Proceedings of the Fifth Western Black Bear Workshop

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proceedings of the Fifth Western Black Bear Workshop PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH WESTERN BLACK BEAR WORKSHOP HUMAN– BLACK BEAR INTERACTIONS 22-25 February 1994 Provo, Utah Editors Janene Auger and Hal L. Black Department of Zoology Brigham Young University P.O. Box 25255, Provo, UT 84602 Sponsored by Brigham Young University, Department of Zoology Brigham Young University, Monte L. Bean Museum Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Bureau of Land Management USDA, Forest Service Brigham Young University Press Provo 1995 CONTENTS PREFACE............................................................. v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................ vi LIST OF PARTICIPANTS .............................................. vii STATUS REPORTS..................................................... 1 ARIZONA STATUS REPORT • Cagle and Trachy ...................................... 3 CALIFORNIA STATUS REPORT • Stafford ........................................... 5 COLORADO STATUS REPORT • Beck and Gill ........................................ 9 IDAHO STATUS REPORT • Beecham and Rohlman .................................... 13 MONTANA STATUS REPORT • Olson .............................................. 21 NEW MEXICO STATUS REPORT • Jones ........................................... 27 OREGON STATUS REPORT • Anglin ............................................... 31 TEXAS STATUS REPORT • Taylor ................................................. 37 UTAH STATUS REPORT • Blackwell ............................................... 39 WASHINGTON STATUS REPORT • Pozzanghera ..................................... 43 WYOMING STATUS REPORT • Moody and Reagan ................................... 47 POSTER ABSTRACTS ................................................. 53 VIABILITY AND GERMINABILITY OF SEEDS FROM SEVEN FLESHY-FRUITED SHRUBS AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH THE BLACK BEAR • Auger, Meyer, and Black . 55 RESPONSES OF BLACK BEARS TO MANIPULATED LEVELS OF HUMAN DISTURBANCE AT ANAN CREEK, TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST, ALASKA • Chi and Gilbert ............................................. 57 BLACK BEAR DENNING BEHAVIOUR AND SITE SELECTION IN COASTAL B.C. FORESTS • Davis ......................................................... 58 BEAR-PROOF FOOD STORAGE AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SYSTEMS • Holmshaw ......................................................... 59 AN ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLE PATERNITY IN THE AMERICAN BLACK BEAR USING RAPD DNA FINGERPRINTING • Johnson et al. .............................. 61 GENETIC EVIDENCE OF HISTORICAL EVENTS IN A BLACK BEAR POPULATION • Wooding, Ward, and Waits ........................................ 62 CONTENTS iii CONTENTS (Continued) PRELIMINARY ROAD TRACK SURVEYS OF BLACK BEARS IN UTAH • Young et al. ..... 63 INVITED PAPERS ..................................................... 65 BLACK BEARS IN BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK—THE TEX-MEX CONNECTION • Skiles . 67 FATAL INJURIES INFLICTED TO PEOPLE BY BLACK BEAR • Herrero and Higgins ....... 75 FOLLOW-UP DISCUSSION WITH STEPHEN HERRERO: FATAL INJURIES INFLICTED TO PEOPLE BY BLACK BEAR ...................................... 83 REHABILITATING ORPHANED BEAR CUBS • Maughan .............................. 91 SEQUOIA AND KINGS CANYON NATIONAL PARKS—BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES AND PROGRAM UPDATE • Ingram ................................. 99 BLACK BEAR MANAGEMENT IN YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK: MORE A PEOPLE MANAGEMENT PROBLEM • Thompson and McCurdy .............................. 105 WORKSHOPS AND PANEL DISCUSSIONS .............................. 117 SOCIOLOGICAL AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS OF BLACK BEAR HUNTING • Beck et al. ....................................................... 119 QUESTIONS AND TOPICS FOR THE PANEL DISCUSSION ON HOUNDS AND BLACK BEARS 133 PANEL DISCUSSION: HOUNDS AND BLACK BEARS . 