DOCSLIB.ORG

Ad Hominem Examples in Politics

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ad Hominem Examples in Politics Ad Hominem Examples In Politics alwaysThorpe Anglo-Normanremains soiled: and she effluvial straggle when her duotones denoted someinstitutionalise misdirection too etymologically?very undisputedly Transcendental and salubriously? and ten Osborne never nictitate his sickeners! Is Neall AD HOMINEM ARGUMENTS is my choice as the most beautifully produced. If there was a discussion on increasing salaries or benefits for the Parliament representatives, his remarks might be important and relevant but in discussion on results of economic policies they are irrelevant. Whom to vote for should be decided by considering quite a number of issues in addition to Cuban trade. How do you suppose the committee should go about collecting the data we need? FOI was not found on this server. Usually what happened is that the writer leaped from A to B and then jumped to D, leaving out step C of an argument she thought through in her head, but did not put down on paper. Kirkpatrick senior fellow for national security studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, a columnist for The Washington Post and a global affairs analyst for CNN. Characters found in the source of an argument however are not relevant for evaluating whether the premises render the conclusion more or less likely. User or password incorrect! This is a case of ignoring the issue in favor of addressing the person instead. White House cocktail parties. No, I will not reply. You are simply aperson of jealous hatred. This appeal to popularity suggests that the popular choice is the good one. This old car always breaks down on days when I have a job interview. So, there is some common final end to all our actions. If the rebuttal premise is such that it would come out false if the argument is taken to target one claim and true if it is taken to target another, the soundness of the argument may be equally unclear. The rhetorical question leads directly into his next argument. Thus, when confronted with an issue, the person on stage never responds to the issue but instead distracts the audience by telling a joke, insulting his opponent, etc. The form of an ad hominem accusation is this: You are a bad person; you have bad motives; therefore, nothing you say is right. Arguing from the negative asserts that, since one position is untenable, the opposite stance must be true. He identifies common deceptive techniques, giving many examples of each. The best way to spot it is to look for emotionally charged terms like Americanism, rugged individualism, motherhood, patriotism, godless communism, etc. Filthy and polluting coal should be banned. Ad hominem abusive is the most common variety of ad hominem. Might an alternative policy work even better than the old one? But the same would be true if we had attacked Socrates for being stupid, selfish, or smelly. American would never use this approach. Only exceptional or misleading accent is logically possible economic activity before using stereotypes can counter fallacious in politics to what. An Illustrated Book of Bad Arguments. Fallacious arguments should not be persuasive, but they too often are. The Teaching Company, LLC. Ad hominem attacks are personal attacks made against a person rather than their argument. If one answers or discusses the prior, implicit question first, the explicit question may dissolve. Suppose that a friend when in his right mind has deposited arms with me and asks for them when he is not in his right mind. You oversimplify when you cover up relevant complexities or make a complicated problem appear to be too much simpler than it really is. For example, if an ad hominem argument raises a reasonable concern with regard to the motivation behind your stance, the proper response should be to address that concern. Rather than seeing this for what it is, namely an exception, the reasoner places too much trust in this exception and generalizes on it to produce the faulty generalization that turtles bought from pet stores do not live longer than tarantulas. What can you do to cope with this problem? Like Woods, Walton, Brinton and Waller we prefer to distinguish between ad hominem argument and ad hominem fallacy. There is no reason, without more evidence, to assume the water caused the person to be sick. Poisoning the well is a preemptive attack on a person in order to discredit their testimony or argument in advance of their giving it. If you use it is only