DOCSLIB.ORG

Wetland Model in an Earth Systems Modeling Framework for Regional Environmental Policy Analysis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Wetland Model in an Earth Systems Modeling Framework for Regional Environmental Policy Analysis By Sirein Salah Awadalla B.A., Physics Smith College, 2006 Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division and the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Technology and Policy And Master of Science in Civil Engineering At the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June, 2011 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature of Author Engineering Systems Division May 6, 2011 Certified by Kenneth Strzepek Research Scientist at the Center for Global Change Science, MIT Thesis Supervisor Certified by Ruben Juanes Professor of Hydrology Internal Advisor Accepted by Heidi M. Nepf Chair, Departmental Committee for Graduate Students Accepted by Dava Newman Director of Technology and Policy 2 Wetland Model in an Earth Systems Modeling Framework for Regional Environmental Policy Analysis By Sirein S. Awadalla Submitted to the Engineering Systems Division on May 6, 2011 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Technology and Policy and Master of Science in Civil Engineering Abstract The objective of this research is to investigate incorporating a wetland component into a land energy and water fluxes model, the Community Land Model (CLM). CLM is the land fluxes component of the Integrated Global Systems Model (IGSM), a framework that simulates the relationship of physical systems to climate variations. Wetlands play an important role in the storage and regulation of the global water budget so including them in a land water cycle model is found to be necessary in balancing the regional water budgets of simulated river basins. This research focuses on modeling broad hydrological characteristics of wetlands (and lakes) into CLM. CLM’s wetland component is reconstructed to reflect a more realistic wetland water budget; it allows for the exchange of water with CLM’s river routing component; it allows for varying the storage of wetlands; it allows for calculating discharge from wetlands based on the physics of these ecosystems; and allows the surface water extent of wetlands to vary, a characteristic important to ecological behavior of wetlands and management of wetland ecosystems. The research then implements the modified version of the model for the Sudd wetland, in South Sudan, as it relates to its larger river system, the White Nile. Projects designed to better manage this wetland, such as diverting its inflow to reduce the amount of water consumed by evaporation, are currently under review by its various stakeholders. This diversion stands to change the area of the Sudd, which has direct implications on the ecological and social services derived from the wetland locally. The modified CLM is thus used to provide a better understanding of the science of this management option, and furthers the discussion on the benefits or drawbacks to diversion. Thus, using area as a proxy for environmental impact, what are the environmental, economic and social risks associated with diverting water from inflow into the Sudd? The new wetland component’s performance is evaluated against existing observed and modeled data on Sudd hydrology and compared to existing models of the Sudd. The research finds that the potential benefits of diversion cannot be said to unequivocally better the larger system of the White Nile. Thesis Supervisor: Kenneth Strzepek Title: Research Scientist at the Center for Global Change Science, MIT 3 Acknowledgements I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to my advisor Kenneth Strzepek, whose patience, teaching, and encouragement have really made my MIT experience fruitful. A very special and heartfelt thank you goes to Adam Schlosser; his reading of this document, being there while I struggled through this whole process, his wonderful advice, that spanned everything from efficient ways of programming in Fortran, to how to think (calmly) about future plans; and always making sure that I don’t leave the office until I’ve understood something new…between Ken and Adam, I really became a hydrologist. And I am very grateful to you both! I would also like to thank Professor Ruben Juanes for supporting me in the Civil Engineering Department and being there whenever I needed him. The International Water Management Institute hosted me, and allowed me to obtain very valuable data to this work, and for that I would like to extend my gratitude. Particularly, Professor Yasir Mohamed’s guidance during those months is very much appreciated. I would also like to thank my family, without which I could not have completed this work. And finally, and certainly not least, I want to thank my friends who were there for me in this entire process, and never left my side: Diana, Mark, Mohamed and Abdelkhalig…you guys are the best! And I would like to dedicate this work to the memory of John Garang de Mabior, who saw so much potential in Sudan and inspired us all to do the same! 4 CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction and Motivation .......................................................................................................... 11 1.1 Problem Statement ..................................................................................................................... 12 1.2 Scope ........................................................................................................................................... 14 2.0 Overview of Wetland Hydrology ..................................................................................................... 16 2.1 Wetland Ecosystems ................................................................................................................... 16 2.1.1 Wetlands under a Changing Climate ................................................................................... 17 3.0 Model Background .......................................................................................................................... 21 3.1 The Community Land Model ....................................................................................................... 23 3.1.1 CLM Lake and Wetland Water Balance ............................................................................... 25 3.1.2 CLM Runoff.......................................................................................................................... 27 3.1.3 River Transport Model ........................................................................................................ 31 3.1.4 General Assessment of CLM Hydrology .............................................................................. 33 4.0 Methodology: The Modified CLM‐LW ............................................................................................ 39 4.1 Lake/Wetland Components in RTM ............................................................................................ 39 4.1.1 CLM Grid Cell and Land Unit Structure ............................................................................... 40 4.1.2 Lake and Wetland Evaporation ........................................................................................... 41 4.1.3 Lake and Wetland Clusters.................................................................................................. 42 4.1.4 Lake and Wetland Equations .............................................................................................. 45 5.0 The White Nile as a Case Study ....................................................................................................... 47 5.1 Nile Basin ..................................................................................................................................... 47 5.3 Hydrology of White Nile Basin .................................................................................................... 51 5.3.1 Equatorial Lakes .................................................................................................................. 51 5.3.2 Bahr El Ghazal ..................................................................................................................... 52 5.3.3 Machar Marshes and Sobat basin ....................................................................................... 52 5.4 Sudd Wetland Hydrology ............................................................................................................ 56 5.4.1 Topography and Vegetation ............................................................................................... 57 5.4.2 Precipitation and Meteorological Characteristics ............................................................... 60 5.4.3 Inflow from L. Albert and Torrent Flow .............................................................................. 61 5.4.4 Outflow: Difference of Malakal and Hillet Doleib ............................................................... 64 5.4.5 Evaporation of Sudd ............................................................................................................ 64 5.4.6 Delineating area of the Sudd .............................................................................................. 69 5 5.4.7 Hydrological model of the Sudd .......................................................................................... 74 5.4.8 Recent Field Studies on southern area of the Sudd Basin .................................................. 76 5.4.9 Hydro‐Climatology of the Sudd ..........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Wetlands of the Nile Basin the Many Eco for Their Liveli This Chapt Distribution, Functions and Contribution to Contribution Livelihoods They Provide

