DOCSLIB.ORG

SJR : Scientific Journal Rankings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SJR : Scientific Journal Rankings Journal Ranking - Anthropology Impact Factor/ Total Cites Citable Docs. Cites / Doc. Title SSCI/SCI ISSN SJR H index Country 5 Year IF (3years) (3years) (2years) 1 American Journal of Physical Anthropology 2.481/2.851 SSCI/SCIE 10968644 Q1 1.221 67 1,547 583 2.24 United States 2 Annual Review of Anthropology 2.237/2.798 SSCI 00846570 Q1 1.263 59 232 77 2.54 United States 3 Current Anthropology 2.740/2.788 SSCI 15375382 Q1 1.045 50 494 203 2.54 United States 4 American Journal of Human Biology 2.335/2.389 SSCI/SCIE 15206300 Q1 0.876 45 745 311 2.42 United States 5 Public Culture 0.690/1.070 SSCI 15278018 Q1 0.889 39 96 82 0.9 United States 6 American Anthropologist 1.398/1.748 SSCI 15481433 Q1 1.193 38 196 140 1.32 United States 7 Human Ecology 1.361/2.174 SSCI 03007839 Q1 0.746 35 392 176 1.48 United States 8 Cultural Anthropology 2.490/3.045 SSCI 08867356 Q1 4.005 31 234 72 2.96 United States 9 American Ethnologist 1.648/1.885 SSCI 00940496 Q1 1.814 30 258 134 2 United States 10 International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 1.085/1.091 SSCI 10991212 Q1 0.499 28 183 179 0.96 United Kingdom 11 Journal of Cultural Heritage 1.176/1.281 SCIE 12962074 Q1 0.512 26 265 201 1.32 France 12 Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 1.098/1.060 SSCI 13590987 Q1 1.128 25 209 147 1.36 United Kingdom 13 Journal of Peasant Studies 5.805/3.636 SSCI 03066150 Q1 2.645 22 591 113 6.04 United Kingdom 14 Anthrozoos 1.000/1.419 SSCI/SCIE 08927936 Q1 0.383 22 119 76 1.32 United States 15 Anthropology and Education Quarterly 0.386/0.598 SSCI 15481492 Q2 0.323 22 45 66 0.55 United States 16 Collegium Antropologicum 0.414/0.572 SSCI 03506134 Q2 0.313 21 653 980 0.54 Croatia 17 Cultural Studies 0.523/0.856 SSCI 14664348 Q2 0.271 21 71 123 0.63 United Kingdom 18 Critique of Anthropology 0.757/0.776 SSCI 0308275X Q1 0.647 20 60 60 1.15 United Kingdom 19 Cross-Cultural Research 0.667/1.234 SSCI 15523578 Q1 0.43 20 64 54 0.81 United States 20 Anthropological Theory 0.880/1.640 SSCI 14634996 Q1 1.627 19 81 69 0.92 United Kingdom 21 Anthropological Science 1.042/1.133 SCIE 13488570 Q1 0.724 18 69 64 1.11 Japan 22 Journal of Anthropological Research 0.875/0.864 SSCI 00917710 Q1 0.561 18 57 55 1.09 United States 23 Journal of Material Culture 0.395/0.874 SSCI 13591835 Q2 0.286 18 48 65 0.5 United Kingdom Impact Factor/ Total Cites Citable Docs. Cites / Doc. Title SSCI/SCI ISSN SJR H index Country 5 Year IF (3years) (3years) (2years) 24 Ethos 0.900/1.445 SSCI 00912131 Q1 0.75 17 80 76 0.85 United States 25 Anthropological Quarterly 0.730/0.837 SSCI 15341518 Q1 0.415 17 72 106 0.78 United States 26 Asian Perspectives NA/NA N 15358283 Q2 0.349 16 12 31 0.25 United States 27 Arctic Anthropology 0.212/0.520 SSCI 00666939 Q2 0.298 13 21 50 0.27 United States 28 Ethnos 0.660/1.000 SSCI 1469588X Q1 0.562 12 63 71 0.7 United States 29 Field Methods 0.551/1.681 SSCI 1525822X Q2 0.343 12 69 71 0.76 United States 30 Oceania 0.394/0.523 SSCI 00298077 Q2 0.314 12 22 51 0.32 Australia 31 Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences NA/NA SSCI/SCIE 18669565 Q1 0.789 9 98 69 1 Germany 32 African Studies Review 0.465/0.711 SSCI 00020206 Q1 0.5 9 45 67 0.5 United States 33 Journal of Evolutionary Psychology NA/NA N 17892082 Q1 0.431 9 78 74 0.78 Hungary 34 Mankind Quarterly NA/NA N 00252344 Q2 0.311 9 31 54 0.61 United States 35 Social Anthropology NA/NA N 14698676 Q2 0.273 9 65 101 0.62 United Kingdom 36 Ethnography 0.551/1.220 SSCI 17412714 Q1 0.525 8 81 71 0.63 United Kingdom 37 Journal of Anthropological Sciences 1.792/1.746 SSCI 18274765 Q1 0.452 8 58 49 1.31 Italy 38 Australian Journal of Anthropology 0.919/0.744 SSCI 10358811 Q1 0.388 8 41 66 0.72 Australia 39 Anthropology Today NA/NA N 0268540X Q1 0.368 7 62 89 0.51 United Kingdom 40 Anthropological Forum 0.577/0.377 SSCI 14692902 Q2 0.35 7 21 42 0.59 United States 41 Journal of Ethnobiology 