DOCSLIB.ORG

Committee for Gender Equality (Gec)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Committee for Gender Equality (Gec) Strasbourg, 9 July 2021 GEC(2021)3 Revised COMMITTEE FOR GENDER EQUALITY (GEC) STUDY on the place of men and boys in women's rights and gender equality policies Prepared by Claire Guiraud & Romain Sabathier GEC(2021)3 Revised 2 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 3 I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 6 II. FRAMING OF THE “MEN, BOYS AND GENDER EQUALITY" FIELD...................... 11 a) A place or places for men and boys? .............................................................................. 11 b) Reasons and objectives of public action ....................................................................... 12 c) Points of caution .............................................................................................................. 19 III. OPERATIONAL MAPPING OF INITIATIVES REGARDING MEN AND BOYS AND GENDER EQUALITY ............................................................................................................. 24 1) Initiatives aimed at developing a scientifically informed diagnosis and a shared normative and political framework ................................................................................... 24 2) Initiatives targeting men and boys as barriers to women's rights and gender equality .............................................................................................................................................. 26 3) Initiatives targeting men and boys as agents of change for the promotion of women's rights and gender equality.................................................................................................. 29 4) Initiatives targeting men and boys as collateral victims of male domination............. 31 IV. RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................. 33 APPENDICES ......................................................................................................................... 36 Appendix 1 - List of interviews .......................................................................................... 36 Appendix 2 - Methodological Issues ..................................................................................... 37 Appendix 3 – For further reading: indicative bibliography ................................................. 38 3 GEC(2021)3 Revised EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The issue of gender equality concerns society as a whole and both men and women are involved. This is one of the reasons why engaging men and boys for gender equality may seem obvious, marked by the seal of modernity and the aspiration to enjoy an egalitarian society together in the future. Consequently, very often, the questions “What are we talking about?” and “Why do we do it?” are replaced by the now urgent question “How do we do it?”. The Council of Europe Gender Equality Commission commissioned this study to clarify the issues at stake and to map existing initiatives and public policies in this area. The involvement of men and boys in achieving an egalitarian society is beneficial in the medium and long term to women and men, and to society as a whole. The study shows that optimism should not exclude lucidity or the consideration of facts. Clarifying the terms of the issue “men, boys and gender equality” is an essential prerequisite before proceeding with the “how to”. This requires examining the multiple positions that men and boys occupy in gender relations, namely: Place 1 - men and boys as barriers to gender equality, Place 2 - men and boys as agents of change towards gender equality, Place 3 - men and boys as collateral victims of male domination. While there is a consensus on the major importance of men's role in ending gender-based violence and inequality, there is a debate regarding the appropriate modalities of action regarding their involvement and inclusion. The principal objective must remain that these strategies globally contribute to gender equality, and to women’s rights and empowerment. Today, this is neither always reflected upon nor always guaranteed. Therefore, a growing number of voices in research, civil society and institutions are calling for reasoned caution in this area. Indeed, the reflection on men and boys in equality policies is partial and influenced by simplifying rhetoric that generates preconceived ideas (“what about male victims?”, “only women are considered nowadays”, etc.), and is sometimes based on arguments aimed at distorting realities and at playing down or even denying the persistence of structural inequalities, to the detriment of women in terms of pay, power, or physical integrity. In the very name of gender equality, the thinking - conscious or not - is, that after the time of women, the time of men should come. This narrative is initially developed by the so-called “masculinist” movement, a “conservative or reactionary social movement that claims that men suffer from an identity crisis because women in general, and feminists in particular, dominate society and its institutions”. This type of individual rather than collective and systemic interpretation depoliticises the issue of gender equality, which is intimately linked to the issue of power sharing. The global Covid-19 pandemic is a stark reminder of the reality of social inequalities today, including