1P1 Alclklelti II RTE[G11 Isitlelrl

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

1P1 AlClKlElTI I I sitiaitiuTsTT RTE[G11 ISITlElRl Tucson Amateur Packet Radio Corporation A Non-Profit Research and Development Corporation_________________ Winter 1997 President’s Corner Issue # 65 What an interesting year 1996 has been and it looks like 1997 is going to be as or more interesting! TAPR met many of it goals for 1996. That of Published by: 1) moving Spread Spectrum issues forward, 2) getting the joint ARRL and Tucson Amateur Packet Radio TAPR DCC off the ground, 3) increasing membership activity, 4) and lots 8987-309 E. Tanque Verde Rd.#337 of other neat projects and concepts. I hope we can keep up with the pace of Tucson. AZ 85749-9399 what is happening. Phone: 817-383-OOCO FAX: 817-566-2544 The big news since last November was that the FCC granted TAPR's New Area Code After May I81 Is 940 request for a Spread Spectrum $TA. This was really great news and we [email protected] already have a number of folks operating under the STA _________ www.tapr.org (http://www.tapr.org/ss/tapr_sta.html). If you want to participate in the Office Hours: STA, just use the on-line application or request one from the office. Tuesday - Friday 9:(X5am-12:00. 3:00-5:00pm Central The sad news 1 have to report is that FreeWave Technologies, Inc. o f Boulder, CO (www.freewave.com), after deciding to sell us their DGR-115 radios at board level for S250 each, decided to cancel the agreement several In This Issue... days after it was announced on the TAPR web page and to the membership Caff for Papers; AMSA T Space Symposkir*n..3 Message from the Editor................... 3 via the Internet list. The units were first mentioned in the last PSR. We TAPR Board of Directors Elections...........4 discussed the issue with FreeWave for three weeks, but were forced to New TAPR Software Librarian.............. 5 finally give up once it was apparent that no solution was possible. This is F6FBBWeb Pages........................5 too bad, since 1 felt that it was an excellent opportunity for both FreeWave New Modem for DSP-93.... ...............5 and TAPR. TAPR would have gotten a radio in the hands of the membership TAC-2 Questions and Answers.............. 6 Multi-Casting............. 7 WfMk. APRS: An Overview and Introduction........11 Look for TAPR at these Upcoming Events APRS Tra cks....... ....................12 m May 1§r%;!897 ... , Dayton HamVention' ‘w 'M m DGPS Tests in Baftmore/WashSngton Area.... 12 %;Sept/Cct" 'ARRL Bsitimwe Area Wf'vm METCON-2 Status Report...... .. .......U ■ ;',v ' Messages IDs: BID. MID and LID...... ... U Packet SLulus Register New V/IN95 & NT Packet Programs.........IS Tucson Amateur Packet Radio Corp. SECOND CLASS North American Digital Systems Directory.... 16 PO Box 51114 POSTAGE PAID AT Packet Radio in Education: Denton,'I X 762116-0114 DENTON. TX. Integration into K-12 Gifted Programs....... 17 FACTOR Mode Demodulator Test Results..... 13 ADDRESS CORRECTION REQUESTED S3 PACSATXMTR mod to TAPR-2 TNC$...... 20 Wireless Digital Communications: Design a id Theory................... 21 Amateur Ratio Invalidates interne! Patents.... 22 Application o f the DAS.................... 22 Organizational News........... 23 TAPR Software library Update.............27 rteg.wia' Digital Organizations List..—.... 28 Software Library..........................30 Winter 1997 - Issue #65 Page i . Presidents Comer, continued..._______________________ Entire contents Copyright 3? 1997 Tucvin Amateur Packet Radio and FreeWave would have received high quality technical Corp. Unless otherwise indicated, explicit percussion is glinted to feedback for future implementation. I know there was a r e p la c e any materials appearing herein for non-commercial Amateur publications provided that credit is given to both the author and TAPR, lot of interest in this radio and 1 hope that all those who along with UtcTAPR phono number (940-3S3-UUIXJ). Other reproduction showed excitement will not let this setback affect their is prohibited without written permission from TAPR. thinking and plans about doing new technology. Opinions expressed aie those of the authors and r.ot necessarily those o f TAPR, the Board of Directors, Officers, or the Editor. Acceptance of It is becoming apparent that Part 15 manufacturers are advertising docs not constitute endorsement, by TAPR, of the products seeing amateur radio operations in our bands, using their advertised. Spread Spectrum technology, as a threat. I don’t believe Postmaster Send address cbacees to TAPR. P.O. Box Si 114. Demon, that getting equipment from these sources in any type of TX. 76206-0114. Packet Staras Register (ISSN 1052-3626, USPS 005- 419) is published quarterly by iheTucv.m Am2tear Packet Radio Corpora­ recognized group purchase is going to be possible in the tion, 1418 Ridgecrest, Denton. TX 76205. Membership in Tucson future. The Part 15 coalition, which Proxim, Metricom, Amateur Packet Radio, including a subscription to Packet Statu.