0.581/1.304 SSCI/SCIE 02780771 Q2 0.287 7 40 49 0.59 United States 42 Ethnomusicology NA/NA N 00141836 Q2 0.262 7 29 52 0.35 United States 43 Visual Studies NA/NA N 14725878 Q1 0.438 6 64 58 1.36 United Kingdom 44 Southern African Humanities NA/NA N 16815564 Q2 0.283 6 22 30 0.79 South Africa Journal of International Migration and 45 NA/NA N 14883473 Q2 0.264 6 36 68 0.3 Netherlands Integration 46 African Studies 0.531/0.472 SSCI 14692872 Q1 0.496 4 42 67 0.65 South Africa 47 Journal of Eastern African Studies 0.362/0.539 SSCI 17531063 Q1 0.447 4 43 99 0.37 United Kingdom 48 Horizontes Antropologicos NA/NA N 01047183 Q2 0.281 4 17 76 0.24 Brazil 49 Family Science NA/NA N 19424639 Q2 0.307 3 19 43 0.44 United Kingdom Impact Factor/ Total Cites Citable Docs. Cites / Doc. Title SSCI/SCI ISSN SJR H index Country 5 Year IF (3years) (3years) (2years) Focaal-Journal of Global and Historical 50 NA/NA N 15585263 Q1 0.605 2 11 26 0.42 Netherlands Anthropology Rank Indicators: Impact Factor: It is the average number of times articles from the journal published in the past two years have been cited in the Journal Citation Report year. 5-Year IF (5-Year Impact Factor): It is the average number of times articles from the journal published in the past five years have been cited in the Journal Citation Report year. SSCI/SCIE (Social Science Citation Index/ Science Citation Index Expanded ): "SSCI" means that the journal is included in the SSCI, "SCIE" means that the journal is included in the SCIE, and "N" indicates that the journal is not included in the SSCI or SCIE. ISSN: International Standard Serial Number SJR (SCImago Journal Rank): It is a measure of journal's impact, influence or prestige. It expresses the average number of weighted citations received in the selected year by the documents published in the journal in the three previous years. SJR Quatile: Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4 H index: It expressed the journal's number of articles (h) that have received at least h citations over the whole period. Total Cites (3 years): It expresses the number of citations in the selected year by a journal to the documents published in the three previous years. Citable Docs (3 years): It expresses the number of citable documents published by a journal in the three previous years (selected year documents are excluded). Cites/Doc. (2 years): It expresses the average citation per document in a 2 year period. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anthropology and Smoke, Anthropological Forum, 28(2): 107-115
    PRE-COPYEDITED VERSION — PUBLISHED AS Denis, Simone and Yasmine Musharbash, 2018. Anthropology and Smoke, Anthropological Forum, 28(2): 107-115. Downloaded from http://www.anthropologicalforum.net COPYRIGHT All rights held by DENIS, Simone and MUSHARBASH, Yasmine. You need to get the authors’ permission for uses other than teaching and personal research. Anthropology and Smoke Simone Dennis1 and Yasmine Musharbash2 1. College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University. 2. Department of Anthropology, The University of Sydney. Abstract: In this introductory paper, we contemplate both a variety of anthropological approaches to smoke and how analyses of smoke—as object, material, phenomenon, practice, or political fact— might contribute to anthropological knowledge. We consider these questions in and through the themes cross-cutting this collection, including: the sensuous aspects of smoke (especially in the olfactory, visual and haptic relations it occasions, entails and denies); the politics of smoke (in particular regard to climate change, public health, and Indigenous knowledge); smoke’s temporal dimensions (from the human mastery of fire via industrial chimneys to vaping e-cigarettes); and its ritual functions (encapsulating transition par excellence, curing ills, placating spirits, and marking time). We conclude by pondering smoke’s inherent capacity to escape the bounds we might set for it, including the imposition of highly politicised spatial, temporal, and intellectual constraints. Keywords: smoke, air, politics,
