Maac-Programabstract Updated.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

CONTENTS Forewords 2 Introduction 4 Venue Information 5 Keynote Speaker 7 Conference Programme 8 Oral Presentation Abstracts 11 Presenters’ Biographies 26 List of Poster Presentations 32 List of Participants 33 Organising Committee 34 ©2017 Centre for Global Archaeological Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia The authors are responsible for the contents on their pages 1 FOREWORD Prof. Dr Mokhtar Saidin Director Centre for Global Archaeological Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia Praise to the Lord the Almighty, because of His Mercy and His Grace, CGAR has managed to host the MAAC 2017. Continuous support from USM in many ways has contributed towards the realisation of this conference. This has enabled CGAR to convene experts from the Malay Archipelago and other parts of the world who will hopefully impart fundamental and specialised knowledge on various research areas in Malay Archipelago archaeology to the MAAC 2017 members. Part of the conference objectives is to bring together various distinguished expertise in archaeology throughout Island Southeast Asia and provide a platform for the dissemination, discussion and debate of ideas. Apart from knowing first hand our heritage of the region, it is also an excellent opportunity for networking, socialising and bridging future collaborations. Last but not least, it is hoped that this conference will be held successfully and every participant will benefit from the series of panel discussions. A thousand thanks to the committee members that have worked tirelessly in making this conference a reality. 2 FOREWORD Dr. Eng Ken Khong Conference Chair Malay Archipelago Archaeology Conference 2017 As Conference Chair, I am delighted to welcome you to the Malay Archipelago Archaeology Conference (MAAC) 2017, held at George Town, Penang, Malaysia. A UNESCO World Cultural Heritage Site in Penang, George Town is ideally located to hold the conference. Not only does it house archaeological sites such as Fort Cornwallis and many other heritage buildings, the vibrancy of the city would also provide an excellent opportunity for networking, socialising and bridging future research collaborations. The MAAC 2017 is organised by the Centre for Global Archaeological Research (CGAR, USM) with a particular interest on Malay Archipelago archaeology. Through the theme “Connecting People Through History”, MAAC 2017 aims to bring together scholars in the fields of prehistorical Malay Archipelago, archaeozoology, historical Malay Archipelago, ethnoarchaeology, heritage management, archaeotourism, linguistics, maritime archaeology and archaeological sciences, to discuss and offer inputs into existing and contemporary archaeological issues in the Malay Archipelago. The range of topics that is covered in this conference is highly reflective of the breadth of research within CGAR and it is hoped that many fruitful sustainable collaborations will be generated through this conference. I hope that you will enjoy the conference and benefit from the diversity of research presentations and discussions. On behalf of my organising committee, I would like to thank you for attending this conference and we hope that you will have a great time in George Town. 3 INTRODUCTION MALAY ARCHIPELAGO ARCHEOLOGY CONFERENCE 2017 Malay Archipelago, also called the island Southeast Asia, covers the countries of Indonesia, East Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore, East Timor and the Philippines. The Malay Archipelago Archaeology Conference will be held in Penang, Malaysia with a theme of Connecting People through History. We hope to bring together various distinguished expertise in archaeology throughout island Southeast Asia and provide a platform for the dissemination, discussion and debate of ideas. Apart from knowing first hand our heritage of the region, it is also an excellent opportunity for networking, socialising and bridging future collaborations. Malay Archipelago Archaeology Conference aims to bring together scholars in the fields of prehistorical Malay Archipelago, archaeozoology, historical Malay Archipelago, ethnoarchaeology, heritage management, archaeotourism, linguistics, maritime archaeology and archaeological sciences, to discuss and offer inputs into existing and contemporary archaeological issues in the region and its environs. 