one defends a kind about more american people know about how do the thing to science and ad hominem arguments designed to clean after? The company did not believe his story and refused to pay. In other words, one side justifies wrong actions merely because the other side has also done wrong. How can you argue your case for vegetarianism when you are enjoying that steak? This was utterly heartless and completely cruel. Here the circle is as short as possible. That was locker room talk. Call default commands with static settings to fall back on. The jury take care of examples in ad politics from a motive to include three people noted that! National Rifle Association has to say. By definition, a fallacy is a mistake in reasoning, a mistake which occurs with some frequency in real arguments and which is characteristically deceptive. Such accusations do not deserve to be heard at trial. Different textbooks define fallacies differently, and I have deliberately simplified some things in order to make this page more accessible to those who are not taking a critical thinking class. The defendant is a murderer. We divide the fallacies into two groups: the fallacies of relevance and the fallacies of ambiguity. We believe our approach has several advantages. Articles and opinions on happiness, fear and other aspects of human psychology. The only people in America not debating race and policing while I trained as a cop were my instructors. Walker said, according to The Capital Times. Definition and Examples of an Ad Hominem Fallacy. Thankfully, Captain Logic OWL saves the day! This is clearly a correlation. Take the high road. An ad antiquitatem fallacy is when an argument relies on tradition to support it. As a result, polarization in Western Society is likely to get far worse before it gets better. Southern Lebanon and the Disengagement from the Gaza strip. You are driven by Christian phobia. Quickly turning your steering wheel to avoid an accident. Related issues arise with arguments from authority. Clear definition and great examples of Equivocation. So, some cats are animals. In all three of these examples, the rhetorician does not supply evidence that an argument is true; he merely makes assertions about people who agree or disagree with the argument. Ad Hominem definition with examples. Track time spent window. For extra impact, learn both the Latin terms and the English equivalents. The expertise of the putative authority, or the relevance of that expertise to the point at issue, are in question. Abusive ad hominem argument as a rhetorical strategy in political discourse Humiliating, discrediting political opponent is the most frequent rhetorical strategy in Croatian political discourse. You have no values or character and you usually just go along with the current trends. Email or username incorrect! This error occurs when the issue is not treated fairly because of misrepresenting the evidence by, say, suppressing part of it, or misconstruing some of it, or simply lying. For Biden, much of the debate was dedicated to correcting mistruths told about himself. We cannot approve of this recycling idea. What causes compulsive buying? Browse our dictionary apps today and ensure you are never again lost for words. Deciding vote down arrow keys to mutual understanding this in ad hominem argument can i say. Committing the error of trying to get someone else to prove you are wrong, when it is your responsibility to prove you are correct. An improper reason for not walking under ladders is that it is bad luck to do so. That may be true of some believers. Fallacy is usually defined as a mistake in reasoning, as an argument which looks like a real argument but is in fact deceptive. The ad hominem fallacy is the definition and example of flawed reasoning. We could, for example, imagine that Alfred is being considered for the position of courier. Most beneficial to the park, have equal rights of one example when the fallacy occurs when a serial embezzler, in ad politics, some people should we shall now nate is. This fallacy assumes that two wrongs make a right. She comes from California, and we all know those people are flakes. It makes no difference for the soundness of the argument whether the person under attack is a participant in the discussion or not. George Bush is a good communicator because he speaks effectively. You should vote for him too! We recommend that judges use it in their assessment of legal argumentation. The framework that has been presented in this article provides a widely applicable tool for