DOCSLIB.ORG

Agroecological Factors Impacting Stem Borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Dynamics in Gulf Coast Sugarcane and Rice Julien M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agroecological Factors Impacting Stem Borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) Dynamics in Gulf Coast Sugarcane and Rice Julien M Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2011 Agroecological factors impacting stem borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) dynamics in Gulf Coast sugarcane and rice Julien M. Beuzelin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Beuzelin, Julien M., "Agroecological factors impacting stem borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) dynamics in Gulf Coast sugarcane and rice" (2011). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1675. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1675 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. AGROECOLOGICAL FACTORS IMPACTING STEM BORER (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) DYNAMICS IN GULF COAST SUGARCANE AND RICE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the formal requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology by Julien M. Beuzelin B.S., Université de Rennes I, 2003 M.S., École Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Rennes, 2005 August 2011 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my major professor, Dr. T. E. Reagan, for giving me the opportunity to conduct this project. His guidance, support, and high level of expectation helped me grow as a young scientist. I would also like to thank Dr. L. T. Wilson for the time he spent working with me, and for sharing his unique vision and knowledge of agroecosystem research. I am grateful to my other committee members Drs. D. C. Blouin, M. J. Stout, and E. P. Webster for sharing their expertise in statistics, plant-insect interactions, and rice weed management, respectively. I thank Dr. K. E. Damann for serving as the Dean‘s representative. I also thank Drs. M. O. Way and A. T. Showler for actively participating in my dissertation project and for letting me use their laboratories and equipment. Special thanks to Anna Mészáros for everything, including her love, moral support, and entomological expertise 24/7. A Sophie, Daniel, Michel, et Aimée, merci pour tout. Special thanks to Blake Wilson— friend, colleague, and driver extraordinaire. I thank Louisiana sugarcane growers Gerald Quebedeaux and Blake Newton, and Texas rice growers Bill Dishman, Jr., John and Jay Jenkins, and Gary and Michael Skalicky for permitting us use of their farmland and for technical assistance. I thank former graduate students Drs. Waseem Akbar, Jiale Lv, and Francis Reay-Jones. I thank Becky Pearson, Mark Nunez, Dr. Lee Tarpley, and Ronnie Porter in Beaumont; Veronica Abrigo and Jaime Cavazos in Weslaco; Jack Vawter and Mike Hiller in Ganado; and Dr. W. H. White and Rita Riggio in Louisiana. I thank Dr. Lowell Urbatsch for identifying numerous grass samples. I also thank Drs. J. A. Davis, L. D. Foil, J. W. Hoy, N. A. Hummel, and S. J. Johnson for participating in the review of selected chapters. I thank student workers Kyle Baker, Jannie Castillo, and Mallory Clarke for their technical assistance. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................. ii LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................................v LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... vii ABSTRACT .....................................................................................................................................x CHAPTER 1: GENERAL INTRODUCTION ................................................................................1 CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW .........................................................................................6 2.1. Taxonomy of D. saccharalis and E. loftini ..........................................................................6 2.2. Diatraea saccharalis and E. loftini Geographic Distribution ..............................................6 2.3. Diatraea saccharalis and E. loftini Host Plants...................................................................7 2.4. Diatraea saccharalis Life Cycle and Morphology ..............................................................9 2.5. Eoreuma loftini Life Cycle and Morphology.....................................................................12 2.6. Stem Borer Injury to Cultivated Hosts...............................................................................14 2.7. Host Effect on Stem Borer Behavior and Biology.............................................................15 2.8. Cultivar Resistance for Stem Borer Management .............................................................18 2.9. Cultural Control of Stem Borers ........................................................................................22 2.10. Biological Control ..............................................................................................................24 2.11. Stem Borer Management with Insecticides .......................................................................27 CHAPTER 3: IMPACT OF HURRICANE RITA STORM SURGE ON SUGARCANE BORER (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) MANAGEMENT IN LOUISIANA ......................................31 3.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................31 3.2. Materials and Methods .......................................................................................................33 3.3. Results ................................................................................................................................38 3.4. Discussion ..........................................................................................................................44 CHAPTER 4: SUGARCANE PLANTING DATE IMPACT ON FALL AND SPRING SUGARCANE BORER (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) INFESTATIONS ...........................49 4.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................49 4.2. Materials and Methods .......................................................................................................50 4.3. Results ................................................................................................................................54 4.4. Discussion ..........................................................................................................................63 CHAPTER 5: POTENTIAL IMPACT OF MEXICAN RICE BORER NON-CROP HOSTS ON SUGARCANE IPM .......................................................................................................................68 5.