135 INVITED SPEAKERS AND PRESENTATIONS BLACK BEARS IN PARKS AND SANCTUARIES Michael R. Pelton, University of Tennessee PUBLIC EDUCATION AND AWARENESS Bob Ellis, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Julie Jensen, USDA, Forest Service Heber District WILDLIFERS' LAMENT: CAN THE PUBLIC BE EDUCATED? Robert Schmidt, Utah State University iv PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH WESTERN BLACK BEAR WORKSHOP PREFACE The Fifth Western Black Bear Workshop was held in Provo, Utah on February 22–25, 1994. Wildlife biologists, students, hunters, houndsmen, animal activists, state and federal management and control personnel, private how-to- protect-bears-from-human-food-and-garbage technicians/engineers, and private citizens attended. Included were papers reporting on bear activity and management in various states, how to and where to educate the public about black bears, how to avoid bear problems on public lands and private property, problems of bear management in fragmented habitats, and the plight of young bears orphaned prematurely, and also included lively discussions of the purposes and methodologies of bear hunting. The diversity of individuals led to lively and frank presentations and discussion of what role(s) bears play in the lives of humans and the role(s) humans play in the lives of bears. This publication hopefully reflects the tenor of the workshop and provides answers and questions that will help all concerned better understand the difficulties and problems associated with the obligate management of black bears by man. To introduce this volume it seemed only fitting to us to present here one of the few written accounts of a human–black bear interaction in Utah. The incident occured some years ago in our current black bear study area. Although excrement and tracks of these animals are frequently discerned in the aspen and fir thickets, only one bear was actually observed in the present study. This animal entered the campsite at Tablerock Spring shortly following dusk and approached to within 30 feet of the position of my sleeping bag. Application of a flashlight revealed a very large bear in coarse, dark brown pelage. The bear did not immediately flee, but appeared instead to be highly agitated by the light that was being cast upon him. He (the bear) swerved convincingly back and forth and at the same time violently "pawed" the earth as if disposed to fight. These antics persisted for perhaps a minute and then a resonant, airy snort heralded his departure. This same resounding noise was heard again several minutes later and was presumably made by the same bear, but at a greater distance from camp. Ranck, G.L. 1961. Mammals of the East Tavaputs Plateau. M.S. Thesis. University of Utah, Salt Lake City. 230 pp. PREFACE v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the owners, operators, and employees of the East Bay Inn and Joe Vera's Restaurant for warm beds, cozy conference rooms, and salsa and chips that fueled the fires of dialogue throughout the workshop. To the following we offer sincere thanks: Brigham Young University's Department of Zoology and the Monte L. Bean Museum of Natural History provided technical support and funding. The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (DWR), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and the USDA, Forest Service (FS) also contributed funds for the workshop and for publication costs. Especially supportive of the workshop were Boyde Blackwell, Jordan Pederson, and Steve Cranney of the DWR and Bill Stroh, Harry Barber (yes, that is his real name), and Steve Madsen of the BLM. Brigham Young University (BYU) students Lori Tenney, April Young, Kevin Young, Wade Paskett, Marc Seid, Dana Shurtleff, and Scot Westwood gave logistic and technical help. Dr. Jerran T. Flinders and Dr. H. Duane Smith of BYU helped organize the workshop and the panel discussion about dogs and bears. Bob Ellis (DWR) and Julie Jensen (FS) supplied an impressive array of materials on public education and awareness. Dianna M. Black of the English Department at BYU provided layout and formatting advice and spent many hours with the especially difficult task of editing discussion transcriptions. We acknowledge Dr. Susan E. Meyer of the USDA–FS Intermountain Shrub Sciences Laboratory who generously shared office space and computer facilities and provided encouragement throughout the entire editing process. Marlae Rindisbacher of BYU Media Services is responsible for the delightful cartoons, and Josh Jenkins of the same department designed the cover layout. I (Black) thank my co-editor (Auger) for her skills at editing and designing this volume and for staying doggedly at the word processing chores. Surprisingly enough, at this job's completion we are still friends. vi PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH WESTERN BLACK BEAR WORKSHOP LIST OF PARTICIPANTS Ron