DOCSLIB.ORG

Quartz Integrated Project Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quartz Integrated Project Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture Quartz Integrated Project Forest Service Environmental Assessment Pacific Northwest Umpqua National Forest Region Cottage Grove Ranger District April 2016 USDA NON-DISCRIMINATION POLICY STATEMENT DR 4300.003 USDA Equal Opportunity Public Notification Policy (June 2, 2015) In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690-7442; or (3) email: [email protected] . USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. Quartz Integrated Project Environmental Assessment Lane & Douglas County, Oregon Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service, Umpqua National Forest Responsible Official: Gabe Dumm, Acting District Ranger Cottage Grove Ranger District 78405 Cedar Park Road Cottage Grove, OR 97424 Phone: 541-767-5000 For More Information Contact: Jane Beaulieu, Team Leader Umpqua National Forest 2900 NW Steward Parkway Roseburg, OR 97471 Phone: 541-957-3466 Email: [email protected] Abstract This Environmental Assessment documents the alternatives considered for an integrated project within the Sharps Creek Watershed on the Cottage Grove Ranger District, Umpqua National Forest. Activities include commercial timber harvesting; fuel reduction treatments such as burning and thinning; meadow restoration and maintenance treatments such as burning and invasive weed removal; and aquatic restoration and maintenance treatments such as riparian thinning as well as road maintenance, decommissioning and inactivation. Quartz Integrated Project TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Purpose and Need for Action ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Relationship to Other Planning Documents and Analyses ----------------------------------------- 1 Purpose and Need ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Proposed Action -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 Decision to be Made --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 Public Involvement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 Issues --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 Project Implementation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 CHAPTER TWO ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19 Alternatives, Including the Proposed Action ------------------------------------------------ 19 Alternatives Considered, But Eliminated From Detailed Study --------------------------------- 19 Alternative 1 – No Action --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21 Alternative 2 – Proposed Action ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 21 Alternative 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 Comparison of Alternatives ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 35 Best Management Practices, Project Design Features, Management Requirements, and Monitoring ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 37 CHAPTER THREE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 51 Affected Environment and Environmental Effects----------------------------------------- 51 Activities That May Contribute to Environmental Effects ----------------------------------------- 51 Aquatic Conservation Strategy ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 54 Terrestrial Environment -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 57 Forest Vegetation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 57 Botany --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 67 Soil Productivity --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 81 Fuels ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 90 Coarse Woody Debris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 103 Forest Wildlife ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 123 Biological Evaluation of Wildlife Species ------------------------------------------------------------ 157 Aquatic Environment ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 189 Beneficial Uses of Water -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 192 Water Quality ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 193 Stream Flows ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 199 Riparian Forest Conditions ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 203 Stream Channels ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 211 Erosion and Sedimentation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 218 Mass Wasting ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 223 Fisheries ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 225 Social Environment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 232 Road Building and Access ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 