those between women and men. This crisis has demonstrated the fragility of the rights and progress patiently conquered in recent decades, mostly by women. The health crisis has not only deepened existing inequalities but may have generated new ones: a decrease in GEC(2021)3 Revised 4 the number of women experts in the media, a drop in paid employment and an increase in unpaid care work disproportionately affecting women, an increase in domestic violence, and the fact that women and gender equality were neglected in many economic support and recovery plans.1 Globally and structurally, there is still a society model of organisation that is unfavourable to the equality and to the rights of women and girls. Thus, beyond the diagnosis, we must reflect about the place given to men and boys in women's rights and gender equality policies that. While it is wrong to suggest that men and boys are excluded from these policies today (for example, education or training policies, or parental leave), it is nonetheless a fact that developing actions specifically aimed at men and boys within gender equality policies may lead to fewer resources and less attention being paid to girls’ and women’s rights and to women’s/feminist organisations that are already underfunded compared to their needs. Moreover, it is necessary to look at whether the different problems result directly from the gender system and whether other public policies already take into account these groups of men and boys. This study identifies and explains these different issues. Part II of the study is devoted to the mapping of initiatives concerning men and boys and gender equality. Almost 80 initiatives are listed in this study. This work is based in particular on the contributions of the member states solicited within the framework of the Council of Europe Gender Equality Commission, as well as a literature review and interviews with experts. This inventory does not pretend to be exhaustive or to provide an in-depth evaluation of these initiatives. Their nature and ambition are diverse. However, particular attention has been paid to those reforms that appear to be structural and likely to have the greatest impact in terms of social transformation towards equality between women and men. A first group of initiatives aims at producing scientific data and analyses, normative frameworks, as well as spaces for exchange and reflection on this issue. Although growing, scientific data and analyses are still sorely lacking. However, this is essential in order to base debates on the diagnosis and to base solutions on solid scientific foundations. Then, three groups of initiatives look at the positions of men and boys identified in the first part of the study: obstacles to equality, agents of change, collateral victims of gender relations. With regard to the group of men as obstacles to equality, many initiatives focus on the important issue of the unequal sharing of unpaid work, i.e. mainly domestic and parental tasks within households. The mobilisation of public authorities seems to be accelerating against the existing inertia that still leads to the fact that in all countries, data shows that men benefit on average from a much lower domestic and parental workload than their female partners. Since 2020, legal and structural reforms have come into force in at least six member states of the Council of Europe going towards greater co-responsibility of both parents for childcare. Since 1 January 2021, for example, Spain has implemented a “birth and childcare 1 See, for example, the statement by UN Secretary General António Guterres, "A crisis with a woman’s face ", 4 March 2021. 5 GEC(2021)3 Revised leave” of 16 weeks for both parents, of which 8 weeks are compulsory for each parent, non- transferable and paid at 100% of salary. This reform - by matching resources with ambition - illustrates a possible way to increase the rights of both parents, to further encourage the involvement of men in care, to promote the social acceptance of this sharing, while improving the living conditions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Men of Color: New Foundations for Developing Models for Success Edited By: Ronald A
    From Men of Color: New Foundations for Developing Models for Success Edited by: Ronald A. Williams The following is an excerpt from the unedited manuscript. Chapter 4: Masculinity Victor Sáenz and Beth Bukoski The “male education crisis” narrative has grown louder among the mainstream media in recent years, and it has been embodied by the faces of White boys (see, for example, the January 30, 2006 Newsweek cover and the January 26, 2007 Chronicle of Higher Education cover and their accompanying articles about the boy “crisis” [Tyre, 2006; Wilson, 2007]). This recognition of the challenges young men confront as they navigate the educational pipeline is an example of how White, middle-class, heteronormative patriarchy has structured our understanding of the “problem” of boys. White boys represent the face of the crisis and have served to legitimize it within the mainstream, yet boys and men of color remain the specter in the shadows — an invisible threat silently lurking and representing the way patriarchy structures boys’ lives in detrimental ways. Within the Latino population, for example, the educational attainment gap between Latino males and their female peers has been widening since the 1970s. As of 2010, Latino males obtained 38.4 percent of all associate’s and bachelor’s degrees awarded to Latinos (U.S. © 2013 Stylus Publishing, LLC www.Stylusb.com Census Bureau, 2010), and this gap is only projected to increase (Sáenz & Ponjuan, 2011). Even as the number of Latinas/os attending college and attaining degrees has increased steadily over the last few decades, the proportional representation of Latino males continues to decline relative to their female peers (Sáenz & Ponjuan, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Masculinity and Gender in a Farewell to Arms A