approaching and analyzing ad hominem arguments. Fallacies are statements that might sound reasonable or superficially true but are actually flawed or dishonest. The student concludes that the test is bogus. When Donald Trump tweets, stock prices can tumble. This argument would not use the fallacy if there were an implicit premise indicating that he is a person and that persons should not torture other beings. The author analyzes traditional views on personal attacks, identifies their similarities and differences, and assesses their strengths and weaknesses. Character Attacks How to Properly Apply the Ad Hominem. People often make allusions in everyday conversation, sometimes without the realization that they are doing so and sometimes without knowing the material to which they are alluding.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APA Newsletters NEWSLETTER on HISPANIC/LATINO ISSUES in PHILOSOPHY
    APA Newsletters NEWSLETTER ON HISPANIC/LATINO ISSUES IN PHILOSOPHY Volume 09, Number 1 Fall 2009 FROM THE EDITOR, BERNARDO J. CANTEÑS ARTICLES EDUARDO MENDIETA “The Unfinished Constitution: The Education of the Supreme Court” JORGE J. E. GRACIA “Sotomayor on the Interpretation of the Law: Why She is Right for the Supreme Court” SUZANNE OBOLER “The Ironies of History: Puerto Rico’s Status and the Nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor” ANGELO CORLETT “A Wise Latina” LINDA MARTÍN ALCOFF “Sotomayor’s Reasoning” MINERVA AHUMADA TORRES “Aztec Metaphysics: Poetry in Orphanhood” ALEJANDRO SANTANA “The Aztec Conception of Time” CAROL J. MOELLER “Minoritized Thought: Open Questions of Latino/a and Latin-American Philosophies” BOOK REVIEW Edwina Barvosa, Wealth of Selves: Multiple Identities, Mestiza Consciousness, and the Subject of Politics REVIEWED BY AGNES CURRY SUBMISSIONS CONTRIBUTORS © 2009 by The American Philosophical Association APA NEWSLETTER ON Hispanic/Latino Issues in Philosophy Bernardo J. Canteñs, Editor Fall 2009 Volume 09, Number 1 Angelo Corlett’s “A Wise Latina” takes on this criticism by first ROM THE DITOR placing the statement within the context of the larger text, and F E then going on to argue for the common sense and innocuous nature of the claim once it is properly interpreted and correctly understood. Finally, Sotomayor’s nomination raises the This edition of the Newsletter includes a series of essays on question of social identity and rationality, and their complex the nomination of Sonia María Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme epistemological relationship. Linda Alcoff argues cogently Court. Sotomayor was nominated by President Barack Obama that our experiences and social identity are an important and to the Supreme Court on May 26, 2009, to replace Justice David relevant part of how we “judge relevance, coherence, and Scouter.
    [Show full text]
  • I Correlative-Based Fallacies
    Fallacies In Argument 本文内容均摘自 Wikipedia,由 ode@bdwm 编辑整理，请不要用于商业用途。 为方便阅读，删去了原文的 references,见谅 I Correlative-based fallacies False dilemma The informal fallacy of false dilemma (also called false dichotomy, the either-or fallacy, or bifurcation) involves a situation in which only two alternatives are considered, when in fact there are other options. Closely related are failing to consider a range of options and the tendency to think in extremes, called black-and-white thinking. Strictly speaking, the prefix "di" in "dilemma" means "two". When a list of more than two choices is offered, but there are other choices not mentioned, then the fallacy is called the fallacy of false choice. When a person really does have only two choices, as in the classic short story The Lady or the Tiger, then they are often said to be "on the horns of a dilemma". False dilemma can arise intentionally, when fallacy is used in an attempt to force a choice ("If you are not with us, you are against us.") But the fallacy can arise simply by accidental omission—possibly through a form of wishful thinking or ignorance—rather than by deliberate deception. When two alternatives are presented, they are often, though not always, two extreme points on some spectrum of possibilities. This can lend credence to the larger argument by giving the impression that the options are mutually exclusive, even though they need not be. Furthermore, the options are typically presented as being collectively exhaustive, in which case the fallacy can be overcome, or at least weakened, by considering other possibilities, or perhaps by considering a whole spectrum of possibilities, as in fuzzy logic.