232 Recreation--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 236 Mining -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 237 Visuals ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 239 Heritage Resources --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 241 Economics -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 242 Potential Wilderness Areas ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 249 Climate Change -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 250 Specifically Required and Other Disclosures --------------------------------------------------- 252 Smoke Management/Air Quality ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 252 Wetlands and Floodplains ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 254 Prime Farmlands, Rangelands, Forestlands, and Parklands ----------------------------------- 254 Potential or Unusual Expenditures of Energy ------------------------------------------------------ 254 Conflicts with Plans, Policies, or Other Jurisdictions --------------------------------------------- 255 Consumers, Civil Rights, Minority Groups, and Women ----------------------------------------- 255 Environmental Justice ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 255 CHAPTER FOUR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 256 Consultation with Others ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 256 REFERENCES CITED ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 257 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Comments
    Revised Willamette Mercury TMDL and Water Quality Management Plan Public Comments Watershed Management 700 NE Multnomah St. Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 Phone: 503-229-5696 800-452-4011 www.oregon.gov/DEQ DEQ is a leader in restoring, maintaining and enhancing the quality of Oregon’s air, land and water. State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 1 This report prepared by: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 700 NE Multnomah Street, Suite 600 Portland, OR 97232 1-800-452-4011 www.oregon.gov/deq Contact: Kevin Brannan Alex Liverman Andrea Matzke Priscilla Woolverton 503-229-6629 503-229-5080 503-229-5350 541-687-7347 DEQ can provide documents in an alternate format or in a language other than English upon request. Call DEQ at 800-452-4011 or email [email protected]. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Comments .................................................................................................................................................... 1 1. Steven Wright, Texas ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Craig & Linda Olson, Oregon ...................................................................................................... 1 3. Tom Quintal, Oregon .................................................................................................................... 6 4. Craig
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Bohemia Mining District, Oregon
    NOTES ON THE BOHEMIA MINING DISTRICT, OREGON. By DONALD FRANCIS MACDONALD. INTRODUCTION. The Bohemia mining district is in Lane and Douglas counties, west-central Oregon. It lies on Calapooya Mountain, in the western foothills of the Cascade Range. The district is about 30 miles south­ east of Cottage Grove, a small town on the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Oregon and Southeastern Railroad runs from Cottage Grove to Disston, within 12 miles of the mines, which are reached by stage. In August, 1908, the writer made a short stay in this district and incidentally to otl}er work visited some of the larger mineral proper­ ties. For some of the data presented• herein he is indebted to Mr. J. S. Diller, of the United States Geological Survey, who made a reconnaissance of the region in 1898,a and for many courtesies to Messrs. L. D. Ryan, F. J. Hard, W. W. Warner, and other mining men of the district. PHYSIOGRAPHY AND GENERAL GEOLOGY. The relief of the district is pronounced. Several peaks are more than 6,000 feet high, and the elevation of the lowest valleys is less than 2,000 feet. This bold relief is the result of mountain glaciation and stream ero&ion. The luxuriant vegetation due to the humid climate has somewhat masked the geologic features of the region. Great forests clothe the mountain slopes and the region is notable for its timber value. The rocks of the district are andesitic lavas and tuft's of Tertiary age, which are cut by dacite porphyry and probably by basalt.
    [Show full text]
  • Metalliferous Mineral Deposits of the Cascade Range in Oregon
