8 HR Share Several Evident Textual Errors: Two Twice-Repeated Lines

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

8 HR Share Several Evident Textual Errors: Two Twice-Repeated Lines [from Eric Weiskott, “Alliterative Meter after 1450: The Vision of William Banastre,” in Aspects of Early English Poetic Culture: Studies in Honour of Geoffrey R. Russom, ed. Lindy Brady and M. J. Toswell (Medieval Institute Publications, forthcoming)] 8 HR share several evident textual errors: two twice-repeated lines (after l. 105, repeating l. 106; and after l. 111, repeating l. 110), insertion of a grammatically superfluous particle (he shall for presumptive He at l. 115, consequent on misprision of 115a mon ‘shall’ <ON munu as ‘man’), and four other presumptive errors (at 22a Therwhiles, 83a Lesbury, 86b, and 98b knowe). Taken together, these shared errors suggest that HR descend from an archetype at some remove from the original. The twice-repeated lines, in which eyeskip occurred at line boundaries, also suggest that the HR archetype was laid out as verse, as in H, not as prose, as in R. As the earlier of the two extant manuscript witnesses, H serves as the copy-text and governs the accidentals of the edited text and title. In the following critical edition, scribal punctuation is omitted, and the caesura between a-verse and b-verse is represented by a tabbed space. Paleographically uncertain or reconstructed readings are enclosed in parentheses. Punctuation is used to clarify ambiguous syntax and to indicate questions, the bounds of speeches, and the ends of larger rhetorical units, but no attempt has been made to make modern sentences of the text. Italics indicate expansion of scribal abbreviations, except that the ampersand is silently expanded to and. Capitalization is editorial and follows modern usage, including capitals at the beginning of each line of verse. Y for þ in abbreviations of particles such as ‘that’ and ‘the’ is printed þ. Line-initial ff is rendered F. Difficult words and phrases are accompanied by glosses, with etymologies where this has been thought useful. In the apparatus, HR readings are given in the form of H. The Vision of William Banastre Part of þe visioun of Sire William Banastre knyght “Lord, sey me for þe mayden love that thou þi modir calles What shall worthe of our kyng lord, yf it be þi wyll?” “I shall [þe tel], William and haue sone done: Ther shall a kyng prik westward propirly with pride 5 And gedir hym an herd fast al out of towne army <OE hired 9 And set hym in a seege12 til a full sory walle But þat shall be as nedelese þat þey seile þedir Als he þat buskes to a bote þat broken were þe rother And þe wynd of þe west were went hym agayne. 10 Therwiles shal Albanie bernes buske out þerag[a]yn And bende bakward behynde into Bretayne And make a blody hervest in a handwhile And wirke bataill bi southe whiles he þere dwellis And whan he hers þat word þan werkis his hert 15 And shall warry þe sithe þat euer he was born of modir curse <OE wirgan Þat he ne were depe þat day dolven vndir erthe Owther sonken þer among þe salt stremes. So shall he greved be he shall grete with bothe his eyen cry <OE gretan And he shall remeve his sege as neuer kyng shold 20 And folow on frekely to fynd þem in his anger scent (hunting) And he þat he trestis most [s]hall tray hym sone.13 The[r]whiles14 shal Albanie bernes be away by þe west bankes And ageyne to þe kith withouten care maked And þus shal worthe of þose lede[s] leue þou þe sothe 25 And alle haue I destenyed this for þe dede of þose synnis.” “Lord,” [said William,]15 “þan were it good þat kyng wer[e] vndir erthe.” “Now maddist þow, William whan þow s[o] me[ll]est.” “Lord,” said William, “was neuer kyng in care cast so mykel in a tide Ne neuer holden so high on loft and so low light.” 30 “William, he shall be tened and takyn and tynt in his owne Wandrand in wild kith where no man hym kennes Amonges þe wild lyons [þ]at he hymself ken. Than after he shall be fond as a fawcoun feir at þe last Wele faire fleand into his owne full bold and full prest swift <OF 35 This I warn þe, William on world it shall fare And tell [me] þi[s] good men16 þat Holy Kirke kepis And yf þei hold it for fabill founden in towne concocted It shall be by prophecy preued at þe last. Thre bugle(s), [William, I þe tell, blow shall] in Bretayn 40 By þe last [blaste] haue bl(ow)en þan shall blis fall The first þat blowe(s) he bydes in þe northwest; 12 Possibly a reference to Edward IV’s ineffectual siege of Harlech Castle, Gwynedd, in northwest Wales (4a westward), to which Margaret of Anjou fled after the Battle of Northampton in 1460. Edward did not take Harlech until 1468. 