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................68 5.2. Materials and Methods .......................................................................................................69 5.3. Results ................................................................................................................................70 5.4. Discussion ..........................................................................................................................75 iii CHAPTER 6: SEASONAL INFESTATIONS OF TWO STEM BORERS (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) IN NON-CROP GRASSES OF GULF COAST RICE AGROECOSYSTEMS .79 6.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................79 6.2. Materials and Methods .......................................................................................................80 6.3. Results ................................................................................................................................87 6.4. Discussion ........................................................................................................................103 CHAPTER 7: OVIPOSITION AND LARVAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE MEXICAN RICE BORER (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) ON RICE AND NON-CROP GRASS HOSTS ....109 7.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................109 7.2. Materials and Methods .....................................................................................................110 7.3. Results ..............................................................................................................................118 7.4. Discussion ........................................................................................................................125 CHAPTER 8: IMPACT OF RICE HARVEST CUTTING HEIGHT AND RATOON CROP ON LATE SEASON AND OVERWINTERING STEM BORER (LEPIDOPTERA: CRAMBIDAE) INFESTATIONS .........................................................................................................................132 8.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................132 8.2. Materials and Methods .....................................................................................................134
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maize Stem/Stalk Borer Busseola Fusca and Chilo Partellus Hurtuu Agadaa/Agada Borbur/Kancha Fehari Prevention Monitoring Direct Control Direct Control Restrictions
    PEST MANAGEMENT DECISION GUIDE: GREEN AND YELLOW LIST Maize Stem/Stalk Borer Busseola fusca and Chilo partellus Hurtuu Agadaa/Agada borbur/Kancha fehari Prevention Monitoring Direct Control Direct Control Restrictions l Remove crop residues after l Check the field l Remove l When using a pesticide or botanical, always wear protective clothing and follow harvest to kill larvae and pupae weekly staring from 2 seriously affected the instructions on the product label left in old stems to prevent carry weeks after plants and feed over to next season crop. emergence to livestock or l Do not use chemicals with the same mode of action year after year as this can lead to resistance These can be used immediately l Look for leaf burn for animal feed or fuel windowing, holes l Apply well sieved l Always consult the most recent list of registered pesticides of MoA, Plant Health Larvae feeding on young l Plough (20cm deep) to kill and tunnelling in the cool wood ash to Regulatory Directorate, Ethiopia leaves (Hiwot Lemma, MOA, larvae and pupae by burying stems and cover of funnels when Ethiopia) stems and exposing pupae to the maize cob 5-10% damage is l Lambda Cyhalothrin (Bravo 5% l WHO II; moderately hazardous, Pyrethroid natural enemies and heat observed, a l Look for caterpillars EC W/V, Datrate 5% EC, Karto 5 with contact and stomach activity. Apply pinch (2.5 gms) l Remove alternative host such of different stages of EC, Lamdex 5% EC, 1-2 times per season starting from 3-4 per plant as wild sorghums and thick development inside Lambdahock 5% EC, Modan 5% weeks after emergence stemmed grasses such as the growing shoot l Apply dry ground EC) 320ml/Ha or 16g ai/Ha, Napier grass and stem ripe neem seed REI-1 day, PH-7 days l Intercrop with legumes such as l Look for deadhearts powder to funnel cowpeas, soya, haricot or faba in maize whorls when 5-10% l Cypermethrin (Cymbush 1% l WHO II; moderately hazardous, Pyrethroid Adult stemborer moth (Hiwot damage is Granules) 2.5 Kg/Ha (apinch per with contact and stomach activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of Cultural, Biological, and Varietal Controls for Management of Stalk Borers in Louisiana Sugarcane
    insects Review Interaction of Cultural, Biological, and Varietal Controls for Management of Stalk Borers in Louisiana Sugarcane Thomas E. Reagan * and Megan M. Mulcahy * Department of Entomology, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] (T.E.R.); [email protected] (M.M.M.) Received: 31 July 2019; Accepted: 11 September 2019; Published: 19 September 2019 Abstract: Diatraea saccharalis F is considered the most important pest of sugarcane in the United States. This article focuses on the history of pest management as it relates to the control of this stem borer in Louisiana sugarcane, and how control practices have become more in tune with integrated pest management paradigms. Various pest management strategies are employed against D. saccharalis and the interactions between each of these provide farmers with the tools needed to curb damaging infestations. However, the invasion of the Mexican rice borer, Eoreuma loftini (Dyar), and other confounding environmental factors have presented farmers, consultants, and researchers with new pest management challenges. We address these challenges and provide an overview of ongoing developments, particularly in the Louisiana sugarcane pest management program. Keywords: sugarcane; Diatraea saccharalis; integrated pest management; Eoreuma loftini; Louisiana; stalk borer 1. Introduction The sugarcane borer, Diatraea saccharalis F (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), is native to the West Indies, as well as Central and South America. It was introduced into Louisiana in the 1850s due to the continued importation of sugarcane for production in the state [1]. Since its introduction, D. saccharalis has long been regarded as the most damaging insect pest on the crop.