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. C. Mendenhall, Director Bulletin 893 METALLIFEROUS MINERAL DEPOSITS OF THE CASCADE RANGE IN OREGON BY EUGENE CALLAGHAN AND A. F. BUDDINGTON Prepared in cooperation with the STATE MINING BOARD OF OREGON UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1938 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C. ------ Price 1.25 CONTENTS Page Abstract__. ..................................................... 1 Introduction ^..................................................... 3 Field work and acknowledgments..__---___-____.__..._.___.__._. 3 Previous work. .___________ ________________________________ 4 Surface features^ .:...-............ ____________..___..__.__.___ 6 Climate and vegetation__.___________________________________ 7 Accessibility- ________--___-___-___----_-___-__________________ 7 Geology. _ ___.-----_-----_----------------------------_--___---_-_ 7 General features.--------_-_----___----__----___--_-_,_____.___ 7 Sedimentary rocks of the Rogue River and Bear Creek Valleys._-__- 10 Black lavas of the western margin of the Cascade Range-_-__-_-_-__ 1C Gray andesitic lavas and associated rocks of the Western Cascades._ 11 General features-_---_--_--------_--------..----_--_------__ 11 Basalt -_-i__---___-_---__---_-___--___--._________-___ 12 Labradorite andesite (basaltic andesite)__.__________________ 13 Normal andesite_-________________________________________ 13 Rhyolite-_________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Slope Stability Assessment
    Appendix A Slope Stability Assessment Sharps Creek Landslide Inventory and Slope Stability Assessment The landslide history of Sharps Creek was developed using a series of 1:24000 air photographs to identify observable landslide features (primarily debris slides) in a time sequence. Due to the mixed ownership, the photo record includes Umpqua Forest coverage as well as Eugene BLM photos. Three flight years were evaluated to develop an understanding of the historical landslide occurrence, relative to disturbance in Sharps Creek. The 1946 photos were used for historic perspective on the National Forest, however 1950 photos were the earliest available for the BLM. The period of early management activity was observed using the 1966 flight for the forest and 1968 for the BLM. The third series included 1988 forest coverage and 1990 photos for the BLM. While it is well accepted that landslide analysis using air photos without field verification has limited applicability, it does provide a broad scale understanding of the frequency and magnitude of landslides, particularly shallow rapid ones. During the interpretation phase, an attempt was made to identify the type or associated disturbance with each feature. Each landslide was assigned an attribute, either natural, timber or road, based on proximal location to observable characteristics. In addition to the development of a comprehensive landslide layer in a GIS format, an attempt was made to incorporate a modeling approach to predict potential mass wasting hazards. In cooperation with the Eugene District of the BLM, in particular Barry Williams, we utilized a cohesionless, infinite slope stability model developed by Montgomery and Deitrich (1994) to portray areas subject to mass wasting potential.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Bohemia Mining District, Lane County, Oregon
    Geology of the Bohemia mining district, Lane County, Oregon Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Lutton, R. J. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 03/10/2021 21:47:27 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565597 GEOLOGY OF THE BOHEMIA MINING DISTRICT, LANE COUNTY, OREGON . :■ . ■: -■ by .. : U".: J Richard JC. Lutton * - -r" - A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA c: 1962 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Richard J. Lutton entitled "Geology of the Bohemia Mining District, Lane County, Oregon" be accepted as fulfilling the disserta­ tion requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. jr . Dissertation Director Efcte After inspection of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* 9. /% % ^ J 9 & ^ /fto ♦This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examina­ tion. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dis­ sertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examina­ tion. STATEMENT BY AUTHOR : ■ / ' v- .
    [Show full text]
  • Lane County Historian