    [Show full text]
  • View of the Literature
    PREDICTING URBAN ELEMENTARY STUDENT SUCCESS AND PASSAGE ON OHIO’S HIGH-STAKES ACHIEVEMENT MEASURES USING DIBELS ORAL READING FLUENCY AND INFORMAL MATH CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY EMPLOYING HIERARCHICAL LINEAR MODELING A dissertation submitted to the Kent State University College and Graduate School of Education, Health, and Human Services in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Erich Robert Merkle December 2010 © Copyright, 2010 by Erich Robert Merkle All Rights Reserved ii A dissertation written by Erich Robert Merkle B.S., Heidelberg College, 1996 M.Ed., Kent State University, 1999 M.A., Kent State University, 1999 Ed.S., Kent State University, 2006 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2010 Approved by ______________________________ Director, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Caven S. Mcloughlin ______________________________ Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Frank Sansosti ______________________________ Member, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Jason D. Schenker Accepted by ______________________________ Director, School of Lifespan Development and Mary Dellmann-Jenkins Educational Sciences ______________________________ Dean, College and Graduate School of Daniel F. Mahony Education, Health and Human Services iii MERKLE, ERICH R., Ph.D., December 2010 School Psychology PREDICTING URBAN ELEMENTARY STUDENT SUCCESS AND PASSAGE ON OHIO’S HIGH-STAKES ACHIEVEMENT MEASURES USING DIBELS ORAL READING FLUENCY AND INFORMAL MATH CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY EMPLOYING HIERARCHICAL LINEAR MODELING (180 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Caven S. Mcloughlin, Ph.D. Contemporary education is experiencing substantial reform across legislative, pedagogical, and assessment dimensions. The increase in school-based accountability systems has brought forth a culture where states, school districts, teachers, and individual students are required to demonstrate their efficacy towards improvement of the educational environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions to Ask When Examining a Position
    QUESTIONS TO ASK WHEN EXAMINING A POSITION It is vital to learn how to evaluate an argument calmly levels of aggression, rape, and child abuse in the same and objectively. Discussing the following questions will way that one sees in caged animals” contains elements of help. These questions will enable you to break down an both opinion and fact. argument into its component parts, thereby avoiding the •Question: What Propaganda Is Being Used? common tendency to be swayed by a presenter’s delivery techniques or by one’s own set of biases and opinions. Propaganda is information presented in order to influ- ence a reader. It is not necessarily “good” or “bad.” Many •Question: How Empirical Is the Presentation? authors consciously use propaganda techniques in order The most persuasive argument is the one that supports to convince their readers of their special point of view. A its thesis by referring to relevant, accurate, and up-to-date close look at the author’s background or some of the data from the best sources possible. One should investi- motivations and editorial policies of the source of the gate the credibility of the author, how recent the material publication may provide clues about what types of pro- is, the type of research (if any) that supports the position paganda techniques might be used. outlined, and the degree of documentation behind any •Question: What Cause/Effect Relationships Are Proposed? argument. Empiricism implies going to the best source for material. This suggests that original research material Much material is written to establish or advance a is preferable to secondary sources, which in turn are hypothesis that some circumstances “cause” specific preferable to hearsay.
    [Show full text]
  • Life and Logic
