Morphology Characterization, Molecular Phylogeny, and Pathogenicity of Diaporthe Passifloricola on Citrus Reticulata Cv
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1 Etiology, Epidemiology and Management of Fruit Rot Of
Etiology, Epidemiology and Management of Fruit Rot of Deciduous Holly in U.S. Nursery Production Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Shan Lin Graduate Program in Plant Pathology The Ohio State University 2018 Dissertation Committee Dr. Francesca Peduto Hand, Advisor Dr. Anne E. Dorrance Dr. Laurence V. Madden Dr. Sally A. Miller 1 Copyrighted by Shan Lin 2018 2 Abstract Cut branches of deciduous holly (Ilex spp.) carrying shiny and colorful fruit are popularly used for holiday decorations in the United States. Since 2012, an emerging disease causing the fruit to rot was observed across Midwestern and Eastern U.S. nurseries. A variety of other symptoms were associated with the disease, including undersized, shriveled, and dull fruit, as well as leaf spots and early plant defoliation. The disease causal agents were identified by laboratory processing of symptomatic fruit collected from nine locations across four states over five years by means of morphological characterization, multi-locus phylogenetic analyses and pathogenicity assays. Alternaria alternata and a newly described species, Diaporthe ilicicola sp. nov., were identified as the primary pathogens associated with the disease, and A. arborescens, Colletotrichum fioriniae, C. nymphaeae, Epicoccum nigrum and species in the D. eres species complex were identified as minor pathogens in this disease complex. To determine the sources of pathogen inoculum in holly fields, and the growth stages of host susceptibility to fungal infections, we monitored the presence of these pathogens in different plant tissues (i.e., dormant twigs, mummified fruit, leaves and fruit), and we studied inoculum dynamics and assessed disease progression throughout the growing season in three Ohio nurseries exposed to natural inoculum over two consecutive years. -
Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry. -
Abstracts of Oral and Poster Presentations Given at the 10Th International Workshop on Grapevine Trunk Diseases, Reims, France, 4–7 July 2017
Phytopathologia Mediterranea (2017) DOI: 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-21865 ABSTRACTS Abstracts of oral and poster presentations given at the 10th International Workshop on Grapevine Trunk Diseases, Reims, France, 4–7 July 2017 The 10th International Workshop on Grapevine Trunk diseases was held in Reims, France, on July 4–7 2017. This workshop was co-organized with the COST Action FA1303 entitled “Sustainable control of grape- vine trunk diseases” and supported by the International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV). The meeting was attended by 240 participants from 29 countries and 155 papers were presented either as oral (63) or poster (92) presentations in four sessions: Pathogen characterization, Detection and epidemiology, Micro- bial ecology, Host-pathogen and fungus-fungus competitive interactions and Disease management. A field tour in the champagne vineyard was co-organized by the Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne (CIVC). Delegates were presented with an overview of the Champagne region focussing on “terroir”, varietal crea- tion and grapevine diseases, especially GTDs. The tour concluded with a visit to Mercier cellar with cham- pagne tasting. The workshop is the 10th organized by the International Council on Grapevine Trunk Diseases (www. icgtd.org) and the 2nd one organised by the members of the COST Action FA1303 (www.managtd.eu). The next 11th IWGTD will be held in British Colombia Canada in 2019. Pathogen identification and worldwide, especially with grapevine trunk dis- characterization eases such as Petri disease and esca. Over the last 20 years, 29 species of this genus have been isolated Characterization and pathogenicity of Phaeo- from affected grapevines. However, the role of some acremonium species associated with Petri disease species as causal agents of grapevine dieback as well 1 and esca of grapevine in Spain. -