4 VENUE INFORMATION About Bangunan UAB The conference venue is Bangunan UAB, which is located at the junction of Gat Lebuh China and Lebuh Victoria. This Art Deco building-turned-event space was built in the 1930s and used to house the Indian Overseas Bank, which is now owned by Khazanah Nasional. There are two event halls on the ground floor and a multi-purpose hall on the first floor. All presentation sessions will take place in the multi-purpose hall (MH). Lunch and tea breaks will be provided in the event hall (EH), where a poster presentation will also be taking place. Multi-purpose hall Event hall 5 Address : No. 21-35, Gat Lebuh China, 10200 George Town, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia GPS : 5.41554, 100.34199 6 KEYNOTE SPEAKER Prof. Dato’ Dr. Mokhtar Saidin Centre for Global; Archaeological Research Universiti Sains Malaysia Prof. Dato’ Dr. Mokhtar Saidin obtained his Bachelor of Science (Hons) degree in Geology from Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 1987. Then, he pursued his studies in Universiti Sains Malaysia where he received his Master’s degree in Archaeology in 1993 and his PhD degree in Archaeogeology from Universiti Sains Malaysia in 1998 through a doctoral coursework at Harvard University. Prof. Dato’ Dr. Mokhtar Saidin is the first Malaysia’s archaeogeologist. His expertise is in the field of palaeoenvironment, Palaeolithic culture and stone tools. With 30 years of experience in archaeological research throughout the country, he has led Palaeolithic studies in Peninsular and East Malaysia, covering key sites in Southeast Asia such as Bukit Temelong, Bukit Bunuh, Lawin, Tingkayu and Mansuli. He is also involved in international archaeological research and projects such as Kashmir Smast of Pesahwar, Pakistan and international research collaboration on the Islamic archaeology of Nusantara. In terms of consultancy works, he has been a committee member and archaeological consultant to several projects, such as the Bakun Dam Project, Sarawak, and UEM Nusajaya Project and Petronas Gas pipeline in Peninsular Malaysia. Currently, he sits in several national experts committees that oversee the research, development and protection of Malaysian Cultural and geological heritage, such as acting as the Head of National Archaeological Expert under the National Heritage department, a member in a focus group to enhance preservation of the Environment, Culture and Heritage for Rural Areas under the EPU Transformation Program, Prime Minister’ Department, and also a member of the National Geopark Committee. Prof. Dato’ Dr. Mokhtar Saidin has been playing a key role in the formation and development of the Malaysian Archaeological Museum such as The Lenggong Archaeological Museum and a few archaeological heritage parks across the country such as Bukit Tengkorak, Agop Batu Tulup and Mansuli in Sabah, Lenggong Valley in Perak and Sungai Batu in Kedah. He has produced over 100 publications both at national and international levels, and several books especially on Malaysian archaeology and its impact to the regional and world history. Since 2005, he has served as the director for the Centre for Global Archaeological Research at Universiti Sains Malaysia. 7 CONFERENCE PROGRAMME 03-Oct-17 8.30 am - 9.10 am Registration & Breakfast (EH 1) 9.10 am - 9.20 am Opening 9.20 am - 10.20 am Keynote Speech by Mokhtar Saidin (MH) SESSION 1 MH Chairman: Nasha Rodziadi KHAW 10.20 am - 10.25 am Theme: Palaeolithic & Neolithic Title: Palaeolithic Evidence in Malaysia 10.25 am - 10.45 am Speaker: Mokhtar SAIDIN Title: Evidence from the Gua Pelangi Excavation 10.45 am - 11.05 am Speaker: Rasydan MUHAMMAD Title: Palynological Evidence from Lenggong Valley 11.05 am - 11.25 am Speaker: Nur Khairunnisa TALIB Title: Guar Kepah and Its Context in Malaysian Neolithic Period 11.25 am - 11.45 am Speaker: Shaiful SHAHIDAN Title: Gravity Survey on Bukit Bunuh Crater 11.45 am - 12.05 pm Speaker: Shyeh Sahibul Karamah MASNAN 12.05 pm - 12.30 pm Q & A Poster Presentation (EH 1) 12.30 pm - 1.00 pm Roundtable discussion by Deborah La Gorce Kramer (MH) 1.00 pm - 2.00 pm Lunch (EH1) SESSION 2 MH Chairman: Stephen CHIA 2.00 pm - 2.05 pm Theme: Archaeological Sciences Title: Geoarchaeology in Tropical Southeast Asia: Reconstructing the 2.05 pm - 2.25 pm Life and Death of an Archaeological Site Speaker: Mike W. MORLEY Title: Phylogenetic Study Using Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) of Major 2.25 pm - 2.45 pm Ethnic Groups from Sabah: Haplogroup Source Profile Speaker: Yee Min GAN Title: Mollusc Remains from Bukit Kamiri, Semporna, Sabah: A 2.45 pm - 3.05 pm Taphonomic Analysis Speaker: Deejay Daxter A. ALBERT Title: Digital Technology: The Application and a Framework for 3.05 pm - 3.25 pm Interpretation of Archaeological Sites in Sungai Batu Speaker: Siti Hajar SHAHRIN Title: Method Comparison in Platinum Group of Elements (Pt, Ru, Rh, 3.25 pm - 3.45 pm Pd, Os, Ir) in Bukit Bunuh Archaeological site Speaker: A. Mutalib ABDULLAH 3.45 pm - 4.10 pm Q & A 4.10 pm - 4.30 pm Tea Break 4.30 pm - 6.00 pm Guided tour to Fort Cornwallis 8 04-Oct-17 8.30 am - 9.00 am Breakfast (EH 1) SESSION 3 MH Chairman: David Kyle LATINIS 9.00 am - 9.05 am Theme: Rock Art Title: Methods, Modelling and Historical Ecology Approaches in Rock Art 9.05 am - 9.25 am Studies Speaker: David
Recommended publications
  • A Taxonomic Revision of Araceae Tribe Potheae (Pothos, Pothoidium and Pedicellarum) for Malesia, Australia and the Tropical Western Pacific

