Nuclear Power Reactors Worldwide: Technology Developments, Diffusion Patterns, and Country-By- Country Analysis of Implementation (1951-2017)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nuclear Power Reactors Worldwide: Technology Developments, Diffusion Patterns, and Country-By- Country Analysis of Implementation (1951-2017) A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Wealer, Ben; Bauer, Simon; Landry, Nicolas; Seiß, Hannah; von Hirschhausen, Christian R. Research Report Nuclear power reactors worldwide: Technology developments, diffusion patterns, and country-by- country analysis of implementation (1951-2017) DIW Data Documentation, No. 93 Provided in Cooperation with: German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin) Suggested Citation: Wealer, Ben; Bauer, Simon; Landry, Nicolas; Seiß, Hannah; von Hirschhausen, Christian R. (2018) : Nuclear power reactors worldwide: Technology developments, diffusion patterns, and country-by-country analysis of implementation (1951-2017), DIW Data Documentation, No. 93, Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW), Berlin This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/179000 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu 93 Data Documentation Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung 2018 Nuclear Power Reactors Worldwide – Technology Developments, Diff usion Patterns, and Country-by-Country Analysis of Implementation (1951-2017) Ben Wealer, Simon Bauer, Nicolas Landry, Hannah Seiß and Christian von Hirschhausen IMPRESSUM © DIW Berlin, 2018 DIW Berlin Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Mohrenstr. 58 10117 Berlin Tel. +49 (30) 897 89-0 Fax +49 (30) 897 89-200 www.diw.de ISSN 1861-1532 All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution in any form, also in parts, requires the express written permission of DIW Berlin. Data Documentation 93 Ben Wealer1234, Simon Bauer2, Nicolas Landry3, Hannah Seiß2, Christian von Hirschhausen23 Nuclear Power Reactors Worldwide – Technology Developments, Diffusion Patterns, and Country-by- Country Analysis of Implementation (1951–2017) Berlin, April 2018 1 Corresponding author: [email protected], [email protected], phone +49 (0)30-314-75837. 2 Technische Universität Berlin, Workgroup for Infrastructure Policy (WIP), Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin. 3 DIW Berlin, Department of Energy, Transportation, Environment, Mohrenstraße 58, 10117 Berlin. 4 The authors are with the German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin), and with Berlin University of Technology, Workgroup for Infrastructure Policy, and, both institutions share a long-term research program on nuclear energy, see for other publications https://www.diw.de/sixcms/detail.php?id=diw_01.c.528152.en. We thank Stefan Seifert for initiating the data work, Clemens Gerbaulet for long-term membership of the team, Matthias Ilg, Rosina Saß, and other project assistants for research support; the usual disclaimer applies. Data Documentation 93 Executive Summary Executive Summary Nuclear energy is among the most important innovations of the twentieth century, and it continues to play an important role in twenty-first century discussions. In particular, there is a debate about the potential contribution of nuclear power to policies of climate change mitigation and energy security in both, industrialized and emerging countries. In this context, many existing nuclear countries, and others considering entering the sector, are facing ques- tions of how to structure organizational models for nuclear power, and what lessons to be learned from the past seven decades of civilian use of nuclear power. The objective of this Data Documentation is to trace the development of nuclear power since its beginnings, by providing both a technological and a country-specific perspective, to allow a better understanding of issues on nuclear power going forward. Our hypothesis, based on the early literature on nuclear power post World War 2, e.g., the Acheson- Lilienthal Report (1946), Lovins and Lovins (1980) but also a more recent survey of the litera- ture (Hirschhausen 2017), is that nuclear power is the “child of scientific research and the military” (François Lévêque 2014, 212), the development of which follows an “economies-of- scope”-logic: nuclear power is developed for military and civilian purposes (e.g., electricity, medical services), and thus obeys no simple economic logic that could be expressed, e.g., in simple business investment calculus (Davis 2012). Rather than searching for an economic rationale where there is none, it is therefore