    Wetlands of the Nile Basin the Many Eco for Their Liveli This Chapt Distribution, Functions and Contribution to Contribution Livelihoods They Provide

    important role particular imp into wetlands budget (Sutch 11 in the Blue N icantly 1110difi Wetlands of the Nile Basin the many eco for their liveli This chapt Distribution, functions and contribution to contribution livelihoods they provide. activities, ane rainfall (i.e. 1 Lisa-Maria Rebelo and Matthew P McCartney climate chan: food securit; currently eX' arc under tb Key messages water resour support • Wetlands occur extensively across the Nile Basin and support the livelihoods ofmillions of related ;;ervi people. Despite their importance, there are big gaps in the knowledge about the current better evalu: status of these ecosystems, and how populations in the Nile use them. A better understand­ systematic I ing is needed on the ecosystem services provided by the difl:erent types of wetlands in the provide. Nile, and how these contribute to local livelihoods. • While many ofthe Nile's wetlands arc inextricably linked to agricultural production systems the basis for making decisions on the extent to which, and how, wetlands can be sustainably used for agriculture is weak. The Nile I: • Due to these infi)fl11atio!1 gaps, the future contribution of wetlands to agriculture is poorly the basin ( understood, and wetlands are otten overlooked in the Nile Basin discourse on water and both the E agriculture. While there is great potential for the further development of agriculture and marsh, fen, fisheries, in particular in the wetlands of Sudan and Ethiopia, at the same time many that is stat wetlands in the basin are threatened by poor management practices and populations. which at \, In order to ensure that the future use of wetlands for agriculture will result in net benefits (i.e.
  • K&C 13 Wetland Theme Days Summary Laura Hess