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional History, Social Science, and Brown V. Board of Education 1954–1964
    CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY, SOCIAL SCIENCE, AND BROWN V. BOARD OF EDUCATION 1954–1964 RAYMOND WOLTERS PART II: THE CONTINUING CONTROVERSY he segregationists’ counterattack on the Brown ruling and its historical and social science underpinnings was not limited to courtroom battles. Ever since Brown they Thad also challenged the prevailing public opinion about school desegregation. After Stell v. Savannah they redoubled these efforts. Henry E. Garrett and Wesley Critz George often wrote for general audiences, and two especially gifted writers, James J. Kilpatrick and Carleton Putnam, also came to the defense of segregation. From the moment of the Brown decision, Kilpatrick regarded desegregation as “jurisprudence gone mad.” He thought the Supreme Court had ignored eight decades of legal precedents and willfully disregarded the original un- derstanding of the Fourteenth Amendment. Since the justices had interpreted the Constitution “to suit their own gauzy concepts of sociology,” Kilpatrick recommended that the South use every possible legal means to circumvent desegregation. “Let us pledge ourselves to litigate this thing for fifty years,” he wrote. “If one remedial law is ruled invalid, then let us try another; and if the second is ruled invalid, then let us enact a third…If it be said now that the South is flouting the law, let it be said to the high court, You taught us how.”1 In an extraordinary series of editorials published in the Richmond News Leader in 1955, Kilpatrick resurrected the Jeffersonian idea of interposition as a way to stop abuses of federal power. When a Federalist Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, in apparent disregard of states’ rights and of the First Amendment’s prohibition of laws that abridged freedom of speech, James Madison and Thomas Jefferson prepared protests known as the Virginia and Kentucky Resolves.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface My Years with the Pioneer Fund by Harry F. Weyher President
    Preface My Years with the Pioneer Fund by Harry F. Weyher President, The Pioneer Fund On 22 November 1994 ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings was replete with somber voices speaking of a small penis being a "sign of superior intelligence," "eradicating inferior people," arresting blacks solely because of skin color, race superiority, and mentally ill Jews. This voice-over was spiced with references to Hitler and scenes of emaciated victims in Nazi death camps.1 I watched this broadcast with more than usual interest, because I was president of the foundation which was the subject of the broadcast, the Pioneer Fund. Fearing such tabloid treatment, I had refused repeated invitations from ABC to appear on tape for the program.2 My fears were justified. What I saw was a grotesque distortion, akin to what one used to see in fun house mirrors. ii The Science of Human Diversity A History of the Pioneer Fund The ABC broadcast was one of an endless series of attacks on Pioneer and the scientists whom it has funded, dating back almost 50 years, most often by making baseless charges of "Nazism" or "racism," thus sometimes inciting student unrest or faculty reaction. The following also has happened to Pioneer and these scientists: One scientist had to be accompanied by an armed guard on his own campus, as well as guarded in his home. Another scientist was required by the university to teach his classes by closed circuit television, supposedly in order to prevent a riot breaking out in his class. Several scientists had university and other speaking engagements canceled or interrupted by gangs of students or outside toughs.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaged Anthropology, Diversity and Dilemmas
