DOCSLIB.ORG

An Interview with Bernard Tschumi - Uncube 19.06.15 21:09

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Interview with Bernard Tschumi - Uncube 19.06.15 21:09 An interview with Bernard Tschumi - uncube 19.06.15 21:09 BLOG INTERVIEWINTERVIEW 1818 JUNJUN 20152015 INVENTING QUESTIONS AN INTERVIEW WITH BERNARD TSCHUMI 1 / 12 Bernard Tschumi. (Photo (detail) © Martin Mai) A major retrospective exhibition of the work of Bernard Tschumi is currently on show at http://www.uncubemagazine.com/blog/15708387?wt_mc=nluw.2015-06-19.content.linkartikel Seite 1 von 6 An interview with Bernard Tschumi - uncube 19.06.15 21:09 A major retrospective exhibition of the work of Bernard Tschumi is currently on show at the S AM Swiss Architecture Museum in Basel. Tschumi, famous as the original great agent provocateur of deconstruction in the 1980s – his Parc de la Villette project in Paris launched a thousand student project imitators – has since developed a practice honed by an understanding of architecture as a discipline constantly in dialogue with other disciplines like film, art and literature. Evelyn Steiner of S AM talked to Tschumi about his practice, the influence of Cedric Price on his work and how after years of the dominance of form in architecture, the idea of architecture as a place of events is becoming current again. The current exhibition “Bernard Tschumi. Architecture: Concept & Notation” at the Swiss Architecture Museum in Basel is the latest incarnation of your retrospective seen at the Centre Pompidou last year and the first overview of your work in Switzerland. Unlike in the French-speaking or Anglo-American worlds, you’ve received relatively little attention in Switzerland despite your Swiss roots. Why do you think that is? I have no idea! The first comprehensive exhibition of my work took place at MoMA in New York in 1994, 20 years ago. Though that show of course exhibited far less built work than is now in Basel, it already combined a lot of important projects: the Manhattan Transcripts, the Parc de la Villette and a few early competitions including the Bridge-City in Lausanne, Kansai Airport and the ZKM Center for Art and Media Technology in Karlsruhe. We’ve had a number of other exhibitions since including the Swiss pavilion at the Venice Biennale in 2006. But a direct relationship with Switzerland has mostly been established through buildings we’ve built: in Lausanne, Geneva and Rolle, but that was it. I don’t know why there’s never been an exhibition on my work in Switzerland. It’s just the way it is. I’m very happy to have the show in Basel. How do you feel being confronted with your work in a retrospective, as a historical overview? Is there a strange sense of definitive-ness? I wouldn’t call it definitive, but a stage. There are things which have been done and things in the making. The show as conceived for the Centre Pompidou was very much about both. Things done include my earlier research work of the 1970s, the Parc de la Villette of the 1980s, and a series of explorations, through projects but also through books: for example the Event-Cities series, consisting so far of four volumes, documents the research that goes with the projects. At one moment we decided to turn everything into a book as simultaneously documentation but also a sort of manifesto. This was published as the very big 770 page “Architecture Concepts: Red is Not a Color”, the first comprehensive treatment of my architecture. The theme was that architecture is importantly first as the materialisation of concepts and ideas. We worked seven years on the book, and then, apparently only two weeks after the book appeared on his table, Frédéric Migayrou, Chief Curator of the Centre Pompidou, called me. We developed the show relating to five parts of the book: “Manifestos: Space and Event”, “Program / Juxtaposition / Superimposition”, “Vectors and Envelopes”, “Concept, Context, Content” and “Concept-Forms”, following on from the Event- http://www.uncubemagazine.com/blog/15708387?wt_mc=nluw.2015-06-19.content.linkartikel Seite 2 von 6 An interview with Bernard Tschumi - uncube 19.06.15 21:09 Cities series. We were trying to raise a few important questions, not about my architecture, but about architecture in general directing these questions towards a wider audience: not only architects, but people with an interest in cities and architecture. Is it possible to mediate the intellectual and theoretical approach to your work through an exhibition primarily perceived in a visual way? It’s difficult. I don’t know how it will work here in Basel, but at the Pompidou I was amazed to see people staying for an hour and a half, reading every caption and sitting down to watch the films; they were very engaged. It requires effort, but I hope this happens because for me architecture is not only the visual, it’s everything else, it’s the ears, the tactility, the sound, and it’s also the thought. You can’t take any of them away. What’s your relation to the Swiss architectural scene and ETH Zurich, your alma mater? It seems somehow ambivalent: you once mentioned that your diploma