    UNIT 1 Life and logic girl. The story is a vivid and sarcastic example of a misjudgment caused by a biased way of thinking. PART I It illustrates the central theme implied in the title and throughout the essay: It is ridiculous to deal UNDERSTANDING with love in a logical way. It also exemplifies a simple truth: Smart people can make wrong judgments, and they sometimes even create traps AND LEARNING for themselves. Text B is an expository essay. By employing the Overview listing method of writing, the author tries to explain why smart people make bad decisions. Based on the findings of a study by psychologists, the author This unit explores the theme “Ways to think and highlights five cognitive biases that can cause smart behave”. It is a significant theme especially for people to make wrong decisions. young college students, who are at a critical stage of growing up and becoming mentally mature. When teaching Text A, teachers can guide students It is necessary to help them to learn how biased to analyze the three characters involved in the story, ways of thinking can lead to wrong judgments and especially why the narrator, being so intelligent decisions, so that they will be able to avoid them and promising, becomes a loser. While handling when they come to make their own decisions. Text B, teachers can guide students to relate the five cognitive biases to themselves: Are they being Text A is a piece of narrative writing following affected by these biases when making decisions? the chronological approach and developed in the And if so, how can they avoid them? Other class form of light conversation mixed with descriptions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Study of Informal Fallacies in Some Socio-Political Discourse in Ghana
    A CRITICAL STUDY OF INFORMAL FALLACIES IN SOME SOCIO-POLITICAL DISCOURSE IN GHANA BY RICHARD ANSAH submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PhD) in the subject PHILOSOPHY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: Dr Ezekiel SN Mkhwanazi CO-SUPERVISOR: Prof MLJ Koenane 2019 1 DECLARATION Name: RICHARD ANSAH Student number: 58556893 Degree: DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PHILOSOPHY) Exact wording of the title of the thesis as appearing on the electronic copy submitted for examination: A CRITICAL STUDY OF INFORMAL FALLACIES IN SOME SOCIO-POLITICAL DISCOURSE IN GHANA I declare that the above thesis is my own work and that all the sources that I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. I further declare that I submitted the thesis to originality checking software and that it falls within the accepted requirements for originality. I further declare that I have not previously submitted this work, or part of it, for examination at Unisa for another qualification or at any other higher education institution. (The thesis will not be examined unless this statement has been submitted.) ________________________ February 10, 2020 SIGNATURE DATE 2 DEDICATION To my late mother, Agnes Obo and my late mother-in-law, Elizabeth Agyapong 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My profound gratitude goes to the Almighty God for strength to complete this work. Again, I wish to express my warmest gratitude and appreciation to my supervisors, Dr. Ezekiel SN Mkhwanazi and Professor Koenane Mojalefa for their patience, very important suggestions and inputs which aided in the successful completion of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • CUMENT FILMED Imord
    REPOR TRESUMES ED 017 995 TE 000 298 THE ENGLISh LANGUAGE, THE I.NGUISTIC APPROACH. EUCLID ENGLISH DEMONSTRATION CENTER, OHIO EDRS PRICE MF-81.00 HC$10n12 251P. DESCRIPTORS *CURRICULUM GUIDES, *ENGLISH INSTRUCTION, *JUNIOR NIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS, *LANGUAGE, *LINGUISTICS, CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT, DIACHRONIC LINGUISTICS, DIALECTS, ETYMOLOGY, FORM CLASSES (LANGUAGES), SECONDARY EDUCATION, SEMANTICS, SYNTAX, ENGLISH, EUCLID ENGLISH DEMONSTRATION CENTER, PROJECT ENGLISH, THIS GUIDE FOR GRADES 7, 8, AND 9 BEGINS WITH A COLLECTION OF PAPERS EXPLAINING THE LINGUISTIC APPROACH TO THE TEACHING OF LANGUAGE--(1) "THE CLASSROOM TEACHER AND LINGUISTIC ECLECTICISM" BY A. HOOD ROBERTS,(2) "SOME NOTES' ON LINGUISTICS AND THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH" BY JOSEPH H. FRIEND, (3)"A UNIT ON DIALECTS" BY JAMES F. MCCAMPBELL, AND (4) "TEACHING SYNTAX" BY GEORGE HILLOCKS. UNITS WHICH FOLLOW ARE--(1) DIALECTS, (2) SYNTAX,(3) CHANGE IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE (FOR THE GRADE 9 AVERAGE CURRICULUM) ,(4) FORM CLASSES (MORPHOLOGY) ,(5) DEFINITION AND ETYMOLOGY (FOR THE GRADE 7, AVERAGE CURRICULUM) ,AND (6) THREE UNITS ON SEMANTICS FOR GRADES 7, 8, AND 9. LESSONS IN UNITS CONTAIN OBJECTIVES, SUGGESTED TEACHING PROCEDURES, BIBLIOGRAPHIES FOR TEACHERS, EXERCISES, AND STUDY GUIDES. COPIES OF THE EIGHT UNITS ARE ALSO AVAILABLE (LIMITED SUPPLY) FROM CHARLES C. ROGERS, PROJECT UPGRADE, SCHOOL DISTRICT OF AIKEN COUNTY, P.O. BOX 771, AIKEN, SOUTt CAROLINA 29801, $0.50 PER UNIT. (DL) v.4004, - - CUMENT FILMEDIMOrd THE EUCLID ENGLISH DEMONSTRATIONCENTER PROJECT ENGLISH MATERIALS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEWN, EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY ASRECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION DRIGINATIt* IT.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRERNT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Instructions and Reinforcement Versus a Multifaceted Self Control Procedure on the Modification and Generalization of Behavior in Schizophrenics