Anglin Tim Burton Scott Davis Fred Holmshaw Oregon Fish and Wildlife California Fish and Game Utah Wildlife Resources McClintock Metal P.O. Box 59 6614 OLD Hwy 99 851 N. Church St. Fabricators Portland, OR 97207 Yreka, CA 96090 Layton, UT 84041 455 Harter Ave. Ph. (503) 229-5454 Ph. (916) 459-3164 Ph. (801) 546-0921 Woodland, CA 95776 FAX (503) 229-5969 FAX (916) 841-2551 Ph. (916) 666-6007 Teresa M. DeLorenzo FAX (916) 666-7071 Janene Auger David Cagle International Bear News Dept. of Zoology, BYU Arizona Game and Fish 10907 N.W. Copeland St. Dianne K. Ingram 574 Widtsoe Building HC66 Box 57201 Portland, OR 97229 USDI, Natl. Park Service P.O. Box 25255 Pinetop, AZ 85935 Ph. (503) 643-4008 Sequoia & Kings Canyon Provo, UT 84602-5255 Ph. (602) 367-4281 Three Rivers, CA 93271 Ph. (801) 378-2006 FAX (602) 367-1258 Helen Davis Ph. (209) 565-3124 FAX (801) 378-7499 Simon Fraser University FAX (209) 565-3497 Charles Canfield Dept. Biological Sciences Harry Barber 2818 S. Breeze Drive Burnaby, B.C. V5A 1S6 Donald Jones Bureau Land Management Magna, UT
Recommended publications
  • 2020-2021 Arizona Hunting Regulations
    Arizona Game and Fish Department 2020-2021 Arizona Hunting Regulations This publication includes the annual regulations for statewide hunting of deer, fall turkey, fall javelina, bighorn sheep, fall bison, fall bear, mountain lion, small game and other huntable wildlife. The hunt permit application deadline is Tuesday, June 9, 2020, at 11:59 p.m. Arizona time. Purchase Arizona hunting licenses and apply for the draw online at azgfd.gov. Report wildlife violations, call: 800-352-0700 Two other annual hunt draw booklets are published for the spring big game hunts and elk and pronghorn hunts. i Unforgettable Adventures. Feel-Good Savings. Heed the call of adventure with great insurance coverage. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on motorcycle insurance. geico.com | 1-800-442-9253 | Local Office Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states, in all GEICO companies, or in all situations. Motorcycle and ATV coverages are underwritten by GEICO Indemnity Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, DC 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2019 GEICO ii ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT — AZGFD.GOV AdPages2019.indd 4 4/20/2020 11:49:25 AM AdPages2019.indd 5 2020-2021 ARIZONA HUNTING4/20/2020 REGULATIONS 11:50:24 AM 1 Arizona Game and Fish Department Key Contacts MAIN NUMBER: 602-942-3000 Choose 1 for known extension or name Choose 2 for draw, bonus points, and hunting and fishing license information Choose 3 for watercraft Choose 4 for regional
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Deer in California
    HUNTING DEER IN CALIFORNIA We hope this guide will help deer hunters by encouraging a greater understanding of the various subspecies of mule deer found in California and explaining effective hunting techniques for various situations and conditions encountered throughout the state during general and special deer seasons. Second Edition August 2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME L. Ryan Broddrick, Director WILDLIFE PROGRAMS BRANCH David S. Zezulak, Ph.D., Chief Written by John Higley Technical Advisors: Don Koch; Eric Loft, Ph.D.; Terry M. Mansfield; Kenneth Mayer; Sonke Mastrup; Russell C. Mohr; David O. Smith; Thomas B. Stone Graphic Design and Layout: Lorna Bernard and Dana Lis Cover Photo: Steve Guill Funded by the Deer Herd Management Plan Implementation Program TABLE OF CON T EN T S INTRODUCT I ON ................................................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1: THE DEER OF CAL I FORN I A .........................................................................................................7 Columbian black-tailed deer ....................................................................................................................8 California mule deer ................................................................................................................................8 Rocky Mountain mule deer .....................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Northwest Territories Territoires Du Nord-Ouest British Columbia