Professor Jacques Schader and Bernhard Hoesli, the chairman of the school, found it difficult to give you a pass, because your final thesis project was heavily influenced by Cedric Price’s Fun Palace and your approach was not approved of in the conservative climate of 1969. Are there nonetheless traces of your Swiss architectural education in your architecture? Well, it’s very ambiguous because the ETH in the 1960s was both very precise in its mandate and quite narrow in its definition of architecture as the art of construction within a very specific culture. But I worked very well with both professors who were very intelligently open – Hoesli had come back from the US, Schader was very objective and I have a great respect for the two. I was fascinated by the idea not of the present, but of the future and I saw it very much in the work of Cedric Price in England. It’s well known how I tried to invite Cedric to give a lecture at the ETH, but was told “no, you cannot, because his work is not architecture”! But I received a very “gründliche” or thorough grounding at the ETH and expanded it later at the AA in London. You studied only six years before Jacques Herzog and Pierre de Meuron at the ETH, and share a similar educational background and foundation, yet developed in a very different direction. What happened within these six years? Was it only due to Aldo Rossi coming to teach at the ETH from 1972-1975, after you’d already left? His arrival is often seen as a turning point in the history of the ETH due to his rigorous approach, encouraging his students to think of architecture as architecture again after years of experimentation with sociological and philosophical methodologies... I find it indeed very interesting that we studied only six years apart. Of course in between the political upheaval of 1968 happened, and on either side these two important figures: For me Cedric Price, for Herzog, Aldo Rossi. That period between the end of the sixties and beginning of the seventies was very short but very interesting historically. Today, in the aftermath of the financial crisis, many architects have developed a scepticism of form as a kind of http://www.uncubemagazine.com/blog/15708387?wt_mc=nluw.2015-06-19.content.linkartikel Seite 3 von 6 An interview with Bernard Tschumi - uncube 19.06.15 21:09 Today, in the aftermath of the financial crisis, many architects have developed a scepticism of form as a kind of statement against a self-referential starchitecture formed by neoliberalism. Your definition of architecture as a space for events, not in terms of its form seems to have received fresh impetus and your own idols like Cedric Price are being appreciated again. How do you see this development? I feel a bit ambiguous about it, because Cedric was simultaneously an inventor and political provocateur. He was questioning the idea of architecture with a big “A” but also inventing questions. What I mean is that quite often the answer is less important than the question. For example Cedric’s Potteries Thinkbelt project or the Fun Palace: these were not projects determined by others, they were really defined by the architect himself and a few people close to him, but they were not directly linked to the commercial or business requirements of society: they were a reading of the potential needs. Writing the programme was more important than designing the response in form of a building. Today I do not know if we are capable of doing this. I hope so! The Swiss pavilion exhibition at the last Venice Architecture Biennial in 2014 was called “Lucius Burckhardt and Cedric Price – a stroll through a fun palace” and revisited the work of Lucius Burckhardt (1925–2003) and Cedric Price (1934–2003), to reflect on the future. What did you think? I was happy that Cedric was talked about, but irritated by the spectacle aspect: of people pushing carts with reproductions of his drawings, trying – badly – to explain his work. To turn something that was purposefully, intentionally low key on the part of Cedric into a show, a zoo, was perhaps not the best way to ask the question. Film as a medium encompassing space and event had a great impact especially on your early architectural work. A lot of architects seem to have a passion or obsession for film, sharing similar practices in their perception and representation of space. Eisenstein was your hero and also Le Corbusier’s… When film arrived as a completely new media, had to be developed: how you tell a story, how you literally invent the mechanics.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aarchitecture 33 Consider Architecture in a Sensual Form