    A Taxonomic Revision of Araceae Tribe Potheae (Pothos, Pothoidium and Pedicellarum) for Malesia, Australia and the Tropical Western Pacific

    449 A taxonomic revision of Araceae tribe Potheae (Pothos, Pothoidium and Pedicellarum) for Malesia, Australia and the tropical Western Pacific P.C. Boyce and A. Hay Abstract Boyce, P.C. 1 and Hay, A. 2 (1Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, U.K. and Department of Agricultural Botany, School of Plant Sciences, The University of Reading, Whiteknights, P.O. Box 221, Reading, RS6 6AS, U.K.; 2Royal Botanic Gardens, Mrs Macquarie’s Road, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia) 2001. A taxonomic revision of Araceae tribe Potheae (Pothos, Pothoidium and Pedicellarum) for Malesia, Australia and the tropical Western Pacific. Telopea 9(3): 449–571. A regional revision of the three genera comprising tribe Potheae (Araceae: Pothoideae) is presented, largely as a precursor to the account for Flora Malesiana; 46 species are recognized (Pothos 44, Pothoidium 1, Pedicellarum 1) of which three Pothos (P. laurifolius, P. oliganthus and P. volans) are newly described, one (P. longus) is treated as insufficiently known and two (P. sanderianus, P. nitens) are treated as doubtful. Pothos latifolius L. is excluded from Araceae [= Piper sp.]. The following new synonymies are proposed: Pothos longipedunculatus Ridl. non Engl. = P. brevivaginatus; P. acuminatissimus = P. dolichophyllus; P. borneensis = P. insignis; P. scandens var. javanicus, P. macrophyllus and P. vrieseanus = P. junghuhnii; P. rumphii = P. tener; P. lorispathus = P. leptostachyus; P. kinabaluensis = P. longivaginatus; P. merrillii and P. ovatifolius var. simalurensis = P. ovatifolius; P. sumatranus, P. korthalsianus, P. inaequalis and P. jacobsonii = P. oxyphyllus. Relationships within Pothos and the taxonomic robustness of the satellite genera are discussed. Keys to the genera and species of Potheae and the subgenera and supergroups of Pothos for the region are provided.
  • MISC. HERITAGE NEWS –March to July 2017

    MISC. HERITAGE NEWS –March to July 2017

    MISC. HERITAGE NEWS –March to July 2017 What did we spot on the Sarawak and regional heritage scene in the last five months? SARAWAK Land clearing observed early March just uphill from the Bongkissam archaeological site, Santubong, raised alarm in the heritage-sensitive community because of the known archaeological potential of the area (for example, uphill from the shrine, partial excavations undertaken in the 1950s-60s at Bukit Maras revealed items related to the Indian Gupta tradition, tentatively dated 6 to 9th century). The land in question is earmarked for an extension of Santubong village. The bulldozing was later halted for a few days for Sarawak Museum archaeologists to undertake a rapid surface assessment, conclusion of which was that “there was no (…) artefact or any archaeological remains found on the SPK site” (Borneo Post). Greenlight was subsequently given by the Sarawak authorities to get on with the works. There were talks of relocating the shrine and, in the process, it appeared that the Bongkissam site had actually never been gazetted as a heritage site. In an e-statement, the Sarawak Heritage Society mentioned that it remained interrogative and called for due diligences rules in preventive archaeology on development sites for which there are presumptions of historical remains. Dr Charles Leh, Deputy Director of the Sarawak Museum Department mentioned an objective to make the Santubong Archaeological Park a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2020. (our Nov.2016-Feb.2017 Newsletter reported on this latter project “Extension project near Santubong shrine raises concerns” – Borneo Post, 22 March 2017 “Bongkissam shrine will be relocated” – Borneo post, 23 March 2017 “Gazette Bongkissam shrine as historical site” - Borneo Post.
  • The Perak Development Experience: the Way Forward