Diaporthe Rudis (Fr
-- CALIFORNIA D EPAUMENT OF cdfa FOOD & AGRICULTURE ~ California Pest Rating Proposal for Diaporthe rudis (Fr. : Fr.) Nitschke 1870 Current Pest Rating: Z Proposed Pest Rating: C Kingdom: Fungi, Phylum: Ascomycota, Subphylum: Pezizomycotina, Class: Sordariomycetes, Subclass: Sordariomycetidae, Order: Diaporthales, Family: Diaporthaceae Comment Period: 05/19/2021 through 07/03/2021 Initiating Event: In July 2019, an unofficial sample of Arctostaphylos franciscana was submitted to CDFA’s Plant Pest Diagnostics Center by a native plant nursery in San Francisco County. CDFA plant pathologist Suzanne Rooney-Latham isolated Diaporthe rudis in culture from the stems. She confirmed her diagnosis with PCR and DNA sequencing and gave it a temporary Z-rating. Diaporthe faginea (Curr.) Sacc., (1882) and Diaporthe medusaea Nitschke, (1870) are both junior synonyms of D. rudis, and both have previously been reported in California (French, 1989). The risk to California from Diaporthe rudis is described herein and a permanent rating is proposed. History & Status: The genus Diaporthe contains economically important plant pathogens that cause diseases on a wide range of crops, ornamentals, and forest trees, with some endophytes and saprobes. Traditionally, Diaporthe species have been identified with a combination of morphology and host association. This is problematic because multiple species of Diaporthe can often be found on a single host, and a single species of Diaporthe can be associated with many different hosts. Using molecular data and modern systematics has been helpful in identifying and characterizing pathogens, especially for regulatory work. Diaporthe spp. can cause cankers, diebacks, root rots, fruit rots, leaf spots, blights, decay, and wilts. They are hemibiotrophs with both a biotrophic (requiring living plants as a source of nutrients) phase and a nectrotrophic (killing parts of their host and living off the dead tissues) phase. -
A Guide to Citrus Disease Identification1 Stephen H
HS-798 A Guide to Citrus Disease Identification1 Stephen H. Futch2 Citrus trees in both commercial and dooryard plantings can exhibit a host of symptoms reflecting various disorders that can impact their health, vigor and productivity to vary- ing degrees. Identifying symptoms correctly is an important aspect of management, as inappropriate remedial applica- tions or actions can be costly and sometimes detrimental. Disease symptoms addressed in this publication are an important aspect of commercial citrus production pro- grams. Proper disease identification is an important factor in planning and conducting any disease control program. Disease symptoms may vary in expression on foliage, stems, roots and fruit, and may not in all cases resemble those illustrated in various publications. Symptoms can vary Figure 1. Greasy spot on foliage. considerably from mild to severe depending upon infection period, climatic conditions, and age of tissue when infec- Greasy Spot Rind Blotch tion occurred. When in doubt about disease identification, (Mycosphaerella citri) seek advice before committing to costly and perhaps Pinpoint black specks occur between the oil glands with inappropriate corrective measures. infection on grapefruit. When specks coalesce, they give rise to a symptom called pink pitting or greasy spot rind Greasy Spot (Mycosphaerella citri) blotch (Figure 2). The living cells adjacent to the specks Infection by greasy spot produces a swelling on the lower often retain a green color for much longer than normal or leaf surface. A yellow mottle appears at the corresponding even when the fruit is degreened by ethylene. point on the upper leaf surface. The swollen tissue starts to collapse and turn brown and eventually the brown or Scab (Elsinoe fawcettii) black symptoms become clearly visible (Figure 1). -
The Perfect Stage of the Fungus Which Causes Melanose of Citrus1