    AArchitecture 33 Consider architecture in a sensual form – a form made to seduce you, a form that is not concerned with physicality but potential. A form that arouses you from mere expectation. This is the pleasure of architecture and the architecture of desire. For this issue, AArchitecture presents the position of desire from within the blurred realms of art and architecture. Architecture historian Adrian Forty describes human desire as ‘a single idea, which comes across as so familiar that we find ourselves supposing it to be exactly what we ourselves had always thought’.→ 1 This suggests that with desirability comes intention. It takes a sense of feeling or experience to replicate a particular allegory within an object, building or artefact. Desire In ‘The Pleasure of Architecture’, Bernard Tschumi discusses the idea of pleasure through the 1951 filmA Streetcar Named Desire, writing that ‘desire was never seen. Yet it remained constant’. He characterises the presence of desire in this film as ‘the movement toward something constantly missing, toward absence. Each setting, each fragment, was aimed at seduction but always dissolved at the moment it was approached’. → 2 Tschumi is saying that the very essence of desire is that which cannot be attained. ‘To desire’ is to want or to anticipate, and therefore the moment of satisfaction is also the termination of desire. The ‘architecture of desire’ must then be a choreographed apparatus for anticipation, and the architect or artist becomes the erotic curator. In this issue Penelope Haralambidou writes about her analysis of Marcel Duchamp and her depiction of the architecture of desire through his work and her own drawing technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Design Concepts in the Nineties. Theoretical Models of UN
    Ŕ periodica polytechnica Making design concepts in the nineties. Architecture Theoretical models of UN Studio 40/2 (2009) 55–63 doi: 10.3311/pp.ar.2009-2.02 Zoltán Bun web: http://www.pp.bme.hu/ar c Periodica Polytechnica 2009 RESEARCH ARTICLE Received 2010-02-18 Abstract At the very end of the 1980s, the previously determinative Attending to the thinking of the second half of the twentieth past that had been incarcerated in the museum and globalisa- century there has been a shift from the related-causal image tion hand in hand with capitalism were to change gear to turbo- of science to a kind of classification (the examination of local boost. ‘Poststructuralism’ was at war with ‘postmodernism’, singularities), from closed disciplines to their in-betweenness, both in general and architectural thinking. Following difference- from abstract views to pragmatic, then in the territory of archi- philosophy and other social studies, architectural deconstruc- tecture from the direct representation of drawings to generative- tion had questioned the logos-centrism of the discipline and it organisational model of a diagram, from reactive-post-critical had success and great influence in the fields of liberating var- theory to a proactive and productive one. Pluralism and rela- ious layers of rigid structures and rules. The abstract theory, tivity has taken the place of dominating and universal modes of a kind of ‘textual organisation’ that meets material world, did thought, discrete-networked models have been playing a lead- not just pose important questions but it caused serious problems ing role beside continuous-linear ones, as have digital aspects itself: theory made an elitist exodus from everyday life, differ- beside analogue ones, as blob forms beside boxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tschumi Builds
    Tschumi builds Autor(en): Rappaport, Nina Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Schweizer Ingenieur und Architekt Band (Jahr): 115 (1997) Heft 6 PDF erstellt am: 03.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-79200 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch Architektur Schweizer Ingenieur und Architekt Nr. 6, 6. Februar 1997 102 Nina Rappaport, New York Tschumi Builds Bernard Tschumi, architect and 110,000 square foot complex costing $25 Hoiv is this in-between area to be used? Dean of the Graduate School of million. The Center which combines education Architecture Planning and Preservation in visual arts, sound, TV, and media arts Between die two roofs the residual area at Columbia University, New as an (Electronic Bauhaus>, similar to the can be used for exhibitions and film viewing.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Tschumi, Architecture and Event : April 21-July 5, 1994 [Organized by Terence Riley and Anne Dixon]
    Bernard Tschumi, architecture and event : April 21-July 5, 1994 [organized by Terence Riley and Anne Dixon] Author Tschumi, Bernard, 1944- Date 1994 Publisher The Museum of Modern Art Exhibition URL www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/423 The Museum of Modern Art's exhibition history— from our founding in 1929 to the present—is available online. It includes exhibition catalogues, primary documents, installation views, and an index of participating artists. MoMA © 2017 The Museum of Modern Art j\ cC^ve_ MetiA \(o^-r The Museum Modern Art (A o o X M cc l^p»> * t JIBp® |J H BERNARD TSCHUMI Architecture an Event This exhibition is made possible by grants from Obayashi Corporation; YKK; Pro Helvetia Arts Council of Switzerland; the Federal Office of Culture, Switzerland; Etablissement Public du Pare de la Villette; Escofet; and the Nestle Foundation for Art. pril 21- July 5, 1994 Bernard Tschumi was born in 1944 of French-Swiss parentage. He studied