instructive to analyze specific diffusion patterns of nuclear power, based on stylized organizational models, and going back to the origins in the middle of the last century. A certain understanding of nuclear reactor physical principles is useful to understand the link between different applications of nuclear power, and the inherent link between military and other uses. Nuclear fission was developed at industrial scale to produce the atomic bomb, in the Manhattan Project. All subsequent applications derive from the first large-scale military application, be it more sophisticated nuclear weaponry, electricity, medical uses, etc. Post- WW2 reactor technologies were developed with the scope-objectives, be it the graphite- moderated reactors in the U.K., France, and the Soviet Union, or the heavy-water reactors in Canada and Sweden; the light-water route, pursued by the U.S. thanks to a separate pluto- I Data Documentation 93 Executive Summary nium facility, was also rooted in a military application, i.e. submarine propulsion. There is no purely “civil” (sometimes used “peaceful”) use of nuclear power. A historical analysis of the emergence of nuclear power since 1945 suggests to distinguish four periods: i/ Between 1945 and into the mid-1950s, four major countries had established inde- pendent, national pathways of nuclear technologies for military purposes and electricity generation: the U.S., the Soviet Union, the U.K., and France; ii/ subsequent to the mid-1950s, and the failure of US attempts to control prolifera- tion of nuclear material, mainly the “Atoms for Peace” program, lead to fierce competition between the two nuclear superpowers, the U.S. and the Soviet Union, for controlling techno- logical diffusion. The US approach was much more “liberal”, by selling technology and li- censes to adoption countries, like Japan, Korea, and Germany, whereas the Soviet Union kept the technology and only gave away turnkey reactors to satellite states. Some countries were able to develop their own nuclear pathway, such as India, Pakistan, and Israel; iii/ starting in the mid-/late 1980s, China developed its nuclear sector, to become the third nuclear superpower, and the move from the first to the “second nuclear age” (Bracken, 2012), with ten or even more countries controlling the nuclear bomb, including North Korea and attempts in Iran; iv/ Post-Fukushima (2011) is characterized by the implosion of nuclear power in Western capitalist market economies, and the closure of nuclear power plants, often before reaching technical lifetimes, due to economic reasons; many of the newbuild projects were abandoned, too. This leaves the development of nuclear power to “other”, non-market sys- tems, where countries hang on to nuclear development, for political, military-strategic, or other reasons, mainly the nuclear superpowers China and Russia. “Nuclear diplomacy”, i.e. attempts to attract partner countries by providing them reactor technology more or less for free, is gaining ground in particular in China, Russia, and—to a lesser extent—the U.S. The analysis of the diffusion of nuclear power on a country-by-country basis reveals different patterns: we distinguish “economies-of-scope” trajectories, recipient countries of nuclear technologies with and without subsequent indigenous technology catch-up, and “other” II Data Documentation 93 Executive Summary countries; we also identify current trends in potential newcomer countries, such as Turkey, Bangladesh, and Sudan. Initial hopes placed on “Generation IV” and/or small modular reactors (SMRs) have not been fulfilled. Although some Gen IV research reactors are developed, no technology has any perspective of becoming economically competitive, neither with current nuclear technolo- gies, nor with conventional fossil or renewable generation in combination with storage. Most SMRs are based on designs that are several decades old, and none of them is close to attaining any sort of commercial availability. The Data Documentation fills a research gap in the literature, in that it provides bottom-up, evidence-based proof that nuclear power follows no economic rationale, but some other logic linked to “science and warfare”. None of the
Recommended publications
  • Safeguards at Research Reactors: Current Practices, Future Directions
