DOCSLIB.ORG

08 July 2016 Honourable Dr Makhosi Busisiwe Khoza Member Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
08 July 2016 Honourable Dr Makhosi Busisiwe Khoza Member Of Corruption Watch (RF) NPC Reg. No. K2011/118829/08 8th Floor Heerengracht Building, 87 De Korte Street Braamfontein 2001 Johannesburg P O Box 30630 Braamfontein 2017 T +27 (0)11 242 3900 F (0)11 403 2392 [email protected] www.corruptionwatch.org.za 08 July 2016 Honourable Dr Makhosi Busisiwe Khoza Member of Parliament and Chairperson of the Ad Hoc Committee on Appointment of Public Protector Per email: [email protected] And to: Members of the Ad Hoc Committee on Appointment of Public Protector Adv. Bongani Thomas Bongo Per email: [email protected] Mr Nkosiyakhe Amos Masondo Per email: [email protected] Mr Nicolaas Jacobus Janse Van Rensburg Koornhof Per email: [email protected] Ms Grace Kekulu Tseke Per email: [email protected] Ms Madipoane Refiloe Moremadi Mothapo Per email: [email protected] Dr Patrick Maesela Per email: [email protected] Adv. Glynnis Breytenbach Per email: [email protected] Ms Phumzile Thelma Van Damme Per email: [email protected] Mr James Selfe Per email: [email protected] Mr Werner Horn Per email: [email protected] Mr Julius Sello Malema Per email: [email protected] Prof. Christian Themba Msimang Per email: [email protected] Mr Steven Nicholas Swart Per email: [email protected] Mr Sibusiso Christopher Mncwabe Per email: [email protected] Secretary of the Ad Hoc Committee Vhonani Ramaano Per email: [email protected] Public submissions on nominated/applied candidates Dear Honourable Dr Khoza 1. Please find attached the results of the high level vetting exercise of the 62 nominations/applications received for the position of public protector. This vetting exercise was conducted by Corruption Watch and the Democratic Governance and Rights Unit. 1 2. Please note that for the purposes of this exercise we have not attempted to verify the candidates’ educational qualifications. We have solely relied upon their CVs issued on Parliament’s website, as well as information in the public domain. 3. We have outlined whether or not candidates meet the minimum requirements for position of public protector, as stipulated in the Public Protector Act, by examining the candidates’ various qualifications and work experience. This, however, will have to be verified and further investigated by the Ad Hoc Committee through Parliament’s own vetting processes. 4. We trust that this information will assist the Ad Hoc Committee in its deliberations when shortlisting. 5. If you would like to meet with us to further discuss our campaign and any aspect of this correspondence, please indicate your availability and we will attend to all the necessary meeting arrangements. Yours faithfully David Lewis Executive Director of Corruption Watch [Unsigned due to electronic transmission] 2 Contents ASHOOK KIRPAL ..................................................................................................................................... 5 AUDREY MPOFU ..................................................................................................................................... 7 BERNARD AGULHAS ............................................................................................................................... 9 Boiki-John Tamako ............................................................................................................................... 11 BOITUMELO MMUSINYANE ................................................................................................................. 12 BONGANI CHRISTOPHER MAJOLA ....................................................................................................... 14 BURT LAING .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Busisiwe Mkhwebane .......................................................................................................................... 19 DALI MPOFU ......................................................................................................................................... 22 KHUNOANA HARRY TSWAGO .............................................................................................................. 27 HISHAAM MOHAMMED ....................................................................................................................... 29 JANINE KIM MYBURGH ........................................................................................................................ 31 JILL OLIPHANT ....................................................................................................................................... 33 JONAS SIBANYONI ................................................................................................................................ 35 KARABO.B. KGOROEADIRA .................................................................................................................. 37 KEVIN SIFISO MALUNGA ...................................................................................................................... 38 KRISH NAIDOO ...................................................................................................................................... 43 LINDA CAROL MABASO ........................................................................................................................ 47 LOYISO MPUMLWANA ......................................................................................................................... 49 LYNETTE GAIL MARAIS ......................................................................................................................... 52 MZAMO ALEXANDER GUMBI ............................................................................................................... 54 MADIBENG CHRIS MOKODITWA ......................................................................................................... 56 MAKUNGU MTHEBULA ........................................................................................................................ 58 MALCOLM JOHN SIPHIWE NHLEKO ..................................................................................................... 60 MAMIKI GOODMAN (NEE SHAI) .......................................................................................................... 63 MAMODUPI MOHLALA-MULAUDZI ..................................................................................................... 66 MARK ANDREW HAWYES..................................................................................................................... 