DOCSLIB.ORG

06-13-2011 Semiconductors Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
06-13-2011 Semiconductors Report June 13, 2011 The following report is excerpted from THE WALL STREET TRANSCRIPT 06-13-2011 SEMICONDUCTORS REPORT NOTICE uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such The Wall Street Transcript does not in any way endorse or guarantee the accuracy or "forward-looking statements". Such factors are often included in the company’s filings of reliability of any of the information, statements or opinions expressed in the reports or reports with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, including Forms comments of other firms or individuals. We take due care to report or transcribe 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K and Proxy Statements; the company’s annual and interim reports to accurately what has been written or said by others but because of the possibility of human shareholders and similar documents. In carrying out our responsibilities to our readers and or mechanical error, we cannot assume any liability for the correctness of the to the Chief Executive Officers selected for forums or interviews, we are required to offer, transcription. We point out further that, of course, all opinions expressed are subject to and we offer, each Chief Executive Officer an opportunity to back-up the interview and change without notice. Neither the information or any opinion which may be expressed provide our readers and potential investors with specific financial data, including earnings constitutes a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any securities referred to herein. For statements, balance sheet statements and other material business and financial data, further information, contact the individual or investment organization concerned. through the sponsored publication of such reports or highlights therefrom, with meaningful information. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FORUMS/INTERVIEWS Important Note: Wall Street Transcript forums and interviews with Chief Executive Officers are published verbatim as editorial content and include "forward-looking statements" (as such term is defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Founded 1963 Reform Act of 1995). These "forwardlooking statements" may be subject to and be made Published by Wall Street Transcript Corporation pursuant to the "safe-harbor" provisions of Section 27A of the United States Securities 48 West 37th Street, 8th Floor, New York, NY 10018 Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the United States Securities Exchange Act Copyright 2009 Wall Street Transcript Corporation of 1934, as amended. Since these statements are based on factors that involve risks and All Rights Reserved ANALYST INTERVIEW A Bullish Outlook for the Semiconductor Industry JOHN PITZER — CREDIT SUISSE JOHN PITZER is a Managing Director, Global Technology Strategist, Technology Sector Head and Semiconductor Analyst for Credit Suisse. He joined the group in March 2000, and until the end of 2005 he was the semiconductor capital equipment Analyst. Institutional Investor ranked him number-two Analyst for semiconductor capital equipment in 2005 and 2004; number-one analyst for 2003 and 2002; and runner-up in 2001. From 2002 to 2005, he was ranked the number one or two Analyst in the Greenwich Associates polls. Prior to joining Credit Suisse, he was Vice President and the semiconductor capital equipment Analyst at Prudential Volpe Technology Group. He previously was an Analyst at Deutsche Bank Alex.Brown and Needham & Company, LLC, covering the semiconductor, semiconductor capital equipment and contract manufacturing industries. Mr. Pitzer holds a B.A. from Harvard University. SECTOR — SEMICONDUCTORS growth to get from where we were to normal. (ACM806) TWST: What is your coverage in semiconductors? Coming into the 2011, we’re still below normalized lev- Mr. Pitzer: I currently han- els but not by the same amount. So opti- dle the devices. I previously handled cally the cyclical call on semis has been both equipment industry and devices. Highlights harder to buy into. Now, that would But since about 2006, I’ve just been make the pragmatic call to look for John Pitzer discusses his coverage of handling devices. I cover the chips that more stock-specific criteria and don’t the semiconductor industry and some go into PCs, handsets, analog, digital, depend upon the cycle. However, we’re the whole gamut. of the specific names he follows. He kind of making the nonpragmatic call. TWST: What are the major says the global growth of the middle We are saying we believe structurally themes in the space right now? class benefits semiconductor the trend lines are moving higher. So Mr. Pitzer: This is a space companies, as middle class growth our bigger-picture thesis is that this is usually translates into higher demand that’s dominated by where are we in an industry which for the last seven to the cycle call, and there are cyclical for electronic goods. Mr. Pitzer also says nine years has demonstrated a revenue metrics that investors look at to try to the semi content per device is increasing, CAGR of about 5% to 7%. We think with smartphones, automobiles and monitor the health of the industry. You we’re in year two of the market figuring look at things like inventory levels, industrial goods requiring more out that there is a new revenue CAGR semiconductors to perform an ever- how much capex are we spending rela- that’s more like 9% to 11%. increasing number of functions. tive to the revenue we’re generating, TWST: Why is it higher what does year-over-year unit growth Companies include: Intel Corporation than people think? look like, what