DOCSLIB.ORG

Vol. 26, No. 2 (Fall 2002)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vol. 26, No. 2 (Fall 2002) The Wallace Stevens Journal Volume 26 Number 2 Fall 2002 Special Issue: Wallace Stevens and Ezra Pound Edited by Glen MacLeod Contents Introduction —Glen MacLeod 131 “Pound/Stevens: Whose Era?” Revisited —Marjorie Perloff 135 Bloody Battle-Flags and Cloudy Days: The Experience of Metaphor in Pound and Stevens —Patricia Rae 143 How to Do Things with Modernism —Douglas Mao 160 Stevens/Pound in the Cold War —Alan Filreis 181 Genius for Sale! —Rachel Blau DuPlessis 194 Poets/Readers: Whose Era? —Vincent N. LoLordo 211 The Pound/Stevens Era —Charles Altieri 228 Pound vs. Stevens: Old Wine in New Bottles or New Bottles for Old Wine —Leon Surette 251 Poems 267 Reviews 277 News and Comments 285 Cover from Three Crows 2000. Metal, height 11' 6" by William L. Salisbury Sculptor The Wallace Stevens Journal EDITOR John N. Serio POETRY EDITOR ART EDITOR BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Joseph Duemer Kathryn Jacobi George S. Lensing EDITORIAL ASSISTANTS EDITORIAL BOARD Maureen Kravec Milton J. Bates A. Walton Litz Hope Steele Jacqueline V. Brogan James Longenbach Robert Buttel Glen MacLeod Eleanor Cook Marjorie Perloff TECHNICAL ASSISTANT Alan Filreis Joan Richardson Sue Campbell B. J. Leggett Melita Schaum George S. Lensing Lisa M. Steinman The Wallace Stevens Society, Inc. PRESIDENT ADVISORY BOARD John N. Serio Milton J. Bates H. L. Hix Owen E. Brady Kathryn Jacobi Robert Buttel George S. Lensing David M. Craig A. Walton Litz The Wallace Stevens Journal is published biannually in the Spring and Fall by the Wal- lace Stevens Society, Inc. Administrative and editorial offices are located at Clarkson University, Box 5750, Potsdam, NY 13699. Phone: (315) 268-3987; Fax: (315) 268-3983; E-mail: [email protected]; Web site: www.wallacestevens.com. The subscription rate for individuals, both domestic and foreign, is $25 for one year or $45 for two years and includes membership in the Wallace Stevens Society. Rates for institutions are $34 per year domestic and $39 per year foreign. Back issues are available. Also available are volumes 1–25 on CD-ROM (Win/Mac): $29 members; $39 nonmembers; $69 institutions. Manuscripts, subscriptions, and advertising should be addressed to the editor. Manu- scripts should be submitted in duplicate and in Works Cited format. Word-processed manuscripts will not be returned. Authors of accepted manuscripts should furnish a nonreturnable disk copy as well as photocopies of all quotations. The Wallace Stevens Journal is indexed or abstracted in Abstracts of English Studies, American Humanities Index, Arts & Humanities Citation Index, Current Contents, IBR (In- ternational Bibliography of Book Reviews), IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Lit- erature), MHRA Annual Bibliography, MLA International Bibliography, and Year’s Work in English Studies. This journal is a member of the Council of Editors of Learned Journals. © 2002 The Wallace Stevens Society, Inc. ISSN 0148-7132 Introduction GLEN MACLEOD HIS SPECIAL ISSUE on Wallace Stevens and Ezra Pound is also a tribute to Marjorie Perloff, who has been a valued member of the Teditorial board of The Wallace Stevens Journal since 1984. The issue began as a panel at the Modernist Studies Association conference in Octo- ber 2000, which reconsidered Perloff’s influential essay “Pound/Stevens: Whose Era?” (first published in 1982). The papers from that panel appear, in revised form, as the first four essays in this issue. “Pound/Stevens: Whose Era?” has informed the critical debate about these two poets for twenty years. In it, Perloff divides the field of modern poetry into two camps: partisans of Stevens (e.g., Helen Vendler, Harold Bloom) vs. partisans of Pound (e.g., Hugh Kenner, Donald Davie). The defenders of Stevens think of modernism as an extension of the romantic lyric tradition and define poetry primarily in terms of what it says; the defenders of Pound think of modernism as a fundamental break with ro- manticism and define poetry primarily in terms of how it says what it says. There is of course much more to it, but, in sum, Perloff’s essay is a sharp-eyed analysis of the critical situation in the 1970s and early 1980s, and it focuses on issues that still concern poets and critics today. It is regu- larly included on reading lists in graduate courses on modern poetry. What most strikes the Stevens specialist is the essay’s polemical tone. Perloff was clearly