IMA FUNGUS · 8(1): 153–187 (2017) doi:10.5598/imafungus.2017.08.01.11 ARTICLE Diaporthe is paraphyletic Yahui Gao1, 2*, Fang Liu1*, Weijun Duan3, Pedro W. Crous4,5, and Lei Cai1, 2 1State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, P.R. China 2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R. China; corresponding author e-mail:
[email protected] 3Ningbo Academy of Inspection and Quarantine, Zhejiang 315012, P.R. China 4Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Uppsalalaan 8, 3584CT Utrecht, The Netherlands 5Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Tree Protection Co-operative Programme, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa *These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Previous studies have shown that our understanding of species diversity within Diaporthe (syn. Phomopsis) Key words: is limited. In this study, 49 strains obtained from different countries were subjected to DNA sequence analysis. Based Ascomycota on these results, eight new species names are introduced for lineages represented by multiple strains and distinct Diaporthales morphology. Twelve Phomopsis species previously described from China were subjected to DNA sequence analysis, and Phomopsis confirmed to belong to Diaporthe. The genus Diaporthe is shown to be paraphyletic based on multi-locus (LSU, ITS and phylogeny TEF1) phylogenetic analysis. Several morphologically distinct genera, namely Mazzantia, Ophiodiaporthe, Pustulomyces, taxonomy Phaeocytostroma, and Stenocarpella, are embedded within Diaporthe s. lat., indicating divergent morphological evolution. However, splitting Diaporthe into many smaller genera to achieve monophyly is still premature, and further collections and phylogenetic datasets need to be obtained to address this situation.