    International Journal of Engineering and Techniques - Volume 5 Issue 1, Jan-Feb 2019 RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS MASCULINITY AND GENDER IN A FAREWELL TO ARMS A. Ramya, Dr. R. Venkataraman 1Ph.D.Research Scholar, 2Professor and Head School of Languages VELS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY & ADVANCED STUDIES (VISTAS), Pallavaram, Chennai. India Abstract: The present paper critically analyses the gender and masculinity expression and interaction in Hemingway’s most popular novel, A Farewell to Arms. The researcher after going through many novels chosen the novel A Farewell to Arms as Hemingway wrote in detail about gender and masculinity and gender role in the novel. This is the first book of the author that made him popular in the society since it was based on the true story that replicates the World War I. This novel is otherwise termed as an antiwar novel. Considering the main aspect of the novel’s gender issues and stress of masculinity interaction induced the writing of this paper. Keywords: World War I, Love, Gender Interaction, Masculine Identity Introduction Ernest Hemingway (1899 – 1961)occupies an indelible place in the chronicles of American Literary history by virtue of his unique writing style and narration that presents a vivid picture of the scenarios explained in the novel by presenting a realistic depiction of the inter-war period, Hemingway has presented the quandary of the modern man in “a world which increasingly seeks to reduce him to a mechanism, a mere thing” (Brooks,Cleanth). Written in a simple but unconventional style, with the problems of war, violence and death as underlining themes, his novels present a figurative interpretation of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrimination Against Men Appearance and Causes in the Context of a Modern Welfare State
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lauda Pasi Malmi Discrimination Against Men Appearance and Causes in the Context of a Modern Welfare State Academic Dissertation to be publicly defended under permission of the Faculty of Social Sciences at the University of Lapland in the Mauri Hall on Friday 6th of February 2009 at 12 Acta Electronica Universitatis Lapponiensis 39 University of Lapland Faculty of Social Sciences Copyright: Pasi Malmi Distributor: Lapland University Press P.O. Box 8123 FI-96101 Rovaniemi tel. + 358 40-821 4242 , fax + 358 16 341 2933 publication@ulapland.fi www.ulapland.fi /publications Paperback ISBN 978-952-484-279-2 ISSN 0788-7604 PDF ISBN 978-952-484-309-6 ISSN 1796-6310 www.ulapland.fi /unipub/actanet 3 Abstract Malmi Pasi Discrimination against Men: Appearance and Causes in the Context of a Modern Welfare State Rovaniemi: University of Lapland, 2009, 453 pp., Acta Universitatis Lapponinsis 157 Dissertation: University of Lapland ISSN 0788-7604 ISBN 978-952-484-279-2 The purpose of the work is to examine the forms of discrimination against men in Finland in a manner that brings light also to the appearance of this phenomenon in other welfare states. The second goal of the study is to create a model of the causes of discrimination against men. According to the model, which synthesizes administrative sciences, gender studies and memetics, gender discrimination is caused by a mental diff erentiation between men and women. This diff erentiation tends to lead to the segregation of societies into masculine and feminine activities, and to organizations and net- works which are dominated by either men or by women.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Masculinities in the United States and Japan Susan Sims Cochran Kennesaw State University, Sue [email protected]
    Kennesaw State University DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects 12-1-2009 Exploring Masculinities in the United States and Japan Susan Sims Cochran Kennesaw State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/etd Part of the Gender and Sexuality Commons Recommended Citation Cochran, Susan Sims, "Exploring Masculinities in the United States and Japan" (2009). Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects. Paper 53. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses and Capstone Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. EXPLORING MASCULINITIES IN THE UNITED STATES AND JAPAN By Susan Sims Cochran A capstone project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in Professional Writing in the Department of English In the College of Humanities and Social Sciences of Kennesaw State University Kennesaw, Georgia 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my God for giving me the strength to persevere through this topic, despite the opposition. I would like to thank my husband, who was ever encouraging despite the sleepless nights (and many, many discussions) for this paper. I would like to thank my good friend, Don Gammill, who read and re-read this paper on multiple occasions. CONTENTS Personal Narrative...