championing Pound, whom she saw as the poetic un- derdog at the time. (That bias became more obvious when “Pound/Stevens: Whose Era?” was republished as the opening chapter of her book The Dance of the Intellect [1985], aptly subtitled Studies in the Poetry of the Pound Tradi- tion.) Among other things, the essay challenged Stevensians to defend their version of modernism. Perloff’s central commitment as a critic has always been to modernism and to keeping alive the modernist spirit that wel- comes vital controversy. That commitment is nowhere more evident than in the provocative edge of her best criticism, of which “Pound/Stevens: Whose Era?” is a prime example. The essays in this issue demonstrate that it can still provoke sharp responses. It is appropriate that Perloff’s essay was itself inspired by a “wonder- fully argumentative” encounter circa 1980, as she tells us in the lively re- consideration of her original argument that leads off this special issue. It THE WALLACE STEVENS JOURNAL 26.2 (FALL 2002): 131–133. © 2002 THE WALLACE STEVENS SOCIETY, INC. 131 is not giving away too much to say that, in this new essay, she ultimately shifts the ground entirely, finding the relevant models for contemporary poets not in Pound and Stevens but in early T. S. Eliot, Gertrude Stein, and—characteristically stressing the importance of the visual arts to mod- ern poetry—Marcel Duchamp. (This shift of perspective is developed in more detail in her new book 21st-Century Modernism: The “New” Poetics, published this year by Blackwell.) Patricia Rae mounts a three-part assault on Perloff’s distinction, in her original essay, between Stevens as a poet of metaphor and Pound as a poet of metonymy. Extending her own argument in The Practical Muse (1997), Rae shows that Pound and Stevens share a number of fundamen- tal assumptions about life, poetry, and the relations between them. Douglas Mao attributes the staying power of “Pound/Stevens: Whose Era?” to its focus on debates (e.g., open vs. closed form, paratactic vs. syllogistic constructions) that remain centrally important to contempo- rary poets. But he also finds a troubling anti-intellectual slant in the rheto- ric of Perloff’s essay, as well as in her more recent Wittgenstein’s Ladder (1996). Alan Filreis responds to these first three papers by reconstructing the broader historical context of “Pound/Stevens: Whose Era?” In the 1950s and early 1960s, poetic categories were more fluid, not polarized as they had become when Perloff entered the fray. He agrees with Perloff that the situation at the beginning of the twenty-first century is once again more open, with both Pound and Stevens (and many others) available as mod- els to practicing poets. Rachel Blau DuPlessis finds unexamined vestiges of “genius thinking” in both Perloff’s original essay and her present reconsideration of it. In- stead of asking “Whose Era?” she suggests we ask “Which Pound?” or “Which Stevens?” Better yet, we should avoid such reductive dichoto- mies altogether and focus more on the material basis of artistry, the “rol- licking community with many players” behind every act of creation. Vincent N. LoLordo applies the principles DuPlessis expounds (as do Mao and Filreis, in different ways), focusing on John Ashbery’s Flow Chart as an example of how poetry can include the social, and argues that “[t]he current debate most relevant as successor to Perloff’s formulation con- cerns two versions of this single poet.” Charles Altieri challenges Perloff’s dichotomy by proposing a single Pound/Stevens era, beginning in the 1960s. According to Altieri, the two poets share a sense of the pressure of history and what he calls a “second- order lyricism.” Later poets have drawn upon both Pound and Stevens as equally useful aspects of their heritage. Altieri reads Stevens’ “Examina- tion of the Hero in a Time of War” and Pound’s Malatesta cantos to show that both poets seek to train readers in a similar kind of responsiveness to both poetry and life. 132 THE WALLACE STEVENS JOURNAL Finally, Pound scholar Leon Surette takes issue with Perloff’s charac- terization of modernism, arguing that, according to her own criteria, Pound himself does not qualify as a modernist. He offers his own definition of modernism, based on the spiritual aspirations of the abstract painters, in which Pound and Stevens both fit comfortably. One conclusion to be drawn from these essays is that Pound and Stevens seem today to have much more in common than they seemed to have in 1982. As modernism