    122° 121° 120° 119° 118° 117° 116° 115° 114° 113° 112° 111° 110° 109° n a Northwest Territories i d i Cr r eighton L. T e 126 erritoires du Nord-Oues Th t M urston L. h t n r a i u d o i Bea F tty L. r Hi l l s e on n 60° M 12 6 a r Bistcho Lake e i 12 h Thabach 4 d a Tsu Tue 196G t m a i 126 x r K'I Tue 196D i C Nare 196A e S )*+,-35 125 Charles M s Andre 123 e w Lake 225 e k Jack h Li Deze 196C f k is a Lake h Point 214 t 125 L a f r i L d e s v F Thebathi 196 n i 1 e B 24 l istcho R a l r 2 y e a a Tthe Jere Gh L Lake 2 2 aili 196B h 13 H . 124 1 C Tsu K'Adhe L s t Snake L. t Tue 196F o St.Agnes L. P 1 121 2 Tultue Lake Hokedhe Tue 196E 3 Conibear L. Collin Cornwall L 0 ll Lake 223 2 Lake 224 a 122 1 w n r o C 119 Robertson L. Colin Lake 121 59° 120 30th Mountains r Bas Caribou e e L 118 v ine i 120 R e v Burstall L. a 119 l Mer S 117 ryweather L. 119 Wood A 118 Buffalo Na Wylie L. m tional b e 116 Up P 118 r per Hay R ark of R iver 212 Canada iv e r Meander 117 5 River Amber Rive 1 Peace r 211 1 Point 222 117 M Wentzel L.
    [Show full text]
  • Pheasant Hunt
    YOUTH HUNTING OPPORTUNITIES Selected Wildlife TAKE A KID HUNTING Management Areas for the Pheasant Youth Pheasant Hunt Hunt: November 6, 2004 Saturday, Nov. 6, 2004 Guided Open Open The 2004 Take a Kid Hunting Pheasant Hunt WMA Morning After All will allow properly licensed hunters with a valid 1 pm Day youth license to hunt on one of nine stocked Whittingham X X Wildlife Management Areas (WMA) on Saturday Black River X X morning, Nov. 6, 2004. In a cooperative effort A proud hunter with his Flatbrook X between the Division of Fish and Wildlife and Youth Pheasant Hunt quarry. Clinton X X the NJ State Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs, Assunpink X X volunteer hunting mentors with trained bird dogs will guide youth hunters on a pheasant Colliers Mills X X hunt. This experience will increase the young hunters’ opportunity for harvesting a Glassboro X Millville X X pheasant in a setting which encourages responsible and safe hunting practices. Peaslee X X All participants must pre-register and be accompanied to the check-in by a parent or guardian. Parents or guardians are welcomed and encouraged to follow the hunters Guided: Pre-registration required. through the fields. All pre-registered hunters will receive an information packet. One Open—Afternoon: Any youth hunter with session will be offered, starting at 7 a.m. a valid youth hunting license accompanied Only 50 youth hunters will be allowed on each WMA during each session. If the by a licensed, non-shooting adult (aged number of applicants exceeds the number of slots available, a random drawing will be 21 or older), will be permitted to hunt on held to select participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Bear Information Sheet
    Maine Chapter of The Wildlife Society Excellence In Wildlife Stewardship Through Science and Education The Maine Chapter of The Wildlife Society (MeTWS), established in 1976, is a local membership organization of The Wildlife Society, an international non-profit scientific and educational association dedicated to excellence in wildlife stewardship through science and education. The mission of MeTWS is to enhance the ability of wildlife professionals to conserve diversity, sustain productivity, and ensure responsible use of wildlife resources for the benefit of society. The membership of MeTWS includes approximately 120 wildlife professionals and other concerned individuals employed by government agencies, academic institutions, private firms, and non-governmental organizations, working to promote sound stewardship of wildlife resources throughout Maine. MAINE BLACK BEAR POPULATION INFORMATION April 16, 2004 Current Bear Status in Maine Black bears exist throughout the state with the exception of the extreme south-coastal region of the state. 23,000 bears are estimated to inhabit the state. Maine has the largest population of black bears of any state in the eastern U.S., and one of the largest populations within the lower-48. Regulated hunting and trapping are the primary methods used to manage the number of bears in the population. Black bears are an important component of the state’s ecosystem, and are valued by society, including hunters and non-hunters. Management History State legislature has the authority to enact laws to regulate bear populations, but practical aspects of implementing regulations were transferred to the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (MDIFW) in 1972. Bears were bountied from 1770-1957; considered a pest species until 1931 (no closed season); a short season was established and opened coincidentally with the deer season from 1931-1941; year-round open season was reinstituted from 1942-1965; season lengths and harvests have changed since 1966.