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    DOI: 10.4119/ijcv-3805 IJCV: Vol. 14(2)/2020 Connecting Structures: Resistance, Heroic Masculinity and Anti-Feminism as Bridging Narratives within Group Radicalization David Meieringi [email protected] Aziz Dzirii [email protected] Naika Foroutani [email protected] i Berlin Institute for Integration and Migration Research (BIM) at the Humboldt University Berlin Vol. 14(2)/2020 The IJCV provides a forum for scientific exchange and public dissemination of up-to-date scien- tific knowledge on conflict and violence. The IJCV is independent, peer reviewed, open access, and included in the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) as well as other rele- vant databases (e.g., SCOPUS, EBSCO, ProQuest, DNB). The topics on which we concentrate—conflict and violence—have always been central to various disciplines. Consequently, the journal encompasses contributions from a wide range of disciplines, including criminology, economics, education, ethnology, his- tory, political science, psychology, social anthropology, sociology, the study of reli- gions, and urban studies. All articles are gathered in yearly volumes, identified by a DOI with article-wise pagi- nation. For more information please visit www.ijcv.or g Suggested Citation: APA: Meiering, D., Dziri, A., & Foroutan, N. (2020). Connecting structures: Resistance, heroic masculinity and anti-feminism as bridging narratives within group radicaliza- tion. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 14(2), 1-19. doi: 10.4119/ijcv-3805 Harvard: Meiering, David, Dziri, Aziz, Foroutan, Naika. 2020. Connecting Structures: Resistance, Heroic Masculinity and Anti-Feminism as Bridging Narratives within Group Radicalization. International Journal of Conflict and Violence 14(2): 1-19. doi: 10.4119/ijcv-3805 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution—NoDerivatives License.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Our Gender System Sucks for Men, Too
    9/18/12 What About the Men? Why Our Gender System Sucks for Men, Too Published on Alternet (http://www.alternet.org) Home > What About the Men? Why Our Gender System Sucks for Men, Too The Good Men Project [1] / By Noah Brand [2], Ozy Frantz [3] What About the Men? Why Our Gender System Sucks for Men, Too July 10, 2012 | This article is from a book in progress by Noah Brand and Ozy Frantz. If you are anything like us, you spent some time when you were younger playing with optical illusions: the vase that, if you looked at it differently, was two faces; the fish that were also birds; the old woman who was also a young lady. If you were reading this in a book in a bookstore, and some malicious person had not moved it into the Local Birdwatching category, it would almost certainly be next to some other books about gender. (Yes, this is related.) Look at the other books, and you’d find they have one thing in common—they’re almost all about women. Women and work. Women and body image. Women and race. Women and sex. Women and feminism. You’d think that only women have a gender. For a long time, we’ve only been able to see half the illusion—we see the birds, but not the fish; the vases, but not the faces. We’ve noticed the thousands of ways, big and small, that our current gender system wounds women. Rarely, however, and often only as an afterthought does anyone remark on how the current gender system harms men.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Against Feminism: Exploring Discursive Measures and Implications of Anti-Feminist Discourse
    Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, 2: 70-90 (2015) Women against feminism: Exploring discursive measures and implications of anti-feminist discourse Alex Phillip Lyng Christiansen, Aalborg University Ole Izard Høyer, Aalborg University Abstract: The present paper studies anti-feminist discourse within the tumblr-based group Women Against Feminism, and explores how the sentiments of these anti-feminists, as expressed in a multi-modal format, may help to understand the difficulty feminism has with gathering support from its female audience. The textual corpus, gathered through the site, is analysed with methods inspired by Fairclough's 2012 version of CDA, focused on discovering social issues within feminism as it relates to a female audience. By considering implicature and counter-discourse, the analysis demonstrates that anti-feminists perceive feminists as victimising the female population and depriving them of agency, and call for feminism to consider their viewpoint. Conclusively, the created perception of victimisation then serves to illustrate how language works to construe modern feminist discourse in a negative light, and how this may further hinder feminism in reaching the audience it desires. Keywords: Antifeminism, counter-discourse, Critical Discourse Analysis, victimisation. 1. Introduction Women have real reasons to fear feminism, and we do young women no service if we suggest to them that feminism itself is safe. It is not. To stand opposed to your culture, to be critical of institutions, behaviors, discourses--when it is so clearly not in your immediate interest to do so--asks a lot of a young person, of any person. At its best, the feminist challenging of individualism, of narrow notions of freedom, is transformative, exhilarating, empowering.