13 Conceivably a reference to the rebellion of Richard Neville against Edward IV in 1469. 14 H the whiles and R the whiell show a conjunctive phrase meaning ‘while, during the time that’ (MED Online, ‘whīles (n.),’ c and ‘whīle (n.)’, 1b(a)), but an adverb is required by the future tense of 22a. Cf. 10a. 15 The speech tag said William is extra-metrical (hence H omits it). Other extrametrical speech tags are 28a “Lord,” said William; 30a and 39a William; and 54a lord. Cf. Finnsburgh Fragment 24a “Sigeferþ is min nama (cweð he)” and Piers Plowman B.1.85a “Whan alle tresors arn tried (quod she).” See W. W. Skeat, “An Essay on Alliterative Poetry,” in Bishop Percy’s Folio Manuscript, edited by John W. Hales and Frederick J. Furnivall (3 vols.) (London: Trübner, 1867-68), vol. 3, pp. xi-xxxix, at pp. xxxv-xxxvi. 16 The sense is ‘tell this (prediction) for me to (the) good men,’ with me representing an ethical dative and men the dative plural. H simplifies the syntax, omitting me with reinterpretation of þis as a form of ‘these.’ 10 It shall be wele blakker þan bylle of a crawe17 With a treity of howles knyt in þe myddes And a corbid best þe corner [þat] yemes.18 crippled <OF corber 45 Trei trenta[ul]es19 this athel shall wirke trentals (thirty-part masses for the dead) I shall send hym a kay a curle[u] þat yemes20 And bid hym walkand be in all his wirkes Fro tide of mydnyght vnto þe mydmorn. On þe morn he shall do þat fey vpoun feld livestock <OE feoh 50 But wrecched Pride hath won þe day and þat hym likes And þere shall lele Loue be laught all out of lyue. Þan at a brigge ende mon þe bale fall Þat myracles in Holy Kirke know shall sone after.” reveal “Ye whan [þat day shall] fa[l]le, lord, for þi modir loue þou me te(ll).” 55 “Nou maddest þou, William whan þou so mellest. Waite a wate somer and a wyndy hervest A wakand wynter with many wery knyghtes And after by þe Mawdeleyn day þan shall blode ren.”21 “Now is mekyll wondir lord, of thise wordes.” 60 “Yit it is more wondir, William to tell þe þe sothe To se a femal22 fel þe floure of Breteyn And make a bro[del] to be kyng þe kith for to kepe. scoundrel This tyme shall be with care and c[o]myng of knyghtes Be wele wa[l]kand aboute and wandrynge of sorowe23 65 Bold bachelers shall be and neithir set be othir. The tane shall seke southward with sore hert gevene The othir homward to her kith with mekyll care maked But þer shall brest a bugle and blow in þe southwest And whan þat bugil shall brest so mekill blis comes 70 And he shall raise a baner þat neuer none ere liftid 17 Vision, ll. 41-2 = First Scottish Prophecy, ll. 5-6. A similar succession of images, including the bugle, occurs in the roughly contemporary Marvels of Merlin, ll. 5-7 (NIMEV 1260 and 2613.5). See Jansen Jaech, “‘Marvels,’” p. 37. 18 ‘That guards the corner’ or possibly ‘embrasure (of a castle)’ (MED Online, ‘corner (n.(2))’). The emendation improves the meter, maintains parallelism with the other two items in the list, and makes good poetic syntax (cf. l. 46b). A scribe overlooked þat in an unexpected syntactical position. R omits this line. 19 H trent andres could have arisen from misprision of u as n and l as d, perhaps buttressed by misprision of trent as a complete word with the same meaning (MED Online, ‘trent’). R omits this line. 20 The a-verse means ‘I shall give over (the place) to him’ (MED Online, ‘keie (n.(1)),’ 1b(b)). Cf. First Scottish Prophecy 39, “And þe comoynis of kynt | sall kast hime key” and the alliterative Prophecies of St. Thomas of Canterbury, l. 172. A text of the Prophecies of St. Thomas occurs in H (partially edited by Taylor, Political Prophecy, p. 165). The b-verse means ‘who keeps a curlew’ (MED Online, ‘yēmen,’ 2c). 21 To ll. 56-8 cf. NLW MS 441C (olim Williams 219) (sixteenth c.), p. 16: “At somer after at Sandyefoorde is more care/ for euer of Mawdelyens day after”; and BL MS Sloane 2578, fol. 73v (a rhyming verse prophecy copied as prose): “a wyndy somer, a whyte harvest, before this said shalbe. a wtry wynter with wakinge knightes. a blody lenton after shalbe. haue good day I goo my waye.