    Current Anthropology Volume 51 Supplement 2 October 2010 Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas Leslie C. Aiello Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas: Wenner-Gren Symposium Supplement 2 S201 Setha M. Low and Sally Engle Merry Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas: An Introduction to Supplement 2 S203 Ida Susser The Anthropologist as Social Critic: Working toward a More Engaged Anthropology S227 Barbara Rose Johnston Social Responsibility and the Anthropological Citizen S235 Norma Gonza´lez Advocacy Anthropology and Education: Working through the Binaries S249 Michael Herzfeld Engagement, Gentrification, and the Neoliberal Hijacking of History S259 Signe Howell Norwegian Academic Anthropologists in Public Spaces S269 John L. Jackson Jr. On Ethnographic Sincerity S279 Jonathan Spencer The Perils of Engagement: A Space for Anthropology in the Age of Security? S289 Kamari M. Clarke Toward a Critically Engaged Ethnographic Practice S301 Kamran Asdar Ali Voicing Difference: Gender and Civic Engagement among Karachi’s Poor S313 Alan Smart Tactful Criticism in Hong Kong: The Colonial Past and Engaging with the Present S321 http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CA Current Anthropology Volume 51, Supplement 2, October 2010 S201 Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas Wenner-Gren Symposium Supplement 2 by Leslie C. Aiello Engaged Anthropology: Diversity and Dilemmas grew out of a tiative on environmental issues involving 70 international and Wenner-Gren-sponsored workshop titled “The Anthropolo- interdisciplinary scholars who were selected for their common gist as Social Critic: Working toward a More Engaged An- interest and curiosity about the human impact on the earth. thropology” held at the foundation headquarters in New York Among many other Wenner-Gren meetings dealing with City, January 22–25, 2008 (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Feature Current Anthropology
    CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY A world journal of the sciences of man Current Anthropology is an international and interdisciplinary forum for scholarly work in the social sciences, publishing significant research, theoretical statements, and critical analyses in such fields as physical and social anthropology, ethnology and ethnohistory, folklore and linguistics, archaeology and prehistory. Appearing in the journal are articles that not only communicate across the subdisciplines of anthropology but also reveal a firm control of contemporary thought and issues. Representative articles include: Georges Mounin, Language, Communication, Chimpanzees James N. Kerri, Studying Voluntary Associations as Adaptive Mechanisms Erik Cohen, Environmental Orientations: A Multidimensional Approach to Social Ecology Karl L. Hutterer, An Evolutionary Approach to the Southeast Asian Cultural Sequence Robert McGhee, Differential Artistic Productivity in the Eskimo Cuhural Tradition Ramkrisltna Muldierjee, The Value-Base of Social Anthropology: The Context of India in Particular A new feature All major articles will be followed by abstracts in English, French, Spanish, and Russian. Current Anthropology: One-year subscription order Institutions: $25.00 (A*) D Associates* $12.00 (A) D $17.50 (Bf:) D $ 7.00(B) n Individuals: $18.00 (A) D Students: $ 8.00(A) D $12.50(8) D (with faculty $ 5.00(B) D signature) *RateA: USA, Canada, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Japan tRate B: All other countries **Associates: Teachers or researchers in anthropology and related disciplines may subscribe at the special rate upon recommendation ot an Associate of the journal. For information write to the Editor, c/o the address below. Name Address City . State . Country Please mail with your check or purchase order to Current Anthropology, The University of Chicago Press, 11030 Langley Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60628 SES is a multidisciplinary journal devoted to critical studies in Southwest regional develop­ ment.