70 MATHYS GILDENHYS ............................................................................................................................ 73 MHLALISENI MICHAEL MTHEMBU ....................................................................................................... 74 MOHLALE MALULEKE ........................................................................................................................... 76 MTHUTHUZELI MOSHESH NYIKI .......................................................................................................... 78 MUVHANGO LUKHAIMANE ................................................................................................................. 79 NARNIA BOHLER-MULLER .................................................................................................................... 82 NOKUTHULA SINCERCIA NWAOSHAI ................................................................................................... 85 NONKOSI PRINCESS CETYWAYO .......................................................................................................... 85 3 PHILANI MTHETHWA ............................................................................................................................ 87 PHILIP DEXTER ...................................................................................................................................... 90 PIERRE De VOS ...................................................................................................................................... 93 PRINCE MAFOJANE ............................................................................................................................... 96 PUMEZA FUTSHANE ............................................................................................................................. 99 KAAJAL RAMJATHAN-KEOGH ............................................................................................................. 101 ADV RANDALL TITUS .......................................................................................................................... 104 RAYMOND CHALOM ........................................................................................................................... 105 RHULANI BALOYI ................................................................................................................................ 107 RONNIE SAMUEL MOKOENA ............................................................................................................. 108 SESWANTSHO GODFREY LEBEYA ....................................................................................................... 110 SHARISE WEINER ................................................................................................................................ 112 SIRAJ DESAI ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Independence in South Africa's Anti
    ISSUE 71 • NOVEMBER 2013 BUTLER | TAMUKAMOYO | WOLF | MACKAY & POWERS | MAIMELA GOTTSCHALK | OPPENHEIMER & ANSARA | FAGAN | BOULLE REVIEWS | EGAN helen.suzman.foundation Director Francis Antonie Editor-in-Chief Francis Antonie Principal Sub-editor Eythan Morris Sub-editors Wim Louw Anele Mtwesi Sarah Tobin Board of Trustees Ken Andrew Hylton Appelbaum, Doug Band, Colin Eglin, Jane Evans, William Gumede, Nicole Jaff, Daniel Jowell, Temba Nolutshungu, Krishna Patel, Gary Ralfe, Sipho Seepe, Mary Slack, Richard Steyn, David Unterhalter Design & Layout Alison Parkinson Focus is published by The Helen Suzman Foundation, Postnet Suite 130 Private Bag X2600 Houghton, 2041 No 2 Sherborne Road Parktown, 2193 Email: [email protected] Website: www.hsf.org.za ISSN 1680-9822 The publication of Focus is made possible through generous funding provided by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation Contributors David Ansara Laurence Boulle Anthony Butler Antony Egan (Review) Anton Fagan Keith Gottschalk David Maimela Mitchell Mackay Mark Oppenheimer Michael Powers Hamadziripi Tamukamoyo Loammi Wolf CONTENTS Overview and Welcome Francis Antonie 2 The State of the South African Presidency 4 Anthony Butler Independence in South Africa’s Anti-corruption Architecture: Failures and Prospects 10 Hamadziripi Tamukamoyo The unsuccesful constitutional transition of the NPA 20 Loammi Wolf Moving on from Mistrust: Balancing State Security Concerns with the Right to an Open and Democratic Government 27 Mitchell Mackay and Michael Powers Pan-Africanism of the 21st Century –
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa's Anti-Corruption Bodies
    Protecting the public or politically compromised? South Africa’s anti-corruption bodies Judith February The National Prosecuting Authority and the Public Protector were intended to operate in the interests of the law and good governance but have they, in fact, fulfilled this role? This report examines how the two institutions have operated in the country’s politically charged environment. With South Africa’s president given the authority to appoint key personnel, and with a political drive to do so, the two bodies have at times become embroiled in political intrigues and have been beholden to political interests. SOUTHERN AFRICA REPORT 31 | OCTOBER 2019 Key findings Historically, the National Prosecuting Authority The Public Protector’s office has fared (NPA) has had a tumultuous existence. somewhat better overall but its success The impulse to submit such an institution to ultimately depends on the calibre of the political control is strong. individual at its head. Its design – particularly the appointment Overall, the knock-on effect of process – makes this possible but might not in compromised political independence is itself have been a fatal flaw. that it is felt not only in the relationship between these institutions and outside Various presidents have seen the NPA and Public Protector as subordinate to forces, but within the institutions themselves and, as a result, have chosen themselves. leaders that they believe they could control to The Public Protector is currently the detriment of the institution. experiencing a crisis of public confidence. The selection of people with strong and This is because various courts, including visible political alignments made the danger of the Constitutional Court have found that politically inspired action almost inevitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Powers of the Public Protector: Are Its Findings and Recommendations Legally Binding?