Recommended publications
  • Featuring Articles on Henry Wyatt, Elizabeth of York, and Edward IV Inside Cover
    Richard III Society, Inc. Vol. 42 No. 3 September, 2011 Challenge in the Mist by Graham Turner Dawn on the 14th April 1471, Richard Duke of Gloucester and his men strain to pick out the Lancastrian army through the thick mist that envelopes the battlefield at Barnet. Printed with permission l Copyright © 2000 Featuring articles on Henry Wyatt, Elizabeth of York, and Edward IV Inside cover (not printed) Contents The Questionable Legend of Henry Wyatt.............................................................2 Elizabeth of York: A Biographical Saga................................................................8 Edward IV King of England 1461-83, the original type two diabetic?................14 Duchess of York—Cecily Neville: 1415-1495....................................................19 Errata....................................................................................................................24 Scattered Standards..............................................................................................24 Reviews................................................................................................................25 Behind the Scenes.................................................................................................32 A Few Words from the Editor..............................................................................37 Sales Catalog–September, 2011...........................................................................38 Board, Staff, and Chapter Contacts......................................................................43
    [Show full text]
  • Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P
    Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P Namur** . NOP-1 Pegonitissa . NOP-203 Namur** . NOP-6 Pelaez** . NOP-205 Nantes** . NOP-10 Pembridge . NOP-208 Naples** . NOP-13 Peninton . NOP-210 Naples*** . NOP-16 Penthievre**. NOP-212 Narbonne** . NOP-27 Peplesham . NOP-217 Navarre*** . NOP-30 Perche** . NOP-220 Navarre*** . NOP-40 Percy** . NOP-224 Neuchatel** . NOP-51 Percy** . NOP-236 Neufmarche** . NOP-55 Periton . NOP-244 Nevers**. NOP-66 Pershale . NOP-246 Nevil . NOP-68 Pettendorf* . NOP-248 Neville** . NOP-70 Peverel . NOP-251 Neville** . NOP-78 Peverel . NOP-253 Noel* . NOP-84 Peverel . NOP-255 Nordmark . NOP-89 Pichard . NOP-257 Normandy** . NOP-92 Picot . NOP-259 Northeim**. NOP-96 Picquigny . NOP-261 Northumberland/Northumbria** . NOP-100 Pierrepont . NOP-263 Norton . NOP-103 Pigot . NOP-266 Norwood** . NOP-105 Plaiz . NOP-268 Nottingham . NOP-112 Plantagenet*** . NOP-270 Noyers** . NOP-114 Plantagenet** . NOP-288 Nullenburg . NOP-117 Plessis . NOP-295 Nunwicke . NOP-119 Poland*** . NOP-297 Olafsdotter*** . NOP-121 Pole*** . NOP-356 Olofsdottir*** . NOP-142 Pollington . NOP-360 O’Neill*** . NOP-148 Polotsk** . NOP-363 Orleans*** . NOP-153 Ponthieu . NOP-366 Orreby . NOP-157 Porhoet** . NOP-368 Osborn . NOP-160 Port . NOP-372 Ostmark** . NOP-163 Port* . NOP-374 O’Toole*** . NOP-166 Portugal*** . NOP-376 Ovequiz . NOP-173 Poynings . NOP-387 Oviedo* . NOP-175 Prendergast** . NOP-390 Oxton . NOP-178 Prescott . NOP-394 Pamplona . NOP-180 Preuilly . NOP-396 Pantolph . NOP-183 Provence*** . NOP-398 Paris*** . NOP-185 Provence** . NOP-400 Paris** . NOP-187 Provence** . NOP-406 Pateshull . NOP-189 Purefoy/Purifoy . NOP-410 Paunton . NOP-191 Pusterthal .