\ Register, and others arc involved with, have stated that they plan to is $20.00 per year in the U.S. and possessions, of which S12.C0 is allocated to Parke: Status Register. Membership is S20.CO Ir. Canada and Mexico, fight the rules changes as set forth under RM-8737. They and S25.00 elsewhere, payable in U.S. fund*. Membership and Packet want Part 97 operations on bands where they arc selling Staats Register cat toot be separated. Sccond-clzsx postage paid nt Dentco. equipment to be limited to the same technical TX requirements they currently have to operate under: low PSR Editor power, almost no antennas, etc. While the engineers and Bob Hansen. N2GDE P.O. Box 1902, Elmira. N.Y. 14502-1902 others at various companies that we have been discussing Internet: psri&lapr.org group purchases with are enthusiastic about the Advertising: possibility of getting equipment to us, by the lime the Contact the TAPR office. decision reaches higher levels, resistance begins to build. TAPR Officers: In addition, now that the FreeWave purchase has fallen President C-reg Jones. WD5IVD '/ice President T through, is it a good thing for amateur radio that we work John Aikermann, AG9V Secretary Sieve Stron, N8C\'J A on purchases like this? Some at the FCC already see Treasurer Jim N&aly.WASLHS P amateur radio as an obsolete entity. Tin's could lie one TAPR Board of Directors: R reason for the suggested Part 5 rule changes. They sec Bo£td.M;!mei Ism Interns; amateur radio not providing the necessary technology Greg Jone3, W05IVD 1997 \[email protected] development, so the answer is to change the Part 5 rules John Koster, Y.SDOD 1997 \s9([email protected]»rg MeJWhhten, KOPFX 1S97 so more commercial entities can test their RF devices. [email protected] John Ack&rmann. AG9V1998 [email protected] Would we be walking into a pit if we go out and get lots Garry McLsrncfi, V53JF 1993 [email protected] of Part 15 equipment operational on our bands. The easy Jim Neely. WA5LHS 1598 [email protected] answer on the part of the FCC would be to collapse Part Sieve Bide, N7h?R 1939 [email protected] 97 into Part 15. If all wc do is make part 15 equipment Ecb Hansen, N2GDE 1939 n2gde©tapr.o'g operational, why allow part 97 operations? I think it is Gary Hacge, N4CHV 1959 [email protected] Date Is exp-ration of term cn 3oard of Directors. even more important now to stress the experimental and Thu Tucv.m Amatsui Packet Radio Corporation is a non-profit »cien- developmental nature of our hobby and to press the point tilic research and development corporation [Section 5Ul{c)(.>) of the U.S. on several fronts. While getting Part 15 equipment tax code]. Contributions arc deductible ut the extent allowed by U.S. tax laws. TAPR i% chartered in the Slate o: Arizona for the purpose of operational was a solution to several short term issues, 1 designing and developing new systems for digital radio communication don’t believe (now) that it would have been a good iD the Amateur Radio Service, and turdivseminating information required direction in, say, two years. Would have getting the during, and obtained from, such research. FreeWave radios into the amateur market via TAPR set a Article submission deadlines Fur upcoming issues: trend that we could not recover from? I don’t know, but Spring 1997 March 15,1997 it might be fortunate that FreeWave decided that they Summer 1997 June 15,1997 didn’t want to sell u$ radios without additional Fall 1997 September 15,1997 stipulations. Something serious to think about. TAPR can Winter 1998 December 15,1997 now focus on getting amateur technology into the amateur Submission Guidelines: hobby and to that extent, several projects have been TAPR is always interested in receiving information and articles for publication. If you have an idea for an article you would like to see. or started and will be pushed to completion. you. or someone you know, is doing something that would interest digital Communicators, please conlact the editor so tliat your work can he shared On another topic— I have not mentioned the following with the Amateur community. yet in the FSK, because it was still very tenuous and The preferred format for articles a plain ASCII text; the preferred considered to be in the wait and see stage for several graphic formal-; are I IPOLor PCX. However, weean accept many popiilnr months. Now that it looks like we might gel funded, let wind processor and graphic formais. All submissions on diskeite should me outline what has happened. This last August I Hew to be formatted for MS-DOS. Freemont, CA and spent several days at Dewaync P a ge 2 Packet Status Register Winter 1997 - Issue 065 President's Comer, continued..
Recommended publications
  • Implementing MACA and Other Useful Improvements to Amateur Packet Radio for Throughput and Capacity