THE PERFECT STAGE OF THE FUNGUS WHICH CAUSES MELANOSE OF CITRUS1 By FREDERICK A. WOLF Pathologist, Office of Fruit Diseases, Bureau of Plant Industry, United States Depart- ment of Agriculture INTRODUCTION A disease of citrus and related plants to which the common name melanose is applied was ffrst recognized near Citra, Fla., by Swingle and Webber 2 in 1892. Their account of the disease, published in 1896, states that in their opinion it was caused by a " vegetable parasite" which they were not able to isolate in culture. In 1912 a paper by Fawcett3 was published in which he set forth the results of his investigations on a type of stem-end decay of fruits, and he as- cribed the cause of the decay to a previously undescribed organism which he designated PJiomopsis citri. The relationship between this stem-end rot and melanose was not suspected at first. Evidence has been presented by Floyd and Stevens,4 however, and by others who have investigated this problem, which shows that the two forms are undoubtedly caused by one and the same fungus. The rules of proof to establish this relationship have never been completely followed, because thus far it has not been possible for anyone to isolate Pho- mopsis citri from melanose lesions on leaves, twigs, and fruits. In July, 1925, the present writer found, on fallen decaying twigs of lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle), on the grounds of the United States Citrus-Disease Field Laboratory, Orlando, Fia., a species of Diaporthe. Since several species of the form genus Phomopsis are known to have an ascigerous stage belonging to the genus Diaporthe, it was suspected that these specimens were those of the perfect stage of Phomopsis citri. -
Citrus Melanose (Diaporthe Citri Wolf): a Review
Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2014) 3(4): 113-124 ISSN: 2319-7706 Volume 3 Number 4 (2014) pp. 113-124 http://www.ijcmas.com Review Article Citrus Melanose (Diaporthe citri Wolf): A Review K.Gopal*, L. Mukunda Lakshmi, G. Sarada, T. Nagalakshmi, T. Gouri Sankar, V. Gopi and K.T.V. Ramana Dr. Y.S.R. Horticultural University, Citrus Research Station, Tirupati-517502, Andhra Pradesh, India *Corresponding author A B S T R A C T K e y w o r d s Citrus Melanose disease caused by Diaporthe citri Wolf is a fungus that causes two distinct diseases on Citrus species viz, the perfect stage of the fungus causes Citrus melanose, disease characterized by lesions on fruit and foliage and in the imperfect Melanose; stage; it causes Phomopsis stem-end rot, a post-harvest disease. It is one of the Diaporthe most commonly observed diseases of citrus worldwide. As the disease is occurring citri; in larger proportions and reducing marketable fruit yield hence, updated post-harvest information on its history of occurrence, disease distribution and its impact, disease pathogen and its morphology, disease symptoms, epidemiology and management are briefly reviewed in this paper. Introduction Citrus Melanose occurs in many citrus fungus does not normally affect the pulp. growing regions of the world and infects On leaves, the small, black, raised lesions many citrus species. It affects young are often surrounded by yellow halos and leaves and fruits of certain citrus species can cause leaf distortion. On the fruit, the or varieties when the tissues grow and disease produces a superficial blemish expand during extended periods of rainy which is unlikely to affect the overall yield or humid weather conditions. -
Sequencing Abstracts Msa Annual Meeting Berkeley, California 7-11 August 2016
M S A 2 0 1 6 SEQUENCING ABSTRACTS MSA ANNUAL MEETING BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 7-11 AUGUST 2016 MSA Special Addresses Presidential Address Kerry O’Donnell MSA President 2015–2016 Who do you love? Karling Lecture Arturo Casadevall Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Thoughts on virulence, melanin and the rise of mammals Workshops Nomenclature UNITE Student Workshop on Professional Development Abstracts for Symposia, Contributed formats for downloading and using locally or in a Talks, and Poster Sessions arranged by range of applications (e.g. QIIME, Mothur, SCATA). 