    FEATURES Safeguards at research reactors: Current practices, future directions Some new verification measures are being introduced to improve the efficiency and the effectiveness of the Agency's safeguards by Giancarlo /approximately 180 research reactors and crit- immersed in a large pool of water that provides Zuccaro-Labellarte ical assemblies currently are under IAEA safe- both cooling and neutron moderation. The fuel and guards. The vast majority of the research reac- assemblies in the core of a swimming pool reac- Robert Fagerholm tors operate at relatively low power levels (10 tor are normally visible and accessible for safe- megawatts-thermal or lower) and the critical guards measurements. assemblies at virtually zero power.* From a Other types of research reactors operate at safeguards standpoint, this is important since a higher power levels (exceeding 10 megawatts- reactor's power level is a determining factor of thermal). They need more powerful heat its capability to produce plutonium. Along with removal systems and are therefore normally high-enriched uranium (HEU) and uranium- enclosed in core vessels and equipped with 233, plutonium is considered a "direct use" coolant pumps and heat exchangers. The fuel material which could be diverted for the pro- elements in the reactor core at these installa- duction of nuclear weapons. tions are usually not visible or accessible for In this article, the IAEA's safeguards safeguards measurements. implementation at research reactors is Research reactors are widely used for scien- addressed, including aspects related to diver- tific investigations and various applications. sion and clandestine production scenarios and Neutrons produced by research reactors provide main verification activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Reactors' Construction Costs
    Nuclear reactors’ construction costs: The role of lead-time, standardization and technological progress Lina Escobar Rangel and Michel Berthélemy Mines ParisTech - Centre for Industrial Economics CERNA International WPNE Workshop Project and Logistics Management in Nuclear New Build NEA Headquarters - Issy les Moulineaux, 11th March 2014 Growing demand for nuclear power... Demand for nuclear power has increased in the past years and it is likely to keep on rising. Experienced countries: US, UK, Russia, South Korea According with UK’s Department of Energy & Climate Change nuclear industry plans to develop around 16 gigawatts (GW) of new nuclear EDF → 4 EPRs (6.4GW) at Hinkley Point and Sizewell Hitachi → 2 or 3 new nuclear reactors at Wylfa and Oldbury NuGeneration → 3.6GW of new nuclear capacity at Moorside Fast-growing economies: China, India China has 28 reactors under construction and it is planned a three-fold increase in nuclear capacity to at least 58 GWe by 2020, then some 150 GWe by 2030 16 AP1000 reactors are planned to start to be constructed from 2014-2018 At least 6 ACC1000 in 4 different locations 2 EPRs in Guangdong Other technologies like VVER-1000, VVER-1200, CNP-600, etc are also envisioned Growing demand for nuclear power... Demand for nuclear power has increased in the past years and it is likely to keep on rising. Experienced countries: US, UK, Russia, South Korea According with UK’s Department of Energy & Climate Change nuclear industry plans to develop around 16 gigawatts (GW) of new nuclear EDF → 4 EPRs (6.4GW) at
    [Show full text]
  • Can't Go Home by Noelle Adams / Pfangirl PART 1
    Can't go home By Noelle Adams / pfangirl PART 1 - SUFFOCATED A caged lioness. That's what Lara reminded Sam of now. Every time she looked at her best friend, the American thought of the big cat she'd seen in a German zoo during her globe- trotting childhood. It wouldn't lie still. It was pure feral energy, striding back and forth in its enclosure, muscles rippling beneath its pelt. Lara was the same. Lithe grace and power in human form, always moving, always intensely focused on some task or thing. Almost permanently scowling. Sam had always wondered which of her parents Lara inherited her effortless physicality from. Four years of knowing Lara, and Sam still wasn't sure. There were no photos for her to consult. The young archaeologist hardly spoke about her vanished mother and father. She avoided talking about them; evidently running from their memory like she ran from what had happened on Yamatai. In the one and a half months since the shipwreck – well, at least since she was released from hospital – Lara had been seized by a frantic, feverish vigour. They had travelled from Osaka to the UK, where Lara had spent a single day at her family's estate, ransacking her father's study. From there they headed to New York. This put Lara closer to her next intended stop – Roanoke Island. Although the city was a good base for Lara to work from while she planned her next expedition, there was a second, more distasteful reason for the archaeologist to be there: an exclusive television interview.