    [Show full text]
  • Stalk Borer Phenology, Damage Syndrome, and Yield Loss Potential in Field Corn Wayne Charles Bailey Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1985 Stalk borer phenology, damage syndrome, and yield loss potential in field corn Wayne Charles Bailey Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Bailey, Wayne Charles, "Stalk borer phenology, damage syndrome, and yield loss potential in field corn " (1985). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 7817. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/7817 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS Thi» reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target " for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Pagc(s>". If It was possible to obtain the mbslng page(s) or section, they are spliced Into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting througti an Image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity, 2. When an image on the film Is obliterated with a round black mark.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Risk to Neptunia Oleracea Lour. by the Moth, Neurostrota Gunniella (Busck), a Biological Control Agent for Mimosa Pigra L
    Proceedings of the X International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds 449 4-14 July 1999, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA Neal R. Spencer [ed.]. pp. 449-457 (2000) Assessing the Risk to Neptunia oleracea Lour. by the Moth, Neurostrota gunniella (Busck), a Biological Control Agent for Mimosa pigra L. I. W. FORNO1, J. FICHERA1, and S. PRIOR2 1CSIRO Entomology, PMB 3, Indooroopilly Q4069, Australia 2Present Address: Department of Natural Resources, Magazine Street, Sherwood Q4075, Australia Abstract Mimosa pigra L. is native to tropical America and is an aggressive, invasive weed on the flood plains of the Northern Territory of Australia and in several countries in Southeast Asia. Neurostrota gunniella (Busck) (Gracillariidae) was introduced into Australia from Mexico in 1986 for biological control of mimosa. It was released in 1989 following com- pletion of extensive host range studies which determined that the moth bred readily on M. pigra and to a much lesser extent on Neptunia dimorphantha Domin, N. gracilis Benth., N. major (Benth.) Windler, N. monosperma F. Muell. and M. pudica L. Damage to these non-target species was assessed as insignificant. Subsequently, this moth was introduced to Thailand where quarantine studies showed substantial attack on an important vegetable, N. oleracea Lour., which is a perennial, aquatic herb which either grows prostrate near the water’s edge or floats by forming spongy aerenchyma around the stems. N. gunniella was not released in Southeast Asia. Further studies showed that N. gunniella oviposits and breeds similarly on potted M. pigra and the terrestrial form of N. oleracea but fewer eggs are laid and larval mortality is much greater on N.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Prediction of Maize Response to Early-Season Injury from Stalk Borer Paula Marie Davis Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1990 Evaluation and prediction of maize response to early-season injury from stalk borer Paula Marie Davis Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Agricultural Science Commons, Agriculture Commons, Agronomy and Crop Sciences Commons, Biostatistics Commons, and the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Davis, Paula Marie, "Evaluation and prediction of maize response to early-season injury from stalk borer " (1990). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 9359. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/9359 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichneumonid Wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) in the to Scale Caterpillar (Lepidoptera) [1]
    Central JSM Anatomy & Physiology Bringing Excellence in Open Access Research Article *Corresponding author Bui Tuan Viet, Institute of Ecology an Biological Resources, Vietnam Acedemy of Science and Ichneumonid Wasps Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam, Email: (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Submitted: 11 November 2016 Accepted: 21 February 2017 Published: 23 February 2017 Parasitizee a Pupae of the Rice Copyright © 2017 Viet Insect Pests (Lepidoptera) in OPEN ACCESS Keywords the Hanoi Area • Hymenoptera • Ichneumonidae Bui Tuan Viet* • Lepidoptera Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Vietnam Abstract During the years 1980-1989,The surveys of pupa of the rice insect pests (Lepidoptera) in the rice field crops from the Hanoi area identified showed that 12 species of the rice insect pests, which were separated into three different groups: I- Group (Stem bore) including Scirpophaga incertulas, Chilo suppressalis, Sesamia inferens; II-Group (Leaf-folder) including Parnara guttata, Parnara mathias, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, Brachmia sp, Naranga aenescens; III-Group (Bite ears) including Mythimna separata, Mythimna loryei, Mythimna venalba, Spodoptera litura . From these organisms, which 15 of parasitoid species were found, those species belonging to 5 families in of the order Hymenoptera (Ichneumonidae, Chalcididae, Eulophidae, Elasmidae, Pteromalidae). Nine of these, in which there were 9 of were ichneumonid wasp species: Xanthopimpla flavolineata, Goryphus basilaris, Xanthopimpla punctata, Itoplectis naranyae, Coccygomimus nipponicus, Coccygomimus aethiops, Phaeogenes sp., Atanyjoppa akonis, Triptognatus sp. We discuss the general biology, habitat preferences, and host association of the knowledge of three of these parasitoids, (Xanthopimpla flavolineata, Phaeogenes sp., and Goryphus basilaris). Including general biology, habitat preferences and host association were indicated and discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from BOLD Or Requested from Other Authors