    [Show full text]
  • Honoring Racism: the Professional Life and Reputation of Stanley D
    1 Honoring Racism: The Professional Life and Reputation of Stanley D. Porteus David E. Stannard In the Spring of 1998, the University of Hawai’i (UH) Board of Regents (BOR) voted to remove the name of former UH Professor Stanley D. Porteus from its place of honor on the Mānoa campus’ Social Science Building. This was the culmination of more than two decades of on-again, off-again activism on the part of UH students and faculty – spearheaded in the end by the 1997-98 Associated Students of the University of Hawai’i (ASUH). It was all done rather quietly. In the Fall of 1997, following an overwhelmingly supported ASUH resolution on the matter, UH President Kenneth Mortimer directed that a faculty-student committee be appointed to study Porteus’ work and to reconsider the appropriateness of honoring him with a campus building in his name. That committee’s report was issued in March of 1998. It recommended removing Porteus’ name from the Social Science Building, but it carefully avoided any detailed discussion of his work, and thus it provided no in-depth rationale for the serious action it advocated. Following in this line, Vice President for Academic Affairs Dean Smith conveyed the committee’s report to the Board of Regents with his assent, but also with an accompanying brief introduction that denied that Porteus’ work was – as ASUH and many scholars had long claimed – virulently racist and violent in its policy implications. Going one better than the substantially non-committal faculty-student committee, the Vice President’s remarks actually served to deny and undermine the recommendation with which he was concurring – the recommendation that the Regents should take the extraordinary step of removing Porteus’ name from the Social Science Building after two decades of its presence there.
    [Show full text]
  • Not-The-Troubles: Disinterring the Marginalised Stories of the Ordinary and the Everyday
    PRE-COPYEDITED VERSION — PUBLISHED AS Lane, Karen, 2019. Not-the-Troubles: Disinterring the Marginalised Stories of the Ordinary and the Everyday. Anthropological Forum, 29(1) : 62-76. Downloaded from http://www.anthropologicalforum.net COPYRIGHT All rights held by Lane, Karen. You need to get the author’s permission for uses other than teaching and personal research. Not-the-Troubles: Disinterring the Marginalised Stories of the Ordinary and the Everyday Karen Lane Department of Social Anthropology, University of St Andrews Abstract: Urban studies of Belfast, Northern Ireland, thoroughly explore the contested or post- conflict city. However, these ‘grand narratives’ do not necessarily accord with people’s day-to-day experiences. Although the ordinary and everyday is the lifeblood of anthropological inquiry, the mundane in Belfast dwells on the narratorial margin, as academic and political loci predominantly align to the Troubles: to the protagonists, the causes or the peace-building aftermath. Ten by Nine (Tenx9) is a monthly, public storytelling night showcasing ordinary people and their true, personal, everyday stories, juxtaposing the funny, poignant and educational, and celebrating the quotidian. Retelling Belfast at Tenx9 challenges hegemonic discourse by moving the mundane from the margin to the centre, opening up a space for small ‘t’ troubles to be shared. The communitas at Tenx9 promotes a sense of belonging in the city outwith Troubled narratives and storytelling, an ancient Irish oral culture, becomes a new form of symbolic practice. Keywords Divided City; Belfast; Urban Margins; Storytelling; Communitas PRE-COPYEDITED VERSION – Lane, 2019 2 Introduction1 To understand the complexity of city life, one needs to consider a spectrum of experience, and urban studies draw upon several disciplinary approaches (Amin and Thrift 2002; Sennett 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Issues and Challenges in Researching Indigenous Compensation Claims