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Forward And, Macho Homos : Toward a Masculist Reframing Of
    Referencia bibliográfica: Guagliardo, K. (2012). Macho-Homos. Toward a Masculist Reframing of Male Sexuality. Tesis de Grado. Edith Cowan University. Recuperado de http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses_hons/76 ISBN: - MACHO HOMOS Toward a Masculist Reframing of Male Homosexuality Masculinity has taken a number of forms through history, with the dominant ideology of a particular culture and era dictating to men how they should perform their gender in order to be considered valuable or virtuous (Spector Person, 2006). In western patriarchal systems, men portray themselves in a particular manner in order to meet cultural criteria of masculinity (Webb, 1998; Biddulph, 1995; Connell, 1995). Although masculinity as a concept has been critiqued by feminism and queer theory, Clarkson (2006), Payne (2007), De Visser & Smith (2007), and Eguchi (2011) have discovered, along with others in the Journal of Men’s Studies, that traditional ideas of masculinity continue to inform, influence and appeal to both heterosexual and homosexual men. At this point, it is useful to consider Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity. Butler argues, ‘There is no gender identity behind the expressions of gender; that identity is performatively constituted by the very “expressions” that are said to be its results’ (1990, p. 33). Butler asserts that there is no such thing as an inherent, concrete quality of ‘maleness’ within each male human being; that, rather, men perform maleness based on a variety of expressions. With that in mind, what constitutes hegemonic masculinity? What makes a man culturally masculine? Theorists have argued that signifiers of masculinity include: ‘dress, physical stance and movement, vocabulary and speech’ (Webb, 1998, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Solutions for Gender Equality 2018
    HeForShe | Emerging Solutions for Gender Equality 2018 50 Created by UN Women, the United Nations entity for gender equality and the empowerment of women, the HeForShe solidarity movement for gender equality provides a systematic approach and targeted platform where a global audience can engage and become change agents for the achievement of gender equality in our lifetime. This requires an innovative, inclusive approach that mobilizes people of every gender identity and expression as advocates and acknowledges the ways that we all benefit from this equality. HeForShe invites people around the world to stand together as equal partners to craft a shared vision of a gender equal world and implement specific, locally relevant solutions for the good of all of humanity. Since its launch on 20 September 2014, at the United Nations, by then UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon and UN Women Global Goodwill Ambassador, Emma Watson, hundreds of thousands of men from around the world including Heads of State, CEOs, and global luminaries from all walks of life have committed to gender equality. HeForShe has been the subject of more than 2 billion conversations on social media, with off-line activities reaching every corner of the globe. 1 HeForShe | Emerging Solutions for Gender Equality 2018 2 A note from the Secretary-General 4 A note from the Executive Director 5 A note from the HeForShe Champions 6 Executive Summary 7 The HeForShe Champions 8 Part 1 19 HOW TO REACH A GENDER BALANCED LEADERSHIP AccorHotels, Barclays, BNP Paribas, McKinsey & Company,
    [Show full text]
  • Anti Racist Action #7#7
    ANTI RACIST ACTION #7#7 SOUTH • SIDE •CHICAGO TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Actions & Rumors 11News 26 Local Racists 36 Theory ACTIONS & RUMORS THE KLAN TAKES A BEATING IN ANAHEIM, CA a crowd of anti-racists confronts the KKK A chapter of the Ku Klux Klan announced its intention to rally in Anaheim on February 27th. The rally was intended to take place at 1:30 PM in Pearson Park. By 11 AM, several dozen protestors had already shown up to confront the Klan. About one hour later, several men in black garb bearing Klan insignia exited an SUV near the edge of the park. Moments after the Klansmen stepped out, a fight erupted. The Grand Dragon of the KKK was seen receiving a beating from protestors who managed to knock him to the ground. Other members of the group pulled out weapons – three of the people confronting the Klan were, unfortunately, wounded. One was attacked with the pointed end of a flagpole, and two others were stabbed with knives. The police quickly arrived to defend the Klan and arrest a number of protestors. Several Klansmen were also arrested, although predictably released immediately afterward on the basis that their role in the fight had been purely “self-defense”. Cops, as always, remain the strongest defenders of white supremacy in the United States, and the groups who incite racial hatred and genocide find safety in the arms of the law. Nonetheless, the Klan rally never materialized as their miniscule group of supporters were immediately shut down by people defending their city from organized racists.