at the Federal Institute of Technology (ETH), Zurich, where he received a degree in architecture in 1969. He is principal of Bernard Tschumi Architects, New York and Paris, and dean of the Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation, Columbia University. BERNARD TSCHUMI Architecture and Event THE MANHATTAN TRANSCRIPTS (1976-81) Throughout the twentieth century, the machine has served as one of the most pervasive of cultural metaphors, particularly in regard to architectural form and theory. Designers have not only tried to This theoretical project consists of four series of drawings, each of emulate the machine's aesthetic qualities, but to envision an architecture whose relationship to its Ms^ which transcribes, through a combination of two-dimensional rep function corresponds as directly as that of a machine to its purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • The Academic Research Community Publication
    http://www.press.ierek.com ISSN (Print: 2537-0154, online: 2537-0162) International Journal on: The Academic Research Community Publication DOI: 10.21625/archive.v2i4.369 The Correlation of Deconstruction Architecture to Arab Architectural Identity Framework for Application of Deconstruction in Arab Architectural Projects-Exploratory and Practical Study Emad H. Rabboh1,* Ali A. Elmansory1 1Canadian international college, Al Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt. Abstract The Arab architectural identity is characterized by the originality of the various Arab cultures. Islamic culture is what makes Arab societies unique and it is what inspired Arab architecture. Consequently, the Arab architecture encounters contemporary challenges. If modern architectural trends influenced Arab civilization, it could then obliterate its identity over the years. Moreover, positively interacting with modern architectural trends must take place rather than negative interactions. The aforementioned reasons leave this phenomenon the subject of discus- sion and research and thus the lack of update and development of the vocabulary of Arab architecture. The proposed study discusses the problem of the correlation of deconstructive architecture with the architectural and Arabic identity through the end of the 20th century until 2017. In order to arrive at the definition of the philosophy of deconstruction architecture and the appropriate relationship between it and the Arab architectural identity, the study utilizes a qualitative descriptive methodology that tries to give a generic image of philosophy and characteristics. Deconstruction architecture attempts to link the positive aspects of architecture and Arab identity through the analysis of the frameworks of this philosophy of particular architectural works of various architects who adopt this philosophy of architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming Limits Stephanie Riker
    Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve Volume 21 - 2013 Lehigh Review 2013 Overcoming Limits Stephanie Riker Follow this and additional works at: http://preserve.lehigh.edu/cas-lehighreview-vol-21 Recommended Citation Riker, Stephanie, "Overcoming Limits" (2013). Volume 21 - 2013. Paper 8. http://preserve.lehigh.edu/cas-lehighreview-vol-21/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Lehigh Review at Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 21 - 2013 by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OVERCOMING LIMITS This paper examines the philosophy and work of Bernard Tschumi, a contemporary French architect. Tschumi believes that people should reengage with their environment and that meaning should be infused STEPHANIE into architecture through human interaction with the environment. In RIKER recognition of these beliefs, this paper articulates how Tschumi builds with the intention to redefine the notion of architecture and overturn the limitations imposed by society. Dravo Jason Wang t all began in 1968; or, at least for Bernard Ts- society whose sole value was work: in essence, a society void of life. chumi it did. On the streets of Paris, Tschumi Although Tschumi cites the ’68 riots as the moment charnière, the stood fast amongst the thousands of students seeds of this social revolution had been scattered throughout France and workers in riotous protests—reveling for several years. The Situationist International (SI) had formed ten amidst the violence, the arrests, and the blocks years prior to the uprisings in Paris, and the SI’s sentiments of capi- of barricades.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Tschumi's Conception of Architecture