    [Show full text]
  • E:\GENEAL\Geneal Source Files\MISCELLANEOUS
    Rear Admiral Dennis Royle Farquharson Cambell, C.B., D.S.C. X7225 Dennis Cambell married Dorothy in 1933 and they remained happily in love and the best of companions for the next 67years! They have two daughters, six grandchildren and, to date, 6 great grandsons: Cal, Finn, Gabe, Alfie, Jonah and Cormac. His early years Dennis was born on 13 November 1907 in Southsea the eldest of four children. His parents, Dr Archibald Cambell (August 1880-December 1934) and Edith Farquharson Roberts (September 1881-November 1969) were married in 1906 and spent all their married life in Spencer Road, Southsea. Neville Kenneth Cambell was born in April 1911, Katharine in July 1913 and Brian in April 1919. All three sons joined the Fleet Air Arm, and Kay won a scholarship to read languages at Cambridge. In DRFC's formative years, his best friend was Alec Cook whose family lived around the corner from Spencer Road. (This friendship is still continued today by DRFC's younger and Alex's youngest daughter who have remained close friends since childhood. Although both women are in their fifties they date their friendship back 85 years!) DRFC went to Westminster School in 1921 where his form master was the forbidding Ernest Long Fox.At the end of his first term this man wrote on DRFC's report "the boy seems a perfect fool and incapable of learning anything". Fox was clearly not as perceptive as he was morose! Family Memories Of Neville, Kay says "Neville as a small boy was made a boarder at a nearby prep school because my father got very tired of dragging a reluctant child to school everyday.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the Wars of the Roses Free Ebook
    FREEA BRIEF HISTORY OF THE WARS OF THE ROSES EBOOK Desmond Seward | 544 pages | 30 Aug 2007 | Little, Brown Book Group | 9781845290061 | English | London, United Kingdom A Short History of the Wars of the Roses - David Grummitt - Google книги Wars of the Roses—85in English history, the series of dynastic civil wars whose violence and civil strife preceded the strong government of the Tudors. Fought between the houses of Lancaster and York for the English throne, the wars were named many years afterward from the supposed badges of the contending parties: the white rose of York and the red rose of Lancaster. The wars were named many years afterward from the supposed badges of the contending parties: the white rose of York and the red rose of Lancaster. In the midth century great magnates with private armies dominated the English countryside. Lawlessness was rife and taxation burdensome. Inwhen Henry lapsed into insanity, a powerful baronial clique installed Richard, duke of Yorkas protector of the realm. York took up arms, starting the Wars of the Roses. Both houses claimed the throne through descent from the sons of Edward III. Since the Lancastrians had occupied the throne fromthe Yorkists might never have pressed a claim but for the near anarchy prevailing in the midth century. Like Richard II before him, Henry VI had powerful relatives eager to grasp after power and to place themselves at the head of factions in the state. The council soon became their battleground. Great magnates with private armies dominated the countryside. Henry later proved to be feckless and simpleminded, subject to spells of madness, and dominated by his ambitious queen, Margaret of Anjouwhose party had allowed the English position in France to deteriorate.