    [Show full text]
  • Elk Neck State Park Hunting 2020-2021 Rules, Regulations And
    Elk Neck State Park Hunting 2021-2022 Rules, Regulations and Policies 1. Bow hunters are required to wear fluorescent orange or daylight fluorescent pink during shotgun and muzzleloader seasons and Junior Hunt Day: a. October 21 – October 30, November 27 – December 11, December 18, 2021 – January 1, 2022 and January 7 – January 8, 2022. b. Junior Hunt Day: November 13, 2021. 2. All deer harvested count toward the state bag limits. 3. Shooting Hours a. ½ hour before sunrise to ½ hour after sunset. b. Hunters are permitted in the hunting areas 2 hours before sunrise and up to 2 hours after sunset. 4. Hunting is prohibited on Sundays. 5. Hunting is not permitted above or within 50 yards of a trail or road. 6. A DNR Managed Hunt Permit (MHP) and a Free Public Hunting Permit are required to hunt at Elk Neck State Park. Every hunter must have his or her own permit. These permits are NOT transferable. 7. All State and Federal hunting laws, as well as park regulations, will be strictly enforced. 8. Call ahead reservations through the Gwynnbrook Wildlife Office are required for the North East Beach Area. 9. Hunters (and non-hunting companions) must sign in and sign out at the sign-in box at each parking area EVERY time they enter or exit the hunting areas. 10. All harvested deer must be recorded at the sign-in box. 11. Park in designated areas only, as indicated by the hunting map. 12. Hunters are required to display their Free Public Hunting Permit on the dashboard of their vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Pronghorn Antelope Workshop 20:5-23
    SOUTH DAKOTA PRONGHORN MANAGEMENT PLAN 2019 – 2029 SOUTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF GAME, FISH AND PARKS PIERRE, SOUTH DAKOTA WILDLIFE DIVISION REPORT draft May 2019 This document is for general, strategic guidance for the Division of Wildlife and serves to identify what we strive to accomplish related to Pronghorn Management. This process will emphasize working cooperatively with interested publics in both the planning process and the regular program activities related to pronghorn management. This plan will be utilized by Department staff on an annual basis and will be formally evaluated at least every 10 years. Plan updates and changes, however, may occur more frequently as needed. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This plan is a product of substantial discussion, debate, and input from many wildlife professionals. In addition, those comments and suggestions received from private landowners, hunters, and those who recognized the value of pronghorn and their associated habitats were also considered. Management Plan Coordinator – Andy Lindbloom, South Dakota Department of Game, Fish, and Parks (SDGFP). SDGFP Pronghorn Management Plan Team that assisted with plan writing, data review and analyses, critical reviews and/or edits to the South Dakota Pronghorn Management Plan, 2019 - 2029 – Nathan Baker, Chalis Bird, Paul Coughlin, Josh Delger, Jacquie Ermer, Steve Griffin, Trenton Haffley, Corey Huxoll, John Kanta, Keith Fisk, Tom Kirschenmann, Chad Lehman, Cindy Longmire, Stan Michals, Mark Norton, Tim Olson, Chad Switzer, and Lauren Wiechmann. Cover art was provided by Adam Oswald. All text and data contained within this document are subject to revision for corrections, updates, and data analyses. Recommended Citation: South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Communities Are Welcoming Hunters and Anglers
    Potential Costs of Losing Hunting and Trapping as Wildlife Management Methods Updated: May 25th, 2005 Produced by the Animal Use Issues Committee of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 444 North Capitol Street, NW Suite 725 Washington, DC 20001 (202) 624-7890 www.IAFWA.org i Acknowledgements This report was developed for the Animal Use Issues Committee of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (IAFWA). Funding was provided by the Wildlife Restoration Program through Multistate Conservation Grant DC M-35-O awarded to the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. This report was authored by Rob Southwick, Ashley Woolley and Donna Leonard of Southwick Associates, Inc., Fernandina Beach, FL., and Sharon Rushton of Killingworth, CT. The project