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Towards a global DNA barcode reference library for quarantine identifcations of lepidopteran Received: 28 November 2018 Accepted: 5 April 2019 stemborers, with an emphasis on Published: xx xx xxxx sugarcane pests Timothy R. C. Lee 1, Stacey J. Anderson2, Lucy T. T. Tran-Nguyen3, Nader Sallam4, Bruno P. Le Ru5,6, Desmond Conlong7,8, Kevin Powell 9, Andrew Ward10 & Andrew Mitchell1 Lepidopteran stemborers are among the most damaging agricultural pests worldwide, able to reduce crop yields by up to 40%. Sugarcane is the world’s most prolifc crop, and several stemborer species from the families Noctuidae, Tortricidae, Crambidae and Pyralidae attack sugarcane. Australia is currently free of the most damaging stemborers, but biosecurity eforts are hampered by the difculty in morphologically distinguishing stemborer species. Here we assess the utility of DNA barcoding in identifying stemborer pest species. We review the current state of the COI barcode sequence library for sugarcane stemborers, assembling a dataset of 1297 sequences from 64 species. Sequences were from specimens collected and identifed in this study, downloaded from BOLD or requested from other authors. We performed species delimitation analyses to assess species diversity and the efectiveness of barcoding in this group. Seven species exhibited <0.03 K2P interspecifc diversity, indicating that diagnostic barcoding will work well in most of the studied taxa. We identifed 24 instances of identifcation errors in the online database, which has hampered unambiguous stemborer identifcation using barcodes. Instances of very high within-species diversity indicate that nuclear markers (e.g. 18S, 28S) and additional morphological data (genitalia dissection of all lineages) are needed to confrm species boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • ENV /JM /M on O(2016)27 Unclassified
    Unclassified ENV/JM/MONO(2016)27 Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 29-Jun-2016 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________ English - Or. English ENVIRONMENT DIRECTORATE JOINT MEETING OF THE CHEMICALS COMMITTEE AND Unclassified ENV/JM/MONO(2016)27 THE WORKING PARTY ON CHEMICALS, PESTICIDES AND BIOTECHNOLOGY Cancels & replaces the same document of 29 June 2016 CONSENSUS DOCUMENT ON THE BIOLOGY OF SORGHUM (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology No. 62 English JT03398806 Complete document available on OLIS in its original format - This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of Or. English international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. ENV/JM/MONO(2016)27 2 ENV/JM/MONO(2016)27 OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology No. 62 Consensus Document on the Biology of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) Environment Directorate Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Paris 2016 3 ENV/JM/MONO(2016)27 Also published in the Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology: No. 1, Commercialisation of Agricultural Products Derived through Modern Biotechnology: Survey Results (1995) No. 2, Analysis of Information Elements Used in the Assessment of Certain Products of Modern Biotechnology (1995) No. 3, Report of the OECD Workshop on the Commercialisation of Agricultural Products Derived through Modern Biotechnology (1995) No. 4, Industrial Products of Modern Biotechnology Intended for Release to the Environment: The Proceedings of the Fribourg Workshop (1996) No.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Common Beans
    Teparies as a Source of Useful Traits for Improving Common Beans Item Type Article Authors Thomas, Claire V.; Manshardt, Richard M.; Waines, J. Giles Publisher University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Journal Desert Plants Rights Copyright © Arizona Board of Regents. The University of Arizona. Download date 26/09/2021 05:58:10 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/552200 Thomas, Manshardt and Waines Source of Useful Traits 43 The tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray) is of interest Tepariesas aSource for its intrinsic value as an under -exploited crop adapted to hot arid climates, and as a potential donor of desirable traits to the common bean P. vulgaris L.) through interspecific hybridiza- of Useful Traits for tion. Teparies possess several traits that could be valuable if transferred to common beans. Teparies are more heat and Improving Common drought resistant than common beans. They tolerate higher salt (Marcarian, 1981) and boron concentrations in the soil Beans (C. J. Lovatt, personal communication; J. G. Waines, unpubl.). They are tolerant of damage by lesser cornstalk borer, Elasmo- palpus lignosellus Zeller (Thomas, 1983). They show field res- istance to charcoal rot, caused by Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid (Thomas, 1983). All of these factors combine to Claire V. Thomas produce a plant that performs well in hot, semiarid climates. In addition, they show high levels of resistance to Xanthomonas Richard M. Manshardt phaseoli (E.E Sm.) Dows, the bacterium that causes common blight of beans (Coyne and Schuster, 1973). and J. Giles Waines Teparies are routinely grown during the summer in parts of Department of Botany and Plant Sciences the American Southwest and adjacent Mexico, where they set University of California, Riverside pods when temperatures are too high for pod formation in common beans.