    [Show full text]
  • British Royal Ancestry Book 6, Kings of England from King Alfred the Great to Present Time
    GRANHOLM GENEALOGY BRITISH ROYAL ANCESTRY, BOOK 6 Kings of England INTRODUCTION The British ancestry is very much a patchwork of various beginnings. Until King Alfred the Great established England various Kings ruled separate parts. In most cases the initial ruler came from the mainland. That time of the history is shrouded in myths, which turn into legends and subsequent into history. Alfred the Great (849-901) was a very learned man and studied all available past history and especially biblical information. He came up with the concept that he was the 72nd generation descendant of Adam and Eve. Moreover he was a 17th generation descendant of Woden (Odin). Proponents of one theory claim that he was the descendant of Noah’s son Sem (Shem) because he claimed to descend from Sceaf, a marooned man who came to Britain on a boat after a flood. (See the Biblical Ancestry and Early Mythology Ancestry books). The book British Mythical Royal Ancestry from King Brutus shows the mythical kings including Shakespeare’s King Lair. The lineages are from a common ancestor, Priam King of Troy. His one daughter Troana leads to us via Sceaf, the descendants from his other daughter Creusa lead to the British linage. No attempt has been made to connect these rulers with the historical ones. Before Alfred the Great formed a unified England several Royal Houses ruled the various parts. Not all of them have any clear lineages to the present times, i.e. our ancestors, but some do. I have collected information which shows these. They include; British Royal Ancestry Book 1, Legendary Kings from Brutus of Troy to including King Leir.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard, Duke of York: King by Right Free
    FREE RICHARD, DUKE OF YORK: KING BY RIGHT PDF Matthew Lewis | 336 pages | 15 Apr 2016 | Amberley Publishing | 9781445647449 | English | Chalford, United Kingdom Richard, Duke of York: King by Right by Matthew Lewis, Paperback | Barnes & Noble® Wars of the Roses. What's New. Letter from the Editor. Poster Store. Discussion Forums. In he was made Constable of England, in he was appointed Guardian of the Coast of Normandy, and in was made Regent of France, and advanced with an army almost to the gates of Paris [q. Hundred Years' War ]. In the next year he was recalled, but in was appointed regent again, holding office till In he was made Lieutenant of Ireland, and governed that country with great wisdom and moderation during the one year for which he held this post. On his return to England in he came prominently forward as the opponent of the Duke of Somerset. He was as popular as Somerset was odious, and had powerful allies in the Nevilleswith whom he was closely connected by his marriage with Cecily, daughter of the Earl of Westmoreland. In a proposal was made in Parliament that York should be declared heir to the crown, Duke of York: King by Right this was not seriously entertained, and the proposer was imprisoned. In York, declaring that his sole object was to rid the king [ Henry VI ] of Somerset and other evil counsellors, raised a force, and marched Duke of York: King by Right London. Henry met him at Duke of York: King by Right, and York laid before him a bill of accusation against Somerset, at the same time swearing fealty to the king, and promising for the future to sue for remedy in legal form.
    [Show full text]
  • Lancaster and York: the Wars of the Roses Free
    FREE LANCASTER AND YORK: THE WARS OF THE ROSES PDF Alison Weir | 480 pages | 04 Aug 2009 | Vintage Publishing | 9780099540175 | English | London, United Kingdom Wars of the Roses | Summary, History, Family Tree, & Facts | Britannica The War of the Roses was series of battles from to Lancaster and York: The Wars of the Roses divided English society along political alignments due to personal ambitions and egos, plus a pure mistrust among the Lancastrians and the Yorkists. In the period between andthe war would swing both sides and would see foreign intervention into the efforts of both the parties to prevent the Lancaster and York: The Wars of the Roses from being united. When Richard of York, 3rd Duke of York was sent to Ireland he was unhappy with the decision, and skeptical of the move since he feared that Somerset was in a position to climb to the top, a place which he strongly believed to be his. In France, Somerset greatly mismanaged the war effort there leading to embarrassing defeats that made him unpopular at home. Despite this, the King still gave him his backing since he was his cousin. So in the height of Somersets' unpopularity, York set sail from Ireland to England with his supporters. The King was forced from the throne due to mental illness and the perception that he was a weak and ineffectual king. York was appointed the protector of England. He took revenge on his perceived enemies and he had Lancaster and York: The Wars of the Roses put in prison. The royal nobles took advantage of the situation and started small wars with their rivals.