recedes into history, the leading modernist poets seem more and more part of a small, select group whose differences may be less significant than their shared interests. In that spirit, let me end with one point on which Perloff and the other contributors will readily agree: it is a great pleasure to be able to include in this special issue of The Wallace Stevens Journal a poem by Ezra Pound’s daughter, Mary de Rachewiltz. University of Connecticut, Waterbury INTRODUCTION 133 Stevens/Pound: Whose Era? Charcoal drawing by Alexis W. Serio “Pound/Stevens: Whose Era?” Revisited MARJORIE PERLOFF HE IDEA FOR “Pound/Stevens: Whose Era?” came to me one after- noon circa 1980 in the course of a wonderfully argumentative con- Tversation with two young men—brilliant, witty, and charming—I had just met at the Los Angeles home of the poet Charles Wright—Paul Monette and Roger Horwitz, both of whom were to die of AIDS, Roger in 1986 (after a long, painful illness, commemorated in Paul’s harrowing memoir Borrowed Time) and Paul in 1995.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Visual Aid: Teaching H.D.'S Imagist Poetry with the Assistance Of
    Teaching American Literature: A Journal of Theory and Practice Winter 2008 (2:1) Visual Aid: Teaching H.D.'s Imagist Poetry with the Assistance of Henri Matisse Christa Baiada, Borough of Manhattan Community College, CUNY The mantra of the modernist movement, articulated by Ezra Pound, was "make it new." Unfortunately, students don't always know how to approach "new" styles of literature, especially poetry that itself daunts many students. As we've all observed, if not experienced for ourselves, modernist poetry, upon first encounter, can be especially intimidating. In the spirit of making it new, this poetry often appears obscure in its density, perspective, and complexity. Students may look at a poem like "The Red Wheel Barrow" and ask "how is this poetry?" Of course, this is precisely the question we want to work through with them, so this is good. On the other hand, the initial discomfort of students with modernism can develop into a resistance hard to tackle. This is a challenge I found especially difficult to address in my early attempts to teach the poems of H.D. at a small, suburban music college in Long Island, NY. For my first lesson at the start of a unit on modernism in an undergraduate 200-level, Introduction to Literature class, I would devote the entire period to H.D. because I believe that her work beautifully encapsulates many of the principles of modernism laid out by Pound in his seminal essay "A Retrospect." Though several of my students have been fans, or even writers, of poetry and most had artistic sensibilities, many were disconcerted in their first encounter with modernist poetry via H.D., and the malaise they felt would linger in the following weeks as we read additional modernist poets.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modernism of Ezra Pound the Modernism of Ezra Pound
    THE MODERNISM OF EZRA POUND THE MODERNISM OF EZRA POUND The Science of Poetry Martin A. Kayman M MACMILLAN © Martin A. Kayman 1986 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1986 978-0-333-39392-5 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1956 (as amended). Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. First published 1986 Published by THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 2XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world Typeset by Wessex Typesetters (Division of The Eastern Press Ltd) Frome, Somerset British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Kayman, Martin A. The modernism of Ezra Pound: the science of poetry. 1. Pound, Ezra- Criticism and interpretation I. Title 811'.52 PS3531.082ZJ ISBN 978-1-349-18249-7 ISBN 978-1-349-18247-3 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-18247-3 Contents Preface vn Acknowledgements xiii A Note on the Text xv 1 Introduction: Some of our Best Poets are Fascists 1 2 How to Write Well and Influence People: Pound and Imagisme 33 3 'The Drama is Wholly Subjective': Pound and Science 66 4 'And . ': Reading The Cantos 110 5 'The Gorilla and the Bird': Modernism and the Pathology of Language 138 Notes 164 Index 194 v Preface Since Hugh Kenner inaugurated modern Pound criticism with The Poetry of Ezra Pound (London: Faber, 1951), well over seventy major studies of the poet have been published in English, not to mention the thousands of specialised articles and doctoral dissertations in near­ constant production.