    The Perak Development Experience: the Way Forward

    International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences December 2013, Vol. 3, No. 12 ISSN: 2222-6990 The Perak Development Experience: The Way Forward Azham Md. Ali Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Management and Economics Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i12/437 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i12/437 Speech for the Menteri Besar of Perak the Right Honourable Dato’ Seri DiRaja Dr Zambry bin Abd Kadir to be delivered on the occasion of Pangkor International Development Dialogue (PIDD) 2012 I9-21 November 2012 at Impiana Hotel, Ipoh Perak Darul Ridzuan Brothers and Sisters, Allow me to briefly mention to you some of the more important stuff that we have implemented in the last couple of years before we move on to others areas including the one on “The Way Forward” which I think that you are most interested to hear about. Under the so called Perak Amanjaya Development Plan, some of the things that we have tried to do are the same things that I believe many others here are concerned about: first, balanced development and economic distribution between the urban and rural areas by focusing on developing small towns; second, poverty eradication regardless of race or religion so that no one remains on the fringes of society or is left behind economically; and, third, youth empowerment. Under the first one, the state identifies viable small- and medium-size companies which can operate from small towns. These companies are to be working closely with the state government to boost the economy of the respective areas.
  • The Role of Newspaper and State Government in Conservation Of

    The Role of Newspaper and State Government in Conservation Of

    Journal of Public Administration and Governance ISSN 2161-7104 2018, Vol. 8, No. 1 The Role of Newspaper and State Government in Conservation of World Heritage Site in Malaysia Mohd Hiriy Ghazali@Mohd Jani (Corresponding Author) Ph.D Student, School of Multimedia Technology and Communication Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Abdullah Sumrahadi Visiting Lecturer, School of Creative Industry Management & Performing Arts Universiti Utara Malaysia Lecturer, Faculty of Administrative Sciences Universitas Krisnadwipayana, Jakarta, Indonesia E-mail: [email protected] Bahtiar Mohamad Senior Lecturer, School of Multimedia Technology and Communication Universiti Utara Malaysia E-mail: [email protected] Received: Feb. 1, 2018 Accepted: Mar.1, 2018 Online published: Mar. 7, 2018 doi:10.5296/jpag.v8i1.12780 URL: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v8i1.12780 Abstract Currently, there are two historical sites has been recognized as World Heritage Site by United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in Malaysia, which are Melaka (Malacca) and George Town, Penang. Since its recognition, those cities becomes so famous and positioned as one of the world tourism attraction that need to visit. In line with this prestige, conservation matter definitely appears to be a major concern especially to both cities in order to maintain the status given. The paper aims to discover the local daily 212 http://jpag.macrothink.org Journal of Public Administration and Governance ISSN 2161-7104 2018, Vol. 8, No. 1 newspaper of The Star in terms of its portrayal of image on the historic or heritage buildings within the areas of World Heritage Site. Content analysis and previous literature were used as the research method.
  • Kuala Lumpur a State 85 Kuala Lumpur – City-State of the Future? 88