    [Show full text]
  • By Mark Wareham, First Edition 15 December 2011
    Our Family’s Rich Heritage By Mark Wareham, first edition 15th December 2011 Featuring Blachford family ancestors of the – Wareham family of Shaftesbury and Shroton (Iwerne Courtney) in Dorset and the Russell, Hurdle and Tapper families of Shroton and Dodington family ancestors of the – Wareham family of Shaftesbury, Stainer family of Donhead and Shaftesbury and the Love family of Motcombe in Dorset and Mere in Wiltshire 1 Introduction My father’s Wareham family is fortunate to be able to claim ancestral connections to two lines that were landed gentry - the Blachfords of Fordingbridge and the Dodingtons of Mere. The choice of the title of this work is appropriate because I am going to look into our ‘rich’ roots in terms of historical value as well as wealth and social status. As a result of our connection to these two families we have so called ‘gateway’ ancestors, Susannah Blachford of Fordingbridge and Martha Dodington of Mere and they help us trace a family lineage back to the medieval period and beyond. The Blachford family held Sandhill Manor (now called Sandleheath) near Fordingbridge in Hampshire and the Dodington family held Woodlands Manor in Mere in Wiltshire. Page four shows the lines from my two great grandparents, Sidney’s parents Walter George Wareham and Harriet Stainer, to Susannah and Martha. One of my grandfather Sidney Wareham’s (pictured right) great x 7 grandfathers was the gentleman and Lord of the Manor of Woodlands, William Dodington and another great x 5 grandfather was the gentleman, Mr Daniel Blachford who grandson of the Lord of the Manor of Sandhill.
    [Show full text]
  • Alian IV of Brittany (1063-1119) Ermengarde of Anjou (1066-1147
    King David (1005 - 965 BC) Combined Lineage of Stuarts, Sinclairs and House of Guelph Odin Jesus “of Gamala”, not Jesus of Nazareth, as claimed, Mary Magdalene but his cousin Attila the Hun Quintus Tarus Argotta, a prefect of Rome heiress of the Franks, Nicola Kumet (905-947) Merovech, King of the Franks (415 - 558) Samuil of Bulgaria (959-1014) Rabbi Makhir Exilarch of Babylon (b. ? - 793) Charlemagne (742-814) Pippin King of the Lombards Egbert of Wessex Redburga Guillaume de Gellone (773-810) (770-839) (771-821) Bertha of Toulouse Pepin I King of Italy (b. 777) Welf (773-810) Cunigundis of the Francs Bernard of Italy (776-821) (797-835) (797-818) Ethelwulf King of the English Gerhard of Auvergne (b. 800) (? - 934) Conrad of Auxere (800-863) Guelf I of Bavaria (d. 861) Alfred the Great Edico I of Altdorf King of England Judith of England (d. 910) (849-899) Uther Pendragon Ygraine Edward the Elder (874-924) Boleslav I of Bohemia King Arthur Alma-Pompa (967-972) Adiva + Hoel I ‘the Great’ [Mawr] Mieszko I of Poland Dubrawka (922-992) (925-977) Taksony (931-9720 Michael of Hungary Geza Arpad of Hungary Geza Arpad of Hungary Adelaide of Poland Adelaide of Poland (955-997) (955-997) (955-978) (948-997) (948-997) Pepin II of Peronne and S. Quentin (815-849) Cunigundis of he Francs Herbert I of Vermandois Tamar Tephi (b. 855) (846-902) + Wido, Comte de Senlis Heribert II of Vermandois (885-943) Robert de Vermandois Poppa of Bavaria (916-968) Edmund + (921-946) Rollo the Viking (857-929) Adelaide de Vermandois Fulk II of Anjou (d.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund of Langley, 1St Duke of York
    Edmund of Langley, 1st Duke of York Born: 5 June 1341, Kings Langley Died: 1 August 1402 (aged 61), Kings Langley Buried: Entombed in All Saints Church, Kings Langley Spouse(s): Isabella of Castile Joan Holland Issue: Edward, 2nd Duke of York Constance, Countess of Gloucester Richard, 3rd Earl of Cambridge House(s): Plantagenet (by birth) York (founder) Father: Edward III, King of England Mother: Philippa of Hainault Before King Ferdinand I of Edmund’s tomb in All Saints' Church, Portugal, brought to the church in 1575 after the nearby priory had been dissolved. Edmund of Langley, 1st Duke of York, KG (5 June 1341 – 1 August 1402) was the fourth