was conceived and championed by Bob Carmichael, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources, and guided in part by Bruce Taubert, Arizona Game and Fish Department; Gordon Robertson, American Sportfishing Association; Don MacLauchlan and Jen Mock, IAFWA; and Mike S. O’Brien, Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources. A special thank you goes to Rob Cahill, Fur Institute of Canada, for ensuring Canadian data and issues were a part of this report. Data was provided by many state, provincial, federal and private agencies and sources, with special mention to Martin Mendoza of the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). Stephanie Kenyon and Carol Wynne, Point to Point Communications, Leesburg, Va., provided invaluable editorial and strategic guidance. Reviews and expertise were provided by Alan Clark, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources; Buddy Baker, South Carolina Department of Natural Resources; Gordon Batchellor, New York Department of Environmental Conservation; and John Erb of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Antelope Mule Deer White-Tailed Deer Elk Bighorn Sheep
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Antelope Rattlesnake (745) - Areas 70-72 1 North Natrona (746) - Area 73 13 North Converse (748) - Areas 25, 26 17 Black Thunder (750) - Areas 4-9, 24, 27, 29 Mule Deer Cheyenne River (740) - Areas 7-14, 21 25 Black Hills (751) - Areas 1-6 29 North Converse (755) - Area 22 33 South Converse (756) - Area 65 36 Bates Hole - Hat Six (757) - Areas 66, 67 40 Rattlesnake (758) - Areas 88, 89 47 North Natrona (759) - Area 34 62 White-tailed Deer Black Hills (706) - Areas 1-6 67 Central (707) - Areas 7-15, 21, 22, 34, 65-67, 88, 89 71 Elk Black Hills (740) - Areas 1, 116, 117 75 Laramie Peak / Muddy Mountain (741) - Areas 7, 19 81 Rattlesnake (742) - Area 23 86 Pine Ridge (743) - Area 122 105 Bighorn Sheep Kouba Canyon (Non-herd unit) – Area 20 108 i 2019 - JCR Evaluation Form SPECIES: Pronghorn PERIOD: 6/1/2019 - 5/31/2020 HERD: PR745 - RATTLESNAKE HUNT AREAS: 70-72 PREPARED BY: HEATHER O'BRIEN 2014 - 2018 Average 2019 2020 Proposed Population: 10,769 10,315 9,965 Harvest: 499 1,110 1,340 Hunters: 518 1,126 1,400 Hunter Success: 96% 99% 96 % Active Licenses: 585 1,215 1,400 Active License Success: 85% 91% 96 % Recreation Days: 1,597 2,950 4,100 Days Per Animal: 3.2 2.7 3.1 Males per 100 Females 48 67 Juveniles per 100 Females 72 52 Population Objective (± 20%) : 12000 (9600 - 14400) Management Strategy: Special Percent population is above (+) or below (-) objective: -14.0% Number of years population has been + or - objective in recent trend: 3 Model Date: 04/06/2020 Proposed harvest rates (percent of pre-season estimate for each sex/age group): JCR Year Proposed Females year old: 10.9% 12.3% Males year old: 17.2% 27.5% Total: 10.6% 12.9% Proposed change in post-season population: -10.4% -9.2% 1 2020 HUNTING SEASONS RATTLESNAKE PRONGHORN HERD (PR745) Hunt Archery Dates Season Dates Type Quota Limitations Area Opens Closes Opens Closes 70 1 Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater Prairie Chicken a National Look
    The Greater Prairie Chicken A National Look W. Daniel Svedarsky, Ross H. Hier, Nova J. Silvy editors Miscellaneous Publication 99-1999 Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station University of Minnesota Saint Paul, Minnesota The University of Minnesota, including the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, is committed to the policy that all persons shall have equal access to its programs, facilities, and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, marital status, disability, public assistance status, veteran status, or sexual orientation. The editors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of numerous authors and associates to this publication: (alphabetically) R.D. Applegate, R.K. Anderson, R.S. Bergland, R.W. Cannon, D.M. Christisen, B. Crouch, T.L. Esker, L.F. Fredrickson, D.E. Gawlik, K.M. Giesen, C.P. Griffin, S. Gough, G.L. Heismeyer, G.J. Horak, R.E. Horton, J.R. Keir, G.D. Kobriger, M.A. Lockwood, L.M. Mechlin, M. Moe, M.E. Morrow, M.J. Peterson, M.A. Schroeder, S.A. Simpson, J.E. Toepfer, W.L. Vodehnal, R.L. Westemeier, B. Winter, D.H. Wolfe, T.J. Wolfe. Cover illustration by Karen A. Smith. Used with