    Implementing MACA and Other Useful Improvements to Amateur Packet Radio for Throughput and Capacity

    Implementing MACA and Other Useful Improvements to Amateur Packet Radio for Throughput and Capacity John Bonnett – KK6JRA / NCS820 Steven Gunderson – CMoLR Project Manager TAPR DCC – 15 Sept 2018 1 Contents • Introduction – Communication Methodology of Last Resort (CMoLR) • Speed & Throughput Tests – CONNECT & UNPROTO • UX.25 – UNPROTO AX.25 • Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (MACA) – Hidden Terminals • Directed Packet Networks • Brevity – Directory Services • Trunked Packet • Conclusion 2 Background • Mission County – Proverbial: – Coastline, Earthquake Faults, Mountains & Hills, and Missions – Frequent Natural Disasters • Wildfires, Earthquakes, Floods, Slides & Tsunamis – Extensive Packet Networks • EOCs – Fire & Police Stations – Hospitals • Legacy 1200 Baud Packet Networks • Outpost and Winlink 2000 Messaging Software 3 Background • Mission County – Proverbial: – Coastline, Earthquake Faults, Mountains & Hills, and Missions – Frequent Natural Disasters • Wildfires, Earthquakes, Floods, Slides & Tsunamis – Extensive Packet Networks • EOCs – Fire & Police Stations – Hospitals • Legacy 1200 Baud Packet Networks • Outpost and Winlink 2000 Messaging Software • Community Emergency Response Teams: – OK Drills – Neighborhood Surveys OK – Triage Information • CERT Form #1 – Transmit CERT Triage Data to Public Safety – Situational Awareness 4 Background & Objectives (cont) • Communication Methodology of Last Resort (CMoLR): – Mission County Project: 2012 – 2016 – Enable Emergency Data Comms from CERT to Public Safety 5 Background &
  • Kenwood TH-D74A/E Operating Tips