    K&C 13 Wetland Theme Days Summary Laura Hess

    K&C 13 Wetland Theme Days Summary Laura Hess Science Team meeting #13 JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 Post-Copenhagen Considerations (What Obama Faces in the U.S. Congress) “If we decrease the use of carbon dioxide, are we not taking away plant food from the atmosphere? . All our good intentions could be for vain.” Rep. John Shimkus (Illinois) “Wouldn’t it be ironic if in the interest of global warming we mandated massive switches to wind energy, which is a finite resource, which slows the winds down, which causes the temperature to go up? . It’s just something to think about.” Rep. Bill Posey (Florida) Source: “Who’s the Biggest FoolScience on the Team Hill?”, meeting Mother #13 Jones magazine, Jan/Feb 2010 JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 Mapping and Monitoring of Richard Mangroves and Wetlands Lucas Mangrove structural Mangrove change, 2000-2008, northern Australia types, Belize Science Team meeting #13, JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 Mapping Rice Paddies and Agroecological Bill Attributes in Monsoon Asia Salas Poyang Lake Paddy Crop Region, China Area Calendar Science Team meeting #13, JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 Wetlands of the Upper Lisa White Nile Rebelo Sudd Marshes Science Team meeting #13, JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 Central Amazon Wetlands Laura Inundation Periodicity Hess May 2007 (R) June-July 2007 (G) August 2007 (B) Science Team meeting #13, JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 Global Monitoring of Wetland Extent Kyle and Dynamics: Boreal Wetlands McDonald Science Team meeting #13, JAXA TKSC/RESTEC HQ, Tsukuba/Tokyo, January 18-22, 2010 K&C deliverables: Mangroves • A standardized object-orientated method for characterising mangroves and detecting change.
  • The Economic, Cultural and Ecosystem Values of the Sudd Wetland in South Sudan: an Evolutionary Approach to Environment and Development

    The Economic, Cultural and Ecosystem Values of the Sudd Wetland in South Sudan: an Evolutionary Approach to Environment and Development

    The Economic, Cultural and Ecosystem Values of the Sudd Wetland in South Sudan: An Evolutionary Approach to Environment and Development JOHN GOWDY HANNES LANG Professor of Economics and Professor of Science Research Associate & Technology Studies School of Life Sciences Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Technical University Munich Troy New York, 12180 USA 85354 Freising, Germany [email protected] [email protected] The Economic, Cultural and Ecosystem Values of the Sudd Wetland in South Sudan 1 Contents About the Authors ....................................................................................................................2 Key Findings of this Report .......................................................................................................3 I. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 4 II. The Sudd ............................................................................................................................ 8 III. Human Presence in the Sudd ..............................................................................................10 IV. Development Threats to the Sudd ........................................................................................ 11 V. Value Transfer as a Framework for Developing the Sudd Wetland ......................................... 15 VI. Maintaining the Ecosystem Services of the Sudd: An Evolutionary Approach to Development and the Environment ...........................................26
  • The Republic of South Sudan

    The Republic of South Sudan

    THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN PRESENTATION ON AICHI BIODIVERSITY TARGET 5 THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH SUDAN • Population of 11.3 million, 83% rural • Abundant natural resources, but very poor country, largely due to the 50 years of conflict Land cover map of 2011 Percent of land area agriculture 4% trees 33% shrubs 39% herbaceous plants 23% Significant habitats and wildlife populations Example: • Savannah and woodland ecosystems, wetlands (the Sudd) • Biodiversity hot spots: Imatong mountains. • WCS aerial Survey (2007 – 2010) found • 1.2 million white-eared kob and mongalla gazelle • 4000 Elephants and viable populations of other large bodied species. Drivers of loss of natural habitat and wildlife • 1973 – 2006: annual forest loss 2% per year • Underlying drivers of deforestation: demographic, economic, technological, policy, institutional and cultural factors • Biodiversity assets are threatened by escalating commercial poaching linked to population of fire arms, refugees returning, grazing, water scarcity, extractive industries for oil and minerals NATURAL HABITATS; INCLUDING FORESTS IN SOUTH SUDAN: - Low land forest. - Maintenance forest. - Savannah wood land. - Grass land savanna. - Flood plain. - Sudd swamps and other wetlands. - Semi-arid region WCS 2012 TABLE: SOUTH SUDAN NATIONAL HABITATS: HABITATS IMPORTANCE THREATS NEW STEPS Lowland Manual: chimpanzees, • Communities • Assessment forest elephants, forest hug, • Insecurity • Management Bongo, Buffalo and • Illegal • Conservation practices forest monkeys. harvesting • Poaching Mountain Plants: Albizzia, • Farming • Law enforcement forest podocarpus • Hunting • Policies (9,000 km²) Animals: Bush pig, bush • Fire • Institutional framework bug, colobus monkeys, • Illegal logging Rich bird life. Protected area. Savannah Sited in the iron stone • Shifting • Community based wood land plateau. cultivation. management and Elephants, hippos, • Rehabilitation collaboration.
  • The Training of the Upper Nile