    Charitonidou M. Simultaneously Space and Event: Bernard Tschumi’s Conception of Architecture. ARENA Journal of Architectural Research. 2020; 5(1): 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/ajar.250 HUMANITIES ESSAY Simultaneously Space and Event: Bernard Tschumi’s Conception of Architecture Marianna Charitonidou ETH Zürich, CH [email protected] This essay examines the way in which Bernard Tschumi understood and discussed the concept of space during the 1970s, interpreting it in conjunction with his relationship with the so-called ‘London Conceptualists’ whose concern was to embrace spatial experience. Tschumi’s exchanges with the conceptual and performance art scene in London are pivotal for understanding his conception of space at the time. Special attention is hence paid to a number of exhibitions that epitomized the cross-fertilisation between architecture and art, such as ‘A Space: A Thousand Words’ held at the Royal College of Art in 1975 and co-curated by Bernard Tschumi and RoseLee Goldberg. The importance of this exhibition for comprehending the role of space in Tschumi’s thought lies in the fact that it aimed ‘[t]o reveal a change in attitudes towards the theories and the language of space’, and thus to reinforce the contact of architecture with the very reality of spatial experience. The essay examines the evolution of Tschumi’s concerns about spatial praxis, addressing core issues of his 1970s pedagogical and design practice. Particular emphasis is placed upon his teaching strategies at the Architectural Association (AA) in London, and on an ensemble of projects on which he worked during his first forays in the United States of America such as The Manhattan Transcripts, The Screenplays and The 20th Century Follies.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 John Biln This Essay Considers the Significance of a Body of Early Work
    L INES OF E NCOUNTER John Biln This is an unpublished combination of two articles which appeared separately in print form. Biln, John. "Translating Tactility.” Azero 1 (1998); Biln, John. "Lines of Encounter.” In Ben van Berkel: Mobile Forces, edited by Kristin Feireiss. Berlin: Ernst and Sohn, 1994. This essay considers the significance of a body of early work by the Dutch architectural firm of Ben van Berkel and Caroline Bos, known now as UN Studio. Their design program is positioned squarely within the complex and shifting field of contemporary urban culture. Here, the architectural work is subject to conflicting and mutable economic, social, regulatory, technical, and programmatic demands. Van Berkel and Bos acknowledge that architectural works can no longer claim any sweeping powers to enact social change. Although architects cannot be entirely sure of the social effects their works may produce, Van Berkel and Bos neither despair over lost visions of social effect, nor appear willing to abandon a direct engagement with the various human uses, activities and practices that situate the architectural object. In part, their design program derives from a critique of the apparent unwillingness within architectural culture to seriously address human activity and lived experience. The work of Van Berkel and Bos suggests that the power of architecture lies in very real, but perhaps necessarily unstable, social impacts of the architectural object. The investigative agenda set out by Van Berkel and Bos – firmly rooted in form-making – begins to open a space for reconceiving the relationships, and related design strategies, by which architectural forms and social practices may once again be linked.
    [Show full text]
  • Appraisal of the Works of Bernard Tschumi Riya Paul 4Th Year (LSAD) Lovely Professional University, Punjab
    Appraisal of the works of Bernard Tschumi Riya Paul 4th Year (LSAD) Lovely Professional University, Punjab Abstract: "Any relationship between a building and its users is one of violence, for any use means the intrusion of a human body into a given space, the intrusion of one order into another." Tschumi in Architecture and Disjunction This paper discusses the works of Swiss architect Bernard Tschumi, commonly associated with deconstructivism –on the basis of his philosophies and presents a general analysis of the role of concept, context and content in architecture. This paper also looks in detail, at the role played by Tschumi in overcoming the site constraints by infusing them in the concept of the buildings designed by him. Two projects have been selected under the similar approach for deeper analysis to get a better understanding of his thinking. Keywords: Bernard, Tschumi, deconstruction, concept, context, content, museum, Athens, New Acropolis Museum, Museum of African Art, competition, works, Event-Cities 3 1. INTRODUCTION Born in 1944 in Lausanne, Switzerland, Bernard Tschumi comes from a French and Swiss parentage and is the son of the well-known modernist architect, Jean Tschumi. He studied in Paris and at ETH in Zurich, where he received his degree in architecture in 1969. In the 1970s, while he was teaching at the Architectural Association School in London, he came up with a ‘strategy of disjunction’, which was based on his belief that architecture and contemporary culture can be best explained through fragmentation and not through unity. Inspired by the linguistic theories of Jacques Derrida, he began to deconstruct the various elements of architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • CV-Winka Dubbeldam