4. Analysis tools - UNITE provides variety of analysis last name of primary author. Presenting tools including, for example, massBLASTer for author in *bold. blasting hundreds of sequences in one batch, ITSx for detecting and extracting ITS1 and ITS2 regions of ITS 1. UNITE - Unified system for the DNA based sequences from environmental communities, or fungal species linked to the classification ATOSH for assigning your unknown sequences to *Abarenkov, Kessy (1), Kõljalg, Urmas (1,2), SHs. 5. Custom search functions and unique views to Nilsson, R. Henrik (3), Taylor, Andy F. S. (4), fungal barcode sequences - these include extended Larsson, Karl-Hnerik (5), UNITE Community (6) search filters (e.g. source, locality, habitat, traits) for 1.Natural History Museum, University of Tartu, sequences and SHs, interactive maps and graphs, and Vanemuise 46, Tartu 51014; 2.Institute of Ecology views to the largest unidentified sequence clusters and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Lai 40, Tartu formed by sequences from multiple independent 51005, Estonia; 3.Department of Biological and ecological studies, and for which no metadata Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, currently exists. -
Fungal Planet Description Sheets: 400–468
Persoonia 36, 2016: 316– 458 www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/pimj RESEARCH ARTICLE http://dx.doi.org/10.3767/003158516X692185 Fungal Planet description sheets: 400–468 P.W. Crous1,2, M.J. Wingfield3, D.M. Richardson4, J.J. Le Roux4, D. Strasberg5, J. Edwards6, F. Roets7, V. Hubka8, P.W.J. Taylor9, M. Heykoop10, M.P. Martín11, G. Moreno10, D.A. Sutton12, N.P. Wiederhold12, C.W. Barnes13, J.R. Carlavilla10, J. Gené14, A. Giraldo1,2, V. Guarnaccia1, J. Guarro14, M. Hernández-Restrepo1,2, M. Kolařík15, J.L. Manjón10, I.G. Pascoe6, E.S. Popov16, M. Sandoval-Denis14, J.H.C. Woudenberg1, K. Acharya17, A.V. Alexandrova18, P. Alvarado19, R.N. Barbosa20, I.G. Baseia21, R.A. Blanchette22, T. Boekhout3, T.I. Burgess23, J.F. Cano-Lira14, A. Čmoková8, R.A. Dimitrov24, M.Yu. Dyakov18, M. Dueñas11, A.K. Dutta17, F. Esteve- Raventós10, A.G. Fedosova16, J. Fournier25, P. Gamboa26, D.E. Gouliamova27, T. Grebenc28, M. Groenewald1, B. Hanse29, G.E.St.J. Hardy23, B.W. Held22, Ž. Jurjević30, T. Kaewgrajang31, K.P.D. Latha32, L. Lombard1, J.J. Luangsa-ard33, P. Lysková34, N. Mallátová35, P. Manimohan32, A.N. Miller36, M. Mirabolfathy37, O.V. Morozova16, M. Obodai38, N.T. Oliveira20, M.E. Ordóñez39, E.C. Otto22, S. Paloi17, S.W. Peterson40, C. Phosri41, J. Roux3, W.A. Salazar 39, A. Sánchez10, G.A. Sarria42, H.-D. Shin43, B.D.B. Silva21, G.A. Silva20, M.Th. Smith1, C.M. Souza-Motta44, A.M. Stchigel14, M.M. Stoilova-Disheva27, M.A. Sulzbacher 45, M.T. Telleria11, C. Toapanta46, J.M. Traba47, N. -
Diaporthe Vaccinii
EuropeanBlackwell Publishing Ltd and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization PM 7/86 (1) Organisation Européenne et Méditerranéenne pour la Protection des Plantes Diagnostics Diagnostic Diaporthe vaccinii Specific scope Specific approval and amendment This standard describes a diagnostic protocol for Diaporthe Approved in 2008-09. vaccinii1. Introduction Diaporthe vaccinii Shear (anamorph Phomopsis vaccinii Shear) is recorded on stems, shoots and leaves of cultivated Vaccinium corymbosum L. (blueberry), V. macrocarpon Aiton (American cranberry), V. vitis-idaea L. (cowberry) and autochtonous species of European V. myrtillus L., (blueberry), V. oxycoccus L. (cranberries). D. vaccinii causes phomopsis canker and dieback, twig blight, viscid rot (fruit rot). It is common in temperate climate areas of North America: Canada (Nova Scotia), USA (in 11 States). There are a few reports of this fungus on plants in Europe: in Romania, UK (eradicated) and Lithuania. Identity Name: Diaporthe vaccinii Shear Anamorph: Phomopsis vaccinii Shear Fig. 1 (A) Symptoms of Phomopsis/Diaporthe vaccinii on twigs of Taxonomic position: Fungi: Ascomycota: Diaporthales Vaccinium corymbosum. (B) Conidiomata on stem of blueberry. EPPO computer code: DIAPVA Phytosanitary categorization: EPPO A1 list no. 211, EU in two months, killing single twigs and often entire plants of a Annex designation: II/A1 susceptible cultivar. On stems, D. vaccinii causes a brown discoloration of the xylem below wilt symptoms. Conidiomata Detection appear on lesions on 1–2 year old twigs (Fig. 1B), and ascomata on 2–3 year old twigs. The fungus also infects leaves, buds, and Blueberries can be killed by D. vaccinii within a few months. fruits of cranberries (Fig. 2A, Fig. 3). Berries become brownish The first symptoms appear on the tips of non-woody shoots red, inflated and shiny. -