    [Show full text]
  • Pound/Stevens: Whose Era? Author(S): Marjorie Perloff Source: New Literary History, Vol
    Pound/Stevens: Whose Era? Author(s): Marjorie Perloff Source: New Literary History, Vol. 13, No. 3, Theory: Parodies, Puzzles, Paradigms (Spring, 1982), pp. 485-514 Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/468795 Accessed: 05-05-2019 13:21 UTC REFERENCES Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: https://www.jstor.org/stable/468795?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms The Johns Hopkins University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to New Literary History This content downloaded from 174.203.1.64 on Sun, 05 May 2019 13:21:31 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Pound/Stevens: Whose Era? Marjorie Perloff O N 26 October 1955 William Carlos Williams wrote to Ezra Pound at St. Elizabeth's, asking him if he would care to com- ment on the obituary essay he had just written on Wallace Stevens, then two months dead, for Poetry magazine. Pound replied: ... as to yr/ pal/ Wally S/....it wd/ be highly improper for me to have opinions of yr/ opinion of a bloke I haven't read and DOUBT like all hell that yu will be able to PURR-suade me to venture on with such a hellUVAlot I don't know and WANT to find out.1 If this sounds unnecessarily dismissive, compare it to Stevens's curi- ously similar response to Pound.
    [Show full text]
  • Ezra Pound's Imagist Theory and T .S . Eliot's Objective Correlative
    Ezra Pound’s Imagist theory and T .S . Eliot’s objective correlative JESSICA MASTERS Abstract Ezra Pound and T.S. Eliot were friends and collaborators. The effect of this on their work shows similar ideas and methodological beliefs regarding theory and formal technique usage, though analyses of both theories in tandem are few and far between. This essay explores the parallels between Pound’s Imagist theory and ideogrammic methods and Eliot’s objective correlative as outlined in his 1921 essay, ‘Hamlet and His Problems’, and their similar intellectual debt to Walter Pater and his ‘cult of the moment’. Eliot’s epic poem, ‘The Waste Land’ (1922) does not at first appear to have any relationship with Pound’s Imagist theory, though Pound edited it extensively. Further investigation, however, finds the same kind of ideogrammic methods in ‘The Waste Land’ as used extensively in Pound’s Imagist poetry, showing that Eliot has intellectual Imagist heritage, which in turn encouraged his development of the objective correlative. The ultimate conclusion from this essay is that Pound and Eliot’s friendship and close proximity encouraged a similarity in their theories that has not been fully explored in the current literature. Introduction Eliot’s Waste Land is I think the justification of the ‘movement,’ of our modern experiment, since 1900 —Ezra Pound, 1971 Ezra Pound (1885–1972) and Thomas Stearns Eliot (1888–1965) were not only poetic contemporaries but also friends and collaborators. Pound was the instigator of modernism’s first literary movement, Imagism, which centred on the idea of the one-image poem. A benefit of Pound’s theoretically divisive Imagist movement was that it prepared literary society to welcome the work of later modernist poets such as Eliot, who regularly used Imagist techniques such as concise composition, parataxis and musical rhythms to make his poetry, specifically ‘The Waste Land’ (1922), decidedly ‘modern’.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Letters of Ezra Pound
