners and other stakeholders to determine the origin and extent of the GM wheat plants to get as much complete, accurate, and credible information about this discovery as possible. Based on extensive scientific testing, there is no evidence that this GM wheat is present anywhere other than the isolated site where it was discovered. ࢝ There is also no evidence that this wheat has entered the food or animal feed system, nor is it present anywhere else in the environment. ࢝ Health Canada and the CFIA have performed risk assessments of this finding, and have concluded that it does not pose a food safety, animal feed, or environmental risk. ࢝ The wheat plants found in Alberta are not a match for any wheat authorized for sale or for commercial production in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Khorasan (Kamut® Brand) Wheat
    Khorasan (Kamut® Brand) Wheat Introduction Khorasan wheat (Triticum turgidum, ssp. turanicum) is an ancient wheat variety that originated in the Fertile Crescent in Western Asia. It is a relative of durum wheat and is believed to have come to North America from Egypt, following World War II. It was rediscovered in 1977 by a Montana farmer who spent the next few years propagating the small supply of original seed. In 1990, khorasan wheat was first sold under the trademark KAMUT® in the United States. The trademark was implemented to preserve minimum standards for the khorasan wheat variety and to ensure consistent quality and market supply. KAMUT® wheat is currently only grown as KAMUT® wheat has larger heads, awns and kernels than an organic certified grain and hard red spring wheat and durum. marketed to various countries Photo courtesy T. Blyth, Kamut International around the world. Plant Adaptation KAMUT® wheat production is well suited to growing conditions found in southern Alberta and southern Saskatchewan, similar to durum. Northern regions with cooler, wetter conditions are less favorable for KAMUT® wheat production as disease risk may be greater and the crop requires about 100 days to mature after seeding or approximately one week later than spring wheat. KAMUT® wheat will grow well in any soil that is suitable for other cereal grain production. KAMUT® wheat has a growth pattern similar to spring wheat varieties. Each sprouted kernel produces one or two stems per seed, and each stem produces a large head with long black awns. It has moderate straw strength and grows to approximately 127 cm (4.2 ft) tall.
    [Show full text]
  • Spelt Wheat: an Alternative for Sustainable Plant Production at Low N-Levels
    sustainability Article Spelt Wheat: An Alternative for Sustainable Plant Production at Low N-Levels Eszter Sugár, Nándor Fodor *, Renáta Sándor ,Péter Bónis, Gyula Vida and Tamás Árendás Agricultural Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Brunszvik u. 2, 2462 Martonvásár, Hungary; [email protected] (E.S.); [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (P.B.); [email protected] (G.V.); [email protected] (T.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +36-22-569-554 Received: 31 October 2019; Accepted: 21 November 2019; Published: 27 November 2019 Abstract: Sustainable agriculture strives for maintaining or even increasing productivity, quality and economic viability while leaving a minimal foot print on the environment. To promote sustainability and biodiversity conservation, there is a growing interest in some old wheat species that can achieve better grain yields than the new varieties in marginal soil and/or management conditions. Generally, common wheat is intensively studied but there is still a lack of knowledge of the competitiveness of alternative species such as spelt wheat. The aim is to provide detailed analysis of vegetative, generative and spectral properties of spelt and common wheat grown under different nitrogen fertiliser levels. Our results complement the previous findings and highlight the fact that despite the lodging risk increasing together with the N fertiliser level, spelt wheat is a real alternative to common wheat for low N input production both for low quality and fertile soils. Vitality indices such as flag leaf chlorophyll content and normalized difference vegetation index were found to be good precursors of the final yield and the proposed estimation equations may improve the yield forecasting applications.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on KAMUT Khorasan Wheat
    International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition ISSN: 0963-7486 (Print) 1465-3478 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iijf20 Ancient wheat and health: a legend or the reality? A review on KAMUT khorasan wheat Alessandra Bordoni, Francesca Danesi, Mattia Di Nunzio, Annalisa Taccari & Veronica Valli To cite this article: Alessandra Bordoni, Francesca Danesi, Mattia Di Nunzio, Annalisa Taccari & Veronica Valli (2017) Ancient wheat and health: a legend or the reality? A review on KAMUT khorasan wheat, International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 68:3, 278-286, DOI: 10.1080/09637486.2016.1247434 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2016.1247434 © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 28 Oct 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 2866 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 4 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iijf20 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCES AND NUTRITION, 2017 VOL. 68, NO. 3, 278–286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09637486.2016.1247434 COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW Ancient wheat and health: a legend or the reality? A review on KAMUT khorasan wheat Alessandra Bordonia,b , Francesca Danesia , Mattia Di Nunziob , Annalisa Taccaria and Veronica Vallia aDepartment of Agri-Food Sciences and Technologies, University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy; bInterdepartmental Centre of Agri-Food Research, University of Bologna, Cesena, Italy ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY After WWII, the industrialized agriculture selected modern varieties of Triticum turgidum spp. Received 28 July 2016 durum and spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Whole Grain-Rich One... Is As Easy As One... Two... Three