    Kuala Lumpur a State 85 Kuala Lumpur – City-State of the Future? 88

    Contents Executive Director’s Note 3 Section 1: Evaluation of Local Authorities in Malaysia History of Local Govornment Election in Malaysia 6 Revisiting the Athi Nahappan Report Part 1 16 Section 2: Separation of Powers Between the Three Levels of Government The Malaysian Federation: A Contradiction in Terms? 21 How Incompetency in Local Governments Help to Preserve Political Hegemony in Malaysia 25 Double Decentralisation: The Way Forward for Sabah 30 Section 3: Governance in Our Local Authorities Strength from the Grassroots: Practices of Participatory Governance 35 Communications as a Key Competency 39 It’s All About the Money 43 Understanding Local Authority Financial Reports 46 Section 4: Running Our Cities & Towns BRT: Rethinking Expensive Public Transport Projects in Malaysian Cities 51 An Aged-Friendly City For All - Rich or Poor 54 The Truth behind Solid Waste Management and Incinerators 59 A Lucrative Dirty Business 62 The Road Less Taken 68 Section 5: Revisiting the Local Government Election Revisiting the Athi Nahappan Report Part 2 : Recommendations 73 Will Local Government Elections Erode Malay Rights? 79 Local Democracy: More Politics or Less? 82 Beyond Local Government: Making Kuala Lumpur a State 85 Kuala Lumpur – City-State of the Future? 88 Issue 1, 2015 - pg. 1 REFSA QUARTERLY Editorial Team Executive Director | Steven Sim Chee Keong Deputy Executive Director | Wong Shu Qi Editor | Lam Choong Wah Assistant Editor | Rosalind Chua Intern | Yap Lay Sheng Layout Design | PM Wang Published by Research For Social Advancement Bhd (Refsa) 2nd Floor,Block A Wenworth Building Jalan Yew, Off Jalan Pudu 55100 Kuala Lumpur. Tel: 03 9285 5808 Fax: 03 92818104 Executive Director’s Note By Steven Sim Executive Director, REFSA Local authorities are fertile grounds for mission.
  • EAST INDIA COMPANY Straits Settlements Factory Records, 1769-1830 Reels M470-535

    EAST INDIA COMPANY Straits Settlements Factory Records, 1769-1830 Reels M470-535

    AUSTRALIAN JOINT COPYING PROJECT EAST INDIA COMPANY Straits Settlements factory records, 1769-1830 Reels M470-535 India Office Library 197 Blackfriars Road London SE1 8NG National Library of Australia State Library of New South Wales Filmed: 1960 HISTORICAL NOTE Under its charter, granted by Queen Elizabeth I on 31 December 1600, the East India Company had a monopoly of all English trade in Asia and the Pacific. Its trading activities were initially focussed on the port and sultanate of Bantam on the western end of Java, where the Company established a ‘factory’ in 1603. Bantam was a major trading centre, particularly for pepper, and also for exotic spices from Ambon and other eastern islands, silks and porcelain from China, scented woods and Indian textiles. The Dutch East India Company also founded a trading factory at Bantam in 1603 and, after years of conflict and competition, it forced the English company out of Java in 1682. In 1685, however, the East India Company succeeded in setting up a factory at Bencoolen on the south-west coast of Sumatra and it was to be a major source of pepper for the next century. It was transferred to Dutch rule in 1825. In the late seventeenth century the interest of the Company shifted to India. Trading posts were established at Surat (1619), Madras (1639), Bombay (1668), and Calcutta (1690). The factories developed into forts: Fort William (Calcutta), Fort St George (Madras) and Bombay Castle. Surat was the Company’s first presidency in India, but by the early eighteenth century the presidencies, each with their own army, were Bombay, Madras and Calcutta.
  • 1 Chapter 1 Introduction As a Chinese Buddhist in Malaysia, I Have Been

    1 Chapter 1 Introduction As a Chinese Buddhist in Malaysia, I Have Been

    Chapter 1 Introduction As a Chinese Buddhist in Malaysia, I have been unconsciously entangled in a historical process of the making of modern Buddhism. There was a Chinese temple beside my house in Penang, Malaysia. The main deity was likely a deified imperial court officer, though no historical record documented his origin. A mosque serenely resided along the main street approximately 50 meters from my house. At the end of the street was a Hindu temple decorated with colorful statues. Less than five minutes’ walk from my house was a Buddhist association in a two-storey terrace. During my childhood, the Chinese temple was a playground. My friends and I respected the deities worshipped there but sometimes innocently stole sweets and fruits donated by worshippers as offerings. Each year, three major religious events were organized by the temple committee: the end of the first lunar month marked the spring celebration of a deity in the temple; the seventh lunar month was the Hungry Ghost Festival; and the eighth month honored, She Fu Da Ren, the temple deity’s birthday. The temple was busy throughout the year. Neighbors gathered there to chat about national politics and local gossip. The traditional Chinese temple was thus deeply rooted in the community. In terms of religious intimacy with different nearby temples, the Chinese temple ranked first, followed by the Hindu temple and finally, the mosque, which had a psychological distant demarcated by racial boundaries. I accompanied my mother several times to the Hindu temple. Once, I asked her why she prayed to a Hindu deity.
  • Inve R Teb Rate Taxonom Y