    Lane County Historian oq /7 L1wt 2)1m-,U2 e , '-1 -71/ J L44tJb43'4kJ J14- &_l.. fr1'.-4-t4 L ,d4 ,Zo U42t.. 7Z1 64t1 .ayLi 2V ttr& '.. 'L L-'- lJ-d D- o-'- - ,- ,) ieLa4 i4/Q . -1A44 L1)-aiL 2O1r R FIELD NOTES, AUGUST 19-23, 1904 OF RANGER CARL HENRY YOUNG LANE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Vol. XVI, No. 4 Eugene, Oregon Winter, 1971 LANE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Mrs. C. A. Huntington, 740 West 13th Street, Eugene, Oregon 97402 President Stuart W. Hurd, Rt. 2, Box 345, Eugene, Oregon 97401 Membership Secretory LANE COUNTY HISTORIAN Inez Long Fortt (Mrs. James 0. Fortf) Editor 3870 Watkins Lane, Eugene, Oregon 97405 The Lone County Historian is a quorterly publication of the Lane County Historical Society, a non-profit organizotion. Membership in the Lane County Historical Society includes subscription to the Lane County Historian. Annual dues: $3.00; family membership: $5.00. CONTENTS LIFE AS A FOREST RANGER IN 1904 . 63 By Inez Long Fortt, Editor, Lane County Historian THE JENKINS FAMILY- Grandfather Stephen, Son Shelton and Grandson Wayne 75 By Loris Inman, freelance writer Saddle Mountain Trail, Bohemia Mining District The Siuslaw Pioneer 62 ai a7orei1 )eanjerin 1904 By Inez Long Fortt "I am against the man who Gifford Pinchot, one of only two skins the land," proclaimed Theo- American-born professionally dore Roosevelt in a ringing voice trained foresters in the U n i ted at the American Forest Congress States was appointed as head of in Washington, D.C. in 1905. the Bureau. Lumberman at the Congress were The Bureau was a turning point indignant.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report for the Wusa Gold Project, Lane and Douglas Counties, Oregon, Usa
    NI43-101 Technical Report: WUSA Project, Oregon TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE WUSA GOLD PROJECT, LANE AND DOUGLAS COUNTIES, OREGON, USA Prepared For: Aguila American Gold Ltd Suite 1305 1305 West Georgia St Vancouver CANADA Prepared by: Mr John Rice (MSc, P.Geo., AIPG) Signing Date: 8th September, 2020 th Effective Date: 4 September, 2020 i | P a g e NI43-101 Technical Report: WUSA Project, Oregon DATE AND SIGNATURE The Report, “Independent NI 43-101 Technical Report For the WUSA Gold Project, Lane and Douglas Counties, Oregon, USA”, dated 8th September 2020 and with an Effective Date of 4th September 2020, and prepared for Aguila American Gold Ltd, was authored by the following: “signed and sealed original on file” _______________________________________ Mr John A Rice (MSc, P.Geo., AIPG) Consulting Geoscientist Reno, Nevada, USA Dated: 8 September, 2020 ii | P a g e NI43-101 Technical Report: WUSA Project, Oregon Table of Contents 1.0 Summary 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Property Description and Ownership 1 1.3 Exploration History 2 1.4 Geology and Mineralization 2 1.5 Conclusions and Recommendations 3 2.0 Introduction 4 2.1 General 4 2.2 Terms of Reference and Project Scope 4 2.3 Qualifications of Consultants 5 2.4 Sources of Information 5 2.5 Scope of Site Inspection by the Author 5 2.6 Units of Measure 6 2.7 Frequently Used Acronyms and Abbreviations 6 3.0 Reliance on Other Experts 7 4.0 Property Description and Location 8 4.1 Location 8 4.2 Property Description 9 4.3 Ownership Agreements 10 4.4 Environmental Liabilities, Permitting and Significant
    [Show full text]
  • E Gro\¿E , Historic Context Statei}Ient Cottage Grove, Oregon Historic Context Statement
    COTTAGE GRO\¿E , HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEI}IENT COTTAGE GROVE, OREGON HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT PREPARED FOR THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENÏ CITY OF COTTAGE GROVE AND THE COTTAGE GROVE HISTORICAL SOCIETY KENNETH J. GUZOWSKI HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONSULTANT EUGENE, OREGON August, 1992 Cover Photo: View of Cottage Grove towards the southeast, taken from McFarland Butte, circa 1880s (Courtesy of Cottage Grove Historical Society) 9'.19P.ì99'.1ß?9'.199'.ì99'.ìß?92.ì9P.19Gz'oqp)cz'o!9 $ Æ' ',:ßi $ Gr r&= K ¡,r ôr * 3¡K ,o K f.(f $ f.f| ôr rô K .(lã Gr rlD K 3r ã Gr ilt 3ìK ã ä å ä $ ä Grv ði ä ôb'eôôb'eôôb'dóôb'dÔôb'eÔôb'¿ôôb'dóôb'dÓôb'dÓôb'dÓ The Old CitY Hall, South 6th Street. (Photo courtesy of Cottage Grove Historical Society) ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This project was partially funded under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 through the U.S. Depañment of the lnterior, National Parks Service, with a grant from the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office, to whom we are grateful. Additional funding was obtained from the City of Cottage Grove and volunteer labor through the matching grant process. The City of Cottage Grove, the Cottage Grove Historical Society and the Historic Preservation Program at the University of Oregon all participated in the project, ensuring its success. The accomplishments of a project of this scope and nature can never be attributed to any one person. From the beginning the Cottage Grove Survey and lnventory project has been a collaborative effort. Marcia Allen coordinated research volunteers, provided editorial assistance and contributed to the research through her understanding of Cottage Grove history.