    Anthropological Forum A Journal of Social Anthropology and Comparative Sociology ISSN: 0066-4677 (Print) 1469-2902 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/canf20 Framing the Loss of Solace: Issues and Challenges in Researching Indigenous Compensation Claims Sandra Pannell To cite this article: Sandra Pannell (2018) Framing the Loss of Solace: Issues and Challenges in Researching Indigenous Compensation Claims, Anthropological Forum, 28:3, 255-274, DOI: 10.1080/00664677.2018.1495059 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2018.1495059 Published online: 10 Jul 2018. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 327 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=canf20 ANTHROPOLOGICAL FORUM 2018, VOL. 28, NO. 3, 255–274 https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2018.1495059 Framing the Loss of Solace: Issues and Challenges in Researching Indigenous Compensation Claims Sandra Pannella,b aSchool of Social Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; bCollege of Arts, Society & Education, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The 2016 judgment in the ‘Timber Creek’ compensation case Compensation; emotions; (Griffiths v Northern Territory of Australia (no. 3) (2016) FCA 900) solatium; solastalgia; native signals an end to an era of extinguishment-related injustice and title; aboriginal Australia inequality, representing, as it does, the first litigated Federal Court award of compensation for the loss or impairment of rights and interests, under the 1993 Native Title Act. In this paper, I explore some of the methodological challenges and conceptual issues confronting anthropologists involved in researching compensation claims.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowing and Being Known. Approaching Australian Indigenous Tourism Through Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Politics of Knowing, Anthropological Forum, 28(3): 275-292
    PRE-COPYEDITED VERSION — PUBLISHED AS Travési, Céline 2018. Knowing and Being Known. Approaching Australian Indigenous Tourism through Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Politics of Knowing, Anthropological Forum, 28(3): 275-292. Downloaded from http://www.anthropologicalforum.net COPYRIGHT All rights held by TRAVESI, Céline. You need to get the author’s permission for uses other than teaching and personal research. Knowing and Being Known. Approaching Australian Indigenous Tourism through Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Politics of Knowing Celine Travesi Aix-Marseille University, EHESS, CNRS - CREDO UMR 7308 Abstract: Based on ethnographic research conducted with Bardi and Jawi people, an Indigenous group from the Northwestern Kimberley region of Western Australia, the aim of this paper is to approach the complexities related to Indigenous tourism in Australia through the politics of knowing and not-knowing as embodied by Indigenous tour guides and non- Indigenous tourists. It examines the notion of knowing (or not knowing) and its usages by Indigenous and non-Indigenous people in the context of their tourist encounter. ‘Knowing’ represents an important aspect through which Aboriginal people and their non-Indigenous guests negotiate their interactions. In particular, the paper shows how Indigenous and non- Indigenous expectations from tourism lead actors to adopt divergent positions and to assert renewed claims in relation to knowledge or knowing, casting new light on issues of self- representation and empowerment in the domain of Indigenous tourism. Keywords: Australia, Indigenous tourism, knowing and not-knowing, self-representation PRE-COPYEDITED VERSION — Travési 2018 2 Introduction This paper analyses the complexities of Australian Indigenous-owned and -operated tourism through the lens of the politics of knowing.