    Kenwood TH-D74A/E Operating Tips

    1 Copyrights for this Manual JVCKENWOOD Corporation shall own all copyrights and intellectual properties for the product and the manuals, help texts and relevant documents attached to the product or the optional software. A user is required to obtain approval from JVCKENWOOD Corporation, in writing, prior to redistributing this document on a personal web page or via packet communication. A user is prohibited from assigning, renting, leasing or reselling the document. JVCKENWOOD Corporation does not warrant that quality and functions described in this manual comply with each user’s purpose of use and, unless specifically described in this manual, JVCKENWOOD Corporation shall be free from any responsibility for any defects and indemnities for any damages or losses. Software Copyrights The title to and ownership of copyrights for software, including but not limited to the firmware and optional software that may be distributed individually, are reserved for JVCKENWOOD Corporation. The firmware shall mean the software which can be embedded in KENWOOD product memories for proper operation. Any modifying, reverse engineering, copying, reproducing or disclosing on an Internet website of the software is strictly prohibited. A user is required to obtain approval from JVCKENWOOD Corporation, in writing, prior to redistributing this manual on a personal web page or via packet communication. Furthermore, any reselling, assigning or transferring of the software is also strictly prohibited without embedding the software in KENWOOD product memories. Copyrights for recorded Audio The software embedded in this transceiver consists of a multiple number of and individual software components. Title to and ownership of copyrights for each software component is reserved for JVCKENWOOD Corporation and the respective bona fide holder.
  • Examining Ambiguities in the Automatic Packet Reporting System

    Examining Ambiguities in the Automatic Packet Reporting System

    Examining Ambiguities in the Automatic Packet Reporting System A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Electrical Engineering by Kenneth W. Finnegan December 2014 © 2014 Kenneth W. Finnegan ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP TITLE: Examining Ambiguities in the Automatic Packet Reporting System AUTHOR: Kenneth W. Finnegan DATE SUBMITTED: December 2014 REVISION: 1.2 COMMITTEE CHAIR: Bridget Benson, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Electrical Engineering COMMITTEE MEMBER: John Bellardo, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Computer Science COMMITTEE MEMBER: Dennis Derickson, Ph.D. Department Chair, Electrical Engineering iii ABSTRACT Examining Ambiguities in the Automatic Packet Reporting System Kenneth W. Finnegan The Automatic Packet Reporting System (APRS) is an amateur radio packet network that has evolved over the last several decades in tandem with, and then arguably beyond, the lifetime of other VHF/UHF amateur packet networks, to the point where it is one of very few packet networks left on the amateur VHF/UHF bands. This is proving to be problematic due to the loss of institutional knowledge as older amateur radio operators who designed and built APRS and other AX.25-based packet networks abandon the hobby or pass away. The purpose of this document is to collect and curate a sufficient body of knowledge to ensure the continued usefulness of the APRS network, and re-examining the engineering decisions made during the network's evolution to look for possible improvements and identify deficiencies in documentation of the existing network. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures vii 1 Preface 1 2 Introduction 3 2.1 History of APRS .
  • Mind the Uppercase Letters

    Mind the Uppercase Letters

    Integration of APRS Network with SDI Tomasz Kubik1,2, Wojciech Penar1 1 Wroclaw University of Technology 2 Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences Abstract. From the point of view of large information systems designers the most important thing is a certain abstraction enabling integration of heterogeneous solutions. Abstraction is associated with the standardization of protocols and interfaces of appropriate services. Behind this façade any device or sensor system may be hidden, even humans recording their measurements. This study presents selected topics and details related to two families of standards developed by OGC: OpenLS and SWE. It also dis- cusses the technical details of a solution built to intercept radio messages broadcast in the APRS network with telemetric information and weather conditions as payload. The basic assumptions and objectives of a prototype system that integrates elements of the APRS network and SWE are given. Keywords: SWE, OpenLS, APRS, SDI, web services 1. Introduction Modern measuring devices are no longer seen as tools for qualitative and quantitative measurements only. They have become parts of highly special- ized solutions, used for data acquisition and post-processing, offering hardware and software interfaces for communication. In the construction of these solutions the latest technologies from various fields are employed, including optics, precision mechanics, satellite and information technolo- gies. Thanks to the Internet and mobile technologies, several architectural and communication barriers caused by the wiring and placement of the sensors have been broken. Only recently the LBS (Location-Based Services) entered the field of IT. These are information services, available from mo- bile devices via mobile networks, giving possibility of utilization of a mobile This work was supported in part by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Edu- cation with funds for research for the years 2010-2013.
  • Linux Amateur Radio AX.25 HOWTO