    Bryant John James Knox B, A, (Hons, ) , Simon Fraser University, 1973 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of English @ BRYANT JOHN JAMES KNOX 1978 PREVIOUSLY UNPUBLISHED EZRA POUND MATERIAL COPYRIGHT THE TRUSTEES OF THE EZRA POUND LITERARY PROPERTY TRUST 1978 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY July 1978 A11 rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author, APPROVAL NAME : Bryant John James KNOX DEGREE: Master of Arts TITLE OF THESES: Three Letters of Ezra Pound EXAMINING COMMITTEE: Chairman: Prof. Jared Curtis, Associate Professor of English, Simon Fraser University. -, r Prof. Ralph Maud, Professor of English, S. F.U. - - Prof. Jamila Ismail, Assistant Professor of English, S.F.U. Prof. ~eiddritt, Professor of English, U.B.C. ii Date Approved: &ipd /t! 1978 PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENSE I hereby grant to Simon Fraser University the right to lend my thesis, project or extended essay (the title of which is shown below) to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. I further agree that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by me or the Dean of Graduate Studies. It is understood that copying or publication of this work for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article
    2nd International Conference on Education, Language, Art and Intercultural Communication (ICELAIC 2015) An Analysis of Ezra’s Cathy from the Perspective of Functionalist Approach to Translation Yanan He Foreign Languages School Henan University Kaifeng, China 475001 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract—This paper analyzes Ezra Pound’s creativeness in from Nolde, 1996: 22).Ford Hueffer wrote in Outlook in 1915: his translation Cathay of classical Chinese poems by an “We are accustomed to think of the Chinese as arbitrary or elaborated analysis from the perspective of functionalist uniform in sentiment, but these poems (in Cathay) reveal them approach. Under the great influence of classical Chinese poetry, as being just ourselves.” (Homberger, 1972: 108) Pound launches his career as a translator of Chinese poetry and publishes Cathay which has assumed a unique position in the Although Cathay has enjoyed enormous popularity in the history of English translation of classical Chinese poems. Aiming West, many Chinese scholars and translators believe it is not at a better appreciation of Cathay, this paper is to investigate qualified to be a translation. As when translating Cathy, Pound what factors have influenced Pound and how his creativeness in was ignorant of Chinese, and what he mainly depended upon translating classical Chinese poetry has been fully manifested from a perspective of functionalist translation approach. was Fenollosa’s notes while studying Chinese. Owing to numerous inaccuracies and errors resulting from Pound’s Keywords—Cathay; Pound; skopos; classical poetry; ignorance of the Chinese language and his free creations, Cathy translation has been severely criticized since its publication. Roy Earle, a sinologist, in a study of Ernest Fenollosa’s I.
    [Show full text]
  • “Sniffing the Trace of Air”: the Creativity of Influence in Ezra Pound's
    Asian Social Science; Vol. 13, No. 7; 2017 ISSN 1911-2017 E-ISSN 1911-2025 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education “Sniffing the Trace of Air”: The Creativity of Influence in Ezra Pound’s “The Return” Sumaya M. Alhaj Mohammad1 1 The Department of English Language and Literature, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan Correspondence: Sumaya M. Alhaj Mohammad, The Department of English Language and Literature, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan 13132 P.O. Box 132222. Tel: 96-27-7871-2193. E-mail: [email protected] Received: April 2, 2017 Accepted: April 10, 2017 Online Published: June 23, 2017 doi:10.5539/ass.v13n7p62 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n7p62 Abstract This study aims at exploring the concept of influence in modernity, based on Ezra Pound's perception of composing modernist poetry. Pound insightfully regards modernist poetry as connected to other previous texts due to the poets’ entangled web of ideas inspired by their readings. The study focuses on Pound’s poem "The Return (1912), which consciously imitates “Medailles d’Argile," (1900); a poem by the French symbolist Henri de Régnier. The study proves that this technique is intentional, as it enriches the poem by returning readers to previous works. It also affirms that Pound's influence is a process of creativity rather than "anxiety" as Harold Bloom suggests. This creativity is realized because Pound alters the impact of the French poem from a symbolist to an imagistic one through the uncanny use of imagery and rhythm, as well as presenting an image that amalgamates the abstract and the concrete, rather than representing an abstract thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Ezra Pound: the Rise and Fall of the London Vortex
