Gross Workplace Happiness
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Gross Workplace Happiness Kokkorn Klaiyam1 Athiwat Jiawiwatkul2 Even though Thailand went through the worst disaster in the national history, “Great Flood 2011,” what Thais offered to each other at such a difficult time was generosity, sharing, and happiness. The word “Happiness” is implied to human’s feeling and meant differently for different people, measuring happiness thus not an easy task. We cannot measure every cause of happiness. Those who are interested in measuring happiness shall give a clear definition of happiness and explain the process of measuring it. Knowing the small country like the Kingdom of Bhutan drew attention of Thais and other nations on measuring of gross happiness. A former king of Bhutan has put greater emphasis on Gross National Happiness (GNH) than GDP as an indicator of wellbeing and peace among the people since 1972. He announced the “Gross National Happiness” philosophy as the highest goal in developing country, under 4 important policies: (1) economic development, (2) environment preservation, (3) cultural promotion, and (4) good governance. According to the 2005 Bhutan population and housing censuses, it shows that almost all of Bhutanese are happy (96.7%). In addition, there are key indicators of Bhutanese’s gross happiness, which consist of 10 embodiments surveyed annually, that is: (1) mental happiness, which includes health, happiness from material, work and life balance, and relationship, (2) cultural diversity, (3) education, (4) wellbeing, (5) time use and balance, (6) good management, (7) community strength, (8) biological diversity, (9) living standard, and (10) agriculture. Leading academics in many countries agree that Bhutan’s way to measure gross happiness is well studied and researched in both quantitative and qualitative. Today, development requires attention in many ways, including mental condition, environment, justice, and peace. The goal for development should not focus only on economic growth. Many social issues, such as inequality in income distribution, stress, domestic and social violence, alert the world to reconsider development direction and more meaningful indicators. It is realized that having high economic growth rate does not associate with high people’s happiness. 1 Staff of the Database and Information System Development Project for Healthy Organization, supported by Thai Health Promotion Foundation. 2 Lecturer, National Institute for Child and Family Development, Mahidol University, Thailand 1 Therefore, many world institutes have developed key indicators which can compare and reflects happiness of people in the society, such as Happy Planet Index (HPI) by the Center for Wellbeing Studies at New Economic Foundation (NEF). The index, which bases on the concept of wellbeing on the limited amount of natural resource, considers relationship between wellbeing and consumed natural resource. A country that is received a high index number implies to the country that manages natural resource efficiently for its people’s wellbeing. The important indicators are life span, contentment, and ecological footprint3. The 2010 ranking showed that the United States was 114th because the large amount of natural resource was used in spite of the high living standard. Thailand was ranked 41st. In addition, the Institute for Economics and Peace and the Economist Intelligent Unit published “Global Peace Index,” which was intended to measure and compare happiness level of nations and continents by 24 indicators. The index has been initiated since 2007 and continued annually. In 2011, 153 countries participated in the ranking. The happiest country was Iceland, while the unhappiest countries were Sudan, Iraq and Somalia. Thailand was ranked 107th, climbed up 19 places from 126th in 2010. Comparing Thailand with its neighbors in ASEAN, Thailand was higher than Cambodia (115th), Myanmar (133rd), and Philippines (136th). The highest in ASEAN was Malaysia (19th), followed by Singapore (24th), and Vietnam (30th). The causes of Thailand’s low score are crime, human right violation, and internal conflict. In Thailand, the “wellbeing and happiness indicators” was brought in as part of the country’s development in the 8th National Economic and Social Development Plan (NESDP) (1997- 2001), and the 9th NESDP (2002-2006). The plan emphasizes on integration and human-centered development. The achievement was measured by impacts of human development and benefits to living standard of the people in 7 areas: (1) health and nutrition, (2) education, (3) working life, (4) family life, (5) economic growth, poverty, income and welfare distribution, (6) environment and safety, and (7) participatory state. The 10th NESDP (2007-2011) aims toward “peaceful society,” which extends the concept of wellbeing and happiness indicators to “peacefulness indicator” as a tool to evaluate the development impact to the people in Thai society. The key concept of gross national happiness implies to people’s understanding and participation in the country’s mission. But before the country achieves its proper goal and measurement, it takes a long time to learn from the mistake. Since Thailand’s majority population 3 Ecological footprint was first used in 1996 by two community planners from University of British Columbia, Canada. The ecological footprint bases on the fact that all living creatures consume natural resource for surviving. The consumption is similar to a footprint on the world’s ecology. A larger footprint means greater consumption (Green World Foundation, Environment Terms, retrieved from http://www.greenworld.or.th/node/172 on 14 February 2011). 2 is in working age, if we can partly create happiness such as happiness at work, and create a proper indicator. The goal is to raise “gross workplace happiness” at every organization in its own way. The combined results reflect wellbeing and quality of life of people in the nation. Therefore, Happy Workplace Office, under Healthy Organization Promotion Section, Thai Health Promotion Foundation, created the guideline Happy 8 to serve various human needs that are: good health (Happy Body), generosity (Happy Heart), relaxation (Happy Relax), adherence to a religion (Happy Soul), good financial status (Happy Money), knowledge development (Happy Brain), good family (Happy Family), and contented society (Happy Society). The main target is the “people in organizations,” which are important to family, community and society in developing policy, building knowledge, and expanding network for improving quality of life for working people. The happiness of people in organizations creates good impacts to the operation or productivity of the organization, happiness and peace in the family, community and society. Reference Noppadon Kannika, Netnapit Laeiud, and Ponpop Sangthong. From the Bhutan’s Happiness Gauge to a Research of Thai People’s Gross Happiness. Retrieved 11 August 2011 from http://www.abacpollcourses.au.edu/happiness/philo/anop/ABAC_POLL_Model_of_Measurem ent_for_Predicting_the_GDH_in_Thailand.pdf. (in Thai) Patrajit Jumpol Gozzole. (2010). Happiness Measurement. Journal of Economics and Socials 47(3): 34-38. (in Thai) Institute for Economics & Peace. (2011). Global Peace Index 2011. Retrieved December 13,2011,from http://www.visionofhumanity.org/wp- content/uploads/2011/05/2011-GPI-Results-Report-Final.pdf. (in Thai) 3 .