    Linux Amateur Radio AX.25 HOWTO

    Linux Amateur Radio AX.25 HOWTO Jeff Tranter, VE3ICH [email protected] v2.0, 19 September 2001 The Linux operating system is perhaps the only operating system in the world that can boast native and standard support for the AX.25 packet radio protocol utilized by Amateur Radio operators worldwide. This document describes how to install and configure this support. Linux Amateur Radio AX.25 HOWTO Table of Contents 1. Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 1.1. Changes from the previous version...................................................................................................1 1.2. Where to obtain new versions of this document...............................................................................1 1.3. Other related documentation.............................................................................................................1 2. The Packet Radio Protocols and Linux........................................................................................................3 2.1. How it all fits together......................................................................................................................3 3. The AX.25/NET/ROM/ROSE software components...................................................................................5 3.1. Finding the kernel, tools and utility packages..................................................................................5 3.1.1. The
  • (Pdf) Download

    (Pdf) Download

    1 2 • Winlink programs group: “Official Group to support Winlink Team developed Products, both user and gateway software” • Winlink_for_EmComm: “Supports the discussion and use of the Winlink network and Winlink products for emergency or event support communications. ” 3 4 5 6 7 8 1. Digital voice radio works in exactly the same fashion, except that it deals with audio input, not text. 2. PACKET-1200 uses frequency shift keying (FSK) modulation with a 1000Hz shift and 1200 Bd symbol rate. There are a number of variations for PACKET-1200, including a PSK-based satellite version. PACKET-1200 can be seen in the VHF and UHF bands with indirect FM Modulation. FM bandwidth is 12 kHz. 3. See https://www.sigidwiki.com/wiki/PACKET#PACKET-1200 9 10 11 12 • That’s the packet sound • Each individual packet! • Carrier detect • ”NAK” = “NO ACKNOWLEDGEMENT” – resend • ”ACK” – “ACKNOWLEDGEMENT” – send the next packet • Too many retries, and the sending station stops sending (connection is dropped) • Breaking the message into small packets makes it easier to send a large message. But ALL packets MUST be received in order for the message to be read, 13 • One bye = 8 bits = 1 alphanumeric character • See https://tapr.org/pub_ax25.html • FLAG: start and end of each packet • Address: sender, receiver, and the path in between • Control (CTRL): The control field is responsible for identifying the type of “frame” being sent, and is also used to convey commands and responses from one end of the link to the other in order to maintain proper link control • The length of DATA is ≤ 255, and is set by the use.
  • Abkürzungs-Liste ABKLEX

    Abkürzungs-Liste ABKLEX

    Abkürzungs-Liste ABKLEX (Informatik, Telekommunikation) W. Alex 1. Juli 2021 Karlsruhe Copyright W. Alex, Karlsruhe, 1994 – 2018. Die Liste darf unentgeltlich benutzt und weitergegeben werden. The list may be used or copied free of any charge. Original Point of Distribution: http://www.abklex.de/abklex/ An authorized Czechian version is published on: http://www.sochorek.cz/archiv/slovniky/abklex.htm Author’s Email address: [email protected] 2 Kapitel 1 Abkürzungen Gehen wir von 30 Zeichen aus, aus denen Abkürzungen gebildet werden, und nehmen wir eine größte Länge von 5 Zeichen an, so lassen sich 25.137.930 verschiedene Abkür- zungen bilden (Kombinationen mit Wiederholung und Berücksichtigung der Reihenfol- ge). Es folgt eine Auswahl von rund 16000 Abkürzungen aus den Bereichen Informatik und Telekommunikation. Die Abkürzungen werden hier durchgehend groß geschrieben, Akzente, Bindestriche und dergleichen wurden weggelassen. Einige Abkürzungen sind geschützte Namen; diese sind nicht gekennzeichnet. Die Liste beschreibt nur den Ge- brauch, sie legt nicht eine Definition fest. 100GE 100 GBit/s Ethernet 16CIF 16 times Common Intermediate Format (Picture Format) 16QAM 16-state Quadrature Amplitude Modulation 1GFC 1 Gigabaud Fiber Channel (2, 4, 8, 10, 20GFC) 1GL 1st Generation Language (Maschinencode) 1TBS One True Brace Style (C) 1TR6 (ISDN-Protokoll D-Kanal, national) 247 24/7: 24 hours per day, 7 days per week 2D 2-dimensional 2FA Zwei-Faktor-Authentifizierung 2GL 2nd Generation Language (Assembler) 2L8 Too Late (Slang) 2MS Strukturierte
  • Virginia Tech Ground Station TNC Interfacing Tutorial