does unit growth look (INTC); ARM Holdings plc (ARMH); VIA Mr. Pitzer: When you look like relative to long-term trends. One Technologies (2388.TW); Linear Technology back and look at the 5% to 7%, reve- of the issues I think investors are hav- Corp. (LLTC); Avago Technologies Limited nues are always a function of supply ing this year is that relative to normal- (AVGO); NXP Semiconductors NV (NXPI) and demand. On the supply side, for the ized levels at the beginning of 2010 and Apple (AAPL). last seven years this industry has had from most of those metrics, we were structurally too much capacity. And the well below normalized levels. So opti- reason behind that is, starting about 952-7400 (212) Wolfrath permission contact Kenneth reproduction material: For Copyrighted cally you can make a strong cyclical call that there was a lot of 2001 right after the tech bubble burst, the semi industry went ANALYST INTERVIEW — A BULLISH OUTLOOK FOR THE SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY through a manufacturing change to larger wafer sizes. If you look at hear about emerging markets, what you hear is about wage infla- how a semiconductor is made, it’s a square chip, but they’re made tion. That’s a great thing for semis — i.e., you’re starting to see on a round wafer. There are many of these square chips on a single the global middle class accelerate, the growth in the global mid- round wafer. Every 10 years or so, the dle-class accelerate. The reason that industry goes through a wafer size middle class growth is good for transition as a way to improve manu- semis is the middle class buys a lot facturing efficiency. In fact, at the be- “If you look at semiconductors as a of electronic stuff, one. And two, the ginning of this transition, we covered percent of global GDP over time and you middle class also tends to demand semi cap equipment. And as bullish as chart that out, the chart you actually see more services in their economy, and I am now, I was bearish back then. is you go through these waves where the services economy has spent a lot Our call was that the semi cap guys semi content of the economy more on IT infrastructure. The way mispriced the tools. They were giving accelerates and then consolidates.” to think about this is, even if global away capacity too cheaply. And we growth going forward is flat over the saw that the math didn’t work in our next four years versus that 2004-to- models, and we thought we would go 2008 period, the composition of that through a multiyear period of having too much capacity. And in fact growth is better for tech and semis. that’s what’s played out. Now, the bottom-up thesis, just look at a lot of the end The best way to quantify that is a metric that measures the markets that semis go into, and you can actually start to quantify that capital intensity of the industry, which is simply how much capex semi content is going up. The easiest end market to talk about is do you need as a percent of the revenue you’re generating. And back handsets. When you go from a dumb standard feature phone to an before 300 millimeter, the capex-to-rev ratio was about 22%. Dur- iPhone or any other smartphone, the amount of silicon content goes ing the transition, our models were indicating that capital intensity from “x” to about 5x to 8x. So even though you’re selling one unit was going to drop to at least 15%. It actually went down to 10%. At of phone, if it’s a smartphone, you’re selling five to eight more units one level, that’s a good thing because when capital intensity goes of semiconductors, because you’re dealing with more content be- down, your ROI should go up. The negative offset is it’s much cause you’re asking that phone to do more. Now interestingly, I easier to add capacity, hence it’s much easier to screw things up think investors get all that when it comes to handsets, but it’s just as from a supply perspective.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inside Chips
    InsideChips.VenturesTM Tracking Fabless, IP & Design-House Startups Volume 6, Number 5 May 2005 Business Microscope Semiconductor Forecast ... Each year, analyzing capital spending and fab capacity trends, InsideChips bestows a Semiconductor Forecast researching ASIC markets and technologies, and Award to the best analyst forecaster after actual following emerging markets for ICs such as cellular results are posted by the SIA. The purpose of the phones. Feldhan is the founder of SEMICO, one of program is to identify and recognize top analysts the several market research boutiques that spun out whose methodology and experience result in of In-Stat during the 1980s. SEMICO is a consistently accurate forecasting. semiconductor-centric market research firm whose Based on forecasts made in Q4 2003, the award services include consulting, reports, events and for the best semiconductor forecast made by a market newsletters. research firm for 2004 is shared by Bill McClean of The most conservative forecasts for 2004 were IC Insights and Jim Feldhan of SEMICO Research. Both analysts 17%, 18% and 19% made by iSupply, IDC, and SIA, respectively. forecasted +27% growth for 2004, which came in very close to VLSI Research was most optimistic at 32%. The semiconductor the actual +28% growth over 2003 as announced by the forecasts for 2004 average 25.6%. Semiconductor Industry Association. McClean also won This year, the industry has cooled from last year’s double- InsideChips’ forecast award for his semiconductor predictions digit pace. The average forecast compiled from all analysts is a for 2002. modest 1.4%. Prior to forming IC Insights, McClean worked at ICE Readers can view the results of last year’s forecasts on Corporation (acquired by Chipworks).