    POWERS OF THE PUBLIC PROTECTOR: ARE ITS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LEGALLY BINDING? by MOLEFHI SOLOMON PHOREGO 27312837 Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree: Master of Laws (LLM Research): Public Law Study Leader: Professor Danie Brand Department of Public Law, University of Pretoria November 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………………….........................vii CHAPTER 1 Introduction…..…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..1 The Public Protector as a Chapter Nine Institution………………………………………………………1 Research problem………………………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Aims and objectives of study……………………………………………………………………………………….3 Research Methodology………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Research Questions………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 Limitations…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Chapter Outline……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..4 CHAPTER 2 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE OPERATIONS OF THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC PROTECTOR Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6 The Constitutional provisions……………………………………………………………………………………..7 Meaning of “Appropriate remedial action’ as contained in the Constitution….…………..11 STATUTORY PROVISIONS REGULATING THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC PROTECTOR……...10 Section 6 of the Public Protector Act………………………………………………………………………….12 i Section 7 of the Public Protector Act………………………………………………………………………….17 Section 8 of the Public Protector Act………………………………………………………………………….19
    [Show full text]
  • Africa's Best Read
    AFRICA’S BEST READ January 3 to 9 2020 Vol 36 No 1 @ mailandguardian mg.co.za Illustration: Francois Smit 2 Mail & Guardian January 3 to 9 2020 Act or witness IN BRIEF – THE NEWS YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED Time called on Zulu king’s trust civilisation’s fall The end appears to be nigh for the Ingonyama Trust, which controls more than three million A decade ago, it seemed that the climate hectares of land in KwaZulu-Natal on behalf crisis was something to be talked about of King Goodwill Zwelithini, after the govern- in the future tense: a problem for the next ment announced it will accept the recommen- generation. dations of the presidential high-level panel on The science was settled on what was land reform to review the trust’s operations or causing the world to heat — human emis- repeal the legislation. sions of greenhouse gases. That impact Minister of Agriculture, Land Reform and had also been largely sketched out. More Rural Development Thoko Didiza announced heat, less predictable rain and a collapse the decision to accept the recommendations in the ecosystems that support life and and deal with barriers to land ownership human activities such as agriculture. on land controlled by amakhosi as part of a But politicians had failed to join the dots package of reforms concerned with rural land and take action. In 2009, international cli- tenure. mate negotiations in Copenhagen failed. She said rural land tenure was an “immedi- Other events regarded as more important ate” challenge which “must be addressed.” were happening.