    [Show full text]
  • IAMCR 2016 Gender and Communication Section
    International Association for Media and Communication Research Asociación internacional de estudios en comunicación social Association internationale des études et recherches sur l’information et la communication IAMCR 2016 Gender and Communication Section Abstracts of papers accepted for presentation at the annual conference of the International Association for Media and Communication Research IAMCR Leicester, UK 27-31 July 2016 Report any problems with this document to [email protected] Id: 11932 Title: Learning to sell sex(ism)' A cultural sociological analysis of gender in the educational cultures of advertising students in Ireland Session Type: Individual submission Authors: Name: Aileen O'Driscoll Email: aileen.odriscoll22 (at) mail.dcu.ie Country: IE (Ireland) Affiliation: Dublin City University Abstract: This PhD project is an empirical study of how gender operates in the educational cultures of advertising students in Ireland. The research is strongly guided by Nixon’s 2003 study into advertising cultures and discourses that work to promote traditional gendered working practices and organisational cultures hostile to gender equality. As a point of departure, however, this thesis takes an inter-disciplinary approach to bring together theoretical and empirical work on feminist critiques of postfeminist culture and the impact of postfeminism on gendered imagery in advertising texts, with a consideration of the cultural production processes that create advertisements, and also with – crucially – an attempt to delve into the underexplored
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Equality?: a Transnational Feminist Analysis of the Un
    GENDER EQUALITY?: A TRANSNATIONAL FEMINIST ANALYSIS OF THE UN HEFORSHE CAMPAIGN AS A GLOBAL “SOLIDARITY” MOVEMENT FOR MEN _______________________________________ A Thesis presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School at the University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts _____________________________________________________ by JAIME HENRY-WHITE Dr. Cristina Mislán, Thesis Supervisor MAY 2015 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled GENDER EQUALITY?: A TRANSNATIONAL FEMINIST ANALYSIS OF THE UN HEFORSHE CAMPAIGN AS A GLOBAL “SOLIDARITY” MOVEMENT FOR MEN presented by Jaime Henry-White, a candidate for the degree of master of arts, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Professor Cynthia Frisby Professor Debra Mason Professor Cristina Mislán Professor Tola Pearce ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS “Wise shall be the bearers of light.” Hundreds have walked under the Journalism School archway at the University of Missouri and read this quote etched in its stone. I, too, have seen this quote hundreds of times while heading to the quad or rushing, yet again, late to class. But every time, it strikes a chord. This place and its people, who tirelessly work to train the journalists of tomorrow, epitomize wisdom. Professors here not only teach students to be storytellers. They teach us to be better human beings, to constantly evolve and to pursue the truth undeterred. They teach us to imagine, to fail, to live. I almost didn’t come here. But, somehow, I did. And how truly lucky I am. First things first, I have to thank the photojournalism department, my original home at Mizzou and a place with so much heart.
    [Show full text]