    Virginia Tech Ground Station TNC Interfacing Tutorial

    Virginia Tech Ground Station TNC Interfacing Tutorial Zach Leffke, MSEE ([email protected]) Research Associate Aerospace Systems Lab Ted & Karyn Hume Center for National Security and Technology 3/23/2018 Agenda VHF/UHF • TNC Connection Overview 3.0m Dish Antennas • KISS Protocol 4.5m Dish • AX.25/HDLC Protocol • AFSK/FSK/GMSK Modulation • ….System Review…. • OSI Stack • Remote Connection Students assembling • VTGS Remote Interface 4.5m Dish • Summary Deployable Space@VT Ops Center 1.2m Dish GNU Radio at work (students preparing for 2016 RockSat Launch) 3/23/2018 TNC Interfacing Tutorial 2 Preview of the Finale…………… Primary Ground Station - UPEC Host Computer Client Software TNC TC SW TNC SW SoundCard AX.25 AX.25 KISS Interface KISS HDLC RADIO Localhost DATA FM TCP TCP AFSK D to A LOOPBACK IN RF Spacecraft IP IP IP IP MAC C&DH Audio Audio Comput HOST OS NETWORK RADIO er TC SW FIRMWARE AX.25 AX.25 KISS HDLC KISS AFSK SERIAL Remote Ground Station - VTGS FM SERIAL RF Host Computer Telecommand (TC) TTL Serial Software TNC TNC SW SoundCard AX.25 INTERNET KISS Interface HDLC RADIO DATA FM TCP AFSK D to A HOST IN RF OS IP NET VPN CONNECTION MAC Audio Audio Radio 3/23/2018 TNC Interfacing Tutorial 3 TNC Connection Overview TNC Implementation Types Hardware Radio DATA Jack Specific Interface Examples 3/23/2018 TNC Interfacing Tutorial 4 TNC Implementation Summary • Multiple implementation options exist • Hardware TNC Ground Station • Software TNC + Sound Card • Software Defined Radio Receiver • Software Defined Radio Transceiver • Hybrid SDR RX / HW Radio TX implementations 3/23/2018 TNC Interfacing Tutorial 5 Hardware Radios – Common for Satellite 3/23/2018 TNC Interfacing Tutorial 6 Hardware TNCs 3/23/2018 TNC Interfacing Tutorial 7 Radio Sound Card Interfaces • Good ones offer optical isolation (optocouplers).
  • Softmac – Flexible Wireless Research Platform

    Softmac – Flexible Wireless Research Platform

    SoftMAC – Flexible Wireless Research Platform Michael Neufeld, Jeff Fifield, Christian Doerr, Anmol Sheth and Dirk Grunwald Dept. of Computer Science University of Colorado, Boulder Boulder, CO 80309-0430 November 4, 2005 Abstract lision avoidance protocols for that network influenced the design of Ethernet. Contributions by researchers interested Discontent with the traditional network protocol stack ar- in packet radio have greatly influenced protocol designs of chitecture has been steadily increasing as new network tech- existing products. For example, the RTS/CTS mechanism nologies and applications demand a greater degree of flexi- used in the 802.11 networking standard was influenced by bility and “end to end” information than a strictly layered the MACA protocol proposed by Phil Karn [1]. structure permits. Software-defined radio (SDR) systems Recently, most of the experimentation in wireless net- have prompted some rethinking of the network stack, and working has used commodity components such as 802.11b schemes have been presented that attempt to take advan- networkingcards. This has occurred for a numberof reasons tage of the opportunities afforded by these flexible radio – these commodity networking cards are inexpensive, do not systems. However, evaluation of these schemes has largely require a license to operate, and offer good performance. taken place only in simulation or on small testbeds. In or- Furthermore there are a wealth of interesting computer sys- der to seriously evaluate the utility and efficacy of architec- tems problems facing wireless networking that occur above tures and heuristics that take advantage of SDR systems it the physical and MAC layers. Using these commodity cards is essential to construct and test these systems “in the wild,” allows researchers to build systems to investigate these prob- i.e.
  • Marc 2020.08.13