    [Show full text]
  • State Capture and the Political Manipulation of Criminal Justice Agencies a Joint Submission to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry Into Allegations of State Capture
    State capture and the political manipulation of criminal justice agencies A joint submission to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture CORRUPTION WATCH AND THE INSTITUTE FOR SECURITY STUDIES APRIL 2019 State capture and the political manipulation of criminal justice agencies A joint submission by Corruption Watch and the Institute for Security Studies to the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture April 2019 Contents Executive summary ..........................................................................................................................................3 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................3 Structure and purpose of this submission .....................................................................................................3 Impact of manipulation of criminal justice agencies .......................................................................................4 Recent positive developments .......................................................................................................................4 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................4 Fixing the legacy of the manipulation of criminal justice agencies..............................................................4 Addressing risk factors for future manipulation
    [Show full text]
  • Advocate Busisiwe Mkhwebane Public Protector in the Public’S Perception? Report on the Public Protector’S First 100 Days in Office
    ADVOCATE BUSISIWE MKHWEBANE PUBLIC PROTECTOR IN THE Public’s PERCEPTION? Report on the Public Protector’s first 100 days in office 17/10/2016 - 24/01/2017 COMPILED BY AFRIFORUM Report on the Public Protector’s first 100 days in office Report TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 4 Legal basis 5 CV Adv. Busisiwe Mkhwebane 6 Objections by Opposition & Appointment 8 Media Statements & Reports – Timeline 8 Conclusion 13 3 Report Report on the Public Protector’s first 100 days in office INTRODUCTION The office of the Public Protector (PP) was created by the President would eventually approve the appointment. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa 1996 as one of the instruments to create checks and balances and limit From a shortlist of 14 candidates, which included Judge the power of Parliament and the Government. The PP and Sharise Weiner, Judge Sirajudien Desai, Adv. Kevin Malunga, other Chapter 9 institutions were heavily debated during Adv. Nonkosi Cetywayo, Adv. Mhlaliseni Mthembu, Adv. the discussions around the adoption of the Constitution. Madibeng Mokoditwa, Adv. Mamiki Goodman, Prof. Narnia Their eventual inclusion in the Constitution was therefore a Bohler-Muller, Prof Bongani Majola, Ms Jill Oliphant, Ms victory for the South African people, although the first public Muvhango Lukhaimane, Ms Kaajal Ramjathan-Keogh, and protectors were relatively unknown and they were often Mr Willie Hofmeyr, Ms Busisiwe Mkhwebane eventually criticised for not performing their constitutional duties. emerged victorious, if one can call it that, and was appointed as the new Public Protector. With Thuli Madonsela transforming the office of the Public Protector from a rather unknown and almost insignificant This report aims to evaluate the new Public Protector’s state institution to virtual rock star status in South Africa first 100 days in office, starting from her first day at the through her handling of the Nkandla case and her state office on 17 October 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • 12-Politcsweb-Going-Off-The-Rails
    http://www.politicsweb.co.za/documents/going-off-the-rails--irr Going off the rails - IRR John Kane-Berman - IRR | 02 November 2016 John Kane-Berman on the slide towards the lawless South African state GOING OFF THE RAILS: THE SLIDE TOWARDS THE LAWLESS SOUTH AFRICAN STATE SETTING THE SCENE South Africa is widely recognised as a lawless country. It is also a country run by a government which has itself become increasingly lawless. This is so despite all the commitments to legality set out in the Constitution. Not only is the post–apartheid South Africa founded upon the principle of legality, but courts whose independence is guaranteed are vested with the power to ensure that these principles are upheld. Prosecuting authorities are enjoined to exercise their functions “without fear, favour, or prejudice”. The same duty is laid upon other institutions established by the Constitution, among them the public protector and the auditor general. Everyone is endowed with the right to “equal protection and benefit of the law”. We are all also entitled to “administrative action that is lawful, reasonable, and procedurally fair”. Unlike the old South Africa – no doubt because of it – the new Rechtsstaat was one where the rule of law would be supreme, power would be limited, and the courts would have the final say. This edifice, and these ideals, are under threat. Lawlessness on the part of the state and those who run it is on the increase. The culprits run from the president down to clerks of the court, from directors general to immigration officials, from municipal managers to prison warders, from police generals to police constables, from cabinet ministers to petty bureaucrats.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement by Public Protector Adv. Busisiwe Mkhwebane
    Statement by Public Protector Adv. Busisiwe Mkhwebane during a meeting of the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services on Tuesday, March 06, 2018 in Parliament, Cape Town. Honourable Chairperson, Dr. Mathole Motshekga; Honourable Members of the Committee; Ladies and gentlemen; Good morning! I appreciate the opportunity to appear before the Committee to offer the much needed clarity on matters that appear to have given rise to a sense of disquiet among Honourable Members and the public at large. In the same breath, I am grateful that this opportunity provides a platform for me to bring to the attention of the Committee a worrying state of affairs in my office that is threatening to hamper the delivery of services to the people of South Africa. The latter statement refers to conditions that have a potential to pose a serious threat to the realization of the vision that underpins all of my office’s operations. That is Vision 2023, an elaborate eight-pillared blueprint whose main thrust is to see to it that the services of this institution make a greater impact at the grassroots than ever before. I will come back to this point shortly. Honourable Chairperson and Members, my constitutional mandate aside, one of the things I undertook to put high-up on my priority list right at the beginning of my term of office was forging and nurturing mutually beneficial relations between my office and stakeholders. This was informed by the understanding that, although it is independent, my office is not an island. Its successes and failures depend on how strong the links are 1 between us and those that have a keen interest in the ever so important task entrusted to us.