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting Mary Douglas
    Review article Elementary forms and their dynamics: revisiting Mary Douglas by Perri 6 Professor in Public Management School of Business and Management Queen Mary, University of London E-mail: [email protected] Accepted for publication in Anthropological forum , 28.5.2014 Acknowledgements I am grateful to Mitchell Low and to Greg Acciaioli for commissioning this review article and for their comments on an earlier draft, and to Paul Richards for many invaluable suggestions. Elementary forms and their dynamics: revisiting Mary Douglas Review article on Fardon R, ed, 2013, Mary Douglas: cultures and crises – understanding risk and resolution , London: Sage and Fardon R, ed, 2013, Mary Douglas: a very personal method – anthropological writings drawn from life , London: Sage. Keywords Mary Douglas; neo-Durkheimian institutional theory; institutions; social dynamics; hierarchy; enclave; isolate; individualism; Abstract Mary Douglas’s oeuvre furnishes the social sciences with one of the most profound and ambitious bodies of social theory ever to emerge from within anthropology. This article uses the occasion of the publication of Fardon’s two volumes of her previously uncollected papers to restate her core arguments about the limited plurality of elementary forms of social organisation and about the institutional dynamics of conflict and about conflict attenuation. In reviewing these two volumes, the article considers what those anthropologists who have been sceptical either of Douglas’s importance or of the Durkheimian traditions generally will want from these books to convince them to look afresh at her work. It concludes that the two collections will provide open-minded anthropologists with enough evidence of the creativity and significance of her achievement to encourage them to reopen her major theoretical works.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Racism and the Legal Prohibitions Against Miscegenation
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 5 2000 Blood Will Tell: Scientific Racism and the Legal Prohibitions Against Miscegenation Keith E. Sealing John Marshall Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Race Commons, Legal History Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Keith E. Sealing, Blood Will Tell: Scientific Racism and the Legal Prohibitions Against Miscegenation, 5 MICH. J. RACE & L. 559 (2000). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol5/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BLOOD WILL TELL: SCIENTIFIC RACISM AND THE LEGAL PROHIBITIONS AGAINST MISCEGENATION Keith E. Sealing* INTRODUCTION .......................................................................... 560 I. THE PARADIGM ............................................................................ 565 A. The Conceptual Framework ................................ 565 B. The Legal Argument ........................................................... 569 C. Because The Bible Tells Me So .............................................. 571 D. The Concept of "Race". ...................................................... 574 II.
    [Show full text]
  • Science in the Service of the Far Right: Henry E. Garrett, the IAAEE, and the Liberty Lobby
    Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 54, No. 1, 1998,pp. 179-210 Science in the Service of the Far Right: Henry E. Garrett, the IAAEE, and the Liberty Lobby Andrew S. Winston* Universily of Guelph Henry E. Garrett (1894-1973) was the President of the American Psychological Association in 1946 and Chair of Psychology at Columbia Universityfrom 1941 to 1955. In the 1950s Garrett helped organize an international group of scholars dedi- cated to preventing race mixing, preserving segregation, and promoting the princi- ples of early 20th century eugenics and “race hygiene.” Garrett became a leader in the fight against integration and collaborated with those who sought to revitalize the ideology of National Socialism. I discuss the intertwined history the Interna- tional Association for the Advancement of Ethnology and Eugenics (IAAEE),the journal Mankind Quarterly, the neofascist Northern League, and the ultra-right- wing political group, the Liberty Lobby. The use of psychological research and expertise in the promotion of neofascism is examined. No more than Nature desires the mating of weaker with stronger individu- als, even less does she desire the blending of a higher with a lower race, since, if she did, her whole work of higher breeding, over perhaps hun- dreds of thousands of years, might be ruined with one blow. Historical ex- perience offers countless proofs of this. It shows with terrifying clarity that in every mingling ofAryan blood with that of lowerpeoples the result was the end of the culturedpeople. , , , The result of all racial crossing is there- fore in brief always thefollowing: Lowering of the level of the higher race; *Portions of this paper were presented at the annual meeting of CHEIRON, the International Soci- ety for the History of Behavioral and Social Sciences, at the University of Richmond in June 1997.
    [Show full text]