    THE EFFECTS OF INSTRUCTIONS AND REINFORCEMENT VERSUS A MULTIFACETED SELF CONTROL PROCEDURE ON THE MODIFICATION AND GENERALIZATION OF BEHAVIOR IN SCHIZOPHRENICS Robert C. Gresen A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements far the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY March 1975 ii ABSTRACT The present investigation examined the treatment efficacy of a multifaceted self control procedure relative to behavior modification and yoked control procedures with chronic, nonparanoid schizophrenics. Further, the potential differential effectiveness of the same proce­ dures, depending upon the experimenter (E) who administered them, was examined. Forty-two subjects were pretested on five dependent measures. Subsequently, each subject was randomly assigned to one of two training Es and to one of the three experimental procedures. Regardless of B and treatment assignment, each subject received four hours of training on two of the five dependent variables- digit symbol and proverb inter­ pretation. After training, the subjeots were posttested using parallel forms of the five dependent measures. Four weeks later, a follow-up assessment was conducted, using a third set of parallel forms. Analysis of the pretest measures and five individual difference variables suggested that the groups were comparable prior to training. Individual analyses of the posttest and follow-up data, however, failed to reveal significant effects due to the E or methods or £ by method interaction. Separate multivariate trend analyses were conducted on each of the five dependent variables. Except for the digit symbol analysis, which may have reflected a rather transitory difference in treatment effectiveness, significant differential trends were not found among the three training methods, between the two training Es, or on the E by method interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch-1 Fundamental Characteristics of Science Technology and Scientists File
    Grad501 Fundamental characteristics of science, technology and scientists: Ch - 1 Scientific thinking skills By Osman YILMAZ, Eastern Mediterranean University Outline: • What is science? • Main features of science • The nature of technology • Fundamental characteristics of scientists What is science? Science is a particular way of understanding the natural world. Science is also said to be a systematic process of seeking or producing knowledge. This process is complicated but in very general terms it involves - observation and problem definition - development of hypothesis, - continuous testing and extensive peer review - development of theories, laws or principles But, at the same time, science benefits from some other human values like curiosity, creativity and imagination, and requires a positive attitude for being efficient and effective in scientific development. Main features of science. • Scientific outcomes are universal. Science assumes that the universe is, as its name implies, a vast single system in which the basic rules are the same everywhere. Knowledge gained from studying one part of the universe is applicable to other parts. • Scientific ideas or conclusions are subject to change, i.e, they are tentative. Science welcomes revision of its outcomes (laws, theories, principles, standards etc) by continuous testing and evaluation, peer review or replication. In principle, any theory can change after disproof attempts and new theories may replace the old ones. Thus, science corrects itself. Plasticity of thought is the very essence of the scientific process. In this sense, science rejects dogmatism. Recall that the "quantum mechanics" replaced the "classical mechanics (Newton's Laws)" for studying the behavior of micro-particles (atoms, electrons etc) at the beginning of this century before which the behavior of all particles (micro- or macro-) were being explained by classical mechanics).