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History of George Scalise
    Oral History of George Scalise Interviewed by: David Laws Recorded: January 27, 2010 Mountain View, California CHM Reference number: X5680.2010 © 2010 Computer History Museum Oral History of George Scalise David Laws: It’s Wednesday, January 27th, 2010. We are at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, California and this afternoon we’re going to interview George Scalise, who is currently President of the Semiconductor Industry Association and has a long and distinguish career in the semiconductor industry. Let’s jump right in. Can you tell us where you were born and a little about your family background? Scalise: Thanks David. I was born in a little steel town in western Pennsylvania, Warren, Pennsylvania, north of Pittsburgh. I guess there were two things that distinguished that area. One was that oil was discovered in t nearby, in Titusville. The Drake well was about 25 or so miles from where we lived In Warren. And therefore, there were a lot of oil fields when I was a young boy. Most of them have now dried up; there’s not much of it left but there’s a little. And then there was the steel fabrication business, which was the main industry in Warren. It wasn’t the processing the steel but the fabrication of tank cars, railroad cars, tank trucks and all of the things that use steel. So, it was a very prosperous area at that stage. And as a result, it was a destination point for a lot of the immigrants coming from Europe. My father came from Italy and originally went to work at Cornell University as a gardener.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Purpose Acquisition Companies: SPAC and SPAN, Or Blank Check Redux?
    Washington University Law Review Volume 85 Issue 4 January 2007 Special Purpose Acquisition Companies: SPAC and SPAN, or Blank Check Redux? Daniel S. Riemer Washington University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Securities Law Commons Recommended Citation Daniel S. Riemer, Special Purpose Acquisition Companies: SPAC and SPAN, or Blank Check Redux?, 85 WASH. U. L. REV. 931 (2007). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol85/iss4/5 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPECIAL PURPOSE ACQUISITION COMPANIES: SPAC AND SPAN, OR BLANK CHECK REDUX? I. INTRODUCTION In September 2005, three former Apple Computer executives launched a new high-tech venture called Acquicor Technology (Acquicor).1 Acquicor raised $172.5 million in its March 2006 IPO on the American Stock Exchange.2 Although the amount Acquicor raised in its initial offering was unremarkable for a high-tech company with a prominent management team, Acquicor was anything but a typical high-tech venture. At the time of its IPO, Acquicor had minimal earnings and assets, no employees, and no business operations.3 Acquicor did not even have a business plan other than to “acquir[e] . one or more operating businesses.”4 While these traits would mean certain failure for a traditional startup company, Acquicor’s successful offering is an archetype of an increasingly popular investment vehicle: the Special Purpose Acquisition 5 Company (SPAC).