    The Training of the Upper Nile

    THE TRAINING OF THE UPPER NILE I PUBLISHED BY PITMAN WATER SUPPLY PROBLEMS AND DEVELOPMENTS By W. H. MAXWELL, A.M.Inst.C.E., Chartered Civil Engineer, Formerly Borough and Waterworks Engineer, Tunbridge Wells Corporation. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 337 pp., illustrated. 25s. net. WATERWORKS FOR URBAN AND RURAL DISTRICTS By HBNB-T C. ADAMS, M.Inst.C.E., M.I.M.E., F.S.I. In demy 8vo, 246 pp.* with 111 illustrations and 3 folding plates. 15s. net. RIVER WORK CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS By H. C. H. SHENTON, F.S.E., M.Inat.M. and Cy. E., F.R.San.I., F.R.San.E., and F. E. H. SHBNTON, M.S.E. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 146 pp. 12s. 6d. net. HYDRAULICS FOR ENGINEERS By ROBERT W. ANGUS, B.A.SC, M.E. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 336 pp. 12s. 6d. net. REINFORCED CONCRETE ARCH DESIGN By G. P. MANNING, M.Eng., A.M.Inst.C.E. In demy 8vo, cloth gilt, 200 pp. 18s. 6d. net. Sir Isaac Pitman & Sons, Ltd. Parker St. Kingsway, London, W.C.2 THE TRAINING OF THE UPPER NILE BY F. NEWHOUSE B.Sc, F .C.G.I., M.INST.C.E. Late Inspector-General of Egyptian Irrigation in the Sudan PUBLISHED IN OOLLABOBATION WITH THE INSTITUTION OF CIVIL ENGINEERS LONDON SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LTD. 1939 SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS, LTD. PITMAN HOUSE, PARKER STREET, KINGSWAY, LONDON, W.C.2 THE PITMAN PRESS, BATH PITMAN HOUSE, LITTLE COLLINS STREET, MELBOURNE ASSOCIATED COMPANIES PITMAN PUBLISHING CORPORATION 2 WEST 45TH STREET, NEW YORK 2O5 WEST MONROE STREET, CHICAGO SIR ISAAC PITMAN & SONS (CANADA), LTD.
  • 7. Sudd Marshes Management Tools