    [Show full text]
  • Betrayal of the Promise: How South Africa Is Being Stolen
    BETRAYAL OF THE PROMISE: HOW SOUTH AFRICA IS BEING STOLEN May 2017 State Capacity Research Project Convenor: Mark Swilling Authors Professor Haroon Bhorat (Development Policy Research Unit, University of Cape Town), Dr. Mbongiseni Buthelezi (Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI), University of the Witwatersrand), Professor Ivor Chipkin (Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI), University of the Witwatersrand), Sikhulekile Duma (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University), Lumkile Mondi (Department of Economics, University of the Witwatersrand), Dr. Camaren Peter (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University), Professor Mzukisi Qobo (member of South African research Chair programme on African Diplomacy and Foreign Policy, University of Johannesburg), Professor Mark Swilling (Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University), Hannah Friedenstein (independent journalist - pseudonym) Preface The State Capacity Research Project is an interdisciplinary, inter- that the individual confidential testimonies they were receiving from university research partnership that aims to contribute to the Church members matched and confirmed the arguments developed public debate about ‘state capture’ in South Africa. This issue has by the SCRP using largely publicly available information. This dominated public debate about the future of democratic governance triangulation of different bodies of evidence is of great significance. in South Africa ever since then Public Protector Thuli Madonsela published her report entitled State of Capture in late 2016.1 The The State Capacity Research Project is an academic research report officially documented the way in which President Zuma and partnership between leading researchers from four Universities senior government officials have colluded with a shadow network of and their respective research teams: Prof. Haroon Bhorat from the corrupt brokers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Protector As a Mechanism of Political Accountability
    The Public Protector as a Mechanism of Political Accountability:CJ TCHAWOUO The Extent MBIADA of its ContributionPER / PELJ 2017 (20) 1 to the Realisation of the Right to Access Adequate Housing in South Africa CJ Tchawouo Mbiada* Abstract Pioneer in peer -reviewed, open access online law publications This paper is premised on the concept of political accountability which aims to hold accountable government for its action and or Author omission. Political accountability encompasses a number of mechanisms such as the judiciary and the ombudsman. Courts Carlos Joel Tchawouo Mbiada have been instrumental in enforcing the realisation of the right to access to adequate housing in South Africa. This paper argues, Affiliation however, that the judiciary is not the only enforcing avenue because other mechanisms of political accountability may also Labour Appeal Court, South Africa contribute to the realisation of the right to housing. The paper, therefore, explores the extent of the Public Protector's Email [email protected] contribution to the realisation of the right to access to adequate Date published housing. The paper then argues that it is through its functions that the Public Protector exercises its accounting role in the 28 May 2017 realisation of the right to access to adequate housing. The paper, however, cautions that the Public Protector is not an alternative Editor Prof C Rautenbach dispute resolution institution parallel to courts. But that the Public Protector complements the role played by courts by offering How to cite this article another medium through which such right may be realised. Tchawouo Mbiada CJ "The Public Protector as a Mechanism of Political Accountability: The Extent of its Contribution to the Realisation Keywords of the Right to Access Adequate Housing in South Africa" PER / Right to access to adequate housing; political accountability; PELJ 2017(20) - DOI judiciary; ombudsman; Public Protector; accountability; http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727- 3781/2017/v20n0i1382 enforcement and realisation.