    [Show full text]
  • From Gen I to Gen III
    From Gen I to Gen III Gabriel Farkas Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava Ilkovicova 3, 81219 Bratislava [email protected] 14. 9. 2010 1 Evolution of Nuclear Reactors Generation I - demonstration reactors Generation II - working in the present Generation III - under construction 14. 9. 2010 2 Generation IV - R&D 14. 9. 2010 3 Expected development in nuclear technologies Prolongation of lifetieme of existing nuclear reactors Construction of new reactors in frame of Gen. III and IV . Figure 1 Replacement staggered over a 30-year period (2020 - 2050) Rate of construction : 2,000 MW/year 70000 60000 Lifetime 50000 prolongation 40000 Generation IV 30000 Actual reactors 20000 Generation III+ 10000 0 197519801985199019952000200520102015202020252030203520402045205020552060 14. 9. 2010 Average plant life : 48 years 4 Nuclear in Europe (Nuclear ~ 32% of total EU electricity production) SE, 7.3% UK, 7.9% SP, 5.8% BE,4.8% CZ, 2.5% GE, 16.3% FI, 2.4% BU, 1.8% Other 12.4% SK, 1.7% HU, 1.4% LT, 1.1% FR, 45.5% SI, 0.6% NL, RO, 0.5% 0.4% Source PRIS 14. 9. 2010 5 Central & Eastern Europe - Nuclear Landscape Russia Lithuania Ukraine 6 VVER440 Poland 1 RBMK 1300 2 VVER440 8 VVER1000 Min. of Energy 13 VVER1000 NNEGC State owned 11 RBMK 1 BN600 4 Graph Mod BWR Czech Republic Rosenergoatom State 4 VVER440 owned 2 VVER1000 CEZ/ 67% State Romania owned 2 Candu PHW Nuclearelectrica State owned Slovak Republic 4/6 VVER440 Bulgaria ENEL 67% owned 2/4 VVER1000 NEC State owned Hungary Armenia 4 VVER 440 1 VVER440 MVM State owned Armatomenergo, State owned 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence from Opportunity's Microscopic Imager for Water on Meridiani Planum K
    Evidence from Opportunity's Microscopic Imager for Water on Meridiani Planum K. E. Herkenhoff, et al. Science 306, 1727 (2004); DOI: 10.1126/science.1105286 This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. If you wish to distribute this article to others, you can order high-quality copies for your colleagues, clients, or customers by clicking here. Permission to republish or repurpose articles or portions of articles can be obtained by following the guidelines here. The following resources related to this article are available online at www.sciencemag.org (this infomation is current as of October 27, 2011 ): Updated information and services, including high-resolution figures, can be found in the online version of this article at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/306/5702/1727.full.html Supporting Online Material can be found at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/suppl/2004/11/30/306.5702.1727.DC1.html A list of selected additional articles on the Science Web sites related to this article can be on October 27, 2011 found at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/306/5702/1727.full.html#related This article has been cited by 70 article(s) on the ISI Web of Science This article has been cited by 10 articles hosted by HighWire Press; see: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/306/5702/1727.full.html#related-urls This article appears in the following subject collections: Planetary Science www.sciencemag.org http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/collection/planet_sci Downloaded from Science (print ISSN 0036-8075; online ISSN 1095-9203) is published weekly, except the last week in December, by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1200 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005.
    [Show full text]
  • The EPR™ Reactor
    The EPR™ reactor the reference for New Build - © Photo credits: AREVA - EDF - TNPJVC - Tracy FAVEYRIAL - Elodie FERRARE - René QUATRAIN - Charlène MOREAU - Image et Process - Image - Charlène MOREAU QUATRAIN - Elodie FERRARE René FAVEYRIAL - Tracy - EDF TNPJVC AREVA credits: - © Photo April 2014 - design and production: April 2014 - design and production: The value of experience With 4 EPR™ reactors being built in 3 different countries, AREVA can leverage an unparalleled experience in licensing and construction to deliver high-performance new-generation projects to nuclear utilities all over the world. Olkiluoto 3, Best practices from continuous Finland project experience The most advanced new-generation Licensing experience with different regulators: project in the The only reactor with 5 separate licensing processes world underway worldwide • Construction licenses granted in Finland, France and China • Full Design Acceptance Confirmation awarded in the United Kingdom • Licensing review underway in the United States Flamanville 3, The only Gen3+ reactor design submitted to the European France “post-Fukushima” stress tests The first reactor in the new EDF’s EPR™ fleet Project management excellence • The largest in-house nuclear Engineering Procurement Construction (EPC) team: - More than 1,000 project management skilled people - 6,000+ Engineering and Project experienced workforce • Most Taishan Project Directors have worked on Taishan 1 and 2, Olkiluoto 3 or Flamanville 3 projects China EPR™ projects on track to be delivered Company-wide
    [Show full text]
  • 18Th EANA Conference European Astrobiology Network Association