    FACULTEIT LETTEREN EN WIJSBEGEERTE VAKGROEP ENGELSE LITERATUUR ACADEMIEJAAR 2007–2008 EZRA POUND: THE RISE AND FALL OF THE LONDON VORTEX FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF PIERRE BOURDIEU’S FIELD OF CULTURAL PRODUCTION FREDERICK MOREL PROMOTOR: PROF. DR. M. DEMOOR. SCRIPTIE INGEDIEND TOT HET BEHALEN VAN DE GRAAD VAN MASTER IN DE TAAL-EN LETTERKUNDE: ENGELS Morel | i I would like to thank Prof. Dr. M. Demoor for her dedication, her support, and for believing in me. Morel | ii List of Illustrations Numbers refer to pages 30 Ezra Pound. Cartoon of Pound as a dandy by “Tom T,” in the NewAge, October 1913. Courtesy of Robert Scholes. 38 Wyndham Lewis. Photo by Hulton Archive. 44 Symbol of the Vortex, in BLAST June 1914. 47 “Alcibiades” by Wyndham Lewis, 1912. 49 Cover of the first issue of BLAST, June 20, 1914. 50 Manifesto from the first issue of BLAST, June 20, 1914. 51 Cover of the second issue of BLAST, (“Before Antwerp” by Wyndham Lewis), July 1915. Estate of Mrs. Gladys Anne Wyndham Lewis. 57 Hieratic Head of Ezra Pound, c. 1914. Nasher Sculpture Center, photograph by David Heald. Morel | 1 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Ezra Loomis Pound: Background ................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Research Question and Aim .......................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Theoretical Embedding and
    [Show full text]
  • Olga Rudge & Ezra Pound: "What Thou Lovest Well..."
    Olga Rudge and Ezra Pound Anne Conover Olga Rudge and Ezra Pound ‘‘What Thou Lovest Well . .’’ Yale University Press New Haven & London Excerpt from Shakespeare and Company, ∫ 1959 by Sylvia Beach and renewed 1987 by Frederic Beach Dennis, reprinted by permission of Harcourt, Inc. Excerpts from A Serious Character: The Life of Ezra Pound by Humphrey Carpenter, ∫ 1988 by Humphrey Carpenter, reprinted by permission of Houghton Mi∆in Company. Excerpts from Discretions by Mary de Rachewiltz, ∫ 1971, reprinted by permission of Little, Brown and Company. Copyright ∫ 2001 by Anne Conover Carson. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Designed by Rebecca Gibb. Set in Fournier type by Keystone Typesetting, Inc., Orwigsburg, Pennsylvania. Printed in the United States of America by R. R. Donnelley & Sons, Harrisonburg, Virginia. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Carson, Anne Conover, 1937– Olga Rudge and Ezra Pound : ‘‘What thou lovest well— ’’ / Anne Conover. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. isbn 0-300-08703-9 (alk. paper) 1. Rudge, Olga, 1895–1996. 2. Violinists—Biography. 3. Pound, Ezra, 1885–1972. I. Title. ml418.r83 c37 2001 811%.52–dc21 2001001527 A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyndham Lewis and Literary Modernist Studies
    Wyndham Lewis and Literary Modernist Studies (Stephen Ross, University of Victoria) Lewis‟s relation to modernism is very much like – and in fact reflects – the fortunes of modernism itself in the last century: first marginal, then central, then savagely attacked, reduced to a grotesque caricature, and finally (perhaps) on the rise again. In this regard, he is perhaps the unlikely standard-bearer for modernism‟s fortunes and the best test of its current status. Present in London in the „teens of the last century, Lewis both coined the term “men of 1914” and was a key one of them, along with Ezra Pound, James Joyce, and T. S. Eliot. With typically modernist brio, Lewis thus anointed himself and a few of his friends as the arbiters and inventors of the most important artistic and cultural movement of his – perhaps of any – time. Lewis was motivated in part in this regard by F. T. Marinetti‟s 1911 and 1913 visits to London. Promoting the