    7. Sudd Marshes Management Tools

    k r o w t e N GIS Based Decision Support Tool g n for Sustainable Development i d l of SUDD Marshes Region i (SUDAN) u B y t i c a p a C n i s a B e l i N GIS Based Decision Support Tool for Sustainable Development of SUDD Marshes Region (SUDAN) “Key knowledge” By Mohamed El Shamy Eman Sayed Mamdouh Anter Ibrahim Babakir Muna El Hag Yasser Elwan Coordinated by Prof. Dr. Karima Attia Nile Research Institute, Egypt Scientific Advisor Prof. Roland K. Price UNESCO-IHE Dr. Zoltan Vekerdy ITC 2010 Produced by the Nile Basin Capacity Building Network (NBCBN-SEC) office Disclaimer The designations employed and presentation of material and findings through the publication don’t imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of NBCBN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Copies of NBCBN publications can be requested from: NBCBN-SEC Office Hydraulics Research Institute 13621, Delta Barrages, Cairo, Egypt Email: [email protected] Website: www.nbcbn.com Images on the cover page are property of the publisher © NBCBN 2010 Project Title Knowledge Networks for the Nile Basin Using the innovative potential of Knowledge Networks and CoP’s in strengthening human and institutional research capacity in the Nile region. Implementing Leading Institute UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands (UNESCO-IHE) Partner Institutes Ten selected Universities and Ministries of Water Resources from Nile Basin Countries. Project Secretariat Office Hydraulics Research Institute – Cairo - Egypt Beneficiaries Water Sector Professionals and Institutions in the Nile Basin Countries Short Description The idea of establishing a Knowledge Network in the Nile region emerged after encouraging experiences with the first Regional Training Centre on River Engineering in Cairo since 1996.
  • Locking Carbon in Wetlands for Enhanced Climate Action in Ndcs Acknowledgments Authors: Nureen F

    Locking Carbon in Wetlands for Enhanced Climate Action in Ndcs Acknowledgments Authors: Nureen F

    Locking Carbon in Wetlands for Enhanced Climate Action in NDCs Acknowledgments Authors: Nureen F. Anisha, Alex Mauroner, Gina Lovett, Arthur Neher, Marcel Servos, Tatiana Minayeva, Hans Schutten and Lucilla Minelli Reviewers: James Dalton (IUCN), Hans Joosten (Greifswald Mire Centre), Dianna Kopansky (UNEP), John Matthews (AGWA), Tobias Salathe (Secretariat of the Convention on Wetlands), Eugene Simonov (Rivers Without Boundaries), Nyoman Suryadiputra (Wetlands International), Ingrid Timboe (AGWA) This document is a joint product of the Alliance for Global Water Adaptation (AGWA) and Wetlands International. Special Thanks The report was made possible by support from the Sector Program for Sustainable Water Policy of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) on behalf of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) of the Federal Republic of Germany. The authors would also like to thank the Greifswald Mire Centre for sharing numerous resources used throughout the report. Suggested Citation Anisha, N.F., Mauroner, A., Lovett, G., Neher, A., Servos, M., Minayeva, T., Schutten, H. & Minelli, L. 2020.Locking Carbon in Wetlands for Enhanced Climate Action in NDCs. Corvallis, Oregon and Wageningen, The Netherlands: Alliance for Global Water Adaptation and Wetlands International. Table of Contents Foreword by Norbert Barthle 4 Foreword by Carola van Rijnsoever 5 Foreword by Martha Rojas Urrego 6 1. A Global Agenda for Climate Mitigation and Adaptation 7 1. 1. Achieving the Goals of the Paris Agreement 7 1.2. An Opportunity to Address Biodiversity and GHG Emissions Targets Simultaneously 8 2. Integrating Wetlands in NDC Commitments 9 2.1. A Time for Action: Wetlands and NDCs 9 2.2. Land Use as a Challenge and Opportunity 10 2.3.
  • Distribution of Tropical Peatland Types, Their Locating and Current Degradation Status Alexandra Barthelmes*1& Cosima Tegetmeyer1

    Distribution of Tropical Peatland Types, Their Locating and Current Degradation Status Alexandra Barthelmes*1& Cosima Tegetmeyer1

    GLOBAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOIL ORGANIC CARBON, Rome, Italy, 21-23 March 2017 Distribution of tropical peatland types, their locating and current degradation status Alexandra Barthelmes*1& Cosima Tegetmeyer1 1 Greifswald Mire Centre, c/o Greifswald University, Germany (contact: [email protected]) Abstract Peatlands of the Tropics are highly diverse and occur from the coast to alpine altitudes. Natural tropical peatlands are covered by peat swamp forests, wet grasslands, Papyrus reeds, mangroves, salt-marshes, and specific high altitude afro-alpine or páramo vegetation. The total area of tropical peatland is estimated to be 30-45 million ha (10-12% of the total global peatland resource). It constitutes one of the largest near-surface pools of terrestrial organic carbon (Sorensen 1993). Although the exact extent of peatlands in large and partially remote areas is unclear (e.g. western Amazon Basin, Pantanal, Congo Basin, Sudd, Okavango Delta, Ganges Delta), a wealth of information is available to locate the majority of peatlands across the Tropics (cf. Barthelmes et al. 2015). We present an overview of tropical peatland types and their distribution based on ecoregions and geospatial data collated in the Global Peatland Database. The current degradation status of tropical peatlands is addressed in case studies from East Africa, the Ganges Delta and the Guyana shield. Furthermore, we highlight regions where vast areas of undisturbed tropical peatlands (may) occur, and that need protection against land reclamation that involves drainage (e.g. Congo Basin, Zambia floodplains, western Amazon Basin, coastal lowlands of Papua New Guinea). Keywords: Tropics, peatland types and distribution, peatland mapping, organic soil, utilization pressure, drainage Introduction, scope and main objectives Peatlands have become increasingly recognized as a vital part of the world’s wetland resources.
  • Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use

    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and Its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use

    Biodiversity in Sub-Saharan Africa and its Islands Conservation, Management and Sustainable Use Occasional Papers of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 6 IUCN - The World Conservation Union IUCN Species Survival Commission Role of the SSC The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is IUCN's primary source of the 4. To provide advice, information, and expertise to the Secretariat of the scientific and technical information required for the maintenance of biologi- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna cal diversity through the conservation of endangered and vulnerable species and Flora (CITES) and other international agreements affecting conser- of fauna and flora, whilst recommending and promoting measures for their vation of species or biological diversity. conservation, and for the management of other species of conservation con- cern. Its objective is to mobilize action to prevent the extinction of species, 5. To carry out specific tasks on behalf of the Union, including: sub-species and discrete populations of fauna and flora, thereby not only maintaining biological diversity but improving the status of endangered and • coordination of a programme of activities for the conservation of bio- vulnerable species. logical diversity within the framework of the IUCN Conservation Programme. Objectives of the SSC • promotion of the maintenance of biological diversity by monitoring 1. To participate in the further development, promotion and implementation the status of species and populations of conservation concern. of the World Conservation Strategy; to advise on the development of IUCN's Conservation Programme; to support the implementation of the • development and review of conservation action plans and priorities Programme' and to assist in the development, screening, and monitoring for species and their populations.
  • A Global Overview of Wetland and Marine Protected Areas on the World Heritage List

    A Global Overview of Wetland and Marine Protected Areas on the World Heritage List

    A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF WETLAND AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST A Contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites Prepared by Jim Thorsell, Renee Ferster Levy and Todd Sigaty Natural Heritage Programme lUCN Gland, Switzerland September 1997 WORLD CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE lUCN The World Conservation Union 530S2__ A GLOBAL OVERVIEW OF WETLAND AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS ON THE WORLD HERITAGE LIST A Contribution to the Global Theme Study of Wodd Heritage Natural Sites Prepared by Jim Thorsell. Renee Ferster Levy and Todd Sigaty Natural Heritage Program lUCN Gland. Switzerland September 1997 Working Paper 1: Earth's Geological History - A Contextual Framework Assessment of World Heritage Fossil Site Nominations Working Paper 2: A Global Overview of Wetland and Marine Protected Areas on the World Heritage List Working Paper 3; A Global Overview of Forest Protected Areas on the World Heritage List Further volumes (in preparation) on biodiversity, mountains, deserts and grasslands, and geological features. Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2010 witii funding from UNEP-WCIVIC, Cambridge littp://www.arcliive.org/details/globaloverviewof97glob . 31 TABLE OF CONTE>rrS PAGE I. Executive Summary (e/f) II. Introduction 1 III. Tables & Figures Table 1 . Natural World Heritage sites with primary wetland and marine values 1 Table 2. Natural World Heritage sites with secondary wetland and marine values 12 Table 3. Natural World Heritage sites inscribed primarily for their freshwater wetland values 1 Table 4. Additional natural World Heritage sites with significant freshwater wetland values 14 Tables. Natural World Heritage sites with a coastal/marine component 15 Table 6.
  • Water Sharing in the Nile River Valley