    18th EANA Conference European Astrobiology Network Association Abstract book 24-28 September 2018 Freie Universität Berlin, Germany Sponsors: Detectability of biosignatures in martian sedimentary systems A. H. Stevens1, A. McDonald2, and C. S. Cockell1 (1) UK Centre for Astrobiology, University of Edinburgh, UK ([email protected]) (2) Bioimaging Facility, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, UK Presentation: Tuesday 12:45-13:00 Session: Traces of life, biosignatures, life detection Abstract: Some of the most promising potential sampling sites for astrobiology are the numerous sedimentary areas on Mars such as those explored by MSL. As sedimentary systems have a high relative likelihood to have been habitable in the past and are known on Earth to preserve biosignatures well, the remains of martian sedimentary systems are an attractive target for exploration, for example by sample return caching rovers [1]. To learn how best to look for evidence of life in these environments, we must carefully understand their context. While recent measurements have raised the upper limit for organic carbon measured in martian sediments [2], our exploration to date shows no evidence for a terrestrial-like biosphere on Mars. We used an analogue of a martian mudstone (Y-Mars[3]) to investigate how best to look for biosignatures in martian sedimentary environments. The mudstone was inoculated with a relevant microbial community and cultured over several months under martian conditions to select for the most Mars-relevant microbes. We sequenced the microbial community over a number of transfers to try and understand what types microbes might be expected to exist in these environments and assess whether they might leave behind any specific biosignatures.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Grayling and Burbot Studies at the Fort Knox Mine, 2005 by Alvin G
    Technical Report No. 05-06 Arctic Grayling and Burbot Studies at the Fort Knox Mine, 2005 by Alvin G. Ott and William A. Morris Pond D in Wetland Complex Photograph by William A. Morris 2005 December 2005 Alaska Department of Natural Resources Office of Habitat Management and Permitting The Alaska Department of Natural Resources administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. The department administers all programs and activities in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire further information please write to DNR, 1300 College Road, Fairbanks, Alaska 99701; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4040 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 300 Webb, Arlington, VA 22203; or O.E.O., U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington DC 20240. For information on alternative formats for this and other department publications, please contact the department ADA Coordinator at (voice) 907-269-8549 or (TDD) 907-269-8411. ARCTIC GRAYLING AND BURBOT STUDIES AT THE FORT KNOX MINE, 2005 By Alvin G. Ott and William A. Morris Kerry M. Howard Executive Director Office of Habitat Management and Permitting Alaska Department of Fish and Game Table of Contents Table of Contents.................................................................................................................I List of Tables .....................................................................................................................iii List of Figures...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Advanced Nuclear Technologies
    A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D MARCH 2017 B | CHAPTER NAME ABOUT THE CENTER ON GLOBAL ENERGY POLICY The Center on Global Energy Policy provides independent, balanced, data-driven analysis to help policymakers navigate the complex world of energy. We approach energy as an economic, security, and environmental concern. And we draw on the resources of a world-class institution, faculty with real-world experience, and a location in the world’s finance and media capital. Visit us at energypolicy.columbia.edu facebook.com/ColumbiaUEnergy twitter.com/ColumbiaUEnergy ABOUT THE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS SIPA’s mission is to empower people to serve the global public interest. Our goal is to foster economic growth, sustainable development, social progress, and democratic governance by educating public policy professionals, producing policy-related research, and conveying the results to the world. Based in New York City, with a student body that is 50 percent international and educational partners in cities around the world, SIPA is the most global of public policy schools. For more information, please visit www.sipa.columbia.edu A COMPARISON OF ADVANCED NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGIES Andrew C. Kadak, Ph.D* MARCH 2017 *Andrew C. Kadak is the former president of Yankee Atomic Electric Company and professor of the practice at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He continues to consult on nuclear operations, advanced nuclear power plants, and policy and regulatory matters in the United States. He also serves on senior nuclear safety oversight boards in China. He is a graduate of MIT from the Nuclear Science and Engineering Department.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of New Nuclear Power Plants in France
    The cost of new nuclear power plants in France SFEN TECHNICAL NOTE – MARCH 2018 SFEN TECHNICAL NOTE – MARCH 2018 The French Nuclear Energy Society (SFEN) is the French knowledge hub for nuclear energy. Created in 1973, the SFEN provides a place where French and International specialists, and all those with an interest in nuclear energy and its applications, can obtain and share information. The SFEN brings together 4000 professio- nals in industry, education and research. The SFEN’s contribution to France’s Multi-Year Energy Plan (Programmation pluriannuelle de l’énergie) The cost of new nuclear power plants in France Executive Summary & Recommendations SFEN TECHNICAL NOTE – MARCH 2018 Guaranteeing the nuclear option for 2050 With its June 2017 Climate Change Plan (Plan Climat), France has set a greenhouse gas emissions neutrality target for 2050. France currently relies on nuclear and renewable energy for generating low-carbon elec- tricity, with one of the most competitive supplies in Europe. France is committed to diversifying its energy mix at a pace that will depend on several factors which are not yet fully clear: the characteristics of demand, the technical and economic performance of the different technologies (renewable energy, storage, smart grids), as well as the energy strategies of its European neighbours, as part of an increas- ingly interconnected electricity system. In the short-term, continued operation of existing nuclear reactors (‘Grand carénage’ refurbishment programme) will provide France with low-carbon electricity, produced locally and at a competitive price. In the long-term, between 2030 and 2050, France is expected to progressively replace part of its existing nuclear fleet by new means of production.