    Inve R Teb Rate Taxonom Y

    Publishing Inve r teb rate Taxonom y An international journal of biodiversity and systematics Volume 15, 2001 © CSIRO 2001 All enquiries and manuscripts should be directed to: Invertebrate Taxonomy CSIRO Publishing PO Box 1139 (150 Oxford St) Collingwood, Vic. 3066, Australia Telephone: +61 3 9662 7629 Fax: +61 3 9662 7611 Email: [email protected] Published by CSIRO Publishing for CSIRO and the Australian Academy of Science www.publish.csiro.au/journals/it © CSIRO Australia 2001 10.1071/IT01001_AC 0818-0164 Invertebrate Taxonomy, 2001, 15(5), 589–665. Accessory Publication Taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the ant genus Tetraponera (Hymenoptera : Formicidae) in the Oriental and Australian regions Philip S. Ward Department of Entomology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. Email: [email protected] Abstract A revision of the ant genus Tetraponera in the Oriental and Australian regions reveals 33 species (18 new), belonging to four informal species-groups: allaborans-group (T. allaborans (Walker), T. apiculata, sp. nov., T. avia, sp. nov., T. bita, sp. nov., T. brevis, sp. nov., T. conica, sp. nov., T. connectens, sp. nov., T. crassiuscula (Emery) stat. nov., T. extenuata, sp. nov., T. microcarpa Wu & Wang and T. modesta (F. Smith)); nigra-group (T. aitkenii (Forel), T. atra Donisthorpe, T. attenuata F. Smith, T. binghami (Forel), T. buops, sp. nov., T. difficilis (Emery), T. inversinodis, sp. nov., T. laeviceps (F. Smith), T. mimula, sp. nov., T. nigra (Jerdon), T. nitida (F. Smith), T. nixa, sp. nov., T. nodosa, sp. nov., T. notabilis, sp. nov., T. polita, sp. nov., T. punctulata F. Smith, T. rotula, sp.
  • RM8.85B of Manufacturing Investments;

    RM8.85B of Manufacturing Investments;

    Hari Raya 正面看待 joy in 槟城2030 Penang 《珍珠快讯》 pg 6-8 第3版 JUNE 16 – 30, 2019 The achievement surpassed the full RM8.85b of year investment amount of RM5.78 billion last year manufacturing - CHOW US$300 billion of Chinese exports to the US. investments; “The meeting between Trump and China’s leader Xi Jin Ping later this month is crucial. “The superb 1Q19 investment figure may not repeat itself in 2Q19 10,000 new jobs in the offing or 3Q19 but Penang’s investment Story by Christopher Tan outlook is on the right track in the Pix by Darwina Mohd Daud medium to longer term,” he said. “The Penang government, A WHOPPING RM8.85 billion through investPenang, will continue in approved investments. to focus on bringing in high quality That is the figure Penang re- investments that suit the state’s in- corded of the total approved manu- dustry profile and those that can facturing investments in Malaysia create high value jobs. in the first quarter of this year - all “We cannot control the global this despite the challenging times macro risk, but we have been pro- faced by the global economy. actively introducing initiatives to According to the Malaysian In- mitigate the impact of the US-China vestment Development Authority trade war on the overall local (MIDA), Penang successfully gar- economy,” he said. nered 41 projects amounting to Some of the initiatives include RM8.85 billion (+ 768% year-on- the signing of Memorandum of year) from January to March this Understanding with China Chamber year. of International Commerce with the The figure represents 35% of objective of promoting bilateral Malaysia’s total approved manufac- investment and economic and tech- turing investments.
  • Gustavus 2020 Brochure