    Marc 2020.08.13

    Packet Radio Murray Amateur Radio Club (MARC) Jan L. Peterson (KD7ZWV) What is it? u Packet Radio is a digital communications mode where data is sent in ”packets.” u So what are packets? u Packets are discrete collections of data, typically called “datagrams”, that have assorted headers and trailers added to handle things like addressing, routing, and data integrity. u I’ve never heard of such a thing? u Sure you have... you’re using it right now. The Internet uses packet technology, and if you are using Wi-Fi, you are already using a form of packet radio! History u Radio is essentially a broadcast medium... many or all nodes are connected to the same network. u In the early 1970s, Norman Abramson of the University of Hawaii developed the ALOHAnet protocol to enable sharing of this medium. u Work done on ALOHAnet was instrumental in the development of Ethernet in the mid-to-late 1970s, including the choice of the CSMA mechanism for sharing the channel. u In the mid-1970s, DARPA created a system called PRNET in the bay area to experiment with ARPANET protocols over packet radio. History u In 1978, amateurs in Canada started experimenting with transmitting ASCII data over VHF using home-built hardware. u In 1980, the Vancouver Area Digital Communications Group started producing commercial hardware to facilitate this... these were the first Terminal Node Controllers (TNCs). u The FCC then authorized US amateurs to send digital ASCII data over VHF, also in 1980, including the facility for “digipeaters” or digital repeaters. u This started rolling out in San Francisco in late 1980 with a system called AMPRNet.
  • Implementation of a Communication Protocol for Cubestar Master Thesis

    Implementation of a Communication Protocol for Cubestar Master Thesis

    UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Department of Physics Implementation of a communication protocol for CubeSTAR Master thesis Markus Alexander Grønstad July, 2010 Abstract This thesis describes the process of implementing the software part of a communication sub-system for a student built satellite (CubeSat). The im- plementation consist of a communication protocol in the data link layer that utilizes AX.25 frames for communicating with a ground station based on am- ateur radio equipment. The development and usage of this communication protocol are based on data communication theory, link budget calculations, efficiency and availability analyzes together with practical tests. The steps in how this software has been developed and evaluated are described, and can be useful for other project that could benefit from this communication pro- tocol. Source code listings are included. The reader should be familiar with communication theory, data communication, programming and electronics. ii Acknowledgement Some fantastic years at the University have come to an end, and a long journey as an academic ambassador has started. In my B.Sc. and M.Sc. degree I have explored and studied the fundamentals of technology that always have fascinated me. My masters project started one year ago at the Department of Physics. The opportunity to combine several interesting fields as digital communication, programming and electronics made this project really interesting for me. It has been highly enjoyable to see the results from practical implementations of theory in this project, and having the final project goal of a functional satellite. I would like to thank associate professor Torfinn Lindem for the opportu- nity to take this masters project.
  • Santa Clara County Enhanced BBS Implementation Guide

    Santa Clara County Enhanced BBS Implementation Guide

    County Packet Network System Description Prepared for: County Packet Committee Santa Clara County RACES Author: Jim Oberhofer KN6PE Date: May 2009 Vision: V0.5, WORK IN PROGRESS County Packet System Description Santa Clara County RACES Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................... 1 2 REQUIREMENTS.............................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 IN GENERAL ................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 ASSUMPTIONS .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.3 PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS.................................................................................................. 4 3 SYSTEM OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 IN GENERAL ................................................................................................................................. 5 3.2 CITY/AGENCY SPECIFICS ............................................................................................................