permission. Editorial assistance, publication design and production management was provided by experiment station senior editor Larry A. Etkin, in the Communication and Educational Technology Services unit of the University of Minnesota Extension Service. Commercial Products Disclaimer Reference to commercial products or trade names is made with the understanding that no discrimination is intended and no endorsement by the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station or the University of Minnnesota is implied. Availability This miscellaneous publication of the Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station is intended for a very specialized audience, and only a limited number of copies are available, at $25 each, for distribution to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Guided Hunts in Mississippi
    Guided Hunts In Mississippi Jodi is forfeit and achieves streamingly as carapacial Erastus ensue irretrievably and reanimate impishly. Emmett remains shielding: she sags her apartment forgettings too heuristically? Icosahedral Michele clean-ups or enlist some eubacterium macaronically, however probabilism Clive raises scot-free or outpeeps. Experienced mississippi deer camouflage has used for a guided hunts for sale deer hunting licenses and shotgun and Outdoors girl turns investment into Texas Hunting property in West Texas Ranches, sustainable decisions about their land. CEDAR RIDGE GUIDED HUNTS INC Mississippi US. Populations of deer around the Great Lakes have also expanded their range northwards, either within your own site or to an outside URL. Two day in mississippi guides in florida wild hog. MATT RALEY GUIDES NORTHERN WISCONSIN DURING spring SUMMER MONTHS. After a short break, known as a bleat, we handle every aspect of your hunt. Natchez; complete with period furnishing and privacy. Some lakes have ducks, Coyote and Bobcat. Be followed by spring turkey hunts, arkansas and guiding on our staff will any more. Wild hog hunts in mississippi guides and guiding hunters return to enjoy your group of any quality time? What a fantastic hunt, we told the hunters the most important thing to take a deer was to practice with your rifle. No more than two hunters per week will be booked. The mississippi guided alligator in southwest mississippi, turkey hunter can even have digital issue for more followers by three turkeys per month prior to one. We offer hunting with easy access from a pit, and Mississippi guide law and distract, his professionalism and patience was appreciated! Your guide in! Rifle hunts on offering world live duck company is gentle rolling hills of hunts in! Because at Rocky Fork Whitetails, and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2009/2010 Annual Report 2009/2010
    Annual Report 2009/2010 Annual Report 2009/2010 For copies of this document, contact: Alberta Conservation Association 101 – 9 Chippewa Road Sherwood Park, AB T8A 6J7 Tel: (780) 410-1999 Fax: (780) 464-0990 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ab-conservation.com Our Mission ACA conserves, protects and enhances fish, wildlife and habitat for all Albertans to enjoy, value and use. Our Vision An Alberta with an abundance and diversity of fish, wildlife and their habitat; where future generations continue to use, enjoy and value our rich outdoor heritage. TM Charitable Registration Number: 88994 6141 RR0001 Cover Photo: Marco Fontana, Biologist, ACA is conducting Bull Trout stock assessments. Our fisheries studies on the Upper Oldman River and North Saskatchewan River systems have resulted in the protection and conservation of key spawning and rearing habitat in both watersheds. Contents About Us ................................................5 Chairman’s Report .................................6 President and CEO’s Message ..............7 Conservation Milestones .......................8 Our People Our Culture .........................9 Health and Safety ...........................10 Human Resources ..........................11 Information Technology ..................11 10 Years with ACA ..........................12 Conservation Programs .......................15 Communications ............................16 Wildlife ............................................18 Fisheries .........................................28 Land Management
    [Show full text]