    Water Sharing in the Nile River Valley

    PROJECT GNV011 : USING GIS/REMOTE SENSING FOR THE SUSTAINABLE USE OF NATURAL RESOURCES Water Sharing in the Nile River Valley Diana Rizzolio Karyabwite UNEP/DEWA/GRID -Geneva January -March 1999 January-June 2000 Water Sharing in the Nile River Valley ABSTRACT The issue of freshwater is one of highest priority for the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). The Nile Basin by its size, political divisions and history constitutes a major freshwater-related environmental resource and focus of attention. UNEP/DEWA/GRID-Geneva initiated several case studies stressing a river basin approach to the integrated and sustainable management of freshwater resources. In 1998 GRID-Geneva started a project on Water Sharing in the Nile River Basin. The Nile Valley project was set up to prepare an experimental methodology to identify the potential water-related issues in a watershed. The first stage of the project consisted of the compilation of available geoferenced data sets for the Nile valley region to be used as inputs for water bala nce modelling; and led to the elaboration of a first report1. Available georeferenced data sets have been stored in Arc/Info-ArcView. They serve as inputs for water balance modelling. General data on transboundary water sharing and on the Nile River Basin were also collected. Several international projects operating in the Nile River Valley are oriented towards Nile Basin water management, using GIS and remote sensing techniques. Therefore any continuation of the GRID- Geneva Nile River project should be linked with and integrated into one of these successful field programmes. 1 Booth J., Jaquet J.-M., December 1998.
  • Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)

    Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA)

    PERMANENTPERMANENT COURT COURT OF OF ARBITRATION ARBITRATION ININTHETHE MATTER MATTER OF OFANANARBITRATIONARBITRATION BEFORE BEFORE A ATRIBUNALTRIBUNAL CONSTITUTEDCONSTITUTEDININACCORDANCEACCORDANCEWITHWITHARTICLEARTICLE55OFOFTHETHE ARBITRATIONARBITRATION AGREEMENTAGREEMENT BETWEENBETWEEN THETHE GOVERNMENTGOVERNMENT OFOF SUDANSUDAN ANDAND THETHE SUDANSUDAN PEOPLE’SPEOPLE’S LIBERATIONLIBERATION MOVEMENT/ARMYMOVEMENT/ARMY ON ON DELIMITING DELIMITING ABYEI ABYEI AREA AREA BETWEEN:BETWEEN: GOVERNMENTGOVERNMENT OF OF SUDAN SUDAN andand SUDANSUDAN PEOPLE’S PEOPLE’S LIBERATION LIBERATION MOVEMENT/ARMY MOVEMENT/ARMY MEMORIALMEMORIAL OF OF THE THE GOVERNMENT GOVERNMENT OF OF SUDAN SUDAN VOLUMEVOLUME II II ANNEXESANNEXES 1818 DECEMBER DECEMBER 2008 2008 Figure 1 The Area of the Bahr el Arab Figure 1 The Area of the Bahr el Arab ii ii Table of Contents Glossary Personalia List of Figures paras 1. Introduction 1-38 A. Geographical Outline 1-3 B. The Comprehensive Peace Agreement and the Boundaries of 1956 4-5 C. Abyei and the “Abyei Area” 6-9 D. Origins of the Dispute Submitted to the Tribunal 10-15 E. The Task of this Tribunal 16-36 (i) Key Provisions 16-18 (ii) The Dispute submitted to Arbitration 19-20 (iii) The Excess of Mandate 21-21 (iv) The Area Transferred 22-36 (a) The Territorial Dimension 22-30 (b) The Temporal Dimension 31-33 (c) The Applicable Law 34-35 (d) Conclusion 36-36 F. Outline of this Memorial 37-38 2. The Meaning of the Formula 39-56 A. Introduction 39-40 B. The Addis Ababa Agreement of 1972 41-42 C. Discussions leading to the CPA and the Abyei Protocol 43-55 D. Conclusions 56-56 3. The ABC Process 57-92 A. Introduction 57-58 B.