    [Show full text]
  • Recognizing Methods of Persuasion and Becoming a Critical Consumer
    Analyzing Commercials: Recognizing Methods of Persuasion and Becoming a Critical Consumer By Jennifer Lynn Abernethy Introduction It seems as if every day a new piece of technology emerges to make things more accessible to the everyday American, to the everyday citizen of the world. Phones have the ability to surf the Internet, and there is an “app” (it seems) for everything. The click of a button can figuratively take anyone anywhere. My students are used to this world. This closely-connected, remarkably high-tech world that they have grown up in represents a normal progression of technology for them. And as social media sites overshadow face-to-face conversations, phones offer hours upon hours of entertainment, and TV shows are waiting for the viewer to access, the concept of audience has broadened, and the routes to access this audience have multiplied. In order to be an actively analytical member of this audience and therefore evaluate the effect of every gimmick and ploy, my students need the tools to critically analyze the pervasive and persuasive advertisements that bombard them. There are many forms of advertisements: television commercials; print advertisements in newspapers and magazines; online advertisements on social networks or on the sidebars of favorite websites; and the list goes on. Advertisements have become more pervasive in other genres of entertainment since it became possible for the intended audiences to fast forward through commercials or buy subscriptions to radio stations that boast “commercial free” music Therefore, the persuasive techniques of the ads that do make it to the audience must take full advantage of the target.
    [Show full text]
  • Logical Fallacies by Dr
    Logical Fallacies by Dr. Karen Lee, M.F.A., Ph.D. The Writing Center @ Vanguard University of Southern California “Faith and knowledge resting on the hope of eternal life . .” (NIV, Titus 1.2). Version Date: 3.10.06, [email protected], Colossians 2.8 Grateful Acknowledgments • Exercises are briefly excerpted from Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student by Corbett, Edward P.J. and Robert J. Connors. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. (This textbook is used in our upper-division English course, ENG 370: Advanced Rhetoric & Composition.) • Short passages by H.L. Mencken and Herman Melville are briefly excerpted from Dora Smith’s anthology, American Experience: Nonfiction. New York: MacMillan, 1984. Version Date: 3.10.06, [email protected], Colossians 2.8 Introduction Getting to Know Logical Fallacies Version Date: 3.10.06, [email protected], Colossians 2.8 What’s a logical fallacy and why should you care? • It’s poor logic partly consisting of overgeneralizations and assumptions. • The presence of logical fallacies may weaken a writing project. When you’re developing an argument, your points should follow in logical order and make proper conclusions. • When you’re refuting a counterargument (procatalepsis), it’s useful to point out logical fallacies as weak points in your opponent’s argument. Version Date: 3.10.06, [email protected], Colossians 2.8 Logical Fallacies: Several Examples • non sequitor: reasoning doesn’t hold together, "doesn't follow“ • bandwagon: recommends a course of action just because “everyone else” is doing it
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Thinking
    Presenting & debating FS20 Zürich Universität Marie van Loon & Melanie Sarzano Lecture 12 – Critical Thinking 1. What is critical thinking? When we try to defend or argue against a view, there’s always a chance that our reasoning is being affected by cognitive biases, our moods, our preferences or maybe just by lack of experience. Critical thinking is a skill that can help counter these effects. Knowing how to think critically is a fundamental skill you need to do philosophy well, but it’s also a skill that definitely has its use beyond the walls of academia, to say the least. Critical thinking is not only achieved thanks to the ability to produce sound arguments, but also thanks to the ability to spot and avoid faulty reasoning. Thus, the ability to think critically gathers both a set of positive skills, i.e. knowing to how to produce good arguments, and a set of negative skills, i.e. knowing to avoid bad arguments and reasoning mistakes. Below you can find a non-exhaustive list of common informal and formal fallacies as well as a classification of arguments and a list of notions fundamental to knowing how to think critically. 2. Informal fallacies Informal fallacies are fallacies that do not rule out the validity of an argument but that render one’s argument deeply unconvincing. Ad hominem An ‘argument’ said ad hominem is an argument that targets your interlocutor rather than their thesis, in a way which is irrelevant to the consistency or validity of their argument. For example, claiming against your interlocutor’s view on the existence of time is probably invalid because they vote for right wing parties is a claim ad hominem.
    [Show full text]