    Winka Dubbeldam, March, MsAAD CV EDUCATION 1991 -1992 Columbia University • New York • MSD in Advanced Architectural Design [MArch2] 1983 -1990 Academy of Architecture • Rotterdam • Professional Masters degree in Architecture [MArch1] ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS 2018 – 2023 University of Pennsylvania – The Ella Warren Shafer Miller Professor and Chair of the Department of Architecture. Director of the ARI, the Research and Innovation Lab. 2013 – 2018 University of Pennsylvania - Professor and Chair of the Department of Architecture, Director of ARI 2004 - 2014 University of Pennsylvania - Founder & Director of Post-Professional Program (M.Arch II) 2009 - 2013 University of Pennsylvania - Professor of Practice, 3rd Year Masters Design Studio’s 2010 Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, Spring Masters Studio, and summer workshop 2003 - 2008 University of Pennsylvania, Design- Research Studios - Associate Professor of Practice 2002, ‘08, ‘09 Harvard University - Visiting Practice Professor of Architecture • 3rd year Adv.Masters Studio 1995 - 2002 University of Pennsylvania, School of Architecture, Philadelphia, Lecturer 1997 - 2002 Columbia University Adjunct Assistant Professor • 3rd year Masters Design Studio • 1997 University of Manitoba, Canada, Graduate Design studio 1996 - 1998 Academy of Architecture, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Post-Graduate Digital Design studio 1994 Columbia University, co-taught 3rd year Masters Design Studio with Ben van Berkel, Architect. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1994 – Current Archi-Tectonics NYC, LLC [New York, China, Netherlands],
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Tschumi – Six Concepts
    Bernard Tschumi - Six Concepts Excerpt from Architecture and Disjunction CONCEPT I: Technologies of Defamiliarization In the mid-1970s small pockets of resistance began to form as architects in various parts of the world -- England, Austria, the United States, Japan (for the most part, in advanced postindustrial cultures) -- started to take advantage of this condition of fragmentation and superficiality and to turn it against itself. If the prevalent ideology was one of familiarity -- familiarity with known images, derived from 1920s modernism or eighteenth century classicism -- maybe one's role was to defamiliarize. If the new, mediated world echoed and reinforced our dismantled reality, maybe, just maybe, one should take advantage of such dismantling, celebrate fragmentation by celebrating the culture of differences, by accelerating and intensifying the loss of certainty, of center, of history. In culture in general, the world of communication in the last twenty years has certainly helped the expression of a multiplicity of new “angles” on the canonic story, airing the views of women, immigrants, gays, minorities, and various non-Western identities who never sat comfortably within the supposed “community.” In architecture in particular, the notion of defamiliarization was a clear tool. If the design of windows only reflects the superficiality of the skin's decoration, we might very well start to look for a way to do without windows. If the design of pillars reflects the conventionality of a supporting frame, maybe we might get rid of pillars altogether. Although the architects concerned might not profess an inclination towards the exploration of new technologies, such work usually took advantage of contemporary technological developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhizogramming and a Synesthetic Transformation of Designer´S Mind
    FourFaces_s1_210x250_0822_2 05-08-23 12.56 Page 4 concept medium programme – an essay dedicated to the study of architecture rhizogramming and a synesthetic transformation of designer´s mind Mahesh Senagala Figure 1. Rhizogram, Mahesh Senagala. R.00 Edit Time 10.46 Authors’ Note: This paper is intended to be a rhizome. You may connect to it in +1 any way you wish, including reading the sections sequentially (spatially) or by 21.47 following the edit time (chronologically, for the adventurous readers), or com- +2 pletely randomly. A + sign indicates a different day, though not necessarily the 11.59 following day. +3 20.50 4 FourFaces_s1_210x250_0822_2 05-08-23 12.56 Page 5 mahesh senagala R.01 11.22 Abstract 11.42 Architectural education places great importance on transforming the visual per- +1 ception of the designer through spatial, tectonic and visual exercises. Little or 17.36 no emphasis is given to drawing non-visual and temporal phenomena. 17.50 Rhizogramming involves a process of sketching non-selective synesthetic sensa- +2 tions of the non-visual phenomena perceived by the designer at any specific mo- 00.00 ment of time. The emphasis is on ‘diagramming’ (the process) as opposed to the +3 ‘diagram’ (the product). Although, like any other type of diagram, the rhizo- 21.49 grams can be used directly to generate a formal concept, the power of rhizo- +4 gramming lies in actually altering the perception of the designer. 10.18 Rhizogramming significantly differs from the more direct formal techniques employed by Bernard Tschumi, Christopher Alexander, Coop Himmelblau, et al.
    [Show full text]