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGY and MANAGEMENT of the SOYBEAN STEM BORER, Dectes Texanus Leconte, in KENTUCKY
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Entomology Entomology 2019 BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF THE SOYBEAN STEM BORER, Dectes texanus LeConte, IN KENTUCKY Izabela Gomes University of Kentucky, [email protected] Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/etd.2019.448 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Gomes, Izabela, "BIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OF THE SOYBEAN STEM BORER, Dectes texanus LeConte, IN KENTUCKY" (2019). Theses and Dissertations--Entomology. 49. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/entomology_etds/49 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Entomology by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Rice Striped Stem Borer (412)
    Pacific Pests and Pathogens - Fact Sheets https://apps.lucidcentral.org/ppp/ Rice striped stem borer (412) Photo 1. Adult Asiatic stem borer, Scirpophaga Photo 2. Adult Asiatic stem borer, Scirpophaga suppressalis. suppressalis. Photo 4. Damage ('deadheart') to rice stem by Chilo Photo 3. Eggs of the Asiatic stem borer, Scirpophaga auricilius (damage to Scirpophaga suppressalis is suppressalis, laid in rows. similar). Photo 5. 'Whitehead' - a symptom caused by stem borers: the base of the panicle is damaged preventing it from emerging or, if already emerged, the grain is unfilled and white. Common Name Striped rice stem borer; it is also known as the Asiatic rice borer. Scientific Name Chilo suppressalis. A moth in the Crambidae. Distribution Restricted. South, East and Southeast Asia, North America (Hawaii), Europe, Oceania. It is recorded from Australia, and Papua New Guinea. Hosts Rice, sorghum and maize are major hosts, but it is also found on sugarcane, millet, and many wild grasses. Symptoms & Life Cycle The larvae is a serious pest of rice, more under temperate and sub-tropical than tropical conditions. The larvae feed on the stems causing similar symptoms to other rice stem borers (see Fact Sheets nos. 408, 409, 410, 411). The larvae tunnel into the stems, through the internodes towards the base of the plant, causing stems to wilt and die, a condition known as 'deadheart'. The stems are easily pulled out (Photo 4). Feeding at the base of the panicles may prevent emergence or result in white unfilled grain of those that have emerged, a symptom called 'whitehead' (Photo 5). Eggs are scale-like, white turning yellow as they mature, up to 60 in several rows on the leaves, sometimes on the leaf sheaths (Photo 3).
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Water Hyacinth with Arthropods: a Review to 2000
    Biological Control of Water Hyacinth with Arthropods: a Review to 2000 M.H. Julien* Abstract Water hyacinth, native to the Amazon River, invaded the tropical world over the last century and has become an extremely serious weed. The search for biological control agents began in the early 1960s and continues today. Six arthropod species have been released around the world. They are: two weevils, Neochetina bruchi and N. eichhorniae; two moths, Niphograpta albiguttalis and Xubida infusellus; a mite Orthogalumna terebrantis; and a bug Eccritotarsus catarinensis. The mite and X. infusellus have not contributed to control and the bug is under evaluation following recent releases in Africa. The two weevils and the moth N. albiguttalis have been released in numerous infestations since the 1970s and have contributed to successful control of the weed in many locations. It is timely to assess their impact on water hyacinth and, to help in planning future strategies, to identify the factors that contribute to or mitigate against successful biological control. Although the search for new agents continues, and as a result biological control will likely be improved, this technique alone is unlikely to be successful in all of the weed’s habitats. It is important that whole-of-catchment management strategies be developed that integrate biological control with other control techniques. The aims of such strategies should be to achieve the best possible control using methods that are affordable and sustainable; hence the need to develop strategies using biological control as the base component. WATER hyacinth apparently became a problem in the sation of the weed for commercial and subsistence USA following its distribution to participants in the purposes has also been widely considered.
    [Show full text]