    [Show full text]
  • Ore Bin / Oregon Geology Magazine / Journal
    VOLUME 40 , No. 6 JUNE 1978 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOlOGY AND MINERAl INDUSTRIES ......... linD IIIIIUl 111]] r...,. ..... .....I...... 'oZ'"' .. .... " ...."'" "':16>!""" • '.D to.> I({"-"'" DIYIII(JI 11" ~.t ~'I .. _ .,..... 9",,1 1!' 'll' I. t"! M\" ... ,,,.,.1>0<'I ro", ""''' lJ 00.1_"" 1 ..-t" .-_. ~,~ I.v.i."" _ ,1 ... ,0.'..... It ........ ' ...... 00"," ~"'''- ~ .. _ .... co". _ ..., Do'" _ L ,~ .... STOll ClII."'lIT -"0 .....11 RIILO,"'" II (>IMI;[ Of nll~ IIffltl~ _'" e........ , ...... ..... ............. .. ..... ,.,~ ....... -.. --.~ ' 1'- t .. ''''.... ~ ___.,,-_ , ,' ...... -.............._. .... .... ." .. _.. ... State of Oregon The ORE BIN Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Volume 40, No.6 1069 State Office Bldg. Portland, Oregon 97201 June 1978 A GEOLOGICAL FIELD TRIP GUIDE FROM COTTAGE GROVE, OREGON TO THE BOHEMIA MINING DISTRICT Jerry J. Gray and Beverly F. Vogt Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries This article, a companion to the "Overview of the Bohemia Mining District" (Ore Bin, May 1978), is the last in the four-part series on mineralization in the Western Cascades. The route of the self-guided trip and locations of check­ points mentioned in the article are indicated on the cen­ terfold map. Titles of the other articles in this series and sources of additional information on individual mines and the geology of Lane County are given on page 116. Anyone taking this field trip is warned of the dan­ gers of entering abandoned mines, caves, open pits, and quarries. Remember, you enter any mine at your own risk, and the greatest dangers are those that you cannot see until it is too late. Mines that look safe to you may instead be extremely dangerous.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharps Creek Watershed Analysis
    TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS USED............................................................................................................................VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................X SOME IMPORTANT FINDINGS ................................................................................................................. XI SOME IMPORTANT RECOMMENDATIONS................................................................................................ XII 1. CHARACTERIZATION ...................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ ...................................... 1 CORE TOPICS ................................................................................................ ......................................... 1 WATERSHED ANALYSIS ORGANIZATION.................................................................................................. 2 WATERSHED HIERARCHY ....................................................................................................................... 2 LAND OWNERSHIP................................................................................................ .................................. 4 LANDSCAPE STRATIFICATIONS...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A 'Brief3-[Sror3
    1Be&mIa'Mining'ibtrcr A 'Brief3-[sror3 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service, RegIon 6 Umpqua National Forest foEugene N Coffage Grove' Laynçoi.,I C,.. > "I-' It Colapooya Divide :S DISTRI\ I p ;rillhi'- '.i 'I I Steamboat lo Roseburg BOHEMIA MINING DISTRICT A BRIEF HISTORY The Bohemia Mining District is situated on the Calapooya Divide, which separates the North Umpqua and Willamette river basins. It is the largest mineral- producing area in the western Cascade Range of Oregon, although mining districts in eastern and southern Oregon have singly produced more gold. Historically, Bohemia is credited with over one and a half million dollars in gold--certainly much more at today's prices. Bohemia is one of the best preserved historic mining districts in the Northwest. Although damaged by vandalism and harsh weather conditions, it contains the remains of buildings, machinery, and trails from the early mining days. Bohemia also possesses evidence of the remains of Indian cultures which occupied this area before the miners came in search of gold. LLL I (3 1 .-'-------r 1 p o , 1 r HI S V Location of the Bohemia Mining District BOHEMIA BEFORE THE MINERS Anthropologists who have studied the Bohemia Mining District have 'found that Indians were here before the miners arrived. The way of life of Indians in this area is not well known, because there is no written information, nor have there been archaeological excavations.Anthro- pologists suggest how the Indians might have lived in the Bohemia region based upon information known about other cultural areas that might be similar to Bohemia in climate, terrain, and resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Willamette Valley Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan
    Southern Willamette Valley Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan March 28, 2019 Developed by the Oregon Department of Agriculture Southern Willamette Valley Local Advisory Committee With support from the Upper Willamette Soil and Water Conservation District Oregon Department of Agriculture Upper Willamette SWCD Water Quality Program 780 Bailey Hill Road, Suite #5 635 Capitol St. NE Eugene, OR 97402 Salem, OR 97301 Phone: (541) 650-3052 Phone: (503) 986-4700 [email protected] https://oda.direct/AgWQPlans Southern Willamette Valley Agricultural Water Quality Management Area Plan March 28, 2019 Table of Contents Acronyms and Terms Used in this Document ............................................................................ i Foreword .......................................................................................................................................... iii Required Elements of Area Plans ............................................................................................... iii Plan Content ..................................................................................................................................... iii Chapter 1: Agricultural Water Quality Management Program Purpose and Background ......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose of Agricultural Water Quality Management Program and Applicability of Area Plans....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]