    Gustavus 2020 Brochure

    singapore malaysia gustavus symphony orchestra gustavus jazz ensemble JANUARY 24 - FEBRUARY 8, 2020 13-night tour planned and produced by www.accentconcerts.com GUSTAVUS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA & JAZZ ENSEMBLE singapore & malaysia Clockwise from top: Batu Caves; George Town seen from Penang Hill; Independence Square, Kuala Lumpur Friday, January 24 & Saturday, January 25 section of one of the city’s residential Mansion, and Market Street. Check into Overnight flights to Malaysia neighborhoods around the city that are the hotel and have dinner in a local closed to traffic after the workday ends in restaurant. (B,D) Sunday, January 26 order to allow for endless stalls of Welcome to Malaysia merchants selling produce street food, Thursday, January 30 Upon arrival in Kuala Lumpur, meet your clothing, household items, and more. (B,D) Penang Hill local tour manager and transfer to the Ascend Penang Hill for amazing views of hotel to freshen up for welcome dinner in Tuesday, January 28 the Strait of Malacca from the Sky Deck. a local restaurant. (D) Kuala Lumpur Performance Return to George Town for lunch on own, Morning visit to a local school for a musical followed by a George Town Street Art Tour Monday, January 27 exchange where the ensembles will and entrance to the Pinang Peranakan Kuala Lumpur & Batu Caves perform for each other, or, present a public Museum, a furnished mansion recreating Kuala Lumpur is Malaysia’s capital, as well performance during the Chinese New Year the style of the Straits Chinese heritage. as its financial and cultural center. A celebrations. The remainder of the day is Dinner in a local restaurant.
  • PENANG MUSEUMS, CULTURE and HISTORY Abu Talib Ahmad

    PENANG MUSEUMS, CULTURE and HISTORY Abu Talib Ahmad

    Kajian Malaysia, Vol. 33, Supp. 2, 2015, 153–174 PENANG MUSEUMS, CULTURE AND HISTORY Abu Talib Ahmad School of Humanities, Universiti Sains Malaysia, MALAYSIA Email: [email protected] The essay studies museums in Penang, their culture displays and cultural contestation in a variety of museums. Penang is selected as case study due to the fine balance in population numbers between the Malays and the Chinese which is reflected in their cultural foregrounding in the Penang State Museum. This ethnic balance is also reflected by the multiethnic composition of the state museum board. Yet behind this façade one could detect the existence of culture contests. Such contests are also found within the different ethnic groups like the Peranakan and non-Peranakan Chinese or the Malays and the Indian-Muslims. This essay also examines visitor numbers and the attractiveness of the Penang Story. The essay is based on the scrutiny of museum exhibits, museum annual reports and conversations with former and present members of the State Museum Board. Keywords: Penang museums, State Museum Board, Penang Story, museum visitors, culture and history competition INTRODUCTION The phrase culture wars might have started in mid-19th century Germany but it came into wider usage since the 1960s in reference to the ideological polarisations among Americans into the liberal and conservative camps (Hunter, 1991; Luke, 2002). Although not as severe, such wars in Malaysia are manifested by the intense culture competition within and among museums due to the pervasive influence of ethnicity in various facets of the national life. As a result, museum foregrounding of culture and history have become contested (Matheson- Hooker, 2003: 1–11; Teo, 2010: 73–113; Abu Talib, 2008: 45–70; 2012; 2015).
  • The Contribution of Historic Urban Spaces in Influencing the Character of George Town UNESCO World Heritage Site, Malaysia

    The Contribution of Historic Urban Spaces in Influencing the Character of George Town UNESCO World Heritage Site, Malaysia

    The Sustainable City VIII, Vol. 2 1191 The contribution of historic urban spaces in influencing the character of George Town UNESCO World Heritage Site, Malaysia C. A. Rohayah, S. Shuhana & B. S. Ahmad Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia Abstract This paper examines the significance of the historic urban spaces in influencing the character of George Town UNESCO World Heritage Site (WHS) by analyzing the perception of the residents towards the character of the heritage sites. George Town was the first British port city recognized as having a unique architectural and cultural townscape that was inscribed together with Malacca as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2008. The multi-cultural character influences of Asia and Europe have created tangible and intangible elements that contribute to the character of the historic urban spaces. The significance of the historic buildings with unique its architecture and the urban pattern derived through their juxtaposition on the site has created unique spaces that characterized the George Town WHS. These rows of pre-war historic buildings enclosed the areas and create the planned or incidental urban spaces, which divided the area into several significant streets or spaces. The names of the street depict the historical significance of the area having a close association with the existence of different groups of the community. The findings suggest that the historic urban spaces play an important role in influencing the character of the WHS sites. Keywords: historic urban space, world heritage site, character, townscape. 1 Introduction George Town was the oldest British colonial town in South East Asia which represents the early development of British period at the end of the 18th C.