    [Show full text]
  • The EPR - a Safe and Competitive Solution for Future Energy Needs
    International Conference Nuclear Energy for New Europe 2006 Portorož, Slovenia, September 18-21, 2006 http://www.djs.si/port2006 The EPR - A Safe and Competitive Solution for Future Energy Needs Rüdiger Leverenz AREVA NP GmbH Freyeslebenstr. 1, 91058 Erlangen, Germany [email protected] Introduction In 2002, the Finnish Government gave the go-ahead for construction of the country's fifth nuclear power plant unit. In December of 2003, the AREVA NP/Siemens Consortium was awarded a turnkey contract by the Finnish utility Teollisuuden Voima Oy (TVO) to build a new nuclear power plant at the Olkiluoto site where two boiling water reactor units are already in operation. "Olkiluoto 3" [1][2] is an EPR, and thus the world’s very first third- generation nuclear power plant under construction. The reactor is being supplied by AREVA NP, the turbine and generator by Siemens. AREVA NP, which is head of the consortium, is responsible for overall project management as well as technical and functional integration. Figure 1: Affordable climate protection: the EPR (foreground) at Olkiluoto in Finland is to start producing electricity in 2009. AREVA: Power is Our Core Business With manufacturing facilities in 40 countries and a sales network in more than 100, AREVA offers customers reliable technological solutions for CO2-free power generation and electricity transmission and distribution. AREVA is the world leader in nuclear power and the only company to cover all industrial activities in this field (from uranium mining, processing 409.1 409.2 and enrichment as well as fuel manufacture, through reactor construction and services to reprocessing of used fuel).
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Descending NASA’S Mars Strategy Goes from “Follow the Water” to “Arrive at the Ice”
    NEWS NATURE|Vol 453|8 May 2008 Phoenix descending NASA’s Mars strategy goes from “follow the water” to “arrive at the ice”. Since 2001, the slogan for from hardware and software. NASA’s Mars programme has “We may not succeed, but we NASA been “follow the water”. deserve to succeed,” he says. With Phoenix, a US$420- Engineers at the Jet Propul- million mission to the edge of sion Laboratory in Pasadena, the planet’s north ice cap, the California, which runs most of agency hopes to finally touch NASA’s planetary missions, will its quarry, in the form of dirty have their last chance to tweak water ice scraped from the the trajectory on 24 May. The subsurface and melted in the next day, Phoenix is expected probe’s on-board ovens. to use the planet’s atmosphere, If all goes as planned, Phoenix and its own heat shielding, will reach the end of its 680- parachutes and retrorockets, to million-kilometre, 10-month- slow itself down from an orbital long journey on 25 May. Its speed of 20,000 kilometres per landing site is in a region where hour to a soft, safe landing at NASA’s orbiting Mars Odyssey just 2.4 metres per second. spacecraft has detected gamma-ray and neu- Phoenix, a 350-kilogram lander, inherited Smith and his team hope that the ice and soil tron signatures suggesting a significant amount hardware from the Mars Surveyor Lander, a samples they will study with the spacecraft’s of hydrogen — thought to be a constituent of mission cancelled in 2000 after the failure of mass-spectrometer and chemical analysis sys- frozen water — near the surface.
    [Show full text]