    [Show full text]
  • Dataport Als E-Government- Controlling-Tool Für Lowcost-Airlines
    € ALWAYS ON März I Deutschland 2,00 März I Deutschland Hamburgs Magazin der digitalen Wirtschaft www.hamburg-media.net AUSGABE CEBIT SPECIAL I 03.07 CEBIT-TRENDS ICT-KONVERGENZ Wie Anwendungsbereiche zusammen- wachsen ... Seite 6 PROGRAMM NORDDEUTSCHER GEMEINSCHAFTSSTAND Vielfalt der norddeutschen digitalen Wirtschaft ... Seite 17 PORTRAITS STANDPARTNER STELLEN SICH VOR Alles über die Unternehmen auf dem Gemeinschaftsstand ... Seite 10 Das Tor zur digitalen Welt INTERVIEW MICHAEL BATZ Hamburg und Schleswig-Holstein auf der CeBIT Neues Wahrzeichen für die Webcity Hamburg ... Seite 34 EDITORIAL INHALT INTERVIEW 3 Die ganze Vielfalt der nordeutschen IT-Wirtschaft DIGITALE WIRTSCHAFT 4 Der Norden spannt das Netz CEBIT-TRENDS Dietrich Austermann Gunnar Uldall 6 ICT-Konvergenz Sehr geehrte Leserin, sehr geehrter Leser, „connect & communicate | Wir vernetzen den Norden.“ Unter die- CEBIT-SERVICE sem Motto präsentiert sich die digitale Wirtschaft aus Hamburg 9 Informationen zum Hallenplan, Ticketpreisen und Schleswig-Holstein erstmals mit einem Gemeinschaftsstand auf der CeBIT 2007. Die beiden norddeutschen Bundesländer un- und Öffnungszeiten terstützen diese gemeinsame Initiative der Branchennetzwerke Hamburg@work und DiWiSH. STANDPARTNER Wir unterstreichen damit unsere in Jahrzehnten gewachsene Verbundenheit in einem dynamischen Wirtschaftszweig, der das Unternehmen und Behörden auf dem Gemeinschaftsstand Leben der Menschen heute und morgen entscheidend verändern stellen sich vor wird. Kommunikation und Vernetzung spielen dabei eine heraus-
    [Show full text]
  • A Revolutionary Foundry Concept” (See Sept 2015 Company Presentation) – Still These Market Opportunities Have Not Generated in Cumulative Free Cash Flows
    I. Executive Summary II. Brief Overview of Tower Semiconductor Ltd III. A Business Model Appearing To Be In Peril a) Key Business Issues b) Underinvestment in Capex and R&D c) Focus on Revenues, But Where’s the Free Cash Flow? d) Deals Dependent on Dilution Causing Share Count to Grow Faster Than Revenues! IV. Management and Corporate Governance Don’t Look Too Pretty a) Does Tower’s CEO Have a College Education? b) Dissecting a Stock Promotion Sounding Too Good To Be True c) Tower’s Questionably Reckless Compensation Strategies V. A Closer Look at the Micron and Panasonic Deals Concerns Spruce Point… a) Accounting Magic: Repeated Use of Bargain Purchase Gains on the Micron and Panasonic Deals b) Strong Evidence of Asset Inflation From Panasonic’s Disclosure c) Shifting Expenses to Juice Gross Margins? VI. Numerous Red Flags Point to Potential Accounting Scheme a) Summary of Key Accounting Concerns b) Financial Reporting and Disclosures Significantly Below Industry Standard c) Mountain of Debt and Playbook For Possible Accounting Manipulations d) Warning: Tower’s Auditor Cited By the PCAOB For Numerous Audit Deficiencies e) Alchemy of Tower’s Financial Results: Non-GAAP Abuse and Exclusion of Depreciation and Amortization f) Deceptive Change in Capex Presentation Enabling Free Cash Flow Overstatement? g) Tower Resorting to Accounting Games 101: Changing Useful Life Assumptions for PP&E? h) Accounting Issues With Series F Convertible Debt i) Questionable Bank Debt Revaluation VII. Are Shareholders Telegraphing that Tower’s Share Price is Overvalued? VIII. Valuation Disconnect: Seeing Through the Stock Promotion and Analyst Oversight a) Tower Has Received Best of Breed Stock Coverage b) It’s Unanimous! Tower is a Buy With Big Upside c) Don’t Be Fooled By Seemingly “Cheap” Valuation IX.
    [Show full text]