aesthetic and cultural vision of Futurism, Marinetti exercised a magnetic pull upon both Lewis and that other modernist impresario, Ezra Pound. Animated by Marinetti‟s visit and excited by his version of a new cultural production that would cut away the decaying flesh of a civilization he saw as gangrenous and septic, Lewis quickly put together what may be the founding document of English 1 modernism: BLAST! A proto-typical “little magazine,” BLAST! featured radically explosive typefaces, irreverent lists of those who should be “blasted” away and those who should be “blessed” for their innovation, and an indigenized version of Futurism called Vorticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbolism, Imagism, and Hermeneutic Anxiety: a Response to Andrew Hay*
    Connotations Vol. 23.1 (2013/2014) Symbolism, Imagism, and Hermeneutic Anxiety: A Response to Andrew Hay* NICHOLAS HALMI I. In an article published last year in Connotations, Andrew Hay pro- posed an intriguing analogy between the image as postulated in Ezra Pound’s program for Imagist poetry and the symbol as conceived by various Romantic-era writers and defined normatively in my book The Genealogy of the Romantic Symbol (2007). The analogy is between rela- tionships constitutive of the respective semiotic phenomena: the relationship of ontological content to meaning in the Romantic sym- bol, and of presentation to reception in the Imagist poem. While the symbol is supposed to represent the fusion of contrary states (Halmi, Genealogy 1-2), Pound’s Imagist distich “In the Station of a Metro”— “The apparition of these faces in the crowd; / Petals on a wet, black bough” (Personæ 111)—is asserted to represent the fusion of an objec- tive image with the reader’s subjective response to it: “Just as the Romantic symbol necessitates a union—whether it is the contingent and the absolute, or the temporal and the trans-temporal—Pound’s poem works through a yoking together of different contingencies: the reader and the image” (Hay 314). Proceeding from Pound’s own statement that the poem embodies “the precise instant when a thing outward and objective transforms itself, or darts into a thing inward and subjective” (“Vorticism” 286), *Reference: Andrew Hay, “On the Shore of Interpretation: The Theory and Read- ing of the Image in Imagism,” Connotations 21.2-3 (2011/2012): 304-26.
    [Show full text]
  • From Economics to Fascism: Ezra Pound's Shift Towards
    UDC 821.111(73).09-1 Паунд Е. Svetlana Nedeljkov* University of New Brunswick, English Language Department, Fredericton, Canada FROM ECONOMICS TO FASCISM: EZRA POUND’S SHIFT TOWARDS INCLUSIVITY Abstract Ezra Pound was a literary activist who devoted his life to writing, translating, and educating those willing to be initiated to modernist writing. He was also a poet of megalomaniacal ideas, believing that he could change the world by educating “the nation.” Seeking a solution for the contemporary socio-political issues, Pound started equating Jews with usury and blaming them for the world’s ills. These views consequently pushed him over the edge, towards fascism. The aim of this paper, therefore, is to investigate how Pound’s aim to educate readers became an effort to re-educate them by exposing them to his fascist and anti-Semitic views, and explore whether The Cantos, which Pound sets up to be aesthetically and semantically “open,” consequently turns into a “closed” fascist manifesto, mirroring Pound’s political agenda. Key words: Ezra Pound, The Cantos, teaching pedagogy, fascism, closed and open text After the disillusionment that followed World War I, Pound’s dissatisfaction with the economic ills of the world became increasingly visible in The Cantos. A believer in conspiracy theories, Pound attributed most of the world’s economic ills to an international scheme of Jewish bankers “who controlled the British crown and had ‘succeeded in duping the government of the United States’” (qtd. in Doberman 2000: 47). By turning his poetry * E-mail address: [email protected]. The author is a PhD candidate.
    [Show full text]