surviving son of King Edward III of England and Philippa of Hainault. Like many medieval English princes, Edmund gained his nickname from his birthplace: Kings Langley Palace. He was the founder of the House of York, but it was through the marriage of his younger son, Richard of Conisburgh, 3rd Earl of Cambridge, to Anne de Mortimer, great-granddaughter of Edmund's elder brother Lionel of Antwerp, 1st Duke of Clarence, that the House of York made its claim to the English throne in the Wars of the Roses. The other party in the Wars of the Roses, the incumbent House of Lancaster, was formed from descendants of Edmund's elder brother John of Gaunt, 1st Duke of Lancaster, Edward III's third son. Early years On the death of his godfather, the Earl of Surrey, Edmund was granted the earl's lands north of the Trent, primarily in Yorkshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Descendants of Hugh 3Rd Earl of Norfolk Macanluain Bigod MCS
    Descendants of Hugh 3rd Earl of Norfolk MacAnluain Bigod MCS Generation 1 1. HUGH 3RD EARL OF NORFOLK MACANLUAIN BIGOD1 MCS was born about 1186 in Thetford, Norfolk, England. He died on 18 Feb 1225 in England. He married Maud OR Mahelt OR Matilda Countess Marshal of England, daughter of William 1st Earl of Pembroke Marshall and Isabel 4th Countess of Pembroke Fitzgilbert De Clare, before 1207 in Pembroke, Pembrokeshire, Wales. She was born in 1194 in Pembroke, Pembrokeshire, Wales. She died on 27 Mar 1248 in Tintern Abbey, Chapel Hill, Monmouthshire, England. Hugh 3rd Earl of Norfolk MacAnluain Bigod MCS and Maud OR Mahelt OR Matilda Countess Marshal of England had the following children: 2. i. ISABEL2 BIGOD was born about 1210 in Norfolk, Norfolk, England. She died in 1239 in Weobley, Herefordshire, England. She married (1) GILBERT DE LACY, son of Walter De Lacy and Margaret De Braose, about 1225 in Norfolk, Norfolk, England. He was born about 1206 in Dublin, Ireland. He died in 1234. She married (2) JOHN FITZGEOFFREY, son of Geoffrey Fitzpiers and Eveline DeClare, in 1230 in Shere, Surrey, England. He was born in 1215 in Shere, Surrey, England. He died on 23 Nov 1258 in Essex, England. ii. ROGER 4TH EARL OF NORFOLK BIGOD MCS was born in 1212 in Thetford, Norfolk, England. He died in Mar 1270 in Thetford, Norfolk, England. He married Isabella Princess of Scotland, daughter of William I 'The Lion' Earl of Huntingdon King of Scotland and Ermengarde De Beaumont Queen of Scotland, in 1225 in Alnwick, Northumberland, England.
    [Show full text]
  • “Our Literary Genes”
    Our Literary Genes 1 INTRODUCTION The talent for writing literature, poetry and prose, seems to be a gift, not something everybody can learn. Maybe there is such a gene, which has been inherited. Some in our family seem to have that interest and talent; my brother Kaj has written stories and poetry, which we have on our homepage. I have compiled some information about several famous authors which definitely have had that gene – and which maybe has been carried over to some in our family. These authors are listed on the next page and there are brief descriptions about them in this book, taken from Wikipedia. The cover page shows some of their most popular books. An appendix shows how we are related to them, in alphabetical order. For some I have included YouTube links for listening to their poetry and music. Our earliest direct ancestor/author is the Viking age famous poet Egill Skallagrimsson (910 - 990). He is my grand-daughter Anna’s 32nd great-grandfather. His story and famous poems were written down by Snorri Sturluson. Anna is interested in and has now begun to do some writing, so I have listed these authors’ relationships in relation to her. Her first novel, Protected (Book 1 in the Ariya Adams trilogy), is available now on Amazon and Barnes & Noble in e-book form. Amazon offers a free downloadable application for computers for users who do not have a Kindle. The links to the book in the US are available below but they are available on other countries Amazon sites as well.
    [Show full text]