    Identifying Whole Grain-Rich Is as easy as One... Two... Three... One... Food is labeled as Whole Wheat. If the packaging has “Whole Wheat” anywhere on the package (not just Whole Grain), then look no further. This product is considered whole grain-rich and is creditable. WGR1 Two... Rule of Three A whole grain is listed as the first ingredient (or the second after water) and the next two grain ingredients are creditable which include whole grains, enriched grains, bran, and germ. Otherwise known as the rule of three. Whole Grain #1 2nd Grain Ingredient Whole Corn, Sunflower and/or Canola Oil, Whole INGREDIENTS: 2 Wheat, Brown Rice Flour, Whole Oat Flour, Sugar, Salt, Natural WGR Flavor, and Maltodextrin (Made from Corn). CONTAINS A WHEAT INGREDIENT 3rd Grain Ingredient Exception to the Rule of Three If second and/or third grain ingredient follows this statement: “contains less than 2% of each of the following...”, as long as the first ingredient is a whole grain, this product is creditable as WGR. Whole Grain #1 INGREDIENTS: Whole Wheat Flour, Water, Soybean Oil, contains 2% or less of each of the following: Yeast, Sugar, Dried Honey Solids, Leavening (Sodium Aluminum Phosphate, Baking Soda), Salt, Dough Conditioners (Enzymes), Fumaric Acid, Calcium Propionate (Preservative). CONTAINS WHEAT Statement CACFP is an indicator of quality child care. Identifying Whole Grain-Rich Three... FDA Statement One of the following FDA statements are included on the labeling: “Diets rich in whole grain foods and other plant foods and low in total fat, saturated fat, and cholesterol may reduce the risk of heart disease and some cancers.” “Diets rich in whole grain foods and other plant foods, and low in saturated fat and cholesterol, may help reduce the risk of heart disease.” WGR3 Alternative option..
    [Show full text]
  • John Percival
    THE LINNEAN Wheat Taxonomy: the legacy of John Percival THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON BURLINGTON HOUSE, PICCADILLY, LONDON WlJ OBF SPECIAL ISSUE No 3 2001 ACADEMIC PRESS LIMITED 32 Jam.estown Road London NWl 7BY Printed on acid free paper © 2001 The Linnean Society of London All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system without permission in writing from the publisher. The designations of geographic entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the publishers, the Linnean Society, the editors or any other participating organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of The Society, the editors, or other participating organisations. Printed in Great Britain. Wheat Taxonomy: the legacy of John Percival Conference Participants (most of whom are identified by number on the key to the group photograph above). I. M. Ambrose,; 2. J. Bingham, UK; 3. R. Blatter, Switzerland; 4. A. Bomer, Germany; 5. A. Brandolini Italy; 6. R. Brigden, UK; 7. A. H. Bunting, UK; 8. P. Caligari, UK; 9. E.M.L.P. Clauss, USA; 10. P.O. Clauss, USA; 11 . K. Clavel, France; 12. P. Davis, UK; 13. J. Dvohik, USA; 14. !. Faberova, Czech Republic; 15 . A. A. Filatenko, Russia; 16.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutritional Profile of Three Spelt Wheat Cultivars Grown at Five Different Locations
    NUTRITION NOTE Nutritional Profile of Three Spelt Wheat Cultivars Grown at Five Different Locations 3 G. S. RANHOTRA,"12 J. A. GELROTH,' B. K. GLASER,' and G. F. STALLKNECHT Cereal Chem. 73(5):533-535 The absence of gluten-forming proteins, which trigger allergic Nutrient Analyses reaction in some individuals (celiacs), and other nutritional claims Moisture, protein (Kjeldahl), fat (ether extract), and ash were have been made for spelt (Triticum aestivum var. spelta), a sub- determined by the standard AACC (1995) methods. Fiber (total, species of common wheat. Spelt is widely grown in Central insoluble and soluble) was determined by the AACC (1995) Europe. It was introduced to the United States in the late 1800s by method 32-07. Lysine content was determined by hydrolyzing Russian immigrants (Martin and Leighty 1924). However, the samples in 6N HCl (in sealed and evacuated tubes, 24 hr, 110°C), popularity of spelt in the United States diminished rapidly due to evaporating to dryness, diluting in appropriate buffer containing the limited number of adapted cultivars, and due to the major em- norleucine as an internal standard, and then analyzing on a Beck- phasis on common wheats, barley, and oats. In recent years, inter- man 6300 amino acid analyzer using a three-buffer step gradient est in spelt as human food has risen, primarily due to the efforts of program and ninhydrin post-column detection. Carbohydrate val- some millers who actively contract and market spelt grain and ues were obtained by calculation; energy values were also processed finished products. In spite of this renewed interest, only obtained by calculation using standard conversion factors (4 kcal/ g a few cultivars are yet grown, and samples are difficult to obtain for protein and carbohydrates each, and 9 kcal/g for fat).
    [Show full text]