Diaporthe Juglandicola Sp. Nov. (Diaporthales, Ascomycetes), Evidenced by Morphological Characters and Phylogenetic Analysis Ar
Mycosphere 8(5): 817–826 (2017) www.mycosphere.org ISSN 2077 7019 Article Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/8/5/3 Copyright © Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Diaporthe juglandicola sp. nov. (Diaporthales, Ascomycetes), evidenced by morphological characters and phylogenetic analysis Yang Q, Fan XL, Du Z and Tian CM* The Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China Yang Q, Fan XL, Du Z, Tian CM 2017 – Diaporthe juglandicola sp. nov. (Diaporthales, Ascomycetes), evidenced by morphological characters and phylogenetic analysis. Mycosphere 8(5), 817–826, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/8/5/3 Abstract Diaporthe juglandicola sp. nov, collected from diseased branches of Juglans mandshurica in Beijing, China, is described and illustrated in this paper. Evidence for this new species is provided by its holomorphic morphology and phylogenetic analysis. Morphologically, the asexual morph produces hyaline, aseptate, ellipsoidal, alpha conidia (8.1–8.7 × 2.3–2.9 μm), while the sexual morph produces 8-spored, unitunicate, clavate to cylindric asci and fusoid, 0–1-septate ascospores. The phylogeny inferred from combined multi-locus sequences (CAL, HIS, ITS, TEF1-α, TUB) grouped the isolates of the new species into a distinct lineage. Key words – dieback – molecular phylogeny – new species – taxonomy Introduction The genus Diaporthe (syn. Phomopsis) was established by Nitschke (1870). Species of Diaporthe occur widely in natural ecosystems, comprising endophytes and saprobes, as well as plant pathogens (Uecker 1988, Rehner & Uecker 1994, Rossman & Palm-Hernández 2008, Udayanga et al. 2011, 2012a, b). According to Index Fungorum, there are 977 names in Diaporthe and 980 names in Phomopsis, although the relationships between the asexual and sexual taxa are mostly unclear. -
AR TICL E Diaporthe Is Paraphyletic
IMA FUNGUS · 8(1): 153–187 (2017)) doi:10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.11 Diaporthe is paraphyletic ARTICL Yahui Gao1, 2*, Fang Liu1*, Weijun Duan#, Pedro W. Crous4,5, and Lei Cai1, 2 E 1State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R. China 2\%/zV;*!!!$]A/{'| #+z<°[#* !*]A/ 4JH;%<\"# "/\+ 5X@]]]/'%]Hz;< University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa * Abstract: Previous studies have shown that our understanding of species diversity within Diaporthe (syn. Phomopsis) Key words: <$X+z; Ascomycota on these results, eight new species names are introduced for lineages represented by multiple strains and distinct Diaporthales % Phomopsis%/X+z Phomopsis [Diaporthe Diaporthe'V\<V phylogeny TEF1) phylogenetic analysis. Several morphologically distinct genera, namely Mazzantia, Ophiodiaporthe, Pustulomyces, taxonomy Phaeocytostroma, and Stenocarpella, are embedded within Diaporthe s. lat., indicating divergent morphological evolution. However, splitting Diaporthe into many smaller genera to achieve monophyly is still premature, and further collections and phylogenetic datasets need to be obtained to address this situation. Article info: Submitted: 25 March 2017; Accepted: 22 May 2017; Published: 1 June 2017. INTRODUCTION have been regularly observed on carrots in France, resulting in seed production losses since 2007 (Ménard et al. 2014). Species of Diaporthe are known as important plant Avocado (Persea americana), cultivated worldwide in tropical pathogens, endophytes or saprobes (Udayanga et al. 2011, and subtropical regions, is threatened by branch cankers Gomes et al. !*#% ' D. foeniculina and on many plant hosts, including cultivated crops, trees, and D. sterilis (Guarnaccia et al. 2016). Furthermore, species ornamentals (Diogo et al.!*!et al.