    [Show full text]
  • National List
    NATIONAL LIST 1 Otta Helen Maree 2 Mmoba Solomon Seshoka 3 Lindiwe Desire Mazibuko 4 Suhla James Masango 5 Joseph Job Mcgluwa 6 Andrew Grant Whitfield 7 Semakaleng Patricia Kopane 8 Gregory Allen Grootboom 9 Dion Travers George 10 David John Maynier 11 Desiree van der Walt 12 Gregory Rudy Krumbock 13 Tarnia Elena Baker 14 Leonard Jones Basson 15 Zisiwe Beauty Nosimo Balindlela 16 Annelie Lotriet 17 Dirk Jan Stubbe 18 Anchen Margaretha Dreyer 19 Phumzile Thelma Van Damme 20 Stevens Mokgalapa 21 Michael John Cardo 22 Stanford Makashule Gana 23 Mohammed Haniff Hoosen 24 Gavin Richard Davis 25 Kevin John Mileham 26 Natasha Wendy Anita Michael 27 Denise Robinson 28 Werner Horn 29 Ian Michael Ollis 30 Johanna Fredrika Terblanche 31 Hildegard Sonja Boshoff 32 Lance William Greyling 33 Glynnis Breytenbach 34 Robert Alfred Lees 35 Derrick America 36 James Robert Bourne Lorimer 37 Terri Stander 38 Evelyn Rayne Wilson 39 James Vos 40 Thomas Charles Ravenscroft Walters 41 Veronica van Dyk 42 Cameron MacKenzie 43 Tandeka Gqada 44 Dianne Kohler 45 Darren Bergman 46 Zelda Jongbloed 47 Annette Steyn 48 Sejamotopo Charles Motau 49 David Christie Ross 50 Archibold Mzuvukile Figlan 51 Michael Waters 52 John Henry Steenhuisen 53 Choloane David Matsepe 54 Santosh Vinita Kalyan 55 Hendrik Christiaan Crafford Kruger 56 Johanna Steenkamp 57 Annette Theresa Lovemore 58 Nomsa Innocencia Tarabella Marchesi 59 Karen De Kock 60 Heinrich Cyril Volmink 61 Michael Bagraim 62 Gordon Mackay 63 Erik Johannes Marais 64 Marius Helenis Redelinghuys 65 Lungiswa Veronica James
    [Show full text]
  • South African Crime Quarterly, No 48
    CQ Cover June 2014 7/10/14 3:27 PM Page 1 Reviewing 20 years of criminal justice in South Africa South A f r i c a n CRIME QUA RT E R LY No. 48 | June 2014 Previous issues Stacy Moreland analyses judgements in rape ISS Pretoria cases in the We s t e r n Cape, finding that Block C, Brooklyn Court p a t r i a rchal notions of gender still inform 361 Veale Street judgements in rape case. Heidi Barnes writes a New Muckleneuk case note on the Constitutional Court case Pretoria, South Africa F v Minister of Safety and Security. Alexander Tel: +27 12 346 9500 Hiropoulos and Jeremy Porter demonstrate how Fax:+27 12 460 0998 Geographic Information Systems can be used, [email protected] along with crime pattern theory, to analyse police crime data. Geoff Harris, Crispin Hemson ISS Addis Ababa & Sylvia Kaye report on a conference held in 5th Floor, Get House Building Durban in mid-2013 about measures to reduce Africa Avenue violence in schools; and Hema Harg o v a n Addis Ababa, Ethiopia reviews the latetest edition of Victimology in Tel: +251 11 515 6320 South Africa by Robert Peacock (ed). Fax: +251 11 515 6449 [email protected] Andrew Faull responds to Herrick and Charman ISS Dakar (SACQ 45), delving into the daily liquor policing 4th Floor, Immeuble Atryum in the Western Cape. He looks beyond policing Route de Ouakam for solutions to alcohol-related harms. Claudia Forester-Towne considers how race and gender Dakar, Senegal influence police reservists' views about their Tel: +221 33 860 3304/42 work.
    [Show full text]